Classifications

• • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
  • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
  • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
  • A61B6/00—Apparatus or devices for radiation diagnosis; Apparatus or devices for radiation diagnosis combined with radiation therapy equipment
  • A61B6/42—Arrangements for detecting radiation specially adapted for radiation diagnosis
  • A61B6/4291—Arrangements for detecting radiation specially adapted for radiation diagnosis the detector being combined with a grid or grating
• • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
  • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
  • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
  • A61B6/00—Apparatus or devices for radiation diagnosis; Apparatus or devices for radiation diagnosis combined with radiation therapy equipment
  • A61B6/48—Diagnostic techniques
  • A61B6/484—Diagnostic techniques involving phase contrast X-ray imaging
• • G—PHYSICS
  • G02—OPTICS
  • G02B—OPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
  • G02B5/00—Optical elements other than lenses
  • G02B5/18—Diffraction gratings
  • G02B5/1838—Diffraction gratings for use with ultraviolet radiation or X-rays
• • G—PHYSICS
  • G02—OPTICS
  • G02B—OPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
  • G02B5/00—Optical elements other than lenses
  • G02B5/18—Diffraction gratings
  • G02B5/1866—Transmission gratings characterised by their structure, e.g. step profile, contours of substrate or grooves, pitch variations, materials
  • G02B5/1871—Transmissive phase gratings
• • G—PHYSICS
  • G21—NUCLEAR PHYSICS; NUCLEAR ENGINEERING
  • G21K—TECHNIQUES FOR HANDLING PARTICLES OR IONISING RADIATION NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; IRRADIATION DEVICES; GAMMA RAY OR X-RAY MICROSCOPES
  • G21K1/00—Arrangements for handling particles or ionising radiation, e.g. focusing or moderating
  • G21K1/02—Arrangements for handling particles or ionising radiation, e.g. focusing or moderating using diaphragms, collimators
  • G21K1/025—Arrangements for handling particles or ionising radiation, e.g. focusing or moderating using diaphragms, collimators using multiple collimators, e.g. Bucky screens; other devices for eliminating undesired or dispersed radiation
• • G—PHYSICS
  • G21—NUCLEAR PHYSICS; NUCLEAR ENGINEERING
  • G21K—TECHNIQUES FOR HANDLING PARTICLES OR IONISING RADIATION NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; IRRADIATION DEVICES; GAMMA RAY OR X-RAY MICROSCOPES
  • G21K1/00—Arrangements for handling particles or ionising radiation, e.g. focusing or moderating
  • G21K1/06—Arrangements for handling particles or ionising radiation, e.g. focusing or moderating using diffraction, refraction or reflection, e.g. monochromators
• • G—PHYSICS
  • G21—NUCLEAR PHYSICS; NUCLEAR ENGINEERING
  • G21K—TECHNIQUES FOR HANDLING PARTICLES OR IONISING RADIATION NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; IRRADIATION DEVICES; GAMMA RAY OR X-RAY MICROSCOPES
  • G21K1/00—Arrangements for handling particles or ionising radiation, e.g. focusing or moderating
  • G21K1/10—Scattering devices; Absorbing devices; Ionising radiation filters
• • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
  • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
  • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
  • A61B6/00—Apparatus or devices for radiation diagnosis; Apparatus or devices for radiation diagnosis combined with radiation therapy equipment
  • A61B6/40—Arrangements for generating radiation specially adapted for radiation diagnosis
  • A61B6/4064—Arrangements for generating radiation specially adapted for radiation diagnosis specially adapted for producing a particular type of beam
  • A61B6/4092—Arrangements for generating radiation specially adapted for radiation diagnosis specially adapted for producing a particular type of beam for producing synchrotron radiation
• • G—PHYSICS
  • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
  • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
  • G01N23/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation, e.g. X-rays or neutrons, not covered by groups G01N3/00 – G01N17/00, G01N21/00 or G01N22/00
  • G01N23/02—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation, e.g. X-rays or neutrons, not covered by groups G01N3/00 – G01N17/00, G01N21/00 or G01N22/00 by transmitting the radiation through the material
  • G01N23/04—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation, e.g. X-rays or neutrons, not covered by groups G01N3/00 – G01N17/00, G01N21/00 or G01N22/00 by transmitting the radiation through the material and forming images of the material
  • G01N23/041—Phase-contrast imaging, e.g. using grating interferometers
• • G—PHYSICS
  • G21—NUCLEAR PHYSICS; NUCLEAR ENGINEERING
  • G21K—TECHNIQUES FOR HANDLING PARTICLES OR IONISING RADIATION NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; IRRADIATION DEVICES; GAMMA RAY OR X-RAY MICROSCOPES
  • G21K2207/00—Particular details of imaging devices or methods using ionizing electromagnetic radiation such as X-rays or gamma rays
  • G21K2207/005—Methods and devices obtaining contrast from non-absorbing interaction of the radiation with matter, e.g. phase contrast

