US20070006625A1 - Method and control device for operating a mill train for metal strip - Google Patents

Method and control device for operating a mill train for metal strip Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20070006625A1
US20070006625A1 US10/574,723 US57472306A US2007006625A1 US 20070006625 A1 US20070006625 A1 US 20070006625A1 US 57472306 A US57472306 A US 57472306A US 2007006625 A1 US2007006625 A1 US 2007006625A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
flatness
metal strip
bulge
strip
mill train
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US10/574,723
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Johannes Reinschke
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Siemens AG
Original Assignee
Siemens AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=34399272&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=US20070006625(A1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Siemens AG filed Critical Siemens AG
Assigned to SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT reassignment SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: REINSCHKE, JOHANNES
Publication of US20070006625A1 publication Critical patent/US20070006625A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B21—MECHANICAL METAL-WORKING WITHOUT ESSENTIALLY REMOVING MATERIAL; PUNCHING METAL
    • B21B—ROLLING OF METAL
    • B21B37/00—Control devices or methods specially adapted for metal-rolling mills or the work produced thereby
    • B21B37/28—Control of flatness or profile during rolling of strip, sheets or plates
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B21—MECHANICAL METAL-WORKING WITHOUT ESSENTIALLY REMOVING MATERIAL; PUNCHING METAL
    • B21B—ROLLING OF METAL
    • B21B1/00—Metal-rolling methods or mills for making semi-finished products of solid or profiled cross-section; Sequence of operations in milling trains; Layout of rolling-mill plant, e.g. grouping of stands; Succession of passes or of sectional pass alternations
    • B21B1/22—Metal-rolling methods or mills for making semi-finished products of solid or profiled cross-section; Sequence of operations in milling trains; Layout of rolling-mill plant, e.g. grouping of stands; Succession of passes or of sectional pass alternations for rolling plates, strips, bands or sheets of indefinite length
    • B21B2001/225—Metal-rolling methods or mills for making semi-finished products of solid or profiled cross-section; Sequence of operations in milling trains; Layout of rolling-mill plant, e.g. grouping of stands; Succession of passes or of sectional pass alternations for rolling plates, strips, bands or sheets of indefinite length by hot-rolling
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B21—MECHANICAL METAL-WORKING WITHOUT ESSENTIALLY REMOVING MATERIAL; PUNCHING METAL
    • B21B—ROLLING OF METAL
    • B21B38/00—Methods or devices for measuring, detecting or monitoring specially adapted for metal-rolling mills, e.g. position detection, inspection of the product
    • B21B38/02—Methods or devices for measuring, detecting or monitoring specially adapted for metal-rolling mills, e.g. position detection, inspection of the product for measuring flatness or profile of strips

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method; one application is particularly suitable for operation in a hot-rolling mill, e.g. in the finishing train, but is not restricted to this.
  • the invention also relates to a control device.
  • a flatness regulating system for metal strip is known from DE 197 584 66 A1, with a method being employed to measure the surface geometry of hot-rolled strip by generating lines on the surface of the strip. The visible flatness measured in this manner is supplied to a flatness regulator via a flatness analysis system.
  • the object of the invention is to operate a mill train for metal strip such that a control is provided to ensure that a required visible flatness of the rolled metal strip is complied with in a reliable and sufficiently accurate manner within predefined limits.
  • the object is achieved by a method of the type mentioned above, with values for the visible flatness being translated into values for the intrinsic flatness using a bulge model to control the roll stands and a material flow model being used to determine the intrinsic flatness—looked at in the material flow direction—before a physical point for measuring flatness.
  • the claimed possibility of taking into account both the visible flatness of the mill train and the intrinsic flatness with the aid of the bulge model means that extremely stringent requirements can be complied with in respect of the quality of the visible flatness of the metal strip, even though the visible flatness or waviness of the metal strip sometimes completely disappears during rolling under tension, i.e. between the roll posts, and cannot therefore be measured in practice in many instances within the mill train.
  • intrinsic strip flatness values calculated using the material flow model and visible strip flatness values measured at the discharge point of a mill train can be brought into line with each other or verified
  • the bulge model is used first to establish a unique relationship between the intrinsic and visible flatness of the metal strip. It is then possible for the first time not just to carry out presettings on the basis of flatness measurements but also to use the visible flatness for accurate control or regulation of the ongoing rolling process.
  • the visible flatness is advantageously determined in the form of a bulge pattern.
  • the bulge pattern is easy to compare in respect of data and can be stored with relatively little outlay.
  • the bulge pattern is advantageously three-dimensional.
  • At least one of the variables wavelength, amplitude and phase offset of the individual tracks is advantageously evaluated in addition to the relative length of individual tracks of the metal strip to determine the bulge pattern of the metal strip.
  • the bulge pattern can thus be identified much more accurately.
  • a multi-track laser measuring device is advantageously used to determine the bulge pattern, allowing economical identification of the bulge pattern with a sufficiently high level of precision.
  • the visible flatness is advantageously measured topometrically. This makes surface identification of the surface structure of the strip and in particular of the bulge pattern directly possible.
  • the flatness values are advantageously translated online. This allows particularly precise control or regulation of the strip flatness.
  • the flatness values are advantageously translated with the aid of an on-line-capable approximation function. This can save on-line computing time during the translation between visible and intrinsic flatness.
  • the bulge pattern of the metal strip is advantageously modeled using the bulge model by applying a fictitious temperature distribution in the transverse direction of the metal strip based on the intrinsic flatness of the metal strip.
  • the thermal expansion in the longitudinal direction of the strip, but not however in the transverse direction, corresponding to this strip temperature distribution corresponds to a length distribution that can be assigned to the intrinsic flatness. Only one segment of limited length must therefore be modeled and the model equations for elastic plate deformations with major deflections can be worked out with suitable edge conditions at the segment edges.
  • One or more flatness limit values are advantageously predefined at freely selectable points within and/or after the mill train in order to control the mill train.
  • the flatness limit values can relate to the intrinsic flatness and/or the visible flatness. Because flatness limit values can be predefined everywhere within or after the mill train, regulation accuracies for the rolling process can be significantly increased.
  • control device for operating a mill train for metal strip with at least one roll stand, with the control device for implementing a method described above having at least one regulating unit coupled to a bulge model, which is coupled to a device for measuring the visible flatness of the metal strip and to a material flow model.
  • Advantageous embodiments of the control device are specified in the subclaims. The advantages of the control device are similar to those of the method.
  • FIG. 1 shows a multi-stand mill train for rolling metal strip and a control device assigned to the mill train
  • FIGS. 2 a - 2 c show examples of metal strip with flatness errors
  • FIG. 3 shows the division of a metal strip into tracks
  • FIG. 4 shows a section of a multi-stand mill train with a control device
  • FIG. 5 shows the geometry of a section of a metal strip.
  • a mill train for rolling a metal strip 1 is controlled by a control processor 2 .
  • the metal strip 1 can for example be a steel strip, an aluminum strip or a non-ferrous metal strip, in particular a copper strip.
  • the mill train has at least two roll stands 3 .
  • the roll stands 3 have at least working rolls 4 and—as shown in FIG. 1 for one of the roll stands 3 —generally also back-up rolls 5 .
  • the roll stands 3 could have even more rolls, for example intermediate rolls that can be displaced axially.
  • the metal strip 1 passes through the mill train in its longitudinal direction x, with the transverse direction y of the metal strip being largely parallel to the axes of the working rolls 4 .
  • the mill train shown in FIG. 1 is configured as a finishing train for hot-rolling steel strip.
  • the present invention is particularly suitable for use with a multi-stand finishing train for hot-rolling steel strip but is not restricted to this.
  • the mill train could in particular also be configured as a cold-rolling mill train (tandem train) and/or for rolling a non-ferrous metal (e.g. aluminum, copper or another non-ferrous metal).
  • the control device 2 has a regulating unit 11 . This in turn has a module 10 for profile and flatness control, which is coupled to a material flow model 9 .
  • the control device 2 predefines target values for profile and flatness control elements (not shown here) to the stand regulators 6 .
  • the stand regulators 6 then adjust the control elements according to the predefined target values.
  • the input variables supplied to the control device 2 include for example pass schedule data such as the input thickness of the metal strip 1 and a roll force and draft reduction per pass for each roll stand 3 .
  • the input variables generally also include an end thickness, a target profile value, a target thickness contour and a target flatness pattern of the metal strip 1 at the discharge point of the mill train.
  • the rolled metal strip 1 should generally be as flat as possible.
  • the metal strip 1 often has flatness errors, as shown by way of an example and schematically in FIGS. 2 a , 2 b and 2 c .
  • Flatness errors of the metal strip 1 can be measured at one point x 2 , as shown in FIG. 1 , for example using a multi-track laser measuring device 13 .
  • FIG. 2 a shows a centric bulge in the metal strip 1 .
  • FIG. 2 b shows flatness errors at the edges of the metal strip 1 .
  • FIG. 2 c shows bulges in the metal strip 1 , which occur repeatedly in the longitudinal direction x of the metal strip 1 and in two areas in particular in the transverse direction y of the metal strip 1 .
  • the bulges in the metal strip 1 are caused in particular by internal stresses in the metal strip 1 .
  • Internal stresses in the metal strip are also referred to as intrinsic strip flatness ip.
  • FIG. 3 shows the division of a metal strip 1 into fictitious tracks S 1 to Sn or into measuring tracks S 1 ′ to Sm′. If the metal strip 1 were to be cut up into narrow longitudinal strips or into tracks S 1 to Sn, it would be possible to measure an uneven strip length distribution (the intrinsic strip length distribution), which is the cause of the internal stresses in the metal strip 1 .
  • the multi-track laser measuring device 13 captures the relative length of the metal strip 1 for each measuring track S 1 ′ to Sm′ and preferably also determines variables such as wavelength, amplitude and/or the phase offset of the individual tracks S 1 ′ to Sm′. It is important that the associated intrinsic or measured relative lengths do not correspond for corresponding fictitious tracks S 1 to Sn and measuring tracks S 1 ′ to Sm′.
  • intrinsic strip flatness ip refers, as mentioned above, to the strip length distribution over the tracks S 1 to Sn.
  • the visible flatness vp results from the bulge behavior of the strip, which is for example a function of variables such as strip thickness, strip width, the elasticity module of the metal strip 1 and the overall tension to which the metal strip 1 is subjected.
  • the visible flatness vp is measured at one point x 2 at the discharge point of the mill train, in particular a finishing train, and supplied to a bulge model 12 .
  • the visible flatness vp is measured according to the invention such that not only is the visible strip length distribution over the strip width in the transverse direction y an output variable of a measuring device but the three-dimensional bulge pattern of the strip can also be reconstructed from the measuring device output variables.
  • a multi-track laser measuring system therefore not only the (relative) length of the individual measuring tracks S 1 ′ to Sm′ is output by the measuring device but also wavelength and phase offset for each track S 1 ′ to Sm′.
  • a topometric strip flatness measurement is preferably based on a strip projection method. Strip patterns are thereby projected onto the surface of the metal strip 1 and continuously captured with the aid of a matrix camera.
  • the intrinsic flatness ip is preferably calculated at a point x 1 between or after the roll stands 3 , in particular between and/or after the roll stands 3 of a finishing train.
  • the calculation is thereby preferably made using a material flow model 9 (see FIG. 1 ), which is preferably part of a regulating unit 1 .
  • the intrinsic flatness ip calculated by the material flow model 9 can be compared with the measured visible flatness vp with the aid of the bulge model 12 at one point x 2 at the discharge point of the mill train, at which the visible flatness vp is measured. In the case of a cold-rolling mill in particular it would essentially also be possible to measure the intrinsic flatness ip on the metal strip 1 .
  • the bulge model 12 allows a unique relationship to be established between intrinsic flatness ip and visible flatness vp, as far as possible.
  • intrinsic flatness ip and visible flatness vp, as far as possible.
  • the various flatness values (ip and vp) are preferably determined in the following sequence:
  • the relationship between an intrinsic flatness ip between the roll stands 3 and an intrinsic flatness ip after the last of the roll stands 3 is established using the material flow model 9 .
  • Input variables such as the strip thickness contours of the metal strip 1 as well as flatness patterns or flatness values before and after passage through a roll stand 3 can be supplied to the material flow model 9 .
  • the material flow model 9 determines the intrinsic flatness pattern of the metal strip 1 online after passage through the roll stand 3 as well as a roll force pattern in the transverse direction y of the metal strip 1 and supplies it to a roll deformation model (not shown in more detail here).
  • the roll deformation model (not shown in more detail here) is preferably part of a regulating unit 11 .
  • the roll deformation model determines roll deformations and supplies them to a target value determination unit (not shown in more detail here), which uses the determined roll deformations and a contour pattern of the metal strip 1 on the stand discharge side to determine the target values for the profile and flatness control elements in each individual roll stand 3 .
  • the bulge model 12 allows the material flow model 9 and the profile and flatness control implemented in the module 10 (see FIG. 1 in each instance) to be adjusted based on the measured data for visible flatness vp.
  • Upper and lower limits can be specified for the visible flatness vp or for the corresponding visible lack of flatness of the strip and these limits can be translated with the aid of the bulge model 12 into limits for the intrinsic flatness ip or intrinsic lack of flatness.
  • the bulge model 12 uses the intrinsic lack of flatness to calculate the bulge pattern of the metal strip 1 . The calculated bulge pattern can be used in turn to determine the visible lack of flatness. Inverse modeling is used for the converse conclusion.
  • the bulge model 12 is preferably based on the theory of elastic plate deformation.
  • the intrinsic flatness ip is modeled by applying a fictitious strip temperature distribution over the strip width, i.e. in the transverse direction y, resulting in thermal expansion in the longitudinal direction x of the metal strip 1 and at the same time to the length distribution associated with the intrinsic flatness ip.
  • FIG. 5 Let us look now at a strip segment of length a, width b and thickness h as shown in FIG. 5 .
  • the drawing also shows the longitudinal direction x, transverse direction y and a perpendicular z. Only a strip segment with a length a of a half or whole basic bulge length and with periodic edge conditions at the top and bottom ends of the strip segment is modeled. The edge conditions at the sides of the strip are free edges.
  • the model equations are partial differential equations and the associated edge conditions, which can be solved for example using finite difference methods or finite element methods.
  • the bulge model 12 can be used directly online as a function of the computing time of the solution algorithm.
  • an offline model can be used to generate an online-capable approximation function, which is then used online for the bulge model 12 .
  • the measured deflections of the metal strip 1 which are due to the bulging of the metal strip 1 , are generally significantly larger than the strip thickness h. They are however typically significantly smaller than both the typical wavelength of the bulge behavior and also the strip width b. While the traditional, linear theory of plate deformation only applies when the deflections are less than or equal to approximately 1 ⁇ 5 of the strip thickness h, in the present instance a non-linear description of the plate warp must be used. In addition to the variables shown in FIG.
  • E thereby stands for the e-module and v stands for the Poisson's ratio of the metal strip 1 .
  • L ⁇ ( w , ⁇ ) ⁇ ⁇ 2 ⁇ w ⁇ x 2 ⁇ ⁇ 2 ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ y 2 - ⁇ 2 ⁇ w ⁇ y 2 ⁇ ⁇ 2 ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ x 2 - 2 ⁇ ⁇ 2 ⁇ w ⁇ x ⁇ ⁇ y ⁇ ⁇ 2 ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ x ⁇ ⁇ y ( III )
  • T thereby refers to the temperature in the metal strip 1 and K x or K y the coefficient of thermal expansion in the longitudinal or transverse direction (x or y).
  • the equations (I) and (IV) form a system of two coupled, non-linear, partial differential equations. If suitable edge conditions are now inserted, for example free edges or periodical edge conditions at the top and bottom ends of a strip segment, the equations (I) and (IV) can be solved numerically in an iterative manner.
  • the invention relates to a method and a control device for operating a mill train for metal strip 1 , having at least one roll stand 3 , with the intrinsic flatness ip of the metal strip 1 being determined at the discharge point of the mill train.
  • the visible flatness vp or bulge behavior of the metal strip 1 be determined or preferably be measured at the discharge point of the mill train and be translated into the intrinsic flatness ip of the metal strip 1 using a bulge model 12 .
  • the visible flatness can thus be used online with the aid of the bulge model 12 to control the roll stands of the mill train.
  • the visible flatness vp can be better regulated preferably online throughout the mill train with the aid of the bulge model 12 .
  • the bulge model 12 is online-capable and establishes a unique relationship between the absolute intrinsic flatness ip of the rolled metal strip 1 and the actual measured visual defects in the metal strip 1 , in other words the visible flatness vp. It is possible for the first time to verify, adjust and coordinate a material flow model 9 based on the intrinsic flatness or its corresponding profile and flatness control in respect of the actual measured values.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Control Of Metal Rolling (AREA)
  • Metal Rolling (AREA)
US10/574,723 2003-10-06 2004-10-06 Method and control device for operating a mill train for metal strip Abandoned US20070006625A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE10346274A DE10346274A1 (de) 2003-10-06 2003-10-06 Verfahren und Steuervorrichtung zum Betrieb einer Walzstraße für Metallband
DE103-46-274.0 2003-10-06
PCT/EP2004/011171 WO2005035156A1 (fr) 2003-10-06 2004-10-06 Procédé et dispositif de commande pour faire fonctionner un train de laminoir pour bande métallique

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20070006625A1 true US20070006625A1 (en) 2007-01-11

Family

ID=34399272

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/574,723 Abandoned US20070006625A1 (en) 2003-10-06 2004-10-06 Method and control device for operating a mill train for metal strip

Country Status (7)

Country Link
US (1) US20070006625A1 (fr)
EP (1) EP1675694B1 (fr)
JP (1) JP2007507354A (fr)
CN (1) CN100395044C (fr)
AT (1) ATE380607T1 (fr)
DE (2) DE10346274A1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2005035156A1 (fr)

Cited By (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20070220939A1 (en) * 2006-03-08 2007-09-27 Nucor Corporation Method and plant for integrated monitoring and control of strip flatness and strip profile
US20090139290A1 (en) * 2006-03-08 2009-06-04 Nucor Corporation Method and plant for integrated monitoring and control of strip flatness and strip profile
USRE41553E1 (en) 1999-02-05 2010-08-24 Castrip Llc Strip casting apparatus
US20100249973A1 (en) * 2005-06-08 2010-09-30 Abb Ab Method and device for optimization of flatness control in the rolling of a strip
US20170252786A1 (en) * 2014-09-17 2017-09-07 Primetals Technologies Germany Gmbh Width setting on a finishing train
US20180003637A1 (en) * 2016-07-01 2018-01-04 Tsinghua University Method for detecting single molecule
US20180003638A1 (en) * 2016-07-01 2018-01-04 Tsinghua University Method for making carrier for single molecule detection
US20180003639A1 (en) * 2016-07-01 2018-01-04 Tsinghua University Carrier for single molecule detection
US20180136137A1 (en) * 2016-11-14 2018-05-17 Tsinghua University Device for single molecule detection
US20190079015A1 (en) * 2017-09-08 2019-03-14 Tsinghua University Molecule carrier used for molecule detection
US10254228B2 (en) * 2014-12-09 2019-04-09 Konica Minolta, Inc. Detection chip and detection method
US20230052057A1 (en) * 2021-08-16 2023-02-16 The Bradbury Co., Inc. Methods and apparatus to control roll-forming processes
US11975372B2 (en) 2018-07-25 2024-05-07 Primetals Technologies Austria GmbH Method and device for ascertaining the lateral strip contour or the position of the strip edges of a running metal strip

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP5708356B2 (ja) * 2011-08-08 2015-04-30 新日鐵住金株式会社 金属板の形状計測方法、形状計及び金属板の圧延方法
EP2737963B1 (fr) * 2012-10-03 2016-05-18 Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corporation Procédé de calcul de déformation et système de laminage
DE102014007381A1 (de) * 2014-05-20 2015-07-23 Asinco GmbH Verfahren zum Messen und Regeln der Ebenheit eines durch Bandwalzen erzeugten Bandes
WO2021006997A1 (fr) * 2019-07-08 2021-01-14 Aleris Rolled Products, Inc. Procédés et systèmes de mesure de la planéité d'une tôle d'alliage d'aluminium dans un four de traitement thermique
EP3888810B1 (fr) * 2020-04-03 2023-08-02 ABB Schweiz AG Procédé de réglage de la planéité de bande de matériau laminé, système de commande et ligne de production

Citations (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4541723A (en) * 1980-06-13 1985-09-17 Centre De Recherches Metallurgiques-Centrum Voor Research In De Metallurgie Monitoring the planarity of metal sheet
US4752695A (en) * 1985-05-06 1988-06-21 Centre De Recherches Metallurgiques Centrum Voor Research In De Metallurgie Planarity detection method for a moving rolled strip employing side edge detection with respect to a reference surface
US4771622A (en) * 1986-03-12 1988-09-20 International Rolling Mill Consultants Inc. Strip rolling mill apparatus
US5855131A (en) * 1996-05-10 1999-01-05 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Process and device for influencing a profile of a rolled strip
US5927117A (en) * 1996-10-11 1999-07-27 Central Iron & Steel Research Institute Ministry Metallurgical Industry Methods to measure and control strip shape in rolling
US6286349B1 (en) * 1997-03-11 2001-09-11 Betriebsforschungsinstitut Vdeh-Institut Fur Angewandte Forschung Gmbh Flatness measurement system for metal strip
US6427507B1 (en) * 1999-07-15 2002-08-06 Pohang Iron & Steel Co., Ltd. Apparatus for measuring the strip flatness
US6480802B1 (en) * 1999-05-28 2002-11-12 Ims Messsysteme Gmbh Method for determining the flatness of a material strip
US6513358B2 (en) * 1999-12-23 2003-02-04 Abb Ab Method and device for controlling flatness
US6697699B2 (en) * 1999-06-17 2004-02-24 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method and device for influencing relevant quality parameters of a rolling strip
US6779373B2 (en) * 2001-09-29 2004-08-24 ACHENBACH BUSCHHüTTEN GMBH Method for preadjusting and controlling the strip planarity in flexible single-pass and reversing rolling of a strip-shaped material web

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE2104886A1 (de) * 1971-02-03 1972-08-24 Schloemann Ag Verfahren zur Ermittlung von Planheitsabweichungen an unter Längszug geförderten Bändern
DE19851554C2 (de) * 1998-11-09 2001-02-01 Siemens Ag Verfahren und Einrichtung zur Voreinstellung einer Walzstraße

Patent Citations (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4541723A (en) * 1980-06-13 1985-09-17 Centre De Recherches Metallurgiques-Centrum Voor Research In De Metallurgie Monitoring the planarity of metal sheet
US4752695A (en) * 1985-05-06 1988-06-21 Centre De Recherches Metallurgiques Centrum Voor Research In De Metallurgie Planarity detection method for a moving rolled strip employing side edge detection with respect to a reference surface
US4771622A (en) * 1986-03-12 1988-09-20 International Rolling Mill Consultants Inc. Strip rolling mill apparatus
US5855131A (en) * 1996-05-10 1999-01-05 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Process and device for influencing a profile of a rolled strip
US5927117A (en) * 1996-10-11 1999-07-27 Central Iron & Steel Research Institute Ministry Metallurgical Industry Methods to measure and control strip shape in rolling
US6286349B1 (en) * 1997-03-11 2001-09-11 Betriebsforschungsinstitut Vdeh-Institut Fur Angewandte Forschung Gmbh Flatness measurement system for metal strip
US6480802B1 (en) * 1999-05-28 2002-11-12 Ims Messsysteme Gmbh Method for determining the flatness of a material strip
US6697699B2 (en) * 1999-06-17 2004-02-24 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method and device for influencing relevant quality parameters of a rolling strip
US6427507B1 (en) * 1999-07-15 2002-08-06 Pohang Iron & Steel Co., Ltd. Apparatus for measuring the strip flatness
US6513358B2 (en) * 1999-12-23 2003-02-04 Abb Ab Method and device for controlling flatness
US6779373B2 (en) * 2001-09-29 2004-08-24 ACHENBACH BUSCHHüTTEN GMBH Method for preadjusting and controlling the strip planarity in flexible single-pass and reversing rolling of a strip-shaped material web

Cited By (25)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
USRE41553E1 (en) 1999-02-05 2010-08-24 Castrip Llc Strip casting apparatus
US20100249973A1 (en) * 2005-06-08 2010-09-30 Abb Ab Method and device for optimization of flatness control in the rolling of a strip
US8050792B2 (en) 2005-06-08 2011-11-01 Abb Ab Method and device for optimization of flatness control in the rolling of a strip
US20070220939A1 (en) * 2006-03-08 2007-09-27 Nucor Corporation Method and plant for integrated monitoring and control of strip flatness and strip profile
US20090139290A1 (en) * 2006-03-08 2009-06-04 Nucor Corporation Method and plant for integrated monitoring and control of strip flatness and strip profile
US7849722B2 (en) 2006-03-08 2010-12-14 Nucor Corporation Method and plant for integrated monitoring and control of strip flatness and strip profile
US8205474B2 (en) 2006-03-08 2012-06-26 Nucor Corporation Method and plant for integrated monitoring and control of strip flatness and strip profile
US8365562B2 (en) * 2006-03-08 2013-02-05 Nucor Corporation Method and plant for integrated monitoring and control of strip flatness and strip profile
US20170252786A1 (en) * 2014-09-17 2017-09-07 Primetals Technologies Germany Gmbh Width setting on a finishing train
US11318511B2 (en) 2014-09-17 2022-05-03 Primetals Technologies Germany Gmbh Width setting on a finishing train
US10596608B2 (en) * 2014-09-17 2020-03-24 Primetals Technologies Germany Gmbh Width setting on a finishing train
US10254228B2 (en) * 2014-12-09 2019-04-09 Konica Minolta, Inc. Detection chip and detection method
US20180003639A1 (en) * 2016-07-01 2018-01-04 Tsinghua University Carrier for single molecule detection
US10132756B2 (en) * 2016-07-01 2018-11-20 Tsinghua University Method for making carrier for single molecule detection
US10145798B2 (en) * 2016-07-01 2018-12-04 Tsinghua University Carrier for single molecule detection
US10145797B2 (en) * 2016-07-01 2018-12-04 Tsinghua University Method for detecting single molecule
US20180003638A1 (en) * 2016-07-01 2018-01-04 Tsinghua University Method for making carrier for single molecule detection
US20180003637A1 (en) * 2016-07-01 2018-01-04 Tsinghua University Method for detecting single molecule
US10151704B2 (en) * 2016-11-14 2018-12-11 Tsinghua University Device for single molecule detection
US20180136137A1 (en) * 2016-11-14 2018-05-17 Tsinghua University Device for single molecule detection
US20190079015A1 (en) * 2017-09-08 2019-03-14 Tsinghua University Molecule carrier used for molecule detection
US10527553B2 (en) * 2017-09-08 2020-01-07 Tsinghua University Molecule carrier used for molecule detection
US11975372B2 (en) 2018-07-25 2024-05-07 Primetals Technologies Austria GmbH Method and device for ascertaining the lateral strip contour or the position of the strip edges of a running metal strip
US20230052057A1 (en) * 2021-08-16 2023-02-16 The Bradbury Co., Inc. Methods and apparatus to control roll-forming processes
US11919060B2 (en) * 2021-08-16 2024-03-05 The Bradbury Co., Inc. Methods and apparatus to control roll-forming processes

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
ATE380607T1 (de) 2007-12-15
DE10346274A1 (de) 2005-04-28
JP2007507354A (ja) 2007-03-29
CN1863612A (zh) 2006-11-15
CN100395044C (zh) 2008-06-18
DE502004005723D1 (de) 2008-01-24
WO2005035156A1 (fr) 2005-04-21
EP1675694A1 (fr) 2006-07-05
EP1675694B1 (fr) 2007-12-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20070006625A1 (en) Method and control device for operating a mill train for metal strip
US7031797B2 (en) Computer-aided method for determining desired values for controlling elements of profile and surface evenness
Wang et al. Numerical and experimental analysis of strip cross-directional control and flatness prediction for UCM cold rolling mill
Prinz et al. Automatic gauge control under laterally asymmetric rolling conditions combined with feedforward
JPWO2006008808A1 (ja) 板材圧延におけるウェッジの設定・制御方法
JPH0635007B2 (ja) １基のストリップ材料圧延用の圧延機の制御方法
JP2000317511A (ja) 金属製品の圧延方法
Li et al. Modeling and exploiting the strip tension influence on surface imprinting during temper rolling of cold-rolled steel
KR100362662B1 (ko) 열간압연강판의 폭방향으로의 형상제어방법
JPS6029563B2 (ja) 工作物の形状を制御する方法
Gasiyarov et al. Mathematical modeling of an automatic control system for profiled rolling of slabs in reversing plate-mill stands
Schulte et al. Adaptive Pass Scheduling for Roughness Control in Cold Rolling
US3820366A (en) Rolling mill gauge control method and apparatus including temperatureand hardness correction
JP2000135506A (ja) 可逆式圧延機の板材の圧延方法
JP3330885B2 (ja) 圧延方法及び圧延機並びに圧延設備
JP2825428B2 (ja) 圧延機における板クラウン制御方法
JP2843273B2 (ja) 熱間圧延鋼板の形状予測方法
JP3205130B2 (ja) 熱間圧延における板幅制御方法
JP2661515B2 (ja) 熱間圧延における板クラウン制御方法
JP3300202B2 (ja) 鋼帯の調質圧延における圧下力制御方法
KR100660215B1 (ko) 연속 압연기의 압연롤 속도 제어 장치
KR19990052681A (ko) 열연 판 폭방향 두께 프로파일을 고려한 고정도 판 크라운 예측방법
JP2004034032A (ja) タンデム冷間圧延におけるエッジドロップ制御方法
JPH0441010A (ja) 冷間圧延におけるエッジドロップ制御方法
JPH06277728A (ja) 板クラウン制御設定方法

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, GERMANY

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:REINSCHKE, JOHANNES;REEL/FRAME:017754/0385

Effective date: 20060117

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- AFTER EXAMINER'S ANSWER OR BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION