JPH11349249A - Remote trouble diagnosis system of elevator - Google Patents

Remote trouble diagnosis system of elevator

Info

Publication number
JPH11349249A
JPH11349249A JP10159437A JP15943798A JPH11349249A JP H11349249 A JPH11349249 A JP H11349249A JP 10159437 A JP10159437 A JP 10159437A JP 15943798 A JP15943798 A JP 15943798A JP H11349249 A JPH11349249 A JP H11349249A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
time
value width
elevator
diagnosis
car
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP10159437A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP3709286B2 (en
Inventor
Rei Ishida
礼 石田
Kenji Kono
賢治 河野
Hisatoku Fukai
久徳 深井
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Hitachi Building Systems Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Hitachi Building Systems Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Hitachi Building Systems Co Ltd filed Critical Hitachi Building Systems Co Ltd
Priority to JP15943798A priority Critical patent/JP3709286B2/en
Publication of JPH11349249A publication Critical patent/JPH11349249A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP3709286B2 publication Critical patent/JP3709286B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To indicate the more accurate advance indication of a trouble even if a judging value width is set to narrow by setting the judging value width so as to differ between an usual operation time and a diagnosis operation time and further setting the judging value width at the time of diagnosis operation to narrower than that of the usual operation time. SOLUTION: A diagnosis operation 17a is carried out in a no load state, and a start time 14Ua is shortened in the no load state. The start time 14Ua is lengthered at the time of usual operation. In order to diagnose by one judging value width, such wide range as the start time judging value width 20U has to be set, but in the start time judging value width 20U of such wide range, an accurate diagnosis can not be carried out at the time 17a of diagnosis operation. Therefore, at the time 17b of usual operation, the diagnosis is carried out in such wide range as the start time judging value width 20U while considering the car at the time changed from the no load state to a full state and at the time of diagnosis operation, the diagnosis is carried out by changing to such narrow range as the start time judging value width 19U.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

【0001】[0001]

【発明の属する技術分野】本発明は、エレベータ走行性
能の予兆診断を行なうエレベータ遠隔故障診断システム
に関する。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to an elevator remote failure diagnosis system for performing predictive diagnosis of elevator running performance.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】従来のエレベータ遠隔故障診断システム
として、エレベータの走行性能に関する測定を行ない、
測定項目の実測値が予め設定した判定値幅から外れた場
合に故障の予兆信号を発報するようにしたものが知られ
ている。この走行性能に関する判定値幅は、上昇運転、
下降運転、通常運転、診断運転などの運転状態とは無関
係にただひとつだけ設定していた。
2. Description of the Related Art As a conventional remote fault diagnosis system for an elevator, a measurement concerning the traveling performance of an elevator is performed.
There is known a configuration in which a signal indicating a failure is issued when an actual measurement value of a measurement item deviates from a predetermined determination value range. The judgment value range regarding the traveling performance is ascending operation,
Only one was set regardless of the operating conditions such as descent operation, normal operation, and diagnostic operation.

【0003】[0003]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】一般的にエレベータ
は、乗客が乗っていない無負荷時、乗りかごよりもつり
合いおもりの方が重いため、乗りかごがつり合いおもり
に引っ張られて走行する上昇運転よりもかごがつり合い
おもりを引き上げる下降運転時の方がエレベータにかか
る負荷が大きくなる。従って、エレベータの中には上昇
運転と比べて下降運転の方が定常走行まで加速する時間
が長くなり、定常走行速度が低くなる特徴をもつもので
ある。このようなエレベータに対して従来のエレベータ
遠隔故障診断システムを適用すると、エレベータの走行
状態すなわち負荷に関係なくただひとつの判定値幅で診
断していたため、正常な走行状態でも判定値幅から外れ
て故障の予兆信号を発報してしまうことになる。この誤
動作を防止するには判定値幅を広く設定すればよいが、
設定値幅を広く設定すると正確な診断が行なえなくなっ
てしまう。
Generally, in an elevator, when there is no passenger, the weight of the interlocking weight is heavier than that of the car when there is no load. The load applied to the elevator is greater during the descent operation in which the baskets raise the counterweights. Therefore, some elevators are characterized in that the time required to accelerate to the steady traveling is longer in the descending operation than in the ascending operation, and the steady traveling speed is lower. When a conventional elevator remote failure diagnosis system is applied to such an elevator, the diagnosis is performed using only one determination value range regardless of the traveling state of the elevator, that is, regardless of the load. A warning signal will be issued. In order to prevent this malfunction, the judgment value range may be set wider,
If the set value width is set wide, accurate diagnosis cannot be performed.

【0004】本発明の目的とするところは、判定値幅の
範囲を狭く設定してもより正確な故障の予兆を行なうこ
とができるようにしたエレベータ遠隔故障診断システム
を提供することにある。
It is an object of the present invention to provide an elevator remote fault diagnosis system capable of more accurately predicting a fault even if the range of the judgment value range is set narrow.

【0005】[0005]

【課題を解決するための手段】本発明は上記目的を達成
するために、エレベータの走行性能の測定を行ない、測
定項目の実測値が予め設定した判定値幅から外れた場合
に故障の予兆信号を発報するエレベータ遠隔故障診断シ
ステムにおいて、上記判定値幅は、通常運転時と診断運
転時では異なるように設定し、しかも、上記診断運転時
の上記判定値幅は、上記通常運転時の上記判定値幅より
も狭く設定したことを特徴とする。
In order to achieve the above object, the present invention measures the running performance of an elevator, and outputs a signal indicating a failure when a measured value of a measurement item deviates from a predetermined judgment value range. In the elevator remote failure diagnosis system that issues an alarm, the judgment value width is set to be different between the normal operation and the diagnosis operation, and the judgment value width during the diagnosis operation is larger than the judgment value width during the normal operation. Is also set to be narrow.

【0006】上述したように本発明のエレベータ遠隔故
障診断システムは、上述のようにエレベータの走行状態
に合わせて判定値幅を設定すると共に、診断運転時の判
定値幅を通常運転時のそれよりも狭く設定するようにし
たため、診断運転時においては狭い設定の判定値幅を用
いてより細かな走行状態の診断を行なえ、より正確な予
兆を行なうことができる。
As described above, in the elevator remote failure diagnosis system of the present invention, the judgment value range is set in accordance with the traveling state of the elevator as described above, and the judgment value range during the diagnostic operation is narrower than that during the normal operation. Since the setting is performed, a more detailed diagnosis of the traveling state can be performed using the narrower determination value range during the diagnostic operation, and a more accurate sign can be performed.

【0007】[0007]

【発明の実施の形態】以下、本発明の実施の形態を図面
によって説明する。図2は、本発明によるエレベータ遠
隔故障診断システムを採用するエレベータの概略構成図
である。上部機械室1には、エレベータ制御装置3によ
って駆動操作される巻上機2を配置し、この巻上機2の
シーブに巻回したロープを機械室1の下方に形成した昇
降路4内に垂下し、その両端に乗りかご5およびつり合
いおもり6を連結して構成されている。
Embodiments of the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings. FIG. 2 is a schematic configuration diagram of an elevator employing the elevator remote failure diagnosis system according to the present invention. A hoisting machine 2 driven and operated by an elevator control device 3 is arranged in the upper machine room 1, and a rope wound around a sheave of the hoisting machine 2 is placed in a hoistway 4 formed below the machine room 1. It has a car 5 and a counterweight 6 connected to both ends thereof.

【0008】図1は、本発明の一実施の形態によるエレ
ベータ遠隔故障診断システムのブロック図である。
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an elevator remote fault diagnosis system according to an embodiment of the present invention.

【0009】エレベータ遠隔故障診断システム7は、図
2に示したエレベータ制御装置3内に構成したデータ計
測部8、演算部9、比較判定部10および発報手段11
と、監視センタ13と、発報手段11および監視センタ
13間を接続する電話回線等の通信回線12とで構成さ
れている。ここで、エレベータ制御装置3はエレベータ
の動作に関する全体的な制御を行ない、データ計測部8
はエレベータ制御装置3のデータを読み出し、演算部9
はデータ計測部8で読み出したデータの演算を行なって
後述する走行性能に影響を及ぼす起動時間、加速時間お
よび減速時間などのデータを演算し、また比較判定部1
0は演算部9で演算したデータを予め設定されている判
定値と比較してその判定値幅に入っているかを判定する
もので、演算したデータが判定値幅から外れている場
合、その信号を発報手段11に供給する。これを受信し
た発報手段11は、通信回線12介して監視センタ13
に予兆信号を発報する。
The remote elevator fault diagnosis system 7 comprises a data measuring unit 8, a calculating unit 9, a comparing and judging unit 10 and an alarming unit 11 which are configured in the elevator control device 3 shown in FIG.
, A monitoring center 13, and a communication line 12 such as a telephone line for connecting the alerting means 11 and the monitoring center 13. Here, the elevator control device 3 performs overall control regarding the operation of the elevator, and the data measurement unit 8
Reads the data of the elevator control device 3 and calculates
Calculates the data read out by the data measurement unit 8 to calculate data such as a start time, an acceleration time, and a deceleration time that affect running performance, which will be described later.
0 is for comparing the data calculated by the calculation unit 9 with a predetermined judgment value to determine whether the calculated value falls within the judgment value range. When the calculated data is out of the judgment value range, the signal is issued. It is supplied to the reporting means 11. The alerting means 11 which has received the information is sent to the monitoring center 13 via the communication line 12.
A warning signal is issued to.

【0010】図3は、エレベータの走行状態を示す特性
図である。縦軸は速度を、また横軸は時間を示してお
り、時刻t1で起動指令が与えられると起動時間14を
経てから実線で示すように時刻t2で起動を開始し、時
刻t3までの加速時間15で加速して所定の走行速度に
達し、その後、目的階に接近して時刻t4から減速を開
始し、時刻t5までの減速時間16を経て目的階に停止
するという走行特性を示している。ここで、走行特性に
影響を及ぼす起動時間14、加速時間15および減速時
間16などのデータは、図1で示した演算部9で演算し
ている。
FIG. 3 is a characteristic diagram showing a running state of the elevator. The vertical axis indicates speed, and the horizontal axis indicates time. When a start command is given at time t1, after start time 14 starts, start is started at time t2 as shown by a solid line, and acceleration time until time t3. It shows a traveling characteristic in which the vehicle accelerates at 15 to reach a predetermined traveling speed, then approaches the destination floor, starts deceleration at time t4, and stops at the destination floor after a deceleration time 16 until time t5. Here, data such as the start-up time 14, the acceleration time 15, and the deceleration time 16, which affect the traveling characteristics, are calculated by the calculation unit 9 shown in FIG.

【0011】図4は、上昇運転時の起動時間14を説明
する特性図である。診断運転時17aは乗客が乗りかご
5内に乗っていない無負荷状態で行なうが、無負荷時に
は乗りかご5よりもつり合いおもり6の方が重く、乗り
かご5はつり合いおもり6に引っ張られて上昇すること
になり起動時間14Uaが比較的短くなる。これに対し
て、通常運転時17bで乗りかご5が満員の場合は、乗
りかご5がつり合いおもり6よりも重くなるので、起動
時間14Ubが長くなる。
FIG. 4 is a characteristic diagram for explaining the starting time 14 during the ascending operation. At the time of the diagnostic operation, 17a is performed in a no-load state where no passenger is in the car 5, but at no load, the interlocking weight 6 is heavier than the car 5 and the car 5 is pulled up by the counterweight 6 and rises. As a result, the start-up time 14Ua becomes relatively short. On the other hand, when the car 5 is full at the time of normal operation 17b, the car 5 becomes heavier than the counterweight 6, so that the start-up time 14Ub becomes longer.

【0012】このように異なる状態に対して従来のよう
に一つ判定値幅で診断をするためには、起動時間判定値
幅20Uに示すような広い範囲を設定しなければならな
いが、このように広い範囲の起動時間判定値幅20Uで
は診断運転時17aに正確な診断を行なうことができな
い。そこで、通常運転時17bは乗りかご5が無負荷の
状態から満員状態になった時までを考慮して起動時間判
定値幅20Uに示すように広い範囲で診断し、診断運転
時17aには起動時間判定値幅19Uに示すように狭範
囲に変更して診断を行なう。このように診断運転時17
aと通常運転時17bを区別して、運転状態により変化
する起動時間に対応した起動時間判定値幅19U,20
Uを変更するようにしたため、範囲を狭く設定した起動
時間判定値幅19Uで正確な故障の予兆を行なうことが
できる。
In order to make a diagnosis with a single judgment value range for such different states as in the prior art, a wide range as shown in the start time judgment value width 20U must be set. With the start time determination value width of 20U in the range, accurate diagnosis cannot be performed at the time of the diagnostic operation 17a. Therefore, during the normal operation 17b, the diagnosis is performed in a wide range as shown in the start time determination value range 20U in consideration of the time from when the car 5 becomes full to the full load state when the car 5 is not loaded. Diagnosis is performed by changing the range to a narrow range as shown in the judgment value width 19U. Thus, during diagnostic operation 17
a and the normal operation time 17b are distinguished, and the start time judgment value widths 19U and 20 corresponding to the start time that changes depending on the operation state
Since U is changed, an accurate sign of a failure can be performed with the startup time determination value width 19U having a narrow range.

【0013】図5は、下降運転時の起動時間14を示す
特性図である。上述したように診断運転時17aは、乗
客が乗りかご5内に乗っていない無負荷状態で行なうの
で、無負荷時には乗りかご5よりもつり合いおもり6の
方が重いために乗りかご5はつり合いおもり6を引っ張
りながら下降することになり、その起動時間14Daは
長くなる。一方、通常運転時17bで乗りかご5が満員
の場合は、乗りかご5がつり合いおもり6よりも重くな
るので、その起動時間14Dbが短くなる。
FIG. 5 is a characteristic diagram showing the starting time 14 during the descent operation. As described above, the diagnostic operation 17a is performed in a no-load state in which no passenger is in the car 5; therefore, at no load, the car weight 5 is heavier than the car 5 so that the car 5 is balanced. 6, and the starting time 14Da becomes longer. On the other hand, when the car 5 is full at the time of normal operation 17b, the car 5 is heavier than the counterweight 6, so that the startup time 14Db is shorter.

【0014】このように異なる状態に対して従来のよう
に一つ判定値幅で診断をするためには、起動時間判定値
幅20Dに示すような広い範囲を設定しなければならな
いが、このように広い範囲の起動時間判定値幅20Dで
は診断運転時17aに正確な診断を行なうことができな
い。そこで、通常運転時17bは乗りかご5が無負荷の
状態から満員状態になった時までを考慮して起動時間判
定値幅20Dに示すように広い範囲で診断し、診断運転
時17aには起動時間判定値幅19Dに示すように狭い
範囲に変更して診断を行なう。このように診断運転時1
7aと通常運転時17bを区別して、運転状態により変
化する起動時間に対応した起動時間判定値幅19D,2
0Dを変更するようにしたため、範囲を狭く設定した起
動時間判定値幅19Dによって正確な故障の予兆を行な
うことができる。
In order to make a diagnosis with a single judgment value width for the different states as in the prior art, a wide range as shown in the start time judgment value width 20D must be set. With the start time determination value width 20D in the range, accurate diagnosis cannot be performed at the time of the diagnostic operation 17a. Therefore, in the normal operation 17b, the diagnosis is performed in a wide range as shown in the start time determination value width 20D in consideration of the time when the car 5 becomes full from the no load state to the full state. The diagnosis is performed by changing the range to a narrow range as shown in the determination value width 19D. Thus, during diagnostic operation 1
7a and the normal operation time 17b are distinguished, and a start time determination value width 19D, 2 corresponding to a start time that changes according to the operation state.
Since 0D is changed, an accurate sign of a failure can be made with the startup time determination value width 19D whose range is set narrow.

【0015】図6は、上昇運転時の加速時間15を示す
特性図である。上述のように診断運転時17aは無質荷
状態で行なうため、無質荷時には乗りかご5よりもつり
合いおもり6の方が重く、乗りかご5がつり合いおもり
6に引っ張られて上昇するので加速時間15Uaが短く
なる。一方、通常運転時17bは乗りかごが満員の場
合、乗りかご5がつり合いおもり6よりも重くなるので
加速時間15Ubは長くなる。
FIG. 6 is a characteristic diagram showing the acceleration time 15 during the ascending operation. As described above, since the diagnostic operation 17a is performed in a non-pile load state, the non-priced load causes the interlocking weight 6 to be heavier than the car 5 and the car 5 to be pulled up by the counter weight 6 and rises. 15 Ua is shortened. On the other hand, at the time of normal operation 17b, when the car is full, the car 5 becomes heavier than the counterweight 6, so the acceleration time 15Ub becomes longer.

【0016】そこで、通常運転時17bは加速時間判定
値幅24Uに示すように広い範囲で診断するようにし、
一方、診断運転時17aは加速時間判定値幅23Uに示
すように狭い範囲に変更して診断するようにしている。
このように診断運転時17aと通常運転時17bを区別
して、運転状態により変化する加速時間に対応した加速
時間判定値幅23U,24Uを変更するようにしたた
め、範囲を狭く設定した加速時間判定値幅23Uで正確
な故障の予兆を行なうことができる。
Therefore, at the time of normal operation 17b, diagnosis is made in a wide range as indicated by the acceleration time judgment value width 24U,
On the other hand, at the time of the diagnostic operation 17a, the diagnosis is performed by changing to a narrow range as shown in the acceleration time determination value width 23U.
As described above, the diagnosis operation time 17a and the normal operation time 17b are distinguished from each other, and the acceleration time judgment value widths 23U and 24U corresponding to the acceleration time that changes depending on the operation state are changed. Thus, an accurate sign of failure can be made.

【0017】図7は、下降運転時の加速時間15を示す
特性図である。診断運転時17aは無質荷状態で行なう
ので、無負荷時には乗りかご5よりもつり合いおもり6
の方が重いため、乗りかご5はつり合いおもり6を引っ
張りながら下降することになり加速時間15Daが長く
なる。一方、通常運転時17bで乗りかごが満員の場合
は乗りかご5がつり合いおもり6よりも重くなるので加
速時間15Dbが短くなる。
FIG. 7 is a characteristic diagram showing the acceleration time 15 during the descent operation. At the time of the diagnostic operation, 17a is carried out in a non-pile load state.
Is heavier, the car 5 descends while pulling the counterweight 6, and the acceleration time 15Da becomes longer. On the other hand, if the car is full at the time of normal operation 17b, the car 5 is heavier than the counterweight 6, so the acceleration time 15Db is shorter.

【0018】そこで、通常運転時17bは広い範囲の加
速時間判定値幅24Dとし、一方、診断運転時17aに
は狭い範囲の加速時間判定値幅23Dに変更して診断を
行なう。このように診断運転時17aと通常運転時17
bを区別して、運転状態により変化する加速時間に対応
した加速時間判定値幅23D,24Dを変更するように
したため、診断運転時17aに範囲を狭く設定した加速
時間判定値幅23Dで正確な故障の予兆を行なうことが
できる。
Therefore, in the normal operation 17b, the acceleration time determination value width 24D is set to a wide range during the diagnostic operation 17a. Thus, the diagnostic operation 17a and the normal operation 17a
b, the acceleration time determination value widths 23D and 24D corresponding to the acceleration time that changes depending on the operation state are changed. Therefore, an accurate failure sign is obtained with the acceleration time determination value width 23D whose range is set to be narrow at the time of the diagnostic operation 17a. Can be performed.

【0019】図8は、上昇運転時の減速時間16を示す
特性図である。診断運転時17aは無負荷状態で行なう
ので、無負荷時には乗りかご5よりもつり合いおもり6
の方が重いため、乗りかご5はつり合いおもり6に引っ
張られて上昇しており、これに抵抗する減速時間16U
aが短くなる。これに対して、通常運転時17bで乗り
かご5が満員の場合は乗りかご5がつり合いおもり6よ
りも重くなるので減速時間16Ubは長くなる。そこ
で、通常運転時17bは広い範囲の減速時間判定値幅2
8Uとし、診断運転時17aは狭い範囲の減速時間判定
値幅27Uに変更して診断することで、運転状態により
変化する減速時間に対応して正確な診断が行なえる。
FIG. 8 is a characteristic diagram showing the deceleration time 16 during the ascending operation. Since the diagnostic operation 17a is performed in the no-load state, the car 5 is engaged with the weight 6 when there is no load.
Is heavier, the car 5 is pulled up by the counterweight 6 and rises.
a becomes shorter. On the other hand, when the car 5 is full at the time of normal operation 17b, the car 5 becomes heavier than the counterweight 6 and the deceleration time 16Ub becomes longer. Therefore, during normal operation 17b, the deceleration time judgment value width 2
When the diagnosis operation is performed, the diagnosis is performed by changing the deceleration time determination value width to a narrow range 27U at the time of the diagnostic operation.

【0020】図9は、下降運転時の減速時間16を示す
特性図である。診断運転時17aは、無負荷状態で行な
うので、無負荷時には乗りかご5よりもつり合いおもり
6の方が重いため、乗りかご5はつり合いおもり6を引
っ張りながら下降しており、減速時間16Daは長くな
る。これに対して、通常運転時17bで乗りかごが満員
の場合は、乗りかご5がつり合いおもり6よりも重くな
るので減速時間16Dbは短くなる。そこで、通常運転
時17bは広い範囲の減速時間判定値幅28Dとし、診
断運転時17aは狭い範囲の減速時間判定値幅27Dに
変更して診断する。このように診断運転時17aと通常
運転時17bを区別して、運転状態により変化する減速
時間に対応した減速時間判定値幅27D,28Dを変更
するようにしたため、診断運転時17aには範囲を狭く
設定した減速時間判定値幅27Dで正確な故障の予兆を
行なうことができる。
FIG. 9 is a characteristic diagram showing the deceleration time 16 during the descent operation. Since the diagnostic operation 17a is performed in a no-load state, the unbalanced weight 6 is heavier than the car 5 at the time of no load, so the car 5 is descending while pulling the balanced weight 6, and the deceleration time 16Da is long. Become. On the other hand, when the car is full at the time of normal operation 17b, the car 5 is heavier than the counterweight 6 and the deceleration time 16Db is shorter. Therefore, during normal operation 17b, a wider range of deceleration time determination value width 28D is set, and during diagnostic operation 17a, diagnosis is performed by changing to a narrower range of deceleration time determination value width 27D. In this manner, the diagnostic operation 17a and the normal operation 17b are distinguished from each other, and the deceleration time determination value widths 27D and 28D corresponding to the deceleration time that changes according to the operation state are changed. An accurate failure sign can be made with the deceleration time determination value width 27D thus set.

【0021】以上の説明から分かるように、乗りかご5
の状態とつり合いおもり6の関係によって、エレベータ
における走行性能を左右する起動時間14、加速時間1
5および減速時間16はそれぞれ走行状態に応じて変化
するので、この変化に応じて診断運転時17aの各判定
値幅と通常運転時17bの各判定値幅を図1に比較判定
部10で変化させて比較するようにし、しかも診断運転
時17aには通常運転時17bよりも狭い各判定値幅を
設定して診断するようにしたため、より細かな走行状態
の診断を行なえ、より正確な予兆を行なうことができ
る。
As can be seen from the above description, car 5
Start time 14 and acceleration time 1 which affect the running performance of the elevator according to the relationship between the state of the vehicle and the counterweight 6.
5 and the deceleration time 16 change according to the running state, and accordingly, the respective judgment value widths during the diagnostic operation 17a and during the normal operation 17b are changed by the comparison judgment unit 10 in FIG. Since the comparison is made, and the diagnostic operation 17a is set to be narrower than the normal operation 17b for each of the judgment value ranges and diagnosed, a more detailed diagnosis of the running state can be performed, and a more accurate prediction can be performed. it can.

【0022】[0022]

【発明の効果】以上説明したように本発明によるエレベ
ータ遠隔故障診断システムは、走行性能を左右する起動
時間、加速時間および減速時間を、診断運転時と通常運
転時とでは異なる各判定値幅として比較するようにし、
しかも、診断運転時には通常運転時よりも狭い各判定値
幅として比較して診断するようにしたため、診断運転時
には従来の場合に比べて各判定値幅の範囲を狭く設定し
て、より正確な故障の予兆を行なうことができる。
As described above, the remote fault diagnosis system for an elevator according to the present invention compares the start time, the acceleration time and the deceleration time, which affect the running performance, with different judgment value widths in the diagnostic operation and the normal operation. So that
In addition, the diagnostic operation is performed by comparing each judgment value width that is narrower than that in the normal operation, so that the diagnosis operation range is set to be narrower in the diagnostic operation than in the conventional case, so that a more accurate failure sign is obtained. Can be performed.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of the drawings]

【図1】本発明の一実施の形態によるエレベータ遠隔故
障診断システムを示すブロック図である。
FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing an elevator remote fault diagnosis system according to an embodiment of the present invention.

【図2】図1に示したエレベータ遠隔故障診断システム
を採用する一般的なエレベータを示す概略構成図であ
る。
FIG. 2 is a schematic configuration diagram illustrating a general elevator employing the elevator remote failure diagnosis system illustrated in FIG.

【図3】エレベータの走行状態を示す特性図である。FIG. 3 is a characteristic diagram showing a traveling state of an elevator.

【図4】図1に示したエレベータ遠隔故障診断システム
による上昇運転時の起動時間を示す特性図である。
FIG. 4 is a characteristic diagram showing a startup time at the time of ascending operation by the elevator remote failure diagnosis system shown in FIG. 1;

【図5】図1に示したエレベータ遠隔故障診断システム
による下降運転時の起動時間を示す特性図である。
FIG. 5 is a characteristic diagram showing a startup time at the time of a descending operation by the elevator remote failure diagnosis system shown in FIG. 1;

【図6】図1に示したエレベータ遠隔故障診断システム
による上昇運転時の加速時間を示す特性図である。
FIG. 6 is a characteristic diagram showing acceleration time at the time of ascending operation by the elevator remote failure diagnosis system shown in FIG. 1;

【図7】図1に示したエレベータ遠隔故障診断システム
による下降運転時の加速時間を示す特性図である。
FIG. 7 is a characteristic diagram showing an acceleration time during a descent operation by the elevator remote failure diagnosis system shown in FIG. 1;

【図8】図1に示したエレベータ遠隔故障診断システム
による上昇運転時の減速時間を示す特性図である。
FIG. 8 is a characteristic diagram showing deceleration time during ascending operation by the elevator remote failure diagnosis system shown in FIG. 1;

【図9】図1に示したエレベータ遠隔故障診断システム
による下降運転時の減速時間を示す特性図である。
9 is a characteristic diagram showing a deceleration time during a descending operation by the elevator remote failure diagnosis system shown in FIG.

【符号の説明】[Explanation of symbols]

14 起動時間 15 加速時間 16 減速時間 17a 通常運転時 17b 診断運転時 19U,19D,20U,20D 起動時間判定値幅 23U,23D,24U,24D 加速時間判定値幅 27U,27D,28U,28D 減速時間判定値幅 14 Start time 15 Acceleration time 16 Deceleration time 17a During normal operation 17b During diagnostic operation 19U, 19D, 20U, 20D Start time judgment value width 23U, 23D, 24U, 24D Acceleration time judgment value width 27U, 27D, 28U, 28D Deceleration time judgment value width

Claims (2)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】 エレベータの走行性能の測定を行ない、
測定項目の実測値が予め設定した判定値幅から外れた場
合に故障の予兆信号を発報するエレベータ遠隔故障診断
システムにおいて、上記判定値幅は、通常運転時と診断
運転時では異なるように設定し、しかも、上記診断運転
時の上記判定値幅は、上記通常運転時の上記判定値幅よ
りも狭く設定したことを特徴とするエレベータ遠隔故障
診断システム。
1. The running performance of an elevator is measured.
In an elevator remote failure diagnosis system that issues a signal indicating a failure when an actual measurement value of a measurement item deviates from a predetermined determination value width, the determination value width is set to be different between normal operation and diagnostic operation, In addition, the elevator remote failure diagnosis system is characterized in that the judgment value width during the diagnostic operation is set to be narrower than the judgment value width during the normal operation.
【請求項2】 請求項1記載のものにおいて、上記通常
運転時と上記診断運転時の上記判定値幅は、上昇運転お
よび下降運転時の起動時間、加速時間および減速時間に
対してそれぞれ設定したことを特徴とするエレベータ遠
隔故障診断システム。
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the determination value ranges in the normal operation and the diagnostic operation are set for a start time, an acceleration time, and a deceleration time in an ascending operation and a descending operation, respectively. A remote fault diagnosis system for an elevator.
JP15943798A 1998-06-08 1998-06-08 Elevator remote fault diagnosis system Expired - Lifetime JP3709286B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP15943798A JP3709286B2 (en) 1998-06-08 1998-06-08 Elevator remote fault diagnosis system

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP15943798A JP3709286B2 (en) 1998-06-08 1998-06-08 Elevator remote fault diagnosis system

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH11349249A true JPH11349249A (en) 1999-12-21
JP3709286B2 JP3709286B2 (en) 2005-10-26

Family

ID=15693743

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP15943798A Expired - Lifetime JP3709286B2 (en) 1998-06-08 1998-06-08 Elevator remote fault diagnosis system

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP3709286B2 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2008013279A (en) * 2006-07-03 2008-01-24 Fujitec Co Ltd Earthquake control device of elevator
JP2016108089A (en) * 2014-12-05 2016-06-20 東芝エレベータ株式会社 Fault diagnosis device, system and method
KR20190083666A (en) * 2016-12-28 2019-07-12 미쓰비시 덴키 빌딩 테크노 서비스 가부시키 가이샤 Elevator remote monitoring device

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2008230742A (en) * 2007-03-19 2008-10-02 Toshiba Elevator Co Ltd Maintenance control system of elevator

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH07228444A (en) * 1994-02-15 1995-08-29 Hitachi Ltd Elevator monitoring device and control device
JPH07323972A (en) * 1994-06-01 1995-12-12 Hitachi Building Syst Eng & Service Co Ltd Traveling performance diagnosing device for elevator

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH07228444A (en) * 1994-02-15 1995-08-29 Hitachi Ltd Elevator monitoring device and control device
JPH07323972A (en) * 1994-06-01 1995-12-12 Hitachi Building Syst Eng & Service Co Ltd Traveling performance diagnosing device for elevator

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2008013279A (en) * 2006-07-03 2008-01-24 Fujitec Co Ltd Earthquake control device of elevator
JP2016108089A (en) * 2014-12-05 2016-06-20 東芝エレベータ株式会社 Fault diagnosis device, system and method
KR20190083666A (en) * 2016-12-28 2019-07-12 미쓰비시 덴키 빌딩 테크노 서비스 가부시키 가이샤 Elevator remote monitoring device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP3709286B2 (en) 2005-10-26

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP6049902B2 (en) Elevator diagnostic equipment
WO2006100791A1 (en) Car sway detector for elevator
JP4849397B2 (en) Elevator abnormality detection device
JPWO2002046082A1 (en) Elevator main rope stretch detection device
JP2011042480A (en) Elevator device
JP2009215057A (en) Compulsory deceleration control system of elevator
EP1958911B1 (en) Elevator device
JP5082803B2 (en) Elevator control device and control method, and repair method for existing elevator
JPH11199153A (en) Diagnostic device for elevator
JPH11349249A (en) Remote trouble diagnosis system of elevator
JP2771454B2 (en) Elevator running performance diagnostic device
JP5535441B2 (en) Elevator control operation device
JPH08310759A (en) Brake characteristic evaluating device for elevator
JP6754715B2 (en) Elevator counterweight clearance diagnostic device
JP2007204263A (en) Main rope deterioration diagnostic system of elevator
JP6643219B2 (en) Magnetic pole diagnostic device for permanent magnet synchronous motor for elevator
JP6452925B1 (en) Test method for elevator device and safety device
JPH11100183A (en) Diagnosis operation device of elevator
JP4952579B2 (en) Elevator car shake detection device
KR0179885B1 (en) Tester for an elevator
KR102628184B1 (en) elevator monitoring device
JPH06263354A (en) Elevator braking force inspection device
JP2000344436A (en) Automatic checking device for elevator comfortableness
JPH08192965A (en) Failure judging device of elevator
JPH09156854A (en) Rope slip judging device for elevator

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20050808

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

S531 Written request for registration of change of domicile

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313531

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20080812

Year of fee payment: 3

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110812

Year of fee payment: 6

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130812

Year of fee payment: 8

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130812

Year of fee payment: 8

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20140812

Year of fee payment: 9

S531 Written request for registration of change of domicile

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313531

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

EXPY Cancellation because of completion of term