Definitions

• the invention relates to a grating structure and an imaging system.
• Grating-based phase-contrast and dark- field imaging is a promising technology to enhance the diagnostic quality of x-ray equipment CT(computed tomography).
• CT computed tomography
• an X-ray beam intensity is usually modulated along the fan-angle of the system by means of a bow-tie filter. This filter aims at ensuring a higher flux for the central rays which will be typically attenuated the most by the imaged object, eg a patient.
• a source grating structure for interferometric X-ray imaging cable of generating a non-uniform intensity profile behind a surface of the grating structure when exposed to X-ray radiation.
• said intensity profile has at least one local maximum away from an edge of said surface.
• the grating structure comprises a set of absorbing elements arranged in a periodic pattern to form said surface, said set including at least two absorbing elements, one proximal and one distal to said edge, wherein a material density of the proximal absorbing element is higher than the material density of the distal proximal element.
• the grating structure comprises a set of absorbing elements arranged in a periodic pattern to form said surface, said set including at least two absorbing elements, one proximal and one distal to said edge, the at least one proximal absorbing element having a greater depth perpendicular to said surface than the depth of the distant proximal element.
• the grating structure has a non-uniform duty cycle profile.
• the duty cycle profile has at least one local maximum away from the edge of said surface.
• the grating structure is configured to compensate, in a at least one direction, a Heel effect. Because of the Heel effect, parts of an X-ray beam generated at an X-ray source have different intensities. The grating compensates for this by allowing those parts of the X-ray beam to pass with less intensity loss that have experienced a higher intensity loss due to the Heel effect and vice versa.
• the grating structure is configured so that the intensity profile decreases in a direction along a rotational axis of an X-ray imaging system.
• an imaging system comprising: an X-ray source;
• said imaging system is a rotational one, in particular, a computed tomography imaging system.
• a source grating not only to improve coherence but in addition to compensate or otherwise account for a range of other physical or technical effects that have a bearing on X-ray imaging.
• the need for a bow-tie filter is thus obsolete. This allows securing several advantages: scatter radiation can be reduced compared to a design with separate conventional bow-tie filter. Improved visibility for large fan-angles can be secured, and the proposed combination solution frees up space in the imaging system.
• the duty cycle decreases from a center portion of the grating towards larger ray angles.
• the decreased duty cycle leads to a reduction of the x-ray flux.
• Use of a separate bow-tie filter is hence no longer required.
• the spatial coherence of the outer rays is improved, which will lead to a better overall image quality.
• Similar advantages can be secured by varying the depth of the absorber elements and/or the density of absorber element material as mentioned above.
• the grating structure is configured to compensate instead or on addition for the Heel effect in an X-ray source of the X-ray imaging system.
• the grating may in addition or instead be configured to account, via its generated intensity profile, for other physical/technical effects, either singly or in
• the grating structure is either planar or curved, the latter option being preferable when the imager is rotational, such as CT or C-arm.
• the source grating is at least partly curved for focus on a location of a focal spot of the X-ray source.
• the curvature of the source grating determines the distance at which said grating is to be placed from the focal spot so the non-uniform illumination profile can best be observed when the grating is held into the X-ray beam.
• the source grating is capable of producing the non-uniform intensity profile on its own, that is, without intervening objects (in particular other grating(s)), when the source grating is placed in the X-ray beam of an X-ray source.
• Figure 1 shows in a schematic fashion portions of an interferometric x-ray imaging system
• Figure 2 shows an intensity profile achievable with an interferometric grating structure according to one embodiment
• Figure 3 shows an interferometric x-ray imaging system according to one embodiment
• Figure 4 shows different embodiments of grating structures in plan view
• Figure 5 shows, in plan view, a grating structure according to a further embodiment.
• FIG. 1 there is shown a schematic block diagram of an X- ray imaging apparatus ("imager") I A including an interferometric arrangement IF.
• the interferometric arrangement IF includes two or three gratings arranged between an X-ray source XR and a detector D. There is an examination region between the X-ray source and the detector and between at least two of the gratings.
• the imaging or examination region is suitable to receive an object OB to be imaged.
• the object is animate or inanimate.
• An animate object includes for instance an animal or human patient or at least a part thereof (region of interest) to be imaged.
• X-ray radiation beam XB emitted from a focal spot FS of X-ray source XR interacts with the gratings of the interferometer IF and the object OB and is then incident on the radiation sensitive surface of detector D formed by a plurality of detector pixels.
• the incident radiation causes electrical signals which are picked up by a data acquisition system DAS and are converted into digital projection data. Because of interaction with the interferometer IF (more of which further below), this projection data is referred to herein as interferometric projection data.
• the X-ray source XR comprises an anode AD and a cathode CT arranged in a vacuum tube. A voltage is applied across anode and cathode. This causes an electron beam.
• the electron beam impacts the anode at the focal spot FS.
• the electron beam interacts with the anode material and this produces the X-ray beam.
• the X-ray beam XB exits the tube at a direction perpendicular to an axis between the anode and the cathode.
• the interferometric projection data can be reconstructed into cross-section imagery of the object, on which more further below.
• the imager IX is arranged as a tomographic imaging apparatus the optical axis which is shown in a horizontal arrangement running from the focal point of the X-ray source to the detector.
• This axis can be changed so as to acquire projection data from multiple projection directions around the object (not necessarily in a full revolution, a 180° rotation may be sufficient, or even less in tomosynthesis, etc).
• the X-ray source and /or the detector with the interferometer is rotatable in a rotation plane (having a rotation axis Z) around the object OB.
• the object OB is thought to reside at an iso-center in the examination region whilst at least the X-ray source (in some embodiments together with the detector) and some or all of the interferometer rotates around the object in a projection data acquisition operation. In yet other embodiments, the relative rotation is achieved by rotation of the object OB.)
• the imager IX is capable of producing phase contrast and/or dark field (cross section) images. In some embodiments, but not necessarily in all embodiments, there is also a third image channel for a conventional attenuation (cross section) image.
• the attenuation image represents spatial distribution of attenuation coefficient across the object in the respective section plane, whilst the phase contrast and the dark-field images represent spatial distribution of refractive activity of the object and small angle scattering (caused by micro structures in the object), respectively.
• Each of these images may have diagnostic value for a given diagnostic task at hand.
• the interferometer IF comprises in one embodiment two gratings Gl (sometimes referred to a phase grating) and G2 (sometimes referred to as analyzer grating) arranged at a specific distance to each other.
• G2 is an absorber grating
• Gl is a phase or absorber grating.
• the two gratings are arranged downstream the examination region (in particular the object OB), so that, during the imaging, the two gratings are situated between the object and the detector. The examination region in this arrangement is then between X-ray source and the grating pack formed by the two gratings Gl and G2.
• a source grating GO (on which more below) arranged between focal spot FS of XR source and the object to increase the coherence of the emitted radiation.
• the described interferometric set up is known as Talbot (without GO grating) or Talbot-Lau (with GO grating) interferometer.
• the distance between GO and Gl and between Gl and G2 are specifically adjusted according to the Talbot-Lau set up that has been described elsewhere.
• the distances between GO and Gl and between Gl and G2 must be finely tuned to fit the requirements of Talbot distance which in turn is a function of the "pitch" (that is, the spatial period of the grating rulings) of the respective grating.
• Gl is configured as an absorber grating
• Gl is a phase grating, but with a non-rectangular cross section (non-binary grating). See for instance, A Yaroshenko et al in "Non-binary phase gratings for x-ray imaging with a compact Talbot interferometer", Optics Express, Vol 22, No 1 (2014), pp 548-556.
• inverse grating geometries are also envisaged herein where one of the two interferometer gratings (Gl) is positioned between the XR source and the object OB in the examination region whereas the other (G2) is between the examination region and the detector. Irrespective of the grating geometry used, assuming for a moment that there is no object OB present in the examination region the coherent radiation emerges on the far side of GO, interacts with the interferometer Gl, G2 to produce an interference fringe pattern, in particular, fringes of a Moire pattern, which can be detected at the detector D.
• the two gratings of the interferometer are slightly de-tuned (for instance by slightly tilting the two gratings Gl, G2 relative to each other).
• This Moire pattern which we will refer to herein the "reference fringe pattern” has a certain fixed reference phase, reference visibility and intensity, all of which are encoded by the reference fringe pattern.
• the reference pattern is solely the result of the interferometer's presence (for a given radiation density). In that sense it can be said these quantities, in particular the reference phase, is a property of the interferometer as such and it is therefore apt to say that the interferometer "has" said reference phase, said reference intensity and said reference visibility.
• the interference pattern induced by the presence of object OB can be understood as a perturbed version of the reference fringe pattern when there was no object present in the examination region.
• the reference data of the reference fringe pattern fp are usually acquired in calibration measurement also referred to as an "air scan”. The actual object measurements are then acquired in a second scan when the object to be imaged is present in the examination region.
• the perturbed reference fringe pattern can be processed by known reconstruction algorithm such as described Kohler et al in
• the source grating GO is mounted close to the x-ray source, for instance is integrated in an X-ray tube housing at the egress window of the x-ray source XR but at any rate this source grating structure GO is arranged between the x-ray source and the remaining gratings, in particular Gl .
• the source gating GO modifies the X-ray radiation that passes through it.
• the source grating GO as envisaged herein serves a dual purpose.
• grating GO acts to increases coherence of the x-ray radiation that passed through the grating, relative to the X- radiation as emitted by the source XR.
• grating structure GO is further configured to modulate the intensity or transmission profile of the x-ray radiation that emerges downstream the grating GO so as to conform to a shape of the object to be imaged OB or to a shape prototype of the object. More particularly, the grating structure GO operates similar to a bowtie filter used in existing CT x-ray scanners. In other words it is configured to ensure that the intensity of the radiation beam is reduced at portions of the beam where the expected path length through the object is short and to allow for a larger intensity where the expected path length is large. It has been found that an elliptic shape well represents the general overall path length characteristics of a human patient taken in cross section perpendicular to the patient's longitudinal axis.
• the intensity is then modulated inversely to a mean path length through the elliptic shape prototype (it is apt to speak of a "mean" path length as the path length through an elliptic shape changes during rotation).
• the intensity prolife caused by the grating GO has a local maximum or peak at about a central portion of an imaginary elliptic cross section of the subject OB, whilst the intensity profile decreases either side of said peak as shown in Figure 2.
• Figure 2 illustrates an equivalent manner of describing the intensity profile shape as envisaged herein and generated by grating GO for X- radiation passing through said grating GO.
• Intensity (vertical axis) downstream or "behind" said grating is graphed versus angular divergence a of rays of the beam XB from an optical axis (0°) of the imager IS.
• the angular divergence may correspond to a fan angle of the beam, but this is not limiting as the present disclosure is not limited to beam type such as fan beam. Beams of any divergent geometry such as cone beam are also envisaged herein. Even parallel beams are envisaged, in which case the divergence angle is replaced by perpendicular distance from the optical axis. It will be understood that the intensity profile may be measured along an arbitrary line behind the grating surface S.
• the bell shaped profile of Figure 2 should be understood purely qualitatively and admits a multitude of variations, all envisaged herein.
• a profile having (as in Figure 2) a single local maximum is envisaged as the preferred embodiment, this does not preclude other embodiments with intensity profiles having multiple maxima, depending on the cross-section profile of the object one wishes to image.
• a profile with multiple maxima may be called for.
• FIG. 3 shows in frontal view a CT scanner embodiment of the interferometric imaging system IS mainly envisaged herein.
• the rotation axis Z extends into the drawing plane in of Figure 3.
• the scanner IS in Figure 3 is of the 3 rd generation. In these types of scanners, the x-ray source XR and the detector D are arranged opposite each other across the examination region.
• X-ray source XR and detector DR are arranged in a moveable gantry MG that is moveably arranged in a fixed gantry FG to allow rotation of the x-ray source together with the detector around the examination region and hence around the patient.
• the examination region corresponds to the hole through the gantry FG, thus conferring to the imager IS the familiar "doughnut shape".
• Figure 3 is merely an exemplary embodiment as scanners of the 1 st , 2 nd and 4 th generation are not excluded herein in alternative embodiments.
• Figure 3 further shows the interferometer IF integrated into the CT scanner IS.
• the two gratings Gl and G2 are arranged at the required Talbot distance D before the detector D (not shown) whilst the additional grating structure GO is arranged at the x-ray source.
• the grating structure of the interferometer and/or the addition grating structure GO may be planar as in Figure 1 but are preferably curved as in Figure 3 to form partial surfaces of imaginary concentric cylinders centered about the focal spot of the X-ray source XR.
• grating GO this is arranged as an absorber grating, similar to the analyzer grating G2 (if any) of the interferometer IF.
• grating GO includes a plurality of in general elongate absorber elements AE or "bars" that are laid out and in a periodic pattern to form a surface S (planar or curved) where the incoming radiation emitted from x-ray source XR is received.
• the absorber elements are preferably formed from relatively high Z element such as lead, tungsten, gold or other to achieve good (that is, substantially complete) local absorption of the X-radiation.
• the inter-space-and-bars system allows increasing the spatial coherence of the x-ray radiation that emerges from the grating GO after passage of the incoming radiation through the grating GO.
• the grating GO radiation blocking bars and the inter-spaces act as a collimator that divides the beam into a plurality of virtual source lines that radiate together more coherently.
• the bar elements AE are configured to achieve, in particular, the intensity profile as per Figure 2.
• the intensities that can be measured behind the grating GO are becoming smaller towards edge portions El, E2.
• the intensity increases with distance away from the edge or edges E1,E2 of the grating surface S and, preferably, peaks at a center portion of the surface S of the grating.
• Figure 4 shows three embodiments of grating structure GO envisaged herein.
• Figure 4A)-C) affords respective plan views on grating GO as seen from the x-ray source XR.
• the desired intensity profile is achieved by corresponding modulation of a duty cycle of the grating structure GO.
• the duty cycle is a local property of the grating and can be expressed as the ratio between the width (that is, the spatial extent parallel to the surface) of a grating absorbing element AE versus the width (spatial extent parallel to the surface) of its neighboring inter-space.
• the duty cycle is usually expressed as a number, and the smaller the number is, the wider the absorber elements relative to the width of the inter-space.
• the duty cycle in Figure 4A varies with distance a (eg, fan angle) from the center portion surface S and hence with distance from the optical axis. In particular, the duty cycle decreases from the center portion towards the edge portions El and E2.
• a monotonic decrease of the duty cycle form the center towards edges El, E2 is preferable but alternative embodiments are also envisaged where the duty cycle does not decrease monotonically but rather remains constant sectionwise along the surface.
• a duty cycle profile may be defined as a curve formed from local duty cycles measured locally at sample points on the grating along an arbitrary line (eg, center line) that extends on the surface S, not necessarily perpendicular to the direction in which the bars run. This duty cycle profile has then a local maximum located away from the edges El, E2, preferably at a center portion of the gating surface.
• the duty cycle variation is achieved by having the bar elements increase in thickness measured in a direction perpendicular to the optical axis or parallel to the surface. Whilst the thickness of each absorber element AE in Figure 4A) is constant for any given absorber element AE, this thickness decreases for absorber elements AE away from the center of the surface of the grating. In other words, the further away from the center, the thicker the bars are. As further illustrated in Figure 4A), in addition to the thickness of the absorber elements increasing with the distance from the surface S center portion, reciprocal thereto, a thickness of the inter-space distance decreases.
• the thickness of the absorber elements (perpendicular to the optical axis) that changes with distance from the center of grating surface S.
• the absorber elements have constriction in the central region of the surface S.
• the duty cycle varies across the course of the absorber elements whilst in Figure 4B the duty cycle varies along the course of the absorber elements.
• the embodiment in Figure 4C) is similar to that in Figure B but there the course of the absorber element is slanted relative to the rotation plane of the x-ray source of the imager IS.
• the absorber elements AE run either parallel (as in Figure 4A)) or perpendicular to (as in 4B)) to the rotation plane.
• the bars AE are oriented at about 45° relative to the plane of source XR rotation.
• any other angular inclination relative to the rotation plane is also envisaged.
• variants of Figure 4A,B) are also envisaged where the absorber elements run at an angle other than parallel or perpendicular to the rotation plane.
• the depth or height of the absorbers elements is modulated to achieve the desired bell curve shaped intensity profile.
• the depth of the absorber element is its respective extension in propagation direction of the x-radiation, or, said differently, its extension along the optical axis, is perpendicular to surface S. In plan view of Figure 4, the depth extends into the drawing plane.
• absorber elements situated towards (or proximal to) the edges El, E2 of the surface S have a greater depth than those away (distal) from the edge towards at the center portion of S.
• a monotonic increase of depth is preferable but this is not necessarily so in other embodiments where the depth of the absorber elements does not necessarily increase in a monotonic fashion from the center towards the edge portions.
• the absorber elements may be formed from different materials rather than being formed from the same material as envisaged in the embodiments so far discussed.
• one may form absorber elements at the edge from a material of higher density (high Z elements) than the material used for those absorber elements located at or towards the center of Surface S.
• the qualitative intensity profile as per Figure 2 is achieved by absorber material type or density modulation.
• the embodiments with depth or material type/density modulation may be combined with any of the Figure 4 embodiments. That is, although the absorber element depth in the Figure 4 embodiments and their variants are envisaged as constant, this may not be necessarily so as the depth modulation may be combined with any of the embodiments of Figure 4 or any of their variants.
• the absorber elements AE may be formed as explained from different materials (with different density). It will be understood that if the intensity profile has multiple maxima (as mentioned above), the duty cycle profile, depth profile etc will likewise have multiple extrema.
• the decreased duty cycle (as a function of ray angle a and hence distance from the grating surface S center) or the depth or material density modulation leads to a reduction of the x-ray flux.
• the spatial coherence of the outer rays is improved, which will lead to a better overall image quality.
• the dual purpose grating structure GO envisaged for intensity modulation and beam coherence enhancement may be manufactured by in a manifold ways, all envisaged herein.
• the grating structure Go is cut as a mask or stencil by laser cutting or other techniques from a single high Z material sheet such as a tungsten sheet or other.
• the grating structure is assembled from different parts rather than being formed monolithically.
• trenches are formed by etching or laser cutting or otherwise into a carrier substrate such as silicon or other.
• the trenches are set apart at the required distance to form the inter-space elements.
• These trenches are then filled with an alloy or a high Z material such as gold, tungsten, lead or other to manufacture the grating GO.
• the width and/or depth of the trenches and hence that of the absorber elements can be varied by using for instance a laser beam of a different width or by running a laser beam of constant width multiple times (with relative off-set) across the substrate material to cut the trenches with variable thickness to achieve the desired modulation.
• the grating structure GO has been assumed as planar this is not to restrict other embodiments that are curved as indicated in Figure 3. All of the above discussed grating embodiments in Figure 4 and thereafter can be combined with curved gratings.
• the curvature of the grating GO (and that of Gl and G2) allows focusing the gratings to the focal spot FS of the imager. Shading effects can be reduced and this allows using the available radiation more efficiently.
• the purpose of the intensity profile modulation was to account for different path lengths through the object to be imaged OB.
• the proposed grating GO is configured to compensate for the Heel effect observed in X-ray tubes.
• the duty cycle, absorber bar material and absorber depth etc are so configured that a decreasing intensity profile is measurable behind the grating along the Z-axis (rotation axis) of the rotational X-ray imaging system.
• the intensity profile decreases monotonically, such as linearly. This can be done by modulating the duty cycle, absorber beam depth, etc as explained above in relation to Figure 4.
• the Heel effect describes the situation where the X-ray beam XB generated by the X-ray source has a non-uniform intensity throughout its cross-section. That is, intensity is lost as a consequence of the way the X-ray beam is generated in the source XR. Loss of intensity is a function of the angle between the emitted rays of the beam XB and the anode surface. Specifically, rays inclined towards the anode already experience intensity loss because of intervening anode material. This effect is less pronounced or even absent for rays that are inclined away from the anode surface (and towards the cathode).
• the Heel effect will depend how exactly the XR source is mounted in the imaging system.
• the above mentioned embodiment in terms of the z-axis is merely one embodiment.
• Figure 5 shows a grating GO according to one embodiment which is configured to i) improve coherence, ii) to compensate for different object cross-sections (as in Figure 4) and iii) to compensate for the Heel effect.
• the Z- axis runs parallel to the plane of the drawing.
• the grating GO integrates bow- tie functionality (thanks to the, in the view as per Figure 5, horizontal modulation) and Heel compensator functionality (thanks for the, in the view as per Figure, vertical modulation).
• the grating may be formed to account only for the Heel effect in which case there is no modulation in horizontal direction. Other or additional physical or technical effects may also be accounted for by compensation or otherwise, either singly or in combination.
• the duty cycle is in general in the range of 30-50%.
• Another specification is the "pitch”, that is, the spatial period of the absorber elements. This period is typically in the order of 10-100 ⁇ .
• the aspect ratio describes the ratio between the height/depth of the respective absorber elements and the distance between two neighboring absorber elements (that is, the inter-spaces). Typical aspect ratios are in the order of 30-50 but this is exemplary and depends on the design energy.
• the design energy is the energy at which the fringe pattern has maximum visibility, with visibility being an experimentally definable interferometric quantity expressed in term of intensity ratios.
• Each interferometric set up is in general adjusted to a certain design energy or at least to certain design energy bandwidth around a design energy value. Examples for suitable design energies are for instance 25 keV or 50 keV but these numbers are purely exemplary.
• Distance do (or Talbot distance) is the distance of a path along the optical axis of the imaging system between grating Gi and grating G 2 and distance k is the distance between the source grating Go and phase grating Gi.

Landscapes

• Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
• Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
• Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
• Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
• High Energy & Nuclear Physics (AREA)
• Medical Informatics (AREA)
• Optics & Photonics (AREA)
• General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
• Spectroscopy & Molecular Physics (AREA)
• Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
• General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
• Biomedical Technology (AREA)
• Pathology (AREA)
• Molecular Biology (AREA)
• Surgery (AREA)
• Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
• Radiology & Medical Imaging (AREA)
• Public Health (AREA)
• Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
• Biophysics (AREA)
• General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
• Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
• Toxicology (AREA)
• Apparatus For Radiation Diagnosis (AREA)
• Analysing Materials By The Use Of Radiation (AREA)

Priority Applications (4)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Publications (1)

Family

ID=56888983

Family Applications (1)

Country Status (5)

Cited By (1)

Families Citing this family (24)

Citations (5)

Family Cites Families (20)

• 2017
  • 2017-08-30 WO PCT/EP2017/071806 patent/WO2018046377A1/en not_active Ceased
  • 2017-08-30 EP EP17758190.7A patent/EP3509492B1/en not_active Not-in-force
  • 2017-08-30 US US16/329,807 patent/US10835193B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
  • 2017-08-30 CN CN201780055442.8A patent/CN109688930A/zh active Pending
  • 2017-08-30 JP JP2019512893A patent/JP7044764B6/ja not_active Expired - Fee Related

Patent Citations (5)

Non-Patent Citations (2)

Also Published As

Similar Documents

Legal Events