JP7183519B2 - A surface cutting tool with a hard coating that exhibits excellent chipping resistance - Google Patents

A surface cutting tool with a hard coating that exhibits excellent chipping resistance Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP7183519B2
JP7183519B2 JP2018184992A JP2018184992A JP7183519B2 JP 7183519 B2 JP7183519 B2 JP 7183519B2 JP 2018184992 A JP2018184992 A JP 2018184992A JP 2018184992 A JP2018184992 A JP 2018184992A JP 7183519 B2 JP7183519 B2 JP 7183519B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
layer
average
content ratio
total amount
composite
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2018184992A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2020055041A (en
Inventor
光亮 柳澤
卓也 石垣
大樹 中村
尚志 本間
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Mitsubishi Materials Corp
Original Assignee
Mitsubishi Materials Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Mitsubishi Materials Corp filed Critical Mitsubishi Materials Corp
Priority to JP2018184992A priority Critical patent/JP7183519B2/en
Publication of JP2020055041A publication Critical patent/JP2020055041A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP7183519B2 publication Critical patent/JP7183519B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Description

本発明は、合金鋼、鋳鉄等のように靱性が要求される被削材の切削加工において、特に切刃に対して衝撃的な負荷が作用する高速断続切削加工時に硬質被覆層が優れた耐チッピング性を備えることにより、長期の使用にわたって優れた切削性能を発揮する表面被覆切削工具(以下、「被覆工具」ということがある)に関するものである。 In the cutting of work materials that require toughness, such as alloy steel and cast iron, the present invention provides a hard coating layer that exhibits excellent resistance during high-speed interrupted cutting, in which an impact load acts on the cutting edge. The present invention relates to a surface-coated cutting tool (hereinafter sometimes referred to as "coated tool") that exhibits excellent cutting performance over long-term use by providing chipping resistance.

従来、一般に、炭化タングステン(以下、「WC」で示す)基超硬合金、炭窒化チタン(以下、「TiCN」で示す)基サーメットあるいは立方晶窒化ホウ素(以下、「cBN」で示す)基超高圧焼結体で構成された工具基体(以下、これらを総称して「工具基体」という)の表面に、硬質被覆層として、Ti-Al系の複合窒化物層をPVD法やCVD法により被覆形成した被覆工具があり、これらは、優れた耐摩耗性を発揮することが知られている。
ただ、前記従来のTi-Al系の複合窒化物層や複合炭窒化物層を被覆形成した被覆工具は、比較的耐摩耗性に優れるものの、高速断続切削条件で用いた場合にチッピング等の異常損耗を発生しやすいことから、硬質被覆層の改善についての種々の提案がなされている。
Conventionally, in general, tungsten carbide (hereinafter referred to as "WC") based cemented carbide, titanium carbonitride (hereinafter referred to as "TiCN") based cermet or cubic boron nitride (hereinafter referred to as "cBN") based cemented carbide A Ti—Al-based composite nitride layer is coated as a hard coating layer on the surface of a tool base made of a high-pressure sintered body (hereinafter collectively referred to as “tool base”) by a PVD method or a CVD method. There are formed coated tools, which are known to exhibit excellent wear resistance.
However, although the conventional coated tools coated with the Ti—Al-based composite nitride layer or composite carbonitride layer have relatively excellent wear resistance, they may cause abnormalities such as chipping when used under high-speed interrupted cutting conditions. Various proposals have been made to improve the hard coating layer because it is prone to wear.

例えば、特許文献1には、基材と、該基材上に形成された被覆膜とを備える表面被覆切削工具であって、前記被覆膜は、1層以上のA層と1層以上のB層と2層以上のC層とを含み、前記基材と接する最下層はC層であり、かつA層とB層とはC層を挟んで交互に積層した構造を有し、前記A層は、化学式AlTi(化学式中、a、b、cは各々原子比を示し、0.4<a<0.75、0≦b<0.6、0<c<0.3、a+b+c=1を満たし、MはSi、Cr、V、Y、Zr、B、Nb、MoおよびMnからなる群から選ばれる少なくとも1種の元素を示す。)で表わされる第1複合金属の窒化物、炭窒化物、窒酸化物または炭窒酸化物によって構成され、前記B層は、化学式TiSi(化学式中、d、eは各々原子比を示し、0<e<0.3、d+e=1を満たす。)で表わされる第2複合金属の炭窒化物によって構成され、前記C層は、TiNによって構成されることを特徴とする表面被覆切削工具が記載されている。 For example, Patent Document 1 discloses a surface-coated cutting tool comprising a substrate and a coating film formed on the substrate, wherein the coating film comprises one or more A layers and one or more layers and two or more C layers, wherein the bottom layer in contact with the substrate is the C layer, and the A layer and the B layer have a structure in which the C layer is sandwiched and alternately laminated, The A layer has a chemical formula of Al a Ti b M c (wherein a, b, and c each represent an atomic ratio, 0.4<a<0.75, 0≦b<0.6, 0<c<0 .3, a + b + c = 1, and M represents at least one element selected from the group consisting of Si, Cr, V, Y, Zr, B, Nb, Mo and Mn.) The B layer has a chemical formula of Ti d Sie (where d and e each represent an atomic ratio, and 0<e<0. 3, satisfies d+e=1), and the C layer is composed of TiN.

また、例えば、特許文献2には、超硬合金、サーメットまたは高速度工具鋼を基材とする切削工具の基材上に、(Ti,Al,M)(C1-d)からなる硬質皮膜であって、
0.02≦a≦0.2、0.8≦b≦0.95、a+b+c=1、0.5≦d≦1(Mは1種または2種以上の金属又は半金属元素であり、a、b、cはそれぞれTi、Al、Mの原子比を示す、dはNの原子比を示す。以下同じ)の組成の硬質皮膜を、少なくとも1層以上被覆したことを特徴とする硬質皮膜被覆工具が記載されている。
Further, for example, in Patent Document 2, (Ti a , Al b , M c ) (C 1-d N d ) is a hard film consisting of
0.02 ≤ a ≤ 0.2, 0.8 ≤ b ≤ 0.95, a + b + c = 1, 0.5 ≤ d ≤ 1 (M is one or more metal or metalloid elements, a , b and c respectively indicate the atomic ratios of Ti, Al and M, and d indicates the atomic ratio of N. The same shall apply hereinafter). Tools are listed.

特開2008-183671号公報JP 2008-183671 A 特開2005-88130号公報JP-A-2005-88130

前記特許文献1に記載の硬質皮膜は、耐熱性、靱性を有し、多層構造の各層間の密着性も優れているものの、合金鋼、鋳鉄等の高速断続切削に供した場合には、皮膜の密着強度の他、硬度や強度に劣るため、剥離やチッピングが発生しやすく満足する切削性能を発揮するとはいえない。また、前記特許文献2に記載の硬質皮膜は、AlTiCN皮膜に対し、金属あるいは半金属元素を添加することで皮膜のAl含有量を高めることに言及されており、所定の硬さ、耐酸化性を有するものの耐摩耗性に乏しいため、満足する切削性能を発揮するとは言えない。
そこで、本発明は、合金鋼、鋳鉄等の高速断続切削加工時にも硬質被覆層が優れた耐チッピング性を長期にわたって発揮する被覆工具を提供することを目標とする。
The hard coating described in Patent Document 1 has heat resistance, toughness, and excellent adhesion between each layer of the multilayer structure. In addition to the adhesion strength of , it is inferior in hardness and strength, so peeling and chipping are likely to occur, and it cannot be said that satisfactory cutting performance is exhibited. In addition, the hard coating described in Patent Document 2 mentions that the Al content of the coating is increased by adding a metal or semi-metallic element to the AlTiCN coating, and has a predetermined hardness and oxidation resistance. Although it has poor wear resistance, it cannot be said that satisfactory cutting performance is exhibited.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION Accordingly, an object of the present invention is to provide a coated tool in which a hard coating layer exhibits excellent chipping resistance over a long period of time even during high-speed intermittent cutting of alloy steel, cast iron, and the like.

本発明者は、合金鋼、鋳鉄等の高速断続切削に供した場合であっても、被覆工具の耐チッピング性の改善を図り、長期の使用にわたって優れた耐チッピング性を有する硬質被覆層の組成や組織について鋭意研究を重ねた結果、以下の知見を得た。 The present inventor has attempted to improve the chipping resistance of coated tools even when subjected to high-speed intermittent cutting of alloy steel, cast iron, etc., and has developed a composition of a hard coating layer that has excellent chipping resistance over long-term use. As a result of earnest research on and organization, the following knowledge was obtained.

すなわち、本発明者は、硬質被覆層が少なくともNaCl型の面心立方構造を有する結晶粒を含む柱状結晶組織(柱状結晶粒を有する組織)を有する単層のTiとAlの複合窒化物層または複合炭窒化物層に所定量のMnを添加すると、合金鋼、鋳鉄等の高速断続切削加工時にも耐チッピング性を向上させることができるという新規な知見を見出したのである。
なお、特許文献1では、A層に含まれるM成分としてMnが示され、M成分を特定量含むことにより硬度が飛躍的に向上する旨の記載があるが、特許文献1に記載された硬質被覆層は、耐摩耗性と靱性を向上させるA層と耐熱性と潤滑性を向上させるB層とをC層を挟んで交互に積層するものであって、前記知見を示唆すらしないものである。
That is, the present inventors have found that the hard coating layer has a columnar crystal structure (structure having columnar crystal grains) containing at least NaCl-type face-centered cubic crystal grains, or The present inventors have found a novel finding that adding a predetermined amount of Mn to a composite carbonitride layer can improve chipping resistance even during high-speed interrupted cutting of alloy steel, cast iron, and the like.
In addition, in Patent Document 1, Mn is shown as the M component contained in the A layer, and there is a description that the hardness is dramatically improved by including a specific amount of the M component. The coating layer is formed by alternately laminating an A layer that improves wear resistance and toughness and a B layer that improves heat resistance and lubricity with a C layer interposed therebetween, and does not even suggest the above findings. .

本発明は、前記知見に基づいたものであって、
「(1)炭化タングステン基超硬合金、炭窒化チタン基サーメットまたは立方晶窒化ホウ素基超高圧焼結体のいずれかで構成された工具基体の表面に、硬質被覆層が設けられた表面被覆切削工具において、
(a)前記硬質被覆層が、平均層厚1.0~20.0μmのTiとAlとMnの複合窒化物層または複合炭窒化物層を少なくとも含み、
(b)前記TiとAlとMnの複合窒化物層または複合炭窒化物層は、工具基体の表面と垂直な縦断面から分析した場合、NaCl型の面心立方構造を有する結晶粒を70面積%以上含み、
(c)前記TiとAlとMnの複合窒化物層または複合炭窒化物層は、その組成が、
組成式:(Ti1-α―βAlαMnβ)(Cγ1-γ
で表わされ、AlのTiとAlとMnの合量に占める平均含有割合α、MnのTiとAlとMnの合量に占める平均含有割合βおよびCのCとNの合量に占める平均含有割合γ(但し、α、β、γはいずれも原子比)が、それぞれ、0.500≦α≦0.900、0.005≦β≦0.150、0.505≦α+β≦0.950かつ0.0000≦γ≦0.0050を満足し、
(d)前記TiとAlとMnの複合窒化物層または複合炭窒化物層の前記NaCl型の面心立方構造を有する結晶粒は、柱状結晶組織を有し、その結晶粒の面積加重平均で算出し 平均粒子幅Wが0.1~3.0μm、面積加重平均で算出した平均アスペクト比Aが2.0~10.0であり、
(e)前記TiとAlとMnの複合窒化物層または複合炭窒化物層の縦断面を観察したと き、前記NaCl型の面心立方構造を有する結晶粒の結晶粒界にMnが存在し、かつ、M nが存在する粒界の長さは、前記NaCl型の面心立方構造を有する結晶粒の全粒界の長 さの0.1~10.0%であることを特徴とする表面被覆切削工具。
)前記TiとAlとMnの複合窒化物層または複合炭窒化物層は、微量のClを含有し、CとNとClの合量に占めるClの含有割合ε(但し、εは原子比)は0.0001≦ε≦0.0020を満足することを特徴とする前記()に記載の表面被覆切削工具。()前記TiとAlとMnの複合窒化物層または複合炭窒化物層は、Siをさらに含み、その組成が、
組成式:(Ti1-α―β―δAlαMnβSiδ)(Cγ1-γ
で表わされ、AlのTiとAlとMnとSiの合量に占める平均含有割合α、MnのTiとAlとMnとSiの合量に占める平均含有割合βおよびCのCとNの合量に占める平均含有割合γ、SiのTiとAlとMnとSiの合量に占める平均含有割合δ(但し、α、β、γ、δはいずれも原子比)とするとき、AlのTiとAlとMnの合量に占める平均含有割合α/(1―δ)、MnのTiとAlとMnの合量に占める平均含有割合β/(1―δ)、SiのTiとAlとMnとSiの合量に占める平均含有割合δおよびCのCとNの合量に占める平均含有割合γが、それぞれ、0.500≦α/(1―δ)≦0.900、0.005≦β/(1―δ)≦0.150、0.005≦δ≦0.150かつ0.505≦(α+β)/(1―δ)≦0.950、0.0000≦γ≦0.0050を満足すること、
を特徴とする前記(1)または(2)に記載の表面被覆切削工具。」
である。
The present invention is based on the above findings,
"(1) Surface-coated cutting in which a hard coating layer is provided on the surface of a tool base made of either a tungsten carbide-based cemented carbide, a titanium carbonitride-based cermet, or a cubic boron nitride-based ultra-high pressure sintered body. in the tool,
(a) the hard coating layer includes at least a composite nitride layer or composite carbonitride layer of Ti, Al and Mn with an average layer thickness of 1.0 to 20.0 μm;
(b) The composite nitride layer or composite carbonitride layer of Ti, Al, and Mn has 70 areas of crystal grains having a NaCl-type face-centered cubic structure when analyzed from a longitudinal section perpendicular to the surface of the tool substrate. % or more, including
(c) The composite nitride layer or composite carbonitride layer of Ti, Al and Mn has a composition of
Composition formula: (Ti 1-α-β Al α Mn β ) (C γ N 1-γ )
represented by the average content ratio α of Al in the total amount of Ti, Al and Mn, the average content ratio β of Mn in the total amount of Ti, Al and Mn, and the average of C in the total amount of C and N The content ratio γ (where α, β, and γ are all atomic ratios) is 0.500 ≤ α ≤ 0.900, 0.005 ≤ β ≤ 0.150, and 0.505 ≤ α + β ≤ 0.950, respectively and satisfies 0.0000 ≤ γ ≤ 0.0050,
(d) The crystal grains having the NaCl-type face-centered cubic structure of the composite nitride layer or composite carbonitride layer of Ti, Al, and Mn have a columnar crystal structure, and the area-weighted average of the crystal grains is The calculated average particle width W is 0.1 to 3.0 μm, the average aspect ratio A calculated by area weighted average is 2.0 to 10.0,
(e) When observing the longitudinal section of the composite nitride layer or composite carbonitride layer of Ti, Al, and Mn, Mn is present at the grain boundaries of the crystal grains having the NaCl-type face-centered cubic structure. And, the length of the grain boundary where Mn exists is 0.1 to 10.0% of the length of all grain boundaries of the crystal grains having the NaCl type face-centered cubic structure. Surface coated cutting tools.
( 2 ) The composite nitride layer or composite carbonitride layer of Ti, Al, and Mn contains a small amount of Cl, and the content ratio ε of Cl in the total amount of C, N, and Cl (where ε is an atom ratio) satisfies 0.0001 ε≦0.0020. ( 3 ) The composite nitride layer or composite carbonitride layer of Ti, Al, and Mn further contains Si, and its composition is
Composition formula: (Ti 1-α-β-δ Al α Mn β Si δ ) (C γ N 1-γ )
represented by the average content ratio α of Al in the total amount of Ti, Al, Mn and Si, the average content ratio β of Mn in the total amount of Ti, Al, Mn and Si, and the total amount of C and N of C When the average content ratio γ in the amount and the average content ratio δ in the total amount of Ti, Al, Mn and Si of Si (where α, β, γ, and δ are all atomic ratios), Ti in Al and Average content ratio α / (1-δ) in the total amount of Al and Mn, average content ratio β / (1-δ) in the total amount of Ti, Al and Mn in Mn, Ti and Al and Mn in Si The average content ratio δ in the total amount of Si and the average content ratio γ of C in the total amount of C and N are 0.500≦α/(1−δ)≦0.900 and 0.005≦β, respectively. / (1-δ) ≤ 0.150, 0.005 ≤ δ ≤ 0.150 and 0.505 ≤ (α + β) / (1-δ) ≤ 0.950, 0.0000 ≤ γ ≤ 0.0050 to do
The surface-coated cutting tool according to (1) or (2) , characterized by: "
is.

本発明工具は柱状結晶組織を有するTiとAlとの複合窒化物層または複合炭窒化物層にMnを含有することによって、合金鋼、鋳鉄等の高速断続切削時の耐熱亀裂性が向上し、優れた耐チッピング性を発揮する。 The tool of the present invention contains Mn in the composite nitride layer or composite carbonitride layer of Ti and Al having a columnar crystal structure, thereby improving thermal crack resistance during high-speed interrupted cutting of alloy steel, cast iron, etc. Exhibits excellent chipping resistance.

本発明について、以下に詳細に説明する。なお、本明細書および特許請求の範囲において数値範囲を「~」で表現するとき、その範囲は上限および下限の数値を含んでいる。 The present invention is described in detail below. In addition, when a numerical range is expressed by "-" in the present specification and claims, the range includes upper and lower numerical values.

TiAlMn(Si)CN層の平均層厚:
本発明の硬質被覆層は、組成式:(Ti1-α-β-δAlαMnβSiδ)(Cγ1-γ)で表されるTiAlMn(Si)CN層(Siは任意添加成分であるためSiを括弧で囲んで表した)を少なくとも含む。このTiAlMn(Si)CN層は、硬さが高く、優れた耐チッピング性、耐摩耗性を有するが、特に平均層厚が1.0~20.0μmのとき、その効果が際立って発揮される。これは、平均層厚が1.0μm未満では、層厚が薄いため長期の使用にわたっての耐摩耗性を十分確保することができず、一方、その平均層厚が20.0μmを超えると、TiAlMn(Si)CN層の結晶粒が粗大化しやすくなり、チッピングを発生しやすくなる。
したがって、その平均層厚を1.0~20.0μmと定めた。より好ましくは2.0~15.0μmである。
また、ここでいうTiAlMn(Si)CN層は、微量であればO元素やCl元素等の不可避的に含まれることがある元素があっても前述の発明の効果を損なわない。O元素については出来るだけ含まない方が良い。また、後述するように、Cl元素は所定量であれば、前記層の靭性を低下させずに潤滑性を高めることができる。
Average layer thickness of TiAlMn(Si)CN layer:
The hard coating layer of the present invention is a TiAlMn ( Si ) CN layer (Si is an optional Since Si is a component, Si is enclosed in parentheses). This TiAlMn(Si)CN layer has high hardness and excellent chipping resistance and wear resistance, and the effect is particularly noticeable when the average layer thickness is 1.0 to 20.0 μm. . This is because if the average layer thickness is less than 1.0 μm, the layer thickness is too thin to ensure sufficient wear resistance over long-term use. The crystal grains of the (Si)CN layer tend to coarsen, and chipping tends to occur.
Therefore, the average layer thickness was set to 1.0 to 20.0 μm. More preferably, it is 2.0 to 15.0 μm.
In addition, the TiAlMn(Si)CN layer referred to here does not impair the effects of the invention described above even if elements such as O element and Cl element are inevitably contained in a very small amount. It is better not to contain the O element as much as possible. Further, as will be described later, a predetermined amount of Cl element can improve the lubricity of the layer without lowering the toughness of the layer.

TiAlMn(Si)CN層内のNaCl型の面心立方構造を有する結晶粒の面積割合:
前記TiAlMn(Si)CN層において、NaCl型の面心立方晶構造を有する結晶粒が、面積割合として70面積%以上であることが好ましい。これにより、高硬度であるNaCl型の面心立方晶構造を有する結晶粒の面積割合が六方晶構造の結晶粒に比べて相対的に高くなり、硬さが向上するという効果を得ることができる。この面積割合は、85面積%以上がより好ましい。
ここで、NaCl型の面心立方構造の面積割合は以下のような手順で算出できる。NaCl型の面心立方構造を有する結晶粒の面積割合は高分解能電子線後方散乱回折装置を用いて縦断面(工具基体に垂直な断面)において層厚方向に0.02μm間隔で、幅10μm、縦は層厚(平均層厚)の範囲内での測定を実施し、全測定点に占めるTiAlMn(Si)CN層を構成するNaCl型面心立方構造を有する測定点数を求め、面積割合を求める。同様の測定を5視野以上で繰り返し平均値を算出することで、TiAlMn(Si)CN層のNaCl型の面心立方構造を有する結晶粒が占める面積割合(面積%)を求める。
Area ratio of crystal grains having a NaCl-type face-centered cubic structure in the TiAlMn(Si)CN layer:
In the TiAlMn(Si)CN layer, it is preferable that crystal grains having a NaCl-type face-centered cubic crystal structure account for 70 area % or more as an area ratio. As a result, the area ratio of crystal grains having a face-centered cubic crystal structure of the NaCl type, which has high hardness, becomes relatively higher than that of crystal grains having a hexagonal crystal structure, and the effect of improving hardness can be obtained. . This area ratio is more preferably 85 area % or more.
Here, the area ratio of the NaCl-type face-centered cubic structure can be calculated by the following procedure. The area ratio of the NaCl-type crystal grains having a face-centered cubic structure was measured using a high-resolution electron beam backscatter diffraction device, and the width was 10 μm at intervals of 0.02 μm in the layer thickness direction in a longitudinal section (a section perpendicular to the tool substrate). Vertically measure within the range of layer thickness (average layer thickness), determine the number of measurement points having a NaCl-type face-centered cubic structure that constitutes the TiAlMn(Si)CN layer occupying all measurement points, and determine the area ratio. . By repeating the same measurement for five or more fields of view and calculating the average value, the area ratio (area %) occupied by the crystal grains having the NaCl-type face-centered cubic structure of the TiAlMn(Si)CN layer is obtained.

TiAlMn(Si)CN層の平均組成:
(1)本発明におけるSiを含有しないときのTiAlMn(Si)CN層の組成は、
組成式:(Ti1-α―βAlαMnβ)(Cγ1-γ)で表され、
AlのTi、Al、Mnの合量に占める平均含有割合(以下、「Alの平均含有割合」という)αが、
MnのTi、Al、Mnの合量に占める平均含有割合(以下、「Mnの平均含有割合」という)βが、
CのC、Nの合量に占める平均含有割合(以下、「Cの平均含有割合」という)γが、
それぞれ、0.500≦α≦0.900、0.005≦β≦0.150、0.505≦α+β≦0.950、0.0000≦γ≦0.0050(但し、α、β、γはいずれも原子比)を満足するように定める。
その理由は、以下のとおりである。
Alの平均含有割合αが0.500未満であると、TiAlMn(Si)CN層は硬さが劣るため、合金鋼や鋳鉄等の高速断続切削に供した場合には、耐摩耗性が十分でなく、一方、0.900を超えると硬さが劣る六方晶を含有しやすくなり、耐摩耗性が低下する。したがって、0.500≦α≦0.900としたが、より好ましくは0.750≦α≦0.900である。
Mnの平均含有割合βが0.005未満であると、高温強度を確保できず異常損傷を生じやすくなる。また、0.150を超えると高温硬さを確保できなくなり、耐摩耗性が低下する。
また、Cの平均含有割合γを0.0000≦γ≦0.0050と定めたのは、この範囲において耐チッピング性を保ちつつ硬さを向上させることができるためである。
Average composition of TiAlMn(Si)CN layer:
(1) The composition of the TiAlMn(Si)CN layer containing no Si in the present invention is
Composition formula: represented by (Ti 1-α-β Al α Mn β ) (C γ N 1-γ ),
The average content ratio of Al in the total amount of Ti, Al, and Mn (hereinafter referred to as “average content ratio of Al”) α is
The average content ratio of Mn in the total amount of Ti, Al, and Mn (hereinafter referred to as “average content ratio of Mn”) β is
The average content ratio of C in the total amount of C and N (hereinafter referred to as “average content ratio of C”) γ is
0.500≤α≤0.900, 0.005≤β≤0.150, 0.505≤α+β≤0.950, 0.0000≤γ≤0.0050 (where α, β, γ are Both are determined to satisfy the atomic ratio).
The reason is as follows.
When the average content ratio α of Al is less than 0.500, the TiAlMn(Si)CN layer is inferior in hardness, so that when subjected to high-speed intermittent cutting of alloy steel, cast iron, etc., the wear resistance is insufficient. On the other hand, if it exceeds 0.900, it tends to contain hexagonal crystals that are inferior in hardness, resulting in a decrease in wear resistance. Therefore, 0.500≦α≦0.900, but more preferably 0.750≦α≦0.900.
If the average content ratio β of Mn is less than 0.005, high-temperature strength cannot be ensured, and abnormal damage tends to occur. On the other hand, if it exceeds 0.150, high-temperature hardness cannot be ensured, and wear resistance decreases.
The reason why the average content ratio γ of C is set to 0.0000≦γ≦0.0050 is that the hardness can be improved while maintaining the chipping resistance within this range.

(2)本発明におけるSiを含有するときのTiAlMn(Si)CN層の組成は、
組成式:(Ti1-α―β―δAlαMnβSiδ)(Cγ1-γ)で表され、
AlのTi、Al、Mnの合量に占める平均含有割合(以下、「Si含有量で補正されたAlの平均含有割合」という)α/(1-δ)が、
MnのTi、Al、Mnの合量に占める平均含有割合(以下、「Si含有量で補正されたMnの平均含有割合」という)β/(1-δ)が、
SiのTi、Al、Mn、Siの合量に占める平均含有割合(以下、「Siの平均含有割合」という)δが、
CのC、Nの合量に占める平均含有割合(以下、「Cの平均含有割合」という)γが、
それぞれ、0.500≦α/(1-δ)≦0.900、0.005≦β/(1-δ)≦0.150、0.005≦δ≦0.150、0.0000≦γ≦0.0050(但し、α、β、γ、δはいずれも原子比)を満足するように定める。
その理由は、Si含有量で補正されたAl、Mn、Cの平均含有割合については、前述のAl、Mn、Cの平均含有割合と同様であり、Siの平均含有割合については、0.0050未満であると高温強度を確保できず異常損傷を生じやすくなるためであり、また、0.150を超えると高温硬さを確保できなくなり、耐摩耗性が低下するためである。
なお、0.005≦δ≦0.150であるとき、AlのTi、Al、Mn、Siの合量に占める平均含有割合αの取り得る範囲は、小数点第3位までの表記で、0.425≦α≦0.896である。同様にMnのTi、Al、Mn、Siの合量に占める平均含有割合βの取り得る範囲は、0.004≦β≦0.149である。これら二式はともに左辺の等号成立はδ=0.150のとき、右辺の等号成立はδ=0.005のときである。ただし、α、βの関係は同時に0.505≦(α+β)/(1―δ)≦0.950を満足しなければならない。また、この式からα+β+δが少なくとも満たすべき範囲は、0.505×(1―δ)+δ≦α+β+δ≦0.950×(1―δ)+δゆえ、0.505+0.495δ≦α+β+δ≦0.950+0.05δとなり、少なくとも0.507<α+β+δ≦0.958を満たす。なお、下限は少数第4位を四捨五入した。示した下限に最も近い値を与えるのはδ=0.005のときであり、右辺の等号成立のときはδ=0.150のときである。
(2) The composition of the TiAlMn(Si)CN layer containing Si in the present invention is
Composition formula: represented by (Ti 1-α-β-δ Al α Mn β Si δ ) (C γ N 1-γ ),
The average content ratio of Al in the total amount of Ti, Al, and Mn (hereinafter referred to as “the average content ratio of Al corrected by the Si content”) α / (1-δ) is
The average content ratio of Mn to the total amount of Ti, Al, and Mn (hereinafter referred to as “average content ratio of Mn corrected by Si content”) β/(1−δ) is
The average content ratio of Si in the total amount of Ti, Al, Mn, and Si (hereinafter referred to as “average content ratio of Si”) δ is
The average content ratio of C in the total amount of C and N (hereinafter referred to as “average content ratio of C”) γ is
0.500≤α/(1-δ)≤0.900, 0.005≤β/(1-δ)≤0.150, 0.005≤δ≤0.150, 0.0000≤γ≤0, respectively 0.0050 (where α, β, γ, and δ are all atomic ratios).
The reason for this is that the average content ratio of Al, Mn, and C corrected by the Si content is the same as the average content ratio of Al, Mn, and C described above, and the average content ratio of Si is 0.0050. If it is less than 0.150, high-temperature strength cannot be ensured and abnormal damage tends to occur.
When 0.005≦δ≦0.150, the possible range of the average content ratio α in the total amount of Ti, Al, Mn, and Si in Al is 0.005 to the third decimal place. 425≦α≦0.896. Similarly, the possible range of the average content ratio β of Mn in the total amount of Ti, Al, Mn and Si is 0.004≦β≦0.149. In both of these two equations, the equality of the left side is established when .delta.=0.150, and the equality of the right side is established when .delta.=0.005. However, the relationship between α and β must simultaneously satisfy 0.505≤(α+β)/(1-δ)≤0.950. Also, from this formula, the range that α+β+δ should at least satisfy is 0.505×(1−δ)+δ≦α+β+δ≦0.950×(1−δ)+δ, so 0.505+0.495δ≦α+β+δ≦0.950+0. 05δ, satisfying at least 0.507<α+β+δ≦0.958. The lower limit is rounded off to the fourth decimal place. The closest value to the lower limit shown is given when .delta.=0.005, and when the equality on the right side holds, .delta.=0.150.

Clの含有割合:
本発明の硬質被覆層は微量のClを含んでもよい。本発明の硬質被覆層におけるTiAlMn(Si)CN層の成膜に際して、反応ガス成分としてHClガスを用いた場合、あるいは用いなくてもAlCl、TiCl、SiClを使用することから、TiAlMn(Si)CN層中には微量のClが不可避的に含有されるが、CとNとClの合量に対して、その平均含有割合ε(原子比)は、0.0001≦ε≦0.0020であることが好ましい。その理由は、Clの量がこの範囲にあるとき、前記層の靭性を低下させずに潤滑性を高めることができるためである。しかし、平均塩素含有割合が0.0001未満であると潤滑性向上効果は少なく、一方、平均塩素含有割合が0.0020を超えると、耐チッピング性が低下するため好ましくない。
Content ratio of Cl:
The hard coating layer of the present invention may contain trace amounts of Cl. When forming the TiAlMn(Si)CN layer in the hard coating layer of the present invention, when HCl gas is used as a reaction gas component, or even if not used, AlCl 3 , TiCl 4 and SiCl 4 are used. Si) A small amount of Cl is inevitably contained in the CN layer. 0020 is preferred. The reason is that when the amount of Cl is in this range, the lubricity can be enhanced without reducing the toughness of the layer. However, if the average chlorine content is less than 0.0001, the effect of improving lubricity is small.

次に、Al、Mn、Si、Clの各平均含有割合(α、β、δ、ε)の測定方法について説明する。電子線マイクロアナライザ(Electron-Probe-Micro-Analyser:EPMA)を用い、TiAlMn(Si)CN層の表面を研磨した試料において、電子線を試料表面側から照射し、得られた特性X線の解析結果の10点平均からAlの平均含有割合α、Mnの平均含有割合β、Siの平均含有割合δ、Clの平均含有割合εを求める。
また、Cの平均含有割合γについては、二次イオン質量分析(Secondary-Ion-Mass-Spectrometry:SIMS)により求める。イオンビームを試料表面側から70μm×70μmの範囲に照射し、スパッタリング作用によって放出された成分について深さ方向の濃度測定を行い、Cの平均含有割合γはTiAlMn(Si)CN層についての深さ方向の平均値を求める。
Next, a method for measuring each average content ratio (α, β, δ, ε) of Al, Mn, Si and Cl will be described. Using an electron-probe-micro-analyser (EPMA), in a sample in which the surface of the TiAlMn(Si)CN layer is polished, an electron beam is irradiated from the sample surface side, and the obtained characteristic X-ray analysis. From the 10-point average of the results, the average Al content ratio α, the average Mn content ratio β, the average Si content ratio δ, and the average Cl content ratio ε are obtained.
Further, the average content ratio γ of C is obtained by secondary-ion-mass-spectrometry (SIMS). An ion beam is irradiated in a range of 70 μm × 70 μm from the sample surface side, and the concentration in the depth direction is measured for the components emitted by the sputtering action. Find the average of the directions.

TiAlMn(Si)CN層内の柱状結晶組織の平均粒子幅とアスペクト比:
本発明において、TiAlMn(Si)CN層は柱状結晶組織を有し、その組織における結晶粒の縦断面における平均粒子幅Wが0.1~3.0μm、平均アスペクト比Aが2.0~10.0であることが望ましい。その理由は、次のとおりである。平均粒子幅Wが0.1μmよりも小さい微粒結晶になると粒界の増加による耐塑性変形性の低下、耐酸化性の低下により異常損傷に至りやすくなる。一方、平均粒子幅Wが3.0μmよりも大きくなると粗大に成長した粒子の存在により、靱性が低下しやすくなる。また、平均アスペクト比Aが2.0よりも小さい粒状結晶になると切削時に皮膜表面に生じるせん断応力に対してその界面が破壊起点となりやすくなってしまいチッピングの原因となる。また、平均アスペクト比Aが10.0を超えると、切削時に刃先に微小なチッピングが生じ、隣り合う柱状結晶組織に欠けが生じた場合に、硬質被覆層表面に生じるせん断応力に対しての抗力が小さくなりやすく、柱状結晶組織が破断することで一気に損傷が進行し、大きなチッピングを生じる。したがって、結晶粒の平均粒子幅Wが0.1~3.0μm、平均アスペクト比Aが2.0~10.0であることが望ましい。
Average Grain Width and Aspect Ratio of Columnar Crystal Structure in TiAlMn(Si)CN Layer:
In the present invention, the TiAlMn(Si)CN layer has a columnar crystal structure, the average grain width W in the longitudinal section of the crystal grains in the structure is 0.1 to 3.0 μm, and the average aspect ratio A is 2.0 to 10. .0 is desirable. The reason is as follows. If the average grain width W is less than 0.1 μm, fine grain crystals are prone to abnormal damage due to a decrease in resistance to plastic deformation and a decrease in oxidation resistance due to an increase in grain boundaries. On the other hand, when the average grain width W is larger than 3.0 μm, the presence of coarsely grown grains tends to lower the toughness. In addition, if the average aspect ratio A is less than 2.0, the interface between the granular crystals tends to act as a fracture starting point against the shear stress generated on the film surface during cutting, which causes chipping. In addition, when the average aspect ratio A exceeds 10.0, fine chipping occurs on the cutting edge during cutting, and when adjacent columnar crystal structures are chipped, resistance to shear stress generated on the surface of the hard coating layer is likely to become small, and breakage of the columnar crystal structure causes damage to progress at once, resulting in large chipping. Therefore, it is desirable that the average grain width W of the crystal grains is 0.1 to 3.0 μm and the average aspect ratio A is 2.0 to 10.0.

次に、結晶粒の平均粒子幅Wと平均アスペクト比A、および柱状結晶組織を有するNaCl型の面心立方構造を有する結晶粒の面積割合の算出方法について説明する。まず、硬質被覆層の縦断面における、工具基体に平行な方向に幅10μm、縦は層厚(平均層厚)分の観察視野において結晶粒界を判定する。まず、高分解能電子線後方散乱回折装置を用いて前記観察視野面内を0.02μm間隔で解析し、観察視野面内のNaCl型の面心立方構造を有する測定点を求める。このNaCl型の面心立方構造を有する測定点の中で隣接する測定点(以下、ピクセルという)の間で5度以上の方位差がある場合、あるいは隣接するNaCl型の面心立方構造を有する測定点がない場合はそこを粒界と定義する。ここで、縦断面とは、工具基体表面に垂直な断面である。そして、粒界で囲まれた領域でNaCl型の面心立方構造を有する測定点を含むものを1つの結晶粒と定義する。ただし、隣接するピクセル全てと5度以上の方位差がある、あるいは、隣接するNaCl型の面心立方構造を有する測定点がないような、単独に存在するピクセルは結晶粒とせず、2ピクセル以上が連結しているものを結晶粒として取り扱う。このようにして、粒界判定を行い、結晶粒を特定する。次に、画像処理を行い、ある結晶粒iにおける工具基体と垂直方向の最大長さH、結晶粒iにおける基体と水平方向の最大長さである粒子幅W、結晶粒iの面積Sを求める。結晶粒iのアスペクト比AはA=H/Wとして算出する。このようにして、観察視野内の少なくとも20以上の結晶粒の粒子幅W~W(n≧20)を数1により面積加重平均し、前記結晶粒の平均粒子幅Wとする。また、同様にして前記結晶粒のアスペクト比A~A(n≧20)を求め、数2により面積加重平均して、前記結晶粒の平均アスペクト比Aとする。平均粒子幅W、平均アスペクト比Aはそれぞれ以下のような式に基づき算出できる。 Next, a method for calculating the average grain width W and average aspect ratio A of the crystal grains, and the area ratio of the crystal grains having a NaCl-type face-centered cubic structure with a columnar crystal structure will be described. First, in the longitudinal section of the hard coating layer, grain boundaries are determined in an observation field of view of 10 μm wide in the direction parallel to the tool substrate and layer thickness (average layer thickness) in the vertical direction. First, the inside of the observation field plane is analyzed at intervals of 0.02 μm using a high-resolution electron beam backscatter diffraction apparatus to obtain measurement points having a NaCl-type face-centered cubic structure within the observation field plane. If there is an orientation difference of 5 degrees or more between adjacent measurement points (hereinafter referred to as pixels) among measurement points having this NaCl-type face-centered cubic structure, or if adjacent measurement points have an NaCl-type face-centered cubic structure If there is no measurement point, it is defined as the grain boundary. Here, the longitudinal section is a section perpendicular to the surface of the tool base. One crystal grain is defined as a region surrounded by grain boundaries and including a measurement point having a NaCl-type face-centered cubic structure. However, a single pixel that has an orientation difference of 5 degrees or more from all adjacent pixels, or that has no measurement point with an adjacent NaCl-type face-centered cubic structure, is not regarded as a crystal grain, and is two pixels or more. are connected as crystal grains. In this manner, grain boundary determination is performed to specify crystal grains. Next, image processing is performed to determine the maximum length H i of a certain crystal grain i in the direction perpendicular to the tool substrate, the grain width W i that is the maximum length of the crystal grain i in the horizontal direction to the substrate, and the area S of the crystal grain i. Find i . The aspect ratio A i of the crystal grain i is calculated as A i =H i /W i . In this way, the grain widths W 1 to W n (n≧20) of at least 20 or more crystal grains within the observation field are averaged according to Equation 1, and the average grain width W of the crystal grains is obtained. Similarly, the aspect ratios A 1 to A n (n≧20) of the crystal grains are obtained, and the average aspect ratio A of the crystal grains is obtained by area-weighted averaging according to Equation 2. The average grain width W and the average aspect ratio A can be calculated based on the following formulas.

Figure 0007183519000001
Figure 0007183519000001

Figure 0007183519000002
Figure 0007183519000002

Mnが存在する結晶粒界の粒界の長さの割合:
前記TiAlMn(Si)CN層のNaCl型の面心立方構造を有する結晶粒の結晶粒界にMnが存在し、かつ、Mnが存在する粒界の長さは、当該結晶粒の全粒界長さの合計の0.1~10.0%であることが好ましい。その理由は、粒界にMnが適量存在することにより、切削時に粒界に沿って進展することが多い亀裂の進展を抑制する効果を発揮するためである。当該結晶粒の全粒界長さに占めるMn元素が存在する粒界の長さが0.1%よりも小さいと前記効果が十分に得られず、10.0%を超えると、粒界における強度が減少し亀裂が発生しやすくなり、異常損傷を生じやすくなるためである。
当該結晶粒の全粒界長さに占めるMn元素が存在する粒界の長さの割合の算出方法について、以下に説明する。前述の高分解能電子線後方散乱回折装置による粒界のマッピングに加え、同時にFE(Field Emission)-EPMAの組成マッピングを行い、粒界上にMn元素が検出された結晶粒の粒界の合計の長さを算出し、全粒界長さに占める割合を計算することにより求めることができる。なお、FE-EPMAの測定間隔はEBSDと同等以下(0.02μm間隔以下)で実施する。
Grain boundary length ratio of grain boundaries where Mn is present:
Mn is present at the grain boundaries of the crystal grains having a NaCl-type face-centered cubic structure in the TiAlMn(Si)CN layer, and the length of the grain boundaries where Mn is present is the total grain boundary length of the crystal grains. It is preferably 0.1 to 10.0% of the total thickness. The reason for this is that the presence of an appropriate amount of Mn in the grain boundaries exerts an effect of suppressing the propagation of cracks that often propagate along the grain boundaries during cutting. If the length of the grain boundary where the Mn element exists in the total grain boundary length of the crystal grain is less than 0.1%, the above effect cannot be sufficiently obtained, and if it exceeds 10.0%, the grain boundary This is because the strength is reduced, cracks are likely to occur, and abnormal damage is likely to occur.
A method for calculating the ratio of the length of the grain boundary where the Mn element exists to the total grain boundary length of the crystal grain will be described below. In addition to the grain boundary mapping by the high-resolution electron beam backscatter diffraction device described above, FE (Field Emission)-EPMA composition mapping was performed at the same time, and the total grain boundary of the crystal grains in which the Mn element was detected on the grain boundary. It can be obtained by calculating the length and calculating the proportion of the total grain boundary length. Note that the measurement interval of FE-EPMA is equal to or less than that of EBSD (0.02 μm interval or less).

下部層および上部層:
本発明では、硬質被覆層として前記TiAlMn(Si)CN層を設けることによって十分な耐チッピング性、耐摩耗性を有するが、Tiの炭化物層、窒化物層、炭窒化物層、炭酸化物層および炭窒酸化物層のうちの1層または2層以上からなり、0.1~20.0μmの合計平均層厚を有するTi化合物層を含む下部層を設けた場合、および/または、少なくとも酸化アルミニウム層を含む上部層が1.0~25.0μmの合計平均層厚で設けられた場合には、これらの層が奏する効果と相俟って、一層優れた特性を発揮することができる。
Tiの炭化物層、窒化物層、炭窒化物層、炭酸化物層および炭窒酸化物層のうちの1層または2層以上からなり、0.1~20.0μmの合計平均層厚を有するTi化合物層を含む下部層を設ける場合、下部層の合計平均層厚が0.1μm未満では、下部層の効果が十分に奏されず、一方、20.0μmを超えると結晶粒が粗大化し易くなり、チッピングを発生しやすくなる。また、酸化アルミニウム層を含む上部層の合計平均層厚が1.0μm未満では、上部層の効果が十分に奏されず、一方、25.0μmを超えると結晶粒が粗大化し易くなり、チッピングを発生しやすくなる。
Bottom layer and top layer:
In the present invention, by providing the TiAlMn(Si)CN layer as the hard coating layer, sufficient chipping resistance and wear resistance are obtained. provided with a lower layer comprising one or more layers of carbonitride oxide layers and containing a Ti compound layer having a total average layer thickness of 0.1 to 20.0 μm, and/or at least aluminum oxide When the upper layer including the layers is provided with a total average layer thickness of 1.0 to 25.0 μm, further excellent properties can be exhibited in combination with the effects of these layers.
Ti having a total average layer thickness of 0.1 to 20.0 μm consisting of one or more layers selected from a Ti carbide layer, a nitride layer, a carbonitride layer, a carbonate layer and a carbonitride layer When a lower layer containing a compound layer is provided, if the total average layer thickness of the lower layer is less than 0.1 μm, the effect of the lower layer is not sufficiently exhibited. , chipping is more likely to occur. Further, if the total average layer thickness of the upper layer including the aluminum oxide layer is less than 1.0 μm, the effect of the upper layer is not sufficiently exhibited, while if it exceeds 25.0 μm, the crystal grains tend to coarsen, causing chipping. more likely to occur.

製造方法:
本発明のTiAlMn(Si)CN層は、例えば、次のようにして作製することができる。
Production method:
The TiAlMn(Si)CN layer of the present invention can be produced, for example, as follows.

工具基体の表面に、CVD装置を用い、NHとH、Nとからなるガス群Aと、AlCl、TiCl、C、HCl、SiCl、Mn(C、Hからなるガス群B、およびおのおのガスの供給方法として、反応ガス組成(ガス群Aおよびガス群Bを合わせた全体に対する容量%)、反応雰囲気圧力、反応雰囲気温度、供給周期、1周期当たりのガス供給時間、ガス群Aとガス群Bとの供給の位相差を以下のような成膜条件で熱CVD法を用い、所定平均層厚のTiAlMn(Si)CN層を成膜した。
反応ガス組成(%は容量%を表し、ガス群Aとガス群Bの和を100容量%とする)
ガス群A:NH:2.00~3.00%、H:15.00~25.00%、
:15.00~25.00%
ガス群B:AlCl:0.50~1.00%、TiCl:0.07~0.50%、
:0.00~0.50%、HCl:0.00~0.10%、
SiCl:0.00~0.20%、
Mn(C:0.01~0.20%、H:残
反応雰囲気圧力:4.5~5.0kPa
反応雰囲気温度:700~850℃
供給周期:1.00~5.00秒
1周期当たりのガス供給時間:0.15~0.25秒
ガス群Aとガス群Bとの供給の位相差:0.10~0.20秒
A gas group A consisting of NH 3 , H 2 and N 2 and AlCl 3 , TiCl 4 , C 2 H 4 , HCl, SiCl 4 and Mn(C 5 H 5 ) were applied to the surface of the tool substrate using a CVD apparatus. 2 , gas group B consisting of H2 , and the method of supplying each gas, reaction gas composition (% by volume of the total of gas group A and gas group B), reaction atmosphere pressure, reaction atmosphere temperature, supply cycle, 1 A TiAlMn(Si)CN layer with a predetermined average layer thickness was formed using a thermal CVD method under the following film formation conditions for the gas supply time per cycle and the phase difference between the supply of gas group A and gas group B: .
Reaction gas composition (% represents volume %, and the sum of gas group A and gas group B is 100 volume %)
Gas group A: NH 3 : 2.00 to 3.00%, H 2 : 15.00 to 25.00%,
N2 : 15.00 to 25.00%
Gas group B: AlCl 3 : 0.50 to 1.00%, TiCl 4 : 0.07 to 0.50%,
C2H4 : 0.00-0.50%, HCl: 0.00-0.10% ,
SiCl4 : 0.00-0.20%,
Mn(C 5 H 5 ) 2 : 0.01 to 0.20%, H 2 : Residual reaction atmosphere pressure: 4.5 to 5.0 kPa
Reaction atmosphere temperature: 700-850°C
Supply cycle: 1.00 to 5.00 seconds Gas supply time per cycle: 0.15 to 0.25 seconds Supply phase difference between gas group A and gas group B: 0.10 to 0.20 seconds

次に、本発明の被覆工具を実施例により具体的に説明する。
なお、以下の実施例では、工具基体として、WC基超硬合金を用いた場合について説明するが、TiCN基サーメットおよびcBN基超高圧焼結体を工具基体として用いた場合も同様である。また、被覆工具としてはインサートに限らず、ドリル、メタルソー、リーマー、タップなどの切削工具に、本発明の被覆工具は好適に使用できることは言うまでもない。
Next, the coated tool of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to examples.
In the following examples, the case of using a WC-based cemented carbide as a tool substrate will be described, but the same applies to the case of using a TiCN-based cermet and a cBN-based ultrahigh-pressure sintered body as a tool substrate. Needless to say, the coated tool of the present invention can be suitably used not only for inserts but also for cutting tools such as drills, metal saws, reamers, and taps.

原料粉末として、いずれも0.1~3.0μmの平均粒径を有するWC粉末、TiC粉末、ZrC粉末、TaC粉末、NbC粉末、Cr粉末、TiN粉末およびCo粉末を用意し、これら原料粉末を、表1に示される配合組成に配合し、さらにワックスを加えてアセトン中で24時間ボールミル混合し、減圧乾燥した後、98MPaの圧力で所定形状の圧粉体にプレス成形し、この圧粉体を5Paの真空中、1370~1470℃の範囲内の所定の温度に1時間保持の条件で真空焼結し、焼結後、ISO規格SEEN1203AFSNのインサート形状をもったWC基超硬合金製の工具基体A~CおよびISO規格CNMG120412のインサート形状をもったWC基超硬合金製の工具基体D~Fをそれぞれ製造した。 As raw material powders, WC powder, TiC powder, ZrC powder, TaC powder, NbC powder, Cr 3 C 2 powder, TiN powder and Co powder, all having an average particle size of 0.1 to 3.0 μm, were prepared. The raw material powder was blended according to the formulation shown in Table 1, wax was added, and the mixture was mixed in a ball mill in acetone for 24 hours. The green compact is vacuum-sintered in a vacuum of 5 Pa at a predetermined temperature within the range of 1370 to 1470° C. for 1 hour. and tool substrates D to F made of WC-based cemented carbide having an insert shape according to ISO standard CNMG120412.

次に、これらの工具基体A~Fの表面に、CVD装置を用い、TiAlMn(Si)CN層をCVDにより形成した。
CVD成膜条件は、次のとおりである。
表3に示される形成条件A~K、すなわち、NHとH、Nとからなるガス群Aと、AlCl、TiCl、C、HCl、SiCl、Mn(C、Hからなるガス群B、および、おのおのガスの供給方法として、反応ガス組成(%は、ガス群Aおよびガス群Bを合わせた全体に対する容量%)を、ガス群AとしてNH:2.00~3.00%、H:15.00~25.00%、N:15.00~25.00%、ガス群BとしてAlCl:0.50~1.00%、TiCl:0.07~0.50%、C:0.00~0.50、HCl:0.00~0.10%、SiCl:0.00~0.20%、Mn(C:0.01~0.20%、H:残、反応雰囲気圧力:4.5~5.0kPa、反応雰囲気温度:700~850℃、供給周期1.00~5.00秒、1周期当たりのガス供給時間0.15~0.25秒、ガス群Aとガス群Bの供給の位相差0.10~0.20秒とし、所定時間熱CVD法による蒸着形成を行った。
Next, a TiAlMn(Si)CN layer was formed on the surfaces of these tool substrates A to F by CVD using a CVD apparatus.
CVD film formation conditions are as follows.
Formation conditions A to K shown in Table 3, that is, gas group A consisting of NH 3 and H 2 and N 2 and AlCl 3 , TiCl 4 , C 2 H 4 , HCl, SiCl 4 , Mn(C 5 H 5 ) 2 , gas group B consisting of H 2 , and as a method of supplying each gas, the reaction gas composition (% is the volume % of the total of gas group A and gas group B), and gas group A is NH 3 : 2.00 to 3.00%, H 2 : 15.00 to 25.00%, N 2 : 15.00 to 25.00%, AlCl 3 as gas group B: 0.50 to 1.00% , TiCl 4 : 0.07-0.50%, C 2 H 4 : 0.00-0.50, HCl: 0.00-0.10%, SiCl 4 : 0.00-0.20%, Mn (C 5 H 5 ) 2 : 0.01-0.20%, H 2 : balance, reaction atmosphere pressure: 4.5-5.0 kPa, reaction atmosphere temperature: 700-850° C., supply cycle 1.00-5 0.00 seconds, the gas supply time per cycle is 0.15 to 0.25 seconds, and the phase difference between gas group A and gas group B is 0.10 to 0.20 seconds. did

このように、表3に示される形成条件でCVD法を行うことにより、表5に示されるCVDによって成膜された本発明被覆工具1~22(本発明被覆工具4は参考例であって、 以下、参考例の記載を省略する。)を得た。
なお、本発明被覆工具1~11、14、15、17~19、21、22については、表2に示される形成条件で、表4に示される下部層および/または上部層を形成した。
In this way, by performing the CVD method under the formation conditions shown in Table 3, the coated tools 1 to 22 of the present invention (the coated tool 4 of the present invention is a reference example, Hereinafter, the description of Reference Examples is omitted.) was obtained.
For the coated tools 1 to 11, 14, 15, 17 to 19, 21 and 22 of the present invention, the lower layer and/or the upper layer shown in Table 4 were formed under the formation conditions shown in Table 2.

また、比較の目的で、工具基体A~Fの表面に、表3に示される形成条件A’~H’でCVD法を行うことにより、表6に示される比較被覆工具1~16を得た。
なお、比較被覆工具2、3、5、6、8、10、14、16については、表2に示される形成条件で、表4に示される下部層および/または上部層を形成した。
For the purpose of comparison, the surfaces of the tool substrates A to F were subjected to the CVD method under the forming conditions A' to H' shown in Table 3 to obtain comparative coated tools 1 to 16 shown in Table 6. .
For comparative coated tools 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 10, 14 and 16, the lower layer and/or the upper layer shown in Table 4 were formed under the formation conditions shown in Table 2.

本発明被覆工具1~22、比較被覆工具1~16の各構成層の工具基体に垂直な方向の断面(縦断面)を、走査型電子顕微鏡(倍率5000倍)を用いて測定し、観察視野内の5点の層厚を測って平均して平均層厚を求めたところ、いずれも表5、6に示される平均層厚であった。
また、NaCl型の面心立方構造を有する結晶粒子の割合、組成、柱状結晶組織を有する結晶粒の平均粒子幅W、アスペクト比Aを前述の方法で測定した。なお、平均粒子幅WとアスペクトAの測定は20点で行った。
なお、Mnの原子比β、Siの原子比δについて、それぞれ、表5、6中で0.001未満、0.0001未満と記載しているものは、検出限界以下の含有量であり、Mn、Siを含んでいないと扱うことができるものであって、表6に示す比較被覆工具では、Mn、Siを同時に含んだ例がないため、α/(1―δ)、β/(1―δ)および(α+β)/(1―δ)は求めていない。
なお、当該結晶粒の全粒界長さに占めるMn元素が存在する粒界の長さの割合の算出にあたり、FE-EPMAの測定は0.02μm間隔で実施した。
The cross section (longitudinal cross section) of each component layer of the coated tools 1 to 22 of the present invention and the comparative coated tools 1 to 16 in the direction perpendicular to the tool substrate was measured using a scanning electron microscope (magnification: 5000 times), and the field of view was observed. When the average layer thickness was calculated by measuring the layer thickness at five points inside, the average layer thicknesses shown in Tables 5 and 6 were obtained.
In addition, the proportion and composition of crystal grains having a NaCl-type face-centered cubic structure, the average grain width W and the aspect ratio A of crystal grains having a columnar crystal structure were measured by the methods described above. The average grain width W and aspect A were measured at 20 points.
Regarding the atomic ratio β of Mn and the atomic ratio δ of Si, those described as less than 0.001 and less than 0.0001 in Tables 5 and 6, respectively, are contents below the detection limit, and Mn , and can be treated as not containing Si, and the comparative coated tools shown in Table 6 do not contain Mn and Si at the same time, so α/(1-δ), β/(1- δ) and (α+β)/(1−δ) are not determined.
In calculating the ratio of the length of the grain boundary where the Mn element exists to the total grain boundary length of the crystal grain, the FE-EPMA measurement was performed at intervals of 0.02 μm.

Figure 0007183519000003
Figure 0007183519000003

Figure 0007183519000004
Figure 0007183519000004

Figure 0007183519000005
Figure 0007183519000005

Figure 0007183519000006
Figure 0007183519000006

Figure 0007183519000007
Figure 0007183519000007

Figure 0007183519000008
Figure 0007183519000008

次に、前記各種の被覆工具をいずれもカッタ径80mmの工具鋼製カッタ先端部に固定治具にてクランプした状態で、本発明被覆工具1~11、比較被覆工具1~8について、以下に示す、鋳鉄の高速断続切削の一種である乾式高速正面フライス、センターカット切削加工試験を実施し、切刃の逃げ面摩耗幅を測定した。
<切削試験1>
カッタ径: 80mm
被削材: JIS・FCD700 幅60mm、長さ400mmのブロック材
回転速度: 1393/min
切削速度: 350m/min
切り込み: 2.0mm
一刃送り量: 0.2mm/刃
切削時間: 20分
(通常切削速度は、150~250m/min)
表7に切削試験の結果を示す。なお、比較被覆工具1~8については、チッピング発生が原因で切削試験終了前に寿命に至ったため、寿命に至るまでの時間を示す。
Next, the coated tools 1 to 11 of the present invention and the comparative coated tools 1 to 8 were measured in a state where each of the various coated tools was clamped to the tip of a tool steel cutter having a cutter diameter of 80 mm with a fixing jig. A dry high-speed face milling and center-cut cutting test, which is a type of high-speed interrupted cutting of cast iron, was performed, and the flank wear width of the cutting edge was measured.
<Cutting test 1>
Cutter diameter: 80mm
Work material: JIS FCD700 block material with a width of 60 mm and a length of 400 mm Rotational speed: 1393/min
Cutting speed: 350m/min
Notch: 2.0mm
Feed amount per blade: 0.2 mm/blade Cutting time: 20 minutes (normal cutting speed is 150 to 250 m/min)
Table 7 shows the results of the cutting test. The comparative coated tools 1 to 8 reached the end of their lives before the end of the cutting test due to the occurrence of chipping, so the time until the end of their lives is shown.

次に、前記各種の被覆工具をいずれも工具鋼製バイトの先端部に固定治具にてネジ止めした状態で、本発明被覆工具12~22、比較被覆工具9~16について、以下に示す鋳鉄の8スリット溝入り材の乾式高速断続旋削試験を実施し、いずれも切刃の逃げ面摩耗幅を測定した。
<切削試験2>
被削材: JIS・FCD700 長さ方向等間隔8本溝入り
切削速度: 350m/min
切り込み: 1.0mm、
送り: 0.2mm/rev、
切削時間: 5分
(通常切削速度は、150~200m/min)
表7に切削試験の結果を示す。なお、比較被覆工具9~16については、チッピング発生が原因で切削試験終了前に寿命に至ったため、寿命に至るまでの時間を示す。
Next, in a state where each of the various coated tools is screwed to the tip of the tool steel cutting tool with a fixing jig, the coated tools 12 to 22 of the present invention and the comparative coated tools 9 to 16 are cast iron shown below. A dry high-speed intermittent turning test was performed on the 8-slit grooved material, and the flank wear width of the cutting edge was measured in each case.
<Cutting test 2>
Work material: JIS FCD700 8 grooves equally spaced in the length direction Cutting speed: 350m/min
Notch: 1.0mm,
Feed: 0.2mm/rev,
Cutting time: 5 minutes (normal cutting speed is 150-200m/min)
Table 7 shows the results of the cutting test. The comparative coated tools 9 to 16 reached the end of their lives before the end of the cutting test due to the occurrence of chipping, so the time until the end of their lives is shown.

Figure 0007183519000009
Figure 0007183519000009

表7に示される結果から明らかなように、本発明被覆工具は、いずれもTiとAlとMnおよび任意成分としてのSiの複合窒化物層または複合炭窒化物層を含み、組成が所定範囲にあって所定の関係を満足し、所定の平均粒子幅、平均アスペクト比を有していることによって、高熱発生を伴い、切れ刃に断続的・衝撃的高負荷が作用する合金鋼や鋳鉄等の高速断続切削加工に用いた場合であっても、硬質被覆層としてすぐれた耐チッピング性を示し、長期の使用にわたって優れた切削性能を発揮する。
これに対して、本発明の被覆工具に規定される事項を一つでも満足していない比較被覆工具は、合金鋼や鋳鉄等の高速断続切削加工に用いると、チッピングが発生し短時間で使用寿命に至っている。
As is clear from the results shown in Table 7, the coated tools of the present invention each contain a composite nitride layer or composite carbonitride layer of Ti, Al, Mn, and Si as an optional component, and have a composition within a predetermined range. It satisfies the prescribed relationship, and has a prescribed average grain width and average aspect ratio. Even when used for high-speed interrupted cutting, it exhibits excellent chipping resistance as a hard coating layer and exhibits excellent cutting performance over long-term use.
On the other hand, when the comparative coated tool that does not satisfy even one of the items specified in the coated tool of the present invention is used for high-speed interrupted cutting of alloy steel, cast iron, etc., chipping occurs and it can be used in a short time. has reached the end of its life.

前述のように、本発明の被覆工具は、合金鋼や鋳鉄等の高負荷が作用する高速断続切削加工であっても、長期にわたって優れた耐摩耗性を発揮するから、切削装置の高性能化並びに切削加工の省力化及び省エネ化、さらには低コスト化に十分に満足できる対応ができるものである。 As described above, the coated tool of the present invention exhibits excellent wear resistance over a long period of time even in high-speed interrupted cutting of alloy steel, cast iron, etc., where high loads act, so it is possible to improve the performance of cutting equipment. In addition, it is possible to fully satisfy labor saving and energy saving in cutting and cost reduction.

Claims (3)

炭化タングステン基超硬合金、炭窒化チタン基サーメットまたは立方晶窒化ホウ素基超高圧焼結体のいずれかで構成された工具基体の表面に、硬質被覆層が設けられた表面被覆切削工具において、
(a)前記硬質被覆層が、平均層厚1.0~20.0μmのTiとAlとMnの複合窒化物層または複合炭窒化物層を少なくとも含み、
(b)前記TiとAlとMnの複合窒化物層または複合炭窒化物層は、工具基体の表面と垂直な縦断面から分析した場合、NaCl型の面心立方構造を有する結晶粒を70面積%以上含み、
(c)前記TiとAlとMnの複合窒化物層または複合炭窒化物層は、その組成が、
組成式:(Ti1-α―βAlαMnβ)(Cγ1-γ
で表わされ、AlのTiとAlとMnの合量に占める平均含有割合α、MnのTiとAlとMnの合量に占める平均含有割合βおよびCのCとNの合量に占める平均含有割合γ(但し、α、β、γはいずれも原子比)が、それぞれ、0.500≦α≦0.900、0.005≦β≦0.150、0.505≦α+β≦0.950かつ0.0000≦γ≦0.0050を満足し、
(d)前記TiとAlとMnの複合窒化物層または複合炭窒化物層の前記NaCl型の面心立方構造を有する結晶粒は、柱状結晶組織を有し、その結晶粒の面積加重平均で算出し 平均粒子幅Wが0.1~3.0μm、面積加重平均で算出した平均アスペクト比Aが2.0~10.0であり、
(e)前記TiとAlとMnの複合窒化物層または複合炭窒化物層の縦断面を観察したと き、前記NaCl型の面心立方構造を有する結晶粒の結晶粒界にMnが存在し、かつ、M nが存在する粒界の長さは、前記NaCl型の面心立方構造を有する結晶粒の全粒界の長 さの0.1~10.0%であることを特徴とする表面被覆切削工具。
A surface-coated cutting tool in which a hard coating layer is provided on the surface of a tool substrate made of any one of a tungsten carbide-based cemented carbide, a titanium carbonitride-based cermet, and a cubic boron nitride-based ultrahigh-pressure sintered body,
(a) the hard coating layer includes at least a composite nitride layer or composite carbonitride layer of Ti, Al and Mn with an average layer thickness of 1.0 to 20.0 μm;
(b) The composite nitride layer or composite carbonitride layer of Ti, Al, and Mn has 70 areas of crystal grains having a NaCl-type face-centered cubic structure when analyzed from a longitudinal section perpendicular to the surface of the tool substrate. % or more, including
(c) The composite nitride layer or composite carbonitride layer of Ti, Al and Mn has a composition of
Composition formula: (Ti 1-α-β Al α Mn β ) (C γ N 1-γ )
represented by the average content ratio α of Al in the total amount of Ti, Al and Mn, the average content ratio β of Mn in the total amount of Ti, Al and Mn, and the average of C in the total amount of C and N The content ratio γ (where α, β, and γ are all atomic ratios) is 0.500 ≤ α ≤ 0.900, 0.005 ≤ β ≤ 0.150, and 0.505 ≤ α + β ≤ 0.950, respectively and satisfies 0.0000 ≤ γ ≤ 0.0050,
(d) The crystal grains having the NaCl-type face-centered cubic structure of the composite nitride layer or composite carbonitride layer of Ti, Al, and Mn have a columnar crystal structure, and the area-weighted average of the crystal grains is The calculated average particle width W is 0.1 to 3.0 μm, the average aspect ratio A calculated by area weighted average is 2.0 to 10.0,
(e) When observing the longitudinal section of the composite nitride layer or composite carbonitride layer of Ti, Al, and Mn, Mn is present at the grain boundaries of the crystal grains having the NaCl-type face-centered cubic structure. And, the length of the grain boundary where Mn exists is 0.1 to 10.0% of the length of all grain boundaries of the crystal grains having the NaCl type face-centered cubic structure. Surface coated cutting tools.
前記TiとAlとMnの複合窒化物層または複合炭窒化物層は、微量のClを含有し、CとNとClの合量に占めるClの含有割合ε(但し、εは原子比)は0.0001≦ε≦0.0020を満足することを特徴とする請求項に記載の表面被覆切削工具。The composite nitride layer or composite carbonitride layer of Ti, Al, and Mn contains a trace amount of Cl, and the content ratio ε of Cl in the total amount of C, N, and Cl (where ε is the atomic ratio) is The surface-coated cutting tool according to claim 1 , wherein 0.0001≤ε≤0.0020 is satisfied. 前記TiとAlとMnの複合窒化物層または複合炭窒化物層は、Siをさらに含み、その組成が、
組成式:(Ti1-α―β―δAlαMnβSiδ)(Cγ1-γ
で表わされ、AlのTiとAlとMnとSiの合量に占める平均含有割合α、MnのTiとAlとMnとSiの合量に占める平均含有割合βおよびCのCとNの合量に占める平均含有割合γ、SiのTiとAlとMnとSiの合量に占める平均含有割合δ(但し、α、β、γ、δはいずれも原子比)とするとき、AlのTiとAlとMnの合量に占める平均含有割合α/(1―δ)、MnのTiとAlとMnの合量に占める平均含有割合β/(1―δ)、SiのTiとAlとMnとSiの合量に占める平均含有割合δおよびCのCとNの合量に占める平均含有割合γが、それぞれ、0.500≦α/(1―δ)≦0.900、0.005≦β/(1―δ)≦0.150、0.005≦δ≦0.150かつ0.505≦(α+β)/(1―δ)≦0.950、0.0000≦γ≦0.0050を満足すること、
を特徴とする請求項1または2に記載の表面被覆切削工具。
The composite nitride layer or composite carbonitride layer of Ti, Al, and Mn further contains Si, and its composition is
Composition formula: (Ti 1-α-β-δ Al α Mn β Si δ ) (C γ N 1-γ )
represented by the average content ratio α of Al in the total amount of Ti, Al, Mn and Si, the average content ratio β of Mn in the total amount of Ti, Al, Mn and Si, and the total amount of C and N of C When the average content ratio γ in the amount and the average content ratio δ in the total amount of Ti, Al, Mn and Si of Si (where α, β, γ, and δ are all atomic ratios), Ti in Al and Average content ratio α / (1-δ) in the total amount of Al and Mn, average content ratio β / (1-δ) in the total amount of Ti, Al and Mn in Mn, Ti and Al and Mn in Si The average content ratio δ in the total amount of Si and the average content ratio γ of C in the total amount of C and N are 0.500≦α/(1−δ)≦0.900 and 0.005≦β, respectively. / (1-δ) ≤ 0.150, 0.005 ≤ δ ≤ 0.150 and 0.505 ≤ (α + β) / (1-δ) ≤ 0.950, 0.0000 ≤ γ ≤ 0.0050 to do
The surface-coated cutting tool according to claim 1 or 2 , characterized by:
JP2018184992A 2018-09-28 2018-09-28 A surface cutting tool with a hard coating that exhibits excellent chipping resistance Active JP7183519B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2018184992A JP7183519B2 (en) 2018-09-28 2018-09-28 A surface cutting tool with a hard coating that exhibits excellent chipping resistance

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2018184992A JP7183519B2 (en) 2018-09-28 2018-09-28 A surface cutting tool with a hard coating that exhibits excellent chipping resistance

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2020055041A JP2020055041A (en) 2020-04-09
JP7183519B2 true JP7183519B2 (en) 2022-12-06

Family

ID=70106074

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2018184992A Active JP7183519B2 (en) 2018-09-28 2018-09-28 A surface cutting tool with a hard coating that exhibits excellent chipping resistance

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP7183519B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP7453616B2 (en) 2020-02-03 2024-03-21 三菱マテリアル株式会社 surface coated cutting tools

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2006181705A (en) 2004-12-28 2006-07-13 Sumitomo Electric Hardmetal Corp Surface coated cutting tool and manufacturing method thereof
JP2015163423A (en) 2014-01-31 2015-09-10 三菱マテリアル株式会社 Surface coated cutting tool whose hard coating layer exerts excellent chipping resistance in high-speed intermittent cutting work
JP2015193071A (en) 2014-03-26 2015-11-05 三菱マテリアル株式会社 Surface coated cutting tool and manufacturing method of the same
JP2016049573A (en) 2014-08-28 2016-04-11 三菱マテリアル株式会社 Surface-coated cutting tool allowing hard coating layer to exhibit superior chipping resistance
JP2016107397A (en) 2014-11-28 2016-06-20 三菱マテリアル株式会社 Surface coated cutting tool
JP2018149668A (en) 2017-03-14 2018-09-27 三菱マテリアル株式会社 Surface coated cutting tool with hard coating layer exhibiting superior chipping resistance and abrasion resistance

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2006181705A (en) 2004-12-28 2006-07-13 Sumitomo Electric Hardmetal Corp Surface coated cutting tool and manufacturing method thereof
JP2015163423A (en) 2014-01-31 2015-09-10 三菱マテリアル株式会社 Surface coated cutting tool whose hard coating layer exerts excellent chipping resistance in high-speed intermittent cutting work
JP2015193071A (en) 2014-03-26 2015-11-05 三菱マテリアル株式会社 Surface coated cutting tool and manufacturing method of the same
JP2016049573A (en) 2014-08-28 2016-04-11 三菱マテリアル株式会社 Surface-coated cutting tool allowing hard coating layer to exhibit superior chipping resistance
JP2016107397A (en) 2014-11-28 2016-06-20 三菱マテリアル株式会社 Surface coated cutting tool
JP2018149668A (en) 2017-03-14 2018-09-27 三菱マテリアル株式会社 Surface coated cutting tool with hard coating layer exhibiting superior chipping resistance and abrasion resistance

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2020055041A (en) 2020-04-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP6677932B2 (en) Surface coated cutting tool that demonstrates excellent chipping and wear resistance in heavy interrupted cutting
EP3290137B1 (en) Coated cutting tool
JP7063206B2 (en) Surface coating cutting tool with excellent chipping resistance due to the hard coating layer
JP7191287B2 (en) A surface-coated cutting tool with a hard coating layer that exhibits excellent chipping resistance
JP6284034B2 (en) Surface coated cutting tool with excellent chipping resistance due to hard coating layer
JP7121234B2 (en) A surface cutting tool with a hard coating that exhibits excellent chipping resistance
WO2018042740A1 (en) Surface-coated cutting tool with hard coating layer exhibiting excellent chipping resistance and peeling resistance
JP7021607B2 (en) Surface-coated cutting tools with excellent chipping resistance and chipping resistance due to the hard coating layer
EP3360632A1 (en) Coated cutting tool
EP3392380A1 (en) Coated cutting tool
JP6857298B2 (en) Surface coating cutting tool with excellent chipping resistance due to the hard coating layer
JP7183519B2 (en) A surface cutting tool with a hard coating that exhibits excellent chipping resistance
JP6709536B2 (en) Surface coated cutting tool with excellent hard coating layer and chipping resistance
JP7183522B2 (en) A surface-coated cutting tool with a hard coating layer that exhibits excellent chipping resistance
JP6935058B2 (en) Surface coating cutting tool with excellent chipping resistance and wear resistance with a hard coating layer
JP2021126738A (en) Surface-coated cutting tool exhibiting excellent chipping resistance and wear resistance in strong intermittent cutting
JP7453616B2 (en) surface coated cutting tools
JP6850997B2 (en) Surface-coated cutting tool with excellent chipping resistance, heat-resistant crack resistance, and oxidation resistance with a hard film layer
JP7137149B2 (en) A surface-coated cutting tool with a hard coating layer that exhibits excellent chipping resistance
JP7325720B2 (en) surface coated cutting tools
WO2020166683A1 (en) Surface-coated cutting tool
JP7453613B2 (en) surface coated cutting tools
JP7132548B2 (en) surface coated cutting tools
JP6957824B2 (en) Surface coating cutting tool with excellent chipping resistance and wear resistance with a hard coating layer
WO2020138304A1 (en) Surface-coated cutting tool

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20210326

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20220124

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20220202

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20220627

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20220708

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20221024

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20221106

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 7183519

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150