US20130105047A1 - Method for manufacturing mechanical components made of particularly wear-resistant austempered spheroidal cast iron - Google Patents

Method for manufacturing mechanical components made of particularly wear-resistant austempered spheroidal cast iron Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20130105047A1
US20130105047A1 US13/805,310 US201113805310A US2013105047A1 US 20130105047 A1 US20130105047 A1 US 20130105047A1 US 201113805310 A US201113805310 A US 201113805310A US 2013105047 A1 US2013105047 A1 US 2013105047A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
comprised
cast iron
mechanical components
casting
percentage
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US13/805,310
Inventor
Franco ZANARDI
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
ZANARDI FONDERIE SpA
Original Assignee
ZANARDI FONDERIE SpA
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by ZANARDI FONDERIE SpA filed Critical ZANARDI FONDERIE SpA
Assigned to ZANARDI FONDERIE S.P.A. reassignment ZANARDI FONDERIE S.P.A. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: ZANARDI, FRANCO
Publication of US20130105047A1 publication Critical patent/US20130105047A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21DMODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D5/00Heat treatments of cast-iron
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21DMODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D1/00General methods or devices for heat treatment, e.g. annealing, hardening, quenching or tempering
    • C21D1/34Methods of heating
    • C21D1/44Methods of heating in heat-treatment baths
    • C21D1/46Salt baths
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C33/00Making ferrous alloys
    • C22C33/08Making cast-iron alloys
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C37/00Cast-iron alloys
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C37/00Cast-iron alloys
    • C22C37/04Cast-iron alloys containing spheroidal graphite

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method for manufacturing mechanical components made of particularly wear-resistant austempered spheroidal cast iron.
  • austempered spheroidal cast irons of various types and having different structures are known and are used in particular for manufacturing various types of mechanical components.
  • the thermal treatment required in order to obtain this type of cast iron consists of a treatment of complete austenitization, with holding of the component at a temperature higher than the upper austenitization limit temperature (usually designated by A c3 ) followed by quenching in a molten salt bath.
  • a c3 the upper austenitization limit temperature
  • ausferritic structure is composed of acicular ferrite and austenite. This particular structure gives the material high mechanical characteristics. Since it is essential to prevent the forming of pearlite during cooling, it is necessary to alloy the material with alloying elements, such as nickel and/or molybdenum.
  • the cited international standard ISO 17804 : 2005 defines, in Annex A, “Abrasion-resistant grades of ausferritic spheroidal graphite cast iron”, grades ISO17804/JS/HBW400 and ISO17804/JS/HBW450. These are the two recommended grades for applications that require high resistance to wear.
  • the maximum contribution to wear-resistance is given by the high proportion of acicular ferrite in the matrix and by its hardness.
  • FIG. 5 taken from “Section IV Ductile Iron Databook for Design Engineers” (http://www.ductile.org/didata/Section4), shows schematically the Dorazil curve (the topmost chart).
  • the curve represents the volumetric fraction of stabilized austenite as a function of the time elapsed from the moment when the material is immersed in the austempering bath.
  • the horizontal portion which represents the maximum of this curve, corresponds to the maximum stability of the austenite as a consequence of its progressive enrichment with carbon. Accordingly, the Brinell hardness of the material also reaches its minimum value, since the transformation into martensite of an important volume fraction of the matrix subjected to the hardness test is avoided.
  • first stage The part of the transformation process from the beginning to the attainment of the cited condition of maximum stability of the austenite is termed first stage, since an excessive extension of the holding of the material in the austempering bath would cause an unwanted decomposition of the austenite, stabilized by the carbon enrichment, into acicular ferrite and carbides, a possible part of the transformation process known as second stage.
  • the condition of maximum stability of the austenite is necessary in order to manage the process in controlled and repetitive conditions. It is also known that the optimum time, with respect to this requirement, of permanence in the thermal bath in order to reach the condition of maximum stability of the carbon-enriched austenite depends essentially on the thickness of the casting, on the austenitization temperature, on the isothermal quenching temperature, and on the content of silicon, manganese and other elements with strong segregation, such as molybdenum.
  • This comparative chart shows the advantageous behavior, in wear resistance, of ADI cast irons with respect to the materials with which they have been compared.
  • the wear resistance values offered by ADI cast irons advantageous in many applications in which it has been possible to avoid the induction quenching of cast irons and/or steels, the nitriding of cast irons and/or steels, the cementation of steels, such as for example:
  • ADI cast irons are insufficient and it is necessary to resort to other families of abrasion-resistant cast irons.
  • These materials besides being penalized by the cost associated with a high content of carbide-forming alloying elements (these are in fact ledeburitic white cast irons in which the carbon is predominantly in a form that is combined with iron), are even more limited in use due to their fragility, which is a consequence of the ledeburitic white structure.
  • wear-resistant steels which, as is known, are characterized by a foundry process that is more complex and expensive than the typical one of cast iron foundry.
  • CADI cast irons make it possible indeed to obtain mechanical components that are particularly wear-resistant, on the other hand they are more fragile than normally required in many applications and are also difficult to obtain.
  • the chart shown in FIG. 2 taken from “Agricultural Applications of Austempered Cast Irons” by Kathy L. Hayrynen PhD FASM, Tim Dorn, John R. Keough PE, Vasko Popovski PE, Steven Sumner, Anon Rimmel PhD, illustrates the improvement of the resistance to wear/abrasion of CADI cast irons, compared with abrasion-resistant cast irons, which increases as the carbide content rises.
  • the aim of the present invention is to provide a new method for manufacturing austempered spheroidal cast iron that makes it possible to obtain a material that has an optimum wear-resistance and at the same time a sufficient resilience.
  • FIG. 1 is a comparative chart of the wear resistance of various metallic materials, including various ADI cast irons and various types of hardened and tempered spheroidal cast irons and steels;
  • FIG. 2 is a chart, similar to the previous one, in which the behavior of an ADI cast iron and of CADI cast irons with different percentages of carbides are compared with abrasion-resistant cast irons;
  • FIG. 3 is a perspective view of a hammer subjected to a method according to the invention.
  • FIG. 4 is a micrograph at 500 magnifications of a component subjected to a method according to the invention.
  • FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram showing the effect of austempering time on the amount and stability of austenite and the hardness of ADI;
  • FIG. 6 is a plot of a time/temperature curve of a thermal treatment for interrupted quenching in a salt bath related to the method according to the invention.
  • the present invention relates to a method for manufacturing spheroidal cast iron mechanical components such as, for example, armors for stone mills and for the cement industry, screw conveyors for the cement industry, hammers for stone mills, lamination rollers for clays and mechanical components in general.
  • the method entails the following steps:
  • critical rate is understood as the minimum cooling rate required to prevent pearlitic transformation.
  • interrupted quenching in salt bath is understood to be a temperating process (as shown in FIG. 6 ) that has a cooling step at a rate that is higher than the critical rate and stops at a temperature higher than that at the beginning of the martensitic transformation MS, followed by a holding period at this temperature for the time sufficient to start the reaction but insufficient to complete it; finally, rapid cooling to ambient temperature is performed.
  • interrupted quenching in salt bath in practice is interrupted twice: a first time because during the quick cooling step one stops at the isothermal holding temperature, which is higher than MS, the second time because we interrupt the reaction at isothermal temperature at a time that is very early with respect to the condition of maximum stability of carbon-enriched austenite.
  • the method according to the invention provides for limiting, during the step for producing the casting, the forming of disperse primary carbons (Fe 3 C) in a percentage by volume of less than 5% of the volume.
  • the step that consists in limiting the forming of disperse primary carbons (Fe 3 C) comprises a process of post-inoculation in the step for pouring the casting into the die.
  • the casting of the spheroidal cast iron mechanical component subjected to the method according to the invention has a nickel content by weight comprised between 0% and 3% and a copper content by weight comprised between 0% and 1.2%.
  • the casting of the spheroidal cast iron mechanical component subjected to the method according to the invention can have a silicon content by weight comprised between 1.5% and 2.5%.
  • the casting of the spheroidal cast iron mechanical component subjected to the method according to the invention has a molybdenum content by weight comprised between 0.4% and 1%.
  • the temperature used preferably to perform the isothermal step of interrupted quenching is comprised between 290° C. and 310° C.
  • thermal interrupted quenching treatment designates a cooling with a rate that is higher than the critical one (minimum cooling rate required to prevent pearlitic transformation), keeping the casting at a higher isothermal temperature than the temperature of martensitic transformation MS; the holding at this temperature has a duration sufficient to make the ausferritic reaction start at the edges of the spheroids and is interrupted at such a stage as to obtain the desired proportion of metastable austenite.
  • Control of the process is possible thanks to the conspicuous slowing of the reaction, caused by the relatively high ratio of high-segregation alloying elements.
  • the temperature at which the mechanical components are held, as mentioned, during the austenitization step is higher than the temperature technically identified as A c3 , or temperature of complete austenitization for the time necessary to obtain a fully austenitic structure. This can be obtained by choosing a temperature higher than 850° C. and lower than 910° C. and, advantageously, according to the carbon and silicon content, comprised between 880° C. and 900° C.
  • Such temperatures are indicative for cast irons having a carbon content of approximately 3.5% and a silicon content of approximately 2%, but, obviously, may vary according to the percentages of these elements in the casting to be subjected to the thermal treatment.
  • the holding time of the mechanical component at the austenitization temperature A c3 is comprised between 90 minutes and 210 minutes, preferably between 120 minutes and 180 minutes.
  • the isothermal holding step has a duration comprised between 10 minutes and 30 minutes.
  • the method according to the invention is based essentially on the addition of a high ratio of high-segregation alloying elements, such as manganese and molybdenum.
  • a high ratio of high-segregation alloying elements such as manganese and molybdenum.
  • a hammer was provided by casting with a weight of approximately 1.74 kg, using cast iron with a predominantly pearlitic matrix (pearlite in a percentage higher than 80%) having a carbon percentage equal to 3.47%, a silicon percentage equal to 2.08%, a manganese percentage equal to 1.07% and a molybdenum percentage equal to 0.94%.
  • pearlite in a percentage higher than 80%
  • the component was brought to a complete austenitization temperature (higher than A c3 ) equal to 890° C. and was held at this temperature for 120 minutes.
  • the components made of austempered spheroidal cast iron according to the invention have always shown, for an equal hardness, a higher resistance to abrasive wear (by approximately 10-15%) than traditional austempered cast irons and Q&T steels.
  • the dimensions may be any according to the requirements, although it has been found that the method according to the invention is particularly effective for treating components with dimensions up to 100 mm.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Thermal Sciences (AREA)
  • Crystallography & Structural Chemistry (AREA)
  • Heat Treatment Of Articles (AREA)
  • Mushroom Cultivation (AREA)

Abstract

A method for manufacturing mechanical components made of spheroidal cast iron, comprising the following steps:
    • providing a casting of a mechanical cast iron component with a percentage of pearlitic structure greater than 70%, having a carbon content comprised between 2.5% and 4.0%, a silicon content comprised between 1.5% and 3.5%, a manganese content comprised between 0.6% and 1.2%, a molybdenum content comprised between 0% and 1%, and a chromium content comprised between 0% and 0.5%;
    • bringing the cast iron casting with a percentage of pearlitic structure greater than 70% to a temperature that is higher than the upper austenitization temperature (Ac3) for the time required to obtain a fully austenitic structure;
    • performing a thermal treatment for interrupted quenching in a salt bath, comprising a step of cooling the mechanical components in a salt bath at a cooling rate that is higher than the critical rate and an isothermal holding step at a temperature comprised between 250° C. and 320° C. for a time comprised between 10 minutes and 60 minutes in order to obtain a matrix comprising metastable unsaturated austenite in a percentage comprised between 40% and 90% of the total.

Description

  • The present invention relates to a method for manufacturing mechanical components made of particularly wear-resistant austempered spheroidal cast iron.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • Currently, austempered spheroidal cast irons of various types and having different structures are known and are used in particular for manufacturing various types of mechanical components.
  • The thermal treatment required in order to obtain this type of cast iron consists of a treatment of complete austenitization, with holding of the component at a temperature higher than the upper austenitization limit temperature (usually designated by Ac3) followed by quenching in a molten salt bath.
  • The final structure that is obtained, technically termed ausferritic structure, is composed of acicular ferrite and austenite. This particular structure gives the material high mechanical characteristics. Since it is essential to prevent the forming of pearlite during cooling, it is necessary to alloy the material with alloying elements, such as nickel and/or molybdenum.
  • With reference to international standard ISO 17804:2005 “Founding—Ausferritic spheroidal graphite cast irons—Classification”, Table 1 and Annex C, the mechanical characteristics vary with the structure and therefore with the hardness. In particular, as the hardness increases, so does the minimum tensile strength, while the minimum elongation decreases. Similar relations are found in standard ASTM A 897/A 897/M—06 “Standard Specification for Austempered Ductile Iron Castings” and in other standards of this family of materials.
  • It is known that, in general, all grades of austempered spheroidal cast irons represented in the above mentioned standard exhibit a good resistance to wear, without the need for specific surface treatments. This characteristic is not explicitly highlighted in the standard, since determining it is difficult and not standardized.
  • The phenomenon, which has long been described extensively in literature, has to be ascribed to the combined effect of two competing characteristics:
      • the proportion of acicular ferrite in the matrix and its hardness
      • the transformation of part (up to 8%) of the austenite in martensite, as a consequence of a pressure (PITRAM effect—pressure induced transformation of residual austenite into martensite) and/or of a stress state (SITRAM effect—stress induced transformation of residual austenite into martensite).
  • As the hardness of the material increases, so does the contribution of the first characteristic, while the contribution of the second one decreases.
  • The cited international standard ISO 17804:2005 defines, in Annex A, “Abrasion-resistant grades of ausferritic spheroidal graphite cast iron”, grades ISO17804/JS/HBW400 and ISO17804/JS/HBW450. These are the two recommended grades for applications that require high resistance to wear.
  • In this case, the maximum contribution to wear-resistance is given by the high proportion of acicular ferrite in the matrix and by its hardness.
  • It is known that generally all grades of austempered spheroidal cast irons represented in the cited standard derive from a process of pouring and subsequent heat treatment for austempering adapted to give the transformed austenite (high part of the Dorazil curve) the maximum possible stability.
  • FIG. 5, taken from “Section IV Ductile Iron Databook for Design Engineers” (http://www.ductile.org/didata/Section4), shows schematically the Dorazil curve (the topmost chart). The curve represents the volumetric fraction of stabilized austenite as a function of the time elapsed from the moment when the material is immersed in the austempering bath. The horizontal portion, which represents the maximum of this curve, corresponds to the maximum stability of the austenite as a consequence of its progressive enrichment with carbon. Accordingly, the Brinell hardness of the material also reaches its minimum value, since the transformation into martensite of an important volume fraction of the matrix subjected to the hardness test is avoided.
  • The part of the transformation process from the beginning to the attainment of the cited condition of maximum stability of the austenite is termed first stage, since an excessive extension of the holding of the material in the austempering bath would cause an unwanted decomposition of the austenite, stabilized by the carbon enrichment, into acicular ferrite and carbides, a possible part of the transformation process known as second stage.
  • The condition of maximum stability of the austenite is necessary in order to manage the process in controlled and repetitive conditions. It is also known that the optimum time, with respect to this requirement, of permanence in the thermal bath in order to reach the condition of maximum stability of the carbon-enriched austenite depends essentially on the thickness of the casting, on the austenitization temperature, on the isothermal quenching temperature, and on the content of silicon, manganese and other elements with strong segregation, such as molybdenum.
  • It is also known that an excessive quantity of strong segregation elements, such as manganese and molybdenum, causes a very long dilation of the required holding time in the thermal bath. For this reason, strong segregation elements, such as manganese and molybdenum, must be limited to values that make the process industrially feasible.
  • The chart shown in FIG. 1, taken from “Section IV Ductile Iron Databook for Design Engineers http://www.ductile.org/didata/Section4/Figures/pfig423.htm”, gives evidence of the wear resistance for various materials.
  • This comparative chart shows the advantageous behavior, in wear resistance, of ADI cast irons with respect to the materials with which they have been compared.
  • The wear resistance values offered by ADI cast irons, advantageous in many applications in which it has been possible to avoid the induction quenching of cast irons and/or steels, the nitriding of cast irons and/or steels, the cementation of steels, such as for example:
      • driving wheels for tracks of earth-moving machines
      • epicyclic reduction gear bodies with broached teeth
      • driving shafts
      • et cetera,
        have been found to be insufficient in applications where higher wear resistance is required, such as for example:
      • armors for stone mills and for the cement industry
      • screw conveyors for the cement industry
      • hammers for stone mills
      • lamination rollers for clays
      • et cetera.
  • For such applications, ADI cast irons are insufficient and it is necessary to resort to other families of abrasion-resistant cast irons. These materials, besides being penalized by the cost associated with a high content of carbide-forming alloying elements (these are in fact ledeburitic white cast irons in which the carbon is predominantly in a form that is combined with iron), are even more limited in use due to their fragility, which is a consequence of the ledeburitic white structure. In the frequent cases in which a resistance, albeit a limited one, to impacts is required, it is necessary to use wear-resistant steels, which, as is known, are characterized by a foundry process that is more complex and expensive than the typical one of cast iron foundry.
  • For this reason, attempts have been made to increase the resistance to wear/abrasion by introducing carbides in the pouring step so as to obtain a so-called CADI cast iron (Carbidic Austempered Ductile Iron).
  • While on the one hand CADI cast irons make it possible indeed to obtain mechanical components that are particularly wear-resistant, on the other hand they are more fragile than normally required in many applications and are also difficult to obtain.
  • The chart shown in FIG. 2, taken from “Agricultural Applications of Austempered Cast Irons” by Kathy L. Hayrynen PhD FASM, Tim Dorn, John R. Keough PE, Vasko Popovski PE, Steven Sumner, Anon Rimmel PhD, illustrates the improvement of the resistance to wear/abrasion of CADI cast irons, compared with abrasion-resistant cast irons, which increases as the carbide content rises.
  • Correspondingly, by increasing the carbide content fragility increases.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The aim of the present invention is to provide a new method for manufacturing austempered spheroidal cast iron that makes it possible to obtain a material that has an optimum wear-resistance and at the same time a sufficient resilience.
  • This aim and these and other objects that will become better apparent hereinafter are achieved by a method for manufacturing spheroidal cast iron mechanical components according to what is indicated in the independent claims that follow.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • Further characteristics and advantages of the invention will become better apparent from the description of some preferred but not exclusive embodiments of a method for manufacturing spheroidal cast iron according to the present invention, illustrated by way of non-limiting example in the accompanying drawings, wherein:
  • FIG. 1 is a comparative chart of the wear resistance of various metallic materials, including various ADI cast irons and various types of hardened and tempered spheroidal cast irons and steels;
  • FIG. 2 is a chart, similar to the previous one, in which the behavior of an ADI cast iron and of CADI cast irons with different percentages of carbides are compared with abrasion-resistant cast irons;
  • FIG. 3 is a perspective view of a hammer subjected to a method according to the invention;
  • FIG. 4 is a micrograph at 500 magnifications of a component subjected to a method according to the invention;
  • FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram showing the effect of austempering time on the amount and stability of austenite and the hardness of ADI;
  • FIG. 6 is a plot of a time/temperature curve of a thermal treatment for interrupted quenching in a salt bath related to the method according to the invention.
  • DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • In the exemplary embodiments that follow, individual characteristics, given in relation to specific examples, may actually be interchanged with other different characteristics that exist in other exemplary embodiments.
  • Moreover, it is noted that anything found to be already known during the patenting process is understood not to be claimed and to be the subject of a disclaimer.
  • With reference to the figures, the present invention relates to a method for manufacturing spheroidal cast iron mechanical components such as, for example, armors for stone mills and for the cement industry, screw conveyors for the cement industry, hammers for stone mills, lamination rollers for clays and mechanical components in general.
  • In particular, the method entails the following steps:
      • providing a casting of a spheroidal cast iron mechanical component with a percentage by volume of pearlitic structure greater than 70%, having a carbon content by weight comprised between 2.5% and 4.0%, a silicon content by weight comprised between 1.5% and 3.5%, a manganese content by weight comprised between 0.6% and 1.2%, a molybdenum content by weight comprised between 0% and 1%, and a chromium content by weight comprised between 0% and 0.5%;
      • bringing said cast iron casting with a percentage by volume of pearlitic structure greater than 70% to a temperature that is higher than the upper austenitization temperature (Ac3) for the time required to obtain a fully austenitic structure;
      • performing a thermal treatment for interrupted quenching in a salt bath, comprising a step of cooling said mechanical components in a salt bath at a cooling rate that is higher than the critical rate and an isothermal holding step at a temperature comprised between 250° C. and 320° C. for a time comprised between 10 minutes and 60 minutes in order to obtain a matrix comprising metastable unsaturated austenite in a percentage by volume comprised between 40% and 90% of the total.
  • The expression “critical rate” is understood as the minimum cooling rate required to prevent pearlitic transformation.
  • The expression “interrupted quenching in salt bath” according to the provisions of the present application is understood to be a temperating process (as shown in FIG. 6) that has a cooling step at a rate that is higher than the critical rate and stops at a temperature higher than that at the beginning of the martensitic transformation MS, followed by a holding period at this temperature for the time sufficient to start the reaction but insufficient to complete it; finally, rapid cooling to ambient temperature is performed.
  • It should be noted that in the specific case the interrupted quenching in salt bath in practice is interrupted twice: a first time because during the quick cooling step one stops at the isothermal holding temperature, which is higher than MS, the second time because we interrupt the reaction at isothermal temperature at a time that is very early with respect to the condition of maximum stability of carbon-enriched austenite.
  • The method according to the invention provides for limiting, during the step for producing the casting, the forming of disperse primary carbons (Fe3C) in a percentage by volume of less than 5% of the volume.
  • Advantageously, the step that consists in limiting the forming of disperse primary carbons (Fe3C) comprises a process of post-inoculation in the step for pouring the casting into the die.
  • In particular, it has been found that it is particularly convenient if the percentage by volume of the pearlite in the casting on which the thermal treatment has to be performed is higher than 80%.
  • Conveniently, the casting of the spheroidal cast iron mechanical component subjected to the method according to the invention has a nickel content by weight comprised between 0% and 3% and a copper content by weight comprised between 0% and 1.2%.
  • Preferably, the casting of the spheroidal cast iron mechanical component subjected to the method according to the invention can have a silicon content by weight comprised between 1.5% and 2.5%.
  • Advantageously, the casting of the spheroidal cast iron mechanical component subjected to the method according to the invention has a molybdenum content by weight comprised between 0.4% and 1%.
  • Experimentally, moreover, it has been found particularly advantageous from the point of view of the typical mechanical characteristics of the components subjected to the method according to the invention, to start from spheroidal cast iron castings having a percentage by volume of pearlite substantially equal to 85%.
  • Advantageously, the temperature used preferably to perform the isothermal step of interrupted quenching is comprised between 290° C. and 310° C.
  • In particular, the expression “thermal interrupted quenching treatment” designates a cooling with a rate that is higher than the critical one (minimum cooling rate required to prevent pearlitic transformation), keeping the casting at a higher isothermal temperature than the temperature of martensitic transformation MS; the holding at this temperature has a duration sufficient to make the ausferritic reaction start at the edges of the spheroids and is interrupted at such a stage as to obtain the desired proportion of metastable austenite.
  • Control of the process is possible thanks to the conspicuous slowing of the reaction, caused by the relatively high ratio of high-segregation alloying elements.
  • The temperature at which the mechanical components are held, as mentioned, during the austenitization step is higher than the temperature technically identified as Ac3, or temperature of complete austenitization for the time necessary to obtain a fully austenitic structure. This can be obtained by choosing a temperature higher than 850° C. and lower than 910° C. and, advantageously, according to the carbon and silicon content, comprised between 880° C. and 900° C.
  • Such temperatures are indicative for cast irons having a carbon content of approximately 3.5% and a silicon content of approximately 2%, but, obviously, may vary according to the percentages of these elements in the casting to be subjected to the thermal treatment.
  • In order to obtain a fully austenitic structure, it is observed experimentally that, depending on the dimensions of the mechanical component, the holding time of the mechanical component at the austenitization temperature Ac3 is comprised between 90 minutes and 210 minutes, preferably between 120 minutes and 180 minutes.
  • Preferably, during the interrupted quenching treatment the isothermal holding step has a duration comprised between 10 minutes and 30 minutes.
  • The method according to the invention is based essentially on the addition of a high ratio of high-segregation alloying elements, such as manganese and molybdenum. In this manner, the ausferritic reaction starts with a rate of transformation, measurable as volume of matrix transformed in the unit time, which is appreciable from the edges of the spheroids (First To Freeze=First To React), where the concentration of manganese and molybdenum is minimal and the concentration of silicon is maximum, slowing down very quickly when the reaction advances in the direction of the edges of the grains (Last To Freeze=Last to React).
  • Thanks to this great slowing, caused by the high ratio of segregating elements, it is possible to control the structure composed of high-hardness acicular ferrite and stabilized austenite proximate to the edges of the spheroids, associated with an important fraction of metastable austenite (because it is scarcely enriched with carbon during transformation) toward the edges of the grains.
  • Example 1
  • A hammer was provided by casting with a weight of approximately 1.74 kg, using cast iron with a predominantly pearlitic matrix (pearlite in a percentage higher than 80%) having a carbon percentage equal to 3.47%, a silicon percentage equal to 2.08%, a manganese percentage equal to 1.07% and a molybdenum percentage equal to 0.94%.
  • The component was brought to a complete austenitization temperature (higher than Ac3) equal to 890° C. and was held at this temperature for 120 minutes.
  • Then an interrupted quenching treatment in a salt bath at 250° C. was performed.
  • An average hardness of approximately 520 HB was observed on the finished part.
  • All the characteristics of the invention indicated above as advantageous, convenient or the like may also be omitted or replaced by equivalents.
  • The invention thus conceived is susceptible of numerous modifications and variations, all of which are within the scope of the appended claims.
  • In practice it has been found that in all the embodiments the invention has achieved the intended aim and objects.
  • Comment on the mechanical characteristics of the treated components.
  • In the specific case, the components made of austempered spheroidal cast iron according to the invention have always shown, for an equal hardness, a higher resistance to abrasive wear (by approximately 10-15%) than traditional austempered cast irons and Q&T steels.
  • Moreover, these components have always shown a higher impact strength than CADI cast irons or white cast irons (impact strength obtained on a notch-free specimen according to the ISO148 standard comprised between 10 and 20 J).
  • In practice, the dimensions may be any according to the requirements, although it has been found that the method according to the invention is particularly effective for treating components with dimensions up to 100 mm.
  • All the details may further be replaced with other technically equivalent elements.
  • The disclosures in Italian Patent Application No. VR2010A000124 from which this application claims priority are incorporated herein by reference.

Claims (9)

1-8. (canceled)
9. A method for manufacturing mechanical components made of spheroidal cast iron, comprising the steps of:
providing a casting of a mechanical cast iron component with a percentage by volume of pearlitic structure greater than 70%, having a carbon content by weight comprised between 2.5% and 4.0%, a silicon content by weight comprised between 1.5% and 3.5%, a manganese content by weight comprised between 0.6% and 1.2%, a molybdenum content by weight comprised between 0% and 1%, and a chromium content by weight comprised between 0% and 0.5%;
bringing said cast iron casting with a percentage by volume of pearlitic structure greater than 70% to a temperature that is higher than an upper austenitization temperature (Ac3) for the time required to obtain a fully austenitic structure;
performing a thermal treatment for interrupted quenching in a salt bath, comprising a step of cooling said mechanical components in a salt bath at a cooling rate that is higher than the critical rate and an isothermal holding step at a temperature comprised between 250° C. and 320° C. for a time comprised between 10 minutes and 60 minutes in order to obtain a matrix comprising metastable unsaturated austenite in a percentage by volume comprised between 40% and 90% of the total.
10. The method for manufacturing mechanical components made of spheroidal cast iron according to claim 9, wherein during said step of performing the casting, the forming of disperse primary carbons (Fe3C) is limited to percentage by volume that is lower than 5% of the volume.
11. The method for manufacturing mechanical components made of spheroidal cast iron according to claim 10, wherein said step that consists in limiting the forming of disperse primary carbons (Fe3C) comprises a process of post-inoculation during the step for pouring the casting into the die.
12. The method for manufacturing spheroidal cast iron mechanical components according to claim 9, wherein said casting of a cast iron mechanical component has a percentage by volume of pearlitic structure comprised between 80% and 90%.
13. The method for manufacturing spheroidal cast iron mechanical components according to claim 9, wherein said casting of a cast iron mechanical component has a nickel content by weight comprised between 0% and 3% and a copper content by weight comprised between 0% and 1.2%.
14. The method for manufacturing spheroidal cast iron mechanical components according to claim 9, wherein said isothermal holding step during said interrupted quenching step is performed at a temperature comprised between 290° C. and 310° C.
15. The method for manufacturing spheroidal cast iron mechanical components according to claim 9, wherein said austenitization temperature is comprised between 860° C. and 910° C., preferably comprised between 890° C. and 900° C.
16. The method for manufacturing spheroidal cast iron mechanical components according to claim 9, wherein during said interrupted quenching treatment said isothermal holding step has a duration comprised between 10 minutes and 30 minutes.
US13/805,310 2010-06-18 2011-06-17 Method for manufacturing mechanical components made of particularly wear-resistant austempered spheroidal cast iron Abandoned US20130105047A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
ITVR2010A000124A IT1400634B1 (en) 2010-06-18 2010-06-18 PROCEDURE FOR THE PRODUCTION OF MUSHROOM COMPONENTS IN SPIRIOUS CAST IRON AUSTEMPERATA PARTICULARLY RESISTANT TO WEAR.
ITVR2010A000124 2010-06-18
PCT/EP2011/060166 WO2011157840A1 (en) 2010-06-18 2011-06-17 Method for manufacturing mechanical components made of particularly wear-resistant austempered spheroidal cast iron

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20130105047A1 true US20130105047A1 (en) 2013-05-02

Family

ID=43535866

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/805,310 Abandoned US20130105047A1 (en) 2010-06-18 2011-06-17 Method for manufacturing mechanical components made of particularly wear-resistant austempered spheroidal cast iron

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (1) US20130105047A1 (en)
EP (1) EP2582856B1 (en)
IT (1) IT1400634B1 (en)
WO (1) WO2011157840A1 (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104831024A (en) * 2015-05-11 2015-08-12 柳州金盾机械有限公司 Process for isothermal quenching heat treatment of ausferrite ductile cast iron grinding balls
CN105018711A (en) * 2015-08-05 2015-11-04 人本集团有限公司 Heat treatment technology for grey cast iron HT250 bearing ring
CN109852886A (en) * 2019-03-25 2019-06-07 山东润源实业有限公司 A kind of spheroidal graphite cast-iron of high-intensity and high-tenacity, crankshaft and preparation method thereof
US11441204B2 (en) * 2018-12-11 2022-09-13 Hyundai Motor Company Method of manufacturing cam piece for continuously variable valve duration and cam piece manufactured therefrom
CN115216585A (en) * 2022-07-29 2022-10-21 宁国市华丰耐磨材料有限公司 Process method for refining particle size of CADI (graphite oxide) grinding ball graphite spheres

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2993575B1 (en) * 2012-07-23 2016-07-22 Ferry Capitain CORRESPONDING ALLOY, PART, AND MANUFACTURING METHOD
ITUB20152456A1 (en) * 2015-07-24 2017-01-24 Zanardi Fond S P A PROCEDURE FOR THE PRODUCTION OF MECHANICAL COMPONENTS IN LAMELLAR IRON OR VERMICULAR.
CN110484676B (en) * 2019-09-26 2021-05-11 天润曲轴股份有限公司 Method for controlling addition of silicon amount in nodular cast iron, method for casting nodular cast iron, and casting

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4737199A (en) * 1985-12-23 1988-04-12 Ford Motor Company Machinable ductile or semiductile cast iron and method
US20040112479A1 (en) * 2002-09-04 2004-06-17 Druschitz Alan Peter Machinable austempered cast iron article having improved machinability, fatigue performance, and resistance to environmental cracking and a method of making the same
US20080145645A1 (en) * 2006-12-15 2008-06-19 The Dexter Company As-cast carbidic ductile iron

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4596606A (en) * 1984-09-04 1986-06-24 Ford Motor Company Method of making CG iron
US5028281A (en) * 1988-06-14 1991-07-02 Textron, Inc. Camshaft
US6258180B1 (en) * 1999-05-28 2001-07-10 Waupaca Foundry, Inc. Wear resistant ductile iron
SE531107C2 (en) * 2006-12-16 2008-12-23 Indexator Ab Method

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4737199A (en) * 1985-12-23 1988-04-12 Ford Motor Company Machinable ductile or semiductile cast iron and method
US20040112479A1 (en) * 2002-09-04 2004-06-17 Druschitz Alan Peter Machinable austempered cast iron article having improved machinability, fatigue performance, and resistance to environmental cracking and a method of making the same
US20080145645A1 (en) * 2006-12-15 2008-06-19 The Dexter Company As-cast carbidic ductile iron

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Aravind Vadiraj, G. Balachandran, M. Kamaraj, B. Gopalakrishna, K. Prabhakara Rao, Studies on mechanical and wear properties of alloyed hypereutectic gray cast irons in the as-cast pearlitic and austempered conditions, Materials & Design, Volume 31, Issue 2, February 2010, Pages 951-955, ISSN 0261-3069, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2009.07.03 *
ASM International Handbook Committee. (1994). ASM Handbook, Volume 05 - Surface Engineering - 83.1.1 Austempered Ductile Iron. ASM International *
Verhoeven, John D.. (2007). Steel Metallurgy for the Non-Metallurgist - 12.5 Salt Bath Quenchants. ASM International. *

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104831024A (en) * 2015-05-11 2015-08-12 柳州金盾机械有限公司 Process for isothermal quenching heat treatment of ausferrite ductile cast iron grinding balls
CN105018711A (en) * 2015-08-05 2015-11-04 人本集团有限公司 Heat treatment technology for grey cast iron HT250 bearing ring
US11441204B2 (en) * 2018-12-11 2022-09-13 Hyundai Motor Company Method of manufacturing cam piece for continuously variable valve duration and cam piece manufactured therefrom
CN109852886A (en) * 2019-03-25 2019-06-07 山东润源实业有限公司 A kind of spheroidal graphite cast-iron of high-intensity and high-tenacity, crankshaft and preparation method thereof
CN115216585A (en) * 2022-07-29 2022-10-21 宁国市华丰耐磨材料有限公司 Process method for refining particle size of CADI (graphite oxide) grinding ball graphite spheres

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2011157840A1 (en) 2011-12-22
IT1400634B1 (en) 2013-06-14
EP2582856B1 (en) 2016-04-06
ITVR20100124A1 (en) 2011-12-19
EP2582856A1 (en) 2013-04-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2582856B1 (en) Method for manufacturing mechanical components made of particularly wear-resistant austempered spheroidal cast iron
US8858736B2 (en) Austempered ductile iron, method for producing this and component comprising this iron
JP5135563B2 (en) Carburizing steel, carburized steel parts, and manufacturing method thereof
JP4728883B2 (en) Carburized and hardened steel and carburized parts with excellent low cycle fatigue properties
US20170191149A1 (en) Railway vehicle wheel and method for manufacturing railway vehicle wheel
US9890446B2 (en) Steel for induction hardening roughly shaped material for induction hardening
JP5505263B2 (en) Carburized and hardened steel and carburized parts with excellent low cycle fatigue properties
WO2015147067A1 (en) Steel component for high-temperature carburizing with excellent spalling strength and low-cycle fatigue strength
JP2006274373A (en) Steel for high strength screw having excellent toughness and cold workability and method for producing high strength screw
US8636859B2 (en) Austempering heat treatment during hot isostatic pressing conditions
JP4728884B2 (en) Induction contour hardened steel and induction contour hardened parts with excellent low cycle fatigue characteristics
JP3896365B2 (en) High strength forging steel and large crankshaft using the same
JP4828321B2 (en) Induction hardened steel and induction hardened parts with excellent low cycle fatigue properties
JP6825605B2 (en) Carburizing member
JP5505264B2 (en) Induction contour hardened steel and induction contour hardened parts with excellent low cycle fatigue characteristics
JP2012001765A (en) Bar steel for steering rack bar and method for manufacturing bar steel
JP2011084784A (en) Steel to be worm-worked
Nag Chaudhury Effect of heat treatment, pre-stress and surface hardening on fracture toughness of micro-alloyed steel
Krawczyk et al. Banded microstructure in forged 18CrNiMo7-6 steel
JP2006199993A (en) Steel material to be case-hardened superior in cold forgeability and temper softening resistance
RU2710760C1 (en) Wear resistant metastable austenitic steel
Dossett et al. Heat treating of gray irons
JPH11131184A (en) Case hardening steel minimal in heat treatment strain
JP6569650B2 (en) Case-hardened steel
Paknikar PREDICTION OF HARDENABILITY OF SG IRONS

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: ZANARDI FONDERIE S.P.A., ITALY

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ZANARDI, FRANCO;REEL/FRAME:029494/0603

Effective date: 20121130

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION