WO2019013196A1 - Dispositif de gestion de fabrication, système de fabrication, et procédé de gestion de fabrication - Google Patents

Dispositif de gestion de fabrication, système de fabrication, et procédé de gestion de fabrication Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2019013196A1
WO2019013196A1 PCT/JP2018/026011 JP2018026011W WO2019013196A1 WO 2019013196 A1 WO2019013196 A1 WO 2019013196A1 JP 2018026011 W JP2018026011 W JP 2018026011W WO 2019013196 A1 WO2019013196 A1 WO 2019013196A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
manufacturing
contribution
components
degree
component
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/JP2018/026011
Other languages
English (en)
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
太一 清水
博史 天野
多鹿　陽介
裕一 樋口
Original Assignee
パナソニックＩｐマネジメント株式会社
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by パナソニックＩｐマネジメント株式会社 filed Critical パナソニックＩｐマネジメント株式会社
Publication of WO2019013196A1 publication Critical patent/WO2019013196A1/fr

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B19/00—Programme-control systems
    • G05B19/02—Programme-control systems electric
    • G05B19/418—Total factory control, i.e. centrally controlling a plurality of machines, e.g. direct or distributed numerical control [DNC], flexible manufacturing systems [FMS], integrated manufacturing systems [IMS] or computer integrated manufacturing [CIM]
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/04—Manufacturing
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H05—ELECTRIC TECHNIQUES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • H05K—PRINTED CIRCUITS; CASINGS OR CONSTRUCTIONAL DETAILS OF ELECTRIC APPARATUS; MANUFACTURE OF ASSEMBLAGES OF ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS
    • H05K13/00—Apparatus or processes specially adapted for manufacturing or adjusting assemblages of electric components
    • H05K13/02—Feeding of components
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P90/00—Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
    • Y02P90/02—Total factory control, e.g. smart factories, flexible manufacturing systems [FMS] or integrated manufacturing systems [IMS]
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P90/00—Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
    • Y02P90/30—Computing systems specially adapted for manufacturing

Definitions

  • the present disclosure relates to a manufacturing management apparatus, a manufacturing system including the manufacturing management apparatus, and a manufacturing management method.
  • a component mounter includes a plurality of feeders and a plurality of nozzles, and a component supplied by a single feeder selected from a plurality of feeders is suctioned by a single nozzle selected from a plurality of nozzles. Mount on a board.
  • a technique in which the positional deviation accuracy of suction is detected for each nozzle or each feeder, and used to determine the necessity of maintenance see, for example, Patent Document 1).
  • the present disclosure provides a manufacturing control apparatus, a manufacturing system, and a manufacturing control method that can support suppression of the reduction in production efficiency and quality of products.
  • a manufacturing management apparatus that manages a plurality of processes performed to manufacture a product, and each of the plurality of processes is: The method is executed using two or more components selected from a plurality of components, and the manufacturing control device corresponds to each of the plurality of processes, the two or more components used in the corresponding process, and An acquisition unit for acquiring production log information indicating the results of the processing to be performed, and a calculation unit for calculating the contribution degree of each of the plurality of components to the production of the product by statistically processing the production log information And an output unit that outputs the degree of contribution calculated by the calculation unit.
  • a manufacturing system includes the manufacturing control apparatus, and at least one of the plurality of components, and includes a manufacturing facility that manufactures the product.
  • a manufacturing control method for managing a plurality of processes performed to manufacture a product, wherein each of the plurality of processes includes a plurality of components.
  • the method is executed using two or more selected components, and the manufacturing control method includes, for each of the plurality of processes, two or more components used in the corresponding process, and the results of the corresponding process
  • the manufacturing control method includes, for each of the plurality of processes, two or more components used in the corresponding process, and the results of the corresponding process
  • one aspect of the present disclosure can be realized as a program for causing a computer to function the manufacturing control method.
  • it may be realized as a computer readable recording medium storing the program.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram showing the configuration of a manufacturing system according to the embodiment.
  • FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating an example of manufacturing log information acquired by the manufacturing management apparatus according to the embodiment.
  • FIG. 3 is a block diagram showing the configuration of a manufacturing control apparatus according to the embodiment.
  • FIG. 4 is a diagram showing input data of a logistic regression model by the manufacturing control apparatus according to the embodiment.
  • FIG. 5 is a diagram showing a list of contribution degrees for each component calculated by the manufacturing control apparatus according to the embodiment.
  • FIG. 6 is a flowchart showing the operation of the manufacturing control apparatus according to the embodiment.
  • FIG. 7 is a diagram showing the number of occurrences of errors per predetermined number of times calculated by the manufacturing management apparatus according to the first modification of the embodiment.
  • FIG. 8 is a diagram showing a list of contribution degrees for each component calculated by the manufacturing management apparatus according to the second modification of the embodiment.
  • FIG. 9 is a diagram showing input data of a Poisson regression model by the manufacturing control apparatus according to the third modification of the embodiment.
  • FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating input data of a binomial logistic regression model by the manufacturing management apparatus according to the fourth modification of the embodiment.
  • a manufacturing control apparatus that manages a plurality of processes performed to manufacture an article, and each of the plurality of processes is A plurality of components selected from a plurality of components, and the manufacturing control apparatus, for each of the plurality of processes, two or more components used in corresponding processes; Calculation for calculating the contribution of each of the plurality of components to the manufacture of the product by statistically acquiring the production log information indicating the corresponding processing performance and the production log information And an output unit that outputs the degree of contribution calculated by the calculation unit.
  • the degree of contribution is calculated for each component, and therefore the necessity of maintenance can be accurately determined based on the degree of contribution.
  • components that adversely affect manufacturing can be estimated based on the degree of contribution, and maintenance of the estimated bad components can be performed quickly. Therefore, according to the manufacturing control apparatus according to this aspect, it is possible to support the suppression of the deterioration of the production efficiency and the quality of the product.
  • the calculation unit may calculate the degree of contribution by processing the manufacturing log information based on a generalized linear model.
  • the contribution of each component is the quantified effect of the corresponding component on manufacturing, and statistical processing based on the generalized linear model eliminates the effects of other components. ing. For this reason, components that adversely affect manufacturing can be accurately estimated based on the degree of contribution. As the estimation accuracy of the adversely affecting component is increased, it is not necessary for a person such as a maintenance worker or a manufacturing manager (operator) to investigate and judge the abnormal point, and to promptly cope with the bad component. Can.
  • the generalized linear model may be a logistic regression model, a Poisson regression model, or a binary logistic regression model.
  • the optimal regression model can be used according to the information classification of manufacture log information, the contribution degree with high reliability can be calculated.
  • the actual result is indicated by a flag indicating the presence or absence of an error in the corresponding processing, and the calculation unit calculates the contribution degree by processing the manufacturing log information based on a logistic regression model. It is also good.
  • the calculation unit may further calculate the number of predictions of an error that occurs when a predetermined component is used a predetermined number of times based on the degree of contribution of each of the plurality of components.
  • the output unit may be a display unit which graphically displays the degree of contribution of each of the plurality of components.
  • the degree of contribution can be presented in a display manner that can be easily understood by the maintenance worker or operator.
  • the plurality of components may be any of a plurality of manufacturing facilities for performing the plurality of processes, a plurality of component parts provided in each of the plurality of manufacturing facilities, and a plurality of components constituting the product. It may be
  • the degree of contribution can be calculated more accurately.
  • the plurality of components are classified into a plurality of component groups for each type, and each of the plurality of processes is executed using a component selected from each of the plurality of component groups.
  • a manufacturing system includes the manufacturing control apparatus, and at least one of the plurality of components, and includes a manufacturing facility that manufactures the product.
  • the manufacturing control device helps to suppress the deterioration of the production efficiency and the quality of the product. For this reason, according to the manufacturing system according to the present aspect, it is possible to suppress the deterioration of the production efficiency and the quality of the product.
  • a manufacturing control method for managing a plurality of processes performed to manufacture a product, wherein each of the plurality of processes includes a plurality of components.
  • the method is executed using two or more selected components, and the manufacturing control method includes, for each of the plurality of processes, two or more components used in the corresponding process, and the results of the corresponding process
  • the manufacturing control method includes, for each of the plurality of processes, two or more components used in the corresponding process, and the results of the corresponding process
  • a program according to an aspect of the present disclosure is a program for causing a computer to execute the manufacturing method.
  • each drawing is a schematic view, and is not necessarily illustrated exactly. Therefore, for example, the scale and the like do not necessarily match in each figure. Further, in each of the drawings, substantially the same configuration is given the same reference numeral, and overlapping description will be omitted or simplified.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram showing the configuration of a manufacturing system 10 according to the present embodiment.
  • the manufacturing system 10 includes a manufacturing facility 20 and a manufacturing control apparatus 100.
  • the manufacturing facility 20 manufactures the product 30, and the manufacturing control apparatus 100 manages a plurality of processes performed to manufacture the product 30 by the manufacturing facility 20. .
  • the manufacturing facility 20 manufactures the product 30 by performing a plurality of processes.
  • the manufacturing facility 20 is, for example, a component mounter.
  • the product 30 has a substrate 31 and a plurality of components 32 mounted on the substrate 31.
  • the manufacturing facility 20 mounts the plurality of components 32 on the substrate 31.
  • the manufacturing facility 20 is an example of a manufacturing apparatus disposed on a manufacturing line of the product 30, and by mounting a plurality of parts 32 on each of a plurality of substrates 31 sequentially carried in, parts can be obtained.
  • the substrate 31 with the 32 mounted thereon ie, the product 30
  • the carried-out substrate 31 (product 30) is transported to a manufacturing facility that performs the next manufacturing process (for example, a reflow process) or an inspection facility that performs an inspection of the product 30.
  • the production facility 20 includes a plurality of component groups each including a plurality of components (not shown) involved in the production of the product 30.
  • the plurality of components include a feeder for supplying the component 32, a nozzle for suctioning the component 32, a header for holding the nozzle and moving between the feeder and the substrate 31 (lane in which the substrate 31 is transported).
  • the manufacturing facility 20 includes a feeder group including a plurality of feeders, a nozzle group including a plurality of nozzles, a reel group including a plurality of reels, and a header group including a plurality of headers.
  • the product 30 is manufactured by performing a plurality of processes.
  • the plurality of processes are, for example, individual mounting processes of the plurality of components 32.
  • the plurality of processes may be performed simultaneously or sequentially.
  • Each of the plurality of processes is performed using two or more components selected from the plurality of components included in the manufacturing facility 20.
  • the plurality of components also includes a component 32 which is an object to be mounted.
  • the manufacturing control apparatus 100 is an apparatus that manages a plurality of processes performed to manufacture the product 30.
  • the manufacturing control apparatus 100 is, for example, a computer provided with a display or a computer connected to the display.
  • the manufacturing management apparatus 100 acquires manufacturing log information from the manufacturing facility 20, and manages a plurality of processes based on the acquired manufacturing log information.
  • the manufacturing log information is data indicating the results of each of the plurality of processes performed by the manufacturing facility 20.
  • FIG. 2 is a diagram showing an example of manufacturing log information acquired by the manufacturing control apparatus 100 according to the present embodiment. As shown in FIG. 2, for each of a plurality of processes, the manufacturing log information indicates the time when the corresponding process was performed, the two or more components used in the corresponding process, and the results of the corresponding process. Is shown.
  • the time when the process is performed is, for example, at least one of the start time and the end time of the process.
  • the start time and the end time are represented by, for example, a date indicated by year / month / day and a time indicated by hour: minute: second.
  • the time may be expressed in units below second, such as milliseconds.
  • the processing results are indicated by a flag (error flag) indicating the presence or absence of an error in the corresponding processing.
  • a flag error flag
  • FIG. 2 when the error flag is “1”, it indicates that an error has occurred, and when the error flag is “0”, it indicates that an error has not occurred.
  • the manufacturing facility 20 includes a unit A group, a unit B group, and a unit C group.
  • the unit A group is a feeder group including a plurality of feeders (unit A).
  • the unit B group is a nozzle group including a plurality of nozzles (unit B).
  • the unit C group is a reel group composed of a plurality of reels (units C).
  • Information indicated by an alphabet such as "A001", "B001" and "C001" and a three-digit number is an example of an identification number unique to each component. The way of assigning identification numbers is not particularly limited.
  • the process P001 is performed using a feeder A having an identification number "A001", a nozzle B having an identification number "B001”, and a reel C having an identification number "C001”.
  • feeder A 001 when “feeder A 001” is described, it means the feeder A whose identification number is “A 001”. The same applies to "nozzle B001” and "reel C001”.
  • an identification number such as "P001” is given for each process, but this is described for the sake of clarity of the explanation, and it is not included in the manufacturing log information. Good.
  • one unit is selected from each of unit A, unit B and unit C for each process, and the selected units cooperate with one another. Perform the corresponding processing.
  • FIG. 3 is a block diagram showing the configuration of the manufacturing control apparatus 100 according to the present embodiment.
  • the manufacturing management apparatus 100 includes an acquisition unit 110, a calculation unit 120, a display unit 130, and a storage unit 140.
  • the acquisition unit 110 acquires manufacturing log information from the manufacturing facility 20.
  • the acquisition unit 110 acquires the manufacturing log information illustrated in FIG. 2 and stores the acquired manufacturing log information in the storage unit 140.
  • the acquisition unit 110 is, for example, a communication interface that communicates with the manufacturing facility 20.
  • the communication may be either wireless communication or wired communication.
  • the calculation unit 120 statistically processes the manufacturing log information to calculate the contribution of each of the plurality of components to the manufacture of the product 30.
  • the contribution of a component quantifies the influence of the component on manufacturing after excluding the influence of other components. Specifically, the contribution of the component corresponds to the degree of adverse effect on production, ie, the degree of badness.
  • the calculation unit 120 calculates the degree of contribution by processing the manufacturing log information based on the generalized linear model.
  • Generalized linear models include, but are not limited to, logistic regression models, Poisson regression models or binary logistic regression models.
  • the calculation unit 120 calculates the degree of contribution by processing the manufacturing log information based on the logistic regression model. Details of the process of calculating the degree of contribution based on the logistic regression model will be described later.
  • the calculation unit 120 may calculate the degree of contribution based on information in which at least one of the start time and the end time of the corresponding process is included in the predetermined aggregation period in the manufacturing log information.
  • the aggregation period is a period during which the contribution of components used in the processing performed during the period is calculated, and is, for example, one hour to several hours, or one day to several days, etc. It is a period.
  • the aggregation period By setting the aggregation period to a short period such as one minute to several minutes or one hour to several hours, it is possible to calculate the contribution degree with high real-time property. For this reason, abnormality of the component can be determined promptly based on the calculated degree of contribution, and manufacturing processes such as maintenance work such as member replacement can be improved. That is, it is not necessary to perform periodic maintenance and the like. Therefore, the downtime of the production line can be reduced and the production efficiency can be improved.
  • the display unit 130 is an example of an output unit that outputs the degree of contribution calculated by the calculation unit 120.
  • the display unit 130 graphically displays the degree of contribution of each component.
  • the display unit 130 displays a list indicating the degree of contribution of each component.
  • the display unit 130 is, for example, a flat panel display such as a liquid crystal display (LCD) or an organic electroluminescence (EL) display, but is not limited thereto.
  • a flat panel display such as a liquid crystal display (LCD) or an organic electroluminescence (EL) display, but is not limited thereto.
  • the storage unit 140 is a memory for storing the manufacturing log information acquired from the manufacturing facility 20, the calculated contribution degree, and the like.
  • the storage unit 140 is a non-volatile memory such as a hard disk drive (HDD) or a semiconductor memory.
  • the calculation unit 120 processes the manufacturing log information based on the logistic regression model.
  • the logistic regression model is a regression model used when the dependent variable (target variable) is represented by two values. Specifically, the calculation unit 120 first generates input data of the logistic regression model based on the manufacturing log information.
  • FIG. 4 is a diagram showing input data of a logistic regression model by the manufacturing control apparatus 100 according to the present embodiment.
  • each process is disposed on the vertical axis (column direction), and on the horizontal axis (row direction), a value y indicating the presence or absence of an error, and use and non-use of each component involved in the process.
  • a value x indicating.
  • the value x is expressed as like x a1, x a2, x b1 in accordance with the identification number of the components.
  • an identification number such as "P001" is assigned to each process, but this is described to make the description easy to understand. , Not included in the input data.
  • the calculation unit 120 sets “0” or “1” to each of the value y indicating the presence or absence of an error and the value x indicating the use and non-use of all the components for each process based on the manufacturing log information. Assign a number.
  • the calculation unit 120 assigns “1” to the value y corresponding to the process in which the error has occurred, and assigns “0” to the value y corresponding to the process in which the error has not occurred. That is, in FIG. 4, when the value y is “1”, it indicates that an error occurs in the corresponding process, and when the value y is “0”, no error occurs in the corresponding process. It is shown that.
  • the calculation unit 120 assigns “1” to the value x of the used component and assigns “0” to the value x of the unused component for each process. That is, in FIG. 4, when the component value x is “1”, it indicates that the component is used for the corresponding processing, and when the value x is “0”, the corresponding processing is performed. Indicates that the component has not been used.
  • FIG. 4 shows that the feeder A 001 and the nozzle B 001 are used, the process P 001 is performed, and an error does not occur. Similarly, the feeder A 002 and the nozzle B 002 are used to perform the process P 002, indicating that an error has occurred.
  • the calculation unit 120 calculates the degree of contribution based on the logistic regression model, using the data shown in FIG. 4 as input data.
  • the error occurrence probability is represented by the following equation 1 with ⁇ .
  • Equation 1 C is a common constant term.
  • x a1 , x a2 , x b1 and x b2 are values x of the respective components shown in FIG. 4.
  • Each of a 1 , a 2 , b 1 and b 2 is a parameter (coefficient) of each component, and corresponds to the contribution of the component.
  • the calculation unit 120 substitutes the values of x and y into Equation 1 and Equation 2 for each process (row shown in FIG. 4), that is, for each combination of components, and P (y
  • FIG. 5 is a diagram showing a list of contribution degrees for each component calculated by the manufacturing control apparatus 100 according to the present embodiment.
  • the degree of contribution indicates the inferiority of the component, so a higher numerical value indicates that an error is more likely to occur when the corresponding component is used.
  • the degree of contribution of each component is arranged in descending order. This indicates that the component positioned at the top (specifically, the feeder A 004) has the highest contribution, and the need for maintenance is high.
  • the list of contribution degrees shown in FIG. 5 is displayed on the display unit 130, for example. As a result, the necessity of maintenance can be easily determined for each component by looking at the list in which the maintenance worker or operator etc. are illustrated.
  • the degrees of contribution may be arranged in ascending order. Alternatively, they may be arranged in the ascending or descending order of the identification numbers of the components.
  • FIG. 6 is a flowchart showing the operation of the manufacturing control apparatus 100 according to the present embodiment.
  • the acquisition unit 110 acquires manufacturing log information from the manufacturing facility 20 (S10). For example, the acquiring unit 110 acquires, for each predetermined period such as one hour to several hours or one day to several days, manufacturing log information on the process performed in the period. Alternatively, the acquiring unit 110 may acquire manufacturing log information on the process each time the manufacturing facility 20 performs the process. The acquisition unit 110 stores the acquired manufacturing log information in the storage unit 140.
  • the calculation unit 120 calculates the degree of contribution for each component (S20). Specifically, as described above, the calculation unit 120 calculates the contribution degree for each component based on the logistic regression model using the input data shown in FIG. 4. The calculation unit 120 calculates, for example, the degree of contribution for each predetermined period, such as one hour or one day.
  • the display unit 130 graphically displays the calculated degree of contribution (S30). For example, as shown in FIG. 5, the display unit 130 displays the degree of contribution of each component in a list.
  • the degree of contribution is calculated for each component by performing analysis based on the regression model.
  • the contribution of a component is based on the contribution because the influence of the corresponding component on manufacturing is quantified and statistical processing based on the regression model excludes the influence of other components.
  • the necessity of maintenance can be determined accurately. For example, components that adversely affect manufacturing can be estimated based on the degree of contribution, and maintenance of the estimated bad components can be performed quickly.
  • a person such as a maintenance worker or a production manager (operator) does not have to investigate and judge the abnormal part, and bad components can be dealt with promptly. Therefore, according to the manufacturing control apparatus 100 which concerns on this Embodiment, suppression of the fall of the productive efficiency of the product 30, and quality can be assisted.
  • the manufacturing management apparatus calculates the number of predicted errors that may occur for each component based on the calculated degree of contribution, and displays the calculation result.
  • the configurations of the manufacturing control apparatus 100 and the manufacturing system 10 are the same as those of the embodiment, and thus the description thereof is omitted.
  • the calculation unit 120 calculates the number of times of error that occurs when the corresponding component is used a predetermined number of times.
  • the predetermined number of times is, for example, 10000 times, but is not limited to this, and may be 1000 times or 100,000 times.
  • the calculation unit 120 uses the degree of contribution as a known value Calculate the number of errors predicted for each element. Specifically, the calculation unit 120 calculates the number of predicted errors (error occurrence probability) p when the target component is used once based on Equation 4 below.
  • the contribution of the average unit is a value obtained by averaging the contributions of one or more units that can be used in combination with the target unit.
  • the contribution of the average unit is a value obtained by averaging the contributions of all the nozzles that can be combined with the feeder A 001.
  • the calculation unit 120 calculates the number of occurrences of errors per 10000 times by multiplying the calculated p by 10000.
  • the calculation unit 120 generates, for example, a list of the number of times of errors illustrated in FIG. 7 by calculating 10000 ⁇ p for all the constituent elements.
  • FIG. 7 is a diagram showing the number of times of occurrence of an error in 10000 trials for each component calculated by the manufacturing management apparatus 100 according to the present modification.
  • the presence or absence of an error can be displayed in a more easily understandable display manner for a maintenance worker or an operator.
  • FIG. 7 shows the result of calculating the degree of contribution on a daily basis. Thereby, the temporal change of the degree of contribution can also be represented.
  • the numerical values of the degree of contribution are illustrated as a list.
  • the degree of contribution is shown graphically by means other than numerical values.
  • the configurations of the manufacturing control apparatus 100 and the manufacturing system 10 are the same as those of the embodiment, and thus the description thereof is omitted.
  • the display unit 130 may classify the degree of contribution into a plurality of ranges according to the value as shown in the list shown in FIG.
  • FIG. 8 is a view showing another example of the list of contribution degrees for each component calculated by the manufacturing management apparatus 100 according to the present embodiment.
  • the degree of contribution is classified into, for example, four ranges according to the value.
  • predetermined colors are determined in advance for each range of contribution degree. For example, the smaller the degree of contribution, the whiter, and the larger the degree of contribution, the bluer.
  • the difference in color is expressed by the difference in density of dots. Note that the density difference of dots as shown in FIG. 8 or the type of hatching may be different for each range, instead of the color.
  • the calculation unit 120 performs division and setting of the range of possible values of the degree of contribution by performing clustering with the calculated degree of contribution for each component as input data.
  • the clustering method is, for example, a Ward method or a k-means method, but is not limited thereto. Further, the number of divisions of the range may not be four, and may be two or more. In addition, the calculation unit 120 may equally divide the range of the degree of contribution.
  • the calculation unit 120 calculates the contribution degree over a plurality of periods, and the results are displayed together. Specifically, the calculation unit 120 classifies the manufacturing log information according to the day on which the process is performed based on the start date and time of the process, and calculates the degree of contribution on a daily basis. In FIG. 8, Day 1 to Day 4 indicate the days on which the process was performed.
  • the degree of contribution can be presented in a manner that can be easily understood by the maintenance worker or the operator.
  • the number of errors per predetermined number may be displayed by color coding.
  • the manufacturing log information acquired by the manufacturing management apparatus 100 is different, and along with this, the regression model used by the calculating unit 120 is different.
  • the configurations of the manufacturing control apparatus 100 and the manufacturing system 10 are the same as those of the embodiment, and thus the description thereof is omitted.
  • the calculation unit 120 processes the manufacturing log information based on the Poisson regression model.
  • the Poisson regression model is a regression model used when the dependent variable (target variable) is a number value (count data) without an upper limit number.
  • FIG. 9 is a diagram showing input data of a Poisson regression model by the manufacturing control apparatus 100 according to the present modification.
  • the combination of the used component is shown similarly to the manufacture log information shown in FIG.
  • the producible number per day is used as the actual value y, instead of the error flag.
  • the number of producible products is a count value (count data) substantially without an upper limit.
  • the calculation unit 120 calculates the degree of contribution based on the Poisson regression model, using the data shown in FIG. 9 as input data.
  • the average number of predicted production is represented by ⁇ , and is represented by the following Equation 5.
  • Equation 5 C is a common constant term.
  • x a1 , x a2 , x b1 and x b2 are values x of the respective components shown in FIG. 4.
  • Each of a 1 , a 2 , b 1 and b 2 is a parameter (coefficient) of each component, and corresponds to the contribution of the component. These are the same as in the embodiment.
  • the left side of Equation 5 may be only ⁇ instead of log ⁇ .
  • the calculation unit 120 substitutes the values of x and y into Equations 5 and 6 for each combination of components (rows shown in FIG. 9), and maximizes P (y
  • the larger the actual value y the larger the number of producible products, which is preferable as the manufacturing equipment 20. Therefore, the contribution of the component corresponds to the degree of good influence on production, ie, the degree of goodness.
  • the contribution degree for each component can be calculated even when the number value with no upper limit is used as the actual value.
  • the contribution of a component is based on the contribution because the influence of the corresponding component on manufacturing is quantified and statistical processing based on the regression model excludes the influence of other components.
  • the necessity of maintenance can be determined accurately.
  • the manufacturing log information acquired by the manufacturing management apparatus 100 is different, and accordingly, the regression model used by the calculation unit 120 is different.
  • the configurations of the manufacturing control apparatus 100 and the manufacturing system 10 are the same as those of the embodiment, and thus the description thereof is omitted.
  • the calculation unit 120 processes the manufacturing log information based on the binomial logistic regression model.
  • the binomial logistic regression model is a regression model used when the dependent variable (target variable) is an upper limit number having a number value (count data).
  • FIG. 10 is a diagram showing input data of a binomial logistic regression model by the manufacturing management apparatus 100 according to the present modification.
  • the combination of the used component is shown similarly to the manufacture log information shown in FIG.
  • the number of times of occurrence of an error y and the number of times of implementation N are used as the actual value y, instead of the error flag.
  • the number of mountings corresponds to the number of processes performed in the corresponding combination.
  • the number of occurrences of errors y does not exceed the number of implementation times N. That is, y is a count value (count data) whose upper limit is N.
  • the calculation unit 120 calculates the degree of contribution based on a binomial logistic regression model, using the data shown in FIG. 10 as input data.
  • the occurrence probability of an error is represented by the following Equation 7 as q.
  • Equation 7 C is a common constant term.
  • x a1 , x a2 , x b1 and x b2 are values x of the respective components shown in FIG. 4.
  • Each of a 1 , a 2 , b 1 and b 2 is a parameter (coefficient) of each component, and corresponds to the contribution of the component. These are the same as in the embodiment.
  • the calculation unit 120 substitutes the values of x, y and N into Equations 7 and 8 for each combination of components (rows shown in FIG. 10), and P (y
  • the contribution degree for each component can be calculated even when the upper limit value is used as the actual value.
  • the contribution of a component is based on the contribution because the influence of the corresponding component on manufacturing is quantified and statistical processing based on the regression model excludes the influence of other components.
  • the necessity of maintenance can be determined accurately.
  • the degree of contribution for each component lot or manufacturer of parts is calculated with respect to the number of failures of electronic devices such as smart phones. This makes it possible to estimate lots with high failure rates or manufacturers.
  • regression model and probability distribution shown in the above embodiment and modification are merely examples, and other regression models and probability distributions may be used.
  • normal distribution or gamma distribution may be used.
  • a list of contribution degrees is displayed, but among the calculated contribution degrees, only contribution degrees and components (specifically, constituent elements that adversely affect) that are larger than the threshold are You may display it.
  • the output unit may be an audio output unit.
  • the output unit may output a component with a high degree of contribution as audio data.
  • the output unit may print a list of contribution degrees on a medium such as paper.
  • the manufacturing equipment 20 may be a processing device for processing a raw material such as metal or resin, and a molding device for molding a processed material.
  • the component may not be any one of the manufacturing equipment, the components provided in the manufacturing equipment, and the parts constituting the product. Specifically, the components do not have to be physically present.
  • the component may be a condition relating to manufacturing, which is an element that may affect production performance.
  • the component may be the condition of equipment such as the speed of a head or a part suction method, or may be the condition of a person such as a worker in charge or a group in charge.
  • the component may be conditions of the production method such as the presence or absence of splicing, or environmental conditions such as season.
  • Each of the above-described devices may be specifically a computer system including a microprocessor, a ROM, a RAM, a hard disk unit, a display unit, and the like.
  • a computer program is stored in a RAM (Ramdom Access Memory) or a hard disk unit.
  • Each device achieves its function by the microprocessor operating according to the computer program.
  • the computer program is configured by combining a plurality of instruction codes indicating instructions to the computer in order to achieve a predetermined function.
  • a part or all of the components constituting each of the above-described devices may be configured from one system LSI (Large Scale Integration: large scale integrated circuit).
  • the system LSI is a super-multifunctional LSI manufactured by integrating a plurality of components on one chip, and specifically includes a microprocessor, a ROM (Read Only Memory), a RAM, etc. Computer system. A computer program is stored in the RAM. The system LSI achieves its functions by the microprocessor operating according to the computer program.
  • a part or all of the components constituting each of the above-described devices may be composed of an IC card or a single module which can be detached from each device.
  • the IC card or module is a computer system including a microprocessor, a ROM, a RAM, and the like.
  • the IC card or module may include the above-described ultra-multifunctional LSI.
  • the IC card or module achieves its functions by the microprocessor operating according to the computer program. This IC card or this module may be tamper resistant.
  • the present disclosure may be the method described above.
  • it may be a computer program that realizes these methods by a computer, or may be a digital signal composed of a computer program.
  • the present disclosure relates to a computer program or a recording medium capable of reading digital signals from a computer, such as a flexible disk, a hard disk, a CD-ROM, an MO, a DVD, a DVD-ROM, a DVD-RAM, a BD (Blu-ray (registration It may be recorded on a trademark (trademark) Disc), a semiconductor memory or the like.
  • a computer such as a flexible disk, a hard disk, a CD-ROM, an MO, a DVD, a DVD-ROM, a DVD-RAM, a BD (Blu-ray (registration It may be recorded on a trademark (trademark) Disc), a semiconductor memory or the like.
  • BD Blu-ray (registration It may be recorded on a trademark (trademark) Disc), a semiconductor memory or the like.
  • digital signals recorded on these recording media may be used.
  • the present disclosure may transmit a computer program or a digital signal via a telecommunication line, a wireless or wired communication line, a network represented by the Internet, data broadcasting, and the like.
  • the present disclosure is a computer system provided with a microprocessor and a memory, the memory storing the computer program, and the microprocessor may operate according to the computer program.
  • It may be implemented by another independent computer system by recording and transferring the program or digital signal on a recording medium, or by transferring the program or digital signal via a network or the like .
  • the present disclosure can be used as, for example, a production management device that can help suppress the production efficiency and the deterioration of product quality, and can be used, for example, for management of production in a factory.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Primary Health Care (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Microelectronics & Electronic Packaging (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
  • General Factory Administration (AREA)

Abstract

La présente invention concerne un dispositif de gestion de fabrication (100) permettant de gérer une pluralité de processus exécutés pour fabriquer un article manufacturé (30). Chaque processus de la pluralité de processus est exécuté à l'aide d'au moins deux éléments constitutifs choisis parmi une pluralité d'éléments constitutifs. Le dispositif de gestion de fabrication (100) comporte : une unité d'acquisition (110) qui acquiert des informations de journal de fabrication indiquant, par rapport à chaque processus de la pluralité de processus, au moins deux éléments constitutifs utilisés pour un processus correspondant et les résultats du processus correspondant ; une unité de calcul (120) qui, en traitant statistiquement les informations de journal de fabrication, calcule le degré de contribution de chaque élément de la pluralité d'éléments constitutifs à la fabrication de l'article manufacturé (30) ; et une unité d'affichage (130) qui délivre le degré de contribution calculé par l'unité de calcul (120).
PCT/JP2018/026011 2017-07-14 2018-07-10 Dispositif de gestion de fabrication, système de fabrication, et procédé de gestion de fabrication WO2019013196A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2017-138110 2017-07-14
JP2017138110 2017-07-14

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2019013196A1 true WO2019013196A1 (fr) 2019-01-17

Family

ID=65001222

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/JP2018/026011 WO2019013196A1 (fr) 2017-07-14 2018-07-10 Dispositif de gestion de fabrication, système de fabrication, et procédé de gestion de fabrication

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2019013196A1 (fr)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2021240845A1 (fr) * 2020-05-27 2021-12-02 パナソニックＩｐマネジメント株式会社 Dispositif et procédé d'analyse de données
WO2024105931A1 (fr) * 2022-11-17 2024-05-23 パナソニックＩｐマネジメント株式会社 Système d'aide à la production, procédé d'aide à la production et programme

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2002190700A (ja) * 2000-12-20 2002-07-05 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd 電子部品実装制御装置及び方法
JP2006048429A (ja) * 2004-08-05 2006-02-16 Nec Corp 解析エンジン交換型システム及びデータ解析プログラム
JP2007323455A (ja) * 2006-06-02 2007-12-13 Fuji Xerox Co Ltd 故障予防診断支援システム及び故障予防診断支援方法
JP2013098360A (ja) * 2011-11-01 2013-05-20 Panasonic Corp 電子部品実装装置におけるフィーダランク分け装置およびフィーダランク分け方法
WO2015136586A1 (fr) * 2014-03-14 2015-09-17 日本電気株式会社 Dispositif d'analyse factorielle, procédé d'analyse factorielle et programme d'analyse factorielle
WO2016079972A1 (fr) * 2014-11-19 2016-05-26 日本電気株式会社 Appareil d'analyse de facteur, procédé d'analyse de facteur et support d'enregistrement et système d'analyse de facteur

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2002190700A (ja) * 2000-12-20 2002-07-05 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd 電子部品実装制御装置及び方法
JP2006048429A (ja) * 2004-08-05 2006-02-16 Nec Corp 解析エンジン交換型システム及びデータ解析プログラム
JP2007323455A (ja) * 2006-06-02 2007-12-13 Fuji Xerox Co Ltd 故障予防診断支援システム及び故障予防診断支援方法
JP2013098360A (ja) * 2011-11-01 2013-05-20 Panasonic Corp 電子部品実装装置におけるフィーダランク分け装置およびフィーダランク分け方法
WO2015136586A1 (fr) * 2014-03-14 2015-09-17 日本電気株式会社 Dispositif d'analyse factorielle, procédé d'analyse factorielle et programme d'analyse factorielle
WO2016079972A1 (fr) * 2014-11-19 2016-05-26 日本電気株式会社 Appareil d'analyse de facteur, procédé d'analyse de facteur et support d'enregistrement et système d'analyse de facteur

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2021240845A1 (fr) * 2020-05-27 2021-12-02 パナソニックＩｐマネジメント株式会社 Dispositif et procédé d'analyse de données
EP4160330A4 (fr) * 2020-05-27 2023-12-13 Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co., Ltd. Dispositif et procédé d'analyse de données
WO2024105931A1 (fr) * 2022-11-17 2024-05-23 パナソニックＩｐマネジメント株式会社 Système d'aide à la production, procédé d'aide à la production et programme

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20180150066A1 (en) Scheduling system and method
US9807920B2 (en) Electronic component mounting system
US11550313B2 (en) Equipment element maintenance analysis system and equipment element maintenance analysis method
US20090157455A1 (en) Instruction system and method for equipment problem solving
CN109960234B (zh) 生产管理系统和生产管理方法
JP7133775B2 (ja) 表示装置、製造システム及び表示方法
WO2019013196A1 (fr) Dispositif de gestion de fabrication, système de fabrication, et procédé de gestion de fabrication
US11143689B2 (en) Method and system for data collection and analysis for semiconductor manufacturing
JP5807158B2 (ja) 電子部品実装装置におけるフィーダランク分け装置およびフィーダランク分け方法
JP2017139364A (ja) 部品実装システムおよび部品実装方法
US10692738B2 (en) Information management device and information management method
CN104684271A (zh) 用于监视和预测smt设备的故障的系统及其操作方法
JP3772906B1 (ja) 情報処理装置、情報処理方法、プログラム、および、プログラムを記録したコンピュータ読み取り可能な記録媒体
US11917765B2 (en) Device for estimating cause of mounting error, and method for estimating cause of mounting error
US11550293B2 (en) Board production management device and board production management method to determine a countermeasure to a board production device error
US11307567B2 (en) Component mounting device, method, and system that controls head based on degree of malfunction
JP2002251212A (ja) 品質管理方法、同システム、および同プログラムを記録した記録媒体
US20190303257A1 (en) Service system and server
CN103760881B (zh) 一种物料使用情况的监控管理方法及系统
CN114747307A (zh) 生产数据生成装置、生产数据生成方法以及程序
WO2024105931A1 (fr) Système d'aide à la production, procédé d'aide à la production et programme
WO2023037693A1 (fr) Procédé de gestion de production, dispositif de gestion de production et programme
KR20210133685A (ko) 전자부품 실장라인들의 통합유지보수방법
JP2020027329A (ja) 設備診断システム及び設備診断方法
WO2019013224A1 (fr) Procédé de visualisation d'état de fabrication, dispositif de visualisation d'état de fabrication et système de fabrication

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 18832496

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 18832496

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP