JP4587134B2 - Pachinko machine - Google Patents

Description

  The present invention relates to a pachinko machine that prevents fraud due to a so-called “hanging board” that illegally places a pachinko machine into a hit state by controlling the acquisition timing of the count value used in the hit determination.

  Conventionally, in a pachinko machine, each operation processing program such as fluorescent tube display data transfer processing, switch input processing, and hit determination processing is sequentially executed for each reset signal generated at a fixed interval due to a hardware configuration. The pachinko machine is operating. In the hit determination process, the hit determination is performed based on the count value that changes for each reset signal.

  For example, in the case of the first type pachinko machine, by determining whether or not the count value acquired when the pachinko ball enters the first start port is a preset “hit” The hit determination process is performed.

  Therefore, when the count value that changes for each reset signal is a “hit value”, the pachinko machine cannot be put into a win state unless the pachinko ball enters the first start port. In addition, the reset signal is generated at regular intervals in “msec” units, and the player cannot recognize the count value changing in “msec” units. Therefore, when the count value is “winning value” It is impossible for a player to enter a pachinko ball into the first starting opening aiming at In other words, from the player's side, there is no way to put the pachinko machine into a winning state, other than putting the pachinko balls one after another into the first starting port, in other words, during the hit determination process. Whether or not “winning value” has been acquired as the count value to be used depends greatly on the chance of the pachinko ball entering the first starting port.

  However, the count value used in the hit determination process changes periodically and sequentially within a certain range by adding a certain addition value for each reset signal generated at certain intervals. When the count value changes to the “hit value” periodically, the count value will be periodically visited. If the time at which the count value becomes the “hit value” can be recognized by some hardware, the count value will be changed thereafter. It is also possible to predict when the “winning value” will be reached.

  In recent years, the so-called “hanging board” is illegally connected to the main board, and the time point when the count value becomes “hit” is recognized by the hardware configuration, and the count value is predicted to be “hit value”. At that time, a signal indicating that a pachinko ball has entered the first starting port is transmitted to the main board, and by obtaining a “hit value” as a count value used in the hit determination process, There have been many fraudulent acts that put pachinko machines in a winning state, and the need to prevent such fraud has arisen.

  Therefore, the present invention has been made to solve the above-described problems, and makes it impossible to predict the change in the count value used in the hit determination process from the outside, so-called An object is to provide a pachinko machine that prevents fraudulent acts caused by “bunged boards”.

  The pachinko machine according to claim 1, which is configured to achieve this object, sequentially executes each operation processing program for each signal generated at a constant interval of “msec” units, and adds a constant for each signal. In a pachinko machine that performs a hit determination based on a value of a first count that periodically and sequentially changes within a first range by adding a value, the hit determination that is executed each time the signal is generated is included A second count value different from the first count that is not involved in the hit determination within a waiting time after the execution of the last motion processing program is completed until a new signal is generated, It is determined whether or not to update the update means that sequentially and repeatedly updates regardless of the value, and whether or not to substitute the value of the second count updated by the update means for the value of the first count. Case Includes a substituted unit that assigns a value of the second count to the value of the first counting, and the first count, characterized in that it is counted continuously from the assigned value.

  In the pachinko machine of the present invention having such a configuration, the operation of the pachinko machine is performed by sequentially executing each operation processing program for each signal generated at regular intervals, and one of such operation processing programs The hit determination process is based on the value of the first count.

  At this time, as a general rule, the value of the first count changes periodically and sequentially within the first range by adding an added value for each signal generated at a constant interval. In addition, the value of the second count is within the first range or the second range different from the first range within the waiting time after the execution of the last motion processing program is completed until a new signal is generated. It has changed. Each operation processing program may be executed depending on the status of the pachinko machine, and some may not be executed. The waiting time for each signal is random, so it is not possible to predict the change in the second count value from the outside. It becomes possible.

  Furthermore, if the value of the first count is irregularly changed by adding an addition value corresponding to the value of the second count to the first count, a change in the value of the first count is also predicted from the outside. Is impossible.

  That is, the pachinko machine of the present invention changes the value of the first count based on the value of the second count for which the change cannot be predicted from the outside, and the first count used in the hit determination process. Since it is impossible to predict the change in the value from the outside, it is possible to prevent fraudulent acts caused by the so-called “hanging board”.

  The pachinko machine of the present invention changes the value of the first count based on the value of the second count for which the change cannot be predicted from the outside, and the value of the first count used in the hit determination process This makes it impossible to predict the change from the outside, so that it is possible to prevent fraudulent acts caused by the so-called “hanging board”.

It is a flowchart figure of operation | movement of the pachinko machine of 1st Embodiment. It is a flowchart figure of the process of the 2nd count update of the pachinko machine of 1st Embodiment. It is a flowchart figure of the process of the 1st count update of the pachinko machine of 1st Embodiment. It is a flowchart figure of operation | movement of the pachinko machine of 2nd Embodiment. It is a flowchart figure of the process of the 2nd count update of the pachinko machine of 2nd Embodiment. It is a flowchart figure of the process of the 1st count update of the pachinko machine of 2nd Embodiment. In the pachinko machine of 2nd Embodiment, it is the figure which showed the relationship between the value of a 2nd count, and an addition value.

  Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. A pachinko machine according to a first embodiment will be described with reference to FIGS. The pachinko machine of the first embodiment is a first type pachinko machine. Then, the pachinko machine itself is operated by sequentially executing each operation processing program for each “reset interrupt” that is a reset signal generated at a fixed interval of “msec” units by the hardware configuration.

First, before describing the operation of the pachinko machine according to the first embodiment, a process of hit determination which is one of the operation processing programs will be described. In the pachinko machine of the first embodiment, a first count RND that is a variable is provided in the RAM for the hit determination process. The first count RND starts from the value “AX” when the power is turned on, and thereafter, the value “N1”, which is the addition value N, is added every time “reset interrupt” occurs at a fixed interval of “msec” unit. When “AY” is reached, the value is rewritten to “AX”, and changes between the value “AX” that is the first range and the value “AY”. Note that such a change in the value of the first count RND is performed by executing a first count update process in S7 of FIG. 1 described later for each “reset interrupt”.

As described above, the first count RND that periodically and sequentially changes between the value “AX” and the value “AY” by adding the value “N1” for each “reset interrupt” is input to the first start port. Acquired when a pachinko ball enters, and the acquired value is a value “AM” set in advance as a “hit”
The hit determination process is performed depending on whether or not it matches. The hit determination process is executed for each “reset interrupt” as one of the operation processing programs in S6 of FIG. In addition, the operation of obtaining the value of the first count RND is to determine whether or not a pachinko ball has entered the first start port for each “reset interrupt” and that the pachinko ball has entered the first start port. Only when it is judged, it is performed in the “reset interrupt”.

  Next, the operation of the pachinko machine according to the first embodiment will be described. As shown in FIG. 1, in the pachinko machine according to the first embodiment, each operation processing program is sequentially executed for each “reset interrupt” generated at regular intervals of “msec” units. That is, when a “reset interrupt” occurs, it is determined in S1 whether the current “reset interrupt” is immediately after power-on.

If it is determined that the current “reset interrupt” is immediately after the power is turned on (S1: Yes), in S3, a process such as substituting the value “AX” into the first count RND is performed. Is initialized. In S5, the second count update process is executed as a part of the operation processing program.

Here, the second count update process of S5 will be described with reference to FIG. In the second count update process (S5 in FIG. 1), the second count SYC, which is a variable provided in the RAM, is changed between the value “AX” and the value “AY” that are the first range. . That is, as shown in FIG. 2, in S20, it is determined whether or not the second count SYC is greater than or equal to the value “AY”, and if it is determined that the second count SYC is greater than or equal to the value “AY” ( (S20: Yes), in S21, the value “AX” is substituted for the second count SYC. On the other hand, if it is determined that the second count SYC is not equal to or greater than the value “AY” (S20: No), The value “N1” is added to the count SYC. As described above, the second count update process (S5 in FIG. 1) for changing the second count SYC between the value “AX” and the value “AY” is performed after the execution of S3 in FIG. This is repeated within the waiting time until the reset signal is generated.

  Returning to FIG. 1, if it is determined that the current “reset interrupt” is not immediately after power-on (S1: No), a part of the operation processing program such as fluorescent tube display data transfer processing is sequentially executed in S2. In S6, a part of the operation processing program such as the hit determination process and the stop symbol creation process is sequentially executed. In S7, the first count update process is performed as a part of the operation process program. Execute.

Here, the first count update process of S7 will be described with reference to FIG. In the first count update process (S7 in FIG. 1), the first count RND, which is a variable provided in the RAM, is changed between the value “AX” and the value “AY” that are the first range. . That is, as shown in FIG. 3, in S30, the value “N1” is added to the first count RND, and in subsequent S31, it is determined whether or not the first count RND is greater than or equal to the value “AY + N1”. Only when it is determined that the one-count RND is greater than or equal to the value “AY + N1” (S31: Yes), the value “(AY−AX) + N1” is subtracted from the first count RND in S32. The first count update process (S7 in FIG. 1)
) Is executed, the process proceeds to S8 in FIG.

  In S8 of FIG. 1, it is determined whether or not the hit determination process in S6 in the current “reset interrupt” has been determined to be a win, and if it is determined that the hit determination process has been determined to be a win. (S8: Yes), after substituting the value of the second count SYC for the first count RND in S9, the process proceeds to S10. On the other hand, if it is not determined that the winning determination is made in the winning determination process (S8: No), the process proceeds to S10 without doing anything.

  In the next S10, the second count update process similar to the second count update process of S5 described above is performed (see FIG. 2). Similarly to S5, the second count update process (S10) for changing the second count SYC between the value “AX” and the value “AY” is performed after the execution of S8 or S9 is completed. This is repeated within the waiting time until the occurrence of.

  As described above in detail, in the pachinko machine according to the first embodiment, the current “reset interrupt” is the one immediately after power-on for every “reset interrupt” that occurs at regular intervals in “msec” units. (S1: Yes), by sequentially executing the operation processing programs of S3 and S5, or when it is not determined that the current “reset interrupt” is immediately after power-on. (S1: No), the operation of the pachinko machine is performed by sequentially executing each operation processing program from S2 and S6 to S10 (see FIG. 1), and hit determination that is one of such operation processing programs This processing is performed based on the value of the first count RND acquired when the pachinko ball enters the first start port (S6).

At this time, in principle, the first count RND periodically and sequentially changes between the value “AX” and the value “AY” by adding the value “N1” for each “reset interrupt”. (S7 in FIG. 1, S30 to S32 in FIG. 3). Also, the second count SYC is a new value within the waiting time from when the execution of S3 in FIG. 1 is completed until a new reset signal is generated (S5), and after the execution of S8 or S9 is completed. Within the waiting time until the reset signal is generated (S10), the value changes between the value “AX” and the value “AY”. Each operation processing program such as S2, S3, and S6 may be executed depending on the status of the pachinko machine, and may not be executed. Since the waiting time for each “reset interrupt” is random, the second count SYC It is impossible to predict changes in value from the outside.

  Further, when it is determined that the winning is determined in the winning determination process in S6 (S8: Yes), the value of the second count SYC is substituted into the first count RND (S9), thereby the first count. Since the RND value is changed from the value at the time of substitution to the value of the second count SYC, it is impossible to predict the change in the value of the first count RND from the outside.

  In other words, the pachinko machine according to the first embodiment changes the value of the first count RND based on the second count SYC whose change cannot be predicted from the outside, and is used for the hit determination process. Since it is impossible to predict a change in the value of the first count RND from the outside, it is possible to prevent an illegal act by a so-called “hanging board”.

  Next, a pachinko machine according to a second embodiment will be described with reference to FIGS. The pachinko machine of the second embodiment is a first type pachinko machine. Then, the pachinko machine itself is operated by sequentially executing each operation processing program for each “reset interrupt” that is a reset signal generated at a fixed interval of “msec” units by the hardware configuration.

First, before describing the operation of the pachinko machine according to the second embodiment, a process of hit determination which is one of the operation processing programs will be described. In the pachinko machine according to the second embodiment, a first count RND that is a variable is provided in the RAM for the hit determination process. The first count RND starts from the value “AX” when the power is turned on, and thereafter, the addition value N is added at every “reset interrupt” generated at a fixed interval of “msec” unit. The value is rewritten to the value “AX” and changes between the value “AX” that is the first range and the value “AY”. Note that such a change in the value of the first count RND is performed by executing a first count update process in S47 of FIG. 4 described later for each “reset interrupt”.

In this way, the first count RND, which periodically and sequentially changes between the value “AX” and the value “AY” by adding the addition value N every “reset interrupt”, is output to the first start port. Acquired when a ball enters the ball, and the acquired value is a value “AM” set in advance as a “hit”
The hit determination process is performed depending on whether or not it matches. The hit determination process is executed for each “reset interrupt” as one of the operation processing programs in S46 of FIG. 4 to be described later. In addition, the operation of obtaining the value of the first count RND is to determine whether or not a pachinko ball has entered the first start port for each “reset interrupt” and that the pachinko ball has entered the first start port. Only when it is judged, it is performed in the “reset interrupt”.

  Next, the operation of the pachinko machine according to the second embodiment will be described. As shown in FIG. 4, in the pachinko machine according to the second embodiment, each operation processing program is sequentially executed for each “reset interrupt” generated at regular intervals of “msec” units. That is, when a “reset interrupt” occurs, it is determined in S41 whether or not the current “reset interrupt” is immediately after power-on.

If it is determined that the current “reset interrupt” is immediately after the power is turned on (S41: Yes), in S43, the value “AX” is substituted into the first count RND to perform processing such as Is initialized. In S45, the second count update process is executed as a part of the operation processing program.

Here, the second count update process of S45 will be described with reference to FIG. In the second count update process (S45 in FIG. 4), the second count CTN, which is a variable provided in the RAM, is changed between the value “BX” and the value “BY”. That is, as shown in FIG. 5, in S50, it is determined whether or not the second count CTN is greater than or equal to the value “BY”, and if it is determined that the second count CTN is greater than or equal to the value “BY” ( S50: Yes) In S51, the value “BX” is substituted for the second count CTN. On the other hand, if it is determined that the second count CTN is not greater than “BY” (S50: No), the second count is determined in S52. Value “N1” which is an addition value N to CTN
Is added. As described above, in the second count update process (S45 in FIG. 4) for changing the second count CTN between the value “BX” and the value “BY”, the last operation processing program in S44 in FIG. 4 is executed. This is repeated within a waiting time after the completion until a new reset signal is generated.

  Returning to FIG. 4, if it is determined that the current “reset interrupt” is not immediately after power-on (S41: No), a part of the operation processing program such as fluorescent tube display data transfer processing is sequentially executed in S42. In S46, a part of the operation processing program such as the hit determination process and the stop symbol creation process is sequentially executed. In S47, the first count update process is performed as a part of the operation process program. Execute.

  Here, the first count update process of S47 will be described with reference to FIG. In the first count update process (S47 in FIG. 4), an addition value N corresponding to the value of the second count CTN is added to the first count RND, which is a variable provided in the RAM, by one-to-one. The first count RND is changed between the value “AX” and the value “AY”. That is, as shown in FIG. 6, in S60, the addition value N corresponding to the value of the second count CTN is obtained one-on-one. The added value N is the value “N1” or the value “N2”, and “BX”, “BX + N1”, “BX + 2N1”, etc., which are the values of the second count CTN, according to the table of FIG. 7 stored in the RAM. “BY” is defined so as to correspond one-to-one.

Then, in S61, the addition value N acquired in S60 is added to the first count RND, and in subsequent S62, it is determined whether or not the first count RND is greater than or equal to the value “AY + N”.
Only when it is determined that the count RND is greater than or equal to the value “AY + N” (S62: Yes), S63
Then, the value “(AY−AX) + N” is subtracted from the first count RND. When the first count update process (S47 in FIG. 4) is executed, the process proceeds to S48 in FIG.

In the next S48, a second count update process similar to the second count update process of S45 described above is performed (see FIG. 5). Similarly to S45, the second count update process (S48) for changing the second count CTN between the value “BX” and the value “BY” is performed after the execution of the first count update process of S47 is completed. Is repeated within a waiting time until a new reset signal is generated.

  As described above in detail, in the pachinko machine of the second embodiment, the current “reset interrupt” is the one immediately after power-on for every “reset interrupt” that occurs at regular intervals of “msec” units. If it is determined (S41: Yes), by sequentially executing the operation processing programs of S43 and S45, or if it is not determined that the current “reset interrupt” is immediately after power-on (S41: No), the operation of the pachinko machine is performed by sequentially executing each operation processing program from S42 and S46 to S48 (see FIG. 4), and hit determination that is one of such operation processing programs This processing is performed based on the value of the first count RND acquired when the pachinko ball enters the first start port (S46).

  At this time, the second count CTN is executed within the waiting time after the completion of the execution of S43 in FIG. 4 until a new reset signal is generated (S45), and the first count update process of S47 is executed. Within the waiting time after the completion until the new reset signal is generated (S48), the value changes between the value "BX" and the value "BY". In addition, each operation processing program such as S42, S43, and S46 may be executed depending on the situation of the pachinko machine and may not be executed, and the waiting time for each “reset interrupt” is random. It is impossible to predict changes in value from the outside.

  Further, for each reset signal generated at regular intervals, the first value RND is changed by changing the addition value N to the value “N1” or the value “N2” based on the value of the second count CTN (S60, FIG. 7). Since the value of R is irregularly changed, it is impossible to predict the change in the value of the first count RND from the outside.

  That is, the pachinko machine according to the second embodiment changes the value of the first count RND based on the second count CTN whose change cannot be predicted from the outside, and is used in the hit determination process. Since it is impossible to predict a change in the value of the first count RND from the outside, it is possible to prevent an illegal act by a so-called “hanging board”.

  In addition, this invention is not limited to the said embodiment, A various change is possible in the range which does not deviate from the meaning. For example, in the pachinko machine according to the first embodiment, when it is determined that the winning is determined in the winning determination process in S6 (S8: Yes), the value of the second count SYC is set to the first count RND. Although it is substituted (S9), as long as the operation of the pachinko machine is not adversely affected, the value of the second count SYC may be substituted at any time for the first count RND.

  In the pachinko machine according to the first embodiment, the value of the second count SYC is directly substituted for the first count RND (S9), but the calculated value from the value of the second count SYC is changed to the first range. If the calculation is performed between the same value “AX” and the value “AY”, the calculated value may be substituted into the first count RND.

In the pachinko machine according to the first embodiment, in the second count update process (S5, S10), the second count SYC is changed between the same value “AX” and the value “AY” in the first range. However, it may be changed within a second range different from the first range. However, before substituting the value of the second count SYC for the first count RND in S9, the second count SYC is set to the value “AX” in the first range.
To a value between the values “AY”.

  In addition, in the pachinko machine of the second embodiment, the addition value N is always newly acquired in the first count update process of S47 (S60). However, the addition value is obtained only when a certain condition is satisfied. N may be newly acquired.

Further, the value “N1” that is the addition value N of the pachinko machine of the first embodiment and the value “N1” or the value “N2” that is the addition value N of the pachinko machine of the second embodiment are added together. The value N may be either positive or negative.

  In addition, the pachinko machine of the first embodiment and the pachinko machine of the second embodiment are the first type pachinko machines, but other types of pachinko machines such as the second type and third type pachinko machines. It may be.

  In addition, the pachinko machine according to the first embodiment, which is a feature of the pachinko machine according to the first embodiment, jumps and changes the value of the first count RND from the value at the time of substitution to the value of the second count SYC. The characteristic is that the value of the first count RND is added irregularly by adding the value “N1” or the value “N2” of the addition value N to the value of the first count RND. It may be impossible to predict.

    RND: first count, SYC, CTN: second count, N: added value.

Claims (1)

  Each operation processing program is sequentially executed for each signal generated at a constant interval of “msec” units, and a constant addition value is added for each signal, thereby changing the first range periodically and sequentially. In a pachinko machine that makes a hit determination based on the value of the first count, a new signal is generated after execution of the last motion processing program including the hit determination that is executed each time the signal is generated. Update means for sequentially and repeatedly updating the value of the second count different from the first count not involved in the hit determination within the waiting time until regardless of the value of the first count, and updated by the update means. It is determined whether or not the second count value is substituted for the first count value. If it is determined that the second count value is to be substituted, the second count value is substituted for the first count value. Substitution means The first count pinball machine, characterized in that it is counted continuously from the assigned value.