JP6689323B2 - Component mounting system - Google Patents

Description

The present invention relates to a component mounting system including a plurality of component mounters and a management device .

Conventionally, as a component mounting system including this type of management device , in a board production line in which a plurality of component mounting machines are installed, when there are a plurality of warning occurrence events such as a notice of parts shortage It has been proposed that work priorities are determined so that workers who are more likely to be in the vicinity of the work are prioritized, and workers are encouraged to work in the determined priority order (for example, see Patent Document 1). . In this apparatus, specifically, the priority order is determined such that the work is prioritized as the warning position is closer to the warning position processed immediately before.

JP, 2008-313393, A

  By the way, as the work to be performed by the worker for the board mounting machine such as the component mounting machine, for example, the work that does not require a special work unit such as the replacement of the suction nozzle or the removal of the defective substrate, and the shortage of the parts soon A special work unit such as performing the splicing work that joins the beginning of a new component tape to the end of a component tape that will become a new component tape by using the auto-splicing unit (ASU) or replacing a feeder that is short of components with a new feeder. There is work to be performed using. In the latter work, the worker has to go to the work unit (ASU or new feeder) and carry the work unit to the work target. The work efficiency cannot be sufficiently improved only by determining the priority order (work order) according to the target position of the substrate processing machine.

  The main object of the present invention is to further improve the work efficiency of work performed by a worker using a work unit on a plurality of substrate processing machines that perform a predetermined process on a circuit board.

The present invention adopts the following means in order to achieve the above-mentioned main object.
That is, the component mounting system of the present invention is
A plurality of component mounters that pick up electronic components supplied by the component supply device and mount them on a circuit board;
A component mounting system including a management device that manages a predetermined work to be performed by an operator using a predetermined work unit for the plurality of component mounters,
At least a work information acquisition unit that acquires, as work information, a work target of the plurality of component mounters, and a component outage expected time of an electronic component mounted on the work target,
Position acquisition means for acquiring the current position of the working unit,
When a plurality of pieces of work information are acquired by the work information acquisition unit, the estimated parts out time corresponding to each of the plurality of work targets related to the plurality of pieces of acquired work information and the position acquisition unit are acquired. Work order determining means for determining a work order for the plurality of work targets based on the current position of the work unit,
Work instruction means for instructing a worker to execute the predetermined work based on the determined work order;
It is characterized by including.
In such a component mounting system of the present invention, the work order determination means calculates the distance from the current position of the work unit to the position of the work target for each of the plurality of work targets based on the current position of the work unit. Of the plurality of work targets, the work order may be preferentially determined as the distance to the work unit is shorter.
Further, in the component mounting system of the present invention, the work order determination means determines whether or not there is a work target that cannot complete the predetermined work by the corresponding expected time of parts outage when the determined work order is followed. If it is determined that there is a work target that cannot complete the predetermined work by the corresponding expected component run-out time, the predetermined task for the work target that cannot complete the predetermined work by the corresponding expected run-out time of the component The work order in which work is prioritized may be determined.

The first management device of the reference invention disclosed by reference in this specification ,
A management device for managing a predetermined work to be performed by a worker using a predetermined work unit for a plurality of substrate processing machines that perform a predetermined process on a circuit board,
At least a work information acquisition unit that acquires, as work information, a work target of the plurality of substrate processing machines and a work time when the predetermined work is required for the work target,
Position acquisition means for acquiring the current position of the working unit,
When a plurality of pieces of work information are acquired by the work information acquisition unit, the predetermined work is performed before the corresponding work time for each of the plurality of work targets related to the plurality of pieces of work information acquired. A work order determining unit that determines a work order for the plurality of work targets based on the current position of the work unit acquired by the position acquiring unit within an executable range;
Work instruction means for instructing a worker to execute the predetermined work based on the determined work order;
The main point is to provide.

In the first management apparatus of the reference invention, at least a work target of the plurality of substrate processing machines and a work time when a predetermined work is required for the work target are acquired as work information, and the work information is acquired. When the current position of the unit is acquired and a plurality of pieces of work information are acquired, it is possible to execute a predetermined work until the corresponding work time elapses for a plurality of work targets related to the plurality of pieces of work information acquired. Within the range, the work order for a plurality of work targets is determined based on the acquired current position of the work unit, and the worker is instructed to perform a predetermined work based on the determined work order. As a result, the work order is determined in consideration of the time required for the worker to pick up the work unit and carry it to the work target, so that the overall work efficiency can be improved.

In the first management apparatus of the reference invention, the work order determination unit gives priority to a work object having a shorter distance from the current position of the acquired work unit to the position of the work object among the plurality of work objects. It is also possible to determine the work order so that the predetermined work is executed. In the first management apparatus of the present invention in this aspect, a storage unit that stores work histories for the plurality of substrate processing machines is provided, and the position acquisition unit is configured to perform the predetermined work immediately before the stored work history. It is also possible to obtain the information about the substrate processing machine for which the process has been performed and estimate the current position of the working unit. In this way, it is not necessary to provide a dedicated position detecting means for acquiring the current position of the work unit.

Further, in the first management device of the reference invention, the position acquisition unit acquires the current position of the worker, and the work order determination unit determines the current position of the acquired worker among the plurality of work targets. The shorter the sum of the distance from the position to the current position of the acquired work unit and the distance from the current position of the work unit to the position of the work target is, the priority work is preferentially executed. The work order may be determined. By doing so, it is possible to determine the work sequence for shortening the flow line of the worker in consideration of the current position of the work unit, and it is possible to further improve the work efficiency.

Further, in the first management apparatus of the reference invention, a plurality of the work units are provided, the position acquisition means acquires the current position of each of the plurality of work units, and the work order determination means, Of the plurality of work units, the work order may be determined based on the current position of the work unit having the shortest distance to the work target. With this, even when a plurality of work units are provided, work efficiency can be improved.

The second management device of the reference invention is
A management device that manages the work to be performed by a worker using a work unit housed in a predetermined housing position for a plurality of anti-board processing machines that perform a predetermined process on a circuit board,
At least a work information acquisition unit that acquires, as work information, a work target of the plurality of substrate processing machines and a work time when the predetermined work is required for the work target,
Position acquisition means for acquiring the current position of each of a plurality of workers,
When the work information is acquired by the work information acquisition means, the predetermined work is performed by the time when the work time corresponding to the work target related to the acquired work information among the plurality of workers elapses. A worker deciding means for deciding, as a worker performing the predetermined work, a worker who is capable of performing the above, and has the shortest distance from the current position acquired by the position acquiring means to the accommodation position. ,
Work instructing means for instructing the determined worker to perform the predetermined work;
The main point is to provide.

In the second management apparatus of the reference invention, at least a work target of the plurality of substrate processing machines and a work period when a predetermined work is required for the work target are acquired as work information, and a plurality of work targets are acquired. When the current position of each worker is acquired and the work information is acquired, a predetermined work is performed before the corresponding work time for the work target related to the acquired work information among the plurality of workers. The worker who can execute the, and has the shortest distance from the acquired current position to the accommodation position for accommodating the work unit is determined as the worker who performs the predetermined work, and Instruct execution of a predetermined work. As a result, a worker suitable for the work is determined in consideration of the time required for the worker to pick up the work unit and carry the work unit to the work target, so that the work efficiency can be improved.

In the second management apparatus of the reference invention, a storage unit that stores the work history of each of the plurality of workers is provided, and the position acquisition unit is configured such that each of the plurality of workers immediately before the stored work history. It is also possible to estimate the current position of each of a plurality of workers by acquiring information on the substrate processing machine that has performed the predetermined work. In this way, it is not necessary to provide a dedicated position detecting means for acquiring the current position of the worker.

It is a block diagram which shows the outline of a structure of the component mounting system 1. It is a block diagram which shows the outline of a structure of the component mounter 10. It is an external view showing the external appearance of an auto-splicing unit (ASU) 90. 3 is a block diagram showing an electrical connection relationship between a control device 70 and a management device 80 of the component mounter 10. FIG. It is explanatory drawing which shows an example of a production line. It is a flow chart which shows an example of the 1st work directions output processing. It is explanatory drawing explaining the flow until it instructs a splicing work by the 1st work instruction output process. It is a flow chart which shows an example of the 2nd work directions output processing. It is explanatory drawing which shows an example of a work schedule. It is explanatory drawing explaining the flow until it instructs a splicing work by the 2nd work instruction output process. It is a flow chart which shows an example of the 3rd work directions output processing. It is explanatory drawing explaining the flow until it instruct | indicates a splice work by the 3rd work instruction output process. It is explanatory drawing which shows the production line of a modification. It is explanatory drawing which shows the production line of a modification. It is a flow chart which shows an example of the 4th work directions output processing. It is explanatory drawing explaining the flow until it instructs a feeder exchange work by a 4th work instruction output process.

  Next, a mode for carrying out the present invention will be described.

  FIG. 1 is a configuration diagram showing an outline of the configuration of the component mounting system 1, FIG. 2 is a configuration diagram showing an outline of the configuration of one component mounting machine 10 configuring the component mounting system 1, and FIG. FIG. 4 is an external view showing the external appearance of the auto-splicing unit (ASU) 90, and FIG. 4 is an explanatory diagram showing the electrical connection relationship between the control device 70 and the management device 80 of the component mounter 10. In this embodiment, the left-right direction in FIG. 2 is the X-axis direction, the front-back direction is the Y-axis direction, and the up-down direction is the Z-axis direction.

  As shown in FIG. 1, the component mounting system 1 pushes a solder on a screen by a squeegee into a pattern hole formed in the screen while rolling the solder on the screen, so that the circuit board S (hereinafter, simply referred to as “below”) through the pattern hole. A screen printing machine 2 that prints a wiring pattern on a “board”) and an electronic component P (not shown) (noted simply “component” hereinafter) supplied by the component supply device 16 are picked up to form a wiring pattern on the substrate S. A plurality of (for example, 10) component mounters 10 to be mounted and a management device 80 that manages the entire component mounting system are provided.

  The plurality of component mounters 10 have a head (multi-nozzle head) capable of mounting a large number of suction nozzles and mount a relatively small component P at high speed, and a head capable of mounting a small number of suction nozzles ( A component P having a multifunctional head) and a component P of a relatively large size or a component P of a different shape are arranged, and the component P is mounted on the substrate S by the sharing work. As shown in FIG. 2, the component mounter 10 backs up the component supply device 16 that supplies the component P, the substrate transport device 20 that transports the substrate S, and the substrate S transported by the substrate transport device 20 from the back side. Backup device 30, a head 50 for picking up the component P by the suction nozzle 51 and mounting it on the substrate S, an XY robot 40 for moving the head 50 in the XY directions, and a positioning reference mark attached to the substrate S. And the like, a part camera 48 capable of imaging the component P sucked by the suction nozzle 51, a nozzle station 49 for stocking a plurality of suction nozzles 51, and a component mounting machine as a whole. The control device 70 (see FIG. 4) that controls the control is provided. The substrate transfer device 20, the backup device 30, the head 50, and the XY robot 40 are housed in a main body frame 12 installed on the base 11.

  The component supply device 16 includes a feeder 18 (not shown) formed on the front surface of the main body frame 12, and feeders 18 arranged in line in the left-right direction (X-axis direction). The feeder 18 is a tape feeder that feeds a carrier tape containing the components P at a predetermined pitch to a component supply position where the suction nozzle 51 can pick up the carrier tape. Although not shown, the carrier tape is composed of a bottom tape in which cavities (recesses) are formed at a predetermined pitch, and a top film that covers the bottom tape with the parts P accommodated in each cavity. . The feeder 18 pulls out the carrier tape wound on the reel, sends it out to the component supply position, and peels off the top film from the bottom tape before the component supply position to expose the component P at the component supply position, that is, the pickup. Make it possible.

  As shown in FIG. 2, the substrate transfer device 20 is configured as a dual-lane type transfer device provided with two substrate transfer paths, and is arranged on a support base 13 provided in a middle part of the main body frame 12. Has been done. A belt conveyor device 22 is provided in each substrate transport path, and the substrate S is transported from the left to the right (substrate transport direction) in FIG. 2 by driving the belt conveyor device 22.

  The backup device 30 includes a backup plate 32 installed so as to be able to move up and down by an elevator device (not shown), and a plurality of backup pins 34 provided upright on the backup plate 32. The backup device 30 backs up the substrate S from the back side by raising the backup plate 32 in a state where the substrate S is transported above the backup plate 32 by the substrate transport device 20.

  As shown in FIG. 2, the XY robot 40 includes a Y-axis guide rail 43 provided along the Y-axis direction on the upper stage portion of the main body frame 12, and a Y-axis slider movable along the Y-axis guide rail 43. 44, an X-axis guide rail 41 provided on the lower surface of the Y-axis slider 44 along the X-axis direction, and an X-axis slider 42 movable along the X-axis guide rail 41. The mark camera 46 described above is attached to the lower surface of the X-axis slider 42. The mark camera 46 can drive and control the XY robot 40 to image an arbitrary position on the surface of the substrate S backed up by the backup device 30.

  The control device 70 is configured as a microprocessor centered on a CPU 71, and includes a CPU 72, a ROM 72, a HDD 73, a RAM 74, and an input / output interface 75, which are electrically connected via a bus 76. It is connected. The control device 70 includes a position signal from the X-axis position sensor 42a that detects the position of the X-axis slider 42, a position signal from the Y-axis position sensor 44a that detects the position of the Y-axis slider 44, and an image from the mark camera 46. Signals, image signals from the parts camera 48, read information from the card reader 60, etc. are input via the input / output interface 75. The worker has an IC card as a worker certificate, and when starting the work on the screen printing machine 2 or each component mounting machine 10, selects the content of the work to be performed from now on, and uses the IC card as the card reader 60. It is supposed to be held over. By reading the card information from the card reader 60, the control device 70 registers the worker ID for identifying the worker and grasps the start time of the work and the time spent for the work. On the other hand, from the control device 70, a control signal to the component supply device 16, a control signal to the substrate transfer device 20, a control signal to the backup device 30, a drive signal to the X-axis actuator 42b for moving the X-axis slider 42, A drive signal to a Y-axis actuator 44b that moves the Y-axis slider 44, a drive signal to a Z-axis actuator 52 that moves the suction nozzle 51 in the Z-axis direction, a drive signal to a θ-axis actuator 54 that rotates the suction nozzle 51, etc. Is output via the input / output interface 75. Further, the control device 70 is connected to the management device 80 so as to be able to perform bidirectional communication, and exchanges data and control signals with each other.

  The management device 80 is, for example, a general-purpose computer, and includes a CPU 81, a ROM 82, an HDD 83, a RAM 84, an input / output interface 85, etc., which are electrically connected via a bus 86. An input signal or the like is input to the management device 80 from an input device 87 such as a mouse or a keyboard via the input / output interface 85, and an image signal to the display 89 is input from the management device 80 via the input / output interface 85. It is being output. The HDD 83 stores the production plan of the board S. Here, the production plan of the board S includes which board S the wiring pattern is to be printed on by the screen printing machine 2, which parts P are mounted on the board S by each component mounting machine 10, and the order of the parts. In this way, the plan defines how many boards S on which the component P is mounted are to be produced. The production plan includes head information regarding the head 50 to be used, nozzle information regarding the suction nozzle 51 to be used, component information regarding the component P to be mounted, feeder information regarding the feeder 18 to be used, and the like. This production plan is input to the management apparatus 80 by the operator operating the input device 87. The management device 80 outputs a command signal to the screen printing machine 2 so that the wiring pattern is printed on the board S according to the production plan, and mounts each component so that the component P is mounted on the wiring pattern of the board S. A command signal is output to the machine 10. In addition, each component mounter 10 supplies component information such as the types of components P that can be supplied from the feeder 18 mounted on the feeder base, the maximum number of components P that can be supplied, and the number of components P that have actually been supplied. It is acquired together with the ID (identification information) and transmitted to the management device 80. The management device 80 stores (manages) the received component information in association with the feeder ID for each component mounter 10, and predicts the time when the component runs out in each feeder 18 for each component mounter 10.

  Further, in the management device 80, read information from the card reader 88 is input via the input / output interface 85. The worker holds his or her own IC card (worker ID) over the card reader 88 at the start and end of the work on the line in charge. The management device 80 reads the card information from the card reader 88 to register the worker ID and the line in charge or cancel the registration at any time. In other words, the management device 80 uses the IC card owned by the worker each time, even if the worker leaves the line in charge on the way or another worker takes charge of the line on the way. By reading the card information, the worker currently in charge of the line is managed. Further, the management device 80 communicates with a control device (not shown) of the screen printing machine 2 and a control device 70 of each component mounting machine 10, and the identification information (worker ID) of a worker who has worked on each line and A work history such as a work target (which one of the screen printing machine 2 and the plurality of component mounters 10 has been worked on), work content, and work completion time is acquired from the control device 70 and managed.

  The auto-splicing unit (ASU) 90 is a device that automatically joins the end of the carrier tape wound on the reel mounted on the feeder 18 to the start of the carrier tape wound on a new reel. Feed grooves 92 and 94 for feeding the carrier tape toward the central portion are formed on the left and right portions of the ASU 90, respectively. Further, in the central portion of the ASU 90, there is provided a joining device (not shown) which attaches the splicing tape to the two carrier tapes fed along the feeding grooves 92 and 94 and joins them. Further, each of the feeding grooves 92, 94 is also provided with a cutting device (not shown) for cutting the carrier tape fed into the feeding grooves 92, 94. The ASU 90 cuts unnecessary portions of the two carrier tapes by a cutting device when two carrier tapes to be joined by an operator are fed into the feed grooves 92 and 94, respectively, and the cut surfaces of the two carrier tapes are abutted to each other so that the carrier tapes It joins with a joining device. The standard working time when the worker performs the splicing work using the ASU 90 is about 30 seconds. The ASU 90 is mounted on a dolly (not shown) and is movable between the component mounters 10 on the mounting line.

  FIG. 5 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of a production line. As shown in FIG. 5, the production line includes a plurality of (six) lines 1 to 6, and each line includes a screen printing machine and 10 component mounting machines 10 (also called mounters 1 to 10). It is composed by. The workers A to F are assigned to the respective lines 1 to 6 as persons in charge. The workers A to F perform solder replenishment work and screen replacement work in the screen printing machine 2, and in each mounter 1 to 10, the feeder 18 replacement work, the splicing work using the ASU 90, and the head 50 work. Replacement work, replacement work of the suction nozzle 51 housed in the nozzle station 49, collection work of the waste tape discharged from the feeder 18 with the supply of components, and the like are performed.

  Next, description will be given of a management process performed when the operator is instructed to perform a splicing operation in the management device 80 thus configured. FIG. 6 is a flowchart showing an example of a first work instruction output process executed by the CPU 81 of the management device 80. In the present embodiment, since a plurality of production lines (lines 1 to 6) are provided, the first work instruction output process is executed for each line.

  When the first work instruction output process is executed, the CPU 81 of the management device 80 first determines whether or not there is a feeder 18 that is expected to run out of parts within a predetermined time (for example, within 10 minutes) (step). S100). When the CPU 81 determines that there is no feeder 18 that is expected to run out of parts within a predetermined time, it ends the first work instruction output process without giving an instruction for splicing work. On the other hand, when determining that there are feeders 18 that are expected to run out of parts within a predetermined time, the CPU 81 determines whether there are a plurality of mounters equipped with such feeders 18 (step S102). When the CPU 81 determines that there is only one mounter equipped with the feeder 18 that is expected to run out of parts, it instructs the operator to perform the splicing work with the mounter equipped with the feeder 18 as the work target mounter ( (Step S104), the first work instruction output process ends. The splicing work instruction may be given by notifying the worker who should perform the work, the work position (mounter number), the work content (splicing work), etc. on the display 89, or by notifying the mobile information terminal owned by the worker. This can be done by On the other hand, when the CPU 81 determines that there are a plurality of mounters equipped with the feeders 18 expected to run out of parts, the CPU 81 acquires the current position of the ASU 90 (step S106), and mounts the plurality of mounters equipped with the feeders 18 expected to run out of parts. Is the work target mounter, and the distance from the ASU 90 to the work target mounter is calculated for each work target mounter based on the acquired current position of the ASU 90 (step S108). Here, in the process of step S108, a well-known positioning system such as GPS may be provided in the ASU 90 to acquire the current position thereof, or each component mounter 10 (mounters 1 to 10) each time the splicing work is performed. ) May be acquired and stored in the HDD 83, and the current position of the ASU 90 may be estimated based on information (mounter number) regarding the mounter used by the ASU 90 in the immediately preceding splicing operation.

  When the CPU 81 thus calculates the distance from the ASU 90 to the work target mounter for each work target mounter, the priority order is set so that the work target mounter having a shorter distance from the ASU 90 among the plurality of work target mounters is preferentially subjected to the splicing work. Is temporarily determined (step S110), and the required work time for each of the plurality of work target mounters is derived (step S112). Here, the work required time is the moving time required for the worker to carry (move) the ASU 90 to the work target mounter and the standard work required for performing the splicing work on the work target mounter using the ASU 90. It can be calculated by the sum of time (for example, 30 seconds). The travel time can be calculated by the sum of the time required for the worker to pick up the ASU 90 and the time required to carry the ASU 90 to the work mounter. The former travel time can be a predetermined time, and the latter travel time is obtained by dividing the distance from the ASU 90 calculated in step S108 to the work mounter by the predetermined standard moving speed of the ASU 90. Can be calculated by The former moving time is the standard moving speed of the worker, in which the distance from the worker to the ASU 90 is predetermined by obtaining the current position of the worker and calculating the distance from the worker to the ASU 90. It may be calculated by dividing by (standard walking speed).

  Then, the CPU 81 determines whether or not the splicing work can be completed for each of the splicing works by the respective parts outage predicted times, assuming that the splicing work is performed according to the priority order provisionally determined in step S110. Yes (step S114). In this process, it is determined that the splicing work can be completed for the splicing work whose remaining time from the current time to the expected parts outage time is equal to or longer than the work required time derived in step S112, and the remaining time from the current time to the expected parts outage time. Can be performed by determining that the splicing work cannot be completed for the splicing work shorter than the work required time. Further, in the process of step S114, if the remaining time from the current time to the estimated time of parts loss for the first priority splicing work is equal to or longer than the work required time derived in step S112, the first priority splicing work is performed. Then, for the second priority splicing work, the remaining time from the current time plus the work required time of the first priority splicing work to the estimated time of parts loss is given priority. The splicing work with the higher priority is determined such that the splicing work with the second priority is determined to be completed if the time required for the work is derived from the position of the mounter having the first work as the position of the ASU. The determination may be made in consideration of the result of.

  When the CPU 81 determines that the splicing work can be completed for all of the splicing works by the respective expected parts outage times, the CPU 81 finally determines the priority order provisionally determined in step S110 (step S116), and splices in the determined priority order. The operator is instructed to perform the work (step S120), and the work instruction output process is ended. The process in step S120 is performed by, for example, notifying the work priority order, work position (mounter number), and work content (splicing work) on the display 89, or notifying the mobile information terminal owned by the worker. be able to. The work priority also includes which worker should work and where the ASU 90 is currently. On the other hand, if the CPU 81 determines that the splicing work cannot be completed by the expected time of parts loss for any of the plurality of splicing works, the splicing work is preferentially performed for the splicing work having the expected time of parts loss. Then, the priority order is re-determined (step S118), the operator is instructed to perform the splicing work in the determined priority order (step S120), and the first work instruction output process is ended.

  FIG. 7 is an explanatory diagram for explaining a flow until the splicing work is instructed by the first work instruction output process. As shown in FIG. 7, the worker A completes the splicing work using the ASU 90 on the mounter 10 at the time 14:00:00 (see FIG. 7A), and at the time 14:02:00, the “mounter 03 When a parts outage prediction occurs (see splice work (expected time out of parts 14:12:00)) and "splicing work at mounter 09 (expected time out of parts 14:12:00)" (see FIG. 7B). think of. In this case, the CPU 81 of the management device 80 determines the distance of “current position of ASU 90 (mounter 10 where ASU 90 was used immediately before) → work position (mounter 03)” and “current position of ASU 90 (ASU 90 is used immediately before). The mounter 10) → work position (mounter 09) ”is compared, and the priority order is determined in ascending order of distance, that is, the mounter 09 first performs splicing work, and then the mounter 03 performs splicing work. (See FIG. 7C). Then, the CPU 81 derives the required work time for each of the splicing work of the mounter 03 and the splicing work of the mounter 09, and determines whether or not the splicing work can be completed by the respective expected parts run-out times. In this description, it is assumed that it is determined that both splicing operations can be completed by the expected time of parts shortage even if the operations are performed in the temporarily determined priority order. Therefore, the priority order of the provisional decision is finally decided. After the worker performs the splicing work of the mounter 09 according to the priority order at 14:08: 00 (see FIG. 7 (d)), at 14:08:10 at the time of "Splicing work by mounter 05 (parts out When the component out-of-stock prediction occurs (predicted time 14:13:10) (see FIG. 7E), the CPU 81 determines the “current position of the ASU 90 (immediately before the ASU 90) for the mounter 03 for which the splicing work has not been completed. "Mounter 09)-> work position (mounter 03)" and "current position of ASU 90 (mounter 09 where ASU 90 was used immediately before) about mounter 05 where a new out-of-parts forecast occurred" (Mounter 05) ", and the distance is ascending. First, mounter 05 performs splicing work, and then mounter 0 In determining the priority of performing splicing operations (see FIG. 7 (f)). As described above, the priority order is determined such that the splicing work is performed earlier as the distance from the ASU 90 is shorter among the plurality of work target mounters for which the splicing work has not been completed. Of. This can minimize the movement of the ASU 90 when performing the splicing work on all the mounters to be worked, so that the splicing work can be efficiently performed in a short time.

  Next, a work instruction output process (second work instruction output process) when a plurality of workers are assigned to one production line to perform work will be described. FIG. 8 is a flowchart showing an example of the second work instruction output process executed by the CPU 81 of the management device 80. The second work instruction output process is executed for each line. As described above, the management device 80 registers a worker ID and a line in charge for each line, and manages a worker in charge of each line and a work schedule for each worker. The worker's work schedule is a list of which workers are to be in charge of which work by what time according to the production plan. For example, as shown in FIG. Information such as work content, standard work time, and estimated time when a member runs out can be associated with each other.

  When the second work instruction output process is executed, the CPU 81 of the management device 80 first determines whether or not there is a mounter equipped with the feeder 18 that is expected to run out of parts within a predetermined time (step S200). If it is determined that there is no mounter equipped with the feeder 18 that is expected to run out of parts within a predetermined time, the work instruction output process is terminated without giving a splice work instruction. On the other hand, when the CPU 81 determines that there is a mounter equipped with the feeder 18 that is expected to run out of parts within a predetermined time, it acquires information (worker ID) about the registered worker currently assigned to the line (step S202). ), It is determined whether there are a plurality of registered workers (step S204). When the CPU 81 determines that there is only one registered worker, the CPU 81 instructs the registered worker designated in the work schedule to perform the splicing work (step S206), and ends the second work instruction output process. In this case, when there are a plurality of work target mounters whose work should be completed within the predetermined time, priority is determined and the work is instructed by the processing of steps S106 to S120 of the first work instruction output processing of FIG. It may be one. On the other hand, when the CPU 81 determines that the number of registered workers is plural, the CPU 81 acquires the work schedule for each worker (step S208), acquires the current position for each worker (step S210), and the current position of the ASU 90. Is acquired (step S212). Here, in the process of step S210, a positioning system such as GPS may be provided in the portable information terminal owned by the worker to acquire the current position, or the work on the printing machine or the mounters 1 to 10 is performed. The work history of the worker who is in charge each time may be acquired from each device and stored in the HDD 83, and the current position of the worker may be estimated based on the information regarding the device on which the work was performed immediately before. The process of step S212 can be performed in the same manner as the process of step S106 described above.

  When the current position of each worker and the current position of the ASU 90 are acquired in this way, the CPU 81 determines that the worker is based on the acquired current position of each worker, the current position of the ASU 90, and the position of the work target mounter. The moving distance to get to and the moving distance to carry the ASU 90 to the work target mounter are calculated for each worker (step S214), and the work required time for each worker for the work target mounter is derived. Yes (step S216). Here, the work required time for each worker is, as described above, the moving time for the worker to go to pick up the ASU 90 and carry it to the work target mounter, and perform the splicing work at the work target mounter using the ASU 90. It can be calculated by the sum of the standard working time (for example, 30 seconds) required for The travel time can be calculated by the sum of the time required for the worker to pick up the ASU 90 and the time required to carry the ASU 90 to the work mounter. The former travel time is calculated for each worker by calculating the travel distance from the worker to picking up the ASU90 based on the current position of the worker calculated in step S210 and the current position of the ASU90 acquired in step S212. It can be calculated for each worker by dividing the moving distance for each worker by the standard moving speed (standard walking speed) of the worker. The movement time of the latter is calculated by calculating the movement distance from the ASU 90 to the work target mounter based on the ASU 90 calculated in step S214 and the position of the predetermined work target mounter, and calculating the calculated movement distance of the predetermined ASU 90. It can be calculated by dividing by the standard moving speed.

  Then, the CPU 81 determines whether or not, among the plurality of registered workers, there is a worker who cannot complete the work by the estimated time of parts outage by using the free time of the work schedule of each worker acquired in step S208. When it is determined (step S218) that there is a worker who cannot complete the work, the worker is instructed to perform the work (step S206), and the second work instruction output process ends. . On the other hand, when the CPU 81 determines that there is no worker who cannot complete the work, the current position of the worker calculated in step S214 among the plurality of registered workers → the current position of the ASU 90 → the movement distance of the work target mounter Priority is determined so that workers with shorter numbers have priority to perform work (step S220), the work is instructed to the workers according to the determined priority (step S222), and the work schedule is updated (step S224). ), And ends the second work instruction output process. The process of step S220 is performed by, for example, notifying the work priority order, the work position (mounter number), and the work content (splice work) on the display 89, or by notifying the mobile information terminal owned by the worker. be able to. The work priority also includes which worker should work and where the ASU 90 is currently. The process of step S224 is a process of replacing the worker specified in the work schedule for the work related to the instruction with the worker having the highest priority determined in step S220.

  FIG. 10 is an explanatory diagram illustrating a flow until the splicing work is instructed by the second work instruction output process. As shown in FIG. 10, a worker A and a worker B are registered as workers in charge of the production line, and the worker A solders at the printing machine (screen printing machine 2) at 14:00 pm. And the worker B completes the splicing work with the mounter 09 (see FIG. 10 (a)), and at the time 14:02:00, "the splicing work with the mounter 02 (the expected time when the parts are out 14:77:00). ) ”, A case where a component outage prediction is generated (see FIG. 10B) is considered. When the worker A is in the printing machine and the worker B is in the mounter 02, the CPU 81 of the management apparatus 80 displays “current position of the worker A (printing machine) → current position of the ASU 90 (mounter 09) → mounting target mounter”. (Mounter 02) "and the distance of" current position of worker B (mounter 09)-> current position of ASU 90 (mounter 09)-> target mounter (mounter 02) ", and work for each worker Derive the required time. Next, it is determined whether or not there is a worker who cannot complete the work by the expected time when the mounter 02 runs out of parts. In this description, it is assumed that both workers are determined to be able to complete the work by the expected time when the mounter 02 runs out of parts. Therefore, the CPU 81 determines and directs that the shorter distance, that is, the worker B performs the splicing work with the mounter 02 (see FIG. 10C). The CPU 81 updates the work schedule based on the newly determined content. In this way, when a component shortage prediction occurs, a worker having a short moving distance of worker → ASU90 → work target mounter among a plurality of registered workers is given a priority for work instruction. As a result, it is possible to minimize the movement of the worker until the worker takes the ASU 90, and it is possible to efficiently perform the splicing work.

  Next, a work instruction output process (third work instruction output process) in the case where a plurality of ASUs 90 are assigned to one production line will be described. FIG. 11 is a flowchart showing an example of a third work instruction output process executed by the CPU 81 of the management device 80. The third work instruction output process is executed for each line. As described above, the management device 80 registers a worker ID and a line in charge for each line, and manages a worker in charge of each line and a work schedule for each worker. The management device 80 also registers an ASU ID (identification information of the ASU 90) and a line in charge for each line, and also manages an ASU 90 in charge of each line and a work schedule for each ASU 90. The identification information (ASUID) of the ASU 90 may be information unique to each ASU 90, but is not essential. A plurality of ASUs 90 used in the same line may be information (number, name, etc.) that can be distinguished in the same line. Further, the work schedule of the ASU 90 is a list in which which ASU 90 is to be in charge of the work of which mounter is predetermined.

  When the third work instruction output process is executed, the CPU 81 of the management device 80 first determines whether or not there is a mounter equipped with the feeder 18 that is expected to run out of parts within a predetermined time (step S300). If it is determined that there is no mounter equipped with the feeder 18 that is expected to run out of parts within a predetermined time, the work instruction output process is terminated without giving a splice work instruction. On the other hand, when the CPU 81 determines that there is a mounter equipped with the feeder 18 that is expected to run out of parts within a predetermined time, it acquires a work schedule for each ASU 90 (step S302), and executes step S210 of the second work instruction output process. Similarly, the current position of the worker is acquired (step S304), and the current position is acquired for each ASU 90 similarly to step S212 (step S306).

  When the current position of each worker and the current position of the ASU 90 are acquired in this way, the CPU 81 determines that the worker has the ASU 90 based on the acquired current position of the worker, the current position of each ASU 90, and the position of the work target mounter. The moving distance to get the ASU 90 and the moving distance to carry the ASU 90 to the work target mounter are calculated for each ASU 90 (step S308), and the work required time for each ASU 90 for the work target mounter is derived ( Step S310). Here, the processes of steps S308 and S310 can be performed in the same manner as steps 214 and 216 of the second work instruction output process described above.

  Then, the CPU 81 determines whether or not, among the plurality of ASUs 90 in charge of the processing target line, there is an ASU 90 that cannot complete the work before the expected time of parts outage by using the free time of the work schedule of each ASU 90 acquired in step S302. Is determined (step S312), and if it is determined that there is an ASU 90 that cannot complete the work, the worker is instructed to perform the work using the ASU 90 specified in the work schedule (step S314), and the third work instruction output process is performed. finish. On the other hand, when determining that there is no ASU 90 that cannot complete the work, the CPU 81 preferentially uses the ASU 90 having a shorter moving distance of the worker → ASU 90 → the work target mounter calculated in step S308 among the plurality of ASUs 90 in charge. Priority order is determined (step S316), the work using the ASU 90 is instructed to the worker according to the determined priority order (step S318), the work schedule of the ASU 90 is updated (step S320), and the third work is performed. The instruction output process ends. The process of step S318 is performed by, for example, notifying the work priority order, the work position (mounter number), and the work content (splicing work) on the display 89, or by notifying the mobile information terminal owned by the worker. be able to. The work priority also includes which ASU 90 should be used to work and where that ASU 90 is currently located. It is desirable that each ASU 90 be provided with an ID mark or a number such as ASU 1 so that a worker can visually identify which ASU 90 it is. The process of step S320 is a process of replacing the ASU 90 specified in the work schedule for the work related to the instruction with the ASU 90 having the highest priority determined in step S316. In the third work instruction output process, when there are a plurality of workers who are in charge of the line to be processed, the CPU 81 executes the processes of steps S308 to S312 for each worker and performs the work in steps S316 and S318. Person-> ASU90-> the splicing work is instructed to the worker by determining the priority order in which the combination of the worker and the ASU90 having a shorter travel distance of the mounter to be worked is given priority.

  FIG. 12 is an explanatory diagram illustrating a flow until the splicing work is instructed by the third work instruction output process. Workers A and B are registered as workers in charge of the production line, and ASU1 and ASU2 are registered as ASU90 in charge of the production line. At a time of 14:00, the worker A is ASU1. To complete the splicing work of the mounter 01 using the ASU 2 and the worker B to complete the splicing work of the mounter 10 using the ASU 2 (see FIG. 12 (a)). Let us consider a case in which a component outage prediction "occurrence of the component outage time 14: 07: 00: 00" "occurs (see FIG. 12B). In this case, the CPU 81 of the management device 80 determines the distance of “current position of worker A (mounter 01) → current position of ASU1 (mounter 01) → mounter to be operated (mounter 02)” and “current position of worker B”. (Mounter 10) → current position of ASU 2 (mounter 10) → mounter for work (mounter 02) ”, and the work required time of each ASU 90 is derived. Next, it is determined whether or not there is an ASU 90 that cannot complete the work by the expected time when the mounter 02 runs out of parts. In this description, it is assumed that both ASUs 90 are determined to be able to complete the work by the expected time when the mounter 02 runs out of parts. Therefore, the CPU 81 determines the shorter distance, that is, the splicing work using the ASU1, and instructs the worker A (see FIG. 12 (c)). The CPU 81 updates the work schedule based on the newly determined content. In this way, when a component shortage prediction occurs, the work is instructed by giving priority to the ASU 90 having the shortest movement distance of the worker → ASU 90 → the mounter of the work among the plurality of registered ASUs 90. Thereby, the splicing work can be efficiently performed in consideration of the moving distance of the ASU 90.

  According to the management apparatus 80 of the present embodiment described above, in the first work instruction output process, the ASU 90 among the plurality of work target mounters for which the splicing work has not yet been completed is executed each time a component shortage prediction occurs. Since the priority is determined so that the splicing work is performed earlier as the distance is shorter, it is possible to minimize the movement of the ASU 90 when performing the splicing work for all the mounters to be worked, and to perform the splicing work. It can be done efficiently in a short time.

  Further, according to the management device 80 of the present embodiment, when a plurality of workers who are in charge of one production line are registered in the second work instruction output process, it is registered that a parts outage prediction occurs. Among the plurality of workers, the worker, the ASU 90, and the worker having the shortest movement distance of the work target mounter are prioritized for the work instruction, so that the movement until the worker goes to pick up the ASU 90 can be minimized. The splicing work can be performed efficiently.

  Further, according to the management device 80 of the present embodiment, when there is a plurality of ASUs 90 assigned to one production line in the third work instruction output process, when a component outage prediction occurs, a plurality of registered parts are registered. Among the ASU 90, the operator → ASU 90 → ASU 90 having a short moving distance of the work target mounter is given priority for the work, so that the moving distance of the ASU 90 can be minimized and the splicing work can be efficiently performed.

  In the component mounting system 1 of the present embodiment, one line or a plurality of ASU 90 is assigned to one line, but the present invention is not limited to this, and one or a plurality of ASU 90 is assigned to a plurality of lines. May be shared. For example, as shown in FIG. 13, each mounter of two adjacent lines of a plurality of production lines is installed so that the parts supply device 16 side (hatched part) faces each other, and two mounters are installed. One ASU 90 may be shared. In this case, the movement distance of the ASU 90 does not consider the distance in the lateral direction of the line (vertical direction in FIG. 13), but may consider only the distance in the longitudinal direction of the line (horizontal direction in FIG. 13). Good. For example, a worker A near the mounter 10 on the line 1 goes to pick up the ASU 90 on the mounter 05 on the line 2, carries the ASU 90 to the mounter 01 on the line 1 which is the target mounter, and performs splicing work on the target mounter. In the case of performing, the moving distance of the mounter 10 of the line 1 → the mounter 05 of the line 2 → the mounter 01 of the line 1 along the longitudinal direction of the line may be calculated.

  In the above-described embodiment, the present invention is applied to the splicing work using the ASU 90, but the present invention is not limited to this. For example, as shown in FIG. 14, a spare feeder 18 is placed on the production line. A feeder storage area 100 is provided at a predetermined position (for example, a central position) on the line, and an operator takes the feeder 18 to the feeder storage area 100 and carries it to the work mounter to replace the feeder 18 with respect to the work mounter. It may be applied when performing. FIG. 15 is a flowchart showing an example of a fourth work instruction output process executed by the CPU 81 of the management device 80. The fourth work instruction output process is executed for each line. As described above, the management device 80 registers a worker ID and a line in charge for each line, and manages a worker in charge of each line and a work schedule for each worker.

  When the fourth work instruction output process is executed, the CPU 81 of the management device 80 first determines whether or not there is a mounter equipped with the feeder 18 that is expected to run out of parts within a predetermined time (step S400). If it is determined that there is no mounter equipped with the feeder 18 that is expected to run out of parts within a predetermined time, the work instruction output process ends without instructing to replace the feeder. On the other hand, when the CPU 81 determines that there is a mounter equipped with the feeder 18 that is expected to run out of parts within a predetermined time, the CPU 81 acquires information (worker ID) about the registered worker currently assigned to the line (step S402). ), It is determined whether there are a plurality of registered workers (step S404). When the CPU 81 determines that there is one registered worker, the CPU 81 instructs the registered worker designated in the work schedule to replace the feeder (step S406), and ends the fourth work instruction output process. On the other hand, when the CPU 81 determines that there are a plurality of registered workers, the CPU 81 acquires the work schedule for each worker (step S408) and acquires the current position for each worker (step S410). The process of step S410 can be performed by the same process as step S210.

  When the current position of each worker is acquired in this way, the CPU 81 stores the worker in the feeder storage 100 based on the acquired current position of each worker, the position of the feeder storage 100, and the position of the work target mounter. The moving distance to get the spare feeder 18 and the moving distance to carry the feeder 18 in the feeder storage area 100 to the work target mounter are calculated for each worker (step S412), and the work target mounter is also calculated. The work required time for each worker is derived (step S414). Here, the work required time for each worker is the moving time for the worker to go to the feeder storage area 100 to pick up the feeder 18 and carry it to the work target mounter, and the feeder 18 is replaced by the work target mounter. It can be calculated by the sum of the standard working time (for example, 30 seconds) required for The moving time can be calculated by the sum of the time required for the worker to pick up the feeder 18 from the feeder storage area 100 and the time to transport the feeder 18 from the feeder storage area 100 to the work target mounter. The former travel time is based on the current position of the worker calculated in step S410 and the predetermined position of the feeder yard 100 (the center position of the line) until the worker takes the feeder 18 to the feeder yard 100. Can be calculated for each worker by calculating the moving distance for each worker and dividing the calculated moving distance by the standard moving speed (standard walking speed) of the worker. The latter moving time can be calculated by dividing the moving distance from the feeder storage 100 to the work target mounter calculated in step S412 by the standard moving speed of the worker when carrying the feeder 18.

  Then, the CPU 81 determines whether or not, among the plurality of registered workers, there is a worker who cannot complete the work by the estimated time of parts outage by using the free time of the work schedule of each worker acquired in step S408. If it is determined that there is a worker who cannot complete the work (step S416), the work is instructed to the worker specified in the work schedule (step S406), and the fourth work instruction output process ends. . On the other hand, when the CPU 81 determines that there is no worker who cannot complete the work, among the plurality of registered workers, the work calculated in step S412 → the feeder storage 100 → the work with the shortest movement distance of the work target mounter The priorities are determined so that the workers are given priority to perform the work (step S418), the work is instructed to the workers according to the determined priority (step S420), and the work schedule is updated (step S422). 4 The work instruction output process ends. The process of step S420 is performed by, for example, notifying the work priority order, work position (mounter number), and work content (feeder replacement) on the display 89, or notifying the mobile information terminal owned by the worker. be able to. The work priority also includes which worker should work and where the feeder 18 is currently. The process of step S422 is a process of replacing the worker specified in the work schedule for the work related to the instruction with the worker having the highest priority determined in step S418.

  FIG. 16 is an explanatory diagram illustrating a flow until a feeder replacement is instructed by the fourth work instruction output process. As shown in FIG. 16, workers A and B are registered as workers in charge of the production line, and the worker A completes the feeder exchange with the mounter 05 at the time of 14:00 pm. B completes the replacement of the feeder on the mounter 10 (see FIG. 16 (a)), and at the time of 14:02:00, there is an expected out-of-part condition that "feeder is replaced on the mounter 02 (expected time of out-of-part time 14:77:00)". Consider the case where it occurs (see FIG. 16B). In this case, the CPU 81 of the management device 80 has a distance of “current position of worker A (mounter 05) → position of feeder storage area 100 (line center position, near mounter 05) → mounter to be operated (mounter 02)” and “ Worker B's current position (mounter 10) → position of feeder storage area 100 (line center position, near mounter 05) → distance of work target mounter (mounter 02) "and the work required time of each worker is derived. To do. Next, it is determined whether or not there is a worker who cannot complete the work by the expected time when the mounter 02 runs out of parts. In this description, it is assumed that both workers are determined to be able to complete the work by the expected time when the mounter 02 runs out of parts. Therefore, the CPU 81 determines and directs that the shorter distance, that is, the worker A performs the splicing work with the mounter 02 (see FIG. 16C). The CPU 81 updates the work schedule based on the newly determined content. In this way, when a component shortage prediction occurs, the operator who has a short moving distance of the operator → the feeder storage 100 → the work target mounter among the plurality of registered operators is given a priority for the work. Accordingly, it is possible to efficiently perform the feeder exchange in consideration of the moving distance when the feeder 18 is taken from the feeder storage area 100.

  In the above-described embodiment, the position of the mounter that is the work target is considered as the position of the work target, but the mounting position of the feeder mounted on the mounter that is the work target may be the position of the work target. For example, in a single mounter in which the component supply device is long in the longitudinal direction of the line, when a plurality of feeders are expected to run out of components, an efficient work order can be determined based on the mounting position of the work target feeder. .

  In the above-described embodiment, in the first work instruction output process, if it is assumed that the splicing work is performed in accordance with the temporarily determined priority order, the work is performed by any of the plurality of splicing works by the expected time of parts outage. If it is determined that the work cannot be completed, the priority order is determined so that the work will be performed with a higher priority for the splice work with the estimated out-of-component time coming earlier.However, the splice work that cannot be completed by the estimated out-of-component time will be given priority. It is also possible to determine the priority order by applying the provisionally determined priority order only to the splicing work in which the work can be completed by the expected time of parts outage.

  In the embodiment described above, in the second work instruction output process or the fourth work instruction output process, if it is determined that there is an operator who cannot complete the work by the estimated time of parts outage by using the idle time of the schedule, the work schedule is designated. Although the work is instructed to the worker who has been done, the worker → ASU 90 → the movement distance of the work target mounter, only to the worker who can complete the work by the estimated time of parts outage by using the idle time of the schedule, Alternatively, the priority order of the worker may be determined based on the movement distance of the worker → the feeder storage 100 → the mounter for the work, and the determined worker may be instructed to perform the work.

  In the above-described embodiment, in the third work instruction output process, when it is determined that there is an ASU 90 that cannot complete the work by the estimated time of parts outage by using the free time of the work schedule of each ASU 90, the ASU 90 designated by the work schedule. I instructed the worker to work using, but only for the ASU90 that can complete the work by the estimated time of parts outage by using the idle time of the work schedule, based on the movement distance of the worker → ASU90 → work target mounter The priority order of the ASU 90 may be determined, and the worker may be instructed to perform the work using the determined ASU 90.

  Here, the correspondence relationship between the main elements of this embodiment and the main elements of the invention described in the column of the summary of the invention will be described. That is, the screen printing machine 2 and the component mounting machine 10 correspond to the “to-board processing machine”, and the processing of step S100 of the first work instruction output processing of FIG. 6 and the step S200 of the second work instruction output processing of FIG. 8 are performed. The CPU 81 of the management device 80 that executes the process, the process of step S300 of the third work instruction output process of FIG. 11, corresponds to the “work information acquisition unit”, and the process of step S106 of the first work instruction output process and the second work. The CPU 81 of the management device 80 that executes the processing of steps S210 and S212 of the instruction output processing and the processing of steps S304 and S306 of the third work instruction output processing corresponds to the "position acquisition means", and the step of the first work instruction output processing. The processing of S108 to S118, the processing of steps S214 to S220 of the second work instruction output processing, and the steps S308 to S of the third work instruction output processing. The CPU 81 of the management device 80 that executes 16 processes corresponds to the “work order determining means”, and includes the process of step S120 of the first work instruction output process, the process of step S222 of the second work instruction output process, and the third work instruction. The CPU 81 of the management device 80 that executes the process of step S318 of the output process corresponds to the “work instruction means”. Further, the RAM 84 of the management device 80 corresponds to "storage means". Further, the CPU 81 of the management apparatus 80 that executes the process of step S400 of the fourth work instruction output process of FIG. 15 corresponds to the “work information acquisition means”, and management that executes the process of step S410 of the fourth work instruction output process. The CPU 81 of the device 80 corresponds to the “position acquisition unit”, the CPU 81 of the management device 80 that executes the processes of steps S412 to S418 of the fourth work instruction output process corresponds to the “worker determination unit”, and the fourth work instruction. The CPU 81 of the management device 80 that executes the process of step S420 of the output process corresponds to the “work instruction means”.

  It is needless to say that the present invention is not limited to the above-described embodiments and can be implemented in various modes as long as they are within the technical scope of the present invention.

  INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY The present invention can be used in the manufacturing industry of substrate processing machines and management devices.

  DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 component mounting system, 2 screen printing machine, 10 component mounting machine, 11 base, 12 main body frame, 13 support stand, 14 feeder stand, 16 component supply device, 18 feeder, 20 substrate transfer device, 22 belt conveyor device, 30 Backup device, 32 backup plate, 34 backup pin, 40 XY robot, 41 X-axis guide rail, 42 X-axis slider, 42a X-axis position sensor, 42b X-axis actuator, 43 Y-axis guide rail, 44 Y-axis slider, 44a Y Axis position sensor, 44b Y-axis actuator, 46 mark camera, 48 parts camera, 49 nozzle station, 50 head, 51 suction nozzle, 52 Z-axis actuator, 54 θ-axis actuator, 60 card reader, 70 control device, 71 CPU, 72 ROM, 73 HDD, 74 RAM, 75 input / output interface, 76 bus, 80 management device, 81 CPU, 82 ROM, 83 HDD, 84 RAM, 85 input / output interface, 86 bus, 87 input device, 88 card reader, 89 Display, 90 Auto Splicing Unit (ASU), 92,94 Feed groove.

Claims (5)

A plurality of component mounters that pick up electronic components supplied by the component supply device and mount them on a circuit board;
Wherein for a plurality of component mounting machines, operator A component mounting system including a management apparatus that manages predetermined work to be performed on the work object by using a predetermined unit of work
At least, it said work object of the plurality of component mounting machines, and work information acquisition means for acquiring a working information and a parts shortage predicted time of the electronic components mounted on said working object,
Position acquisition means for acquiring the current position of the working unit,
When a plurality of pieces of work information are acquired by the work information acquisition unit, the estimated parts out time corresponding to each of the plurality of work targets related to the plurality of pieces of acquired work information and the position acquisition unit are acquired. Work order determining means for determining a work order for the plurality of work targets based on the current position of the work unit,
Work instruction means for instructing a worker to execute the predetermined work based on the determined work order;
A component mounting system comprising:   A plurality of component mounters that pick up electronic components supplied by the component supply device and mount them on a circuit board;
  A feeder that is provided in the component supply device and is a work target that sends out the electronic component to a component supply position where the electronic component can be picked up,
  A work unit used when a worker works on the feeder,
  A component mounting system including: a management device that manages a predetermined work to be performed by an operator using the work unit for the plurality of component mounters;
  At least the feeder of the plurality of component mounters, and work information acquisition means for acquiring, as work information, a component out-of-date estimated time of an electronic component mounted on the feeder,
  Position acquisition means for acquiring the current position of the working unit,
  When a plurality of pieces of work information are acquired by the work information acquisition means, the estimated parts out time corresponding to the plurality of feeders related to the plurality of pieces of work information acquired, and the position acquisition means are acquired. Work order determining means for determining a work order for the plurality of feeders based on the current position of the work unit;
  Work instruction means for instructing a worker to execute the predetermined work based on the determined work order;
  A component mounting system comprising:   A plurality of component mounters that pick up electronic components supplied by the component supply device and mount them on a circuit board;
  A component mounting system including a management device that manages a predetermined work to be performed by an operator using a predetermined work unit for the plurality of component mounters,
  At least a work information acquisition unit that acquires, as work information, a work target of the plurality of component mounters, and a component outage expected time of an electronic component mounted on the work target,
  A position acquisition means for acquiring the current position of the work unit by a positioning system provided in the work unit;
  When a plurality of pieces of work information are acquired by the work information acquisition unit, the estimated parts out time corresponding to each of the plurality of work targets related to the plurality of pieces of acquired work information and the position acquisition unit are acquired. Work order determining means for determining a work order for the plurality of work targets based on the current position of the work unit,
  Work instruction means for instructing a worker to execute the predetermined work based on the determined work order;
  A component mounting system comprising: The component mounting system according to any one of claims 1 to 3 ,
The work order determination means calculates a distance from the current position of the work unit to the position of the work target for each of the plurality of work targets based on the current position of the work unit, and the work target among the plurality of work targets is calculated. A component mounting system characterized in that the work order is prioritized when the distance to the work unit is short. The component mounting system according to any one of claims 1 to 4 ,
The work order determination means determines whether or not there is a work target that cannot complete the predetermined work by the corresponding estimated time of parts outage, when the determined work order is followed, until the corresponding estimated time of parts outage. When it is determined that there is a work target that cannot complete the predetermined work, the work order that prioritizes the predetermined work with respect to the work target that cannot complete the predetermined work by the corresponding part outage time is determined,
A component mounting system characterized in that

Images