JP4817446B2 - Adsorption component interference determination method and adsorption component interference determination apparatus for electronic component mounting machine - Google Patents

Adsorption component interference determination method and adsorption component interference determination apparatus for electronic component mounting machine Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP4817446B2
JP4817446B2 JP2006249328A JP2006249328A JP4817446B2 JP 4817446 B2 JP4817446 B2 JP 4817446B2 JP 2006249328 A JP2006249328 A JP 2006249328A JP 2006249328 A JP2006249328 A JP 2006249328A JP 4817446 B2 JP4817446 B2 JP 4817446B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
component
electronic component
margin
range
electronic
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
JP2006249328A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2008071941A (en
Inventor
公夫 磯村
剛 加藤
和美 星川
明宏 川尻
雅幸 田代
聡 杉浦
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Fuji Corp
Original Assignee
Fuji Machine Manufacturing Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Fuji Machine Manufacturing Co Ltd filed Critical Fuji Machine Manufacturing Co Ltd
Priority to JP2006249328A priority Critical patent/JP4817446B2/en
Publication of JP2008071941A publication Critical patent/JP2008071941A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4817446B2 publication Critical patent/JP4817446B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Description

本発明は、複数の吸着ノズルにそれぞれ電子部品を吸着して回路基板に装着する電子部品装着機の吸着部品干渉判定方法及び吸着部品干渉判定装置に関する発明である。   The present invention relates to a suction component interference determination method and a suction component interference determination device of an electronic component mounting machine that sucks and mounts electronic components on a circuit board by sucking electronic components to a plurality of suction nozzles, respectively.

複数の吸着ノズルにそれぞれ電子部品を吸着する電子部品装着機においては、特許文献1(特開2004−304120号公報)に示すように、2本以上の吸着ノズルに吸着する電子部品同士が干渉しないようにする必要がある。この電子部品同士の干渉の有無を判定する際に、図5に示すように、電子部品が内接する四角形を部品外形と見なして、この部品外形の周囲に、部品寸法ばらつきや電子部品装着機の精度ばらつき等を考慮するためのマージンを加算して電子部品が存在する可能性のある範囲(以下「部品存在範囲」という)を設定しておき、2つの電子部品の部品存在範囲が部分的に重なり合うか否かで電子部品同士の干渉の有無を判定するようにしている。
特開2004−304120号公報
In an electronic component mounting machine that sucks electronic components to a plurality of suction nozzles, as shown in Patent Document 1 (Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2004-304120), electronic components sucked by two or more suction nozzles do not interfere with each other. It is necessary to do so. When determining the presence or absence of interference between the electronic components, as shown in FIG. 5, the rectangle inscribed by the electronic components is regarded as the component outer shape, and the component dimension variation or the electronic component mounting machine is surrounded around the component outer shape. A range in which electronic components may exist (hereinafter referred to as “component existence range”) is set by adding a margin for taking into account variations in accuracy, etc., and the component existence range of two electronic components is partially The presence or absence of interference between electronic components is determined based on whether or not they overlap.
JP 2004-304120 A

従来の部品存在範囲は、電子部品が内接する四角形を基準にしてX方向(水平方向)とY方向(垂直方向)に同一のマージンを設定するようにしている。   In the conventional component existence range, the same margin is set in the X direction (horizontal direction) and the Y direction (vertical direction) with reference to a rectangle inscribed by the electronic component.

本来、電子部品装着機の構成や部品寸法精度、位置決め精度等によってX方向のマージンとY方向のマージンは異なる値になるはずであるが、従来は、X方向のマージンとY方向のマージンを同じ値に設定しているため、大きい方のマージンを取らざるを得なかった。その結果、部品存在範囲を設定する際に、本来、マージンが小さい方向であるにも拘らず、必要以上に大きなマージンを取ることになってしまい、実際には電子部品同士が干渉しない場合でも、2つの部品存在範囲のマージン部分が重なり合って電子部品同士が干渉すると誤判定される可能性があった。   Originally, the margin in the X direction and the margin in the Y direction should be different depending on the configuration of the electronic component mounting machine, component dimensional accuracy, positioning accuracy, etc., but conventionally the margin in the X direction and the margin in the Y direction are the same. Because it was set to a value, the larger margin had to be taken. As a result, when setting the component existence range, although the margin is originally in a small direction, it will take a larger margin than necessary, and even if the electronic components do not actually interfere with each other, There is a possibility that an erroneous determination is made that the electronic parts interfere with each other because the margin parts of the two parts existing ranges overlap.

また、従来の部品存在範囲の形状は、電子部品が内接する四角形よりもマージン分だけ大きい四角形となるため、電子部品の形状が四角形でない場合は、実際の電子部品が存在する範囲よりも部品存在範囲が大きく設定されてしまう。このため、図6に示すように、実際には電子部品同士が干渉しない場合でも、2つの部品存在範囲が部分的に重なり合って電子部品同士が干渉すると誤判定される可能性があった。   In addition, since the shape of the conventional component existence range is a rectangle that is larger by a margin than the rectangle in which the electronic component is inscribed, if the shape of the electronic component is not a rectangle, the component exists more than the range where the actual electronic component exists. The range is set too large. For this reason, as shown in FIG. 6, even when the electronic components do not actually interfere with each other, there is a possibility that the two component existence ranges partially overlap to make an erroneous determination that the electronic components interfere with each other.

本発明はこれらの事情を考慮してなされたものであり、従ってその目的は、2本以上の吸着ノズルに吸着する電子部品同士の干渉の有無を精度良く判定することができる電子部品装着機の吸着部品干渉判定方法及び吸着部品干渉判定装置を提供することにある。   The present invention has been made in consideration of these circumstances. Therefore, the object of the present invention is to provide an electronic component mounting machine that can accurately determine the presence or absence of interference between electronic components attracted by two or more suction nozzles. To provide a suction component interference determination method and a suction component interference determination device.

上記目的を達成するために、本発明は、予め、電子部品の外形を基準にしてX方向のマージンとY方向のマージンを個別に設定して当該電子部品が存在する可能性のある範囲(以下「部品存在範囲」という)を決定しておき、2本以上の吸着ノズルに吸着する電子部品同士が干渉するか否かを前記部品存在範囲に基づいて判定する吸着部品干渉判定を行う際に、予め、1つの電子部品を複数のエレメントに分割して、各エレメント毎に各エレメントの外形を基準にしてX方向のマージンとY方向のマージンを個別に設定して当該エレメントが存在する可能性のある範囲(以下「エレメント存在範囲」という)を決定して、1つの部品存在範囲を複数のエレメント存在範囲の組み合わせで構成し、2本以上の吸着ノズルに吸着する電子部品同士が干渉するか否かを前記エレメント存在範囲に基づいて判定するものであり、前記エレメント存在範囲を決定する際に、前記電子部品の各辺毎に長さと幅が同じリード列を1つのエレメントとして取り扱うことを特徴とするものである。本発明では、電子部品装着機の構成や部品寸法精度、位置決め精度等によってX方向のマージンとY方向のマージンとが異なる値になるという事情を考慮して、X方向のマージンとY方向のマージンを個別に異なる値に設定するため、X方向のマージンとY方向のマージンをそれぞれ必要最小限のマージンに設定することができ、実際には電子部品同士が干渉しないものを干渉すると誤判定することを未然に防止できる。しかも、電子部品の外形を基準にしてX方向のマージンとY方向のマージンを加算して部品存在範囲を設定するため、図7、図8に示すように、部品存在範囲の形状を電子部品の外形とほぼ相似形とすることができ、実際には電子部品同士が干渉しない非四角形の部品形状のものを干渉すると誤判定することを未然に防止できる。 In order to achieve the above-described object, the present invention sets the margin in the X direction and the margin in the Y direction separately in advance based on the external shape of the electronic component, and the range in which the electronic component may exist (hereinafter referred to as the electronic component). (Referred to as “component existence range”), and when performing suction component interference determination that determines whether or not electronic components sucked by two or more suction nozzles interfere with each other based on the component presence range , There is a possibility that one electronic component is divided into a plurality of elements in advance, and each element has an X-direction margin and a Y-direction margin individually set based on the outer shape of each element. An electronic component that determines a certain range (hereinafter referred to as “element existence range”) and is composed of a combination of a plurality of element existence ranges and adsorbs to two or more adsorption nozzles Whether to interfere or not is determined based on the element existence range, and when determining the element existence range, a lead row having the same length and width is handled as one element for each side of the electronic component. It is characterized by this. In the present invention, the X-direction margin and the Y-direction margin are considered in consideration of the fact that the X-direction margin and the Y-direction margin have different values depending on the configuration of the electronic component mounting machine, component dimensional accuracy, positioning accuracy, and the like. Are set to different values individually, the margin in the X direction and the margin in the Y direction can be set to the minimum necessary margins, respectively, and it is erroneously determined that the electronic components do not actually interfere with each other Can be prevented. Moreover, since the component existence range is set by adding the margin in the X direction and the margin in the Y direction on the basis of the outer shape of the electronic component, the shape of the component existence range is changed to the shape of the electronic component as shown in FIGS. It is possible to make the shape substantially similar to the outer shape, and it is possible to prevent an erroneous determination that a non-rectangular component shape in which electronic components do not interfere with each other actually interfere.

更に、本発明は、予め、1つの電子部品を複数のエレメントに分割して、各エレメント毎に各エレメントの外形を基準にしてX方向のマージンとY方向のマージンを個別に設定して当該エレメントが存在する可能性のある範囲(以下「エレメント存在範囲」という)を決定して、1つの部品存在範囲を複数のエレメント存在範囲の組み合わせで構成し、2本以上の吸着ノズルに吸着する電子部品同士が干渉するか否かを前記エレメント存在範囲に基づいて判定するところに特徴がある。このように、1つの電子部品を複数のエレメントに分割して、各エレメント毎に干渉の有無を判定するようにすれば、電子部品の外形が比較的複雑な形状であっても、干渉の有無を精度良く判定することができる。 Furthermore, the present invention divides one electronic component into a plurality of elements in advance, and individually sets the margin in the X direction and the margin in the Y direction for each element based on the outer shape of each element. An electronic component that determines the range in which there is a possibility (hereinafter referred to as an “element presence range”), configures one component presence range as a combination of a plurality of element presence ranges, and is sucked by two or more suction nozzles It is characterized in that whether or not they interfere with each other is determined based on the element existence range. In this way, if one electronic component is divided into a plurality of elements and the presence / absence of interference is determined for each element, even if the outer shape of the electronic component is a relatively complicated shape, the presence / absence of interference Can be determined with high accuracy.

更に、本発明は、エレメント存在範囲を決定する際に、電子部品の各辺毎に長さと幅が同じリード列を1つのエレメントとして取り扱うようにしたところに特徴がある。このようにすれば、1つの電子部品を複数のエレメントに分割する処理が容易である。 Furthermore, the present invention is, in determining the elements existing range, length and width for each side of the electronic components is characterized in that when handling the same lead column as a single element. In this way, the process of dividing one electronic component into a plurality of elements is easy.

以下、本発明を実施するための最良の形態を具体化した一実施例を説明する。
本実施例では、例えば特開2000−294990号公報に記載された部品実装機を使用する。この部品実装機の機械的構成は、上記公報に記載された構成と同じもので良いので、説明を省略し、主要な部分についてのみ説明する。
Hereinafter, an embodiment embodying the best mode for carrying out the present invention will be described.
In the present embodiment, for example, a component mounting machine described in JP 2000-294990 A is used. Since the mechanical configuration of this component mounting machine may be the same as that described in the above publication, description thereof will be omitted and only the main part will be described.

図1に示すように、レボルバー型のノズルヘッド13(回転体)に対して円周方向(回転方向)に所定間隔で配列した複数の吸着ノズル1〜12を下向きに組み付け、各吸着ノズル1〜12に電子部品を吸着して回路基板(図示せず)に実装するようにしている。   As shown in FIG. 1, a plurality of suction nozzles 1 to 12 arranged at predetermined intervals in the circumferential direction (rotation direction) with respect to a revolver type nozzle head 13 (rotating body) are assembled downward, and each suction nozzle 1 to 1 is assembled. An electronic component is attracted to 12 and mounted on a circuit board (not shown).

本実施例では、吸着ノズル1〜12の本数を12本としているため、最大12個の部品を同時に吸着できるようになっている(図2参照)。吸着ノズル1〜12の径は全て同一でも良いが、吸着する部品のサイズに合わせて複数種類のノズル径の吸着ノズルを用いても良い。本実施例では、例えば、大径、中径、小径の3種類のノズル径の吸着ノズル1〜12を用い、1番目の吸着ノズル1と、その180°反対側に位置する7番目の吸着ノズル7は、中型部品(例えば10mm×10mmまでの部品)を吸着できるように中間的なノズル径の吸着ノズルを使用し、更に、1番目の吸着ノズル1から90°離れた4番目の吸着ノズル4と、その180°反対側に位置する10番目の吸着ノズル10は、大型部品(例えば20mm×20mmまでの部品)を吸着できるように大径の吸着ノズルを使用し、残りの8本の吸着ノズル2,3,5,6,8,9,11,12は、小型部品(例えば5mm×4mmまでの部品)を吸着できるように小径の吸着ノズルを使用している。   In the present embodiment, the number of suction nozzles 1 to 12 is set to 12, so that a maximum of 12 parts can be sucked simultaneously (see FIG. 2). Although the diameters of the suction nozzles 1 to 12 may all be the same, suction nozzles having a plurality of types of nozzle diameters may be used according to the size of the parts to be sucked. In the present embodiment, for example, suction nozzles 1 to 12 having three types of nozzle diameters of large diameter, medium diameter, and small diameter are used, and the first suction nozzle 1 and the seventh suction nozzle located on the opposite side of 180 °. 7 uses a suction nozzle having an intermediate nozzle diameter so that medium-sized parts (for example, parts up to 10 mm × 10 mm) can be sucked, and further, a fourth suction nozzle 4 that is 90 ° apart from the first suction nozzle 1. The tenth suction nozzle 10 located on the opposite side of 180 ° uses a large-diameter suction nozzle so that large parts (for example, parts up to 20 mm × 20 mm) can be sucked, and the remaining eight suction nozzles 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11, and 12 use a small-diameter suction nozzle so that small parts (for example, parts up to 5 mm × 4 mm) can be sucked.

図2に示すように、12本の吸着ノズル1〜12に吸着する部品が全て比較的小さい部品であれば、全ての吸着ノズル1〜12に最大12個の部品を吸着することが可能であるが、図3、図4に示すように、大径の吸着ノズル4,10に大型部品(B,D,E,F)を吸着する場合は、その大型部品が邪魔になって、隣接する小径の吸着ノズル2,3,5,6,8,9,11,12に部品を吸着できないことがある。   As shown in FIG. 2, if all the parts sucked by the 12 suction nozzles 1 to 12 are relatively small parts, it is possible to suck a maximum of 12 parts to all the suction nozzles 1 to 12. However, as shown in FIG. 3 and FIG. 4, when a large component (B, D, E, F) is adsorbed to the large-diameter suction nozzles 4, 10, the large component obstructs the adjacent small diameter. The suction nozzles 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11, and 12 may not be able to suck parts.

尚、各吸着ノズル1〜12で部品を吸着する毎に、ノズルヘッド13が回転して次の吸着ノズルを図1に示す1番目の吸着ノズル1の位置(吸着ステーション)まで旋回移動させ、常に同じ位置で部品を吸着するようにしている。このような部品吸着動作を一巡した後に、各吸着ノズル1〜12に吸着された全ての部品をカメラ(図示せず)の視野内に収めて撮像し、画像処理技術によって各部品の吸着姿勢を判定したり、各部品の欠損等を検出するようにしている。   Each time the parts are picked up by the suction nozzles 1 to 12, the nozzle head 13 is rotated and the next suction nozzle is swung to the position (suction station) of the first suction nozzle 1 shown in FIG. The parts are picked up at the same position. After completing this part suction operation, all the parts sucked by the suction nozzles 1 to 12 are captured in the field of view of a camera (not shown), and the suction posture of each part is determined by image processing technology. Judgment and detection of missing parts are performed.

ところで、図2に示すように、各吸着ノズル1〜12に部品を吸着したときに、隣接する部品同士が干渉することがなければ問題ないが、吸着部品の大きさや吸着角度によっては、図3及び図4の事例に示すように、隣接する吸着部品(A〜F)が干渉することがある。このような吸着部品同士の干渉が発生すると、部品(A〜F)の吸着位置が当初の吸着位置からずれて回路基板への実装位置がずれてしまい(当初の吸着位置からのずれ量が不明であるため)、実装不良になりやすい等の問題が発生する。   By the way, as shown in FIG. 2, there is no problem if adjacent parts do not interfere with each other when the parts are sucked to the suction nozzles 1 to 12, but depending on the size and suction angle of the suction parts, FIG. As shown in the example of FIG. 4, adjacent suction parts (A to F) may interfere with each other. When such interference between the suction components occurs, the suction position of the components (A to F) shifts from the initial suction position and the mounting position on the circuit board shifts (the amount of shift from the initial suction position is unknown). Therefore, problems such as easy mounting failure occur.

そこで、本実施例では、2以上の吸着ノズルに順番に電子部品を吸着する際に、吸着しようとする電子部品が他の電子部品と干渉するか否かを判定し、電子部品同士が干渉すると判定されたときには、吸着しようとする電子部品の吸着位置を部品干渉を避ける方向(本実施例ではノズルヘッド13の外径方向)にオフセット補正するようにしている。   Therefore, in this embodiment, when the electronic components are sequentially picked up by two or more suction nozzles, it is determined whether the electronic component to be picked up interferes with other electronic components, and the electronic components interfere with each other. When the determination is made, the suction position of the electronic component to be sucked is offset-corrected in a direction that avoids component interference (in this embodiment, the outer diameter direction of the nozzle head 13).

従来は、電子部品同士の干渉の有無を判定する際に、図5に示すように、電子部品が内接する四角形を部品外形と見なして、この部品外形の周囲に、部品寸法ばらつきや電子部品装着機の精度ばらつき等を考慮するためのマージンをX方向(水平方向)とY方向(垂直方向)に同じ値に設定して、電子部品が存在する可能性のある範囲(以下「部品存在範囲」という)を設定しておき、2つの電子部品の部品存在範囲が部分的に重なり合うか否かで電子部品同士の干渉の有無を判定するようにしていた。   Conventionally, when determining the presence or absence of interference between electronic components, as shown in FIG. 5, a rectangle inscribed by the electronic component is regarded as a component outer shape, and component dimensional variations and electronic component mounting are placed around the component outer shape. The margin for taking into account machine accuracy variations is set to the same value in the X direction (horizontal direction) and the Y direction (vertical direction), and the range in which electronic components may exist (hereinafter referred to as “component existence range”) In other words, the presence or absence of interference between the electronic components is determined based on whether or not the component existence ranges of the two electronic components partially overlap.

本来、電子部品装着機の構成や部品寸法精度、位置決め精度等によってX方向のマージンとY方向のマージンは異なる値になるはずであるが、従来は、X方向のマージンとY方向のマージンを同じ値に設定しているため、大きい方のマージンを取らざるを得なかった。その結果、部品存在範囲を設定する際に、本来、マージンが小さい方向であるにも拘らず、必要以上に大きなマージンを取ることになってしまい、実際には電子部品同士が干渉しない場合でも、2つの部品存在範囲のマージン部分が重なり合って電子部品同士が干渉すると誤判定される可能性があった。   Originally, the margin in the X direction and the margin in the Y direction should be different depending on the configuration of the electronic component mounting machine, component dimensional accuracy, positioning accuracy, etc., but conventionally the margin in the X direction and the margin in the Y direction are the same. Because it was set to a value, the larger margin had to be taken. As a result, when setting the component existence range, although the margin is originally in a small direction, it will take a larger margin than necessary, and even if the electronic components do not actually interfere with each other, There is a possibility that an erroneous determination is made that the electronic parts interfere with each other because the margin parts of the two parts existing ranges overlap.

また、従来の部品存在範囲の形状は、電子部品が内接する四角形よりもマージン分だけ大きい四角形となるため、電子部品の形状が四角形でない場合は、実際の電子部品が存在する範囲よりも部品存在範囲が大きく設定されてしまう。このため、図6に示すように、実際には電子部品同士が干渉しない場合でも、2つの部品存在範囲が部分的に重なり合って電子部品同士が干渉すると誤判定される可能性があった。   In addition, since the shape of the conventional component existence range is a rectangle that is larger by a margin than the rectangle in which the electronic component is inscribed, if the shape of the electronic component is not a rectangle, the component exists more than the range where the actual electronic component exists. The range is set too large. For this reason, as shown in FIG. 6, even when the electronic components do not actually interfere with each other, there is a possibility that the two component existence ranges partially overlap to make an erroneous determination that the electronic components interfere with each other.

そこで、本実施例では、図7及び図8に示すように、電子部品の外形を基準にしてX方向のマージンとY方向のマージンを個別に設定して当該電子部品が存在する可能性のある範囲(部品存在範囲)を決定することで、部品存在範囲の形状を電子部品の外形とほぼ相似形とすると共に、X方向のマージンとY方向のマージンを個別に異なる値に設定している。この場合、部品存在範囲の形状が電子部品の外形とほぼ相似形となるため、電子部品の形状が非四角形であれば、部品存在範囲の形状も非四角形となる。   Therefore, in this embodiment, as shown in FIGS. 7 and 8, there is a possibility that the electronic component exists by setting the margin in the X direction and the margin in the Y direction individually based on the outer shape of the electronic component. By determining the range (component existence range), the shape of the component existence range is substantially similar to the outer shape of the electronic component, and the margin in the X direction and the margin in the Y direction are individually set to different values. In this case, since the shape of the component existence range is substantially similar to the outer shape of the electronic component, if the shape of the electronic component is non-rectangular, the shape of the component existence range is also non-rectangular.

更に、本実施例では、1つの電子部品を複数のエレメントに分割して、各エレメント毎に各エレメントの外形を基準にしてX方向のマージンとY方向のマージンを個別に設定して当該エレメントが存在する可能性のある範囲(以下「エレメント存在範囲」という)を決定して、1つの部品存在範囲を複数のエレメント存在範囲の組み合わせで構成し、電子部品装着機の稼働中に2本以上の吸着ノズルに吸着する電子部品同士が干渉するか否かを前記エレメント存在範囲に基づいて判定する。   Furthermore, in this embodiment, one electronic component is divided into a plurality of elements, and the margin in the X direction and the margin in the Y direction are individually set for each element based on the outer shape of each element. A range that may exist (hereinafter referred to as “element presence range”) is determined, and one component existence range is configured by a combination of a plurality of element existence ranges. It is determined based on the element existence range whether or not the electronic components sucked by the suction nozzle interfere with each other.

この場合、エレメント存在範囲を決定する際に、電子部品の各辺毎に長さと幅が同じリード列を1つのエレメントとして取り扱うようにする。図8の例では、7つのエレメントa〜gに分割される。各エレメントa〜gの位置(XY座標)は、電子部品の中心を基準位置(XY座標の原点)として設定される。尚、電子部品は、4辺にそれぞれリード列が設けられたものに限定されず、対向する2辺のみにリード列が設けられたもの(SOP等)や、1辺のみにリード列が設けられたもの(コネクタ等)について、部品存在範囲(エレメント存在範囲)を設定するようにしても良い。   In this case, when the element existence range is determined, a lead row having the same length and width is handled as one element for each side of the electronic component. In the example of FIG. 8, it is divided into seven elements ag. The positions (XY coordinates) of the elements a to g are set with the center of the electronic component as the reference position (the origin of the XY coordinates). The electronic components are not limited to those provided with lead rows on each of the four sides, but are provided with lead rows only on two opposite sides (such as SOP), and lead rows are provided only on one side. For parts (connectors and the like), a part existence range (element existence range) may be set.

例えば、図9、図10に示すように、2つの電子部品A,Bの干渉の有無を判定する場合は、一方の電子部品Aの各エレメント存在範囲1a〜3aと他方の電子部品Bの各エレメント存在範囲1b〜3bとが重なり合うか否かを判定し、図9に示すように、重なり合うエレメント存在範囲が1つも無ければ、2つの電子部品A,Bが干渉しないと判定し、図10に示すように、重なり合うエレメント存在範囲が1つでも存在すれば、2つの電子部品A,Bが干渉すると判定する。   For example, as shown in FIGS. 9 and 10, when determining the presence or absence of interference between two electronic components A and B, each element existence range 1 a to 3 a of one electronic component A and each of the other electronic components B It is determined whether or not the element existence ranges 1b to 3b overlap each other. As shown in FIG. 9, if there is no overlapping element existence range, it is determined that the two electronic components A and B do not interfere with each other, and FIG. As shown, if even one overlapping element existence range exists, it is determined that the two electronic components A and B interfere.

以上説明した本実施例によれば、電子部品の外形の周囲にマージンを設定して電子部品が存在する可能性のある範囲(部品存在範囲)を決定する際に、電子部品装着機の構成や部品寸法精度、位置決め精度等によってX方向のマージンとY方向のマージンとが異なる値になるという事情を考慮して、X方向のマージンとY方向のマージンを個別に異なる値に設定するようにしたので、X方向のマージンとY方向のマージンをそれぞれ必要最小限のマージンに設定することができ、実際には電子部品同士が干渉しないものを干渉すると誤判定することを未然に防止できる。しかも、電子部品の外形を基準にしてX方向のマージンとY方向のマージンを加算して部品存在範囲を設定するため、図7、図8に示すように、部品存在範囲の形状を電子部品の外形とほぼ相似形とすることができ、実際には電子部品同士が干渉しない非四角形の部品形状のものを干渉すると誤判定することを未然に防止できる。   According to the present embodiment described above, when a margin is set around the outline of the electronic component to determine a range where the electronic component may exist (component existence range), the configuration of the electronic component mounting machine, In consideration of the fact that the margin in the X direction and the margin in the Y direction are different depending on the part dimensional accuracy, positioning accuracy, etc., the margin in the X direction and the margin in the Y direction are individually set to different values. Therefore, the margin in the X direction and the margin in the Y direction can be set to the minimum necessary margins, and it is possible to prevent erroneous determination that the electronic components do not actually interfere with each other. Moreover, since the component existence range is set by adding the margin in the X direction and the margin in the Y direction on the basis of the outer shape of the electronic component, the shape of the component existence range is changed to the shape of the electronic component as shown in FIGS. It is possible to make the shape substantially similar to the outer shape, and it is possible to prevent an erroneous determination that a non-rectangular component shape in which electronic components do not interfere with each other actually interfere.

この結果、従来技術では電子部品同士の干渉有りと誤判定されて生産できなかったレシピでも生産できるようになり、生産可能なレシピの範囲を拡大できる。しかも、レボルバー型のノズルヘッド13を搭載した電子部品装着機においては、吸着ノズル1〜12への電子部品の配置を最適化することができ、電子部品の吸着を能率良く行うことができて、生産時間を短縮できる。更に、従来技術では干渉すると誤判定されて吸着位置のオフセット補正を余儀なくされていた電子部品でもオフセット補正無しで正常に吸着できるようになり、オフセット補正による吸着率の悪化を回避できる。   As a result, it becomes possible to produce even a recipe that could not be produced due to erroneous determination that there is interference between electronic components in the prior art, and the range of recipes that can be produced can be expanded. Moreover, in the electronic component mounting machine equipped with the revolver type nozzle head 13, the arrangement of the electronic components to the suction nozzles 1 to 12 can be optimized, and the electronic components can be efficiently suctioned. Production time can be shortened. Further, even an electronic component that has been erroneously determined to interfere with the conventional technology and has been forced to perform offset correction of the suction position can be normally suctioned without offset correction, and deterioration of the suction rate due to offset correction can be avoided.

尚、本発明は、1つの電子部品を複数のエレメントに分割するようにしているが、図7、図8に示す参考例1,2のように、電子部品の外形とほぼ相似形の部品存在範囲を設定して、2つの電子部品の部品存在範囲が部分的に重なり合うか否かで電子部品同士の干渉の有無を判定することも考えられるIn the present invention, one electronic component is divided into a plurality of elements. However , as in Reference Examples 1 and 2 shown in FIGS. 7 and 8, there is a component that is substantially similar to the external shape of the electronic component. It is also conceivable to set the range and determine the presence or absence of interference between the electronic components based on whether or not the component existence ranges of the two electronic components partially overlap.

その他、本発明は、レボルバー型のノズルヘッド13を搭載した電子部品装着機に限定されず、複数の吸着ノズルにそれぞれ電子部品を吸着して回路基板に装着する電子部品装着機に広く適用して実施できる。   In addition, the present invention is not limited to the electronic component mounting machine on which the revolver type nozzle head 13 is mounted. The present invention is widely applied to an electronic component mounting machine that sucks and mounts electronic components on a plurality of suction nozzles. Can be implemented.

本発明の一実施例を示すノズルヘッドの下面図である。It is a bottom view of the nozzle head which shows one Example of this invention. 吸着ノズルに電子部品を吸着した状態を示すノズルヘッドの下面図である。It is a bottom view of a nozzle head showing a state where an electronic component is sucked by a suction nozzle. 吸着ノズルに吸着した電子部品が干渉する様子を示すノズルヘッドの下面図である(事例1)。It is a bottom view of the nozzle head which shows a mode that the electronic component attracted | sucked to the suction nozzle interferes (case 1). 吸着ノズルに吸着した電子部品が干渉する様子を示すノズルヘッドの下面図である(事例2)。It is a bottom view of the nozzle head which shows a mode that the electronic component attracted | sucked to the suction nozzle interferes (example 2). 従来のマージンと部品存在範囲の設定方法を説明する図である。It is a figure explaining the setting method of the conventional margin and component presence range. 実際には電子部品同士の干渉の可能性がない場合でも、従来技術では電子部品同士が干渉すると誤判定される事例を説明する図である。It is a figure explaining the example mistakenly determined that electronic parts interfere with each other in the related art even when there is actually no possibility of interference between electronic parts. 本発明に関連する参考例1におけるマージンと部品存在範囲の設定方法を説明する図である。 Ru Figure der explaining a method of setting the margin and the component present ranges in reference example 1 related to the present invention. 本発明に関連する参考例2におけるマージンと部品存在範囲の設定方法を説明する図である。 Ru Figure der explaining a method of setting the margin and the component present ranges in reference example 2 related to the present invention. 2つの電子部品A,Bの干渉無しと判定する事例を説明する図である。It is a figure explaining the example determined with no interference of two electronic components A and B. FIG. 2つの電子部品A,Bの干渉有りと判定する事例を説明する図である。It is a figure explaining the example determined with two electronic components A and B having interference.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

1〜12…吸着ノズル、13…ノズルヘッド、A〜G…電子部品   DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1-12 ... Adsorption nozzle, 13 ... Nozzle head, AG ... Electronic component

Claims (2)

複数の吸着ノズルにそれぞれ電子部品を吸着して回路基板に装着する電子部品装着機の吸着部品干渉判定方法において、
予め、前記電子部品の外形を基準にしてX方向のマージンとY方向のマージンを個別に設定して当該電子部品が存在する可能性のある範囲(以下「部品存在範囲」という)を決定しておき、2本以上の吸着ノズルに吸着する電子部品同士が干渉するか否かを前記部品存在範囲に基づいて判定する吸着部品干渉判定を行う際に、
予め、1つの電子部品を複数のエレメントに分割して、各エレメント毎に各エレメントの外形を基準にしてX方向のマージンとY方向のマージンを個別に設定して当該エレメントが存在する可能性のある範囲(以下「エレメント存在範囲」という)を決定して、1つの部品存在範囲を複数のエレメント存在範囲の組み合わせで構成し、2本以上の吸着ノズルに吸着する電子部品同士が干渉するか否かを前記エレメント存在範囲に基づいて判定するものであり、
前記エレメント存在範囲を決定する際に、前記電子部品の各辺毎に長さと幅が同じリード列を1つのエレメントとして取り扱うことを特徴とする電子部品装着機の吸着部品干渉判定方法。
In the adsorption component interference determination method of an electronic component mounting machine that adsorbs electronic components to a plurality of suction nozzles and mounts them on a circuit board,
A range in which the electronic component may exist (hereinafter referred to as “component existence range”) is determined in advance by individually setting a margin in the X direction and a margin in the Y direction based on the outline of the electronic component. When performing the suction component interference determination for determining whether or not the electronic components sucked by two or more suction nozzles interfere with each other based on the component existence range ,
There is a possibility that one electronic component is divided into a plurality of elements in advance, and each element has an X-direction margin and a Y-direction margin individually set based on the outer shape of each element. Whether a certain range (hereinafter referred to as “element existence range”) is determined, one component existence range is configured by a combination of a plurality of element existence ranges, and electronic components adsorbed by two or more adsorption nozzles interfere with each other Is determined based on the element existence range,
When determining the element existence range, a lead row having the same length and width is handled as one element for each side of the electronic component, and a suction component interference determination method for an electronic component mounting machine.
複数の吸着ノズルにそれぞれ電子部品を吸着して回路基板に装着する電子部品装着機の吸着部品干渉判定装置において、
予め前記電子部品の外形を基準にしてX方向のマージンとY方向のマージンを個別に設定して得られた当該電子部品が存在する可能性のある範囲(以下「部品存在範囲」という)を記憶する記憶手段と、
2本以上の吸着ノズルに吸着する電子部品同士が干渉するか否かを前記部品存在範囲に基づいて判定する干渉判定手段と
を備え
前記部品存在範囲は、1つの電子部品を複数のエレメントに分割して複数のエレメント存在範囲の組み合わせで構成され、
各エレメント存在範囲は、前記1つの電子部品を複数のエレメントに分割する際に、前記電子部品の各辺毎に長さと幅が同じリード列を1つのエレメントとして取り扱い、各エレメント毎に各エレメントの外形を基準にしてX方向のマージンとY方向のマージンを個別に設定したものであり、
前記干渉判定手段は、2本以上の吸着ノズルに吸着する電子部品同士が干渉するか否かを前記エレメント存在範囲に基づいて判定することを特徴とする電子部品装着機の吸着部品干渉判定装置。
In the adsorption component interference determination device of an electronic component mounting machine that adsorbs electronic components to a plurality of suction nozzles and mounts them on a circuit board,
Stores a range (hereinafter referred to as “component existence range”) in which the electronic component may exist in advance, which is obtained by individually setting a margin in the X direction and a margin in the Y direction based on the outline of the electronic component in advance Storage means for
Interference determining means for determining whether or not electronic components sucked by two or more suction nozzles interfere with each other based on the component existence range ;
The component existence range is composed of a combination of a plurality of element existence ranges by dividing one electronic component into a plurality of elements,
Each element existence range is determined by handling a lead row having the same length and width for each side of the electronic component as one element when dividing the electronic component into a plurality of elements. A margin in the X direction and a margin in the Y direction are individually set based on the outer shape.
The said interference determination means determines whether the electronic components adsorbed by two or more adsorption nozzles interfere based on the said element presence range, The adsorption component interference determination apparatus of the electronic component mounting machine characterized by the above-mentioned .
JP2006249328A 2006-09-14 2006-09-14 Adsorption component interference determination method and adsorption component interference determination apparatus for electronic component mounting machine Active JP4817446B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2006249328A JP4817446B2 (en) 2006-09-14 2006-09-14 Adsorption component interference determination method and adsorption component interference determination apparatus for electronic component mounting machine

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2006249328A JP4817446B2 (en) 2006-09-14 2006-09-14 Adsorption component interference determination method and adsorption component interference determination apparatus for electronic component mounting machine

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2008071941A JP2008071941A (en) 2008-03-27
JP4817446B2 true JP4817446B2 (en) 2011-11-16

Family

ID=39293280

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2006249328A Active JP4817446B2 (en) 2006-09-14 2006-09-14 Adsorption component interference determination method and adsorption component interference determination apparatus for electronic component mounting machine

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4817446B2 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN105379445A (en) * 2013-07-09 2016-03-02 富士机械制造株式会社 Method for allocating electronic components and electronic component mounting system

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP4043121B2 (en) * 1998-12-15 2008-02-06 松下電器産業株式会社 Electronic component mounting apparatus and method
JP4342199B2 (en) * 2003-04-01 2009-10-14 富士機械製造株式会社 Component adsorption position correction device for component mounting machine
JP2005174014A (en) * 2003-12-11 2005-06-30 Sharp Corp Component clearance check apparatus

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN105379445A (en) * 2013-07-09 2016-03-02 富士机械制造株式会社 Method for allocating electronic components and electronic component mounting system
CN105379445B (en) * 2013-07-09 2018-09-25 富士机械制造株式会社 The distribution method and electronic component mounting system of electronic component

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2008071941A (en) 2008-03-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP4767995B2 (en) Component mounting method, component mounting machine, mounting condition determining method, mounting condition determining apparatus, and program
US9908236B2 (en) Transfer system and transfer method
JP2013115229A (en) Component mounting method and component mounting system
JP2007214212A (en) Method, program and device for packaging state determination and packaging method
JP4342199B2 (en) Component adsorption position correction device for component mounting machine
JP4817446B2 (en) Adsorption component interference determination method and adsorption component interference determination apparatus for electronic component mounting machine
US20140238959A1 (en) Processing system
JP6663430B2 (en) Component mounting machine
JP5013816B2 (en) Surface mount equipment
JP6328964B2 (en) Nozzle stocker and component mounting device
JP2008066472A (en) Composite processor for workpiece
JP5850794B2 (en) Component conveying device and component mounting machine
JP2019140384A (en) Component mounter with push function
JP6552386B2 (en) Component mounting machine, component mounting method
JP6669782B2 (en) Electronic component mounting machine and production line
JP2008258382A (en) Assembling method of printed circuit board, and program for making mounting program
JP2017003411A (en) Processing device, processing method and production method of wiring board
JP2007283445A (en) Suction nozzle
JP6616981B2 (en) Ball inspection repair device
JP5271654B2 (en) Electronic component mounting equipment
JP2007220770A (en) Surface-mounting device
JP2009170586A (en) Method and apparatus for recognizing electronic component
JP2007242755A (en) Nozzle type recognition control method and component mounting apparatus
JP5570050B2 (en) Component mounter
JP2009206405A (en) Component mounting method and apparatus

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20090901

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20110530

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20110624

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20110809

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20110829

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20110829

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20140909

Year of fee payment: 3

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 4817446

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

S533 Written request for registration of change of name

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250