CN110689326A - Supplier information auditing and recommending method - Google Patents
Supplier information auditing and recommending method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN110689326A CN110689326A CN201910945649.3A CN201910945649A CN110689326A CN 110689326 A CN110689326 A CN 110689326A CN 201910945649 A CN201910945649 A CN 201910945649A CN 110689326 A CN110689326 A CN 110689326A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- result
- target
- service
- type
- audited
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/10—Office automation; Time management
- G06Q10/103—Workflow collaboration or project management
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/90—Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
- G06F16/903—Querying
- G06F16/9035—Filtering based on additional data, e.g. user or group profiles
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06395—Quality analysis or management
Abstract
The invention discloses a supplier information auditing and recommending method, which comprises the following steps: s1, acquiring to-be-inspected information of the target audit item; s2, calculating the check result of each service check point of the target audit item based on the service check point directory and the information to be checked, wherein the service check point directory comprises all service check points and the calculation method of the check results thereof; and S3, judging whether the target audit item needs to be audited based on the logic judgment configuration information and the check result, wherein the logic judgment configuration information records judgment logic for judging whether the target audit item needs to be audited based on the check result corresponding to the service check point, and when any judgment logic judges that the target audit item needs to be audited, recommending the target audit item to an auditor as a recommended audit item. The invention can judge whether the target audit item needs to be audited according to the preset service checkpoint catalogue and the logic judgment configuration information, thereby avoiding unnecessary audit, improving the audit efficiency and reducing the labor cost.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of data processing, in particular to a supplier information auditing and recommending method.
Background
The Q1MSA is a set of standard for auditing a supplier system, and can be used for auditing the capabilities of development management and mass production product management of a new project of a supplier. The problem after the Q1MSA is audited is analyzed and tracked and managed by using the informatization system, so that the audit problem can be effectively improved by a supplier, and the process of improving the supplier system can be traced. According to the actual performance of the supplier, the problems existing in a supplier management system can be quickly found, and the problem terms related to the Q1MSA can be accurately checked, so that the problem rectification efficiency is effectively improved, and the human efficiency is effectively improved.
Taking ford as an example, currently, each systematic review of a supplier needs to cover 15 major terms and 80 minor terms, and the supplier is comprehensively reviewed. At least 1 person/3 days is needed for each audit, the workload is large, and the efficiency is low.
Therefore, how to improve the efficiency of the Q1MSA audit becomes a problem that needs to be solved urgently by those skilled in the art.
Disclosure of Invention
Aiming at the defects in the prior art, the technical problems to be solved by the invention are as follows: how to improve the efficiency of Q1MSA auditing.
In order to solve the technical problems, the invention adopts the following technical scheme:
a supplier information auditing and recommending method comprises the following steps:
s1, acquiring to-be-inspected information of the target audit item;
s2, calculating the check result of each service check point of the target audit item based on a service check point directory and the information to be checked, wherein the service check point directory comprises all service check points and calculation methods of the check results thereof;
and S3, judging whether the target audit item needs to be audited based on logic judgment configuration information and the check result, wherein the logic judgment configuration information records judgment logic for judging whether the target audit item needs to be audited based on the check result corresponding to the service check point, and when any judgment logic judges that the target audit item needs to be audited, recommending the target audit item to an auditor as a recommended audit item.
Preferably, the service check points include a first type service check point and/or a second type service check point, the check result of the first type service check point includes a conforming result or a non-conforming result, the check result of the second type service check point includes a result value, the logic judgment configuration information includes a first type judgment logic and/or a second type judgment logic, the first type judgment logic judges that the target audit item needs or does not need to be audited when the corresponding first type check result is the conforming result or the non-conforming result, and the second type judgment logic judges that the target audit item needs to be audited when the result value of the corresponding second type check result is within a preset result threshold value.
Preferably, the first type of service checkpoint comprises any one or more of quality system certification, FMEA, and control scheduling and project delivery delay.
Preferably, the conformity result of the quality system certification includes that the quality system certification is not expired, the nonconformity result of the quality system certification includes that the quality system certification is expired, and the first class judgment logic corresponding to the quality system certification includes that the target audit item needs to be audited when the quality system certification is expired, or else, does not need to be audited; the consistent class result of the FMEA comprises a defined FMEA, the inconsistent class result of the FMEA comprises an undefined FMEA, and the first class judgment logic of the FMEA comprises that when the FMEA is undefined, the target auditing item needs to be audited, otherwise, the target auditing item does not need to be audited; the conforming class result of the control plan comprises a defined control plan, the non-conforming class result of the control plan comprises an undefined control plan, and the first class judgment logic of the control plan comprises that the target audit item needs to be audited when the control plan is undefined.
Preferably, the second type of service checkpoint includes supplier project deliverable delay times and/or annual QR issue numbers.
Preferably, when the number of times of delay of delivery of the supplier item is greater than or equal to 1, the second type of judgment logic corresponding to the delay of delivery of the supplier item judges that the target audit item needs to be audited; and when the annual QR question number is greater than or equal to 4, judging that the target audit item needs to be audited by the second type of judgment logic corresponding to the annual QR question number.
Preferably, recommending the target audit item as a recommended audit item to an auditor comprises:
when the checking result of any service checking point is judged by the judgment logic to be required to check the target checking item, generating a Q1MSA clause number corresponding to the service checking point, and sending the Q1MSA clause number to a checking party, wherein each service checking point is corresponding to a unique Q1MSA clause number.
In summary, the invention discloses a supplier information auditing and recommending method, which comprises the following steps: s1, acquiring to-be-inspected information of the target audit item; s2, calculating the check result of each service check point of the target audit item based on a service check point directory and the information to be checked, wherein the service check point directory comprises all service check points and calculation methods of the check results thereof; and S3, judging whether the target audit item needs to be audited based on logic judgment configuration information and the check result, wherein the logic judgment configuration information records judgment logic for judging whether the target audit item needs to be audited based on the check result corresponding to the service check point, and when any judgment logic judges that the target audit item needs to be audited, recommending the target audit item to an auditor as a recommended audit item. The invention can judge whether the target audit item needs to be audited according to the preset service checkpoint catalogue and the logic judgment configuration information, thereby avoiding unnecessary audit, improving the audit efficiency and reducing the labor cost.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a supplier information auditing and recommending method disclosed by the present invention;
Detailed Description
In order to make the objects, technical solutions and advantages of the present invention more apparent, the present invention will be described in further detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.
As shown in fig. 1, the invention discloses a supplier information auditing and recommending method, which comprises the following steps:
s1, acquiring to-be-inspected information of the target audit item;
s2, calculating the check result of each service check point of the target audit item based on a service check point directory and the information to be checked, wherein the service check point directory comprises all service check points and calculation methods of the check results thereof;
and S3, judging whether the target audit item needs to be audited based on logic judgment configuration information and the check result, wherein the logic judgment configuration information records judgment logic for judging whether the target audit item needs to be audited based on the check result corresponding to the service check point, and when any judgment logic judges that the target audit item needs to be audited, recommending the target audit item to an auditor as a recommended audit item.
It should be understood by those skilled in the art that before the recommendation is made, the service checkpoint directory and the logic judgment configuration information need to be established, and the specific content of the service checkpoint directory and the logic judgment configuration information can be set according to the auditing requirement.
The invention can judge whether the target audit item needs to be audited according to the preset service checkpoint catalogue and the logic judgment configuration information, thereby avoiding unnecessary audit, improving the audit efficiency and reducing the labor cost.
In specific implementation, the service check points include a first type service check point and/or a second type service check point, the check result of the first type service check point includes a conforming result or a non-conforming result, the check result of the second type service check point includes a result value, the logic judgment configuration information includes a first type judgment logic and/or a second type judgment logic, the first type judgment logic judges that the target audit item needs or does not need to be audited when the corresponding first type check result is the conforming result or the non-conforming result, and the second type judgment logic judges that the target audit item needs to be audited when the result value of the corresponding second type check result is within a preset result threshold.
The invention includes two types of service check points: the result is the first kind of service check point which accords with the class result or does not accord with the class result (yes or no), and the result is a specific second kind of service check point, for different service check points, the invention also adopts two kinds of different judgment logics, thus a service check point catalog and logic judgment configuration information can be reasonably formulated according to the checking requirement of Q1MSA, all requirements can be met as far as possible, and the missing judgment or the wrong judgment can be avoided.
In particular implementations, the first type of service checkpoint includes any one or more of quality system authentication, FMEA, and control scheduling and project delivery delay.
In specific implementation, the conformity result of the quality system certification comprises that the quality system certification is not expired, the nonconformity result of the quality system certification comprises that the quality system certification is expired, and the first type judgment logic corresponding to the quality system certification comprises that the target audit item needs to be audited when the quality system certification is expired, or else, the target audit item does not need to be audited; the consistent class result of the FMEA comprises a defined FMEA, the inconsistent class result of the FMEA comprises an undefined FMEA, and the first class judgment logic of the FMEA comprises that when the FMEA is undefined, the target auditing item needs to be audited, otherwise, the target auditing item does not need to be audited; the conforming class result of the control plan comprises a defined control plan, the non-conforming class result of the control plan comprises an undefined control plan, and the first class judgment logic of the control plan comprises that the target audit item needs to be audited when the control plan is undefined.
In particular implementations, the second type of service checkpoint includes provider project delivery delay times and/or annual QR issue numbers.
In specific implementation, when the number of times of delay of the supplier item delivery is greater than or equal to 1, the second type of judgment logic corresponding to the supplier item delivery delay judges that the target audit item needs to be audited; and when the annual QR question number is greater than or equal to 4, judging that the target audit item needs to be audited by the second type of judgment logic corresponding to the annual QR question number.
As shown in table 1 and table 2, each service checkpoint has a unique IP and a unique logical identifier, which is a specific example of the service checkpoint directory and the logical judgment configuration information in the present invention.
In the invention, the table 1 can be periodically traversed, the result of the service check point is calculated, the 'logic check result' and the 'service check ID' are used as joint main keys in the table 2 for searching, and the 'Q1 MSA clause number' which is matched and recorded is used as a Q1MSA recommended audit item and returned to the user.
TABLE 1
TABLE 2
In specific implementation, recommending the target audit item as a recommended audit item to an auditor includes:
when the checking result of any service checking point is judged by the judgment logic to be required to check the target checking item, generating a Q1MSA clause number corresponding to the service checking point, and sending the Q1MSA clause number to a checking party, wherein each service checking point is corresponding to a unique Q1MSA clause number.
In the invention, when the recommendation information is fed back, the Q1MSA clause number is directly fed back, and because each service check point is corresponding to the unique Q1MSA clause number, a auditing party can determine auditing emphasis according to the fed back Q1MSA clause number, thereby improving auditing efficiency.
In summary, the technical solution disclosed in the present invention has the following technical effects:
the system is more accurate to be audited and can reach the problem points of the enterprise directly; the auditing efficiency is improved; the labor cost is reduced.
The method has the advantages that enterprise real enterprise business management data about project management, problem management, point selection management and the like are collected, and the data can be effectively analyzed, so that problem points of the enterprise are judged. And automatically recommending which edition blocks of the Q1MSA examination should be performed on the enterprise according to Q1MSA clauses corresponding to the problem points of the enterprise. Therefore, the problem points of the enterprise can be directly solved, the auditing time is saved, and the auditing efficiency is improved.
Finally, it is noted that the above-mentioned embodiments illustrate rather than limit the invention, and that, while the invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
Claims (7)
1. A supplier information auditing and recommending method is characterized by comprising the following steps:
s1, acquiring to-be-inspected information of the target audit item;
s2, calculating the check result of each service check point of the target audit item based on a service check point directory and the information to be checked, wherein the service check point directory comprises all service check points and calculation methods of the check results thereof;
and S3, judging whether the target audit item needs to be audited based on logic judgment configuration information and the check result, wherein the logic judgment configuration information records judgment logic for judging whether the target audit item needs to be audited based on the check result corresponding to the service check point, and when any judgment logic judges that the target audit item needs to be audited, recommending the target audit item to an auditor as a recommended audit item.
2. The supplier information review recommendation method of claim 1, wherein the service check points include a first type of service check point and/or a second type of service check point, the check result of the first type of service check point includes a conforming result or a non-conforming result, the check result of the second type of service check point includes a result value, the logic judgment configuration information includes a first type judgment logic and/or a second type judgment logic, the first type judgment logic judges whether the target review item needs to be reviewed or not when the corresponding first type check result is the conforming result or the non-conforming result, and the second type judgment logic judges that the target review item needs to be reviewed when the corresponding result value of the second type check result is within a preset result threshold.
3. The supplier information audit recommendation method of claim 2 wherein the first type of service checkpoint includes any one or more of quality system certification, FMEA and control planning and project delivery delay.
4. The supplier information auditing recommendation method of claim 3, where the compliance result of quality system certification includes that the quality system certification is not expired, the non-compliance result of quality system certification includes that the quality system certification is expired, the first type of judgment logic corresponding to the quality system certification includes that the target auditing item needs to be audited when the quality system certification is expired, otherwise, no auditing is needed; the consistent class result of the FMEA comprises a defined FMEA, the inconsistent class result of the FMEA comprises an undefined FMEA, and the first class judgment logic of the FMEA comprises that when the FMEA is undefined, the target auditing item needs to be audited, otherwise, the target auditing item does not need to be audited; the conforming class result of the control plan comprises a defined control plan, the non-conforming class result of the control plan comprises an undefined control plan, and the first class judgment logic of the control plan comprises that the target audit item needs to be audited when the control plan is undefined.
5. The supplier information audit recommendation method according to claim 2, wherein the second type of service check point includes supplier item delivery delay times and/or annual QR issue numbers.
6. The supplier information audit recommendation method according to claim 5, wherein when the number of times of delay of supplier item deliveries is greater than or equal to 1, the second type judgment logic corresponding to the delay of supplier item deliveries judges that the target audit item needs to be audited; and when the annual QR question number is greater than or equal to 4, judging that the target audit item needs to be audited by the second type of judgment logic corresponding to the annual QR question number.
7. The supplier information audit recommendation method according to any of claims 1 to 6, wherein recommending the target audit item to an auditor as a recommended audit item includes:
when the checking result of any service checking point is judged by the judgment logic to be required to check the target checking item, generating a Q1MSA clause number corresponding to the service checking point, and sending the Q1MSA clause number to a checking party, wherein each service checking point is corresponding to a unique Q1MSA clause number.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201910945649.3A CN110689326A (en) | 2019-09-30 | 2019-09-30 | Supplier information auditing and recommending method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201910945649.3A CN110689326A (en) | 2019-09-30 | 2019-09-30 | Supplier information auditing and recommending method |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN110689326A true CN110689326A (en) | 2020-01-14 |
Family
ID=69111336
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201910945649.3A Pending CN110689326A (en) | 2019-09-30 | 2019-09-30 | Supplier information auditing and recommending method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN110689326A (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN113764075A (en) * | 2021-09-13 | 2021-12-07 | 杭州太美星程医药科技有限公司 | Medical image quality control method and device, readable storage medium and electronic equipment |
Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20040162763A1 (en) * | 2003-02-19 | 2004-08-19 | Accenture Global Services Gmbh | Accelerated sourcing and procurement operations |
| CN101334860A (en) * | 2007-06-29 | 2008-12-31 | 上海网环信息科技有限公司 | Suppliers aptitude checking control method |
| CN106021214A (en) * | 2016-05-18 | 2016-10-12 | 广东源恒软件科技有限公司 | Generation method and system of audit manuscript of taxation audit |
| CN108428184A (en) * | 2017-12-01 | 2018-08-21 | 中国平安财产保险股份有限公司 | Data processing method, storage medium when a kind of taking out insurances and server |
| CN109886845A (en) * | 2019-01-08 | 2019-06-14 | 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 | Intelligent checks method, apparatus, computer equipment and the storage medium of contract |
-
2019
- 2019-09-30 CN CN201910945649.3A patent/CN110689326A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20040162763A1 (en) * | 2003-02-19 | 2004-08-19 | Accenture Global Services Gmbh | Accelerated sourcing and procurement operations |
| CN101334860A (en) * | 2007-06-29 | 2008-12-31 | 上海网环信息科技有限公司 | Suppliers aptitude checking control method |
| CN106021214A (en) * | 2016-05-18 | 2016-10-12 | 广东源恒软件科技有限公司 | Generation method and system of audit manuscript of taxation audit |
| CN108428184A (en) * | 2017-12-01 | 2018-08-21 | 中国平安财产保险股份有限公司 | Data processing method, storage medium when a kind of taking out insurances and server |
| CN109886845A (en) * | 2019-01-08 | 2019-06-14 | 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 | Intelligent checks method, apparatus, computer equipment and the storage medium of contract |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN113764075A (en) * | 2021-09-13 | 2021-12-07 | 杭州太美星程医药科技有限公司 | Medical image quality control method and device, readable storage medium and electronic equipment |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN110162516B (en) | Data management method and system based on mass data processing | |
| US11256683B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for integrating multi-data source user information | |
| WO2019100577A1 (en) | Automated test management method and apparatus, terminal device, and storage medium | |
| US8275739B2 (en) | User interface display for monitoring a database load engine | |
| CN108647357B (en) | Data query method and device | |
| CN111563130A (en) | Data credible data management method and system based on block chain technology | |
| CN111553137B (en) | Report generation method and device, storage medium and computer equipment | |
| CN112348530A (en) | Automatic server production inspection and repair method | |
| CN114493249A (en) | Road construction full-period management method, system, terminal and storage medium for road engineering supervision | |
| CN110689246A (en) | Medical equipment maintenance management method and device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN110689326A (en) | Supplier information auditing and recommending method | |
| CN114185770A (en) | Method and device for generating test data, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN110502529B (en) | Data processing method, device, server and storage medium | |
| US20080162273A1 (en) | System and method of tracking process for managing decisions | |
| CN111737148A (en) | Automatic regression testing method and device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN111367982A (en) | Method and device for importing TRIRIGA basic data, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN111427936B (en) | Report generation method and device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN104216986A (en) | Device and method for improving data query efficiency through pre-operation according to data update period | |
| CN114066395A (en) | Project management method and system established by combining expert database | |
| CN113778996A (en) | Large data stream data processing method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
| CN112632247A (en) | Method and device for detecting man-hour report, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| US10474649B2 (en) | Providing action corrections using a dual model system | |
| CN117370317A (en) | Data model quality auditing method, device, equipment and storage medium | |
| US11042536B1 (en) | Systems and methods for automated data visualization | |
| US10740508B1 (en) | System and method for employing model repository |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20200114 |
|
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |