US20140161919A1 - Plant Parts and Extracts Having Anticoccidial Activity - Google Patents
Plant Parts and Extracts Having Anticoccidial Activity Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20140161919A1 US20140161919A1 US13/928,504 US201313928504A US2014161919A1 US 20140161919 A1 US20140161919 A1 US 20140161919A1 US 201313928504 A US201313928504 A US 201313928504A US 2014161919 A1 US2014161919 A1 US 2014161919A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- infectoria
- coccidiosis
- extracts
- gallic acid
- eimeria
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 239000000284 extract Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 33
- 230000001165 anti-coccidial effect Effects 0.000 title description 12
- LNTHITQWFMADLM-UHFFFAOYSA-N gallic acid Chemical compound OC(=O)C1=CC(O)=C(O)C(O)=C1 LNTHITQWFMADLM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 90
- 241000920652 Quercus lusitanica Species 0.000 claims abstract description 85
- 208000003495 Coccidiosis Diseases 0.000 claims abstract description 62
- 206010023076 Isosporiasis Diseases 0.000 claims abstract description 62
- 241000223924 Eimeria Species 0.000 claims abstract description 60
- 230000003902 lesion Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 45
- 210000003250 oocyst Anatomy 0.000 claims abstract description 45
- 229940074391 gallic acid Drugs 0.000 claims abstract description 43
- 235000004515 gallic acid Nutrition 0.000 claims abstract description 43
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 claims abstract description 37
- 210000003608 fece Anatomy 0.000 claims abstract description 34
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 22
- 241000001522 Terminalia chebula Species 0.000 claims abstract description 20
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 claims abstract description 20
- 240000003152 Rhus chinensis Species 0.000 claims abstract description 16
- 244000144977 poultry Species 0.000 claims abstract description 15
- 235000014220 Rhus chinensis Nutrition 0.000 claims abstract description 14
- 235000011517 Terminalia chebula Nutrition 0.000 claims abstract description 13
- 229920001461 hydrolysable tannin Polymers 0.000 claims abstract description 11
- 229920002824 gallotannin Polymers 0.000 claims abstract description 7
- 210000003046 sporozoite Anatomy 0.000 claims description 58
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 claims description 44
- 241000223932 Eimeria tenella Species 0.000 claims description 34
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 20
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims description 13
- 241000223931 Eimeria acervulina Species 0.000 claims description 12
- 241000223934 Eimeria maxima Species 0.000 claims description 12
- 241001465754 Metazoa Species 0.000 claims description 8
- 210000004027 cell Anatomy 0.000 description 65
- 241000271566 Aves Species 0.000 description 61
- 239000013641 positive control Substances 0.000 description 47
- 238000011282 treatment Methods 0.000 description 42
- KQXDHUJYNAXLNZ-XQSDOZFQSA-N Salinomycin Chemical compound O1[C@@H]([C@@H](CC)C(O)=O)CC[C@H](C)[C@@H]1[C@@H](C)[C@H](O)[C@H](C)C(=O)[C@H](CC)[C@@H]1[C@@H](C)C[C@@H](C)[C@@]2(C=C[C@@H](O)[C@@]3(O[C@@](C)(CC3)[C@@H]3O[C@@H](C)[C@@](O)(CC)CC3)O2)O1 KQXDHUJYNAXLNZ-XQSDOZFQSA-N 0.000 description 33
- 208000015181 infectious disease Diseases 0.000 description 29
- 241000287828 Gallus gallus Species 0.000 description 27
- 210000004534 cecum Anatomy 0.000 description 26
- 239000013642 negative control Substances 0.000 description 26
- 239000004189 Salinomycin Substances 0.000 description 23
- 230000035755 proliferation Effects 0.000 description 23
- 229960001548 salinomycin Drugs 0.000 description 23
- 235000019378 salinomycin Nutrition 0.000 description 23
- 241000252983 Caecum Species 0.000 description 18
- 230000001276 controlling effect Effects 0.000 description 16
- 238000000338 in vitro Methods 0.000 description 16
- 230000009545 invasion Effects 0.000 description 13
- 235000013594 poultry meat Nutrition 0.000 description 12
- 239000002609 medium Substances 0.000 description 11
- 239000000419 plant extract Substances 0.000 description 11
- 239000000843 powder Substances 0.000 description 11
- 238000003753 real-time PCR Methods 0.000 description 11
- 239000008280 blood Substances 0.000 description 10
- 210000004369 blood Anatomy 0.000 description 10
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 10
- 238000001727 in vivo Methods 0.000 description 10
- 230000006698 induction Effects 0.000 description 10
- 230000008595 infiltration Effects 0.000 description 9
- 238000001764 infiltration Methods 0.000 description 9
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 9
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 8
- 238000000134 MTT assay Methods 0.000 description 7
- 231100000002 MTT assay Toxicity 0.000 description 7
- 231100000673 dose–response relationship Toxicity 0.000 description 7
- 238000011534 incubation Methods 0.000 description 7
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 7
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 7
- 208000003322 Coinfection Diseases 0.000 description 6
- 230000003078 antioxidant effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 235000005911 diet Nutrition 0.000 description 6
- 210000005087 mononuclear cell Anatomy 0.000 description 6
- 239000000725 suspension Substances 0.000 description 6
- 230000035899 viability Effects 0.000 description 6
- AZKSAVLVSZKNRD-UHFFFAOYSA-M 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide Chemical compound [Br-].S1C(C)=C(C)N=C1[N+]1=NC(C=2C=CC=CC=2)=NN1C1=CC=CC=C1 AZKSAVLVSZKNRD-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 5
- 241000283690 Bos taurus Species 0.000 description 5
- 238000003556 assay Methods 0.000 description 5
- 239000011324 bead Substances 0.000 description 5
- 239000006143 cell culture medium Substances 0.000 description 5
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 5
- 235000013330 chicken meat Nutrition 0.000 description 5
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000037213 diet Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000002255 enzymatic effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000009472 formulation Methods 0.000 description 5
- 239000012737 fresh medium Substances 0.000 description 5
- 239000011521 glass Substances 0.000 description 5
- 238000000227 grinding Methods 0.000 description 5
- 210000003734 kidney Anatomy 0.000 description 5
- 244000045947 parasite Species 0.000 description 5
- 230000002829 reductive effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 241000711404 Avian avulavirus 1 Species 0.000 description 4
- 208000032843 Hemorrhage Diseases 0.000 description 4
- OKKJLVBELUTLKV-UHFFFAOYSA-N Methanol Chemical compound OC OKKJLVBELUTLKV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000004480 active ingredient Substances 0.000 description 4
- 235000013399 edible fruits Nutrition 0.000 description 4
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000007489 histopathology method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000002255 vaccination Methods 0.000 description 4
- IUTKPPDDLYYMBE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoic acid;hydrate Chemical compound O.OC(=O)C1=CC(O)=C(O)C(O)=C1 IUTKPPDDLYYMBE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- IAZDPXIOMUYVGZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Dimethylsulphoxide Chemical compound CS(C)=O IAZDPXIOMUYVGZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 244000068697 Vitis rotundifolia Species 0.000 description 3
- 235000006359 Vitis rotundifolia var rotundifolia Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 239000003963 antioxidant agent Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000012223 aqueous fraction Substances 0.000 description 3
- 201000010099 disease Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 208000037265 diseases, disorders, signs and symptoms Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 3
- 229940079593 drug Drugs 0.000 description 3
- 239000003814 drug Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229940097942 gallic acid monohydrate Drugs 0.000 description 3
- 238000000099 in vitro assay Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 3
- 210000004877 mucosa Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 230000003387 muscular Effects 0.000 description 3
- 229920001864 tannin Polymers 0.000 description 3
- 235000018553 tannin Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 239000001648 tannin Substances 0.000 description 3
- 241000224482 Apicomplexa Species 0.000 description 2
- 208000027312 Bursal disease Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 208000004232 Enteritis Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 244000068988 Glycine max Species 0.000 description 2
- 235000010469 Glycine max Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 239000009140 Grape Seed Proanthocyanidin Substances 0.000 description 2
- 206010061298 Mucosal haemorrhage Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 206010067993 Mucosal necrosis Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 240000008042 Zea mays Species 0.000 description 2
- 235000005824 Zea mays ssp. parviglumis Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 235000002017 Zea mays subsp mays Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 230000003110 anti-inflammatory effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000003224 coccidiostatic agent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229920002770 condensed tannin Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 235000005822 corn Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 239000012153 distilled water Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000013401 experimental design Methods 0.000 description 2
- 210000001035 gastrointestinal tract Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 230000036039 immunity Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000002458 infectious effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000002401 inhibitory effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000005764 inhibitory process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000011081 inoculation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 210000000936 intestine Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000001294 liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000007726 management method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 150000003272 mannan oligosaccharides Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 210000003936 merozoite Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 239000002032 methanolic fraction Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000002156 mixing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000017074 necrotic cell death Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001338 necrotic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000008506 pathogenesis Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003449 preventive effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001681 protective effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000000384 rearing effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 2
- 210000001563 schizont Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 238000012216 screening Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000009469 supplementation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 210000004876 tela submucosa Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- VHYPETWOECSQQP-BYPYZUCNSA-N (2r)-2-amino-3-(methylsulfanylmethylsulfanyl)propanoic acid Chemical compound CSCSC[C@H](N)C(O)=O VHYPETWOECSQQP-BYPYZUCNSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 241000224483 Coccidia Species 0.000 description 1
- 206010012735 Diarrhoea Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 241000499566 Eimeria brunetti Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000179199 Eimeria mitis Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000499563 Eimeria necatrix Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000499544 Eimeria praecox Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000224484 Eimeriidae Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000003222 MTT reduction assay Methods 0.000 description 1
- 108700018351 Major Histocompatibility Complex Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 206010025476 Malabsorption Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000004155 Malabsorption Syndromes Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 241000219492 Quercus Species 0.000 description 1
- 240000009239 Tulbaghia violacea Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000000430 Tulbaghia violacea Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 241000219094 Vitaceae Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000002835 absorbance Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010306 acid treatment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013019 agitation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000844 anti-bacterial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001093 anti-cancer Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000843 anti-fungal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002790 anti-mutagenic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002141 anti-parasite Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229940124536 anticoccidial agent Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 229940121375 antifungal agent Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000000427 antigen Substances 0.000 description 1
- 108091007433 antigens Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000036639 antigens Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 239000004599 antimicrobial Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003096 antiparasitic agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000975 bioactive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004166 bioassay Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010260 bioassay-guided fractionation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000019751 broiler diet Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000006227 byproduct Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003501 co-culture Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004440 column chromatography Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011217 control strategy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002596 correlated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000875 corresponding effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000287 crude extract Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000034994 death Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000378 dietary effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002550 fecal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009408 flooring Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012268 genome sequencing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000021021 grapes Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000036541 health Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000008216 herbs Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000004128 high performance liquid chromatography Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012750 in vivo screening Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000004615 ingredient Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000968 intestinal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011835 investigation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 150000002605 large molecules Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 230000014759 maintenance of location Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000003097 mucus Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- VMGAPWLDMVPYIA-HIDZBRGKSA-N n'-amino-n-iminomethanimidamide Chemical compound N\N=C\N=N VMGAPWLDMVPYIA-HIDZBRGKSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 235000021590 normal diet Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000003305 oral gavage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007170 pathology Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000002989 phenols Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 235000017807 phytochemicals Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229930000223 plant secondary metabolite Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 230000003389 potentiating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 244000000040 protozoan parasite Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000000746 purification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000001047 purple dye Substances 0.000 description 1
- BOLDJAUMGUJJKM-LSDHHAIUSA-N renifolin D Natural products CC(=C)[C@@H]1Cc2c(O)c(O)ccc2[C@H]1CC(=O)c3ccc(O)cc3O BOLDJAUMGUJJKM-LSDHHAIUSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012552 review Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011894 semi-preparative HPLC Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002904 solvent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000007858 starting material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001954 sterilising effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004659 sterilization and disinfection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000006228 supernatant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000013589 supplement Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000020382 suppression by virus of host antigen processing and presentation of peptide antigen via MHC class I Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002195 synergetic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000001519 tissue Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 229960005486 vaccine Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000001018 virulence Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004584 weight gain Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000019786 weight gain Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000002023 wood Substances 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
- A61K36/00—Medicinal preparations of undetermined constitution containing material from algae, lichens, fungi or plants, or derivatives thereof, e.g. traditional herbal medicines
- A61K36/18—Magnoliophyta (angiosperms)
- A61K36/185—Magnoliopsida (dicotyledons)
- A61K36/49—Fagaceae (Beech family), e.g. oak or chestnut
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
- A61K31/00—Medicinal preparations containing organic active ingredients
- A61K31/185—Acids; Anhydrides, halides or salts thereof, e.g. sulfur acids, imidic, hydrazonic or hydroximic acids
- A61K31/19—Carboxylic acids, e.g. valproic acid
- A61K31/192—Carboxylic acids, e.g. valproic acid having aromatic groups, e.g. sulindac, 2-aryl-propionic acids, ethacrynic acid
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
- A61K36/00—Medicinal preparations of undetermined constitution containing material from algae, lichens, fungi or plants, or derivatives thereof, e.g. traditional herbal medicines
- A61K36/18—Magnoliophyta (angiosperms)
- A61K36/185—Magnoliopsida (dicotyledons)
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
- A61K36/00—Medicinal preparations of undetermined constitution containing material from algae, lichens, fungi or plants, or derivatives thereof, e.g. traditional herbal medicines
- A61K36/18—Magnoliophyta (angiosperms)
- A61K36/185—Magnoliopsida (dicotyledons)
- A61K36/22—Anacardiaceae (Sumac family), e.g. smoketree, sumac or poison oak
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61P—SPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
- A61P33/00—Antiparasitic agents
- A61P33/02—Antiprotozoals, e.g. for leishmaniasis, trichomoniasis, toxoplasmosis
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61P—SPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
- A61P33/00—Antiparasitic agents
- A61P33/10—Anthelmintics
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
- A61K2121/00—Preparations for use in therapy
Definitions
- the present invention relates generally to the control of coccidiosis and, more specifically, to the application of plant parts, plant extracts and compounds to control coccidiosis in poultry and other animals.
- Coccidiosis is a major disease in the poultry industry and according to a recent survey, it is estimated that the global impact is greater than $3 billion USD annually (worldpoultry.net/Broilers/Health/2009/9/In-ovo-vaccination-against-coccidiosis-WP006949W/—accessed Jun. 18, 2013).
- Coccidiosis is caused by a protozoan parasite, namely Eimeria, belonging to the phylum Apicomplexa, and the family Eimeriidae (Clare, R. A and Danforth, H. D (1989).
- tenella are known to cause coccidiosis in poultry (Williams, 2005) and the species are highly host and site specific.
- E. tenella is one of the major species causing coccidiosis in poultry, and their site of infection is the caecum (Khazandi, M and Tivey, D (2010). Developing an in vitro method for Eimeria tenella attachment to its preferred and non-preferred intestinal sites. Experimental Parasitology, 125 (2), 137-140). Coccidiosis is currently controlled by medication, but the increasing emergence of drug-resistant strains of Eimeria requires the development of an alternative control strategy. Since plants are known to possess antiparasitic and anticoccidial activity due to the presence of phenolic compounds (Tipu, M.
- McCann et al. tested the effect of Sweet Chestnut Wood tannins on the performance of broiler chicks vaccinated with a live coccidia vaccine (M. E. E. McCann, E. Newell, C. Preston and K. Forbes. The Use of Mannan-Oligosaccharides and/or Tannin in Broiler Diets. Intl. J. of Poultry Sci. 5 (9): 873-879, 2006). They reported that supplementation with mannan-oligosaccharides or tannins, either individually or in combination, did not reduce the impact of the coccidiosis.
- Wang et al. teach the use of a grape seed proanthocyanidin extract on coccidiosis (Wang, et al. Influence of Grape Seed Proanthocyanidin Extract in Broiler Chickens: Effect on Chicken Coccidiosis and Antioxidant Status. Poultry Science. 87:2273-2280, 2008). They attributed activity to the anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties of the proanthocyanidins, a condensed tannin rather than a hydrolysable tannin.
- Naidoo et al. teach an in vivo study using four plants selected based on their antioxidant activity (Naidoo et al. The value of plant extracts with antioxidant activity in attenuating coccidiosis in broiler chickens. Veterinary Parasitology. 153:214-219; 2008). They observed that one of the plants ( Tulbaghia violacea ) reduced the Eimeria oocyst counts in the chicken excreta and they speculate that this effect could be due to the antioxidant compound S (methylthiomethyl) cysteine sulfoxide.
- McDougald et al. describe the use of a muscadine pomace to enhance resistance to coccidiosis in broiler chickens (McDougald et al. Enhancement of Resistance to Coccidiosis and Necrotic Enteritis in Broiler Chickens by Dietary Muscadine Pomace. Avian Diseases. 52: 646-651; 2008).
- Muscadine pomace is a by-product of grapes used in wine production. They make no mention of efficacy of any specific compounds in the pomace.
- the proposed anti-coccidial activity differs significantly from the activities proposed by Wang et al. and Naidoo et al.
- the present invention consists of the identification and use of plant parts and plant extracts effective in the control of coccidiosis in animals, particularly in poultry.
- plant parts and natural extracts of Quercus infectoria, Rhus chinensis gall nut, Terminalia chebula fruit have been found to control coccidiosis in poultry and, more specifically, coccidiosis caused by Eimeria spp.
- the plant parts and natural extracts of gall nuts of Quercus infectoria, Rhus chinensis and fruits of Terminalia chebula result in a reduction of lesion score, oocysts per gram of fecal matter and mortality.
- the plant parts/extract was also found to have a direct inhibitory effect on the sporozoites of Eimeria, as observed in the in vitro MTT assay.
- Compounds selected gallic acid, gallotannins and hydrolys able tannins were also found to reduce lesion score, oocysts per gram of fecal matter and mortality.
- the compounds were also found to have a direct inhibitory effect on the sporozoites of Eimeria, as observed in the in vitro MTT assay.
- the present invention also consists of a method of controlling coccidiosis in poultry and other animals by administering a composition comprising plant parts or extracts of plants containing an efficacious amount of gall nuts of Quercus infectoria, Rhus chinensis, Terminalia chebula fruit and/or compounds such as gallic acid, gallotannins and hydrolysable tannins.
- FIG. 1 are microphotographic images of caecal lesions of control birds, birds treated with the negative control, birds treated with the positive control, and birds treated with Quercus infectoria.
- FIG. 2 is a chart of the oocysts per gram (OPG) of excreta of birds treated with Quercus infectoria on day 7 post infection; columns with different superscripts are statistically significant (p ⁇ 0.05).
- OPG oocysts per gram
- FIG. 3 are microphotographic images of the H and E stained sections of caecum of infected control birds and birds treated with Quercus infectoria.
- FIG. 4 is a chart of the lesion score for E. acervulina, E. maxima and E. tenella for the birds treated with Q. infectoria water extract on day 5 post infection; columns with different superscripts are statistically significant (p ⁇ 0.05).
- FIG. 5 is a chart of the oocysts per gram (OPG) of excreta of birds treated with Q. infectoria water extract on day 7 post infection; columns with different superscripts are statistically significant (p ⁇ 0.05).
- OPG oocysts per gram
- FIG. 6 is a chart of the MTT assay carried out for the evaluation of Q. infectoria at various dosage levels along with a coccidiostat (Salinomycin) as positive control; columns with different superscripts are statistically significant (p ⁇ 0.05).
- FIG. 7 is a chart of PCR results after invasion of MDBK host cells with sporozoites and different concentrations of Q. infectoria.
- FIG. 8 is a chart of fold changes in Eimeria DNA for different time points versus T4 within one treatment.
- FIG. 9 is a chart of PCR results after invasion of MDBK host cells with sporozoites, pre-treated with different concentrations of Q. infectoria.
- FIG. 10 is a chart of fold changes in Eimeria DNA for different time points versus T20 within one treatment.
- FIG. 11 is a chart of the anti-sporozoite activity of the different fractions of Q. infectoria; columns with different superscripts are statistically significant (p ⁇ 0.05).
- FIG. 12 is a High Performance Liquid Chromatogram (HPLC) chromatogram of water fraction of Q. infectoria.
- FIG. 13 is a chart of the anti-sporozoite activity of the four major peaks of Q. infectoria; columns with different superscripts are statistically significant (p ⁇ 0.05).
- FIG. 14 is the LC/MS/MS chromatogram of peak 1 of Q. infectoria.
- FIG. 15 is a chart depicting the correlation between the concentration of gallic acid and the anti-sporozoite activity of Q. infectoria; columns with different superscripts are statistically significant (p ⁇ 0.05).
- FIG. 16 is a chart of PCR results of MDBK host cells, pre-treated with 10 ppm gallic acid, invaded with sporozoites.
- FIG. 17 is a chart of fold changes in Eimeria DNA for different time points versus T20 within one treatment.
- FIG. 18 is a chart of PCR results after invasion of MDBK host cells with sporozoites, pre-treated with different concentrations of gallic acid.
- FIG. 19 is a chart of fold changes in Eimeria DNA for different time points versus T20 within one treatment.
- FIG. 20 is a chart of the lesion score on day 5 post infection of birds treated with gallic acid at different concentrations; columns with different superscripts are statistically significant (p ⁇ 0.05).
- FIG. 21 is a chart of the OPG on day 7 post infection of birds treated with gallic acid at different concentrations; columns with different superscripts are statistically significant (p ⁇ 0.05).
- FIG. 22 is a chart of the anti-sporozoite activity of Rhus chinensis and a chart of the anti-sporozite activity of Terminalia chebula; columns with different superscripts are statistically significant (p ⁇ 0.05).
- FIG. 23 is a chart of PCR results after invasion of MDBK host cells with sporozoites, pre-treated with different concentrations of T. chebula.
- FIG. 24 is a chart of fold changes in Eimeria DNA for different time points versus T20 within one treatment.
- FIG. 25 is a chart of the lesion score on day 5 post infection of birds treated with R. chinensis and T. chebula; columns with different superscripts are statistically significant (p ⁇ 0.05).
- FIG. 26 is a chart of the OPG on day 7 post infection of birds treated with R. chinensis and T. chebula; columns with different superscripts are statistically significant (p ⁇ 0.05).
- a plant part, extract or compounds is termed to be efficacious if it can result in statistically significant reduction in the lesion score, the oocysts shed in the excreta, (Oocyst Per Gram (OPG)) or the mortality of the birds as compared to the infected control which is untreated.
- OPG Olecyst Per Gram
- administration of gallic acid and gallic acid containing formulations are described with formulations providing a dosage from 0.1 to 50 ppm, preferably from 2 to 20 ppm, and most preferably from 3 to 10 ppm through feed or water or an equivalent supplementation through other routes.
- the plants, plant parts and/or extracts described contain around a mininimum of 0.1% of gallic acid.
- infectoria in controlling coccidiosis caused by other species of Eimeria also.
- an in vitro method based on 3-(4, 5-Dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) reduction assay was developed to evaluate the anti-sporozoite activity of plant extracts as a measure of the viability of the sporozoites.
- MTT 3-(4, 5-Dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide
- an in vitro assay was developed based on a co-culture of host cells and Eimeria parasites. Cells and parasite are combined in an assay with a positive control and different test products. The invasion and proliferation of the Eimeria parasites is measured by detecting Eimeria DNA using real-time PCR. For this, specific primers were selected and PCR conditions were optimised. The positive control and potential anticoccidial compounds are added to the in vitro assay in three different ways:
- the products are combined with Eimeria sporozoites and added to the host cells.
- the products are added to the sporozoites for a specific time, then removed and afterwards the sporozoites are added to the host cells.
- the products are added to the host cells for a specific time, then removed and afterwards the sporozoites are added to the host cells.
- Farm management Good farm managing practices were followed during the trial. The entire farm and the equipment used for the study were cleaned and disinfected before the arrival of the chicks. The birds were housed in cages organized on concrete flooring and a tray was provided at the bottom of the cages to facilitate collection of fecal samples. The temperature and humidity of the farm was monitored continuously.
- NDV Newcastle Disease Virus
- IBD Infectious Bursal Disease
- Feed formulation A corn soya based mash diet was formulated. The feed ingredients were procured from Ponni feeds, Tamil Nadu, India. The mash feed was fed ad libitum to the birds throughout the study period. Three feed formulations were prepared according to the phases of the life of the bird; Prestarter (Day 1-10), Starter (Day 11-20), and Finisher feed (Day 21-42). No antimicrobials and supplements were used in the feed formulation.
- Control 1 uninfected Normal feed control
- Control 2 Negative infected Coccidiosis induction + Normal feed Control
- Control 3 Pursitive Control
- Coccidiosis induction + Feed with Q. infectoria at 100 g/ton *Coxistac is a product from Pfizer containing Salinomycin at 12% concentration.
- addition of Coxistac at the mentioned dose of 500 g/ton of feed will enable delivery of Salinomycin at 60 ppm levels in the feed which is the recommended preventive dose for broilers.
- the dose in this experiment was double the recommended concentration.
- Parameters analyzed were the indices of pathogenesis namely excreta appearance, mortality, lesion scoring of the caecum for coccidiosis, and oocysts per gram (OPG) of excreta. The methods are detailed below.
- excreta Examination of excreta. The excreta of the birds were monitored daily from the day 1 post infection to day 10 for their consistency, presence of blood, mucus, undigested feed, and orange color. Scoring of the excreta was carried out based on the severity of blood shedding.
- OPG of excreta Triplicate samples of the excreta of the birds were collected randomly from the tray kept below the cages and the oocyst per gram was evaluated.
- Lesion scoring of the caecum Lesion scoring of the caeca on day 5 and 7 post infection indicated that the lesions were severe on day 5, and the birds started recovering on day 7 post infection which was indicated by the formation of a caecal plug. This followed the normal pattern of infection enabling the removal of oocysts from the caeca.
- the results of the lesion score showed that the positive control (Salinomycin control did not show any difference in the score as compared to the negative control due to inexplicable reasons.
- the treatment with Q. infectoria reduced the lesion score as compared to the negative control (Table 4). The reduced lesion score correlated with reduced excreta score and absence of mortality.
- OPG of excreta of the birds on day 7 post infection The counts of OPG of excreta of the birds on day 7 post infection are shown in Table 5.
- the anticoccidial Salinomycin treated birds C3, Table 5
- the values presented are an average of three replicates.
- a 35 day in vivo challenge trial was conducted in broiler birds challenged with Eimeria tenella
- the treatment groups included, 1) control, uninfected normal birds; 2) negative control, birds infected with E. tenella and fed normal diet without any anticoccidial compounds; 3) positive control, birds infected and fed diet containing Coxistac (anticoccidial agent, Salinomycin) at the recommended dose of 500 g/ton and 4) treatment group including infected birds administered diet containing Q. infectoria gall nut at 500 g/ton dose. No mortality was observed in the positive control group and treatment group supplemented with crude powder of gall nuts of Quercus infectoria.
- the second in vivo experiment involved the following treatment groups.
- Oocyst counts in excreta The OPG of excreta was estimated on day 7 post infection to evaluate the shedding of oocysts. The results of the study showed that the positive control, Q. infectoria had significantly lower counts of oocysts in the excreta as compared to the infected negative control (p ⁇ 0.05). Q. infectoria treatment was equally effective as the positive control ( FIG. 2 ). This correlates with the results of the lesion score.
- Quercus infectoria is a potent candidate in controlling caecal coccidiosis in broiler birds caused by E. tenella.
- the efficacy of the extract was found to be on par with that of the positive control in terms of reducing lesion score, OPG and rate of mortality.
- Efficacy of Q. infectoria crude powder in controlling mixed infection of coccidiosis in broiler birds was evaluated.
- a 35 day in vivo trial was conducted wherein the birds were challenged with field strains of mixed culture of oocysts of the species E. tenella, E. acervulina and E. maxima.
- the mixed culture of oocysts was provided by Department of parasitology, Tamil Nadu Veterinary Research Institute, Namakkal, India.
- the oocysts culture was a mixture of E. tenella, E. acervulina and E. maxima isolated from feces of birds with clinical coccidiosis infection.
- Virulence of the oocysts obtained was evaluated in broiler birds and the dosage of the oocysts was finalized to be 5 ⁇ 10 5 based on the concentration that yields a lesion score of 3 and above for all the tested oocysts, E. tenella, E. maxima and E. acervulina.
- NDV Newcastle Disease Virus
- IBD Infectious Bursal Disease
- Extracts of gall nut of Q. infectoria were prepared by mixing the crude powder (100-800 micron particle size) in distilled water at the ratio of 1:2, then extracting at 80 to 90° C. for one and half hour with agitation. The extract was filtered and again the residue was extracted in water in a similar manner. This was repeated for about 2 more times and the total liquid extract was freeze dried.
- an in vitro method based on 3-(4, 5-Dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) reduction assay was developed to evaluate the anti-sporozoite activity of plant extracts as a measure of the viability of the sporozoites.
- the optimized method included the preparation, sterilization and purification of sporozoites, followed by incubation of sporozoite suspension (minimum of 10 5 cells/ml) with required concentration of plant extract.
- the plant samples were prepared by mixing crude powder into a known volume of distilled water to achieve the specific ppm, vortexed for 2 min and filtered through a 0.2 ⁇ syringe filter.
- MTT-PMS solution (0.2 millimolar each) is incubated with the sporozoite suspension (at 1:10 ratio) for 2 h at 41° C. After incubation, the contents are centrifuged at 800 g for 5 min and the supernatant is carefully removed. The purple dye formazan is dissolved in 200 ul DMSO and the absorbance is measured at 530 nm against a reference wavelength of 630 nm.
- MTT assay was carried out for the evaluation of Q. infectoria at various dosage levels along with Coccidiostac (Salinomycin) as positive control ( FIG. 6 ). There was a dose dependent reduction in the viability of sporozoites in the Q. infectoria treated samples as compared to the control.
- Sporozoites were obtained from sporulated oocysts after glass bead grinding and enzymatic excystation.
- As host cells Madin-Darby Bovine Kidney (MDBK) cells, were selected. Sporozoites and Quercus infectoria at 50 and 100 ppm were added to MDBK host cells for four hours. Afterwards, the medium was removed, cells were washed and fresh medium was added. After 4 (T4), 24 (T24), 48 (T48) and 72 (T72) hours the medium and MDBK cells were collected and stored at ⁇ 20° C.
- MDBK Madin-Darby Bovine Kidney
- the negative control was MDBK cells infected with Eimeria sporozoites, incubated in cell culture medium.
- the positive control was MDBK cells infected with Eimeria sporozoites, incubated with a 5 ⁇ g/ml solution of Salinomycin.
- DNA was extracted from the infected MDBK cells.
- Real-time PCR to detect Eimeria DNA was performed on the samples for the different time points and different treatments.
- the PCR results are presented in FIG. 7 .
- the negative control shows a clear Eimeria proliferation since there is a 15 fold increase in Eimeria DNA at 72 hours versus the start at 4 hours.
- the positive control was able to inhibit the proliferation completely.
- Q. infectoria treatments a clear inhibition of the proliferation was observed versus the start of 4 hours, in a dose dependent manner.
- Sporozoites were obtained from sporulated oocysts after glass bead grinding and enzymatic excystation.
- As host cells Madin-Darby Bovine Kidney (MDBK) cells, were selected. Sporozoites were pre-treated with 50, 100 and 250 ppm of Quercus infectoria for three hours. Thereafter, the sporozoite suspension was washed and put onto a culture of MDBK cells for 20 hours. After incubation, the medium was removed, cells were washed and fresh medium was added. After 20, 72 and 96 hours the medium and MDBK cells were collected and stored at ⁇ 20° C.
- MDBK Madin-Darby Bovine Kidney
- the negative control was MDBK cells infected with Eimeria sporozoites, incubated in cell culture medium.
- the positive control was MDBK cells infected with Eimeria sporozoites, incubated with a 5 ⁇ g/ml solution of Salinomycin.
- DNA was extracted from the MDBK cells.
- Real-time PCR to detect Eimeria tenella DNA was performed on the samples for the different time points and different treatments.
- the PCR results are presented in FIG. 9 .
- the negative control shows a clear Eimeria proliferation since there is a 20 fold increase in Eimeria DNA at 96 hours versus the start at 20 hours.
- the positive control was able to inhibit the proliferation completely.
- the different dosages of Q. infectoria all inhibited the Eimeria proliferation.
- Bioassay Guided Fractionation assay (BGFA) of Q. infectoria gall nuts was carried out using the modified MTT reduction assay as the bioassay as we had identified that the crude extract possess anti-sporozoite activity and this could be one of the mode of action by which it is able to control coccidiosis.
- Q. infectoria gall nut crude powder was fractionated using different solvent by column chromatography. The sample from each of the fractions was evaluated for their anti-sporozoite activity. Methanol and water fractions of Q. infectoria showed better reduction in the viability of sporozoites as compared to the other fractions and were comparable to the Salinomycin control ( FIG. 11 ).
- Sporozoites were obtained from sporulated oocysts after glass bead grinding and enzymatic excystation.
- As host cells Madin-Darby Bovine Kidney (MDBK) cells, were selected. MDBK cells were incubated with 10 ppm gallic acid for seven hours. Afterwards the medium was removed and a sporozoite suspension was added to the MDBK cells for 20 hours. After incubation, the medium was removed, cells were washed and fresh medium was added. After 20, 72 and 96 hours the medium and the MDBK cells were collected and stored at ⁇ 20° C.
- MDBK Madin-Darby Bovine Kidney
- the negative control was MDBK cells infected with Eimeria sporozoites, incubated in cell culture medium.
- the positive control was MDBK cells infected with Eimeria sporozoites, incubated with a 5 ⁇ g/ml solution of Salinomycin.
- DNA was extracted from the MDBK cells.
- Real-time PCR to detect Eimeria DNA was performed on the samples for the different time points and different treatments.
- the PCR results are presented in FIG. 16 .
- the negative control shows a clear Eimeria proliferation since there is a 60 fold increase in Eimeria DNA at 96 hours versus the start at 20 hours.
- the positive control was able to inhibit the proliferation almost completely.
- gallic acid treatment a clear inhibition of the proliferation was observed in a dose dependent manner. This indicates that gallic acid at a low dose of 10 ppm is able to protect the host cells to some extend against Eimeria proliferation.
- Sporozoites were obtained from sporulated oocysts after glass bead grinding and enzymatic excystation.
- As host cells Madin-Darby Bovine Kidney (MDBK) cells, were selected. Sporozoites were pre-treated with 10, 25 and 50 ppm gallic acid monohydrate for three hours. Thereafter, the sporozoite suspension was washed and put onto a culture of MDBK cells for 20 hours. After incubation, the medium was removed, cells were washed and fresh medium was added. After 20, 72 and 96 hours the medium and MDBK cells were collected and stored at ⁇ 20° C.
- MDBK Madin-Darby Bovine Kidney
- the negative control was MDBK cells infected with Eimeria sporozoites, incubated in cell culture medium.
- the positive control was MDBK cells infected with Eimeria sporozoites, incubated with a 5 ⁇ g/ml solution of Salinomycin.
- DNA was extracted from the MDBK cells.
- Real-time PCR to detect Eimeria DNA was performed on the samples for the different time points and different treatments.
- the PCR results are presented in FIG. 18 .
- the negative control shows a clear Eimeria proliferation since there is a 20 fold increase in Eimeria DNA at 96 hours versus the start at 20 hours.
- the positive control as well as the different dosages of gallic acid inhibited the Eimeria proliferation. There was a slightly lower effect visible for 10 ppm gallic acid. But this is negligible in comparison to the increase in the negative control.
- the efficacy of gallic acid at three different dosages of 11, 22 and 33 ppm in controlling coccidiosis in broiler birds was evaluated by an in vivo challenge trial.
- the birds were induced with mixed infection of Eimeria using oocysts of E. tenella, E. maxima and E. acervulina. These oocysts were isolated from birds confirmed with clinical coccidiosis.
- the trial design, oocysts dosage, vaccination schedule, farm maintenance were similar to that of example 3.
- the lesion scoring showed that there was significant reduction in the score for all the three tested species of Eimeria as compared to the infected control and even the positive control, Salinomycin ( FIG. 20 ).
- Rhus chinensis Choinese gall nut
- Terminalia chebula Indian gall nut
- Rhus chinensis contains about 70% hydrolysable tannins
- Terminalia chebula contains around 0.28% free gallic acid.
- T. chebula contains 25 to 40% hydrolysable tannins which can degrade to release gallic acid.
- Sporozoites were obtained from sporulated oocysts after glass bead grinding and enzymatic excystation.
- As host cells Madin-Darby Bovine Kidney (MDBK) cells, were selected. Sporozoites were pre-treated with 50, 100 and 250 ppm of Terminalia chebula for three hours. Thereafter, the sporozoite suspension was washed and put onto a culture of MDBK cells for 20 hours. After incubation, the medium was removed, cells were washed and fresh medium was added. After 20, 72 and 96 hours the medium and MDBK cells were collected and stored at ⁇ 20° C.
- MDBK Madin-Darby Bovine Kidney
- the negative control was MDBK cells infected with Eimeria sporozoites, incubated in cell culture medium.
- the positive control was MDBK cells infected with Eimeria sporozoites, incubated with a 5 ⁇ g/ml solution of Salinomycin.
- DNA was extracted from the MDBK cells.
- Real-time PCR to detect Eimeria tenella DNA was performed on the samples for the different time points and different treatments.
- the PCR results are presented in FIG. 23 .
- the negative control shows a clear Eimeria proliferation since there is a 20 fold increase in Eimeria DNA at 96 hours versus the start at 20 hours.
- the positive control as well as 250 ppm T. chebula completely inhibited the Eimeria proliferation. There was a dose-response effect visible although the lower effect for 100 ppm T. chebula is negligible in comparison to the increase in the negative control
- the efficacy of plants containing gallic acid namely, Terminalia chebula and Rhus chinensis in controlling coccidiosis in broiler birds was evaluated by an in vivo challenge trial.
- the birds were induced with mixed infection of Eimeria using oocysts of E. tenella, E. maxima and E. acervulina isolated from birds confirmed with clinical coccidiosis.
- the trial design, oocysts dosage, vaccination schedule, farm maintenance were similar to that of example 3.
- Rhus chinensis at 200 and 500 ppm and Terminalia chebula at 1000 ppm were able to reduce the score for all the three tested species of Eimeria as compared to the infected control and even the positive control, Salinomycin ( FIG. 25 ).
- the oocysts per gram showed a similar trend ( FIG. 26 ), however, mortality was not observed in any of the treatment groups including the infected control. Dose dependent response was observed with Rhus chinensis.
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Natural Medicines & Medicinal Plants (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
- Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Pharmacology & Pharmacy (AREA)
- Epidemiology (AREA)
- Medical Informatics (AREA)
- Microbiology (AREA)
- Mycology (AREA)
- Biotechnology (AREA)
- Botany (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Alternative & Traditional Medicine (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Tropical Medicine & Parasitology (AREA)
- General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
- Medicines Containing Plant Substances (AREA)
- Acyclic And Carbocyclic Compounds In Medicinal Compositions (AREA)
- Pharmaceuticals Containing Other Organic And Inorganic Compounds (AREA)
Priority Applications (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US13/928,504 US20140161919A1 (en) | 2012-06-27 | 2013-06-27 | Plant Parts and Extracts Having Anticoccidial Activity |
US14/675,180 US10568923B2 (en) | 2012-06-27 | 2015-03-31 | Plant parts and extracts having anticoccidial activity |
US14/802,545 US10426808B2 (en) | 2012-06-27 | 2015-07-17 | Plant extracts having anticoccidial activity |
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US201261664795P | 2012-06-27 | 2012-06-27 | |
IN177DE2013 | 2013-01-23 | ||
IN177/DEL/2013 | 2013-01-23 | ||
US13/928,504 US20140161919A1 (en) | 2012-06-27 | 2013-06-27 | Plant Parts and Extracts Having Anticoccidial Activity |
Related Child Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US14/675,180 Continuation-In-Part US10568923B2 (en) | 2012-06-27 | 2015-03-31 | Plant parts and extracts having anticoccidial activity |
US14/802,545 Division US10426808B2 (en) | 2012-06-27 | 2015-07-17 | Plant extracts having anticoccidial activity |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20140161919A1 true US20140161919A1 (en) | 2014-06-12 |
Family
ID=49784015
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US13/928,504 Abandoned US20140161919A1 (en) | 2012-06-27 | 2013-06-27 | Plant Parts and Extracts Having Anticoccidial Activity |
US14/802,545 Active 2035-07-08 US10426808B2 (en) | 2012-06-27 | 2015-07-17 | Plant extracts having anticoccidial activity |
Family Applications After (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US14/802,545 Active 2035-07-08 US10426808B2 (en) | 2012-06-27 | 2015-07-17 | Plant extracts having anticoccidial activity |
Country Status (9)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US20140161919A1 (ja) |
EP (1) | EP2866794A4 (ja) |
JP (1) | JP6441794B2 (ja) |
KR (1) | KR102104921B1 (ja) |
CN (1) | CN104936583A (ja) |
AU (1) | AU2013280331C1 (ja) |
BR (1) | BR112014032632A2 (ja) |
CA (1) | CA2877884C (ja) |
WO (1) | WO2014004761A2 (ja) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2017066777A1 (en) * | 2015-10-15 | 2017-04-20 | Kemin Industries, Inc. | Compositions and methods of improving performance and intestinal health of poultry |
Families Citing this family (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN106107194A (zh) * | 2016-06-28 | 2016-11-16 | 北京中农华正兽药有限责任公司 | 净化肉鸡小肠球虫病的组合物及使用方法 |
FR3078629B1 (fr) | 2018-03-12 | 2020-07-31 | Adisseo France Sas | Additif alimentaire a base de saponines pour le traitement de la coccidiose |
KR102408566B1 (ko) * | 2020-04-09 | 2022-06-16 | 대한민국 | 터미날리아 비아라타 추출물을 이용한 피부 주름 개선용 조성물 |
KR102660905B1 (ko) * | 2020-09-25 | 2024-04-24 | 씨제이제일제당 (주) | 비올라세인을 포함하는 항콕시듐용 조성물 및 이의 용도 |
Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN101744839A (zh) * | 2008-12-08 | 2010-06-23 | 杨建华 | 维药没食子及其提取物的抑制皮肤色素沉着和防晒美白作用 |
Family Cites Families (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0395294A3 (en) * | 1989-04-25 | 1991-05-22 | Takeda Chemical Industries, Ltd. | Control of protozoal disease |
CH688172A5 (fr) * | 1994-10-26 | 1997-06-13 | Crina | Composition d'additif pour aliments destinés à la volaille. |
SK14882002A3 (en) * | 2000-04-27 | 2004-11-03 | Pfizer Prod Inc | The use of azalide antibiotic compositions for treating or preventing a bacterial or protozoal infection in mammals |
WO2004052393A1 (en) * | 2002-12-09 | 2004-06-24 | University Of Georgia Research Foundation, Inc. | Coccidial vaccine and methods of making and using same |
DE102006038292A1 (de) | 2006-08-16 | 2008-02-21 | Bayer Healthcare Ag | Transdermale Anwendung von Triazinen zur Bekämpfung von Coccidien-Infektionen |
DE102007045724B4 (de) * | 2007-09-24 | 2012-01-26 | Evonik Stockhausen Gmbh | Superabsorbierende Zusammensetzung mit Tanninen zur Geruchskontrolle, Verfahren zu deren Herstellung und Verwendung |
CN102988764B (zh) * | 2012-12-19 | 2014-07-23 | 西安市昌盛动物保健品有限公司 | 一种抗鸡球虫的中药制剂及其制备方法 |
-
2013
- 2013-06-27 AU AU2013280331A patent/AU2013280331C1/en active Active
- 2013-06-27 EP EP13808799.4A patent/EP2866794A4/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2013-06-27 CN CN201380044551.1A patent/CN104936583A/zh active Pending
- 2013-06-27 CA CA2877884A patent/CA2877884C/en active Active
- 2013-06-27 BR BR112014032632A patent/BR112014032632A2/pt not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2013-06-27 US US13/928,504 patent/US20140161919A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2013-06-27 JP JP2015520483A patent/JP6441794B2/ja active Active
- 2013-06-27 KR KR1020157002227A patent/KR102104921B1/ko active IP Right Grant
- 2013-06-27 WO PCT/US2013/048064 patent/WO2014004761A2/en active Application Filing
-
2015
- 2015-07-17 US US14/802,545 patent/US10426808B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN101744839A (zh) * | 2008-12-08 | 2010-06-23 | 杨建华 | 维药没食子及其提取物的抑制皮肤色素沉着和防晒美白作用 |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
McDougald et al., Enhancement of Resistance to Coccidiosis and Necrotic Enteritis in BroilerChickens by Dietary Muscadine Pomace, 2008, Avian Diseases, 52: 646-651 * |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2017066777A1 (en) * | 2015-10-15 | 2017-04-20 | Kemin Industries, Inc. | Compositions and methods of improving performance and intestinal health of poultry |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US10426808B2 (en) | 2019-10-01 |
EP2866794A4 (en) | 2015-12-09 |
KR102104921B1 (ko) | 2020-04-28 |
BR112014032632A2 (pt) | 2017-06-27 |
AU2013280331A1 (en) | 2015-01-22 |
JP2015522023A (ja) | 2015-08-03 |
AU2013280331C1 (en) | 2018-06-21 |
KR20150023899A (ko) | 2015-03-05 |
CA2877884A1 (en) | 2014-01-03 |
WO2014004761A2 (en) | 2014-01-03 |
US20160015765A1 (en) | 2016-01-21 |
CA2877884C (en) | 2022-09-06 |
WO2014004761A3 (en) | 2014-02-20 |
EP2866794A2 (en) | 2015-05-06 |
CN104936583A (zh) | 2015-09-23 |
AU2013280331B2 (en) | 2017-12-14 |
JP6441794B2 (ja) | 2018-12-19 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US10426808B2 (en) | Plant extracts having anticoccidial activity | |
Cejas et al. | Evaluation of quebracho red wood (Schinopsis lorentzii) polyphenols vegetable extract for the reduction of coccidiosis in broiler chicks | |
Dragan et al. | Effects of Artemisia annua and Pimpinella anisum on Eimeria tenella (Phylum Apicomplexa) low infection in chickens | |
Imran et al. | Anticoccidial Efficacy of Citrus sinensis Essential Oil in Broiler Chicken. | |
Wang et al. | Anticoccidial effects of areca nut (Areca catechu L.) extract on broiler chicks experimentally infected with Eimeria tenella | |
Acharya et al. | Alternatives to fight against coccidiosis: A review | |
Adamu et al. | Effect of Lepidium sativum L.(garden cress) seed and its extract on experimental Eimeria tenella infection in broiler chickens | |
Hayajneh et al. | Anticoccidial effect of apple cider vinegar on broiler chicken: an organic treatment to measure anti-oxidant effect | |
Ahmad et al. | Management and control of coccidiosis in poultry—A review | |
Meskerem et al. | Protective effects of Moringa stenopetala leaf supplemented diets on Eimeria tenella infected broiler chickens in debre zeit, central, Ethiopia | |
KR100519720B1 (ko) | 유해활성산소 및 방사선에 의한 생체손상 억제효과와면역활성 증진효과를 갖는 프로폴리스 함유 복합조성물 및그의 제조방법 | |
US10568923B2 (en) | Plant parts and extracts having anticoccidial activity | |
US20240024396A1 (en) | Anticoccidial composition comprising ginkgo leaves and use thereof | |
Zyan et al. | Molecular identification of Eimeria tenella in broiler chickens in Kalyoubia governorate and evaluation of different strategies for control cecal coccidiosis. | |
KR100836944B1 (ko) | 돌외를 포함하는 콕시듐증의 예방 또는 치료용 조성물 | |
Abbasi et al. | In vitro and in vivo activity of cinnamaldehyde against Eimeria kofoidi in chukar partridge (Alectoris chukar) | |
KR20220035944A (ko) | 항-콕시듐성 식물성 제제 | |
Ahmadov et al. | Effects of herbal plants on ducks and quail infected with Eimeria species | |
EP4302608A1 (en) | Anticoccidial composition comprising coumaric acid and use thereof | |
Ferdji et al. | Anticoccidial resistance in poultry: determination of ionophore sensitivity for Eimeria acervulina and Eimeria maxima isolated from broiler chicken farms in Tizi Ouzou province (Algeria) | |
EP3024470A1 (de) | Zusatzstoff für futtermittel, nahrungsmittel, trinkwasser oder pharmazeutische präparate | |
Guven et al. | Anticoccidal efficacy of usnic acid in broilers | |
Alqhtani et al. | Efficacy and Optimal Feeding Level of Rumex Nervosus Leaves on Blood Biochemistry, Carcass Characteristics, Productivity Indices, and Anticoccidial Indicators of Broiler Chickens Infected or Not Infected with Eimeria Tenella | |
Tuvshintulga et al. | Evaluation of inhibitory effect of methylene blue against Babesia and Theileria parasites | |
Jatau et al. | COMBINED EFFECTS OF FEED SUPPLEMENTATION WITH PROBIOTIC AND ORAL ADMINISTRATION OF METHANOL LEAF EXTRACT OF Anacardium occidentale AGAINST EXPERIMENTAL Eimeria tenella INFECTION IN BROILERS |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT, IOWA Free format text: IP SUPPLEMENT (PATENTS);ASSIGNORS:KEMIN INDUSTRIES, INC.;KEMIN FOODS, L.C.;KEMIN HOLDINGS, L.C.;REEL/FRAME:031615/0812 Effective date: 20131104 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: KEMIN INDUSTRIES, INC., IOWA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:SCHOETERS, ELKE;WOUTERS, HILDE;MAST, ILSE;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20130710 TO 20140130;REEL/FRAME:032353/0801 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |