WO2009093488A1 - 水素ガス中疲労試験方法 - Google Patents
水素ガス中疲労試験方法 Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2009093488A1 WO2009093488A1 PCT/JP2009/050196 JP2009050196W WO2009093488A1 WO 2009093488 A1 WO2009093488 A1 WO 2009093488A1 JP 2009050196 W JP2009050196 W JP 2009050196W WO 2009093488 A1 WO2009093488 A1 WO 2009093488A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- fatigue
- condition
- hydrogen
- crack
- test piece
- Prior art date
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N3/00—Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress
- G01N3/32—Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress by applying repeated or pulsating forces
- G01N3/34—Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress by applying repeated or pulsating forces generated by mechanical means, e.g. hammer blows
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N2203/00—Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress
- G01N2203/0058—Kind of property studied
- G01N2203/006—Crack, flaws, fracture or rupture
- G01N2203/0062—Crack or flaws
- G01N2203/0066—Propagation of crack
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N2203/00—Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress
- G01N2203/02—Details not specific for a particular testing method
- G01N2203/022—Environment of the test
- G01N2203/0236—Other environments
- G01N2203/0242—With circulation of a fluid
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N2203/00—Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress
- G01N2203/02—Details not specific for a particular testing method
- G01N2203/026—Specifications of the specimen
- G01N2203/0262—Shape of the specimen
- G01N2203/027—Specimens with holes or notches
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a fatigue test method for specifying a crack length that has propagated under a predetermined condition from a fatigue fracture surface of a test piece.
- Patent Document 1 As a fatigue test method for confirming the progress of a crack imparted to a test piece, there is a method of imparting a beach mark to the test piece.
- the beach mark is given by the following procedure.
- a crack is formed in advance on the surface of the test piece. Then, as shown in FIG. 1A, a load is applied at a predetermined repetition rate, a predetermined stress amplitude, and a predetermined number of repetitions so that the crack propagates.
- the stress amplitude is ⁇ 1
- the number of repetitions is N 1 .
- a load is applied by changing at least one or both of the repetition rate and the stress amplitude to a value different from the first load condition.
- the stress amplitude is ⁇ 2 ( ⁇ 0.5 ⁇ 1 )
- the repetition rate and the stress amplitude are set to values in a range where the crack hardly propagates. This is because the fretting oxide based on repeated contact of the fracture surface is remarkably formed when the crack growth rate is extremely reduced. This fretting oxide becomes visible as a black belt-like beach mark along the crack leading edge when the load condition is changed.
- the crack growth rate must be extremely slow in order to impart a beach mark, so the first load at which fatigue develops can be obtained in a single fatigue test. Only the crack length developed under the conditions. That is, there is a problem that the crack progress under the first load condition can be confirmed from the fatigue fracture surface of the test piece, but the crack progress under the latter load condition cannot be confirmed.
- the present invention has been made in view of such problems, and its purpose is to change the test repetition rate (frequency) by changing the hydrogen in the test piece (hydrogen and hydrogen penetrating the test piece in a hydrogen gas atmosphere). (Or hydrogen contained in the specimen in advance) has an effect on the growth of cracks, resulting in the formation of different fatigue fracture surfaces.
- the purpose is to provide a technique capable of confirming the progress of each crack related to the conditions.
- it is an object of the present invention to provide a technique for acquiring each fatigue crack growth curve for a plurality of repetition rates in a single fatigue test.
- 1st invention is the fatigue test method in the hydrogen gas atmosphere of the test piece which does not contain hydrogen, or the test piece containing hydrogen, Comprising: The predetermined stress amplitude with which the crack currently formed in the said test piece progresses, A first loading step of applying a load to the test piece in the hydrogen gas atmosphere under a first condition consisting of a predetermined repetition rate and a predetermined number of repetitions; a predetermined stress amplitude at which the crack propagates; A second loading step for applying a load to the test piece in the hydrogen gas atmosphere under a second condition, which comprises a predetermined repetition rate and a predetermined number of repetitions, and at least a second condition different from the first condition.
- hydrogen in the test piece means I.I.
- hydrogen indicates hydrogen that has been contained in the test piece by hydrogen entering the test piece in a hydrogen gas atmosphere
- II When hydrogen was contained in the test piece in advance, the hydrogen contained in the test piece in the hydrogen gas atmosphere and hydrogen contained in the test piece led to inclusion in the test piece.
- the first invention can be applied to both the case where the test piece is a hydrogen charged material and the case where the test piece is an uncharged material.
- the second invention is a fatigue test method for a test piece containing hydrogen, comprising a predetermined stress amplitude at which a crack formed in the test piece propagates, a predetermined repetition rate, and a predetermined number of repetitions.
- the first condition includes a first loading step for applying a load to the test piece, a predetermined stress amplitude at which the crack propagates, a predetermined repetition rate, and a predetermined number of repetitions.
- a second loading step for applying a weight to the test piece at least under a second condition having a different repetition rate, and the hydrogen in the test piece is changed as the repetition rate changes.
- the first crack length developed under the first condition and the first crack propagated under the second condition are based on the phenomenon that the influence on the crack growth is different and the appearance of the fatigue fracture surface is different. Each of the two crack lengths The features.
- the above-mentioned “hydrogen in the test piece” indicates hydrogen contained in the test piece in advance. That is, the second invention is naturally applicable when the test piece is a hydrogen-charged material, but even if the test piece is an uncharged material, the hydrogen content of the test piece is constant (examples described later). In this case, it is also applicable to the case of 2.6 mass ppm or more.
- the third invention is the fatigue test method of the invention 1 or 2, wherein the second condition has the same stress amplitude as the first condition.
- a fourth invention is the fatigue test method according to 1 selected from the inventions 1 to 3, wherein the first condition is based on the specified first crack length and the first condition.
- a first fatigue crack growth curve indicating a relationship between a stress intensity factor and a crack growth rate below, and based on the specified second crack length and the second condition,
- a second fatigue crack growth curve showing the relationship between the stress intensity factor and the crack growth rate under the above conditions is obtained.
- the fatigue test method according to the present invention is based on the condition that hydrogen is present in the test piece.
- the degree of influence of hydrogen on the crack propagation also changes (the effect of hydrogen increases as the repetition rate decreases).
- the repetition rate By mutually changing the repetition rate, it is possible to alternately cause an area where the influence of hydrogen is large and an area where the influence of hydrogen is small within the same fatigue fracture surface.
- the fracture surface appearance such as the surface roughness is different, and as a result, a striped pattern is formed. That is, a plurality of load conditions can all be the conditions under which the crack propagates, and it is possible to specify the length of each crack related to a plurality of repetition rate conditions in a single fatigue test. .
- the present invention is particularly suitable for testing under high-pressure hydrogen gas required by a fuel cell vehicle under development (the pressure of hydrogen gas is currently 35 MPa and is estimated to be 70 MPa in the future). It is effective for.
- high-pressure hydrogen gas is confined in a pressure vessel with a large plate pressure, it is difficult to use a conventional optical or electrical crack length measurement technique.
- the cost of being able to specify the crack length for each of multiple repetition rate conditions in the environment, eliminating the need to remove the test piece, etc., and eliminating the need to repeatedly take in and out the high-pressure hydrogen gas There are also safety advantages.
- each crack length related to a plurality of load conditions in one fatigue test since it is possible to specify each crack length related to a plurality of load conditions in one fatigue test, it is possible to acquire each fatigue crack growth curve related to the plurality of conditions. This contributes greatly to improving the efficiency of fatigue tests.
- FIG. 1 is a diagram showing an outline of a conventional fatigue test method.
- FIG. 2A is a diagram showing the dimensions of the fatigue test piece
- FIG. 2B is a diagram showing the dimensions of the artificial microholes provided in the fatigue test piece.
- FIG. 3 is an example of a fatigue crack generated from an artificial microhole.
- FIG. 4 is a graph showing the relationship between the number of repetitions and the crack length in a fatigue test.
- FIG. 4 (a) shows the test results of SUS304
- FIG. 4 (b) shows SUS316
- FIG. 4 (c) shows the results of SUS316L. It is.
- FIG. 5 is a graph showing the relationship between the number of repetitions and the crack length in the fatigue test of SUS316L.
- FIG. 5 is a graph showing the relationship between the number of repetitions and the crack length in the fatigue test of SUS316L.
- FIG. 6 is a graph showing the relationship between the number of repetitions and the crack length in the fatigue test of SUS316L, and is a graph showing the relationship after the crack length reaches 200 ⁇ m.
- FIG. 7 is a diagram showing an outline of the fatigue test method of the present invention.
- FIG. 8A is a diagram showing a weighted variation when a SUS304 hydrogen charge material is subjected to a fatigue test in a hydrogen atmosphere
- FIG. 8B is a fatigue fracture surface due to the fatigue test.
- c) is a diagram showing the relationship between the number of repetitions and the crack length.
- FIG. 9 shows a fatigue fracture surface when a hydrogen charge material of SCM435 is subjected to a fatigue test in the atmosphere.
- FIG. 9 shows a fatigue fracture surface when a hydrogen charge material of SCM435 is subjected to a fatigue test in the atmosphere.
- FIG. 10 is a diagram showing a fatigue crack growth curve when a hydrogen charge material and non-charge material of SCM435 are subjected to a fatigue test in the atmosphere.
- FIG. 11 is a diagram showing the hydrogen content of a hydrogen-charged material and a non-charged material of austenitic stainless steel (SUS316L).
- Test pieces The materials used were austenitic stainless steel SUS304, SUS316, and SUSU316L (A) (hereinafter simply referred to as SUSU316L). As the SUS304, SUS316, and SUSU316L, those subjected to solution treatment were used.
- FIG. 2A shows the shape of the test piece. The surface of the test piece was polished to # 2000 with emery paper and then finished by buffing. For each test piece, both the hydrogen-charged and the non-hydrogen-charged shown below are prepared.
- FIG. 2B In order to easily observe the fatigue crack growth, as shown in FIG. 2B, an artificial microhole having a diameter of 100 ⁇ m and a depth of 100 ⁇ m in the central portion in the longitudinal direction of the test piece and perpendicular to the longitudinal direction.
- the test part is a cylindrical part at the center of the test piece shown in FIG. 2 (a), and the length of this cylinder is about 20 mm.
- the top surface and the bottom surface of the cylinder are parallel and perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the test piece.
- FIG. 3 is a diagram showing an outline of the test unit. Examples of the direction of load applied to the test piece and fatigue cracks generated from the introduced artificial microhole are shown. In the case of a test piece charged with hydrogen, immediately after the completion of hydrogen charge, buffing was performed again to open an artificial microhole.
- Hydrogen charging was performed by a cathodic charging method.
- the solution temperature was 50 ° C. (323 K)
- hydrogen charging was performed for 672 hours (4 weeks)
- the temperature was 80 ° C. (353 K)
- hydrogen charging was performed for 336 hours (2 weeks).
- the aqueous sulfuric acid solution was changed every week in order to reduce the change in sulfuric acid concentration due to evaporation.
- FIG. 4 is a graph showing the relationship between the crack length and the number of repetitions in a fatigue test.
- 4A shows the test results of SUS304
- FIG. 4B shows the test results of SUS316
- FIG. 4C shows the test results of SUS316L.
- Each material SUS304, SUS316, SUS316L was compared with the case where it was charged with hydrogen and the case where it was not charged with hydrogen.
- the repetition rate was 1.2 Hz for SUS304 and SUS316, and 5 Hz for SUS316L.
- FIG. 5 is a graph illustrating the results of a fatigue test of SUS316L.
- hydrogen charge is not performed, and hydrogen content is 2.6 mass ppm in a state where hydrogen content is not performed, and two materials having a hydrogen content of 0.4 mass ppm and 2.6 mass ppm.
- the fatigue test result of the material which performed hydrogen charge with respect to ppm material and was set to 3.9 mass ppm is shown.
- the repetition rate is 1.5 Hz until the fatigue crack length reaches 200 ⁇ m. After the fatigue crack length reached 200 ⁇ m, the repetition rate was changed from 1.5 Hz to 0.0015 Hz.
- a material having a hydrogen content of 2.6 ppm by mass and 3.9 ppm by mass requires about 10,000 repetitions until the fatigue crack length reaches 200 ⁇ m, but a material having a hydrogen content of 0.4 ppm It requires 60000 or more, and it can be said that there is a clear difference between the two. From this result, it can be confirmed that the material having a hydrogen content of 2.6 ppm by mass and 3.9 ppm by mass has a higher crack growth rate than the material having a hydrogen content of 0.4 ppm by mass. .
- FIG. 6 is a graph illustrating the results of a fatigue test of SUS316L.
- hydrogen charge is not performed, and hydrogen content is 2.6 mass ppm in a state where hydrogen content is not performed, and two materials having a hydrogen content of 0.4 mass ppm and 2.6 mass ppm.
- Hydrogen material was charged to 3.9 mass ppm by performing hydrogen charge on the ppm material, and hydrogen material was charged to 2.6 mass ppm in the same state without hydrogen charge.
- the fatigue test results of the material with a mass ppm of 1 are shown. There are two repetition rates, 1.5 Hz and 0.0015 Hz.
- FIG. 7A shows an example of a load applied to the test piece.
- the second condition is different from the first condition by at least the repetition rate.
- the test piece breaks.
- the repetition rate f 1 of condition 1 0.01 Hz
- the fatigue fracture surface the influence of hydrogen is large area area effect of hydrogen and (repetition rate f area developed in 1) is small (area developed by the repetition rate f 2) appeared alternately, both areas Since the fracture surface appearance is different, the boundary line becomes visible.
- the fatigue fracture surface has a substantially concentric striped beach mark centered on the crack occurrence point (the beach mark here is not a fretting oxide). And a boundary line that can be visually recognized based on the difference in fracture surface appearance).
- the range surrounded by the first beach mark and the second beach mark from the crack generation point toward the crack expansion direction is the range of the crack that has propagated under the first condition. . In the figure, it is shown in a blackened range.
- the range surrounded by the 2nd beach mark and the 3rd beach mark is the range of cracks that developed under the 2nd condition. In the figure, it is the range sandwiched between the black areas. And, since the cracks alternately propagate under the first condition and the second condition, if the odd number is n (1, 3, 5,...) And the even number is m (2, 4, 6,...) ,
- the range surrounded by the nth beach mark and the n + 1th beach mark is identified as the range of the crack that has developed under the first condition (hereinafter referred to as the “first range”), and the mth beach A range surrounded by the mark and the (m + 1) th beach mark is specified as a range of a crack that has propagated under the second condition (hereinafter referred to as “second range”).
- a plurality of relationships of (stress intensity factor ⁇ K, fatigue crack growth rate da / dN) can also be obtained for the second condition, and as a result, the second condition
- Test Example 1 Fatigue test in hydrogen gas atmosphere
- the test piece used here is SUS304 charged with hydrogen.
- FIG. 8C shows the relationship between the number of repetitions and the crack length in this experiment.
- the initial value of the crack length is 245 ⁇ m, and the crack gradually develops by applying a load alternately under the first condition and the second condition.
- the first beach mark appears when the cumulative number of repetitions is 2700
- the second beach mark appears at 2800
- the third beach mark appears at 2900.
- the number of repetitions is 2800 times.
- fretting oxide since the formation of fretting oxide is unnecessary, even when the fatigue test is performed in the hydrogen atmosphere gas atmosphere of this example, a plurality of fretting oxides are formed based on the difference in the fatigue fracture surface appearance. It is possible to specify the length of each crack with respect to the load condition. As a result, there is a safety advantage in terms of cost that it is not necessary to drain hydrogen every predetermined period in a test in a high-pressure hydrogen atmosphere, open the pressure vessel, and refill with hydrogen after collecting replicas. .
- the crack length can be specified, it is possible to obtain a fatigue crack growth curve indicating the relationship between the stress intensity factor and the crack growth rate for each of the first condition and the second condition. .
- a hydrogen charged material is used as a test piece.
- hydrogen enters the test piece in a hydrogen gas atmosphere, and hydrogen is contained in the test piece. Therefore, the above test method can be applied.
- Test Example 2 (Fatigue test in the atmosphere)
- test examples in which the fatigue test method of the present invention is applied in the air (in an oxidizing atmosphere) will be described with reference to FIGS.
- the test piece used here is SCM435 charged with hydrogen.
- the second condition has the same stress amplitude as the first condition and a different repetition rate.
- FIG. 10 shows a fatigue crack growth curve concerning the first condition (repetition rate 0.01 Hz) and a fatigue crack growth curve concerning the second condition (repetition rate 10 Hz) obtained as described above.
- the fatigue showing the relationship between the stress intensity factor and the crack growth rate with respect to each of the first condition and the second condition. It is possible to obtain a crack growth curve.
- austenitic stainless steel such as SUS304 contains about 2.6 mass ppm of hydrogen originally contained from the time of steelmaking. As described above, this hydrogen content is a value sufficient to influence the progress of fatigue cracks. Then, by changing the repetition rate, the effect of originally contained hydrogen on the fatigue crack growth changes, and the area where the influence of hydrogen is large and the area where the influence of hydrogen is small appear alternately. Since the fracture surface appearance is different, the boundary line becomes visible.
- the present invention can be used when a hydrogen charged material or an uncharged material is subjected to a fatigue test in a hydrogen gas atmosphere.
- it can be used when a fatigue test is performed in an oxidizing atmosphere for a hydrogen-charged material or an uncharged material having a hydrogen content above a certain level.
- it is a useful technique in the metal manufacturing industry that manufactures steel materials and the like used in a hydrogen environment, and in the hydrogen infrastructure construction industry.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Immunology (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Investigating Strength Of Materials By Application Of Mechanical Stress (AREA)
- Testing Resistance To Weather, Investigating Materials By Mechanical Methods (AREA)
Abstract
Description
第1の発明は、水素を含有しない試験片又は水素を含有する試験片の水素ガス雰囲気中における疲労試験方法であって、前記試験片に形成されているき裂が進展する所定の応力振幅、所定の繰返し速度、及び所定の繰返し数からなる第1の条件で、前記水素ガス雰囲気中の前記試験片に荷重を加える第1の加荷重ステップと、前記き裂が進展する所定の応力振幅、所定の繰返し速度、及び所定の繰返し数からなり、前記第1の条件と少なくとも繰返し速度が異なる第2の条件で、前記水素ガス雰囲気中の前記試験片に加重を加える第2の加荷重ステップと、を相互に繰り返し、前記繰返し速度の変化に伴って、前記試験片中の水素が前記き裂の進展に及ぼす影響が異なり、これにより疲労破面の様相が異なるという現象に基づいて、前記第1の条件下で進展した第1のき裂長さ及び前記第2の条件下で進展した第2のき裂長さを各々特定することを特徴とする。
まず、試験片に含有される水素が疲労き裂の進展に及ぼす影響について説明する。
水素は、金属材料中に侵入し、材料の静的強度や疲労強度を低下させることが知られている(例えば、上記非特許文献1、2)。本発明の発明者等は、次の実験を行い、試験片に含まれる水素がどのように疲労き裂の進展速度に影響するかを確認した。
使用した材料は、オーステナイト系ステンレス鋼SUS304、SUS316、及びSUSU316L(A)(以下、単にSUSU316Lという。)である。SUS304、SUS316、及びSUSU316Lは、溶体化処理を行ったものを用いた。図2(a)には、試験片の形状を図示している。試験片の表面は、エメリー紙で#2000まで研磨した後、バフ研磨により仕上げたものである。各試験片に関して、以下に示す水素チャージしたものと、水素チャージしていないものを双方準備する。
水素チャージは、陰極チャージ法によって行った。水素チャージの条件は、pH=3.5の硫酸水溶液、白金陽極、電流密度i=27A/m2である。溶液温度が50℃(323K)の場合は、672時間(4週間)、温度が80℃(353K)の場合は、336時間(2週間)の水素チャージを行った。硫酸水溶液は、蒸発による硫酸濃度の変化を小さくするために、1週間ごとに交換した。
疲労試験は、繰返し速度0.0015~5Hz、応力比R=-1で行った。繰返し速度は疲労試験中に試験部表面温度が60℃を超えないように調節した。レプリカ法により疲労き裂を観察するとともに疲労き裂の長さの測定を行った。
図5及び図6に示した実験結果から、水素チャージされているか否かにかかわらず、試験片の水素含有量が一定以上であれば(本例では2.6質量ppm程度)、疲労き裂進展速度に影響を与えることを確認した。また、繰返し速度が遅いほど、疲労き裂進展速度が速くなることを確認した。これを踏まえつつ、以下では本発明について具体例を用いて説明する。
以下、本発明に係る疲労試験方法を図面に従って説明する。まず図7を用いて、本発明の疲労試験方法の概要について説明し、次に図8~図11を用いて本発明の疲労試験方法を適用した試験例について説明する。
次に図8を用いて、本発明の疲労試験方法を水素ガス雰囲気中で適用した試験例について説明する。ここで用いる試験片は水素チャージを行ったSUS304である。各試験片の中央表面には、予め長さが2a=245μmのき裂を形成している。本疲労試験は水素雰囲気中で行う。
次に図9~図10を用いて、本発明の疲労試験方法を大気中(酸化雰囲気中)で適用した試験例について説明する。ここで用いる試験片は水素チャージを行ったSCM435である。
Claims (4)
- 水素を含有しない試験片又は水素を含有する試験片の水素ガス雰囲気中における疲労試験方法であって、
前記試験片に形成されているき裂が進展する所定の応力振幅、所定の繰返し速度、及び所定の繰返し数からなる第1の条件で、前記水素ガス雰囲気中の前記試験片に荷重を加える第1の加荷重ステップと、
前記き裂が進展する所定の応力振幅、所定の繰返し速度、及び所定の繰返し数からなり、前記第1の条件と少なくとも繰返し速度が異なる第2の条件で、前記水素ガス雰囲気中の前記試験片に加重を加える第2の加荷重ステップと、
を相互に繰り返し、
前記繰返し速度の変化に伴って、前記試験片中の水素が前記き裂の進展に及ぼす影響が異なり、これにより疲労破面の様相が異なるという現象に基づいて、前記第1の条件下で進展した第1のき裂長さ及び前記第2の条件下で進展した第2のき裂長さを各々特定することを特徴とする疲労試験方法。 - 水素を含有する試験片の疲労試験方法であって、
前記試験片に形成されているき裂が進展する所定の応力振幅、所定の繰返し速度、及び所定の繰返し数からなる第1の条件で、前記試験片に荷重を加える第1の加荷重ステップと、
前記き裂が進展する所定の応力振幅、所定の繰返し速度、及び所定の繰返し数からなり、前記第1の条件と少なくとも繰返し速度が異なる第2の条件で、前記試験片に加重を加える第2の加荷重ステップと、
を相互に繰り返し、
前記繰返し速度の変化に伴って、前記試験片中の水素が前記き裂の進展に及ぼす影響が異なり、これにより疲労破面の様相が異なるという現象に基づいて、前記第1の条件下で進展した第1のき裂長さ及び前記第2の条件下で進展した第2のき裂長さを各々特定することを特徴とする疲労試験方法。 - 請求項1又は2に記載した疲労試験方法であって、
前記第2の条件は、前記第1の条件と応力振幅が同一であることを特徴とする疲労試験方法。 - 請求項1ないし3から選択される1項に記載した疲労試験方法であって、
特定された前記第1のき裂長さ及び前記第1の条件に基づいて、当該第1の条件下における応力拡大係数及びき裂進展速度の関係を示す第1の疲労き裂進展曲線を取得すると共に、
特定された前記第2のき裂長さ及び前記第2の条件に基づいて、当該第2の条件下における応力拡大係数及びき裂進展速度の関係を示す第2の疲労き裂進展曲線を取得することを特徴とする疲労試験方法。
Priority Applications (5)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CA2698900A CA2698900A1 (en) | 2008-01-22 | 2009-01-09 | Method for testing fatigue in hydrogen gas |
EP09704902A EP2233911A1 (en) | 2008-01-22 | 2009-01-09 | Fatigue testing method in hydrogen gas |
US12/677,175 US20110005329A1 (en) | 2008-01-22 | 2009-01-09 | Method for testing fatigue in hydrogen gas |
KR1020107005177A KR101166626B1 (ko) | 2008-01-22 | 2009-01-09 | 수소 가스 중 피로 시험 방법 |
CN200980100438A CN101809428A (zh) | 2008-01-22 | 2009-01-09 | 氢气中疲劳试验方法 |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2008-011048 | 2008-01-22 | ||
JP2008011048A JP5024764B2 (ja) | 2008-01-22 | 2008-01-22 | 水素ガス中疲労試験方法 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2009093488A1 true WO2009093488A1 (ja) | 2009-07-30 |
Family
ID=40900996
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP2009/050196 WO2009093488A1 (ja) | 2008-01-22 | 2009-01-09 | 水素ガス中疲労試験方法 |
Country Status (7)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20110005329A1 (ja) |
EP (1) | EP2233911A1 (ja) |
JP (1) | JP5024764B2 (ja) |
KR (1) | KR101166626B1 (ja) |
CN (1) | CN101809428A (ja) |
CA (1) | CA2698900A1 (ja) |
WO (1) | WO2009093488A1 (ja) |
Families Citing this family (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
KR101154189B1 (ko) * | 2010-05-13 | 2012-06-18 | 한국표준과학연구원 | 선상 수소재료 내장형 앰풀 시험편 및 이를 이용한 인장 시험 방법 |
JP5409688B2 (ja) * | 2011-04-06 | 2014-02-05 | 本田技研工業株式会社 | 圧力容器 |
JP6156873B2 (ja) * | 2013-07-30 | 2017-07-05 | 日本精工株式会社 | 転がり疲労き裂進展試験方法及び転がり疲労寿命予測方法 |
US10989640B2 (en) | 2015-03-24 | 2021-04-27 | Bell Helicopter Textron Inc. | Method for defining threshold stress curves utilized in fatigue and damage tolerance analysis |
EP3073245B1 (en) * | 2015-03-24 | 2018-09-12 | Bell Helicopter Textron Inc. | System and method for determining direct damage tolerance allowables |
US10732085B2 (en) | 2015-03-24 | 2020-08-04 | Bell Helicopter Textron Inc. | Notch treatment methods for flaw simulation |
JP6520547B2 (ja) * | 2015-08-10 | 2019-05-29 | 日本製鉄株式会社 | 試験片の製造方法 |
JP2020034292A (ja) * | 2018-08-27 | 2020-03-05 | 山陽特殊製鋼株式会社 | 超音波疲労試験による鋼材中の最大介在物径の予測方法 |
US11828698B2 (en) * | 2018-11-30 | 2023-11-28 | Nsk Ltd. | Ambient-hydrogen-level assessment method and white-structure-damage-likelihood prediction method |
KR102148978B1 (ko) * | 2020-05-07 | 2020-08-27 | 선문대학교 산학협력단 | 초고주기 피로 시험 방법 |
CN112540014B (zh) * | 2020-12-02 | 2023-12-15 | 安科工程技术研究院(北京)有限公司 | 高压氢气气氛下疲劳试验装置及方法 |
JP2021060428A (ja) * | 2021-01-14 | 2021-04-15 | 山陽特殊製鋼株式会社 | 超音波疲労試験による鋼材中の最大介在物径の予測方法と、そのための破壊起点である非金属介在物の直径の測定方法 |
Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPH11230880A (ja) | 1998-02-10 | 1999-08-27 | Ishikawajima Harima Heavy Ind Co Ltd | 割れ進展状況確認マーク付与方法 |
Family Cites Families (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4711131A (en) * | 1986-01-03 | 1987-12-08 | Mobil Oil Corporation | Method and apparatus for determining crack initiation and propagation in metals |
JP2512818B2 (ja) * | 1990-03-19 | 1996-07-03 | 株式会社日立製作所 | ダブルカンチレバ―型試験片及び腐食環境測定装置 |
JP3230840B2 (ja) * | 1992-06-10 | 2001-11-19 | 株式会社日立製作所 | 腐食環境センサー及び腐食環境制御装置 |
US6026691A (en) * | 1995-06-30 | 2000-02-22 | University Of Pennsylvania | Methods and devices for electrochemically determining metal fatigue status |
JP4360509B2 (ja) * | 2000-07-31 | 2009-11-11 | 独立行政法人物質・材料研究機構 | 高強度鋼における高疲労強度の評価法と製造方法 |
JP4857425B2 (ja) * | 2001-03-23 | 2012-01-18 | 株式会社産学連携機構九州 | 金属材料の長寿命疲労強度設計法 |
US7013249B1 (en) * | 2001-07-16 | 2006-03-14 | Kinder Morgan, Inc. | Method for detecting near neutral/low pH stress corrosion cracking in steel gas pipeline systems |
JP2004286586A (ja) * | 2003-03-20 | 2004-10-14 | Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd | 高圧気体疲労試験方法及び装置 |
US7157920B2 (en) * | 2004-08-10 | 2007-01-02 | United Technologies Corporation | Non-destructive monitoring of material integrity |
US20070068605A1 (en) * | 2005-09-23 | 2007-03-29 | U.I.T., Llc | Method of metal performance improvement and protection against degradation and suppression thereof by ultrasonic impact |
JP2007178151A (ja) * | 2005-12-27 | 2007-07-12 | Shimadzu Corp | 疲労試験機 |
US7387031B1 (en) * | 2006-12-22 | 2008-06-17 | Tetra Technologies, Inc. | Method for monitoring corrosion damage to a metal sample |
-
2008
- 2008-01-22 JP JP2008011048A patent/JP5024764B2/ja not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2009
- 2009-01-09 WO PCT/JP2009/050196 patent/WO2009093488A1/ja active Application Filing
- 2009-01-09 US US12/677,175 patent/US20110005329A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2009-01-09 CA CA2698900A patent/CA2698900A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2009-01-09 KR KR1020107005177A patent/KR101166626B1/ko not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2009-01-09 CN CN200980100438A patent/CN101809428A/zh active Pending
- 2009-01-09 EP EP09704902A patent/EP2233911A1/en not_active Withdrawn
Patent Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPH11230880A (ja) | 1998-02-10 | 1999-08-27 | Ishikawajima Harima Heavy Ind Co Ltd | 割れ進展状況確認マーク付与方法 |
Non-Patent Citations (5)
Title |
---|
HIDEYUKI UYAMA ET AL.: "Tansoko no Kurikaeshi Oryoku -Hizumi Tokusei Oyobi Hiro Kyodo ni Oyobosu Suiso Charge no Eikyo", NSK TECHNICAL JOURNAL, no. 681, 8 November 2006 (2006-11-08), pages 26 - 32 * |
HIROYUKI TANAKA ET AL.: "Suiso Station Chikuatsukiyo SCM435-ko no Hiro Tokusei ni Oyobosu Suiso to Kurikaeshi Sokudo no Eikyo", TRANSACTIONS OF THE JAPAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS A HEN, vol. 73, no. 736, 25 December 2007 (2007-12-25), pages 42 - 49 * |
T. KANAZAKI; C. NARAZAKI; MINE; S. MATSUOKA; Y. MURAKAMI: "Effect of hydrogen on fatigue crack growth in pre-strained austenitic stainless steel", JAPAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS, 4 November 2005 (2005-11-04), pages 595 - 596 |
T. KANAZAKI; C. NARAZAKI; Y. MINE; S. MATSUOKA; Y. MURAKAMI: "Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers collected papers", vol. 72, 1 May 2006, article "Martensite morphology and effect of hydrogen on fatigue crack growth characteristics in stainless steel", pages: 123 - 130 |
YOSHIO KITSUNAI ET AL.: "A533B-ko no Ko'onsui Kankyochu no Hiro Kiretsu Shinten Kyodo to Zairyo Ihosei no Kankei", THE JAPAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS, HEISEI 12 NENDO ZAIRYO RIKIGAKU BUMON KOENKAI KOEN RONBUNSHU, no. 00-19, 5 October 2000 (2000-10-05), pages 447 - 448 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JP2009174883A (ja) | 2009-08-06 |
US20110005329A1 (en) | 2011-01-13 |
EP2233911A1 (en) | 2010-09-29 |
CA2698900A1 (en) | 2009-07-30 |
KR101166626B1 (ko) | 2012-07-18 |
KR20100066497A (ko) | 2010-06-17 |
JP5024764B2 (ja) | 2012-09-12 |
CN101809428A (zh) | 2010-08-18 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
JP5024764B2 (ja) | 水素ガス中疲労試験方法 | |
Stratulat et al. | Micro-mechanical measurement of fracture behaviour of individual grain boundaries in Ni alloy 600 exposed to a pressurized water reactor environment | |
Zhai et al. | Stress corrosion crack initiation of alloy 600 in PWR primary water | |
Meng et al. | Effects of scratching on corrosion and stress corrosion cracking of Alloy 690TT at 58° C and 330° C | |
Ebara | Corrosion fatigue crack initiation in 12% chromium stainless steel | |
Takahashi et al. | Effects of shot peening on the torsional fatigue limit of high‐strength steel containing an artificial surface defect | |
Kocer et al. | Measurement of very slow crack growth in glass | |
JP2007155540A (ja) | 金属材料の破壊靭性値測定方法 | |
JP6544220B2 (ja) | 水素脆性評価装置および水素脆性評価方法 | |
Shimamura et al. | Sulfide Stress Cracking (SSC) of Low Alloy Linepipe Steels in Low H2S Content Sour Environment | |
Tehrani Yekta | Acceptance Criteria for Ultrasonic Impact Treatment of Highway Steel Bridges | |
Júnior et al. | Effect of Specimen Cross Section and Notch Radius on the Hydrogen Embrittlement Susceptibility of Tempered and Quenched AISI 4140 Steel | |
Howard | Development of novel small scale mechanical tests to assess the mechanical properties of ex-service Inconel X-750 CANDU reactor components | |
Sanchez et al. | Reasons for crack arrest in stress corrosion cracking tests—crack propagation rate in high-strength steels | |
Na | Evaluation of sensitization and corrosive damages of the weldment for SUS 316 stainless steel | |
Kamaya | Environmental Effect on Fatigue Crack Initiation and Growth of Stainless Steel for Flaw Tolerance Assessment | |
KR101144062B1 (ko) | 침식성 가스 손상가속화 충격 시험편 | |
Vina | Experimental study of the behavior of colonies of environmentally-assisted short cracks by Digital Image Correlation, Acoustic Emission and Electrochemical Noise | |
Hu et al. | A study of interaction and coalescence of micro surface fatigue cracks in aluminium 7050 | |
Eaton-Mckay | Creep mechanics of carburised 316H stainless steel in Advanced Gas-cooled Reactor environments | |
Monahan | Early fatigue crack growth in offshore structures | |
Herbert et al. | Micromechanical testing of stress corrosion cracking | |
Torbatisarraf | Effect of Microstructure on Corrosion of Structural and Advanced Alloys | |
Nahm et al. | A study on observation and growth behavior of small surface cracks by remote measurement system | |
Kulkarni | Role of pre-accumulated plastic strain on grain boundary corrosion of API-X70 Steel |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 200980100438.4 Country of ref document: CN |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 09704902 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2698900 Country of ref document: CA |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 20107005177 Country of ref document: KR Kind code of ref document: A |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 1518/CHENP/2010 Country of ref document: IN Ref document number: 2009704902 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 12677175 Country of ref document: US |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |