EP3544876B1 - Procédé pour faire fonctionner une installation de triage par gravité et système de commande conçu pour une telle installation - Google Patents

Procédé pour faire fonctionner une installation de triage par gravité et système de commande conçu pour une telle installation Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3544876B1
EP3544876B1 EP17829668.7A EP17829668A EP3544876B1 EP 3544876 B1 EP3544876 B1 EP 3544876B1 EP 17829668 A EP17829668 A EP 17829668A EP 3544876 B1 EP3544876 B1 EP 3544876B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
vehicle
value
shunted
hump
acceleration
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP17829668.7A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP3544876A1 (fr
Inventor
Gerhard Dierkes
Andreas Fischer
Stefan Hahn
Mario Huster
Peter KUEHS
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Siemens Mobility GmbH
Original Assignee
Siemens Mobility GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Siemens Mobility GmbH filed Critical Siemens Mobility GmbH
Publication of EP3544876A1 publication Critical patent/EP3544876A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3544876B1 publication Critical patent/EP3544876B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B61—RAILWAYS
    • B61J—SHIFTING OR SHUNTING OF RAIL VEHICLES
    • B61J3/00—Shunting or short-distance haulage devices; Similar devices for hauling trains on steep gradients or as starting aids; Car propelling devices therefor
    • B61J3/02—Gravity shunting humps
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B61—RAILWAYS
    • B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
    • B61L17/00—Switching systems for classification yards

