JPH0946094A - Component mounting method - Google Patents

Component mounting method

Info

Publication number
JPH0946094A
JPH0946094A JP7194816A JP19481695A JPH0946094A JP H0946094 A JPH0946094 A JP H0946094A JP 7194816 A JP7194816 A JP 7194816A JP 19481695 A JP19481695 A JP 19481695A JP H0946094 A JPH0946094 A JP H0946094A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
mounting
parts
component
components
supply means
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP7194816A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP3611374B2 (en
Inventor
Hideki Yoshihara
秀樹 吉原
Tatsuya Kawamura
竜也 川村
Sei Masuda
聖 益田
Kenichi Sato
健一 佐藤
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Panasonic Holdings Corp
Original Assignee
Matsushita Electric Industrial Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Matsushita Electric Industrial Co Ltd filed Critical Matsushita Electric Industrial Co Ltd
Priority to JP19481695A priority Critical patent/JP3611374B2/en
Publication of JPH0946094A publication Critical patent/JPH0946094A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP3611374B2 publication Critical patent/JP3611374B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Automatic Assembly (AREA)
  • Supply And Installment Of Electrical Components (AREA)

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To balance the speed of the mounting machines, and minimize the frequency of the case that components ran out. SOLUTION: From CAD data, the number of components to be used is calculated for each component. Components are so assigned to each mounting machine constituting a mounting line that the speed is made uniform. Under the assigned condition, simulation concerning the frequency of the case that components are out of stock is performed for each mounting machine, on the basis of the input number of components to a supply means, the estimated production number of boards, etc. The items of components which are frequently out of stock are divided and assigened to a plurality of the component supply means, and the frequency of the case that components are out of stock is made uniform among the mounting machines. Further simulation is performed. In order to make the balance uniform between the mounting machines, the changing process of supply means among the mounting machines is repeated. Hence the arrangement of supply means is datermined wherein the speed and the frequency of the case that components are out of stock become uniform.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】Detailed Description of the Invention

【0001】[0001]

【産業上の利用分野】本発明は、実装機が多数配設され
た実装ラインにおける部品実装方法に関し、特に部品切
れ回数を最小にする部品実装方法に関するものである。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a component mounting method in a mounting line in which a large number of mounting machines are arranged, and more particularly to a component mounting method that minimizes the number of times a component runs out.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】従来、実装ラインによる部品実装方法に
おいて実装部品を各実装機に振り分ける場合は、実装機
のNCデータ作成者が今までの経験により振り分け作業
を行い、その後実装ラインで各実装機のタクトをストッ
プウォッチで計測し、その計測結果に応じて各実装機間
でタクトバランスがとれるように振り分け調整を行なっ
ている。
2. Description of the Related Art Conventionally, when a mounted component is distributed to each mounting machine in a method of mounting a component on a mounting line, the NC data creator of the mounting machine performs the distribution work based on the experience so far, and then each mounting machine is mounted on the mounting line. The takt time is measured with a stopwatch, and distribution adjustment is performed so that the tact balance can be achieved among the mounting machines according to the measurement result.

【0003】また、特願平4−51427号に記した振
り分け方法では、タクトバランスの平準化を主眼とした
部品配列となるように実装機間のタクトバランス調整を
繰り返し行なって部品配列を決定している。その結果に
基づいて、さらに現場オペレータが部品切れ回数が極力
少なくなるように部品供給手段の分割を行ない、数パタ
ーンの試行の後最終決定を行なっている。
Further, in the distribution method described in Japanese Patent Application No. 4-51427, the tact balance adjustment between the mounting machines is repeatedly performed so as to determine the component arrangement so that the component arrangement is aimed mainly at equalizing the tact balance. ing. Based on the result, the site operator further divides the component supply means so as to reduce the number of parts out as much as possible, and makes a final decision after trial of several patterns.

【0004】[0004]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】しかし、上記従来の振
り分け方法は、振り分け作業に経験と熟練を要するとと
もに時間が長くかかり、その後実装ラインで計測して手
作業にて振り分け調整を行なわねばならないために、さ
らに経験と時間を要するという問題がある。
However, the above-mentioned conventional distribution method requires experience and skill in the distribution work and takes a long time, and after that, it is necessary to measure it on the mounting line and manually perform the distribution adjustment. The problem is that it requires more experience and time.

【0005】本発明は、上記従来の問題点に鑑み、各実
装機間でのタクトバランスが取れるとともに部品切れ回
数を最小にできる部品実装方法を提供することを目的と
している。
In view of the above-mentioned conventional problems, it is an object of the present invention to provide a component mounting method capable of achieving a tact balance between mounting machines and minimizing the number of component breaks.

【0006】[0006]

【課題を解決するための手段】本発明の部品実装方法
は、部品が実装される基板に関する情報をCADデータ
から得、実装情報を記録してある実装データベースを用
いて実装機駆動用のNCデータを生成し、このNCデー
タに基づいて実装機を動作させる部品実装方法であっ
て、取り込んだCAD情報から部品毎の使用数を算出
し、実装ラインを構成する各実装機へタクトバランスが
平準化するように部品を振り分け、一旦振り分けた条件
で各部品毎に供給手段の部品の入り数、基板予定生産数
等の条件をもとに実装機毎に部品切れ回数のシミュレー
ションを行い、そのシミュレーション結果で部品切れ回
数の多い部品品番に関して複数の供給手段に分割し、部
品切れ回数を実装機間で平準化することを特徴とする。
According to the component mounting method of the present invention, information on a board on which a component is mounted is obtained from CAD data, and NC data for driving a mounting machine is obtained by using a mounting database in which mounting information is recorded. Is a component mounting method for operating the mounting machine based on this NC data, calculating the number of uses for each component from the captured CAD information, and leveling the tact balance for each mounting machine that constitutes the mounting line. The parts are distributed as described above, and the simulation result of the number of parts shortages is calculated for each mounting machine based on the conditions such as the number of parts in the supply means, the planned production quantity of the board, etc. Is divided into a plurality of supply means for a part number having a large number of times of parts cut, and the number of times of parts cut is equalized among mounting machines.

【0007】好適には、部品切れ回数を平準化するよう
に所要の供給手段を複数に分割した後、タクトシミュレ
ーションを行い、各実装機間でタクトバランスが平準化
するように供給手段を他の実装機との間で入れ替える処
理を繰り返し、タクト及び部品切れ回数が実装機間で平
準となる供給手段の配列を決定する。
[0007] Preferably, after dividing the required supply means into a plurality of parts so as to level out the number of parts out, a tact simulation is carried out, and the supply means other than each other are provided so as to level the tact balance among the mounting machines. The process of exchanging with the mounting machine is repeated, and the arrangement of the supplying means is determined so that the tact and the number of times of parts cut out are equalized between the mounting machines.

【0008】[0008]

【作用】本発明の部品実装方法によれば、CADデータ
と実装データと各部品毎の供給手段の部品の入り数、生
産予定枚数等の生産計画を用いて、まずタクトバランス
を主とした仮想部品配列を決め、その配列下で生産計画
実行の際の各実装機での部品切れ発生頻度の事前シミュ
レーションを行い、部品切れ回数が平準化するように所
要の供給手段を複数に分割することにより、部品切れ回
数を最小とすることができる。
According to the component mounting method of the present invention, the CAD data, the mounting data, and the production plan such as the number of parts of the supply means for each part, the planned number of parts, and the like are used, and the virtual tact balance is mainly used. By deciding the parts arrangement, performing a preliminary simulation of the occurrence frequency of parts shortage in each mounting machine when executing the production plan under the arrangement, and dividing the required supply means into multiple parts so that the number of times of parts shortage is leveled. It is possible to minimize the number of parts out.

【0009】さらに、タクトシミュレーションを行なっ
て各実装機間でタクトバランスがとれるように実装機間
で供給手段を入れ替えることにより、タクトバランスが
とれかつ部品切れ回数を最小にした効率的な部品実装を
実現できる。
Further, by performing a tact simulation and exchanging the supply means between the mounting machines so that the tact balance can be achieved among the respective mounting machines, the tact balance can be maintained and the efficient component mounting can be achieved with a minimum number of component outages. realizable.

【0010】[0010]

【実施例】以下、本発明の一実施例の実装ラインにおけ
る部品実装方法を、図1〜図6を参照して説明する。
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS A component mounting method in a mounting line according to an embodiment of the present invention will be described below with reference to FIGS.

【0011】まず、図1により実装設備の全体構成につ
いて説明する。実装設備1には、実装機2をライン配置
した実装ライン3が複数形成されている。各実装ライン
3を構成する各実装機2の制御部には制御装置4が接続
されている。制御装置4は各実装機2に対して実装すべ
き実装部品を振り分けるとともに、その振り分けた実装
部品のCADデータの入力を行なう。
First, the overall structure of the mounting equipment will be described with reference to FIG. A plurality of mounting lines 3 in which the mounting machines 2 are arranged in a line are formed in the mounting equipment 1. A control device 4 is connected to the control unit of each mounting machine 2 that constitutes each mounting line 3. The control device 4 distributes the mounting components to be mounted to each mounting machine 2 and inputs the CAD data of the distributed mounting components.

【0012】このため制御装置4には、CADシステム
5が接続されており、CADシステム5からは部品の実
装対象である基板毎にCADデータが入力される。ま
た、各実装機2に関するデータを格納した実装機データ
ベース7aや各実装部品に関するデータを格納した部品
データベース7b等から成る実装データベース6のデー
タが入力される。なお、各実装機2に対するCADデー
タの入力はそれぞれ別途に行なうこともできる。
Therefore, a CAD system 5 is connected to the control device 4, and CAD data is input from the CAD system 5 for each board on which components are mounted. Further, the data of the mounting database 6 including the mounting machine database 7a storing the data relating to each mounting machine 2 and the component database 7b storing the data relating to each mounting component are input. The CAD data may be input to each mounting machine 2 separately.

【0013】次に、制御装置4における各実装機2に対
する実装部品の振り分け動作を図2〜図6を参照して説
明する。
Next, the operation of allocating the mounting components to each mounting machine 2 in the control device 4 will be described with reference to FIGS.

【0014】図2、図3において、まずステップ#1、
#2、#3にて部品の実装対象となる基板機種とその生
産計画を指定入力するとともに、その基板機種のCAD
データを指定入力し、かつ実装ライン3を指定する。こ
の際、実装ライン3に流す複数の基板機種についてそれ
ぞれの生産計画とCADデータとを入力する。
In FIGS. 2 and 3, first, in step # 1,
In # 2 and # 3, specify and input the board model to which the component is to be mounted and its production plan, and CAD the board model.
Data is designated and input, and mounting line 3 is designated. At this time, the production plan and CAD data of each of the plurality of board models to be flown to the mounting line 3 are input.

【0015】続いてステップ#4において、上記従来例
と同じタクトバランス重視の振り分け方法により、タク
トバランスを考慮した振り分け(1次振り分け)を実施
する。一次振り分けの結果例を表1に示す。
Subsequently, in step # 4, the distribution method (primary distribution) in consideration of the tact balance is carried out by the same distribution method that emphasizes the tact balance as in the conventional example. Table 1 shows an example of the result of the primary distribution.

【0016】[0016]

【表1】 [Table 1]

【0017】なお、表1は基板1機種1枚を対象とした
場合の結果例である。
Table 1 shows an example of the results when one board and one model are used.

【0018】次に、ステップ#5で入力された生産計画
をもとに各部品毎に必要部品数を算出し、ステップ#6
で部品データベースより各部品品番毎に供給手段の部品
の入り数(例えば、部品供給カセットの部品aの収容数
が100個の場合は、入り数は100である。)を取り
込み、ステップ#7で生産計画に基づいて生産する場合
の部品切れシミュレーションを行ない、部品切れによる
実装機の部品切れ回数を評価する。以上のステップ#
5、#6、#7による結果例を表2と図4に示す。
Next, the required number of parts is calculated for each part based on the production plan input in step # 5, and step # 6
In the step # 7, the number of pieces of the parts of the supply means (for example, 100 pieces of the parts a stored in the parts supply cassette is 100) is read from the parts database for each part number. In the case of production based on the production plan, a part out simulation is performed to evaluate the number of parts out of the mounter due to part out. More steps #
Table 2 and FIG. 4 show examples of the results of Nos. 5, # 6 and # 7.

【0019】[0019]

【表2】 [Table 2]

【0020】この例は、基板Aには部品aを3個、部品
bを2個、基板Bには部品aを2個、部品bを2個、基
板Cには部品aを5個、部品bを2個、それぞれ実装す
るとともに、これら基板Aを200枚、基板Bを50
枚、基板Cを40枚連続生産する例であり、一次振り分
けで部品aは実装機1に、部品bは実装機2に振り分け
られたものとしている。また、表2と図4は部品aと部
品bに関する部分のみ図示している。図4の理解のため
に一部詳しく説明すると、実装機1における部品aは3
3枚の基板Aへの実装が終わった時点で99個使用され
たことになり、その時点で部品供給カセット(入り数1
00)の入れ替えが必要となる。そして200枚の基板
Aへの部品aの実装を終了した時点では既に部品供給カ
セットの入れ替えを6回行なっており、かつその時点で
部品供給カセット内には94個の部品aが残った状態と
なっており、引き続いて基板Bへの実装に用いる。
In this example, there are three parts a, two parts b on the board A, two parts a, two parts b on the board B, and five parts a on the board C. 2 boards b are mounted, respectively, and 200 boards A and 50 boards B are mounted.
This is an example in which 40 sheets and the substrates C are continuously produced, and it is assumed that the component a is distributed to the mounting machine 1 and the component b is distributed to the mounting machine 2 in the primary distribution. Further, Table 2 and FIG. 4 show only parts relating to the parts a and b. In order to understand partly in detail for understanding FIG. 4, the component a in the mounting machine 1 is 3
By the time the mounting on the three boards A is completed, 99 pieces have been used, and at that time, the component supply cassette
00) must be replaced. Then, when the mounting of the component a on the 200 boards A is completed, the component supply cassette has already been replaced six times, and at that time, 94 components a remain in the component supply cassette. And is subsequently used for mounting on the board B.

【0021】表2と図4において、基板A〜Cを連続生
産する場合、部品a、bについて部品切れによる停止回
数は実装機1が9回、実装機2が5回になっている。基
板1枚あたりでタクトバランスがとれていても、このよ
うな部品切れによる停止はライン全体の稼働停止となる
ために稼働率低下に直結し、極力避けることが要求され
る。
In Table 2 and FIG. 4, when the boards A to C are continuously produced, the mounting machines 1 and 9 are stopped 9 times and 5 times, respectively, due to the parts a and b being out of stock. Even if the tact balance is maintained for each substrate, such a stop due to the component shortage causes an operation stop of the entire line, which directly leads to a decrease in the operation rate and is required to be avoided as much as possible.

【0022】そこで、ステップ#8においてステップ#
7のシミュレーション結果をもとに部品切れ回数の実装
機毎の平準化がなされているかどうかの判定を行なう。
本実施例では、上記のように実装機間で部品切れ回数が
2部品で評価しても4回の開きがあるため、ステップ#
9の再振り分け(2次振り分け)を実施する。このステ
ップ#9では、ステップ#5、#6で作成した表2をも
とに、部品切れ回数が多い部品についてその部品供給手
段(カセット)数を1つ増加させ、その仮想の部品配置
によりステップ#7に示した部品切れ回数シミュレーシ
ョンで再評価するという処理を繰り返す。
Therefore, in step # 8, step #
Based on the simulation result of 7, it is determined whether or not the number of times of component cutout is leveled for each mounting machine.
In the present embodiment, as described above, even when the number of parts out of the mounting machines is evaluated as 2 parts, there is a difference of 4 times.
Carry out 9 reassignments (secondary assignment). In this step # 9, based on the table 2 created in steps # 5 and # 6, the number of parts supply means (cassettes) is increased by 1 for the parts having a large number of parts out, The process of re-evaluating by the number-of-parts simulation shown in # 7 is repeated.

【0023】表3と図5に、まず部品切れ回数の最大の
部品aの部品供給手段(カセット)を1つ増加させ、次
いでその結果次に部品切れ回数が最大となった部品bの
部品供給手段(カセット)数を1つ増加させた時点の結
果を示す。この時点では部品a、bについてそれぞれ9
回から4回、5回から2回にそれぞれ部品切れ回数が減
っている。
In Table 3 and FIG. 5, first, the number of the component supply means (cassette) for the component a having the maximum number of component outs is increased by one, and then the component supply of the component b having the maximum number of component outs is supplied next. The result at the time of increasing the number of means (cassettes) by one is shown. At this point, 9 for each of parts a and b
The number of out-of-parts has decreased from 4 times to 5 times to 2 times.

【0024】[0024]

【表3】 [Table 3]

【0025】このように、ステップ#8の判断で部品切
れ回数の実装機間での平準化がなされていない場合、シ
ミュレーション結果で部品切れ回数の多い実装機につい
て、ステップ#9を再度実行し、ラインを構成する実装
機の部品切れ回数が所望の平準状態となるまでこれを繰
り返す。
In this way, if the number of times of component outages is not leveled among the mounters in the determination of step # 8, step # 9 is executed again for the mounter having a large number of times of component loss according to the simulation result. This is repeated until the number of times the parts of the mounter forming the line run out reaches a desired level.

【0026】ステップ#9の繰り返しの結果、ステップ
#8の判定で部品切れ回数の平準化がなされると、次い
でステップ#10において、平準化された仮想の部品配
置をもとに1つのCADデータを対象にしてタクトシミ
ュレーションを実施する。その結果例を表4に示す。
As a result of the repetition of step # 9, the number of out-of-components is leveled in the determination of step # 8. Then, in step # 10, one piece of CAD data is created based on the leveled virtual part placement. Tact simulation is carried out for. An example of the result is shown in Table 4.

【0027】[0027]

【表4】 [Table 4]

【0028】次に、ステップ#11で、タクトシミュレ
ーションの結果タクトバランスがとれているか否かの判
定を行なう。表4の結果では、下線で示した実装機1の
実装タクト(19.54sec)が他と比べて特に大き
くなっているので、これがネックとなってラインのタク
トバランスがとれていないという判定がなされる。その
場合ステップ#12で、ステップ#9の結果部品切れの
平準化された仮想の部品配置をもとに、ライン上の実装
機間で部品供給手段(カセット)の入れ換え作業を行う
(3次振り分け)。このステップ#10、#11、#1
2の処理・判定をタクトバランスが許容範囲内に入るま
で繰り返す。タクトバランスが許容範囲に入ると、部品
切れ発生を最小とし、かつタクトバランスがとれた部品
供給手段(カセット)の配列が実現されたことになり、
ステップ#13でそのように部品供給手段(カセット)
の配列を決定する。
Next, at step # 11, it is judged whether or not tact balance is obtained as a result of the tact simulation. In the results of Table 4, since the mounting tact (19.54 sec) of the mounting machine 1 indicated by the underline is particularly large as compared with the others, this is a bottleneck and it is determined that the tact balance of the line is not balanced. It In that case, in step # 12, the component supply means (cassette) is exchanged between the mounting machines on the line based on the leveled virtual component placement resulting from the component exhaustion in step # 9 (third sorting). ). This step # 10, # 11, # 1
The processing and judgment of 2 are repeated until the tact balance falls within the allowable range. When the tact balance is within the allowable range, the occurrence of parts shortage is minimized, and the arrangement of the parts supply means (cassette) with a good tact balance is realized.
In step # 13, the component supply means (cassette)
Determine the sequence of.

【0029】最終結果の部品配列とその場合の部品切れ
の発生状態を表5と図6に、またその部品配列によるタ
クトシミュレーション結果を表6に示す。
Table 5 and FIG. 6 show the final result component arrangement and the occurrence state of component shortage in that case, and Table 6 shows the tact simulation result by the component arrangement.

【0030】[0030]

【表5】 [Table 5]

【0031】[0031]

【表6】 [Table 6]

【0032】最終結果の例は、部品切れ回数、タクト共
に、実装機間で平準化されるように以上のステップを繰
り返し処理した結果である。本例では、1次振り分け結
果から2次振り分けにより部品aについては1つの部品
供給手段から3つの部品供給手段、部品bについては2
つの部品供給手段に分割し、かつ3次振り分けにより部
品aについて1つの部品供給手段を実装機1から実装機
2に入れ換えを行なっている。
An example of the final result is a result of repeating the above steps so that the number of times of parts out and the tact are leveled among the mounting machines. In this example, from the primary distribution result, the secondary distribution is performed by the secondary distribution. For the component a, one component supply means to three component supply means, and for the component b, two.
It is divided into one component supply means, and one component supply means is replaced from the mounting machine 1 to the mounting machine 2 by the third distribution.

【0033】[0033]

【発明の効果】本発明の部品実装方法によれば、以上の
説明から明らかなように、CADデータと実装データと
各部品毎の供給手段の部品の入り数、生産予定枚数等の
生産計画を用いて、タクトバランスを主とした仮想部品
配列を決め、その配列下で生産計画実行の際の各実装機
での部品切れ発生頻度の事前シミュレーションを行い、
部品切れ回数が平準化するように所要の供給手段を複数
に分割することにより、部品切れ回数を最小とすること
ができ、タクトバランスを主とした部品配列では部品切
れ回数が多くなって稼働率が低下する点が改善され、ラ
イン稼働率向上を図ることができる。。
According to the component mounting method of the present invention, as is apparent from the above description, the CAD data, the mounting data, and the production plan such as the number of parts of the supply means for each part, the number of parts to be produced, and the like are set. By using it, we decide a virtual component array centered on tact balance, and perform a preliminary simulation of the frequency of component outages on each mounting machine when executing the production plan under that array,
By dividing the required supply means into multiple parts so that the number of out-of-components is leveled, the number of out-of-components can be minimized. It is possible to improve the line operating rate by improving the point that the power consumption decreases. .

【0034】さらに、タクトシミュレーションを行なっ
て各実装機間でタクトバランスがとれるように実装機間
で供給手段を入れ替えることにより、タクトバランスが
とれかつ部品切れ回数を最小にした効率的な部品実装を
実現することができる。
Furthermore, by performing a tact simulation and exchanging the supply means between the mounting machines so that the tact balance can be achieved among the mounting machines, efficient component mounting can be achieved with tact balance and a minimum number of component cuts. Can be realized.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of drawings]

【図1】本発明の一実施例における部品実装設備の全体
概略構成図である。
FIG. 1 is an overall schematic configuration diagram of a component mounting facility according to an embodiment of the present invention.

【図2】同実施例の部品振り分け動作のフローチャート
の第1の部分図である。
FIG. 2 is a first partial view of a flowchart of a component allocation operation of the same embodiment.

【図3】同実施例の部品振り分け動作のフローチャート
の第2の部分図である。
FIG. 3 is a second partial view of the flowchart of the component allocation operation of the same embodiment.

【図4】同実施例の1次振り分け後の部品切れ状態の説
明図である。
FIG. 4 is an explanatory diagram of a state of parts shortage after primary sorting in the embodiment.

【図5】同実施例の2次振り分け中の部品切れ状態の説
明図である。
FIG. 5 is an explanatory diagram of a component out state during secondary sorting in the embodiment.

【図6】同実施例の3次振り分け後の部品切れ状態の説
明図である。
FIG. 6 is an explanatory view of a state of parts shortage after tertiary sorting in the embodiment.

【符号の説明】[Explanation of symbols]

2 実装機 3 実装ライン 4 制御装置 5 CADシステム 6 実装データベース 2 Mounting machine 3 Mounting line 4 Control device 5 CAD system 6 Mounting database

───────────────────────────────────────────────────── フロントページの続き (72)発明者 佐藤 健一 大阪府門真市大字門真1006番地 松下電器 産業株式会社内 ─────────────────────────────────────────────────── ─── Continuation of the front page (72) Inventor Kenichi Sato 1006 Kadoma, Kadoma City, Osaka Prefecture Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.

Claims (2)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】 部品が実装される基板に関する情報をC
ADデータから得、実装情報を記録してある実装データ
ベースを用いて実装機駆動用のNCデータを生成し、こ
のNCデータに基づいて実装機を動作させる部品実装方
法であって、取り込んだCAD情報から部品毎の使用数
を算出し、実装ラインを構成する各実装機へタクトバラ
ンスが平準化するように部品を振り分け、一旦振り分け
た条件で各部品毎に供給手段の部品の入り数、基板予定
生産数等の条件をもとに実装機毎に部品切れ回数のシミ
ュレーションを行い、そのシミュレーション結果で部品
切れ回数の多い部品品番に関して複数の供給手段に分割
し、部品切れ回数を実装機間で平準化することを特徴と
する部品実装方法。
1. Information on a board on which a component is mounted is provided as C.
A component mounting method for obtaining NC data for driving a mounting machine using a mounting database in which mounting information is recorded, which is obtained from AD data, and operates the mounting machine based on the NC data. Calculate the number of used parts for each part, distribute the parts to each mounter that composes the mounting line so that the tact balance is leveled, and once allocate the parts, the number of parts in the supply means and the board schedule Based on the conditions such as the number of productions, a simulation of the number of parts shortages is performed for each mounting machine, and the simulation result is used to divide the number of parts with a large number of parts shortages into multiple supply means to level the number of parts shortages among mounting machines. Component mounting method characterized by the following:
【請求項2】 部品切れ回数を平準化するように所要の
供給手段を複数に分割した後、タクトシミュレーション
を行い、各実装機間でタクトバランスが平準化するよう
に供給手段を他の実装機との間で入れ替える処理を繰り
返し、タクト及び部品切れ回数が実装機間で平準となる
供給手段の配列を決定することを特徴とする請求項1記
載の部品実装方法。
2. A required supplying means is divided into a plurality of parts so as to level out the number of parts out, and then a tact simulation is performed, so that the supplying means is equalized to other mounting machines so that the takt balance is leveled among the respective mounting machines. 2. The component mounting method according to claim 1, wherein the arrangement of the supplying means is determined so that the tact and the number of times of component breakage are leveled among the mounting machines by repeating the process of exchanging between the mounting machine and the mounting machine.
JP19481695A 1995-07-31 1995-07-31 Component mounting method Expired - Fee Related JP3611374B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP19481695A JP3611374B2 (en) 1995-07-31 1995-07-31 Component mounting method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP19481695A JP3611374B2 (en) 1995-07-31 1995-07-31 Component mounting method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH0946094A true JPH0946094A (en) 1997-02-14
JP3611374B2 JP3611374B2 (en) 2005-01-19

Family

ID=16330741

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP19481695A Expired - Fee Related JP3611374B2 (en) 1995-07-31 1995-07-31 Component mounting method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP3611374B2 (en)

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH11232339A (en) * 1998-02-18 1999-08-27 Pfu Ltd Production system for printed board unit
JP2000101291A (en) * 1998-09-17 2000-04-07 Pfu Ltd Part supply control system in printed board unit production
DE19834620C2 (en) * 1997-08-01 2001-05-31 Boehnlein Claus Burkard Process for upgrading the placement machines of a placement line for a mix of different types of printed circuit boards
JP2008016602A (en) * 2006-07-05 2008-01-24 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Mounting condition determining method
JP2012099614A (en) * 2010-11-01 2012-05-24 Fuji Mach Mfg Co Ltd Schedule generation method for worker operation with pair circuit board work machine group
JP2019091952A (en) * 2019-03-26 2019-06-13 株式会社Fuji Board working system
WO2020003378A1 (en) * 2018-06-26 2020-01-02 株式会社Fuji Component supply unit arrangement determination method and component mounting system
WO2020012522A1 (en) * 2018-07-09 2020-01-16 株式会社日立製作所 Mounting time leveling device for pick-and-place machine and method for leveling mounting time

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE19834620C2 (en) * 1997-08-01 2001-05-31 Boehnlein Claus Burkard Process for upgrading the placement machines of a placement line for a mix of different types of printed circuit boards
JPH11232339A (en) * 1998-02-18 1999-08-27 Pfu Ltd Production system for printed board unit
JP2000101291A (en) * 1998-09-17 2000-04-07 Pfu Ltd Part supply control system in printed board unit production
JP2008016602A (en) * 2006-07-05 2008-01-24 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Mounting condition determining method
JP2012099614A (en) * 2010-11-01 2012-05-24 Fuji Mach Mfg Co Ltd Schedule generation method for worker operation with pair circuit board work machine group
WO2020003378A1 (en) * 2018-06-26 2020-01-02 株式会社Fuji Component supply unit arrangement determination method and component mounting system
JPWO2020003378A1 (en) * 2018-06-26 2021-05-13 株式会社Fuji Component supply unit placement determination method and component mounting system
WO2020012522A1 (en) * 2018-07-09 2020-01-16 株式会社日立製作所 Mounting time leveling device for pick-and-place machine and method for leveling mounting time
JPWO2020012522A1 (en) * 2018-07-09 2021-04-01 株式会社日立製作所 Mounting time leveling device for component mounting machine and mounting time leveling method
JP2019091952A (en) * 2019-03-26 2019-06-13 株式会社Fuji Board working system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP3611374B2 (en) 2005-01-19

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JPH09282374A (en) Mounting factory management support system
JP2016149545A (en) Method for determining setups for constant tables of automatic placement machines, computer software program for implementing method, computer readable medium containing instructions for implementing method, and placement lines having constant tables
JPH11232339A (en) Production system for printed board unit
JP2015531161A (en) Method for assigning multiple printed circuit boards to each mounting line
JPH0946094A (en) Component mounting method
JPH056212A (en) Data preparing method for equipment loading machine
EP0843513B1 (en) Facility operating method
Randhawa et al. An integer programming application to solve sequencer mix problems in printed circuit board production
Johnsson et al. Observations on PCB assembly optimization
JP2009272562A (en) Method of deciding mounting condition
JPH06310898A (en) Parts mount design equipment
JPS6175600A (en) Method of assembling and producing printed substrate
KR0179890B1 (en) Automatic work method of part mounter for surface mounting
JP3003869B2 (en) Electronic package manufacturing equipment
CN100505982C (en) Method for controlling cutting tools of forming / drilling machine for printing circuit board
JPH10335896A (en) Apparatus for mounting electronic component
JPH07129683A (en) One-man product production schedule control optimization supporting system
JP2832318B2 (en) Electronic package manufacturing equipment
Gronalt et al. Component allocation and job sequencing for two series-connected SMD placement machines
JPS62275528A (en) Summerizing method for sheet metal parts
JP2000261190A (en) Method of distributing part feeders in electronic component mounting machine
JP2773018B2 (en) Electronic component mounting machine management device
CN114722576A (en) Simulation method and simulation system
JPH06209199A (en) Mounting process management system
JPH10326996A (en) Method for assigning channel to part and automatic part mounter employing that method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20040818

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20040921

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20041019

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20081029

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20091029

Year of fee payment: 5

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20091029

Year of fee payment: 5

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20101029

Year of fee payment: 6

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20111029

Year of fee payment: 7

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20121029

Year of fee payment: 8

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20131029

Year of fee payment: 9

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees