CA2232041A1 - Copper alloy foils for flexible circuits - Google Patents
Copper alloy foils for flexible circuits Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2232041A1 CA2232041A1 CA 2232041 CA2232041A CA2232041A1 CA 2232041 A1 CA2232041 A1 CA 2232041A1 CA 2232041 CA2232041 CA 2232041 CA 2232041 A CA2232041 A CA 2232041A CA 2232041 A1 CA2232041 A1 CA 2232041A1
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- copper alloy
- copper
- weight
- strips
- mpa
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Landscapes
- Parts Printed On Printed Circuit Boards (AREA)
Abstract
A flexible circuit (10) to interconnect two components of an electrical device is formed with a flexible polymeric substrate (14). A copper alloy strip (12) is laminated to the flexible substrate (14). This copper alloy strip (12) is processed to have relatively high strength and an ultimate tensile strength in excess of about 551.6 MPa by alloying additions, by processing, or by a combination of the two. When such a copper alloy strip (12) is laminated to the flexible polymeric substrate (14), the resultant flexible circuit (10) has improved (more cycles to failure) dynamic fatigue performance when compared to both pure copper and dilute copper alloy strips.
Description
COPPER ALLOY FOILS
FOR FLEXIBLE CIRCUITS
This invention relates to copper alloys for use in flexible circuits. More particularly, increasing the strength of a copper alloy increases the number of cyclical flexes the circuit withstands before fracture.
Flexible circuits are used in electrical devices having moving parts. For example, a flexible circuit electrically interconnects a print head to a control panel in a computer printer.
Flexible circuits are also used to electrically interconnect moving parts in an automobile such as the circuitry that activates airbags.
One flexible circuit has a thin polymer substrate, such as 0.025 millimeter (0.001 inch) thick polyimide. Copper foil is laminated to the substrate and then etched into circuitry. Usually the circuitry is in the form of parallel, longitudinal running strips. These copper foil strips extend beyond the transverse edges of the substrate and are soldered to electrical components.
As the electrical components move during service, the laminated copper strips are flexed.
Periodic flexing fatigues the copper strips eventually causing the strip to fracture.
Circuit flexing is classified into three categories:
Stage 1 - static, the circuit is flexed one or two times during installation.
Stage 2 - semi-dynamic, the circuit undergoes between 5 and 1000 cycles during device lifetime.
WO 97/10689 PCT~US96/14303 Stage 3 - dynamic, the circuit undergoes between lOO0 and in excess o~ 1 million cycles during device lifetime.
A stage 1 flexible circuit is a tape automated bonding (TAB) circuit as disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 4,908,275 to Tsuji et al. In a TAB circuit, copper circuit traces are formed on a polymer, typically polyimide, substrate. Inner leads of the circuit traces extend in cantilever fashion into a window formed in a central portion of the substrate.
These inner lead ends are bonded to an integrated circuit device. Opposing outer lead portions extend beyond tlle polymer substrate and are soldered to a printed circuit board or other circuit.
The inner leads and the outer leads are bent approximately once each. The inner leads are bent during bonding to the integrated circuit device and the outer leads during soldering to an external circuit.
For stage 1 TAB applications, the copper requires high ductility and high electrical conductivity. The alloying additions to the copper of the alloys disclosed in the Tsuji et al. patent total, by weight, from 0.005%-1.5%.
High ductility, copper alloys, while ef~ective for stage 1 and possibly stage 2 applications, fail in certain stage 3 applications where extremely high flex cycles are required. There exists, therefore, a need for flexible circuits having copper alloys suitable for stage 3 applications.
Accordingly, it is object of the invention to provide a flexible circuit having improved stage 3 performance. It is a feature of the invention that W O 97/10689 PCT~US96/14303 a class of copper based alloys may be laminated to a flexible polymeric substrate to achieve satisfactory stage 3 operation. It is a common feature of these alloys that the alloys generally have lower ductility and higher strength than copper alloy C110.
Among the advantages of the invention are that the flexible circuits manufactured utilizing the alloys of the invention may be flexed thousands to millions of times prior to failure. The electrical devices utilizing the flexible circuits will have an extended operating life.
In accordance with the invention, there is provided a flexible circuit. The circuit has a polymer substrate with two parallel running longitudinal sides interconnected by two transverse sides. A plurality of conductive copper alloy strips are laminated to the polymer substrate.
These copper alloy strips run generally parallel to the longitudinal sides of the polymer substrate and extend beyond both of the transverse sides of the substrate. The composition of the copper alloy is effective to reduce fracture when compared to copper alloy C110 when the distance between the transverse side is repetitively varied.
The above stated objects, features and advantages will become more apparent from the specification and drawings that follow.
Figure 1 is a perspective of a flexible circuit.
Figure 2 graphically illustrates the cyclical failure characteristics of two types of copper alloys.
W O 97/10689 PCT~US~6fl4303 Figure 3 identifies the cycles to failure of various copper alloys subjected to a simulated stage 1 application.
Figure 4 graphically illustrates the cycles to failure for various copper alloys subjected to a simulated stage 2 operation.
Figure 5 graphically illustrates the cycles to failure for various copper alloys subjected to a simulated stage 3 operation.
Figure 6 graphically illustrates the effect of thickness on the number of cycles to failure of various copper alloys.
Figure 7 graphically illustrates the effect of alloy selection on peel strength.
Figure 1 illustrates a flexible circuit 10 having a plurality of copper alloy strips 12. The copper alloy strips 12 are laminated to a polymer substrate 14 that is formed ~rom any suitable flexible dielectric material such as polyimide or polyester.
The polymer substrate 14 has two opposing parallel running longitudinal sides 16 interconnected by two transverse sides 18.
The copper strips 12 are laminated to the polymer substrate 14 such as by either a combination o~ heat and pressure using an acrylic or epoxy adhesive or by casting a polymer onto a copper alloy ~oil. The copper strips 12 have extensions 20 that extend beyond both transverse sides 18. The extensions 20 are soldered to electrical components such as a printer head or a printed circuit board.
Frequently, one or both of the electrical components move and the distance, "D", between the two W O 97/10689 PCT~US96/14303 transverse sides 18 is repetitively varied. For example, if the extensions 20 are soldered to a printer head, as the head moves about the paper, the distance changes.
Figure 2 graphically illustrates the relationship between the number of cycles to failure at various strain ranges for the alloys utilized in the invention (reference line 22) and comparative alloys (reference line 24). Reference line 22 illustrates that copper alloys having moderate ductility, an average elastic modulus, at room temperature, in the range of about 124 x 103 MPa (18 x 106 psi) to about 172 x 103 MPa (25 x 106 psi) and high strength, and an ultimate tensile strength 15 (UTS) in excess of 551.6 MPa (80 ksi) have superior performance when compared to other copper alloys.
As illustrated by reference line 24, more dilute copper alloys having higher ductility and lower strength are superior for stage 1 applications and equivalent for stage 2 applications, but less satisfactory for stage 3 applications.
The alloys of the invention generally include in excess of 1.5% by weight alloying additions and preferably include in excess of 2% by weight alloying additions. Any alloying additions that increase strength without imparting excessive brittleness may be employed. Preferred additions include transition metals such as iron, nickel and cobalt.
The transition metal should be present in an amount of from about 0.5% by weight to about 6% by weight and preferably in an amount of from about 2 W O 97/10689 PCT~US96/14303 to about 5% by weight. Among the preferred alloys for are:
copper alloy C7025 having the composition, by weight, 2%-4.8% nickel, 0.2%-1.4~ silicon, 0.05%-0.45% magnesium and the balance copper;
copper alloy C71500 having the composition, byweight, of 29%-33% nickel and the balance copper;
and A copper alloy containing from an effective amount to increase strength up to 1% chromium, 0.05%-0.40% zirconium, from 0.1% to about 1.0% by weight of a transition metal, from 0.05~ to 0.7%
titanium and the balance copper with an atomic ratio of transition metal to titanium, M:Ti of from about 1.2:1 to about 7.0:1 as disclosed in U.S. Patent No.
5,306,465 to Caron et al.
For use as a flexible foil, the copper alloy has a thickness of from about 0.0076 mm (0.0003 inch) to about 0.10 mm (0.004 inch). Preferably the foil has a thickness of from about 0.016 mm (0.00065 inch) to about 0.038 mm (0.0015 inch). The foil should be wrought, rolled to gage from a cast ingot of the desired composition and heat treated to a desired temper.
To improve adhesion to the polymer substrate, the foil is treated with an adhesion enhancing compound, such as electrolytically deposited copper dendrites, as disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 4,468,293 to Polan et al. or with an electrolytically co-deposited layer of chromium and zinc as disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 5,230,932 to Chen et al. Other adhesion enhancing processes include electrolytically deposited nodules of a copper-nickel alloy as disclosed in U.K. Patent Application No. GB 2,285,813--A,that published on July 26, 1995 and a chromium phosphate coating as disclosed in U.S. Patent Nos. 3,677,828 to Caule and ~,647,315 to 5 Parthasarathi et al.
Referring back to Figure 1, the lamination of the copper strips 18 to the polymer substrate 14 is accomplished through the use of a polymer adhesive, such as an acrylic, heat (a temperature in the range of 180~C to 200~C) and pressure (1.4 MPa to 2.1 MPa (200 psi to 300 psi)).
Delamination, separation of the copper strips from the polymeric substrate, is a cause of failure in flexible circuits. We have found that the alloys 15 of the invention have a peel strength, force required for delamination, of approximately twice that of the more dilute copper alloys of the prior art.
Still another advantage of using the higher 20 strength materials is that both before and after the lamination cure cycle, the material is more resistant to creasing, denting and transit damage.
The advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from the examples that follow.
EXAMPLE
Cu--W7, copper alloy C110 (electrolytic tough pitch copper having a nominal composition by weight of 99.90% copper and a maximum of 0.05% oxygen).
Cu-E2-electrolytically formed copper foil having a nominal composition of 99.996 (minimum, by weight) of copper.
-Copper alloy C197 (nominal composition by weight 0.6% iron, 0.2% phosphorous, 0.05% magnesium and the balance copper).
Copper alloy C7025.
To evaluate stage 1 static performance, unlaminated foil was treated by heating to 180~C for 3 hours in a forming gas ~96~ nitrogen, 4% hydrogen). The treated foils were tested using standard industry test equipment. Stage 1 flex performance was evaluated in accordance with ASTM
(American Society for Testing and Materials) method D2176-69. In accordance with this method, the foil is flexed through an angle of 135~+2~ to the right and to the left of the position of the unfolded foil. The folds are about two folding surface mandrels having a specified radius.
The samples were repetitively bent around a mandrel having a 0.38 millimeter radius and the number of cycles to fracture recorded. As illustrated in Figure 3, a high strength alloy in accordance with the invention had performance approximately equivalent to that of the essentially pure copper (CU-W7 and CU-E2) and dilute copper alloys (C197).
Semi-dynamic, stage 2, flex performance was evaluated in accordance with ASTM method, D2176-69.
Unlaminated foil samples were treated as above and the samples then repetitively bent around a mandrel having a 2.0 mm radius. As illustrated in Figure 4, the high strength alloy utilized in the invention has a performance approximately equivalent to that of a dilute copper alloy and significantly improved performance to that of relatively pure copper.
W O 97/10689 PCT~US96/14303 Dynamic, stage 3, flex performance was evaluated utilizing a fatigue ductility test in accordance with IPC (The Institute for InterconneCting and Packaging Electronic Circuits) 5 method, IPC-TM-650, 2.4.2.1. In accordance with the method, the foil is pulled between a series of support rollers about a mandrel of a specified radius. The unlaminated foil samples were treated as above. As illustrated in Figure 5, the high strength copper alloy utilized in the invention had an excess of two fold improvement over dilute copper alloys and between a 3 and 6 fold improvement over pure copper.
The performance of one-half ounce (0.017 mm (0.00067 inch)) copper alloy foil was evaluated in accordance with ASTM Method D2176-69. Unlaminated one-half ounce copper foil strips were as in Example 1. As illustrated in Figure 6, in stage 1 performance, the copper alloy of the invention had approximately a 15 fold improvement in the number of cycles to failure when compared to pure copper. In stage 2 operation, the improvement was almost 100 fold.
By comparing Figure 6 with Figures 3 and 4, it is seen that superior stage 1 and stage 2 results are obtained with one-half ounce copper alloy foil as compared to one ounce (0.034 mm) copper foil.
Copper strips were laminated to a thicker copper substrate 1.0 mm (0.040 inch) thick by an CA 0223204l l998-03-l3 acrylic adhesive. The peel strength was then evaluated by peeling the foil from the substrate at a 90~ angle and measuring the force required in newtons per meter (pounds per inch of width (PIW)) as illustrated in Figure 7. The copper alloys utilized in the flexible circuits of the invention have superior peel strength to both dilute copper alloys and to pure copper.
A series of copper alloys were exposed to various thermal profiles that the copper strip may be exposed to during lamination or use. The copper alloys of the invention have improved thermal stability, identified by m;n;m~l or no change in mechanical properties when comparing before and after the thermal exposure, as illustrated in Table 1.
Alloy UTS Elonga- Thermal Stability MPa ksi tion after Exposure 180~C/3 hrs 350~C/1 hr CU-W7 206.830 17 Y Y
CU-W5 448.165 2 N N
CU-E2 310.245 9 Y N
C197 517.175 5 Y Y
C7025 723.9105 3 Y Y
C715 (AR~654.9 95 1 Y Y
The copper flexible circuits of the invention utilizing the copper strips with higher strength and softening resistance permit the use of the circuit traces themselves as the jack in an electrical W O 97/10689 PCTAUS96/1~303 connection. This simplifies assembly and decreases the cost of electrical components. In addition, the preferred alloys such as C7025 are solderable.
While the higher strength of the alloys utilized in the invention was disclosed as being the result of alloying additions, these higher strengths can also be the result of alloy processing. Some copper alloys can be cold worked, such as by rolling, to achieve the ultimate tensile strength required for satisfactory stage 3 operation. Other copper alloys can be heat treated for precipitation hardening and softening resistance.
While described in terms of single copper layer flex circuits, the invention is equally applicable to multi-layer flex circuitry.
It is apparent that there has been provided in accordance with the present invention a flexible circuit that fully satisfies the objects, means and advantages set forth hereinabove. While the invention has been described in combination with embodiments thereof, it is evident that many alternatives, modifications and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art in light of the foregoing description. Accordingly, it is intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications and variations as fall within the spirit and broad scope of the appended claims.
FOR FLEXIBLE CIRCUITS
This invention relates to copper alloys for use in flexible circuits. More particularly, increasing the strength of a copper alloy increases the number of cyclical flexes the circuit withstands before fracture.
Flexible circuits are used in electrical devices having moving parts. For example, a flexible circuit electrically interconnects a print head to a control panel in a computer printer.
Flexible circuits are also used to electrically interconnect moving parts in an automobile such as the circuitry that activates airbags.
One flexible circuit has a thin polymer substrate, such as 0.025 millimeter (0.001 inch) thick polyimide. Copper foil is laminated to the substrate and then etched into circuitry. Usually the circuitry is in the form of parallel, longitudinal running strips. These copper foil strips extend beyond the transverse edges of the substrate and are soldered to electrical components.
As the electrical components move during service, the laminated copper strips are flexed.
Periodic flexing fatigues the copper strips eventually causing the strip to fracture.
Circuit flexing is classified into three categories:
Stage 1 - static, the circuit is flexed one or two times during installation.
Stage 2 - semi-dynamic, the circuit undergoes between 5 and 1000 cycles during device lifetime.
WO 97/10689 PCT~US96/14303 Stage 3 - dynamic, the circuit undergoes between lOO0 and in excess o~ 1 million cycles during device lifetime.
A stage 1 flexible circuit is a tape automated bonding (TAB) circuit as disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 4,908,275 to Tsuji et al. In a TAB circuit, copper circuit traces are formed on a polymer, typically polyimide, substrate. Inner leads of the circuit traces extend in cantilever fashion into a window formed in a central portion of the substrate.
These inner lead ends are bonded to an integrated circuit device. Opposing outer lead portions extend beyond tlle polymer substrate and are soldered to a printed circuit board or other circuit.
The inner leads and the outer leads are bent approximately once each. The inner leads are bent during bonding to the integrated circuit device and the outer leads during soldering to an external circuit.
For stage 1 TAB applications, the copper requires high ductility and high electrical conductivity. The alloying additions to the copper of the alloys disclosed in the Tsuji et al. patent total, by weight, from 0.005%-1.5%.
High ductility, copper alloys, while ef~ective for stage 1 and possibly stage 2 applications, fail in certain stage 3 applications where extremely high flex cycles are required. There exists, therefore, a need for flexible circuits having copper alloys suitable for stage 3 applications.
Accordingly, it is object of the invention to provide a flexible circuit having improved stage 3 performance. It is a feature of the invention that W O 97/10689 PCT~US96/14303 a class of copper based alloys may be laminated to a flexible polymeric substrate to achieve satisfactory stage 3 operation. It is a common feature of these alloys that the alloys generally have lower ductility and higher strength than copper alloy C110.
Among the advantages of the invention are that the flexible circuits manufactured utilizing the alloys of the invention may be flexed thousands to millions of times prior to failure. The electrical devices utilizing the flexible circuits will have an extended operating life.
In accordance with the invention, there is provided a flexible circuit. The circuit has a polymer substrate with two parallel running longitudinal sides interconnected by two transverse sides. A plurality of conductive copper alloy strips are laminated to the polymer substrate.
These copper alloy strips run generally parallel to the longitudinal sides of the polymer substrate and extend beyond both of the transverse sides of the substrate. The composition of the copper alloy is effective to reduce fracture when compared to copper alloy C110 when the distance between the transverse side is repetitively varied.
The above stated objects, features and advantages will become more apparent from the specification and drawings that follow.
Figure 1 is a perspective of a flexible circuit.
Figure 2 graphically illustrates the cyclical failure characteristics of two types of copper alloys.
W O 97/10689 PCT~US~6fl4303 Figure 3 identifies the cycles to failure of various copper alloys subjected to a simulated stage 1 application.
Figure 4 graphically illustrates the cycles to failure for various copper alloys subjected to a simulated stage 2 operation.
Figure 5 graphically illustrates the cycles to failure for various copper alloys subjected to a simulated stage 3 operation.
Figure 6 graphically illustrates the effect of thickness on the number of cycles to failure of various copper alloys.
Figure 7 graphically illustrates the effect of alloy selection on peel strength.
Figure 1 illustrates a flexible circuit 10 having a plurality of copper alloy strips 12. The copper alloy strips 12 are laminated to a polymer substrate 14 that is formed ~rom any suitable flexible dielectric material such as polyimide or polyester.
The polymer substrate 14 has two opposing parallel running longitudinal sides 16 interconnected by two transverse sides 18.
The copper strips 12 are laminated to the polymer substrate 14 such as by either a combination o~ heat and pressure using an acrylic or epoxy adhesive or by casting a polymer onto a copper alloy ~oil. The copper strips 12 have extensions 20 that extend beyond both transverse sides 18. The extensions 20 are soldered to electrical components such as a printer head or a printed circuit board.
Frequently, one or both of the electrical components move and the distance, "D", between the two W O 97/10689 PCT~US96/14303 transverse sides 18 is repetitively varied. For example, if the extensions 20 are soldered to a printer head, as the head moves about the paper, the distance changes.
Figure 2 graphically illustrates the relationship between the number of cycles to failure at various strain ranges for the alloys utilized in the invention (reference line 22) and comparative alloys (reference line 24). Reference line 22 illustrates that copper alloys having moderate ductility, an average elastic modulus, at room temperature, in the range of about 124 x 103 MPa (18 x 106 psi) to about 172 x 103 MPa (25 x 106 psi) and high strength, and an ultimate tensile strength 15 (UTS) in excess of 551.6 MPa (80 ksi) have superior performance when compared to other copper alloys.
As illustrated by reference line 24, more dilute copper alloys having higher ductility and lower strength are superior for stage 1 applications and equivalent for stage 2 applications, but less satisfactory for stage 3 applications.
The alloys of the invention generally include in excess of 1.5% by weight alloying additions and preferably include in excess of 2% by weight alloying additions. Any alloying additions that increase strength without imparting excessive brittleness may be employed. Preferred additions include transition metals such as iron, nickel and cobalt.
The transition metal should be present in an amount of from about 0.5% by weight to about 6% by weight and preferably in an amount of from about 2 W O 97/10689 PCT~US96/14303 to about 5% by weight. Among the preferred alloys for are:
copper alloy C7025 having the composition, by weight, 2%-4.8% nickel, 0.2%-1.4~ silicon, 0.05%-0.45% magnesium and the balance copper;
copper alloy C71500 having the composition, byweight, of 29%-33% nickel and the balance copper;
and A copper alloy containing from an effective amount to increase strength up to 1% chromium, 0.05%-0.40% zirconium, from 0.1% to about 1.0% by weight of a transition metal, from 0.05~ to 0.7%
titanium and the balance copper with an atomic ratio of transition metal to titanium, M:Ti of from about 1.2:1 to about 7.0:1 as disclosed in U.S. Patent No.
5,306,465 to Caron et al.
For use as a flexible foil, the copper alloy has a thickness of from about 0.0076 mm (0.0003 inch) to about 0.10 mm (0.004 inch). Preferably the foil has a thickness of from about 0.016 mm (0.00065 inch) to about 0.038 mm (0.0015 inch). The foil should be wrought, rolled to gage from a cast ingot of the desired composition and heat treated to a desired temper.
To improve adhesion to the polymer substrate, the foil is treated with an adhesion enhancing compound, such as electrolytically deposited copper dendrites, as disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 4,468,293 to Polan et al. or with an electrolytically co-deposited layer of chromium and zinc as disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 5,230,932 to Chen et al. Other adhesion enhancing processes include electrolytically deposited nodules of a copper-nickel alloy as disclosed in U.K. Patent Application No. GB 2,285,813--A,that published on July 26, 1995 and a chromium phosphate coating as disclosed in U.S. Patent Nos. 3,677,828 to Caule and ~,647,315 to 5 Parthasarathi et al.
Referring back to Figure 1, the lamination of the copper strips 18 to the polymer substrate 14 is accomplished through the use of a polymer adhesive, such as an acrylic, heat (a temperature in the range of 180~C to 200~C) and pressure (1.4 MPa to 2.1 MPa (200 psi to 300 psi)).
Delamination, separation of the copper strips from the polymeric substrate, is a cause of failure in flexible circuits. We have found that the alloys 15 of the invention have a peel strength, force required for delamination, of approximately twice that of the more dilute copper alloys of the prior art.
Still another advantage of using the higher 20 strength materials is that both before and after the lamination cure cycle, the material is more resistant to creasing, denting and transit damage.
The advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from the examples that follow.
EXAMPLE
Cu--W7, copper alloy C110 (electrolytic tough pitch copper having a nominal composition by weight of 99.90% copper and a maximum of 0.05% oxygen).
Cu-E2-electrolytically formed copper foil having a nominal composition of 99.996 (minimum, by weight) of copper.
-Copper alloy C197 (nominal composition by weight 0.6% iron, 0.2% phosphorous, 0.05% magnesium and the balance copper).
Copper alloy C7025.
To evaluate stage 1 static performance, unlaminated foil was treated by heating to 180~C for 3 hours in a forming gas ~96~ nitrogen, 4% hydrogen). The treated foils were tested using standard industry test equipment. Stage 1 flex performance was evaluated in accordance with ASTM
(American Society for Testing and Materials) method D2176-69. In accordance with this method, the foil is flexed through an angle of 135~+2~ to the right and to the left of the position of the unfolded foil. The folds are about two folding surface mandrels having a specified radius.
The samples were repetitively bent around a mandrel having a 0.38 millimeter radius and the number of cycles to fracture recorded. As illustrated in Figure 3, a high strength alloy in accordance with the invention had performance approximately equivalent to that of the essentially pure copper (CU-W7 and CU-E2) and dilute copper alloys (C197).
Semi-dynamic, stage 2, flex performance was evaluated in accordance with ASTM method, D2176-69.
Unlaminated foil samples were treated as above and the samples then repetitively bent around a mandrel having a 2.0 mm radius. As illustrated in Figure 4, the high strength alloy utilized in the invention has a performance approximately equivalent to that of a dilute copper alloy and significantly improved performance to that of relatively pure copper.
W O 97/10689 PCT~US96/14303 Dynamic, stage 3, flex performance was evaluated utilizing a fatigue ductility test in accordance with IPC (The Institute for InterconneCting and Packaging Electronic Circuits) 5 method, IPC-TM-650, 2.4.2.1. In accordance with the method, the foil is pulled between a series of support rollers about a mandrel of a specified radius. The unlaminated foil samples were treated as above. As illustrated in Figure 5, the high strength copper alloy utilized in the invention had an excess of two fold improvement over dilute copper alloys and between a 3 and 6 fold improvement over pure copper.
The performance of one-half ounce (0.017 mm (0.00067 inch)) copper alloy foil was evaluated in accordance with ASTM Method D2176-69. Unlaminated one-half ounce copper foil strips were as in Example 1. As illustrated in Figure 6, in stage 1 performance, the copper alloy of the invention had approximately a 15 fold improvement in the number of cycles to failure when compared to pure copper. In stage 2 operation, the improvement was almost 100 fold.
By comparing Figure 6 with Figures 3 and 4, it is seen that superior stage 1 and stage 2 results are obtained with one-half ounce copper alloy foil as compared to one ounce (0.034 mm) copper foil.
Copper strips were laminated to a thicker copper substrate 1.0 mm (0.040 inch) thick by an CA 0223204l l998-03-l3 acrylic adhesive. The peel strength was then evaluated by peeling the foil from the substrate at a 90~ angle and measuring the force required in newtons per meter (pounds per inch of width (PIW)) as illustrated in Figure 7. The copper alloys utilized in the flexible circuits of the invention have superior peel strength to both dilute copper alloys and to pure copper.
A series of copper alloys were exposed to various thermal profiles that the copper strip may be exposed to during lamination or use. The copper alloys of the invention have improved thermal stability, identified by m;n;m~l or no change in mechanical properties when comparing before and after the thermal exposure, as illustrated in Table 1.
Alloy UTS Elonga- Thermal Stability MPa ksi tion after Exposure 180~C/3 hrs 350~C/1 hr CU-W7 206.830 17 Y Y
CU-W5 448.165 2 N N
CU-E2 310.245 9 Y N
C197 517.175 5 Y Y
C7025 723.9105 3 Y Y
C715 (AR~654.9 95 1 Y Y
The copper flexible circuits of the invention utilizing the copper strips with higher strength and softening resistance permit the use of the circuit traces themselves as the jack in an electrical W O 97/10689 PCTAUS96/1~303 connection. This simplifies assembly and decreases the cost of electrical components. In addition, the preferred alloys such as C7025 are solderable.
While the higher strength of the alloys utilized in the invention was disclosed as being the result of alloying additions, these higher strengths can also be the result of alloy processing. Some copper alloys can be cold worked, such as by rolling, to achieve the ultimate tensile strength required for satisfactory stage 3 operation. Other copper alloys can be heat treated for precipitation hardening and softening resistance.
While described in terms of single copper layer flex circuits, the invention is equally applicable to multi-layer flex circuitry.
It is apparent that there has been provided in accordance with the present invention a flexible circuit that fully satisfies the objects, means and advantages set forth hereinabove. While the invention has been described in combination with embodiments thereof, it is evident that many alternatives, modifications and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art in light of the foregoing description. Accordingly, it is intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications and variations as fall within the spirit and broad scope of the appended claims.
Claims (14)
1. A foil with improved stage 3 flex performance, characterized by:
a copper alloy strip (12) having a thickness of from about 0.0076 mm (0.0003 inch) to about 0.102 mm (0.004 inch) and the combination of a room temperature average elastic modulus of from (124-172)x10 3 MPa (18x10 6 psi to 25x10 6 psi), a room temperature ultimate tensile strength in excess of 551.6 MPa (80 ksi) and in excess of 1.5%, by weight, of alloy additions; and an adhesion enhancing layer coating said copper alloy strip (12).
a copper alloy strip (12) having a thickness of from about 0.0076 mm (0.0003 inch) to about 0.102 mm (0.004 inch) and the combination of a room temperature average elastic modulus of from (124-172)x10 3 MPa (18x10 6 psi to 25x10 6 psi), a room temperature ultimate tensile strength in excess of 551.6 MPa (80 ksi) and in excess of 1.5%, by weight, of alloy additions; and an adhesion enhancing layer coating said copper alloy strip (12).
2. The foil of claim 1 characterized in that said adhesion enhancing layer is selected from the group consisting of copper dendrites, co-deposited chromium and zinc, copper-nickel alloy nodules and chromium phosphate.
3. The foil of claim 2 characterized in that said copper alloy contains in from 0.5%, by weight, to 6%, by weight, of a transition metal selected from the group consisting of iron, nickel, cobalt and mixtures thereof.
4. The foil of claim 3 characterized in that said copper alloy strip (12) contains from about 2%, by weight, to about 5%, by weight, of a transition metal.
5. The foil of claim 4 characterized in that said coating layer is copper dendrites.
6. A flexible circuit (10), characterized by:
a polymer substrate (14) having two parallel running longitudinal sides (16) interconnected by two transverse sides (18); and a plurality of conductive copper alloy strips (12) laminated to said polymer substrate (14) running generally parallel to said longitudinal sides and extending (20) beyond both of said two transverse sides (18), wherein said copper alloy strips (12) have a room temperature average elastic modulus of from 124x103 MPa to 172x103 MPa and reduced fracture as compared to copper alloy C110 strips when the distance between said transverse sides (18) is repetitively varied.
a polymer substrate (14) having two parallel running longitudinal sides (16) interconnected by two transverse sides (18); and a plurality of conductive copper alloy strips (12) laminated to said polymer substrate (14) running generally parallel to said longitudinal sides and extending (20) beyond both of said two transverse sides (18), wherein said copper alloy strips (12) have a room temperature average elastic modulus of from 124x103 MPa to 172x103 MPa and reduced fracture as compared to copper alloy C110 strips when the distance between said transverse sides (18) is repetitively varied.
7. An electrical apparatus designed for stage 3 operation, characterized by:
a first component;
a second component; and a flexible circuit (10) interconnecting said first and second components wherein said flexible circuit (10) comprises a polymer substrate (14) having two parallel running longitudinal sides (16) interconnected by two transverse sides (18) and a plurality of conductive copper alloy strips (12) laminated to said polymer substrate (14) running generally parallel to said longitudinal sides (16) and extending (20) beyond both of said two transverse sides (18) wherein said copper alloy strips (12) have a room temperature average elastic modulus of from 124x10 3 MPa to 172x10 3 MPa and reduced fracture as compared to copper alloy C110 strips when said device undergoes stage 3 operation.
a first component;
a second component; and a flexible circuit (10) interconnecting said first and second components wherein said flexible circuit (10) comprises a polymer substrate (14) having two parallel running longitudinal sides (16) interconnected by two transverse sides (18) and a plurality of conductive copper alloy strips (12) laminated to said polymer substrate (14) running generally parallel to said longitudinal sides (16) and extending (20) beyond both of said two transverse sides (18) wherein said copper alloy strips (12) have a room temperature average elastic modulus of from 124x10 3 MPa to 172x10 3 MPa and reduced fracture as compared to copper alloy C110 strips when said device undergoes stage 3 operation.
8. The electrical apparatus (10) of either claim 6 or 7 characterized in that said copper alloy strips (12) have a composition, by weight, of 29% to 33%
nickel and the balance copper.
nickel and the balance copper.
9. The electrical apparatus (10) of either claim 6 or 7 characterized in that said copper alloy strips (12) have a room temperature ultimate tensile strength in excess of 551.6 MPa (80 ksi).
10. The electrical apparatus (10) of either claim 6 or 7 characterized in that said copper alloy strips (12) contain in excess of 1.5%, by weight, of alloy additions.
11. The electrical apparatus (10) of claim 10 characterized in that said copper alloy strips (12) contain from about 0.5%, by weight, to about 6%, by weight, of a transition metal selected from the group consisting of iron, nickel, cobalt and mixtures thereof.
12. The electrical apparatus (10) of claim 11 characterized in that said copper alloy strips (12) contain from about 2%, by weight, to about 5%, by weight, of a transition metal.
13. The electrical apparatus (10) of claim 10 characterized in that said adhesion enhancing layer is disposed between said polymer substrate (14) and said copper alloy strips (12).
14. An electrical apparatus (10) of claim 13 characterized in that said adhesion enhancing layer is copper dendrites.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US59226595A | 1995-09-15 | 1995-09-15 | |
| US08/529,265 | 1995-09-15 |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2232041A1 true CA2232041A1 (en) | 1997-03-20 |
Family
ID=24369983
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA 2232041 Abandoned CA2232041A1 (en) | 1995-09-15 | 1996-09-05 | Copper alloy foils for flexible circuits |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CA (1) | CA2232041A1 (en) |
-
1996
- 1996-09-05 CA CA 2232041 patent/CA2232041A1/en not_active Abandoned
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US5681662A (en) | Copper alloy foils for flexible circuits | |
| EP1851778B1 (en) | Method of making multilayered construction for use in resistors and capacitors | |
| US20020139459A1 (en) | Method of manufacturing rolled copper foil for flexible printed circuit | |
| JP6294376B2 (en) | Copper foil for flexible printed circuit board, copper-clad laminate using the same, flexible printed circuit board, and electronic device | |
| EP0493939A1 (en) | Flexible printed circuits | |
| JP6392268B2 (en) | Copper foil for flexible printed circuit board, copper-clad laminate using the same, flexible printed circuit board, and electronic device | |
| JP2009108376A (en) | Copper foil and flexible printed circuit board using the same | |
| JP5235080B2 (en) | Copper alloy foil and flexible printed circuit board using the same | |
| JP6617313B2 (en) | Copper foil for flexible printed circuit board, copper-clad laminate using the same, flexible printed circuit board, and electronic device | |
| JP2002060866A (en) | Copper alloy foil for laminates | |
| JP6348621B1 (en) | Copper foil for flexible printed circuit board, copper-clad laminate using the same, flexible printed circuit board, and electronic device | |
| JP2017115222A (en) | Rolled copper foil, copper-clad laminate using the same, flexible printed circuit board, and electronic device | |
| CA2232041A1 (en) | Copper alloy foils for flexible circuits | |
| CN107046763B (en) | Copper foil for flexible printed circuit board, copper clad laminate using same | |
| KR102285062B1 (en) | Copper foil for flexible printed circuit board, copper-clad laminate using the same, flexible printed circuit board, and electronic equipment | |
| EP1009200B1 (en) | Circuit member and circuit board | |
| JP7027602B1 (en) | Surface-treated copper foil, copper-clad laminate and printed wiring board | |
| WO2022138513A1 (en) | Surface-treated copper foil, copper-cladded laminate plate, and printed wiring board | |
| KR101721314B1 (en) | Rolled copper foil, copper clad laminate, and flexible printed board and electronic device | |
| JPH03230591A (en) | Flexible printed circuit board for bend | |
| JP2018154888A (en) | Copper foil for flexible printed circuit board, and copper clad laminate, flexible printed circuit board, and electronic apparatus using the same | |
| Shepler | Flexible Interconnections—Materials and Design | |
| JPS63264341A (en) | Multi-layer copper plated laminate | |
| KR19980087753A (en) | Laminating agent for electrolytic capacitor outer container and manufacturing method thereof | |
| JPH0745953A (en) | Manufacture of multilayer wiring board |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| EEER | Examination request | ||
| FZDE | Dead |