WO2018030340A1 - Care plan creation assistance system, storage medium, care plan creation assistance method, and care plan creation assistance program - Google Patents

Care plan creation assistance system, storage medium, care plan creation assistance method, and care plan creation assistance program Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2018030340A1
WO2018030340A1 PCT/JP2017/028587 JP2017028587W WO2018030340A1 WO 2018030340 A1 WO2018030340 A1 WO 2018030340A1 JP 2017028587 W JP2017028587 W JP 2017028587W WO 2018030340 A1 WO2018030340 A1 WO 2018030340A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
care
care plan
plan
output
probability
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/JP2017/028587
Other languages
French (fr)
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
茂雄 岡本
竜哉 関根
瑛子 篠澤
浜田 宏一
Original Assignee
セントケア・ホールディング株式会社
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by セントケア・ホールディング株式会社 filed Critical セントケア・ホールディング株式会社
Priority to CN201780048927.4A priority Critical patent/CN109564780B/en
Priority to JP2018533450A priority patent/JP7004655B2/en
Publication of WO2018030340A1 publication Critical patent/WO2018030340A1/en

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G16INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
    • G16HHEALTHCARE INFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE HANDLING OR PROCESSING OF MEDICAL OR HEALTHCARE DATA
    • G16H40/00ICT specially adapted for the management or administration of healthcare resources or facilities; ICT specially adapted for the management or operation of medical equipment or devices
    • G16H40/20ICT specially adapted for the management or administration of healthcare resources or facilities; ICT specially adapted for the management or operation of medical equipment or devices for the management or administration of healthcare resources or facilities, e.g. managing hospital staff or surgery rooms
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00Systems or methods specially adapted for specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/10Services
    • G06Q50/22Social work

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a care plan creation support system, a storage medium, a care plan creation support method, and a care plan creation support program.
  • a care plan for a supporter who needs care or assistance from another person in daily life, including bathing, excretion, and meals, or a care recipient (hereinafter collectively referred to as “caregiver”) is called a care plan.
  • the care plan includes a service plan schedule that defines specific contents of the care service and the date and time when the care service is provided.
  • the care plan is usually prepared by taking care benefits determined by the care manager according to the degree of care required that is certified based on the situation of the care recipient.
  • the nursing care insurer who has received the application causes the authorized investigator of the accredited research organization to investigate the physical condition of the applicant.
  • the survey is performed by selecting a preset item from two or more options that matches the applicant's situation, or inputting an item in text. This survey result is input to a computer or the like and used for primary determination of the degree of care required by a predetermined calculation method.
  • the long-term care insurer causes the long-term care certification examination committee, which is the installation organization, to certify the applicant's degree of long-term care based on the above primary determination, other special instructions for the care recipient, and the opinion of the attending physician.
  • the upper limit of the nursing care benefit to the care recipient is determined according to the degree of nursing care required.
  • the care manager After the upper limit of nursing care benefits is determined, the care manager creates a care plan suitable for the care recipient in consideration of the above nursing benefits. At this time, the care manager or the person entrusted with the care manager newly evaluates the condition of the care recipient at the time of preparing the care plan (hereinafter also simply referred to as “assessment”). Thereafter, the care manager creates the care plan based on the current status of the cared person (hereinafter, also simply referred to as “assessment result”).
  • Patent Documents 1 to 6 include assessments for the purpose of streamlining care plan creation and homogenizing care plans that are provided by suppressing the deterioration of the quality of care plans due to the ability of care managers.
  • a method for supporting the creation of a care plan from the results and a system for implementing the method have been proposed.
  • the number of care recipients is increasing due to the recent declining birthrate and aging population.
  • the degree of care required is improved by nursing
  • the number of care recipients with a high degree of care required is increasing as the number of care recipients increases.
  • Some of the funds required for long-term care benefits are covered by long-term care benefit costs, which are a type of social security costs.
  • long-term care benefit costs are a type of social security costs.
  • care benefit costs are increasing year by year due to an increase in the number of care recipients and an increase in the number of care recipients with a high degree of care required.
  • the population of so-called elderly people over the age of 65 in Japan is about 36.5 million (population of 3.3) in 2015, compared to about 34 million in 2015 (1 in 3.7).
  • the number of nursing care benefits is expected to be 21 trillion yen in 2025, compared to 10.1 trillion yen in 2015.
  • JP 11-149499 A Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2000-3404 JP 2000-3391 A JP 2001-101279 A JP 2006-146410 A JP 2010-205263 A
  • the care plan is devised to improve the level of care recipients, the increase in the number of care recipients with high levels of care can be suppressed.
  • care plans that have improved the level of care required, and even if these examples are applied to other care recipients in different situations, improvement of the level of care required is also expected. It is not always possible.
  • Patent Documents 1 to 6 describe that the purpose of improving the efficiency of care plan creation and homogenization of the created care plan can be achieved by having the computer assist the creation of the care plan.
  • a system that supports the creation of a care plan is also simply referred to as a “care plan creation support system.”
  • the care plan creation support system is a system that can output information useful for the creation of a care plan by a care manager.
  • the present invention has been made in view of the above-mentioned problems, and by generating a recommended care plan that can be expected to improve the degree of care required according to the situation of each individual care recipient, creation of a care plan
  • the purpose is to provide a care plan creation support system capable of supporting the above.
  • the present invention also provides a storage medium that can be used in the system, a care plan creation support method that can be implemented using the system, and a care plan creation support program that can execute the method. And its purpose.
  • a care receiver uses a care plan output model that outputs, for each care plan, the probability that the degree of care required improves with respect to the input of the status of the care recipient. For each care plan, a probability that the degree of care required of the care recipient is improved is input for each care plan, and a care plan with a higher probability is output as a recommended care plan.
  • Another embodiment of the present invention for solving the above-described problem is a storage medium connectable to the care plan creation support system, the information for identifying the care recipient, the subject of the care recipient.
  • the situation of the caregiver, the care plan used for the cared person, and the degree of care required of the cared person after the care is performed using the care plan, or the care is performed using the care plan.
  • the present invention relates to a storage medium for storing a record associated with a change in the degree of care required as a result of the change.
  • another embodiment of the present invention for solving the above-described problems uses a care plan output model that outputs, for each care plan, the probability that the degree of care required improves with respect to the input of the situation of the care recipient.
  • the calculated accuracy So as to approach, the step of changing the care plan output assistance model relates care plan preparation supporting method comprising.
  • another embodiment of the present invention for solving the above-described problem is a care plan output model for outputting, for each care plan, the probability that the degree of care required improves with respect to the input of the status of the care recipient.
  • the probability of improvement in the degree of care required of the care recipient is obtained for each care plan with respect to the input of the care recipient status of the care recipient, and a care plan with a higher probability of acquisition is recommended.
  • a process of outputting as a care plan to be performed, a process of determining whether or not the degree of care required of the care receiver after providing the output care plan to the care receiver has improved, and a result of the determination A process for newly calculating a probability that the degree of care required of the care recipient is improved by providing the output care plan, and the output care plan in response to the input of the situation of the care recipient Acquired Rate is closer to the calculated probability, and the process for changing the care plan output assistance model relates care plan creation support program for execution.
  • the present invention provides a care plan creation support system that can support the creation of a care plan by outputting a recommended care plan that can be expected to improve the degree of care required according to the situation of each individual care recipient. Is done.
  • the present invention also provides a storage medium that can be used in the system, a care plan creation support method that can be implemented using the system, and a care plan creation support program that can execute the method.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing an example of the configuration of a care plan creation support system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 2 is a flowchart illustrating an example of processing by the care plan creation support system.
  • FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing specific processing included in the care plan output (step S100).
  • FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram illustrating the configuration of the intermediate unit according to the first embodiment.
  • FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing specific processes included in the learning process (step S200).
  • FIG. 6 is a flowchart showing the configuration of a care plan creation support system according to another embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 7 is a block diagram showing a configuration of a care plan creation support system according to still another embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 8 is a block diagram showing a configuration of a care plan creation support system according to still another embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating an example of a configuration of a care plan creation support system 100 according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • the care plan creation support system 100 includes a care plan output unit 110 that functions as a processing unit, a determination unit 120, a probability calculation unit 130, a process change unit 140, a storage unit 150 that functions as a storage medium, and a display.
  • Unit 160 and an input unit 170 are examples of input unit 170.
  • the care plan creation support system 100 includes, for example, a CPU (Central Processing Unit) as a processor, a storage medium such as a ROM (Read Only Memory) storing a control program, and a RAM (Random Access Memory).
  • a CPU Central Processing Unit
  • ROM Read Only Memory
  • RAM Random Access Memory
  • a working memory and a communication circuit are provided.
  • the function of each processing unit described above is realized by the CPU executing a control program (corresponding to the “care plan creation support program” of the present invention).
  • At least a part of a program for executing processing by the care plan output unit, the determination unit, the probability calculation unit, and the processing change unit is stored in a server, but as in a fourth embodiment to be described later
  • At least a part of the program may be stored in a cloud server.
  • the care plan output unit 110 When the care plan output unit 110 provides care to the cared person using a preset care plan (hereinafter also simply referred to as “provided the care plan”), the degree of care required of the cared person is determined. It is a processing unit that acquires the improvement probability for each care plan set in advance and outputs the care plan having the higher acquired probability as a recommended care plan. For example, the care plan output unit 110 inputs the care recipient status of the care recipient to a probabilistic inference model (hereinafter simply referred to as “care plan output support model”), so that care is set in advance. A probability that the degree of care required of the care receiver is improved when the plan is provided is acquired.
  • a probabilistic inference model hereinafter simply referred to as “care plan output support model”
  • the probabilistic inference model is an inference value (in this embodiment, the degree of care required is improved in this embodiment) by performing a predetermined operation on the input value.
  • This is an inference model that outputs a probability of Thereafter, the care plan output unit 110 refers to the probability that the degree of care required that is output for each care plan is improved, for example, by selecting a care plan that has a higher probability that the degree of care required improves, It is a processing unit that outputs a care plan recommended for the care recipient.
  • the determination unit 120 is a processing unit that determines whether the current level of care required of the care recipient has improved over the previous level of care required of the care recipient. For example, the determination unit 120 determines whether or not the care-required level of the cared person has improved after the cared person has been cared for using the care plan output from the care plan output unit 110. Note that the determination unit 120 may determine whether or not the care-required level of the cared person has improved after the cared person has been cared for using a care plan created separately by the care manager.
  • the probability calculation unit 130 uses the result of determination by the determination unit 120 to receive a caregiver when care is performed according to the preset care plan (in particular, the care plan output by the care plan output 110). It is a processing part which newly calculates the probability that the degree of care required will improve.
  • the probability calculation unit 130 includes the total number of records having the same care plan and the care plan used for care among the records stored in the storage unit 150, and the degree of care required included in the record. The number of records determined to be improved is calculated, the ratio of the number of records determined to have improved the degree of care required to the total number of records is calculated, and the calculated ratio It is assumed that the degree of care required of the person will improve.
  • the process change unit 140 includes a care plan created from the past situation of the care recipient and the past situation of the care recipient and provided to the care recipient in the past, and a result of determination by the determination unit 120. Is a processing unit that changes the care plan output support model using the combination of and as teacher data. Specifically, the processing change unit 140 has a combination of the situation of the care recipient and the care plan that has the same probability of being acquired for a care plan when the care recipient status is input to the care plan output unit 110. The care plan output support model is changed so as to approach the probability calculated by the probability calculation unit 130.
  • the care plan creation support system 100 is characterized in that the care plan output support model is changed by a learning process. According to the learning process, it is possible to change the care plan output support model so that features included in past data can be mechanically extracted and similar results are output for inputs having similar features. It is. Therefore, it is determined whether the degree of care required has improved for each care plan provided for the situation of a care recipient, and these data (care recipient status, care plan, and each care plan The care plan output support model is changed so that a care plan with a high probability of improving the degree of care required can be output even in situations with similar characteristics by performing the learning process using the above determination result) it can.
  • the care plan creation support system 100 has a higher probability that even after individual caregivers having various situations will improve after the care is required according to the characteristics of the situation of the care recipient. Can be output as a recommended care plan.
  • the accuracy of outputting a care plan with a higher probability of improving the degree of care required for the situation of any care recipient will increase. .
  • the storage unit 150 is a storage medium that can be written and read.
  • the storage unit 150 can be a storage medium such as a database.
  • care recipient information in the storage unit 150, care recipient information, date or date and time, the situation of the care recipient, a care plan, the degree of care required of the care recipient, and care required after care has been performed using the care plan.
  • a record in which the degree or change in the degree of care required as a result of providing the care plan is associated is stored.
  • a unique record number may be given to the record.
  • the above date or date is the date or date when the care recipient was assessed.
  • the care recipient information is information for uniquely identifying a care recipient who can receive care, and may include an ID number unique to the care recipient, the name, gender and date of birth of the care recipient. .
  • the situation of the care recipient can be the assessment result obtained by the care manager or the person entrusted with the care to the care recipient. Moreover, as the situation of the care recipient, the contents described in the doctor's opinion such as the survey result on the service usage status, the survey result on the special notes, the disease name, etc. may be used.
  • the care plan is a care plan prepared by the care manager based on the situation of the care recipient and provided to the care recipient.
  • the degree of care required of the care recipient is the degree of care required of the care recipient certified by the Care Certification Committee when the care plan was created.
  • the degree of long-term care required after care has been performed using the above care plan is that the care recipient needs to be re-certified by the Care Certification Committee after providing the care plan to the same care recipient. Degree.
  • the change in the degree of care required is data that can be tabulated and is determined by determination by the determination unit 120. For example, “1” is recorded for a record that includes a care plan that is determined to have improved the degree of care required, and “0” is stored for a record that includes a care plan that has not been improved for the level of care required. Is granted.
  • the storage unit 150 stores in advance the number of records that can be calculated by the probability calculation unit 130 at the time of initial setting.
  • the display unit 160 is a display device such as a smartphone, a PC, or a TV carried by the care manager, and displays a recommended care plan according to a display control signal input from the care plan output unit 110.
  • the display unit 160 can be used by the care manager who has viewed the displayed care plan to create a care plan provided to the care recipient.
  • the input unit 170 includes various operation keys such as a numeric keypad and a start key, an audio reception unit, or a video reception unit such as a camera, receives various input operations by a user, generates input data, and generates the generated input Data is output to the care plan output unit 110 and the determination unit 120.
  • the input unit 170 is a variety of signal receiving devices configured to receive input data electrically output from other media such as a reception connector and output the input data to the care plan output unit 110 and the determination unit 120. May be.
  • the input data output from the input unit 170 is output to the care plan output unit 110 to be used for the output of the care plan, and is also output to the determination unit 120 for output of the care plan by the probability calculation unit 130 and the processing change unit 140. Used to change support model.
  • FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing an example of processing by the care plan creation support system 100.
  • the care plan creation support system 100 receives data related to the situation of the care recipient and outputs a recommended care plan for the care recipient based on a predetermined probabilistic inference model (step S100). Then, the care plan creation support system 100 performs a learning process for changing the probabilistic reasoning model so that a care plan with a higher probability of improving the degree of care required of the care recipient can be output (step S200).
  • FIG. 2 shows a mode in which the learning process (step S200) is performed after the care plan output (step S100), but the care plan output (step S100) is performed after the learning process (step S200).
  • the care plan output (step S100) and the learning process (step S200) may be performed simultaneously in parallel.
  • step S100 input data used for processing by the care plan creation support system 100
  • learning processing step S200
  • the input data is information related to the assessment performed on the cared person in order to create a new care plan.
  • the care receiver information included in the input data and the care receiver information stored in the storage unit 150 are preferably composed of only the same items, but the determination unit 120 can determine the same care recipient. As long as there are some, only some items may overlap.
  • the situation of the care recipient is the one that best suits the situation of the care recipient from two or more choices of "Yes (Y)” or "No (N)” for multiple survey items. Can be the result of selecting.
  • the types of the plurality of survey items and options are not particularly limited, and can be arbitrarily determined.
  • survey items and options defined for use in certification of the degree of care required can be used.
  • the survey for accreditation of the degree of care required includes general surveys and basic surveys, either or both of which may be used, and basic survey items and options (74 items as of July 2015) You may use only. At this time, when the certification standard for the degree of care required is changed, it is preferable that the survey items and options can be changed accordingly.
  • the contents of the result of the general survey and the opinion of the attending physician may be input as text.
  • the survey items used to determine the level of care required as of July 2015 include “paralysis of left upper limb (selection from“ Yes ”and“ No ”)” and “turn over (“ Do not grab ”),“ Items related to the caregiver's physical function / living behavior, such as “Can be grasped by something” and “Cannot do”), “Movement (“ Not assisted ”,“ Need to watch, ”etc.),“ One Items related to the caregiver's life function, such as “Departmental assistance is required” and “All assistance is required”), “Communication of intention” (“Study subject can communicate intention to others”, “Occasionally The choice of “can communicate”, “can hardly communicate” and “can't communicate”) and “speak birth date and age (selection from“ capable ”and“ impossible ”) Items involved, “Stolen things etc.
  • Items related to mental / behavioral disorders of care recipients such as “become damaging (choose from“ No ”,“ Occasionally ”and“ Yes ”),“ Management of money (“Unreleased”, “One” Select from “partially released” and “all released”) or “daily decision-making” (“can be done in special cases”), “can be done except in special cases”, “daily” Related to adaptation to social life, such as “selection from“ difficult ”and“ impossible ”), and medical treatment received in the past 14 days, such as“ dialysis (selection from “with” and “without”) It consists of 74 items such as items. These items may be used as they are, or some items may be selected and used, and other items may be arbitrarily registered and used.
  • the situation of the cared person at this time is preferably composed of survey items used during the evaluation (monitoring) of the daily life action (ADL) and the instrumental daily life action (IADL) performed on the cared person.
  • ADL daily life action
  • IADL instrumental daily life action
  • the evaluation items used in the evaluation methods such as the Barcel index, the performance status defined by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG), and the functional independence evaluation table (FIM) should be used. Can do.
  • Step S100 Output of care plan
  • the care plan output unit 110 inputs the input status of the care recipient into the care plan output support model, and acquires the probability that the degree of care required improves for each care plan. To do. Thereafter, the care plan output unit 110 outputs a care plan recommended to the care recipient from the probability that the degree of care required output for each care plan is improved, and displays the care plan on the display unit 160.
  • the above care plan includes at least nursing care services.
  • the care service is a specific content of the care service provided to the care recipient.
  • the care service may be selected from those that can be provided by a care provider.
  • the care plan may include a service plan schedule that defines the date and time for providing the care service in addition to the specific content of the care service.
  • FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing specific processing included in the care plan output (step S100).
  • the care plan output unit 110 inputs the status of the care recipient into the care plan output support model, and acquires the probability that the degree of care required improves for each care plan (step S310). Thereafter, the care plan output unit 110 outputs one or a plurality of care plans that have a high probability of improving the degree of care required as recommended care plans (step S320). For example, the care plan output unit 110 outputs a care plan with a high output probability (for example, a care plan with the highest probability or a care plan corresponding to the 10th output unit with the probability) as a recommended care plan. To do.
  • a care plan with a high output probability for example, a care plan with the highest probability or a care plan corresponding to the 10th output unit with the probability
  • the care plan output unit 110 outputs the output care plan as a display control signal to the display unit 160, and displays the care plan on the display unit 160 (step S330).
  • the process returns to step S310, and the care plan output unit 110 causes the display unit 160 to display the modified care plan.
  • the care plan output unit 110 newly records in the storage unit 150 the care receiver information, date or date / time, the care receiver status and the level of care required, and the output or changed care plan included in the input data. (Step S340).
  • the care plan output support model described above is a probabilistic inference model that outputs a predetermined inference value for each type of care plan set in advance with respect to the input of the status of the care recipient. It is configured to be changeable.
  • the inference value is a probability that the degree of care required of the cared person is improved when each care plan is provided to the cared person having the input status.
  • the care plan output support model includes, for example, a neural network, a Boltzmann machine, and a decision tree.
  • the configuration of the care plan output support model when the care plan output support model includes a neural network will be exemplified.
  • the neural network (hereinafter also simply referred to as “plan output network”) includes an input layer composed of a plurality of input units, one or a plurality of intermediate layers each composed of a plurality of intermediate units, and an output composed of a plurality of output units.
  • the plan output network is a multi-layer neural network having N layers having a plurality of intermediate layers from the input layer side to the output layer side, and the intermediate unit of each intermediate layer is the middle of the previous layer.
  • Information received from one or more intermediate units (or input units) included in the layer is output to one or more intermediate units (or output units) included in the intermediate layer of the next layer.
  • the number (N) of layers included in the plan output network may be three or more, and can be arbitrarily determined according to the number of assessment items.
  • the number (N) of the layers may be 3 or more and 25 or less, preferably 5 or more and 20 or less, and more preferably 8 or more and 16 or less.
  • the input unit corresponds to one of the plurality of survey items and outputs an input value corresponding to each option of the survey item as it is to one or a plurality of intermediate units.
  • the intermediate unit receives an output from one or a plurality of intermediate units (or one or a plurality of input units included in the input layer) of the intermediate layer of the previous layer, and receives any or a plurality of the intermediate layers of the next layer Output to the intermediate unit (or the output unit of the output layer).
  • the intermediate layer may be a fully connected layer in which the intermediate unit included in the intermediate layer is combined with all the intermediate units (or input units) in the previous layer, or the intermediate unit included in the intermediate layer is the intermediate unit in the previous layer. It may be a convolutional layer that combines only with a part of (or the input unit).
  • the intermediate unit Z in the k-th layer receives the outputs w1, w2, w3, and w4 from the intermediate unit (four in the figure) in the k-1th layer. Thereafter, as shown in the equation (1), the intermediate unit Z obtains a value u1 obtained by further adding a predetermined bias b to a sum of values obtained by multiplying each output by a predetermined weight y1, y2, y3, and y4. calculate. Note that the weight and bias can be changed by the process changing unit 140.
  • u1 w1 * y1 + w2 * y2 + w3 * y3 + w4 * y4 + b (1)
  • the intermediate unit further outputs a value z1 obtained by applying a predetermined activation function f to u1 to the intermediate unit (or output unit) of the (k + 1) th layer.
  • the type of the activation function f is not particularly limited, and a sigmoid function, a logistic function, a normalized linear function (Rectified Linear Unit: ReLU), a softmax function, and the like can be used.
  • the activation function f of the intermediate unit is preferably ReLu from the viewpoint of increasing the output accuracy and increasing the processing speed.
  • Each output unit receives the output from one or a plurality of (N-1) th intermediate units, and the value obtained by performing the same processing as that of the intermediate unit is the value of the cared person input to the input layer. Output as an inference value for the situation (probability of improving the degree of care required).
  • the activation function f of the output unit has a sum of inference values output from all the output units of 1, and the output inference values can be used as they are in a probability distribution. Function is preferred.
  • each of the output units is associated with a care plan that can be output by a preset care plan output unit 110 on a one-to-one basis.
  • the inference value output by each of the output units is regarded as a probability that the degree of care required of the cared person having the above situation is improved when each care plan is provided. Therefore, the care plan output unit 110 can select and output a care plan corresponding to an output unit having a larger inference value as a care plan recommended for a care recipient having the above situation.
  • the weights and biases of each unit in the intermediate layer and output layer are set as teacher data based on a combination of a past care recipient status and a care plan selected by the care manager for the care recipient at the time of initial setting. It is preferable to set in advance by a learning process by the process changing unit 140.
  • Step S200 Learning process
  • the determination unit 120, the probability calculation unit 130, and the process change unit 140 change the above-described care plan output support model through the learning process.
  • the determination unit 120 determines whether or not the degree of care required included in the input data has improved from the past degree of care required of the same care recipient registered in the storage unit 150.
  • the probability calculation unit 130 determines, for any combination of the care recipient status and the care plan included in the storage unit 150, from the determination result, to the care recipient having the care recipient status that constitutes the combination.
  • the probability that the degree of care required improves when the care plan is provided is calculated.
  • the process changing unit 140 changes the care plan output support model using the situation and care plan of the cared person constituting the combination and the probability that the degree of care required for the combination is improved as teacher data. For example, when the process changer 140 inputs the care recipient status to the neural network, the inference value output from each output unit provides a care plan corresponding to the output unit. The weight and bias values of each intermediate unit and output unit are changed so as to approach the value calculated as the probability that the degree of care improves.
  • the past care-required degree, the past care recipient status and the past care plan are the date or date of the input data among the records of the same care recipient registered in the storage unit 150.
  • the degree of care required, the status of the care recipient, and the care plan included in the record at the time of going back to the past for a predetermined period is included in a record in which the date or date registered in the assessment date or date included in the record is a point in time that is a predetermined period after the assessment date or date included in the input data.
  • the items are the above-mentioned degree of care required, the past care plan, and the past care recipient status.
  • the predetermined period can be a period from the creation of a care plan to the re-creation of a care plan, for example, six months.
  • FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing specific processing included in the learning processing (step S200).
  • the determination unit 120 compares the care receiver information included in the input data with the care receiver information registered in the storage unit 150, and the record of the care receiver same as the input data is registered in the storage unit 150. It is determined whether or not (step S510).
  • step S510 when records of the same cared person are registered (step S510: YES), the determination unit 120 performs the above after care is performed using a past care plan for the cared person.
  • a change in the degree of care required of the care recipient (whether or not the degree of care required has been improved) is evaluated (step S520).
  • the determination unit 120 is included in the care recipient's degree of care required (current care requirement level) included in the input data and in the past records of the same care recipient registered in the storage unit 150. It is determined whether or not the current level of care required has improved (becomes lower) than the past level of need for care.
  • step S510: NO the input data cannot be used for the learning process, so the process in FIG. 5 ends.
  • the level of long-term care required in Japan consists of 7 levels: Need 1 Need, Need 2 Need 1, Need 1 Need 2, Need 3 Need 4, Need 4 Need 5 and Need 5, Need For Care
  • the degree of care required is low, and the latter is judged to be high. Therefore, when the degree of care required shifts from the latter classification to the former classification, for example, the degree of care required in the past for a care recipient is “care required 3”, but the degree of care required included in the input data is “required care required”. When it is “care 2”, it is determined that the degree of care required of the care recipient has improved.
  • This determination result is based on the item “change in the degree of care required” in the record of the same care recipient included in the storage unit 150 and including the past care recipient status and the past care plan used for the evaluation. Is registered as a value of “” (step S530).
  • the probability calculation unit 130 counts the number of records in which the value of the item “change in the degree of care required” is newly registered in the storage unit 150 (step S540). As a result, when it is determined that a predetermined number or more of data has been newly registered (step S540: YES), the probability calculation unit 130 obtains a probability that the degree of care required of the care recipient is improved (step S550). For example, the probability calculation unit 130 includes the total number of records having the same care plan and the care plan used for care among the records stored in the storage medium 150, and the degree of care required included in the record. The number of records determined to have improved is obtained, and the ratio of the number of records determined to have improved the degree of care required to the total number of records is calculated. If it is not determined that a predetermined number or more of data has been newly registered (step S540: NO), the processing in FIG. 5 ends.
  • the process changing unit 140 performs a learning process to change the care plan output support model (step S560).
  • the processing change unit 140 may cause the inference value output from the output unit corresponding to the care plan to be the obtained ratio when the care receiver status is input to the above-described plan output network. , Change the above plan output network.
  • the process changing unit 140 obtains a difference (error) between the inferred value output by the plan output network when the care recipient status is input and the calculated ratio.
  • the process changing unit 140 reduces the weights and biases of any of the intermediate units and output units of the plan output network (in the above-described example of FIG. 4, y1, y2, y3) so that the error is reduced.
  • Y4 and b) change one or more values.
  • the method of changing the evaluation network and the plan output network is not particularly limited, and a known method such as a gradient descent method using an error back propagation method can be used.
  • a known method such as a gradient descent method using an error back propagation method
  • the type of error function used to represent the error in the gradient descent method is not particularly limited, and publicly known expressions such as a square error and a cross entropy expression can be used.
  • the care plan output by the care plan output unit 110 through the process including the execution of the care plan output support model including the plan output network has a high probability that the degree of care required of the care recipient is improved. It will be a thing.
  • the above-described combination having a high probability of improving the degree of care required is configured for a cared person having any cared person's situation.
  • a care plan can be selected and provided to the care recipient.
  • One of the factors that hindered the improvement of the quality of the created care plan in the conventional care plan creation method is whether there is liveliness of the care recipient who was provided with the care plan included in the care plan. It is mentioned that the quality of selection of the care plan was evaluated based on the judgment criteria that are easily changed depending on the subjectivity of the observer. On the other hand, if the care plan is evaluated according to an evaluation criterion that can objectively determine whether or not the degree of care required is improved, the subjectivity of the observer that affects the evaluation of the care plan can be eliminated as much as possible. .
  • the care plan output support model is configured to include a multi-layer neural network as in this embodiment, when a specific care plan is provided among the survey items included in the status of the care recipient input
  • the care plan output support model can be changed so that the probability that the specific care plan is output will be higher when an item having a characteristic that the degree of care required is likely to be improved is input. . Therefore, even when a situation of a similar cared person having a survey item having the above characteristics is input, since the specific care plan is output with high probability, the care plan output unit 110 is not included in the teacher data. It is possible to output a care plan with a high probability that the degree of care required will improve even for the situation of a care recipient (or the number of data is small).
  • FIG. 6 is a flowchart showing a specific process included in the learning process (step S200) in another embodiment of the present invention.
  • This embodiment is different from the first embodiment in that a care plan evaluation model which is a probabilistic inference model different from the care plan output support model is used for changing the care plan output support model by the learning process. Since other processes and the system configuration are the same as those in the first embodiment, a duplicate description is omitted.
  • the care plan evaluation model is a probabilistic inference model that outputs the probability of improvement in the level of care required by the implementation of the care plan for the input of the combination of the situation of the care recipient and the care plan, and is changed by the learning process It is configured to be possible.
  • the care plan evaluation model includes, for example, a neural network, a Boltzmann machine, and a decision tree.
  • the care plan evaluation model includes a neural network (hereinafter also simply referred to as “evaluation network”)
  • the care plan evaluation model has an input layer composed of a plurality of input units, one or a plurality of intermediate layers each composed of a plurality of intermediate units, and an output layer composed of one output unit.
  • the evaluation network is a multi-layer neural network having N layers having a plurality of intermediate layers from the input layer side to the output layer side, and each intermediate layer has an intermediate unit of the previous layer.
  • the information received from one or more intermediate units (or input units) included in is output to one or more intermediate units (or output units) included in the next intermediate layer.
  • the number (N) of layers that the evaluation network has may be three or more, and can be arbitrarily determined according to the number of combinations of the situation of the care recipient and the care plan.
  • the number (N) of the layers may be 3 or more and 25 or less, preferably 5 or more and 20 or less, and more preferably 8 or more and 16 or less.
  • the evaluation network except that the input items to the input layer are a combination of the situation of the care recipient and the care plan, and the inference value output from the output layer is the probability that the degree of care required will improve for the above combination, It can be set as the structure similar to the plan output network mentioned above.
  • the probability calculation unit 130 determines that a sufficient amount of data has been newly registered in the storage unit 150 in step S540 described above (step S540: YES), and then records among the records stored in the storage medium 150. , Find the total number of records with the same care plan and care plan used for care, and the number of records included in the above records that have been determined that the level of care required has been improved. Then, the ratio of the number of records determined that the degree of care required has been improved is calculated (step S550). Thereafter, the process changing unit 140 changes the evaluation network so that the ratio is output when the combination is input to the care plan evaluation model (step S570).
  • the process change unit 140 obtains a difference (error) between the probability that the degree of care required output by the evaluation network improves when the combination is input and the calculated ratio. Next, the process changing unit 140 changes one or more values of the weight and bias of each of the intermediate units and output units of the evaluation network so that the error is reduced.
  • the processing change unit 140 performs the same processing as in the first embodiment, and the inference value output by each output unit when the situation of the care recipient is input to the plan output network is the situation of the care recipient. Then, the plan output network is changed so that the degree of care required output from the evaluation network is improved when the combination with the care plan corresponding to the output unit is input (step S560-2).
  • the method of changing the evaluation network and the plan output network is not particularly limited, and a known method such as a gradient descent method using an error back propagation method can be used.
  • a known method such as a gradient descent method using an error back propagation method
  • the type of error function used to represent the error in the gradient descent method is not particularly limited, and publicly known expressions such as a square error and a cross entropy expression can be used.
  • Embodiment 1 With this configuration, the probability that the degree of care required with higher accuracy than the “ratio of records with improved degree of care required” in Embodiment 1 is the target output when changing the care plan output support model Can be used as a value. Therefore, it is possible to make the recommended care plan output from the care plan output support model more likely to improve the degree of care required.
  • FIG. 7 is a block diagram showing a configuration of a care plan creation support system according to still another embodiment of the present invention.
  • the care plan creation support system 700 according to the present embodiment includes a care plan change unit 710 that changes the care plan displayed on the display unit 160.
  • the care plan changing unit 710 includes various operation keys such as a numeric keypad and a start key, an audio receiving unit, or a video receiving unit such as a camera, and accepts various input operations by the care manager for changing the output care plan.
  • the generated input data is transmitted to the care plan output unit 110.
  • the care plan output unit 110 receives input data and changes the output care plan.
  • 7 shows an example in which the care plan changing unit 710 is configured separately from the display unit 160.
  • the display unit 160 is configured such that the operation part is integrally formed on the display screen, such as a touch panel. Or may be configured to be connected to a hard key such as a button or a key and function as the care plan changing unit 710 at the same time.
  • the changed care plan is registered in the storage unit 150 in the same manner as in the first embodiment and the second embodiment.
  • the display unit 160 may be connected to a care provider's server and display information such as availability of the care service included in the output care plan and availability information.
  • the care manager can change the care plan from the display unit 160 when it is determined that reservation of the displayed care service cannot be made.
  • care plan changing unit 710 may be configured to connect to a care provider's server and to arrange care service by input from the touch panel or the hard key.
  • FIG. 8 is a block diagram showing a configuration of a care plan creation support system according to still another embodiment of the present invention.
  • the care plan creation support system 800 includes a cloud server 810 that is a virtualization server that cooperates with various devices via the Internet.
  • the cloud server 810 includes a program for executing processing by the care plan output unit 110, the determination unit 120, the probability calculation unit 130, and the process change unit 140 described above, and data stored in a storage medium such as the storage unit 150, and the like. A part or all of is saved.
  • the cloud server 810 is owned, managed, and operated by a management company that operates a nursing care business or a contractor that is commissioned by the management company (hereinafter also simply referred to as “management company etc. 830”).
  • the operating company or the like 830 accesses the cloud server 810 from one or more processing units 835 such as a PC that can be connected to the cloud server 810, and causes the processing unit 835 to execute the above-described processing.
  • the input unit 170 may be a device (for example, a smartphone, a PC, a TV, or the like) that can be connected to the Internet held by a group 820 such as an assessment operator who performs an assessment of the care recipient.
  • Input data input from the device as the input unit 170 is transmitted from the device to the cloud server 810.
  • the input unit 170 is configured to automatically delete personal information such as the name, date of birth, and status of the care receiver after transmission.
  • the display unit 160 may be a device (for example, a smartphone, a PC, a TV, or the like) that can be connected to the Internet held by the group 840 such as a care manager who creates a care plan.
  • the care plan output by the care plan output unit 110 is transmitted to the device as the display unit 160 and displayed.
  • the group 840 corrects the care plan from the display unit 160, the corrected data is transmitted to the cloud server 810.
  • group 820 and the group 840 may be the same company or individual.
  • data with a change in the level of care required by one step and data with a change in two or more levels are similarly treated as data with an improved level of care required.
  • the degree of improvement may be weighted according to how many times the degree of care has been improved and used in the learning process.
  • the storage unit 150 is described as a component incorporated in the care plan creation support system.
  • the storage unit 150 is configured independently of the care plan creation support system, and the care plan creation support system is configured. May be configured to be able to refer to data for performing each of the processes described above.
  • the storage unit 150 may be stored in a cloud server.
  • the determination result by the determination unit 120 is registered in the storage unit 150, and the probability calculation unit 130 newly calculates the probability that the degree of care required improves using the registered determination result.
  • the degree of care required in the past and the degree of care required included in the input data are registered in the storage unit 150, and the determination unit 120 compares the above two levels of care required registered in the storage unit 150 and You may determine the change of a nursing care degree. Also at this time, a change in the degree of care required as a result of care being performed using the care plan may be separately registered in the storage unit 150.
  • a plurality of care plans are output as recommended care plans from the care plan output unit 110, and one care plan selected by the care manager is input from the care plan change unit 710.
  • the care plan selected and input may be registered in the storage unit 150.
  • the display unit 160 is described as a smartphone or tablet PC that can be carried by the care manager.
  • the care manager is displayed on the screen as a desktop PC or the like provided in an office or the like.
  • a care plan may be created while checking the care plan.
  • the output unit 160 may not only display the care plan on the screen, but may also be a mode in which the care plan is read out as speech.
  • the care plan creation support system of the present invention it is possible to output a care plan having a high probability of improving the degree of care required according to the situation of each individual care recipient, and to improve the output accuracy by learning processing. be able to. Therefore, if the care plan produced using the care plan creation support system of the present invention is provided to the care recipient, an improvement in the degree of care required of the care recipient can be expected. If the level of care required of the cared person is improved, it is expected that the care benefit cost will be reduced and the turnover of the caregiver will be reduced, and the financial and social burden due to the increase in the cared person can be expected.

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Primary Health Care (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Child & Adolescent Psychology (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Epidemiology (AREA)
  • Medical Informatics (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Medical Treatment And Welfare Office Work (AREA)

Abstract

This care plan creation assistance system comprises: a care plan output unit which, using a care plan output model, acquires for each care plan a probability with respect to an input of a care recipient's situation that a level of required care will improve, and outputs the care plan with the higher acquired probability; an assessment unit which assesses whether the level of required care has improved after care has been carried out upon the care recipient using the outputted care plan; a probability computation unit which, using the result of the assessment which has been performed by the assessment unit, computes anew the probability that the level of required care will be improved by the outputted care plan; and a process change unit which changes the care plan output assistance model such that the probability which is acquired for the care plan which has been outputted with respect to the input of the care recipient's situation approaches the computed probability. This care plan creation assistance system assists with the creation of a care plan by outputting, in accordance with each individual care recipient's situation, a care plan for which an improvement in a level of required care may be expected.

Description

ケアプラン作成支援システム、記憶媒体、ケアプラン作成支援方法およびケアプラン作成支援プログラムCare plan creation support system, storage medium, care plan creation support method, and care plan creation support program
 本発明は、ケアプラン作成支援システム、記憶媒体、ケアプラン作成支援方法およびケアプラン作成支援プログラムに関する。 The present invention relates to a care plan creation support system, a storage medium, a care plan creation support method, and a care plan creation support program.
 入浴、排せつおよび食事などを含む日常生活に他者の介護または支援を受ける要支援者または要介護者(以下、まとめて「被介護者」ともいう。)への介護計画を、ケアプランという。ケアプランには、具体的な介護サービスの内容、および上記介護サービスを提供する日時を定めたサービス計画スケジュールが含まれる。 A care plan for a supporter who needs care or assistance from another person in daily life, including bathing, excretion, and meals, or a care recipient (hereinafter collectively referred to as “caregiver”) is called a care plan. The care plan includes a service plan schedule that defines specific contents of the care service and the date and time when the care service is provided.
 ケアプランは、通常、ケアマネジャーによって、被介護者の状況に基づいて認定される要介護度に応じて定められる介護給付を考慮して作成される。要介護度の認定を受けようとする者が要介護認定の申請をすると、申請を受けた介護保険者は、認定調査機関の認定調査員に、申請者の身体状況などを調査させる。上記調査は、予め設定された項目について、2またはそれ以上の選択肢から申請者の状況にあったものを選択したり、テキストで項目を入力したりする方法で行われる。この調査結果は、コンピュータなどに入力されて、定められた算出法による要介護度の一次判定に用いられる。介護保険者は、その設置機関である介護認定審査会に、上記一次判定、それ以外の被介護者の特記事項および主治医の意見書などに基づいて申請者の要介護度を認定させる。このようにして認定された要介護度によって、その被介護者への介護給付の上限が定められる。 The care plan is usually prepared by taking care benefits determined by the care manager according to the degree of care required that is certified based on the situation of the care recipient. When a person who wishes to receive certification for the degree of care required applies for certification for long-term care, the nursing care insurer who has received the application causes the authorized investigator of the accredited research organization to investigate the physical condition of the applicant. The survey is performed by selecting a preset item from two or more options that matches the applicant's situation, or inputting an item in text. This survey result is input to a computer or the like and used for primary determination of the degree of care required by a predetermined calculation method. The long-term care insurer causes the long-term care certification examination committee, which is the installation organization, to certify the applicant's degree of long-term care based on the above primary determination, other special instructions for the care recipient, and the opinion of the attending physician. Thus, the upper limit of the nursing care benefit to the care recipient is determined according to the degree of nursing care required.
 介護給付の上限が定まった後、ケアマネジャーは、上記介護給付を考慮して、その被介護者に適したケアプランを作成する。このとき、ケアマネジャーまたはその委託を受けた者は、ケアプラン作成時の被介護者の状態を新たに評価(以下、単に「アセスメント」ともいう。)する。その後、ケアマネジャーは、評価された被介護者の現在の状況(以下、単に「アセスメント結果」ともいう。)をもとに、上記ケアプランの作成を行う。 After the upper limit of nursing care benefits is determined, the care manager creates a care plan suitable for the care recipient in consideration of the above nursing benefits. At this time, the care manager or the person entrusted with the care manager newly evaluates the condition of the care recipient at the time of preparing the care plan (hereinafter also simply referred to as “assessment”). Thereafter, the care manager creates the care plan based on the current status of the cared person (hereinafter, also simply referred to as “assessment result”).
 特許文献1~特許文献6には、ケアプラン作成を効率化することや、ケアマネジャーの力量によるケアプランの質の低下を抑制して提供されるケアプランを均質化することなどを目的として、アセスメント結果からのケアプランの作成を支援するための方法および上記方法を実施するためのシステムが提案されている。 Patent Documents 1 to 6 include assessments for the purpose of streamlining care plan creation and homogenizing care plans that are provided by suppressing the deterioration of the quality of care plans due to the ability of care managers. A method for supporting the creation of a care plan from the results and a system for implementing the method have been proposed.
 ところで、近年進展する少子高齢化などの理由により、被介護者の数は増加傾向にある。また、介護によって要介護度が改善される事例は非常に少ないため、被介護者の数の増加に伴って、要介護度が高い被介護者の数も増加しつつある。介護給付に必要な資金の一部は、社会保障費の一種である介護給付費によって賄われるが、被介護者一人あたりの介護給付費は、要介護度が高いほど高額になる。そのため、被介護者の増加、およびそれに伴う要介護度が高い被介護者の数の増加により、介護給付費も年ごとに増加している。例えば、我が国における65歳以上のいわゆる高齢者の人口は、2015年の約3400万人(人口3.7人に1人)に対して、2025年には約3650万人(人口3.3人に1人)に増加すると見込まれ、介護給付費は、2015年の10.1兆円に対して、2025年には21兆円になると見込まれている。 By the way, the number of care recipients is increasing due to the recent declining birthrate and aging population. In addition, since there are very few cases where the degree of care required is improved by nursing, the number of care recipients with a high degree of care required is increasing as the number of care recipients increases. Some of the funds required for long-term care benefits are covered by long-term care benefit costs, which are a type of social security costs. However, the higher the degree of care required, the higher the long-term care benefit costs. Therefore, care benefit costs are increasing year by year due to an increase in the number of care recipients and an increase in the number of care recipients with a high degree of care required. For example, the population of so-called elderly people over the age of 65 in Japan is about 36.5 million (population of 3.3) in 2015, compared to about 34 million in 2015 (1 in 3.7). The number of nursing care benefits is expected to be 21 trillion yen in 2025, compared to 10.1 trillion yen in 2015.
 また、被介護者の数の増加、および要介護度が高い被介護者の数の増加は、社会的にも大きな影響を与える。例えば、近親者の介護のために離職を余儀なくされる、いわゆる介護離職などの問題も顕在化しており、これらの問題は、被介護者や被介護者に関係する人の生活の質を低下させたり、労働力を減少させたりして、社会的な損失をももたらしかねない。 Also, the increase in the number of care recipients and the increase in the number of care recipients that require a high degree of care will have a significant social impact. For example, problems such as so-called nursing care leave, which are forced to leave work for the care of close relatives, have also become apparent, and these problems can reduce the quality of life of care recipients and those involved in caregivers. Or reduce the workforce, which can cause social losses.
特開平11-149499号公報JP 11-149499 A 特開2000-3404号公報Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2000-3404 特開2000-3391号公報JP 2000-3391 A 特開2001-101279号公報JP 2001-101279 A 特開2006-146410号公報JP 2006-146410 A 特開2010-205263号公報JP 2010-205263 A
 上述したように、被介護者の増加によって財政的、社会的な負担が大きくなりつつあり、これらの負担を抑制することが求められる。特に、要介護度が高くなると介護給付費の額も社会的な負担の量も大きくなるため、要介護度が高い被介護者の数の増加を抑制することが望ましい。しかし、要介護度が高い被介護者の数を減らす有効な方法は、未だ確立されていない。 As mentioned above, the financial and social burdens are increasing due to the increase in the number of care recipients, and it is necessary to suppress these burdens. In particular, since the amount of nursing care benefits and the amount of social burden increase as the degree of care required increases, it is desirable to suppress an increase in the number of care recipients with a high degree of care required. However, an effective method for reducing the number of care recipients with high care needs has not yet been established.
 例えば、ケアプランを工夫して、被介護者の要介護度を改善していけば、要介護度が高い被介護者の数の増加が抑制できると考えられる。しかし、要介護度を改善させることができたケアプランの例はわずかであり、また、状況の異なる他の被介護者にこれらの例を適用しても、同様に要介護度の改善が期待できるとは限らない。 For example, if the care plan is devised to improve the level of care recipients, the increase in the number of care recipients with high levels of care can be suppressed. However, there are only a few examples of care plans that have improved the level of care required, and even if these examples are applied to other care recipients in different situations, improvement of the level of care required is also expected. It is not always possible.
 また、上記ケアプランの工夫を実行していくためには、ケアプラン作成の効率化や、作成されたケアプランの均質化が重要になると考えられる。これに対し、特許文献1~特許文献6には、ケアプランの作成をコンピュータに支援させることで、ケアプラン作成の効率化や、作成されたケアプランの均質化といった目的が達成されると記載されている(以下、ケアプランの作成を支援するシステムを単に「ケアプラン作成支援システム」ともいう。ケアプラン作成支援システムは、ケアマネジャーによるケアプランの作成に有用な情報を出力できるシステムであればよく、ケアプランに含めるべき介護サービスのみを出力する機能のみを有していてもよいし、上記介護サービスを提供する日時を定めたサービス計画スケジュールを同時に出力する機能を有してもよい。)。しかし、これらの文献では、要介護度を改善できるようなケアプランの作成について何ら考慮されていない。 Also, in order to implement the above-mentioned care plan, it is thought that it is important to make care plans more efficient and to make the created care plans more uniform. On the other hand, Patent Documents 1 to 6 describe that the purpose of improving the efficiency of care plan creation and homogenization of the created care plan can be achieved by having the computer assist the creation of the care plan. (Hereinafter, a system that supports the creation of a care plan is also simply referred to as a “care plan creation support system.” The care plan creation support system is a system that can output information useful for the creation of a care plan by a care manager. Well, it may have only a function of outputting only the care service to be included in the care plan, or may have a function of simultaneously outputting a service plan schedule defining the date and time for providing the care service. . However, these documents do not consider the creation of a care plan that can improve the degree of care required.
 本発明は、上記課題に鑑みてなされたものであり、要介護度の改善が期待できる、推奨されるケアプランを、個々の被介護者の状況にあわせて出力することで、ケアプランの作成を支援可能なケアプラン作成支援システムを提供することを、その目的とする。また、本発明は、上記システムに用いることが可能なに用いる記憶媒体、上記システムを用いて実施可能なケアプラン作成支援方法、および上記方法を実行可能なケアプラン作成支援プログラムを提供することを、その目的とする。 The present invention has been made in view of the above-mentioned problems, and by generating a recommended care plan that can be expected to improve the degree of care required according to the situation of each individual care recipient, creation of a care plan The purpose is to provide a care plan creation support system capable of supporting the above. The present invention also provides a storage medium that can be used in the system, a care plan creation support method that can be implemented using the system, and a care plan creation support program that can execute the method. And its purpose.
 上記課題を解決するための本発明の一実施形態は、被介護者の状況の入力に対して要介護度が改善する確率をケアプランごとに出力するケアプラン出力モデルを用いて、被介護者の被介護者の状況の入力に対して前記被介護者の要介護度が改善する確率をケアプランごとに取得し、前記取得された確率がより高いケアプランを推奨されるケアプランとして出力するケアプラン出力部と、前記出力されたケアプランを用いて前記被介護者に介護が行われた後の前記被介護者の要介護度が改善したか否かを判定する判定部と、前記判定部による判定の結果を用いて、前記出力されたケアプランにより介護が行われたときに被介護者の要介護度が改善する確率を新たに算出する確率算出部と前記被介護者の状況の入力に対して前記出力されたケアプランについて取得される確率が、前記算出された確率に近づくように、前記ケアプラン出力支援モデルを変更する処理変更部と、を備えるケアプラン作成支援システムに関する。 One embodiment of the present invention for solving the above problem is that a care receiver uses a care plan output model that outputs, for each care plan, the probability that the degree of care required improves with respect to the input of the status of the care recipient. For each care plan, a probability that the degree of care required of the care recipient is improved is input for each care plan, and a care plan with a higher probability is output as a recommended care plan. A care plan output unit; a determination unit that determines whether or not the degree of care required of the cared person after the cared person has been cared for using the output care plan; and the determination Using the result of the determination by the unit, a probability calculation unit for newly calculating a probability that the degree of care required of the cared person is improved when care is performed according to the output care plan and the situation of the cared person Said output care for input Probability of being acquired for orchids, closer to the calculated probability, and the process-changing section for changing the care plan output assistance model relates care plan creation support system comprising a.
 また、上記課題を解決するための本発明の別の実施形態は、上記ケアプラン作成支援システムに接続可能な記憶媒体であって、被介護者を特定するための情報、前記被介護者の被介護者の状況、前記被介護者に対して用いられたケアプラン、おおよび前記ケアプランを用いて介護が行われた後の前記被介護者の要介護度または前記ケアプランを用いて介護が行われた結果としての要介護度の変化、が関連付けられたレコードを格納する記憶媒体に関する。 Another embodiment of the present invention for solving the above-described problem is a storage medium connectable to the care plan creation support system, the information for identifying the care recipient, the subject of the care recipient. The situation of the caregiver, the care plan used for the cared person, and the degree of care required of the cared person after the care is performed using the care plan, or the care is performed using the care plan. The present invention relates to a storage medium for storing a record associated with a change in the degree of care required as a result of the change.
 また、上記課題を解決するための本発明の別の実施形態は、被介護者の状況の入力に対して要介護度が改善する確率をケアプランごとに出力するケアプラン出力モデルを用いて、被介護者の被介護者の状況の入力に対して前記被介護者の要介護度が改善する確率をケアプランごとに取得し、前記取得された確率がより高いケアプランを推奨されるケアプランとして出力する工程と、前記出力されたケアプランを前記被介護者に提供した後の前記被介護者の要介護度が改善したか否かを判定する工程と、前記判定の結果を用いて、前記出力されたケアプランの提供によって被介護者の要介護度が改善する確率を新たに算出する工程と前記被介護者の状況の入力に対して前記出力されたケアプランについて取得される確率が、前記算出された確率に近づくように、前記ケアプラン出力支援モデルを変更する工程と、を含むケアプラン作成支援方法に関する。 In addition, another embodiment of the present invention for solving the above-described problems uses a care plan output model that outputs, for each care plan, the probability that the degree of care required improves with respect to the input of the situation of the care recipient. A care plan in which the probability of improvement in the degree of care required of the care receiver is obtained for each care plan with respect to the input of the care recipient status of the care recipient, and a care plan with a higher probability of acquisition is recommended. Using the results of the determination, the step of outputting as, the step of determining whether or not the degree of care required of the care receiver after providing the output care plan to the care receiver has improved, The step of newly calculating the probability that the degree of care required of the cared person will be improved by providing the output care plan and the probability of obtaining the output care plan for the input of the status of the cared person , The calculated accuracy So as to approach, the step of changing the care plan output assistance model relates care plan preparation supporting method comprising.
 また、上記課題を解決するための本発明のさらに別の実施形態は、コンピュータに、被介護者の状況の入力に対して要介護度が改善する確率をケアプランごとに出力するケアプラン出力モデルを用いて、被介護者の被介護者の状況の入力に対して前記被介護者の要介護度が改善する確率をケアプランごとに取得し、前記取得された確率がより高いケアプランを推奨されるケアプランとして出力する処理と、前記出力されたケアプランを前記被介護者に提供した後の前記被介護者の要介護度が改善したか否かを判定する処理と、前記判定の結果を用いて、前記出力されたケアプランの提供によって被介護者の要介護度が改善する確率を新たに算出する処理と、前記被介護者の状況の入力に対して前記出力されたケアプランについて取得される確率が、前記算出された確率に近づくように、前記ケアプラン出力支援モデルを変更する処理と、を実行させるケアプラン作成支援プログラムに関する。 Further, another embodiment of the present invention for solving the above-described problem is a care plan output model for outputting, for each care plan, the probability that the degree of care required improves with respect to the input of the status of the care recipient. For each care plan, the probability of improvement in the degree of care required of the care recipient is obtained for each care plan with respect to the input of the care recipient status of the care recipient, and a care plan with a higher probability of acquisition is recommended. A process of outputting as a care plan to be performed, a process of determining whether or not the degree of care required of the care receiver after providing the output care plan to the care receiver has improved, and a result of the determination A process for newly calculating a probability that the degree of care required of the care recipient is improved by providing the output care plan, and the output care plan in response to the input of the situation of the care recipient Acquired Rate is closer to the calculated probability, and the process for changing the care plan output assistance model relates care plan creation support program for execution.
 本発明により、要介護度の改善が期待できる、推奨されるケアプランを、個々の被介護者の状況にあわせて出力することで、ケアプランの作成を支援可能なケアプラン作成支援システムが提供される。また、本発明によれば、上記システムに用いることが可能なに用いる記憶媒体、上記システムを用いて実施可能なケアプラン作成支援方法、および上記方法を実行可能なケアプラン作成支援プログラムが提供される。 The present invention provides a care plan creation support system that can support the creation of a care plan by outputting a recommended care plan that can be expected to improve the degree of care required according to the situation of each individual care recipient. Is done. The present invention also provides a storage medium that can be used in the system, a care plan creation support method that can be implemented using the system, and a care plan creation support program that can execute the method. The
図1は、本発明の一実施形態に関するケアプラン作成支援システムの構成の一例を示すブロック図である。FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing an example of the configuration of a care plan creation support system according to an embodiment of the present invention. 図2は、ケアプラン作成支援システムによる処理の一例を表すフローチャートである。FIG. 2 is a flowchart illustrating an example of processing by the care plan creation support system. 図3は、ケアプランの出力(ステップS100)に含まれる具体的な処理を表すフローチャートである。FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing specific processing included in the care plan output (step S100). 図4は、第1の実施形態における中間ユニットの構成を示す模式図である。FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram illustrating the configuration of the intermediate unit according to the first embodiment. 図5は、学習処理(ステップS200)に含まれる具体的な処理を表すフローチャートである。FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing specific processes included in the learning process (step S200). 図6は、本発明の他の実施形態に関するケアプラン作成支援システムの構成を示すフローチャートである。FIG. 6 is a flowchart showing the configuration of a care plan creation support system according to another embodiment of the present invention. 図7は、本発明のさらに他の実施形態に関するケアプラン作成支援システムの構成を示すブロック図である。FIG. 7 is a block diagram showing a configuration of a care plan creation support system according to still another embodiment of the present invention. 図8は、本発明のさらに他の実施形態に関するケアプラン作成支援システムの構成を示すブロック図である。FIG. 8 is a block diagram showing a configuration of a care plan creation support system according to still another embodiment of the present invention.
 [第1の実施形態]
 図1は、本発明の一実施形態に関するケアプラン作成支援システム100の構成の一例を示すブロック図である。本実施形態に係るケアプラン作成支援システム100は、処理部として機能するケアプラン出力部110、判定部120、確率算出部130および処理変更部140と、記憶媒体として機能する記憶部150と、表示部160と、入力部170と、を備えている。
[First Embodiment]
FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating an example of a configuration of a care plan creation support system 100 according to an embodiment of the present invention. The care plan creation support system 100 according to the present embodiment includes a care plan output unit 110 that functions as a processing unit, a determination unit 120, a probability calculation unit 130, a process change unit 140, a storage unit 150 that functions as a storage medium, and a display. Unit 160 and an input unit 170.
 なお、ケアプラン作成支援システム100は、図示しないが、例えば、プロセッサとしてのCPU(Central Processing Unit)、制御プログラムを格納したROM(Read Only Memory)などの記憶媒体、RAM(Random Access Memory)などの作業用メモリ、および通信回路を備える。この場合、上記した各処理部の機能は、CPUが制御プログラム(本発明の「ケアプラン作成支援プログラム」に対応)を実行することにより実現される。前記ケアプラン出力部、前記判定部、前記確率算出部および前記処理変更部による処理を実行するためのプログラムの少なくとも一部はサーバに保存されているが、後述する第4の実施形態のように、上記プログラムの少なくとも一部はクラウドサーバに保存されていてもよい。 Although not shown, the care plan creation support system 100 includes, for example, a CPU (Central Processing Unit) as a processor, a storage medium such as a ROM (Read Only Memory) storing a control program, and a RAM (Random Access Memory). A working memory and a communication circuit are provided. In this case, the function of each processing unit described above is realized by the CPU executing a control program (corresponding to the “care plan creation support program” of the present invention). At least a part of a program for executing processing by the care plan output unit, the determination unit, the probability calculation unit, and the processing change unit is stored in a server, but as in a fourth embodiment to be described later At least a part of the program may be stored in a cloud server.
 ケアプラン出力部110は、予め設定されたケアプランを用いて被介護者に介護を行った(以下、単に「ケアプランを提供した」ともいう。)ときに前記被介護者の要介護度が改善する確率を、予め設定されたケアプランごとに取得し、上記取得された確率がより高いケアプランを推奨されるケアプランとして出力する処理部である。例えば、ケアプラン出力部110は、入力された被介護者の被介護者の状況を、確率的推論モデル(以下、単に「ケアプラン出力支援モデル」)に入力することにより、予め設定されたケアプランを提供したときに前記被介護者の要介護度が改善する確率を取得する。なお、確率的推論モデルとは、入力値に対して所定の演算を行うことで、予め定めた属性(本実施形態ではケアプランの種類)ごとの推論値(本実施形態では要介護度が改善する確率)を出力する推論モデルである。その後、ケアプラン出力部110は、前記ケアプランごとに出力された要介護度が改善する確率を参照して、例えば上記要介護度が改善する確率がより高いケアプランを選択するなどして、前記被介護者に推奨されるケアプランを出力する処理部である。 When the care plan output unit 110 provides care to the cared person using a preset care plan (hereinafter also simply referred to as “provided the care plan”), the degree of care required of the cared person is determined. It is a processing unit that acquires the improvement probability for each care plan set in advance and outputs the care plan having the higher acquired probability as a recommended care plan. For example, the care plan output unit 110 inputs the care recipient status of the care recipient to a probabilistic inference model (hereinafter simply referred to as “care plan output support model”), so that care is set in advance. A probability that the degree of care required of the care receiver is improved when the plan is provided is acquired. Note that the probabilistic inference model is an inference value (in this embodiment, the degree of care required is improved in this embodiment) by performing a predetermined operation on the input value. This is an inference model that outputs a probability of Thereafter, the care plan output unit 110 refers to the probability that the degree of care required that is output for each care plan is improved, for example, by selecting a care plan that has a higher probability that the degree of care required improves, It is a processing unit that outputs a care plan recommended for the care recipient.
 判定部120は、上記被介護者の現在の要介護度が、上記被介護者の過去の要介護度よりも改善したか否かを判定する処理部である。たとえば、判定部120は、ケアプラン出力部110から出力されたケアプランを用いて被介護者に介護が行われた後の上記被介護者の要介護度が改善したか否かを判定する。なお、判定部120は、別途ケアマネジャーが作成したケアプランを用いて被介護者に介護が行われた後の上記被介護者の要介護度が改善したか否かを判定してもよい。 The determination unit 120 is a processing unit that determines whether the current level of care required of the care recipient has improved over the previous level of care required of the care recipient. For example, the determination unit 120 determines whether or not the care-required level of the cared person has improved after the cared person has been cared for using the care plan output from the care plan output unit 110. Note that the determination unit 120 may determine whether or not the care-required level of the cared person has improved after the cared person has been cared for using a care plan created separately by the care manager.
 確率算出部130は、判定部120による判定の結果を用いて、前記予め設定されたケアプラン(特には、ケアプラン出力得110が出力したケアプラン)により介護が行われたときに被介護者の要介護度が改善する確率を新たに算出する処理部である。たとえば、確率算出部130は、記憶部150に格納されたレコードのうち、被介護者の状況および介護に用いられたケアプランが同一であるレコードの総数、および上記レコードに含まれる、要介護度が改善したと判定されたレコードの数、を求め、上記レコードの総数に対する、上記要介護度が改善したと判定されたレコードの数の割合を算出して、算出された割合を、上記被介護者の要介護度が改善する確率とする。 The probability calculation unit 130 uses the result of determination by the determination unit 120 to receive a caregiver when care is performed according to the preset care plan (in particular, the care plan output by the care plan output 110). It is a processing part which newly calculates the probability that the degree of care required will improve. For example, the probability calculation unit 130 includes the total number of records having the same care plan and the care plan used for care among the records stored in the storage unit 150, and the degree of care required included in the record. The number of records determined to be improved is calculated, the ratio of the number of records determined to have improved the degree of care required to the total number of records is calculated, and the calculated ratio It is assumed that the degree of care required of the person will improve.
 処理変更部140は、前記被介護者の過去の状況と、前記被介護者の過去の状況から作成されて前記被介護者に過去に提供されたケアプランと、前記判定部120による判定の結果との組み合わせを教師データとして、前記ケアプラン出力支援モデルを変更する処理部である。具体的には、処理変更部140は、被介護者の状況をケアプラン出力部110に入力したときにあるケアプランについて取得される確率が、同一の被介護者の状況とケアプランとの組み合わせについて確率算出部130により算出された確率に近づくように、前記ケアプラン出力支援モデルを変更する。 The process change unit 140 includes a care plan created from the past situation of the care recipient and the past situation of the care recipient and provided to the care recipient in the past, and a result of determination by the determination unit 120. Is a processing unit that changes the care plan output support model using the combination of and as teacher data. Specifically, the processing change unit 140 has a combination of the situation of the care recipient and the care plan that has the same probability of being acquired for a care plan when the care recipient status is input to the care plan output unit 110. The care plan output support model is changed so as to approach the probability calculated by the probability calculation unit 130.
 これらの処理部による処理の詳細は後述する。 Details of processing by these processing units will be described later.
 ケアプラン作成支援システム100は、上記ケアプラン出力支援モデルを、学習処理によって変更することを一つの特徴とする。学習処理によれば、過去のデータに含まれる特徴を機械的に抽出して、類似の特徴を有する入力に対して類似の結果を出力するように、ケアプラン出力支援モデルを変更することが可能である。そのため、ある被介護者の状況に対して、提供したケアプランごとに要介護度が改善したか否かを判定し、これらのデータ(被介護者の状況、ケアプラン、および上記ケアプランごとの上記判定結果)を用いて上記学習処理をすることで、類似する特徴を有する状況に対しても、要介護度が改善する確率が高いケアプランを出力できるように、ケアプラン出力支援モデルを変更できる。これにより、ケアプラン作成支援システム100は、様々な状況を有する個々の被介護者に対しても、上記被介護者の状況の特徴に応じて、要介護後が改善する確率がより高いケアプランを推奨されるケアプランとして出力することが可能である。また、このようなデータを多数用意して上記学習処理を繰り返し行うことで、任意の被介護者の状況に対して要介護度が改善する確率がより高いケアプランを出力できる精度も高まっていく。 The care plan creation support system 100 is characterized in that the care plan output support model is changed by a learning process. According to the learning process, it is possible to change the care plan output support model so that features included in past data can be mechanically extracted and similar results are output for inputs having similar features. It is. Therefore, it is determined whether the degree of care required has improved for each care plan provided for the situation of a care recipient, and these data (care recipient status, care plan, and each care plan The care plan output support model is changed so that a care plan with a high probability of improving the degree of care required can be output even in situations with similar characteristics by performing the learning process using the above determination result) it can. As a result, the care plan creation support system 100 has a higher probability that even after individual caregivers having various situations will improve after the care is required according to the characteristics of the situation of the care recipient. Can be output as a recommended care plan. In addition, by preparing a large number of such data and repeating the above learning process, the accuracy of outputting a care plan with a higher probability of improving the degree of care required for the situation of any care recipient will increase. .
 記憶部150は、書き込みおよび読み出しが可能な記憶媒体である。 The storage unit 150 is a storage medium that can be written and read.
 記憶部150は、データベースなどの記憶媒体とすることができる。記憶部150には、被介護者情報、日付または日時、上記被介護者の状況、ケアプラン、上記被介護者の要介護度、および上記ケアプランを用いて介護が行われた後の要介護度または上記ケアプランを提供した結果としての要介護度の変化、が紐付けられたレコードを格納する。上記レコードには、一意なレコード番号が付与されていてもよい。 The storage unit 150 can be a storage medium such as a database. In the storage unit 150, care recipient information, date or date and time, the situation of the care recipient, a care plan, the degree of care required of the care recipient, and care required after care has been performed using the care plan. A record in which the degree or change in the degree of care required as a result of providing the care plan is associated is stored. A unique record number may be given to the record.
 上記日付または日時は、被介護者にアセスメントを行った日付または日時である。 The above date or date is the date or date when the care recipient was assessed.
 上記被介護者情報は、介護を受ける被介護者を一意に特定するための情報であり、被介護者に固有のID番号、被介護者の氏名、性別および生年月日などを含むことができる。 The care recipient information is information for uniquely identifying a care recipient who can receive care, and may include an ID number unique to the care recipient, the name, gender and date of birth of the care recipient. .
 上記被介護者の状況は、ケアマネジャーまたはその委託を受けた者による上記被介護者へのアセスメントによって得られたアセスメント結果とすることができる。また、上記被介護者の状況としては、サービスの利用状況に関する概況調査や特記事項についての調査結果、疾患名などの主治医意見書に記載された内容を用いてもよい。 The situation of the care recipient can be the assessment result obtained by the care manager or the person entrusted with the care to the care recipient. Moreover, as the situation of the care recipient, the contents described in the doctor's opinion such as the survey result on the service usage status, the survey result on the special notes, the disease name, etc. may be used.
 上記ケアプランは、上記被介護者の状況からケアマネジャーが作成し、上記被介護者に提供したケアプランである。 The care plan is a care plan prepared by the care manager based on the situation of the care recipient and provided to the care recipient.
 上記被介護者の要介護度は、上記ケアプランを作成したときの、介護認定審査会が認定したその被介護者の要介護度である。 The degree of care required of the care recipient is the degree of care required of the care recipient certified by the Care Certification Committee when the care plan was created.
 上記ケアプランを用いて介護が行われた後の要介護度は、同一の被介護者に対してケアプランを提供した後に、介護認定審査会によって改めて認定された、その被介護者の要介護度である。 The degree of long-term care required after care has been performed using the above care plan is that the care recipient needs to be re-certified by the Care Certification Committee after providing the care plan to the same care recipient. Degree.
 上記要介護度の変化は、判定部120による判定によって定められる、集計可能なデータである。例えば、要介護度の改善が見られたと判定されたケアプランを含むレコードには「1」が、要介護度の改善が見られなかったと判定されたケアプランを含むレコードには「0」が付与される。 The change in the degree of care required is data that can be tabulated and is determined by determination by the determination unit 120. For example, “1” is recorded for a record that includes a care plan that is determined to have improved the degree of care required, and “0” is stored for a record that includes a care plan that has not been improved for the level of care required. Is granted.
 記憶部150には、初期設定時に、確率算出部130による上記確率の算出が可能な数の上記レコードが予め用意されて格納されている。 The storage unit 150 stores in advance the number of records that can be calculated by the probability calculation unit 130 at the time of initial setting.
 表示部160は、ケアマネジャーが携帯するスマートフォン、PC、TVなどの表示装置であって、ケアプラン出力部110から入力される表示制御信号に従って、推奨されるケアプランを表示する。表示部160は、表示されたケアプランを見たケアマネジャーが、その被介護者に提供するケアプランを作成するために、用いることができる。 The display unit 160 is a display device such as a smartphone, a PC, or a TV carried by the care manager, and displays a recommended care plan according to a display control signal input from the care plan output unit 110. The display unit 160 can be used by the care manager who has viewed the displayed care plan to create a care plan provided to the care recipient.
 入力部170は、テンキー、スタートキーなどの各種操作キー、音声受信部、またはカメラなどの映像受信部などを備え、ユーザーによる各種の入力操作を受け付けて、入力データを生成し、生成された入力データをケアプラン出力部110および判定部120に出力する。入力部170は、受信コネクタなどの、他の媒体から電気的に出力された入力データを受信してケアプラン出力部110および判定部120に出力可能に構成された、各種の信号受信機器であってもよい。入力部170から出力された入力データは、ケアプラン出力部110に出力されてケアプランの出力に用いられるとともに、判定部120に出力されて、確率算出部130および処理変更部140によるケアプラン出力支援モデルの変更に用いられる。 The input unit 170 includes various operation keys such as a numeric keypad and a start key, an audio reception unit, or a video reception unit such as a camera, receives various input operations by a user, generates input data, and generates the generated input Data is output to the care plan output unit 110 and the determination unit 120. The input unit 170 is a variety of signal receiving devices configured to receive input data electrically output from other media such as a reception connector and output the input data to the care plan output unit 110 and the determination unit 120. May be. The input data output from the input unit 170 is output to the care plan output unit 110 to be used for the output of the care plan, and is also output to the determination unit 120 for output of the care plan by the probability calculation unit 130 and the processing change unit 140. Used to change support model.
 図2は、ケアプラン作成支援システム100による処理の一例を表すフローチャートである。ケアプラン作成支援システム100は、被介護者の状況に関するデータの入力を受けて、所定の確率的推論モデルに基づいてその被介護者への推奨されるケアプランを出力する(ステップS100)。そして、ケアプラン作成支援システム100は、被介護者の要介護度が改善する確率がより高いケアプランを出力できるように上記確率的推論モデルを変更するための学習処理を行う(ステップS200)。 FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing an example of processing by the care plan creation support system 100. The care plan creation support system 100 receives data related to the situation of the care recipient and outputs a recommended care plan for the care recipient based on a predetermined probabilistic inference model (step S100). Then, the care plan creation support system 100 performs a learning process for changing the probabilistic reasoning model so that a care plan with a higher probability of improving the degree of care required of the care recipient can be output (step S200).
 なお、図2にはケアプランの出力(ステップS100)の後に学習処理(ステップS200)を行う態様が記載されているが、学習処理(ステップS200)の後にケアプランの出力(ステップS100)を行ってもよく、また、ケアプランの出力(ステップS100)と学習処理(ステップS200)とを並行して同時に行ってもよい。 FIG. 2 shows a mode in which the learning process (step S200) is performed after the care plan output (step S100), but the care plan output (step S100) is performed after the learning process (step S200). Alternatively, the care plan output (step S100) and the learning process (step S200) may be performed simultaneously in parallel.
 以下、ケアプラン作成支援システム100による処理に用いられる入力データについて説明し、その後、ケアプランの出力(ステップS100)および学習処理(ステップS200)に含まれるより具体的な処理を説明する。 Hereinafter, input data used for processing by the care plan creation support system 100 will be described, and then more specific processing included in care plan output (step S100) and learning processing (step S200) will be described.
 (入力データ)
 入力データは、ケアプランを新たに作成するために、被介護者に対して行ったアセスメントに関する情報であり、被介護者情報、上記被介護者に行ったアセスメントの日付または日時、上記被介護者の状況、および上記アセスメントの日付または日時における被介護者の要介護度を含む。入力データに含まれる被介護者情報と、記憶部150が格納する被介護者情報とは、互いに同一の項目のみからなることが好ましいが、判定部120による被介護者の同一の判定が可能である限り、一部の項目のみが重複していてもよい。
(Input data)
The input data is information related to the assessment performed on the cared person in order to create a new care plan. The information on the cared person, the date or date of the assessment performed on the cared person, the cared person And the degree of care required of the care recipient at the date or date of the assessment. The care receiver information included in the input data and the care receiver information stored in the storage unit 150 are preferably composed of only the same items, but the determination unit 120 can determine the same care recipient. As long as there are some, only some items may overlap.
 上記被介護者の状況は、複数の調査項目について、「はい(Y)」または「いいえ(N)」の2つ、または3つ以上の選択肢から、被介護者の状況に最もよく適合するものを選択した結果とすることができる。上記複数の調査項目および選択肢の種類は特に限定されず、任意に定めることができ、例えば、要介護度の認定に用いるために定められた調査項目および選択肢を用いることができる。上記要介護度の認定おける調査には、概況調査および基本調査が含まれるが、これらのいずれかまたは両方を用いてもよいし、基本調査の項目および選択肢(2015年7月時点では74項目)のみを用いてもよい。このとき、要介護度の認定基準が変更されたときは、それに合わせて上記調査項目および選択肢も変更可能であることが好ましい。また、上記被介護者の状況は、上記概況調査の結果や、主治医意見書などの内容をテキストで入力するようにしてもよい。 The situation of the care recipient is the one that best suits the situation of the care recipient from two or more choices of "Yes (Y)" or "No (N)" for multiple survey items. Can be the result of selecting. The types of the plurality of survey items and options are not particularly limited, and can be arbitrarily determined. For example, survey items and options defined for use in certification of the degree of care required can be used. The survey for accreditation of the degree of care required includes general surveys and basic surveys, either or both of which may be used, and basic survey items and options (74 items as of July 2015) You may use only. At this time, when the certification standard for the degree of care required is changed, it is preferable that the survey items and options can be changed accordingly. In addition, as for the situation of the care recipient, the contents of the result of the general survey and the opinion of the attending physician may be input as text.
 例えば、2015年7月時点での要介護度の認定に用いる調査項目は、「左上肢の麻痺(「あり」および「なし」からの選択)」や「寝返り(「つかまらないでできる」、「何かにつかまればできる」および「できない」からの選択)」などの被介護者の身体機能・起居動作に関わる項目、「移動(「介助されていない」、「見守り等が必要」、「一部介助が必要」および「全介助が必要」からの選択)」などの被介護者の生活機能に関わる項目、「意思の伝達(「調査対象者が意思を他者に伝達できる」、「ときどき伝達できる」、「ほとんど伝達できない」および「できない」からの選択)」や「生年月日や年齢を言うこと(「できる」および「できない」からの選択)」などの被介護者の認知能力に関わる項目、「物を盗られたなどと被害的になる(「ない」、「ときどきある」および「ある」からの選択)」などの被介護者の精神・行動障害に関わる項目、「金銭の管理(「解除されていない」、「一部解除されている」および「全解除されている」からの選択)」や「日常の意思決定(「できる(特別な場合でもできる)」、「特別な場合を除いてできる」、「日常的に困難」および「できない」からの選択)」などの社会生活への適応に関わる項目、ならびに「透析(「あり」および「なし」からの選択)」などの過去14日に受けた医療に関わる項目、などの74項目からなる。これらの項目はそのまま用いてもよいし、いくつか選択して用いてもよいし、任意に他の項目を登録して用いてもよい。 For example, the survey items used to determine the level of care required as of July 2015 include “paralysis of left upper limb (selection from“ Yes ”and“ No ”)” and “turn over (“ Do not grab ”),“ Items related to the caregiver's physical function / living behavior, such as “Can be grasped by something” and “Cannot do”), “Movement (“ Not assisted ”,“ Need to watch, ”etc.),“ One Items related to the caregiver's life function, such as “Departmental assistance is required” and “All assistance is required”), “Communication of intention” (“Study subject can communicate intention to others”, “Occasionally The choice of “can communicate”, “can hardly communicate” and “can't communicate”) and “speak birth date and age (selection from“ capable ”and“ impossible ”) Items involved, “Stolen things etc. Items related to mental / behavioral disorders of care recipients, such as “become damaging (choose from“ No ”,“ Occasionally ”and“ Yes ”),“ Management of money (“Unreleased”, “One” Select from “partially released” and “all released”) or “daily decision-making” (“can be done in special cases”), “can be done except in special cases”, “daily” Related to adaptation to social life, such as “selection from“ difficult ”and“ impossible ”), and medical treatment received in the past 14 days, such as“ dialysis (selection from “with” and “without”) It consists of 74 items such as items. These items may be used as they are, or some items may be selected and used, and other items may be arbitrarily registered and used.
 なお、入力の手間を省く観点からは、被介護者の状況の項目数は、5個以上20個以下、さらには5個以上15個以下とすることができる。このときの被介護者の状況は、被介護者に対して行う日常生活動作(ADL)や手段的日常生活動作(IADL)の評価(モニタリング)時に用いられる調査項目からなることが好ましい。上記ADLの評価時に用いられる調査項目としては、バーセル指数、Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group(ECOG)が定めたパフォーマンスステータス、機能的自立度評価表(FIM)などの評価方法で用いられる評価項目などを用いることができる。 It should be noted that the number of items in the situation of the care recipient can be 5 or more and 20 or less, and further 5 or more and 15 or less from the viewpoint of saving the input effort. The situation of the cared person at this time is preferably composed of survey items used during the evaluation (monitoring) of the daily life action (ADL) and the instrumental daily life action (IADL) performed on the cared person. As the survey items used in the evaluation of the ADL, the evaluation items used in the evaluation methods such as the Barcel index, the performance status defined by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG), and the functional independence evaluation table (FIM) should be used. Can do.
 (ステップS100:ケアプランの出力)
 ケアプランの出力(ステップS100)において、ケアプラン出力部110は、入力された被介護者の状況をケアプラン出力支援モデルに入力して、ケアプランごとに、要介護度が改善する確率を取得する。その後、ケアプラン出力部110は、上記ケアプランごとに出力された要介護度が改善する確率から、上記被介護者に推奨するケアプランを出力し、表示部160に表示する。
(Step S100: Output of care plan)
In the output of the care plan (step S100), the care plan output unit 110 inputs the input status of the care recipient into the care plan output support model, and acquires the probability that the degree of care required improves for each care plan. To do. Thereafter, the care plan output unit 110 outputs a care plan recommended to the care recipient from the probability that the degree of care required output for each care plan is improved, and displays the care plan on the display unit 160.
 上記ケアプランは、介護サービスを少なくとも含む。介護サービスは、被介護者に対して行う具体的な介護サービスの内容である。上記介護サービスは、介護事業者が提供可能なものから選択すればよい。なお、上記ケアプランは、具体的な介護サービスの内容のほかに、および上記介護サービスを提供する日時を定めたサービス計画スケジュールを含んでいてもよい。 The above care plan includes at least nursing care services. The care service is a specific content of the care service provided to the care recipient. The care service may be selected from those that can be provided by a care provider. The care plan may include a service plan schedule that defines the date and time for providing the care service in addition to the specific content of the care service.
 図3は、ケアプランの出力(ステップS100)に含まれる具体的な処理を表すフローチャートである。 FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing specific processing included in the care plan output (step S100).
 まず、ケアプラン出力部110は、被介護者の状況をケアプラン出力支援モデルに入力して、ケアプランごとに、要介護度が改善する確率を取得する(ステップS310)。その後、ケアプラン出力部110は、上記要介護度が改善する確率が高い1または複数のケアプランを、推奨するケアプランとして出力する(ステップS320)。例えば、ケアプラン出力部110は、出力された確率が高いケアプラン(たとえば、確率が最も高いケアプランまたは確率が上記10位の出力ユニットに対応するケアプランなど)を、推奨するケアプランとして出力する。 First, the care plan output unit 110 inputs the status of the care recipient into the care plan output support model, and acquires the probability that the degree of care required improves for each care plan (step S310). Thereafter, the care plan output unit 110 outputs one or a plurality of care plans that have a high probability of improving the degree of care required as recommended care plans (step S320). For example, the care plan output unit 110 outputs a care plan with a high output probability (for example, a care plan with the highest probability or a care plan corresponding to the 10th output unit with the probability) as a recommended care plan. To do.
 その後、ケアプラン出力部110は、出力されたケアプランを表示制御信号として表示部160に出力し、上記ケアプランを表示部160に表示させる(ステップS330)。このとき、後述する第3の実施形態のようにケアプランが変更された場合は、ステップS310に戻って、ケアプラン出力部110は、修正されたケアプランを表示部160に表示させる。 Thereafter, the care plan output unit 110 outputs the output care plan as a display control signal to the display unit 160, and displays the care plan on the display unit 160 (step S330). At this time, when the care plan is changed as in a third embodiment to be described later, the process returns to step S310, and the care plan output unit 110 causes the display unit 160 to display the modified care plan.
 最後に、ケアプラン出力部110は、入力データに含まれる被介護者情報、日付または日時、被介護者の状況および要介護度、ならびに出力または変更されたケアプランを、記憶部150に新規レコードとして登録する(ステップS340)。 Finally, the care plan output unit 110 newly records in the storage unit 150 the care receiver information, date or date / time, the care receiver status and the level of care required, and the output or changed care plan included in the input data. (Step S340).
 上述したケアプラン出力支援モデルは、被介護者の状況の入力に対して、予め設定されたケアプランの種類ごとに、一定の推論値を出力する確率的推論モデルであり、処理変更部140によって変更可能に構成されている。上記推論値は、入力された状況を有する被介護者に、それぞれのケアプランを提供したときに、上記被介護者の要介護度が改善する確率である。ケアプラン出力支援モデルは、例えば、ニューラルネットワーク、ボルツマンマシンおよび決定木などを含む。 The care plan output support model described above is a probabilistic inference model that outputs a predetermined inference value for each type of care plan set in advance with respect to the input of the status of the care recipient. It is configured to be changeable. The inference value is a probability that the degree of care required of the cared person is improved when each care plan is provided to the cared person having the input status. The care plan output support model includes, for example, a neural network, a Boltzmann machine, and a decision tree.
 以下、ケアプラン出力支援モデルがニューラルネットワークを含む場合におけるケアプラン出力支援モデルの構成を例示する。 Hereinafter, the configuration of the care plan output support model when the care plan output support model includes a neural network will be exemplified.
 上記ニューラルネットワーク(以下、単に「プラン出力ネットワーク」ともいう。)は、複数の入力ユニットからなる入力層、それぞれが複数の中間ユニットからなる1または複数の中間層、および複数の出力ユニットからなる出力層を有する。プラン出力ネットワークは、入力層側から出力層側にかけて複数の中間層を有する、N個の層を有する多階層のニューラルネットワークであり、それぞれの中間層が有する中間ユニットは、ひとつ前の階層の中間層に含まれる1または複数の中間ユニット(または入力ユニット)から受けた情報を、次の階層の中間層に含まれる1または複数の中間ユニット(または出力ユニット)に出力する。プラン出力ネットワークが有する層の数(N)は、3個以上であればよく、アセスメント項目の数などに応じて任意に定めることができる。例えば、上記層の数(N)は3個以上25個以下とすることができ、5個以上20個以下であることが好ましく、8個以上16個以下であることがより好ましい。 The neural network (hereinafter also simply referred to as “plan output network”) includes an input layer composed of a plurality of input units, one or a plurality of intermediate layers each composed of a plurality of intermediate units, and an output composed of a plurality of output units. Has a layer. The plan output network is a multi-layer neural network having N layers having a plurality of intermediate layers from the input layer side to the output layer side, and the intermediate unit of each intermediate layer is the middle of the previous layer. Information received from one or more intermediate units (or input units) included in the layer is output to one or more intermediate units (or output units) included in the intermediate layer of the next layer. The number (N) of layers included in the plan output network may be three or more, and can be arbitrarily determined according to the number of assessment items. For example, the number (N) of the layers may be 3 or more and 25 or less, preferably 5 or more and 20 or less, and more preferably 8 or more and 16 or less.
 上記入力層(N=1)は、被介護者の状況が含む調査項目と同じ数の上記入力ユニットを有する。上記入力ユニットは、上記複数の調査項目のいずれかに対応し、上記調査項目が有する各選択肢に対応する入力値を、そのまま1または複数の中間ユニットに出力する。 The input layer (N = 1) has the same number of the input units as the survey items included in the situation of the care recipient. The input unit corresponds to one of the plurality of survey items and outputs an input value corresponding to each option of the survey item as it is to one or a plurality of intermediate units.
 上記中間層(N=k(1<k<N))は、それぞれ任意の数の上記中間ユニットを有する。上記中間ユニットは、前階層の中間層が有する1または複数の中間ユニット(または入力層が有する1または複数の入力ユニット)からの出力を受けて、次階層の中間層が有する何れかまたは複数の中間ユニット(または出力層が有する出力ユニット)に出力する。上記中間層は、当該中間層に含まれる中間ユニットが前階層の中間ユニット(または入力ユニット)のすべてと結合する全結合層でもよいし、当該中間層に含まれる中間ユニットが前階層の中間ユニット(または入力ユニット)の一部とのみ結合する畳み込み層でもよい。 The intermediate layers (N = k (1 <k <N)) each have an arbitrary number of the intermediate units. The intermediate unit receives an output from one or a plurality of intermediate units (or one or a plurality of input units included in the input layer) of the intermediate layer of the previous layer, and receives any or a plurality of the intermediate layers of the next layer Output to the intermediate unit (or the output unit of the output layer). The intermediate layer may be a fully connected layer in which the intermediate unit included in the intermediate layer is combined with all the intermediate units (or input units) in the previous layer, or the intermediate unit included in the intermediate layer is the intermediate unit in the previous layer. It may be a convolutional layer that combines only with a part of (or the input unit).
 このとき、図4に示すように、第k層の中間ユニットZは、第k-1層の中間ユニット(図では4個)からの出力w1、w2、w3およびw4を受け取る。その後、中間ユニットZは、式(1)に示すように、各出力に所定の重みy1、y2、y3およびy4をそれぞれ乗じた値の合算値に、所定のバイアスbをさらに加算した値u1を算出する。なお、上記重みおよびバイアスは、処理変更部140によって変更可能である。
 u1=w1×y1+w2×y2+w3×y3+w4×y4+b・・・(1)
At this time, as shown in FIG. 4, the intermediate unit Z in the k-th layer receives the outputs w1, w2, w3, and w4 from the intermediate unit (four in the figure) in the k-1th layer. Thereafter, as shown in the equation (1), the intermediate unit Z obtains a value u1 obtained by further adding a predetermined bias b to a sum of values obtained by multiplying each output by a predetermined weight y1, y2, y3, and y4. calculate. Note that the weight and bias can be changed by the process changing unit 140.
u1 = w1 * y1 + w2 * y2 + w3 * y3 + w4 * y4 + b (1)
 中間ユニットはさらに、上記u1に所定の活性化関数fを適用して得られる値z1を、第k+1層の中間ユニット(または出力ユニット)に出力する。活性化関数fの種類は特に限定されず、シグモイド関数、ロジスティック関数、正規化線形関数(Rectified Linear Unit: ReLU)およびソフトマックス関数などを用いることができる。これらのうち、中間ユニットが有する活性化関数fは、出力の精度を高めつつ、処理の高速化も図る観点から、ReLuが好ましい。 The intermediate unit further outputs a value z1 obtained by applying a predetermined activation function f to u1 to the intermediate unit (or output unit) of the (k + 1) th layer. The type of the activation function f is not particularly limited, and a sigmoid function, a logistic function, a normalized linear function (Rectified Linear Unit: ReLU), a softmax function, and the like can be used. Among these, the activation function f of the intermediate unit is preferably ReLu from the viewpoint of increasing the output accuracy and increasing the processing speed.
 上記出力層(N=N)は、予め設定された、出力可能なケアプランの数と同じ数の上記出力ユニットを有する。それぞれの出力ユニットは、1または複数の第N-1の中間ユニットからの出力を受け取り、上記中間ユニットと同様の処理を行って得られた値を、上記入力層に入力された被介護者の状況に対する推論値(要介護度が改善する確率)として出力する。なお、このとき出力ユニットが有する活性化関数fは、すべての出力ユニットから出力された推論値の合計が1となり、出力された推論値をそのまま確率分布をして用いることができるため、ソフトマックス関数が好ましい。 The output layer (N = N) has the same number of output units as the number of preset care plans that can be output. Each output unit receives the output from one or a plurality of (N-1) th intermediate units, and the value obtained by performing the same processing as that of the intermediate unit is the value of the cared person input to the input layer. Output as an inference value for the situation (probability of improving the degree of care required). At this time, the activation function f of the output unit has a sum of inference values output from all the output units of 1, and the output inference values can be used as they are in a probability distribution. Function is preferred.
 このとき、上記出力ユニットのそれぞれを、予め設定されたケアプラン出力部110が出力可能なケアプランのそれぞれに、一対一で対応させる。そして、上記それぞれの出力ユニットが出力した推論値を、それぞれのケアプランを提供したときに上記状況を有する被介護者の要介護度が改善する確率と見なす。そのため、ケアプラン出力部110は、上記推論値がより大きい出力ユニットに対応するケアプランを、上記状況を有する被介護者に推奨されるケアプランとして選択し、出力することができる。 At this time, each of the output units is associated with a care plan that can be output by a preset care plan output unit 110 on a one-to-one basis. Then, the inference value output by each of the output units is regarded as a probability that the degree of care required of the cared person having the above situation is improved when each care plan is provided. Therefore, the care plan output unit 110 can select and output a care plan corresponding to an output unit having a larger inference value as a care plan recommended for a care recipient having the above situation.
 なお、上記中間層および出力層における各ユニットの重みおよびバイアスは、初期設定時に、過去の被介護者の状況と、その被介護者に対してケアマネジャーが選択したケアプランとの組み合わせを教師データとして、処理変更部140による学習処理により予め設定されることが好ましい。 The weights and biases of each unit in the intermediate layer and output layer are set as teacher data based on a combination of a past care recipient status and a care plan selected by the care manager for the care recipient at the time of initial setting. It is preferable to set in advance by a learning process by the process changing unit 140.
 (ステップS200:学習処理)
 学習処理(ステップS200)において、判定部120、確率算出部130および処理変更部140は、上述したケアプラン出力支援モデルを学習処理によって変更する。具体的には、判定部120は、入力データに含まれる要介護度が、記憶部150に登録されている同一の被介護者の過去の要介護度から改善したか否かを判定する。その後、確率算出部130は、記憶部150に含まれる被介護者の状況とケアプランの任意の組み合わせについて、上記判定の結果から、上記組み合わせを構成する被介護者の状況を有する被介護者に対して上記ケアプランを提供したときに要介護度が改善する確率を算出する。その後、処理変更部140は、上記組み合わせを構成する被介護者の状況およびケアプランと、その組み合わせについての要介護度が改善する確率とを教師データとして、ケアプラン出力支援モデルを変更する。例えば、処理変更部140は、前記ニューラルネットワークに上記被介護者の状況を入力したときに、それぞれの出力ユニットから出力される推論値が、その出力ユニットに対応するケアプランを提供したときの要介護度が改善する確率として算出された値に近づくように、各中間ユニットおよび出力ユニットの重みおよびバイアスの値を変更する。
(Step S200: Learning process)
In the learning process (step S200), the determination unit 120, the probability calculation unit 130, and the process change unit 140 change the above-described care plan output support model through the learning process. Specifically, the determination unit 120 determines whether or not the degree of care required included in the input data has improved from the past degree of care required of the same care recipient registered in the storage unit 150. Thereafter, the probability calculation unit 130 determines, for any combination of the care recipient status and the care plan included in the storage unit 150, from the determination result, to the care recipient having the care recipient status that constitutes the combination. On the other hand, the probability that the degree of care required improves when the care plan is provided is calculated. Thereafter, the process changing unit 140 changes the care plan output support model using the situation and care plan of the cared person constituting the combination and the probability that the degree of care required for the combination is improved as teacher data. For example, when the process changer 140 inputs the care recipient status to the neural network, the inference value output from each output unit provides a care plan corresponding to the output unit. The weight and bias values of each intermediate unit and output unit are changed so as to approach the value calculated as the probability that the degree of care improves.
 なお、上記過去の要介護度、ならびに後述する過去の被介護者の状況および過去のケアプランは、記憶部150に登録されている同一の被介護者のレコードのうち、入力データの日付または日時から所定の期間だけ過去に遡った時点のレコードに含まれる、要介護度、被介護者の状況およびケアプランである。具体的には、当該レコードに含まれるアセスメントの日付または日時に登録された日付または日時が、入力データに含まれるアセスメントの日付または日時から所定の期間だけ遡った時点となるようなレコードに含まれる項目を、上記過去の要介護度、過去のケアプランおよび過去の被介護者の状況とする。上記所定の期間は、ケアプランを作成した後、新たにケアプランを作成し直すまでの期間とすることができ、例えば6ヶ月とすることができる。 In addition, the past care-required degree, the past care recipient status and the past care plan, which will be described later, are the date or date of the input data among the records of the same care recipient registered in the storage unit 150. The degree of care required, the status of the care recipient, and the care plan included in the record at the time of going back to the past for a predetermined period from Specifically, it is included in a record in which the date or date registered in the assessment date or date included in the record is a point in time that is a predetermined period after the assessment date or date included in the input data. The items are the above-mentioned degree of care required, the past care plan, and the past care recipient status. The predetermined period can be a period from the creation of a care plan to the re-creation of a care plan, for example, six months.
 図5は、学習処理(ステップS200)に含まれる具体的な処理を表すフローチャートである。判定部120は、入力データに含まれる被介護者情報と、記憶部150に登録されている被介護者情報とを照合し、入力データと同一の被介護者のレコードが記憶部150に登録されているか否かを判定する(ステップS510)。 FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing specific processing included in the learning processing (step S200). The determination unit 120 compares the care receiver information included in the input data with the care receiver information registered in the storage unit 150, and the record of the care receiver same as the input data is registered in the storage unit 150. It is determined whether or not (step S510).
 判定の結果、同一の被介護者のレコードが登録されていた場合(ステップS510:YES)、判定部120は、その被介護者への過去のケアプランを用いて介護が行われた後の上記被介護者の要介護度の変化(要介護度が改善したか否か)を評価する(ステップS520)。具体的には、判定部120は、入力データに含まれる被介護者の要介護度(現在の要介護度)と、記憶部150に登録されている同一の被介護者の過去のレコードに含まれる要介護度とを比較して、上記現在の要介護度が上記過去の要介護度よりも改善した(低くなった)か否かを判定する。なお、同一の被介護者のレコードが登録されていない場合(ステップS510:NO)、その入力データは学習処理に用いることができないため、図5における処理は終了する。 As a result of the determination, when records of the same cared person are registered (step S510: YES), the determination unit 120 performs the above after care is performed using a past care plan for the cared person. A change in the degree of care required of the care recipient (whether or not the degree of care required has been improved) is evaluated (step S520). Specifically, the determination unit 120 is included in the care recipient's degree of care required (current care requirement level) included in the input data and in the past records of the same care recipient registered in the storage unit 150. It is determined whether or not the current level of care required has improved (becomes lower) than the past level of need for care. In addition, when the record of the same care receiver is not registered (step S510: NO), the input data cannot be used for the learning process, so the process in FIG. 5 ends.
 平成28年7月時点で、我が国における要介護度は、要支援1、要支援2、要介護1、要介護2、要介護3、要介護4および要介護5の7段階からなり、前者ほど要介護度が低く、後者ほど要介護度が高いと判断される。そのため、要介護度が後者の分類からより前者の分類に移行したとき、例えばある被介護者の過去の要介護度が「要介護3」であるが入力データに含まれる要介護度が「要介護2」であるとき、その被介護者の要介護度は改善したと判定される。 As of July 2016, the level of long-term care required in Japan consists of 7 levels: Need 1 Need, Need 2 Need 1, Need 1 Need 2, Need 3 Need 4, Need 4 Need 5 and Need 5, Need For Care The degree of care required is low, and the latter is judged to be high. Therefore, when the degree of care required shifts from the latter classification to the former classification, for example, the degree of care required in the past for a care recipient is “care required 3”, but the degree of care required included in the input data is “required care required”. When it is “care 2”, it is determined that the degree of care required of the care recipient has improved.
 この判定結果は、記憶部150に含まれる同一の被介護者のレコードのうち、上記評価に用いた過去の被介護者の状況および過去のケアプランを含むレコードに、項目「要介護度の変化」の値として登録される(ステップS530)。 This determination result is based on the item “change in the degree of care required” in the record of the same care recipient included in the storage unit 150 and including the past care recipient status and the past care plan used for the evaluation. Is registered as a value of “” (step S530).
 その後、確率算出部130は、記憶部150に項目「要介護度の変化」の値が新たに登録されたレコードの数をカウントする(ステップS540)。その結果、所定数以上のデータが新たに登録されたと判定した場合(ステップS540:YES)に、確率算出部130は被介護者の要介護度が改善される確率を求める(ステップS550)。例えば、確率算出部130は、記憶媒体150に格納されたレコードのうち、被介護者の状況および介護に用いられたケアプランが同一であるレコードの総数、および上記レコードに含まれる、要介護度が改善したと判定されたレコードの数を求め、上記レコードの総数に対する、上記要介護度が改善したと判定されたレコードの数の割合を算出する。所定数以上のデータが新たに登録されたと判定されなかった場合(ステップS540:NO)、図5における処理は終了する。 Thereafter, the probability calculation unit 130 counts the number of records in which the value of the item “change in the degree of care required” is newly registered in the storage unit 150 (step S540). As a result, when it is determined that a predetermined number or more of data has been newly registered (step S540: YES), the probability calculation unit 130 obtains a probability that the degree of care required of the care recipient is improved (step S550). For example, the probability calculation unit 130 includes the total number of records having the same care plan and the care plan used for care among the records stored in the storage medium 150, and the degree of care required included in the record. The number of records determined to have improved is obtained, and the ratio of the number of records determined to have improved the degree of care required to the total number of records is calculated. If it is not determined that a predetermined number or more of data has been newly registered (step S540: NO), the processing in FIG. 5 ends.
 その後、処理変更部140は、学習処理を行って、ケアプラン出力支援モデルを変更する(ステップS560)。 Thereafter, the process changing unit 140 performs a learning process to change the care plan output support model (step S560).
 例えば、処理変更部140は、上述したプラン出力ネットワークに上記被介護者の状況を入力したときに上記ケアプランに対応する出力ユニットから出力される推論値が、上記求められた割合となるように、上記プラン出力ネットワークを変更する。 For example, the processing change unit 140 may cause the inference value output from the output unit corresponding to the care plan to be the obtained ratio when the care receiver status is input to the above-described plan output network. , Change the above plan output network.
 具体的には、処理変更部140は、上記被介護者の状況を入力したときに上記プラン出力ネットワークが出力する推論値と、上記算出された割合との差(誤差)を求める。次に、処理変更部140は、上記誤差が小さくなるように、上記プラン出力ネットワークの各中間ユニットおよび出力ユニットのいずれかが有する重みおよびバイアス(上述した図4の例では、y1、y2、y3、y4およびb)の1つまたは複数の値を変更する。 Specifically, the process changing unit 140 obtains a difference (error) between the inferred value output by the plan output network when the care recipient status is input and the calculated ratio. Next, the process changing unit 140 reduces the weights and biases of any of the intermediate units and output units of the plan output network (in the above-described example of FIG. 4, y1, y2, y3) so that the error is reduced. , Y4 and b) change one or more values.
 評価ネットワークおよびプラン出力ネットワークの変更の方法は特に限定されず、誤差逆伝播法を用いた勾配降下法などの公知の方法を用いることができる。また、勾配降下法において上記誤差を表すために用いられる誤差関数の種類も特に限定されず、二乗誤差および交差エントロピー式などの公知の式を用いることができる。 The method of changing the evaluation network and the plan output network is not particularly limited, and a known method such as a gradient descent method using an error back propagation method can be used. In addition, the type of error function used to represent the error in the gradient descent method is not particularly limited, and publicly known expressions such as a square error and a cross entropy expression can be used.
 このような構成とすれば、上記プラン出力ネットワークを含むケアプラン出力支援モデルの実行を含む処理によってケアプラン出力部110が出力するケアプランは、被介護者の要介護度が改善する確率が高いものとなる。特に、多数の入力データを入力して多数回の学習処理を行うことで、任意の被介護者の状況を有する被介護者に対して、要介護度が改善する確率が高い上記組み合わせを構成するケアプランを選択して被介護者に提供することができる。 With such a configuration, the care plan output by the care plan output unit 110 through the process including the execution of the care plan output support model including the plan output network has a high probability that the degree of care required of the care recipient is improved. It will be a thing. In particular, by inputting a large number of input data and performing a large number of learning processes, the above-described combination having a high probability of improving the degree of care required is configured for a cared person having any cared person's situation. A care plan can be selected and provided to the care recipient.
 また、ケアプランの作成をコンピュータに支援させることで、ケアプラン作成の効率化や、作成されたケアプランの均質化といった目的も達成され得る。 Also, by making the computer support the creation of the care plan, the purpose of improving the efficiency of the care plan creation and homogenizing the created care plan can be achieved.
 なお、従来のケアプラン作成方法において、作成されたケアプランの質の改善を妨げていた要因の一つとして、当該ケアプランに含まれるケアプランを提供された被介護者の活気があるかないかなどの、観察者の主観によって変動されやすい判断基準によって、当該ケアプランの選択の良否が評価されていたことが挙げられる。これに対し、要介護度が改善するか否かという客観的に大小が判定可能な評価基準によってケアプランを評価すれば、ケアプランの評価に影響する観察者の主観を極力排除することができる。 One of the factors that hindered the improvement of the quality of the created care plan in the conventional care plan creation method is whether there is liveliness of the care recipient who was provided with the care plan included in the care plan. It is mentioned that the quality of selection of the care plan was evaluated based on the judgment criteria that are easily changed depending on the subjectivity of the observer. On the other hand, if the care plan is evaluated according to an evaluation criterion that can objectively determine whether or not the degree of care required is improved, the subjectivity of the observer that affects the evaluation of the care plan can be eliminated as much as possible. .
 また、本実施形態のようにケアプラン出力支援モデルを多階層のニューラルネットワークを含んで構成した場合、入力される被介護者の状況に含まれる調査項目のうち、特定のケアプランを提供したときに要介護度が改善する可能性の高いという特徴を有するものが入力されたときに、上記特定のケアプランが出力される確率がより高まるように、ケアプラン出力支援モデルを変更することができる。そのため、上記特徴を有する調査項目を有する類似の被介護者の状況を入力したときも、上記特定のケアプランが高確率で出力されるため、ケアプラン出力部110は、教師データに含まれない(またはデータ個数が少ない)被介護者の状況に対しても、要介護度が改善する確率が高いケアプランを出力することが可能となる。 In addition, when the care plan output support model is configured to include a multi-layer neural network as in this embodiment, when a specific care plan is provided among the survey items included in the status of the care recipient input The care plan output support model can be changed so that the probability that the specific care plan is output will be higher when an item having a characteristic that the degree of care required is likely to be improved is input. . Therefore, even when a situation of a similar cared person having a survey item having the above characteristics is input, since the specific care plan is output with high probability, the care plan output unit 110 is not included in the teacher data. It is possible to output a care plan with a high probability that the degree of care required will improve even for the situation of a care recipient (or the number of data is small).
 [第2の実施形態]
 図6は、本発明の別の実施形態における、学習処理(ステップS200)に含まれる具体的な処理を表すフローチャートである。本実施形態は、学習処理によるケアプラン出力支援モデルの変更に、ケアプラン出力支援モデルとは別の確率的推論モデルであるケアプラン評価モデルを用いる点で、第1の実施形態と異なる。その他の処理およびシステムの構成は第1の実施形態と同一なので、重複する説明は省略する。
[Second Embodiment]
FIG. 6 is a flowchart showing a specific process included in the learning process (step S200) in another embodiment of the present invention. This embodiment is different from the first embodiment in that a care plan evaluation model which is a probabilistic inference model different from the care plan output support model is used for changing the care plan output support model by the learning process. Since other processes and the system configuration are the same as those in the first embodiment, a duplicate description is omitted.
 ケアプラン評価モデルは、被介護者の状況とケアプランとの組み合わせの入力に対して、そのケアプランの実施によって要介護度が改善する確率を出力する確率的推論モデルであり、学習処理によって変更可能に構成されている。ケアプラン評価モデルは、例えば、ニューラルネットワーク、ボルツマンマシンおよび決定木などを含んでなる。 The care plan evaluation model is a probabilistic inference model that outputs the probability of improvement in the level of care required by the implementation of the care plan for the input of the combination of the situation of the care recipient and the care plan, and is changed by the learning process It is configured to be possible. The care plan evaluation model includes, for example, a neural network, a Boltzmann machine, and a decision tree.
 以下、ケアプラン評価モデルがニューラルネットワーク(以下、単に「評価ネットワーク」ともいう。)を含む場合の構成を例示する。このとき、ケアプラン評価モデルは、複数の入力ユニットからなる入力層、それぞれが複数の中間ユニットからなる1または複数の中間層、および1つの出力ユニットからなる出力層を有する。評価ネットワークは、入力層側から出力層側にかけて複数の中間層を有する、N個の層を有する多階層のニューラルネットワークであり、それぞれの中間層が有する中間ユニットは、ひとつ前の階層の中間層に含まれる1または複数の中間ユニット(または入力ユニット)から受けた情報を、次の階層の中間層に含まれる1または複数の中間ユニット(または出力ユニット)に出力する。評価ネットワークが有する層の数(N)は、3個以上であればよく、被介護者の状況とケアプランとの組み合わせの数などに応じて任意に定めることができる。たとえば、上記層の数(N)は3個以上25個以下とすることができ、5個以上20個以下で在ることが好ましく、8個以上16個以下であることがより好ましい。 Hereinafter, the configuration in the case where the care plan evaluation model includes a neural network (hereinafter also simply referred to as “evaluation network”) will be exemplified. At this time, the care plan evaluation model has an input layer composed of a plurality of input units, one or a plurality of intermediate layers each composed of a plurality of intermediate units, and an output layer composed of one output unit. The evaluation network is a multi-layer neural network having N layers having a plurality of intermediate layers from the input layer side to the output layer side, and each intermediate layer has an intermediate unit of the previous layer. The information received from one or more intermediate units (or input units) included in is output to one or more intermediate units (or output units) included in the next intermediate layer. The number (N) of layers that the evaluation network has may be three or more, and can be arbitrarily determined according to the number of combinations of the situation of the care recipient and the care plan. For example, the number (N) of the layers may be 3 or more and 25 or less, preferably 5 or more and 20 or less, and more preferably 8 or more and 16 or less.
 評価ネットワークは、入力層への入力項目を被介護者の状況とケアプランとの組み合わせとし、出力層から出力される推論値を上記組み合わせに対して要介護度が改善する確率とする以外は、上述したプラン出力ネットワークと同様の構成とすることができる。 The evaluation network, except that the input items to the input layer are a combination of the situation of the care recipient and the care plan, and the inference value output from the output layer is the probability that the degree of care required will improve for the above combination, It can be set as the structure similar to the plan output network mentioned above.
 このとき、確率算出部130は、上述したステップS540において記憶部150に十分な量のデータが新たに登録されたと判定された後(ステップS540:YES)、記憶媒体150に格納されたレコードのうち、被介護者の状況および介護に用いられたケアプランが同一であるレコードの総数、および上記レコードに含まれる、要介護度が改善したと判定されたレコードの数を求め、上記レコードの総数に対する、上記要介護度が改善したと判定されたレコードの数の割合を算出する(ステップS550)。その後、処理変更部140は、上記組み合わせをケアプラン評価モデルに入力したときに、上記割合が出力されるように、評価ネットワークを変更する(ステップS570)。 At this time, the probability calculation unit 130 determines that a sufficient amount of data has been newly registered in the storage unit 150 in step S540 described above (step S540: YES), and then records among the records stored in the storage medium 150. , Find the total number of records with the same care plan and care plan used for care, and the number of records included in the above records that have been determined that the level of care required has been improved. Then, the ratio of the number of records determined that the degree of care required has been improved is calculated (step S550). Thereafter, the process changing unit 140 changes the evaluation network so that the ratio is output when the combination is input to the care plan evaluation model (step S570).
 具体的には、処理変更部140は、上記組み合わせを入力したときに上記評価ネットワークが出力する要介護度が改善する確率と、上記算出された割合との差(誤差)を求める。次に、処理変更部140は、上記誤差が小さくなるように、評価ネットワークの各中間ユニットおよび出力ユニットのいずれかが有する重みおよびバイアスの1つまたは複数の値を変更する。 Specifically, the process change unit 140 obtains a difference (error) between the probability that the degree of care required output by the evaluation network improves when the combination is input and the calculated ratio. Next, the process changing unit 140 changes one or more values of the weight and bias of each of the intermediate units and output units of the evaluation network so that the error is reduced.
 その後、処理変更部140は、第1の実施形態と同様の処理によって、プラン出力ネットワークに被介護者の状況を入力したときにそれぞれの出力ユニットが出力する推論値が、その被介護者の状況およびその出力ユニットに対応するケアプランとの組み合わせを入力したときに上記評価ネットワークから出力される要介護度が改善する確率となるように、プラン出力ネットワークを変更する(ステップS560-2)。 Thereafter, the processing change unit 140 performs the same processing as in the first embodiment, and the inference value output by each output unit when the situation of the care recipient is input to the plan output network is the situation of the care recipient. Then, the plan output network is changed so that the degree of care required output from the evaluation network is improved when the combination with the care plan corresponding to the output unit is input (step S560-2).
 評価ネットワークおよびプラン出力ネットワークの変更の方法は特に限定されず、誤差逆伝播法を用いた勾配降下法などの公知の方法を用いることができる。また、勾配降下法において上記誤差を表すために用いられる誤差関数の種類も特に限定されず、二乗誤差および交差エントロピー式などの公知の式を用いることができる。 The method of changing the evaluation network and the plan output network is not particularly limited, and a known method such as a gradient descent method using an error back propagation method can be used. In addition, the type of error function used to represent the error in the gradient descent method is not particularly limited, and publicly known expressions such as a square error and a cross entropy expression can be used.
 このような構成とすれば、実施形態1における「要介護度が改善したレコードの割合」よりも精度を高めた要介護度が改善した確率を、ケアプラン出力支援モデルの変更時に目標とする出力値として用いることができる。そのため、ケアプラン出力支援モデルから出力される、推奨されるケアプランを、より要介護度が改善する確率が高いものとすることができる。 With this configuration, the probability that the degree of care required with higher accuracy than the “ratio of records with improved degree of care required” in Embodiment 1 is the target output when changing the care plan output support model Can be used as a value. Therefore, it is possible to make the recommended care plan output from the care plan output support model more likely to improve the degree of care required.
 なお、このような構成とすれば、上記評価ネットワークからの出力のみを取り出して用いて、その被介護者の予後予測などを行うことも可能である。 Note that, with such a configuration, it is possible to predict the prognosis of the care recipient using only the output from the evaluation network.
 [第3の実施形態]
 図7は、本発明のさらに他の実施形態に関するケアプラン作成支援システムの構成を示すブロック図である。本実施形態に係るケアプラン作成支援システム700は、表示部160に表示されたケアプランを変更するケアプラン変更部710を備える。
[Third Embodiment]
FIG. 7 is a block diagram showing a configuration of a care plan creation support system according to still another embodiment of the present invention. The care plan creation support system 700 according to the present embodiment includes a care plan change unit 710 that changes the care plan displayed on the display unit 160.
 ケアプラン変更部710は、テンキー、スタートキーなどの各種操作キー、音声受信部、またはカメラなどの映像受信部などを備え、出力されたケアプランを変更するためのケアマネジャーによる各種の入力操作を受け付けて、生成された入力データをケアプラン出力部110に送信する。ケアプラン出力部110は、入力データを受信して、出力したケアプランを変更する。なお、図7にはケアプラン変更部710が表示部160とは別に構成された例を示したが、たとえば、表示部160が、タッチパネルなどのように操作部分が表示画面に一体的に構成されたり、ボタンやキーなどのハードキーと接続されて構成されたりして、同時にケアプラン変更部710として機能してもよい。 The care plan changing unit 710 includes various operation keys such as a numeric keypad and a start key, an audio receiving unit, or a video receiving unit such as a camera, and accepts various input operations by the care manager for changing the output care plan. The generated input data is transmitted to the care plan output unit 110. The care plan output unit 110 receives input data and changes the output care plan. 7 shows an example in which the care plan changing unit 710 is configured separately from the display unit 160. For example, the display unit 160 is configured such that the operation part is integrally formed on the display screen, such as a touch panel. Or may be configured to be connected to a hard key such as a button or a key and function as the care plan changing unit 710 at the same time.
 変更されたケアプランは、第1の実施形態および第2の実施形態と同様に、記憶部150に登録される。 The changed care plan is registered in the storage unit 150 in the same manner as in the first embodiment and the second embodiment.
 また、同時に、表示部160は、介護事業者のサーバに接続して、出力されたケアプランに含まれる介護サービスの空き状況および利用可能か否かの情報などを表示してもよい。このような構成とすることで、表示された介護サービスの予約ができないと判断される場合などに、ケアマネジャーは、表示部160からケアプランを変更することができる。 At the same time, the display unit 160 may be connected to a care provider's server and display information such as availability of the care service included in the output care plan and availability information. With such a configuration, the care manager can change the care plan from the display unit 160 when it is determined that reservation of the displayed care service cannot be made.
 また、ケアプラン変更部710は、介護事業者のサーバに接続して、上記タッチパネルまたはハードキーなどからの入力により、介護サービスの手配も可能に構成されていてもよい。 Further, the care plan changing unit 710 may be configured to connect to a care provider's server and to arrange care service by input from the touch panel or the hard key.
 [第4の実施形態]
 図8は、本発明のさらに他の実施形態に関するケアプラン作成支援システムの構成を示すブロック図である。本実施形態に係るケアプラン作成支援システム800は、インターネットを介して様々な機器と連携する仮想化サーバであるクラウドサーバ810を有する。クラウドサーバ810は、上述したケアプラン出力部110、判定部120、確率算出部130および処理変更部140による処理を実行するためのプログラム、ならびに記憶部150などの記憶媒体に記憶されたデータ、などの一部または全部が保存されている。
[Fourth Embodiment]
FIG. 8 is a block diagram showing a configuration of a care plan creation support system according to still another embodiment of the present invention. The care plan creation support system 800 according to the present embodiment includes a cloud server 810 that is a virtualization server that cooperates with various devices via the Internet. The cloud server 810 includes a program for executing processing by the care plan output unit 110, the determination unit 120, the probability calculation unit 130, and the process change unit 140 described above, and data stored in a storage medium such as the storage unit 150, and the like. A part or all of is saved.
 クラウドサーバ810は、介護事業を運営する運営会社、または上記運営会社から委託を受けた委託先(以下、単に「運営会社等830」ともいう。)に保有、管理および運営される。運営会社等830は、クラウドサーバ810に接続可能なPCなどの、1または複数の処理部835からクラウドサーバ810にアクセスして、処理部835に上述した処理を実行させる。 The cloud server 810 is owned, managed, and operated by a management company that operates a nursing care business or a contractor that is commissioned by the management company (hereinafter also simply referred to as “management company etc. 830”). The operating company or the like 830 accesses the cloud server 810 from one or more processing units 835 such as a PC that can be connected to the cloud server 810, and causes the processing unit 835 to execute the above-described processing.
 このとき、入力部170は、被介護者のアセスメントを行うアセスメント事業者などのグループ820が保有するインターネットと接続可能な機器(例えば、スマートフォン、PC、TVなど)とすることができる。入力部170としての上記機器から入力された入力データは、上記機器からクラウドサーバ810に送信される。このとき、入力部170は、送信後に、被介護者の氏名、生年月日および被介護者の状況などの個人情報を自動に削除する構成とすることが好ましい。 At this time, the input unit 170 may be a device (for example, a smartphone, a PC, a TV, or the like) that can be connected to the Internet held by a group 820 such as an assessment operator who performs an assessment of the care recipient. Input data input from the device as the input unit 170 is transmitted from the device to the cloud server 810. At this time, it is preferable that the input unit 170 is configured to automatically delete personal information such as the name, date of birth, and status of the care receiver after transmission.
 また、このとき、表示部160は、ケアプランを作成するケアマネジャーなどのグループ840が保有するインターネットと接続可能な機器(例えば、スマートフォン、PC、TVなど)とすることができる。ケアプラン出力部110が出力したケアプランは、表示部160としての上記機器に送信され、表示される。グループ840が表示部160からケアプランを修正すると、修正されたデータはクラウドサーバ810に送信される。 At this time, the display unit 160 may be a device (for example, a smartphone, a PC, a TV, or the like) that can be connected to the Internet held by the group 840 such as a care manager who creates a care plan. The care plan output by the care plan output unit 110 is transmitted to the device as the display unit 160 and displayed. When the group 840 corrects the care plan from the display unit 160, the corrected data is transmitted to the cloud server 810.
 なお、グループ820およびグループ840は同一の事業者または個人であってもよい。 Note that the group 820 and the group 840 may be the same company or individual.
 なお、上記各実施形態は、何れも本発明を実施するにあたっての具体化の一例を示したものに過ぎず、これらによって本発明の技術的範囲が限定的に解釈されてはならないものである。すなわち、本発明はその要旨、またはその主要な特徴から逸脱することなく、様々な形で実施することができる。 Note that each of the above-described embodiments is merely an example of implementation in carrying out the present invention, and the technical scope of the present invention should not be construed in a limited manner. That is, the present invention can be implemented in various forms without departing from the gist or the main features thereof.
 たとえば、上記各実施形態では、要介護度が1段階変化したものも、2段階以上変化したものも、同様に要介護度が改善したデータとして同様に扱っているが、過去のケアプランによって要介護度が何段回改善したかによって改善の度合いに重みを付けて学習処理に用いてもよい。 For example, in each of the above-described embodiments, data with a change in the level of care required by one step and data with a change in two or more levels are similarly treated as data with an improved level of care required. The degree of improvement may be weighted according to how many times the degree of care has been improved and used in the learning process.
 また、上記各実施形態では、記憶部150はケアプラン作成支援システムに組み込まれた構成要素として記載したが、記憶部150をケアプラン作成支援システムとは独立に構成して、ケアプラン作成支援システムから接続して上記各処理を行うためのデータを参照可能に構成してもよい。このときも、第4の実施形態において、上記記憶部150をクラウドサーバに保存してもよい。 In the above embodiments, the storage unit 150 is described as a component incorporated in the care plan creation support system. However, the storage unit 150 is configured independently of the care plan creation support system, and the care plan creation support system is configured. May be configured to be able to refer to data for performing each of the processes described above. Also at this time, in the fourth embodiment, the storage unit 150 may be stored in a cloud server.
 また、上記各実施形態では、判定部120による判定の結果を記憶部150に登録し、確率算出部130は登録された判定の結果を用いて要介護度が改善する確率を新たに算出しているが、過去の要介護度および入力データに含まれる要介護度を記憶部150に登録しておき、判定部120は記憶部150に登録されている上記2つの要介護度を比較して前記要介護度の変化の判定を行ってもよい。このときも、記憶部150には前記ケアプランを用いて介護が行われた結果としての要介護度の変化を別途登録してもよい。 Further, in each of the above embodiments, the determination result by the determination unit 120 is registered in the storage unit 150, and the probability calculation unit 130 newly calculates the probability that the degree of care required improves using the registered determination result. However, the degree of care required in the past and the degree of care required included in the input data are registered in the storage unit 150, and the determination unit 120 compares the above two levels of care required registered in the storage unit 150 and You may determine the change of a nursing care degree. Also at this time, a change in the degree of care required as a result of care being performed using the care plan may be separately registered in the storage unit 150.
 また、上記第3の実施形態においては、ケアプラン出力部110から複数のケアプランを推奨されるケアプランとして出力し、これらからケアマネジャーが選択した一のケアプランをケアプラン変更部710から入力し、選択されて入力されたケアプランが記憶部150に登録されるようにしてもよい。 In the third embodiment, a plurality of care plans are output as recommended care plans from the care plan output unit 110, and one care plan selected by the care manager is input from the care plan change unit 710. The care plan selected and input may be registered in the storage unit 150.
 また、上記各実施形態では、表示部160はケアマネジャーが携帯できるスマートフォンやタブレットPCなどとして記載しているが、事業所などに備え付けのデスクトップPCなどとして、ケアマネジャーがその画面に表示された推奨されるケアプランを確認しながら、ケアプランを作成してもよい。なお、出力部160はケアプランを画面に表示するのみならず、音声として読み上げる態様などであってもよい。 In each of the above-described embodiments, the display unit 160 is described as a smartphone or tablet PC that can be carried by the care manager. However, the care manager is displayed on the screen as a desktop PC or the like provided in an office or the like. A care plan may be created while checking the care plan. Note that the output unit 160 may not only display the care plan on the screen, but may also be a mode in which the care plan is read out as speech.
 本出願は、2016年8月8日出願の日本国出願番号2016-155859号に基づく優先権を主張する出願であり、当該出願の特許請求の範囲、明細書および図面に記載された内容は本出願に援用される。 This application claims priority based on Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-155859 filed on August 8, 2016, and the contents described in the claims, specification and drawings of this application are Incorporated into the application.
 本発明のケアプラン作成支援システムによれば、要介護度が改善する確率が高いケアプランを個々の被介護者の状況にあわせて出力することができ、かつ、出力の精度を学習処理によって高めることができる。よって、本発明のケアプラン作成支援システムを用いて作製したケアプランを被介護者に提供すれば、被介護者の要介護度の改善が期待できる。被介護者の要介護度が改善すれば、介護給付費の低減や、介護離職の減少などが見込まれ、被介護者の増加による財政的、社会的な負担の抑制が期待できる。 According to the care plan creation support system of the present invention, it is possible to output a care plan having a high probability of improving the degree of care required according to the situation of each individual care recipient, and to improve the output accuracy by learning processing. be able to. Therefore, if the care plan produced using the care plan creation support system of the present invention is provided to the care recipient, an improvement in the degree of care required of the care recipient can be expected. If the level of care required of the cared person is improved, it is expected that the care benefit cost will be reduced and the turnover of the caregiver will be reduced, and the financial and social burden due to the increase in the cared person can be expected.
 100、700、800 ケアプラン作成支援システム
 110 ケアプラン出力部
 120 判定部
 130 確率算出部
 140 処理変更部
 150 記憶部
 160 表示部
 170 入力部
 710 ケアプラン変更部
 810 クラウドサーバ
 820 グループ
 830 運営会社等
 835 処理部
 840 グループ
100, 700, 800 Care plan creation support system 110 Care plan output unit 120 Judgment unit 130 Probability calculation unit 140 Processing change unit 150 Storage unit 160 Display unit 170 Input unit 710 Care plan change unit 810 Cloud server 820 Group 830 Operating company etc. 835 Processing Unit 840 Group

Claims (10)

  1.  被介護者の状況の入力に対して要介護度が改善する確率をケアプランごとに出力するケアプラン出力モデルを用いて、被介護者の状況の入力に対して前記被介護者の要介護度が改善する確率をケアプランごとに取得し、前記取得された確率がより高いケアプランを推奨されるケアプランとして出力するケアプラン出力部と、
     前記出力されたケアプランを用いて前記被介護者に介護が行われた後の前記被介護者の要介護度が改善したか否かを判定する判定部と、
     前記判定部による判定の結果を用いて、前記出力されたケアプランにより介護が行われたときに被介護者の要介護度が改善する確率を新たに算出する確率算出部と
     前記被介護者の状況の入力に対して前記出力されたケアプランについて取得される確率が、前記算出された確率に近づくように、前記ケアプラン出力支援モデルを変更する処理変更部と、
     を備えるケアプラン作成支援システム。
    Using the care plan output model that outputs, for each care plan, the probability that the degree of care required improves with respect to the input of the status of the care recipient, the degree of care required of the care recipient for the input of the status of the care recipient A care plan output unit that obtains a probability of improvement for each care plan, and outputs the care plan with the higher probability acquired as a recommended care plan;
    A determination unit that determines whether or not the degree of care required of the cared person after the cared person has been cared for using the output care plan; and
    Using the result of determination by the determination unit, a probability calculation unit that newly calculates a probability that the degree of care required of the care recipient improves when care is performed according to the output care plan, and the care recipient A process changing unit that changes the care plan output support model so that a probability acquired for the output care plan with respect to an input of a situation approaches the calculated probability;
    Care plan creation support system with
  2.  前記ケアプラン出力支援モデルは、ニューラルネットワークを含む、
     請求項1に記載のケアプラン作成支援システム。
    The care plan output support model includes a neural network,
    The care plan creation support system according to claim 1.
  3.  前記被介護者の状況は、要介護度の認定に用いるために定められた調査項目に対して、前記被介護者の状況に適合する選択肢を選択した結果である、請求項1または2に記載のケアプラン作成支援システム。 The situation of the cared person is a result of selecting an option that matches the situation of the cared person with respect to a survey item set for use in authorization of the degree of care required. Care plan creation support system.
  4.  前記ケアプラン出力部からの出力を変更可能なケアプラン変更部を備える、
     請求項1~3のいずれか1項に記載のケアプラン作成支援システム。
    A care plan changing unit capable of changing the output from the care plan output unit;
    The care plan creation support system according to any one of claims 1 to 3.
  5.  前記判定部は、前記ケアプランを用いて介護が行われた後に新たに入力された前記被介護者の要介護度が、前記介護が行われる前の前記被介護者の要介護度より改善したか否かを判定する、請求項1~4のいずれか1項に記載のケアプラン作成支援システム。 In the determination unit, the care-required level of the care receiver newly input after care is performed using the care plan is improved from the care-required level of the care receiver before the care is performed. The care plan creation support system according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the care plan creation support system determines whether or not.
  6.  前記ケアプラン出力部、前記判定部、前記確率算出部および前記処理変更部による処理を実行するためのプログラムの少なくとも一部は、サーバに保存されている、
     請求項1~5のいずれか1項に記載のケアプラン作成支援システム。
    At least a part of a program for executing processing by the care plan output unit, the determination unit, the probability calculation unit, and the processing change unit is stored in a server,
    The care plan creation support system according to any one of claims 1 to 5.
  7.  前記ケアプラン出力部、前記判定部、前記確率算出部および前記処理変更部による処理を実行するためのプログラムの少なくとも一部は、クラウドサーバに保存されている、
     請求項6に記載のケアプラン作成支援システム。
    At least a part of a program for executing processing by the care plan output unit, the determination unit, the probability calculation unit, and the processing change unit is stored in a cloud server,
    The care plan creation support system according to claim 6.
  8.  請求項1に記載のケアプラン作成支援システムに接続可能な記憶媒体であって、
     被介護者を特定するための情報、前記被介護者の被介護者の状況、前記被介護者に対して用いられたケアプラン、および前記ケアプランを用いて介護が行われた後の前記被介護者の要介護度または前記ケアプランを用いて介護が行われた結果としての要介護度の変化、が関連付けられたレコードを格納する、 
     記憶媒体。
    A storage medium connectable to the care plan creation support system according to claim 1,
    Information for identifying the care recipient, the status of the care recipient of the care recipient, the care plan used for the care recipient, and the care recipient after the care has been performed using the care plan Storing a record associated with a caregiver's need for care or a change in the need for care as a result of care being performed using the care plan,
    Storage medium.
  9.  被介護者の状況の入力に対して要介護度が改善する確率をケアプランごとに出力するケアプラン出力モデルを用いて、被介護者の被介護者の状況の入力に対して前記被介護者の要介護度が改善する確率をケアプランごとに取得し、前記取得された確率がより高いケアプランを推奨されるケアプランとして出力する工程と、
     前記出力されたケアプランを前記被介護者に提供した後の前記被介護者の要介護度が改善したか否かを判定する工程と、
     前記判定の結果を用いて、前記出力されたケアプランの提供によって被介護者の要介護度が改善する確率を新たに算出する工程と
     前記被介護者の状況の入力に対して前記出力されたケアプランについて取得される確率が、前記算出された確率に近づくように、前記ケアプラン出力支援モデルを変更する工程と、
     を含むケアプラン作成支援方法。
    Using the care plan output model that outputs, for each care plan, the probability that the degree of care required will improve with respect to the input of the status of the care recipient, the care recipient for the input of the status of the care receiver of the care recipient Obtaining a probability that the degree of care required for each care plan is improved for each care plan, and outputting the care plan with the higher probability acquired as a recommended care plan; and
    A step of determining whether or not the degree of care required of the cared person after providing the output care plan to the cared person has improved;
    Using the result of the determination, the step of newly calculating a probability that the degree of care required of the care recipient is improved by providing the output care plan and the output for the input of the situation of the care recipient Changing the care plan output support model so that the probability acquired for the care plan approaches the calculated probability;
    Care plan creation support method including.
  10.  コンピュータに、
     被介護者の状況の入力に対して要介護度が改善する確率をケアプランごとに出力するケアプラン出力モデルを用いて、被介護者の被介護者の状況の入力に対して前記被介護者の要介護度が改善する確率をケアプランごとに取得し、前記取得された確率がより高いケアプランを推奨されるケアプランとして出力する処理と、
     前記出力されたケアプランを前記被介護者に提供した後の前記被介護者の要介護度が改善したか否かを判定する処理と、
     前記判定の結果を用いて、前記出力されたケアプランの提供によって被介護者の要介護度が改善する確率を新たに算出する処理と、
     前記被介護者の状況の入力に対して前記出力されたケアプランについて取得される確率が、前記算出された確率に近づくように、前記ケアプラン出力支援モデルを変更する処理と、
     を実行させるケアプラン作成支援プログラム。
    On the computer,
    Using the care plan output model that outputs, for each care plan, the probability that the degree of care required will improve with respect to the input of the status of the care recipient, the care recipient for the input of the status of the care receiver of the care recipient Processing for obtaining the probability of improvement in the degree of care required for each care plan, and outputting the acquired care plan with a higher probability as a recommended care plan,
    A process of determining whether or not the degree of care required of the cared person after providing the output care plan to the cared person has improved;
    Using the result of the determination, a process for newly calculating the probability that the degree of care required of the care recipient is improved by providing the output care plan;
    A process of changing the care plan output support model so that a probability acquired for the output care plan with respect to the input of the care recipient status approaches the calculated probability;
    Care plan creation support program to execute
PCT/JP2017/028587 2016-08-08 2017-08-07 Care plan creation assistance system, storage medium, care plan creation assistance method, and care plan creation assistance program WO2018030340A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201780048927.4A CN109564780B (en) 2016-08-08 2017-08-07 Support system and method for creating care plan, and storage medium
JP2018533450A JP7004655B2 (en) 2016-08-08 2017-08-07 Care plan creation support system

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2016-155859 2016-08-08
JP2016155859 2016-08-08

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2018030340A1 true WO2018030340A1 (en) 2018-02-15

Family

ID=61162329

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/JP2017/028587 WO2018030340A1 (en) 2016-08-08 2017-08-07 Care plan creation assistance system, storage medium, care plan creation assistance method, and care plan creation assistance program

Country Status (3)

Country Link
JP (2) JP7004655B2 (en)
CN (1) CN109564780B (en)
WO (1) WO2018030340A1 (en)

Cited By (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2019149087A (en) * 2018-02-28 2019-09-05 株式会社日本総合研究所 Care level optimization device, daily life obstruction factor omission prevention device, and method and program for the same
JP2019207516A (en) * 2018-05-29 2019-12-05 株式会社日立製作所 Care service analysis system, care service analysis method, and care service analysis processing device
JP2020046847A (en) * 2018-09-18 2020-03-26 株式会社日本総合研究所 Assessment/monitoring operation support device, method for controlling the same, and program
WO2020075369A1 (en) * 2018-10-10 2020-04-16 株式会社ウェルモ Information processing device, information processing method, and information processing program
CN111326242A (en) * 2018-12-14 2020-06-23 松下电器(美国)知识产权公司 Information processing method, information processing apparatus, and recording medium storing information processing program
JP6716144B1 (en) * 2020-01-20 2020-07-01 株式会社シェルパ Care support system, care support information registration system, care support method and care support information registration method
JP2020166835A (en) * 2019-03-29 2020-10-08 株式会社Rehab for JAPAN Rehabilitation plan creation support device, rehabilitation plan creation support system, rehabilitation plan creation support method, and rehabilitation plan creation support computer program
JP2020190818A (en) * 2019-05-20 2020-11-26 洋一 石川 Care support system and care support method
WO2020235428A1 (en) * 2019-05-20 2020-11-26 株式会社シェルパ Care assistance system, care assistance information recording system, care assistance method, and care assistance information recording method
CN113159481A (en) * 2020-01-07 2021-07-23 株式会社爱克萨威泽资 Information processing apparatus, method, and storage medium
JP7004985B1 (en) 2020-06-29 2022-01-24 株式会社エクサウィザーズ Information processing equipment, information processing methods, and programs
WO2022118563A1 (en) * 2020-12-02 2022-06-09 日本電気株式会社 Rehabilitation approach proposal device, method, and non-transitory computer-readable medium
EP4220657A1 (en) 2022-01-31 2023-08-02 Fujitsu Limited Planning method and planning program
JP7399648B2 (en) 2018-12-14 2023-12-18 パナソニック インテレクチュアル プロパティ コーポレーション オブ アメリカ Information processing method, information processing device, and information processing program

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN112599247A (en) * 2021-03-04 2021-04-02 四川华迪信息技术有限公司 Method, equipment, device and medium for acquiring and utilizing care service data

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH11282933A (en) * 1998-03-27 1999-10-15 Yoshiko Kiyooka Nursing process supporting system, control method therefor and computer readable memory
JP2001350843A (en) * 2000-06-06 2001-12-21 Nec Infrontia Corp Nursing information processing system
JP2013097748A (en) * 2011-11-06 2013-05-20 Seiji Hatano Information processor, information processing method, program and database system

Family Cites Families (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH1153455A (en) * 1997-08-08 1999-02-26 Mitsubishi Electric Corp Care service plan supporting device
US6484144B2 (en) * 1999-03-23 2002-11-19 Dental Medicine International L.L.C. Method and system for healthcare treatment planning and assessment
JP2002163359A (en) 2000-11-27 2002-06-07 Mediva:Kk Device and system for supporting medical diagnosis/ treatment and computer readable recording medium recording medical diagnosis/treatment support program
CN1636210A (en) * 2001-11-02 2005-07-06 美国西门子医疗解决公司 Patient data mining for clinical trials
JP4393081B2 (en) * 2003-02-26 2010-01-06 株式会社東芝 Virtual patient system
CA2594181A1 (en) 2004-12-30 2006-07-06 Proventys, Inc. Methods, systems, and computer program products for developing and using predictive models for predicting a plurality of medical outcomes, for evaluating intervention strategies, and for simultaneously validating biomarker causality
CN101341504A (en) * 2005-12-19 2009-01-07 松下电器产业株式会社 Life-style improvement supporting device and life-style improvement supporting method
US20090070137A1 (en) * 2007-09-10 2009-03-12 Sultan Haider Method and system to optimize quality of patient care paths
US20100004948A1 (en) * 2008-07-01 2010-01-07 Mckesson Financial Holdings Limited Apparatus, method, system and computer program product for creating, individualizing and integrating care plans
JP5531711B2 (en) * 2010-03-29 2014-06-25 オムロンヘルスケア株式会社 Health management support device, health management support system, and health management support program
CN102650994A (en) * 2011-02-24 2012-08-29 悦康健康管理顾问科技股份有限公司 Body condition integral management system as well as management method thereof
US20130290005A1 (en) * 2012-04-30 2013-10-31 General Electric Company Systems and methods for intelligent care transitions informed by predictive analytics
US20140249851A1 (en) * 2013-03-04 2014-09-04 Elekta Ab (Publ) Systems and Methods for Developing and Managing Oncology Treatment Plans
CN103455961A (en) * 2013-09-09 2013-12-18 丁玉兰 Patient high risk factor nursing assessment system
JP6367092B2 (en) 2014-11-18 2018-08-01 富士フイルム株式会社 Information collecting device, operating method and operating program for information collecting device, and information collecting system
US10524722B2 (en) * 2014-12-26 2020-01-07 Cerner Innovation, Inc. Method and system for determining whether a caregiver takes appropriate measures to prevent patient bedsores

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH11282933A (en) * 1998-03-27 1999-10-15 Yoshiko Kiyooka Nursing process supporting system, control method therefor and computer readable memory
JP2001350843A (en) * 2000-06-06 2001-12-21 Nec Infrontia Corp Nursing information processing system
JP2013097748A (en) * 2011-11-06 2013-05-20 Seiji Hatano Information processor, information processing method, program and database system

Cited By (24)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP7034766B2 (en) 2018-02-28 2022-03-14 株式会社日本総合研究所 Nursing care level optimization device and daily life obstruction factor omission prevention device, as well as the same method and program
JP2019149087A (en) * 2018-02-28 2019-09-05 株式会社日本総合研究所 Care level optimization device, daily life obstruction factor omission prevention device, and method and program for the same
JP2019207516A (en) * 2018-05-29 2019-12-05 株式会社日立製作所 Care service analysis system, care service analysis method, and care service analysis processing device
JP7109995B2 (en) 2018-05-29 2022-08-01 株式会社日立製作所 Nursing Care Service Analysis System, Nursing Care Service Analysis Method, Nursing Care Service Analysis Processing Device
JP2020046847A (en) * 2018-09-18 2020-03-26 株式会社日本総合研究所 Assessment/monitoring operation support device, method for controlling the same, and program
JPWO2020075369A1 (en) * 2018-10-10 2021-04-01 株式会社ウェルモ Information processing equipment, information processing methods and information processing programs
JP2021108146A (en) * 2018-10-10 2021-07-29 株式会社ウェルモ Information processing device, information processing method and information processing program
WO2020075369A1 (en) * 2018-10-10 2020-04-16 株式会社ウェルモ Information processing device, information processing method, and information processing program
JP7399648B2 (en) 2018-12-14 2023-12-18 パナソニック インテレクチュアル プロパティ コーポレーション オブ アメリカ Information processing method, information processing device, and information processing program
CN111326242A (en) * 2018-12-14 2020-06-23 松下电器(美国)知识产权公司 Information processing method, information processing apparatus, and recording medium storing information processing program
JP2020166835A (en) * 2019-03-29 2020-10-08 株式会社Rehab for JAPAN Rehabilitation plan creation support device, rehabilitation plan creation support system, rehabilitation plan creation support method, and rehabilitation plan creation support computer program
JP2020190818A (en) * 2019-05-20 2020-11-26 洋一 石川 Care support system and care support method
WO2020235428A1 (en) * 2019-05-20 2020-11-26 株式会社シェルパ Care assistance system, care assistance information recording system, care assistance method, and care assistance information recording method
JP2021111020A (en) * 2020-01-07 2021-08-02 株式会社エクサウィザーズ Information processing device, method, and program
CN113159481A (en) * 2020-01-07 2021-07-23 株式会社爱克萨威泽资 Information processing apparatus, method, and storage medium
JP7383090B2 (en) 2020-01-07 2023-11-17 株式会社エクサウィザーズ Information processing device, method, and program
JP2021114276A (en) * 2020-01-20 2021-08-05 株式会社シェルパ Care support system and care support method
JP2021114206A (en) * 2020-01-20 2021-08-05 株式会社シェルパ Care support system, care support information registration system, care support method, and care support information registration method
JP7037208B2 (en) 2020-01-20 2022-03-16 株式会社ゼロワン Care support system and care support method
JP6716144B1 (en) * 2020-01-20 2020-07-01 株式会社シェルパ Care support system, care support information registration system, care support method and care support information registration method
JP7004985B1 (en) 2020-06-29 2022-01-24 株式会社エクサウィザーズ Information processing equipment, information processing methods, and programs
JP2022024988A (en) * 2020-06-29 2022-02-09 株式会社エクサウィザーズ Information processing device, information processing method, and program
WO2022118563A1 (en) * 2020-12-02 2022-06-09 日本電気株式会社 Rehabilitation approach proposal device, method, and non-transitory computer-readable medium
EP4220657A1 (en) 2022-01-31 2023-08-02 Fujitsu Limited Planning method and planning program

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP7145261B2 (en) 2022-09-30
CN109564780A (en) 2019-04-02
CN109564780B (en) 2023-11-03
JPWO2018030340A1 (en) 2019-06-13
JP7004655B2 (en) 2022-01-21
JP2021099867A (en) 2021-07-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
WO2018030340A1 (en) Care plan creation assistance system, storage medium, care plan creation assistance method, and care plan creation assistance program
Raza et al. Relationship between FDI and economic growth in the presence of good governance system: Evidence from OECD Countries
Parker Harris et al. Social entrepreneurship as an employment pathway for people with disabilities: exploring political–economic and socio-cultural factors
Rouder et al. An assessment of fixed-capacity models of visual working memory
Beauchamp-Pryor From absent to active voices: Securing disability equality within higher education
Burgess et al. Biobanking in British Columbia: discussions of the future of personalized medicine through deliberative public engagement
Omata The complexity of refugees' return decision-making in a protracted exile: Beyond the home-coming model and durable solutions
Hughes et al. My experiences with kidney care: a qualitative study of adults in the Northern Territory of Australia living with chronic kidney disease, dialysis and transplantation
Tindall et al. Essential ingredients of engagement when working alongside people after their first episode of psychosis: A qualitative meta‐synthesis
Stark et al. Clinical reasoning guideline for home modification interventions
Sultan et al. Analytic hierarchy process for the success of e‐government
Hamer et al. ‘The right thing to do’: fostering social inclusion for mental health service users through acts of citizenship
McGarry Relationships between nurses and older people within the home: exploring the boundaries of care
Litva et al. Lay perceptions of the desired role and type of user involvement in clinical governance
Ruggiano Consumer direction in long-term care policy: Overcoming barriers to promoting older adults' opportunity for self-direction
Chakraborty et al. Marching toward “heart work”: Connecting in new ways to thrive amidst COVID‐19 crisis
Petersen et al. Work reintegration after long-term sick leave: domains of influence on co-workers’ ability to be supportive
Kan et al. Vouchers and consumer-directed care: Implications for community care services in Hong Kong
Polley et al. What does successful social prescribing look like? Mapping meaningful outcomes
Leutgeb et al. On a European collaboration to identify organizational models, potential shortcomings and improvement options in out-of-hours primary health care
Haarsma et al. The perceived impact of public involvement in palliative care in a provincial palliative care network in the N etherlands: A qualitative study
Forrester-Jones et al. The impact of austerity measures on people with intellectual disabilities in England
Chamberlain et al. Challenges in caring for unbefriended residents in long-term care homes: A qualitative study
Shen Aging, PEOU, and adoption of communication technology
Harris Meeting the needs of disabled children and their families: Some messages from the literature

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 17839411

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2018533450

Country of ref document: JP

Kind code of ref document: A

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 17839411

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1