US6739456B2 - Apparatus and methods for separating particles - Google Patents

Apparatus and methods for separating particles Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US6739456B2
US6739456B2 US10/161,019 US16101902A US6739456B2 US 6739456 B2 US6739456 B2 US 6739456B2 US 16101902 A US16101902 A US 16101902A US 6739456 B2 US6739456 B2 US 6739456B2
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
inlet
housing
flow
particle
particles
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime, expires
Application number
US10/161,019
Other languages
English (en)
Other versions
US20030221996A1 (en
Inventor
Spyros A. Svoronos
H. Steven Crouch
Hassan El-Sayed El-Shall
Kevin W. Powers
Gary Wayne Scheiffele
Rachel Anna Worthen
Steve Robin Wright
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
FLORIDA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INCORPORATED
University of Florida Research Foundation Inc
Original Assignee
University of Florida Research Foundation Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by University of Florida Research Foundation Inc filed Critical University of Florida Research Foundation Inc
Priority to US10/161,019 priority Critical patent/US6739456B2/en
Assigned to UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA reassignment UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: CROUCH, H. STEVEN, EL-SHALL, HASSAN EL-SAYED, POWERS, KEVIN W., SCHEIFFELE, GARY WAYNE, SVORONOS, SPYROS A., WORTHEN, RACHEL ANNA, WRIGHT, STEVE ROBIN
Assigned to FLORIDA RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INCORPORATED, THE reassignment FLORIDA RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INCORPORATED, THE ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: FLORIDA, UNIVERSITY OF
Priority to PCT/US2003/009697 priority patent/WO2003101602A2/en
Priority to AT03756153T priority patent/ATE395141T1/de
Priority to EP03756153A priority patent/EP1534436B1/de
Priority to DE60321006T priority patent/DE60321006D1/de
Priority to AU2003226139A priority patent/AU2003226139A1/en
Publication of US20030221996A1 publication Critical patent/US20030221996A1/en
Publication of US6739456B2 publication Critical patent/US6739456B2/en
Application granted granted Critical
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B07—SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS; SORTING
    • B07B—SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS BY SIEVING, SCREENING, SIFTING OR BY USING GAS CURRENTS; SEPARATING BY OTHER DRY METHODS APPLICABLE TO BULK MATERIAL, e.g. LOOSE ARTICLES FIT TO BE HANDLED LIKE BULK MATERIAL
    • B07B7/00—Selective separation of solid materials carried by, or dispersed in, gas currents
    • B07B7/08—Selective separation of solid materials carried by, or dispersed in, gas currents using centrifugal force
    • B07B7/083—Selective separation of solid materials carried by, or dispersed in, gas currents using centrifugal force generated by rotating vanes, discs, drums, or brushes
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01D—SEPARATION
    • B01D46/00—Filters or filtering processes specially modified for separating dispersed particles from gases or vapours
    • B01D46/24—Particle separators, e.g. dust precipitators, using rigid hollow filter bodies
    • B01D46/2403—Particle separators, e.g. dust precipitators, using rigid hollow filter bodies characterised by the physical shape or structure of the filtering element
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01D—SEPARATION
    • B01D50/00—Combinations of methods or devices for separating particles from gases or vapours
    • B01D50/20—Combinations of devices covered by groups B01D45/00 and B01D46/00
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B04—CENTRIFUGAL APPARATUS OR MACHINES FOR CARRYING-OUT PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES
    • B04C—APPARATUS USING FREE VORTEX FLOW, e.g. CYCLONES
    • B04C5/00—Apparatus in which the axial direction of the vortex is reversed
    • B04C5/12—Construction of the overflow ducting, e.g. diffusing or spiral exits
    • B04C5/13—Construction of the overflow ducting, e.g. diffusing or spiral exits formed as a vortex finder and extending into the vortex chamber; Discharge from vortex finder otherwise than at the top of the cyclone; Devices for controlling the overflow
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B04—CENTRIFUGAL APPARATUS OR MACHINES FOR CARRYING-OUT PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES
    • B04C—APPARATUS USING FREE VORTEX FLOW, e.g. CYCLONES
    • B04C9/00—Combinations with other devices, e.g. fans, expansion chambers, diffusors, water locks
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B04—CENTRIFUGAL APPARATUS OR MACHINES FOR CARRYING-OUT PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES
    • B04C—APPARATUS USING FREE VORTEX FLOW, e.g. CYCLONES
    • B04C9/00—Combinations with other devices, e.g. fans, expansion chambers, diffusors, water locks
    • B04C2009/002—Combinations with other devices, e.g. fans, expansion chambers, diffusors, water locks with external filters

Definitions

  • the present invention relates generally to particle classification. More particularly, the present invention relates to the classification of particles from a fluid stream via centrifugal separation imparted by boundary layers developed between rotating parallel disks, whereby the primary airflow runs counter to the ejected trajectory of the particles larger than the cut-size of the device. Fine particles smaller in diameter than the cut-size of the classifier follow the primary airflow streamlines to a collection vessel.
  • Air classifiers can be used to classify, or selectively filter, airborne particles according to their size, density, or shape based on a balance between inertial and fluid forces acting on the particles in a flow field. Air classifiers are used primarily to produce particles in a limited size range. Production of powders in a limited size range is important in many different types of industries (e.g., electronics, food, chemical, petroleum, and pharmaceuticals), where product quality depends on the size distribution of the powder used to make the product. Size distribution affects powder properties such as homogeneity, flowability, taste, texture, and surface area. A narrow size distribution can give the final product more uniformity to improve product quality. Industries commonly use air classifiers to classify dry powders because they can handle higher mass throughputs than other methods such as screening. In the production of fine powders, air classification often follows a comminution, or grinding, process. Powder generated from the grinding process is sent to an air classifier to remove the coarser particles.
  • the ideal efficiency curve is a unit step function at the cut size. That is, all particles below the cut size leave with the air in the fine fraction, while all particles above the cut size are collected from the air as the coarse fraction. Theoretically, particles at the cut size should be suspended in the classification zone since the forces acting on the particles are balanced. In reality, 50% of particles at the cut size leave with the coarse fraction, and 50% leave with the fine fraction. Air classifiers do not give an ideal separation of particles at the cut size because of random fluctuations in the flow field, particle-particle interactions, and variations in the forces acting on the particles in relation to the position of the particles in the classifier.
  • the quality of the separation, or cut sharpness is commonly represented by the values K 25/75 and K 10/90 , which are respectively defined as:
  • K 25/75 and K 10/90 can have values between 0 and 1, where 1 represents an ideal separation.
  • the energy necessary to disperse a powder can be supplied mechanically (e.g., a mixing blade) or by shear force (e.g., feeding the particles into a high-velocity air stream). Since agglomeration is often caused by moisture in the air, the relative humidity of the air should be sufficiently low. However, if humidity is too low, the particles can become electrostatically charged, which also hinders dispersion.
  • the optimum relative humidity for classification is approximately 50 to 70%.
  • Particle size also affects dispersion, since attractive forces between particles increase as particle size decreases. Because of the difficulty in dispersing very fine particles, especially below 1 ⁇ m, these particles are commonly collected with the coarse fraction as agglomerates. As solids loading, or particle concentration, increases, adequate dispersion becomes more difficult. Consequently, cut sharpness must be compromised for a higher particle loading. This is a dilemma for industries, which need to classify particles at high throughputs to minimize energy consumption.
  • the lower limit on cut size for air classifiers is typically 1 or 2 ⁇ m.
  • extremely high tangential velocities are required for the inertial force to overcome the fluid forces on the particles. Random particle motion caused by diffusion and Brownian motion also becomes significant below 1 ⁇ m. See Leschonski, K., “Classification of particles in the submicron range in an impeller wheel air classifier,” KONA, No. 14, pp. 52-60 (1996). This is more of a problem if the flow is turbulent.
  • Submicron cut sizes have been achieved by air classification, but only for limited throughputs. In addition, achieving sharp cuts at these small cut sizes is a challenge because of the difficulty in dispersing submicron particles.
  • Separation of particles from the air stream can be either counterflow or crossflow.
  • counterflow classifiers particles are removed from the fluid in the direction opposite to the main flow.
  • crossflow classifiers particles are removed perpendicular to the main flow. Particle removal is usually accomplished by gravity or inertial forces, such as centrifugal force, which isdue to the angular momentum of the flow. Because centripetal acceleration can be much stronger than gravitational acceleration at high tangential velocities, centrifugal classifiers are able to remove smaller particles from the flow than gravity-based classifiers.
  • counterflow classifiers can provide smaller cut sizes than crossflow classifiers, with the counterflow centrifugal classifier providing the smallest cut sizes.
  • the approximate cut size range for counterflow centrifugal air classifiers is 1 to 100 ⁇ m for mineral particle densities ( ⁇ 2000 to 3000 kg/m 3 ).
  • the only other type of classifier that has achieved cut sizes as small as the counterflow centrifugal classifier is the crossflow elbow classifier. See Maly, K., “Schsuchung der prism-strömungsstoff- crispungen für strahlumlenk-windsichter,” Dissertation, Techn. Hoch Engelhoff, Germany (1979); Rumpf, H. and Leschonski, K., “Prinzipien und Anlagenre bacter der windsichtung, Chemie-Ing.-Technik,” Vol. 39, pp. 1231-1241 (1967).
  • the crossflow elbow classifier cannot handle as high throughputs.
  • m p is the particle mass
  • v r,p and v ⁇ ,p are the particle radial and tangential velocities
  • F D is the drag force
  • F C is the centifugal force
  • Equation 1-6 generally holds for Re p ⁇ 2 and D p >1 ⁇ m.
  • F C For counterflow centrifugal classification, F C must act opposite to F D . Since F C acts radially outward in the positive r-direction, the main fluid flow is radially inward, in the negative redirection, so that v r ⁇ 0. Since F C is proportional to D p 3 , while F D is only proportional to D p , F C becomes the dominant force as D p increases, making it more likely that the particle will be removed from the air.
  • the theoretical cut size (D pc ) is determined by setting v r, ⁇ and the particle acceleration ( ⁇ v r , p ⁇ t )
  • a particle of diameter D pc will revolve around the axis of rotation at a constant radius.
  • the flow can be either free or forced vortex.
  • the difference between a free and forced vortex is in the dependence of the fluid tangential velocity (v ⁇ ) on radius (r).
  • v ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ( r ) ⁇ 1 r m (1-10)
  • the particle tangential velocity is equal to the fluid tangential velocity
  • Equation 1-4 in a free vortex, F C (Equation 1-4) is inversely proportional to r (1+2m) , while in a forced vortex, F C is directly proportional to r. Therefore, in a free vortex, F C increases as r decreases; but in a forced vortex, F C decreases as r decreases.
  • Equation 1-13 Equation 1-13 holds, F D (Equation 1-6) is inversely proportional to r. Substituting Equation 1-12 into Equation 1-9 and using Equations 1-10 and 1-13, one finds that in a free vortex,
  • cut size also depends on the volume of material rotating at the periphery of the classifier. As the volume of material increases, the pressure drop decreases, which tends to increase the cut size.
  • a spiral classifier has been developed that forces the main air stream to pass through a perforated cylindrical wall before combining with the feed. See Metzger, K. L., Richter, W., Schwedes, J., Aufleungstechnik, Vol. 20, No. 10, pp. 589-590 (1979). This provides more uniform radial velocity into the classification zone, which is important in achieving a sharp cut.
  • the feed is supplied tangentially to the classifier with a secondary air stream, which adds a tangential component to the air velocity.
  • the diameter of the tube in the center of the classifier through which air and fines exit can be adjusted to control cut size.
  • the coarse fraction exits the classifier tangentially.
  • Gas cyclones are also counterflow centrifugal separators with free vortex sink flow, and have been widely used to remove dust from air. Because of their simple design and inexpensive operation with no moving parts, they are commonly used in industry.
  • a conventional gas cyclone generally designated 10 .
  • the standard cyclone design entails a cylindrical section 12 on the top and a conical section 14 on the bottom. Typically, conical section 14 is longer than cylindrical section 12 .
  • Air and particles enter gas cyclone 10 at the top tangentially through an inlet 16 with a square or rectangular cross-sectional area, as indicated by arrow A, and swirl within gas cyclone 10 as indicated by arrow B.
  • the coarse fraction is collected at the outer wall of gas cyclone 10 where it falls to the bottom, as indicated by arrow C. Air and fines spiral inward, enter a vortex finder 18 disposed at the top of gas cyclone 10 as indicated by arrow D, and exit gas cyclone 10 as indicated by arrow E.
  • cyclone separators such as gas cyclone 10 can be used to classify particles. However, because of their turbulent, free vortex flow, gas cyclones do not give as sharp a cut as counterflow centrifugal classifiers with forced vortex flow.
  • Some free vortex classifiers have rotating walls at the top and bottom of the classification zone. Stationary walls can have adverse effects on classification performance because of decreased flow velocities in this region.
  • a spiral classifier with rotating walls has been developed and sold commercially as Alpine MikroplexTM classifiers. See Rumpf, H. and Kaiser, F., Chemie-Ing.-Technik, Vol. 24, No. 129, pp. 935 (1952).
  • MikroplexTM spiral classifier with rotating walls air is pulled into a cylindrical, scroll-shaped housing and passes through adjustable guide vanes surrounding the classification zone before combining with the particle feed. Air and particles then enter the classification zone, which has a rotating wall above and below it. The wall rotates at the same speed as the fan that drives the air flow. Air and fine particles exit through the center classifier, while coarse particles are thrown outward and exit through a channel within the periphery of the guide vanes. In the process, the coarse fraction is mixed with the incoming air to remove some of the entrained fines.
  • the characteristic cut size is determined by the classifier diameter. Smaller cut sizes can be achieved as the diameter decreases. However, the maximum throughput allowed to maintain cut sharpness also decreases.
  • the Alpine MikroplexTM classifier was the first industrial-scale classifier to achieve cut sizes in the range of 10 ⁇ m with a reasonably high sharpness of cut. See Nied, R., “CFS-HD: a new classifier for fine classification with high efficiency,” International Journal of Mineral Processing , Vol. 44-45, pp. 723-731 (1996). Variations of the MikroplexTM spiral classifier are available from other manufacturers. In some, the wall rotational speed can be adjusted independently of the fan speed, or a secondary air stream is supplied with the feed stream to more evenly distribute the particles entering the classification zone.
  • the BahcoTM classifier is a well-known laboratory classifier with rotating walls. See Gustavson, K. E., Teknisk Tidskrift, Vol. 78, No. 10, pp. 667-670 (1948). It is used mainly to determine size distribution of particles in the range of approximately 1 to over 100 ⁇ m. The design and operation of the BahcoTM classifier are described in the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Power Test Code 28: Determining the Properties of Fine Particulate Matter, New York (1985). Air is first pulled radially through a stack of closely spaced rotating disks to impart angular momentum to the air flow. From the disks, air exits axially into the rotating classification chamber.
  • Particles are fed from a hopper above the classification zone using a vibrator and a rolling brush.
  • the particles drop into a vertical tube, where they combine with a high-velocity air stream.
  • the dispersed material falls through the tube into the axis of a narrow channel between two rotating plates.
  • the material is conveyed radially outward through the channel by centrifugal force to a feed slot where it combines with the air stream leaving the rotating disks.
  • Air and particles then enter the classification chamber, which is surrounded by rotating walls. Air and fine particles are pulled radially inward to the outlet at the center. Coarser particles are removed against the air by centrifugal force and are collected in a basin at the outer periphery of the classification zone.
  • the rotational speed of all parts in the BahcoTM classifier is the same as the speed of the fan wheel above the classification zone that drives the air flow.
  • a throttle at the air inlet controls air flow rate. By adjusting the throttle, different cut fractions can be obtained for determining particle size distribution.
  • the BahcoTM classifier is a recommended method for determining the collection efficiency of centrifugal air separators. See EPA Contract No. 68-D-98-026, Work Assignment No. 0-08, Stationary source control techniques for fine particulate matter (October 1998).
  • a forced vortex is generated by rotating vanes.
  • the rotor vane, or impeller wheel, classifier particles dispersed in air pass radially through rotating vanes attached to a rotor. The vanes accelerate the flow tangentially.
  • Coarser particles are collected from the air by centrifugal force. Finer particles are carried with the air through the vanes radially and exit through the center of the classifier. Cut size decreases with increasing rotor vane speed and decreasing air flow rate.
  • Cut sizes for the rotor vane classifier range from about 1 or 2 to 30 ⁇ m. Cut sharpness, as well as cut size, tends to decrease as solids loading increases.
  • the different rotor vane classifiers on the market differ mainly in the housing design and the way air and particles are introduced to the classifier.
  • a rotor vane classifier is the AcucutTM classifier described by de Silva, S. R., “Centrifugal air classification for the production of fine powders,” Journal of Powder and Bulk Solids Technology , Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 3-12 (1978) and Luckie. P. T. and Klima. M. S., “Fundamentals of size separation,” KONA, No. 18, pp. 88-101 (2000).
  • air is pulled into the classifier from the bottom in the direction of the axis of rotation at a radius just outside the vanes. Particles enter perpendicular to the air stream and combine with the air before passing through the vanes.
  • the rotor vanes are centrally located in the classifier in the axial direction and occupy nearly the entire height of the classifier. Air and fines exit through a tube at the axis of the classifier, while coarse particles exit tangentially.
  • the height of the inside of the rotor was modified to increase as radius decreased.
  • the air and fines outlet tube was made to rotate in the same direction as the rotor. The rotating outlet extends into the internal area to prevent coarse particles from being carried to the outlet by high radial velocities near the rotor walls.
  • the MikroCut MCTM classifier is a recently developed rotor vane classifier that can operate with a centripetal acceleration of over 15,000 ⁇ g. See Galk, J., Peukert, W., Krahnen, J., “Industrial classification in a new impeller wheel classifier,” Powder Technology , Vol. 105, pp. 186-189 (1999). Because of this, cut sizes from below 1 to 20 ⁇ m for particle densities from 1000 to 4000 kg/m 3 can be obtained. Air and particles enter the classifier together tangentially. A secondary air stream of varying flow rate can also be supplied tangentially to the classifier to improve separation of fines from the coarse fraction and to prevent particles from being collected before entering the classification zone.
  • a two-phase (gas and solids) model was developed for a rotor vane classifier. See Wang, X., Ge, X., Zhao, X., and Wang, Z., “A model for performance of the centrifugal countercurrent air classifier,” Powder Technology , Vol. 98, pp. 171-176 (1998). From this model, an equation was derived for cut size as a function of classifier geometry and operating parameters. Cut sizes obtained by experiment were compared with model predictions. The agreement between experiment and theory was reasonable. The deviation between the experiment and theory was attributed to incomplete dispersion of the particles, a non-uniform force field in the classification zone, the influence of size and shape of the feed material, and experimental error. The model was used to optimize the classifier design and operating parameters for a desired cut size.
  • a two-phase model was developed for an AcucutTM classifier using the commercial computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code, FLUENTTM. See Johansen, S. T., Anderson, N. M., and de Silva, S. R., “A two-phase model for particle local equilibrium applied to air classification of powders,” Powder Technology , Vol. 63, pp. 121-132 (1990).
  • the flow was modeled as two-dimensional (assuming the angular velocity of the flow was constant), steady state, and turbulent using a version of the k-E model for two-phase flows.
  • the particle phase was modeled by grouping the particles into a number of size classes. Particle-particle interactions were neglected. Flow fields and particle concentrations with and without particle-gas momentum and turbulence coupling were determined.
  • a problem with the rotor vane classifier is that the vanes tend to impact the particles, especially if the particles do not move at the same velocity as the air. This can cause significant particle attrition if the material being classified is fragile or breaks easily. Particle attrition has been studied in a rotor vane classifier. See Furukawa, T., Ito., M., Fujii, S., and Tanaka, H., “Comminution of particles in centrifugal air classifier,” Proceedings of 2 nd World Congress PARTICLE TECHNOLOGY , Kyoto, Japan, pp. 104-111 (1990). As in the CFS-HDTM classifier, air passed through guide vanes before combining with the particle feed.
  • Attrition increased with increase in rotor speed and air flow rate and with decrease in feed rate and distance between the guide vanes and rotor vanes. Attrition resulted in generation of particles in two size ranges: one in the micron and submicron range and the other in the range between 10 and 100 ⁇ m. It was believed that attrition was due to impaction of particles with each other, the wall, and the rotor vanes and turbulence. The increased attrition was also explained by the increased residence time of the particles in the classifier. Because of the decrease of fine particles in the coarse fraction as attrition increases, it was concluded that conditions that lead to attrition also contribute to dispersion.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a boundary layer momentum transfer (BLMT) particle separator, generally designated 30 , that has been developed by InnovaTech, Inc., and disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,746,789 to Wright et al. as a radial inflow centrifugal filter device for separating fine particulates from fluid flow.
  • the BLMT particle separator 30 uses a stack of closely spaced, rotating, coaxial, annular disks 35 to filter particles from a fluid. These rotating disks 35 are somewhat similar to those in the BahcoTM classifier, except that in the BLMT particle separator 30 , particle separation occurs between the rotating disks 35 .
  • the disk annulus width is on the order of 25 times that of the disk spacing.
  • Particle-laden fluid enters the device as indicated by arrow F. Since the bottom of the disk stack is closed, fluid is forced radially inward through disks 35 as indicated by arrows G, and exits axially though the center of the disk stack as indicated by arrow H. Momentum is transferred from disks 35 to the fluid in the boundary layer at each disk surface, accelerating the fluid tangentially. This causes coarser particles in the fluid to accelerate by centrifugal force radiallyoutwardly, against the main radially inward flow. Smaller particles are carriedwith the air though disks 35 . In accordance with the present invention, it is believed that the BLMT particle separator is well-suited for particle classification in part because of the forced vortex flow imposed by disks 35 .
  • Bickert et al. implemented a principle somewhat similar to that of BLMT particle separator 30 to classify particles in a liquid, as reported in Bickert, G., Stahl, G., Bartsch, R., and Müller, F., “Grinding circuit for fine particles in liquid suspensions with a new counter-flow centrifugal classifier,” International Journal of Mineral Processing , Vol. 44-45, pp. 531-534 (1996).
  • Their classifier consisted of four, rotating annular disks. Unlike the BLMT particle separator 30 , which has uniform disk spacing, the space between the rotating disks increases slightly as the radius decreases.
  • This classifier was able to achieve a wide range of cut sizes for glass spheres by varying the radial fluid velocity, or fluid volumetric flow rate.
  • the experimental cut size was defined as the D 99 of the fines, where D 99 is the particle diameter for which 99 volume % of the particles are smaller.
  • D 99 is the particle diameter for which 99 volume % of the particles are smaller.
  • experimental cut sizes agreed very well with those predicted by equating the settling velocity in the centrifugal field to the radial fluid velocity.
  • cut size increased as the solids loading in the classification zone increased. They believe the higher solids loading reduced the settling rate by increasing the viscosity of the fluid.
  • particles above the cut size were almost completely separated from those below, the coarse fraction still contained a significant amount of fines. They attributed the poor separation to particles being collected before being introduced to the classification zone.
  • the results in this paper from Bickert et al. did not show the effect of varying centripetal acceleration (disk rotational speed) on cut size.
  • Desired performance criteria include higher efficiencies, smaller size ranges of particles classified, a relatively low pressure drop across the device utilized for classification, and the potential for adaptation (i.e., retrofit) to existing classifiers.
  • a novel centrifugal classifier apparatus takes advantage of the boundary layer momentum transfer (BLMT) concept to greatly improve the efficiency of fine particle classification with lower particle attrition of friable particles.
  • the classifier apparatus of the invention is durable, self-cleaning, and highly efficient across a wide range of particle sizes, thereby resulting in improved performance and reduced maintenance.
  • the system parameters associated with the classifier apparatus are easily variable so that a wide range of particle sizes can be classified from the inlet air stream.
  • the classifier apparatus is provided with a BLMT particle separator assembly comprising rotating disks, and preferably with a novel inlet device as described hereinbelow in the form of several different embodiments.
  • a particle-carrying fluid such as air is forced to flow radially inward between closely spaced, rotating, coaxial, annular disks.
  • the disks accelerate the air tangentially, causing coarser particles to be removed by centrifugal force.
  • Finer particles are carried with the air through the disks by the drag force exerted by a fluid moving device such as a blower situated either upstream or downstream of the BLMT particle separator device.
  • the centrifugal force imparted to both the fluid and the particles causes the fluid and particles to be separated in opposite directions. Moreover, the centrifugal force is oriented in a direction opposite to that of the drag force.
  • the classifier apparatus of the present invention differs from other forced vortex centrifugal classifiers in that it does not supply rotational momentum by collision of the particles with rotating vanes. Thus, classifier apparatus of the present invention is more effective in separating fragile particles without breaking them.
  • a fluid moving device such as a blower situated either upstream or downstream of the BLMT particle separator
  • the fluid pressure at the core of the BLMT particle separator is reduced and, consequently, outside fluid is drawn through the rotating disks.
  • the rotation of the disks establishes a boundary layer on each side of every disk in the stack, thereby imparting rotation to the fluid and particles in the incoming fluid stream.
  • a pressure drop across the disk stack from its outer edge to its inner edge is caused by the frictional losses of the outside fluid traversing through or near the boundary layer.
  • the boundary layers and the pressure drop across the disk stack can be affected by a number of parameters, including disk size, the spacing between each disk, disk rotational speed, downstream pressure, ambient fluid conditions, and the like.
  • Particle-laden fluid enters the classifier apparatus, enters the disk stack from the perimeter thereof, exits the disk stack through an open end thereof, and exits the classifier apparatus through an appropriate outlet.
  • the particle cut size for the classifier apparatus is achieved.
  • Angular momentum transfer from the rotating disks effected by means of the intra-disk boundary layers established in the BLMT particle separator device, causes any particles above the cut size selected for the classifier apparatus that are entrained in the incoming fluid to be immediately expelled away from the perimeter of the BLMT particle separator device.
  • the expelled particles are preferably retained in a collection component disposed below the BLMT particle separator device.
  • particles smaller than the cut size follow the fluid streams through the rotating disks, into the central plenum defined by the disks, and out from the classifier apparatus, thereby effecting separation and classification of the particles of the incoming fluid stream.
  • the rotational requirement for the classifier apparatus of the invention can be provided by several different means, such as a small external electric or air-driven motor or other power means. Rotational power requirements are minimal due to relatively low boundary layer drag losses; rotating flat disks can easily sustain constant or substantially constant velocity with little power drain once accelerated to an appropriate operational speed.
  • Embodiments of the classifier apparatus have given sharp cuts for a wide range of cut sizes with both ideal glass spheres and non-ideal, industrial particles. It was initially expected that cut size would decrease monotonically with increasing disk speed because of higher centrifugal force on the particles. However, over a certain range of disk speeds, cut size increased with increasing disk speed. Further analysis demonstrated that disk rotation causes flow near the disk surface to reverse. To compensate for the reversed flow, the velocity radially inward at the center between the disks increases, increasing the drag force, which could explain the observed increase in cut size with increasing disk speed. As disk speed increases further, the flow becomes turbulent. Turbulence makes the velocity profile more uniform, reducing the reversed flow and thus the center radial velocity inward. More uniform velocity profiles are also in agreement with sharper cuts observed at higher disk speed.
  • the housing comprises an inlet, an interior chamber, a coarse particle outlet, and a fine particle outlet.
  • the boundary layer momentum transfer device comprises a plurality of disks stacked in spaced, parallel relation in the interior chamber. The disks are rotatable about a disk axis. The disks have respective central openings cooperatively defining a plenum having a closed axial end and an opposing open axial end.
  • the plenum communicates with spaces defined between each adjacent disk to cooperatively define a fine particle flow path from the interior chamber, through the spaces, through the plenum and the open axial end thereof, and to the fine particle outlet.
  • the inlet flow control mechanism communicates with the interior chamber and provides an adjustable inlet flow path into the interior chamber.
  • the drive mechanism is coupled to the boundary layer momentum transfer device to cause rotation of the disks.
  • a particle separation assembly comprises a housing and a boundary layer momentum transfer device.
  • the housing comprises an inlet, an interior chamber, a coarse particle outlet, and a fine particle outlet.
  • the boundary layer momentum transfer device comprises a plurality of disks stacked in spaced, parallel relation in the interior chamber, and which are rotatable about a disk axis.
  • the disks have respective central openings cooperatively defining a plenum having a closed axial end and an opposing open axial end. The plenum communicates with spaces defined between each adjacent disk.
  • a decreasing pressure gradient from the disk spaces to the plenum is created to establish a fine particle flow path through the inlet of the housing, the interior chamber, the disk spaces, the plenum, the open axial end of the plenum, and the fine particle outlet.
  • a particle-laden fluid stream is flowed through the inlet of the housing into the interior chamber.
  • a tangential velocity component of the fluid stream adjusting to promote uniform dispersion of particles in the fluid stream as the fluid stream flows around and toward the disks.
  • the disks are rotated to eject coarse particles away from the disks, whereby fine particles are permitted to continue along the fine particle flow path to the fine particle outlet.
  • FIG. 1 is perspective view of a conventional gas cyclone
  • FIG. 2 is a perspective view of a boundary layer momentum transfer filter utilized in accordance with the present invention
  • FIG. 3 is a vertical elevation view in partial cross-section of a particle classifying apparatus provided in accordance with the present invention.
  • FIG. 4 is a cutaway view of a boundary layer momentum transfer filter provided in accordance with the present invention.
  • FIG. 5 is a top plan view of a spoked plate utilized in conjunction with the apparatus illustrated in FIG. 3;
  • FIG. 6 is a cross-sectional view of an inlet control mechanism provided in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 7 is a cross-sectional view of an inlet control mechanism provided in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 8 is a plot of efficiency as a function of particle diameter for different inlet flow angles demonstrating classification performance utilizing the inlet control mechanism illustrated in FIG. 7;
  • FIG. 9 is a cross-sectional view of an inlet control mechanism provided in accordance with still another embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 10 is a cross-sectional view of an inlet control mechanism provided in accordance with yet another embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 11 is a cross-sectional view of an inlet control mechanism provided in accordance with a further embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 12 is a plot of efficiency as a function of particle diameter demonstrating classification performance utilizing the inlet control mechanism illustrated in FIG. 11 as compared to performance utilizing the inlet control mechanism illustrated in FIG. 6;
  • FIG. 13 is a plot of average overall efficiency as a function of inlet flow split ratio demonstrating classification performance utilizing the inlet control mechanism illustrated in FIG. 11;
  • FIG. 14 is a plot of efficiency as a function of particle diameter for different inlet flow split ratios demonstrating classification performance utilizing the inlet control mechanism illustrated in FIG. 11;
  • FIG. 15 is a schematic view of a blower-based particle classification system incorporating the apparatus illustrated in FIG. 3;
  • FIG. 16 is a schematic view of a vacuum-based particle classification system incorporating the apparatus illustrated in FIG. 3;
  • FIG. 17 is a plot of feed volume fraction as a function of particle diameter characterizing different types of particles used in testing the performance of the apparatus illustrated in FIG. 3;
  • FIG. 18 is a cross-sectional, top plan view of a particle classifying apparatus provided in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 19 is a cross-sectional, front elevation view of a scroll housing provided with the particle classifying apparatus illustrated in FIG. 18;
  • FIG. 20 is a cross-sectional perspective view of the scroll housing illustrated in FIG. 19;
  • FIG. 21 is a cross-sectional, front elevation view of an alternative scroll housing provided with the particle classifying apparatus illustrated in FIG. 18;
  • FIG. 22 is a cross-sectional perspective view of the scroll housing illustrated in FIG. 21;
  • FIG. 23 is a plot of efficiency as a function of particle diameter obtained using the particle classifying apparatus illustrated in FIG. 18, wherein the particles were ISO 12103-1, A4 coarse test dust and the cut size was 25.3 ⁇ m;
  • FIG. 24 is a plot of efficiency as a function of particle diameter obtained using the particle classifying apparatus illustrated in FIG. 18, wherein the particles were ISO 12103-1, A4 coarse test dust and the cut size was 75.7 ⁇ m; and
  • FIG. 25 is a plot of efficiency as a function of particle diameter obtained using the particle classifying apparatus illustrated in FIG. 18, wherein the particles were ISO 12103-1, A4 coarse test dust and the cut size was 129.1 ⁇ m.
  • the term “communicate” e.g., a first component “communicates with” or “is in communication with” a second component
  • communicate e.g., a first component “communicates with” or “is in communication with” a second component
  • communicate e.g., a first component “communicates with” or “is in communication with” a second component
  • communicate is used herein to indicate a structural, functional, mechanical, optical, or fluidic relationship, or any combination thereof, between two or more components or elements.
  • the fact that one component is said to communicate with a second component is not intended to exclude the possibility that additional components may be present between, and/or operatively associated or engaged with, the first and second components.
  • fluid is taken to mean any quantity of matter that is not predominantly a solid. While a solid can resist the application of a shear stress by static deformation, a fluid cannot do so. As long as a fluid is subjected to a shear stress, the fluid will respond by moving and/or deforming.
  • the term “fluid” encompasses, by way of example, flowable media such as liquids, vapors, and gases.
  • the term “fluid” encompasses mixtures of liquids, vapors, and gases with solid particulate matter, as in the case of particles entrained in a gas (e.g., air) stream.
  • Classifier apparatus 100 generally comprises a BLMT particle separator, generally designated 130 , disposed within the confines of an appropriate housing generally designated 110 .
  • Housing 110 can be generally cylindrical or, preferably, includes an upper cylindrical section 112 and a lower conical section 114 as shown in FIG. 3, and serves as a gas cyclone.
  • Housing 110 fluidly communicates with a fluid inlet device, generally designated 120 , comprising cylindrical section 112 and an inlet structure 122 .
  • Inlet structure 122 has an inlet aperture 122 A for admitting an appropriate fluid such as air and particles into housing 110 .
  • BLMT particle separator 130 generally comprises a stack of annular, rotatable disks 132 supported between a solid bottom plate 134 and a spoked top plate 136 (see FIGS. 4 and 5 ).
  • the bottommost disk of the stack of disks 132 could serve as bottom plate 134 and the topmost disk could serve as top plate 136 .
  • the central openings of disks 132 collectively define a hollow disk plenum, generally designated 138 .
  • a vortex finder is disposed above BLMT particle separator 130 , preferably with an annular brush seal 152 providing a sealed interface therebetween.
  • vortex finder 150 is cylindrical and has an outer diameter approximately equal to that of BLMT particle separator 130 .
  • vortex finder 150 preferably includes an upper section 150 A and a lower section 150 B that slide with respect to each other so that vortex finder 150 has an adjustable height, thereby enabling variation of the axial position of BLMT particle separator 130 with respect to housing 110 .
  • a fluid outlet section 155 fluidly communicates with vortex finder 150 and serves as a fine particle outlet.
  • Inlet device 120 is disposed concentrically around vortex finder 150 and/or outlet section 155 .
  • the stack of disks 132 , vortex finder 150 , outlet section 155 , housing 110 , and inlet device 120 are arranged concentrically around a main shaft 160 around which shaft bearings 162 - 168 are press-fitted.
  • Shaft bearing 164 supports support plate 134
  • shaft bearing 162 is supported by a bearing cross-support 171
  • shaft bearing 166 bears against top plate 136
  • shaft bearing 168 bears against an outer surface of outlet section 155 .
  • Bearing cross-support 171 is configured to straighten fluid flow passing therethrough.
  • Main shaft 160 is supported by bearing cross-support 171 and extends through an opening in outlet section 155 .
  • Main shaft 160 is powered by an appropriate power and transmission arrangement such as, for example, a motor 175 that transfers rotational energy to main shaft 160 through a motor shaft 177 , a pulley 179 connected to motor shaft 177 , a pulley 181 connected to main shaft 160 , and an endless belt or chain 183 operatively engaged with pulleys 179 and 181 .
  • motor 175 is a variable-drive device.
  • housing 110 fluidly communicates with a chamber serving as a coarse fraction collector 185 .
  • a vortex breaker 187 is interposed between housing 110 and coarse fraction collector 185 so that the movement of coarse particles into coarse fraction collector 185 is not impeded.
  • top plate 136 and bottom plate 134 of BLMT particle separator 130 between which the plurality of disks 132 are stacked, include a plurality of holes 136 A and 134 A (e.g., eight holes), respectively, through which a corresponding plurality of rods 141 extend along the axial direction of disks 132 .
  • Rods 141 are secured to top and bottom plates 136 and 134 by suitable fastening means, such as nuts 136 B and 134 B, respectively, to mechanically connect top and bottom plates 136 and 134 , and thus disks 132 , to main shaft 160 (see FIG. 3 ).
  • holes 134 A and 136 A and rods 141 are spaced equally apart in relation to a central longitudinal axis L of BLMT particle separator 130 , and are located approximately halfway across the annulus of each disk 132 .
  • disks 132 are fixed in a spaced apart relation to each other by a plurality of spacers 143 , such as washers, collars or annular structures, interposed between each adjacent disk 132 .
  • FIG. 5 is a plan view of top plate 136 (or topmost disk) and illustrates a centrally disposed spoked configuration. If more stability is needed for the stack of disks 132 , one or more of disks 132 can also be provided with a spoked configuration such as shown in FIG. 5 .
  • the spoked configuration comprises four spoke sections 186 and a central hub section 188 through which main shaft 160 passes.
  • One suitable embodiment of BLMT particle separator 130 for example, contains a stack of 200 disks 132 of which the 67 th and 133 rd disks from the top disk are spoked for added structural stability.
  • BLMT particle separator 130 improves the classification performance of housing 110 by adding forced vortex flow the classification region within housing 110 .
  • housing 110 improves the classification performance of BLMT particle separator 130 by providing a more uniform radial velocity in the axial direction at the outer radii of disks 132 , assuming disks 132 do not appreciably alter the flow pattern in housing 110 .
  • housing 110 is conical
  • housing 110 and vortex finder 150 cooperate to provide a nearly uniform radial velocity in the axial direction at the outer radii of disks 132 , which is desirable in obtaining a sharp separation cut.
  • Housing 110 also serves the practical purpose of pre-filtering the very coarse particles and providing a means to collect the coarse fraction.
  • a fluid moving means such as a blower (not shown) is located either upstream of inlet section 120 to develop positive pressure or downstream of outlet section 155 to develop negative pressure.
  • a fluid moving means such as a blower (not shown) is located either upstream of inlet section 120 to develop positive pressure or downstream of outlet section 155 to develop negative pressure.
  • Motor 175 imparts rotary motion to the stack of disks 132 . While disks 132 are rotating, the blower pulls particle-laden air through inlet device 120 and into the interior of housing 110 , radially through the spaces between disks 132 , axially through disk plenum 138 and vortex finder 150 , and through outlet section 155 . The suction of the blower causes a pressure drop in disk plenum 138 . The reduced pressure differential created between disk plenum 138 and the entrances at the outer perimeter of disks 132 causes air to flow between the disk spaces. The rotational motion of disks 132 causes the development of boundary layers on each side of each disk 132 .
  • classifier apparatus 100 separates the larger particles from the air directed through BLMT particle separator 130 by taking advantage of the difference in the forces acting on the air and the particles.
  • the drag forces of the air entering BLMT particle separator 130 acting on the smaller particles are greater than the centrifugal forces encountered at the boundary layers.
  • the smaller particles follow the airflow streams between disks 132 and exit classifier apparatus 100 .
  • the design parameters characterizing classifier apparatus 100 significantly influence the classification efficiency and pressure drop across BLMT particle separator 130 .
  • the particle size eliminated from classifier apparatus 100 can be decreased by either increasing the size of disks 132 or increasing the rotational velocity of disks 132 .
  • the momentum transferred to the particles through the rotating boundary layers is sufficient for ejection from the primary flow streams between the rotating disks 132 . Any fine particles below the designed cutoff size will pass through classifier apparatus 100 .
  • a tangential or involute inlet device has an inlet structure 212 tangentially oriented in relation to cylindrical section 112 of housing 110 .
  • the tangential inlet design is provided to maximize the angular velocity of the airflow in housing 110 and thus the resulting centrifugal force that removes particles from the air. While this inlet device 210 is suitable for conventional particle collection, it is not a preferred embodiment of the present invention where it is desired to classify particles as opposed to simply collecting particles.
  • the cyclone can provide only a single cut size for a given fluid flow rate and cyclone geometry.
  • Adjustable angle inlet device 220 enables control of the tangential fluid velocity of the air at the outer radii of disks 132 by utilizing an inlet structure 222 whose angle (and thus the angle of the air stream entering housing 110 through inlet structure 122 ) is adjustable from 0° (normal) to 90° (tangential).
  • the angle can be varied by providing a flexible inlet structure 222 (with, for example, a bellows) or by providing a replaceable inlet device 220 (i.e., selecting from a plurality of inlet devices 220 having differently angled inlet structures 222 ).
  • the centrifugal force that drives particle rejection is a function of the tangential fluid velocity at the outer radii of disks 132 .
  • the tangential fluid velocity can be adjusted in accordance with this embodiment by controlling the inlet angle, as well as the angular velocity of spinning disks 132 . By adjusting the inlet angle and disk velocity, the operator of classifier apparatus 100 can realize a wide range of cut sizes.
  • FIG. 8 illustrates the results of a classification test performed using classifier apparatus 100 equipped with adjustable angle inlet device 220 set at its two extreme angular positions (or, equivalently, classifier apparatus 100 equipped with a normal angle inlet device 220 in one test run and a tangential angle inlet device 220 in another test run).
  • FIG. 8 is plot of efficiency versus particle diameter, where efficiency is the percentage of particles of a particular size that were collected in coarse fraction collector 185 , and the dimension of particle diameter is scaled in microns.
  • disk velocity was set at 900 RPM for the tangential inlet configuration and 1600 RPM for the normal inlet configuration.
  • the particle-laden fluid processed by classifier apparatus 100 comprised glass beads carried in air. From this plot, it can be seen that classifier apparatus 100 can sharply separate glass beads in the range of approximately 2 to approximately 17 ⁇ m.
  • a sliding inlet device generally designated 230
  • inlet section 112 of housing 110 comprises a circular section 232 and a housing/sliding inlet interface 234 having a straight cross-section. Interface 234 terminates at an open flange 236 .
  • Sliding inlet device 230 further comprises a sliding inlet structure primarily including an inlet conduit 238 attached to a base plate 239 .
  • Base plate 239 is slidably engaged with flange 236 by conventional means, and has an aperture (not specifically shown) to enable fluid communication from inlet conduit 238 to housing 110 .
  • Sliding inlet device 230 is adjustable between the extreme normal and tangential positions.
  • the tangential position of inlet conduit 238 is indicated in FIG. 9 by phantom lines.
  • Base plate 239 is long enough to ensure that flange 236 is fluidly sealed from the environment surrounding inlet conduit 238 and its aperture at all positions of inlet conduit 238 .
  • modified adjustable angle inlet device generally designated 245
  • the modification comprises a streamlined flow divider 247 conformally attached to vortex finder 150 and extending to housing/sliding inlet interface 234 .
  • the height of flow divider 247 is the same as the diameter of inlet conduit 238 .
  • modified adjustable angle inlet device 245 has been observed to produce more repeatable results as compared with adjustable angle inlet device 230 illustrated in FIG. 9 .
  • split-flow inlet device 250 comprises a flow splitter 252 disposed at an interface 254 between an inlet conduit 256 and housing 110 .
  • Interface 254 is illustrated by way of example as a transitional structure connecting the respective walls of inlet conduit 256 and housing 110 .
  • incoming fluid is split by flow splitter 252 into two fractions, both of which enter housing 110 at an approximately 45° angle but in opposing directions (i.e., from the perspective of FIG. 11, in the clockwise and counterclockwise directions).
  • flow splitter 252 is illustrated as being centrally located with respect to the cross-section of inlet conduit 256 .
  • flow splitter 252 is preferably made adjustable by conventional mechanical means to positions to the left and right of the illustrated central position. In this manner, the flow split ratio can be varied.
  • the flow split ratio is defined as the flow rate of the fluid stream entering housing 110 in the clockwise direction divided by the flow rate of the other fluid stream entering housing 110 in the counterclockwise direction.
  • Flow splitter 252 can be adjusted to control and vary this flow split ratio over its full range, i.e., between 0 and 1.
  • the flow split ratio is 1, and the respective flow rates of the two divided fluid streams are approximately equal.
  • the angular velocity of air in housing 110 should be approximately 0 and result in the lowest collection efficiency for classifier apparatus 100 . If flow splitter 252 is moved all the way to the right, the flow split ratio becomes 0 (tangential co-spin) and the angular velocity of fluid is at its maximum in the direction of the spinning disks. If the flow splitter 252 is moved all of the way to the left, the flow split ratio becomes ⁇ (tangential counter spin) and the angular velocity of the fluid is at a maximum in the direction opposite to the spinning disks.
  • the efficiency of classifier apparatus 100 has been observed in at least one case to be essentially the same as that obtained using conventional tangential inlet device 210 illustrated in FIG. 6 .
  • FIG. 12 which compares the classification performance of classifier apparatus 100 equipped with tangential inlet device 210 and split-flow inlet device 250 , respectively.
  • an industrial kaolin derivative (SG ⁇ 0.9) was employed as the particle material and air was employed as the conveying fluid.
  • the kaolin derivative entered classifier apparatus 100 at a flow rate of 13 kg/hr, carried by air at 420 m 3 /hr.
  • the average overall efficiency (i.e., the overall weight fraction of particles collected) of classifier apparatus 100 equipped with split-flow inlet device 250 was plotted as a function of inlet flow split ratio.
  • the kaolin derivative entered classifier apparatus 100 at a flow rate of 13 kg/hr, and the air entered at 420 m 3 /hr.
  • the overall efficiency decreased from 97 to 80%. Because the transition from highest to lowest efficiency was fairly smooth, as shown in FIG. 13, an intermediate efficiency can be achieved by properly adjusting the flow split ratio.
  • a classifier apparatus 100 was constructed with a 510 m 3 /hr (300 ft 3 /min) nominal capacity housing 110 from Kice Industries.
  • Housing 110 has a cylinder-on-cone geometry with dimensions given in TABLE 2 hereinbelow.
  • Bearing cross-support 171 extends 152 mm (6 in) into housing 110 from its apex.
  • BLMT particle separator 130 consists of 200 aluminum disks 132 with a 0.20 m (8 in) outer diameter and a 0.15 m (6 in) inner diameter. Disks 132 are perforated with eight holes spaced equally apart in the angular direction for holding disks 132 together with rods 141 . The holes are located halfway across the disk annulus. Disks 132 are spaced 0.97 mm apart using washers 143 , which are located on each of the eight rods 141 .
  • Rods 141 connect disks 132 to top plate 136 and bottom plate 134 , which are attached to the rotating shaft 160 . Bottom plate 134 is solid, while top plate 136 is spoked with four spokes 186 as shown in FIG. 5 .
  • disk thickness was 0.39 mm but later was increased to 0.50 mm to improve rotational stability of the disk pack.
  • two spoked disks with four spokes 186 were added to the disk pack, one 67 disks and the other 133 disks from the top disk.
  • Experiments were run with the top disk of the disk stack approximately 394 mm (15.5 in.) from the top of cylindrical section 112 of housing 110 (i.e., a constant vortex finder height).
  • one experimental set-up comprised a blower-based particle delivery system, generally designated 300 .
  • air 303 was supplied by a positive displacement-type blower 305 through a 76 mm (3 in.) ID duct 307 to classifier apparatus 100 .
  • Blower 305 provided a constant air flow rate for varying downstream pressure.
  • the air stream combines with a particle feed stream 309 when the air stream passes through a venturi eductor 313 .
  • the air stream is accelerated to high velocity in the nozzle of venturi eductor 313 .
  • Particles 315 loaded in a hopper 317 drop from a screwfeeder 319 into venturi eductor 313 .
  • the vacuum created by the nozzle draws particles into the air stream.
  • the air stream carries the particles first to a disperser 321 and then to classifier apparatus 100 .
  • Particles leaving the top of classifier apparatus 100 with the air as the fine fraction are collected in a filter bag 323 attached to a sealed drum 325 .
  • Particles leaving the bottom of classifier apparatus 100 as the coarse fraction are collected in coarse fraction collector 185 , which in this case constituted a sealed drum.
  • disperser 321 was initially developed as a mechanical particle disperser comprising a motor-driven mixing blade (not shown) whose axis was parallel to the air flow.
  • the mechanical particle disperser was subsequently replaced with a simpler static mixer.
  • the mechanical particle disperser is better at dispersing particles than the static mixer, the shear forces from venturi eductor 313 have the most significant effect on dispersing the particles.
  • air flow rate was measured downstream of venturi eductor 313 and upstream of classifier apparatus 100 .
  • Flow rate was originally measured with an orifice meter and later with a Pitot tube. The flow rate determined by the Pitot tube was in good agreement with that given by the orifice meter.
  • the collection devices for the fine and coarse fractions separated by classifier apparatus 100 were weighed to determine the total masses of particles collected in the fine and coarse fractions (m f and m c ). The two fractions were split and riffled to obtain a representative sample for analysis of size distribution. Samples were analyzed on a CoulterTM LS 230 instrument, which measures particle size by light diffraction. From the intensity and angular distribution of light scattered, this analyzing instrument determines the fraction of particles in each of 116 size channels representing particle diameters from 0.04 to 2000 ⁇ m. The particle samples were dispersed in de-ionized water for analysis. At least two samples from each fraction were measured. The average size distribution was used to calculate efficiency.
  • the particle feed rate was calculated by dividing the sum of m c and m f by the run time assuming a constant feed rate throughout the experiment. This calculated value agreed well with the feed rate determined from the screwfeeder calibration.
  • pressure-based particle delivery system 300 shown in FIG. 15 was eventually replaced in favor of a vacuum-based particle delivery system, generally designated 350 .
  • air classifiers are frequently operated under vacuum to reduce operating costs and avoid leakage problems.
  • venturi eductor 313 which was important for particle dispersion, could not be utilized.
  • a suitable vacuum source 357 such as a pump situated on the downstream side of classifier apparatus 100 .
  • Air and particles pass through disperser 321 (e.g., a static mixer) before entering classifier apparatus 100 .
  • Particles leaving classifier apparatus 100 with the air were transported through a duct 359 and collected in a baghouse 363 .
  • Particles separated from the air were collected in coarse fraction collector 185 such as a sealed drum disposed below classifier apparatus 100 as in blower-based system 300 shown in FIG. 15 .
  • a sample from the fine fraction was collected online by intercepting part of the air stream from classifier apparatus 100 , diverting the fine fraction sample through a sampling tube 367 under the influence of an appropriate vacuum source 369 , and bubbling the sample through de-ionized water contained in a container 371 .
  • the velocity in sampling tube 367 is matched to the velocity in duct 359 from which the sample is taken. Velocities were measured with a Pitot tube.
  • the fine fraction mass (m f ) and a sample for size analysis were obtained differently than in the case of blower-based system 300 . Due to the presence of baghouse 363 , the mass of particles collected at the top of classifier apparatus 100 could not be measured directly with accuracy. Instead, the value for m f was obtained by subtracting the coarse fraction mass (m c ) from the total feed mass (m F ). Precautions were taken to ensure that the mass of particles remaining in duct 359 upstream of classifier apparatus 100 or on the cyclone walls was negligible. This meant that particles not collected in coarse fraction collector 185 of classifier apparatus 100 could be considered part of the fine fraction. Total feed mass was obtained by multiplying feed rate by run time. Screwfeeder 319 was calibrated before and after each run to obtain an accurate feed rate.
  • a representative sample from the fine fraction was obtained as described hereinabove.
  • the coarse fraction mass and a representative sample for size analysis were obtained in the same way as with blower-based system 300 .
  • the kaolin derivative is an industrial material, consisting of porous particles of varying shape that are composed of kaolin, an inorganic dispersant, and sodium silicate. These particles can break easily, generating many smaller particles, which have a different density than the original particle. Since the individual particles have varying density, the density given for the kaolin derivatives in TABLE 3 is only a bulk density whereas the density given for the glass spheres is a particle density.
  • classifier apparatus 400 comprises a scroll housing, generally designated 410 , attached to an auxiliary housing or framework 413 .
  • a BLMT particle separator, generally designated 430 is mounted within scroll housing 410 .
  • BLMT particle separator 430 comprises a stack of annular rotatable disks 432 disposed between a first plate 434 and a second plate 436 , with the central openings of disks 432 collectively defining a hollow disk plenum 438 .
  • disks 432 are spaced approximately 1 mm apart.
  • BLMT particle separator 430 is otherwise structured similarly to BLMT particle separator 130 as detailed in FIGS. 4 and 5. However, disks 432 of BLMT particle separator 430 are oriented such that the axis of disk plenum 438 is horizontal or substantially horizontal whereas, in the previous embodiments, disk plenum 138 (see FIG. 3) is vertically or substantially vertically oriented.
  • First plate 434 of BLMT particle separator 430 is mounted to a first side wall 441 of scroll housing 410 and is solid.
  • Second plate 436 of BLMT particle separator 430 is mounted at a second side wall 443 of scroll housing 410 , and includes an opening to permit fine particles flowing into disk plenum 438 to exit scroll housing 410 .
  • the fine particles exit scroll housing 410 into an exit plenum 450 disposed in auxiliary housing 413 . From exit plenum 450 , the fine particles flow through an exit conduit 453 to exit classifier apparatus 400 .
  • a cylindrical structure 455 is interposed between first plate 434 of BLMT particle separator 430 and first side wall 441 of scroll housing 410 , thereby ensuring that all fine particles pass through disks 432 in order to exit classifier apparatus 400 . It will be noted, however, that this embodiment does not require the use of a vortex finder as in the previously described embodiments (see, e.g., vortex finder 150 in FIG. 3 ).
  • First plate 434 and second plate 436 are connected to a shaft 460 in a manner similar to the previously described embodiments.
  • Shaft 460 is rotatably supported by a bearing 462 mounted to first side wall 441 of scroll housing 410 , as well as by one or more bearings 466 mounted in auxiliary housing 413 .
  • a coupler 468 disposed in auxiliary housing 413 connects shaft 460 to the drive shaft of a motor 475 mounted to auxiliary housing 413 .
  • Motor 475 thus provides rotational power to shaft 460 to rotate BLMT particle separator 430 , and preferably is operable at variable speeds.
  • scroll housing 410 includes an inlet section 482 that has an inlet aperture 482 A for admitting an appropriate fluid such as particle-laden air into scroll housing 410 .
  • the width of inlet section 482 and its aperture 482 A is approximately equal to or greater than that of BLMT particle separator 430 .
  • the variable inlet section 482 allows fine angular velocity control of the air and entrained feed particles entering scroll housing 410 , as well as providing the means to evenly distribute the feed particles across the entire surface of the BLMT particle separator 430 .
  • Inlet section 482 fluidly communicates with an involute section 485 characterized by a varying radius of curvature.
  • Involute section 485 of scroll housing 410 is not concentrically disposed about BLMT particle separator 430 , but rather the central axis of involute section 485 is offset from the axis of rotation of BLMT particle separator 430 .
  • the cross-sectional area of involute section 485 available for fluid flow around BLMT particle separator 430 decreases as fluid travels around the periphery of BLMT particle separator 430 .
  • fluid flow through scroll housing 410 of the present embodiment is constrained to multiple eccentric paths or orbits around the circumference of BLMT particle separator 430 . This configuration provides a greater opportunity for fine particles to be separated from coarse particles, and thus the efficiency of BLMT particle separator 430 is increased in comparison to the previously described embodiments.
  • a variable entrance lip 491 is pivotable into inlet section 482 to permit adjustment of both the cross-sectional area of inlet section 482 and the direction of fluid flow into involute section 485 .
  • decreasing the inlet cross-sectional area increases inlet flow velocity, thereby producing a jet of dispersed particles into involute section 485 .
  • increasing the inlet cross-sectional area decreases inlet flow velocity, thereby producing a gentler dispersion of slowed particles into involute section 485 .
  • the ability to alter the trajectory of the particles into involute section 485 by means of variable entrance lip 491 enables the tangential velocity of the inlet flow to be changed, thereby affecting particle classification in a desired manner.
  • a coarse fraction outlet aperture 501 establishes fluid communication between involute section 485 and a coarse fraction collecting chamber 505 disposed within the framework common to scroll housing 410 .
  • the width of outlet aperture 501 is at least substantially as great as that of BLMT particle separator 430 .
  • the particles constituting the coarse fraction of the fluid entering scroll housing 410 having a greater mass/diameter and thus greater inertia than the fine particles, travel near the wall of involute section 485 and pass tangentially from involute section 485 , through outlet aperture 501 , and into collecting chamber 505 .
  • a variable exit vane or skif 508 is pivotably mounted to a wall of scroll housing 410 to protrude into the primary flow stream moving through exit aperture 501 and vary the cross-sectional area of exit aperture 501 .
  • Decreasing the depth of skif 508 from the scroll housing wall i.e., closing the outlet aperture to the coarse fraction collecting chamber 505 ) increases the nominal particle size extracted from scroll housing 410 , such that only the largest particles leave involute section 485 .
  • Increasing the depth of skif 508 from the scroll housing wall decreases the nominal particle size extracted from involute section 485 , such that a larger distribution of particles leave involute section 485 .
  • fine particles can be agglomerated with coarse particles in the fluid stream entering scroll housing 410 , or otherwise be urged to flow with the heavier coarse particles along the inside wall of involute section 485 due to the high centrifugal forces developed within scroll housing 410 .
  • such fine particles may not have an opportunity to be classified by BLMT particle separator 430 .
  • this undesirable effect can be remedied by providing one or more variable-angle air jets 515 pivotally mounted to a wall of scroll housing 410 with orifices 515 A directed toward openings in involute section 485 downstream from inlet section 482 .
  • Air jets 515 can be advantageously employed as an airknife for breaking up agglomerated particles entering involute section 485 and redistributing fine particles away from coarse particles flowing along the wall of involute section 485 .
  • air jets 515 can be pivoted to vary the direction of the jet streams introduced into scroll housing 410 , and their airflow output can be adjusted by adjusting their fluid pressure.
  • classifier apparatus 400 is believed to be superior than classifier apparatus 100 described hereinabove and illustrated in FIG. 3 .
  • Scroll housing 410 of classifier apparatus 400 causes the particle-laden fluid to flow eccentrically in multiple orbits around BLMT particle separator 430 , with the result that a higher percentage of fine particles will be properly classified and separated from the coarse particles.
  • the fluid entering scroll housing 410 is not forced to reverse the direction of its flow, whereas the fluid entering classifier apparatus 100 must reverse direction and exit upwardly through vortex finder 150 (see FIG. 3 ). It has been found that such reversed flow can cause turbulent mixing of coarse and fine particles within classifier apparatus 100 , which in turn can impair the ability of classifier apparatus 100 to maintain separation of coarse and fine particles.
  • the principal control parameters for scroll housing 410 affecting cut size and efficiency have been found to be fluid flow, disk rpm, and particle loading (e.g., feed concentration expressed in terms of mass per unit time, such as kg/hr).
  • particle loading e.g., feed concentration expressed in terms of mass per unit time, such as kg/hr.
  • a scroll housing is provided for classifier apparatus 400 as an alternative to scroll housing 410 illustrated in FIGS. 18-20.
  • Scroll housing 610 illustrated in FIGS. 21 and 22 differs from scroll housing 410 illustrated in FIGS. 18-20 in the manner in which particle-laden fluid enters scroll housing 610 and coarse particles exit therefrom.
  • Scroll housing 610 comprises an inlet section 682 provided in the form of a tube. This inlet section 682 fluidly communicates with involute section 685 at an aperture 687 located proximate to one end of BLMT particle separator 430 , which preferably is the end where the first, closed plate 441 is located.
  • Exit aperture 601 into coarse fraction collecting chamber 505 is located proximate to the opposite end of BLMT particle separator 430 , which preferably is the end where the second, open plate is located.
  • involute section 685 of scroll housing 610 could also be made more eccentric as compared with that of scroll housing 410 .
  • fluid entering scroll housing 610 is constrained to flow in multiple passes around BLMT particle separator 430 , and in the same direction as the rotation of BLMT particle separator 430 .
  • the fluid flow through scroll housing 610 has an axial component in the direction of exit plenum 450 (see FIG.
  • scroll housing 610 is helical.
  • the use of scroll housing 610 according to this design has been found to provide a more efficient classification when the particle distribution entering scroll housing 610 is relatively narrow.
  • the use of scroll housing 410 illustrated in FIGS. 18-20 has been found to provide a more efficient classification when the particle distribution is relatively broader.
  • Other features characterizing scroll housing 610 can be similar to those of scroll housing 410 , and accordingly are not described further.
  • FIGS. 23-25 are the classification curves produced for nominal cut sizes of 25, 75 and 125 ⁇ m.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Geometry (AREA)
  • Combined Means For Separation Of Solids (AREA)
  • Treatment Of Liquids With Adsorbents In General (AREA)
  • Separation Of Solids By Using Liquids Or Pneumatic Power (AREA)
  • Seal Device For Vehicle (AREA)
US10/161,019 2002-06-03 2002-06-03 Apparatus and methods for separating particles Expired - Lifetime US6739456B2 (en)

Priority Applications (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/161,019 US6739456B2 (en) 2002-06-03 2002-06-03 Apparatus and methods for separating particles
AU2003226139A AU2003226139A1 (en) 2002-06-03 2003-03-28 Apparatus and methods for separating particles
EP03756153A EP1534436B1 (de) 2002-06-03 2003-03-28 Vorrichtung und verfahren zum trennen von teilchen
AT03756153T ATE395141T1 (de) 2002-06-03 2003-03-28 Vorrichtung und verfahren zum trennen von teilchen
PCT/US2003/009697 WO2003101602A2 (en) 2002-06-03 2003-03-28 Apparatus and methods for separating particles
DE60321006T DE60321006D1 (de) 2002-06-03 2003-03-28 Vorrichtung und verfahren zum trennen von teilchen

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/161,019 US6739456B2 (en) 2002-06-03 2002-06-03 Apparatus and methods for separating particles

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20030221996A1 US20030221996A1 (en) 2003-12-04
US6739456B2 true US6739456B2 (en) 2004-05-25

Family

ID=29583330

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/161,019 Expired - Lifetime US6739456B2 (en) 2002-06-03 2002-06-03 Apparatus and methods for separating particles

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US6739456B2 (de)
EP (1) EP1534436B1 (de)
AT (1) ATE395141T1 (de)
AU (1) AU2003226139A1 (de)
DE (1) DE60321006D1 (de)
WO (1) WO2003101602A2 (de)

Cited By (24)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20040035765A1 (en) * 2000-09-07 2004-02-26 Roland Nied Air separator
US20050164115A1 (en) * 2003-10-20 2005-07-28 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Process for producing toner
US20050223685A1 (en) * 2004-04-07 2005-10-13 Jeff Bertram Cyclonic separator with secondary vortex break
DE102004035207A1 (de) * 2004-07-21 2006-02-16 Westfalia Separator Ag Filtrationsvorrichtung und Verfahren zu deren Betrieb
US20060254959A1 (en) * 2005-05-11 2006-11-16 Allmineral Aufbereitungstechnik Gmbh & Co. Kg Air sifting apparatus having variable air supply
US20070163925A1 (en) * 2004-02-04 2007-07-19 Magotteaux International S.A. Classifier for granular material
US20070241035A1 (en) * 2004-05-18 2007-10-18 Jacek Kolacz Particle Classifier
US20080011190A1 (en) * 2006-07-13 2008-01-17 Unimin Corporation Ultra fine nepheline syenite powder and products for using same
US20080185463A1 (en) * 2007-02-07 2008-08-07 Unimin Corporation Method of processing nepheline syenite powder to produce an ultra-fine grain size product
US20090013905A1 (en) * 2007-05-11 2009-01-15 Unimin Corporation Nepheline syenite powder with controlled particle size and novel method of making same
US20090260541A1 (en) * 2008-04-17 2009-10-22 Kragten David D Powder formed from mineral or rock material with controlled particle size distribution for thermal films
US20100012666A1 (en) * 2008-05-30 2010-01-21 Millipore Corporation Container having vortex breaker and system
US20100012665A1 (en) * 2008-05-30 2010-01-21 Millipore Corporation Container having vortex breaker and fluid diverter and system
US20100072116A1 (en) * 2008-09-25 2010-03-25 Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd Classifying device and method of classification
US20100304952A1 (en) * 2006-07-13 2010-12-02 Unimin Corporation Method of processing nepheline syenite
US20110123804A1 (en) * 2006-07-13 2011-05-26 Unimin Corporation Ultrafine nepheline syenite
US20110271739A1 (en) * 2010-05-10 2011-11-10 Goohs Kevin J Particulate matter monitor
US20130004964A1 (en) * 2009-09-21 2013-01-03 Roche Diagnostics Operations,Inc. Method for carrying out reactions in an analytical device
US8658056B1 (en) 2010-05-05 2014-02-25 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force Harvesting single domain nanoparticles and their applications
US8882873B2 (en) 2011-02-14 2014-11-11 David Brownlee Vortex finder for cyclone separator
WO2016054756A1 (es) * 2014-10-09 2016-04-14 Basualto Lira Guillermo Ciclon con vortice asistido
US9528407B2 (en) 2013-12-12 2016-12-27 Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. High efficiency cyclone oil separator device
RU195743U1 (ru) * 2019-09-06 2020-02-04 Общество с ограниченной ответственностью "Камилла" Безнапорный сепаратор для рыбоводных систем
US11266937B2 (en) 2017-03-28 2022-03-08 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Air flow rates in cyclonic particle separation chambers

Families Citing this family (42)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7488448B2 (en) * 2004-03-01 2009-02-10 Indian Wells Medical, Inc. Method and apparatus for removal of gas bubbles from blood
KR20060068666A (ko) * 2004-12-16 2006-06-21 삼성전자주식회사 사이클론 공기청정기
US7775370B2 (en) * 2005-03-21 2010-08-17 Utah State University Particle sorting by fluidic vectoring
MX2008002188A (es) * 2005-08-18 2008-04-10 Clean Filtration Technologies Inc Sistema de filtrado de liquidos basados en un hidroclon.
US8083071B2 (en) * 2006-07-14 2011-12-27 University Of Florida Research Foundation, Inc. Rotating cone classifier
US9433880B2 (en) * 2006-11-30 2016-09-06 Palo Alto Research Center Incorporated Particle separation and concentration system
US8276760B2 (en) * 2006-11-30 2012-10-02 Palo Alto Research Center Incorporated Serpentine structures for continuous flow particle separations
GB2449218B (en) * 2007-05-18 2009-04-15 Jessal Murarji Gas sampler for vapour detectors
US8029583B2 (en) * 2007-12-14 2011-10-04 Western Pneumatics, Inc. Cleaning apparatus for a gas filter
WO2011160087A1 (en) 2010-06-17 2011-12-22 Clean Filtration Technologies, Inc. Cleaning assembly for use in fluid filtration systems
US8960450B2 (en) 2010-12-08 2015-02-24 Dow Global Technologies Llc Apparatus and method for implementing hydroclone based fluid filtration systems with extensible isolated filter stages
PE20140205A1 (es) * 2010-12-30 2014-03-08 Ivanhoe Energy Inc Metodo, sistema y aparato para la separacion en el procesamiento de materias primas
US9063118B2 (en) 2011-03-24 2015-06-23 University Of Iowa Research Foundation Isolation and characterization of tumor cells using shear stress measurements
MX350036B (es) * 2011-05-03 2017-08-24 Axion Power Int Inc Proceso para la manufactura de una hoja de carbon para un electrodo.
WO2012154448A1 (en) 2011-05-06 2012-11-15 Dow Global Technologies Llc Multi-chambered hydroclone
US8979522B2 (en) * 2011-09-12 2015-03-17 Formtec, Llc. Fiber orienting technology for a grinding machine
US10385307B2 (en) 2011-12-21 2019-08-20 Lonza Walkersville, Inc. Scalable process for therapeutic cell concentration and residual clearance
WO2013173115A1 (en) 2012-05-17 2013-11-21 Dow Global Technologies Llc Hydroclone with inlet flow shield
WO2013181028A1 (en) 2012-05-31 2013-12-05 Dow Global Technologies Llc Hydroclone with vortex flow barrier
US9101859B2 (en) 2012-06-01 2015-08-11 Dow Global Technologies Llc Cross-flow filtration system including particulate settling zone
US8691001B2 (en) 2012-06-12 2014-04-08 CSL Industrial Systems Filter bag cleaning system
WO2014066036A2 (en) 2012-10-26 2014-05-01 Dow Global Technologies Llc Hydroclone
US9073087B2 (en) * 2013-09-03 2015-07-07 Kenneth Abbott Injector mechanism
US9259675B2 (en) 2013-11-11 2016-02-16 Andover Protection Systems, Llc Centripetal separation system for cleaning particulate-pervaded air or gas
US9527091B2 (en) 2013-12-05 2016-12-27 Dow Global Technologies Llc Hydroclone with improved cleaning assembly
US9810558B2 (en) * 2014-03-14 2017-11-07 Particle Measuring Systems, Inc. Pressure-based airflow sensing in particle impactor systems
CA2966415C (en) 2014-10-31 2023-03-28 University Of Iowa Research Foundation Fluid handling systems for application of fluid shear stress to a fluid sample
CA2971175C (en) 2014-12-18 2024-01-23 Dow Global Technologies Llc Cylindrical filter screen with tensioning mechanism
US10493390B2 (en) 2016-09-22 2019-12-03 Andover Protection Systems, Llc Air or gas cleaning blower with spiral separation chamber
BE1024631B9 (nl) * 2016-10-11 2019-05-13 Atlas Copco Airpower Nv Vloeistofafscheider
WO2018232541A1 (es) * 2017-06-21 2018-12-27 Biodryingtech Spa (85 %) Sistema integrado de separación de partículas sólidas
RU179675U1 (ru) * 2017-12-19 2018-05-22 Российская Федерация, от имени которой выступает Министерство промышленности и торговли Российской Федерации (Минпромторг России) Фильтр самоочищающийся для очистки сточных вод
BE1027073B1 (nl) * 2019-02-21 2020-09-21 Atlas Copco Airpower Nv Cycloonafscheider
CN110013910B (zh) * 2019-03-22 2021-03-26 太原理工大学 一种分选密度在线调节的水介质分选旋流器
CN111632753B (zh) * 2019-12-04 2022-03-11 石家庄金垦科技有限公司 淘洗磁选机
DE102020200950A1 (de) * 2020-01-27 2021-07-29 Deere & Company Absauganordnung für einen Zentrifugalluftfilter
CN111992502A (zh) * 2020-08-18 2020-11-27 李彩蓉 一种兼顾除杂和降尘功能的大米加工用稻谷筛选装置
CN115569476A (zh) * 2021-12-24 2023-01-06 中国建筑第五工程局有限公司 一种用于碳中和的循环除尘设备
CN114264634B (zh) * 2021-12-24 2024-04-16 中国科学院长春光学精密机械与物理研究所 一种航空煤油在线测量装置
US11904425B2 (en) * 2022-05-09 2024-02-20 Compass Systems & Sales, LLC Method and apparatus for separating waste material
CN114832569B (zh) * 2022-05-16 2023-09-08 安徽理工大学 一种递进变径调压除尘装置及使用方法
CN114985122B (zh) * 2022-05-25 2024-03-22 江苏原创美妆有限公司 一种uv漆雾离心回收装置

Citations (44)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3174264A (en) * 1963-02-25 1965-03-23 Vacu Maid Inc Dirt separator for suction cleaners
US3643800A (en) 1969-05-21 1972-02-22 Bo Gustav Emil Mansson Apparatus for separating solids in a whirling gaseous stream
US3656618A (en) 1968-06-19 1972-04-18 Polysius Ag Air sifter
US3667600A (en) 1968-11-27 1972-06-06 Kazuo Oi Method and apparatus for centrifugal classification
US3669265A (en) 1969-07-17 1972-06-13 Kurt H Conley Classifying apparatus with adjustable fines outlet
US3670886A (en) 1970-08-05 1972-06-20 Hosokawa Funtaikogaku Kenkyush Powder classifier
US3682302A (en) 1969-03-01 1972-08-08 Paul Bernutat Air separator
US3708067A (en) 1970-06-29 1973-01-02 Battelle Development Corp Separating apparatus
US3731800A (en) 1970-11-27 1973-05-08 Polaroid Corp Counter-current centrifugal device and use
US3734287A (en) 1969-01-25 1973-05-22 Westfalia Dinnendahl Air classifier assembly
US3891543A (en) 1971-02-03 1975-06-24 Josef Wessel Centrifugal sifter apparatus
US3901794A (en) 1972-07-21 1975-08-26 Polysius Ag Circulatory air sifter
US3933626A (en) 1973-07-12 1976-01-20 Ottawa Silica Company Classifier for particulate material
US3960714A (en) 1973-12-24 1976-06-01 Klockner-Humboldt-Deutz Aktiengesellschaft Centrifugal separator with rotary distributor
US4059507A (en) 1975-06-13 1977-11-22 Yoshimori Nobuo Classifying apparatus for particulate materials
US4066535A (en) 1975-06-19 1978-01-03 Klockner-Humboldt-Deutz Aktiengesellschaft Method and apparatus for the classification of fine material from a stream of material in a circulating air classifier
US4071441A (en) 1974-12-03 1978-01-31 Gebr. Pfeiffer Ag Bypass separator
US4100061A (en) 1975-10-24 1978-07-11 Polysius Ag Separator
US4211641A (en) 1977-10-28 1980-07-08 Heinz Jager Circulating air classifier or separator
US4236997A (en) 1978-04-22 1980-12-02 Josef Wessel Air separator apparatus
US4257880A (en) 1979-06-28 1981-03-24 Jones Donald W Centrifugal air classifying apparatus
US4260478A (en) 1978-11-24 1981-04-07 Kabushiki Kaisha Hosokawa Funtai Kogaku Kenkyusho Apparatus for classifying particles
US4296864A (en) 1979-07-17 1981-10-27 Onoda Cement Co., Ltd. Air classifier
US4388183A (en) 1980-10-13 1983-06-14 Christian Pfeiffer Swirling air centrifugal scatter classifier
US4390419A (en) 1981-10-16 1983-06-28 Omya Gmbh Centrifugal classifier
US4409097A (en) 1981-10-16 1983-10-11 Omya Gmbh Improved pivotable centrifugal classifier and method of classifying
US4515686A (en) 1982-06-18 1985-05-07 Pks-Engineering Gmbh & Co. Kg Method for the operation of an air separator, and an air separator for the practice of the method
US4551241A (en) 1984-02-08 1985-11-05 Sturtevant, Inc. Particle classifier
US4560471A (en) 1982-06-30 1985-12-24 Nisshin Flour Milling Co. Ltd. Powder classifier
US4602924A (en) 1983-10-28 1986-07-29 Metallgesellschaft Aktiengesellschaft Centrifugal separator
US4626343A (en) 1984-08-13 1986-12-02 F. L. Smidth & Co. A/S Separator for sorting particulate material
US4661244A (en) 1985-04-25 1987-04-28 Firma Christian Pfeiffer Rotary basket air classifier
US4689140A (en) 1985-07-23 1987-08-25 F. L. Smidth & Co. A/S Separator for sorting particulate material
US4793917A (en) 1987-04-15 1988-12-27 Institut Khimii Tverdogo Tela I Pererabotki Mineralnogo Syrya Sibirskogo Otdelenia Akademii Nauk Ussr Centrifugal classifier for superfine powders
US4799595A (en) 1985-12-21 1989-01-24 O&K Orenstein & Koppel Aktiengesellschaft Apparatus for the classifying of powdered bulk materials
DE3800843A1 (de) * 1987-11-23 1989-06-01 Kloeckner Humboldt Deutz Ag Turbo-windsichter
US4869786A (en) 1986-06-25 1989-09-26 Christian Pfeiffer Air classifying process and air classifier
US5024754A (en) 1988-12-22 1991-06-18 Krupp Polysius Ag Separator
US5229014A (en) * 1991-12-18 1993-07-20 Vortech International, Inc. High efficiency centrifugal separation apparatus and method using impeller
US5354002A (en) 1990-11-26 1994-10-11 F. L. Smith & Co. A/S Double separator for sorting particulate material
US5366095A (en) 1993-11-15 1994-11-22 Christopher Martin Air classification system
US5746789A (en) 1995-11-28 1998-05-05 Innovatech, Inc. Apparatus for separating particulates from a fluid stream
US6202854B1 (en) * 1999-03-23 2001-03-20 Marsulex Environmental Technologies, Llc Air classifier for particulate material
US20030085158A1 (en) * 2001-10-30 2003-05-08 Oirschot Frank Van Method apparatus for separating unwanted matter from granular material

Patent Citations (44)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3174264A (en) * 1963-02-25 1965-03-23 Vacu Maid Inc Dirt separator for suction cleaners
US3656618A (en) 1968-06-19 1972-04-18 Polysius Ag Air sifter
US3667600A (en) 1968-11-27 1972-06-06 Kazuo Oi Method and apparatus for centrifugal classification
US3734287A (en) 1969-01-25 1973-05-22 Westfalia Dinnendahl Air classifier assembly
US3682302A (en) 1969-03-01 1972-08-08 Paul Bernutat Air separator
US3643800A (en) 1969-05-21 1972-02-22 Bo Gustav Emil Mansson Apparatus for separating solids in a whirling gaseous stream
US3669265A (en) 1969-07-17 1972-06-13 Kurt H Conley Classifying apparatus with adjustable fines outlet
US3708067A (en) 1970-06-29 1973-01-02 Battelle Development Corp Separating apparatus
US3670886A (en) 1970-08-05 1972-06-20 Hosokawa Funtaikogaku Kenkyush Powder classifier
US3731800A (en) 1970-11-27 1973-05-08 Polaroid Corp Counter-current centrifugal device and use
US3891543A (en) 1971-02-03 1975-06-24 Josef Wessel Centrifugal sifter apparatus
US3901794A (en) 1972-07-21 1975-08-26 Polysius Ag Circulatory air sifter
US3933626A (en) 1973-07-12 1976-01-20 Ottawa Silica Company Classifier for particulate material
US3960714A (en) 1973-12-24 1976-06-01 Klockner-Humboldt-Deutz Aktiengesellschaft Centrifugal separator with rotary distributor
US4071441A (en) 1974-12-03 1978-01-31 Gebr. Pfeiffer Ag Bypass separator
US4059507A (en) 1975-06-13 1977-11-22 Yoshimori Nobuo Classifying apparatus for particulate materials
US4066535A (en) 1975-06-19 1978-01-03 Klockner-Humboldt-Deutz Aktiengesellschaft Method and apparatus for the classification of fine material from a stream of material in a circulating air classifier
US4100061A (en) 1975-10-24 1978-07-11 Polysius Ag Separator
US4211641A (en) 1977-10-28 1980-07-08 Heinz Jager Circulating air classifier or separator
US4236997A (en) 1978-04-22 1980-12-02 Josef Wessel Air separator apparatus
US4260478A (en) 1978-11-24 1981-04-07 Kabushiki Kaisha Hosokawa Funtai Kogaku Kenkyusho Apparatus for classifying particles
US4257880A (en) 1979-06-28 1981-03-24 Jones Donald W Centrifugal air classifying apparatus
US4296864A (en) 1979-07-17 1981-10-27 Onoda Cement Co., Ltd. Air classifier
US4388183A (en) 1980-10-13 1983-06-14 Christian Pfeiffer Swirling air centrifugal scatter classifier
US4390419A (en) 1981-10-16 1983-06-28 Omya Gmbh Centrifugal classifier
US4409097A (en) 1981-10-16 1983-10-11 Omya Gmbh Improved pivotable centrifugal classifier and method of classifying
US4515686A (en) 1982-06-18 1985-05-07 Pks-Engineering Gmbh & Co. Kg Method for the operation of an air separator, and an air separator for the practice of the method
US4560471A (en) 1982-06-30 1985-12-24 Nisshin Flour Milling Co. Ltd. Powder classifier
US4602924A (en) 1983-10-28 1986-07-29 Metallgesellschaft Aktiengesellschaft Centrifugal separator
US4551241A (en) 1984-02-08 1985-11-05 Sturtevant, Inc. Particle classifier
US4626343A (en) 1984-08-13 1986-12-02 F. L. Smidth & Co. A/S Separator for sorting particulate material
US4661244A (en) 1985-04-25 1987-04-28 Firma Christian Pfeiffer Rotary basket air classifier
US4689140A (en) 1985-07-23 1987-08-25 F. L. Smidth & Co. A/S Separator for sorting particulate material
US4799595A (en) 1985-12-21 1989-01-24 O&K Orenstein & Koppel Aktiengesellschaft Apparatus for the classifying of powdered bulk materials
US4869786A (en) 1986-06-25 1989-09-26 Christian Pfeiffer Air classifying process and air classifier
US4793917A (en) 1987-04-15 1988-12-27 Institut Khimii Tverdogo Tela I Pererabotki Mineralnogo Syrya Sibirskogo Otdelenia Akademii Nauk Ussr Centrifugal classifier for superfine powders
DE3800843A1 (de) * 1987-11-23 1989-06-01 Kloeckner Humboldt Deutz Ag Turbo-windsichter
US5024754A (en) 1988-12-22 1991-06-18 Krupp Polysius Ag Separator
US5354002A (en) 1990-11-26 1994-10-11 F. L. Smith & Co. A/S Double separator for sorting particulate material
US5229014A (en) * 1991-12-18 1993-07-20 Vortech International, Inc. High efficiency centrifugal separation apparatus and method using impeller
US5366095A (en) 1993-11-15 1994-11-22 Christopher Martin Air classification system
US5746789A (en) 1995-11-28 1998-05-05 Innovatech, Inc. Apparatus for separating particulates from a fluid stream
US6202854B1 (en) * 1999-03-23 2001-03-20 Marsulex Environmental Technologies, Llc Air classifier for particulate material
US20030085158A1 (en) * 2001-10-30 2003-05-08 Oirschot Frank Van Method apparatus for separating unwanted matter from granular material

Non-Patent Citations (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
"Power Test Code 28: Determining the Properties of Fine Particulate Matter", American Society of Mechancial Engineers, International, New York, 1985.
Bauer et al., "Air Classification in the Submicron Range with a Deflector Wheel Classifier," World Congress on Particle Technology (UK), (Jul. 2001).
Bickert et al., "A New Centrifugal Classifier for the Separation of Concentrated Suspensions under 10 u.m.," Advances in Filteration and Separation Technology, vol. 9, American Filteration and Separation Society (USA), p. 531-534, (1995).
Bickert et al., "Grinding circuit for fine particles in liquid suspensions with a new counter-flow centrifugal classifier," Elsevier Science B.V., International Journal of Mineral Processing, vol. 44-45 (Netherlands), p. 733-741, (1996).
Furukawa et al., "Comminution of Particles in Centrifugal Air Classifier," Proceedings of Second World Congress Particle Technology (Japan), p. 104-111, (Sep. 19-22, 1990).
Galk et al., "Industrial classification in a new impeller wheel classifier," Powder Technology, Elsevier Science S.A. (Netherlands), p. 186-189, (1999).
Iinoya et al., "Air Cyclone Classifier for Submicron Size," Proceedings of Second World Congress Particle Technology (Japan), p. 120-127, (Sep. 19-22, 1990).
Johansen et al., "A two-phase model for particle local equilibrium applied to air classification of powders," Powder Technology, vol. 63, Elsevier Sequoia (The Netherlands), p. 121-132, (1990).
Johansen, et al., "Some considerations regarding optimum flow fields for centrifugal air classification," International Journal of Mineral Processing, vol. 44-45, Elsevier (Netherlands), p. 703-721, (1996).
Jurt Leschonski, "Short Course on Selected Topics of Particle Technology," p. i-ii, 39-116, (1998).
Kurt Leschonski, "Classification of Particles in the Submicron Range in an Impeller Wheel Air Classifier," KONA Powder and Particle, No. 14, p. 52-59, (1996).
Luckie et al., "Fundamentals of Size Separation," KONA, No. 18, p. 88-101, (2000).
Powitz et al., "A Centrifugal Cross Flow Classifier for Cut Sizes in the Submicron Range," World Congress on Particle Technology (UK), (Jul. 1998).
Roland Nied, "CFS-HD: A new classifier for fine classification with high efficiency," International Journal of Mineral Processing, vol. 44-45, Elsevier Science B.V. (Netherlands), p. 723-731, (1996).
Wang et al., "A model for performance of the centrifugal countercurrent air classifier," Powder Technology, vol. 98, Elsevier (Netherlands), p. 171-176, (1998).
Wang et al., "Study on horizontal turbine classification," Powder Technology, vol. 102, Elsevier (Netherland), p. 166-170, (1999).

Cited By (50)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6935510B2 (en) * 2000-09-07 2005-08-30 Roland Nied Air separator
US20040035765A1 (en) * 2000-09-07 2004-02-26 Roland Nied Air separator
US20050164115A1 (en) * 2003-10-20 2005-07-28 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Process for producing toner
US20110089085A1 (en) * 2003-10-20 2011-04-21 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Process for producing toner
US20070163925A1 (en) * 2004-02-04 2007-07-19 Magotteaux International S.A. Classifier for granular material
US7780012B2 (en) * 2004-02-04 2010-08-24 Magotteaux International S.A. Classifier for granular material
US20050223685A1 (en) * 2004-04-07 2005-10-13 Jeff Bertram Cyclonic separator with secondary vortex break
WO2005096728A3 (en) * 2004-04-07 2006-10-26 Engineered Support Systems Inc Cyclonic separator with secondary vortex break
US7377960B2 (en) 2004-04-07 2008-05-27 Engineered Support Systems, Inc. Cyclonic separator with secondary vortex break
US20070241035A1 (en) * 2004-05-18 2007-10-18 Jacek Kolacz Particle Classifier
US7900779B2 (en) * 2004-05-18 2011-03-08 Comex As Particle classifier
DE102004035207A1 (de) * 2004-07-21 2006-02-16 Westfalia Separator Ag Filtrationsvorrichtung und Verfahren zu deren Betrieb
DE102004035207B4 (de) * 2004-07-21 2009-03-05 Gea Westfalia Separator Gmbh Filtrationsvorrichtung und Verfahren zu deren Betrieb
US20060254959A1 (en) * 2005-05-11 2006-11-16 Allmineral Aufbereitungstechnik Gmbh & Co. Kg Air sifting apparatus having variable air supply
US8864900B2 (en) 2006-07-13 2014-10-21 Unimin Corporation Ultrafine nepheline syenite
US8858699B2 (en) 2006-07-13 2014-10-14 Unimin Corporation Ultra fine nepheline syenite powder and products for using same
US10294377B2 (en) 2006-07-13 2019-05-21 Covia Holdings Corporation Ultra fine nepheline syenite powder and products for using same
US10065194B2 (en) 2006-07-13 2018-09-04 Covia Holdings Corporation Ultrafine nepheline syenite
US20110123804A1 (en) * 2006-07-13 2011-05-26 Unimin Corporation Ultrafine nepheline syenite
US20100304952A1 (en) * 2006-07-13 2010-12-02 Unimin Corporation Method of processing nepheline syenite
US20080011190A1 (en) * 2006-07-13 2008-01-17 Unimin Corporation Ultra fine nepheline syenite powder and products for using same
CN103331194B (zh) * 2007-02-07 2015-05-20 尤尼明公司 加工霞石正长岩粉末以生产超细粒径产品的方法
US7757976B2 (en) 2007-02-07 2010-07-20 Unimin Corporation Method of processing nepheline syenite powder to produce an ultra-fine grain size product
WO2008097427A1 (en) * 2007-02-07 2008-08-14 Unimin Corporation Method of processing nepheline syenite powder to produce an ultra-fine grain size product
US20080185463A1 (en) * 2007-02-07 2008-08-07 Unimin Corporation Method of processing nepheline syenite powder to produce an ultra-fine grain size product
US7942351B2 (en) 2007-02-07 2011-05-17 Unimin Corporation Method of processing nepheline syenite powder to produce an ultra-fine grain size product
US8070080B2 (en) 2007-02-07 2011-12-06 Unimin Corporation Method of processing nepheline syenite powder to produce an ultra-fine grain size product
US20110165421A1 (en) * 2007-02-07 2011-07-07 Unimin Corporation Method of processing nepheline syenite powder to produce an ultra-fine grain size product
CN103331194A (zh) * 2007-02-07 2013-10-02 尤尼明公司 加工霞石正长岩粉末以生产超细粒径产品的方法
US9034096B2 (en) 2007-05-11 2015-05-19 Unimin Corporation Nepheline syenite powder with controlled particle size and novel method of making same
US20090013905A1 (en) * 2007-05-11 2009-01-15 Unimin Corporation Nepheline syenite powder with controlled particle size and novel method of making same
US20090260541A1 (en) * 2008-04-17 2009-10-22 Kragten David D Powder formed from mineral or rock material with controlled particle size distribution for thermal films
US9266115B2 (en) 2008-04-17 2016-02-23 Unimin Corporation Powder formed from mineral or rock material with controlled particle size distribution for thermal films
US8182601B2 (en) 2008-04-17 2012-05-22 Unimin Corporation Powder formed from mineral or rock material with controlled particle size distribution for thermal films
US20100012666A1 (en) * 2008-05-30 2010-01-21 Millipore Corporation Container having vortex breaker and system
US20100012665A1 (en) * 2008-05-30 2010-01-21 Millipore Corporation Container having vortex breaker and fluid diverter and system
US9290729B2 (en) 2008-05-30 2016-03-22 Emd Millipore Corporation Container having vortex breaker and system
US20100072116A1 (en) * 2008-09-25 2010-03-25 Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd Classifying device and method of classification
US7770738B2 (en) * 2008-09-25 2010-08-10 Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. Classifying device and method of classification
US9151750B2 (en) * 2009-09-21 2015-10-06 Roche Diagnostics Operations, Inc. Method for carrying out reactions in an analytical device
US20130004964A1 (en) * 2009-09-21 2013-01-03 Roche Diagnostics Operations,Inc. Method for carrying out reactions in an analytical device
US8658056B1 (en) 2010-05-05 2014-02-25 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force Harvesting single domain nanoparticles and their applications
US8726720B2 (en) * 2010-05-10 2014-05-20 Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. Particulate matter monitor
US20110271739A1 (en) * 2010-05-10 2011-11-10 Goohs Kevin J Particulate matter monitor
US20150040526A1 (en) * 2011-02-14 2015-02-12 David A. Brownlee Vortex finder for cyclone separator
US8882873B2 (en) 2011-02-14 2014-11-11 David Brownlee Vortex finder for cyclone separator
US9528407B2 (en) 2013-12-12 2016-12-27 Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. High efficiency cyclone oil separator device
WO2016054756A1 (es) * 2014-10-09 2016-04-14 Basualto Lira Guillermo Ciclon con vortice asistido
US11266937B2 (en) 2017-03-28 2022-03-08 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Air flow rates in cyclonic particle separation chambers
RU195743U1 (ru) * 2019-09-06 2020-02-04 Общество с ограниченной ответственностью "Камилла" Безнапорный сепаратор для рыбоводных систем

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE60321006D1 (de) 2008-06-26
WO2003101602A2 (en) 2003-12-11
EP1534436B1 (de) 2008-05-14
US20030221996A1 (en) 2003-12-04
EP1534436A2 (de) 2005-06-01
WO2003101602A3 (en) 2004-06-17
EP1534436A4 (de) 2005-09-21
AU2003226139A8 (en) 2003-12-19
ATE395141T1 (de) 2008-05-15
AU2003226139A1 (en) 2003-12-19

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6739456B2 (en) Apparatus and methods for separating particles
US2616563A (en) Centrifugal classifier for segregating finely divided particles on the basis of size and density
EP1787729B1 (de) Zyklonklassifikator, Verfahren zum Zubereiten eines Toners.
US4153541A (en) Method and apparatus for the continuous centrifugal classifying of a continuous flow of particulate material in a deflected flow
US3720314A (en) Classifier for fine solids
KR0186059B1 (ko) 와류식 공기분급기
JPS59142877A (ja) 空気分級機
CN107971224B (zh) 用于颗粒分级的流场构建方法和分级装置
US5201422A (en) Classifier for powdery material
EP0552837B1 (de) Zentrifugal-Partikelklassierer mit Verteiler zum uniformen Zufluss
JPH07155638A (ja) 微粒固形物を２つの粒子群に分離する方法及び装置
JP2597794B2 (ja) 粉末原料の分級方法および分級装置
US8083071B2 (en) Rotating cone classifier
CN106076672A (zh) 气流式多产品微细颗粒排序分级器
RU2407601C1 (ru) Способ воздушно-центробежной классификации порошков и устройство для его осуществления
HU195746B (en) Method and apparatus for separating the aggregation of grains of smaller than 300 micron size into fine and coarse phase
KR20210043691A (ko) 분급 로터 및 분급 장치
Leschonski et al. Principle and construction of two new air classifiers for particle size analysis
JPH11290785A (ja) 気流式分級装置
US3441135A (en) Particle classification device and method
JPS60161721A (ja) 粉体の気流混合方法およびその装置
JP3632425B2 (ja) 気流式分級機
JPH07185465A (ja) 空気分級装置
US2943734A (en) Air directing and particle removing structure for particle classifiers
CN115889195A (zh) 一种具有中置耦合转笼的多粒径分级装置及其分级方法

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA, FLORIDA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:SVORONOS, SPYROS A.;CROUCH, H. STEVEN;EL-SHALL, HASSAN EL-SAYED;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:013217/0406

Effective date: 20020725

AS Assignment

Owner name: FLORIDA RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INCORPORATED, THE, FL

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:FLORIDA, UNIVERSITY OF;REEL/FRAME:013321/0416

Effective date: 20020911

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 8

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 12