US7198952B2 - Catalyst deterioration detecting apparatus and method - Google Patents

Catalyst deterioration detecting apparatus and method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US7198952B2
US7198952B2 US10/193,900 US19390002A US7198952B2 US 7198952 B2 US7198952 B2 US 7198952B2 US 19390002 A US19390002 A US 19390002A US 7198952 B2 US7198952 B2 US 7198952B2
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
oxygen
catalyst
side catalyst
upstream side
amount
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related, expires
Application number
US10/193,900
Other languages
English (en)
Other versions
US20030017603A1 (en
Inventor
Takahiro Uchida
Hiroshi Sawada
Toshinari Nagai
Akihiro Katayama
Yasuhiro Kuze
Naoto Kato
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Toyota Motor Corp
Original Assignee
Toyota Motor Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from JP2001218661A external-priority patent/JP2003027932A/ja
Priority claimed from JP2001285885A external-priority patent/JP4474817B2/ja
Application filed by Toyota Motor Corp filed Critical Toyota Motor Corp
Assigned to TOYOTA JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI KAISHA reassignment TOYOTA JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI KAISHA ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: KATAYAMA, AKIHIRO, KATO, NAOTO, KUZE, YASUHIRO, NAGAI, TOSHINARI, SAWADA, HIROSHI, UCHIDA, TAKAHIRO
Publication of US20030017603A1 publication Critical patent/US20030017603A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US7198952B2 publication Critical patent/US7198952B2/en
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F01—MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
    • F01N—GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES
    • F01N11/00—Monitoring or diagnostic devices for exhaust-gas treatment apparatus, e.g. for catalytic activity
    • F01N11/007—Monitoring or diagnostic devices for exhaust-gas treatment apparatus, e.g. for catalytic activity the diagnostic devices measuring oxygen or air concentration downstream of the exhaust apparatus
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01D—SEPARATION
    • B01D53/00—Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/34—Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
    • B01D53/92—Chemical or biological purification of waste gases of engine exhaust gases
    • B01D53/94—Chemical or biological purification of waste gases of engine exhaust gases by catalytic processes
    • B01D53/9495—Controlling the catalytic process
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F02—COMBUSTION ENGINES; HOT-GAS OR COMBUSTION-PRODUCT ENGINE PLANTS
    • F02D—CONTROLLING COMBUSTION ENGINES
    • F02D41/00—Electrical control of supply of combustible mixture or its constituents
    • F02D41/02—Circuit arrangements for generating control signals
    • F02D41/14—Introducing closed-loop corrections
    • F02D41/1401—Introducing closed-loop corrections characterised by the control or regulation method
    • F02D41/1408—Dithering techniques
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F02—COMBUSTION ENGINES; HOT-GAS OR COMBUSTION-PRODUCT ENGINE PLANTS
    • F02D—CONTROLLING COMBUSTION ENGINES
    • F02D41/00—Electrical control of supply of combustible mixture or its constituents
    • F02D41/22—Safety or indicating devices for abnormal conditions
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F01—MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
    • F01N—GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES
    • F01N2550/00—Monitoring or diagnosing the deterioration of exhaust systems
    • F01N2550/02—Catalytic activity of catalytic converters
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F02—COMBUSTION ENGINES; HOT-GAS OR COMBUSTION-PRODUCT ENGINE PLANTS
    • F02D—CONTROLLING COMBUSTION ENGINES
    • F02D2200/00—Input parameters for engine control
    • F02D2200/02—Input parameters for engine control the parameters being related to the engine
    • F02D2200/08—Exhaust gas treatment apparatus parameters
    • F02D2200/0814—Oxygen storage amount
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F02—COMBUSTION ENGINES; HOT-GAS OR COMBUSTION-PRODUCT ENGINE PLANTS
    • F02D—CONTROLLING COMBUSTION ENGINES
    • F02D2200/00—Input parameters for engine control
    • F02D2200/02—Input parameters for engine control the parameters being related to the engine
    • F02D2200/08—Exhaust gas treatment apparatus parameters
    • F02D2200/0816—Oxygen storage capacity
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F02—COMBUSTION ENGINES; HOT-GAS OR COMBUSTION-PRODUCT ENGINE PLANTS
    • F02D—CONTROLLING COMBUSTION ENGINES
    • F02D41/00—Electrical control of supply of combustible mixture or its constituents
    • F02D41/02—Circuit arrangements for generating control signals
    • F02D41/021—Introducing corrections for particular conditions exterior to the engine
    • F02D41/0235—Introducing corrections for particular conditions exterior to the engine in relation with the state of the exhaust gas treating apparatus
    • F02D41/0295—Control according to the amount of oxygen that is stored on the exhaust gas treating apparatus
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02T—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION
    • Y02T10/00—Road transport of goods or passengers
    • Y02T10/10—Internal combustion engine [ICE] based vehicles
    • Y02T10/40—Engine management systems
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T436/00—Chemistry: analytical and immunological testing
    • Y10T436/20—Oxygen containing
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T436/00—Chemistry: analytical and immunological testing
    • Y10T436/20—Oxygen containing
    • Y10T436/207497—Molecular oxygen
    • Y10T436/208339—Fuel/air mixture or exhaust gas analysis
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T436/00—Chemistry: analytical and immunological testing
    • Y10T436/25—Chemistry: analytical and immunological testing including sample preparation
    • Y10T436/25875—Gaseous sample or with change of physical state

Definitions

  • the invention relates generally to a catalyst deterioration detecting apparatus that uses a catalyst having an oxygen storage capability. More specifically, the invention relates to a catalyst deterioration detecting apparatus that detects deterioration of a catalyst that purifies exhaust gas of an internal combustion engine.
  • a catalyst used to purify exhaust gas is disposed in an exhaust passage of an internal combustion engine for a vehicle.
  • This catalyst is capable of storing an appropriate amount of oxygen.
  • the catalyst uses this stored oxygen to oxidize them.
  • the catalyst reduces them and stores the resultant oxygen.
  • the catalyst disposed in the exhaust passage of an internal combustion engine for a vehicle aims to purify the exhaust gas as described above. Therefore, the purification capability of the catalyst is largely affected by its oxygen storage capability. Accordingly, the deterioration state of the purification capability of the catalyst is determined by the maximum amount of oxygen able to be stored by the catalyst, i.e., by the oxygen storage capacity. As a result, in order to determine the deterioration state of the catalyst, it is necessary to accurately detect the oxygen storage capability of the catalyst.
  • an apparatus that accurately detects the oxygen storage capability of the catalyst by oscillating the air-fuel ratio of the exhaust gas flowing into the catalyst (hereinafter referred to as the “exhaust air-fuel ratio”) back and forth between rich and lean so as to increase and decrease the amount of oxygen stored in the catalyst and detecting the exhaust air-fuel ratio of the exhaust gas flowing out on the downstream side of the catalyst with an air-fuel ratio sensor.
  • the deterioration of the catalyst from the detected oxygen storage capability is then determined (Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open Publication Nos. 5-133264 and 5-209510 and the like). Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open Publication No.
  • 5-133264 discloses an apparatus that detects the oxygen storage capacity of a catalyst disposed in an exhaust passage by forcing exhaust gas, with the rich or lean air-fuel reaction, to the internal combustion engine.
  • Exhaust gas having a shortage of oxygen that contains unburned components, such as HC and CO is supplied to the catalyst while the air-fuel ratio is rich.
  • the catalyst discharges oxygen stored therein in an attempt to purify the exhaust gas.
  • the catalyst eventually discharges all of its oxygen such that it is no longer able to oxidize the HC and CO. This state of the catalyst will hereinafter be referred to as “minimum stored oxygen state”.
  • exhaust gas having an excess of oxygen that contains NOx flows into the catalyst while the air-fuel ratio is lean.
  • the catalyst stores the excess oxygen in the exhaust gas in an attempt to purify the exhaust gas.
  • exhaust gas having an excess amount of oxygen flows into the catalyst and oxygen continues to be stored in the catalyst over an extended period of time, the catalyst eventually becomes full of oxygen such that it can no longer reduces the incoming NOx and therefore can no longer purify the exhaust gas.
  • This state of the catalyst will hereinafter be referred to as “maximum stored oxygen state”.
  • the apparatus controls the air-fuel ratio of the mixture supplied to the internal combustion engine so as to repeatedly put the catalyst in the minimum stored oxygen state and the maximum stored oxygen state, alternating between the two states.
  • the oxygen storage capacity of the catalyst is then obtained by integrating the amount of oxygen stored in the catalyst during the process in which the catalyst shifts from the minimum stored oxygen state to the maximum stored oxygen state, or by integrating the amount of oxygen discharged from the catalyst during the process in which the catalyst shifts from the maximum stored oxygen state to the minimum stored oxygen state.
  • the foregoing apparatus determines whether the catalyst is normal or is deteriorating based on whether the oxygen storage capacity obtained in the foregoing manner is larger than a predetermined determination value.
  • the air-fuel ratio of the mixture is switched from lean to rich after the catalyst reaches the maximum stored oxygen state and from rich to lean after the catalyst reaches the minimum stored oxygen state.
  • exhaust gas having an excess amount of oxygen continues to flow into the catalyst, which is in the maximum stored oxygen state.
  • unpurified exhaust gas having an excess amount of oxygen flows out downstream of the catalyst during this period.
  • exhaust gas having a shortage of oxygen flows out downstream of the catalyst, which is in the minimum stored oxygen state.
  • One conceivable method to prevent unpurified exhaust gas from being discharged into the atmosphere is, for example, to dispose a downstream side catalyst downstream of that catalyst. This configuration effectively prevents exhaust emissions from becoming worse by treating the unpurified exhaust gas that flows out from the catalyst on the upstream side with the downstream side catalyst.
  • a catalyst deterioration detecting apparatus for an internal combustion engine is provided with an upstream side catalyst disposed in an exhaust passage of the internal combustion engine, a downstream side catalyst disposed downstream of the upstream side catalyst, a first oxygen sensor that detects an oxygen concentration of exhaust gas that flows out from the upstream side catalyst and a controller that detects a maximum stored oxygen state of the upstream side catalyst from which exhaust gas having an excess amount of oxygen flows out downstream, based on a detection value of the first oxygen sensor, detects a minimum stored oxygen state of the upstream side catalyst from which exhaust gas having a shortage of oxygen flows out downstream, based on a detection value of the first oxygen sensor, forces an air-fuel ratio of a mixture supplied to the internal combustion engine to be rich after the upstream side catalyst becomes in the maximum stored oxygen state until the up
  • the above catalyst deterioration detecting apparatus can be provided with a controller that alternatively correct at least one of a control parameter of the force-rich portion and a control parameter of the force-lean portion such that the downstream catalyst becomes in the appropriate state when the downstream side catalyst is not in the appropriate state.
  • a catalyst deterioration detecting apparatus is provided with a controller that detects an amount of oxygen stored in a catalyst, controls the amount of oxygen stored in the catalyst by controlling an exhaust air-fuel ratio of the exhaust gas flowing into the catalyst, detects the oxygen storage capability of the catalyst based on a history of the amount of stored oxygen detected by the stored oxygen amount detecting portion, while increasing and decreasing the amount of stored oxygen with the stored oxygen amount controlling portion, and allows detection by the oxygen storage capability detecting portion to start, wherein the controller allows detection of the oxygen storage capability to start only when the amount of stored oxygen that is detected is within a predetermined range.
  • the controller can allow detection of the oxygen storage capability to start only when a variation in the amount of stored oxygen that is detected by the stored oxygen amount detecting portion is equal to, or less than, a predetermined value.
  • Catalyst deterioration detecting apparatuses having these configurations are able to detect catalyst deterioration without making exhaust emissions worse.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram for explaining the configuration of a catalyst deterioration detecting apparatus according to a first exemplary embodiment of the invention
  • FIG. 2 is a flowchart of an air-fuel ratio force-control routine executed according to the first exemplary embodiment of the invention
  • FIG. 3 is a timing chart to explain a method of calculating the oxygen storage capacity of the catalyst according to the first exemplary embodiment of the invention
  • FIG. 4 is a flowchart of a routine for calculating an oxygen storage integration amount to be executed according to the first exemplary embodiment of the invention
  • FIG. 5 is a flowchart of a routine to be executed in order to detect deterioration of the upstream side catalyst according to the first exemplary embodiment of the invention
  • FIG. 6 is a flowchart of a series of processes to be executed in order to obtain the oxygen storage capacity and the like according to the first exemplary embodiment of the invention
  • FIG. 7 is a flowchart of a routine to be executed in order to detect deterioration of the upstream side catalyst according to a second exemplary embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 8 is a flowchart of a routine to be executed in order to detect deterioration of the upstream side catalyst according to a third exemplary embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 9 is a flowchart of a routine to be executed in order to detect deterioration of the upstream side catalyst according to a fourth exemplary embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 10 is a flowchart of a routine to be executed in order to detect deterioration of the upstream side catalyst according to a fifth exemplary embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 11 is a flowchart of a routine to be executed in order to determine whether the downstream side catalyst is in an appropriate state according to a sixth exemplary embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 12 is a cross-sectional view of an internal combustion engine with a catalyst deterioration detecting apparatus according to one exemplary embodiment of this invention.
  • FIG. 13 is a timing chart showing an example of an oxygen storage integration amount of the catalyst, a reference value thereof, and an exhaust air-fuel ratio sensor output on the downstream side of the catalyst;
  • FIG. 14 is a flowchart of updating control for the oxygen storage integration amount
  • FIG. 15 is a flowchart of updating control of an upper limit and a lower limit of the oxygen storage integration amount
  • FIG. 16 is a flowchart of oxygen storage capability calculating control according to a seventh exemplary embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 17 is a flowchart of an oxygen storage capability calculating control according to an eighth exemplary embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 18 is a flowchart of an oxygen storage capability calculating control according to a ninth exemplary embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 1 is a drawing to explain an internal combustion engine 10 in which is mounted a catalyst deterioration detecting apparatus, as well as the surrounding structure thereof, according to a first exemplary embodiment of the invention.
  • An intake passage 12 and an exhaust passage 14 are communicated with the internal combustion engine 10 .
  • the intake passage 12 is provided with an air filter 16 on the upstream side end portion.
  • An intake air temperature sensor 18 that detects an intake air temperature THA (i.e., outside air temperature) is mounted in the air filter 16 .
  • THA intake air temperature
  • An airflow meter 20 is disposed downstream of the air filter 16 .
  • the airflow meter 20 is a sensor that detects an intake air amount Ga which flows through the intake passage 12 .
  • a throttle valve 22 is provided downstream of the airflow meter 20 . Near the throttle valve 22 are disposed a throttle sensor 24 that detects a throttle opening TA and an idle switch 26 which turns on when the throttle valve 22 is fully closed.
  • a surge tank 28 is provided downstream of the throttle valve 22 . Also, a fuel injection valve 30 for injecting fuel into an injection port of the internal combustion engine 10 is disposed further downstream of the surge tank 28 .
  • An upstream side catalyst 32 and a downstream side catalyst 34 are disposed in serial in the exhaust passage 14 . These upstream side catalyst 32 and downstream side catalyst 34 are able to store a certain degree of oxygen and when the exhaust gas contains unburned components of HC and CO and the like, the upstream side catalyst 32 and downstream side catalyst 34 oxidize them with the stored oxygen. Further, when there are oxidizing components such as NOx and the like in the exhaust gas, the upstream side catalyst 32 and downstream side catalyst 34 reduce them and store the discharged oxygen. In this way, the exhaust gas discharged from the internal combustion engine 10 is purified inside the upstream side catalyst 32 and downstream side catalyst 34 by the process described above.
  • an air-fuel ratio sensor 36 is disposed upstream of the upstream side catalyst 32 and a first oxygen sensor 38 is disposed between the upstream side catalyst 32 and the downstream side catalyst 34 . Also, a second oxygen sensor 40 is disposed downstream of the downstream side catalyst 34 .
  • the air-fuel ratio sensor 36 is a sensor that detects the oxygen concentration within the exhaust gas. Meanwhile, the first oxygen sensor 38 and the second oxygen sensor 40 are sensors in which the outputs thereof greatly change when the oxygen concentration in the exhaust gas exceeds a predetermined value.
  • the air-fuel ratio sensor 36 detects the air-fuel ratio of the mixture combusted by the internal combustion engine 10 .
  • the first oxygen sensor 38 determines whether the exhaust gas after treatment by the upstream side catalyst 32 is fuel rich (i.e., whether it contains HC and CO) or fuel lean (whether it contains NOx).
  • the second oxygen sensor 40 determines whether the exhaust gas that passed through the downstream side catalyst 34 is fuel rich (i.e., whether it contains HC and CO) or fuel lean (whether it contains NOx).
  • the catalyst deterioration detecting apparatus is provided with an ECU (Electronic Control Unit) 42 .
  • ECU Electronic Control Unit
  • Connected to this ECU 42 are the various sensors described above, a fuel injection valve 30 , a water temperature sensor 44 that detects a cooling water temperature THW of the internal combustion engine 10 , and the like.
  • the exhaust gas discharged from the internal combustion engine 10 is first purified with the upstream side catalyst 32 . Then, any exhaust gas that was not completely purified with the upstream side catalyst 32 is purified with the downstream side catalyst 34 . Because the upstream side catalyst 32 is positioned near the internal combustion engine 10 , the temperature of the upstream side catalyst 32 rises and reaches the active temperature quickly after starting of the internal combustion engine 10 . Therefore, the upstream side catalyst 32 exhibits excellent exhaust gas purification performance immediately after the internal combustion engine 10 has been started. In order for the system to constantly exhibit appropriate exhaust gas purification performance, it is necessary to quickly detect deterioration of the upstream side catalyst 32 .
  • the upstream side catalyst 32 purifies the exhaust gas by discharging oxygen into fuel rich exhaust gas.
  • the upstream side catalyst 32 also purifies the exhaust gas by storing the excess oxygen that is in the fuel lean exhaust gas. Therefore, purification performance of the upstream side catalyst 32 decreases as the maximum amount of oxygen that the upstream side catalyst 32 is able to store, i.e., the oxygen storage capacity OSC of the upstream side catalyst 32 , decreases. Therefore, the catalyst deterioration detecting apparatus according to this exemplary embodiment detects the oxygen storage capacity OSC of the upstream side catalyst 32 and determines the degree of deterioration of the upstream side catalyst 32 based on the detected value.
  • FIG. 2 is a flowchart of an air-fuel ratio force-control routine that the ECU 42 executes in order to detect the oxygen storage capacity OSC of the upstream side catalyst 32 .
  • Step 80 it is first determined whether a command to detect the oxygen storage capacity OSC has been generated.
  • Step 82 it is next determined whether a lean flag Xlean has switched from OFF to ON.
  • the lean flag Xlean is a flag that is ON while the first oxygen sensor 38 generates an output (hereinafter referred to as a “lean output”) that exceeds the lean determination value (see FIG. 4 , Step 114 ). Accordingly, the determination in the Step 82 is YES when the output of the first oxygen sensor 38 changes from a value below the lean determination value to a value equal to, or greater than, the lean determination value during the period from the most recent process cycle through the current process cycle. In the routine shown in FIG. 2 , when this determination is YES, control is then performed that fixes the air-fuel ratio of the mixture supplied to the internal combustion engine 10 at a predetermined value on the rich side (Step 84 ).
  • the rich flag Xrich is a flag that is ON while the first oxygen sensor 38 generates an output (hereinafter referred to as “rich output”) that is below the rich determination value (See FIG. 4 , Step 118 ). Accordingly, the determination in Step 86 is YES when the output of the first oxygen sensor 38 changes from a value above the rich determination value to a value equal to, or less than, the rich determination value during the period from the most recent process cycle through the current process cycle. In the routine shown in FIG. 2 , when the determination is YES, control is then performed that fixes the air-fuel ratio of the mixture at a predetermined value on the lean side (Step 88 ).
  • Step 86 when the determination in Step 86 is NO, i.e., when the rich flag Xrich has not switched from OFF to ON, rich fixed control or lean fixed control is performed according to the air-fuel ratio of the mixture used up to this time. More specifically, when the air-fuel ratio up to the present has been rich, control is performed so as to fix the air-fuel ratio at a predetermined value on the rich side, just as in Step 84 . On the other hand, when the air-fuel ratio up to the present has been lean, control is performed so as to fix the air-fuel ratio at a predetermined value on the lean side (Step 88 ).
  • FIG. 3 shows a case in which the air-fuel ratio has been fixed at a predetermined value on the rich side until time t 0 . While the air-fuel ratio of the mixture is fixed to be fuel rich, the output of the air-fuel ratio sensor 36 becomes a value that tends toward the rich side, as shown in FIG. 3A . During that time, the upstream side catalyst 32 purifies the exhaust gas by discharging stored oxygen into it.
  • the rich flag Xrich at that time turns ON (Step 86 ), and the air-fuel ratio of the mixture is forced to be fixed at a predetermined value on the lean side (Step 88 ).
  • the output from the air-fuel ratio sensor 36 then becomes a value that tends toward the lean side.
  • the wave shape shown in FIG. 3A shows that output at time t 1 in a state in which it has reversed to a value tending toward the lean side.
  • the upstream side catalyst 32 purifies that exhaust gas by storing that excess oxygen. As this continues, the oxygen storage capacity OSC of the upstream side catalyst 32 gradually becomes full with the stored oxygen until it is no longer able to purify the exhaust gas in this way.
  • the lean flag Xlean at that time turns ON (Step 82 ) and the air-fuel ratio of the mixture is forced to be fixed at the predetermined value on the rich side (Step 84 ).
  • the output from the air-fuel ratio sensor 36 then becomes a value that tends toward the rich side.
  • the wave shape shown in FIG. 3A shows that output at time t 3 in a state in which it has reversed to a value tending toward the rich side.
  • the catalyst deterioration detecting apparatus keeps the air-fuel ratio of the mixture fuel rich until the output from the first oxygen sensor 38 becomes smaller than the rich determination value Vr again. Then when the output from the first oxygen sensor 38 becomes smaller than the rich determination value Vr (time t 4 ), the process after time t 0 is performed repeatedly. As a result, the upstream side catalyst 32 continuously switches back and forth between a state in which it has completely discharged all of the stored oxygen (minimum stored oxygen state) and a state in which the oxygen storage capacity OSC of the upstream side catalyst 32 is full with stored oxygen (maximum stored oxygen state).
  • the amount of oxygen that the upstream side catalyst 32 stores per unit/time, or the amount of oxygen that the upstream side catalyst 32 discharges per unit/time, is obtained based on the air-fuel ratio of the exhaust gas and the intake air amount Ga.
  • the amounts of both stored oxygen as a positive value and discharged oxygen as a negative value will be referred to as “amount of stored oxygen 02 AD”.
  • the catalyst deterioration detecting apparatus calculates the oxygen storage capacity OSC by integrating the amount of stored oxygen 02 AD in the process of shifting from the minimum stored oxygen state to the maximum stored oxygen state or vice versa.
  • FIG. 4 is a flowchart of a routine for calculating the amount of stored oxygen, which is executed by the ECU 42 as a prerequisite for obtaining the oxygen storage capacity OSC.
  • the routine shown in FIG. 4 is a regular interrupt routine that is performed repeatedly at predetermined intervals of time.
  • an air-fuel ratio difference amount ⁇ A/F is first calculated (Step 100 ).
  • the air-fuel ratio difference amount ⁇ A/F is the difference between the air-fuel ratio A/F detected by the air-fuel ratio sensor 36 , i.e., the air-fuel ratio A/F of the exhaust gas flowing into the upstream side catalyst 32 , and the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio A/Fst, and is obtained by the following expression.
  • ⁇ A/F A/F ⁇ A/Fst (1)
  • the intake air amount Ga is detected based on the output from the airflow meter 20 (Step 102 ).
  • the amount of oxygen stored in the upstream side catalyst 32 per unit/time, or the amount of oxygen discharged from the upstream side catalyst 32 per unit/time, i.e., the amount of stored oxygen 02 AD, is obtained based on the air-fuel ratio difference amount ⁇ A/F and the intake air amount Ga (Step 104 ).
  • the amount of stored oxygen 02 AD is calculated according to a map stored in the ECU 42 or an operational expression.
  • the value of the amount of stored oxygen 02 AD is positive when the air-fuel ratio of the exhaust gas flowing into the upstream side catalyst 32 is lean (when A/F>A/Fst, i.e., ⁇ A/F>0).
  • the value of the amount of stored oxygen 02 AD is negative when the air-fuel ratio of the exhaust gas flowing into the upstream side catalyst 32 is rich (when A/F ⁇ A/Fst, i.e., ⁇ A/F ⁇ 0).
  • the lean flag Xlean is a flag that turns ON when the first oxygen sensor 38 generates a lean output, as described above. Accordingly, it is determined in step 106 whether the exhaust gas is lean (i.e., there is excess oxygen) both upstream and downstream of the upstream side catalyst 32 .
  • Step 106 The determination in Step 106 is YES between times t 2 and t 3 shown in FIG. 3 , for example. That is, the conditions for this are fulfilled when the oxygen storage capacity OSC of the upstream side catalyst 32 is full with stored oxygen and there is no change in that stored amount. In the routine shown in FIG. 4 , the processes after Step 112 are performed soon after these conditions have been fulfilled.
  • the rich flag Xrich is a flag that turns ON when the first oxygen sensor 38 generates a rich output, as described above. Accordingly, it is determined in Step 108 whether the exhaust gas is rich both upstream and downstream of the upstream side catalyst 32 .
  • Step 108 are fulfilled between times t 0 and t 1 shown in FIG. 3 , for example. That is, the conditions are fulfilled when the upstream side catalyst 32 has discharged all of its stored oxygen and there is no change in that stored amount. In the routine shown in FIG. 4 , the processes after Step 112 are performed soon after these conditions have been fulfilled.
  • Step 108 the upstream side catalyst 32 is actually storing or discharging oxygen so it can be determined that the amount of oxygen stored in the upstream side catalyst 32 is continuously changing.
  • a process for updating an oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM is performed by adding the amount of stored oxygen 02 AD calculated in the current process cycle to the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM that was calculated in the most recent process cycle (Step 110 ). This process in Step 110 enables the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM to be selectively increased or decreased according to the amount of oxygen actually stored in the upstream side catalyst 32 .
  • Step 112 it is next determined whether exhaust gas with a lean air-fuel ratio is flowing out downstream of the upstream side catalyst 32 . More specifically, it is determined whether the first oxygen sensor 38 is generating a lean output (Step 112 ).
  • Step 112 When it is determined in Step 112 that exhaust gas having a lean air-fuel ratio is not flowing out from the downstream side of the upstream side catalyst 32 , it is then determined whether exhaust gas having a rich air-fuel ratio is flowing out downstream of the upstream side catalyst 32 , i.e., whether the first oxygen sensor 38 is generating a rich output (Step 116 ).
  • the first oxygen sensor 38 only generates a rich output when the upstream side catalyst 32 is in the minimum stored oxygen state and a fuel rich mixture is being supplied to the internal combustion engine 10 .
  • the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM that is calculated at that point is stored as a minimum oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUMmin. Then the process to turn the lean flag Xlean OFF and the rich flag Xrich ON is performed (Step 118 ).
  • Step 116 When it is determined in Step 116 that exhaust gas having a rich air-fuel ratio is not flowing out from the downstream side of the upstream side catalyst 32 , it can be determined that the upstream side catalyst 32 is purifying the exhaust gas suitably, i.e., that the upstream side catalyst 32 is neither in the maximum stored oxygen state nor in the minimum stored oxygen state. In this case, both the lean flag Xlean and the rich flag Xrich are turned OFF (Step 120 ).
  • the routine shown in FIG. 4 enables the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM to be selectively increased or decreased according to an increase or decrease in the amount of oxygen actually stored in the upstream side catalyst 32 .
  • the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM corresponding to the maximum stored oxygen state can then be stored as the maximum oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUMmax and the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM corresponding to the minimum stored oxygen state can then be stored as the minimum oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUMmin.
  • the ECU 42 is able to calculate the oxygen storage capacity OSC of the upstream side catalyst 32 by subtracting the minimum oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUMmin from the maximum oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUMmax.
  • exhaust gas with an excess of oxygen containing NOx flows out downstream of the upstream side catalyst 32 for a certain period of time after the upstream side catalyst 32 has reached the maximum stored oxygen state.
  • exhaust gas with a shortage of oxygen containing HC and CO flows out downstream of the upstream side catalyst 32 for a certain period of time after the upstream side catalyst 32 has reached the minimum stored oxygen state.
  • the catalyst deterioration detecting apparatus of this exemplary embodiment is provided with the downstream side catalyst 34 downstream of the upstream side catalyst 32 , unpurified exhaust gas that flows out downstream of the upstream side catalyst 32 is not ordinarily discharged into the atmosphere.
  • the downstream side catalyst 34 is in the maximum stored oxygen state or the minimum stored oxygen state such that it is not able to display its original purification performance, any unpurified exhaust gas that flows out downstream of the upstream side catalyst 32 passes right through the downstream side catalyst 34 and is discharged as it is into the atmosphere.
  • a series of processes for detecting deterioration of the upstream side catalyst 32 i.e., a series of processes including a process for forcing the upstream side catalyst 32 into the maximum stored oxygen state or minimum stored oxygen state are performed only when the downstream side catalyst 34 is able to display appropriate purification performance.
  • FIG. 5 is a flowchart of a routine executed to detect deterioration of the upstream side catalyst 32 under the aforementioned restriction of only when the downstream side catalyst 34 is able to display appropriate purification performance.
  • it is first determined whether basic execution conditions for detecting deterioration of the exhaust catalyst have been fulfilled (Step 130 ).
  • Step 130 it is determined whether the intake air amount Ga is within a predetermined range or whether the catalyst temperature of the upstream side catalyst 32 is within a predetermined range. These ranges are predetermined as ranges over which there is a distinguishable difference between the oxygen storage capacity OSC of a normal catalyst and the oxygen storage capacity OSC of a deteriorated catalyst. When the conditions of Step 130 are not fulfilled, the current routine ends quickly without proceeding with any of the following processes.
  • Step 131 it is then determined whether the stored oxygen state of the downstream side catalyst 34 is appropriate, i.e., whether the stored oxygen state of the downstream side catalyst 34 is such that oxygen exceeding the predetermined amount is able to be further stored and whether oxygen exceeding the predetermined amount is able to be further discharged.
  • the predetermined amount of oxygen able to be further stored is an amount that is predetermined as the amount of oxygen sufficient to suitably purify exhaust gas having an excess of oxygen that flows into the downstream side catalyst 34 after the upstream side catalyst 32 has been forced into the maximum stored oxygen state in the process of detecting deterioration.
  • the predetermined amount of oxygen able to be further discharged is an amount that is predetermined as the amount of oxygen sufficient to suitably purify exhaust gas having a shortage of oxygen that flows into the downstream side catalyst 34 after the upstream side catalyst 32 has been forced into the minimum stored oxygen state in the process of detecting deterioration.
  • Step 131 the conditions of Step 131 are determined to be fulfilled depending on whether the output of the second oxygen sensor 40 disposed downstream of the downstream side catalyst 34 is a lean output or a rich output, i.e., whether the output of the second oxygen sensor 40 is a value between the lean determination value Vl and the rich determination value Vr.
  • the output of the second oxygen sensor 40 is a value that is between the lean determination value Vl and the rich determination value Vr
  • the stored oxygen state of the downstream side catalyst 34 is appropriate.
  • the output of the oxygen storage capacity OSC of the upstream side catalyst 32 is detected and the parameters specifying those detecting conditions are calculated and the like (Step 132 ).
  • Step 132 is done by a series of processes shown in FIG. 6 .
  • the oxygen storage capacity OSC of the upstream side catalyst 32 is detected while the mean catalyst temperature during detection and the mean intake air amount during detection are calculated as parameters specifying the conditions for that detection.
  • the mean catalyst temperature during detection is the mean value of the temperature of the upstream side catalyst 32 while the oxygen storage capacity OSC is being detected.
  • the mean intake air amount during detection is the mean value of the intake air amount Ga that is generated while the oxygen storage capacity OSC is being detected.
  • Step 134 it is first determined whether the sign of the air-fuel ratio difference amount ⁇ A/F is reversed, i.e., whether the air-fuel ratio A/F that is detected by the air-fuel ratio sensor 36 has reversed from a value indicating fuel rich to a value indicating fuel lean or vice versa.
  • the upstream side catalyst 32 is maintained in either the maximum stored oxygen state or the minimum stored oxygen state from after the first oxygen sensor 38 generates a rich output or a lean output (e.g., time t 0 or t 2 ) until the sign of the air-fuel difference amount ⁇ A/F reverses (e.g., time t 1 or t 3 ).
  • the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM which indicates the amount of oxygen stored in the upstream side catalyst 32 starts to be updated. Accordingly, the process of Step 134 enables detection of the time when the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM starts to be updated.
  • Step 134 The process in Step 134 is performed repeatedly until it is determined that the sign of the air-fuel difference amount ⁇ A/F has reversed, i.e., until it is determined that the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM has started to be updated. Then when it is determined that the sign of the air-fuel difference amount ⁇ A/F has reversed, a catalyst temperature integration value THCSUM and a intake air amount integration value GASUM, both to be described later, are then cleared and an integration count number n, also to be described later, is reset to 0 (Step 136 ).
  • a catalyst temperature THC is detected, and further, the catalyst temperature integration value THCSUM is updated based on that detected value (Step 138 ).
  • the catalyst temperature THC is the temperature of the upstream side catalyst 32 according to actual measurement or estimation.
  • the catalyst temperature THC can be detected by adding a catalyst temperature sensor to the upstream side catalyst 32 .
  • the catalyst temperature THC can be detected according to a previously prepared map or operational expression based on the ignition timing, the air-fuel ratio A/F of the mixture, the intake air amount Ga, vehicle speed SPD, and intake air temperature THA, and the like.
  • the catalyst temperature integration value THCSUM is a value in which the catalyst temperature THC detected in the current process cycle is added to the value at the time of the most recent process cycle.
  • the intake air amount Ga is detected, and further, the intake air amount integration value GASUM is updated based on that detected value (Step 140 ).
  • the intake air amount Ga is a value that has actually been measured with the airflow meter 20 .
  • the intake air amount integration value GASUM is a value in which the intake air amount Ga detected in the current process cycle is added to the value at the time of the most recent process cycle.
  • the integration count number n is incremented (Step 142 ).
  • the integration count number n is a value indicating the number of times that the processes in Step 138 and Step 140 have been repeated from this kind of processing.
  • Step 144 it is next determined whether the lean flag Xlean has changed from OFF to ON, or whether the rich flag Xrich has changed from OFF to ON.
  • the lean flag Xlean changes from OFF to ON when the first oxygen sensor 38 generates a lean output (see Step 114 ).
  • the rich flag Xrich changes from OFF to ON when the first oxygen sensor 38 generates a rich output (see Step 118 ).
  • Step 144 when it has been determined that the conditions of Step 144 have not been fulfilled, the processes after Step 138 are performed again. Then the processes of Steps 138 through 144 are performed repeatedly until it is determined that those conditions have been fulfilled.
  • the maximum oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUMmax is calculated at the time when the lean flag Xlean changes from OFF to ON (see Step 114 ).
  • the minimum oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUMmin is calculated at the time when the rich flag Xrich changes from OFF to ON (see Step 118 ).
  • the process of Step 146 enables the oxygen storage capacity OSC to be calculated every time one of the maximum oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUMmax and the minimum oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUMmin has been updated to a new value using that new value.
  • the series of processes shown in FIG. 6 enables the oxygen storage capacity OSC to be calculated based on the newest data immediately after the upstream side catalyst 32 reaches the maximum stored oxygen state or the minimum stored oxygen state.
  • the series of processes shown in the FIG. 6 also enables the mean catalyst temperature during detection THCAV and the intake air amount mean value during detection GAAV that were generated in the process in which that new oxygen storage capacity OSC is obtained to be obtained.
  • Step 132 The series of processes shown in FIG. 6 is performed in Step 132 in the routine shown in FIG. 5 , as described above.
  • a threshold A(x) for determining deterioration is then decided based on the mean catalyst temperature during detection THCAV and the intake air amount mean value during detection GAAV (Step 152 ).
  • the ECU 42 stores a map in which the threshold for distinguishing between an oxygen storage capacity OSC of the deteriorated catalyst and an oxygen storage capacity OSC of a normal catalyst has been set based on the relationship between the catalyst temperature and the intake air amount.
  • Step 154 it is then determined whether the oxygen storage capacity OSC detected in the current process cycle is larger than the threshold A(x) decided on in Step 152 (Step 154 ).
  • the upstream side catalyst 32 is determined to be normal when it is determined that OSC>threshold A(x) is fulfilled (Step 156 ).
  • the upstream side catalyst 32 is determined to be deteriorated when it is determined that OSC>threshold A(x) is not fulfilled (Step 158 ).
  • Step 131 when it is determined in Step 131 that the stored oxygen state is not appropriate, i.e., that the output of the second oxygen sensor 40 is either a rich output or a lean output, it can be determined that the downstream side catalyst 34 is in either the maximum stored oxygen state or the minimum stored oxygen state. That is, it can be determined that the downstream side catalyst 34 is not in a state where it can purify unpurified exhaust gas.
  • a process for detecting deterioration of the upstream side catalyst 32 i.e., a process for forcing the upstream side catalyst 32 into the maximum stored oxygen state or the minimum stored oxygen state, is prohibited.
  • a command is then issued to start an adjustment process to make the stored oxygen state of the downstream side catalyst 34 appropriate (Start 160 ).
  • the above adjusting process is performed by another routine that is different from the routine shown in FIG. 5 .
  • it is first determined whether the downstream side catalyst 34 is in the maximum stored oxygen state or the minimum stored oxygen state based on the output from the second oxygen sensor 40 .
  • a process is performed to force the air-fuel ratio of the mixture supplied to the internal combustion engine 10 to a predetermined value on the rich side.
  • exhaust gas having a shortage of oxygen is gradually supplied to the downstream side catalyst 34 , which enables the downstream side catalyst 34 to be brought out of the maximum stored oxygen state.
  • downstream side catalyst 34 when it is determined that the downstream side catalyst 34 is in the minimum stored oxygen state, a process is performed to force the air-fuel ratio of the mixture supplied to the internal combustion engine 10 to a predetermined value on the lean side. As this continues, exhaust gas having an excess of oxygen is gradually supplied to the downstream side catalyst 34 , which enables the downstream side catalyst 34 to be brought out of the minimum stored oxygen state.
  • Step 131 After the downstream side catalyst 34 has been brought out of the maximum stored oxygen state or the minimum stored oxygen state, it is determined in Step 131 at the start of the routine shown in FIG. 5 that the stored oxygen state of the downstream side catalyst 34 is appropriate. Then, by the processes of Steps 132 through 158 , it is determined whether the upstream side catalyst 32 is normal such that it does not discharge unpurified exhaust gas into the atmosphere, i.e., such that it does not make the exhaust emissions worse, or whether the upstream side catalyst 32 is deteriorating.
  • the catalyst deterioration detecting apparatus of this exemplary embodiment it is possible to perform the series of processes to detect deterioration of the upstream side catalyst 32 only when the stored oxygen state of the downstream side catalyst 34 is appropriate. Then, when the stored oxygen state of the downstream side catalyst 34 is not appropriate, it is possible to actively put the downstream side catalyst 34 into an appropriate stored oxygen state. Therefore, the catalyst deterioration detecting apparatus of this exemplary embodiment enables deterioration of the upstream side catalyst 32 to be detected with high accuracy without making the exhaust emissions worse.
  • an oxygen sensor was used for the sensor disposed between the upstream side catalyst 32 and the downstream side catalyst 34 , as well as for the sensor disposed downstream of the downstream side catalyst 34 .
  • those sensors may also be air-fuel ratio sensors that indicate a change that is substantially linear with respect to the air-fuel ratio of the exhaust gas.
  • the first oxygen sensor 38 corresponds to the first oxygen sensor.
  • Step 112 that is performed by the ECU 42 corresponds to the maximum stored oxygen state detecting portion.
  • Step 116 that is performed by the ECU 42 corresponds to the minimum stored oxygen state detecting portion.
  • Steps 82 through 90 that are performed by the ECU 42 correspond to the force-rich portion and force-lean portion.
  • Step 132 that is performed by the ECU 42 corresponds to the oxygen storage capacity detecting portion.
  • Step 154 that is performed by the ECU 42 corresponds to the deterioration determining portion.
  • Step 131 that is performed by the ECU 42 corresponds to the appropriate state determining portion and the determination-start allowing portion.
  • Step 160 that is performed by the ECU 42 corresponds to the air-fuel ratio adjusting portion.
  • the determination in the adjusting process in Step 160 by the ECU 42 of whether the downstream side catalyst 34 is in the maximum stored oxygen state or in the minimum stored oxygen state corresponds to the oxygen storage limit detecting portion and the oxygen discharge limit detecting portion. Also, forcing the air-fuel ratio of the mixture by the ECU 42 according to the above determination result to a predetermined value on the rich side or to a predetermined value on the lean side corresponds to the rich side adjusting portion and the lean side adjusting portion.
  • the second oxygen sensor 40 corresponds to the second oxygen sensor. Also, the determination by the ECU 42 in Step 131 of whether the output of the second oxygen sensor 40 is a value between the lean determination valve Vl and the rich determination value Vr corresponds to the first determining portion, the second determining portion, and the determining portion.
  • the catalyst deterioration detecting apparatus according to exemplary Embodiment 2 is the same as the apparatus in exemplary Embodiment 1 except in that the ECU 42 performs the routine shown in FIG. 7 in place of the aforementioned routine shown in FIG. 5 .
  • the apparatus according to exemplary Embodiment 1 determines the deterioration state of the upstream side catalyst 32 based on a single oxygen storage capacity OSC.
  • the catalyst deterioration detecting apparatus in exemplary Embodiment 2 determines whether the upstream side catalyst 32 is deteriorating based on a plurality of oxygen storage capacities OSC.
  • the routine shown in FIG. 7 is a flowchart of a routine performed by the ECU 42 in exemplary Embodiment 2 to realize the foregoing function.
  • steps that are identical to those steps shown in FIG. 5 are denoted by the same reference numerals that they are denoted by in FIG. 5 , and explanations thereof will be omitted or simplified.
  • Step 200 when it is determined in Step 154 that the oxygen storage capacity OSC is greater than the threshold A(x), a temporary normal determination is made (Step 200 ).
  • Step 202 when it is determined in Step 154 that OSC>threshold A(x) is not fulfilled, a temporary abnormal determination is made (Step 202 ).
  • Step 204 it is then determined whether the number of determinations in Step 154 has reached a predetermined number No (Step 204 ).
  • Step 130 the processes after Step 130 are then performed again. Conversely, when it is determined that the number of determinations has reached the predetermined number No, it is then determined by a majority between the number of temporary normal determinations and the number of temporary abnormal determinations whether the upstream side catalyst 32 is normal or abnormal (Steps 206 , 156 , and 158 ).
  • This process enables the state of the upstream side catalyst 32 to be determined based on a plurality of oxygen storage capacities OSC. Therefore, the apparatus according to exemplary Embodiment 2 can detect deterioration of the upstream side catalyst 32 with higher accuracy than the apparatus according to exemplary Embodiment 1 that determines the state of the upstream side catalyst 32 based only on a single oxygen storage capacity OSC.
  • the above described process enables the process for detecting the oxygen storage capacity OSC to be temporarily stopped when the stored oxygen state of the downstream side catalyst 34 is off from the appropriate state before the oxygen storage capacity is detected the predetermined number No of times such that the adjusting process can be performed to return the downstream side catalyst 34 to the appropriate state (see Steps 130 and 161 ). Therefore, the catalyst deterioration detecting apparatus according to exemplary Embodiment 2 enables increased accuracy of deterioration determination without making the exhaust emissions any worse.
  • a third exemplary exemplary embodiment of the invention will be described with reference to FIG. 8 .
  • the elements in exemplary Embodiment 3 that are the same as those in exemplary Embodiment 1 are denoted by the same reference numerals that they are denoted by in exemplary Embodiment 1, and redundant explanations thereof will be omitted.
  • the catalyst deterioration detecting apparatus according to exemplary Embodiment 3 is the same as the apparatuses in exemplary Embodiments 1 and 2 except in that the ECU 42 performs the routine shown in FIG. 8 in place of the aforementioned routine shown in FIG. 5 or FIG. 7 .
  • the apparatus according to exemplary Embodiment 2 determines the deterioration state of the upstream side catalyst 32 by a majority of a plurality of temporary determinations that are based on specific oxygen storage capacities OSC.
  • the catalyst deterioration detecting apparatus in exemplary Embodiment 3 determines whether the upstream side catalyst 32 is normal based on whether the mean value of a plurality of oxygen storage capacities OSC exceeds the threshold A(x).
  • the routine shown in FIG. 8 is a flowchart of a routine performed by the ECU 42 in exemplary Embodiment 3 to realize the foregoing function.
  • steps that are identical to those steps shown in FIG. 5 or 7 are denoted by the same reference numerals that they are denoted by in FIG. 5 or 7 , and explanations thereof will be omitted or simplified.
  • Step 210 it is determined after the processes of Steps 132 and 134 whether the number of detections of the oxygen storage capacity OSC has reached a predetermined number No (Step 210 ).
  • an oxygen storage capacity mean value OSCAV is then calculated by dividing integration values OSCSUM of all of the oxygen storage capacities OSC that were detected by the number of detections No (Step 212 ).
  • This process enables the state of the upstream side catalyst 32 to be determined based on a plurality of oxygen storage capacities OSC, or more specifically, based on the mean value OSCAV of those oxygen storage capacities OSC. Further, the above described process enables the process for detecting the oxygen storage capacity OSC to be temporarily stopped when the stored oxygen state of the downstream side catalyst 34 is different from the appropriate state before the oxygen storage capacity OSC is detected the predetermined number of times such that the adjusting process can be performed to return the downstream side catalyst 34 to the appropriate state (see Steps 131 and 160 ). Therefore, the catalyst deterioration detecting apparatus according to exemplary Embodiment 3 enables deterioration of the upstream side catalyst 32 to be detected with a high degree of accuracy without making the exhaust emissions any worse, just as with exemplary Embodiment 2.
  • a fourth exemplary embodiment of the invention will be described with reference to FIG. 9 .
  • the elements in exemplary Embodiment 4 that are the same as those in exemplary Embodiment 1 are denoted by the same reference numerals that they are denoted by in exemplary Embodiment 1, and redundant explanations thereof will be omitted.
  • the catalyst deterioration detecting apparatus according to exemplary Embodiment 4 is the same as any one of the apparatuses in exemplary Embodiments 1 through 3 except in that the ECU 42 performs the routine shown in FIG. 9 in place of the aforementioned routines shown in FIG. 5 , 7 , or 8 .
  • the routine shown in FIG. 9 is a flowchart of a routine performed by the ECU 42 in exemplary Embodiment 4 to detect deterioration of the upstream side catalyst 32 .
  • This routine is the same as the routine shown in FIG. 7 that is performed in exemplary Embodiment 2 except in that the processes of Steps 200 and 222 are performed after Step 131 .
  • Step 131 when it is determined in Step 131 that the stored oxygen state of the downstream side catalyst 34 is not appropriate, it is then determined whether deterioration determination of the upstream side catalyst 32 has already started (Step 220 ).
  • Step 220 it is determined whether detection of the first oxygen storage capacity OSC has already started.
  • the process of Step 160 is then performed after this such that the adjusting process to make the stored oxygen state of the downstream side catalyst 34 appropriate is started.
  • the processes for detecting the oxygen storage capacity OSC of the upstream side catalyst 32 are started.
  • Step 220 is performed after Step 131 in the routine shown in FIG. 9 , and it is determined that deterioration determination of the upstream side catalyst 32 has already started (Step 220 ).
  • Step 220 When it is determined in Step 220 that deterioration determination of the upstream side catalyst 32 has already started, parameters for the rich setting control and the lean setting control are then corrected (Step 222 ).
  • the catalyst deterioration detecting apparatus of this exemplary embodiment forces the air-fuel ratio to oscillate by repeatedly alternating between rich setting control and lean setting control when the oxygen storage capacity OSC of the upstream side catalyst 32 is being detected, just like the apparatus of exemplary Embodiment 1 (see FIG. 2 ).
  • Rich setting control forcibly sets the air-fuel ratio to a predetermined value on the rich side
  • lean setting control forcibly sets the air-fuel ratio to a predetermined value on the lean side.
  • Step 222 the parameters used for these controls, respectively, are corrected in accordance with the stored oxygen state of the upstream side catalyst 32 .
  • Step 222 it is first determined whether the upstream side catalyst 32 is in the maximum stored oxygen state or in the minimum stored oxygen state based on the output of the second oxygen sensor 40 .
  • the target air-fuel ratio on the rich side with the rich setting control is set to a value tending sufficiently towards the rich side compared with the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio
  • the target air-fuel ratio on the lean side with the lean setting control is set to a value tending sufficiently towards the lean side compared with the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio.
  • Step 222 when it is determined that the downstream side catalyst 34 is in the minimum stored oxygen state, the target air-fuel ratio on the rich side for the rich setting control is set to a value tending slightly toward the rich side compared with the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio, and the target air-fuel ratio on the lean side for the lean setting control is set to a value tending slightly toward the lean side compared with the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio.
  • the rich setting control and the lean setting control are repeated so as to bring the downstream side catalyst 34 out of the minimum stored oxygen state and return it to the appropriate stored oxygen state.
  • Step 132 is performed after the process in Step 222 is performed.
  • the rich setting control and the lean setting control are repeatedly performed under the conditions set in Step 220 such that the downstream side catalyst 34 is returned to a normal state in which almost no unpurified exhaust gas flows out into the atmosphere.
  • the catalyst deterioration detecting apparatus of exemplary Embodiment 4 enables deterioration of the upstream side catalyst 32 to be detected accurately and within a short amount of time without losing the good exhaust emissions characteristics.
  • Step 222 the target air-fuel ratio for the rich setting control and the target air-fuel ratio for the lean setting control are corrected.
  • the parameters corrected in Step 222 are not limited to this. That is, in Step 222 , the time from after the first oxygen sensor 38 generates a rich output or a lean output until the air-fuel ratio of the mixture reverses, and the like, may also be corrected.
  • the time from after the first oxygen sensor 38 generates a rich output until the air-fuel ratio becomes lean may be made relatively long, and the time from after the first oxygen sensor 38 generates a lean output until the air-fuel output becomes rich may be made short.
  • the downstream side catalyst 34 is in the minimum stored oxygen state, the above settings may be reversed. Shortening the time until the air-fuel ratio becomes rich enables a large amount of exhaust gas having a shortage of oxygen to be supplied to the downstream side catalyst 34 , therefore enabling the downstream side catalyst 34 to be quickly brought out of the maximum stored oxygen state. Also, shortening the time until the air-fuel ratio becomes lean enables a large amount of exhaust gas having an excess of oxygen to be supplied to the downstream side catalyst 34 , therefore enabling the downstream side catalyst 34 to be quickly brought out of the minimum stored oxygen state.
  • the parameters of the rich setting control and the lean setting control are corrected.
  • the invention is not limited to this.
  • the parameters of the rich setting control and the lean setting control can also be corrected at that point.
  • Step 204 that is performed by the ECU 42 corresponds to the control repeating portion
  • Step 206 corresponds to the deterioration determining portion
  • Steps 220 and 222 correspond to the air-fuel ratio force-correcting portion.
  • the first oxygen sensor 38 corresponds to the first oxygen sensor.
  • Step 112 that is performed by the ECU 42 corresponds to the maximum stored oxygen state detecting portion.
  • Step 116 that is performed by the ECU 42 corresponds to the minimum stored oxygen state detecting portion.
  • Steps 82 through 90 that are performed by the ECU 42 correspond to the force-rich portion and the force-lean portion.
  • Step 132 that is performed by the ECU 42 corresponds to the oxygen storage capacity detecting portion.
  • Step 154 that is performed by the ECU 42 corresponds to the deterioration determining portion.
  • Step 131 that is performed by the ECU 42 corresponds to the appropriate state determining portion.
  • Steps 220 and 222 that are performed by the ECU 42 correspond to the air-fuel ratio force-correcting portion.
  • a fifth exemplary embodiment of the invention will be described with reference to FIG. 10 .
  • the elements in exemplary Embodiment 5 that are the same as those in exemplary Embodiment 1 are denoted by the same reference numerals that they are denoted by in exemplary Embodiment 1, and redundant explanations thereof will be omitted.
  • the catalyst deterioration detecting apparatus according to exemplary Embodiment 5 is the same as any one of the apparatuses in exemplary Embodiments 1 through 4 except in that the ECU 42 performs the routine shown in FIG. 10 in place of the aforementioned routine shown in FIG. 5 , 7 , 8 , or 9 .
  • the routine shown in FIG. 10 is the same as the routine shown in FIG. 8 that is performed in exemplary Embodiment 3 except in that the processes of Steps 200 and 222 are performed after Step 131 .
  • the processes in Steps 200 and 222 shown in Step internal combustion engine 10 are the same as those processes performed in exemplary Embodiment 4.
  • initial processing in order to detect the oxygen storage capacity OSC can be started after the stored oxygen state of the downstream side catalyst 34 has been adjusted to the appropriate state, just as when the routine shown in FIG. 9 is performed. Then, if the downstream side catalyst 34 is in an inappropriate state before the oxygen storage capacity OSC is detected the predetermined number No of times, detection of the oxygen storage capacity OSC continues while the downstream side catalyst 34 is returned to the appropriate state with almost no unpurified exhaust gas flowing out into the atmosphere. Accordingly, the catalyst deterioration detecting apparatus of this exemplary embodiment enables deterioration of the upstream side catalyst 32 to be detected accurately and within a short amount of time without losing the good exhaust emissions characteristics, just as with exemplary Embodiment 4.
  • Step 222 the target air-fuel ratio for the rich setting control and the target air-fuel ratio for the lean setting control are corrected.
  • the parameters corrected in Step 222 are not limited to this.
  • the time from after the first oxygen sensor 38 generates a rich output or a lean output until the air-fuel ratio of the mixture reverses may also be corrected, just as was described in exemplary Embodiment 4.
  • detection of the initial oxygen storage capacity OSC begins after the stored oxygen state of the downstream side catalyst 34 has been adjusted to an appropriate state.
  • the invention is not limited to this.
  • the parameters of the rich setting control and the lean setting control can also be corrected at that point (at the point when the initial oxygen storage capacity OSC is to be detected).
  • Step 210 that is performed by the ECU 42 corresponds to the control repeating portion
  • Step 214 corresponds to the deterioration determining portion
  • Steps 220 and 222 both correspond to the air-fuel ratio force-correcting portion.
  • the first oxygen sensor 38 corresponds to the first oxygen sensor.
  • Step 112 that is performed by the ECU 42 corresponds to the maximum stored oxygen state detecting portion.
  • Step 116 that is performed by the ECU 42 corresponds to the minimum stored oxygen state detecting portion.
  • Steps 82 through 90 that are performed by the ECU 42 correspond to the force-rich portion and the force-lean portion.
  • Step 132 that is performed by the ECU 42 corresponds to the oxygen storage capacity detecting portion.
  • Step 214 that is performed by the ECU 42 corresponds to the deterioration determining portion.
  • Step 131 that is performed by the ECU 42 corresponds to the appropriate state determining portion.
  • Steps 220 and 222 that are performed by the ECU 42 both correspond to the air-fuel ratio force-correcting portion.
  • a sixth exemplary embodiment of the invention will be described with reference to FIG. 11 .
  • the elements in exemplary Embodiment 6 that are the same as those in exemplary Embodiment 1 are denoted by the same reference numerals that they are denoted by in exemplary Embodiment 1, and redundant explanations thereof will be omitted.
  • the catalyst deterioration detecting apparatus according to exemplary Embodiment 6 has a construction in which the second oxygen sensor 40 is eliminated from the system configuration shown in FIG. 1 . This is able to be accomplished by having the ECU 42 perform the routine shown in FIG. 11 in addition to the routine performed in any one of exemplary Embodiments 1 through 5 above.
  • the catalyst deterioration detecting apparatus estimates the amount of oxygen stored in the downstream side catalyst 34 according to a predetermined rule and then determines whether the downstream side catalyst 34 is in the appropriate state based on that estimated value.
  • FIG. 11 is a flowchart of a routine performed by the ECU 42 to realize the aforementioned function.
  • the catalyst temperature of the downstream side catalyst 34 is first detected (Step 300 ).
  • the catalyst temperature of the downstream side catalyst 34 can be actually measured by adding a catalyst temperature sensor to the downstream side catalyst 34 .
  • the catalyst temperature of the downstream side catalyst 34 can also be detected according to a previously prepared map or operational expression based on the ignition timing, the air-fuel ratio A/F of the mixture, the intake air amount Ga, vehicle speed SPD, and intake air temperature THA, and the like.
  • the catalyst temperature is detected according to these methods.
  • Step 302 it is determined whether the first oxygen sensor 38 is generating a rich output, i.e., whether exhaust gas having a shortage of oxygen is flowing into the downstream side catalyst 34 (Step 302 ).
  • the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM of the oxygen stored in the downstream side catalyst 34 is decreased according to a predetermined rule (Step 304 ).
  • a well-known model for estimating the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM for example, can be used as the predetermined rule.
  • the process in Step 304 can be performed after changing the first oxygen sensor 38 to an air-fuel ratio sensor or an HC sensor. That is, in this case, it is possible to calculate the oxygen discharge amount per unit/time based on the output of the air-fuel ratio sensor or the HC sensor and the intake air amount Ga. Then, the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM can be appropriately updated by subtracting that calculated value from the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM at the time of the most recent process cycle.
  • Step 306 when it is determined in Step 302 that the first oxygen sensor 38 is not generating a rich output, it is then determined whether the first oxygen sensor 38 is generating a lean output (Step 306 ).
  • Step 308 it is further determined whether a fuel cut is being performed.
  • the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM of the oxygen stored in the downstream side catalyst 34 is increased according to a usual rule (Step 310 ).
  • the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM of the oxygen stored in the downstream side catalyst 34 is increased according to a rule in which it is assumed that a fuel cut is being performed (Step 312 ).
  • Steps 310 and 312 can be performed using a well-known model, just as in Step 304 above. These processes can also be realized by calculating the amount of stored oxygen per unit/time after the first oxygen sensor 38 has been changed to an air-fuel sensor or an HC sensor, and then adding that calculated value to the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM during the most recent process cycle.
  • the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM is updated while distinguishing between when a fuel cut is being performed and when a fuel cut is not being performed, as described above. Accordingly, the system according to this exemplary embodiment is able to accurately estimate the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM of the downstream side catalyst 34 .
  • Step 306 when it is determined in Step 306 that the first oxygen sensor 38 is not generating a lean output, it can be determined that exhaust gas which has neither an excess or shortage of oxygen is flowing into the downstream side catalyst 34 . In this case, because no large increase or decrease is generated in the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM, the process for updating the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM is omitted.
  • the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM of the downstream side catalyst 34 is then read (Step 314 ).
  • Step 316 it is determined whether that oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM is an appropriate amount of stored oxygen for the downstream side catalyst 34 . More specifically, it is determined whether the downstream side catalyst 34 is in a state in which it can suitably purify exhaust gas having either an excess or shortage of oxygen that flows into the downstream side catalyst 34 with the detection of deterioration of the upstream side catalyst 32 (Step 316 ).
  • the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM is an appropriate stored amount is to be determined by its relationship to the oxygen storage capacity of the downstream side catalyst 34 .
  • the oxygen storage capacity of the downstream side catalyst 34 changes in accordance with the catalyst temperature. Therefore, the oxygen storage capacity of the downstream side catalyst 34 is first estimated based on the catalyst temperature detected in Step 300 . Then after the oxygen storage capacity of the downstream side catalyst 34 is estimated, it is determined whether the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM read in Step 314 is equal to, or greater than, a first integration value sufficient for purifying exhaust gas having a shortage of oxygen that may flow out from the downstream side catalyst 34 . It is further determined whether the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM read in Step 314 is equal to, or less than, a second integration value that has leeway for purifying exhaust gas having an excess of oxygen that may flow out from the downstream side catalyst 34 .
  • Step 320 when the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM of the downstream side catalyst 34 is inappropriate, it is determined that the downstream side catalyst 34 is not in the appropriate state (Step 320 ).
  • the catalyst deterioration detecting apparatus according to exemplary Embodiment 6 is able to realize the same function as the apparatuses in exemplary Embodiments 1 through 5 despite the fact that it is not provided with the second oxygen sensor 40 .
  • Steps 302 through 312 that are performed by the ECU 42 correspond to the first estimating portion and the stored oxygen integration amount detecting portion, and Step 316 corresponds to the determining portion.
  • Step 308 that is performed by the ECU 42 corresponds to the fuel cut detecting portion, and Step 312 corresponds to the second estimating portion.
  • FIG. 12 is a block diagram of an internal combustion engine having a catalyst deterioration detecting apparatus according to a seventh exemplary embodiment.
  • the catalyst deterioration detecting apparatus according to this exemplary embodiment purifies the exhaust gas of an engine 401 , which is an internal combustion engine.
  • the engine 401 is an engine having multiple cylinders, but the figure shows the cross-section of only one of these cylinders.
  • the engine 401 generates a driving force by burning mixtures within each cylinder 403 using a spark plug 402 .
  • air drawn in from the outside passes through the intake passage 404 and mixes with fuel injected from an injector 405 such that they are drawn into the cylinder 403 together as a mixture.
  • the intake passage 404 and the inner portion of the cylinder 403 are connected and disconnected with the opening and closing of an intake valve 406 .
  • the mixture that is burned in the inner portion of the cylinder 403 is then exhausted into an exhaust passage 407 as exhaust gas.
  • the exhaust passage 407 and the inner portion of the cylinder 403 are connected and disconnected by the opening and closing of an exhaust valve 408 .
  • a throttle valve 409 that adjusts the amount of intake air drawn into the cylinder 403 .
  • a throttle position sensor 410 that detects the opening of the throttle valve 409 .
  • the throttle valve 409 is connected also to a throttle motor 411 which provides a driving force that opens and closes the throttle valve 409 .
  • an accelerator position sensor 412 that detects an operating amount (accelerator opening) of an accelerator pedal. That is, in this case, an electronically controlled throttle method that electronically controls the opening of the throttle valve 409 is employed.
  • an airflow meter 413 for detecting the amount of intake air is also mounted on the intake passage 404 .
  • a crank position sensor 414 that detects the position of a crankshaft is mounted near the crankshaft of the engine 401 .
  • the position of a piston 415 inside the cylinder 403 , as well as an engine rotation speed NE, can also be obtained from the output of the crank position sensor 414 .
  • a knock sensor 416 that detects knocking of the engine 401 and a water temperature sensor 417 that detects a cooling water temperature are mounted in the engine 401 .
  • a catalyst 419 is disposed in the exhaust passage 407 .
  • a plurality of these catalysts may also be provided in the exhaust passage, in which case the plurality may be provided in serial or in parallel in a branched portion.
  • one catalyst can be located in a place where exhaust pipes from two of the cylinders come together and another catalyst can be located in a place where exhaust pipes from the remaining two cylinders come together.
  • one catalyst 419 is disposed on the downstream side from the place where the exhaust pipes from each of cylinder 403 come together.
  • the spark plug 402 , the injector 405 , the throttle position sensor 410 , the throttle motor 411 , the accelerator position sensor 412 , the airflow meter 413 , the crank position sensor 414 , the knock sensor 416 , the water temperature sensor 417 , and other sensors are all connected to an electronic control unit (ECU) 418 that comprehensively controls the engine 401 .
  • ECU electronice control unit
  • Those sensors are all controlled based on signals from the ECU 418 , and detection results from these sensors are sent to the ECU 418 .
  • a catalyst temperature sensor 421 that measures the temperature of the catalyst 419 disposed in the exhaust passage 407 , and a purge control valve 424 that purges the intake passage 404 of evaporated fuel in a fuel tank captured by a charcoal canister 423 are also connected to the ECU 418 .
  • an upstream side air-fuel ratio sensor 425 that is provided on the upstream side of the catalyst 419 and a downstream side air-fuel ratio sensor 426 that is provided on the downstream side of the catalyst 419 are also connected to the ECU 418 .
  • the upstream side air-fuel ratio sensor 425 detects an exhaust air-fuel ratio from the oxygen concentration in the exhaust gas at the place where it is located
  • the downstream side air-fuel ratio sensor 426 detects the exhaust air-fuel ratio from the oxygen concentration in the exhaust gas at the place where it is located.
  • a linear air-fuel ratio sensor is used to detect the exhaust air-fuel ratio linearly and an oxygen sensor is used to detect the exhaust air-fuel ratio in an on-off manner. Also, because the upstream side air-fuel ratio sensor 425 and downstream side air-fuel ratio sensor 426 are unable to accurately detect the air-fuel ratio until they are above a certain temperature (activation temperature), the upstream side air-fuel ratio sensor 425 and downstream side air-fuel ratio sensor 426 are warmed up with power supplied via the ECU 418 so that their temperatures quickly rise to the activation temperature.
  • the ECU 418 includes in its inner portion a CPU that performs calculations, RAM that stores various types of information such as such as calculation results, backup RAM that stores that stored information with a battery, and ROM, in which is stored all of the control programs, and the like.
  • the ECU 418 calculates the amount of oxygen stored in the catalyst 419 and controls the engine 401 based on the exhaust air-fuel ratio and the calculated amount of stored oxygen and the like.
  • the ECU 418 also performs other various functions such as calculating the fuel injection amount to be injected by the injector 405 , controlling the ignition timing of the spark plug 402 , and performing model corrections, to be described later, as well as sensor diagnoses.
  • the catalyst used has a component of ceria (CeO 2 ) and the like, and has a property which stores and discharges oxygen in the exhaust gas in addition to a property which oxidizes and reduces components to be purified in the exhaust gas.
  • the target value for the amount of stored oxygen of the catalyst is set so as to be able to handle cases in which the exhaust air-fuel ratio of the exhaust gas flowing into the catalyst becomes lean or rich.
  • the amount of stored oxygen is controlled so as to match that same target value. With that same control, the amount of stored oxygen to be stored by the catalyst 419 is estimated, and the oxygen storage capability (also referred to as the storable amount of oxygen or the maximum oxygen storage amount or the like) is also estimated using the history of that estimated amount of stored oxygen.
  • FIG. 13 shows the change over time of each control amount relating to the estimation of the amount of stored oxygen of the catalyst 419 .
  • the calculation of the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM will be described referring to the flowchart shown in FIG. 14 .
  • the airflow meter 413 detects the intake air amount Ga and the amount of stored oxygen 02 AD of the oxygen stored in, or discharged from, the catalyst 419 is calculated from this intake air amount Ga and the exhaust air-fuel ratio difference ⁇ AF (Step 500 ).
  • the calculation of the amount of stored oxygen 02 AD may also be obtained from a map within the ECU 418 or by using an operational expression stored in the ECU 418 .
  • Step 500 it is determined whether the lean flag Xlean is on and whether the calculated amount of stored oxygen 02 AD is a positive value (Step 510 ).
  • the lean flag Xlean is on.
  • the exhaust air-fuel ratio detected by that downstream side air-fuel ratio sensor 426 is rich, the rich flag Xrich is on.
  • the lean flag Xlean When the lean flag Xlean is on in Step 510 , it means that the exhaust air-fuel ratio of the exhaust gas flowing out from the catalyst 419 is lean, thus there is a surplus of oxygen. Further, when the amount of stored oxygen 02 AD is a positive value, it can be said that the exhaust gas flowing into the catalyst 419 contains oxygen that could be stored in the catalyst 419 . Therefore, when the determination in Step 510 is YES, regardless of the fact that the exhaust gas flowing into the catalyst 419 contains oxygen that could be stored in the catalyst 419 , the catalyst 419 already contains as much oxygen as it can store, and so it is unable to store any more oxygen.
  • Step 510 when the determination in Step 510 is YES, the routine ends as it is and the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM of the catalyst 419 is not updated. If the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM were to be updated when the determination in Step 510 was YES, the CPU would determine that oxygen, which in reality was unable to be stored, was stored, so updating of the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM in this way is prohibited.
  • the determination in Step 510 is NO, it is then determined whether the rich flag Xrich is on and whether the calculated amount of stored oxygen 02 AD is a negative value (Step 520 ).
  • the rich flag Xrich When the rich flag Xrich is on, it means that the exhaust air-fuel ratio of the gas flowing out from the catalyst 419 is rich and there is a shortage of oxygen. Also, when the amount of stored oxygen 02 AD is a negative value, it can be said that the exhaust air-fuel ratio of gas flowing into the catalyst 419 is rich and that the catalyst 419 should be discharging oxygen stored therein to purify the exhaust gas. Accordingly, when the determination in Step 520 is YES, regardless of the fact that the gas flowing into the catalyst 419 is purified by the oxygen discharged from the catalyst 419 , the catalyst 419 has already discharged all of its oxygen so it can no longer discharge any more oxygen.
  • the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM of the catalyst 419 is not updated thereafter. If the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM were to be updated when the determination in Step 520 was YES, the CPU would determine that oxygen, which in reality was unable to be discharged, was discharged, so updating of the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM in this way is prohibited.
  • the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM is updated using the calculated amount of stored oxygen 02 AD because the catalyst 419 is not in either i) a state where, despite the fact that there is oxygen that could be stored contained in the exhaust gas flowing into the catalyst 419 , the catalyst 419 already contains as much oxygen as it can store, or ii) a state where, despite the fact that oxygen should be discharged into the exhaust gas flowing into the catalyst 419 , the catalyst 419 has already discharged all of its oxygen (Step 530 ).
  • the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM is updated using the amount of stored oxygen 02 AD (with the exception of when the determination is YES in Step 510 or Step 520 , in which case updating is prohibited) the oxygen amount stored in the catalyst 419 is always able to be accurately estimated.
  • the history of the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM generated in this way is shown in the upper part of the timing chart in FIG. 13 .
  • the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM that is successively updated is then stored sequentially in the ECU 418 .
  • the upper limit value 02 SUMmax and lower limit value 02 SUMmin are corresponding to the maximum stored oxygen state and the minimum stored oxygen state respectively.
  • Step 600 it is determined whether an output voltage V 02 of the downstream side air-fuel ratio sensor 426 is below a preset lean side threshold Vlean (more specifically, 0.3V in this case) (Step 600 ). This is shown in the lower part of the timing chart in FIG. 13 .
  • the output voltage V 02 is below the lean side threshold Vlean, it means that the catalyst 419 has stored oxygen up to the limit of its oxygen storage capability so it is thought that no more oxygen can be stored in the catalyst 419 .
  • the determination in Step 600 is YES
  • the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM is determined to have reached its upper limit and the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM at that point is stored in the ECU 418 as the upper limit value 02 SUMmax.
  • the lean flag Xlean is set to on and the rich flag Xrich is set to off (Step 610 ).
  • Step 620 it is determined whether the output voltage V 02 of the downstream side air-fuel ratio sensor 426 exceeds a preset rich side threshold Vrich (more specifically, 0.7V in this case) (Step 620 ).
  • Vrich rich side threshold
  • the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM is determined to have reached its lower limit and the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM at that point is stored in the ECU 418 as the lower limit value 02 SUMmin.
  • the lean flag Xlean is set to off and the rich flag Xrich is set to on (Step 630 ).
  • Step 620 When the determination in Step 620 is NO, the output voltage V 02 of the downstream side air-fuel ratio sensor 426 is between the lean side threshold Vlean and the rich side threshold Vrich (Vlean ⁇ V 02 ⁇ Vrich). Accordingly, the exhaust air-fuel ratio of the gas flowing out from the catalyst 419 is neither lean nor rich, but is taken as being close to the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio. In this case, both the lean flag Xlean and the rich flag Xrich are set to off (Step 640 ).
  • the history of the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM is successively updated and the upper limit value 02 SUMmax and the lower limit value 02 SUMmin are updated from that history and the output from the downstream side air-fuel ratio sensor 426 . Therefore, the maximum limit of the amount of oxygen able to be stored in the catalyst 419 (the oxygen storage capability) can be obtained by taking the difference of the upper limit value 02 SUMmax minus the lower limit value 02 SUMmin (i.e., 02 SUMmax ⁇ 02 SUMmin).
  • the oxygen storage capability ( 02 SUMmax ⁇ 02 SUMmin) of the catalyst 419 fluctuates depending on the state (i.e., temperature and state of deterioration and the like) of the catalyst 419 , but is updated by the constant updating of the upper limit value 02 SUMmax and the lower limit value 02 SUMmin.
  • TAUP is the basic fuel injection amount obtained from the intake air amount Ga and the engine rotation speed NE.
  • the final fuel injection amount TAU is determined by correcting this basic fuel injection amount TAUP with the correction coefficient KAF and other various correction coefficients ⁇ and ⁇ .
  • an air-fuel ratio feedback coefficient FAF is well known.
  • the intake air-fuel ratio of the engine 401 is controlled by controlling this fuel injection amount TAU.
  • a detailed explanation of various correction coefficients ⁇ and ⁇ other than the correction coefficient KAF will be omitted.
  • Feedback control such that the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM of the catalyst 419 becomes equal to the reference value 02 sumref is performed by correcting the fuel injection amount using correction coefficient KAF, as described above.
  • air-fuel ratio oscillating control is performed such that the exhaust air-fuel ratio of the exhaust gas flowing into the catalyst 419 oscillates alternately to the rich side and the lean side, and the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM is actively increased and decreased.
  • the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM is increased and decreased in this way, it is possible to detect the upper limit value 02 SUMmax and the lower limit value 02 SUMmin earlier on, such that earlier and accurate detection of the oxygen storage capability can be performed.
  • control by the reference value 02 sumref of the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM is temporarily stopped.
  • the exhaust purification performance could be made worse by the oxygen storage state of the catalyst 419 at that point.
  • the catalyst 419 is storing oxygen to the point where it is nearly full to its upper limit
  • the catalyst 419 starts to detect the upper limit value 02 SUMmax and the exhaust air-fuel ratio is controlled to the lean side
  • the upper limit value 02 SUMmax is soon reached and purification of the exhaust might not be sufficiently performed until this is controlled to the reverse side (the lower limit value 02 SUMmin side).
  • this exemplary embodiment is such that control for detecting the oxygen storage capability is allowed when the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM is within a predetermined range.
  • This predetermined range is set as a range where there is no fear of the exhaust purification rate becoming worse even if control for detecting the oxygen storage capability is performed.
  • the variation (or the rate of change) of the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM is also considered at the same time and whether that variation is equal to, or less then, a predetermined value is set as a condition for allowing the detection control. When the variation or the rate of change is large, it means that the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM is actively changing.
  • the upper limit value 02 SUMmax or lower limit value 02 SUMmin would soon be reached and immediately thereafter the exhaust would not be able to be sufficiently purified. That is, the aforementioned predetermined value is set as an upper limit where there is no fear of making the exhaust purification rate worse even if the control for detecting the oxygen storage capability is performed.
  • FIG. 16 shows a flowchart of this exemplary embodiment. The flowchart shown in FIG. 16 is performed repeatedly at predetermined intervals of time (e.g., every few seconds).
  • Step 700 it is determined whether there has been a request to actively calculate (update) the oxygen storage capability (Step 700 ).
  • the calculation request may be output at predetermined intervals of time or at predetermined intervals of distance driven, for example.
  • the calculation request may also be output when the driving state of the internal combustion engine has reached a predetermined state.
  • Step 700 is a step for monitoring whether the calculation request has been output. When the determination in Step 700 is NO, this control temporarily ends and is performed again from Step 700 during the next cycle of the routine.
  • Step 700 it is determined whether the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM at that time is within a predetermined range between a lower limit value SUML and an upper limit value SUMU (Step 710 ).
  • the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM is constantly updated (there are also cases, however, in which updating is temporarily stopped) and it is determined here whether the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM is within the aforementioned predetermined range.
  • the lower limit value SUML and the upper limit value SUMU are set to the midpoint in a range determined by the upper limit value 02 SUMmax and the lower limit value 02 SUMmin at that point (the point at which the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM was updated). For example, when the upper limit value 02 SUMmax is set to 100 and the lower limit value 02 SUMmin is set to 0, the upper limit value SUMU is set to 60 and the lower limit SUML is set to 40.
  • the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM is between the lower limit value SUML and the upper limit value SUMU, it can be determined that deterioration of the exhaust purification will not occur (or will be minimized) even if the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM is increased and decreased in order to calculate the oxygen storage capability.
  • the lower limit value SUML and the upper limit value SUMU are set as variable values. However, both values (the lower limit value SUML and the upper limit value SUMU) may also be set as fixed values.
  • the determination in Step 710 is NO, it is first determined whether oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM is above or below the predetermined range in order to perform control to bring the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM within the predetermined range. More specifically, it is determined whether the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM is greater than the upper limit value SUMU (Step 720 ).
  • Step 720 When the determination in Step 720 is YES, the exhaust air-fuel ratio is controlled to be slightly rich because the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM is above the predetermined range, i.e., a sufficiently large amount of oxygen is stored (Step 730 ). After Step 730 , the process returns to Step 710 . By making the exhaust air-fuel ratio slightly rich, oxygen stored in the catalyst 419 is consumed such that the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM eventually falls to within the predetermined range.
  • Step 710 determines whether the exhaust air-fuel ratio is slightly lean because the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM is below the predetermined range, i.e., the amount of stored oxygen is low.
  • Step 740 the process returns to Step 710 .
  • oxygen is stored in the catalyst 419 such that the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM eventually rises to within the predetermined range.
  • Step 710 it is then determined whether the variation in the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM is in some predetermined range.
  • this is determined using the amount of stored oxygen 02 AD as the variation 02 AD. That is, it is determined whether the amount of stored oxygen 02 AD is equal to, or less than, a predetermined value 02 ADU (Step 750 ).
  • the control gain for the purpose of increasing and decreasing the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM is decreased in order to perform control such that the variation 02 AD becomes equal, or less than, the predetermined value 02 ADU (Step 760 ).
  • the variation 02 AD of the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM becomes smaller and eventually becomes equal to, or less than, the predetermined value 02 ADU.
  • the predetermined value 02 ADU may be a fixed value or it may be a variable value.
  • the difference between the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM before a predetermined time and the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM at that time can be calculated as ⁇ 02 SUM and it can be determined whether this ⁇ 02 SUM is equal to, or less than, a predetermined upper limit value ⁇ 02 SUMU.
  • the Step 750 is YES, it can be determined that the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM is within the predetermined range and that the variation 02 AD thereof is also equal to, or less than, the predetermined value 02 ADU.
  • the upper limit value 02 SUMmax and the lower limit value 02 SUMmin are detected early on by actively increasing and decreasing the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM.
  • Step 770 The oxygen storage capability is then calculated from these (Step 770 ). After Step 770 , whether the calculation of the oxygen storage capability has ended is monitored in Step 780 . When the calculation of the oxygen storage capability has ended, the aforementioned slight rich and slight lean control, or the control gain and the like, is returned to its original state such that the control returns to normal (Step 790 ).
  • the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM it is determined prior to detecting the oxygen storage capability whether the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM is within the predetermined range, and it is only when the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM is within that predetermined range that detection of the oxygen storage capability is allowed by increasing and decreasing the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM. Accordingly, it is possible to inhibit the deterioration of the exhaust purification at the time of detecting the oxygen storage capability. Further, when the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM is not within the predetermined range, it is possible to perform control so as to bring the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM within the predetermined range and perform early detection of the oxygen storage capability while inhibiting the deterioration of exhaust purification.
  • the variation (rate of change) of the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM is equal to, or less than, a predetermined value, and it is only when that variation (rate of change) is equal to, or less than, the predetermined value that detection of the oxygen storage capability is allowed by increasing and decreasing the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM. Accordingly, it is possible to inhibit the deterioration of the exhaust purification at the time of detecting the oxygen storage capability.
  • the variation (rate of change) of the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM is not equal to, or less than, the predetermined value, it is possible to perform control so as to bring the variation (rate of change) of the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM equal to, or less than, the predetermined value and perform early detection of the oxygen storage capability while inhibiting the deterioration of exhaust purification.
  • the upstream side air-fuel ratio sensor 425 and downstream side air-fuel ratio sensor 426 , and the ECU 418 and the like function as stored oxygen amount detecting portions and oxygen storage capability detecting portions.
  • air-fuel ratio control portions such as the airflow meter 413 and the injector 405 , in addition to the upstream side air-fuel ratio sensor 425 and downstream side air-fuel ratio sensor 426 , and the ECU 418 and the like, function as stored oxygen amount controlling portions.
  • the ECU 418 and the like functions as detection-start allowing portion.
  • the determination in Step 760 is NO, the process returns to right before Step 750 . However, it may also be made to return to right before Step 710 .
  • the catalyst deterioration detecting apparatus of this invention is not limited to the foregoing exemplary embodiment.
  • the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM is able to be either a positive value or a negative value.
  • the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM is taken only as a positive value and only the upper limit value 02 SUMmax is set. In this way, it is conceivable that control be performed only on the upper limit value 02 SUMmax side, without control using both the upper limit value 02 SUMmax and the lower limit value 02 SUMmin.
  • control for detecting the oxygen storage capability is allowed when both the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM is within a predetermined range and the variation (rate of change) thereof is equal to, or less than, a predetermined value.
  • FIG. 17 shows a flowchart in the case when the only requirement to allow detection is that the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM be within the predetermined range.
  • the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM is not within the predetermined range, it is controlled so as to become within the predetermined range.
  • the steps in the flowchart shown in FIG. 17 that are the same as steps in the flowchart shown in FIG. 16 are denoted by the same reference numerals, so explanations thereof will be omitted.
  • FIG. 18 shows a flowchart in the case when the only requirement to allow detection is that the variation (rate of change) of the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM be equal to, or less than, a predetermined value.
  • the variation (rate of change) of the oxygen storage integration amount 02 SUM is not equal to, or less than, the predetermined value, it is controlled so as to become equal to, or less than, the predetermined value.
  • the steps in the flowchart shown in FIG. 18 that are the same as steps in the flowchart shown in FIG. 16 are denoted by the same reference numerals, so explanations thereof will be omitted.
  • the controllers e.g., the ECU 42 and the ECU 418 ) of the illustrated embodiment are implemented as one or more programmed general purpose computers. It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the controller can be implemented using a single special purpose integrated circuit (e.g., ASIC) having a main or central processor section for overall, system-level control, and separate sections dedicated to performing various different specific computations, functions and other processes under control of the central processor section.
  • the controller can be a plurality of separate dedicated or programmable integrated or other electronic circuits or devices (e.g., hardwired electronic or logic circuits such as discrete element circuits, or programmable logic devices such as PLDs, PLAs, PALs or the like).
  • the controller can be implemented using a suitably programmed general purpose computer, e.g., a microprocessor, microcontroller or other processor device (CPU or MPU), either alone or in conjunction with one or more peripheral (e.g., integrated circuit) data and signal processing devices.
  • a suitably programmed general purpose computer e.g., a microprocessor, microcontroller or other processor device (CPU or MPU)
  • CPU or MPU processor device
  • peripheral e.g., integrated circuit
  • a distributed processing architecture can be used for maximum data/signal processing capability and speed.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Exhaust Gas After Treatment (AREA)
  • Electrical Control Of Air Or Fuel Supplied To Internal-Combustion Engine (AREA)
US10/193,900 2001-07-18 2002-07-15 Catalyst deterioration detecting apparatus and method Expired - Fee Related US7198952B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2001218661A JP2003027932A (ja) 2001-07-18 2001-07-18 内燃機関の排気浄化装置
JP2001-218661 2001-07-18
JP2001285885A JP4474817B2 (ja) 2001-09-19 2001-09-19 内燃機関の触媒劣化検出装置
JP2001-285885 2001-09-19

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20030017603A1 US20030017603A1 (en) 2003-01-23
US7198952B2 true US7198952B2 (en) 2007-04-03

Family

ID=26618955

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/193,900 Expired - Fee Related US7198952B2 (en) 2001-07-18 2002-07-15 Catalyst deterioration detecting apparatus and method

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (1) US7198952B2 (de)
DE (1) DE10232385B4 (de)

Cited By (20)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20060218989A1 (en) * 2005-03-30 2006-10-05 Dominic Cianciarelli Method and apparatus for monitoring catalytic abator efficiency
US20060266020A1 (en) * 2005-05-31 2006-11-30 Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. Combustion control apparatus for direct-injection spark-ignition internal combustion engine
US20080016847A1 (en) * 2004-12-23 2008-01-24 Tino Arlt Method and Device for Determining an Oxygen Storage Capacity of the Exhaust Gas Catalytic Converter of an Internal Combustion Engine and Method and Device for Determining a Dynamic Time Duration for Exhaust Gas Probes of an Internal Combustion Engine
US20080028829A1 (en) * 2004-06-29 2008-02-07 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Air Fuel Ratio Sensor Deterioration Determination System for Compression Ignition Internal Combustion Engine
US20090150019A1 (en) * 2007-12-06 2009-06-11 Hitachi, Ltd. Vehicle diagnostic control apparatus
US20090235726A1 (en) * 2007-12-12 2009-09-24 Audi Method for determining the oxygen storage capacity of a catalytic converter for a motor vehicle as well as an associated measuring device
US20110000193A1 (en) * 2009-07-02 2011-01-06 Woodward Governor Company System and method for detecting diesel particulate filter conditions based on thermal response thereof
US20120067030A1 (en) * 2009-05-22 2012-03-22 Umicore Ag & Co. Kg Method for purifying the exhaust gases of an internal combustion engine having a catalytic converter
US20120285142A1 (en) * 2011-05-11 2012-11-15 GM Global Technology Operations LLC System and method for controlling fuel delivery based on output from a post-catalyst oxygen sensor during catalyst light-off
US20130034911A1 (en) * 2011-08-02 2013-02-07 GM Global Technology Operations LLC Ozone conversion sensors for an automobile
US20130186066A1 (en) * 2010-09-01 2013-07-25 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Catalyst deterioration detection apparatus and method
US20130226439A1 (en) * 2012-02-24 2013-08-29 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Method for controlling an engine
US8897955B2 (en) 2011-10-19 2014-11-25 GM Global Technology Operations LLC Ozone converting catalyst fault identification systems and methods
US20150101312A1 (en) * 2013-10-11 2015-04-16 Hyundai Motor Company O2 purge control method and vehicle exhaust system for two type catalysts
US9038369B2 (en) 2013-02-13 2015-05-26 Cummins Inc. Systems and methods for aftertreatment system diagnostics
US20170101953A1 (en) * 2014-05-26 2017-04-13 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Control device for internal combustion engine
US20180030872A1 (en) * 2016-08-01 2018-02-01 Hyundai Motor Company Method for catalyst heating control
US20190309698A1 (en) * 2016-11-15 2019-10-10 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method for controlling an exhaust gas component filling level in an accumulator of a catalytic converter
US10563606B2 (en) 2012-03-01 2020-02-18 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Post catalyst dynamic scheduling and control
US20230296043A1 (en) * 2022-03-15 2023-09-21 Subaru Corporation Vehicle

Families Citing this family (38)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE10338181B4 (de) * 2003-06-30 2012-05-31 Volkswagen Ag Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Temperaturbeeinflussung eines Katalysatorsystems
DE10333337B4 (de) * 2003-06-30 2010-09-16 Volkswagen Ag Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Diagnose eines Katalysatorsystems
DE10351590A1 (de) * 2003-11-05 2005-06-02 Audi Ag Verfahren zum Betreiben einer Brennkraftmaschine eines Fahrzeuges, insbesondere eines Kraftfahrzeuges
US7257943B2 (en) * 2004-07-27 2007-08-21 Ford Global Technologies, Llc System for controlling NOx emissions during restarts of hybrid and conventional vehicles
DE102005024872A1 (de) * 2005-05-31 2006-12-14 Siemens Ag Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Ermitteln einer Sauerstoffspeicherkapazität des Abgaskatalysators einer Brennkraftmaschine und Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Ermitteln einer Dynamik-Zeitdauer für Abgassonden einer Brennkraftmaschine
DE102006025050B4 (de) * 2006-05-27 2014-04-03 Fev Gmbh Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Betrieb einer Abgasnachbehandlungsanlage
JP4844257B2 (ja) * 2006-06-27 2011-12-28 トヨタ自動車株式会社 触媒劣化検出装置
DE102008025676B4 (de) * 2008-05-29 2012-02-09 Continental Automotive Gmbh Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Betreiben einer Brennkraftmaschine
JP4688941B2 (ja) * 2008-08-05 2011-05-25 本田技研工業株式会社 触媒の劣化判定装置
US8041501B2 (en) * 2009-01-26 2011-10-18 GM Global Technology Operations LLC Method and system for monitoring an active hydrocarbon adsorber
US8865082B2 (en) * 2009-10-05 2014-10-21 GM Global Technology Operations LLC Method and system for monitoring a hydrocarbon adsorber
US8516796B2 (en) * 2009-11-20 2013-08-27 GM Global Technology Operations LLC System and method for monitoring catalyst efficiency and post-catalyst oxygen sensor performance
US9347352B2 (en) 2011-05-19 2016-05-24 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Correction device for air/fuel ratio sensor
US9599006B2 (en) 2011-08-30 2017-03-21 GM Global Technology Operations LLC Catalyst oxygen storage capacity adjustment systems and methods
JP5871009B2 (ja) * 2011-10-24 2016-03-01 トヨタ自動車株式会社 触媒劣化検出装置
US9890730B2 (en) 2011-11-24 2018-02-13 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Air-fuel ratio detection device and air-fuel ratio detection method
US8793976B2 (en) 2012-01-19 2014-08-05 GM Global Technology Operations LLC Sulfur accumulation monitoring systems and methods
US9057338B2 (en) * 2012-11-09 2015-06-16 GM Global Technology Operations LLC Exhaust gas oxygen sensor fault detection systems and methods using fuel vapor purge rate
AU2013376226B2 (en) * 2013-01-29 2016-07-28 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Control device for internal combustion engine
KR101780878B1 (ko) * 2013-01-29 2017-09-21 도요타지도샤가부시키가이샤 내연 기관의 제어 장치
US9644561B2 (en) * 2013-08-27 2017-05-09 Ford Global Technologies, Llc System and method to restore catalyst storage level after engine feed-gas fuel disturbance
JP6094438B2 (ja) * 2013-09-27 2017-03-15 トヨタ自動車株式会社 内燃機関の制御装置
US9771888B2 (en) 2013-10-18 2017-09-26 GM Global Technology Operations LLC System and method for controlling an engine based on an oxygen storage capability of a catalytic converter
JP6015629B2 (ja) * 2013-11-01 2016-10-26 トヨタ自動車株式会社 内燃機関の制御装置
JP6206314B2 (ja) * 2014-04-25 2017-10-04 トヨタ自動車株式会社 内燃機関の制御装置
JP6102907B2 (ja) 2014-12-26 2017-03-29 トヨタ自動車株式会社 排気浄化装置の劣化診断装置
US9650981B1 (en) 2015-12-28 2017-05-16 GM Global Technology Operations LLC Adjustment of measured oxygen storage capacity based on upstream O2 sensor performance
DE102016222108A1 (de) * 2016-11-10 2018-05-17 Robert Bosch Gmbh Verfahren zum Einstellen eines Kraftstoff/Luft-Verhältnisses eines Verbrennungsmotors
JP6870566B2 (ja) * 2017-10-19 2021-05-12 トヨタ自動車株式会社 内燃機関の排気浄化装置
JP6579179B2 (ja) * 2017-11-01 2019-09-25 トヨタ自動車株式会社 内燃機関の排気浄化装置
JP6834917B2 (ja) * 2017-11-09 2021-02-24 トヨタ自動車株式会社 内燃機関の排気浄化装置
JP7047742B2 (ja) 2018-12-12 2022-04-05 株式会社デンソー 状態推定装置
DE102020204809A1 (de) * 2020-04-16 2021-10-21 Robert Bosch Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung Verfahren und Recheneinheit zur Ermittlung eines Katalysatorzustandes
DE102021203184A1 (de) * 2021-03-30 2022-10-06 Psa Automobiles Sa Verfahren zum Einstellen einer Sauerstoffspülmasse eines Katalysators und zur Steuerung eines Luft-Kraftstoffverhältnisses eines Verbrennungsmotors unter Berücksichtigung der erfassten Sauerstoffspülmasse
DE102021111454A1 (de) 2021-05-04 2022-11-10 Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft Verfahren zum Ermitteln einer Verbausituation eines Katalysators in einem Kraftfahrzeug sowie elektronische Recheneinrichtung
CN114856777B (zh) * 2022-05-10 2023-07-18 潍柴动力股份有限公司 双级三元催化器氧清洁控制方法、装置、车辆及存储介质
CN114962034B (zh) * 2022-06-08 2023-09-22 东风汽车集团股份有限公司 混动车型发动机宽域氧传感器劣化诊断方法
CN115217659B (zh) * 2022-06-17 2024-02-09 天津大学 基于三元催化器储氧状态监测结果的汽油机喷油量控制方法

Citations (35)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5077970A (en) * 1990-06-11 1992-01-07 Ford Motor Company Method of on-board detection of automotive catalyst degradation
JPH05133264A (ja) 1991-11-12 1993-05-28 Toyota Motor Corp 触媒劣化度検出装置
JPH05209510A (ja) 1991-08-30 1993-08-20 Robert Bosch Gmbh 触媒の貯蔵能力を定める方法及び装置
US5282383A (en) * 1991-04-23 1994-02-01 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Method and apparatus for determining deterioration of three-way catalysts in double air-fuel ratio sensors system
US5509267A (en) * 1994-11-14 1996-04-23 General Motors Corporation Automotive vehicle catalyst diagnostic
US5531069A (en) * 1994-01-31 1996-07-02 Suzuki Motor Corporation Catalyst deterioration-determining device of an internal combustion engine
US5533332A (en) * 1993-09-02 1996-07-09 Unisia Jecs Corporation Method and apparatus for self diagnosis of an internal combustion engine
US5545377A (en) * 1994-02-18 1996-08-13 Nippondenso Co., Ltd. Catalyst degradation detecting apparatus
JPH08254147A (ja) 1995-03-17 1996-10-01 Toyota Motor Corp 内燃機関の空燃比制御装置
US5606855A (en) * 1993-11-02 1997-03-04 Unisia Jecs Corporation Apparatus and method for estimating the temperature of an automotive catalytic converter
US5609023A (en) * 1993-12-01 1997-03-11 Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Fuel supply control system for internal combustion engines
US5678402A (en) * 1994-03-23 1997-10-21 Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Air-fuel ratio control system for internal combustion engines and exhaust system temperature-estimating device applicable thereto
US5842339A (en) * 1997-02-26 1998-12-01 Motorola Inc. Method for monitoring the performance of a catalytic converter
US5842340A (en) * 1997-02-26 1998-12-01 Motorola Inc. Method for controlling the level of oxygen stored by a catalyst within a catalytic converter
US5848527A (en) * 1996-04-11 1998-12-15 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Apparatus for detecting deterioration of a three-way catalytic converter for an engine
US5896743A (en) * 1997-06-24 1999-04-27 Heraeus Electro-Nite International N.V. Catalyst monitor utilizing a lifetime temperature profile for determining efficiency
US5901552A (en) 1996-02-23 1999-05-11 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method of adjusting the air/fuel ratio for an internal combustion engine having a catalytic converter
EP0915244A2 (de) 1997-11-10 1999-05-12 Mitsubishi Jidosha Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Vorrichtung zur Abgasreinigung für eine Brennkraftmaschine
DE19801625A1 (de) 1998-01-17 1999-07-22 Bosch Gmbh Robert Diagnose eines NOx-Speicherkatalysators beim Betrieb von Verbrennungsmotoren
US5966930A (en) * 1996-08-22 1999-10-19 Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Catalyst deterioration-determining system for internal combustion engines
US6085518A (en) * 1997-09-02 2000-07-11 Denso Corporation Air-fuel ratio feedback control for engines
US6145304A (en) * 1997-12-26 2000-11-14 Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. Deterioration determination apparatus for exhaust emission control device of internal combustion engine
US6161428A (en) * 1998-01-31 2000-12-19 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method and apparatus for evaluating the conversion capability of a catalytic converter
US6173569B1 (en) 1998-12-28 2001-01-16 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Catalyst deterioration detecting apparatus for internal combustion engine
US6199373B1 (en) * 1997-08-29 2001-03-13 Ford Global Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for desulfating a NOx trap
JP2001115879A (ja) 1999-10-14 2001-04-24 Denso Corp 触媒劣化状態検出装置
US6253541B1 (en) 1999-08-10 2001-07-03 Daimlerchrysler Corporation Triple oxygen sensor arrangement
US6289673B1 (en) * 1998-10-16 2001-09-18 Nissan Motor Co., Ltd Air-fuel ratio control for exhaust gas purification of engine
US6338243B1 (en) * 1999-09-01 2002-01-15 Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Exhaust emission control system for internal combustion engine
US6453661B1 (en) * 2001-06-20 2002-09-24 Ford Global Technologies, Inc. System and method for determining target oxygen storage in an automotive catalyst
US6481201B2 (en) * 2000-06-26 2002-11-19 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Air-fuel ratio control apparatus of internal combustion engine
US6622478B2 (en) * 2000-02-16 2003-09-23 Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. Engine exhaust purification device
US6673619B2 (en) * 2000-06-01 2004-01-06 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Catalyst deterioration detecting device and catalyst deterioration detecting method
US6679050B1 (en) * 1999-03-17 2004-01-20 Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. Exhaust emission control device for internal combustion engine
US6755013B2 (en) * 2001-10-11 2004-06-29 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Apparatus and method for detecting deterioration of catalyst of internal combustion engine

Patent Citations (40)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5077970A (en) * 1990-06-11 1992-01-07 Ford Motor Company Method of on-board detection of automotive catalyst degradation
US5282383A (en) * 1991-04-23 1994-02-01 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Method and apparatus for determining deterioration of three-way catalysts in double air-fuel ratio sensors system
DE4128823C2 (de) 1991-08-30 2000-06-29 Bosch Gmbh Robert Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Bestimmen des Speichervermögens eines Katalysators
JPH05209510A (ja) 1991-08-30 1993-08-20 Robert Bosch Gmbh 触媒の貯蔵能力を定める方法及び装置
US5335538A (en) 1991-08-30 1994-08-09 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method and arrangement for determining the storage capacity of a catalytic converter
US5414996A (en) * 1991-11-12 1995-05-16 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Device for detecting the degree of deterioration of a catalyst
JPH05133264A (ja) 1991-11-12 1993-05-28 Toyota Motor Corp 触媒劣化度検出装置
US5533332A (en) * 1993-09-02 1996-07-09 Unisia Jecs Corporation Method and apparatus for self diagnosis of an internal combustion engine
US5606855A (en) * 1993-11-02 1997-03-04 Unisia Jecs Corporation Apparatus and method for estimating the temperature of an automotive catalytic converter
US5609023A (en) * 1993-12-01 1997-03-11 Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Fuel supply control system for internal combustion engines
US5531069A (en) * 1994-01-31 1996-07-02 Suzuki Motor Corporation Catalyst deterioration-determining device of an internal combustion engine
US5545377A (en) * 1994-02-18 1996-08-13 Nippondenso Co., Ltd. Catalyst degradation detecting apparatus
US5678402A (en) * 1994-03-23 1997-10-21 Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Air-fuel ratio control system for internal combustion engines and exhaust system temperature-estimating device applicable thereto
US5509267A (en) * 1994-11-14 1996-04-23 General Motors Corporation Automotive vehicle catalyst diagnostic
JPH08254147A (ja) 1995-03-17 1996-10-01 Toyota Motor Corp 内燃機関の空燃比制御装置
US5901552A (en) 1996-02-23 1999-05-11 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method of adjusting the air/fuel ratio for an internal combustion engine having a catalytic converter
US5848527A (en) * 1996-04-11 1998-12-15 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Apparatus for detecting deterioration of a three-way catalytic converter for an engine
US5966930A (en) * 1996-08-22 1999-10-19 Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Catalyst deterioration-determining system for internal combustion engines
US5842339A (en) * 1997-02-26 1998-12-01 Motorola Inc. Method for monitoring the performance of a catalytic converter
US5842340A (en) * 1997-02-26 1998-12-01 Motorola Inc. Method for controlling the level of oxygen stored by a catalyst within a catalytic converter
US6116021A (en) * 1997-02-26 2000-09-12 Motorola, Inc. Method for monitoring the performance of a catalytic converter using a rate modifier
US5896743A (en) * 1997-06-24 1999-04-27 Heraeus Electro-Nite International N.V. Catalyst monitor utilizing a lifetime temperature profile for determining efficiency
US6199373B1 (en) * 1997-08-29 2001-03-13 Ford Global Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for desulfating a NOx trap
US6085518A (en) * 1997-09-02 2000-07-11 Denso Corporation Air-fuel ratio feedback control for engines
EP0915244A2 (de) 1997-11-10 1999-05-12 Mitsubishi Jidosha Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Vorrichtung zur Abgasreinigung für eine Brennkraftmaschine
US6145304A (en) * 1997-12-26 2000-11-14 Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. Deterioration determination apparatus for exhaust emission control device of internal combustion engine
DE19801625A1 (de) 1998-01-17 1999-07-22 Bosch Gmbh Robert Diagnose eines NOx-Speicherkatalysators beim Betrieb von Verbrennungsmotoren
US6161428A (en) * 1998-01-31 2000-12-19 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method and apparatus for evaluating the conversion capability of a catalytic converter
US6289673B1 (en) * 1998-10-16 2001-09-18 Nissan Motor Co., Ltd Air-fuel ratio control for exhaust gas purification of engine
US6173569B1 (en) 1998-12-28 2001-01-16 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Catalyst deterioration detecting apparatus for internal combustion engine
US6679050B1 (en) * 1999-03-17 2004-01-20 Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. Exhaust emission control device for internal combustion engine
US6253541B1 (en) 1999-08-10 2001-07-03 Daimlerchrysler Corporation Triple oxygen sensor arrangement
US6338243B1 (en) * 1999-09-01 2002-01-15 Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Exhaust emission control system for internal combustion engine
US6600998B1 (en) 1999-10-14 2003-07-29 Denso Corporation Catalyst deteriorating state detecting apparatus
JP2001115879A (ja) 1999-10-14 2001-04-24 Denso Corp 触媒劣化状態検出装置
US6622478B2 (en) * 2000-02-16 2003-09-23 Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. Engine exhaust purification device
US6673619B2 (en) * 2000-06-01 2004-01-06 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Catalyst deterioration detecting device and catalyst deterioration detecting method
US6481201B2 (en) * 2000-06-26 2002-11-19 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Air-fuel ratio control apparatus of internal combustion engine
US6453661B1 (en) * 2001-06-20 2002-09-24 Ford Global Technologies, Inc. System and method for determining target oxygen storage in an automotive catalyst
US6755013B2 (en) * 2001-10-11 2004-06-29 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Apparatus and method for detecting deterioration of catalyst of internal combustion engine

Cited By (38)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20080028829A1 (en) * 2004-06-29 2008-02-07 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Air Fuel Ratio Sensor Deterioration Determination System for Compression Ignition Internal Combustion Engine
US7520274B2 (en) * 2004-06-29 2009-04-21 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Air fuel ratio sensor deterioration determination system for compression ignition internal combustion engine
US20110113751A1 (en) * 2004-12-23 2011-05-19 Tino Arlt Method and Device for Determining a Dynamic Time Duration for Exhaust Gas Probes of an Internal Combustion Engine
US20080016847A1 (en) * 2004-12-23 2008-01-24 Tino Arlt Method and Device for Determining an Oxygen Storage Capacity of the Exhaust Gas Catalytic Converter of an Internal Combustion Engine and Method and Device for Determining a Dynamic Time Duration for Exhaust Gas Probes of an Internal Combustion Engine
US8434294B2 (en) * 2004-12-23 2013-05-07 Continental Automotive Gmbh Method and device for determining a dynamic time duration for exhaust gas probes of an internal combustion engine
US7849671B2 (en) * 2004-12-23 2010-12-14 Continental Automotive Gmbh Method and device for determining an oxygen storage capacity of the exhaust gas catalytic converter of an internal combustion engine and method and device for determining a dynamic time duration for exhaust gas probes of an internal combustion engine
US20060218989A1 (en) * 2005-03-30 2006-10-05 Dominic Cianciarelli Method and apparatus for monitoring catalytic abator efficiency
US20060266020A1 (en) * 2005-05-31 2006-11-30 Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. Combustion control apparatus for direct-injection spark-ignition internal combustion engine
US7958720B2 (en) * 2005-05-31 2011-06-14 Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. Combustion control apparatus for direct-injection spark-ignition internal combustion engine
US8065049B2 (en) * 2007-12-06 2011-11-22 Hitachi, Ltd. Vehicle diagnostic control apparatus
US20090150019A1 (en) * 2007-12-06 2009-06-11 Hitachi, Ltd. Vehicle diagnostic control apparatus
US7926333B2 (en) * 2007-12-12 2011-04-19 Audi Ag Method for determining the oxygen storage capacity of a catalytic converter for a motor vehicle as well as an associated measuring device
US20090235726A1 (en) * 2007-12-12 2009-09-24 Audi Method for determining the oxygen storage capacity of a catalytic converter for a motor vehicle as well as an associated measuring device
US20120067030A1 (en) * 2009-05-22 2012-03-22 Umicore Ag & Co. Kg Method for purifying the exhaust gases of an internal combustion engine having a catalytic converter
CN102439278A (zh) * 2009-05-22 2012-05-02 尤米科尔股份公司及两合公司 用于净化具有催化转化器的内燃机的排气的方法
US20110000193A1 (en) * 2009-07-02 2011-01-06 Woodward Governor Company System and method for detecting diesel particulate filter conditions based on thermal response thereof
US20130186066A1 (en) * 2010-09-01 2013-07-25 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Catalyst deterioration detection apparatus and method
US8789357B2 (en) * 2010-09-01 2014-07-29 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Catalyst deterioration detection apparatus and method
US20120285142A1 (en) * 2011-05-11 2012-11-15 GM Global Technology Operations LLC System and method for controlling fuel delivery based on output from a post-catalyst oxygen sensor during catalyst light-off
US8621844B2 (en) * 2011-05-11 2014-01-07 GM Global Technology Operations LLC System and method for controlling fuel delivery based on output from a post-catalyst oxygen sensor during catalyst light-off
US8932871B2 (en) * 2011-08-02 2015-01-13 GM Global Technology Operations LLC Ozone conversion sensors for an automobile
US20130034911A1 (en) * 2011-08-02 2013-02-07 GM Global Technology Operations LLC Ozone conversion sensors for an automobile
US8897955B2 (en) 2011-10-19 2014-11-25 GM Global Technology Operations LLC Ozone converting catalyst fault identification systems and methods
RU2632315C2 (ru) * 2012-02-24 2017-10-03 ФОРД ГЛОУБАЛ ТЕКНОЛОДЖИЗ, ЭлЭлСи Способ управления двигателем (варианты)
US20130226439A1 (en) * 2012-02-24 2013-08-29 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Method for controlling an engine
US9303576B2 (en) * 2012-02-24 2016-04-05 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Method for controlling an engine
US10563606B2 (en) 2012-03-01 2020-02-18 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Post catalyst dynamic scheduling and control
US9038369B2 (en) 2013-02-13 2015-05-26 Cummins Inc. Systems and methods for aftertreatment system diagnostics
US9394823B2 (en) * 2013-10-11 2016-07-19 Hyundai Motor Company O2 purge control method and vehicle exhaust system for two type catalysts
US20150101312A1 (en) * 2013-10-11 2015-04-16 Hyundai Motor Company O2 purge control method and vehicle exhaust system for two type catalysts
US20170101953A1 (en) * 2014-05-26 2017-04-13 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Control device for internal combustion engine
US10012165B2 (en) * 2014-05-26 2018-07-03 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Control device for internal combustion engine
US20180030872A1 (en) * 2016-08-01 2018-02-01 Hyundai Motor Company Method for catalyst heating control
US10422262B2 (en) * 2016-08-01 2019-09-24 Hyundai Motor Company Method for catalyst heating control
US20190309698A1 (en) * 2016-11-15 2019-10-10 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method for controlling an exhaust gas component filling level in an accumulator of a catalytic converter
US10859017B2 (en) * 2016-11-15 2020-12-08 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method for controlling an exhaust gas component filling level in an accumulator of a catalytic converter
US20230296043A1 (en) * 2022-03-15 2023-09-21 Subaru Corporation Vehicle
US11920503B2 (en) * 2022-03-15 2024-03-05 Subaru Corporation Vehicle engine control device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE10232385A1 (de) 2003-08-07
US20030017603A1 (en) 2003-01-23
DE10232385B4 (de) 2006-12-28

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7198952B2 (en) Catalyst deterioration detecting apparatus and method
US5743086A (en) Device for judging deterioration of catalyst of engine
US5228286A (en) Air-fuel ratio control device of engine
US7249453B2 (en) Control device for an internal combustion engine
EP0793009B1 (de) Steuerungsvorrichtung für das Kraftstoff/Luftverhältnis eines inneren Verbrennungsmotors
EP0828068A2 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Reinigen von Abgasen einer Brennkraftmaschine
JP4161771B2 (ja) 酸素センサの異常検出装置
US5412941A (en) Device for determining deterioration of a catalytic converter for an engine
US5784879A (en) Air-fuel ratio control system for internal combustion engine
JP4193869B2 (ja) 排ガス浄化触媒の劣化診断装置
US5743082A (en) Apparatus for detecting reduction of purifying capacity of catalyst for purifying exhaust gas from internal combustion engine and method thereof
JPH09195863A (ja) 内燃機関の蒸発燃料処理装置
JP6269371B2 (ja) 内燃機関
JP2003148136A (ja) 排気浄化触媒の劣化判定装置
JP3540989B2 (ja) 内燃機関の排気浄化装置
JP2010138705A (ja) 内燃機関の空燃比制御装置
JP3551782B2 (ja) 内燃機関の空燃比制御装置
KR940002958B1 (ko) 엔진의 공연비 제어장치
JP3674404B2 (ja) 内燃機関の制御装置
JP4055256B2 (ja) 内燃機関の排ガス浄化装置
JPH07158425A (ja) 内燃機関の排気浄化装置
JP2020045814A (ja) 内燃機関の燃料噴射制御装置
JP2681965B2 (ja) 内燃機関の空燃比制御装置
JP3866347B2 (ja) エンジンの排気浄化装置
EP4238634A1 (de) Steuerungsvorrichtung für verbrennungsmotor und verfahren zur diagnose der katalysatorverschlechterung

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: TOYOTA JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI KAISHA, JAPAN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:UCHIDA, TAKAHIRO;SAWADA, HIROSHI;NAGAI, TOSHINARI;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:013105/0335

Effective date: 20020706

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

REMI Maintenance fee reminder mailed
LAPS Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees
STCH Information on status: patent discontinuation

Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362

FP Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee

Effective date: 20110403