Classifications

• • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
  • B07—SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS; SORTING
  • B07B—SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS BY SIEVING, SCREENING, SIFTING OR BY USING GAS CURRENTS; SEPARATING BY OTHER DRY METHODS APPLICABLE TO BULK MATERIAL, e.g. LOOSE ARTICLES FIT TO BE HANDLED LIKE BULK MATERIAL
  • B07B15/00—Combinations of apparatus for separating solids from solids by dry methods applicable to bulk material, e.g. loose articles fit to be handled like bulk material
• • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
  • B07—SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS; SORTING
  • B07B—SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS BY SIEVING, SCREENING, SIFTING OR BY USING GAS CURRENTS; SEPARATING BY OTHER DRY METHODS APPLICABLE TO BULK MATERIAL, e.g. LOOSE ARTICLES FIT TO BE HANDLED LIKE BULK MATERIAL
  • B07B13/00—Grading or sorting solid materials by dry methods, not otherwise provided for; Sorting articles otherwise than by indirectly controlled devices
  • B07B13/003—Separation of articles by differences in their geometrical form or by difference in their physical properties, e.g. elasticity, compressibility, hardness
• • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
  • B07—SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS; SORTING
  • B07B—SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS BY SIEVING, SCREENING, SIFTING OR BY USING GAS CURRENTS; SEPARATING BY OTHER DRY METHODS APPLICABLE TO BULK MATERIAL, e.g. LOOSE ARTICLES FIT TO BE HANDLED LIKE BULK MATERIAL
  • B07B9/00—Combinations of apparatus for screening or sifting or for separating solids from solids using gas currents; General arrangement of plant, e.g. flow sheets

Definitions

• the present invention relates to seed. More particularly, though not exclusively, the present invention relates to a method of sorting and categorizing hybrid seed into different sub-products.
• seed is typically sorted and categorized into sub-products based on the size of the seed.
• the seeds are sorted by size and packaged for sale in separate packages based on the size.
• the bag of seed will contain seed from one size category depending on the farmer's needs or preferences.
• growing conditions commonly vary sufficiently to cause a range of size-out for a given hybrid of seed.
• a range of sizes is produced.
• approximately 7 sub-products comprise the total sample.
• an 8th or 9th size for a given hybrid is produced for those products that exhibit a substantial size response to varying growing conditions.
• a general feature of the present invention is the provision of a method for sorting and categorizing seed which overcomes problems found in the prior art.
• a further feature of the present invention is the provision of a method for sorting and categorizing seed which involves sorting and categorizing seed based on the shape of the seeds.
• a method for sorting and categorizing seed which divides the seeds into two general categories, flat and round.
• a method for sorting and categorizing seed which reduces the total number of sub-products resulting in ease of use as growers seek consistency of sub-products across hybrids.
• a method for sorting and categorizing seed which simplifies warehousing of the seed.
• a method for sorting and categorizing seed which makes seed easier to fit into customers' sub-product preferences.
• a method for sorting and categorizing seed which simplifies inventory management including conditioning, bagging, warehousing, initial shipping, and interplant shipment.
• a method for sorting and categorizing seed which provides improved plantability through all planter types.
• a method for sorting and categorizing seed which reduces the cost of managing and maintaining the sub-products.
• a method for sorting and categorizing seed which eliminates undesirable size categories.
• a method for sorting and categorizing seed which simplifies the sub- product system which makes future expansion through technology introductions more feasible.
• the method of sorting and categorizing seed of the present invention is a simple yet advanced system for dividing seed, for example corn, into logical sub-units for effective planting.
• seed shape rather than seed size as a primary determinate, the system avails many advantages. These advantages extend throughout many components of the seed delivery process, with significance for the customer, sales representatives, and seed companies.
• Figure 1 is a diagram illustrating one example of a sizing system which utilizes seed shape.
• Figure 2 illustrates a study on percentage of seed drop utilizing a Case-
• Figure 3 illustrates a study of the effect of speed on seed drop utilizing a John Deere 7000 planter.
• Figure 4 illustrates a study comparing a John Deere 7000 (JD 700) and a Kinze planter for plantability in finer pickup units.
• Figure 5 illustrates a study of percent seed drop under varying ounces of vacuum for various kernel sizes.
• hybrid corn seeds are sorted and packaged into many different sizes. Customers are often disappointed when a hybrid's "size-out" forces them to switch from their preferred choice.
• the many different seed sizes also presents invoicing and warehousing challenges for sales representatives, dealers, and employees.
• the present invention helps to consolidate the number of sub-products (sorted by size) in any particular hybrid from approximately 9 with prior art systems down to potentially 4 sub- products, with 75%-90% of the unit volume falling within two sub-products.
• These two sub-product categories include pilot design flat (PDF) and pilot design round (PDR).
• PDF/PDR system of the present invention allows customers to have the same or similar accuracy as with the prior art system, while improving in some categories.
• hybrid corn seeds are sized according to the following category identifications: F12, F13, F14, F15, F16, F17, R22, R23, R24, R25, R26, CD2, CD4, CD5.
• the letter F means the seed is relatively flat in shape.
• the letter R means the seed is relatively round in shape.
• the letters CD mean that the seed is mixture of relatively round and relatively flat seeds. In all cases, however, each category is sorted primarily based on the size of the seed. The number following the letter(s) F, R, or CD indicates the size of the seeds in that category.
• F12 are the largest flat seeds
• F17 are the smallest flat seeds for those identified categories.
• R22 is the largest
• R26 the smallest round seeds for those identified categories.
• the number indicates the average size of seeds in the category; namely the average size of seeds in CD2 are the largest, and the average size of seeds in CD5 are the smallest of the above-listed identified categories. The precise sizing criteria for each of these categories is known in the art and will not be repeated here.
• Categories CD2, F13, and R22 can account for most of the remainder (for example, most of the remaining 5% to 15%). As is known in the art, categories CD2, F13, and R22 are on the large side of the spectrum of size of such seeds, and therefore, are generally preferred for mechanized planters that use a plate or disc to pick up seeds prior to delivery to the ground. Currently, under 10% of mechanized planters in use are these plate or disc planters. The remaining planters generally operate on air or vacuum or utilize a finger to pick up seeds.
• Tables 3-6 list these basic seed size category identifiers in the context of comparing performance of planters with those traditional sorted seed sizes versus category identifications for seeds sorting according to the present invention.
• the present invention can optionally use a few of the traditional categories (e.g. F13 and R22), but also uses the identifiers PDF and PDR.
• the present invention can be used to sort seeds that are best suited for or preferable to farmers with plate or disc planters. Therefore, categories F13 and R22 can be used with the present invention to supply such seeds for plate or disc planters, because farmers usually want larger seeds for these planters.
• these categories are sorted not only by size (i.e. the seeds are the relatively largest of the traditional categories), but also by shape (i.e. flats versus rounds).
• Categories PDF and PDR are primarily sorted by shape and actually end up with a mixture of seed sizes, generally in the range of medium to smaller in size. Air (or vacuum) or finger planters have been found to operate effectively with such a mixture, primarily based on shape not size.
• Figure 1 illustrates diagrammatically that prior art seed sorting
• Boxes 10 and 12 indicate the categories CD5 and CD4 when sorted. Even though each category CD5 and CD 4 includes a variety of shapes of seeds (e.g. flats and rounds), category CD5 (box 10) is characterized primarily by being comprised of seeds of the same size (relatively small). Category CD4 (box 12) is characterized primarily by being comprised of seeds of the same size (larger than CD5; and generally a medium average seed size).
• Track In comparison seed sorting by the present invention, labeled "trial” in Figure 1 takes in the seeds to be sorted but as indicated at boxes 14 and 16, sorts primarily on the basis of shape.
• Category PDF (box 14) comprises seeds of generally or relatively flat shape, but a mixture of sizes (e.g. from the smaller to the medium sizes).
• Category PDR (box 16) comprises seeds of generally or relatively round shape, but a mixture of sizes.
• Figure 1 therefore illustrates with a few examples the difference between traditional seed sorting (based primarily on seed size) and that of the invention (based primarily on seed shape).
• Table 1 illustrates that PDF and PDR sorted seeds perform well with respect to stand count, doubles and skips, both generally and with respect to different planter types (plate, air, or finger). Table 1 also illustrates the same for two other categories of sorted seed that optionally can be used with the invention, namely traditionally categories F14 and R23. If PDF and PDR are used, along with sorting out F14 and R23, four total categories would be available. This reduces the number of categories from seven, eight, or sometimes nine to just four. As explained above, F14 and R23 might be used to have a supply of relatively large seeds, sorted by shape, available particularly for use with plate planters. Table 1 shows, however, that PDF and PDR operate with plate planters.
• Table 2 illustrates the efficacy of PDF versus PDR by comparing seeds dropped per acre and stand count, doubles, and skips.
• Table 3 is illustrating the efficacy of PDF and PDR, as well as F14 and
• R23 relative to the traditional categories based primarily on seed size (e.g. CD2, CD4, CD5, F13, F15, F16, R22, R24, R25, R26) for a given planter type (John Deere 7200) and different discs, showing all compare favorably.
• Table 4 shows the same for a John Deere 7000 planter.
• Tables 5 and 6 show the same for a Kinze planter and IH planter, respectively.
• Figures 2-5 are illustrations of the same points for different planters:
• Figure 2 illustrates a study on percentage of seed drop utilizing a Case- IH 800 Early Riser where the drum pressure was at 9 oz. for all samples except CD2 and CD4 where the drum pressure was at 11 oz.
• Figure 3 illustrates a study of the effect of speed on seed drop utilizing a John Deere 7000 planter.
• Figure 4 illustrates a study comparing a John Deere 7000 (JD 700) and a Kinze planter for plantability in finer pickup units.
• Figure 5 illustrates a study of percent seed drop under varying ounces of vacuum for various kernel sizes.
• Tables 7 and 8 illustrate the same points for different planters, but show the data limited to seeds sorted according to PDF and PDR. They do not show direct comparisons with seeds sorted by traditional size categories.
• PDS pilot design seed
• PDF pilot design flats
• PDR pilot design rounds
• the remaining 10%-25% of the sample could be divided into traditional sub-products.
• the PDF and PDR sub-products demonstrate excellent interchangeability. In other words, a corn planter set up to plant PDF, with little or no adjustment, would also do a good job of planting PDR sub-products. These shape divided sub-products plant with good accuracy through plate-type planters, even though they are comprised of a mixture of medium to small kernel sizes. In addition, interchangeability between hybrids will be improved over the prior art helping to reduce the number of required disc changes.
• hybrids with a narrow range of medium sized seed could be offered as one sub-product for the entire hybrid.
• Testing of the system of the present invention was conducted on a variety of planter brands and types including plate, finger and air-type planters. No adjustments whatsoever were made to any of the planters in transitioning from traditional sizes to the pilot design seed of the present invention. In field testing, no difficulties were encountered in the planting process. There were no issues of seed sorting in the seed box, or seed bridging. Testing of the emerged crop was also evaluated. Detailed stand counts compared total plant populations to targeted seed drop, frequency of skips, and frequency of doubles and triples. Tables 1 and 2 illustrate test data conducted with emerged crops.
• the PDS seed of the present invention performed very well.
• the basic discard rate at the time of conditioning is essentially unchanged for the PDS system of the present invention as compared to the traditional approach. More importantly, due to the nature of the PDS approach, the percentage of undesirable sizes is greatly reduced or eliminated.
• interplant shipments i.e. shipments between two different plants of the same seed company
• interplant shipments can be reduced.
• one particular company plant may produce certain sub-products of a hybrid, but may need to sell other sub-products (e.g., seeds of a different size) which are produced at another company plant.
• the sub- products would have to be shipped from the other company plant.
• these interplanted units would be available within either PDF or PDR, thus eliminating this interplant situation. This results from the fact that PDR and PDF would comprise a high percentage of the total volume of seed. As a result, both sub-products would be produced at all production locations.
• the present invention will also simplify inventory management to a significant extent as compared to prior art systems. This is primarily due to the consolidation of seed sizes into PDS.
• the process of modifying conditioning towers to handle PDS may be required to practice the present invention.
• up to 95% of the total seed volume will be destined for one of only two sub-products.
• Conditioning towers may have to be repiped to permit distribution of this high percentage of seed across all segments of the tower.
• all PDF and PDR seeds will be packaged in 80,000 kernel units. All PDF seeds will be palletized in counts of 66 units per pallet. All PDR seeds will be palletized in counts of 54 units per pallet. Any remaining sub-products not falling within the PDR or PDF sub-products will be packaged in 60,000 kernel units in 66 count pallets.
• CD2 1 1.0 24 1050 990 1019

Landscapes

• Pretreatment Of Seeds And Plants (AREA)
• Combined Means For Separation Of Solids (AREA)
• Breeding Of Plants And Reproduction By Means Of Culturing (AREA)
• Tires In General (AREA)
• Sowing (AREA)

Priority Applications (8)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Publications (1)

Family

ID=22051997

Family Applications (1)

Country Status (13)

Cited By (2)

Families Citing this family (14)

Citations (5)

Family Cites Families (22)

• 1998
  • 1998-10-30 HU HU0004914A patent/HUP0004914A3/hu unknown
  • 1998-10-30 ZA ZA9809919A patent/ZA989919B/xx unknown
  • 1998-10-30 AU AU95547/98A patent/AU9554798A/en not_active Abandoned
  • 1998-10-30 JP JP2000518537A patent/JP2003529441A/ja active Pending
  • 1998-10-30 EP EP98949179A patent/EP1028612A1/en not_active Withdrawn
  • 1998-10-30 CA CA002306132A patent/CA2306132C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
  • 1998-10-30 CN CN98812134A patent/CN1281332A/zh active Pending
  • 1998-10-30 AR ARP980105472A patent/AR015477A1/es unknown
  • 1998-10-30 RO ROA200000451A patent/RO119058B1/ro unknown
  • 1998-10-30 BR BR9814748-0A patent/BR9814748A/pt not_active Application Discontinuation
  • 1998-10-30 WO PCT/IB1998/001736 patent/WO1999022579A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
  • 1998-10-30 US US09/529,830 patent/US6635840B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
  • 1998-10-30 TR TR2000/01186T patent/TR200001186T2/xx unknown

Patent Citations (5)

Non-Patent Citations (1)

Also Published As

Similar Documents

Legal Events