US20120143515A1 - Multi-detector gas identification system - Google Patents

Multi-detector gas identification system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20120143515A1
US20120143515A1 US11/905,414 US90541407A US2012143515A1 US 20120143515 A1 US20120143515 A1 US 20120143515A1 US 90541407 A US90541407 A US 90541407A US 2012143515 A1 US2012143515 A1 US 2012143515A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
gas analysis
response
pid
data
chemical sensor
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US11/905,414
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Mark L. Norman
Terence W. Sauer
David R. St. Pierre
Greger Andersson
Eric G. Diken
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Smiths Detection Inc
Original Assignee
Smiths Detection Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Smiths Detection Inc filed Critical Smiths Detection Inc
Priority to US11/905,414 priority Critical patent/US20120143515A1/en
Assigned to SMITHS DETECTION INC. reassignment SMITHS DETECTION INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: ST.PIERRE, DAVID R., ANDERSSON, GREGER, DIKEN, ERIC G., NORMAN, MARK L., SAUER, TERENCE W.
Publication of US20120143515A1 publication Critical patent/US20120143515A1/en
Priority to US13/612,567 priority patent/US8904849B2/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
    • G01N33/0004—Gaseous mixtures, e.g. polluted air
    • G01N33/0009—General constructional details of gas analysers, e.g. portable test equipment
    • G01N33/0073—Control unit therefor
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
    • G01N33/0004—Gaseous mixtures, e.g. polluted air
    • G01N33/0009—General constructional details of gas analysers, e.g. portable test equipment
    • G01N33/0027—General constructional details of gas analysers, e.g. portable test equipment concerning the detector
    • G01N33/0031—General constructional details of gas analysers, e.g. portable test equipment concerning the detector comprising two or more sensors, e.g. a sensor array
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N27/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of electric, electrochemical, or magnetic means
    • G01N27/62—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of electric, electrochemical, or magnetic means by investigating the ionisation of gases, e.g. aerosols; by investigating electric discharges, e.g. emission of cathode
    • G01N27/622—Ion mobility spectrometry

Definitions

  • One embodiment provides a gas analysis system comprising a plurality of gas analysis units and a computer system, wherein the plurality of gas analysis units are in fluid contact with a single gas sample, wherein the plurality of gas analysis units comprises a photoionization detector (PID), a chemical sensor array, and ion mobility spectrometers (IMS), wherein data produced by each of the gas analysis units is analyzed individually and/or in parallel and the data is characteristic of an analyte, and wherein the qualitative and quantitative data from each of the gas analysis units are multiplexed to identify the analyte.
  • PID photoionization detector
  • IMS ion mobility spectrometers
  • FIG. 1A is a block diagram of an exemplary gas analysis system combining a PID, a metal oxide chemical sensor (MOS) array and an IMS on a single platform and in simultaneous fluid contact with a single gas sample.
  • MOS metal oxide chemical sensor
  • FIG. 1B is a block diagram of an another exemplary gas analysis system combining a PID, a metal oxide chemical sensor (MOS) array and an IMS on a single platform and in simultaneous fluid contact with a single gas sample, where further details of the IMS are illustrated.
  • MOS metal oxide chemical sensor
  • FIG. 2 is a graph showing raw output voltage (Vout) versus time for gas sample measurements obtained during an ambient air controlled contamination experiment using an array of six MOS employed in a functional prototype of the exemplary system described in FIG. 1 .
  • FIG. 3 is a graph showing the PID data obtained during the same experiment referenced in FIG. 2 .
  • FIG. 4 is a graph showing representative data for PID, MOS, and IMS detectors for a single sample of 5000 ppm benzene obtained using a functional prototype of the exemplary system described in FIG. 1 .
  • FIG. 5 shows representative data for PID, MOS, and IMS detectors for a single sample of 150 ppm diborane obtained using a functional prototype of the exemplary system described in FIG. 1 .
  • FIG. 6 is a process flow diagram for an exemplary embodiment of a gas identification system using PID, IMS, and MOS array gas analysis units.
  • FIG. 7 is a process flow diagram showing detail of a sequential data filtering approach for the “initiate data fusion algorithm” step within the process flow diagram shown in FIG. 6 .
  • FIG. 8 is a process flow diagram showing detail of a predictive combined probability approach for the “initiate data fusion algorithm” step within the process flow diagram shown in FIG. 6 for another exemplary embodiment.
  • analyte can be present in a gas sample such as, for example, toxic industrial chemicals (TIC), chemical warfare agents (CWAs), irritants, and simulants.
  • TIC toxic industrial chemicals
  • CWAs chemical warfare agents
  • irritants irritants
  • simulants simulants
  • An analyte also can be present as a solid or liquid sample. In such cases, the analyte can be made gaseous to facilitate analysis.
  • FIG. 1 shows an exemplary embodiment of a gas analysis system.
  • the gas analysis system can include a plurality of gas analysis technologies and the data output of the plurality of gas analysis technologies can be used to identify one or more target analytes present in a gas sample.
  • the system can use a common inlet and common sample flow path to allow the same gas sample to be analyzed by the gas analysis technologies.
  • the common inlet 50 may comprise an inlet chamber.
  • the gas analysis technologies can be incorporated into a system as gas analysis units, which can be individually selected and upgradeable.
  • a redundant gas analysis technology also can be used.
  • a gas analysis technology includes, but is not limited to, an ion mobility spectrometer (IMS), a chemical sensor, a chemical sensor array, a photoionization detector (PID), a radioactivity detector, a gas chromatograph (GC), a mass spectrometer (MS), a GC-MS, an optical spectrometer (including, e.g., infrared (IR), Raman, etc.) or a biosensor (including, e.g., fluorescence). Any embodiment of such gas analysis technologies known in the art can be used. In one embodiment, as shown in FIG.
  • the gas analysis system 10 comprises a PID 20 , a chemical sensor array 30 , and a dual channel IMS 40 .
  • the system also can include standard four-gas meter capabilities that can measure inflammable gases in terms of their lower explosive limit (LEL), as well as levels of carbon dioxide, oxygen, and hydrogen sulfide.
  • LEL lower explosive limit
  • a chemical sensor array can be comprised of one or more of any of the following: a semiconductor sensor (e.g., a metal oxide chemical sensor (MOS) array), an electrochemical sensor (EC), (e.g. a cermet sensor), a surface acoustic wave (SAW) sensor, an optical vapor sensor, chemiresistor sensors, or a conductive polymer sensor.
  • a semiconductor sensor e.g., a metal oxide chemical sensor (MOS) array
  • EC electrochemical sensor
  • SAW surface acoustic wave
  • a chemical sensor array can be comprised of a plurality of one type of sensor, any combination of different types of sensors, including a plurality of one or more different types of sensors.
  • a chemical sensor array can be comprised of any metal oxide sensor, including, but not limited to a tin oxide (SnO 2 ) sensor.
  • metal oxide sensor any suitable type can be used, such as, for example, a liquefied petroleum gas (LP) sensor, a volatile organic compound (VOC) sensor, or a toxic air contaminant gas sensor.
  • LP liquefied petroleum gas
  • VOC volatile organic compound
  • a metal oxide sensor can be a Taguchi Gas Sensor (TGS, Figaro USA, Inc., Glenville, Ill.).
  • a sensor can be a Figaro TGS 2600-series sensor (2600, 2602, 2610, 2620, etc.).
  • a chemical sensor array can contain between 2 and 4, between 2 and 6, or between 2 and 10 sensors, for example. In one embodiment, an array contains 6 sensors.
  • the chemical sensor array gas analysis unit can be included in a common flow path 54 (the arrows in FIGS. 1A and 1B illustrate the flow) that delivers a portion of the sample stream to each gas analysis unit or technology simultaneously while permitting each detector to function individually and to be individually controlled.
  • a gas analysis system can include one or more valves 32 associated with a chemical sensor array that can isolate a chemical sensor array from the sample stream upon analyte exposure to prevent saturation of the individual chemical sensors.
  • One or more valves are capable of isolating the chemical sensor array from the gas sample by diverting the sample flow array from the chemical sensor array.
  • the one or more valves can be a set of valves.
  • the valves can be actuated in a first position or a second position in response to the amount of analyte detected by an IMS, a PID and/or the chemical sensor array.
  • a first position the valves allow fluid communication of a gas sample with the chemical sensor array.
  • a second position the valves prevent fluid communication of a gas sample with a chemical sensor array.
  • a valve or valves can be in communication with a control mechanism, such as controller 60 , for actuating the one or more valves.
  • the control mechanism can be computer controlled and can use operation logic for achieving proper exposure of the chemical sensor array to a gas sample.
  • the system operates with the valves in the first position to allow the chemical sensor array to detect analytes in the background air.
  • the system autonomously operates the valves to be arranged in the second position and processes the data, during which time the other gas analysis technologies (e.g., IMS and PID) continue to monitor the sample stream.
  • the system again operates the valves to be arranged in the first position to allow the chemical sensor array to recover, but will alternate between valve positions if the background air is not sufficiently clear. This operation serves to minimize both the response time for sample identification and the recovery time of the chemical sensors by limiting the exposure of the sensor array to a sample. For example, a MOS array will produce sufficient data for sample identification within 1-30 seconds after initial exposure and will recover to baseline within approximately 30 seconds to approximately 5 to 10 minutes.
  • a chemical sensor array can be controlled by an operation logic.
  • the operation logic can enable a chemical sensor array to detect analytes with a fast response time and in concert with other gas analysis technologies in a gas analysis system.
  • a chemical sensor array analysis time can be from approximately 1 to approximately 30 seconds.
  • Operation logic also can control exposure of a chemical sensor array to a sample such that the amount of an analyte in contact with a chemical sensor array is sufficient for identification, but that saturation of the array is avoided and recovery time is minimized.
  • FIG. 1B illustrates another exemplary embodiment of a gas analysis system, where like reference numerals illustrate the same features as in the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 1A .
  • FIG. 1B illustrates the components of the dual channel IMS 40 in further detail.
  • the dual channel IMS 40 comprises dual ion mobility spectrometers 42 , where each of the spectrometers 42 includes a drift cell 44 .
  • the dual channel IMS 40 also comprises a fan 46 and dopant 48 as shown in FIG. 1B .
  • a chemical sensor array operation logic can process one or more time-dependent chemical sensor signals to produce a multi-channel array pattern, which can be used to identify an analyte.
  • FIG. 2 shows time-dependent responses of a six-sensor MOS array to various gas samples. For FIG.
  • the identities of the released analytes are given in the Figure, and the concentrations (parts per million, ppm) were determined from the PID measurements referenced in FIG. 3 .
  • Chemical sensors within an array can be the same or different. Sensors within an array can be operated using different parameters to obtain data sufficient to identify an analyte or to propose a list of possible analytes (a “hit list”).
  • an individual MO sensor in a MOS array can operate at a fixed temperature (fixed operating voltage, Vop) or the temperature/voltage can be temporally modulated and multiple data points obtained from a single sensor.
  • data can be collected using multiple MO sensors operating at different, fixed temperatures.
  • a change in MO sensor response as a function of temperature can provide data useful in identifying an analyte.
  • a chemical sensor array can include multiple sensors, where each of the sensors operates at a different, fixed temperature.
  • a gas analysis unit comprises multiple metal oxide sensors. The multiple metal oxide sensors can be SnO 2 sensors, each operating at a different, fixed temperature and voltage.
  • Kinetic information associated with the sensing mechanism of a chemical sensor also can be used as output data for identifying an analyte and can be used for assessing array status.
  • a gas analysis system can monitor rate of change of the MOS responses (i.e., dVi/dt or any change between two or more data points within the data array over the course of the measurement), which can be used to autonomously monitor the MOS array stability.
  • dVi/dt rate of change of the MOS responses
  • dVi/dt any change between two or more data points within the data array over the course of the measurement
  • one can set a reference MOS baseline (Vo) based on dVi/dt, monitor the dVi/dt signal or deflection from Vo as an indicator of sensor response, and transform mathematically the time-dependent response of each sensor to produce a response signal for each sensor channel.
  • FIG. 4 and 5 show six-channel MOS array patterns for benzene and diborane, respectively, in which the signal for each sensor channel monitored at 5 Hz is processed over a predetermined time window.
  • a gas analysis system also can be configured to allow the ability to set multiple temperatures for a MOS allowing customization for different sets of analytes.
  • the two IMS spectrometers Smiths Detection
  • RIP reactant ion peaks
  • the reduced mobility (k 0 ) for the positive mode product ion peak (PIP) is also given.
  • the 10.6 eV PID data illustrates that the analyte is detectable above the preset threshold during the course of the measurement.
  • the reduced mobility (k 0 ) for the negative mode product ion peak (PIP) is given.
  • the MOS array is the same as in FIG. 4 .
  • the 10.6 eV PID data illustrates that the analyte is not detectable above the preset threshold during the course of the measurement.
  • a system also can include a relative humidity (% RH) sensor such as the sensor 35 shown in FIGS. 1A and 1B .
  • % RH relative humidity
  • Any suitable % RH sensor can be used.
  • the % RH sensor can be temperature-compensated.
  • a % RH sensor can be a capacitive thin film sensor.
  • a system also can include a PID 20 .
  • the voltage output (Vout) of the PID can be monitored periodically or continuously. The voltage can be monitored at 0.2 Hz, 1 Hz, 5 Hz, 10 Hz, or any other practical rate. In one embodiment, the PID Vout is continuously monitored at 1 Hz, as illustrated in FIG. 3 , or at an optimum rate based on analog-to-digital converter (A/D) delay times. In another embodiment, the PID incorporates a 10.6 eV ionization source. A PID can be adjusted with a user controlled gain.
  • the system can access a database containing correction factors (CF) for target analytes, such as, for example, target analytes that a system can be programmed to detect.
  • CF correction factors
  • a PID can calculate sample concentration using, for example, [((Vout ⁇ PID 0 )/PIDCAL)*CF], where PID 0 is a baseline voltage that is determined autonomously by the system or manually by the user, and PIDCAL is a calibration response factor (mV/ppm) that is specific for each PID.
  • FIG. 3 shows exemplary PID readings from a controlled contamination ambient air monitoring experiment employing a functional prototype of the exemplary system described in FIG. 1 during which low levels of acetone, ethanol, ammonia, propane and acetic acid were released. Any suitable PID can be used having a detection range of from approximately 1 to approximately 5000 ppm.
  • the PID can be a Black Label piD-Tech PID sensor unit (Baseline-Mocon, Inc, Lyons, Colo.).
  • the PID data in FIG. 3 was obtained with the Black Label 10.6 eV piD Tech PID module (Baseline-Mocon, Lyons, Colo.) simultaneously with the MOS data during the experiment referenced in FIG. 2 .
  • the concentration (ppm) values on the ordinate axis were calculated in real time using analyte correction factors (CF, as noted) that were programmed into the system computer of the prototype.
  • the system can autonomously adjust a second and subsequent “corrected” PID reading based on the identity information to enable continuous air monitoring and quantification by the system.
  • the chemical sensor array and PID detector can be contained in a chamber that allows the PID to be continuously exposed to a gas sample during operation of the system.
  • An IMS can be a single IMS or a dual-channel IMS having two IM spectrometers that are adapted to monitor positive and negative mode ions simultaneously.
  • An IMS can function at approximately room temperature (“cold IMS”) or at elevated temperatures (“hot IMS”).
  • An IMS can use any suitable reagents or dopants, including, for example, ammonia, acetone, dimethylsulfoxide, nicotinamide, nonylamine, hydrazine, monomethyl hydrazine, dimethylhydrazine or water.
  • the system can include methods of noise reduction and signal amplification.
  • a gas analysis system can be self-contained and portable and, in one embodiment, man-portable. In another embodiment, the system can be handheld. The system can include a battery and/or it can be battery powered. In a further embodiment the system is ruggedized and can used in a range of ambient conditions. The system can be capable of automatic clearing and resetting of the system and gas analysis units.
  • An analysis cycle can be less than 20 minutes, less than 15 minutes, less than 10 minutes, less than 5 minutes, less than 2 minutes, less than 1 minute, less than 30 seconds, less than 15 seconds, less than 10 seconds, less than 5 seconds, less than 3 seconds, or less than 1 second. In one embodiment, an analysis cycle can be less than 3 seconds.
  • a system can include one or more compressors or pumps 70 , such as shown in FIGS. 1A and 1B .
  • a compressor or pump can draw a gas sample through the system, providing a portion of the same gas sample to each gas analysis unit in the system.
  • the sample collection system can include a flexible wand that interfaces with an inlet port.
  • the system can include a means for preventing introduction of liquid into the system, such as, for example, a water trap.
  • a system can be mounted on a tripod or function free-standing so that the system is capable of constant monitoring applications.
  • a system can be capable of collecting a sample that can be further analyzed at a remote site, such as, for example, a laboratory.
  • the system can include a computer system.
  • the computer system can be on-board or remote, connected via hard wire or wireless or a combination of hard wire and wireless. In one embodiment, the computer system is on-board.
  • the computer system may be part of the controller 60 (See FIGS. 1A and 1B ) or may be separate therefrom.
  • the computer system can include at least one memory.
  • the memory can be any type of computer memory or any other type of electronic storage medium that is located either internally or externally to the system, such as, for example, read-only memory (ROM), random access memory (RAM), compact disc read-only memory (CDROM), electro-optical memory, magneto-optical memory, or the like.
  • ROM read-only memory
  • RAM random access memory
  • CDROM compact disc read-only memory
  • electro-optical memory magneto-optical memory, or the like.
  • the memory can, for example, be programmed using conventional techniques known to those having ordinary skill in the art of computer programming.
  • the actual source code or object code for carrying out the steps of, for example, a computer program can be stored in the memory.
  • the computer system can also include at least one processor, for example, to execute the computer program stored in the memory.
  • the processor can be any known processor, such as, for example, any type of microprocessor. However, those of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that the system can be any combination of hardware, software, and/or firmware.
  • the computer system can be configured to monitor and control the operation of the system and/or to analyze response data obtained from the gas analysis units.
  • the computer system can include software and hardware for identifying target analytes using response data obtained from a sample.
  • software in the computer system can be coded to interpret obtained data (e.g., chemical sensor array response, photoionization response, IMS spectrum peak location, peak height, peak area) using comparison to a database or library of known responses that correspond to known target analytes and to known chemical families or functional groups.
  • the computer system can include, for example, a spectral library (database) of known IMS spectra for various functional groups and chemicals.
  • the computer system can include a database of chemical sensor array pattern signatures for known target analytes.
  • the computer system can include a database of ionization potentials and PID correction factors for known target analytes.
  • the computer system can contain one or more databases providing an IMS spectral library, chemical sensor array pattern signatures, and ionization potentials of known target analytes.
  • the computer system can provide an indication of the degree of certainty or percentage match of the identified analyte with the unknown analyte present in a gas sample.
  • the computer system also can include a graphical user interface for displaying information.
  • the graphical user interface can display, for example, a list of functional groups or chemicals from the databases that correspond to the response data obtained for the unknown analyte, including an International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) chemical and a common name of the identified compound.
  • the computer system can include user input systems, such as a keyboard or mouse, touchpad, joystick, or other control mechanism to allow the user to interact with the computer system.
  • the computer system can include hardware and/or software to allow the user to manipulate information provided on the graphical user interface.
  • the computer system can include log and data storage capability including, for example, date, time, user identification, and system status at the time of sample analysis.
  • the computer system can include global positioning system hardware and software that can record the location of a sample collection.
  • a gas analysis system can be an all-inclusive unit that functions as a single unit.
  • an all-inclusive unit can be networked with other units that can be placed in different locations.
  • one or more systems containing the desired gas analysis units can be networked to a remote computer, which performs control and/or analysis functions.
  • a system can use wireless technology to communicate with a central controller when used remotely or a part of a network.
  • the computer system also can include a network connection for connecting the system to one or more networks (e.g., intranets or internets) or other systems.
  • the network connection can be any type of network connection, such as, for example, an Ethernet connection, to a remote computer system, network or the like, or any other form of connection (e.g., a RS-232 connection, an optical link, a wireless connection, or the like) over which information can be communicated.
  • a system can be used to detect a wide variety of analytes.
  • the system is used to detect and identify priority TICs and CWAs and is programmable to detect and/or identify other vaporous or aerosolized chemical or biological agents of interest.
  • Other vaporous and/or aerosolized materials that may be detected and/or identified by the system can be, but are not limited to, any specific chemical from the general classes of hydrocarbons, alcohols, aldehydes, ketones, aromatics, peroxides, esters, ethers, carbonates, nitrates, phosphates, sulfates, sulfides, halides, azides, as well as explosives, drugs, CWAs and simulants, BWAs and simulants, and combinations thereof.
  • TICs that can be detected and/or identified include, but are not limited to, acetone, acrylonitrile, ammonia, benzene, butane, carbon monoxide, chlorobenzene, mono-, di-, and tri-methyl amine, hexane, methyl hydrazine, hydrogen cyanide, hydrogen sulfide, methane, methyl ethyl ketone, m-xylene, pepper spray (capsaicin), phosgene, propane, trichloroethylene, acrolein, ethanol, formaldehyde, isopropanol, methanol, phosphine, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, vinyl chloride, chlorine, ethylene oxide, hydrogen chloride, hydrogen fluoride, phosphorus trichloride, sulfur dioxide, sulfuric acid, methyl caproate, tetrachloroethylene, acetic acid, fluorine, hydrogen bromide, nitric acid, s
  • Explosives that can be detected and/or identified include, but are not limited to, 2-amino-4,6-dinitrotoluene, 4-amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene, ammonal, ammonium nitrate, black powder, 2,4-dimethyl-1,3-dinitrobutane, 2,4-dinitrotoluene, ethylene glycol dinitrate, forcite 40, GOMA-2, hexanitrostilbene, 1,3,5,7-tetranitro-1,3,5,7-tetrazacyclooctane (HMX), mononitrotoluene, nitroglycerine, pentaerythritol tetranitrate (PETN), 1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazacyclohexane (RDX), semtex-A, Semtex-H, smokeless powder, trinitro-2,4,6-phenylmethylnitramine tetryl (Tetryl), 2,4,6
  • the explosive which are collected are 1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazacyclohexane, pentaerythritol tetranitrate, 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene, trinitro-2,4,6-phenylmethylnitramine tetryl, nitroglycerine, ammonium nitrate, 3,5,7-tetranitro-1,3,5,7-tetrazacyclooctane, and combinations thereof.
  • Chemical warfare agents and other toxins that can be detected and/or identified include, but are not limited to amiton (VG), arsine, cyanogen chloride, hydrogen chloride, chlorine, diphosgene, PFIB, phosgene, phosgene oxime, chloropicrin, ethyl N,N-dimethyl phosphoramicocyanidate (Tabun), isopropyl methyl phosphonofluoridate (Sarin), pinacolyl methyl phosphonefluoridate (Soman), phosphonofluoridic acid, ethyl-, isopropyl ester (GE), phosphonothioic acid, ethyl-, S-(2-(diethylamino)ethyl) O-ethyl ester (VE), phosphonothioic acid, methyl-, S-(2-(diethylamino)ethyl) O-ethyl ester (VM), distilled mustard, ethyl
  • Biological agents that can be detected and/or identified include, but are not limited to Bacillus anthracis (anthrax), Clostridium botulinum toxin, Yersinia pestis (plague), variola major (smallpox), Francisella tularensis (tularemia), and Ricinus communis (ricin).
  • a target analyte can be detected and identified at less than or equal to the Immediately Dangerous to Life and Health (IDLH) concentration.
  • IDLH Immediately Dangerous to Life and Health
  • an analyte can be detected and identified at less than or equal to approximately 50% of the IDLH concentration, less than or equal to approximately 25% of the IDLH concentration, or less than or equal to approximately 10% of the IDLH.
  • Table A lists some exemplary TICs that can be detected and identified along with their 10% IDLH (( 1/10) IDLH) concentrations.
  • some of the target analytes may be identified at greater than 50% IDLH concentration.
  • Target analytes can be detected and identified using data supplied by the gas analysis technologies of a system.
  • each gas analysis technology includes one or more detectors capable of providing a signal or data output in response to an analyte. Output of each detector (e.g., response data) can be recorded by a computer.
  • Each gas analysis technology can provide qualitative and quantitative response data that are characteristic of an analyte. In some cases, the response data from a detector will be the same for different analytes and in other cases, the response data from a detector will be different for different analytes. Using response data from more than one gas analysis technology can be useful to differentiate analytes having the same response data, because analytes having the same response data in a first gas analysis technology often will not have the same response data in a second gas analysis technology.
  • the qualitative and/or quantitative response data from the gas analysis technologies and the detectors and sensors of each of the gas analysis technologies can be combined (or “multiplexed”) using a novel algorithm that can identify an analyte in a sample.
  • the algorithm can multiplex data from a plurality of gas analysis technologies to provide the chemical identity of an analyte or to provide a class of chemical of an analyte.
  • An IMS response comprises of an ion spectrum from which measurable peaks can be located and normalized to reduced mobility (k 0 ) space to account for parameters such as temperature and pressure.
  • the k 0 values and their associated intensities can be compared against known peak “windows” to determine whether the measured spectrum is consistent with one or more of the known analytes.
  • the IMS peaks also can provide semi-quantitative information based on the measured intensities.
  • the peak window of a known analyte provided in, for example, a database provided in the computer system, can be compared to a peak window of an unknown analyte and the identity of an analyte or group of potential analytes can be determined.
  • a PID response is a voltage output that can generate a binary metric that indicates whether one or more of the known analytes could be present according to their known ionization potentials (relative to the PID bulb energy). These ionization potentials are inherently characteristic of the analyte and can be used in concert with response data from the other gas analysis technologies to identify the analyte. Furthermore, a PID response can be converted to a concentration using a pre-set calibration coefficient (PIDCAL) and a correction factor (CF) for the analyte following its identification.
  • PIDCAL pre-set calibration coefficient
  • CF correction factor
  • a chemical sensor array response is an array of signals that can be produced using any suitable analysis method known in the art.
  • a chemical sensor array response can be produced by processing and, optionally, integrating a time-dependent voltage output for each sensor upon exposure to the analyte to obtain qualitative and quantitative information.
  • This array pattern can be further processed using pattern recognition techniques, such as, for example, rank extraction (Wilson, D. M., et al, “Rank Extraction in Tin-Oxide Sensor Arrays,” Sensors and Actuators B, 62, pp. 199-210 (2000)), or as otherwise known in the art to determine whether a measured response pattern is consistent with one or more known target analytes.
  • FIG. 6 shows a process flow diagram that can be used by a system to monitor, detect, identify and quantify one or more analytes in a sample.
  • the gas analysis technologies include a PID, an MOS array, and an IMS.
  • the process flow diagram shows how each of the gas analysis technologies can be controlled independently and how a suite of gas analysis technologies can be used together to detect, identify, and/or quantify an analyte in a sample.
  • the system is initiated and begins operating (S 601 ), and parameters of the sample are monitored by each of an IMS, PID, and chemical sensor MOS array gas technologies.
  • the IMS monitors an IMS spectrum (S 603 ), the PID monitors voltage (S 605 ), and the MOS array monitors voltages for sensor (i . . . n) (S 607 ).
  • rolling MOS baselines based on dVi/dt change in voltage with time
  • a detection alarm may be activated (S 617 , S 619 , S 621 ).
  • S 617 when a change is detected in a positive or negative phase spectrum an alarm is activated (S 617 ).
  • a PID voltage reaches a specified threshold, an alarm is activated (S 619 ).
  • the MOS array also monitors for detectable changes in voltage, but can use a rolling baseline (Vo) based on the stability of dVi/dt (S 609 ).
  • a change that results in an alarm (S 621 ) is defined as a detectable deflection from a baseline voltage. This alarm also can alert the user to a change in the chemical composition of the background atmosphere, and is a precursor to the subsequent identification step.
  • the MOS signals can be further processed to convert the time-dependent MOS array signal into a static pattern that can be characteristic of and consistent with a target analyte (S 625 ).
  • the valves 32 See FIGS. 1A and 1B
  • a novel output (or response) data fusion method can logically sort and filter information from the response data to yield (a) the identity of one or more analytes and the concentration of the analytes, (b) a possible chemical family or list of possible identities for one or more analytes (but no definitive identity) and approximate concentration, and/or (c) an alarm to a detected analyte of unknown identity or class and an approximate concentration.
  • the identification from the data fusion method may be fed back to the PID (S 629 ).
  • step S 631 it is determined whether or not monitoring is to be continued. If not, the monitoring process is stopped (S 633 ). Otherwise monitoring is continued.
  • FIG. 7 is a process flow diagram that shows an embodiment of a data fusion method (step S 627 in FIG. 6 ).
  • the flow diagram of FIG. 7 shows a “sequential filtering” method of multiplexing the data from more than one gas analysis technology.
  • This method can involve sequential filtering of a target analyte candidate list based on the qualitative aspects, such as, for example, signal shape, peak shape and/or peak position, and the magnitude of output signal (data) from each of the gas analysis technologies.
  • the qualitative aspects and magnitude of signal output from each of the gas analysis technologies are analyzed and compared with the signal output from the other gas analysis technologies used in a system.
  • the process can involve concatenation of data output from each of the gas analysis technologies that can be followed by analysis of the fused data.
  • the fused data can be analyzed by, for example, principal component analysis (PCA), artificial neural networks (ANN), or any other such pattern recognition and/or hierarchal classification algorithms.
  • PCA principal component analysis
  • ANN artificial neural networks
  • a system can evaluate each of the gas analysis technology signal outputs independently and in parallel. Analysis of the individual output data can result in a list of “candidate knowns” from each of the gas analysis technologies. Each of the individual candidate lists can be fused to produce the identity or identities of one or more analytes in a target sample. A final identity can be determined based on the comparison of the lists of candidate knowns from each other gas analysis technologies and a statistical analysis of the probabilities that the output signals from the combined gas analysis technologies has the identity of a particular target analyte.
  • the signal outputs of the gas analysis technologies are provided (S 701 ).
  • step S 703 it is determined whether or not the PID voltage exceeds a threshold amount. Based on this determination, analyte candidates are eliminated (S 705 ), and a first filtered list with the eliminated analyte candidates removed is provided (S 707 ).
  • step S 709 it is determined whether or not the IMS plasmagram has a detectable change. If so, analyte candidates which do not have such an IMS response are eliminated (S 711 ) from the first filtered list and the IMS response is compared to reference data of the analyte candidates (S 713 ). A second filtered list with the eliminated analyte candidates removed based on the IMS response is provided (S 715 ). In step 717 the MOS response is compared to reference data of the analyte candidates. Based on this comparison, further analyte candidates may be eliminated from the second filtered list and a third filtered list provided (S 719 ). The response magnitudes from the three gas analysis technologies is then cross-correlated and compared to the reference data from the remaining analyte candidates in the third list (S 721 ) and a final analyte candidate thereby determined (S 723 ).
  • the process hierarchy can be controlled or facilitated by hardware and software for control of the gas analysis technologies and the detectors and sensors that are comprised in the gas analysis technologies.
  • FIG. 8 illustrates a process flow diagram illustrating another embodiment of a data fusion method as an alternative to the method of FIG. 7 .
  • the data fusion method in FIG. 8 is based on probabilities of fit generated from parallel tests. As illustrated in FIG. 8 , three different tests are presented but any combination of tests utilizing the data from the three different instruments 20 , 30 , and 40 (See FIGS. 1A and 1B ) might be used. The three tests are based on the responses from the PID, chemical sensor MOS array and IMS, as illustrated by the IMS output step (S 801 ), MOS output step (S 803 ), and PID output step (S 805 ).
  • the first test presented is a comparison between chemical sensor MOS array response of library entities and the unknown analyte being detected by the chemical sensor MOS array (S 807 ). Based on the closeness of fit, a probability for fit is calculated for each and every entity in the library (S 809 ). The closeness of fit may be determined, for example, using a least squares fit analysis, or some other fit analysis.
  • the second test uses the chemical sensor MOS array response and quantitatively predicts the PID response at some given time after detection, such as about 10 seconds after detection, for example, for each and every entity in the library (S 817 ). The predicted and a measured PID response are compared (S 819 ).
  • a probability of fit is calculated for each and every entity in the library (S 821 ).
  • the closeness of fit may be determined, for example, using a least squares fit analysis, or some other fit analysis.
  • the third presented test uses the chemical sensor MOS array response to predict the IMS response (S 811 ). The predicted and a measured IMS response are compared (S 813 ).
  • a probability of fit is calculated for each and every entity in the library (S 815 ).
  • the closeness of fit may be determined, for example, using a least squares fit analysis, or some other fit analysis.
  • the calculated probabilities are combined in some way to produce one combined probability of fit for each and every one of the library entities (S 823 ).
  • the individual probabilities might be combined, for example, using an average, a product, or weighted product, or some other mathematical combination of the probabilities.
  • This example provides details the potential configuration of a gas analysis system. Default settings for all configurable parameters are specified below.
  • MO Metal Oxide
  • MO sensor array Six separate TGS style MO sensors are used. The functions performed by the MO sensor array are as follows:
  • Vi the output voltage of each sensor
  • Vop a direct current heater operating voltage
  • each sensor Vi
  • dVi/dt time-dependent slope
  • temperature and humidity are continuously monitored at 5 Hz.
  • the sensor path valves are operated to allow exposure of the array to sample by default.
  • the MO sensors are stable and “ready” when all dVi/dt ⁇ DSTABLE for TSTABLE (sec). At this time, each sensor baseline Vi 0 is remembered as Vi. This is used later to determine when sensors are clean. If all sensors remain stable for TSTABLE (and by default have not responded to any sample), the baselines are reset on a rolling basis after each passage of TSTABLE.
  • SUM( ⁇ Vi) the mathematical sum of these deflections
  • the MO sensor pattern is a 6-channel array of the logarithmic transform. Data from this array is processed, for example, by the data fusion algorithm illustrated in FIG. 7 or 8
  • the sensor isolation valves After the sensor isolation valves have been opened and the sensors have recovered to baseline, they area “ready” again when all dVi/dt ⁇ DSTABLE for TSTABLE and each Vi is within +/ ⁇ VBASE volts of its original Vi 0 .
  • the PID and IMS operate in a “continuous monitor” mode during this time.
  • the PID is “ready” immediately upon startup. An electronic check is used to ensure the PID is operable.
  • the raw Vout (volts) is continuously monitored at 1 Hz (or optimum rate based on A/D delay times).
  • the PID A/D has a settable gain PIDGAIN, with available values of 1, 4, 8, 16, 32, or 64.
  • the baseline voltage PID 0 (volts) is set upon user calibration or autonomously by the system, and the calibration factor PIDCAL (volts/ppm) is supplied by the manufacturer but is user-updatable upon calibration.
  • IMS Ion Mobility Spectrometer
  • the system can include one IMS detector (Smiths Detection), which operates as configured by its manufacturer.
  • IMS detector Smiths Detection
  • the IMS generates a table of k 0 versus intensity (counts) for each of the positive and negative mode IMS spectra (collected at 0.2 Hz). This table is compared against predefined compound “windows” to determine whether the signal is consistent with a known compound, and this information is multiplexed with the MOS and PID to arrive at a final sample identity ( FIG. 7 or 8 ).
  • This example characterizes twenty one TICs using the multi-detector gas analysis system. Each compound is studied over a range of gas phase concentrations (in parts-per-million, ppm) above and below its Immediately Dangerous to Life and Health (IDLH) value under flowing conditions.
  • gas phase concentrations in parts-per-million, ppm
  • IDLH Immediately Dangerous to Life and Health
  • For gases certified mixtures in a nitrogen balance (Scott Specialty Gas, South Plainfield, N.J.) are combined with pure zero air (Scott) using digital mass flow controllers (Sierra Instruments, Monterey, Calif.) to attain the desired dilutions.
  • pure liquids Sigma-Aldrich, St.
  • syringe driver Cold-Parmer, Vernon Hills, Ill.
  • Humidification is achieved by flowing zero air through a gas washing bottle (Fisher Scientific, Hampton, N.H.) and combining the flow with the sample stream. Humidities range from 0-50% R.H. and all measurements are conducted at room temperature.
  • a sample delivery system is configured to maintain a consistent humidity and flow rate (typically 2-10 standard liters per minute, slpm) for the background and sample air streams. Both streams are kept flowing at all times and are switched between instrument and exhaust via a four-way valve.
  • the instrument is first turned on and allowed to stabilize in the presence of the background air stream of the desired humidity. During this time, the sample stream of the desired TIC concentration is established and directed to exhaust. Introduction of the sample is achieved by turning the four-way valve toward the instrument for a preset time (typically 10 seconds). Replicate measurements are collected to evaluate reproducibility.
  • an “unknown” sample of acetone vapor is measured at 50 ppm (1/50 IDLH) and 50% R.H. at ambient temperature.
  • the PID and MOS detectors Upon exposing the instrument to the vapor, only the PID and MOS detectors respond. Based on these detection events, the data fusion algorithm of FIG. 7 is initiated. Since the PID responds, twelve of the twenty one candidate TICs are eliminated in the first filter step, because their ionization potentials (I.P.) are greater than the 10.6 eV PID bulb energy. Therefore, nine TICs remain in the first filtered candidate list. Of these compounds, none are eliminated in the second filter, because the IMS produced no response and an IMS-active TIC could be present below its detectable concentration. This leaves nine TICs in the second filtered candidate list.
  • I.P. ionization potentials
  • the MOS array patterns for these candidates are then compared to the sample pattern in the third filter step, leaving three compounds in the third candidate filter list: acetone, ethanol and hydrogen sulfide. To discriminate among these three possibilities, the magnitudes of the various detector responses are then cross-correlated on a case-by-case basis.
  • the unknown sample concentration corresponds to 38 ppm isobutylene (the calibrant gas).
  • the PID concentrations obtained in these measurements are always less than the equilibrium reference measurements, since the PID readings are taken shortly after each detection event before the sample stabilizes within in the flow path (see FIG. 4 ).
  • the data fusion algorithm incorporates an empirical adjustment factor to account for this discrepancy.
  • the PID concentrations reported to the user during continuous operation are real-time, unadjusted values. This translates into 42 ppm acetone, 380 ppm ethanol, or 125 ppm hydrogen sulfide based on the respective PID correction factors for these candidates.
  • the magnitude of the MOS pattern determined as the sum of the individual channel signals, is 14 V. This translates into 50 ppm acetone, 40 ppm ethanol, or 100 ppm hydrogen sulfide. Clearly, the magnitudes of the PID and MOS are only consistent with acetone or hydrogen sulfide, so ethanol is eliminated as a plausible candidate.
  • the MOS sum is 3.8 V.
  • this corresponds to 9 ppm acrylonitrile, 1 ppm diborane, 10 ppm ethanol or 1 ppm hydrogen sulfide.
  • acrylonitrile is not PID- or IMS-active, it would not produce a response at either detector as observed in this measurement, so it remains a candidate.
  • Diborane is not PID-active either, but its IMS detection limit is 0.5 ppm, so it would produce a negative mode response.
  • ethanol is not IMS-active but does have a PID response, and it would have produced a PID signal at 10 ppm. As such, these two compounds are eliminated as plausible candidates.
  • This example represents a large set of experimental measurements that have been conducted to validate the multi-detector hardware platform and data fusion algorithm for gas and vapor identification. These results demonstrate the importance of combining orthogonal detection techniques and the power of evaluating quantitative information to corroborate qualitative responses of the associated devices for sample identification.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Food Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Other Investigation Or Analysis Of Materials By Electrical Means (AREA)
  • Investigating Or Analyzing Materials By The Use Of Fluid Adsorption Or Reactions (AREA)
  • Sampling And Sample Adjustment (AREA)
US11/905,414 2006-09-28 2007-09-28 Multi-detector gas identification system Abandoned US20120143515A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/905,414 US20120143515A1 (en) 2006-09-28 2007-09-28 Multi-detector gas identification system
US13/612,567 US8904849B2 (en) 2006-09-28 2012-09-12 Multi-detector gas identification system

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US84766006P 2006-09-28 2006-09-28
US11/905,414 US20120143515A1 (en) 2006-09-28 2007-09-28 Multi-detector gas identification system

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/612,567 Continuation US8904849B2 (en) 2006-09-28 2012-09-12 Multi-detector gas identification system

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20120143515A1 true US20120143515A1 (en) 2012-06-07

Family

ID=39231019

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/905,414 Abandoned US20120143515A1 (en) 2006-09-28 2007-09-28 Multi-detector gas identification system
US13/612,567 Active US8904849B2 (en) 2006-09-28 2012-09-12 Multi-detector gas identification system

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/612,567 Active US8904849B2 (en) 2006-09-28 2012-09-12 Multi-detector gas identification system

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (2) US20120143515A1 (enrdf_load_stackoverflow)
EP (1) EP2069779B1 (enrdf_load_stackoverflow)
JP (1) JP5643511B2 (enrdf_load_stackoverflow)
WO (1) WO2008039996A2 (enrdf_load_stackoverflow)

Cited By (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2014055947A1 (en) * 2012-10-04 2014-04-10 Rae Systems, Inc. Interference compensated photoionization detector
WO2014149216A1 (en) * 2013-03-21 2014-09-25 Mocon, Inc. Reactor for near absolute conversion of alternative moiety-containing species into a select moiety-containing species and analytical instrument employing the reactor
US20150115152A1 (en) * 2013-10-28 2015-04-30 Nuctech Company Limited Ion mobility spectrometer system
WO2016115030A1 (en) * 2015-01-13 2016-07-21 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Acoustic downhole leak classification and quantification
US20170321540A1 (en) * 2015-01-13 2017-11-09 Intermetallics Co., Ltd. Acoustic array signal processing for flow detection
CN108603831A (zh) * 2015-10-29 2018-09-28 英福康有限责任公司 具有辅助传感器的红外气体检测器
US20180299416A1 (en) * 2015-05-04 2018-10-18 Alpha M.O.S Method for identifying an analyte in a fluid
US20180335407A1 (en) * 2015-10-13 2018-11-22 bentekk GmbH Continuous and separating gas analysis
US20190011417A1 (en) * 2017-05-15 2019-01-10 Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation Fielded chemical threat detectors
US20190285504A1 (en) * 2018-03-13 2019-09-19 International Business Machines Corporation Heuristic Based Analytics for Gas Leak Source Identification
US10794885B2 (en) 2015-11-02 2020-10-06 Alpha M.O.S. Gas sensor controller
CN112362766A (zh) * 2020-10-13 2021-02-12 广西电网有限责任公司电力科学研究院 一种检测六氟化硫电气设备中气体组分的系统
US10921221B2 (en) * 2018-01-31 2021-02-16 Microjet Technology Co., Ltd. Gas detecting device
WO2021094981A1 (en) 2019-11-14 2021-05-20 Gentex Corporation System and methods for chemical detection and amplification
CN113341005A (zh) * 2021-05-19 2021-09-03 浙江大学 Gc-ims和荧光光谱联用检测产黄曲霉毒素真菌污染的方法
US11204304B2 (en) * 2018-01-31 2021-12-21 Microjet Technology Co., Ltd. Gas detecting device
US11331019B2 (en) 2017-08-07 2022-05-17 The Research Foundation For The State University Of New York Nanoparticle sensor having a nanofibrous membrane scaffold
CN115015150A (zh) * 2022-05-25 2022-09-06 中国船舶重工集团公司第七0三研究所 一种多通道冗余型高精度可燃气体浓度传感器

Families Citing this family (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7940188B2 (en) 2008-02-07 2011-05-10 Veltek Associates, Inc. Air sampling system having a plurality of air sampling devices with their own flow switches
TWI414786B (zh) * 2009-07-28 2013-11-11 Univ Nat Taiwan 氣體偵測裝置及氣體監控裝置
JP5745429B2 (ja) 2009-12-22 2015-07-08 アトナープ株式会社 ロボットおよびロボットを制御する方法
EA025772B1 (ru) * 2009-12-22 2017-01-30 Атонарп Инк. Аппарат для обнаружения химических веществ
CN103201621B (zh) * 2010-08-31 2015-11-25 Atonarp株式会社 基于由传感器测量出的数据找出候选的方法和装置
PL2789007T3 (pl) * 2011-12-05 2019-04-30 Smiths Detection Montreal Inc Układy, urządzenia i sposoby do analizy próbki z wykorzystaniem spektrometrii mas
US10859474B2 (en) * 2013-02-28 2020-12-08 TricornTech Taiwan Real-time on-site gas analysis network for ambient air monitoring and active control and response
US10132829B2 (en) 2013-03-13 2018-11-20 Invensense, Inc. Heading confidence interval estimation
US10139383B2 (en) * 2013-12-02 2018-11-27 TricornTech Taiwan Real-time air monitoring with multiple sensing modes
US9939416B2 (en) 2014-08-28 2018-04-10 Veltek Assoicates, Inc. Programmable logic controller-based system and user interface for air sampling in controlled environments
JP6731710B2 (ja) * 2015-08-31 2020-07-29 新コスモス電機株式会社 ガス分析システム、及び、ガス分析方法
CN107271575B (zh) * 2016-04-08 2020-01-14 株式会社岛津制作所 离子迁移谱和质谱并行分析的方法及装置
JP6584366B2 (ja) * 2016-05-20 2019-10-02 三菱電機株式会社 ガス分析装置およびガス分析方法
CN109564191B (zh) * 2016-08-09 2022-07-19 霍尼韦尔国际公司 低功耗光致电离检测器(pid)
CN108074795B (zh) * 2016-11-17 2019-07-05 中国科学院大连化学物理研究所 一种离子迁移谱和离子阱质谱联用电离腔体
WO2019163966A1 (ja) * 2018-02-26 2019-08-29 日本電気株式会社 ニオイ検出装置、ニオイ検出方法、及びコンピュータ読み取り可能な記録媒体
FI20185249A1 (en) * 2018-03-15 2019-09-16 Karsa Oy Detection of hydrogen halides
US11774422B2 (en) * 2018-07-25 2023-10-03 Stmicroelectronics Pte Ltd Selective multi-gas detection through pulse heating in a gas sensor
CN109613070B (zh) * 2019-01-02 2021-04-20 大连理工大学 基于二维MXene/SnO2异质结的氨气气体传感器、制备工艺及应用
US11578147B2 (en) 2020-03-17 2023-02-14 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Olefin polymerization processes
GB2593511A (en) * 2020-03-25 2021-09-29 Sumitomo Chemical Co Sensor apparatus
DE102020114982A1 (de) * 2020-06-05 2021-12-09 Dräger Safety AG & Co. KGaA Gasmessgerät und Verfahren zum Messen von Dicyan in Anwesenheit von Cyanwasserstoff

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20030176804A1 (en) * 2002-01-22 2003-09-18 Melker Richard J. Method and apparatus for monitoring respiratory gases during anesthesia
US20040005715A1 (en) * 2001-12-13 2004-01-08 The University Of Wyoming Research Corporation D/B/A Western Research Institute Volatile organic compound sensor system

Family Cites Families (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5109691A (en) * 1989-12-08 1992-05-05 Research Corporation Technologies, Inc. Explosive detection screening system
US6604033B1 (en) * 2000-07-25 2003-08-05 Networkcar.Com Wireless diagnostic system for characterizing a vehicle's exhaust emissions
US7096125B2 (en) * 2001-12-17 2006-08-22 Honeywell International Inc. Architectures of sensor networks for biological and chemical agent detection and identification
US7171312B2 (en) * 2002-07-19 2007-01-30 Smiths Detection, Inc. Chemical and biological agent sensor array detectors
US7019291B2 (en) * 2002-10-12 2006-03-28 Sionex Corporation NOx monitor using differential mobility spectrometry
US7023956B2 (en) * 2002-11-11 2006-04-04 Lockheed Martin Corporaiton Detection methods and system using sequenced technologies
ES2369903T3 (es) * 2003-01-23 2011-12-09 University Of Florida Research Foundation, Incorporated Método y aparato para la vertificación de la concentración intravenosa (iv) de fármacos usando aliento exhalado.
DE10310394A1 (de) * 2003-03-07 2004-09-23 Wma Airsense Analysentechnik Gmbh Verfahren und Meßsystem zur Erfassung von Gefahrstoffen
EP1673606A4 (en) * 2003-10-08 2010-05-05 Smiths Detection Inc METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR INTRODUCING AN ANALYTE IN A ION MOBILITY SPECTROMETER
EP1733219A2 (en) * 2004-01-13 2006-12-20 Sionex Corporation Methods and apparatus for enhanced sample identification based on combined analytical techniques
US20060062734A1 (en) * 2004-09-20 2006-03-23 Melker Richard J Methods and systems for preventing diversion of prescription drugs
WO2006034370A2 (en) * 2004-09-20 2006-03-30 University Of Florida Research Foundation, Inc. Systems and methods for evaluating enzyme competency
WO2006049064A1 (ja) * 2004-11-02 2006-05-11 Shimadzu Corporation 質量分析方法

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20040005715A1 (en) * 2001-12-13 2004-01-08 The University Of Wyoming Research Corporation D/B/A Western Research Institute Volatile organic compound sensor system
US20030176804A1 (en) * 2002-01-22 2003-09-18 Melker Richard J. Method and apparatus for monitoring respiratory gases during anesthesia

Cited By (30)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2014055947A1 (en) * 2012-10-04 2014-04-10 Rae Systems, Inc. Interference compensated photoionization detector
EP2906936A4 (en) * 2012-10-04 2016-06-15 Rae Systems Inc INTERFERENCE COMPENSATED PHOTOIONIZATION DETECTOR
US9459235B2 (en) 2012-10-04 2016-10-04 Honeywell International Inc. Interference compensated photoionization detector
WO2014149216A1 (en) * 2013-03-21 2014-09-25 Mocon, Inc. Reactor for near absolute conversion of alternative moiety-containing species into a select moiety-containing species and analytical instrument employing the reactor
US9513267B1 (en) 2013-03-21 2016-12-06 Mocon, Inc. Reactor for near absolute conversion of alternative moiety-containing species into a select moiety-containing species and analytical instrument employing the reactor
US20150115152A1 (en) * 2013-10-28 2015-04-30 Nuctech Company Limited Ion mobility spectrometer system
US9285342B2 (en) * 2013-10-28 2016-03-15 Nuctech Company Limited Ion mobility spectrometer system
WO2016115030A1 (en) * 2015-01-13 2016-07-21 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Acoustic downhole leak classification and quantification
US20170321540A1 (en) * 2015-01-13 2017-11-09 Intermetallics Co., Ltd. Acoustic array signal processing for flow detection
US11208884B2 (en) * 2015-01-13 2021-12-28 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Acoustic array signal processing for flow detection
US11053790B2 (en) 2015-01-13 2021-07-06 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Acoustic downhole leak classification and quantification
US10942156B2 (en) * 2015-05-04 2021-03-09 Alpha M.O.S. Method for identifying an analyte in a fluid
US20180299416A1 (en) * 2015-05-04 2018-10-18 Alpha M.O.S Method for identifying an analyte in a fluid
US10900937B2 (en) * 2015-10-13 2021-01-26 bentekk GmbH Continuous and separating gas analysis
US20180335407A1 (en) * 2015-10-13 2018-11-22 bentekk GmbH Continuous and separating gas analysis
US10309943B2 (en) * 2015-10-29 2019-06-04 Inficon Gmbh Infrared gas detector with secondary sensor
CN108603831A (zh) * 2015-10-29 2018-09-28 英福康有限责任公司 具有辅助传感器的红外气体检测器
US10794885B2 (en) 2015-11-02 2020-10-06 Alpha M.O.S. Gas sensor controller
US10571445B2 (en) * 2017-05-15 2020-02-25 Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation Fielded chemical threat detectors
US20190011417A1 (en) * 2017-05-15 2019-01-10 Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation Fielded chemical threat detectors
US11331019B2 (en) 2017-08-07 2022-05-17 The Research Foundation For The State University Of New York Nanoparticle sensor having a nanofibrous membrane scaffold
US10921221B2 (en) * 2018-01-31 2021-02-16 Microjet Technology Co., Ltd. Gas detecting device
US11204304B2 (en) * 2018-01-31 2021-12-21 Microjet Technology Co., Ltd. Gas detecting device
US10775258B2 (en) * 2018-03-13 2020-09-15 International Business Machines Corporation Heuristic based analytics for gas leak source identification
US20190285504A1 (en) * 2018-03-13 2019-09-19 International Business Machines Corporation Heuristic Based Analytics for Gas Leak Source Identification
WO2021094981A1 (en) 2019-11-14 2021-05-20 Gentex Corporation System and methods for chemical detection and amplification
EP4058780A4 (en) * 2019-11-14 2023-01-11 Gentex Corporation SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR CHEMICAL DETECTION AND AMPLIFICATION
CN112362766A (zh) * 2020-10-13 2021-02-12 广西电网有限责任公司电力科学研究院 一种检测六氟化硫电气设备中气体组分的系统
CN113341005A (zh) * 2021-05-19 2021-09-03 浙江大学 Gc-ims和荧光光谱联用检测产黄曲霉毒素真菌污染的方法
CN115015150A (zh) * 2022-05-25 2022-09-06 中国船舶重工集团公司第七0三研究所 一种多通道冗余型高精度可燃气体浓度传感器

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2069779B1 (en) 2021-07-07
US8904849B2 (en) 2014-12-09
EP2069779A2 (en) 2009-06-17
JP5643511B2 (ja) 2014-12-17
EP2069779A4 (en) 2017-02-08
JP2010506150A (ja) 2010-02-25
WO2008039996A3 (en) 2008-07-03
US20130046485A1 (en) 2013-02-21
WO2008039996A2 (en) 2008-04-03

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8904849B2 (en) Multi-detector gas identification system
Utriainen et al. Combining miniaturized ion mobility spectrometer and metal oxide gas sensor for the fast detection of toxic chemical vapors
JP5748231B2 (ja) 流量調整システム、および空気により運ばれる検体を検出するための前記流量調整システムを備える監視装置
Marć et al. Current air quality analytics and monitoring: A review
EP1461598B1 (en) Volatile organic compound sensor system
US7227136B2 (en) Method and arrangement for detecting harmful substances
Müller et al. Direct sampling and analysis of atmospheric particulate organic matter by proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry
Räsänen et al. Determination of gas phase triacetone triperoxide with aspiration ion mobility spectrometry and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry
Terzic et al. Gas chromatography–full scan mass spectrometry determination of traces of chemical warfare agents and their impurities in air samples by inlet based thermal desorption of sorbent tubes
Sheu et al. Advances in offline approaches for chemically speciated measurements of trace gas-phase organic compounds via adsorbent tubes in an integrated sampling-to-analysis system
Spinelle et al. Sensitivity of VOC sensors for air quality monitoring within the EURAMET key-VOC project
Chang et al. Investigations on the direct introduction of cigarette smoke for trace elements analysis by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry
Lu et al. Chamber evaluation of a portable GC with tunable retention and microsensor-array detection for indoor air quality monitoring
Coffey et al. Measurement capability of field portable organic vapor monitoring instruments under different experimental conditions
Anttalainen et al. Time-Resolved Ion Mobility Spectrometry with a Stop Flow Confined Volume Reaction Region
Chu et al. Real-time determination of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by ion molecule reaction–mass spectrometry (IMR-MS)
Viitanen et al. Experimental study of the effect of temperature on ion cluster formation using ion mobility spectrometry
Lozanoa et al. Detection of pollutants in water using a wireless network of electronic noses
Richardt et al. Analysis of Chemical Warfare Agents–Searching for Molecules
Herrick et al. Measurement of Vapors and Gases
Jin Chemometric methods for the determination of volatile organic compounds with microsensor arrays
Andrews et al. Characterizing Dynamic Atmosphere Generation System Performance for Analytical Method Development
Mikedi et al. Enhancing capabilities of aspiration-type Ion Mobility Spectrometer using a Pulsed Sampling System and a heated transfer line
Innocente et al. Matching Continuous Monitoring and Bag Olfactometric Sampling at the Source: a Case Study
Miles et al. How Tube-Based Thermal Desorption Can be Used to Monitor Chemical Warfare Agents at Ultratrace Levels

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: SMITHS DETECTION INC., CONNECTICUT

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:NORMAN, MARK L.;SAUER, TERENCE W.;ST.PIERRE, DAVID R.;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20080103 TO 20080109;REEL/FRAME:020427/0519

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION