EP2582856A1 - Method for manufacturing mechanical components made of particularly wear-resistant austempered spheroidal cast iron - Google Patents

Method for manufacturing mechanical components made of particularly wear-resistant austempered spheroidal cast iron

Info

Publication number
EP2582856A1
EP2582856A1 EP11725767.5A EP11725767A EP2582856A1 EP 2582856 A1 EP2582856 A1 EP 2582856A1 EP 11725767 A EP11725767 A EP 11725767A EP 2582856 A1 EP2582856 A1 EP 2582856A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
comprised
cast iron
mechanical components
casting
percentage
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP11725767.5A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2582856B1 (en
Inventor
Franco Zanardi
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
ZANARDI FONDERIE SpA
Original Assignee
ZANARDI FONDERIE SpA
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by ZANARDI FONDERIE SpA filed Critical ZANARDI FONDERIE SpA
Publication of EP2582856A1 publication Critical patent/EP2582856A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2582856B1 publication Critical patent/EP2582856B1/en
Not-in-force legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21—METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21D—MODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D5/00—Heat treatments of cast-iron
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21—METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21D—MODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D1/00—General methods or devices for heat treatment, e.g. annealing, hardening, quenching or tempering
    • C21D1/34—Methods of heating
    • C21D1/44—Methods of heating in heat-treatment baths
    • C21D1/46—Salt baths
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22C—ALLOYS
    • C22C33/00—Making ferrous alloys
    • C22C33/08—Making cast-iron alloys
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22C—ALLOYS
    • C22C37/00—Cast-iron alloys
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22C—ALLOYS
    • C22C37/00—Cast-iron alloys
    • C22C37/04—Cast-iron alloys containing spheroidal graphite

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method for manufacturing mechanical components made of particularly wear-resistant austempered spheroidal cast iron.
  • austempered spheroidal cast irons of various types and having different structures are known and are used in particular for manufacturing various types of mechanical components.
  • the thermal treatment required in order to obtain this type of cast iron consists of a treatment of complete austenitization, with holding of the component at a temperature higher than the upper austenitization limit temperature (usually designated by A c3 ) followed by quenching in a molten salt bath.
  • a c3 the upper austenitization limit temperature
  • ausferritic structure is composed of acicular ferrite and austenite. This particular structure gives the material high mechanical characteristics.
  • alloying elements such as nickel and/or molybdenum.
  • the cited international standard ISO 17804:2005 defines, in Annex A, "Abrasion-resistant grades of ausferritic spheroidal graphite cast iron", grades ISO17804/JS/HBW400 and ISO17804/JS/HBW450. These are the two recommended grades for applications that require high resistance to wear.
  • the maximum contribution to wear-resistance is given by the high proportion of acicular ferrite in the matrix and by its hardness.
  • FIG. 5 taken from "Section IV Ductile Iron Databook for Design Engineers” (http://www.ductile.org/didata/Section4), shows schematically the Dorazil curve (the topmost chart).
  • the curve represents the volumetric fraction of stabilized austenite as a function of the time elapsed from the moment when the material is immersed in the austempering bath.
  • the horizontal portion which represents the maximum of this curve, corresponds to the maximum stability of the austenite as a consequence of its progressive enrichment with carbon. Accordingly, the Brinell hardness of the material also reaches its minimum value, since the transformation into martensite of an important volume fraction of the matrix subjected to the hardness test is avoided.
  • first stage The part of the transformation process from the beginning to the attainment of the cited condition of maximum stability of the austenite is termed first stage, since an excessive extension of the holding of the material in the austempering bath would cause an unwanted decomposition of the austenite, stabilized by the carbon enrichment, into acicular ferrite and carbides, a possible part of the transformation process known as second stage.
  • the condition of maximum stability of the austenite is necessary in order to manage the process in controlled and repetitive conditions. It is also known that the optimum time, with respect to this requirement, of permanence in the thermal bath in order to reach the condition of maximum stability of the carbon-enriched austenite depends essentially on the thickness of the casting, on the austenitization temperature, on the isothermal quenching temperature, and on the content of silicon, manganese and other elements with strong segregation, such as molybdenum.
  • This comparative chart shows the advantageous behavior, in wear resistance, of ADI cast irons with respect to the materials with which they have been compared.
  • the wear resistance values offered by ADI cast irons advantageous in many applications in which it has been possible to avoid the induction quenching of cast irons and/or steels, the nitriding of cast irons and/or steels, the cementation of steels, such as for example:
  • ADI cast irons are insufficient and it is necessary to resort to other families of abrasion-resistant cast irons.
  • These materials besides being penalized by the cost associated with a high content of carbide-forming alloying elements (these are in fact ledeburitic white cast irons in which the carbon is predominantly in a form that is combined with iron), are even more limited in use due to their fragility, which is a consequence of the ledeburitic white structure.
  • wear-resistant steels which, as is known, are characterized by a foundry process that is more complex and expensive than the typical one of cast iron foundry.
  • CADI cast irons make it possible indeed to obtain mechanical components that are particularly wear-resistant, on the other hand they are more fragile than normally required in many applications and are also difficult to obtain.
  • the aim of the present invention is to provide a new method for manufacturing austempered spheroidal cast iron that makes it possible to obtain a material that has an optimum wear-resistance and at the same time a sufficient resilience.
  • Figure 1 is a comparative chart of the wear resistance of various metallic materials, including various ADI cast irons and various types of hardened and tempered spheroidal cast irons and steels;
  • Figure 2 is a chart, similar to the previous one, in which the behavior of an ADI cast iron and of CADI cast irons with different percentages of carbides are compared with abrasion-resistant cast irons;
  • Figure 3 is a perspective view of a hammer subjected to a method according to the invention.
  • Figure 4 is a micrograph at 500 magnifications of a component subjected to a method according to the invention.
  • Figure 5 is a schematic diagram showing the effect of austempering time on the amount and stability of austenite and the hardness of ADI;
  • Figure 6 is a plot of a time/temperature curve of a thermal treatment for interrupted quenching in a salt bath related to the method according to the invention.
  • the present invention relates to a method for manufacturing spheroidal cast iron mechanical components such as, for example, armors for stone mills and for the cement industry, screw conveyors for the cement industry, hammers for stone mills, lamination rollers for clays and mechanical components in general.
  • the method entails the following steps:
  • a casting of a spheroidal cast iron mechanical component with a percentage by volume of pearlitic structure greater than 70% having a carbon content by weight comprised between 2.5% and 4.0%, a silicon content by weight comprised between 1.5% and 3.5%, a manganese content by weight comprised between 0.6% and 1.2%, a molybdenum content by weight comprised between 0% and 1%, and a chromium content by weight comprised between 0% and 0.5%;
  • - performing a thermal treatment for interrupted quenching in a salt bath comprising a step of cooling said mechanical components in a salt bath at a cooling rate that is higher than the critical rate and an isothermal holding step at a temperature comprised between 250°C and 320°C for a time comprised between 10 minutes and 60 minutes in order to obtain a matrix comprising metastable unsaturated austenite in a percentage by volume comprised between 40% and 90% of the total.
  • critical rate is understood as the minimum cooling rate required to prevent pearlitic transformation.
  • interrupted quenching in salt bath is understood to be a temperating process (as shown in Figure 6) that has a cooling step at a rate that is higher than the critical rate and stops at a temperature higher than that at the beginning of the martensitic transformation MS, followed by a holding period at this temperature for the time sufficient to start the reaction but insufficient to complete it; finally, rapid cooling to ambient temperature is performed.
  • interrupted quenching in salt bath in practice is interrupted twice: a first time because during the quick cooling step one stops at the isothermal holding temperature, which is higher than MS, the second time because we interrupt the reaction at isothermal temperature at a time that is very early with respect to the condition of maximum stability of carbon-enriched austenite.
  • the method according to the invention provides for limiting, during the step for producing the casting, the forming of disperse primary carbons (Fe 3 C) in a percentage by volume of less than 5% of the volume.
  • the step that consists in limiting the forming of disperse primary carbons (Fe C) comprises a process of post-inoculation in the step for pouring the casting into the die.
  • the casting of the spheroidal cast iron mechanical component subjected to the method according to the invention has a nickel content by weight comprised between 0% and 3% and a copper content by weight comprised between 0% and 1.2%.
  • the casting of the spheroidal cast iron mechanical component subjected to the method according to the invention can have a silicon content by weight comprised between 1.5% and 2.5%.
  • the casting of the spheroidal cast iron mechanical component subjected to the method according to the invention has a molybdenum content by weight comprised between 0.4% and 1%.
  • the temperature used preferably to perform the isothermal step of interrupted quenching is comprised between 290 °C and 310 °C.
  • thermal interrupted quenching treatment designates a cooling with a rate that is higher than the critical one (minimum cooling rate required to prevent pearlitic transformation), keeping the casting at a higher isothermal temperature than the temperature of martensitic transformation MS; the holding at this temperature has a duration sufficient to make the ausferritic reaction start at the edges of the spheroids and is interrupted at such a stage as to obtain the desired proportion of metastable austenite.
  • Control of the process is possible thanks to the conspicuous slowing of the reaction, caused by the relatively high ratio of high- segregation alloying elements.
  • the temperature at which the mechanical components are held, as mentioned, during the austenitization step is higher than the temperature technically identified as A c3 , or temperature of complete austenitization for the time necessary to obtain a fully austenitic structure.
  • Such temperatures are indicative for cast irons having a carbon content of approximately 3.5% and a silicon content of approximately 2%, but, obviously, may vary according to the percentages of these elements in the casting to be subjected to the thermal treatment.
  • the holding time of the mechanical component at the austenitization temperature A c3 is comprised between 90 minutes and 210 minutes, preferably between 120 minutes and 180 minutes.
  • the isothermal holding step has a duration comprised between 10 minutes and 30 minutes.
  • the method according to the invention is based essentially on the addition of a high ratio of high- segregation alloying elements, such as manganese and molybdenum.
  • a high ratio of high- segregation alloying elements such as manganese and molybdenum.
  • a hammer was provided by casting with a weight of approximately
  • the component was brought to a complete austenitization temperature (higher than A c3 ) equal to 890 °C and was held at this temperature for 120 minutes.
  • the components made of austempered spheroidal cast iron according to the invention have always shown, for an equal hardness, a higher resistance to abrasive wear (by approximately 10-15%) than traditional austempered cast irons and Q&T steels.
  • the dimensions may be any according to the requirements, although it has been found that the method according to the invention is particularly effective for treating components with dimensions up to 100 mm.

Abstract

A method for manufacturing mechanical components made of spheroidal cast iron, characterized in that it comprises the following steps: - providing a casting of a mechanical cast iron component with a percentage of pearlitic structure greater than 70%, having a carbon content comprised between 2.5% and 4.0%, a silicon content comprised between 1.5% and 3.5%, a manganese content comprised between 0.6% and 1.2%, a molybdenum content comprised between 0% and 1%, and a chromium content comprised between 0% and 0.5%; - bringing the cast iron casting with a percentage of pearlitic structure greater than 70% to a temperature that is higher than the upper austenitization temperature (Ac3) for the time required to obtain a fully austenitic structure; - performing a thermal treatment for interrupted quenching in a salt bath, comprising a step of cooling the mechanical components in a salt bath at a cooling rate that is higher than the critical rate and an isothermal holding step at a temperature comprised between 250 °C and 320 °C for a time comprised between 10 minutes and 60 minutes in order to obtain a matrix comprising metastable unsaturated austenite in a percentage comprised between 40% and 90% of the total.

Description

METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING MECHANICAL COMPONENTS MADE OF PARTICULARLY WEAR-RESISTANT AUSTEMPERED SPHEROIDAL CAST IRON
Technical field
The present invention relates to a method for manufacturing mechanical components made of particularly wear-resistant austempered spheroidal cast iron.
Background Art
Currently, austempered spheroidal cast irons of various types and having different structures are known and are used in particular for manufacturing various types of mechanical components.
The thermal treatment required in order to obtain this type of cast iron consists of a treatment of complete austenitization, with holding of the component at a temperature higher than the upper austenitization limit temperature (usually designated by Ac3) followed by quenching in a molten salt bath.
The final structure that is obtained, technically termed ausferritic structure, is composed of acicular ferrite and austenite. This particular structure gives the material high mechanical characteristics.
Since it is essential to prevent the forming of pearlite during cooling, it is necessary to alloy the material with alloying elements, such as nickel and/or molybdenum.
With reference to international standard ISO 17804:2005 "Founding - Ausferritic spheroidal graphite cast irons - Classification", Table 1 and Annex C, the mechanical characteristics vary with the structure and therefore with the hardness. In particular, as the hardness increases, so does the minimum tensile strength, while the minimum elongation decreases. Similar relations are found in standard ASTM A 897/A 897/M - 06 "Standard Specification for Austempered Ductile Iron Castings" and in other standards of this family of materials. It is known that, in general, all grades of austempered spheroidal cast irons represented in the above mentioned standard exhibit a good resistance to wear, without the need for specific surface treatments. This characteristic is not explicitly highlighted in the standard, since determining it is difficult and not standardized.
The phenomenon, which has long been described extensively in literature, has to be ascribed to the combined effect of two competing characteristics:
- the proportion of acicular ferrite in the matrix and its hardness
- the transformation of part (up to 8%) of the austenite in martensite, as a consequence of a pressure (PITRAM effect - pressure induced transformation of residual austenite into martensite) and/or of a stress state (SITPvAM effect - stress induced transformation of residual austenite into martensite).
As the hardness of the material increases, so does the contribution of the first characteristic, while the contribution of the second one decreases.
The cited international standard ISO 17804:2005 defines, in Annex A, "Abrasion-resistant grades of ausferritic spheroidal graphite cast iron", grades ISO17804/JS/HBW400 and ISO17804/JS/HBW450. These are the two recommended grades for applications that require high resistance to wear.
In this case, the maximum contribution to wear-resistance is given by the high proportion of acicular ferrite in the matrix and by its hardness.
It is known that generally all grades of austempered spheroidal cast irons represented in the cited standard derive from a process of pouring and subsequent heat treatment for austempering adapted to give the transformed austenite (high part of the Dorazil curve) the maximum possible stability.
Figure 5, taken from "Section IV Ductile Iron Databook for Design Engineers" (http://www.ductile.org/didata/Section4), shows schematically the Dorazil curve (the topmost chart). The curve represents the volumetric fraction of stabilized austenite as a function of the time elapsed from the moment when the material is immersed in the austempering bath. The horizontal portion, which represents the maximum of this curve, corresponds to the maximum stability of the austenite as a consequence of its progressive enrichment with carbon. Accordingly, the Brinell hardness of the material also reaches its minimum value, since the transformation into martensite of an important volume fraction of the matrix subjected to the hardness test is avoided.
The part of the transformation process from the beginning to the attainment of the cited condition of maximum stability of the austenite is termed first stage, since an excessive extension of the holding of the material in the austempering bath would cause an unwanted decomposition of the austenite, stabilized by the carbon enrichment, into acicular ferrite and carbides, a possible part of the transformation process known as second stage.
The condition of maximum stability of the austenite is necessary in order to manage the process in controlled and repetitive conditions. It is also known that the optimum time, with respect to this requirement, of permanence in the thermal bath in order to reach the condition of maximum stability of the carbon-enriched austenite depends essentially on the thickness of the casting, on the austenitization temperature, on the isothermal quenching temperature, and on the content of silicon, manganese and other elements with strong segregation, such as molybdenum.
It is also known that an excessive quantity of strong segregation elements, such as manganese and molybdenum, causes a very long dilation of the required holding time in the thermal bath. For this reason, strong segregation elements, such as manganese and molybdenum, must be limited to values that make the process industrially feasible.
The chart shown in Figure 1, taken from "Section IV Ductile Iron Databook for Design Engineers http://www.ductile.org/didata/Section4/Figures/pfig4_23.htm", gives evidence of the wear resistance for various materials.
This comparative chart shows the advantageous behavior, in wear resistance, of ADI cast irons with respect to the materials with which they have been compared.
The wear resistance values offered by ADI cast irons, advantageous in many applications in which it has been possible to avoid the induction quenching of cast irons and/or steels, the nitriding of cast irons and/or steels, the cementation of steels, such as for example:
- driving wheels for tracks of earth-moving machines
- epicyclic reduction gear bodies with broached teeth
- driving shafts
- et cetera,
have been found to be insufficient in applications where higher wear resistance is required, such as for example:
- armors for stone mills and for the cement industry
- screw conveyors for the cement industry
- hammers for stone mills
- lamination rollers for clays
- et cetera.
For such applications, ADI cast irons are insufficient and it is necessary to resort to other families of abrasion-resistant cast irons. These materials, besides being penalized by the cost associated with a high content of carbide-forming alloying elements (these are in fact ledeburitic white cast irons in which the carbon is predominantly in a form that is combined with iron), are even more limited in use due to their fragility, which is a consequence of the ledeburitic white structure. In the frequent cases in which a resistance, albeit a limited one, to impacts is required, it is necessary to use wear-resistant steels, which, as is known, are characterized by a foundry process that is more complex and expensive than the typical one of cast iron foundry.
For this reason, attempts have been made to increase the resistance to wear/abrasion by introducing carbides in the pouring step so as to obtain a so-called CADI cast iron (Carbidic Austempered Ductile Iron).
While on the one hand CADI cast irons make it possible indeed to obtain mechanical components that are particularly wear-resistant, on the other hand they are more fragile than normally required in many applications and are also difficult to obtain.
The chart shown in Figure 2, taken from "Agricultural Applications of Austempered Cast Irons" by Kathy L. Hayrynen PhD FASM, Tim Dorn, John R. Keough PE, Vasko Popovski PE, Steven Sumner, Arron Rimmel PhD, illustrates the improvement of the resistance to wear/abrasion of CADI cast irons, compared with abrasion-resistant cast irons, which increases as the carbide content rises.
Correspondingly, by increasing the carbide content fragility increases.
Disclosure of the Invention
The aim of the present invention is to provide a new method for manufacturing austempered spheroidal cast iron that makes it possible to obtain a material that has an optimum wear-resistance and at the same time a sufficient resilience.
This aim and these and other objects that will become better apparent hereinafter are achieved by a method for manufacturing spheroidal cast iron mechanical components according to what is indicated in the independent claims that follow.
Brief description of the drawings
Further characteristics and advantages of the invention will become better apparent from the description of some preferred but not exclusive embodiments of a method for manufacturing spheroidal cast iron according to the present invention, illustrated by way of non-limiting example in the accompanying drawings, wherein: Figure 1 is a comparative chart of the wear resistance of various metallic materials, including various ADI cast irons and various types of hardened and tempered spheroidal cast irons and steels;
Figure 2 is a chart, similar to the previous one, in which the behavior of an ADI cast iron and of CADI cast irons with different percentages of carbides are compared with abrasion-resistant cast irons;
Figure 3 is a perspective view of a hammer subjected to a method according to the invention;
Figure 4 is a micrograph at 500 magnifications of a component subjected to a method according to the invention;
Figure 5 is a schematic diagram showing the effect of austempering time on the amount and stability of austenite and the hardness of ADI;
Figure 6 is a plot of a time/temperature curve of a thermal treatment for interrupted quenching in a salt bath related to the method according to the invention.
Ways of carrying out the Invention
In the exemplary embodiments that follow, individual characteristics, given in relation to specific examples, may actually be interchanged with other different characteristics that exist in other exemplary embodiments.
Moreover, it is noted that anything found to be already known during the patenting process is understood not to be claimed and to be the subject of a disclaimer.
With reference to the figures, the present invention relates to a method for manufacturing spheroidal cast iron mechanical components such as, for example, armors for stone mills and for the cement industry, screw conveyors for the cement industry, hammers for stone mills, lamination rollers for clays and mechanical components in general.
In particular, the method entails the following steps:
- providing a casting of a spheroidal cast iron mechanical component with a percentage by volume of pearlitic structure greater than 70%, having a carbon content by weight comprised between 2.5% and 4.0%, a silicon content by weight comprised between 1.5% and 3.5%, a manganese content by weight comprised between 0.6% and 1.2%, a molybdenum content by weight comprised between 0% and 1%, and a chromium content by weight comprised between 0% and 0.5%;
- bringing said cast iron casting with a percentage by volume of pearlitic structure greater than 70% to a temperature that is higher than the upper austenitization temperature (Ac3) for the time required to obtain a fully austenitic structure;
- performing a thermal treatment for interrupted quenching in a salt bath, comprising a step of cooling said mechanical components in a salt bath at a cooling rate that is higher than the critical rate and an isothermal holding step at a temperature comprised between 250°C and 320°C for a time comprised between 10 minutes and 60 minutes in order to obtain a matrix comprising metastable unsaturated austenite in a percentage by volume comprised between 40% and 90% of the total.
The expression "critical rate" is understood as the minimum cooling rate required to prevent pearlitic transformation.
The expression "interrupted quenching in salt bath" according to the provisions of the present application is understood to be a temperating process (as shown in Figure 6) that has a cooling step at a rate that is higher than the critical rate and stops at a temperature higher than that at the beginning of the martensitic transformation MS, followed by a holding period at this temperature for the time sufficient to start the reaction but insufficient to complete it; finally, rapid cooling to ambient temperature is performed.
It should be noted that in the specific case the interrupted quenching in salt bath in practice is interrupted twice: a first time because during the quick cooling step one stops at the isothermal holding temperature, which is higher than MS, the second time because we interrupt the reaction at isothermal temperature at a time that is very early with respect to the condition of maximum stability of carbon-enriched austenite.
The method according to the invention provides for limiting, during the step for producing the casting, the forming of disperse primary carbons (Fe3C) in a percentage by volume of less than 5% of the volume.
Advantageously, the step that consists in limiting the forming of disperse primary carbons (Fe C) comprises a process of post-inoculation in the step for pouring the casting into the die.
In particular, it has been found that it is particularly convenient if the percentage by volume of the pearlite in the casting on which the thermal treatment has to be performed is higher than 80%.
Conveniently, the casting of the spheroidal cast iron mechanical component subjected to the method according to the invention has a nickel content by weight comprised between 0% and 3% and a copper content by weight comprised between 0% and 1.2%.
Preferably, the casting of the spheroidal cast iron mechanical component subjected to the method according to the invention can have a silicon content by weight comprised between 1.5% and 2.5%.
Advantageously, the casting of the spheroidal cast iron mechanical component subjected to the method according to the invention has a molybdenum content by weight comprised between 0.4% and 1%.
Experimentally, moreover, it has been found particularly advantageous from the point of view of the typical mechanical characteristics of the components subjected to the method according to the invention, to start from spheroidal cast iron castings having a percentage by volume of pearlite substantially equal to 85%.
Advantageously, the temperature used preferably to perform the isothermal step of interrupted quenching is comprised between 290 °C and 310 °C.
In particular, the expression "thermal interrupted quenching treatment" designates a cooling with a rate that is higher than the critical one (minimum cooling rate required to prevent pearlitic transformation), keeping the casting at a higher isothermal temperature than the temperature of martensitic transformation MS; the holding at this temperature has a duration sufficient to make the ausferritic reaction start at the edges of the spheroids and is interrupted at such a stage as to obtain the desired proportion of metastable austenite.
Control of the process is possible thanks to the conspicuous slowing of the reaction, caused by the relatively high ratio of high- segregation alloying elements.
The temperature at which the mechanical components are held, as mentioned, during the austenitization step is higher than the temperature technically identified as Ac3, or temperature of complete austenitization for the time necessary to obtain a fully austenitic structure.
This can be obtained by choosing a temperature higher than 850 °C and lower than 910 °C and, advantageously, according to the carbon and silicon content, comprised between 880 °C and 900 °C.
Such temperatures are indicative for cast irons having a carbon content of approximately 3.5% and a silicon content of approximately 2%, but, obviously, may vary according to the percentages of these elements in the casting to be subjected to the thermal treatment.
In order to obtain a fully austenitic structure, it is observed experimentally that, depending on the dimensions of the mechanical component, the holding time of the mechanical component at the austenitization temperature Ac3 is comprised between 90 minutes and 210 minutes, preferably between 120 minutes and 180 minutes.
Preferably, during the interrupted quenching treatment the isothermal holding step has a duration comprised between 10 minutes and 30 minutes.
The method according to the invention is based essentially on the addition of a high ratio of high- segregation alloying elements, such as manganese and molybdenum. In this manner, the ausferritic reaction starts with a rate of transformation, measurable as volume of matrix transformed in the unit time, which is appreciable from the edges of the spheroids (First To Freeze = First To React), where the concentration of manganese and molybdenum is minimal and the concentration of silicon is maximum, slowing down very quickly when the reaction advances in the direction of the edges of the grains (Last To Freeze = Last to React).
Thanks to this great slowing, caused by the high ratio of segregating elements, it is possible to control the structure composed of high-hardness acicular ferrite and stabilized austenite proximate to the edges of the spheroids, associated with an important fraction of metastable austenite (because it is scarcely enriched with carbon during transformation) toward the edges of the grains.
EXAMPLE 1
A hammer was provided by casting with a weight of approximately
1.74 kg, using cast iron with a predominantly pearlitic matrix (pearlite in a percentage higher than 80%) having a carbon percentage equal to 3.47%, a silicon percentage equal to 2.08%, a manganese percentage equal to 1.07% and a molybdenum percentage equal to 0.94%.
The component was brought to a complete austenitization temperature (higher than Ac3) equal to 890 °C and was held at this temperature for 120 minutes.
Then an interrupted quenching treatment in a salt bath at 250 °C was performed.
An average hardness of approximately 520 HB was observed on the finished part.
All the characteristics of the invention indicated above as advantageous, convenient or the like may also be omitted or replaced by equivalents.
The invention thus conceived is susceptible of numerous modifications and variations, all of which are within the scope of the appended claims.
In practice it has been found that in all the embodiments the invention has achieved the intended aim and objects.
Comment on the mechanical characteristics of the treated components.
In the specific case, the components made of austempered spheroidal cast iron according to the invention have always shown, for an equal hardness, a higher resistance to abrasive wear (by approximately 10-15%) than traditional austempered cast irons and Q&T steels.
Moreover, these components have always shown a higher impact strength than CADI cast irons or white cast irons (impact strength obtained on a notch- free specimen according to the ISO 148 standard comprised between 10 and 20 J).
In practice, the dimensions may be any according to the requirements, although it has been found that the method according to the invention is particularly effective for treating components with dimensions up to 100 mm.
All the details may further be replaced with other technically equivalent elements.
The disclosures in Italian Patent Application No. VR2010A000124 from which this application claims priority are incorporated herein by reference.
Where technical features mentioned in any claim are followed by reference signs, those reference signs have been included for the sole purpose of increasing the intelligibility of the claims and accordingly such reference signs do not have any limiting effect on the interpretation of each element identified by way of example by such reference signs.

Claims

1. A method for manufacturing mechanical components made of spheroidal cast iron, characterized in that it comprises the steps of:
- providing a casting of a mechanical cast iron component with a percentage by volume of pearlitic structure greater than 70%, having a carbon content by weight comprised between 2.5% and 4.0%, a silicon content by weight comprised between 1.5% and 3.5%, a manganese content by weight comprised between 0.6% and 1.2%, a molybdenum content by weight comprised between 0% and 1%, and a chromium content by weight comprised between 0% and 0.5%;
- bringing said cast iron casting with a percentage by volume of pearlitic structure greater than 70% to a temperature that is higher than the upper austenitization temperature (Ac3) for the time required to obtain a fully austenitic structure;
- performing a thermal treatment for interrupted quenching in a salt bath, comprising a step of cooling said mechanical components in a salt bath at a cooling rate that is higher than the critical rate and an isothermal holding step at a temperature comprised between 250 °C and 320 °C for a time comprised between 10 minutes and 60 minutes in order to obtain a matrix comprising metastable unsaturated austenite in a percentage by volume comprised between 40% and 90% of the total.
2. The method for manufacturing mechanical components made of spheroidal cast iron according to claim 1, characterized in that during said step of performing the casting, the forming of disperse primary carbons (Fe3C) is limited to percentage by volume that is lower than 5% of the volume.
3. The method for manufacturing mechanical components made of spheroidal cast iron according to one or more of the preceding claims, characterized in that said step that consists in limiting the forming of disperse primary carbons (Fe C) comprises a process of post-inoculation during the step for pouring the casting into the die.
4. The method for manufacturing spheroidal cast iron mechanical components according to claim 1 , characterized in that said casting of a cast iron mechanical component has a percentage by volume of pearlitic structure comprised between 80% and 90%.
5. The method for manufacturing spheroidal cast iron mechanical components according to one or more of the preceding claims, characterized in that said casting of a cast iron mechanical component has a nickel content by weight comprised between 0% and 3% and a copper content by weight comprised between 0% and 1.2%.
6. The method for manufacturing spheroidal cast iron mechanical components according to one or more of the preceding claims, characterized in that said isothermal holding during said interrupted quenching step is performed at a temperature comprised between 290 °C and 310 °C.
7. The method for manufacturing spheroidal cast iron mechanical components according to one or more of the preceding claims, characterized in that said austenitization temperature is comprised between 860 °C and 910 °C, preferably comprised between 890 °C and 900 °C.
8. The method for manufacturing spheroidal cast iron mechanical components according to one or more of the preceding claims, characterized in that during said interrupted quenching treatment said isothermal holding step has a duration comprised between 10 minutes and 30 minutes.
EP11725767.5A 2010-06-18 2011-06-17 Method for manufacturing mechanical components made of particularly wear-resistant austempered spheroidal cast iron Not-in-force EP2582856B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
ITVR2010A000124A IT1400634B1 (en) 2010-06-18 2010-06-18 PROCEDURE FOR THE PRODUCTION OF MUSHROOM COMPONENTS IN SPIRIOUS CAST IRON AUSTEMPERATA PARTICULARLY RESISTANT TO WEAR.
PCT/EP2011/060166 WO2011157840A1 (en) 2010-06-18 2011-06-17 Method for manufacturing mechanical components made of particularly wear-resistant austempered spheroidal cast iron

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2582856A1 true EP2582856A1 (en) 2013-04-24
EP2582856B1 EP2582856B1 (en) 2016-04-06

Family

ID=43535866

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP11725767.5A Not-in-force EP2582856B1 (en) 2010-06-18 2011-06-17 Method for manufacturing mechanical components made of particularly wear-resistant austempered spheroidal cast iron

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (1) US20130105047A1 (en)
EP (1) EP2582856B1 (en)
IT (1) IT1400634B1 (en)
WO (1) WO2011157840A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2993575B1 (en) * 2012-07-23 2016-07-22 Ferry Capitain CORRESPONDING ALLOY, PART, AND MANUFACTURING METHOD
CN104831024A (en) * 2015-05-11 2015-08-12 柳州金盾机械有限公司 Process for isothermal quenching heat treatment of ausferrite ductile cast iron grinding balls
ITUB20152456A1 (en) * 2015-07-24 2017-01-24 Zanardi Fond S P A PROCEDURE FOR THE PRODUCTION OF MECHANICAL COMPONENTS IN LAMELLAR IRON OR VERMICULAR.
CN105018711A (en) * 2015-08-05 2015-11-04 人本集团有限公司 Heat treatment technology for grey cast iron HT250 bearing ring
KR102599427B1 (en) * 2018-12-11 2023-11-08 현대자동차주식회사 A method of manufacturing a cam piece for continuously variable valve duration and a cam piece manufactured therefrom
CN110484676B (en) * 2019-09-26 2021-05-11 天润曲轴股份有限公司 Method for controlling addition of silicon amount in nodular cast iron, method for casting nodular cast iron, and casting
CN115216585B (en) * 2022-07-29 2023-07-18 宁国市华丰耐磨材料有限公司 Technological method for refining particle size of CADI grinding ball graphite spheres

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4596606A (en) * 1984-09-04 1986-06-24 Ford Motor Company Method of making CG iron
US4737199A (en) * 1985-12-23 1988-04-12 Ford Motor Company Machinable ductile or semiductile cast iron and method
US5028281A (en) * 1988-06-14 1991-07-02 Textron, Inc. Camshaft
US6258180B1 (en) * 1999-05-28 2001-07-10 Waupaca Foundry, Inc. Wear resistant ductile iron
EP1534867A2 (en) * 2002-09-04 2005-06-01 Intermet Corporation Austempered cast iron article and a method of making the same
US7824605B2 (en) * 2006-12-15 2010-11-02 Dexter Foundry, Inc. As-cast carbidic ductile iron
SE531107C2 (en) * 2006-12-16 2008-12-23 Indexator Ab Method

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2011157840A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2011157840A1 (en) 2011-12-22
IT1400634B1 (en) 2013-06-14
US20130105047A1 (en) 2013-05-02
EP2582856B1 (en) 2016-04-06
ITVR20100124A1 (en) 2011-12-19

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2582856B1 (en) Method for manufacturing mechanical components made of particularly wear-resistant austempered spheroidal cast iron
US8858736B2 (en) Austempered ductile iron, method for producing this and component comprising this iron
JP6163197B2 (en) High-strength cold-rolled steel sheet and method for producing such a steel sheet
JP5135563B2 (en) Carburizing steel, carburized steel parts, and manufacturing method thereof
JP5135562B2 (en) Carburizing steel, carburized steel parts, and manufacturing method thereof
JP4728883B2 (en) Carburized and hardened steel and carburized parts with excellent low cycle fatigue properties
US9890446B2 (en) Steel for induction hardening roughly shaped material for induction hardening
JP2004285474A (en) Rolling member and its manufacturing method
KR20140064929A (en) Steel wire for bolt, bolt, and manufacturing processes therefor
JP4266340B2 (en) High strength wire for induction hardening with excellent cold workability and impact resistance, and steel parts using this wire
JP5505263B2 (en) Carburized and hardened steel and carburized parts with excellent low cycle fatigue properties
US6258180B1 (en) Wear resistant ductile iron
JP4728884B2 (en) Induction contour hardened steel and induction contour hardened parts with excellent low cycle fatigue characteristics
US20110120599A1 (en) Method and work piece
JP2015509142A (en) Spring wire and steel wire excellent in corrosion resistance, method for producing spring steel wire, and method for producing spring
JP4828321B2 (en) Induction hardened steel and induction hardened parts with excellent low cycle fatigue properties
JP5445345B2 (en) Steel bar for steering rack bar and manufacturing method thereof
JP5505264B2 (en) Induction contour hardened steel and induction contour hardened parts with excellent low cycle fatigue characteristics
Nag Chaudhury Effect of heat treatment, pre-stress and surface hardening on fracture toughness of micro-alloyed steel
Krawczyk et al. Banded microstructure in forged 18CrNiMo7-6 steel
JP2006199993A (en) Steel material to be case-hardened superior in cold forgeability and temper softening resistance
Dossett et al. Heat treating of gray irons
JPH11131184A (en) Case hardening steel minimal in heat treatment strain
Paknikar PREDICTION OF HARDENABILITY OF SG IRONS
KR20130051581A (en) Transmission gear and free machining nitriding steel therefor

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20121205

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R079

Ref document number: 602011024900

Country of ref document: DE

Free format text: PREVIOUS MAIN CLASS: C22C0033080000

Ipc: C21D0001460000

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: C22C 33/08 20060101ALI20131203BHEP

Ipc: C22C 38/08 20060101ALI20131203BHEP

Ipc: C21D 1/46 20060101AFI20131203BHEP

Ipc: C21D 5/00 20060101ALI20131203BHEP

Ipc: C22C 37/00 20060101ALI20131203BHEP

Ipc: C22C 37/04 20060101ALI20131203BHEP

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20140326

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20151002

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 787912

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20160415

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602011024900

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Payment date: 20160628

Year of fee payment: 6

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20160406

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 787912

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20160406

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160406

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160806

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160706

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160406

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160406

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20160628

Year of fee payment: 6

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160406

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160808

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160406

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160406

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160406

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160406

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160707

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160406

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160406

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602011024900

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160406

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160406

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160406

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160406

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160406

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160406

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160406

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20160628

Year of fee payment: 6

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20170110

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20160706

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20170228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160630

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160630

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160630

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160706

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160617

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160406

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602011024900

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: EUG

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170617

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170618

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180103

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20110617

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160406

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160406

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160406

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160630

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160617

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160406

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160406