WO1980002433A1 - The identification of bacteria - Google Patents

The identification of bacteria Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1980002433A1
WO1980002433A1 PCT/GB1980/000077 GB8000077W WO8002433A1 WO 1980002433 A1 WO1980002433 A1 WO 1980002433A1 GB 8000077 W GB8000077 W GB 8000077W WO 8002433 A1 WO8002433 A1 WO 8002433A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
bacteria
tests
procedure
enzymes
bacterial
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/GB1980/000077
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Inventor
S Bascomb
Original Assignee
Nat Res Dev
S Bascomb
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nat Res Dev, S Bascomb filed Critical Nat Res Dev
Publication of WO1980002433A1 publication Critical patent/WO1980002433A1/en
Priority to DK556780A priority Critical patent/DK160323C/da

Links

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q1/00—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
    • C12Q1/34—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving hydrolase
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q1/00—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
    • C12Q1/02—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving viable microorganisms
    • C12Q1/04—Determining presence or kind of microorganism; Use of selective media for testing antibiotics or bacteriocides; Compositions containing a chemical indicator therefor
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S435/00—Chemistry: molecular biology and microbiology
    • Y10S435/81—Packaged device or kit

Definitions

  • THE IDENTIFICATION OF BACTERIA This invention relates to the identification of bacteria.
  • Clinical bacteriology laboratories are frequently called upon to test for the presence of pathogenic bacteria in clinical specimens and further to identify the type of bacteria concerned to help guide the clinician in the choice of treatment, e.g. antibiotic, which is to be used to combat infection.
  • Customary bacterial identification procedures rely, upon aseries of characterisation tests on the basis of which the unknown organism is assigned to a defined group of bacteria. These tests include tests in which bacteria are classified by their ability to metabolise various substrates, metabolism being determined by resultant changes in the substrate media, e.g. pH changes, which may be detected by use of coloured indicators. For such metabolic tests it is necessary, however, to grow the bacteria, usually in complete growth media, and this requires considerable expenditure of time so that it is rarely possible to identify the bacteria on the same day as the specimen arrives in the laboratory. Often, if conventional bacteria identification procedures are used, definitive identification is not possible until 48 - 72 hours after receipt of the specimen.
  • the treatment prescribed by the clinician can at best - be only a guess and may be initially incorrect with the consequence that the infection persists and the condition of the patient deteriorates.
  • the correct treatment e.g. antibiotic
  • the present invention comprises a procedure for the identification of bacteria, in which bacteria are subjected to a combination of tests for determination of:
  • the procedure of the invention may be used for i dentification of a very wide range of bacteria, including most of those bacteria which are customarily encountered clinically.
  • the procedure may be used to identify the commonly encountered bacterial groups : Aeromonas , Acinetobacter, Alcaligenes , Bordatella, Citrobacter, Edwardsiella, Enterobacter, Escherichia, Flavobacterium, Hafnia, Klebsiella, Provi dencia, Proteas , Pseudomonas , Salmonella, Serratia, Shigella, Staphylococcus and Streptococcus .
  • the procedure of the invention has been used to i dentify the following bacterial species :
  • Klebsi ella pneumoniae (sensu lato) Klebsi ella rhinoscleromatis
  • the procedure of the invention may also be appli ed to the identification of other bacterial speci es besi des those listed above.
  • the procedure of the invention permi ts very rapi d i dentifi cation of bacteria, the enzyme determination tests used generally requiring only a relatively short period of incubation , e . g . from about 10 minutes up to about 2 hours , usually from about 30 to about 90 , minutes at about 40oC , to give suffi ci ent product for detection e. g . by spectroscopi c measurements .
  • the enzymes whi ch are determined during the procedure of the invention are constitutive enzymes for the bacteria concerned, though in some cases the enzymes may be induced enzymes the rates of bacterial synthesis of whi ch are very fast .
  • the tests used are generally suitably adapted for determination of constitutive enzymes .
  • the tests whi ch are used in the procedure of the invention for determination of bacterial enzymes may comprise any suitable tests for the determination of the enzymes in question which are characteristi cally not dependent on growth of the organisms , and which may include those non-growth enzyme determination tests for the enzymes in question which are well known in the art .
  • These tests are usually of the kind in which the enzyme is determined by i ts ability to interact with a specific substrate. Interaction of the enzyme wi th the substrate, on incubation , usually gives rise to a product which may be detected either directly or after further treatment whi ch may include chemi cal synthesis from the initial enzyme product .
  • the product of the enzyme interaction may be detected by spectrometric measurements including fluorimetry or colorimetry.
  • the speci fic enzyme substrate may comprise an umbelli feryl derivative whi ch on interaction with the enzyme gives rise to umbelliferone whi ch is moni tored fluorimetrically, or the substrate may comprise a nitrophenyl , ni troaniline or similar type of derivative which on interaction with the enzyme gives rise to a coloured product which is monitored colori metrically.
  • the presence of the enzyme may be determined by simple visual observation , for instance, when interacti on of the enzyme and substrate gives rise to a coloured product or a colour change.
  • cytochrome oxi dase An example of an enzyme which may be determined by spectrometric measurement of the direct product of enzyme interaction with a substrate is cytochrome oxi dase; for instance, by interaction of sample with tetraphenyl tetramethyl-p-phenylene-diamine (TMPD) an indi cator which is oxi dised by cytochrome oxidase to give a purple colouration .
  • TMPD tetraphenyl tetramethyl-p-phenylene-diamine
  • acid phosphatases , betagalactosi dases and phenylalanine deaminases may be determined spectrometri cally; for instance, using nitrophenyl derivatives , though it is normally necessary to treat the enzyme-substrate mixture with alkali subsequent to incubation so as to develop the nitrophenyl colouration by raising the pH above the pH optimum of the enzyme reaction .
  • Products which require further treatment after enzyme reaction with the substrate before monitoring may be detected spectrometrically.
  • ammonia releasing enzymes such as leucine deaminase may be determined by reacting the ammonia produced by the enzyme interaction with a colour producing reagent such as the Nessler reagent , and monitoring the resultant colour by colorimetri c measurement .
  • the ammonia released may be measured directly in the enzyme-substrate reaction mixture or may be removed, e.g . by dialysis , from the reaction mixture before assay.
