Classifications

• • H—ELECTRICITY
  • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
  • H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
  • H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets, i.e. electro-acoustic or electro-mechanical hearing aids; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
  • H04R25/45—Prevention of acoustic reaction, i.e. acoustic oscillatory feedback
  • H04R25/453—Prevention of acoustic reaction, i.e. acoustic oscillatory feedback electronically
• • H—ELECTRICITY
  • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
  • H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
  • H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets, i.e. electro-acoustic or electro-mechanical hearing aids; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
  • H04R25/50—Customised settings for obtaining desired overall acoustical characteristics
  • H04R25/505—Customised settings for obtaining desired overall acoustical characteristics using digital signal processing

Definitions

• the invention concerns a programmable hybrid hearing aid with digital signal processing in accordance with the introduction of claims 1, 5 and 10.
• the invention also concerns a method for detection and signal processing in a programmable hybrid hearing aid in accordance with the introduction of claim 27.
• an open meatus normally has a resonance of approximately 3 kHz, and this resonance makes a vital contribution to the quality of the auditory impression, since it falls within the range of the formant frequency for normal speech and thus contributes to giving it its tonal qualities, which are tremendously important for the comprehension of speech sound and thus for the person's ability to understand speech.
• hearing aids In order to facilitate the optimum adaptation of the auditory signal to any hearing residue and simultaneously optimize the hearing aid's response function, hearing aids have been developed wherein the signal processing is performed digitally.
• the response function is adapted through filtering of the digital signal by means of appropriate filter coefficients, thus permitting the frequency response to some extent to simulate the response function of a person with normal hearing. If the aids of the digital type are designed as so-called all- in-the-ear aids, the problem again arises that the meatus is closed, thus preventing any hearing residue which the person may have from being utilized.
• the response curve can be modified to a certain extent in order to take this into consideration.
• any hearing residue at lower frequencies it is also desirable to utilize any hearing residue at lower frequencies, and this requires the meatus to be at least partially open, preferably so that it creates an acoustic transmission channel with a low-pass characteristic between the ear opening and the tympanum. If a channel of this kind is to be used with a hearing aid of the all-in-the-ear type, this makes great demands on the miniaturization of the hearing aid. Moreover, the problem of acoustic feedback will be further accentuated and will need to be eliminated in one way or another.
• Digital hearing aids of the above-mentioned kind are known from, e.g., US-PS no. 4 471 171 (K ⁇ pke et al.), where a digital data processor for processing of digitalized audio signals is connected to a programmable memory which stores predetermined response functions in accordance with the user's requirements or preferences and/or the use of the hearing aid, so that the use of the hearing aid can be directly adapted to the require ⁇ ments of the user, while at the same time it is possible to program the hearing aid in step with any alterations in the user's hearing ability or response characteristics.
• US-PS no. 4 731 850 contains a programmable hearing aid with digital filters where coefficients are supplied from a programmable read-only memory to a programmable filter and an amplitude limiter in the hearing aid, enabling this to be automatically adjusted to an optimum set of parameter values for speech level, echo and type of background noise while simultaneously facilitating a reduction of acoustic feedback, in that an electrical feedback path in the aid is adapted to the acoustic feedback path both in amplitude and phase, causing the two feedback signals to be cancelled by subtraction.
• GB-PS no. 1 582 821 principally contains a hearing aid for digital signal processing by means of a programmable memory which can be fed with values taken from an audiometrically determined audiogram.
• the above-mentioned US-PS no. 4 731 ' 850 also contains a hearing aid which uses one or more microphones, so that the weighted, summed output signal from the microphones with a suitable phase displacement is equal to the output signal from a frequency selective, directive microphone. This should be able to reduce the effect of both noise and echo.
• cancellation or suppression of acoustic feedback in hearing aids is discussed in the article "Measurement and Adaptive Suppression of Acoustic Feedback in Hearing Aids” (Bustamante et al.), IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 1989, no. 2, pp. 2017-20.
• the authors discuss three methods for suppressing acoustic feedback, viz. time-variable delay, adaptive inverse filtering and adaptive feedback cancellation, and find that the latter method is the most successful, since it increases the maximum amplification in the hearing aid by 6- 10 B without acoustic feedback.
• a first object of the invention is to provide a hearing aid which permits the utilization of a hearing residue in the bass range, where amplification of frequencies in this range at least is achieved by means of an acoustic transmission channel with resonant amplification, while at the same time an acoustic feedback through the transmission channel is cancelled.
• a second object is to provide a hearing aid which gives the user the opportunity to choose between different response functions stored in the hearing aid, so that the utilized response function is the one which is best adapted to the acoustic environment in which the user finds himself at that moment.
• a third object is to provide a hearing aid in which all the principal components are arranged in a module which can be inserted in the outer meatus, but simultaneously permits an open connection between the ear opening and an inner portion of the outer meatus in order to utilize a low frequency hearing residue.
• a fourth object is to provide a hearing aid in which any acoustic feedback is eliminated by cancellation in a digital filter.
• a fifth object is to provide a hearing aid in which the acoustic feedback is eliminated by phasing out the feedback signal by means of two microphones.
• a sixth object is to provide a hearing aid in which the stored response functions can be reprogrammed in that the hearing aid is connected to a computer via an interface for input of new response functions.
• a method for detection and signal processing in a hearing aid principally of the type presented in claim 5, is characterized by the features presented by the characteristic part of claim 13.
• Fig. la is a block diagram showing the principles of a hearing aid in accordance with the invention.
• Fig. lb is a schematic representation of an electrical equivalent connection for the acoustic channel in fig. la.
• Fig. 2 is a variant of the hearing aid in accordance with the invention.
• Fig. 3 is a further variant of the hearing aid in accordance with the invention.
• Fig. 4a is a schematic block diagram for a hearing aid in accordance with the invention, where one microphone is used.
• Fig. 4b shows the hearing aid in fig. 4a with a cancellation filter inserted in a feedback loop.
• Fig. 4c shows the hearing aid in fig. 4a with a cancellation filter inserted in the signal's forward path.
• Fig. 4d shows the hearing aid in fig. 4a with a power amplifier in the output stage.
• Fig. 5a shows a hearing aid in accordance with the invention, where two microphones are used.
• Fig. 5b shows a digital signal processor used with the hearing aid in fig. 5a.
• Fig. 6a is three examples of response curves for strong, moderate and weak hearing impairment respectively, in addition to the sound pressure response of a meatus without hearing aid.
• Fig. 6b is an example of the response curve for an envelope signal and a quotient signal generated in the digital signal processor in fig. 5b.
• the principles of the design of a hearing aid in accordance with the invention are illustrated schematically in fig. la.
• the hearing aid comprises an electroacoustic channel consisting of an analog input section, a digital signal processor and an analog output section together with an acoustic transmission channel which simultaneously constitutes both an acoustic low- pass filter and a potential acoustic feedback path.
• An external sound field is detected by a detector, in practice a microphone, and delivers a detection signal to an electro ⁇ acoustic channel which then transfers audio signals on middle and high frequencies to an inner portion of the outer meatus and the tympanum.
• the external sound field is also detected by the acoustic channel and delivers acoustic signals on low frequencies to the inner section of the outer meatus and the tympanum.
• the sound field which is generated in this inner section of the outer meatus can be fed back to the detector via its acoustic channel.
• the method of construction of the hearing aid causes a section of the inner meatus near the tympanum also to constitute an active component of the hearing aid by acting as a resonator.
• the acoustic channel will be discussed in more detail in connection with the equivalence diagram in fig. lb..
• Fig. 2 shows a variant of the hearing aid in accordance with the invention.
• This variant comprises a main section with an acoustic transmission channel ATC which connects the ear opening with an inner portion of the meatus 6 and two microphones Ml, M2, wherein the first microphone Ml is provided at a suitable place in the concha and the other microphone M2 at the outlet of the acoustic transmission channel ATC in the ear opening and at a distance from the first microphone Ml.
• the electronic components which form part of the hearing aid are provided in a first secondary section 2a which here is positioned in the concha itself and connected with the main section 1, but they can also just as well be provided behind the concha. In this secondary section 2a it may be appropriate to provide a battery 4 for the hearing aid.
• Another not shown secondary section constitutes a case for the hearing aid.
• a miniaturised sound generator SG which faces the tympanum and converts the amplified electrical signal in the hearing aid to an acoustic signal which is intercepted by the tympanum.
• the sound generator SG In order to have room inside a person's meatus while simulta ⁇ neously also allowing an open acoustic connection, the sound generator SG must preferably have a diameter which is less than approximately 4.5 mm.
• an electrodynamic sound generator of the type described in Norwegian patent application no. 89 2811 is utilized.
• the sound generator in accordance with the said Norwegian patent application is constructed in such a way that it can be tuned in order to reproduce the meatus's natural resonance of approximately 3 kHz.
• the main section 1 it becomes possible to provide an open connection in the form of an acoustic transmission channel ATC with an equivalent diameter of up to 2 mm.
• the equivalent diameter will depend on the selected critical frequency for the acoustic transmission channel ATC, and the higher the critical frequency selected, the larger the equivalent diameter must be. With a critical frequency of 1000 Hz, the diameter will be 4.8 mm, which, however, is unrealistic, but also completely unnecessary.
• the normal equivalent diameters will be of approximately 1 mm or even less.
• the hearing aid in accordance with the invention is shown in a variant with two microphones Ml and M2 and a main section 1 inserted in the outer meatus 6 and constructed in a similar way to the main section 1 in fig. 2. All the electronics as well as the hearing aid's battery 4 are provided in the main section 1, so that a secondary section provided in or beside the concha has been dispensed with.
• the hearing aid's main section 1 has rather been connected with a not shown secondary section 2 in the form of a case in which the main section is kept when the hearing aid is not in use and which may also comprise possible electronic and electrical auxiliary devices, including an external memory in the form of a random- access memory RAM1 which is supplied from a buffer battery.
• the not shown secondary section 2 also includes a rectifier and possibly plugs and switches and is arranged so that it is used for charging the hearing aid's battery 4 when the main section 1 is in the case.
• the main section 1 can then, e.g., be plugged directly into a wall socket via an adapter for charging.
• the electrical and electronic components used for signal processing in a variant of the hearing aid in accordance with the invention with one microphone Ml will now be described in more detail with reference to fig. 4a. All of these components can be provided in a suitable manner in the hearing aid's main section 1 or possibly in a first secondary section 2a.
• the microphone Ml is connected to a microphone amplifier 11 whose output is transmitted to a deconvolution filter 13 with a critical frequency of, e.g. , 8 kH. This will therefore be the upper limit of the hearing aid's frequency response.
• the microphone Ml may be, e.g., a cardiod micropohone which gives reduced feedback or a pressure or velocity microphone. Pressure microphones have the greatest sensitivity.
• the signal from the deconvolution filter 13 is converted in an analog/digital converter ADC and transmitted to a digital signal processor DSP which comprises a compressor 33 connected in front of an equalizer 34. Inputs of the compressor
• the control unit CU comprises a second random-access memory RAM2 and is also connected to a selector or a control device in the form of a switch SW, preferably a touch or pressure-sensitive switch.
• the compressor 33 and the equalizer 34 are connected with outputs of a control unit CU which is connected with a first random-access memory RAM1.
• the control unit CU comprises a second random-access memory RAM2 and is also connected to a selector or a control device in the form of a switch SW, preferably a touch or pressure-sensitive switch.
• a cancellation filter 35 is used which in fig. 4b is shown inserted in a feedback loop between the output of the equalizer 34 and the input of the compressor 33.
• the cancellation filter 35 is also connected to a further output of the control unit CU.
• the cancellation filter 35 can also, as shown in fig. 4c, be installed in the signal's forward path in the digital processor, e.g. inserted between the output of the compressor 33 and the input of the equalizer 34.
• Both the compressor 33, the equalizer 34 and the cancellation filter also comprise random-access memories RAM3-5.
• a power amplifier to drive the sound generator.
• the microphone Ml, the control unit CU and possibly the power amplifier 15 are all connected to a battery 4 which is preferably provided in the hearing aid's main section 1.
• Fig. 5a shows the electronic components for signal processing in a hearing aid in accordance with the invention which uses two microphones Ml, M2.
• the microphones Ml, M2 used are shown as electret microphones, in that the microphone output is connected to the impedance converters 10a, 10b.
• Each of the microphones Ml, M2 forms the input to the first channel CHI and a second channel CH2 respectively in the hearing aid's analog section.
• Each channel CHI, CH2 thus comprises a series connection of an impedance converter 10a, 10b, a microphone amplifier 11a, lib, a compressor 12a, 12b and a deconvolution filter 13a, 13b.
• Each channel CHI, CH2 is carried to a first and a second input respectively of a sample-and-hold circuit SH.
• the sample-and-hold circuit SH which comprises a not shown onostable multivibrator MMV, is connected to an analog/- digital converter ADC which is then connected to a digital signal processor DSP.
• a pulse-code modulated output signal from the analog/digital converter ADC is conveyed in the digital signal processor DSP shown in detail in fig. 5b to a first signal path SP1 and a second signal path SP2 respectively.
• the first signal path comprises a series connection of an envelope generator 21 and a second compressor 22, while the second signal path SP2 comprises a series connection of a divider circuit 31, a rounding circuit 32, a third compressor 33, an equalizer 34 and a stabilizer/cancellation circuit 36 together with a pre-compensator 37.
• a second output on the envelope generator 21 is connected to a second input on the divider circuit 31.
• Each of the second inputs on the compressor 22, the compressor 33, the equalizer 34, the stabilizer/cancellation circuit 36 and the precompensator 37 are connected to the respective outputs of a control unit CU.
• a first input of the control unit CU is connected to an external random-acess memory RAM1 which is provided in the secondary section 2 and a second input of the control unit CU is connected to a cycle generator CG which is controlled from an external control device SW, preferably in the form of a touch-sensitive switch and, e.g., provided on the outside of the main section 1 in the ear opening.
• the power supply for the hearing aid passes through an input on the control unit connected to the battery 4 which is preferably provided in the main section 1.
• the battery 4 also supplies the microphones Ml, M2.
• the compressor 22, the compressor 33, the stabilizer 34, the stabilizer/cancellation circuit 36 and the precompensator 37 each have provided random-access memories RAM3-RAM7.
• the control unit CU comprises a random- access memory RAM2.
• the first signal path SP1 is carried from the output of the compressor 22 to the first input of a digital/analog converter DAC, while the second input of the digital/analog converter DAC is connected to the output of the precompensator 37.
• the digital/analog converter DAC comprises a further random-acess memory RAM8.
• the output of the digital/- analog converter DAC is carried to a reconstruction filter 14 whose outputs are connected to the input terminals of the sound generator SG.
• a method for detection and signal processing will now be described in connection with the variant of the hearing aid which is illustrated in figs. 4a-c.
• An external sound field is detected by the microphone Ml and amplified in the microphone amplifier 11.
• the output signal from the microphone amplifier 11 is transmitted to the deconvolution filter 13 which has an upper critical frequency of 8 kH.
• the filtered signal is then transmitted from the deconvolution filter 13 to the input of the analog/digital converter ADC where it is sampled and converted preferably to a linear pulse-code modulated signal with 12 bits.
• the pulse-code modulated signal receives a dynamic limitation in the compressor 33, to, e.g., a level of 60 dB.
• the dynamically limited signal is conveyed to an equalizer 34 in the form of a digital filter network whose primary function is tone control but which in reality enables a number of functions to be performed.
• the equalizer 34 can constitute a divider filter or crossover to the acoustic transmission channel ATC, perform correction for the effective amplitude response of the sound generator SG, correct any phase distortion in the crossover frequency range, perform an adapta ⁇ tion to the user's hearing residue and possibly also a frequency-dependent compression.
• a digital version of the crossover function can be implemented in several ways, the simplest being a complementary filter.
• the tone control in the equalizer 34 can be implemented in several ways, but the simplest and most preferred is the use of a parametric control by means of IIR filters.
• a hearing residue in the low frequency range, e.g. below 200 Hz is safeguarded via the open acoustic transmission path from the ear opening to the inner meatus.
• This acoustic transmission channel ATC functions as a low-pass filter whose characteristics in reality depend on the volume of the channel and the volume of the portion of the inner meatus 6 between the main section 1 and the tympanum. At the same time the acoustic transmission channel ATC acts together with the innermost portion of the meatus 6 as an acoustic resonator, giving a resonant acoustic amplification on the frequencies in the transmission channel's pass band.
• the output signal from the equalizer 34 is conveyed to the digital/analog converter DAC and is converted to an analog output signal s r which is smoothed in the reconstruction filter 14.
• the output signal from the reconstruction filter 14 is conveyed to the input terminals of the sound generator SG whose acoustic output signal mainly reproduces the detected external sound field by means of the microphone Ml.
• this acoustic output signal s r will be fed back via the acoustic transmission channel ATC and will be added to the detected external sound field.
• it will therefore be necessary to cancel this feedback signal which is done preferably by means of a cancellation filter 35 in the digital signal processor DSP.
• the cancellation is performed in a purely digital manner in the cancellation filter 35 which can be provided in various ways in the digital signal processor, e.g.
• the first microphone Ml which is preferably an electret microphone
• the second microphone M2 which is also an electret microphone
• Both microphones Ml, M2 will detect an external sound field at a level which is dependent on the sensitivity of the microphones and will in addition also detect any acoustic signal fed back through the acoustic transmission channel ATC.
• the microphone Ml Since the microphone Ml is installed at a distance from the outlet of the acoustic transmission channel, the feedback acoustic signal will be somewhat attenuated at microphone Ml compared to the level at microphone M2. Microphone M2 is therefore given a correspondingly lower level of sensitivity than microphone Ml, enabling the feedback acoustic signal to be detected at approximately the same level in the two microphones.
• the output signal s ⁇ from microphone Ml is transmitted to the first channel CHI via the impedance converter 10a and amplified in the microphone amplifier 11a and then transmitted to the first compressor 12a which reduces the signal's dynamics to approximately 60 dB, in case the amplified microphone signal has a higher level than this.
• the deconvolution filter 13a gives the signal s ⁇ an upper critical frequency of 8 kHz, thereby acting as a band stop, after which the signal S]_ is transmitted to a first input of the sample- and-hold circuit SH.
• the microphone signal S2 is transmitted from microphone M2 through corresponding components in the second channel CH2, viz. the impedance converter 10b, the microphone amplifier lib, the compressor 12b and the deconvolution filter 13b to a second input of the sample-and- hold circuit SH with equal band limitation.
• the signal S2 is now delayed for a period ⁇ t which corresponds to the propagation time difference for the sound waves between microphones M2 and Ml, resulting in a phasing out of the feedback acoustic signal.
• the feedback compensated signal is sampled preferably at a frequency of 16 kHz, and it is thus seen that the delayed sampling in reality creates an all-pass filter which removes the feedback acoustic signal.
• the sampled signal S Q is transmitted to the analog/digital converter ADC which converts the signal preferably to a linear pulse-code modulated spectral signal s(t) with, e.g. 12 bits.
• This pulse- code modulated signal s(t) is transmitted to the envelope generator 21 which generates the envelope in the form of a signal e(t) whose bandwidth is limited to 30 Hz, and which preferably has a length of 4 or 6 bits.
• the pulse-code modulated output signal s(t) from the analog/digital converter ADC is also transmitted to an input of the divider circuit 31 which via a second input receives the envelope signal e(t) from the envelope generator 21.
• the quotient signal f(t) is rounded off in a rounding circuit 32, preferably giving a result of 8 bits and possibly 6 bits.
• the envelope signal e(t) thus represents the amplitude components of the spectral signal s(t), while the quotient signal f(t) represents the frequency components of the spectral signal s(t).
• the frequency response for e(t) and f(t) respectively are also shown in fig. 6b.
• the digital signal processor DSP now transmits the envelope signal e(t) from the envelope generator 21 to the compressor 22, where it is further compressed, e.g. to 30 dB, in that e(t) as has already been mentioned has been compressed in advance to 60 dB.
• the compressed envelope signal e(t) is then transmitted further along signal path SP1 to a first input of the digital/- analog converter DAC.
• the quotient signal f(t) is passed on from the rounding circuit 32 to the compressor 33 where its frequency response is modified and where a further compression of the signal is performed.
• the compressed and response-modified quotient signal is then transmitted to the equalizer 34.
• the equalizer 34 acts as a digital tone control stage, providing an optimum frequency response curve to the signal f(t). In the form of a digital filter the equalizer 34 can also simultaneously enable correction of both phase and amplitude to be performed for the signal f(t) .
• the lower critical frequency of the signal f(t) becomes the crossover frequency to the acoustic transmission channel ATC and will therefore be determined by the latter"s upper critical frequency.
• the crossover function can moreover be implemented to advantage either in the compressor 33 or in the equalizer 34.
• the total amplification is determined by the selected response function for the hearing aid and cancellation is therefore only required if the response function gives an amplification of over 55 dB. In such cases, therefore, any residue of the acoustic feedback signal in f(t) is cancelled in connection with the stabilization of the optimum frequency response curve in the stabilizer/cancellation circuit 37.
• Cancellation may be performed in various ways which are ' well-known to specialists in the field, but as already mentioned adaptive feedback cancellation has been found to be particularly expedient and enables a further amplification of approximately 10 dB without acoustic feedback causing any negative effects.
• the quotient signal f(t) is transmitted to the precompensator 37 for compensation of any non-linearities in the quotient signal f(t).
• the precompensation particularly comprises compensation of distortion generated in the analog/digital converter ADC together with precompensation of distortion generated by the digital/analog converter DAC or the sound generator SG. It should be noted in this connection that problems of linearity in analog/digital conversion and vice versa are well known in the technique, and a compensation for non-linearity will thus be necessary if high-linear converters are not used.
• the compensation for non-linearity can be performed by taking the compensation values from a stored table in the precompensator 37.
• the compensated quotient signal is then transmitted to a second input of the digital/analog converter DAC.
• the output level of the spectral signal s(t) is tuned, in that the tuning is performed in accordance with the amplification selected for the required response function.
• the tuning can be performed digitally as an arithmetical operation on the envelope signal e(t), e.g. by determining the amplification by reference to a stored table.
• the envelope signal e(t) is then converted to a pulse-width modulated signal with sampling frequency, in that the envelope signal e(t) modulates the sampling signal.
• the compensated quotient signal f(t) is then converted to a pulse-height-modulated signal with sampling frequency, in that f(t) modulates the sampling signal.
• a tuning of the output level of the spectral signal s(t) can also be performed by multiplying the pulse-width modulated envelope signal e(t) by a selected factor k.
• the required amplification for a given response function is thus determined by the value of k.
• the compensation will usually be 1 bit for a voltage drop of over 10% if it occurs in connection with the digital signal e(t) or by a corresponding correction of factor k if compensation for the drop in voltage is performed in connection with the pulse-width modulated signal e(t).
• the compensation value must be adapted to the absolute value of e(t).
• the processed spectral signal s(t), which corresponds to a given response function, is now generated by multiplying the pulse-width modulated signal e(t) by the pulse-height modulated signal f(t).
• the product s(t) e(t)-f(t) is then converted to the analog output signal s r which is smoothed in a reconstruction filter 14 and transmitted to the sound generator SG for conversion to an acoustic output signal which mainly reproduces the external sound field detected by the microphones Ml, M2 minus any detected feedback acoustic signal.
• the digital/analog converter DAC it will be seen that the use of a pulse-width modulated signal which can be limited to a constant low level, will only result in switching losses in the transistors.
• the converter DAC as a high-output converter the hearing aid may be constructed without the use of a power amplifier for the sound generator SG. If it had been necessary to use a power amplifier, this could have been implemented as a pulse-width-modulated amplifier of class D, controlled directly by the digital signal.
• the digital/- analog converter DAC drives the sound generator SG directly and also has the ability to considerably reduce collector loss in the output transistors in that the pulse-height modulated signal f(t) comes after the pulse-width modulated signal e(t).
• channel ATC constitutes a first order low-pass filter whose critical frequency is given by the channel's acoustic impedance and equivalent diameter for a constant length of the channel. It will be obvious, moreover, that the channel may also consist of several smaller, through- going holes. If, e.g., the length of the channel is 1 cm, the equivalent diameter for a critical frequency of 1000 Hz will be 2 mm, as already mentioned.
• the acoustic transmission channel ATC is constructed as a first order low- pass filter, since a version in the form of a higher order filter is difficult to implement due to the dimensions of the hearing aid.
• the approximate electrical equivalent diagram for the acoustic transmission channel ATC is illustrated in fig. lb. It can be seen that the acoustic transmission channel together with the volume of the said portion of the inner meatus 6 and the tympanum impedance can be represented by an RLC network, with a condenser in parallel. The tympanum impedance has an important effect on all transmission paths, viz. acoustic through the transmission channel and electroacoustic in the case of feedback over the sound generator.
• the acoustic transmission channel ATC also acts together with the said portion of the meatus 6 as a resonant amplifier, in that the volume of the said portion constitutes the resonant cavity.
• the maximum amplification will normally be in the order of approximately 38 dB.
• An increase in the equivalent diameter and thus also in the acoustic filter's critical frequency reduces the amplification. If the frequency range of the hearing residue in the bass range is small, a correspondingly greater amplification in the electroacoustic channel will be required. This will result in greater power consumption and a larger battery will therefore be required. In that case, the reduction in the diameter of the acoustic channel will, however, make more room available for the battery 4 in the hearing aid's main section 1, while a hearing residue of a greater frequency range, though requiring a larger equivalent diameter, will also require a correspondingly smaller battery.
• a channel is obtained with a small equivalent diameter in the case of severe hearing impairment which requires a correspondingly larger battery, while in the case of minor hearing impairment which requires a correspondingly smaller battery, a channel is obtained with a relatively larger equivalent diameter.
• the compressor 22, the compressor 33, the equalizer 34, the stabilizer/cancellation circuit 36 and the precompensator 37 in the digital signal processor DSP are each supplied with memories in the form of random-access memories RAM3-7.
• the digital/analog converter DAC also contains a memory in the form of a random-access memory RAM8. Furthermore, it is also advantageous at least to construct the compressor 33, the equalizer 34 and the stabilizer/cancelling circuit 36 as an integrated filter network.
• each individual filter can now be altered in that these are provided with different sets of filter coefficients, a set of filter coefficients being provided for each individual filter, viz. said components 22,32,33,34 and 36, and the separate filter coefficients for each filter which is part of the coefficient set stored in the appropriate random-access memories RAM3-RAM6.
• Each individual set of filter coefficients thus represents a specific response function for the hearing aid together with the set of compensation values which is stored in the memory RAM7 connected with the precompensator 37 and the amplification parameters which are stored in the memory RAM8 connected to the digital/analog converter DAC.
• All the parameters, including the filter coefficients, which are required in order to generate a specific response function, are stored in the memory RAM2 in the control unit CU and also in the external random-access memory RAM8 which is provided in the hearing aid's secondary section 2 or in a case and constitutes a spare memory.
• the menu control is installed in the control unit CU and is called continuously and cyclically by means of a cycle generator CG coupled to the control unit and connected to a control device in the form of a pressure or touch keypad SW which with advantage may be installed in the ear opening on the outside of the hearing aid's main section 1.
• a control device in the form of a pressure or touch keypad SW which with advantage may be installed in the ear opening on the outside of the hearing aid's main section 1.
• a control keypad the user will access a new set of parameters for a specific response function from the memory RAM2 in the hearing aid's control section and input it to the digital signal processor DSP.
• Successive touches of the control keypad SW access all the menu's response functions in succession, and thus, by means of a few touches, the user can quickly find the response function which best suits his acoustic environment and required amplification.
• a typical menu of response functions can include, e.g., five such functions.
• Each of the response functions is adapted to the user'.s hearing and gives the best possible result for a specific, external, acoustic environment.
• the individual adjustment of the hearing aid for each user will therefore require a determination of parameters for the required response functions on the basis of audiometric examinations of the person and use of acoustic parameters which represent specific external, acoustic environments, together with a choice of equivalent diameter for the acoustic transmission channel ATC, its parameters being determined by the user's hearing residue.
• the hearing aid can easily be reprogrammed to suit altered user conditions and changes in the hearing of the user or the hearing of another user.
• Reprogramming is performed in that the random access memory RAM1 in the case or secondary section 2 is connected via an interface IF of type RS232 to a computer, e.g. a personal computer which is connected to an audiometer system.
• Audiometric measuring procedures which can be used in connection with a computer to reprogram digital hearing aids are well known in the art, and in this connection reference is made to DE-OS no. 27 35 024, US-PS no. 3 808 354, PCT application no. WO85/00509 together with the paper "A general- purpose hearing aid prescription, simulation and testing system" (Jamieson et al.), IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 1989, no. 2, pp. 1989-92.
• the optimization of the individual response functions is obtained by adapting the amplification to the sound level, thus reducing noise and by making optimum use of the weighted frequency response so that it gives the best possible signal/- noise ratio at low levels.
• the optimum response curve is thus primarily obtained by a level-controlled frequency weighting. Examples of response curves which correspond to specific response functions are shown in fig. 6a. Three different response functions are here represented by graphs designated by I, II and III respectively.
• the upper graph la, Ila, Ilia gives the response of the electroacoustic channel and the lower graph lb, lib, Illb that of the corresponding acoustic transmission channel.
• the response function I is the optimal in the case of strong hearing impairment, while II is adapted to a moderate hearing impairment and III a weak hearing impairment.
• IV shows the curve for the sound pressure response of the meatus without the use of a hearing aid. It can be seen that the hearing residue, as represented in the lower graph in each case, has a small frequency range in the case of strong hearing impairment and a correspondingly low critical frequency for the acoustic low-pass filter.
• the response function which gives approximately normal hearing volume and an optimum subjective hearing impression can be chosen.
• the individual response functions have different amplification, and by choosing a suitable response function the user will also be able to avoid the problem of "recruitment", the phenomenon which people with neurological hearing loss often experience near normal hearing volume when the signal level is above the hearing threshold.
• the sound generator will be operated with a power which corresponds to the amplification, and the generated sound pressure level will normally be approximately 120 dB in the case of strong hearing impairment and, e.g., 100 dB in the case of a more moderate hearing impairment.
• a programmable hearing aid with digital signal processing which is hybrid in the sense that it is based on a combination of digital and acoustic filtering in order to safeguard any low frequency hearing residue which the user may have.
• All the electronics in the hearing aid's electroacoustic channel i.e. the analog input section, the digital signal processor DSP, the control section CP and the analog output section are implemented as a monolithic VLSI circuit in a CMOS chip.
• a hearing aid of this type which is equipped with only one microphone, will be capable of giving an amplification of 35 dB without cancellation, and with the use of cancellation in the digital signal processor a further 10 dB are gained, giving a total amplification of 45 dB.
• a hearing aid in accordance with the invention with two microphones and phasing out of an acoustic feedback signal 20 dB are gained, giving a total amplification of 55 dB.
• a further cancellation of the feedback signal is necessary, and a further 10 dB can then be gained, giving in this case a total obtainable amplification of 65 dB, and consequently an improvement of 20 dB compared to the one- microphone technique.
• the feedback acoustic signal will be virtually completely suppressed by means of delayed sampling in the sample-and-hold circuit SH.
• the feedback signal will naturally always be suppressed, while at high amplifications, i.e. for the present invention over 55 dB, cancellation is also used in one of the filters in the digital signal processor, in this case the stabilizer/cancelling circuit 36.
• the stabilizer/cancelling circuit 36 is also used in one of the filters in the digital signal processor.
• Cancellation of a feedback signal can be performed digitally by means of several methods known in the art. In principle cancellation is performed on condition that the signal through the filter is the same with and without feedback. In the case of broad-band cancellation it is theoretically possible to obtain 20 dB, while for the hearing aid in accordance with the invention a form of adaptive cancellation is preferred, since this allows consideration to be given to the frequency- dependent tympanum impedance. In this connection it may seem reasonable to expect an attainable gain of approximately 10 dB by using adaptive cancellation, i.e. the maximum, stable amplification for the hearing aid can be increased to 65 dB without loss of speech quality.
• a hybrid hearing aid of the all- in-the-ear type which permits a sound pressure level of over 120 dB at the tympanum with little distortion over a frequency range which extends from approximately 60 to 8,000 Hz, i.e. over 7 octaves, and with a ratio between the signal level and the quantifying noise level during the analog/digital conversion of over 70 dB, since effective use is made of 12 bits per sample during quantification.
• a suitable analog compression prior to the quantification ensures an effective linear dynamic range of over 90 dB.
• the result therefore, is a hearing aid which can be adapted in an optimum manner to most forms of age-dependent and neurological hearing loss and which gives the user a completely adequate reproduction of external sound fields, which, e.g., represent speech and music, and wherein special emphasis is placed on maintaining the tonal qualities of the sound by ensuring an optimum reproduction of the frequency band for the formants in, e.g. , speech.

Landscapes

• General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
• Neurosurgery (AREA)
• Otolaryngology (AREA)
• Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
• Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
• Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
• Signal Processing (AREA)
• Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
• Circuit For Audible Band Transducer (AREA)
• Soundproofing, Sound Blocking, And Sound Damping (AREA)
• Electrotherapy Devices (AREA)
• Adornments (AREA)
• Finger-Pressure Massage (AREA)
• Acyclic And Carbocyclic Compounds In Medicinal Compositions (AREA)
• Steroid Compounds (AREA)
• Transceivers (AREA)
• Reduction Or Emphasis Of Bandwidth Of Signals (AREA)
• Tone Control, Compression And Expansion, Limiting Amplitude (AREA)
• Electrophonic Musical Instruments (AREA)
• Stereophonic System (AREA)
• Cable Transmission Systems, Equalization Of Radio And Reduction Of Echo (AREA)

Priority Applications (5)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Publications (1)

Family

ID=19892639

Family Applications (1)

Country Status (13)

Cited By (8)

Families Citing this family (105)

Citations (5)

Family Cites Families (3)

• 1989
  • 1989-11-30 NO NO894806A patent/NO169689C/no not_active IP Right Cessation
• 1990
  • 1990-11-29 CA CA002069737A patent/CA2069737C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
  • 1990-11-29 ES ES91900061T patent/ES2060345T3/es not_active Expired - Lifetime
  • 1990-11-29 DK DK91900061.2T patent/DK0502073T3/da active
  • 1990-11-29 WO PCT/NO1990/000178 patent/WO1991008654A1/en active IP Right Grant
  • 1990-11-29 HU HU9201417A patent/HUT63726A/hu unknown
  • 1990-11-29 US US07/852,242 patent/US5276739A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
  • 1990-11-29 DE DE69012582T patent/DE69012582T2/de not_active Expired - Fee Related
  • 1990-11-29 JP JP3500704A patent/JPH05504029A/ja active Pending
  • 1990-11-29 EP EP91900061A patent/EP0502073B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
  • 1990-11-29 AU AU68805/91A patent/AU654266B2/en not_active Ceased
  • 1990-11-29 AT AT91900061T patent/ATE111670T1/de not_active IP Right Cessation
• 1992
  • 1992-05-26 FI FI922408A patent/FI922408A0/fi not_active Application Discontinuation

Patent Citations (5)

Also Published As

Similar Documents

Legal Events