WO2019175984A1 - Dispositif de calcul de niveau de défaillance et système de calcul de niveau de défaillance - Google Patents

Dispositif de calcul de niveau de défaillance et système de calcul de niveau de défaillance Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2019175984A1
WO2019175984A1 PCT/JP2018/009798 JP2018009798W WO2019175984A1 WO 2019175984 A1 WO2019175984 A1 WO 2019175984A1 JP 2018009798 W JP2018009798 W JP 2018009798W WO 2019175984 A1 WO2019175984 A1 WO 2019175984A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
component
failure
failure degree
assembly
aggregate
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/JP2018/009798
Other languages
English (en)
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
亮佑 寺部
浩一郎 上田
敦生 葉石
Original Assignee
三菱電機株式会社
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 三菱電機株式会社 filed Critical 三菱電機株式会社
Priority to PCT/JP2018/009798 priority Critical patent/WO2019175984A1/fr
Priority to JP2018566610A priority patent/JP6526362B1/ja
Publication of WO2019175984A1 publication Critical patent/WO2019175984A1/fr

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B23/00—Testing or monitoring of control systems or parts thereof
    • G05B23/02—Electric testing or monitoring

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a failure degree calculation device and a failure degree calculation system for calculating a part failure degree indicating a probability of failure for each of a plurality of parts included in an assembly.
  • Patent Document 1 it is not possible to determine whether or not an abnormality has occurred only for a component to which a sensor is attached.
  • the configuration of the mechanical device is relatively complicated, and it is difficult to attach the sensor to all the parts constituting the mechanical device.
  • Patent Document 2 it is not possible to determine whether or not an abnormality has occurred only for an aggregate modeled by simulation.
  • the assembly includes a plurality of parts, and the mechanical device is configured by a plurality of assemblies.
  • an aggregate in which an abnormality has occurred can be identified, but it cannot be determined which part of a plurality of parts included in the aggregate has an abnormality. . It is required to provide an apparatus that calculates a component failure degree indicating a probability of failure for a plurality of components included in an assembly.
  • the present invention has been made in view of the above, and an object of the present invention is to obtain a failure degree calculation device that calculates a part failure degree indicating a probability of failure for a plurality of parts included in an assembly.
  • the present invention provides a physical quantity for at least one of the plurality of assemblies when each of the plurality of assemblies includes a plurality of parts.
  • an assembly failure degree calculation unit that calculates an assembly failure degree indicating a probability of failure is provided for each of the plurality of assemblies.
  • each of a plurality of parts included in a specific assembly among the plurality of assemblies fails based on connection data indicating a connection state with other components and the assembly failure degree. It further has a part failure degree calculation part which calculates the part failure degree which shows a probability.
  • the failure degree calculation apparatus has an effect of being able to calculate the part failure degree indicating the probability of failure for a plurality of parts included in the assembly.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram for explaining an example of functions of an assembly failure degree calculation unit included in a failure degree calculation apparatus according to an embodiment
  • FIG. 2 is a diagram for explaining an example of functions of an assembly failure degree calculation unit included in the failure degree calculation apparatus according to the embodiment
  • the figure which shows the component failure degree of each of several components calculated by the component failure degree calculation part which the failure degree calculation apparatus concerning embodiment has The figure which shows the list
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating a configuration of a failure degree calculation system 1 according to the embodiment.
  • each of the plurality of aggregates includes a plurality of parts.
  • assembly is the some component which comprises a mechanical apparatus.
  • Each of the plurality of aggregates is a three-dimensional object.
  • FIG. 1 shows an aggregate 30 and a measuring device 40 that measures a physical quantity of the aggregate 30.
  • the aggregate 30 is an example of one aggregate among a plurality of aggregates.
  • an assembly when a simulation of a motor control system is performed, an assembly including at least one component such as a stator, a rotor, a bracket, a fan, and a terminal block, which are generally cited as motor components
  • components such as a stator, a rotor, a bracket, a fan, and a terminal block
  • other parts forming the body include connection parts such as screws and O-rings in addition to the main motor parts.
  • Examples of physical quantities include acceleration, temperature, heat, displacement, pressure, sound waves, or electromagnetics.
  • the physical quantity may be a phenomenon or characteristic that can be measured by the measuring device 40.
  • the failure degree calculation system 1 is calculated by a failure degree calculation device 2 that calculates a component failure degree that indicates a probability of failure for each of a plurality of components included in any of a plurality of assemblies, and the failure degree calculation device 2. And a display device 3 for displaying the component failure degree of each of the plurality of components.
  • An example of the display device 3 is a liquid crystal display or an organic electroluminescence display.
  • FIG. 1 also shows a storage device 50 that stores connection data indicating a connection state of each of a plurality of components included in any of the plurality of assemblies with other components.
  • the storage device 50 has, for each of a plurality of components included in any of the plurality of assemblies, connection data indicating the assembly including the components and the components connected to the components.
  • the connection data is, for example, information on which part is mechanically connected to a certain part.
  • An example of the storage device 50 is a device having a semiconductor memory. The connection data will be further described later with reference to FIG.
  • FIG. 2 is a diagram showing a configuration of a plurality of aggregates and a plurality of parts in the embodiment.
  • the first aggregate 30X, the second aggregate 30Y, and the third aggregate 30Z are examples of a plurality of aggregates.
  • the first aggregate 30X has a part A and a part D.
  • Part A and part D are examples of a plurality of parts included in one aggregate.
  • the second aggregate 30Y includes a part B and a part F.
  • the parts B and F are also examples of a plurality of parts included in one aggregate.
  • the third aggregate 30 ⁇ / b> Z includes a part C, a part E, and a part G.
  • the part C, the part E, and the part G are also examples of a plurality of parts included in one aggregate.
  • connection of two parts included in the same assembly is indicated by a single line.
  • a connection between a part included in one of two different sets and a part included in the other set is indicated by a double line.
  • the part A included in the first aggregate 30X includes a part D included in the first aggregate 30X, and a part B included in the second aggregate 30Y. It is connected to the.
  • the component D included in the first assembly 30X is connected to the component A included in the first assembly 30X.
  • the part B included in the second aggregate 30Y is connected to the part A included in the first aggregate 30X and the part F included in the second aggregate 30Y.
  • the component F included in the second assembly 30Y is connected to the component B included in the second assembly 30Y and the component C included in the third assembly 30Z.
  • the part C included in the third aggregate 30Z is connected to the part F included in the second aggregate 30Y and the part E included in the third aggregate 30Z.
  • the part E included in the third aggregate 30Z is connected to the parts C and G included in the third aggregate 30Z.
  • the part G included in the third aggregate 30Z is connected to the part E included in the third aggregate 30Z.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating connection data stored in the storage device 50 according to the embodiment.
  • the storage device 50 stores connection data constituting the table shown in FIG. That is, for the part A, the storage device 50 includes connection data including information indicating that the part A is included in the first assembly 30X and that the part A is connected to the part D and the part B.
  • the connection data includes information indicating the situation described with reference to FIG. 2 for each of the parts B, C, D, E, F, and G.
  • the failure level calculation device 2 calculates an aggregate failure level that indicates a failure probability for each of the multiple sets based on a physical quantity of at least one of the multiple sets.
  • a degree calculation unit 21 is included.
  • FIG. 4 is a first diagram for explaining an example of the function of the assembly failure degree calculation unit 21 included in the failure degree calculation apparatus 2 according to the embodiment. Specifically, FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating an example of data in which the acceleration of the first aggregate 30X measured by the acceleration sensor changes with time.
  • the acceleration sensor is an example of the measuring device 40.
  • FIG. 5 is a second diagram for explaining an example of the function of the assembly failure degree calculation unit 21 included in the failure degree calculation apparatus 2 according to the embodiment.
  • FIG. 5 shows an example of the result of fast Fourier transform performed on the data shown in FIG. 4 by the aggregate failure degree calculation unit 21 with a solid line. That is, FIG. 5 shows an example of the amplitude at each frequency when the aggregate failure degree calculation unit 21 performs the fast Fourier transform on the data shown in FIG.
  • FIG. 5 shows, as a broken line, the result of performing a fast Fourier transform on the acceleration data of the first aggregate 30X measured by the acceleration sensor when the first aggregate 30X is normal in advance. .
  • FIG. 5 shows that the acceleration indicated by the solid line is “s1” and the acceleration indicated by the broken line is “s0” at the predetermined specific frequency p.
  • the assembly failure degree calculation unit 21 calculates the assembly failure degree R of the first assembly 30X according to the following equation (1).
  • the assembly failure degree calculation unit 21 may calculate the assembly failure degree of the first assembly 30X as follows.
  • the thermometer measures the temperature of the first aggregate 30X, and the measured temperature is “t1”, and the temperature of the first aggregate 30X when it is normal in advance is “t0”. Assume that. In this case, the assembly failure degree calculation unit 21 may calculate the assembly failure degree R of the first assembly 30X according to the following equation (2).
  • a thermometer is an example of the measuring device 40.
  • the heat sensor measures the amount of heat of the first assembly 30X, and the amount of heat measured is “v1”, and the amount of heat of the first assembly 30X when it is normal in advance is “v0”. Assume that.
  • the assembly failure degree calculation unit 21 may calculate the assembly failure degree R of the first assembly 30X according to the following equation (3).
  • the thermal sensor is an example of the measuring device 40.
  • the assembly failure degree calculation unit 21 calculates the assembly failure degree of the first assembly 30X based on the physical quantity of the first assembly 30X. Similarly, the assembly failure degree calculation unit 21 calculates the assembly failure degree of each of the second assembly 30Y and the third assembly 30Z. Alternatively, the aggregate failure degree calculation unit 21 may calculate a physical quantity for any one of the first aggregate 30X, the second aggregate 30Y, and the third aggregate 30Z and each of the plurality of aggregates. Based on the rules determined in advance based on the relationship with other aggregates, the aggregate failure degree of each of the first aggregate 30X, the second aggregate 30Y, and the third aggregate 30Z is calculated. calculate.
  • FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating an aggregate failure degree of each of the multiple aggregates in the embodiment.
  • the failure degree calculation device 2 includes, for each of a plurality of parts included in any of the plurality of assemblies, connection data indicating a connection state with other parts and a plurality of pieces calculated by the assembly failure degree calculation unit 21.
  • a component failure degree calculation unit 22 is further provided that calculates a component failure degree indicating a failure probability based on each assembly failure degree of the assembly.
  • the connection data is stored in the storage device 50 as described with reference to FIG.
  • the component failure degree may be a value indicating the probability of failure, for example, an index indicating which component is relatively likely to fail.
  • a value indicating the degree of deterioration may be used. The same applies to the aggregate failure degree.
  • the part failure degree calculation unit 22 calculates the part failure degree of each part according to the following equation (4).
  • “Ex” is the component failure degree of the component to be calculated by the component failure degree calculation unit 22.
  • the component for which the component failure level calculation unit 22 calculates the component failure level is an example of a specific component.
  • “Ex1” is an assembly failure degree of an assembly including parts for which the component failure degree calculation unit 22 is to calculate the part failure degree.
  • “Ey1” is an assembly failure degree of an assembly including parts connected to the component for which the part failure degree calculation unit 22 is to calculate the part failure degree.
  • the aggregate failure degree is a value calculated by the aggregate failure degree calculation unit 21.
  • “Nall” is the number of components connected to the component for which the component failure degree calculation unit 22 calculates the component failure degree. That is, the component failure level calculation unit 22 calculates the component failure level of a specific component based on the number of components connected to the specific component.
  • the component failure level calculation unit 22 calculates the component failure level of a specific component
  • the component connected to the specific component is determined based on the aggregate failure level of the aggregate including the specific component. Is added to the sum of the failure degrees of the aggregates, and a first aggregate failure degree sum related to a specific part is calculated.
  • the part failure degree calculation unit 22 calculates the part failure degree of a specific part by dividing the first aggregate failure degree total by 1 plus the number of parts connected to the specific part. .
  • the component failure degree of component A is calculated as follows.
  • the part A is included in the first assembly 30X, and the assembly failure degree of the first assembly 30X is “20”.
  • the part A is connected to the part B, the part B is included in the second assembly 30Y, and the assembly failure degree of the second assembly 30Y is “70”.
  • the part A is also connected to the part D.
  • the part D is included in the first assembly 30X, and the assembly failure degree of the first assembly 30X is “20”.
  • the number of parts connected to the part A is two. Therefore, the part failure degree calculation unit 22 calculates the part failure degree of the part A as the following equation (5). That is, the part failure degree calculation unit 22 calculates that the part failure degree Ex of the part A is “36.7”.
  • the component failure degree of component B is calculated as follows.
  • the component B is included in the second assembly 30Y, and the assembly failure degree of the second assembly 30Y is “70”.
  • the component B is connected to the component A, the component A is included in the first assembly 30X, and the assembly failure degree of the first assembly 30X is “20”.
  • the component B is also connected to the component F, and the component F is included in the second assembly 30Y, and the assembly failure degree of the second assembly 30Y is “70”.
  • the number of components connected to the component B is two. Therefore, the component failure degree calculation unit 22 calculates the component failure degree of the component B as the following formula (6). That is, the part failure degree calculation unit 22 calculates that the part failure degree Ex of the part B is “53.3”.
  • the component failure level calculation unit 22 uses the number of components connected to each component as connection data, and calculates the component failure level of each component according to the above equation (4).
  • FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating the component failure degree of each of the plurality of components calculated by the component failure degree calculation unit 22 included in the failure degree calculation apparatus 2 according to the embodiment.
  • the failure level calculation device 2 outputs information indicating the component failure level of each of the plurality of components calculated by the component failure level calculation unit 22 to the display device 3 and causes the display device 3 to display the component failure level. 23. That is, the display device 3 displays the component failure degree of each of the plurality of components calculated by the component failure degree calculation unit 22 of the failure degree calculation device 2.
  • FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating a list of component failure levels of each of a plurality of components displayed by the display device 3 included in the failure level calculation system 1 according to the embodiment.
  • the display device 3 displays a component failure degree of each of a plurality of components as a list.
  • FIG. 9 shows a plurality of assemblies displayed three-dimensionally by the display device 3 included in the failure degree calculation system 1 according to the embodiment, and each of a plurality of components included in any of the plurality of assemblies is a component. It is a figure which shows the condition displayed with a moving image using the color corresponding to a failure degree.
  • FIG. 9 shows that component A is displayed in green, component B is displayed in orange, component C is displayed in yellow, component D is displayed in blue, component E is displayed in yellow-green, and component F is displayed in red. Is displayed, indicating that the component G is displayed in yellow-green. For example, as shown in FIG.
  • the display device 3 displays a component having a relatively high component failure level in a color close to red, and displays a component having a relatively low component failure level in a color close to blue. .
  • the parentheses in FIG. 9 and the characters in the parentheses are not displayed.
  • the display device 3 displays a part having a part failure degree of less than 30 in blue, displays a part having a part failure degree of 30 or more and less than 40 in green, and displays the part failure degree. If the part is 40 or more and less than 50, it is displayed in yellow green, if the part failure degree is 50 or more and less than 53, it is displayed in yellow, and if the part failure degree is 53 or more and less than 60, it is displayed in orange. However, parts having a part failure degree of 60 or more are displayed in red.
  • the failure level calculation device 2 uses the connection data and the failure level of each of the plurality of assemblies for each of a plurality of parts included in any of the plurality of assemblies.
  • the component failure degree indicating the probability of performing is calculated. That is, the failure level calculation device 2 can calculate the component failure level indicating the probability of failure for a plurality of components included in the assembly. Furthermore, the failure level calculation device 2 can identify a component having a relatively high component failure level and a component having a relatively low level of component failure among a plurality of components included in one aggregate. it can.
  • the aggregate failure degree is higher. It is specified that the second aggregate 30Y has the highest probability of failure. However, in the conventional technique, it cannot be specified which of the component B and the component F included in the second assembly 30Y has a higher probability of failure.
  • the failure degree calculation device 2 calculates the part failure degree of each of the plurality of parts included in any of the plurality of aggregates. That is, since the failure level calculation device 2 calculates the component failure level of each of the component B and the component F included in the second assembly 30Y, either of the component B or the component F fails. It can be specified whether the probability is high.
  • the display device 3 displays the component failure level of each of the plurality of components calculated by the component failure level calculation unit 22 of the failure level calculation device 2. Furthermore, the display device 3 uses the failure level calculation system 1 to identify a component having a relatively high component failure degree and a component having a relatively low component failure degree among a plurality of components included in one aggregate. You can inform the administrator. The administrator can know a part that needs to be replaced or repaired based on the degree of the part failure displayed by the display device 3, and the mechanical device suddenly fails by replacing or repairing the part. This can be prevented beforehand.
  • the display device 3 can display a list of component failure levels of each of a plurality of components as shown in FIG.
  • the administrator of the failure level calculation system 1 must grasp the components that need to be replaced or repaired based on numerical values. Can do.
  • the display device 3 can display a plurality of aggregates in a three-dimensional manner and display each of the plurality of parts as a moving image using a color corresponding to the degree of component failure.
  • the display device 3 displays a plurality of assemblies three-dimensionally and displays each of the plurality of parts as a moving image using a color corresponding to the part failure degree, the administrator of the failure degree calculation system 1
  • part failure degree calculation unit 22 may calculate the part failure degree of each part according to the following expression (7) instead of the expression (4).
  • “w1” indicates a specific amount of a component for which the component failure degree calculation unit 22 is to calculate the component failure degree.
  • “W2” indicates a specific amount of a component connected to the component for which the component failure degree calculation unit 22 is to calculate the component failure degree.
  • “W3” is a specific amount of a component for which the component failure degree calculation unit 22 is to calculate the component failure degree, and a component connected to the component for which the component failure degree calculation unit 22 is to calculate the component failure degree. Shows the average with a specific amount.
  • the specific quantity is a physical quantity or physical property. Examples of physical quantities or physical properties are mass, stiffness, moment of inertia or volume.
  • the part failure degree calculation unit 22 specifies the aggregate failure degree of the assembly including the specific part.
  • the value obtained by multiplying a specific amount for a part is added to the following aggregate failure degree partial sum to calculate a second aggregate failure degree sum related to the specific part.
  • An aggregate failure degree partial sum is obtained by multiplying an aggregate failure degree of an aggregate including parts connected to a specific part by a specific amount for the part to obtain a specific value. This is a value obtained by adding specific values of all connected parts.
  • the component failure degree calculation unit 22 adds the specific amount for each of all the components connected to the specific component to the specific amount for the specific component. The sum is divided by 1 plus the number of parts connected to the specific part to calculate the average of the specific amount for the specific part and the part connected to the specific part.
  • the component failure degree calculation unit 22 divides the second aggregate failure degree total by 1 by adding the number of parts connected to the specific part to the value obtained by multiplying the average. The component failure degree of a specific component is calculated.
  • the part failure degree calculation unit 22 may calculate the part failure degree of a specific part based on a specific amount for each of the specific part and the part connected to the specific part.
  • the failure degree calculation device 2 calculates the component failure degree in consideration of a specific amount for each component. be able to.
  • the part failure degree calculation unit 22 calculates the part failure degree of each of the plurality of parts included in any of the plurality of aggregates.
  • the component failure level calculation unit 22 may calculate only the component failure levels of a plurality of components included in a specific assembly among the plurality of assemblies. Each of the plurality of parts included in the specific assembly is an example of the specific part.
  • the component failure degree calculation unit 22 may calculate only the component failure degrees of the parts B and F. Parts B and F are examples of specific parts.
  • the connection data includes, for each of a plurality of parts included in a specific aggregate, a connection state with other parts included in the specific aggregate, and a specific set of the plurality of aggregates.
  • the connection state with the components contained in the assembly other than the body is shown.
  • the component failure degree calculation unit 22 calculates the component failure degree of a specific part included in a specific assembly
  • the component failure degree calculation unit 22 determines a specific failure based on the connection state with the component connected to the specific component indicated by the connection data. The component failure degree of the component is calculated.
  • the control unit 23 indicates the component failure level of each of the plurality of components included in the specific assembly.
  • Information is output to the display device 3 to display the component failure degree on the display device 3.
  • the display device 3 displays the component failure degree of each of a plurality of components included in the specific assembly.
  • the display device 3 displays a part failure degree of each of a plurality of parts included in a specific assembly as a list.
  • the display device 3 displays a specific assembly three-dimensionally, and displays each of a plurality of components included in the specific assembly using, for example, a moving image using a color corresponding to the component failure degree.
  • FIG. 10 illustrates a processor in a case where at least some of the functions of the assembly failure degree calculation unit 21, the component failure degree calculation unit 22, and the control unit 23 included in the failure degree calculation device 2 according to the embodiment are realized by the processor 61.
  • the processor 61 is a CPU (Central Processing Unit), a processing device, an arithmetic device, a microprocessor, a microcomputer, or a DSP (Digital Signal Processor).
  • FIG. 10 also shows the memory 62.
  • the partial functions include the processor 61, software, firmware, or Realized by a combination of software and firmware.
  • Software or firmware is described as a program and stored in the memory 62.
  • the processor 61 implements at least some of the functions of the assembly failure degree calculation unit 21, the component failure degree calculation unit 22, and the control unit 23 by reading and executing a program stored in the memory 62.
  • the failure degree calculation apparatus 2 includes the assembly failure degree calculation unit 21, It has a memory 62 for storing a program in which steps executed by at least a part of the component failure degree calculation unit 22 and the control unit 23 are executed as a result.
  • the program stored in the memory 62 causes the computer to execute a procedure or method executed by at least a part of the assembly failure degree calculation unit 21, the component failure degree calculation unit 22, and the control unit 23.
  • the memory 62 is non-volatile such as RAM (Random Access Memory), ROM (Read Only Memory), flash memory, EPROM (Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory), EEPROM (registered trademark) (Electrically Erasable Programmable Read-Only Memory), etc. Or it is a volatile semiconductor memory, a magnetic disk, a flexible disk, an optical disk, a compact disk, a mini disk, or a DVD (Digital Versatile Disk).
  • FIG. 11 at least some of the constituent elements constituting the assembly failure degree calculation unit 21, the component failure degree calculation unit 22, and the control unit 23 included in the failure degree calculation apparatus 2 according to the embodiment are realized by the processing circuit 63.
  • the processing circuit 63 is dedicated hardware.
  • the processing circuit 63 is, for example, a single circuit, a composite circuit, a programmed processor, a parallel programmed processor, an ASIC (Application Specific Integrated Circuit), an FPGA (Field-Programmable Gate Array), or a combination thereof. It is. Some of the assembly failure degree calculation unit 21, the component failure degree calculation unit 22, and the control unit 23 may be dedicated hardware separate from the remaining part.
  • the plurality of functions of the assembly failure degree calculation unit 21, the component failure degree calculation unit 22, and the control unit 23 a part of the plurality of functions is realized by software or firmware, and the rest of the plurality of functions is dedicated hardware. It may be realized with.
  • the plurality of functions of the assembly failure degree calculation unit 21, the component failure degree calculation unit 22, and the control unit 23 can be realized by hardware, software, firmware, or a combination thereof.
  • an abnormality can be determined only for an aggregate modeled by simulation. That is, abnormality cannot be determined up to the part level constituting the assembly.
  • the simulation model becomes complicated, so it is necessary to perform a large-scale calculation, and the specifications and calculation time of the simulation apparatus greatly increase. To do. Therefore, the apparatus cost and simulation cost also increase. Furthermore, since the apparatus is enlarged, it may not be mounted on, for example, a motor control device.
  • the configuration described in the above embodiment shows an example of the contents of the present invention, and can be combined with another known technique, and can be combined with other configurations without departing from the gist of the present invention. It is also possible to omit or change the part.
  • 1 failure degree calculation system 2 failure degree calculation device, 21 assembly failure degree calculation unit, 22 parts failure degree calculation unit, 23 control unit, 3 display device, 30 assembly, 30X first assembly, 30Y second Aggregate, 30Z 3rd aggregate, 40 measuring device, 50 storage device, 61 processor, 62 memory, 63 processing circuit, A, B, C, D, E, F, G components, p frequency.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Testing And Monitoring For Control Systems (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne un dispositif de calcul de niveau de défaillance (2) qui comprend une unité de calcul de niveau de défaillance d'agrégation (21) qui, sur la base d'une grandeur physique d'au moins une agrégation, parmi une pluralité d'agrégations qui comprennent chacune une pluralité de composants, calcule un niveau de défaillance d'agrégation représentant la probabilité que chaque agrégation de la pluralité d'agrégations subisse une défaillance. Le dispositif de calcul de niveau de défaillance (2) comprend en outre une unité de calcul de niveau de défaillance de composant (22) qui calcule un niveau de défaillance de composant représentant la probabilité que chaque composant de la pluralité de composants inclus dans une agrégation spécifique de la pluralité d'agrégations subisse une défaillance, sur la base du niveau de défaillance d'agrégation et de données de connexion indiquant l'état connecté entre le composant et d'autres composants.
PCT/JP2018/009798 2018-03-13 2018-03-13 Dispositif de calcul de niveau de défaillance et système de calcul de niveau de défaillance WO2019175984A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/JP2018/009798 WO2019175984A1 (fr) 2018-03-13 2018-03-13 Dispositif de calcul de niveau de défaillance et système de calcul de niveau de défaillance
JP2018566610A JP6526362B1 (ja) 2018-03-13 2018-03-13 故障度算出装置及び故障度算出システム

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/JP2018/009798 WO2019175984A1 (fr) 2018-03-13 2018-03-13 Dispositif de calcul de niveau de défaillance et système de calcul de niveau de défaillance

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2019175984A1 true WO2019175984A1 (fr) 2019-09-19

Family

ID=66730654

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/JP2018/009798 WO2019175984A1 (fr) 2018-03-13 2018-03-13 Dispositif de calcul de niveau de défaillance et système de calcul de niveau de défaillance

Country Status (2)

Country Link
JP (1) JP6526362B1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2019175984A1 (fr)

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0332967A (ja) * 1989-06-30 1991-02-13 Mazda Motor Corp 車両の故障診断装置
JPH07200981A (ja) * 1993-12-28 1995-08-04 Toshiba Corp プラントの信頼性評価方法および更新評価方法
JP2000235507A (ja) * 1999-02-16 2000-08-29 Toshiba Corp システムの信頼性設計装置及び方法並びにシステムの信頼性設計用ソフトウェアを記録した記録媒体
JP2005202886A (ja) * 2004-01-19 2005-07-28 Kawahara Tekko Kk 機械の故障とメンテナンスの支援システム
EP3136255A1 (fr) * 2014-04-24 2017-03-01 ALSTOM Transport Technologies Procédé et système pour détecter automatiquement des défaillances dans un arbre tournant
WO2017163561A1 (fr) * 2016-03-25 2017-09-28 株式会社日立製作所 Dispositif de support d'exploitation et système d'énergie éolienne

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS6234247A (ja) * 1985-08-08 1987-02-14 Nec Corp 障害ハ−ドウエア指摘テ−ブル生成方式
JP6533403B2 (ja) * 2015-03-24 2019-06-19 三菱航空機株式会社 故障率の算出装置

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0332967A (ja) * 1989-06-30 1991-02-13 Mazda Motor Corp 車両の故障診断装置
JPH07200981A (ja) * 1993-12-28 1995-08-04 Toshiba Corp プラントの信頼性評価方法および更新評価方法
JP2000235507A (ja) * 1999-02-16 2000-08-29 Toshiba Corp システムの信頼性設計装置及び方法並びにシステムの信頼性設計用ソフトウェアを記録した記録媒体
JP2005202886A (ja) * 2004-01-19 2005-07-28 Kawahara Tekko Kk 機械の故障とメンテナンスの支援システム
EP3136255A1 (fr) * 2014-04-24 2017-03-01 ALSTOM Transport Technologies Procédé et système pour détecter automatiquement des défaillances dans un arbre tournant
WO2017163561A1 (fr) * 2016-03-25 2017-09-28 株式会社日立製作所 Dispositif de support d'exploitation et système d'énergie éolienne

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP6526362B1 (ja) 2019-06-05
JPWO2019175984A1 (ja) 2020-04-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP2012008126A5 (fr)
TW201912930A (zh) 故障機率評估系統
TWI686125B (zh) 風扇轉速控制的優化方法
US10895873B2 (en) Machine health monitoring of rotating machinery
JP5822413B2 (ja) ディーゼルエンジン排出量の測定
TWI687699B (zh) 狀態分析裝置、狀態分析方法、及記錄程式的記憶媒體
JP2015507123A (ja) 内部車両エンジンを制御する装置及び方法
WO2019175984A1 (fr) Dispositif de calcul de niveau de défaillance et système de calcul de niveau de défaillance
JP6671899B2 (ja) 自動故障予測システム及び方法
JP2011199867A (ja) サブモジュールの故障を特定するベイズ法
JP6419534B2 (ja) 診断システム、診断方法および診断プログラム
JP7078060B2 (ja) 分析装置および診断システム
JP2006234621A5 (fr)
US10132718B2 (en) Vehicle computer and crankshaft sensor type detecting method
JP2008011622A (ja) インバータ装置とその交流電動機診断、及び診断結果表示方法
JP2012093356A (ja) 電気機械のステータ熱異常の診断
US9268660B2 (en) Matrix and compression-based error detection
WO2021140942A1 (fr) Dispositif de diagnostic, procédé de diagnostic et programme
JP2015170211A (ja) 情報処理プログラム、情報処理方法、及び情報処理装置
JP6658173B2 (ja) 劣化検出装置および劣化検出方法
KR102199104B1 (ko) 회전 기계의 결함을 검출하는 장치 및 방법
JP2016071419A (ja) 変動データ管理システム及びその特異性検出方法
JP6963456B2 (ja) 歯車診断装置及び歯車診断方法
US20140309948A1 (en) Method and device for generating allowed input data trajectories for a testing system
WO2018101132A1 (fr) Système de diagnostic de défaillance

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2018566610

Country of ref document: JP

Kind code of ref document: A

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 18909651

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 18909651

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1