EP3106262A1 - Dispositif de polissage destine a polir des surfaces de lentilles optiques et son procede de fonctionnement - Google Patents

Dispositif de polissage destine a polir des surfaces de lentilles optiques et son procede de fonctionnement Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3106262A1
EP3106262A1 EP16166363.8A EP16166363A EP3106262A1 EP 3106262 A1 EP3106262 A1 EP 3106262A1 EP 16166363 A EP16166363 A EP 16166363A EP 3106262 A1 EP3106262 A1 EP 3106262A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
axis
polishing
workpiece holder
polishing tool
rotation
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP16166363.8A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP3106262B1 (fr
EP3106262B8 (fr
Inventor
Roland Mandler
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Optotech Optikmaschinen GmbH
Original Assignee
Optotech Optikmaschinen GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from DE102015115078.6A external-priority patent/DE102015115078A1/de
Application filed by Optotech Optikmaschinen GmbH filed Critical Optotech Optikmaschinen GmbH
Publication of EP3106262A1 publication Critical patent/EP3106262A1/fr
Publication of EP3106262B1 publication Critical patent/EP3106262B1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3106262B8 publication Critical patent/EP3106262B8/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B24—GRINDING; POLISHING
    • B24B—MACHINES, DEVICES, OR PROCESSES FOR GRINDING OR POLISHING; DRESSING OR CONDITIONING OF ABRADING SURFACES; FEEDING OF GRINDING, POLISHING, OR LAPPING AGENTS
    • B24B13/00—Machines or devices designed for grinding or polishing optical surfaces on lenses or surfaces of similar shape on other work; Accessories therefor
    • B24B13/0012—Machines or devices designed for grinding or polishing optical surfaces on lenses or surfaces of similar shape on other work; Accessories therefor for multifocal lenses
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B24—GRINDING; POLISHING
    • B24B—MACHINES, DEVICES, OR PROCESSES FOR GRINDING OR POLISHING; DRESSING OR CONDITIONING OF ABRADING SURFACES; FEEDING OF GRINDING, POLISHING, OR LAPPING AGENTS
    • B24B13/00—Machines or devices designed for grinding or polishing optical surfaces on lenses or surfaces of similar shape on other work; Accessories therefor

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a polishing apparatus for polishing curved lens surfaces of optical lenses according to the preamble of claim 1 and a method for their operation according to claim 8.
  • polishing devices are known from the prior art, which have a workpiece holder, which receive an optical lens and rotate about an axis of rotation.
  • a polishing tool with a polishing surface is placed on the free lens surface, which may be concave, convex, toric, spherical and freeform.
  • a polishing tool For processing concave lens surfaces is off DE 10 2007 026 841 A1 known to use a polishing tool, which has a carrier plate on which a resilient Substructure is applied. On the elastic base the polishing surface is arranged. By rotating the carrier plate thus also rotates the polishing surface about a rotation axis perpendicular to the carrier plate. The axes of rotation of the optical lens and a drive shaft of the polishing tool are aligned parallel. The carrier plate in turn is connected via a gimbal compensating joint with the drive shaft.
  • the gimbal compensating joint forms a degree of freedom, so that the polishing tool is statically indefinitely placed on the lens surface and always rests flat on the lens surface, for which it oscillates around the compensating joint.
  • the surface curvature of the polishing surface usually corresponds essentially to the surface curvature of the concave lens surface.
  • a disadvantage of such a configuration is that the polishing tool can be moved only very limited over a peripheral edge of the lens surface. This has the consequence that the contact pressure in the direction of the lens center drops sharply even with a small projection. Moving the polishing surface to an even greater extent beyond the peripheral edge, the polishing tool tilts.
  • a further disadvantage of such polishing tools is that the contact pressure force over the polishing surface causes the polishing removal of the lens surface to tend in the direction of a sphere.
  • already produced optical geometries are polished on the lens surface.
  • large contact pressures are required in order to approach them by elastic deformation of the carrier plate and / or the elastic substructure. As a result, the polishing tendency toward a sphere in these lens regions is enhanced.
  • the object of the invention is therefore to develop a polishing apparatus and a polishing method, with which lens surfaces can be machined, the overlays of spherical, toric and progressive effects and thus form free-form surfaces, which are described by pure point clouds, without polished during polishing these effects become.
  • the device and method are also intended to enable fast, efficient and cost-effective polishing of such lens surfaces.
  • the invention relates to a polishing apparatus for polishing curved lens surfaces of optical lenses, the polishing apparatus comprising a workpiece holder for receiving an optical lens and a polishing tool, the polishing tool having a support member, a resilient substructure and a curved polishing surface on the elastic substructure, wherein the polishing tool wherein the polishing surface is rotationally driven about a rotation axis, wherein either the curved lens surface is concave and the curved polishing surface is convex or the curved lens surface is convex and the curved polishing surface is concave, the workpiece holder being rotationally driven about a first axis to rotate the optical lens wherein a distance between the workpiece holder and the polishing tool is adjustable along a second axis, wherein an offset between the workpiece holder and the polishing tool along a third axis, the transversely to the first axis of is adjustable, and wherein an angle of attack between the rotation axis and the first axis by tilting about a fourth
  • the polishing device has the advantage that an up to ten times higher polishing performance is achieved than with a gimbal-mounted polishing plate.
  • a constant removal profile in narrower and wider radii can be achieved by tilting.
  • the adjacent to the peripheral edge area can be edited very well and precisely.
  • geometries on the optical surface are not polished out. Namely, there is no phenomenon that the polishing tool tends to work the lens surface in the direction of a sphere. Rather, it is possible with the elastic base of the polishing tool and the angle of attack to compensate for deviations caused by a progressive portion of the lens surface of a spherical portion relative surface of the polishing surface to a purely spherical partial contact surface.
  • cylinder effects of up to ten cylinders can be produced with such a polishing device.
  • the whole succeeds in a first variant for the processing of concave lens surfaces with a convex polishing surface and in a second variant for the processing of convex lens surfaces with a concave polishing surface.
  • the curved lens surface is on the front of the lens or the back of the lens.
  • a peripheral edge of the lens does not count toward the curved lens surface.
  • the curved lens surface may be a partial surface of the lens front side or the lens back side.
  • optical lenses having a circular peripheral edge are polished. The peripheral edge bounds the lens front side and the lens back each at its periphery.
  • the first axis should be aligned substantially perpendicularly through the center of the curved lens surface. Accordingly, the first axis will be substantially or exactly perpendicular to a receptacle of the workpiece holder in which an optical lens is received.
  • the invention achieves that the polishing surface rotates in a defined rotationally symmetrical surface about the axis of rotation.
  • the rotationally symmetrical surface may in particular be a sphere, at least outside a contact surface with the lens surface, where elastic deformation of the polishing surface occurs.
  • the polishing surface should rotate around your center. Although the polishing surface can stand up to its center. In many applications, however, also polishing tools are used, in which an annular or ring-segment-shaped polishing surface is arranged around the center.
  • a relatively simple interpolating motion kinematics of the first, second, third and fourth axes is achieved when the first axis is parallel to the second axis.
  • the polishing tool when an optical lens is accommodated in the workpiece holder, the polishing tool can be placed obliquely on the curved lens surface according to the angle of attack and by deformation of the elastic base a strip-shaped contact surface between the polishing surface and the curved lens surface can be formed.
  • the angle of attack between the axis of rotation and the first axis should be so great that the polishing surface is partially lifted from the curved lens surface, so to speak hovers over the latter. In this case, a part of the polishing surface then floats laterally spaced from the contact surface above the lens surface. The stronger the polishing tool is pressed against the lens surface, the greater the contact pressure and the wider the contact surface. Both correlate with the removal rate.
  • an angle of attack is suitable in which the polishing tool has no contact with the lens surface in the region of the axis of rotation. This makes the velocity vector profile in the contact area more constant.
  • a special embodiment also contributes to this, according to which the strip-shaped contact surface extends at both ends to a peripheral edge of the curved lens surface. This ensures that the contact pressure over the length and up to the ends of the strip-shaped contact surface can be regulated to a homogeneous value.
  • the surface curvature of the convex polishing surface should be smaller than the surface curvature of the concave lens surface or the surface curvature of the concave polishing surface should be greater than the surface curvature of the convex lens surface.
  • the diameter of the polishing surface is to be selected larger than the diameter of the lens surface to be polished, preferably at least 20% larger.
  • the polishing apparatus has an electrical control device, by which during a polishing process, in particular exclusively, the speed of rotation of the workpiece holder about the first axis, the distance between the workpiece holder and the polishing tool along the second axis, the offset between the workpiece holder and the polishing tool along the third axis, and the angle of attack between the rotation axis and the first axis are interpolating driven by tilting about the fourth axis.
  • the interpolation makes it possible to regulate the contact pressure of the contact surface over its length to a constant value.
  • the contact pressure can be controlled to a desired value, which is higher, for example, at the beginning of polishing than at the end of polishing. As a result, the polishing progress produces a finer polishing finish.
  • an electrical control device is a CNC control into consideration.
  • the rotating drive of the workpiece holder is effected about the first axis with a first drive
  • the adjustment of the distance between the workpiece holder and the polishing tool along the second axis with a second drive causes the adjustment of the offset between the workpiece holder and causes the polishing tool along the third axis with a third drive
  • the polishing apparatus may comprise an electrical control device, are driven by interpolating during a polishing process, in particular exclusively, the rotational speed of the first drive, the position of the second drive, the position of the third drive, and the position of the fourth drive.
  • Rotary motors are therefore suitable for the first drive, and servomotors in particular for the second, third and fourth drives.
  • the angle of attack with the control device is regulated to a value in which there is a maximum uniform pressing force over the length of a strip-shaped contact surface between the polishing surface and the curved lens surface.
  • the second axis and the third axis are mechanically coupled to the workpiece holder. This means that the workpiece holder moves absolutely along the second axis and the third axis. Thus, the optical lens moves in two spatial directions and thereby rotates about the first axis.
  • the fourth axis is mechanically coupled to the polishing tool. Accordingly, the polishing tool is tilted about the fourth axis. At the same time it can rotate around the axis of rotation. A simple interpolating kinematics is achieved when the axis of rotation intersects the fourth axis, preferably Plumb.
  • a design is preferably selected in which the polishing tool is rigidly coupled to a drive axle. Neither angle nor length changes should be possible, so that a CNC-controlled defined position without degrees of freedom can be approached with the polishing tool. In particular, the polishing tool should not have a cardan compensating joint or be mounted on such.
  • the workpiece holder is arranged geodetically above the polishing tool. Overburden and excess polishing agent thus do not fall on the lens surface to be polished, but fall down.
  • the device for processing curved lens surfaces with a toric basic shape on which also progressive action surfaces can be contained.
  • the invention also relates to the use of a polishing device described above for polishing a curved lens surface of an optical lens, in particular of concave or convex lens surfaces. Also in use, depending on the configuration of the polishing apparatus, the advantages described above are achieved.
  • An advantage of this is that an up to ten times higher polishing performance is achieved than with a gimbal-mounted polishing plate.
  • a constant removal profile in narrower and wider radii can be achieved by the modulated tilting about the fourth axis.
  • the region of the lens surface adjoining the peripheral edge can also be processed very well and precisely.
  • geometries on the optical surface are not polished out. It can be procedurally produced cylinder effects of up to ten cylinders. It is sufficient that during the polishing process, four axes interpolate with each other, namely the first, second, third and fourth axes.
  • a polishing agent should be provided, which may be contained in the polishing surface or in a supplied fluid.
  • an interpolating movement of the second, third and fourth axes is performed with each revolution of the lens blank around the first axis.
  • the rotational speed about the first axis is preferably also simultaneously modulated.
  • a good grinding pattern is achieved, in particular, when the interpolating movement of the second, third and fourth axes is continuous.
  • an angle of attack is taken into account in the interpolating driving as the first target function, in which a maximum uniform pressing force is present over the length of a strip-shaped contact surface between the polishing surface and the curved lens surface.
  • a uniform removal profile over the length of the contact surface is achieved.
  • the shape and position of the polishing tool, as well as the shape and position of the optical lens or of its lens surface should be known as input variables.
  • a further optional method embodiment provides that the interpolating driving as a second objective function takes into account a strip-shaped contact surface between the polishing surface and the curved lens surface, which extends at both ends to a peripheral edge of the curved lens surface. This ensures that a constant pressure force can be present within the lens surface up to the end region of the strip-shaped contact surface.
  • the interpolating driving takes into account as a third objective function a maximum uniform pressing force over one revolution of the optical lens.
  • a uniform pressing force over the length of the contact surface is achieved, but also during a progressive movement of the contact surface on the lens surface.
  • a constant removal profile is achieved over the entire lens surface.
  • a supplementary embodiment of the method provides that the interpolating driving as the fourth objective function takes into account a constant removal profile in the contact surface between the polishing surface and the curved lens surface.
  • the relative speeds between the polishing surface and the lens surface are also taken into account. This results in homogeneously distributed ablation rates over the contact surface.
  • a method variant also contributes to a desired polishing behavior, according to which the angle of attack between the axis of rotation and the first axis rotates twice per revolution of the lens blank about the first axis, in particular exactly twice, around the fourth axis and back and forth becomes.
  • the angle of attack can be adapted to the basic toric shape and it is achieved in each rotation angle over the length of the contact surface uniform contact pressure.
  • a harmonic microsection a variant in which the adjustment of the offset between the workpiece holder and the polishing tool along the third axis is superimposed with an oscillating movement along the third axis, wherein the oscillatory movement is smaller than the adjustment of the offset.
  • larger circular grinding paths are superimposed around the center of the lens surface by smaller circular grinding paths.
  • the result is a particularly fine microsection, in which the larger bevel paths are not recognizable by refraction but blurred.
  • the rotating of the polishing tool about the axis of rotation takes place between a start and a deceleration at a constant speed.
  • the speed does not interpolate with the first, second, third and fourth axis.
  • polishing of the polishing tool about the axis of rotation between starting and braking at a speed between 600 and 1500 revolutions per minute is suitable for polishing.
  • the method should be performed such that the rotational speed of the polishing tool rotating about the axis of rotation between the start and the deceleration is higher than the maximum rotational speed of the rotation of the workpiece holder about the first axis.
  • Fig. 1 one sees in a section through a section of a polishing device 1 how the polishing of a concave lens surface 101 of an optical lens 100 with a polishing tool 20 takes place.
  • the polishing apparatus 1 is composed of two corresponding units.
  • the first unit comprises the recording and motion kinematics of the optical lens 100 with a workpiece holder 10.
  • the second unit relates to the polishing tool 20 and its movement kinematics.
  • the polishing tool 20 has a carrier element 21 and an elastic substructure 22 between a convex polishing surface 23 and the carrier element 21.
  • the polishing tool 20 with the polishing surface 23 is driven to rotate about an axis of rotation R.
  • the polishing tool 20 is rotatably mounted on a tool holder, here in particular a tool drum 50.
  • a spindle drive 35 is arranged, with the polishing tool 20 is driven about the rotation axis R.
  • the tool drum 50 in turn is rotatably driven about a fourth axis A4. This rotation is used to set and regulate by means of a fourth drive A4, on the one hand, an angle of incidence W of the polishing tool 20 relative to the optical lens 100, and on the other hand to use different polishing tools, which are arranged on the circumference of the tool drum 50.
  • the rotation axis R and the fourth axis A4 intersect perpendicularly. This makes the movement kinematics particularly easy. However, this cutting is not essential. Alternatively, a non-perpendicular orientation and / or a spaced arrangement are also conceivable.
  • the polishing tool 20 rotates about the axis of rotation R and can be aligned and adjusted by adjusting the angle of attack W to the lens surface 101. These are the only adjustable axes and degrees of freedom of the polishing tool 20. Thus, no gimbal-mounted polishing plate is provided.
  • the workpiece holder 10 is rotationally driven about a first axis A1 to rotate the optical lens 100 about its center.
  • the optical lens 100 can be connected, in particular with its rear side 102 of the lens, either with a so-called block piece, or else a vacuum holder is used which holds the optical lens 100 by negative pressure on the rear side of the lens 102.
  • the diameter D2 of the lens surface 101, the peripheral edge 103, and the surface curvature K2 of the lens surface 101 are also indicated.
  • the motion kinematics of the workpiece holder 10 is shown schematically.
  • the workpiece holder 10 has a first drive 31 for effecting rotation around the first axis A1.
  • a second drive 32 By means of a second drive 32, the workpiece holder 10 can be moved back and forth along a second axis A2.
  • the second axis A2 is present coaxial with the first axis A1.
  • a third drive 33 is provided, with which the workpiece holder 10 is laterally movable back and forth; this particular transversely and in particular perpendicular to the second axis A2.
  • the first axis A1 is aligned perpendicularly through the center of the concave lens surface 101.
  • the fourth axis A4 intersect perpendicularly the plane defined by the second and third axes A2, A3. In addition, preferably also intersect the rotation axis R and the first axis A1.
  • the first axis A1, the second axis A2 and the third axis A3 are mechanically coupled to the workpiece holder 10 or determine these three axes the degrees of freedom of the workpiece holder 10.
  • the fourth axis A4 and the axis of rotation R are mechanically coupled to the polishing tool 20 or they determine the degrees of freedom of the polishing tool 20.
  • the first axis A1 and the axis of rotation R are to be arranged as described in order to effect the rotations of the lens 100 and the polishing tool 20.
  • This contact surface F is shown by an intersection between the polishing tool 10 and the optical lens 100.
  • the elastic substructure 22 deforms.
  • Another part of the polishing surface 23 is lifted off the lens surface 101. In a sense, it hovers above the lens surface 101. This also applies in particular to the center in the center M of the polishing surface 23 about the axis of rotation R.
  • a strip-shaped contact surface F is formed between the polishing surface 23 and the concave lens surface 101, as will be explained in more detail below Fig. 3 is explained.
  • the removal rate is determined by the rotational speed of the polishing tool 20 about the axis of rotation R and the rotational speed of the optical lens 100 about the first axis A1.
  • the rotational speed of the convex polishing surface 23 about the rotation axis R by the spindle drive 35 is preferably kept at a constant revolution number. This is preferably to be chosen so fast anyway that due to the rotational inertia a rapid modulation of the rotational speed is not possible. To prefer is a speed between 600 and 1500 revolutions per minute.
  • the rotational speed of the rotation of the polishing tool 20 about the rotational axis R between the start and the deceleration should also be higher than the maximum rotational speed of the rotation of the workpiece holder 10 about the first axis A1. Values between 0 and 100 revolutions per minute are particularly suitable as the maximum speed of rotation of the workpiece holder 10 about the first axis A1 during the polishing.
  • the angle of attack W is controlled as far as possible with the control device to a value in which over the length of the strip-shaped contact surface F between the polishing surface 23 and the concave lens surface 101, a maximum uniform pressing force is present.
  • the interpolating drive it is possible for the interpolating drive to take into account as the first target function an angle of attack W in which there is a maximum uniform contact force over the length of a strip-shaped contact surface F between the polishing surface 23 and the concave lens surface 101.
  • the interpolating driving generates, as a third objective function, a maximum uniform pressing force over one revolution of the optical lens 100.
  • a strip-shaped contact surface F between the polishing surface 23 and the concave lens surface 101 can be traced by the interpolating driving as a second objective function, which extends at both ends E1, E2 to a peripheral edge 103 of the concave lens surface 101.
  • Irrelevant is a lens edge that surrounds the concave lens surface 101 and does not need to be polished.
  • the removal rate also depends on the rotational speeds, in particular on the velocity vectors in the contact surface F.
  • the velocity vectors can be determined in addition to the local pressing force solely on the basis of the positions of the workpiece holder 10, the polishing tool 20 and the surface shape of the lens surface 101. This makes it possible for the interpolating driving as the fourth target function to take into account a maximally constant removal profile in the contact surface F between the polishing surface 23 and the concave lens surface 101.
  • Fig. 2 one sees a perspective view of a polishing device 1 with two working levels. In the working plane lying in front of the image, there is a workpiece holder 10 and a polishing tool 20 according to the section Fig. 1 , For clarity, only some of the technical features are provided with reference numerals.
  • the workpiece holder 10 holds an optical lens 100, which is processed by the polishing tool 20.
  • the polishing tool 20 is composed of a carrier element 21, an elastic substructure 22 attached thereto and a polishing surface 23 on the elastic substructure 22.
  • the workpiece holder 10 can be displaced along the second axis A2 in order to be able to control a distance z between the workpiece holder 10 and the polishing tool 20.
  • an offset x between the workpiece holder 10 and the polishing tool 20 can be controlled by displacing the workpiece holder 10 along a third axis A3.
  • the workpiece holder 10 including the optical lens 100 is rotated about a first axis A1.
  • the polishing tool 20 is driven to rotate about a rotation axis R.
  • the tool drum 50 on which the polishing tool 20 is rotatably supported about the rotation axis R, can be rotated about a fourth axis A4 to control the angle of incidence W of the polishing tool 20 on the lens 100.
  • Fig. 2 one recognizes further that an optional second working level is provided. This is functionally identical to the front working level. As a result, two lenses 100, 100a can be processed simultaneously and identically.
  • the working planes are firmly connected with respect to the degrees of freedom of the workpiece holder 10, 10a and the polishing tool 20, 20a. The working planes also divide the drives so that the workpiece holders 10, 10a and the polishing tools 20, 20a move synchronously.
  • the tool drum 50 in each of the working levels over several, in particular four, in particular different polishing tools 20, 20a, 20b, 20c, 20d, 20e, 20f, 20g has.
  • the third to eighth polishing tools 20b, 20c, 20d, 20e, 20f, 20g may also be polishing plates which have a gimbal compensating joint. These polishing plates then attach themselves to the lens surfaces of the lenses 100, 100a and oscillate around the gimbal compensating joint.
  • Fig. 3 1 shows a schematic sketch to illustrate the contact surface F of a polishing tool 20 which has an angle of incidence on a lens surface 101 of an optical lens 100.
  • the peripheral surface 103, the surface curvature K2 and the diameter D2 are also marked by the lens surface 101.
  • the already pre-processed lens 100 has a toric lens surface 101. That is, the lens surface 101 to be polished is oval or elliptical. Two crescent-shaped edge areas do not need polishing.
  • Hatching is now particularly the contact surface F between the polishing surface 23 and the lens surface 101.
  • This is strip-shaped and protrudes at both ends E1, E2 extends to a peripheral edge 103 of the concave lens surface 101. With other areas, the polishing surface 23 protrudes beyond the peripheral edge 103 at the ends E1, E2. Not recognizable are the parts of the polishing surface 23, as in Fig. 1 visibly float above the lens surface 101.
  • Fig. 4 shows a perspective view of a polishing apparatus 1 according to Fig. 2 however, shown with frame 41, housing 40 and secondary equipment for automated operation.
  • the frame 41 holds both the polishing tool 20 and the workpiece holder 10.
  • the entire tool drum 50 together with the polishing tool 20 and the workpiece holder are arranged within the housing 40.
  • the housing 40 On the front, the housing 40 has a viewing window and a flap or door. Good to see in the presentation of the Fig. 4 the drives 31, 32, 33, 34.
  • the first drive 31 drives the workpiece holder 10 in rotation about the first axis A1.
  • the second and third drive 32, 33 are designed as cross slides, so that the displacements for controlling the offset x and the distance z are controllable.
  • the lenses 100, 100a are removed from the transport rail 42 before being polished and loaded into the workpiece holders 10. After polishing, they are removed again with the aid of the loading device 43 from the workpiece holder 10 and deposited for removal on the transport rail 42.
  • the above descriptions also apply to an optional modification in which the curved lens surface 101 is convex and the curved polishing surface 23 is concave.
  • polishing tools 20b, 20c with a concave polishing surface 23 can be used in the tool drum 50 in addition to the polishing tools 20, 20a. Then, in the same polishing apparatus 1, concave and convex lens surfaces 101 are workable.
  • polisher 50 tool drum 10 Workpiece holder 100 optical lens 10a second workpiece holder 100a second optical lens 20 polishing tool 101 lens surface 20a second polishing tool 102 Lens back 20b third polishing tool 103 circumferential edge 20c fourth polishing tool 20d fifth polishing tool A1 first axis (rotation) 20e sixth polishing tool A2 second axis (distance) 20f seventh polishing tool A3 third axis (offset) 20g eighth polishing tool A4 fourth axis (angle of attack) D1 Diameter (polishing surface) 21 support element D2 Diameter (lens area) 22 elastic substructure E1 first end (strip-shaped contact surface) 23 convex polishing surface E2 second end (strip-shaped contact surface) 31 first drive (first axis) 32 second drive (second axis) F strip-shaped contact surface 33 third drive (third axis) K1 Surface curvature (polishing surface) 34 fourth drive (fourth axis) K2 Surface curvature (lens surface) 35 spindle drive
EP16166363.8A 2015-06-15 2016-04-21 Dispositif de polissage destine a polir des surfaces concaves de lentilles optiques et son procede de fonctionnement Active EP3106262B8 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102015109495 2015-06-15
DE102015115078.6A DE102015115078A1 (de) 2015-06-15 2015-09-08 Poliervorrichtung zum Polieren konkaver Linsenflächen von optischen Linsen und Verfahren zu deren Betrieb

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3106262A1 true EP3106262A1 (fr) 2016-12-21
EP3106262B1 EP3106262B1 (fr) 2018-01-17
EP3106262B8 EP3106262B8 (fr) 2018-04-04

Family

ID=55802291

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP16166363.8A Active EP3106262B8 (fr) 2015-06-15 2016-04-21 Dispositif de polissage destine a polir des surfaces concaves de lentilles optiques et son procede de fonctionnement

Country Status (1)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3106262B8 (fr)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN107953191A (zh) * 2017-12-13 2018-04-24 江西佳鼎光电科技有限公司 一种用于加工凹面镜片的研磨装置
CN111390739A (zh) * 2020-03-31 2020-07-10 东莞泰升玻璃有限公司 一种曲面玻璃的双面抛光装置

Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3877177A (en) * 1972-07-17 1975-04-15 Canon Kk Device for machining spherical surfaces
US6012965A (en) * 1997-10-07 2000-01-11 Micro Optics Design Corp. Manufacturing ophthalmic lenses using lens structure cognition and spatial positioning system
US6722962B1 (en) * 1997-04-22 2004-04-20 Sony Corporation Polishing system, polishing method, polishing pad, and method of forming polishing pad
EP1655102A2 (fr) * 2004-11-09 2006-05-10 Seiko Epson Corporation Outil de polissage élastique et méthode de polissage d'une lentille utilisant cet outil
EP1867430A1 (fr) * 2006-06-16 2007-12-19 Satisloh AG Machine d'affûtage et de polissage destinée à affûter et/ou polir des pièces à usiner de qualité optique
DE102007026841A1 (de) 2007-06-06 2008-12-11 Satisloh Ag Polierteller für ein Werkzeug zur Feinbearbeitung von optisch wirksamen Flächen an insbesondere Brillengläsern und Verfahren für dessen Herstellung
DE102009006797A1 (de) * 2008-02-01 2009-08-06 Kojima Engineering Co., Ltd. Linsenbearbeitungsvorrichtung
EP2384854A2 (fr) * 2010-04-30 2011-11-09 Carl Zeiss Vision GmbH Outil de polissage pour le traitement de surfaces optiques, notamment des surfaces de moulage libre
EP2662185A1 (fr) * 2012-05-11 2013-11-13 Cerium Group Limited Plaquette de revêtement de lentille
DE102014003598A1 (de) * 2014-03-17 2015-09-17 Satisloh Ag Vorrichtung zum Schleifen, Feinschleifen und/oder Polieren von Werkstücken in optischer Qualität, insbesondere von sphärischen Linsenflächen in der Feinoptik

Patent Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3877177A (en) * 1972-07-17 1975-04-15 Canon Kk Device for machining spherical surfaces
US6722962B1 (en) * 1997-04-22 2004-04-20 Sony Corporation Polishing system, polishing method, polishing pad, and method of forming polishing pad
US6012965A (en) * 1997-10-07 2000-01-11 Micro Optics Design Corp. Manufacturing ophthalmic lenses using lens structure cognition and spatial positioning system
EP1655102A2 (fr) * 2004-11-09 2006-05-10 Seiko Epson Corporation Outil de polissage élastique et méthode de polissage d'une lentille utilisant cet outil
EP1867430A1 (fr) * 2006-06-16 2007-12-19 Satisloh AG Machine d'affûtage et de polissage destinée à affûter et/ou polir des pièces à usiner de qualité optique
DE102007026841A1 (de) 2007-06-06 2008-12-11 Satisloh Ag Polierteller für ein Werkzeug zur Feinbearbeitung von optisch wirksamen Flächen an insbesondere Brillengläsern und Verfahren für dessen Herstellung
DE102009006797A1 (de) * 2008-02-01 2009-08-06 Kojima Engineering Co., Ltd. Linsenbearbeitungsvorrichtung
EP2384854A2 (fr) * 2010-04-30 2011-11-09 Carl Zeiss Vision GmbH Outil de polissage pour le traitement de surfaces optiques, notamment des surfaces de moulage libre
EP2662185A1 (fr) * 2012-05-11 2013-11-13 Cerium Group Limited Plaquette de revêtement de lentille
DE102014003598A1 (de) * 2014-03-17 2015-09-17 Satisloh Ag Vorrichtung zum Schleifen, Feinschleifen und/oder Polieren von Werkstücken in optischer Qualität, insbesondere von sphärischen Linsenflächen in der Feinoptik

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN107953191A (zh) * 2017-12-13 2018-04-24 江西佳鼎光电科技有限公司 一种用于加工凹面镜片的研磨装置
CN107953191B (zh) * 2017-12-13 2023-10-13 江西佳鼎光电科技有限公司 一种用于加工凹面镜片的研磨装置
CN111390739A (zh) * 2020-03-31 2020-07-10 东莞泰升玻璃有限公司 一种曲面玻璃的双面抛光装置

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP3106262B1 (fr) 2018-01-17
EP3106262B8 (fr) 2018-04-04

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2338640B1 (fr) Machine de meulage de pièces optiques, en particuliere de verres à lunettes en plastique
EP3027345B1 (fr) Procédé d'usinage des arêtes de dents et station d'usinage pour mettre en oeuvre ledit procédé
DE69726620T2 (de) Schleifen von Silizium-Wafer-Werkstücken
DE60017985T2 (de) Brillenglasbearbeitungsvorrichtung
DE60129644T2 (de) Verfahren zur herstellung einer oberfläche einer ophthalmischen linse und vorrichtung zur durchführung des verfahrens
EP2161092A1 (fr) Machine à meuler des roues dentées et procédé de dressage d'un outil de meulage
EP1796872B1 (fr) Procede pour polir, en particulier, des surfaces de faces optiquement actives, telles que des lentilles
DE3320042A1 (de) Verfahren zum schleifen vorverzahnter und schleifmaschine zum durchfuehren dieses verfahrens
DE102015115078A1 (de) Poliervorrichtung zum Polieren konkaver Linsenflächen von optischen Linsen und Verfahren zu deren Betrieb
EP2837464B1 (fr) Procédé de polissage destiné au traitement d'une surface optique d'une lentille optique et outils de polissage appropriés
DE60103123T2 (de) Schleifspindel für schleifmaschinen mit abschnittsweise harzgebundener grober und feiner körnung
DE2835461A1 (de) Vorrichtung und verfahren zum glaetten und/oder polieren von teilkugelfoermigen flaechen
EP3124175B1 (fr) Procede de traitement de pieces usinees optiques, en particulier lentilles de lunette en matiere plastique
EP2394783A1 (fr) Meuleuse cylindrique sans pointe, dispositif et procédé de meulage sans pointe à l'aide d'une plaque de réglage réglable en hauteur
EP0311778B1 (fr) Procédé de finition de flancs de dents bombées en particulier de roues dentées trempées
DE102004037454A1 (de) Verfahren zur Bearbeitung von Oberflächen von Werkstücken
EP3106262B1 (fr) Dispositif de polissage destine a polir des surfaces de lentilles optiques et son procede de fonctionnement
EP2794156B1 (fr) Machine et procédé permettant de faire tourner au moins des épaulements plans, entourant des manetons, d'un vilebrequin
DE3932197A1 (de) Schleif- und nachbearbeitungseinrichtung sowie verfahren zum schleifen und nachbehandeln
DE102014211937C5 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Finish-Bearbeitung von Umfangsflächen rotationssymmetrischer Werkstückabschnitte
DE19751750B4 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Herstellen von polierbaren, optischen Linsen aus Linsenrohlingen
DE19616536A1 (de) Verfahren und Brillenglasrandschleifmaschine zum Formschleifen des Umfangsrandes von Brillengläsern und zum ggf. anschließenden Facettenschleifen
DE202008016620U1 (de) Vorrichtung zum Schleifen, Feinschleifen und/oder Polieren von Werkstücken in optischer Qualität, insbesondere von sphärischen Linsenflächen in der Feinoptik
EP3808499B1 (fr) Unité d'entraînement d'outil, dispositif rotatif et procédé de rotation
DE102011084118A1 (de) Glättungswerkzeug und Glättungsvorrichtung zur automatisierten Bearbeitung eines optischen Elements und entsprechende Verfahren hierzu

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN PUBLISHED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20170403

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: B24B 13/00 20060101AFI20170622BHEP

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20170802

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 964092

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20180215

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502016000464

Country of ref document: DE

GRAT Correction requested after decision to grant or after decision to maintain patent in amended form

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNCDEC

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20180117

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180117

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180117

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180117

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180117

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180117

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180417

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180117

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180117

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180117

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180117

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180417

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180517

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180117

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180418

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180117

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 502016000464

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180117

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180117

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180117

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180117

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180117

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180117

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180117

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20180430

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20181018

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180421

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180117

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180430

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180421

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190430

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190430

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180117

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180117

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20160421

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180117

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180117

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 964092

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20210421

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210421

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230530

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20230421

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20230421

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20230427

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20230418

Year of fee payment: 8