  • diacetyl producing enzymes may be determined by spectrometric monitoring of enzyme products after further treatment. In parti cular, diacetyl producing enzymes are determined by the Voges-Proskauer technique for testing for the presence of diacetyl/acetoin.
  • glutamate decarboxylase activity may be determined by colorimetrically determining the carbon dioxide released as a result of interaction of the enzyme with glutamic acid. For instance, carbon dioxide is determined colorimetrically by dialysis out of the reaction mixture after addition of acid e.g. H 2 SO 4 , through a hydrophobic membrane into a buffered indicator which changes colour as a result of the change in acidity due to the CO 2 .
  • substrate specific peptidases are determined by use of naphthylamine or nitroaniline derivatives, naphthylamine produced being determined either directly by fluorimetry or by colorimetry after diazonium coupling.
  • the tests used for determination of the enzymes may be varied as desired, for instance to increase the organism specific selectivity of the tests.
  • two tests for determination of phosphatase activity are included within the procedure of the inventions one for whole cell acid phosphatase activity and one for acid phosphatase activity in the presence of agents which disrupt the bacterial cell permeability barrier.
  • Any suitable agent may be used, though Cetrimide (Cetyl trimethyl-ammonium bromide) and lysozyme, especially in combination, are particularly preferred.
  • the use of such an agent for instance, has the effect of selectively decreasing the acid phosphatase activity of Proteus bacteria and increasing that of Klebsiella bacteria.
  • the invention includes kits of reagents for use in the procedure of the invention.
  • kits typically comprise separate specific substrates for each of the enzymes which it is desired to determine in the procedure of the invention.
  • a basic kit for use in the procedure of the present invention comprises separate specific substrates, for determination of a - z listed previously..
  • these substrates are such as to give chromogenic products on interaction with corresponding enzymes to advantageously permit colorimetric monitoring .
  • the kits may also comprise suitable buffer solutions and other reagents , e.g . colour developing reagents , together with the enzyme substrates .
  • the procedure of the present invention is generally applicable to the identification of bacteria in clinical specimens including urine, samples , throat swabs and sputum, wound swabs , stools and blood samples .
  • Bacteria may be isolated from the specimens prior to i dentification.
  • bacterial cultures are prepared from the specimens and colonies of the organisms to be identified are harvested from the cultures after a sufficient period of growth e.g . normally about 18 hours , and made up into a suitable form e.g . suspension form, for determination by the procedure of the invention.
  • a sufficient period of growth e.g . normally about 18 hours
  • a suitable form e.g . suspension form
  • the samples containing bacteria Prior to assay of bacterial enzymes , however, the samples containing bacteria, whether derived directly from clinical specimens or derived as single colonies after bacterial growth, may in some cases be subjected to treatment to disrupt the permeability barri er of the bacteria and release the enzymes for assay. Any suitable treatment may be used to disrupt the bacterial permeability barrier. Generally during determination of cytoplasmic and periplasmic enzymes , such as ⁇ -galactosidases and acid phosphatases , such prior disruption of the bacterial permeability barrier may be desirable, though other enzymes , such as deaminases , which appear to be membrane associated may require the bacterial cells to be kept intact for enzyme activity to be maintained.
  • the enzymes assay tests of the procedure of the invention may be carri ed out by any suitable method or means , including continuous flow and discrete sample analysis techniques , such as those which are well known in the art .
  • a discrete analyser such as the Kem-O-Mat system., is used.
  • the enzymes may be assayed by automated continuous analysis techniques .
  • continuous flow analysis methods it may be desirable to include a protein determination in vi ew of the differing protein concentrations of various bacteria, so that the absolute relative enzyme activiti es of the bacterial may be determined.
  • a protein assay may provide a measure of the blank in spectrometric assays for the absorbance due to the concentration of the organisms .
  • the conditions used during enzyme determinations may be varied as desired.
  • the relative organism: to reagent concentration may be raised, e.g . a sample to reagent ratio in the range from about 1:3 up to about 3: 1, to increase the levels of product formed on interaction of enzyme and substrate and thus permit detection of enzyme at lower bacterial suspension concentrations .
  • relatively elevated temperatures e.g . temperatures of about 40oC or more, may be used during incubation of sample and substrate to increase the rate of interaction.
  • the procedure of the invention may be carried out using a test card or other suitable apparatus comprising a plurality of wells or compartments which separately contain specific enzyme substrates for each of the enzyme tests of the procedure and other reagents , as required, e.g . colour developing reagents .
  • the sample usually bacterial suspension
  • the development or absence of a detectable, e.g . coloured, product after a relatively short incubation period e.g. from about 20 minutes tip to about 2 hours in preferred embodiments , indicates the presence or absence of the corresponding enzymes in the bacterial sample.
  • Such apparatus is included within the scope of the invention , and in particularly preferred embodiments may be adapted to handling by automated techniques including automated, preferably computerised, spectro-metric scanning techniques which i dentify the bacterial species directly from the responses of the enzyme tests .
  • the procedure of the invention may incorporate additional tests for determination of bacterial enzymes besides those mentioned previously as tests (a) - (z) ; for instance to strengthen the identification of certain groups of bacteria.
  • the procedure may include a test for determination of bacterial catalase to assist in identification of enterobacteria.
  • the procedure may include a test for determination of bacterial urease activity.
  • the invention also includes a bacterial identification procedure for rapid differentation of the commonly encountered bacterial groups Escherichia, Klebsiella spp, Proteus and Pseudomonas spp, in which a sample comprising bacteria of one of these groups is subjected to a combination of tests for determination of bacterial acid phosphatase, beta-galactosidase, glutamate decarboxylase, phenylalanine deaminase, cytochrome oxidase, diacetyl producing enzymes and urease.
  • This limited combination of seven tests may be used to rapidly differentiate the bacterial groups Escherichia, Klebsiella spp , Proteus and Pseudomonas spp substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to the full identification procedure incorporating the 26 test (a) - (z).
  • kits for use in this 7 test procedure typically comprising separately specific substrates for acid phosphatase, diacetyl producing enzymes, beta-galactosidase, glutamate decarboxylase, phenylalanine deaminase, cytochrome oxidase and urease activity.
  • the procedures of the invention rely upon determination of the enzyme activity profiles of the bacterial. undergoing identification, and in accordance with the invention the combination of enzyme tests chosen, i.e. tests (a) - (z) or the limited combination of 7 tests, typically gives a unique "fingerprint" for the bacteria.
  • the unique "fingerprint" for each species or group of bacteria may be determined with reference to the enzyme activity profiles of previously identified bacteria; for instance, from bacteria obtained from culture collections. Enzyme activity profiles may be determined qualitatively or quantitatively.
  • the use of data-processing techniques may be desirable to facilitate the identification by comparison of enzyme profiles of unknown bacteria with those of previously identified bacteria. For example, processing of results obtained by discriminant function analysis, e.g. using the SPSS package (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) has been found to be particularly useful.
  • the procedures of the invention typically permit very rapid identification of bacteria, a single procedure only being required for identification of a very wide range of bacteria, including most of those bacteria which are commonly encountered clinically. This provision of a single procedure advantageously obviates the need for a preliminary test and the undesirable delay that this causes.
  • the invention is further described by way of illustration only in the following description and examples which refer to the accompanying drawings :
  • Figure 1 whi ch is a diagrammatic representation of a manifold used for continuous flow analysis of nitrophenolreleasing enzymes in the procedure of the inventi on;
  • Figure 2 whi ch is a diagrammatic representation of a similar manifold for anaylsis of ammonia releasing enzymes ;
  • Figure 3 whi ch is a diagrammatic representation of a similar manifold for analysis of diacetyl producing enzymes ;
  • Figure 4 which is a diagrammatic representation of a similar manifold for analysis of glutamate decarboxylase
  • Fi gure 5 which is a diagrammatic representation of a similar manifold for assay of cytochrome oxidase and protein ;
  • Fi gure 6 which is a diagrammatic representation of a flow chart for a three-channel combination continuous flow analysis system for carrying out the procedure of the invention and comprising the manifolds of Figures 1 to 5 ⁇ and
  • Fi gure 7 which is a diagrammatic representation of a manifold used for continuous flow analysis of enzymes using substrates which release fluorescently active products .
  • Tests for determination of bacterial aci d phosphatase, beta-galactosi dase, glutamate decarboxylase, leucine deaminase, phenylalanine deaminase, cytochrome oxi dase, urease and diacetyl producing enzymes are carried out by continuous flow analysis techniques using a three-channel combined system, a flow chart for which is given in Figure 6, comprising enzyme determination manifolds as shown diagrammati cally in Fi gures 1 to 5.
  • the various enzyme determinations are carri ed out as follows : - Enzymes , utilising nitropheny substrates (betagalactosi dase, phenylalanine deaminase and aci d phosphatase) .
  • the manifold shown in Figure 1 is used for determinati on of enzymes utilising ni trophenyl substrates i . e. beta-galactosi dase, phenylalanine deaminase and aci d phosphatase.
  • a stream of organism suspension 1 is mixed with an air segmented buffer stream 2 in the first single mixing coil (SMC) 3 , and is then mixed with the substrate stream 4 in the second SMC 5 and incubated for l8 minutes in a glass coil maintained in an oil bath 6 at 40oC.
  • the reaction is stopped by addition of a strong alkaline solution 7 ( 1.9M NH 4 OH, 0.68M, NaOH, Triton-X-100 0.3 g/l) which also acts as a colour developer for the released p-nitrophenyl molecule.
  • the stream is then de-bubbled and passed through a 20mm flow-cell in a photometer 8 and the absorbance measured at 405nm for beta-galactosidase and aci d phosphatase and at 480 nm for phenylalanine deaminase.
  • the absorbance readings obtained are registered on a recorder 10.
  • the fi gures given in the enclosed area 11 in Figure 1 are the flow rates used for the various reagent and reactant streams .
  • Urease activity is determined in the absence of tris maleate or phosphate buffer as their presence caused a noisy base-line, the enzyme being measured in the presence of distilled water only (pH approximately 4.7-5.0) .
  • NH 4 Cl solutions are used as standards in both assays .
  • the substrates used are 5mM 1leucine in 0.5M phosphate borate, pH 8.0 and 100mM urea in fresh distilled water.
  • the Nessler reagent is prepared as described by Bascomb and Grantham in the abovementioned publication and diluted 1: 10 in fresh glass distilled water daily. A 20mm flow cell is used in the photometer and absorbance is measured at 420nm.
  • the Voges-Proskauer reaction for the presence of acetoin/ diacetyl is used, in the manifold illustrated in Figure 3, for determination of diacetyl-producing enzymes .
  • the method used is developed from that described by Kamoun et al (Clin . Chem. 1972, 18, 355-357) .
  • the substrate solution contains 0.3M sodium pyruvate, 0. 1M acetate buffer (pH 4.5) , 0. 1mM thiamine pyrophosphate and creatine 2g/l .
  • the 1-naphthol colour-developing reagent is dissolved (25g/l) in 2M sodium hydroxi de.
  • Diacetyl solutions are used as standards . Absorbance is measured at 420nm using a 20mm flow cell .
  • Glutamate decarboxylase is determined, with reference to
  • Fi gure 4 by interaction with substrate comprising glutamate to produce CO 2 which is dialysed from the reaction mixture into a buffered cresol red solution where its presence causes a colour change in the indi cator.
  • the method used is based on those described by Leclerc (Annls . Inst. Pasteur, Paris ( 1967) 112, 713-73D , Moran and Witler ( 1976 J. Food Sci . 41, 165-167) and Technicon Methodology AA 11-08.
  • Technicon sodium carbonate standards are used.
  • the substrate used comprises 0. 1M acetate buffer (pH 3.8) , 0.05M sodium glutamate and pyri doxal phosphate 20 mg/l .
  • Cytochrome oxi dase and protein are assayed using the manifold apparatus illustrated in Figure 5 - whi ch contains similar information and components having similar functions as in Figures 1 to 4.
  • the reagents used for assay of cytochrome oxi dase activity are 0.05M Tris maleate buffer pH 6.0 introduced prior to the first single mixing coil , 0.5 mM NN N'N' -tetramethyl-p-phenylene diamine dihydrochloride in 0.001% (w/v) ascorbic aci d introduced prior to the second single mixing coil .
  • the incubation period used is 17 minutes at room temperature and absorption is measured at 550nm in a 10mm flow cell . Protein assay
  • the protein assay used is based on that of Lowry et al ( 1951, J. Biol . Chem. , 193 , 265-275) and as described by Bascomb and Grantham in the abovementioned publication, though using smaller tubes .
  • the reagents used are alkaline copper solution prepared daily by mixing two ml sodium potassium tartrate ( 10 .g/l) with 2 ml CuSO 4 . 5H 2 O (5 g/l) and 46 ml 0.2M NaOH containing 0.37M NaCO 3 (anhydrous) , in the order described.
  • the alkaline copper reagent is introduced prior to the first single mixing coil .
  • Folin-ciocalto reagent (BDH) is diluted 1:8 in distilled water daily and introduced prior to the second single mixing coil .
  • the incubation period used is 17 minutes at room temperature and absorption is measured at 66 ⁇ nm in a 10mm flow cell .
  • Bovine serum albumin solutions are used as standards .
  • a few drops of chloroform are added to the sodium tartrate, carbonate and protein standard solutions to prevent microbial contamination.
  • the enzyme assays described above are carried out in a combined continuous flow analysis system, the flow chart of which is illustrated in Figure 6, comprising three channels which are run simultaneously: one channel (A) for assaying enzymes utilising nitrophenyl derivatives , the second channel (B) for assaying protein and cytochrome oxidase, and the third channel (C) for assaying diacetyl producing , ammonia-producing and CO 2 producing (glutamate decarboxylase) enzymes.
  • the NH 3 and CO 2 products are dialysed from the reaction mixtures and the Nessler and 1-naphtol colour-developing reagents added where appropriate between the incubation coil and the third SMC.
  • the stream from the single sample probe is divided into three, provi ding bacterial suspensions to each of the channels A, B and C.
  • the bacterial suspensions are maintained in cups on a revolving sample plate D, while substrates and buffer solutions are provided in continuous streams via the tubes. All bacterial suspensions are first tested for activity of three enzymes, one in each of the channels A, B and C, When the cycle is complete, the substrate, buffer and sample lines are transferred manually to reagents for the next batch of three tests and the sampling of bacteria is restarted.
  • Example 1 A total of 199 suspensions of different bacteria are tested by the procedure outlined above using the continuous flow apparatus illustrated in the accompanying drawings. The bacteria are isolated from routine urine specimens cultured overnight at 37oC on MacConkey agar plates (Difco Laboratories or Tissue Culture Services). Only plates that showed a homogeneous colony appearance are used.
  • Bacterial suspensions each comprising ten colonies in 5ml saline are prepared in a separate location and are brought to the automated system to ensure that automated identification is carried out without any knowledge of the colonial appearance of the samples.
  • a 0.1 ml aliquot is removed from each suspension and added to 5 ml nutrient broth which was then incubated at 37oC for 2 hours on a Matburn rotary mixer.
  • These suspensions are used for inoculation of a chosen set of conventional test media and a nutrient agar slope to be kept for further testing. The remaining saline suspension is tested directly by the automated procedure.
  • Cetrimide and lysozyme are included in the buffer solutions for acid phosphatase and ⁇ -galactosidase assays and mixed with the saline organism suspensions for 21 ⁇ 2 minutes at room temperature prior to addition of the substrate to effect disruption of the bacterial permeability barrier. This treatment halved the absorbance at 340nm of all gram-negative bacteria tested.
  • V-P Diacetyl (V-P) 0 51 0 0 ⁇ -galactosidase 94 82 0 0
  • Phenylalanine deaminase 2 0 100 0
  • Example 3 A total of 96 suspensions of different organisms is tested by the automated method described above in Example 1 and the preceding description except in this case each suspension comprises a single colony of organisms in 1 ml of saline.
  • the automated test procedure adopted is the same as in Example 1 though with fewer control runs and similarly conventional tests are carried out on aliquots of each suspension for the sake of comparison.
  • the results obtained, in terms of the success rate, are given below in Table 3 which also includes results for the success rate of the automated tests of Example 1. TABLE 3
  • Example 2 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 As can be seen the agreement rate achieved with the automated system in Example 1 is 98%.
  • the three strains that are not identified include a strain of Klebsiella spp. showing only acid phosphatase activity, a strain of E. coli showing only betagalactosidase activity, and a strain of Pseudomonas spp. for which the cytochrome oxidase activity results are not available. All three organisms are originally classified as unidentified and on repeat testing are identified correctly.
  • Example 2 The success rate achieved in Example 2 was as good as that in Example 1. Thus it is possible to identify some bacteria. from a single colony by the use of 9 automated tests.
  • Example 3
  • the continuous flow system as described in Example 1, was used to determine activity of cytochrome oxidase, glutamate decarboxylase and protein content.
  • a semi-automated continuous flow method was used for detection of enzymes listed in Table 4, by fluorimetry using the continuous flow manifold shown in Figure 7.
  • a discrete analyser Kem-0-Mat was used to perform the tests listed in Table 5.
  • L-Lysyl- ⁇ -naphthylami de carbonate Koch Light L-Prolyl- ⁇ -naphthylamide hydrochlori de(pro-NAP) Si gma L-Pyrrolidonyl- ⁇ -naphthylami de ( pyr-NAP) Sigma All substrates were dissolved in dimethyl sulphi de and diluted to a final substrate concentration of 0.1mM with 0.1M Tris phosphate buffer, pH 8.0, containing cobaltous nitrate ( 2 M) . The reagent used in the continuous flow manifold was 0.1M Tris phosphate buffer, pH 8.0.
  • the discrete analyser, Kem-O-Mat , (Coulter Electronics) was used to perform the tests listed in Table 5.
  • the bacterial suspensions were placed in the sample cups , buffers were dispensed by the diluent syringe, substrates and reagents (for developing the colour of the reactant end-products ) were dispensed by the reagent syringe.
  • To increase sample throughput and lengthen incubation periods cuvettes containing bacterial suspensions , buffer and substrate were incubated outsi de the Kem-O-Mat.
  • the cuvette changer was used for simultaneous insertion of all 32 cuvettes and for their removal . Two program cartri dges were used to perform each test.
  • Program cartri dge 1 was used for distribution of bacterial suspensions , buffer, cof actors and substrate to each cuvette and for reading the initial absorbance of each cuvette. The cuvettes were then removed and placed in a 40 oC incubator. The di luent and reagent syringes and probes were rinsed and charged with the reagents for the next enzyme test . After incubation the cuvettes of each enzyme test were returned to the analyser. Program cartri dge 2 was used for adding the second reagent and for reading the final absorbance. The details of reagent compositi on are given in Table 5. For all tests 350 ⁇ l of diluent and 70 ⁇ l of reagent 1 were dispensed into each cuvette.
  • Bacterial suspensions were dispensed in 50 ⁇ l aliquots for the DNAase test and in 20 ⁇ 1 aliquots for all other tests .
  • Minimum incubation periods for tryptophanase and DNAase were 2h, for VP and PNPA 11 ⁇ 2h , and for the remaining tests one hour.
  • reagent 2 was added to the cuvettes containing substrate and bacterial suspension in 50 ⁇ l aliquots for the VP, PNPA , PNPP, PNPP+C+L and PNPG+C+L tests and in 350 ⁇ l aliquots for the INDOLE test.
  • V-P reaction (VP) 0.15M sodium pyruvate, creatine 1g/l and
  • DFA discriminant function analysis
  • the 35 species were divided either into 17 genera or sub-divided within each genus to species or groups of species as shown in Table 6.
  • the taxa which proved difficult to separate are Proteus rettgeri, Acinetobacter anitratus, and the Enterobacter/Serratia species. This is probably a result of use of strains kept for a long time in culture.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Toxicology (AREA)
  • Measuring Or Testing Involving Enzymes Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)
  • Radar Systems Or Details Thereof (AREA)
PCT/GB1980/000077 1979-05-02 1980-04-30 The identification of bacteria WO1980002433A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DK556780A DK160323C (da) 1979-05-02 1980-12-30 Fremgangsmaade til identifikation af bakterier og reagenssaet til brug ved fremgangsmaaden

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB7915318 1979-05-02
GB7915318 1979-05-02

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1980002433A1 true WO1980002433A1 (en) 1980-11-13

Family

ID=10504915

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/GB1980/000077 WO1980002433A1 (en) 1979-05-02 1980-04-30 The identification of bacteria

Country Status (7)

Country Link
US (1) US4603108A (GUID-C5D7CC26-194C-43D0-91A1-9AE8C70A9BFF.html)
EP (1) EP0018825B1 (GUID-C5D7CC26-194C-43D0-91A1-9AE8C70A9BFF.html)
JP (1) JPH0321160B2 (GUID-C5D7CC26-194C-43D0-91A1-9AE8C70A9BFF.html)
DE (1) DE3070143D1 (GUID-C5D7CC26-194C-43D0-91A1-9AE8C70A9BFF.html)
DK (1) DK160323C (GUID-C5D7CC26-194C-43D0-91A1-9AE8C70A9BFF.html)
GB (1) GB2048302B (GUID-C5D7CC26-194C-43D0-91A1-9AE8C70A9BFF.html)
WO (1) WO1980002433A1 (GUID-C5D7CC26-194C-43D0-91A1-9AE8C70A9BFF.html)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0122023A1 (en) * 1983-03-07 1984-10-17 E-Y Laboratories, Inc. Microorganisms detection methods and the separation of agglutinated microorganisms, and a kit for use therein
EP0256476A3 (en) * 1986-08-11 1988-04-20 Ramot University Authority For Applied Research & Industrial Development Ltd. A method of detection of infection by testing of body fluid mucopolysacharide degrading enzymes
US4812409A (en) * 1986-01-31 1989-03-14 Eastman Kodak Company Hydrolyzable fluorescent substrates and analytical determinations using same
WO1998047999A1 (es) 1997-04-18 1998-10-29 Centro Nacional De Investigaciones Cientificas (Cnic) Equipo, juego y metodo para el diagnostico microbiologico
EP1501938A4 (en) * 2002-04-19 2007-01-03 Biolog Inc COMPARATIVE PHENOTYPIC ANALYSIS OF CELLS INCLUDING A TEST OF BIOLOGICALLY ACTIVE COMPOUNDS
US9274101B2 (en) 2001-04-20 2016-03-01 Biolog, Inc. Methods and kits for obtaining a metabolic profile of living animal cells

Families Citing this family (72)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0122028A1 (en) * 1983-03-07 1984-10-17 E-Y Laboratories, Inc. Colorimetric assay for enzymes, diagnostic article therefor and a method for forming such article
US4874695A (en) * 1983-03-08 1989-10-17 American Home Products Corp. Rapid indentification of yeast and other fungal microorganisms by enzyme detection
DE3327839A1 (de) * 1983-08-02 1985-02-14 Merck Patent Gmbh, 6100 Darmstadt Verfahren und mittel zur empfindlichkeitspruefung von bakterien
US4617264A (en) * 1983-11-04 1986-10-14 Syntex (U.S.A.) Inc. Pretreatment method and composition
JPS60234597A (ja) * 1984-05-09 1985-11-21 Terumo Corp β−ガラクトシダ−ゼ試験用培地
CH683616A5 (de) * 1984-06-18 1994-04-15 Univ Michigan Diagnostisches Testverfahren zum Nachweis von oralen pathogenen Bakteriengemischen.
CA1274757A (en) * 1985-05-17 1990-10-02 Barry James Marshall Compositions and methods for the detection of urease for the diagnosis of campylobacter pyloridis infection
US4748113A (en) * 1985-06-13 1988-05-31 Marshall Barry J Compositions and methods for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal disorders involving urease
AU601363B2 (en) * 1985-05-17 1990-09-13 Barry James Marshall Compositions and methods for the detection of urease for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal disorder
GB8513001D0 (en) * 1985-05-22 1985-06-26 Wales University Of College Of Bacterial cell extractant
US5223403A (en) * 1985-05-31 1993-06-29 University Of Michigan Device for diagnosing periodontal disease
US4994376A (en) * 1987-05-27 1991-02-19 The Research Foundation Of State University Of Ny Detection of bacteroides gingivalis
ATE147790T1 (de) * 1987-11-05 1997-02-15 James D Berg Direkte methode zum nachweis von sehr niedrigerem grad der coliform-kontamination
AU3182289A (en) * 1988-02-10 1989-09-22 Nygene Corporation Process for producing biochemicals
US5252484A (en) * 1988-11-29 1993-10-12 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Rapid read-out biological indicator
US5073488A (en) * 1988-11-29 1991-12-17 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Rapid method for determining efficacy of a sterilization cycle and rapid read-out biological indicator
US5223401A (en) * 1988-11-29 1993-06-29 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Rapid read-out sterility indicator
JP3043063B2 (ja) * 1989-04-27 2000-05-22 バイオコントロール システムズ インコーポレイテッド 微生物のための沈澱テスト
US5116735A (en) * 1989-07-26 1992-05-26 The University Of Michigan Diagnosing periodontal disease by measuring proteolytic activity of periodontopathogenic bacteria
WO1993024651A1 (en) * 1989-07-26 1993-12-09 University Of Michigan System for measuring proteolytic activity of periodontopathogenic bacteria
US6699685B1 (en) 1990-04-20 2004-03-02 Rcr Scientific, Inc. Method, test media and chromogenic compounds for identifying and differentiating general coliforms and escherichia coli bacteria
US5210022A (en) * 1990-04-20 1993-05-11 Rcr Scientific, Inc. Method test media and chromogenic compounds for identifying and differentiating general coliforms and Escherichia coli bacteria
US5096668A (en) * 1990-04-26 1992-03-17 Difco Laboratories Diagnostic test slide
US5055594A (en) * 1990-07-19 1991-10-08 Becton, Dickinson And Company Fluorogenic trypotophanase substrates
FR2671100B1 (fr) * 1990-12-28 1993-03-05 Bio Merieux Procede d'analyse bacteriologique, et milieu de detection des bacteries genre salmonella.
AU652603B2 (en) * 1990-12-28 1994-09-01 Dade International Inc. Method and composition for determining antimicrobial susceptibility of the majority of clinically significant gram positive organisms
JPH08500241A (ja) * 1992-05-22 1996-01-16 ユニヴァーシティ オブ ミシガン 歯周病病原性細菌のタンパク質加水分解活性の測定系
US5364767A (en) * 1993-02-11 1994-11-15 Research Organics, In. Chromogenic compounds and methods of using same
US5411893A (en) * 1993-03-15 1995-05-02 Difco Laboratories Dry slide for diagnostic tests
WO1994021816A1 (en) * 1993-03-25 1994-09-29 Envirocon International Incorporated Test kits and methods for rapidly testing for contamination by microorganisms
US5614375A (en) * 1994-03-23 1997-03-25 Yissum Research Development Co. Of The Hebrew University Of Jerusalem Method and test kit for the rapid detection of biotoxic contaminants
US5464755A (en) * 1994-04-29 1995-11-07 Biolog, Inc. Microbiological medium and method of assay
US6387651B1 (en) 1995-04-12 2002-05-14 Biolog, Inc. Comparative phenotype analysis of two or more microorganisms using a plurality of substrates within a microwell device
US5741659A (en) * 1996-01-04 1998-04-21 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Rapid microbial protease assay
US5985593A (en) * 1996-10-11 1999-11-16 Integrated Research Technology, L.L.C. Compositions and methods for enzymatic decontamination
AU772760B2 (en) * 1997-04-10 2004-05-06 Dade Behring Inc. Universal test systems and methods of use thereof for identifying multiple families of microorganisms
US5888760A (en) * 1997-04-10 1999-03-30 Dade Microscan Inc. Universal test systems and methods of use thereof for identifying multiple families of microorganisms
MX9703918A (es) 1997-05-28 1998-11-30 J Marshall M D Barry Procedimiento para preparar un producto farmaceutico reactivo para deteccion de desorden gastrointestinal causado por bacteria en el tracto gastrointestinal superior.
FR2770538B1 (fr) 1997-11-06 2000-10-13 Bio Merieux Procede et agent de detection et d'identification et/ou quantification d'une activite enzymatique de type desaminase
AU756507B2 (en) * 1998-03-18 2003-01-16 Ajinomoto Co., Inc. L-glutamic acid-producing bacterium and method for producing L-glutamic acid
FR2777018B1 (fr) * 1998-04-02 2003-04-25 Bio Merieux Nouveau substrat chromogene ainsi que son procede d'utilisation
WO2000067037A2 (en) * 1999-04-29 2000-11-09 Dade Microscan Inc. A combined rapid anti-microbial susceptibility assay and microorganism identification system
US6696239B1 (en) 2000-04-20 2004-02-24 Biolog, Inc. Comparative phenotype analysis for assessment of biological active compounds such as antimicrobials
FR2809820B1 (fr) * 2000-05-30 2002-10-25 Proteus Methode de detection d'une transformation d'un substrat et ses applications
USD485359S1 (en) 2001-10-15 2004-01-13 Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. Specimen-handling tool
US7008777B2 (en) 2001-10-15 2006-03-07 Barry J. Marshall System for the detection of urease and method for using same
US6998250B2 (en) 2001-10-15 2006-02-14 Donald J. McMichael Method for detecting Helicobacter pylori
US6929926B2 (en) 2001-10-15 2005-08-16 Barry J. Marshall Composition for the detection of gastrointestinal disorders
USD467348S1 (en) 2001-10-15 2002-12-17 Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. Diagnostic test carrier
FR2831889B1 (fr) * 2001-11-08 2004-01-16 Proteus Procede pour generer l'empreinte catalytique idiosyncrasique d'un echantillon, le traitement de ladite empreinte et les systemes pour leur mise en oeuvre
US6696254B2 (en) * 2001-11-21 2004-02-24 Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. Detection and identification of enteric bacteria
FR2832729B1 (fr) 2001-11-28 2004-01-16 Proteus Methode de detection d'une activite catalytique d'un echantillon mettant en oeuvre la detection de la transformation d'un substrat
US20030113931A1 (en) * 2001-12-14 2003-06-19 Li Pan Ammonia and ammonium sensors
USD469881S1 (en) 2001-12-17 2003-02-04 Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. Two-well diagnostic test kit with specimen-handling tool
USD470597S1 (en) 2001-12-17 2003-02-18 Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. Diagnostic test kit
USD471639S1 (en) 2001-12-17 2003-03-11 Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. Tool for handling a specimen
USD470241S1 (en) 2001-12-17 2003-02-11 Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. Specimen-handling tool
USD484988S1 (en) 2001-12-17 2004-01-06 Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. Diagnostic test kit with specimen-handling tool
USD470596S1 (en) 2001-12-17 2003-02-18 Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. Test kit specimen-handling tool
US6783976B2 (en) 2001-12-21 2004-08-31 Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. Carrier and specimen-handling tool for use in diagnostic testing
CN1914332A (zh) * 2003-12-15 2007-02-14 快速实验室微系统公司 用于鉴定微生物的电化学分析
ATE417126T1 (de) * 2004-03-22 2008-12-15 Evonik Goldschmidt Gmbh Verfahren und testkit zum nachweis und zur quantifizierung von organismen
FR2875241B1 (fr) * 2004-09-16 2010-07-30 Biomerieux Sa Procede de detection de streptococcus agalactiae en utilisant l'activite esterase
US8043845B2 (en) * 2006-09-20 2011-10-25 American Sterilizer Company Sterilization indicator
US8895239B2 (en) 2006-09-20 2014-11-25 American Sterilizer Company Genetically engineered biological indicator
US8173388B2 (en) * 2008-09-30 2012-05-08 American Sterilizer Company Self-contained biological indicator
USD608455S1 (en) 2008-09-30 2010-01-19 American Sterilizer Company Self-contained biological indicator
EP2184367A1 (en) * 2008-10-31 2010-05-12 Biosynth AG Non-hydrolytic microbial probes
US20120149046A1 (en) * 2009-08-20 2012-06-14 James Paul Meighan Bioluminescent Bacterial Detection
GB2566516A (en) 2017-09-15 2019-03-20 Univ Oxford Innovation Ltd Electrochemical recognition and quantification of cytochrome c oxidase expression in bacteria
CN110592180A (zh) * 2019-10-05 2019-12-20 天津市宝坻区人民医院 含有溶菌酶的尿素酶生化鉴定管
CN111235132A (zh) * 2019-12-23 2020-06-05 浙江工业大学 一种β-半乳糖苷酶、基因、工程菌及其应用

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4024530A (en) * 1975-12-23 1977-05-17 Arleigh Bruce Hughes Bacteria identification device
FR2356723A1 (fr) * 1976-06-30 1978-01-27 Saint Nicolas Sarrebourg Hopit Micro-methode d'identification des bacteries
GB2005410A (en) * 1977-10-04 1979-04-19 Api Labor Process of rapid idenrification of bacteria of the genus streptococcus

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3451893A (en) * 1966-09-27 1969-06-24 Litton Systems Inc Method of rapidly detecting microorganisms
US3936356A (en) * 1973-04-10 1976-02-03 Analytab Products Inc. Profile recognition method and apparatus for identifying bacteria
US3870601A (en) * 1973-05-04 1975-03-11 Schering Corp Novel diagnostic system for differentiation of enterobacteriaceae
US3957584A (en) * 1974-09-30 1976-05-18 Warner-Lambert Company Detection of beta-galactosidase producing micro-organisms

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4024530A (en) * 1975-12-23 1977-05-17 Arleigh Bruce Hughes Bacteria identification device
FR2356723A1 (fr) * 1976-06-30 1978-01-27 Saint Nicolas Sarrebourg Hopit Micro-methode d'identification des bacteries
GB2005410A (en) * 1977-10-04 1979-04-19 Api Labor Process of rapid idenrification of bacteria of the genus streptococcus

Non-Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Chemical Abstracts, volume 71, No. 17, issued October 17, 1969 (Colombus, Ohio, USA) A.L. Barry et al., "Four-hour urease test for distinguishing between Klebsiella and Enterobacter", see page 83, the abstract no. 78067n, Appl. Microbiol. 1969, 18(2), 156-8 (Eng.) *
Chemical Abstracts, volume 80, no. 17, issued April 29, 1979 (Colombus, Ohio, USA) P.L. Wolf et al., "Test for bacterial alkaline phosphatase. Use in rapid identification of Serratia organisms", see page 182, the abstract no. 93098c, Clin. Chem. 1973, 19(11), 1248-9 (Eng.) *
Chemical Abstracts, volume 87, no. 3, issued July 18, 1977 (Colombus Ohio, USA) N.I. gridneva et al., "Use of beta-galac-tosidase in the differential diagnosis of Salmonella and Citrobacter", see page 274, the abstract no. 18619q, Lab. Delo, 1977, (5), 291-2 (Russ.) *
Chemical Abstracts, volume 88, no. 23 issued June 5, 1978, (Colombus, Ohio, USA), M. Ph. Tierno Jr. et al., "Differentiation of strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis biotypes 1 and 4 by aminopeptidase profiles", see page 302, the abstract no. 166658n, Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci. 1978, 8(2), 111-16 (Eng.) *
Chemical Abstracts, volume 88, no. 5, issued January 30, 1978 (Colombus, Ohio, USA) E.H. Peterson et al., "A report on the development of a rapid bacterial identification technique-aminopeptidase profile studies", see page 230, the abstract no. 34280y, EDRO SARAP Res. Tech. Rep. 1976, 1, Paper 9-73, 29pp. (Eng.) *
Chemical Abstracts, volume 89, no. 9, issued August 28, 1978, (Colombus, Ohio, USA), J.L. Gramoli et al., "Characterization and identification of coagulase-negative, heat-stable deoxyribonuclease-positive staphylococci", see page 206, the abstract no. 72775s, J. Gen. Microbiol. 1978, 105(2), 275-85 (Eng.) *
Chemical Abstracts, volume 90, no. 3, issued January 15, 1979, (Colombus, Ohio, USA) N.J. Legakis et al., "Differentiation of Serratia marcescens and Serratia liquefaciens by tests for lipase and phospholipase production, see page 289, the abstract no. 18831q, J. med. Microbiol. 1978, 11(3), 225-31 (Eng.) *

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0122023A1 (en) * 1983-03-07 1984-10-17 E-Y Laboratories, Inc. Microorganisms detection methods and the separation of agglutinated microorganisms, and a kit for use therein
US4812409A (en) * 1986-01-31 1989-03-14 Eastman Kodak Company Hydrolyzable fluorescent substrates and analytical determinations using same
EP0256476A3 (en) * 1986-08-11 1988-04-20 Ramot University Authority For Applied Research & Industrial Development Ltd. A method of detection of infection by testing of body fluid mucopolysacharide degrading enzymes
WO1998047999A1 (es) 1997-04-18 1998-10-29 Centro Nacional De Investigaciones Cientificas (Cnic) Equipo, juego y metodo para el diagnostico microbiologico
US9274101B2 (en) 2001-04-20 2016-03-01 Biolog, Inc. Methods and kits for obtaining a metabolic profile of living animal cells
EP1501938A4 (en) * 2002-04-19 2007-01-03 Biolog Inc COMPARATIVE PHENOTYPIC ANALYSIS OF CELLS INCLUDING A TEST OF BIOLOGICALLY ACTIVE COMPOUNDS

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DK556780A (da) 1980-12-30
JPH0321160B2 (GUID-C5D7CC26-194C-43D0-91A1-9AE8C70A9BFF.html) 1991-03-22
EP0018825A1 (en) 1980-11-12
US4603108A (en) 1986-07-29
GB2048302A (en) 1980-12-10
JPS56500399A (GUID-C5D7CC26-194C-43D0-91A1-9AE8C70A9BFF.html) 1981-04-02
DE3070143D1 (en) 1985-03-28
EP0018825B1 (en) 1985-02-13
DK160323B (da) 1991-02-25
GB2048302B (en) 1984-03-14
DK160323C (da) 1991-08-05

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4603108A (en) Method for identification of bacterial species
EP0400086B1 (en) Detection of diamines in biological fluids
Edberg et al. Comparison of beta-glucuronidase-based substrate systems for identification of Escherichia coli
EP0530322B1 (en) Novel and improved method for determination of e. coli in water
Kohlerschmidt et al. Identification of aerobic Gram-negative bacteria
Delisle et al. Rapid detection of Escherichia coli in urine samples by a new chromogenic beta-glucuronidase assay
Hengstler et al. Evaluation of BBL CHROMagar orientation medium for detection and presumptive identification of urinary tract pathogens
Carricajo et al. Comparative evaluation of five chromogenic media for detection, enumeration and identification of urinary tract pathogens
WO1989007152A2 (en) Detection of diamines in biological fluids
EP0122028A1 (en) Colorimetric assay for enzymes, diagnostic article therefor and a method for forming such article
EP0451775B1 (en) Identifying microorganisms by measuring enzymatic activity in the presence of enzyme activity affecting agents
Isenberg et al. Collaborative investigation of the AutoMicrobic System Enterobacteriaceae biochemical card
Wauters et al. Evaluation of a new identification system, Crystal Enteric/Non-Fermenter, for gram-negative bacilli
Lehman Biochemical identification of gram-negative bacteria
Kodaka et al. Comparison of the compact dry EC with the most probable number method (AOAC official method 966.24) for enumeration of Escherichia coli and coliform bacteria in raw meats: Performance-tested method SM 110402
Holland et al. A comparison of chemical dipsticks read visually or by photometry in the routine screening of urine specimens in the clinical microbiology laboratory
Welborn et al. Evaluation of Gonochek-II as a rapid identification system for pathogenic Neisseria species
Sonnenwirth Preprototype of an automated microbial detection and identification system: a developmental investigation
WO1994021816A1 (en) Test kits and methods for rapidly testing for contamination by microorganisms
JP2004507252A (ja) サンプル中の標的微生物検出のための組成物および方法
Bascomb et al. Automated methods for identification of bacteria from clinical specimens.
CA1219201A (en) Microorganism detection test
US20040241786A1 (en) Single tube screen
Darbandi Parallel Comparison of Accuracy in Vitek2 Auto analyzer and API 20 E/API 20 NE Microsystems
POPESCU-MITROI Ways to determine coliform bacteria in food–a mini review

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Designated state(s): DK JP US