US6023665A - Aircraft identification and docking guidance systems - Google Patents

Aircraft identification and docking guidance systems Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US6023665A
US6023665A US08/817,368 US81736897A US6023665A US 6023665 A US6023665 A US 6023665A US 81736897 A US81736897 A US 81736897A US 6023665 A US6023665 A US 6023665A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
distance
aircraft
detected
shape
pulses
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US08/817,368
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Lars Millgard
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
ADB Safegate Sweden AB
Original Assignee
Airport Technology in Scandinavia AB
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=20393379&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=US6023665(A) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
US case filed in Arizona District Court litigation https://portal.unifiedpatents.com/litigation/Arizona%20District%20Court/case/2%3A13-cv-00567 Source: District Court Jurisdiction: Arizona District Court "Unified Patents Litigation Data" by Unified Patents is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
US case filed in Minnesota District Court litigation https://portal.unifiedpatents.com/litigation/Minnesota%20District%20Court/case/0%3A13-cv-00247 Source: District Court Jurisdiction: Minnesota District Court "Unified Patents Litigation Data" by Unified Patents is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Airport Technology in Scandinavia AB filed Critical Airport Technology in Scandinavia AB
Assigned to AIRPORT TECHNOLOGY IN SCANDINAVIA AB reassignment AIRPORT TECHNOLOGY IN SCANDINAVIA AB ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: MILLGARD, LARS
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US6023665A publication Critical patent/US6023665A/en
Priority to US10/133,623 priority Critical patent/US6807511B2/en
Assigned to SAFEGATE INTERNATIONAL AB reassignment SAFEGATE INTERNATIONAL AB MERGER (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: AIRPORT TECHNOLOGY IN SCANDINAVIA AB
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G08—SIGNALLING
    • G08G—TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
    • G08G5/00—Traffic control systems for aircraft, e.g. air-traffic control [ATC]
    • G08G5/0017—Arrangements for implementing traffic-related aircraft activities, e.g. arrangements for generating, displaying, acquiring or managing traffic information
    • G08G5/0026—Arrangements for implementing traffic-related aircraft activities, e.g. arrangements for generating, displaying, acquiring or managing traffic information located on the ground
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64—AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64F—GROUND OR AIRCRAFT-CARRIER-DECK INSTALLATIONS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR USE IN CONNECTION WITH AIRCRAFT; DESIGNING, MANUFACTURING, ASSEMBLING, CLEANING, MAINTAINING OR REPAIRING AIRCRAFT, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; HANDLING, TRANSPORTING, TESTING OR INSPECTING AIRCRAFT COMPONENTS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B64F1/00—Ground or aircraft-carrier-deck installations
    • B64F1/002—Taxiing aids
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64—AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64F—GROUND OR AIRCRAFT-CARRIER-DECK INSTALLATIONS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR USE IN CONNECTION WITH AIRCRAFT; DESIGNING, MANUFACTURING, ASSEMBLING, CLEANING, MAINTAINING OR REPAIRING AIRCRAFT, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; HANDLING, TRANSPORTING, TESTING OR INSPECTING AIRCRAFT COMPONENTS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B64F1/00—Ground or aircraft-carrier-deck installations
    • B64F1/36—Other airport installations
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S17/00—Systems using the reflection or reradiation of electromagnetic waves other than radio waves, e.g. lidar systems
    • G01S17/02—Systems using the reflection of electromagnetic waves other than radio waves
    • G01S17/06—Systems determining position data of a target
    • G01S17/42—Simultaneous measurement of distance and other co-ordinates
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S17/00—Systems using the reflection or reradiation of electromagnetic waves other than radio waves, e.g. lidar systems
    • G01S17/88—Lidar systems specially adapted for specific applications
    • G01S17/89—Lidar systems specially adapted for specific applications for mapping or imaging
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S17/00—Systems using the reflection or reradiation of electromagnetic waves other than radio waves, e.g. lidar systems
    • G01S17/88—Lidar systems specially adapted for specific applications
    • G01S17/89—Lidar systems specially adapted for specific applications for mapping or imaging
    • G01S17/894—3D imaging with simultaneous measurement of time-of-flight at a 2D array of receiver pixels, e.g. time-of-flight cameras or flash lidar
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S7/00—Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00
    • G01S7/48—Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00 of systems according to group G01S17/00
    • G01S7/4802—Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00 of systems according to group G01S17/00 using analysis of echo signal for target characterisation; Target signature; Target cross-section
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S7/00—Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00
    • G01S7/48—Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00 of systems according to group G01S17/00
    • G01S7/481—Constructional features, e.g. arrangements of optical elements
    • G01S7/4811—Constructional features, e.g. arrangements of optical elements common to transmitter and receiver
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S7/00—Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00
    • G01S7/48—Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00 of systems according to group G01S17/00
    • G01S7/497—Means for monitoring or calibrating
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G08—SIGNALLING
    • G08G—TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
    • G08G5/00—Traffic control systems for aircraft, e.g. air-traffic control [ATC]
    • G08G5/0073—Surveillance aids
    • G08G5/0082—Surveillance aids for monitoring traffic from a ground station
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G08—SIGNALLING
    • G08G—TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
    • G08G5/00—Traffic control systems for aircraft, e.g. air-traffic control [ATC]
    • G08G5/06—Traffic control systems for aircraft, e.g. air-traffic control [ATC] for control when on the ground
    • G08G5/065—Navigation or guidance aids, e.g. for taxiing or rolling

Definitions

  • This invention relates to systems for locating, identifying and tracking objects. More particularly, it relates to aircraft location, identification and docking guidance systems and to ground traffic control methods for locating and identifying objects on an airfield and for safely and efficiently docking aircraft at such airport.
  • none of those systems have been found to be satisfactory for detection of the presence of aircraft on an airfield, particularly, under adverse climatic conditions causing diminished visibility such as encountered under fog, snow or sleet conditions.
  • none of the systems disclosed in the prior references are capable of identifying and verifying the specific configuration of an approaching aircraft.
  • none of the prior systems provide adequate techniques for tracking and docking an aircraft at a designated stopping point such as an airport loading gate.
  • none of the prior systems have provided techniques which enable adequate calibration of the instrumentation therein.
  • systems and methods are required which are capable of achieving accurate, safe, efficient and cost effective location of objects such as aircraft on an airfield and for proper identification and verification of the identity of such objects.
  • systems and methods are required for tracking and docking guidance of objects such as aircraft, particularly, in a real time operating mode.
  • systems and methods arc required for calibration of such operating systems.
  • Another object of the invention is to provide information to an individual or individuals controlling the docking or parking of aircraft on an airfield via a display unit utilizing communications between the system and a personal computer and other methods for monitoring the overall method operation.
  • a further object is to provide the safety of digitally precise docking control and, also, to provide for implementation of such control in an extremely cost effect manner.
  • a still further object is to provide for the display of aircraft docking information for use by a pilot, co-pilot or other personnel docking an aircraft including information concerning the closing rate distance from an appropriate stopping point for the aircraft.
  • Another significant object is to provide for the automatic comparison and determination that the aircraft positioning and incoming direction does not deviate from the appropriate path necessary for the particular type of aircraft being docked and particularly, to provide visual feedback as to the closing distance in a countdown format from a display, positioned forward of the aircraft which contains the distance for docking position to left or right of appropriate center line for docking and a check of the aircraft type.
  • a further object is to provide systems which ate extremely flexible and allow for the implementation of new operational parameters such as adding new aircraft types, alternate or secondary parking stop positions and other related information in regard to identifying, guiding and docking aircraft on an airfield.
  • the present invention also provides systems and methods for verifying the identity of the detected object which, for example, enables a determination that the correct type of aircraft is approaching the docking facility and is to be docked therein.
  • verification systems and methods involve the projection of light pulses such as laser pulses in angular coordinates onto an object and collecting reflected pulses off of the object in a detection device which enables a comparison of the reflected pulses to be made with a profile corresponding to the shape of a known object in order to determine whether the detected shape corresponds to the known shape.
  • the present invention provides systems and methods for tracking incoming objects wherein light pulses such as laser pulses are projected onto an incoming object and the light reflected from the object is collected and employed in order to ascertain the position of the object relative to an imaginary axial line projecting from a predetermined docking point and to detect the distance between the object and the predetermined point for purposes of determining the location of the object.
  • light pulses such as laser pulses are projected onto an incoming object and the light reflected from the object is collected and employed in order to ascertain the position of the object relative to an imaginary axial line projecting from a predetermined docking point and to detect the distance between the object and the predetermined point for purposes of determining the location of the object.
  • the present invention provides for the location or capture of an approaching aircraft and for the identification or recognition of its shape within a designated capture zone or control area which is essential in initiating an aircraft docking procedure. Thereafter, in accordance with the present invention, a display is provided which enables docking of the identified aircraft in an appropriate docking area for off loading of passengers, cargo and the like.
  • the present invention accomplishes these features while eliminating the heretofore standard need for sensors which must be embedded in the apron of the docking areas. This results in a significant reduction not only in installation time and associated costs but, also, reduces maintenance costs thereafter. Furthermore, this invention permits retrofitting of the present systems into existing systems without requiring apron construction and the accompanying interruption in use of the airport docking areas which has been required with prior devices previously used for docking guidance systems.
  • a pilot bringing an aircraft into a gate at an airport is provided with a real time display mounted, for example, above the gate which indicates the aircraft's position relative to the point where the pilot must start to brake the plane. Also displayed is the aircraft's lateral position compared to a predetermined line for a plane of its type to follow in order to most expeditiously arrive at the gate.
  • the software employed in the systems of the present invention preferably comprises four modules which perform the main computational tasks of the system and control the hardware. These modules include one for capture, one for identification, one for tracking and one for calibration of the system.
  • the capture module is employed to direct the devices for projecting light pulses to scan the area in front of a docking gate.
  • the capture module continues to direct the laser to scan this area until it detects an object entering the area. Once it detects an object, the capture module computes the distance and the angular position of the object and passes control onto the tracking module.
  • the tracking module follows the incoming aircraft to the gate while providing information about its lateral location and distance relative to the desired stopping point. Using this information, the pilot can correct the course of the plane and brake at the precise point that will result in stopping the aircraft in a desired docking position in alignment with the gate.
  • an identification module first scans the detected object to determine if its profile matches the reference profile of the type of aircraft expected. If the profiles do not match, the system informs the airport tower and a signal is transmitted for stopping the docking function.
  • the calibration module calibrates the distance and angular measurements to ensure that the readings of the detection devices such as a Laser Range Finder accurately correspond to the distance and angle of the aircraft. This module runs periodically during the capture and tracking modules to determine the continued accuracy of the system.
  • FIG. 1 is a view illustrating the system as in use at an airport
  • FIG. 2 is a diagrammatic view illustrating the general componentry of a preferred system in accordance with the present invention
  • FIG. 3 is a top plan view illustrating the detection area in front of a docking gate which is established for purposes of detection and identification of approaching aircraft;
  • FIG. 4 is a flow chart illustrating the main routine and the docking mode of the system
  • FIG. 5 is a flow chart illustrating the calibration mode of the system
  • FIG. 6 is a view illustrating the components of the calibration mode
  • FIG. 7 is a flow chart illustrating the capture mode of the system
  • FIG. 8 is a flow chart illustrating the tracking phase of the system
  • FIG. 9 is a flow chart illustrating the height measuring phase of the system.
  • FIG. 10 is a flow chart illustrating the identification phase of the system.
  • Table II is a preferred embodiment of a Comparison Table which is employed in the systems of the present invention for purposes of effectively and efficiently docking an aircraft;
  • FIGS. 1-10 and Tables I-II in which like numerals designate like elements throughout the several views. Throughout the following detailed description, numbered stages depicted in the illustrated flow diagrams are generally indicated by element numbers in parenthesis following such references.
  • the systems of the present invention generally designated 10 in the drawings provide for the computerized location of an object, verification of the identity of the object and tracking of the object, the object preferably being an aircraft 12.
  • the control tower 14 lands an aircraft 12, it informs the system that a plane is approaching the gate 16 and the type of aircraft (i.e., 747, L-1011, etc.) expected.
  • the system 10 then scans the area in front of the gate 16 until it locates an object that it identifies as an airplane 12.
  • the system 10 compares the profile of the aircraft 12 with a reference profile for the expected type of aircraft. If the located aircraft does not match the expected profile, the system informs or signals the tower 14 and shuts down.
  • the system 10 tracks it into the gate 16 by displaying in real time to the pilot the distance remaining to the proper stopping point 29 and the lateral position 31 of the plane 12.
  • the lateral position 31 of the plane 12 is provided on a display 18 allowing the pilot to correct the position of the plane to approach the gate 16 from the correct angle. Once the airplane 12 is at its stopping point 53, this fact is shown on tile display 18 and the pilot stops the plane.
  • the system 10 of the present invention it should be noted that once the plane 12 comes to rest, it is accurately aligned with the gate 16 requiring no adjustment of the gate 16 by the ground staff.
  • the system 10 consists of a Laser Range Finder (LRF) 20, two mirrors 21, 22, a display unit 18, two step motors 24, 25, and a microprocessor 26.
  • LRF Laser Range Finder
  • Suitable LRF products for use herein are sold by Laser Atlanta Corporation and are capable of emitting laser pulses and receiving the reflections of those pulses reflected off of distant objects and computing the distance to those objects.
  • the system 10 is arranged such that there is a connection 28 between the serial port of the LRF 20 and the microprocessor 26. Through this connection, the LRF 20 sends measurement data approximately every 1/400 th of a second to the microprocessor 26.
  • the hardware components generally designated 73 of the system 10 are controlled by the programmed microprocessor 26.
  • the microprosessor 26 feeds data to the display 18. As the interface to the pilot, the display unit 18 is placed above the gate 16 to show the pilot how far the plane is from its stopping point 29 the type of aircraft 30 the system believes is approaching and the lateral location of the plane 31. Using this display, the pilot can adjust the approach of the plane 12 to the gate 16 to ensure the plane is on the correct angle to reach the gate.
  • the microprocessor 26 processes the data from the LRF 20 and controls the direction of the laser 20 through its connection 32 to the step motors 24, 25.
  • the step motors 24, 25 are connected to the mirrors 21, 22 and move them in response to instructions from the microprocessor 26.
  • the microprocessor 26 can change the angle of the mirrors 21, 22 and aim the laser pulses from the LRF 20.
  • the mirrors 21,22 aim the laser by reflecting the laser pulses outward over the tarmac of the airport.
  • the LRF 20 does not move.
  • the scanning by the laser is done with mirrors.
  • One mirror 22 controls the horizontal angle of the laser while the other mirror 21 controls the vertical angle.
  • the microprocessor 26 controls the angle of the mirrors and thus the direction of the laser pulse.
  • the system 10 controls die horizontal mirror 22 to achieve a continuous horizontal scanning within a ⁇ 10 degree angle in approximately 0.1 degree angular steps which are equivalent to 16 microsteps per step with the Escap EDM-453 step motor.
  • One angular step is taken for each reply from the reading unit, i.e., approximately every 2.5 ms.
  • the vertical mirror 21 can be controlled to achieve a vertical scan between +20 and -30 degrees in approximately 0.1 degree angular steps with one step every 2.5 ms.
  • the vertical mirror 21 is used to scan vertically when the nose height is being determined and when the aircraft 12 is being identified. During the tracking mode, the vertical mirror 21 is continuously adjusted to keep the horizontal scan tracking the nose tip of the aircraft 12.
  • the system 10 divides the field in front of it by distance into three parts.
  • the farthest section, from about 50 meters out, is the capture zone 50.
  • the system 10 detects the aircraft's nose and makes a rough estimate of lateral and longitudinal position of the aircraft 12.
  • the identification area 51 Inside the capture zone 50 is the identification area 51.
  • the system 10 checks the profile of the aircraft 12 against a stored profile.
  • the system 10 shows the lateral position of the aircraft 12 in this region, related to a predetermined line, on the display 18.
  • the display or tracking area 52 nearest to the LPF 20 is the display or tracking area 52.
  • the system 10 displays the lateral and longitudinal position of the aircraft 12 relative to the correct stopping position with its highest degree of accuracy.
  • the stopping point 53 At the end of the display area 52, the aircraft will be in the correct position at the gate 16.
  • the system 10 maintains a database containing reference profiles for any type of aircraft it might encounter. Within this database, the system stores the profile for each aircraft type as a horizontal and vertical profile reflecting the expected echo pattern for that type of aircraft.
  • the system maintains the horizontal profile in the form of a Table I whose rows 40 are indexed by angular step and whose columns 41 are indexed by distance from the stopping position for that type of aircraft.
  • the table contains a row 42 providing the vertical angle to the nose of the plane at each distance from the LRF, a row 44 providing the form factor, k, for the profile and a row 45 providing the number of profile values for each profile distance.
  • the body 43 of the Table I contains expected distances for that type of aircraft at various scanning angles and distances from the stopping point 53.
  • the 50 angular steps and the 50 distances to the stopping point 53 would require a Table I containing 50 ⁇ 50, or 2500, entries.
  • the Table I will actually contain far fewer entries because the profile will not expect a return from all angles at all distances. It is expected that a typical table will actually contain between 500 and 1000 values.
  • Well known programming techniques provide methods of maintaining a partially full table without using the memory required by a full table.
  • the system 10 maintains a vertical profile of each type of aircraft.
  • This profile is stored in the same manner as the horizontal profile except its rows are indexed by angular steps in the vertical direction and its column index contains fewer distances from the stopping position than the horizontal profile.
  • the vertical profile requires fewer columns because it is used only for identifying the aircraft 12 and for determining its nose height, which take place at a defined range of distances from the LRF 20 in the identification area 51. Consequently, the vertical profile stores only the expected echoes in that range without wasting data storage space on unneeded values.
  • the system 10 uses the previously described hardware and database to locate, identify and track aircraft using the following procedures:
  • the software running on the microprocessor performs a main routine containing subroutines for the calibration mode 60, capture mode 62 and docking mode 64.
  • the microprocessor first performs the calibration mode 60, then the capture mode 62 and then the docking mode 64. Once the aircraft 12 is docked, the program finishes.
  • the microprocessor 26 is programmed to calibrate itself in accordance with the procedure illustrated in FIG. 5 before capturing an aircraft 12 and at various intervals during tracking. Calibrating the system 10 ensures that the relationship between the step motors 24, 25 and the aiming direction is known. The length measuring ability of the LRF 20 is also checked.
  • the system 10 uses a square plate 66 with a known position.
  • the plate 66 is mounted 6 meters from the LRF 20 and at the same height as the LRF 20.
  • the system sets (a, ⁇ ) to (0,0) causing the laser to be directed straight forward.
  • the vertical mirror 22 is then tilted such that the laser beam is directed backwards to a rear or extra mirror 68 which redirects the beam to the calibration plate 66.
  • the microprocessor 26 uses the step motors 24, 25 to move the mirrors 21, 22 until it finds the center of the calibration plate 66. Once it finds the center of the calibration plate 66, the microprocessor 26 stores the angles ( ⁇ cp , ⁇ cp ) at that point and compares them to stored expected angles. (102) The system 10 also compares the reported distance to the plate 66 center with a stored expected value.
  • the microprocessor 26 changes the calibration constants, which determine the expected values, until they do. (104, 106) However, if any of these values deviate too much from the values stored at installation, an alarm is given. (108)
  • the airport tower 14 notifies the system 10 to expect an incoming airplane 12 and the type of airplane to expect.
  • This signal puts the software into a capture mode 62 as outlined in FIG. 8.
  • the microprocessor 26 uses the step motors 24, 25 to direct the laser to scan the capture zone 50 horizontally for the plane 12. This horizontal scan is done at a vertical angle corresponding to the height of the nose of the expected type of aircraft at the midpoint of the capture zone 50.
  • the microprocessor 26 computes the vertical angle for the laser pulse as:
  • the system 10 can store in the database values for ⁇ r for different types of aircraft at a certain distance. However, storing ⁇ r limits the flexibility of the system 10 because it can capture an aircraft 12 only at a single distance from the LRF 20.
  • the microprocessor 26 directs the laser to scan horizontally in pulses approximately 0.1 degree apart.
  • the microprocessor 26 scans horizontally by varying ⁇ , the horizontal angle from a center line starting from the LRF 20, between ⁇ max , a value defined at installation.
  • ⁇ max is set to 50 which, using 0.1 degree pulses, is equivalent to 5 degrees and results in a 10 degree scan.
  • the release of the laser pulses results in echoes or reflections from objects in the capture zone 50.
  • the detection device of the LRF 20 captures the reflected pulses, computes the distance to the object from the time between pulse transmission and receipt of the echo, and sends the calculated distance value for each echo to the microprocessor 26.
  • the micro processor 26 stores, in separate registers in a data storage device, the total number of echoes or hits in each 1 degree sector of the capture zone 50. (70) Because the pulses are generated in 0.1 degree intervals, up to ten echoes can occur in each sector.
  • the microprocessor 26 stores these hits in variables entitled so where ⁇ varies from 1 to 10 to reflect each one degree slice of the ten degree capture zone 50.
  • the microprocessor 26 stores, again in a data storage device, the distance from the LRF 20 to the object for each hit or echo. Storing the distance to each reflection requires a storage medium large enough to store up to ten hits in each 1 degree of the capture zone 50 or up to 100 possible values. Because, in many cases, most of the entries will be empty, well known programming techniques can reduce these storage requirements below having 100 registers always allocated for these values.
  • the microprocessor 26 computes the total number of echoes, S T , in the scan by summing the s.sub. ⁇ 's. The microprocessor 26 then computes S M , the largest sum of echoes in three adjacent sectors. (72) In other words, S M is the largest sum of (S.sub. ⁇ -l, S.sub. ⁇ , S.sub. ⁇ +l).
  • the microprocessor 26 determines whether the echoes are from an incoming airplane 12. If S M is not greater than 24, no airplane 12 has been found and the microprocessor 26 returns to the beginning of the capture mode 62. If the largest sum of echoes, S M is greater than 24 (74), a "possible" airplane 12 has been located. If a "possible" airplane 12 has been located, the microprocessor checks if S M /S T is greater than 0.5 (76), or the three adjacent sectors with the largest sum contain at least half of all the echoes received during the scan.
  • the microprocessor 26 calculates the location of the center of the echo. (78, 82) The angular location of the center of the echo is calculated as:
  • S.sub. ⁇ is the S.sub. ⁇ that gave S M and a v is the angular sector that corresponds to that S.sub. ⁇ .
  • the longitudinal position of the center of the echo is calculated as:
  • n is the total number of measured values in this sector. (78, 82) Because the largest possible number of measured values is ten, n must be less than or equal to ten.
  • the echoes may have been caused by snow or other aircraft at close range. If the cause is an aircraft at close range, that aircraft is probably positioned fairly close to the centerline so it is assumed that a t should be zero instead of the above calculated value and that l t should be the mean distance given by the three middle sectors. (80) If the distance distribution is too large, the microprocessor 26 has not found an airplane 12 and it returns to the beginning of the capture mode 62. (81).
  • the system 10 After calculating the position of the aircraft 12, the system 10 switches to docking mode 64.
  • the docking mode 64 illustrated in FIG. 4. includes three phases, the tracking phase 84, the height measuring phase 86 and the identification phase 88.
  • the system 10 monitors the position of the incoming aircraft 12 and provides the pilot with information about axial location 31 and distance from the stopping point 53 of the plane through the display 18. The system 10 begins tracking the aircraft 12 by scanning horizontally.
  • the microprocessor 26 directs the LRF 20 to send out laser pulses in single angular steps, ⁇ , or, preferably, at 0.1 degree intervals between:
  • ⁇ t is determined during the capture mode 62 as the annular position of the echo center and ⁇ p is the largest angular position in the current profile column that contains distance values.
  • ⁇ is stepped back and forth with one step per received LRF value between:
  • ⁇ s is the angular position of the scan.
  • the vertical angle, ⁇ is set to the level required for the identified craft 12 at its current distance from the LRF 20 which is obtained from the reference profile Table I .
  • the current profile column is the column representing a position less than but closest to l t .
  • the microprocessor 26 uses the distance from the stopping point 53 to find the vertical angle for the airplane's current distance on the profile Table I.
  • the distance, l t calculated during the capture mode 62, determines the appropriate column of the profile Table I and thus the angle to the aircraft 12.
  • the microprocessor 26 uses the in the column of the profile Table I reflecting the present distance from the stopping point 53. (112)
  • the microprocessor 26 uses the data from the scans and the data on the horizontal profile Table I to create a Comparison Table II .
  • the Comparison Table II is a two dimensional table with the number of the pulses, (or angular step number, as the index 91, i, to the rows.
  • the following information can he accessed for each row: l i 92, the measured distance to the object on this angular step, l ki 93, the measured value compensated for the skew caused by the displacement (equal to l i minus the quantity s m the total displacement during the last scan, minus the quantity i times s p , the average displacement during each step in the last scan (i.e.) l i -(S m -is p )), d i 94, the distance between the generated profile and the reference profile (equal to r ij , the profile value for the corresponding angle at the profile distance j.
  • a i 95, the distance between the nose of the aircraft and the measuring equipment (equal to r jso the reference profile value at zero degrees, minus d i ).
  • a i 96 the estimated nose distance after each step (equal to a m , the nose distance at the end of the last scan, minus the quantity i times s p ), a d , the difference between the estimated and measured nose distance (equal to the absolute value of a i minus a c ), and Note 97 which indicates the echoes that are likely caused by an aircraft.
  • the system 10 uses the horizontal profile column representing an aircraft position, j, less than but closest to the value of l t .
  • the profile column whose value is less than but closest to (a m -s m ) is chosen where a m is the last measured distance to the aircraft 12 and s m is the aircraft's displacement during the last scan. Additionally, the values of the profile are shifted sideways by ⁇ s to compensate for the lateral position of the aircraft. (112)
  • the microprocessor 26 also generates a Distance Distribution Table (DDT).
  • DDT Distance Distribution Table
  • This table contains the distribution of a i values as they appear in the Comparison Table II.
  • the DDT has an entry representing the number of occurrences of each value of a i in the Comparison Table II in 1 meter increments between 10 to 100 meters.
  • the system 10 uses the DDT to calculate the average distance, a m , to the correct stopping point 53.
  • the microprocessor 26 scans the data in the DDT to find the two adjacent entries in the DDT for which the sum of their values is the largest.
  • the microprocessor 26 then flags the Note 97 column in the Comparison Table II for each row containing all entry for a corresponding to either of the two DDT rows having the largest sum.
  • the system 10 determines the lateral deviation or offset. (116)
  • the microprocessor 26 first sets:
  • ⁇ max and a min are the highest and lowest ⁇ values for a continuous flagged block of d i values in the Comparison Table II. Additionally, the microprocessor 26 calculates:
  • the microprocessor 26 After the lateral offset is checked, the microprocessor 26, provides the total sideways adjustment of the profile, which corresponds to the lateral position 31 of the aircraft 12, on the display 18. (122)
  • the microprocessor 26 next calculates the distance to the nose of the aircraft, a m , as:
  • the microprocessor 26 can calculate the distance from the plane 12 to the stopping point 53 by subtracting the distance from the LRF 20 to the stopping point 53 from the distance to the nose of the aircraft. (124)
  • the microprocessor 26 calculates the average displacement during the last scan, s m .
  • the displacement during the last scan is calculated as:
  • S m is set to 0
  • the average displacement s p during each step is calculated as:
  • the microprocessor 26 will inform the pilot of the distance to the stopping position 53 by displaying it on the display unit 18, 29. By displaying the distance to the stopping position 29, 53 after each scan, the pilot receives constantly updated information in real time about how far the plane 12 is from stopping.
  • both the lateral 31 and the longitudinal position 29 are provided on the display 18. (126. 128) Once the microprocessor 26 displays the position of the aircraft 12, the tracking phase ends.
  • the microprocessor 26 verifies that tracking has not been lost by checking that the total number of rows flagged divided by the total number of measured values, or echoes, in the last scan is greater than 0.5. (83) In other words, if more than 50% of the echoes do not correspond to the reference profile, tracking is lost. If tracking is lost and the aircraft 12 is greater than 12 meters from the stopping point, the system 10 returns to the capture mode 62. (85) If tracking is lost and the aircraft 12 is less than or equal to 12 meters from the stopping point 53 the system 10 turns on the stop sign to inform the pilot that it has lost tracking. (85, 87)
  • the microprocessor 26 determines if the nose height has been determined. (130) If the height has not yet been determined the microprosessor 26 enters the height measuring phase 86. If the height has already been determined, the microprocessor 26 checks to see if the aircraft has been identified. (132)
  • the microprocessor 26 determines the nose height by directing the LRF 20 to scan vertically.
  • the nose height is used by the system to ensure that the horizontal scans are made across the tip of the nose.
  • the microporocessor 26 sets ⁇ to a predetermined value ⁇ max and then steps it down in 0.1 degree intervals once per received/reflected pulse until it reaches ⁇ min , another predetermined value ⁇ min and ⁇ max are set during installation and typically are -20 and 30 degrees respectively. After ⁇ reaches ⁇ min the microprocessor 26 directs the step motors 24,25 up until it reaches ⁇ max . This vertical scanning is done with ⁇ set to ⁇ s , the azimuth position of the previous scan.
  • the microprocessor 26 selects the column in the vertical profile table closest to the measured distance. (140) Using the data from the scan and the data on the vertical profile table, the microprocessor 26 creates a Comparison Table II. Referring to FIG. 4, the Comparison Table II is a two dimensional table with the number of the pulse, or angular step number, as an index 91, i to the rows.
  • the following information can be accessed for each row: l i 92, the measured distance of the object on this angular step , l ki 93, the measured value compensated for the skew caused by the displacement (equal to l i minus the quantity S m , the total displacement during the last scan, minus the quantity i times S p , the average displacement during each stop in the last scan), d i 94 the distance between the generated profile and the reference profile (equal to r ij , the profile value for the corresponding angle at the profile distance j, minus l ki ), a i 95, the distance between the nose of the aircraft and the measuring equipment equal to t j so, the referrence profile value at zero degrees, minus d j ), a e 96, the estimated nose distance after each step (equal to a m , the nose distance at the end of the last scan, minus the quantity i times s p
  • the microprocessor 26 also generates a Distance Distribution Table (DDT).
  • DDT Distance Distribution Table
  • This table contains the distribution of a i values as they appear in the Comparison Table II.
  • the DDT has an entry representing the number of occurrences of each value of a i in the Comparison Table II in 1 meter increments between 10 to 100 meters.
  • the system 10 uses the DDT to calculate the average distance a m , to the correct stopping point 53.
  • the microprocessor 26 scans the data in the DDT to find the two adjacent entries in the DDT for which the sum of their values is the largest.
  • the microprocessor 26 then flags the Note 97 column in the Comparison Table II for each row containing an entry for a i corresponding to either of the two DDT rows having the largest sum. (142)
  • the microprocessor 26 calculates the average displacement during the last scan, s m .
  • the displacement during the last scan is calculated as:
  • Calculating the actual nose height is done by adding the nominal nose height, predetermined height of the expected aircraft when empty, to the vertical or height deviation. Consequently, to determine the nose height the system 10 first determines the vertical or height deviation. (144) Vertical deviation is calculated by setting:
  • ⁇ max and ⁇ min are the highest and lowest ⁇ value for a continuous flagged block of d i values in the Comparison Table II. Additionally, the microprocessor 26 calculates:
  • the microprocessor 26 checks if it is bigger than a predetermined value, preferably one. (146) If the deviation is larger than that value, the microprocessor 26 adjusts the profile vertically corresponding to that offset. (148) The microprocessor 26 stores the vertical adjustment as the deviation from the nominal nose height. (150) The actual height of the aircraft is the nominal nose height plus the deviation. Once it completes the height measuring phase 86, the microporocessor 26 returns to the tracking phase 84.
  • a predetermined value preferably one.
  • the microprocessor 26 If the microprocessor 26 has already determined the nose height, it skips the height measuring phase 86 and determines whether the aircraft 12 has been identified. (130,132) If the aircraft 12 has been identified, the microprocessor 26 checks whether the aircraft 12 has reached the stop position. (134) If the stop position is reached the microprocessor 26 turns on the stop sign and the system 10 has completed the docking mode 64. (136) If the aircraft 12 has not reached the stop position, the micro-processor 26 returns to the tracking phase 84. (134)
  • the microprocessor 26 checks whether the aircraft 12 is less than or equal to 12 meters from the stopping position 53. (133) If the aircraft 12 not more than 12 meters from the stopping position 53, the system 10 turns on the stop sign to inform the pilot that identification has failed. (135) After displaying the stop sign, the system 10 shuts down.
  • the microprocessor 26 enters the identification phase illustrated in Fig. 10.
  • the microprocessor 26 creates a Comparison Table II to reflect the results of another vertical scan and the contents of the profile table. (152,154) Another vertical scan is performed in the identification phase 88 because the previous scan may have provided sufficient data for height determination but not enough for identification. In fact, several scans may need to be done before a positive identification can be made.
  • the microprocessor 26 calculates the average distance between marked echoes and the profile and the mean distance between the marked echoes and this average distance. (162)
  • the average distance d m between the measured and corrected profile and the deviation T from this average distance is calculated after vertical and horizontal scans as follows:
  • T is less than a given value, preferably 5, for both profiles, the aircraft 12 is judged to be of the correct type provided that a sufficient number of echoes are received (164) Whether a sufficient number of echoes is received is based on:
  • N is the number of "accepted” echoes and "size” is the maximum number of values possible. If the aircraft 12 is not of the correct type, the microprocessor turns on the stop sign 136 and suspends the docking mode 64. Once the microprocessor 26 completes the identification phase 88, it returns to the tracking phase 84.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
  • Remote Sensing (AREA)
  • Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Electromagnetism (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Optical Radar Systems And Details Thereof (AREA)
  • Radar Systems Or Details Thereof (AREA)
  • Length Measuring Devices By Optical Means (AREA)
  • Organic Low-Molecular-Weight Compounds And Preparation Thereof (AREA)
  • Compositions Of Oxide Ceramics (AREA)
  • Circuits Of Receivers In General (AREA)
  • Traffic Control Systems (AREA)
  • Image Processing (AREA)
US08/817,368 1994-10-14 1994-10-14 Aircraft identification and docking guidance systems Expired - Lifetime US6023665A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/133,623 US6807511B2 (en) 1997-07-17 2002-04-29 Aircraft identification and docking guidance systems

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/SE1994/000968 WO1996012265A1 (en) 1994-10-14 1994-10-14 Aircraft identification and docking guidance systems

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/SE1994/000968 A-371-Of-International WO1996012265A1 (en) 1994-10-14 1994-10-14 Aircraft identification and docking guidance systems

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/429,609 Continuation-In-Part US6324489B1 (en) 1991-10-29 1999-10-29 Aircraft identification and docking guidance systems

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US6023665A true US6023665A (en) 2000-02-08

Family

ID=20393379

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US08/817,368 Expired - Lifetime US6023665A (en) 1994-10-14 1994-10-14 Aircraft identification and docking guidance systems

Country Status (12)

Country Link
US (1) US6023665A (de)
EP (2) EP0787338B1 (de)
JP (1) JP4034341B2 (de)
KR (1) KR100350402B1 (de)
AT (2) ATE215252T1 (de)
AU (1) AU1125195A (de)
BR (1) BR9408629A (de)
DE (1) DE69430270T2 (de)
ES (2) ES2171523T3 (de)
HK (1) HK1005960A1 (de)
TW (1) TW278141B (de)
WO (1) WO1996012265A1 (de)

Cited By (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6282488B1 (en) * 1996-02-29 2001-08-28 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Airport surface movement guidance and control system
WO2002032764A1 (en) * 2000-10-13 2002-04-25 Saab Ab Method and device at automatic landing
US6389334B1 (en) * 1997-09-30 2002-05-14 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Process and device for automatically supported guidance of aircraft to a parking position and management system therefor
WO2002056054A2 (en) * 2001-01-12 2002-07-18 Safegate International Ab Aircraft docking system and method with automatic checking of apron and detection of fog or snow
US20030060998A1 (en) * 1997-07-17 2003-03-27 Safegate International Ab Aircraft identification and docking guidance systems
US6584382B2 (en) * 2000-05-17 2003-06-24 Abraham E. Karem Intuitive vehicle and machine control
WO2003054775A2 (en) * 2001-12-20 2003-07-03 Safegate International Ab Centreline identification in a docking guidance system
US6597818B2 (en) * 1997-05-09 2003-07-22 Sarnoff Corporation Method and apparatus for performing geo-spatial registration of imagery
WO2003104081A1 (en) * 2002-06-11 2003-12-18 Fmt International Trade Ab A method for the contactless measuring of distance and position in respect of aircraft docking procedures, and an arrangement for this purpose.
US6724314B2 (en) * 2001-12-26 2004-04-20 Dew Engineering And Development Limited Automated passenger loading bridge
US20040187234A1 (en) * 2002-05-07 2004-09-30 Dew Engineering And Development Limited Beacon docking system with visual guidance display
AU2006203759B2 (en) * 2001-01-12 2008-05-15 Adb Safegate Sweden Ab Aircraft docking system and method with automatic checking of apron and detection of fog or snow
US20080289558A1 (en) * 2004-06-29 2008-11-27 Peter James Montgomery Lasar Scanning for Mooring Robot
US20100012009A1 (en) * 2002-07-30 2010-01-21 Cavotec Msl Holdings Limited Mooring system with active control
US20100272517A1 (en) * 2007-09-26 2010-10-28 Cavotec Msl Holdings Limited Automated mooring method and mooring system
US9177483B2 (en) 2013-11-20 2015-11-03 Unibase Information Corp. Guiding method for aircraft docking process
US20170175413A1 (en) * 2015-12-18 2017-06-22 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Multi-level fulfillment center for unmanned aerial vehicles
US20170259939A1 (en) * 2014-08-01 2017-09-14 Shenzhen Cimc-Tianda Airport Support Ltd. System and method for aircraft docking guidance and aircraft type identification
EP3222529A1 (de) * 2016-03-21 2017-09-27 ADB Safegate Sweden AB Optimierung der reichweite eines flugzeug-andocksystems
US10255520B2 (en) * 2014-08-01 2019-04-09 Shenzhen Cimc-Tianda Airport Support Ltd. System and method for aircraft docking guidance and aircraft type identification
US11053023B2 (en) 2018-06-18 2021-07-06 Adb Safegate Sweden Ab Method and a system for guiding a pilot of an approaching aircraft to a stop position at a stand
CN115826464A (zh) * 2022-11-29 2023-03-21 航科院中宇（北京）新技术发展有限公司 一种远机位节点采集系统及其采集方法

Families Citing this family (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
AUPN903296A0 (en) * 1996-03-29 1996-04-26 Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation An aircraft detection system
AU760788B2 (en) * 1996-03-29 2003-05-22 Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation An image acquisition system
US5974158A (en) * 1996-03-29 1999-10-26 The Commonwealth Of Australia Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organization Aircraft detection system
EP0939946A1 (de) * 1996-11-15 1999-09-08 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Terminalkoordinationssystem für flughäfen
JP2892336B2 (ja) * 1997-06-09 1999-05-17 運輸省船舶技術研究所長 滑走路予約システム
US6542086B2 (en) 1997-09-22 2003-04-01 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Docking system for airport terminals
DE59807488D1 (de) * 1997-09-22 2003-04-17 Siemens Ag Dockingsystem für flughafenterminals
JP2004069328A (ja) * 2002-08-01 2004-03-04 Nissan Motor Co Ltd 前方環境認識装置及び前方環境認識方法
WO2013141605A1 (ko) * 2012-03-21 2013-09-26 (주)안세기술 항공기의 기종판별 및 주기유도를 위한 시스템 및 방법
KR101314566B1 (ko) 2012-08-30 2013-10-07 (주)안세기술 항공기 기종판별 및 주기유도 시스템 및 방법
TWI486558B (zh) * 2013-09-13 2015-06-01 Unibase Information Corp 航空器停靠過程的導引方法
JP6207967B2 (ja) * 2013-10-25 2017-10-04 株式会社パスコ 林相解析装置、林相解析方法及びプログラム
JP6207968B2 (ja) * 2013-10-25 2017-10-04 株式会社パスコ 林相解析装置、林相解析方法及びプログラム
DK3079136T3 (en) * 2015-04-10 2018-10-22 Adb Safegate Sweden Ab Aircraft Identification
CN107102645B (zh) * 2016-02-22 2023-07-21 成都飞机工业（集团）有限责任公司 一种飞机姿态调节装置
CN110579771A (zh) * 2019-09-12 2019-12-17 南京莱斯信息技术股份有限公司 一种基于激光点云的飞机泊位引导方法
US20220397676A1 (en) * 2021-06-09 2022-12-15 Honeywell International Inc. Aircraft identification

Citations (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0035101A1 (de) * 1980-03-01 1981-09-09 ELTRO GmbH Gesellschaft für Strahlungstechnik Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Detektion und Verfolgung von Luft- und Bodenzielen
US4319332A (en) * 1978-04-28 1982-03-09 Zellweger Uster Ltd. Method and apparatus for space monitoring by means of pulsed directional beam
EP0188757A1 (de) * 1984-12-20 1986-07-30 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Mikrowellen-Einbruchmeldesystem
US4995102A (en) * 1987-05-13 1991-02-19 Hitachi, Ltd. Scanning method used by laser radar and laser radar for carrying out the method
DE4009668A1 (de) * 1990-03-26 1991-10-02 Siemens Ag Verfahren und vorrichtung zum positionsgenauen abstellen von flugzeugen
WO1993013104A1 (en) * 1991-12-21 1993-07-08 Smithkline Beecham Plc C.n.s. active tricyclic thienopyridine derivatives
WO1993015416A1 (en) * 1992-01-31 1993-08-05 Kenneth Gustavsson A device for supervising an area
DE4301637A1 (de) * 1993-01-22 1994-08-11 Deutsche Aerospace Verfahren zum Andocken eines Flugzeuges an eine Fluggastbrücke eines Flughafengebäudes
US5424746A (en) * 1993-11-16 1995-06-13 Cardion, Inc. Method and system for monitoring vehicles
US5475370A (en) * 1992-10-20 1995-12-12 Robotic Vision Systems, Inc. System for detecting ice or snow on surface which specularly reflects light
US5589822A (en) * 1992-10-20 1996-12-31 Robotic Vision Systems, Inc. System for detecting ice or snow on surface which specularly reflects light
US5675661A (en) * 1995-10-12 1997-10-07 Northrop Grumman Corporation Aircraft docking system

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4311385A (en) * 1979-07-02 1982-01-19 Raytheon Company Coherent detection lag angle compensated scanning system independent of inhomogeneities of the detector
FR2618893B1 (fr) * 1987-07-31 1989-12-15 Sagem Perfectionnements apportes aux appareils de reconnaissance de forme et/ou de detection de position d'un objet dans l'espace
AU598418B2 (en) * 1988-06-04 1990-06-21 Fujitsu Limited Optical system for detecting three-dimensional shape
SU1753273A1 (ru) * 1989-08-02 1992-08-07 Производственное объединение "Уральский оптико-механический завод" Устройство дл определени координат объекта
DE4211875A1 (de) * 1990-10-09 1993-10-14 Zeiss Carl Fa Optischer Abstandssensor

Patent Citations (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4319332A (en) * 1978-04-28 1982-03-09 Zellweger Uster Ltd. Method and apparatus for space monitoring by means of pulsed directional beam
EP0035101A1 (de) * 1980-03-01 1981-09-09 ELTRO GmbH Gesellschaft für Strahlungstechnik Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Detektion und Verfolgung von Luft- und Bodenzielen
EP0188757A1 (de) * 1984-12-20 1986-07-30 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Mikrowellen-Einbruchmeldesystem
US4995102A (en) * 1987-05-13 1991-02-19 Hitachi, Ltd. Scanning method used by laser radar and laser radar for carrying out the method
DE4009668A1 (de) * 1990-03-26 1991-10-02 Siemens Ag Verfahren und vorrichtung zum positionsgenauen abstellen von flugzeugen
WO1993013104A1 (en) * 1991-12-21 1993-07-08 Smithkline Beecham Plc C.n.s. active tricyclic thienopyridine derivatives
WO1993015416A1 (en) * 1992-01-31 1993-08-05 Kenneth Gustavsson A device for supervising an area
US5475370A (en) * 1992-10-20 1995-12-12 Robotic Vision Systems, Inc. System for detecting ice or snow on surface which specularly reflects light
US5589822A (en) * 1992-10-20 1996-12-31 Robotic Vision Systems, Inc. System for detecting ice or snow on surface which specularly reflects light
DE4301637A1 (de) * 1993-01-22 1994-08-11 Deutsche Aerospace Verfahren zum Andocken eines Flugzeuges an eine Fluggastbrücke eines Flughafengebäudes
US5424746A (en) * 1993-11-16 1995-06-13 Cardion, Inc. Method and system for monitoring vehicles
US5675661A (en) * 1995-10-12 1997-10-07 Northrop Grumman Corporation Aircraft docking system

Non-Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Database WPI, Section EI, Week 9332, Derwent Publications, Ltd., London, GB, Class S02, AN 93 256658, Aug. 7, 1992 (Abstract). *
Database WPI, Section EI, Week 9332, Derwent Publications, Ltd., London, GB, Class S02, AN 93-256658, Aug. 7, 1992 (Abstract).
Database WPI, Section EI, Week 9514, Derwent Publications, Ltd., London, GB, Class T04, AN 95 105467, Dec. 13, 1994 (Abstract). *
Database WPI, Section EI, Week 9514, Derwent Publications, Ltd., London, GB, Class T04, AN 95-105467, Dec. 13, 1994 (Abstract).

Cited By (49)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6282488B1 (en) * 1996-02-29 2001-08-28 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Airport surface movement guidance and control system
US6597818B2 (en) * 1997-05-09 2003-07-22 Sarnoff Corporation Method and apparatus for performing geo-spatial registration of imagery
US20030060998A1 (en) * 1997-07-17 2003-03-27 Safegate International Ab Aircraft identification and docking guidance systems
US6807511B2 (en) 1997-07-17 2004-10-19 Safegate International Ab Aircraft identification and docking guidance systems
US6389334B1 (en) * 1997-09-30 2002-05-14 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Process and device for automatically supported guidance of aircraft to a parking position and management system therefor
EP2109063A2 (de) 1999-10-29 2009-10-14 Safegate International AB Flugzeugidentifizierungs- und -andockanleitungssysteme
EP2109065A2 (de) 1999-10-29 2009-10-14 Safegate International AB Flugzeugidentifizierungs- und -andockanleitungssysteme
EP2109062A2 (de) 1999-10-29 2009-10-14 Safegate International AB Flugzeugidentifizierungs- und -andockanleitungssysteme
EP2109064A2 (de) 1999-10-29 2009-10-14 Safegate International AB Flugzeugidentifizierungs- und -andockanleitungssysteme
US6584382B2 (en) * 2000-05-17 2003-06-24 Abraham E. Karem Intuitive vehicle and machine control
US20040026573A1 (en) * 2000-10-13 2004-02-12 Sune Andersson Method and device at automatic landing
WO2002032764A1 (en) * 2000-10-13 2002-04-25 Saab Ab Method and device at automatic landing
EP1482326A1 (de) * 2001-01-12 2004-12-01 Safegate International AB Flugzeug-Andocksystem und Verfahren mit automatischer Überprüfung von Flughafengelände
WO2002056054A2 (en) * 2001-01-12 2002-07-18 Safegate International Ab Aircraft docking system and method with automatic checking of apron and detection of fog or snow
WO2002056054A3 (en) * 2001-01-12 2003-01-16 Safegate Int Ab Aircraft docking system and method with automatic checking of apron and detection of fog or snow
US6563432B1 (en) 2001-01-12 2003-05-13 Safegate International Ab Aircraft docking system and method with automatic checking of apron and detection of fog or snow
AU2006203759B2 (en) * 2001-01-12 2008-05-15 Adb Safegate Sweden Ab Aircraft docking system and method with automatic checking of apron and detection of fog or snow
AU2002232537B2 (en) * 2001-01-12 2006-09-21 Adb Safegate Sweden Ab Aircraft docking system and method with automatic checking of apron and detection of fog or snow
US6762694B2 (en) 2001-12-20 2004-07-13 Safegate International Ab Centerline identification in a docking guidance system
WO2003054775A2 (en) * 2001-12-20 2003-07-03 Safegate International Ab Centreline identification in a docking guidance system
WO2003054775A3 (en) * 2001-12-20 2003-10-16 Safegate Int Ab Centreline identification in a docking guidance system
US6724314B2 (en) * 2001-12-26 2004-04-20 Dew Engineering And Development Limited Automated passenger loading bridge
US7093314B2 (en) * 2002-05-07 2006-08-22 Dew Engineering And Development Limited Beacon docking system with visual guidance display
US20040187234A1 (en) * 2002-05-07 2004-09-30 Dew Engineering And Development Limited Beacon docking system with visual guidance display
WO2003104081A1 (en) * 2002-06-11 2003-12-18 Fmt International Trade Ab A method for the contactless measuring of distance and position in respect of aircraft docking procedures, and an arrangement for this purpose.
US6704098B2 (en) 2002-06-11 2004-03-09 Fmt International Trade Ab Method and arrangement for the contactless measuring of distance and position in respect of aircraft docking procedures
US8215256B2 (en) 2002-07-30 2012-07-10 Cavotec Moormaster Limited Mooring system with active control
US20100012009A1 (en) * 2002-07-30 2010-01-21 Cavotec Msl Holdings Limited Mooring system with active control
US7876430B2 (en) 2004-06-29 2011-01-25 Cavotec Msl Holdings Limited Laser scanning for mooring robot
US20080289558A1 (en) * 2004-06-29 2008-11-27 Peter James Montgomery Lasar Scanning for Mooring Robot
US20100272517A1 (en) * 2007-09-26 2010-10-28 Cavotec Msl Holdings Limited Automated mooring method and mooring system
US8408153B2 (en) 2007-09-26 2013-04-02 Cavotec Moormaster Limited Automated mooring method and mooring system
US9177483B2 (en) 2013-11-20 2015-11-03 Unibase Information Corp. Guiding method for aircraft docking process
US10562644B2 (en) * 2014-08-01 2020-02-18 Shenzhen Cimc-Tianda Airport Support Ltd. System and method for aircraft docking guidance and aircraft type identification
US20170259939A1 (en) * 2014-08-01 2017-09-14 Shenzhen Cimc-Tianda Airport Support Ltd. System and method for aircraft docking guidance and aircraft type identification
US10255520B2 (en) * 2014-08-01 2019-04-09 Shenzhen Cimc-Tianda Airport Support Ltd. System and method for aircraft docking guidance and aircraft type identification
US9777502B2 (en) * 2015-12-18 2017-10-03 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Multi-level fulfillment center for unmanned aerial vehicles
US20170175413A1 (en) * 2015-12-18 2017-06-22 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Multi-level fulfillment center for unmanned aerial vehicles
WO2017162432A1 (en) * 2016-03-21 2017-09-28 Adb Safegate Sweden Ab Optimizing range of aircraft docking system
AU2017238589A1 (en) * 2016-03-21 2018-09-27 Adb Safegate Sweden Ab Optimizing range of aircraft docking system
CN108883838A (zh) * 2016-03-21 2018-11-23 Adb 赛福格瑞典有限公司 优化航空器泊位系统的范围
EP3222529A1 (de) * 2016-03-21 2017-09-27 ADB Safegate Sweden AB Optimierung der reichweite eines flugzeug-andocksystems
AU2017238589B2 (en) * 2016-03-21 2019-08-15 Adb Safegate Sweden Ab Optimizing range of aircraft docking system
US10384805B2 (en) 2016-03-21 2019-08-20 Adb Safegate Sweden Ab Optimizing range of aircraft docking system
EP3564133A1 (de) * 2016-03-21 2019-11-06 ADB Safegate Sweden AB Optimierung der reichweite eines flugzeug-andocksystems
CN108883838B (zh) * 2016-03-21 2021-05-11 Adb 赛福格瑞典有限公司 优化航空器泊位系统的范围
US11053023B2 (en) 2018-06-18 2021-07-06 Adb Safegate Sweden Ab Method and a system for guiding a pilot of an approaching aircraft to a stop position at a stand
CN115826464A (zh) * 2022-11-29 2023-03-21 航科院中宇（北京）新技术发展有限公司 一种远机位节点采集系统及其采集方法
CN115826464B (zh) * 2022-11-29 2024-03-22 航科院中宇（北京）新技术发展有限公司 一种远机位节点采集系统的采集方法

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
ES2171523T3 (es) 2002-09-16
EP0787338A1 (de) 1997-08-06
EP1172666A3 (de) 2002-01-23
JP4034341B2 (ja) 2008-01-16
TW278141B (de) 1996-06-11
BR9408629A (pt) 1998-12-01
EP0787338B1 (de) 2002-03-27
EP1172666B1 (de) 2003-09-17
AU1125195A (en) 1996-05-06
DE69430270T2 (de) 2002-11-21
KR100350402B1 (ko) 2003-01-06
KR970707522A (ko) 1997-12-01
HK1005960A1 (en) 1999-02-05
DE69430270D1 (de) 2002-05-02
EP1172666A2 (de) 2002-01-16
ES2206373T3 (es) 2004-05-16
ATE215252T1 (de) 2002-04-15
ATE250232T1 (de) 2003-10-15
JPH10509512A (ja) 1998-09-14
WO1996012265A1 (en) 1996-04-25

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6023665A (en) Aircraft identification and docking guidance systems
CA2389205C (en) Aircraft identification and docking guidance systems
US6563432B1 (en) Aircraft docking system and method with automatic checking of apron and detection of fog or snow
JP4491464B2 (ja) 航空機の識別およびドッキング誘導システム
RU2155384C2 (ru) Идентификация самолета и системы управления швартовкой
CN1053512C (zh) 飞机识别及入坞引导系统
CA2576398C (en) Aircraft identification and docking guidance systems
JP2009288253A (ja) 航空機の識別およびドッキング誘導システム

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: AIRPORT TECHNOLOGY IN SCANDINAVIA AB, SWEDEN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MILLGARD, LARS;REEL/FRAME:008619/0612

Effective date: 19970530

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

CC Certificate of correction
FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 8

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAYER NUMBER DE-ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: RMPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY

Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 12

AS Assignment

Owner name: SAFEGATE INTERNATIONAL AB, SWEDEN

Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:AIRPORT TECHNOLOGY IN SCANDINAVIA AB;REEL/FRAME:029596/0823

Effective date: 19991117