US20060151327A1 - Analysis method - Google Patents

Analysis method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20060151327A1
US20060151327A1 US10/831,761 US83176104A US2006151327A1 US 20060151327 A1 US20060151327 A1 US 20060151327A1 US 83176104 A US83176104 A US 83176104A US 2006151327 A1 US2006151327 A1 US 2006151327A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
bath
working electrode
range
metal
organic component
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US10/831,761
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Wade Sonnenberg
Leon Barstad
Raymond Cruz
Gary Hamm
Mark Kapeckas
Erik Reddington
Katie Price
Thomas Buckley
Trevor Goodrich
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Rohm and Haas Electronic Materials LLC
Rohm and Haas Co
Original Assignee
Rohm and Haas Electronic Materials LLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Rohm and Haas Electronic Materials LLC filed Critical Rohm and Haas Electronic Materials LLC
Priority to US10/831,761 priority Critical patent/US20060151327A1/en
Assigned to ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY, LLC reassignment ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY, LLC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: BUCKLEY, THOMAS, PRICE, KATIE, BARSTAD, LEON R., CRUZ, RAYMOND, GOODRICH, TREVOR, HAMM, GARY, KAPECKAS, MARK J., REDDINGTON, ERIK, SONNENBERG, WADE
Publication of US20060151327A1 publication Critical patent/US20060151327A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B23—MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23G—THREAD CUTTING; WORKING OF SCREWS, BOLT HEADS, OR NUTS, IN CONJUNCTION THEREWITH
    • B23G1/00—Thread cutting; Automatic machines specially designed therefor
    • B23G1/02—Thread cutting; Automatic machines specially designed therefor on an external or internal cylindrical or conical surface, e.g. on recesses
    • B23G1/04—Machines with one working-spindle
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C25—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25D—PROCESSES FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PRODUCTION OF COATINGS; ELECTROFORMING; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25D21/00—Processes for servicing or operating cells for electrolytic coating
    • C25D21/12—Process control or regulation
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B23—MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23G—THREAD CUTTING; WORKING OF SCREWS, BOLT HEADS, OR NUTS, IN CONJUNCTION THEREWITH
    • B23G1/00—Thread cutting; Automatic machines specially designed therefor
    • B23G1/44—Equipment or accessories specially designed for machines or devices for thread cutting
    • B23G1/50—Equipment or accessories specially designed for machines or devices for thread cutting for cutting thread by successive operations
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B23—MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23G—THREAD CUTTING; WORKING OF SCREWS, BOLT HEADS, OR NUTS, IN CONJUNCTION THEREWITH
    • B23G5/00—Thread-cutting tools; Die-heads
    • B23G5/08—Thread-cutting tools; Die-heads with means for adjustment
    • B23G5/083—Adjustable dies
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N27/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of electric, electrochemical, or magnetic means
    • G01N27/26—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of electric, electrochemical, or magnetic means by investigating electrochemical variables; by using electrolysis or electrophoresis
    • G01N27/416—Systems
    • G01N27/42—Measuring deposition or liberation of materials from an electrolyte; Coulometry, i.e. measuring coulomb-equivalent of material in an electrolyte
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N27/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of electric, electrochemical, or magnetic means
    • G01N27/26—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of electric, electrochemical, or magnetic means by investigating electrochemical variables; by using electrolysis or electrophoresis
    • G01N27/416—Systems
    • G01N27/42—Measuring deposition or liberation of materials from an electrolyte; Coulometry, i.e. measuring coulomb-equivalent of material in an electrolyte
    • G01N27/423—Coulometry
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B23—MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23G—THREAD CUTTING; WORKING OF SCREWS, BOLT HEADS, OR NUTS, IN CONJUNCTION THEREWITH
    • B23G2210/00—Details of threads produced
    • B23G2210/08—External threads

Definitions

  • the present invention is directed to an analysis method for analyzing organic components of an electroplating bath. More specifically, the present invention is directed to a method for analyzing organic components of an electroplating bath by an optimized cyclic process.
  • Electroplating solutions or baths for copper and other metals are typically aqueous, or mostly aqueous, solutions composed of metal compounds or salts, ionic electrolytes, and various additives such as brighteners, suppressors, levelers, accelerators, surfactants, and defoamers.
  • electroplating baths which are used to deposit metals or semimetals such as copper, nickel, gold, palladium, platinum, ruthenium, rhodium, tin, zinc, antimony, or alloys such as copper-tin (brass), copper-zinc (bronze), tin-lead, nickel-tungsten, and cobalt-tungsten-phosphide are used in applications such as the fabrication of electronic devices and components, such as conductive circuits for printed circuit boards, multichip modules, and semiconductor devices.
  • metals or semimetals such as copper, nickel, gold, palladium, platinum, ruthenium, rhodium, tin, zinc, antimony, or alloys such as copper-tin (brass), copper-zinc (bronze), tin-lead, nickel-tungsten, and cobalt-tungsten-phosphide are used in applications such as the fabrication of electronic devices and components, such as conductive circuits for printed circuit boards, multichip modules, and semiconductor devices.
  • Reliable operation of electroplating baths in a manufacturing process requires that methods of analysis are employed to determine the appropriate concentrations of the reagent species for bath startup as accurately as permissible in the art.
  • the analytical methods are also used to determine the concentrations of species in the bath during operation, often with on-line feedback control, to allow the components of the bath to be monitored and adjusted as required to maintain concentrations within pre-determined limits.
  • Bath analytical methods also are used to determine the chemical identity and concentrations of species that are produced in the bath as a consequence of chemical and electrochemical reactions that take place during bath operation and/or idling. A deficiency or excess of bath components may result in defective electroplated products such as printed wiring boards and integrated circuits. Accordingly, a method that measures bath components accurately is highly desirable.
  • Electrochemical methods are used principally for the analysis of acid copper plating baths used for plating circuitry on printed wiring boards and integrated circuits.
  • the baths contain one or more organic components (brighteners, suppressors and levelers). In the proper concentrations, these organic components give a bright, smooth deposit with excellent mechanical and electrical properties.
  • the potential of a working electrode is swept through a voltammetric cycle, including a metal plating range and a metal stripping range, for at least two baths of known plating quality and an additional bath whose quality or concentration of components is to be evaluated.
  • An integrated or peak current utilized during the metal stripping range is correlated with the quality of the bath of known quality.
  • the integrated or peak current utilized to strip the metal in the bath of unknown quality is compared to the correlation and its quality evaluated.
  • a potential of an inert working electrode is swept through the voltammetric cycle by a function generator.
  • a counter electrode immersed in the plating bath is coupled in series with a function generator and a coulometer to measure the charge from the working electrode during the stripping part of the cycle.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 4,917,774 and U.S. Pat. No. 4,917,777 describe stepped potential methods, which are improvements on the Tench processes for determining the quantity of organic components in electroplating solutions.
  • the Fisher patents describe a method of measuring organic components of electroplating solutions using either the sweep method of the Tench patent, the pulse method of the Tench publication, or an adaptation of the pulse method with the addition of a pause during the voltammetric cycle. The pause is effectuated by an open circuit condition, or in the alternative, an applied potential equal to or approximately to the open circuit potential of a working electrode.
  • the pause or the open circuit potential follows the cycle of plating and stripping, or it follows the cycle of plating, stripping, cleaning and equilibrating if the cycle is a pulsed cycle.
  • An applied potential equal to or approximately to the open circuit may be applied in lieu of an equilibration step, or an open circuit condition may be used following equilibration.
  • contaminants are either eliminated from the working electrode surface or fail to deposit on the surface. Regardless of the mechanism workers have found that the analysis processes described in the Fisher patents are improvements over the Tench methods.
  • the present invention is directed to a method of determining a quantity of an organic component in a bath including the steps of: a) obtaining a plurality of bath samples each having a known and different quantity of an organic component; b) optimizing a working electrode through a predetermined sequence that includes galvanostatic steps, voltammetric steps by cycles, or pulses, or open circuit steps, or combinations thereof and including a surface optimization step for each bath sample; c) preparing a calibration curve plotting the charge passed during a metal plating or metal stripping step of the sequence versus the organic component being sought; d) obtaining a bath sample having an unknown quantity of the organic component being sought and performing the same sequence of galvanostatic, voltammetric, or open circuit steps or combinations thereof and including a surface optimization step for the bath sample; e) measuring the charge passed during the metal plating or the metal stripping step of the sequence for the bath sample having the unknown quantity of the organic component; and f) comparing the result obtained in e) to the results in a calibration curve obtained
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic wiring diagram showing a device for practicing the method of the present invention.
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic wiring diagram for an alternative device for practicing the method of the present invention.
  • CVS cyclic voltammetric stripping
  • CPVS cyclic pulse voltammetric stripping
  • ° C. degrees Centigrade
  • g/L grams per liter
  • cm centimeter
  • mA milliamperes
  • mA/cm 2 milliamperes per square centimeter
  • mL milliliter
  • mL/L milliliters per liter
  • V volts
  • ppm parts per million
  • ppb parts per billion
  • ppt parts per trillion.
  • plating refers to metal electroplating, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. “Deposition” and “plating” are used interchangeably throughout this specification. “Halo” refers to fluoro, chloro, bromo, and iodo. Likewise, “halide” refers to fluoride, chloride, bromide and iodide. “Alkyl” includes straight chain, branched and cyclic alkyl groups. “Brightener” refers to an organic component that increases the plating rate of the electroplating bath. The terms “brightener” and “accelerator” are used interchangeably throughout this specification. The terms “component” and “additive” are used interchangeably throughout this specification.
  • Leveler refers to an organic compound that is capable of providing a substantially planar metal layer.
  • Energy output refers to energy flow, energy throughput, stripping current and plating current.
  • Energy input refers to potential energy, cell potential, electrode potential and reductive potential.
  • Coulombs means the quantity of electrons transported and is a unit of charge.
  • the present invention provides a method for determining a quantity of an organic component of an electroplating bath including the steps of: a) obtaining a plurality of bath samples each having a known and different quantity of an organic component; b) passing a working electrode through a predetermined sequence of galvanostatic steps, voltammetric steps by cycles or pulses, or open circuit steps or combinations thereof and including a surface optimization step for each bath sample; c) preparing a calibration curve by plotting the charge passed during a metal plating or metal stripping step of the sequence versus the concentration of the organic component being sought; d) obtaining a bath sample having an unknown quantity of the organic component and cycling a working electrode through the predetermined sequence of galvanostatic, voltammetric, or open circuit steps or combinations thereof and including surface optimization for the bath sample; e) measuring the charge passed during the metal plating or the metal stripping step of the sequence for the bath sample having the unknown quantity of the organic component; and f) comparing the result obtained in e) to the results obtained in
  • the surface optimization step involves electrochemically transforming the surface of the working electrode from the bare metal to the metal oxide form. While not being bound by theory, the surface optimization is believed to allow for desorption of any adsorbed halide on the surface of the working electrode.
  • the surface optimization step provides for an amplified measurement of a subsequent plating step on the working electrode during a voltammetric step.
  • amplified within the scope of the present invention means that a smaller energy input results in a larger energy output compared to not performing the surface optimization.
  • Improved amplification of the working electrode during plating or stripping permits workers to measure and correlate an energy output to a concentration of organic components of a bath sample, detecting organic component levels as low as 10 ppt.
  • workers in the electroplating art were unable to measure organic bath components to levels as low as 10 ppt.
  • organic components such as brighteners may range from 100 ppm to 10 ppt.
  • the methods of the present invention enable workers in the art to more sensitively determine quantities of organic bath components.
  • workers may readily monitor electroplating processes to more sensitively determine the change in organic components than conventional analysis methods, and add organic components to or dilute baths to maintain optimum electroplating performance.
  • a surface optimization of a working electrode may be achieved by applying a potential to a working electrode such that residual halide on the working electrode surface is removed. Such applied potential increases electrode sensitivity to current or energy output passing through the electrode during a voltammetric cycle, sweep, or a pulse.
  • Surface optimization potentials typically range from 2 volts to 0.
  • a surface optimization step may be less than 20 seconds in duration, typically from 10 to 20 seconds.
  • the optimization step may be a cycle, sweep or a pulse.
  • the surface optimization potential for an electrode can be determined by performing a voltammetric sweep of the electrode in a solution of an inorganic acid.
  • An applied potential during the bath analysis that is anodic of the oxide layer formation determined from the voltammetric sweep in a solution of an inorganic acid such as sulfuric acid is an example of a surface optimization step.
  • a potential for surface optimization is most preferably close to the onset of the oxide layer formation determined from the voltammetric sweep.
  • Surface optimization potentials may be employed at a rate of 50 mV/sec to 150 mV/sec.
  • a standard calibration curve Prior to measuring a quantity of an unknown organic component of an electroplating bath, a standard calibration curve is prepared. A plurality of bath samples having known and different concentrations of the organic component to be measured are prepared. Each bath is run through a galvanostatic, voltammetric, or open circuit steps or combinations thereof and includes a surface optimization step. Energy output of a working electrode is monitored for each bath sample of known organic component concentration during metal plating or metal stripping. Energy output may be the total charge passing through the working electrode, which is measured in coulombs. The results are plotted on a Cartesian plane of energy output versus organic component concentration to form a standard calibration curve for a given organic component.
  • a standard calibration curve is prepared the same operation is performed with an operating electroplating bath sample containing the unknown amount of the organic component.
  • the working electrode is placed in the bath containing the unknown concentration of the organic component and is passed through a predetermined sequence of galvanostatic, voltammetric, or open circuit steps or combinations thereof and includes surface optimization.
  • Energy output of the working electrode measured either during metal plating or metal stripping is recorded and then correlated to the energy output value on the standard calibration curve. The corresponding energy output value allows for the determination of the organic component concentration sought in the unknown sample.
  • Any suitable apparatus for plating and stripping a metal on a working electrode may be employed to measure organic bath components. Examples of such apparatus are described below, however, the practice of the present invention is not limited to such apparatus.
  • a three electrodes cell is typically employed with a rotating disk working electrode, typically made of an inert metal.
  • a counter/auxiliary electrode may be composed of iridium oxide coated titanium and separated from solution by a salt bridge.
  • the reference electrode is typically a saturated calomel electrode (SCE), and all voltages referred to hereafter are vs. SCE.
  • the present invention is described in the context of measuring organic brighteners in electroplating baths. However, the method of the present invention may be employed to measure other organic components by analogy to the methods described herein.
  • Exemplary CVS or CPVS analytical methods are those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,132,605 (Tench et al.) and Tench et al., Pulse Voltammetric Stripping Analysis of Acid Copper Plating Baths , J. Electrochem. Soc., April 1985, pp 831-834.
  • a small amount of metal is electrodeposited onto an inert electrode (e.g., platinum or gold) under controlled conditions of electrode potential and mass-transport in the solution.
  • the amount of metal deposited is determined by integrating the current peak arising from re-dissolution or “stripping” of the deposited metal from the surface as the electrode potential is swept anodic at a known rate.
  • the quantity of metal deposited, and subsequently re-dissolved, is related to the concentration of brightener affecting the rate of deposition.
  • the cathodic current required to deposit the metal also is an indication of the deposition rate, but is less preferred than the anodic current.
  • the cathodic current is less precise because of reduction reactions (such as the reduction of organic compounds in the bath) that occur during the cathodic portion of the voltammetric cycle.
  • a CVS cycle of the present invention may be schematically illustrated as follows:
  • a CPVS cycle of the present invention may be schematically illustrated as follows:
  • the present invention provides a method for determining the quantity of brightener in an electroplating bath including the steps of: a) obtaining a plurality of plating bath samples where each bath has a known and different quantity of the brightener; b) for each bath sample, employng a typical three electrode cell immersed in the bath sample, and carrying out a predetermined sequence of voltammetric steps by sweeping the working electrode at a predetermined rate through a plurality of voltammetric steps until a steady state condition is obtained, the steps include: 1. surface optimization of the working electrode; 2. plating metal ions on the working electrode with energy input for a time sufficient to measure plating energy output; 3.
  • step c) for each bath sample, correlating the quantity of brightener with the energy output value obtained in step 2 or 3; d) obtaining a plating bath having an unknown quantity of brightener, placing the electrodes in the bath sample and performing the predetermined sequence of steps; e) choosing from the correlations in step d), a particular correlation for a bath containing the amount of brightener determined in step c).
  • the present invention involves determining the unknown concentration of a brightener in a bath according to the steps of: a) obtaining a plurality of bath samples, where each bath sample has a known but different concentration of brightener and where the quantity of each bath sample differs from the quantity in the other bath samples; b) pulsing a working electrode in a bath sample at a predetermined rate through a plurality of voltammetric steps until a steady state condition is obtained, each of the voltammetric steps includes a surface optimization range, a plating range, a stripping range, a cleaning range and an equilibration range; c) measuring the charge passed during the metal plating or stripping range of each cycle for each bath sample for the plurality of bath samples where a correlation is obtained between the quantity of brightener and the charge passed during the metal plating or metal stripping range; d) obtaining a bath sample having an unknown quantity of brightener; e) pulsing a working electrode in an unknown bath sample at the pre
  • electroplating baths may be analyzed according to the present invention to determine the quantity of brightener and other organic bath components.
  • Suitable electroplating baths include, but are not limited to, copper, nickel, chromium, zinc, tin, lead, gold, silver, solder, or cadmium electroplating baths, and preferably copper electroplating baths.
  • Working electrodes include any that provide a uniform current density and controlled agitation. Suitable working electrodes include, but are not limited to, platinum, copper, nickel, chromium, zinc, tin, gold, silver, lead, cadmium, solder, graphite, palladium, rhodium, ruthenium, glassy carbon, mercury or stainless steel. Preferably, the working electrode is a noble metal, more preferably platinum or gold, and most preferably gold. The working electrode may have a flat, polished surface, small diameter and may be mounted flush with the end of a Kel-F cylinder. To establish relative motion between the working electrode and the bath, a motor is typically used to rotate the working electrode to which contact is made by slip brushes.
  • the working electrode is a rotating disk electrode (“RDE”).
  • RDE rotating disk electrode
  • a small diameter disk is preferred since a larger diameter will result in poor sensitivity due to non-uniform current density across the diameter.
  • the reference electrode may be a saturated calomel reference electrode (“SCE”), a standard hydrogen electrode (“SHE”) or any suitable reference electrode.
  • the counter electrode may be a noble metal, metal oxide, or noble metal alloy such as gold, platinum, iridium oxide coated titanium, platinum-ruthenium, or may be a soluble anode composed of the same metal that is present in the bath such as a soluble copper anode for use with a copper electrolyte bath.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic wiring diagram showing a device for determining the quantity of brightener according to the present invention.
  • a working electrode 1 and a counter electrode 3 are immersed in a bath in cell 5 .
  • the counter electrode is selected and designed so as not to be easily polarized in the particular bath being evaluated. This is accomplished, in part, by making the counter electrode large relative to the working electrode and by placing it close to the working electrode.
  • a function generator 7 sweeps the working electrode 1 through a voltage versus time cycle at a specific rate while a coulometer 9 measures the coulombs (amp-seconds) flowing between the counter electrode 3 and the working electrode 1 during the metal stripping portion of the voltammetric cycle.
  • the coulometer may be an ammeter whose output can be fed into a recorder for determining the coulombs utilized during the stripping portion of the cycle, or the output can go directly into a microprocessor or computer 8 for direct correlation and comparison of the coulombs utilized.
  • FIG. 2 shows the schematic wiring diagram for a more elaborate device for determining the quantity of brightener.
  • a motor 21 is used to rotate the working electrode 13 to which contact is made by slip brushes.
  • the working electrode 13 is gold and the counter electrode 15 is an iridium oxide coated titanium mesh electrode.
  • the rotatable working electrode 13 has a flat, polished surface, 0.13 cm 2 in area, mounted flush with the end of a 1.27 cm diameter Kel-F cylinder.
  • the reference electrode 17 is a saturated calomel reference electrode (“SCE”).
  • a function generator 23 and an electronic potentiostat 25 are used to control the potential relative to the reference electrode 17 .
  • a digital coulometer 27 measures the coulombs flowing during the stripping portion of the voltammetric cycle.
  • a microprocessor or computer 29 can be coupled to the digital coulometer to compare the measured coulombs with a previously established correlation.
  • the microprocessor or computer 8 , 29 shown in FIGS. 1 and 2 , can be coupled to the circuit so that they are triggered either manually or by a suitable signal from the function generator 7 , 23 , or from the working electrode 1 , 13 .
  • the working electrode 13 is rotated by motor 21 to obtain controlled relative motion between the working electrode 13 and the plating bath.
  • Other means of obtaining relative motion can be used, such as a pump for moving the bath across the face of the electrode.
  • variation in the plating and stripping current may be observed from day to day for a particular bath composition and are may be caused by uncontrolled variables, such as changes in the working electrode surface.
  • Such variations can be mitigated by measuring the plating or stripping current utilized by a fixed standard immediately before or after making the desired measurement and then utilizing the ratio of the two measurements to obtain the correlation between the plating or stripping current and concentration of ingredients.
  • the methods of the present invention may be employed to control metal electroplating baths such as copper, nickel, chromium, zinc, tin, gold, silver, lead, cadmium and solder.
  • the working electrode may be selected or initially plated to match the metal in the plating bath in order to maximize adsorption of the brighteners used in the baths.
  • An example of a copper electroplating bath useful for the practice of this invention has a composition as follows: Component Amount Copper ions 2.5 to 40.0 g/l Sulfuric acid (added) 0 to 450 g/l Chloride ions 20 to 100 ppm Organic additive As required Water To 1 liter
  • the plating baths are used in the conventional manner, with operating temperatures preferably between 10° and 40° C., and controlled bath agitation.
  • the method of determining the quantity of brightener may begin with a cleaning step to clean the working electrode.
  • the working electrode may be cleaned chemically by treating with nitric acid followed by rinsing with deionized water.
  • the chemically cleaned working electrode is then immersed in an additive-free bath sample.
  • the working electrode is then cleaned and electrochemically oxidized at a fixed potential for a period of time.
  • the cleaning may be carried out by a voltammetric sweep, from 1.6 volts to ⁇ 0.25 V swept from 50 mV/sec.
  • the cleaning may be carried out galvanostatically at an anodic current of greater than 30 mA/cm 2 for a period of time of from 2 to 10 seconds.
  • the method may be continued by any one of the steps or combinations of steps described herein to measure organic bath additives.
  • organic additives may be used in the plating bath such as surfactants, levelers, wetting agents and carriers.
  • the above methods may be performed at a range of temperatures.
  • the analysis of the bath containing the unknown amount of brightener may be performed at the same temperature as the calibration curve samples or family of calibration curve samples.
  • An apparatus having the arrangement as illustrated in FIG. 2 was used to compare the performance of a gold working electrode to a platinum working electrode for measuring brightener content in a copper metal plating bath.
  • the apparatus is equipped with a rotator that allows for the working electrode disk to be screwed on. Both the platinum and gold working electrodes are 3 mm in diameter.
  • the reference electrode for each apparatus was an SCE and the counter electrode was an iridium oxide coated titanium electrode. Both electrodes underwent identical treatment prior to measuring the brightener levels.
  • each working electrode was cleaned chemically by treating with nitric acid followed by rinsing with deionized water. Each working electrode was then electrochemically cycled in a standard copper electroplating bath from 1.6 V to ⁇ 0.25 V to clean the surface of the working electrode.
  • Each bath contained 80 g/L copper, 225 g/L sulfuric acid, 25 ppm of chloride and 15 ml/L of Shipley PPR-H carrier solution.
  • the brightener employed was Shipley Ronal Copper Gleam ST 901® Additive Solution.
  • Each bath was analyzed for brightener using an Electroposit Bath Analyzer, available from S-Systems, Norwood, Mass. A schematic of the cycle may be represented as follows:
  • the working electrode was cleaned at 1.6 V for 5 seconds. Next the working electrode was held at 0.55 V for 18 seconds to optimize the surface of the working electrode. The applied potential was then held at ⁇ 0.25 V for 1 second to plate copper on the working electrode. The applied potential was then increased to 0.20 volts for 5 seconds to strip the plated copper from the working electrode.
  • the Bath Analyzer then generates a TBA number, which is proportional to the amount of charge passed during the stripping step. The amount of brightener measured by the Electroposit Bath Analyzer for each electrode is reported in TBA units in Table 1 below. TABLE 1 TBA Units with TBA Units with Platinum Brightener Level (mL/L) Gold Electrode Electrode 0 0.47 0.90 0.2 6.90 1.67 0.4 15.64 2.65 0.6 22.50 3.99
  • Example 2 An apparatus with the same set up as Example 1 was used to measure the response of a gold working electrode to different surface optimization potentials in an acid-copper plating bath.
  • the reference electrode for each apparatus was an SCE and the counter electrode was an iridium oxide coated titanium electrode separated from solution by a salt bridge.
  • the gold working electrode was cleaned chemically by treating with nitric acid followed by rinsing with deionized water.
  • the working electrode was then electrochemically cycled in an additive free copper electroplating bath from 1.6 V to ⁇ 0.25 V vs. SCE to clean the surface.
  • Each bath contained 80 g/L copper, 225 g/L sulfuric acid, 25 ppm of chloride, and 15 ml/L of Shipley PPR-H carrier solution.
  • the brightener employed was Shipley Ronal Copper Gleam ST 901® Additive Solution.
  • Each bath was analyzed for brightener using an Electroposit Bath Analyzer, available from S-Systems, Norwood, Mass. A schematic of the cycle may be represented as follows:
  • the working electrode was cleaned at 1.6 V for 5 seconds. Next the working electrode was held at either 0.25 V or 0.55 V for 18 seconds to optimize the surface of the working electrode. The applied potential was then held at ⁇ 0.25 V over 1 second to plate copper on the working electrode. The applied potential was then increased to 0.20 volts over 5 seconds to strip the plated copper from the working electrode. The Bath Analyzer then generates a TBA number, which is proportional to the amount of charge passed during the stripping step. The amount of brightener measured by the Electroposit Bath Analyzer for each electrode is reported in TBA units in Table 2 below. TABLE 2 Brightener Level (mL/L) TBA Units at 0.55 V TBA Units at 0.25 V 0 0.47 0.87 0.2 6.90 1.15 0.4 15.64 1.38 0.6 22.50 1.55

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Electrochemistry (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Electroplating Methods And Accessories (AREA)
  • Electroplating And Plating Baths Therefor (AREA)
  • Investigating Or Analyzing Non-Biological Materials By The Use Of Chemical Means (AREA)
US10/831,761 2003-04-25 2004-04-24 Analysis method Abandoned US20060151327A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/831,761 US20060151327A1 (en) 2003-04-25 2004-04-24 Analysis method

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US46538803P 2003-04-25 2003-04-25
US10/831,761 US20060151327A1 (en) 2003-04-25 2004-04-24 Analysis method

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20060151327A1 true US20060151327A1 (en) 2006-07-13

Family

ID=32962779

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/831,761 Abandoned US20060151327A1 (en) 2003-04-25 2004-04-24 Analysis method

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US20060151327A1 (zh)
EP (1) EP1471348A1 (zh)
JP (1) JP2004325441A (zh)
KR (1) KR20040092432A (zh)
CN (1) CN1550578A (zh)
TW (1) TWI275790B (zh)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050016856A1 (en) * 2003-04-25 2005-01-27 Rohm And Haas Electronic Materials, L.L.C. Bath analysis
WO2014066313A1 (en) * 2012-10-23 2014-05-01 Moses Lake Industries, Inc. Improvements in plating bath metrology
WO2019183504A1 (en) * 2018-03-23 2019-09-26 Mara Nanotech Korea, Inc. Methods of manufacturing biosensor nanowells
US11435311B2 (en) 2018-03-23 2022-09-06 Mara Nanotech Korea, Inc. Methods of manufacturing biosensor nanowells

Families Citing this family (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR100649725B1 (ko) * 2005-08-31 2006-11-27 엘지전자 주식회사 플라즈마 디스플레이 패널의 에너지 회수장치 및 회수방법
CN101470097B (zh) * 2007-12-25 2013-05-29 比亚迪股份有限公司 一种电镀液中有机添加剂浓度的测定方法
EP2356267A4 (en) * 2008-11-07 2016-03-30 Xtalic Corp BATHS, SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ELECTROLYTIC DEPOSITION
AU2010302957A1 (en) * 2009-10-02 2012-05-03 Newcastle Innovation Limited Supercapacitor electrodes
JP5888152B2 (ja) * 2012-07-05 2016-03-16 住友金属鉱山株式会社 パラジウムめっき液の劣化状態評価方法、パラジウムめっき方法
JP6426336B2 (ja) * 2013-10-25 2018-11-21 理研計器株式会社 定電位電解式ガスセンサ
CN103698384B (zh) * 2013-12-17 2016-02-10 上海交通大学 深孔镀铜加速剂的测量方法
EP2937686B1 (en) * 2014-04-22 2017-03-08 Rohm and Haas Electronic Materials LLC Electroplating bath analysis
KR101711293B1 (ko) * 2015-08-06 2017-03-03 서울대학교산학협력단 도금용액에 포함된 가속제 농도의 측정방법
CN110872724A (zh) * 2018-09-03 2020-03-10 东莞市脉拓表面处理科技有限公司 调配电镀药水的方法及装置

Citations (29)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4038161A (en) * 1976-03-05 1977-07-26 R. O. Hull & Company, Inc. Acid copper plating and additive composition therefor
US4132605A (en) * 1976-12-27 1979-01-02 Rockwell International Corporation Method for evaluating the quality of electroplating baths
US4479852A (en) * 1983-01-21 1984-10-30 International Business Machines Corporation Method for determination of concentration of organic additive in plating bath
US4631116A (en) * 1985-06-05 1986-12-23 Hughes Aircraft Company Method of monitoring trace constituents in plating baths
US4666567A (en) * 1981-07-31 1987-05-19 The Boeing Company Automated alternating polarity pulse electrolytic processing of electrically conductive substances
US4812210A (en) * 1987-10-16 1989-03-14 The United States Department Of Energy Measuring surfactant concentration in plating solutions
US4917774A (en) * 1986-04-24 1990-04-17 Shipley Company Inc. Method for analyzing additive concentration
US4917777A (en) * 1986-04-24 1990-04-17 Shipley Company Inc. Method for analyzing additive concentration
US5004525A (en) * 1988-08-23 1991-04-02 Shipley Company Inc. Copper electroplating composition
US5049246A (en) * 1989-06-20 1991-09-17 Hull Harry F Electrolytic processing apparatus and method with time multiplexed power supply
US5192403A (en) * 1991-05-16 1993-03-09 International Business Machines Corporation Cyclic voltammetric method for the measurement of concentrations of subcomponents of plating solution additive mixtures
US5223118A (en) * 1991-03-08 1993-06-29 Shipley Company Inc. Method for analyzing organic additives in an electroplating bath
US5252196A (en) * 1991-12-05 1993-10-12 Shipley Company Inc. Copper electroplating solutions and processes
US5298132A (en) * 1993-03-25 1994-03-29 Hughes Aircraft Company Method for monitoring purification treatment in plating baths
US5972192A (en) * 1997-07-23 1999-10-26 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Pulse electroplating copper or copper alloys
US6280602B1 (en) * 1999-10-20 2001-08-28 Advanced Technology Materials, Inc. Method and apparatus for determination of additives in metal plating baths
US6365033B1 (en) * 1999-05-03 2002-04-02 Semitoof, Inc. Methods for controlling and/or measuring additive concentration in an electroplating bath
US20020074244A1 (en) * 2000-11-02 2002-06-20 Shipley Company, L.L.C. Plating bath analysis
US20020125142A1 (en) * 2001-01-18 2002-09-12 Zhi-Wen Sun Plating bath organic additive analyzer
US6471845B1 (en) * 1998-12-15 2002-10-29 International Business Machines Corporation Method of controlling chemical bath composition in a manufacturing environment
US6508924B1 (en) * 2000-05-31 2003-01-21 Shipley Company L.L.C. Control of breakdown products in electroplating baths
US6572753B2 (en) * 2001-10-01 2003-06-03 Eci Technology, Inc. Method for analysis of three organic additives in an acid copper plating bath
US20030201191A1 (en) * 2002-04-29 2003-10-30 Applied Materials, Inc. Electrochemical method for direct organic additives analysis in copper baths
US6645364B2 (en) * 2000-10-20 2003-11-11 Shipley Company, L.L.C. Electroplating bath control
US20030209440A1 (en) * 2002-05-08 2003-11-13 Applied Materials, Inc. Potential pulse-scan methods of analyzing organic additives in plating baths with multi-component additives
US20040000484A1 (en) * 2002-06-27 2004-01-01 Applied Materials, Inc. Methods in electroanalytical techniques to analyze organic components in plating baths
US6673226B1 (en) * 2002-12-20 2004-01-06 Eci Technology Voltammetric measurement of halide ion concentration
US6709561B1 (en) * 2002-11-06 2004-03-23 Eci Technology, Inc. Measurement of the concentration of a reducing agent in an electroless plating bath
US20040065561A1 (en) * 2002-10-07 2004-04-08 Eci Technology, Inc. Detection of suppressor breakdown contaminants in a plating bath

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2001152398A (ja) * 1999-08-05 2001-06-05 Fujitsu Ltd 電気めっき方法、めっき液評価方法、めっき装置、半導体装置の製造方法

Patent Citations (35)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4038161A (en) * 1976-03-05 1977-07-26 R. O. Hull & Company, Inc. Acid copper plating and additive composition therefor
US4132605A (en) * 1976-12-27 1979-01-02 Rockwell International Corporation Method for evaluating the quality of electroplating baths
US4132605B1 (zh) * 1976-12-27 1986-06-10
US4666567A (en) * 1981-07-31 1987-05-19 The Boeing Company Automated alternating polarity pulse electrolytic processing of electrically conductive substances
US4479852A (en) * 1983-01-21 1984-10-30 International Business Machines Corporation Method for determination of concentration of organic additive in plating bath
US4631116A (en) * 1985-06-05 1986-12-23 Hughes Aircraft Company Method of monitoring trace constituents in plating baths
US4917777A (en) * 1986-04-24 1990-04-17 Shipley Company Inc. Method for analyzing additive concentration
US4917774A (en) * 1986-04-24 1990-04-17 Shipley Company Inc. Method for analyzing additive concentration
US4812210A (en) * 1987-10-16 1989-03-14 The United States Department Of Energy Measuring surfactant concentration in plating solutions
US5004525A (en) * 1988-08-23 1991-04-02 Shipley Company Inc. Copper electroplating composition
US5049246A (en) * 1989-06-20 1991-09-17 Hull Harry F Electrolytic processing apparatus and method with time multiplexed power supply
US5223118A (en) * 1991-03-08 1993-06-29 Shipley Company Inc. Method for analyzing organic additives in an electroplating bath
US5192403A (en) * 1991-05-16 1993-03-09 International Business Machines Corporation Cyclic voltammetric method for the measurement of concentrations of subcomponents of plating solution additive mixtures
US5252196A (en) * 1991-12-05 1993-10-12 Shipley Company Inc. Copper electroplating solutions and processes
US5298132A (en) * 1993-03-25 1994-03-29 Hughes Aircraft Company Method for monitoring purification treatment in plating baths
US5972192A (en) * 1997-07-23 1999-10-26 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Pulse electroplating copper or copper alloys
US6551479B1 (en) * 1998-05-01 2003-04-22 Semitool, Inc. Apparatus for controlling and/or measuring additive concentration in an electroplating bath
US6471845B1 (en) * 1998-12-15 2002-10-29 International Business Machines Corporation Method of controlling chemical bath composition in a manufacturing environment
US6365033B1 (en) * 1999-05-03 2002-04-02 Semitoof, Inc. Methods for controlling and/or measuring additive concentration in an electroplating bath
US6495011B2 (en) * 1999-10-20 2002-12-17 Advanced Technology Materials, Inc. Apparatus for determination of additives in metal plating baths
US6280602B1 (en) * 1999-10-20 2001-08-28 Advanced Technology Materials, Inc. Method and apparatus for determination of additives in metal plating baths
US20010042694A1 (en) * 1999-10-20 2001-11-22 Robertson Peter M. Apparatus for determination of additives in metal plating baths
US6592737B1 (en) * 1999-10-20 2003-07-15 Advanced Technology Materials, Inc. Method and apparatus for determination of additives in metal plating baths
US6508924B1 (en) * 2000-05-31 2003-01-21 Shipley Company L.L.C. Control of breakdown products in electroplating baths
US6645364B2 (en) * 2000-10-20 2003-11-11 Shipley Company, L.L.C. Electroplating bath control
US20020074244A1 (en) * 2000-11-02 2002-06-20 Shipley Company, L.L.C. Plating bath analysis
US6827839B2 (en) * 2000-11-02 2004-12-07 Shipley Company, L.L.C. Plating bath analysis
US20020125142A1 (en) * 2001-01-18 2002-09-12 Zhi-Wen Sun Plating bath organic additive analyzer
US6572753B2 (en) * 2001-10-01 2003-06-03 Eci Technology, Inc. Method for analysis of three organic additives in an acid copper plating bath
US20030201191A1 (en) * 2002-04-29 2003-10-30 Applied Materials, Inc. Electrochemical method for direct organic additives analysis in copper baths
US20030209440A1 (en) * 2002-05-08 2003-11-13 Applied Materials, Inc. Potential pulse-scan methods of analyzing organic additives in plating baths with multi-component additives
US20040000484A1 (en) * 2002-06-27 2004-01-01 Applied Materials, Inc. Methods in electroanalytical techniques to analyze organic components in plating baths
US20040065561A1 (en) * 2002-10-07 2004-04-08 Eci Technology, Inc. Detection of suppressor breakdown contaminants in a plating bath
US6709561B1 (en) * 2002-11-06 2004-03-23 Eci Technology, Inc. Measurement of the concentration of a reducing agent in an electroless plating bath
US6673226B1 (en) * 2002-12-20 2004-01-06 Eci Technology Voltammetric measurement of halide ion concentration

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050016856A1 (en) * 2003-04-25 2005-01-27 Rohm And Haas Electronic Materials, L.L.C. Bath analysis
US7384535B2 (en) * 2003-04-25 2008-06-10 Rohm And Haas Electronic Materials Llc Bath analysis
WO2014066313A1 (en) * 2012-10-23 2014-05-01 Moses Lake Industries, Inc. Improvements in plating bath metrology
US9783908B2 (en) 2012-10-23 2017-10-10 Moses Lake Industries, Inc. Plating bath metrology
WO2019183504A1 (en) * 2018-03-23 2019-09-26 Mara Nanotech Korea, Inc. Methods of manufacturing biosensor nanowells
US11435311B2 (en) 2018-03-23 2022-09-06 Mara Nanotech Korea, Inc. Methods of manufacturing biosensor nanowells

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
TWI275790B (en) 2007-03-11
KR20040092432A (ko) 2004-11-03
CN1550578A (zh) 2004-12-01
JP2004325441A (ja) 2004-11-18
TW200508605A (en) 2005-03-01
EP1471348A1 (en) 2004-10-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6827839B2 (en) Plating bath analysis
US5223118A (en) Method for analyzing organic additives in an electroplating bath
EP0242530B1 (en) Method for analyzing additive concentration
US4132605A (en) Method for evaluating the quality of electroplating baths
US6365033B1 (en) Methods for controlling and/or measuring additive concentration in an electroplating bath
US6645364B2 (en) Electroplating bath control
US4917777A (en) Method for analyzing additive concentration
US9612217B2 (en) Electroplating bath analysis
US20060151327A1 (en) Analysis method
US7186326B2 (en) Efficient analysis of organic additives in an acid copper plating bath
US20030188977A1 (en) Voltammetric reference electrode calibration
US6508924B1 (en) Control of breakdown products in electroplating baths
US7384535B2 (en) Bath analysis
KR101511408B1 (ko) 무전해 금속 및 금속 합금 도금 전해질에서의 안정제 첨가물의 제어 방법
EP0993606A1 (en) Measuring additive concentration in an electroplating bath
US20030201191A1 (en) Electrochemical method for direct organic additives analysis in copper baths
US6814855B2 (en) Automated chemical management system having improved analysis unit
US6773569B2 (en) Potential pulse-scan methods of analyzing organic additives in plating baths with multi-component additives
US6899805B2 (en) Automated chemical management system executing improved electrolyte analysis method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY, LLC, MASSACHUSETTS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:SONNENBERG, WADE;BARSTAD, LEON R.;CRUZ, RAYMOND;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:015860/0850;SIGNING DATES FROM 20040708 TO 20041001

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION