WO2024053143A1 - Dispositif de gestion de batterie, procédé de gestion de batterie et programme de gestion de batterie - Google Patents

Dispositif de gestion de batterie, procédé de gestion de batterie et programme de gestion de batterie Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2024053143A1
WO2024053143A1 PCT/JP2023/012808 JP2023012808W WO2024053143A1 WO 2024053143 A1 WO2024053143 A1 WO 2024053143A1 JP 2023012808 W JP2023012808 W JP 2023012808W WO 2024053143 A1 WO2024053143 A1 WO 2024053143A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
battery
calculation unit
plot
management device
eyring
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/JP2023/012808
Other languages
English (en)
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
隼 角田
亨 河野
穣 植田
博也 藤本
アキラ 藤本
絵里 磯崎
慧土 秋月
Original Assignee
株式会社日立ハイテク
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 株式会社日立ハイテク filed Critical 株式会社日立ハイテク
Publication of WO2024053143A1 publication Critical patent/WO2024053143A1/fr

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01R—MEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G01R31/00—Arrangements for testing electric properties; Arrangements for locating electric faults; Arrangements for electrical testing characterised by what is being tested not provided for elsewhere
    • G01R31/36—Arrangements for testing, measuring or monitoring the electrical condition of accumulators or electric batteries, e.g. capacity or state of charge [SoC]
    • G01R31/367—Software therefor, e.g. for battery testing using modelling or look-up tables
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01R—MEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G01R31/00—Arrangements for testing electric properties; Arrangements for locating electric faults; Arrangements for electrical testing characterised by what is being tested not provided for elsewhere
    • G01R31/36—Arrangements for testing, measuring or monitoring the electrical condition of accumulators or electric batteries, e.g. capacity or state of charge [SoC]
    • G01R31/382—Arrangements for monitoring battery or accumulator variables, e.g. SoC
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01R—MEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G01R31/00—Arrangements for testing electric properties; Arrangements for locating electric faults; Arrangements for electrical testing characterised by what is being tested not provided for elsewhere
    • G01R31/36—Arrangements for testing, measuring or monitoring the electrical condition of accumulators or electric batteries, e.g. capacity or state of charge [SoC]
    • G01R31/382—Arrangements for monitoring battery or accumulator variables, e.g. SoC
    • G01R31/3828—Arrangements for monitoring battery or accumulator variables, e.g. SoC using current integration
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01R—MEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G01R31/00—Arrangements for testing electric properties; Arrangements for locating electric faults; Arrangements for electrical testing characterised by what is being tested not provided for elsewhere
    • G01R31/36—Arrangements for testing, measuring or monitoring the electrical condition of accumulators or electric batteries, e.g. capacity or state of charge [SoC]
    • G01R31/385—Arrangements for measuring battery or accumulator variables
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01R—MEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G01R31/00—Arrangements for testing electric properties; Arrangements for locating electric faults; Arrangements for electrical testing characterised by what is being tested not provided for elsewhere
    • G01R31/36—Arrangements for testing, measuring or monitoring the electrical condition of accumulators or electric batteries, e.g. capacity or state of charge [SoC]
    • G01R31/392—Determining battery ageing or deterioration, e.g. state of health
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01R—MEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G01R31/00—Arrangements for testing electric properties; Arrangements for locating electric faults; Arrangements for electrical testing characterised by what is being tested not provided for elsewhere
    • G01R31/36—Arrangements for testing, measuring or monitoring the electrical condition of accumulators or electric batteries, e.g. capacity or state of charge [SoC]
    • G01R31/396—Acquisition or processing of data for testing or for monitoring individual cells or groups of cells within a battery
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01M—PROCESSES OR MEANS, e.g. BATTERIES, FOR THE DIRECT CONVERSION OF CHEMICAL ENERGY INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY
    • H01M10/00—Secondary cells; Manufacture thereof
    • H01M10/42—Methods or arrangements for servicing or maintenance of secondary cells or secondary half-cells
    • H01M10/48—Accumulators combined with arrangements for measuring, testing or indicating the condition of cells, e.g. the level or density of the electrolyte
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02J—CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS OR SYSTEMS FOR SUPPLYING OR DISTRIBUTING ELECTRIC POWER; SYSTEMS FOR STORING ELECTRIC ENERGY
    • H02J7/00—Circuit arrangements for charging or depolarising batteries or for supplying loads from batteries
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E60/00—Enabling technologies; Technologies with a potential or indirect contribution to GHG emissions mitigation
    • Y02E60/10—Energy storage using batteries

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a technology for managing the state of a battery.
  • the degree of deterioration of secondary batteries varies depending on the surrounding environment during operation, C rate, charging/discharging operation method, etc.
  • the general battery diagnosis method diagnoses the state of health (SOH) using only the current state of the battery, there is a possibility that a non-negligible error may occur in the prediction result.
  • Patent Document 1 describes ⁇ a storage battery management system, a storage battery information server, and a charging/discharging control device that aim to use up the secondary battery correctly while preventing accidents by predicting the lifespan of the secondary battery as accurately as possible. and storage batteries.
  • the goal was to ⁇ give a unique LIB ID to the LIB, record the operating status of the LIB in a log table, and aggregate it into a LIB usage log table on the LIB information server.'' Then, the cumulative failure probability is calculated based on the huge LIB usage log table, and a cumulative failure probability table is created.
  • the charge/discharge control device determines the LIB based on the cumulative failure probability table, storage time gradient function, loss cost function, replacement cost function, warning threshold, and use prohibition threshold received from the LIB information server via LIB. Calculate the optimal replacement time. ” (see summary).
  • Patent Document 2 provides a calculation method, a calculation program, a calculation system, and a calculation device that calculate the internal state of a secondary battery with high precision.
  • the voltage and current of the secondary battery BT are read out from the storage unit 160 into the arithmetic unit 10 equipped with the arithmetic processing unit 100 that calculates the internal state of the secondary battery BT, and the characteristics of the secondary battery BT are calculated.
  • Three or more characteristic parameters that are not dependent on each other and include a constant term near the charge/discharge intermediate value, a power term near the limit value, and the charge/discharge limit value included in the formula P are calculated.
  • a calculation method for calculating an internal state of the secondary battery using the characteristic parameters and storing the calculated internal state in a storage unit 160. ” see summary).
  • the present invention has been made in view of the above-mentioned problems, and an object of the present invention is to provide a technique that can accurately estimate the degree of battery wear in a short time.
  • the battery management device estimates a deterioration mode of the battery based on a change in battery voltage over time during a rest period of the battery, selects the Eyring plot corresponding to the estimated deterioration mode, and selects the Eyring plot corresponding to the estimated deterioration mode.
  • the condition of the battery is diagnosed based on the plot.
  • the degree of battery wear can be accurately estimated in a short time.
  • Other problems, configurations, effects, etc. of the present invention will become clear from the description of the embodiments below.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram showing a configuration example of a storage battery system.
  • 3 shows a change in battery voltage over time during a rest period after a charging or discharging operation. It is a graph showing the relationship between ⁇ Va and ⁇ Vb.
  • FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram showing an example of selecting an Eyring plot corresponding to a battery deterioration mode. It is a flowchart explaining the procedure of estimating a deterioration rate.
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram showing a procedure for determining the degree of wear of a battery using the battery condition and an Eyring plot. It is a figure explaining the procedure of calculating
  • 7 is a flowchart illustrating the operation of the battery management device in the first embodiment.
  • FIG. 1 is a configuration diagram of a battery system 1.
  • FIG. It is an example of the user interface provided by the battery management device. It is an example of the user interface provided by the battery management device.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating the results of plotting the current states of a plurality of batteries on an Eyring plot.
  • FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram showing a procedure for creating an Eyring plot for the entire battery system.
  • FIG. 7 is a flowchart illustrating the operation of the battery management device according to the second embodiment.
  • 3 is a diagram showing an example of operation of the battery management device 13.
  • FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating another operational example of the battery management device 13.
  • FIG. 20 is a flowchart illustrating processing performed by the battery management device 13 in the system configuration of FIG. 19.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram showing a configuration example of a storage battery system.
  • a storage battery system includes a battery system including one or more storage batteries, and a battery management device that manages the battery system.
  • the battery is a storage battery.
  • the battery system includes a battery module.
  • a battery module is made up of one or more submodules.
  • the submodule includes a battery cell and a sensor group.
  • the sensor group includes, for example, a voltage sensor that measures the output voltage of the battery cell, a temperature sensor that measures the temperature of the battery cell, and a current sensor that measures the output current of the battery cell.
  • the temperature sensor can be constituted by a thermocouple, for example.
  • the detection unit acquires measurement results from the sensor and transmits them to the battery management module (BMU).
  • the BMU outputs measurement data describing the measurement results to the battery management device.
  • the battery management device includes a detection unit that acquires measurement data, a calculation unit that manages the state of the battery, a storage unit that stores data, and the like.
  • the calculation unit estimates the state of the battery using the measurement data acquired from the BMU. For example, as explained below, the remaining life of the battery (or the degree of wear used to estimate the remaining life) can be estimated.
  • FIG. 2 shows the change in battery voltage over time during a rest period after a charging or discharging operation.
  • the battery voltage during the rest period has a voltage change ⁇ Va in a relatively early first period (time length ⁇ t1) and a voltage change ⁇ Vb in a relatively late second period (time length ⁇ t2).
  • ⁇ Va is a response component due to a component with a small time constant in the equivalent circuit of the battery, such as a response due to internal resistance or a negative electrode.
  • ⁇ Vb is a response component due to a component having a large time constant in the equivalent circuit of the battery, such as a response due to a positive electrode or a diffused resistance.
  • a deterioration mode is estimated using ⁇ Va and ⁇ Vb (or their rate of change over time), and an Eyring plot corresponding to the deterioration mode is used to estimate battery wear. We decided to estimate the state.
  • FIG. 3 is a graph showing the relationship between ⁇ Va and ⁇ Vb.
  • ⁇ Va and ⁇ Vb are plotted as shown in FIG. 3, the plots are concentrated around a certain threshold value.
  • studies conducted by the present inventors have revealed that for batteries with a high rate of deterioration, these plots exist in a region equal to or higher than the threshold value. Therefore, in the present invention, based on whether these plots are equal to or higher than a threshold value, it is estimated whether the battery deteriorates in a mode in which the rate of deterioration of the battery is high or low.
  • the plot of ⁇ Va and ⁇ Vb may be shown in either the upper or lower part of FIG. That is, the horizontal axis may be ⁇ Vb/ ⁇ t2, and the vertical axis may be either ( ⁇ Va/ ⁇ t1)/( ⁇ Vb/ ⁇ t2) or ⁇ Va/ ⁇ t1.
  • a battery with a high deterioration rate is plotted in a region exceeding the threshold on the vertical axis, as shown by the black circle in FIG. In other words, it can be determined that a battery whose plot exceeds the threshold value on the vertical axis in FIG. 3 has a high rate of deterioration.
  • FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram showing an example of selecting an Eyring plot corresponding to a battery deterioration mode.
  • the storage unit of the battery management device stores data describing Eyring plots for each battery deterioration mode (deterioration rate).
  • the calculation unit estimates the deterioration rate of the battery and selects an Eyring plot corresponding to the deterioration rate from the data.
  • the calculation unit estimates the degree of wear of the battery using the Eyring plot according to a procedure described later.
  • the Eyring plot stored in the storage unit is created in advance.
  • the slope of the Eyring plot can be determined, for example, based on the activation energy of the battery.
  • the intercept of the Eyring plot can be determined, for example, based on the SOH of the battery.
  • Eyring plots corresponding to the vertical axis in FIG. 3 may be prepared in advance.
  • FIG. 5 is a flowchart explaining the procedure for estimating the deterioration rate.
  • the calculation unit of the battery management device acquires data describing the measurement results of ⁇ Va and ⁇ Vb from, for example, the BMU.
  • the calculation unit plots these as shown in FIG. If the plot exceeds the threshold, the deterioration rate of the battery is estimated to be A (relatively large), and if it is below the threshold, the deterioration rate is estimated to be B (relatively small). Additionally, the plot may be compared with the lower threshold. In this case, it is estimated which of A to C (relatively the smallest) the deterioration rate is.
  • FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram showing the procedure for determining the degree of battery wear using the battery condition and Eyring plot. Based on the battery measurement results, plots corresponding to the vertical and horizontal axes of the Eyring plot are obtained. By comparing the plot with the Eyring plot selected in FIG. 5, the degree of battery wear was estimated.
  • the battery is not in a worn state (in a normal state). ). If the plot obtained from the measurement results of the battery is outside the predetermined range (FIG. 6(ii)), it is assumed that the battery is not in a worn state, but that deterioration will progress if the current operating state is continued. In this case, as will be described later, the operating conditions of the battery may be readjusted. If the plot obtained from the measurement results of the battery deviates further from the predetermined range (FIG. 6(iii)), the battery is estimated to be in a worn state.
  • the upper and lower limits of the range in which the battery is considered normal on the Eyring plot can also be determined based on the upper and lower limits of the SOH.
  • a battery whose SOH has significantly decreased is plotted on an Eyring plot, it may fall within this normal range. This is considered to be due to a decrease in SOH due to causes other than wear. That is, as a result of studies conducted by the present inventors, it has been found that it may not be appropriate to determine whether or not a wear state exists using only SOH. Therefore, in the present invention, it is determined whether or not the wear state is present based on the degree of deviation from the normal range on the Eyring plot.
  • the battery is in the state shown in FIG. 6 (iii) (worn state). It is determined that there is. If the distance from the normal range to the plot point is less than the first threshold and greater than or equal to the second threshold (second threshold ⁇ distance ⁇ first threshold), the battery is in the state shown in Figure 6 (ii) (deterioration will progress if operated as is). (state).
  • FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating the procedure for determining the current number of cycles of the battery.
  • the SOH of a battery is defined, for example, by the amount of discharge current when fully discharged from full charge.
  • SOH can be defined by the absolute value of the amount of discharge current.
  • the value on the vertical axis when the current state of the battery is plotted on the Eyring plot (that is, the value on the vertical axis of the white circle in FIG. 7) can be determined using this formula.
  • FIG. 8 is a flowchart illustrating the operation of the battery management device in the first embodiment. This flowchart can be implemented by a calculation unit included in the battery management device. This flowchart is for determining the degree of battery wear based on the principle explained above. Each step in FIG. 8 will be explained below.
  • the calculation unit obtains ⁇ Va and ⁇ Vb explained in FIG. 2 from, for example, the BMU.
  • the calculation unit further acquires the battery state of charge (SOC), battery temperature, battery current, etc. from, for example, a measuring device.
  • SOC battery state of charge
  • the sources for acquiring these measurement data are not limited to the above.
  • the calculation unit estimates the deterioration rate of the battery using the method described in FIGS. 3 to 5, and selects the Eyring plot corresponding to the estimated deterioration rate.
  • Data describing the Eyring plot is stored in advance in a storage unit included in the battery management device. More specifically, since the slope of the Eyring plot corresponds to the deterioration mode, the deterioration mode is estimated using the method described in FIGS. 3 to 5, and the slope corresponding to the deterioration mode is specified.
  • the calculation unit obtains the result of measuring or estimating the SOH of the battery.
  • the SOH can be estimated, for example, by referring to data describing the correspondence between ⁇ Va, ⁇ Vb, their time change rates, and the SOH described in FIG. 2.
  • the SOH measurement results may be obtained from an external device such as a BMU.
  • SOH corresponds to the intercept of the Eyring plot. By specifying the slope and intercept of the Eyring plot, the calculation unit can select the Eyring plot corresponding to the deterioration mode.
  • the calculation unit plots the current state of the battery on the selected Eyring plot. Specifically, the difference between the current temperature of the battery and the standard temperature may be set as ⁇ T, and the current number of cycles determined by the method described in FIG. 7 may be set as N, and the values may be plotted on the Eyring plot. The calculation unit further estimates the degree of wear of the battery based on the distance between the Eyring plot and the plot of the current state of the battery, according to the method described in FIG.
  • FIG. 9 is a flowchart illustrating another operation of the battery management device.
  • the calculation unit may also determine whether to use an operation method (deterioration mitigation operation mode) for suppressing the progression of battery deterioration. For example, if the degree of wear on the battery corresponds to the middle row in FIG. 6, it is considered that further deterioration can be suppressed by using an operation method that suppresses the progress of deterioration. If the wear is at the level shown in the upper row of FIG. 6, normal operation may be continued. If the wear is at the level shown in the lower part of FIG. 6, an alert may be output to prompt replacement, for example.
  • an operation method deterioration mitigation operation mode
  • an operation method for suppressing the progression of battery deterioration it is possible to set at least one of the following limits: Set at least one of an upper limit or a lower limit for battery voltage; Allowable battery temperature and at least either an upper limit or a lower limit of the SOC.
  • FIG. 10 shows changes in the battery condition due to the adoption of an operation method that suppresses the progression of battery deterioration.
  • the battery state deviates from the Eyring plot (or near the Eyring plot). (within a predetermined range). This can prevent further deterioration of the battery and extend its remaining life.
  • FIG. 11 is an example of a data table that describes the results of battery diagnosis performed by the battery management device.
  • the battery management device For each battery to be diagnosed, the battery management device records the measurement data obtained from the BMU, etc., the degree of wear determined by the flowchart in Figure 9 (whether or not to change the operation method), etc. on a data table, and stores the data in the storage unit. It may be stored in .
  • FIG. 12 is a configuration diagram of the battery system 1.
  • the battery system 1, battery controller (BMU) 12, and battery management device 13 are those illustrated in FIG.
  • the battery system 1 includes a host controller 11, a battery controller (BMU) 12, and a battery management device 13.
  • the host controller 11 outputs operation instructions for the battery via the battery controller 12.
  • the battery controller 12 controls the battery modules according to the instructions.
  • the battery management device 13 includes a detection unit 131 that acquires measurement data from the battery controller 12, a calculation unit 132 that diagnoses the battery using the method described above, and a storage unit 133 that stores data used by the calculation unit 132.
  • FIGS. 13A and 13B are examples of user interfaces provided by the battery management device.
  • the user interface can display measurement data etc. acquired in the process of implementing the flowchart of FIG. 9. For example, the change over time in the battery voltage as explained in FIG. 3, the threshold value for determining the deterioration rate as explained in FIG. 4, etc. may be displayed. A Weibull distribution, which will be described later, may be displayed.
  • Embodiment 2 When the battery system is composed of a plurality of batteries, the degree of wear of the battery system as a whole may be determined. In this case, as in the first embodiment, the degree of wear of the battery system as a whole can be determined by plotting the current state of each battery on the Eyring plot. Therefore, in Embodiment 2 of the present invention, an example of the operation of a battery management device that diagnoses the state of the battery system as a whole will be described. The configurations of the battery system and battery management device are the same as in the first embodiment.
  • FIG. 14 is a diagram illustrating the results of plotting the current states of multiple batteries on an Eyring plot. For example, if there are relatively few batteries that deviate from the Eyring plot, as shown in the middle row of Figure 14, an operation method that suppresses the progression of deterioration is adopted, and if there are many batteries that deviate significantly from the Eyring plot, as shown in the bottom row of Figure 14, , it may be determined that the battery system as a whole is in a worn out state. An example of using a Weibull plot will be described below as a procedure for diagnosing the state of the battery system as a whole.
  • FIG. 15 is a schematic diagram showing the procedure for creating an Eyring plot for the entire battery system. Eyring plots can be created for each battery, but since a battery system is made up of multiple batteries, the following procedure is used to create a single Eyring plot for the entire battery system.
  • the calculation unit acquires the measurement data of the battery voltage of each battery from, for example, the BMU, and selects the Eyring plot of each battery using the method described in the first embodiment.
  • the calculation unit selects the Eyring plot for the battery system as a whole by specifying, from among these Eyring plots, the Eyring plot in which all the batteries included in the battery system fall within the normal range of the Eyring plot. This Eyring plot is used as a reference when determining the degree of wear of the battery system as a whole.
  • FIG. 16 is a histogram showing the results of counting the degree of deviation between the threshold value and the Eyring plot for each individual battery.
  • FIG. 17 is a flowchart illustrating the operation of the battery management device according to the second embodiment. Similar to the first embodiment, the calculation unit plots the current battery measurement results on the Eyring plot. When implementing this flowchart for a battery system, this Eyring plot is a single Eyring plot selected for the entire battery system, as explained in FIG. 16.
  • the calculation unit When the measurement results of each battery are plotted on the Eyring plot, the calculation unit identifies plots that deviate from the normal range (that is, correspond to the rightmost column in FIG. 16). The calculation unit creates a Weibull plot using the measurement results of the deviating battery. For example, the horizontal axis is the logarithm of the elapsed time from the start of operation, and the vertical axis is the logarithm of the cumulative defective rate. Whether or not a defective state has been reached can be determined from the SOH value.
  • a Weibull plot can be obtained by plotting the measurement results of batteries that deviate from the normal range on both axes. Since the Weibull plot has temporal elements such as elapsed time and cumulative failure rate, it should be added that the battery measurement data acquired by the calculation unit in this flowchart is a history over time.
  • the calculation unit calculates the shape parameter m of the created Weibull plot.
  • the shape parameter m can be obtained by determining the slope of the regression line of the plot of the deviant battery.
  • the calculation unit estimates that the battery system is in a worn state when the shape parameter m of the Weibull distribution exceeds 1. If m is less than or equal to 1, it is determined that the device can be operated within an appropriate operating range.
  • the second embodiment even if the SOH of the battery system as a whole has deteriorated, it can be statistically determined that there is no problem with the battery system as a whole as long as the stress is moderate. If it is estimated that the battery system as a whole is becoming increasingly worn, countermeasures can be taken, such as changing the operating conditions of the battery system as in FIG. 9, or replacing the battery that is significantly worn.
  • FIG. 18 is a diagram showing an example of operation of the battery management device 13.
  • the detection unit 131 acquires measured values such as battery voltage, battery temperature, battery current, C rate, and SOC of each battery module (or battery cell) or their history from the BMU, and records them in the storage unit 133.
  • the calculation unit 132 estimates the degree of battery wear using the method described in Embodiment 1, and changes the operating method as necessary (adopting an operating method that can suppress deterioration). can. Thereby, progress of deterioration of the battery can be suppressed.
  • a power transmission plan is created in advance and sent to the power company the day before the power transmission, and immediately before power transmission starts on the day the power transmission is carried out. It is conceivable to diagnose the degree of battery wear within a short period of time. In such a case, the diagnostic method according to the present invention is useful in that the diagnosis can be completed in a short time.
  • FIG. 19 is a diagram showing another example of operation of the battery management device 13.
  • the battery management device 13 is connected to the charger via a cloud system or the like.
  • a charger is a device that charges a battery mounted on a vehicle.
  • the detection unit 131 acquires measurement data such as battery voltage and battery temperature of a battery mounted on the vehicle via a charger (or via a measuring device connected to the vehicle). Using the measurement data, the calculation unit 132 can diagnose the degree of battery wear using the method described in the first embodiment.
  • FIG. 20 is a flowchart illustrating the processing performed by the battery management device 13 in the system configuration of FIG. 19. This flowchart can be executed by the calculation unit 132.
  • the detection unit 131 acquires battery measurement data from a BMU or the like.
  • the calculation unit 132 plots the measurement results of each battery on the Eyring plot using the method described in the first embodiment.
  • the calculation unit 132 creates a Weibull plot using the procedure described in the second embodiment.
  • the calculation unit 132 estimates the degree of battery wear based on the shape parameter m of the Weibull plot. For batteries that have not yet reached a worn out state but will continue to deteriorate if operated as they are (middle row in FIG. 6, middle row in FIG. 14), the operation method will be changed to one that suppresses the progress of deterioration. For batteries that have reached a worn out state (lower row in FIG. 6, lower row in FIG. 14), the time until they become unusable may be further estimated.
  • the present invention is not limited to the embodiments described above, and includes various modifications.
  • the above-described embodiments have been described in detail to explain the present invention in an easy-to-understand manner, and the present invention is not necessarily limited to having all the configurations described.
  • the start time of ⁇ Vb is after the start time of ⁇ Va
  • the end time of ⁇ Vb is after the end time of ⁇ Va.
  • ⁇ t1 (first period) and ⁇ t2 (second period) may partially overlap.
  • the detection unit 131 and the calculation unit 132 can be configured by hardware such as a circuit device implementing the function, or software implementing the function can be configured by a calculation unit such as a CPU (Central Processing Unit). It can also be configured by the device executing it.
  • hardware such as a circuit device implementing the function
  • software implementing the function can be configured by a calculation unit such as a CPU (Central Processing Unit). It can also be configured by the device executing it.
  • CPU Central Processing Unit

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Electrochemistry (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Power Engineering (AREA)
  • Charge And Discharge Circuits For Batteries Or The Like (AREA)
  • Secondary Cells (AREA)
  • Tests Of Electric Status Of Batteries (AREA)

Abstract

La présente invention a pour objet de fournir une technologie qui permet d'estimer avec précision un degré d'usure d'une batterie en un court laps de temps. Un dispositif de gestion de batterie selon la présente invention estime, sur la base d'un changement temporel de tension de batterie pendant une période de repos de la batterie, un mode de détérioration de la batterie, sélectionne le tracé d'Eyring correspondant au mode de détérioration qui est estimé, et diagnostique un état de la batterie sur la base du tracé qui est sélectionné (voir la Fig. 8).
PCT/JP2023/012808 2022-09-05 2023-03-29 Dispositif de gestion de batterie, procédé de gestion de batterie et programme de gestion de batterie WO2024053143A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2022140551A JP2024035923A (ja) 2022-09-05 2022-09-05 電池管理装置、電池管理方法、電池管理プログラム
JP2022-140551 2022-09-05

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2024053143A1 true WO2024053143A1 (fr) 2024-03-14

Family

ID=90192226

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/JP2023/012808 WO2024053143A1 (fr) 2022-09-05 2023-03-29 Dispositif de gestion de batterie, procédé de gestion de batterie et programme de gestion de batterie

Country Status (2)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2024035923A (fr)
WO (1) WO2024053143A1 (fr)

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH06215770A (ja) * 1993-01-18 1994-08-05 Seiko Instr Inc 非水電解質二次電池及びその負極活物質の製造方法
JP2015081823A (ja) * 2013-10-22 2015-04-27 三菱重工業株式会社 劣化量算出装置、劣化量算出方法及びプログラム
JP2019106334A (ja) * 2017-12-14 2019-06-27 トヨタ自動車株式会社 電池情報処理装置、電池製造支援装置、組電池、電池情報処理方法、及び組電池の製造方法
US20210263108A1 (en) * 2020-02-25 2021-08-26 Battelle Energy Alliance, Llc Methods and systems for diagnosis of failure mechanisms and for prediction of lifetime of metal batteries
JP2021125912A (ja) * 2020-02-03 2021-08-30 株式会社日立製作所 電池制御装置、エネルギーマネジメントシステム
JP2022170227A (ja) * 2021-04-28 2022-11-10 株式会社日立ハイテク 電池状態推定装置、電力システム
JP2022169917A (ja) * 2021-04-28 2022-11-10 株式会社日立ハイテク 電池管理装置、電力システム

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH06215770A (ja) * 1993-01-18 1994-08-05 Seiko Instr Inc 非水電解質二次電池及びその負極活物質の製造方法
JP2015081823A (ja) * 2013-10-22 2015-04-27 三菱重工業株式会社 劣化量算出装置、劣化量算出方法及びプログラム
JP2019106334A (ja) * 2017-12-14 2019-06-27 トヨタ自動車株式会社 電池情報処理装置、電池製造支援装置、組電池、電池情報処理方法、及び組電池の製造方法
JP2021125912A (ja) * 2020-02-03 2021-08-30 株式会社日立製作所 電池制御装置、エネルギーマネジメントシステム
US20210263108A1 (en) * 2020-02-25 2021-08-26 Battelle Energy Alliance, Llc Methods and systems for diagnosis of failure mechanisms and for prediction of lifetime of metal batteries
JP2022170227A (ja) * 2021-04-28 2022-11-10 株式会社日立ハイテク 電池状態推定装置、電力システム
JP2022169917A (ja) * 2021-04-28 2022-11-10 株式会社日立ハイテク 電池管理装置、電力システム

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2024035923A (ja) 2024-03-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3413067B1 (fr) Procédé et appareil permettant d'estimer l'état de santé d'un bloc-batterie
WO2013140781A1 (fr) Procédé de surveillance de cellule de stockage, système de surveillance de cellule de stockage et système de cellule de stockage
US20170139014A1 (en) Energy storage battery, energy storage-battery monitoring method and monitoring controller
JP2008309796A (ja) 電池の診断装置と診断方法
JP2015060761A (ja) 二次電池の劣化診断システム及び劣化診断方法
WO2016208251A1 (fr) Système d'accumulation d'énergie
JP2013195129A (ja) 二次電池装置および二次電池装置の異常検出方法
US11099240B2 (en) Device and method for evaluating energy storage device and evaluation system
JP4372470B2 (ja) 電池の診断装置と診断方法
JP7463008B2 (ja) 電池セル診断装置および方法
KR102569897B1 (ko) 배터리 진단방법 및 장치
AU2021233833A1 (en) Real-time battery fault detection and state-of-health monitoring
US20190113578A1 (en) Method and device for predicting battery life
JP4401809B2 (ja) 二次電池の診断装置とそれに有用な情報収集装置
JP2020180820A (ja) 電池評価システム、電池評価方法及びプログラム
CN113711068A (zh) 电池电阻诊断装置和方法
WO2022049804A1 (fr) Dispositif de détermination relatif à une pluralité de batteries, système de stockage d'électricité, procédé de détermination et programme de détermination
JP5058211B2 (ja) 二次電池の診断装置とそれに有用な情報収集装置
CN114365323A (zh) 管理方法、管理装置、管理系统和管理程序
KR20210007247A (ko) 배터리 모듈을 위한 냉각 요구 사양 진단 장치
KR102630834B1 (ko) 배터리를 진단하기 위한 장치 및 그 방법
WO2024053143A1 (fr) Dispositif de gestion de batterie, procédé de gestion de batterie et programme de gestion de batterie
JP5558391B2 (ja) 二次電池交換方法および交換用二次電池取得装置
JP7225897B2 (ja) 電池監視システム
US20230118311A1 (en) Secondary battery deterioration degree determination device

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 23862693

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1