Classifications

• • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
  • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
  • C12H—PASTEURISATION, STERILISATION, PRESERVATION, PURIFICATION, CLARIFICATION OR AGEING OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES; METHODS FOR ALTERING THE ALCOHOL CONTENT OF FERMENTED SOLUTIONS OR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES
  • C12H1/00—Pasteurisation, sterilisation, preservation, purification, clarification, or ageing of alcoholic beverages
  • C12H1/02—Pasteurisation, sterilisation, preservation, purification, clarification, or ageing of alcoholic beverages combined with removal of precipitate or added materials, e.g. adsorption material
  • C12H1/04—Pasteurisation, sterilisation, preservation, purification, clarification, or ageing of alcoholic beverages combined with removal of precipitate or added materials, e.g. adsorption material with the aid of ion-exchange material or inert clarification material, e.g. adsorption material
  • C12H1/0416—Pasteurisation, sterilisation, preservation, purification, clarification, or ageing of alcoholic beverages combined with removal of precipitate or added materials, e.g. adsorption material with the aid of ion-exchange material or inert clarification material, e.g. adsorption material with the aid of organic added material
  • C12H1/0424—Pasteurisation, sterilisation, preservation, purification, clarification, or ageing of alcoholic beverages combined with removal of precipitate or added materials, e.g. adsorption material with the aid of ion-exchange material or inert clarification material, e.g. adsorption material with the aid of organic added material with the aid of a polymer
• • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
  • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
  • B01D—SEPARATION
  • B01D15/00—Separating processes involving the treatment of liquids with solid sorbents; Apparatus therefor
• • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
  • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
  • B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
  • B01J20/00—Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof
  • B01J20/28—Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof characterised by their form or physical properties
  • B01J20/28002—Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof characterised by their form or physical properties characterised by their physical properties
  • B01J20/28004—Sorbent size or size distribution, e.g. particle size
• • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
  • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
  • B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
  • B01J20/00—Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof
  • B01J20/30—Processes for preparing, regenerating, or reactivating
  • B01J20/32—Impregnating or coating ; Solid sorbent compositions obtained from processes involving impregnating or coating
  • B01J20/3202—Impregnating or coating ; Solid sorbent compositions obtained from processes involving impregnating or coating characterised by the carrier, support or substrate used for impregnation or coating
  • B01J20/3206—Organic carriers, supports or substrates
  • B01J20/3208—Polymeric carriers, supports or substrates
  • B01J20/321—Polymeric carriers, supports or substrates consisting of a polymer obtained by reactions involving only carbon to carbon unsaturated bonds
• • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
  • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
  • B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
  • B01J20/00—Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof
  • B01J20/30—Processes for preparing, regenerating, or reactivating
  • B01J20/32—Impregnating or coating ; Solid sorbent compositions obtained from processes involving impregnating or coating
  • B01J20/3202—Impregnating or coating ; Solid sorbent compositions obtained from processes involving impregnating or coating characterised by the carrier, support or substrate used for impregnation or coating
  • B01J20/3206—Organic carriers, supports or substrates
  • B01J20/3208—Polymeric carriers, supports or substrates
  • B01J20/3212—Polymeric carriers, supports or substrates consisting of a polymer obtained by reactions otherwise than involving only carbon to carbon unsaturated bonds
• • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
  • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
  • B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
  • B01J20/00—Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof
  • B01J20/30—Processes for preparing, regenerating, or reactivating
  • B01J20/32—Impregnating or coating ; Solid sorbent compositions obtained from processes involving impregnating or coating
  • B01J20/3214—Impregnating or coating ; Solid sorbent compositions obtained from processes involving impregnating or coating characterised by the method for obtaining this coating or impregnating
  • B01J20/3217—Resulting in a chemical bond between the coating or impregnating layer and the carrier, support or substrate, e.g. a covalent bond
  • B01J20/3219—Resulting in a chemical bond between the coating or impregnating layer and the carrier, support or substrate, e.g. a covalent bond involving a particular spacer or linking group, e.g. for attaching an active group
• • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
  • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
  • B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
  • B01J20/00—Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof
  • B01J20/30—Processes for preparing, regenerating, or reactivating
  • B01J20/32—Impregnating or coating ; Solid sorbent compositions obtained from processes involving impregnating or coating
  • B01J20/3231—Impregnating or coating ; Solid sorbent compositions obtained from processes involving impregnating or coating characterised by the coating or impregnating layer
  • B01J20/3242—Layers with a functional group, e.g. an affinity material, a ligand, a reactant or a complexing group
  • B01J20/3268—Macromolecular compounds
  • B01J20/327—Polymers obtained by reactions involving only carbon to carbon unsaturated bonds
• • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
  • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
  • B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
  • B01J20/00—Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof
  • B01J20/30—Processes for preparing, regenerating, or reactivating
  • B01J20/32—Impregnating or coating ; Solid sorbent compositions obtained from processes involving impregnating or coating
  • B01J20/3231—Impregnating or coating ; Solid sorbent compositions obtained from processes involving impregnating or coating characterised by the coating or impregnating layer
  • B01J20/3242—Layers with a functional group, e.g. an affinity material, a ligand, a reactant or a complexing group
  • B01J20/3268—Macromolecular compounds
  • B01J20/3278—Polymers being grafted on the carrier
• • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
  • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
  • B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
  • B01J20/00—Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof
  • B01J20/30—Processes for preparing, regenerating, or reactivating
  • B01J20/32—Impregnating or coating ; Solid sorbent compositions obtained from processes involving impregnating or coating
  • B01J20/3291—Characterised by the shape of the carrier, the coating or the obtained coated product
  • B01J20/3293—Coatings on a core, the core being particle or fiber shaped, e.g. encapsulated particles, coated fibers
• • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
  • C08—ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
  • C08F—MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS OBTAINED BY REACTIONS ONLY INVOLVING CARBON-TO-CARBON UNSATURATED BONDS
  • C08F251/00—Macromolecular compounds obtained by polymerising monomers on to polysaccharides or derivatives thereof
• • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
  • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
  • B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
  • B01J2220/00—Aspects relating to sorbent materials
  • B01J2220/50—Aspects relating to the use of sorbent or filter aid materials
  • B01J2220/58—Use in a single column

Definitions

• the present invention relates to stabilization of beverages, and more particularly to separation matrices for stabilization of fermented beverages.
• the invention also relates to a method for stabilization of beverages and to a method of manufacturing a separation matrix for stabilization of fermented beverages.
• haze active (HA) compounds may comprise HA polyphenols and HA polypeptides, as well as complex reaction products between them.
• the beverage can be treated to reduce the concentrations of HA compounds, which is often referred to as beer or wine stabilization.
• SHG silica hydrogel
• PVRP cross-linked polyvinylpyrrolidone particles
• dosages are 15-40 g PVRP/hl and -50 g SHG/hl (CW Bamforth: J Am Soc Brew Chem 57(3), 81-90, 1999).
• SHG is intended to reduce haze-active polypeptides and PVRP to reduce polyphenols.
• Both SHG and PVPP are used in the form of fine particles added to the beverage and afterwards removed by filtration.
• CCS Stabilization System
• One aspect of the invention is to provide a separation matrix with an improved binding capacity for HA compounds in fermented beverages. This is achieved with a separation matrix as defined in claim 1.
• the separation matrix is capable of improving the haze stability of fermented beverages in comparison with prior art matrices. Further advantages are that the separation matrix can be used and regenerated in packed beds, that it does not produce any leachables of food safety or food purity concern and that the matrix can be easily manufactured.
• a second aspect of the invention is to provide a method of stabilizing fermented beverages, allowing an increased loading of beverage on the matrix. This is achieved with a method as defined in the claims.
• a third aspect of the invention is to provide a process for manufacturing a separation matrix with improved capacity for HA compounds in fermented beverages. This is achieved with a method as defined in the claims.
• vinyl pyrrolidone is herein meant l-vinyl-2-pyrrolidinone, CAS 88-12-0, which is also commonly known as N-vinyl pyrrolidone.
• Fig. 1 shows examples of single linking moieties for the PVP chains: a) derived from allylic groups and b) derived from thiol groups. S is the support.
• Fig. 2 shows a grafting process of the invention, with a hydroxyfunctional support first reacted with allyl glycidyl ether (AGE) and vinyl pyrrolidone (VP) then grafted on the allyl-functional support.
• Fig. 3 shows a typical stabilisation curve for the CSS adsorber anion exchange matrix.
• Fig. 4 shows the set-up of the miniaturised beer stabilization test application.
• Fig. 5 shows typical output data from the EBC chill haze method.
• Fig. 6 shows the tannoid content in non-stabilized beer, beer stabilized with the reference and beer stabilized with three prototypes of the invention.
• Fig. 7 shows graphical views on the normalized results for chill haze analysis.
• the three graphs relate to three batches of fresh beer, produced on three different days.
• Fig 8. Shows the total polyphenol reduction for prototypes.
• Fig. 9 Shows the correlation between total polyphenol reduction and chill haze.
• Fig 10. Shows reaction temperature curves for selected experiments. 311 - 55°C 1.9 % initiator; 354 - 55°C 1.0 % initiator; 374 - 45°C 1.0 % initiator; 392 - 35°C 1.0 % initiator; 493 - 45°C 1.0 % initiator, 1 M Na2S04
• the present invention discloses a separation matrix comprising a porous solid support and a plurality of polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) polymer chains covalently attached to said solid support.
• the polyvinylpyrrolidone polymer chains are vinylpyrrolidone homopolymer chains or copolymer chains comprising at least 70 mol % vinylpyrrolidone monomer residues and less than 2 mol % or less than 1 mol% negatively charged monomer residues. Negative charges are likely to repel the, mostly negatively charged, HA compounds and thus reduce the performance of the matrix. It can also be advantageous if the polyvinylpyrrolidone polymer chains are free from negatively charged monomer residues.
• the polyvinylpyrrolidone polymer chains are not crosslinked, in order to provide a high mobility and accessibility to HA compounds.
• the polyvinylpyrrolidone polymer chains comprise up to 30 mol % positively charged monomer residues. Positive charges may give advantageous additional interactions with negatively charged HA compounds. Positively charged monomer residues may be introduced by graft copolymerization of vinyl pyrrolidone with comonomers like e.g.
• DMAC diallyldimethylammonium chloride
• MATAC 3- (methacryloylamino)propyltrimethylammonium chloride
• the polyvinylpyrrolidone polymer chains may alternatively or additionally comprise non-vinyl pyrrolidone non-charged monomer residues. Such residues may, particularly if they contain hydrophobic and/or hydrogen bonding moieties, modulate the interactions between the chains and the HA compounds in favourable ways.
• Specific monomers that can be used for these purposes include e.g. N-vinyl caprolactam, styrene, alkyl vinyl ethers (hydrophobic) and e.g. PEG-monomethacrylates, PEG monovinyl ethers, PEG monoallyl ethers, hydroxyalkyl vinyl ethers, allyl alcohol (hydrogen bonding). If only non-charged comonomers are used, their amount may be up to 30 mol %, and if a combination of non-charged and positively charged comonomers is used, their combined amount may be up to 30 mol %.
• the solid support may comprise positively charged moieties which are not part of the polyvinylpyrrolidone polymer chains.
• moieties may e.g. be introduced by reacting hydroxyl groups on the support (e.g. a polysaccharide support such as agar or agarose) with positively charged reagents.
• a polysaccharide support such as agar or agarose
• reagents include
• the porous solid support comprises particles, such as particles having a (volume weighted) average diameter of 10-500 micrometers. Large particles give lower back pressures in packed beds and for this purpose it can be advantageous if the particles have an average diameter of 150-500 micrometers, such as 200-400 micrometers.
• the particles can suitably be spherical or substantially spherical, which facilitates packing.
• the porous solid support has a porosity of 80-98 %, such as 90-98 %.
• a high porosity is advantageous because the support can accommodate a large amount of polyvinylpyrrolidone polymer chains without blocking the pores.
• the porosity is defined as the volume fraction of pores in the support and can conveniently be measured by measuring the solids content of a support equilibrated with distilled water. With monolithic or membrane- shaped supports, the water-equilibrated support is freed from excess water, weighed and then dried in an oven at e.g. 100 C and weighed again. The volume fraction of pores can then be calculated, using an estimate of the density of the pore wall material.
• Particle-shaped supports are freed from excess water by gentle vacuum suction on a glass filter until a filter cake of particles is formed.
• the excess of water is removed when the water level has receded below the top of the filter cake until a first crack in the filter cake is formed. Prolonged suction should be avoided to avoid evaporation in the filter cake.
• a sample of the filter cake is then weighed and dried and the porosity is calculated from the wet (m wet ) and dry (rridry) weights, using an estimate of the density of the pore wall material.
• Typical pore wall material densities are: agarose 1.5 g/cm 3 , styrene-divinylbenzene 1.1 g/cm 3 , methacrylate polymers 1.15 g/cm 3 , polyvinyl alcohol 1.2 g/cm 3 , silica 2.2 g/cm 3 .
• the porosity (p) in vol % can then be calculated as:
• pmo is the density of water at the temperature in question, typically 1.0 g/cm 3 .
• the pore structure of the support may be characterized by inverse size exclusion chromatography, in which case a Kav value is obtained.
• the Kav value is a measure of the volume fraction of the support which is accessible to a probe molecule of a certain size.
• Kav for human serum albumin (Mw 67 kDa) on the support is at least 0.4, such as at least 0.5 or 0.5-0.9.
• the porous solid support comprises a polymer selected from the group consisting of styrenic polymers, methacrylate polymers, vinyl ether polymers, vinyl alcohol polymers and polysaccharides.
• the porous solid support comprises a polysaccharide selected from the group consisting of agarose, agar, cellulose and dextran.
• Polysaccharides are hydrophilic, which minimizes the risk of fouling due to hydrophobic interactions with compounds in the beverage.
• Agarose and agar can easily be prepared in the form of high porosity (e.g. 90-98% porosity) hydrogels with high rigidity, by thermal gelation.
• high porosity e.g. 90-98% porosity
• agarose is more expensive but has the advantage that it is essentially free from negative charges. If agar is used, it can
• Polysaccharide supports can suitably contain less than 10 or less than 5 micromole/ml negatively charged and acidic groups. This content can be determined by titration methods well known in the art of cation exchangers.
• the supports may additionally comprise extenders, i.e. polymers tethered to the pore surfaces of the support.
• the extenders can e.g. be hydroxyfunctional polymers, in particular polysaccharides like dextran, which can be tethered by covalent coupling on hydroxyl groups of the supports.
• a specific example is agar or agarose beads with dextran polymers tethered on agar/agarose hydroxyls which have been epoxy activated using epichlorohydrin or a diepoxide.
• the extenders can suitably be tethered via linker structures comprising ether groups which are stable under alkaline regeneration of the matrices.
• Extenders may facilitate the interactions between the HA compounds and the PVP chains and may increase the mass transport rates.
• a plurality of the polyvinylpyrrolidone polymer chains are each covalently linked to said solid support via a single linking moiety.
• the single linking moiety can e.g. comprise an ether-linked C 3 chain, such as in, -0-CH 2 CHCH 2 - or -0-CH 2 -CH(OH)-CH 2 -0- CH 2 CHCH 2 - as illustrated in Fig 1 a).
• Such linking moieties can be achieved by reacting hydroxyl groups on a support with an allyl halide or allyl glycidyl ether and polymerizing vinyl pyrrolidone in the presence of the support.
• Two polyvinylpyrrolidone polymer chain ends may be linked via the same linking moiety, if the polymerization proceeds through an allyl group.
• the matrix may additionally comprise a few polyvinylpyrrolidone polymer chains which are linked by two linking moieties, if the allyl density is high enough that one chain may polymerize through two adjacent allyl groups.
• the single linking moiety can also comprise a thioether bond, e.g. as illustrated in Fig 1 b). In this case, thiol groups have been introduced on the support and these have acted as chain transfer agents in the polymerization of
• the linking via a single linking moiety improves the mobility of the polymer chains and thus their accessibility to and interaction with the HA compounds.
• the matrix comprises 0.50-4.0, such as 0.70-3.0 or 1.0-3.0 micromoles vinylpyrrolidone monomer residues per ml matrix.
• the content of vinylpyrrolidone monomer residues can be determined spectroscopically (e.g. NMR OR FTIR) or e.g. by nitrogen elemental analysis, where any nitrogens introduced via positively charged monomers can be titrated and subtracted from the total nitrogen.
• a high content of vinylpyrrolidone monomer residues is advantageous for both the binding capacity and the stability of the treated beverage.
• the matrix comprises 0.50 - 0.80 g, such as 0.60-0.80 g,
• polyvinylpyrrolidone polymer per g dried matrix may comprise 100- 200 mg, such as 120-180 mg, polyvinylpyrrolidone polymer per ml drained matrix.
• a high content of polyvinylpyrrolidone polymer is advantageous for both the binding capacity and the stability of the treated beverage.
• High polyvinylpyrrolidone polymer contents are particularly advantageous in combination with high porosities as discussed above. Overly high polyvinylpyrrolidone polymer contents may however have a negative influence on mass transport and/or the mechanical properties of the matrix.
• the matrix comprises less than 5 micrograms, such as less than 2 or less than 1 microgram carbon leachables per g dry matrix.
• Low leachable contents can be achieved by careful washing of the matrix before use and by using support materials which by themselves have low leachables content.
• the amount of carbon leachables can suitably be determined by the methods described in M Andersson et al: Process Biochemistry 33(1), 47-55, 1998, where 10 ml water-swollen matrix is incubated in 50 ml high purity water for 1 week and the total organic carbon (TOC) content of the water supernatant is determined. It is advantageous to minimize the leachables/extractables content due to food safety concerns but also with respect to purity regulations concerning e.g. beer in certain countries.
• the poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) (hereafter denoted PVP) can be attached in a grafting reaction sequence as shown in Figure 1.
• a hydroxyl-functional base matrix e.g. a cross-linked agarose base matrix such as SepharoseTM Big Beads.
• a radical initiator e.g. ADBA
• reaction solvents sodium sulfate
• the mixture is heated, whereby the initiator decomposes and forms free radicals that start a polymerization of vinyl pyrrolidone.
• the growing PVP chains can also react with the allyl groups on the particles and this way PVP chains are attached covalently to the particles.
• the fine structure of the PVP chains it not known in detail, e.g. the molecular weight, molecular weight distribution and how much of the allyl groups that are consumed.
• a main parameter that can be measured is the dry weight (solids content) of 1 mL gel before and after the grafting reaction. This way the amount of attached PVP in mg/mL can be calculated.
• the polymerization of VP is an exothermic reaction.
• the potential temperature rise will be affected by the reaction speed, the total amount of heat and by how much reaction solvent that is present to take up the heat (i.e. the heat capacity of the solvent).
• the total amount of heat generated will be governed mainly by the amount of VP used while the speed of the reaction will determine the amount of generated heat per time unit.
• the initiator concentration and the reaction temperature are the main parameters that will affect the speed of the reaction.
• a temp log can be used to track the temperature in the reaction vessel over time.
• the present invention discloses a method for stabilizing a fermented beverage, e.g. beer, comprising the steps of:
• the separation matrix can e.g. be a separation matrix as disclosed above.;
• the residence time of the beverage in the column can e.g. be 2 min or less, such as 1 min or less or 10 s - 1 min.
• the residence time is calculated as the bed height (cm) of the column divided by the flow velocity (cm/min) of the beverage through the bed of the column.
• a short residence time is desirable for economical reasons and the matrices of the invention have a sufficiently high mass transport rate to allow sufficient haze stabilization at residence times below 1 or 2 min.
• the stabilized beverage (beer) in step b) can have a chill haze of less than 25% of the chill haze for the beverage before passage of said column.
• the chill haze can suitably be measured according to the well known EBC method (method no. 31.1) and the residence time on the column can be less than 1 minute, such as 18 s.
• the regeneration solution comprises NaOH, such as at least 0.1 M NaOH or 0.1-2 M NaOH, e.g. about 1 M NaOH.
• NaOH solutions can efficiently remove adsorbed contaminants and NaOH is also an accepted cleaning agent in the beverage industry, which if the pH is controlled after cleaning does not leave any toxic or bad tasting residues.
• the present invention discloses a method of manufacturing the separation matrix as disclosed above. This method comprises the steps of:
• step a) comprises either i) providing a divinylbenzene copolymer support, which comprises at least 5 micromole/ml residual double bonds, or ii) reacting a hydoxyfunctional support with an allyl halide or allylglycidyl ether.
• step c) is performed with the support suspended in an aqueous solution comprising the monomer composition and 0.05-3 mol/1 of a salt, such as 0.1 - 2 M sodium sulfate or ammonium sulfate.
• a salt such as 0.1 - 2 M sodium sulfate or ammonium sulfate.
• the tannoids are the amount of polyphenols which are PVP-precipitable. Among them are low to middle molecular weight polyphenols as well as polymers of catechin and anthocyanogens. Tannoids come from malt and hops. Although they are present in small quantities in beer, they are of great significance with regard to the colloid stability and the flavour consistency. The tannoid content of beer, worts, barley, malt and hops extracts can be determined by means of precipitation using PVP. PVP, a protein-like compound, attaches to tannoids via H-bridges and forms insoluble complexes with them, thus leading to turbidity.
• the total polyphenol assay covers all polyphenols. Beers with high amount of total polyphenols >200 mg/L are considered to be difficult to stabilize while beers with total polyphenol ⁇ 150 mg/L are more easy to stabilize using PVPP treatment.
• the total polyphenol determination is made by reacting beer polyphenols with ammonium iron citrate at basic conditions. The ferric-polyphenol complex is measured at absorbance at 600 nm against a blank solution.
• Example 1 Grafting study The main purpose of the study was to find reaction conditions where a suitable amount of PVP could be attached, where the temperature is under control and boiling can be avoided. The following synthesis parameters were included in the study.
• Initiator concentration (varied between 1.0 and 1.9 % w/w)
• the amount of gel to be grafted is the amount of gel to be grafted.
• This parameter determines how much of the reaction suspension in weight-% that should consist of VP and initiator, the active substances.
• Initiator concentration [% w/w J: This parameter determines how many % initiator that should be used in relation to the amount of VP.
• Beads of 6% agarose crosslinked with epichlorohydrin and having an average (volume- weighted) diameter of 200 micrometers (a sieve fraction between 100 and 300 micrometers) were used as the base matrix.
• 100 mL base matrix gel was transferred to a glass filter (pore size rate 2) and sucked dry.
• the round bottom flask was mounted and immersed in a bath that held 50°C.
• a two-bladed swing-out stirrer with a 5 cm diameter was used and the stirring was set at 350 rpm.
• 33.0 g allylglycidyl ether was added.
• the reaction was let to stand for 18 hours.
• the reaction was then neutralized with 114.98 g of 60% acetic acid in portions.
• the gel was washed with 20xGV water followed by 5xGV of ethanol, 20xGV of water again and finally 3xGV 20 % ethanol solution.
• the allyl content was determined by titration and was found to be 231 micromol/mL
• the round bottom flask was mounted. An overhead stirrer motor with a 5 cm swing-out two- blade agitator was used. Nitrogen gas was bubbled through the reaction solution (with a Pasteur pipette) for about 25 minutes. The stirring rate was 200 rpm. A glycerol bath was set to 45 degrees. When this temperature was reached the round-bottom flask was immersed in the glycerol bath and the reaction was started.
• the gel was washed with 20 L of distilled water, and 1 L of 20 % ethanol. The dry weight was recorded after the grafting reaction, and was found to be 265mg/mL. Dry weight measurement
• a dry weight balance set at 120° C was used for all dry weight measurements.
• 1 mL of gel is transferred from a glass filter with a PTFE top designed to accommodate 1.0 ml filter cake to the aluminium cup of the balance.
• a recipe is sought that gives 100-200 mg/mL of attached PVP, where there is no significant temperature rise during the reaction and that is in all aspects suitable for production scale.
• Table 2 Overview of further prototypes.
• the first prototype, 311 had an allyl content of 170 ⁇ /mL.
• the amount of PVP that was attached was 216 mg/mL.
• the synthesis setup for this set of experiments was thus deemed to be OK, although the exotherm caused boiling.
• a very viscous solution is formed that is spun up around the stirrer. The viscosity increased simultaneously with the occurrence of the boiling. The reaction never boiled over however and was therefore allowed to proceed overnight.
• the next experiment was 354, where the amount of initiator was decreased from 1.9 % to 1.0 %.
• the theory was that a lower initiator concentration should lower the speed of the reaction and this could potentially reduce the risk of boiling. This did not turn out to be the case; boiling still occurred. However the boiling was indeed postponed from 17 minutes to 29 minutes.
• the amount of PVP that was attached was in fact higher than for 311, 227 mg/mL compared to 216 mg/mL.
• the initiator concentration was therefore set to 1.0 % since this had a positive effect on both boiling and the amount of PVP that was attached. This parameter could however be optimized further in future studies, an even lower initiator concentration would for example be interesting to investigate.
• the amount of PVP attached was also clearly lower for 410 compared to 374, 120 mg/mL compared to 238 mg/mL. It is interesting to see that a reduction in half of the VP concentration results in half the amount of VP attached. The effect of the allyl content was not very
• 538 is a reproduction of 493 to ensure that the recipe is robust. An almost identical result was obtained 194 mg/mL in attached PVP for 538 compared to 192 mg/mL for 493,
• the amount of VP+initiator is an important synthesis parameter; it significantly affects the amount of PVP that is attached, the boiling tendency and the viscosity of the reaction solution.
• the allyl content affects the amount of PVP that is attached; higher allyl contents give higher amounts of PVP attached. The effect is not dramatic however. When the amount of allyl groups is reduced from 166 to 82 ⁇ /mL the amount of PVP attached is only reduced from 192 to 165 mg/mL.
• Prototypes shown in Table 3, except 9018, were evaluated by flowing 750 ml non-stabilized lager beer through a column packed with 1 mL of the resin prototype at a flow-rate of 3.3 mL/min (18 sec residence time) and at a temperature of ⁇ 5 °C.
• the flow-through beer was analysed with "Alcohol chill haze”, “Tannoids” and “total polyphenols” and compared to non- stabilized beer and non-stabilized beer that has been processed through CSS adsorber (Q
• Each prototype and reference (CSS adsorber lot 10039019) was packed in a Tricorn 5/100 column (GE Healthcare) at 2 mL/min.
• the bed height was adjusted to 5.1 ⁇ 0.1 cm at 2 mL/min to obtain a bed-volume of 1.0 mL resin.
• the top adaptor was adjusted 1 mm below the 5.1 cm mark and the column was equilibrated at 2 mL/min with 5 column volumes of water prior to the beer application.
• Figure 4 shows the set-up of the miniaturised beer stabilization application.
• a 18 L Cornelius bottle of non- stabilised beer was obtained from Slottkallans brewery (Uppsala, Sweden) and put into a 0 °C incubator for three days. Fresh beer that has been sterile filtered must be restored for a couple of days to obtain stable results.
• the tube from the beer bottle was split into 2 pumps and 4 pump heads (P-900 pumps, GE Healthcare) to be able to run 4 prototypes simultaneously. Since it is impossible to remove bubbles from the beer tubes the actual flow-rate must be calibrated.
• All pump-heads was set to 4.0 mL/min and 10 mL volumetric flasks were filled and the time to fill up the volumetric flasks to the mark was noted and the actual flow-rate with beer was calculated to 3.3 mL/min for all pump-heads.
• the 4 columns with prototypes were put into the incubator and tubes from the pump-heads were connected to the columns. 1000 mL collection bottles were connected after each column in the incubator.
• the first column in the test series was always the reference column containing CSS adsorber lot 10039019. These beads have diameters in the range of 100-300 micrometers, with volume-weighted average diameter 200 micrometers and a quaternary ammonium group content of 0.18-0.25 mmol/ml.
• Beer samples from the 1000 mL collection bottles were analyzed within 20 hour after beer stabilization process.
• First non-stabilized beer from the Cornelius bottle was analyzed followed by the CSS adsorber reference sample and the prototypes.
• -20 mL beer was transferred into a 50 mL Falcon tube and the tube was shaken briefly to remove carbon dioxide. After the beer has been settled, 4 x 1.0 mL of the beer was pipetted carefully into the cuvette.
• 120 ⁇ L ethanol was pipetted into the clean cuvette and the cuvette was turned carefully up and down 5 times prior analysis.
• 0.6 mL ethylene glycol was added to the cuvette chamber in the Tannometer to increase the thermal contact between the cuvette and the cooler.
• the cuvette was placed in the cuvette chamber and the Alcohol chill haze analysis was started.
• the sample in the cuvette was frozen down to -5 °C and the turbidity was measured after the sample has been incubated for 40 minutes. It was shown that after -10 minutes, the turbidity remained same turbidity as for 40 minutes, so for some samples the turbidity was monitored after 20 minutes to speed up the analysis.
• the alcohol chill haze was calculated by subtracting the final haze with the initial haze in EBC units. See figure 5.
• Beer samples from the 1000 mL collection bottles were analyzed within 4 hours after beer stabilization process.
• First non-stabilized beer from the Cornelius bottle were analyzed followed by the CSS adsorber reference sample and prototypes.
• -50 mL beer was filtered through a WhatmanTM filter paper into a 200 mL E-flask.
• 2x 10 mL of beer was pipetted into two 25 mL volumetric flask.
• 8 mL of the CMC/EDTA solution was added into both volumetric flasks.
• 500 ⁇ ⁇ ferric reagent was added only to one flask and 500 ⁇ ⁇ ammonia solution was pipetted into both volumetric flasks.
• MilliQTM water was added to the mark of the volumetric flasks.
• the flasks were mixed briefly.
• the flask without ferric reagent was the blank sample.
• the absorbance at 600 nm was measured after >10 min (within 60 min) for sample and blank, using a 10 cm cuvette.
• the total polyphenol content in the flask was calculated by the formula: Were
• a B Absorbance for blank, AU
• Total polyphenol reduction was calculated by dividing total polyphenols of the beer sample processed through prototypes with total polyphenols from non-stabilized beer.
• Figure 6 shows the results of the tannoid content. "Uppsala 1" lot was used.
• Table 4 shows the alcohol chill haze analysis results for the prototypes.
• the chill haze was normalized and the relative percentage of chill haze compared to non-stabilized beer was calculated for the prototypes. "Uppsala 1" lot was used. Table 4. Alcohol chill haze results.
• Table 5 and figure 8 show the total polyphenol reduction results.
• Total polyphenol reduction was measured for the 750 mL beer fraction and also for the 50 mL fraction, collected after the 750 mL to investigate if the prototype was still adsorbing total polyphenols.
• the first bar is the 750 mL fraction and the second bar is the 50 mL fraction. "Uppsala 2" beer lot was used. Table 5. Polyphenol reduction results
• alcohol chill haze assay also includes simple monomeric flavanols that are not able to crosslink polypeptides above 0 °C and at less alcohol content. These flavanols are also not able to polymerise since the oxidation products of these polyphenols are stable. Beer processed through 311, 377 and 431 showed zero in tannoid content and differed 2.8-4.4 EBC units in chill haze. It is therefore mainly the selectivity to bind simple monomeric flavanols that differs between prototypes.
• Agarose beads grafted with diethylene glycol vinyl ether (DEGVE) were prepared according to the methods disclosed in US20100028505 and US Pat. 8, 137,559 by alkylating SepharoseTM 6 FastFlow crosslinked agarose beads (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences AB) with allyl glycidyl ether and reacting 10 g humid allylated beads with a solution of 1.6 g 2,2'-azobis(2- methylbutyronitrile) in 40 g di ethylene glycol vinyl ether at 70°C for 18h under inert atmosphere. The beads were then washed with large amounts of water and ethanol. The content of grafted DEGVE was measured from the increase in dry content and was found to be 0.76 mmol DEGVE monomer residues per mL beads.
• DEGVE diethylene glycol vinyl ether

Landscapes

• Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
• Organic Chemistry (AREA)
• Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
• Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
• Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
• Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
• General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
• Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
• Biochemistry (AREA)
• Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
• Food Science & Technology (AREA)
• General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
• Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
• Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
• Zoology (AREA)
• Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
• Polymers & Plastics (AREA)
• Solid-Sorbent Or Filter-Aiding Compositions (AREA)
• Distillation Of Fermentation Liquor, Processing Of Alcohols, Vinegar And Beer (AREA)
• Treatment Of Liquids With Adsorbents In General (AREA)
• Addition Polymer Or Copolymer, Post-Treatments, Or Chemical Modifications (AREA)

Priority Applications (7)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Publications (1)

Family

ID=53199462

Family Applications (1)

Country Status (8)

Cited By (2)

Families Citing this family (1)

Citations (6)

Family Cites Families (28)

• 2014
  • 2014-11-26 CN CN201480065006.5A patent/CN105744996B/zh active Active
  • 2014-11-26 US US15/037,539 patent/US10465153B2/en active Active
  • 2014-11-26 AU AU2014355200A patent/AU2014355200B2/en active Active
  • 2014-11-26 MX MX2016006663A patent/MX2016006663A/es active IP Right Grant
  • 2014-11-26 WO PCT/SE2014/051407 patent/WO2015080657A1/en not_active Ceased
  • 2014-11-26 EP EP14866010.3A patent/EP3074106B1/en active Active
  • 2014-11-26 JP JP2016534128A patent/JP6851581B2/ja active Active
  • 2014-11-26 BR BR112016011660-7A patent/BR112016011660B1/pt active IP Right Grant

Patent Citations (7)

Non-Patent Citations (4)

Also Published As

Similar Documents

Legal Events