Definitions

  • the push-off speed specified by a shunting locomotive is usually calculated for each sequence in such a way that there are gaps between successive sequences, the length of which only corresponds to the minimum length required in each case. How quickly the corresponding gaps actually arise between the processes and how long they are at the respective point in time generally depends on the running properties of the respective process and on the properties of the respective track system or sequence system. The corresponding influences are taken into account in the best possible way when calculating the respective push-off speed. In practice, however, problems or errors can occur that change the gaps that actually arise or deviate from the expectation, so that unexpected detachment behavior of the respective sequence of a further vehicle in the form of a further sequence or a push-off locomotive results.
  • the document DE 10 107 752 A1 describes a method for controlling the flow of the wagons of a train to be dismantled from an overflow mountain of a marshalling yard into the distribution zone of the marshalling yard, in which the wagons are distributed from the distribution zone to different target tracks by means of successive separating switches.
  • the control of the release signal for the sequence and the switches for the route of a car (trailer) takes place in such a way, that a collision of the back-up with a rotating switch and a collision of the back-up with the forerunner is excluded.
  • the maneuvering process disclosed is to allow the start of a vehicle as soon as the speed of a previous vehicle has been measured and the position on the route has been determined.
  • the measured speed is compared with a previously determined reference speed of a vehicle with good running characteristics so that the assigned zone can be released.
  • a wagon train is divided into individual wagon groups or wagons according to a separation rule.
  • the isolated train is driven over the apex of a switching hump, so that groups of cars or individual cars roll downwards and accelerate as isolated exits under gravity.
  • the departure speed of at least the front axle is determined in the area of the apex over the section after the separation.
  • a reference extension speed is determined and an emergency response is triggered if the measured speed exceeds this.
  • the present invention is based on the object of specifying a method for operating a marshalling system which makes it possible to identify problems in process operation with regard to the separation behavior of processes at an early stage.
  • this object is achieved by a method for operating a shunting system, with at least one measured value being recorded by means of a sensor device, which relates to at least one kinematic measured variable of a process in the form of a car or a group of cars, and taking into account the at least one recorded measured value as well as at least one reference value
  • a plausibility check of a release behavior of the sequence is carried out by at least one further vehicle.
  • the at least one further vehicle can be a further preceding sequence, a further subsequent sequence or a push-pull locomotive.
  • the method according to the invention is based on the knowledge that errors in the detachment behavior of a sequence of at least one further vehicle in the form of a further sequence or a push-off locomotive can be recognized early on using a kinematic measured variable of the sequence.
  • a kinematic measured variable of the sequence is based on at least one corresponding measured value related to the kinematic measured variable of the process, using at least one reference value, it is possible to check the plausibility of the release behavior of the process.
  • the at least one recorded measured value of the kinematic measured variable (or at least one value determined from the at least one recorded measured value, possibly using further information or measured values) and the at least one reference value shows that the at least one recorded measured value (or the at least a value determined from this) lies in an expected value range
  • the plausibility of the release behavior of the process from the at least one further vehicle ie from a push-pull locomotive, a forerunner and / or a follower, is checked to the effect that it can be assumed that there is no error or problem that would impair the release behavior of the process .
  • a successful plausibility check of the release behavior of the process also allows a statement to the effect that the running properties of the process in question are not worse than an assumed poor runner.
  • an implausible detachment behavior of the sequence from the at least one further vehicle indicates that one of the aforementioned problems is present. Regardless of the specific cause, this means that a shortening of a gap between the relevant sequence and a preceding or a subsequent sequence is threatened or already exists. This means that in the context of the plausibility check, imminent problems can be identified in the course of operational operations. This advantageously makes it possible to avert impending damage or an impending accident by means of a corresponding reaction, or at least to reduce the probability or the severity of a corresponding damage event.
  • the measured value related to the kinematic measured variable of the process and the at least one associated reference value it is advantageously possible to detect a faulty release behavior of the process that deviates from the expectation comparatively early and reliably.
  • a corresponding early detection of exceptional situations or problems or errors enables earlier protective measures, by means of which dangerous situations or wrong-way movements can be prevented.
  • the method according to the invention also has the advantage that shunting process systems often already have sensor devices which, in addition to their actual or previous function, are suitable for recording the at least one measured value of the kinematic measured variable.
  • Appropriate use of measurement technology that has already been installed can result in advantages, in particular with regard to the outlay and costs required to implement the method according to the invention.
  • the method according to the invention is developed in such a way that the at least one measured value relates to at least one of the following kinematic measured variables: at least one time of travel, at least one period of time, at least one speed, at least one acceleration.
  • the kinematic measured variables mentioned allow a statement to be made about the separation behavior of the respective sequence. In practice, it depends on the particular circumstances, such as the sensor devices available in the system or the algorithms used to control the system, whether at least one time of travel, at least a period of time, at least one speed or at least one acceleration is used as the kinematic measured variable.
  • the plausibility check of the release behavior of the sequence can basically be carried out in different ways.
  • the method according to the invention can preferably be developed in such a way that the plausibility check of the detachment behavior of the sequence from the at least one further vehicle based on a comparison of the at least one reference value with the recorded at least one measured value or based on a comparison of the at least one reference value with at least one of the at least one Measured value determined value is made.
  • This is advantageous because a comparison of the recorded at least one measured value or at least one value determined from the at least one measured value is also included the at least one reference value enables a plausibility check of the release behavior of the sequence in a comparatively simple and thus in particular also quick manner.
  • the method according to the invention can preferably be further developed in such a way that at least one acceleration value is determined from recorded measured values in the form of travel times and the plausibility check of the detachment behavior of the sequence of the at least one further vehicle based on a comparison of the at least one reference value in the form of a reference acceleration with the determined at least one acceleration value is made.
  • This is advantageous because an implausible detachment behavior of the sequence can be recognized particularly well on the basis of an acceleration value or several acceleration values.
  • forecasts of the behavior of processes are based on assumptions or calculations for the expected and / or actual acceleration of processes, so that the method according to the invention can be integrated into an existing process control with comparatively little effort if acceleration values are used.
  • At least one limit value for a minimum acceleration of the sequence is used as the reference acceleration.
  • it can be required, for example, that the acceleration of the sequence has reached or exceeded the minimum acceleration at a predetermined point in time, in a predetermined situation or at a predetermined location.
  • the specific value of the minimum acceleration depends on the particular circumstances and can be 0.1 m / s 2 , for example.
  • a limit value for a maximum acceleration it is in principle also possible for a limit value for a maximum acceleration to be used as the reference acceleration. In this case it can be checked, for example, that the acceleration of the process is in a permissible or plausible range of values.
  • the method according to the invention can preferably also be implemented in such a way that the plausibility check of the detachment behavior of the sequence from the at least one further vehicle is carried out after the sequence should have reached free running as planned.
  • This offers the advantage that the sequence should accelerate at this point in time, as a result of which a reliable plausibility check of the detachment behavior of the sequence from the further vehicle is possible.
  • any type of sensor device known per se can be used as the sensor device. It is only necessary that the respective sensor device is suitable for recording the at least one measured value related to the kinematic measured variable of the sequence.
  • a sensor device comprising at least one wheel sensor is used and measured values in the form of travel times are recorded.
  • the sensor device can include a wheel sensor or a plurality of wheel sensors.
  • the sensor device can have two wheel sensors arranged at a short distance from one another, wherein the wheel sensors can be designed with one or two channels.
  • a single two-channel wheel sensor also referred to as a double sensor, can also be used, for example.
  • any device for detecting wheels or axles of a rail vehicle is referred to as a wheel sensor.
  • the wheel sensor can have at least one transmitting device and at least one receiving device, for example.
  • wheel sensors in the sense of the present invention are also known under the terms “counting point”, “axle counting point”, “rail contact” or “track contact”.
  • the method according to the invention can preferably also be developed in such a way that a sensor device is used which comprises at least one wheel sensor used to detect the start of a sequence process and / or at least one wheel sensor used to detect center distances.
  • a sensor device which comprises at least one wheel sensor used to detect the start of a sequence process and / or at least one wheel sensor used to detect center distances.
  • the at least one reference value can in principle be determined in different ways.
  • the plausibility check of the detachment behavior of the sequence from the at least one further vehicle is carried out with further consideration of a dismantling list which includes information on separation points provided between successive sequences.
  • a dismantling list which includes information on separation points provided between successive sequences. This is advantageous because the separation points provided between successive processes have a significant influence on the kinematic behavior of the respective process.
  • other information can also be taken into account, such as length, number of axles and / or weight of the individual wagons or processes.
  • the plausibility check of the release behavior of the process is carried out in such a way that it is required that in a situation in which a minimum number of axes has been detected and according to the dismantling list, the process already reaches the summit of the drainage mountain for at least two thirds of its length has happened, the acceleration of the sequence is greater than a minimum acceleration.
  • the appropriate conditions ensure that the center of gravity of the process should have already passed the summit and the process should therefore have already accelerated due to the force of gravity.
  • a warning signal is output in the event that an implausible detachment behavior of the sequence from the at least one further vehicle is determined.
  • the warning signal can be output on the one hand within a control of the sequential system, so that the control can automatically initiate the necessary measures.
  • the warning signal is output to an operator, for example optically or acoustically, in order to inform the operator about the identified problem.
  • the method according to the invention can preferably also be designed in such a way that the sequence mode is stopped in response to the warning signal. This is advantageous because it prevents dangerous situations or wrong-way movements from occurring as a result of subsequent processes due to the unexpected behavior of the process. Regardless of this, as a rule, if possible, measures are also initiated to control the shunting process system in such a way that corresponding dangerous situations or wrong-way travelers, if possible, also with regard to those that have already been triggered Processes are avoided or at least the resulting effects and risks are minimized.
  • the at least one measured value is preferably recorded as close as possible to the summit of the drainage mountain of the drainage system.
  • the at least one measured value is detected by the sensor device no further than 20 meters, in particular no further than 10 meters, behind a summit of a discharge mountain of the discharge system.
  • the respective distance information relates to the direction of flow, so that the respective flow will generally have already at least partially passed the mountain peak when the at least one measured value is recorded.
  • the invention also includes a control device for a shunting system.
  • the control device according to the invention is characterized in that it has means for performing the method according to the invention or for performing one of the aforementioned preferred developments of the method according to the invention.
  • control device corresponds to those of the method according to the invention or its preferred developments, so that in this regard reference is made to the corresponding explanations above.
  • FIG. 1 shows in a schematic sketch to explain an embodiment of the method according to the invention a shunting process system 10 on which a shunting locomotive 20 and processes 30 and 40 consisting of wagon groups with two coupled wagons 31 and 32 or 41 and 42 are located.
  • flow 40 is the "front” car or "precursor”
  • flow 30 is the "rear” car or “follower”.
  • the push-off speed of the following sequence 30 is selected in such a way that the spatial gap between the two sequences 40 and 30 is sufficiently large to be able to set the necessary switches and to allow the sequences 40 and 30 to be touched on their way to avoid along the drainage system.
  • An essential prerequisite for this is that the sequence 40 detaches itself from the sequence 30 in the expected manner. Delayed opening of the car coupling at the separation point between the carriages 41 and 32 would result in the sequence 40 not being or only being delayed could accelerate freely and thus no sufficient gap between the processes 40 and 30 would arise.
  • the sequence 40 would also accelerate later than expected if the car group in question were longer than planned due to the fact that a separation point was set too little.
  • the front carriage 42 would already go into free run when its center of gravity has exceeded the summit 50 of the discharge mountain and thus accelerate earlier than expected. In this case, there could be the risk that the gap or the distance between the carriage 42 and one in the Figure 1 not shown forerunner is too short. In addition to the problems mentioned due to the delayed opening of a car coupling or incorrect setting of a separation point, there is also the possibility that the running properties of the sequence 40 are worse than the assumed "worst case". This, too, can lead to the gap to the trailer 30 not being sufficiently large and thus the sequence 40 to be caught by the sequence 30.
  • the drainage system 10 has a sensor device 60 in the form of at least one wheel sensor.
  • the sensor device 60 is in FIG Figure 1 for the sake of clarity shown in such a way that they only have one Has wheel sensor.
  • the sensor device 60 can, however, also comprise several, in particular two, wheel sensors.
  • the relevant wheel sensors are preferably at a distance that allows the speed of the respective axle to be determined precisely on the basis of the travel times recorded by the two wheel sensors.
  • the two wheel sensors of the sensor device 60 can, for example, have a distance of 75 cm from one another.
  • the representation of the Figure 1 is only a schematic sketch. This means in particular that the positions and distances of the components shown do not scale or correspond to the values typical in practice.
  • the position of the sensor device 60 can also coincide with the summit 50 of the discharge mountain. Routing systems often already have what are known as "mountain contacts", which are used to detect the start of the sequence process and the start of axis tracking and are also used in the context of the method described below for a plausibility check of the separation behavior of the sequence 40 from the subsequent sequence 30 can be.
  • mountain contacts which are used to detect the start of the sequence process and the start of axis tracking and are also used in the context of the method described below for a plausibility check of the separation behavior of the sequence 40 from the subsequent sequence 30 can be.
  • Corresponding "multiple use” is advantageous in that the installation of additional measurement technology for implementing the method is advantageously avoided.
  • the process system 10 is now operated in such a way that at least one measured value is recorded by means of the sensor device 60, which relates to a kinematic measured variable of the process 40.
  • the at least one measured value can refer to at least one kinematic measured variable in the form of at least one travel time, at least one Time duration, at least one speed and / or at least one acceleration.
  • measured values in the form of travel times are recorded for each axis from travel times of the sensor device 60, which, according to the above statements, preferably comprises the two first wheel sensors on the hill.
  • a control device By means of a control device, not shown in the figure, centrally or decentrally in the area of the sensor device 60, it is now possible to use the travel times and the known distance between the wheel sensors of the sensor device 60 (or, in the case of a single double sensor, based on the travel times recorded by the two sensor systems of the double sensor and the known distance of the sensor systems) for each of the axes of the sequence 40, the speed can be determined. On the basis of the speed values of successive axes, at least one acceleration value of the sequence 40 can then be determined or calculated.
  • the control device then makes a plausibility check of the detachment behavior of the sequence 40 from the further vehicle 30 in the form of the subsequent sequence.
  • the at least one reference acceleration can also be referred to as an acceleration threshold value.
  • the reference acceleration is a minimum acceleration which can be 0.1 m / s 2 , for example.
  • a decision as to whether the detachment behavior of the sequence 40 is assessed as plausible is preferably made in a situation in which the sequence 40 is on schedule or according to a previous prognosis should have.
  • the plausibility check of the detachment behavior of the process 40 from the at least one further vehicle 30 takes place with further consideration of a dismantling list, which includes information on the separation points provided between the successive processes 40 and 30 as well as the number of axes of the processes 40, 30. This makes it possible, within the scope of the plausibility check, to take into account that a separation point is provided between the processes 40 and 30.
  • the sequence control based on the breakdown list, how many axes the sequence 40 has or should have.
  • sequence 40 should accelerate or have already accelerated in this situation and, in the process, have reached or exceeded a minimum acceleration in the amount of 0.1 m / s 2 already mentioned as an example above.
  • the detachment behavior of the sequence 40 is assessed as implausible by the sequence 30 (or possibly a further sequence arranged before the sequence 40). This means that there is a fault, for example in the form of a missing separation point or a delayed opening of a central buffer coupling. To indicate this, a warning signal is issued; the sequence operation is still stopped. Depending on the respective situation, further protective measures can also be initiated or initiated. If, on the other hand, according to a normal case, the detachment behavior of sequence 40 from the further vehicle or sequence 30 is assessed as plausible, there is no special reaction required, ie the sequence operation can be continued normally.
  • a further sensor device 70 which likewise comprises a wheel sensor or a plurality of wheel sensors.
  • This further sensor device 70 which can include, for example, two wheel sensors arranged in the area of a light grid for separating point detection, could be used as an alternative to or in conjunction with the sensor device 60 as part of the previously described method for plausibility checking of the detachment behavior of the sequence 40 from the further vehicle 30 .
  • Figure 2 shows a diagram with a representation of acceleration values as a function of the location to further explain the exemplary embodiment of the method according to the invention.
  • a lower limit value 110 and an upper limit value 120 of the acceleration a of the sequence 40 are indicated as a function of the location s.
  • a value in the excluded value range 130 shows that the sequence 40 has separated from the sequence 30 later than expected.
  • the cause for this can be a missing separation point, too late loosening of the coupling between the drains 40 and 30 or too poor running properties of the drain 40.
  • a measured value in the excluded value range 140 would mean that the sequence 40 has separated from the sequence 30 earlier than expected.
  • the cause for this can be an incorrectly placed separation point in the form of an additional separation point, a separation point placed too close to the tip of the train or possibly also too good running properties of the drain 40.
  • an acceleration value of the sequence 40 in one of the excluded value ranges 130 or 140 would indicate an implausible or incorrect separation behavior of the sequence 40 from the sequence 30.
  • a warning signal would be output by the responsible control device and the sequence operation would be stopped. This is intended to avoid dangerous situations due to insufficient gaps between successive processes as well as collisions or incorrect movements that may result from this.
  • further protective measures for example in the form of a protective switch, can be implemented with regard to the processes already running.
  • the acceleration a of the sequence 40 can be checked at different locations s or only at one location s. The latter can be defined, for example, by the fact that the center of gravity of the flow 40 has already passed the summit 50 of the flow mountain and should have gone into free run.
  • the sensor device 60 can comprise at least one radar sensor, for example.
  • the method according to the invention has the particular advantage that an implausible detachment behavior of successive processes 40, 30 can be recognized early and reliably.
  • the sensor device 60 is advantageously arranged close to the summit 50 of the drainage mountain, i.e. preferably not further than 20m, more preferably not further than 10m behind the summit 50 of the drainage mountain of the drainage system.
  • the sensor device 60 is advantageously a wheel sensor or a plurality of wheel sensors, which is or are already provided in the drainage system 10 for other purposes. Appropriate use of already installed measurement technology results in advantages in terms of effort and costs for implementing the method according to the invention.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Regulating Braking Force (AREA)
  • Train Traffic Observation, Control, And Security (AREA)

Claims (14)

  1. Procédé pour faire fonctionner un chantier (10) de triage à la gravité, dans lequel
    - au moyen d'un dispositif (60) de capteur, on relève au moins une valeur de mesure, qui se rapporte à au moins une grandeur de mesure cinématique d'un gravitaire (40) sous la forme d'une voiture ou d'un groupe (41, 42) de voitures, et
    - en tenant compte de la au moins une valeur de mesure relevée ainsi que d'au moins une valeur de référence, on rend vraisemblable que le gravitaire (40) est détaché d'au moins un autre véhicule (30),
    caractérisé en ce que,
    dans la mesure où à l'aide de la au moins une valeur de mesure relevée de la grandeur de mesure cinématique ou à l'aide d'au moins une valeur déterminée à partir de la au moins une valeur de mesure relevée, ainsi qu'à l'aide de la au moins une valeur de référence, on obtient que la au moins une valeur de mesure relevée ou la au moins une valeur déterminée à partir de celle-ci se trouve dans une plage de valeur escomptée, on en déduit que le gravitaire s'est comporté en détachement conformément à ce à quoi l'on s'attend.
  2. Procédé suivant la revendication 1,
    caractérisé en ce que
    la au moins une valeur de mesure se rapporte à au moins l'une des grandeurs de mesure cinématiques suivantes :
    - au moins un instant de passage,
    - au moins une durée,
    - au moins une vitesse,
    - au moins une accélération.
  3. Procédé suivant la revendication 1 ou 2,
    caractérisé en ce que
    on rend vraisemblable que le gravitaire (40) est détaché du au moins un autre véhicule (30) à l'aide d'une comparaison de la au moins une valeur de référence à la au moins une valeur de mesure, qui a été relevée, ou à l'aide d'une comparaison de la au moins une valeur de référence à au moins une valeur déterminée à partir de la au moins une valeur de mesure.
  4. Procédé suivant la revendication 3,
    caractérisé en ce que
    - on détermine au moins une valeur d'accélération à partir de valeurs de mesure relevées sous la forme d'instants de passage et
    - on détermine la plausibilité du détachement du gravitaire (40) d'au moins un autre véhicule (30) à l'aide d'une comparaison de la au moins une valeur de référence, sous la forme d'une accélération de référence, à la au moins une valeur d'accélération, qui a été déterminée.
  5. Procédé suivant la revendication 4,
    caractérisé en ce que
    on utilise comme accélération de référence au moins une valeur limite d'une accélération minimum du gravitaire (40).
  6. Procédé suivant l'une des revendications précédentes,
    caractérisé en ce que
    on rend plausible le détachement du gravitaire (40) du au moins un autre véhicule (30), après que le gravitaire (40) aurait dû avoir atteint, conformément au plan, la marche libre.
  7. Procédé suivant l'une des revendications précédentes,
    caractérisé en ce que
    - on utilise au moins un dispositif (60) de capteur comprenant un capteur de roue et
    - on relève des valeurs de mesure sous la forme d'instants de passage.
  8. Procédé suivant la revendication 7,
    caractérisé en ce que
    - on détermine des vitesses de divers essieux du gravitaire (40) à partir des instants de passage et
    - on détermine au moins une valeur d'accélération du gravitaire (40) à partir des vitesses de plusieurs essieux.
  9. Procédé suivant la revendication 7 ou 8,
    caractérisé en ce que
    on utilise un dispositif (60) de capteur, qui comprend un capteur de roue pour la détection d'un début d'un processus à la gravité et/ou servant à la détection de distances entre essieux.
  10. Procédé suivant l'une des revendications précédentes,
    caractérisé en ce que
    on rend vraisemblable le détachement du gravitaire (40) du au moins un autre véhicule (30) en tenant compte en outre d'une liste de dégroupement, qui comprend des indications sur des points de séparation prévus entre des gravitaires (40, 30) successifs.
  11. Procédé suivant l'une des revendications précédentes,
    caractérisé en ce que
    dans le cas où on constate un détachement invraisemblable du gravitaire (40) du au moins un autre véhicule (30), on émet un signal d'alerte.
  12. Procédé suivant la revendication 11,
    caractérisé en ce que
    au signal d'alerte, on arrête le fonctionnement de triage.
  13. Procédé suivant l'une des revendications précédentes,
    caractérisé en ce que
    l'on relève la au moins une valeur de mesure au moyen du dispositif (60) de capteur pas plus de 20 mètres, notamment pas plus de 10 mètres, derrière un sommet (50) d'une bosse de l'installation (10) de triage.
  14. Dispositif de commande d'un chantier (10) de triage à la gravité,
    caractérisé en ce que
    le dispositif de commande a des moyens pour effectuer le procédé suivant l'une des revendications 1 à 13.
EP17829668.7A 2017-01-26 2017-12-27 Procédé pour faire fonctionner une installation de triage par gravité et système de commande conçu pour une telle installation Active EP3544876B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102017201266.8A DE102017201266A1 (de) 2017-01-26 2017-01-26 Verfahren zum Betreiben einer rangiertechnischen Ablaufanlage sowie Steuereinrichtung für eine solche Anlage
PCT/EP2017/084624 WO2018137878A1 (fr) 2017-01-26 2017-12-27 Procédé pour faire fonctionner une installation de triage par gravité et système de commande conçu pour une telle installation

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3544876A1 EP3544876A1 (fr) 2019-10-02
EP3544876B1 true EP3544876B1 (fr) 2021-05-26

Family

ID=60990775

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP17829668.7A Active EP3544876B1 (fr) 2017-01-26 2017-12-27 Procédé pour faire fonctionner une installation de triage par gravité et système de commande conçu pour une telle installation

Country Status (5)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3544876B1 (fr)
DE (1) DE102017201266A1 (fr)
LT (1) LT3544876T (fr)
RU (1) RU2729132C1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2018137878A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN112158236B (zh) * 2020-09-22 2022-10-25 北京全路通信信号研究设计院集团有限公司 一种智慧型货运列车编组识别控制方法及系统

Family Cites Families (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE4441396C1 (de) 1994-11-09 1996-02-22 Siemens Ag Einrichtung zum Herstellen der Ablaufbereitschaft und/oder Kuppelbereitschaft von spurgebundenen Fahrzeugen
DE19507931C1 (de) 1995-02-24 1996-09-12 Siemens Ag Verfahren zum Aktualisieren von Ersatzwerten für eine laufbestimmende Eigenschaft von Wagen auf einer Rangieranlage
DE19708677C1 (de) * 1997-02-21 1998-05-07 Siemens Ag Verfahren zum Betrieb einer Gleisanlage
DE10107752A1 (de) * 2000-03-03 2004-08-12 Tiefenbach Gmbh Verfahren zur Steuerung des Ablaufs der Wagen eines zu zerlegenden Eisenbahnzuges
EP1129922B1 (fr) 2000-03-03 2007-04-18 Tiefenbach GmbH Procédé pour commander le triage par gravité de wagons d'un train ferroviaire d'être débranché d'une rampe de triage d'une gare de triage
DE10108300C1 (de) * 2001-02-21 2002-06-20 Deutsche Bahn Ag Rangiertechnisches Verfahren für den Ablauf von Eisenbahnfahrzeugen in Schwerkraft-Ablaufanlagen
DE102008027633A1 (de) 2008-06-05 2009-12-17 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Steuereinrichtung für eine Ablaufanlage des schienengebundenen Verkehrs und Verfahren zum Betreiben einer solchen Anlage
DE102011079335A1 (de) * 2011-07-18 2013-01-24 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Verfahren zum Betreiben einer rangiertechnischen Ablaufanlage sowie Steuereinrichtung für eine solche
DE102011079419A1 (de) * 2011-07-19 2013-01-24 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Verfahren sowie Steuereinrichtung zum Bestimmen der Länge zumindest eines Gleisabschnitts
DE102012203812A1 (de) * 2012-03-12 2013-09-12 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Verfahren zum Steuern einer rangiertechnischen Ablaufanlage
DE102015202429A1 (de) 2015-02-11 2016-08-11 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Verfahren zum Betreiben einer rangiertechnischen Ablaufanlage sowie Steuereinrichtung für eine solche Anlage

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
None *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE102017201266A1 (de) 2018-07-26
WO2018137878A1 (fr) 2018-08-02
LT3544876T (lt) 2021-08-10
RU2729132C1 (ru) 2020-08-04
EP3544876A1 (fr) 2019-10-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3697667B1 (fr) Procédé pour faire fonctionner des véhicules ferroviaires avec une distance de freinage absolue
WO2016062568A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif permettant de faire fonctionner un véhicule
EP2879934B1 (fr) Commande d'un véhicule ferroviaire
EP2695797A2 (fr) Procédé pour le déplacement sans conducteur d'un véhicule sur une aire de stationnement
EP2718165B1 (fr) Procédé permettant de faire fonctionner une installation de triage technique et dispositif de commande pour une telle installation
EP3573873B1 (fr) Sabot d'arrêt, capteur et procédé
EP3230147B1 (fr) Procédé pour faire fonctionner une installation de triage par gravité et système de commande pour une telle installation
EP3713808B1 (fr) Procédé pour faire fonctionner une installation de triage par gravité et système de commande pour une installation de triage par gravité
EP2720926B1 (fr) Procédé pour faire fonctionner une installation de triage par gravité et système de commande pour une installation de triage par gravité
WO2013135501A1 (fr) Procédé de commande d'une installation technique de triage
EP3544876B1 (fr) Procédé pour faire fonctionner une installation de triage par gravité et système de commande conçu pour une telle installation
EP3333044A2 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de fonctionnement d'une locomotive de manoeuvre
EP3230148B1 (fr) Procédé pour faire fonctionner une installation de triage par gravité et système de commande pour une telle installation
EP2701962B1 (fr) Véhicule ferroviaire doté d'un dispositif de surveillance de boîte chaude
DE102011007775A1 (de) Verfahren zum Erhöhen der Sicherheit beim Betrieb eines Fahrzeugs, Vorrichtung zur Durchführung eines solchen Verfahrens und Fahrzeug aufweisend eine solche Vorrichtung
WO2019201798A1 (fr) Système de transport et procédé de commande d'un tel système
EP3299249B1 (fr) Procédé de fonctionnement d'une installation technique de triage ainsi que dispositif de commande pour une telle installation technique de triage
DE102004048993B4 (de) System und Verfahren zur Steuerung von schienengebundenen Fahrzeugen, insbesondere von Zügen, mittels einer Steuerzentrale, in Abhängigkeit vom Zustand des Fahrwegs, insbesondere des verfügbaren Reibwertes
EP0863064B1 (fr) Procédé pour le fonctionnement de voies ferrées
DE102011088891A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Erhöhung der Haltegenauigkeit eines bewegten Objektes
DE102020135149B3 (de) Verfahren zum betreiben einer rangiertechnischen ablaufanlage sowie rangiertechnische ablaufanlage
EP3494024A1 (fr) Commande de frein de voie à poutre
DE102008026572A1 (de) Verfahren und Anordnung zur Überwachung des Belegungszustandes eines Gleisabschnitts
EP4389559A1 (fr) Système de véhicule ferroviaire avec détection de train fantôme et procédé de fonctionnement
EP4190669A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de fonctionnement d'un véhicule ferroviaire

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: UNKNOWN

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20190627

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20210112

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1395952

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20210615

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502017010500

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: FP

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210826

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210526

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210526

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210926

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210827

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210826

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210927

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210526

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210526

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210526

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210526

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210526

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210526

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210526

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210526

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210526

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210526

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 502017010500

Country of ref document: DE

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20220301

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210926

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210526

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210526

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210526

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20211227

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20211227

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20211227

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20211227

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20211231

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20221219

Year of fee payment: 6

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210526

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20171227

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LV

Payment date: 20231222

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: LT

Payment date: 20231123

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20231109

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20231220

Year of fee payment: 7

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210526

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20240219

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20240305

Year of fee payment: 7