EP2992135A1 - Procédés intégrés de purification d'une matière cellulosique - Google Patents

Procédés intégrés de purification d'une matière cellulosique

Info

Publication number
EP2992135A1
EP2992135A1 EP14728768.4A EP14728768A EP2992135A1 EP 2992135 A1 EP2992135 A1 EP 2992135A1 EP 14728768 A EP14728768 A EP 14728768A EP 2992135 A1 EP2992135 A1 EP 2992135A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
pulp
solvent
hemicellulose
extractant
cellulose
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP14728768.4A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Inventor
Denis FALLON
Bin Li
Rongfu Li
Jay Mehta
Tianshu Pan
Jaimes Sher
Leslie Allen
Dinesh Arora
Monica BOATWRIGHT
Christopher M. Bundren
Michael Combs
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Celanese International Corp
Original Assignee
Celanese International Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Celanese International Corp filed Critical Celanese International Corp
Publication of EP2992135A1 publication Critical patent/EP2992135A1/fr
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21—PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21C—PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE BY REMOVING NON-CELLULOSE SUBSTANCES FROM CELLULOSE-CONTAINING MATERIALS; REGENERATION OF PULPING LIQUORS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • D21C3/00—Pulping cellulose-containing materials
    • D21C3/20—Pulping cellulose-containing materials with organic solvents or in solvent environment
    • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21—PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21C—PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE BY REMOVING NON-CELLULOSE SUBSTANCES FROM CELLULOSE-CONTAINING MATERIALS; REGENERATION OF PULPING LIQUORS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • D21C11/00—Regeneration of pulp liquors or effluent waste waters
    • D21C11/0007—Recovery of by-products, i.e. compounds other than those necessary for pulping, for multiple uses or not otherwise provided for
    • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21—PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21C—PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE BY REMOVING NON-CELLULOSE SUBSTANCES FROM CELLULOSE-CONTAINING MATERIALS; REGENERATION OF PULPING LIQUORS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • D21C9/00—After-treatment of cellulose pulp, e.g. of wood pulp, or cotton linters ; Treatment of dilute or dewatered pulp or process improvement taking place after obtaining the raw cellulosic material and not provided for elsewhere
    • D21C9/001—Modification of pulp properties
    • D21C9/002—Modification of pulp properties by chemical means; preparation of dewatered pulp, e.g. in sheet or bulk form, containing special additives
    • D21C9/005—Modification of pulp properties by chemical means; preparation of dewatered pulp, e.g. in sheet or bulk form, containing special additives organic compounds
    • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21—PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21C—PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE BY REMOVING NON-CELLULOSE SUBSTANCES FROM CELLULOSE-CONTAINING MATERIALS; REGENERATION OF PULPING LIQUORS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • D21C9/00—After-treatment of cellulose pulp, e.g. of wood pulp, or cotton linters ; Treatment of dilute or dewatered pulp or process improvement taking place after obtaining the raw cellulosic material and not provided for elsewhere
    • D21C9/02—Washing ; Displacing cooking or pulp-treating liquors contained in the pulp by fluids, e.g. wash water or other pulp-treating agents

Definitions

  • the present invention relates generally to processes for obtaining a cellulosic product from a raw cellulosic material.
  • the present invention relates to an integrated process for converting a raw cellulosic material into a pulp and then purifying the pulp to produce a purified pulp comprising cellulose and having reduced hemicellulose content.
  • Cellulose is typically obtained from wood pulp and cotton and may be further modified to create derivatives including regenerated cellulose, cellulose ethers, cellulose esters and cellulose nitrate, among others. Cellulose derivatives have a variety of commercial uses.
  • cellulose acetate is the acetate ester of cellulose and is used for a variety of products, including textiles (e.g., linings, blouses, dresses, wedding and party attire, home furnishings, draperies, upholstery and slip covers), industrial uses (e.g., cigarette and other filters for tobacco products, and ink reservoirs for fiber tip pens, decking lumber), high absorbency products (e.g., diapers, sanitary napkins, and surgical products), thermoplastic products (e.g., film applications, plastic instruments, and tape), cosmetic and pharmaceutical (extended capsule/tablet release agents and encapsulating agent), medicinal (hypoallergenic surgical products) and other uses.
  • textiles e.g., linings, blouses, dresses, wedding and party attire, home furnishings, draperies, upholstery and slip covers
  • industrial uses e.g., cigarette and other filters for tobacco products, and ink reservoirs for fiber tip pens, decking lumber
  • high absorbency products e.g., diapers, sanitary napkins, and surgical products
  • Known processes for obtaining a wood pulp from a raw cellulosic material include chemical processes, mechanical processes, and semi-chemical processes, as well as organosolv pulping techniques that use an organic solvent to dissolve lignin and hemicellulose.
  • chemical processes the most commonly used process is the kraft process.
  • the kraft process described in U.S. Pat. No. 296,935, the entirety of which is incorporated by reference herein, involves the digesting (cooking) of wood chips at elevated temperatures and pressure with an alkaline liquor of sodium hydroxide and sodium sulfide.
  • the solid pulp from the cooking step is recovered and subjected to multiple washing and bleaching stages. The solid pulp may then be further processed for use in additional processes.
  • Another chemical process used to generate pulp from a raw material is the sulfite pulping process, described in U.S. Pat. No. 2,999,045, the entirety of which is incorporated by reference herein.
  • This process although similar to the kraft process, uses an acidic cooking liquor to extract lignin from wood chips.
  • the cooking liquor may be a salt of sulfurous acid, comprising sulfites or bisulfites, and a counter ion, e.g., sodium, calcium, potassium, magnesium, or ammonium.
  • the sulfite process is generally conducted at a pH from 1.5 to 5, depending on, inter alia, the counter ion and sulfurous acid salt utilized. Because of the variety in cooking liquors for the sulfite process, there are numerous options for heat and/or chemical recovery.
  • the wood pulp may be further treated to reach a desired purity.
  • High purity a-cellulose pulp is commonly required as a starting material to make cellulose derivatives, such as cellulose acetate.
  • the cost of such so-called cellulose produced in commercial pulp processes is high.
  • Commercial paper grade pulps contain less than 90% ⁇ -cellulose and are potential crude cellulosic sources for making cellulose derivatives.
  • Paper grade pulp contains a high amount of impurities, such as hemicellulose, rendering it incompatible with certain industrial uses, such as making cellulose acetate flake or tow. Accordingly, the separation of hemicellulose and/or other impurities from ⁇ -cellulose in paper grade pulp has been investigated using different technical routes.
  • Zhou et al. discusses the use of dimethyldioxirane (DMDO), a pulp bleaching agent, to treat birch pulp and obtain acetate-grade pulp.
  • DMDO dimethyldioxirane
  • Zhou et al. "Acetate-grade pulp from birch,” BioResources, (2010), 5(3), 1779-1778.
  • U.S. Pub. No. 2010/0112646 discloses a process for preparing glucose from a cellulose material in which a cellulose-comprising starting material is provided and treated with a liquid treatment medium comprising an ionic liquid and an enzyme.
  • U.S. Pub. No. 2010/0081798 discloses a process for preparing glucose from a material containing ligno-cellulose in which the material is first treated with an ionic liquid and then subjected to enzymatic hydrolysis.
  • 2010/0081798 describes obtaining glucose by treating a material containing ligno-cellulose with an ionic liquid and subjecting same to an enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation.
  • a material containing ligno-cellulose with an ionic liquid
  • the methods disclosed in these references result in breaking down the cellulose molecules, making them unsuitable for use as starting materials to make cellulose derivatives.
  • U.S. Pat. 7,828,936 describes a method for dissolving cellulose in which a cellulose based raw material is admixed with a mixture of a dipolar aprotic intercrystalline swelling agent and an ionic liquid. This method results in the complete dissolution of the cellulose and destruction of the fiber morphology of the cellulose. Although the cellulose may be regenerated using a non- solvent, the crystallinity of the regenerated cellulose is lower than the original cellulose sample.
  • the present invention is directed to a process for converting a starting material to a purified pulp material, comprising: removing lignin from a starting material to form a wet pulp comprising at least 5 wt.% water; extracting hemicellulose from the wet pulp with an extractant, wherein the extractant comprises a cellulose solvent and a co-solvent, the cellulose solvent selected from the group consisting of an ionic liquid, an amine oxide, and combinations thereof; and separating the extracted hemicellulose from the wet pulp to form a cellulosic product comprising less hemicellulose than the wet pulp.
  • the removing lignin step may comprise: combining the starting material and a cooking liquor to dissolve lignin and form a cooked pulp comprising cooking liquor, dissolved lignin and pulp; and separating the cooking liquor and lignin from the pulp to form the wet pulp.
  • the separating step may further comprise washing the wet pulp.
  • the process may further comprise bleaching (completely or partially) the wet pulp prior to the extracting step.
  • the process may further comprise bleaching (completely or partially) and washing the wet pulp prior to the extracting step.
  • the process may further comprise bleaching (completely or partially) the cellulosic product.
  • the process may further comprise drying the wet pulp to no less than 1 wt.% water prior to the extracting. In some embodiments, when the wet pulp comprises at least 7 wt.% water, the process further comprises drying the wet pulp to no less than 5 wt.% water prior to the extracting step. In further embodiments, the wet pulp comprises at least 30 wt.% water and may be sent to the extracting step without drying. In some embodiments, the wet pulp may be washed with a pre-extraction wash agent prior to the extracting.
  • the pre-extraction wash agent may be selected from the group consisting of alcohols, esters, ethers, ketones, carboxylic acids, nitriles, amine, amide, halides, hydrocarbon compound or heterocyclic compound and combinations thereof.
  • the pre-extraction wash agent may be selected from the group consisting of methanol, ethanol, iso-propanol, methyl acetate, ethyl acetate, propyl acetate, isopropyl acetate, vinyl acetate, tetrahydrofuran, dimethoxyethane, acetone, acetic acid, formic acid, acetonitrile, propionitrile, butyronitrile, chloroacetonitrile, dichloromethane, chloroform, triethylamine, ⁇ , ⁇ -dimethylformamide, toluene, pyridine, water, and combinations thereof.
  • the pre-extraction wash agent may remove at least 30% of the water from the wet pulp.
  • the separating step may comprise: removing an extraction mixture from the extracting step; separating the extraction mixture to form an intermediate cellulosic material and a liquid stream containing hemicellulose; and flashing at least a portion of the liquid stream to form a vapor stream enriched in the co-solvent and a flashed liquid stream comprising the hemicellulose, the cellulose solvent, and the co-solvent.
  • the separating step may further comprise recovering hemicellulose from the flashed liquid stream.
  • the separating step may comprise: removing an extraction mixture from the extraction step; concentrating the intermediate cellulosic material to form the cellulosic product, wherein the cellulosic product has an increased solids content; and recovering the separated hemicellulose.
  • the process may further comprise drying the cellulosic product to form a sheet product.
  • mono-, di-, and oligo-saccharide and other side products are formed in the process and are removed from the process, such as by using evaporation, membrane filtration, ion exchange, activated carbon bed, simulated moving bed chromatographic separation, flocculation, and/or combinations thereof.
  • the mono-, di-, and oligo-saccharide and other side products may be converted into furfural, ethanol, acetic acid, and/or other products by either enzymatic treatment or catalytic process and then separated from the process.
  • the mono-, di-, and oligo-saccharide and other side products formed in the process may be reacted with polymer-bound boronic acid to form a complex, which is further separated from the liquid stream.
  • the co-solvent may be selected from the group consisting of dimethyl sulfoxide, tetramethylene sulfone, tetramethylene sulfoxide, ⁇ , ⁇ -dimethylacetamide, N-methyl pyrrol idone, dimethyl formamide, piperylene sulfone, acetic acid, water, and mixtures thereof.
  • the co-solvent may be selected from the group consisting of alcohols, esters, ethers, ketones, carboxylic acids, nitriles, amines, amides, halides, hydrocarbon compounds, heterocyclic compounds, and combinations thereof.
  • the co-solvent is selected from the group consisting of methanol, ethanol, iso-propanol, methyl acetate, ethyl acetate, propyl acetate, isopropyl acetate, vinyl acetate, tetrahydrofuran, acetone, acetic acid, formic acid, acetonitrile, propionitrile, butyronitrile, chloroacetonitrile, dichloromethane, chloroform, triethylamine, N,N- dimethylformamide, toluene, pyridine, water, and combinations thereof.
  • the co-solvent may comprise DMSO and/or water, acetonitrile and/or water, or acetic acid and/or water.
  • the cellulosic solvent may be added directly to the wet pulp prior to the extracting.
  • the extracting step may further comprise extracting impurities from the wet pulp, wherein the impurities include degraded cellulose, resins, rosins, and/or other dichloromethane extractables.
  • the cellulose solvent comprises an ionic liquid selected from the group consisting of ammonium-based ionic substances, imidazolium-based ionic substances, pyridinium, pyrollinium, piperidinium, other nitrogen base ionic liquids, phosphonium-based ionic substances, and combinations thereof.
  • the cellulose solvent comprises an ionic liquid selected from the group consisting of ammonium acetate, hydroxyethyl ammonium acetate, hydroxyethyl ammonium formate, tetramethylammonium acetate, tetrabutylammonium acetate, tetraethylammonium acetate, benzyltriethylammonium acetate, benzyltributylammonium acetate, benzyltriethylammonium chloride, benzyltributylammonium chloride, tetramethylammonium hydroxide, tetrabutylammonium hydroxide, benzyltrimethylammonium hydroxide, N,N-dimethylpyrrolidinium acetate, N,N- dimethylpiperidinium acetate, ⁇ , ⁇ -dimethylpyrrolidinium dimethyl phosphate, N,N- dimethylpiperid
  • the cellulose solvent comprises an ionic liquid selected from the group consisting of l -butyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrachloroaluminate, l -ethyl-3-methyl
  • imidazolium tetrachloroaluminate l -ethyl-3 -methyl imidalzolium hydrogensulfate, l -butyl-3-methyl imidazolium hydrogensulfate, methylimidazolium chloride, l-ethyl-3 -methyl imidazolium acetate, 1 ,3 -diethyl imidazolium acetate, l -butyl-3-methyl imidazolium acetate, tris-2(hydroxyl
  • ethyl)methylammonium methylsulfate l -ethyl-3-methyl imidazolium ethylsulfate, l-ethyl-3 -methyl imidazolium methanesulfonate, methyl-tri-n-butylammonium methylsulfate, l-butyl-3 -methyl imidazolium chloride, l-ethyl-3 -methyl imidasolium chloride, l-ethyl-3-methyl imidazolium thiocyanate, l-butyl-3 -methyl imidazolium thiocyanate, l-aryl-3 -methyl imidazolium chloride, 1- ethyl-3 -methylimidazolium dimethyl phosphate, l-ethyl-3 -methyl diethyl phosphate, 1,3- dimethylimidazolium dimethyl phosphate and combinations and complexes thereof.
  • the cellulose solvent comprises an ionic liquid selected from the group consisting of ethyltributylphosphonium diethylphosphate, methyltributylphosphonium dimethylphosphate, tetrabutylphosphonium bromide, tetrabutylphosphonium chloride,
  • ethyltributylphosphonium acetate benzyltriethylphosphonium acetate, benzyltributylphosphonium acetate, tetrabutylphosphonium acetate, tetraethylphosphonium acetate, tetramethylphosphonium acetate, and combinations thereof.
  • the cellulose solvent comprises an amine oxide selected from the group consisting of compounds with chemical structure of acyclic R 3 N + -0 ⁇ , compounds with chemical structure of N-heterocyclic compound N-oxide, and combinations thereof.
  • the cellulose solvent comprises an amine oxide selected from the group consisting of trimethylamine N-oxide, triethylamine N-oxide, tripropylamine N-oxide, tributylamine N-oxide, methyldiethylamine N-oxide, dimethylethylamine N-oxide, methyldipropylamine N-oxide, tribenzylamine N-Oxide, benzyldimethylamine N-oxide, benzyldiethylamine N-oxide,
  • N-methylpiperidine N-oxide N-ethylpiperidine N-oxide N-propylpiperidine N- oxide, N-isopropylpiperidine N-oxide.
  • N-butylpiperidine N-oxide N-hexylpiperidine N-oxide.
  • N-butylpyrrolidine N-oxide N-hexylpyrrolidine N-oxide, and combinations thereof.
  • FIG. 1 shows a pulping process in accordance with conventional pulping processes.
  • FIG. 2 shows an exemplary pulping and purification process in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 3 shows an exemplary pulping and purification process in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 4 shows an exemplary purification process in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 5 shows an exemplary purification process in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention.
  • the present invention relates to processes for converting a starting material to a cellulosic product, comprising removing lignin from the starting material to form a wet pulp comprising at least 1 wt.% water, e.g., at least 5 wt.% water, at least 7 wt.% water, or at least 10 wt.% water, and then separating, e.g., extracting, hemicellulose and other cellulosic impurities (e.g., dichloromethane (DCM) extractables and degraded cellulose) from the wet pulp with an extractant to form the cellulosic product, which comprises less hemicellulose than the starting material and the wet pulp.
  • DCM dichloromethane
  • the cellulosic product may optionally be further processed, depending on the end use. These further processes may include bleaching, washing, refining, wiring, pressing and/or drying.
  • the inventive processes advantageously may result in reduced capital costs, energy consumption, fresh water usage, and/or waste discharge by eliminating one or more operating steps in the pulping process. For example, baling and/or rolling of the pulp for shipment may be advantageously eliminated if the pulping process is co-located with the extraction process.
  • the inventive processes additionally benefit from the use of wet pulp because, without being bound by theory, wet pulp has an open structure that may benefit the extraction.
  • the extractant used in the separating step comprises a cellulose solvent and a cellulose co-solvent.
  • the cellulose solvent should be suitable for dissolving hemicellulose, and preferably degraded cellulose and other impurities in the wet pulp, but should have little solubility for oc- cellulose.
  • the cellulose solvent is preferably selected from the group consisting of an ionic liquid, an amine oxide and combinations thereof.
  • the cellulose co-solvent preferably is suitable for reducing the solubility of the extractant for a-cellulose, and may be selected, for example, from the group consisting of alcohols, esters, ethers, ketones, carboxylic acids, nitriles, amines, amides, halides, water, hydrocarbon compounds, heterocyclic compounds, and combinations thereof.
  • the ultimate purity of the cellulosic product formed in the processes of the invention may vary widely depending largely on the composition of the starting material, the composition of the extractant used, and extraction conditions.
  • the finished cellulose product comprises acetate (or higher) grade cellulose.
  • the present invention is applicable to integrated pulping and pulp purification processes for converting a starting material to a cellulosic product via a delignified wet pulp intermediate. It has now been discovered that the integration of a chemical pulping process with a process for purifying pulp via extraction of hemicellulose and other cellulosic impurities allows for significant savings in capital costs, energy, and fresh water usage as well as reduction in waste discharge due, inter alia, to a reduction in one or more pulp processing steps, integration of steam from the pulping process, and/or elimination of pulp shipment for further processing or purification.
  • the starting material typically comprises cellulose, lignin and hemicellulose, as well as potentially degraded cellulose and other contaminants.
  • the starting material preferably comprises a cellulosic raw material, which may include, without limitation, plant derived biomass, corn stover, sugar cane stalk, bagasse and cane residues, rice and wheat straw, agricultural grasses, hard wood, hardwood pulp, soft wood, softwood pulp, herbs, recycled paper, waste paper, wood chips, pulp and paper wastes, waste wood, thinned wood, cornstalk, chaff, and other forms of wood, bamboo, soyhull, cotton linters, bast fibers, such as kenaf, hemp, jute and flax, agricultural residual products, agricultural wastes, excretions of livestock, microbial, algal cellulose, and all other materials proximately or ultimately derived from plants.
  • Cellulosic raw materials are preferably processed in pellet, chip, clip, sheet, attritioned fiber, powder form, or other form rendering them suitable for extraction with the extractant.
  • Cellulose is a straight chain polymer and is derived from D-glucose units, which condense through ⁇ -1 ,4-glycosidic bonds. This linkage motif contrasts with that for a-l,4-glycosidic bonds present in starch, glycogen, and other carbohydrates. Unlike starch, there is no coiling or branching in cellulose and cellulose adopts an extended and rather stiff rod-like conformation, which is aided by the equatorial confirmation of the glucose residues.
  • the multiple hydroxyl groups on the glucose from one chain form hydrogen bonds with oxygen atoms on the same or on a neighboring chain, holding the chains firmly together side-by-side and forming microfibrils with high tensile strength, which then overlay to form the macrostructure of a cellulose fiber.
  • the starting material e.g., cellulosic raw material, as well as wet pulp intermediate and finished cellulosic product, retains the fiber structure throughout the pulping and extraction steps.
  • the starting material e.g., cellulosic raw material
  • the starting material typically comprises lignin.
  • Lignin is an abundant, complex phenolic polymer derived from the walls of plant cells such as xylem and sclerenchyma cells. Lignin functionally binds the cells, fibers and vessels in plants. Lignin is a random, three-dimensional network polymer with linked phenylpropane units and comprises from 15 to 25 wt.% of woody plants (dry base).
  • the presence of lignin is generally undesired in many derivative processes that employ a-cellulose, such as the acetylation of a- cellulose to form cellulose acetate flake or tow. As a result, the first step of the process is aimed largely at removing lignin as well as some hemicellulose from the starting material to form a wet pulp.
  • the starting material e.g., cellulosic raw material
  • the starting material also comprises hemicellulose linked to cellulose by hydrogen bonds.
  • hemicellulose refers to any of several heteropolymers, e.g., polysaccharides, present in plant cell walls.
  • Hemicellulose can include any one of xylan, glucuronoxylan, arabinoxylan, glucomannan, galactomannan, and xyloglucan. These polysaccharides contain many different sugar monomers and can be hydrolyzed to invert sugars, such as xylose, mannose, galactose, rhamnose and arabinose.
  • Xylose is typically the primary sugar present in hard wood hemicellulose, while mannose and xylose are the primary sugars present in softwood hemicellulose.
  • hemicellulose typically passes through the pulping step and is present in undesirable quantities in the wet pulp intermediate. Like lignin, the presence of hemicellulose is undesirable in many derivative processes involving ⁇ -cellulose.
  • the second step of the process involves the selective extraction of hemicellulose from the wet pulp formed in the first step of the process to form a cellulosic product of high a-cellulose content, which preferably is well-suited for many cellulose derivative processes, such as the formation of cellulose acetate flake or tow.
  • the starting material and the wet pulp formed therefrom have a linear shape of fiber morphology, which is surrounded by hemicellulose via hydrogen bonds. These bonds may become weakened by treating the wet pulp with an extractant to selectively dissolve the
  • the processes of the present invention are particularly beneficial in that they are effective for use with a starting material that comprises a softwood or a hardwood. These woods may be processed in a first step to form a wet paper grade wood pulp, which is subjected to extraction in a second step to remove hemicellulose and form a cellulosic product. Softwoods, in particular, which are generally more abundant and faster growing than most hardwood species, may be
  • a wet pulp which may be upgraded via the extraction process to make a higher grade cellulose, such as acetate grade cellulose.
  • Softwood is a generic term typically used in reference to wood from conifers (i.e., needle-bearing trees from the order Pinales). Softwood-producing trees include pine, spruce, cedar, fir, larch, douglas-fir, hemlock, cypress, redwood and yew. Conversely, the term hardwood is typically used in reference to wood from broad-leaved or angiosperm trees. The terms "softwood” and “hardwood” do not necessarily describe the actual hardness of the wood. While, on average, hardwood is of greater density and hardness than softwood, there is considerable variation in actual wood hardness in both groups, and some softwood trees can actually produce wood that is harder than wood from hardwood trees.
  • softwood contains two types of cells, longitudinal wood fibers (or tracheids) and transverse ray cells. In softwood, water transport within the tree is via the tracheids rather than the pores of hardwoods.
  • the wet pulp formed in the initial pulping step comprises wood pulp, e.g., paper grade wood pulp.
  • the purification processes described herein may be advantageously used to produce acetate grade wood pulp from the paper grade wood pulp, although the processes of the invention are not limited to the use of paper grade wood pulp as the starting material.
  • the paper grade wood pulp may have an S10 (alkali solubility of cellulose in 10% NaOH) from 8 to 20% and an S18 (alkali solubility of cellulose in 18% NaOH) from 6 to 18% and the acetate grade wood pulp may have an S 10 from 2 to 6% and an S 18 from 1.5 to 3%.
  • Chemical pulping processes for converting a starting material, e.g., cellulosic raw material, into a pulp include the kraft process, the acid-sulfite pulping process, the neutral sulfite semichemical (NSSC) pulping process, the organosolv pulping process and the soda pulping process.
  • Mechanical pulping processes separate fibers from each other by applying mechanical energy to the wood matrix in order to break the bonds between the fibers and to release fiber bundles, single fibers, and fiber fragments.
  • the pulp made from a chemical pulping process has a lower lignin concentration than that made from a mechanical pulping process.
  • a pulping process 10 may comprise feeding a raw material 11 and a cooking liquor 12 to a digester 15 to form a cooked pulp 16 comprising cooking liquor and pulp.
  • the raw material may be pre-treated or pre-hydrolyzed.
  • cooking liquor 12 comprises an aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide and sodium sulfide, also referred to as white liquor.
  • the white liquor functions to dissolve the lignin that binds the cellulose fibers of the wood chips.
  • digester 15 may be operated at a temperature from 160 to 180°C, e.g., from 170°C to 176°C, and at pressure of up to 1700 kPa, typically from 300 to 1000 kPa.
  • the residence time of the raw material, e.g., wood chips, and the white liquor in the digester may be adjusted depending on the Kappa number.
  • the Kappa number provides an indication of how well the wood chips have been cooked but varies depending on the composition and moisture content of the wood chips. Generally, the longer the cooking, the higher the yield of pulp. However, if the pulp is overcooked, the strength of the pulp may be degraded.
  • cooking liquor 12 comprises a salt of sulfurous acid, such as a sulfite or a bisulfate with a counter ion such as sodium, calcium, potassium, magnesium, or ammonium.
  • Cooking liquor 12 functions to dissolve the lignin that the binds the cellulose fibers of the wood chips, but degrades the lignin to a lesser degree than the kraft process, allowing lignosulfonates from the process to be recovered and used in further processes and/or products.
  • digester 15 may be operated at a temperature from 120 to 180°C, e.g., from 130°C to 160°C, for 4 to 14 hours, e.g., from 6 to 12 hours, at a pressure from 300 to 1000 kPa, depending on the cooking liquor used.
  • cooked pulp 16 is sent to blow tank 17 where the pressure is approximately atmospheric, allowing for steam and volatiles to be removed from cooked pulp 16 via line 119.
  • the steam and volatiles may be further separated and treated (not shown).
  • the steam may be used in downstream pulp purification processes, specifically to heat one or more of the distillation columns described herein in FIGS. 4 and 5.
  • Other heat integration with different streams may also provide further reduction in energy consumption.
  • Cooked pulp is removed from blow tank 17 via line 18 and fed to a washer 30 to separate the used cooking liquor from the pulp.
  • the washing liquid fed to washer 30 via line 32 may primarily comprise water to wash away cooking chemicals, e.g.
  • Used cooking liquor is removed from the washer via line 33 as black liquor if from the kraft process or as brown or red liquor if from the sulfite process.
  • Black liquor may comprise hemicellulose, sodium carbonate, sodium hydroxide, sodium sulfate and lignin.
  • Brown liquor may comprise hemicellulose, lignin and other chemicals, depending on the cooking liquor used. Therefore, regardless of the process, used cooking liquor 33 may comprise hemicellulose, lignin, washing liquid 32 and cooking liquor and/or derivatives thereof.
  • used cooking liquor 33 may then be directed to evaporator 20, where it is further concentrated to a solids content of about 55% to about 65%, and then fed via line 21 to recovery furnace 25.
  • evaporator 20 may comprise a multiple effect system of evaporators, which may have the same or different internal structures and sizes.
  • recovery furnace 25 lignin is combusted with added air to produce steam via line 27 and smelt comprising sodium carbonate, sodium sulfite, and water via line 26. The generated steam may be used for pulping processes and/or extraction processes.
  • green liquor 26 Prior to exiting recovery furnace 25, water via line 22 may be combined with the smelt to form green liquor 26, which comprises sodium carbonate, sodium sulfite, and water. Green liquor 26 is then sent to a causticizing tank 28 where calcium oxide is added to convert the recovered chemicals to white liquor which may be combined with fresh cooking liquor 12 via line 29 or fed directly to digester 15.
  • the sulfite process may include a similar chemical recovery process, which may be modified depending on the composition of the cooking liquor.
  • the concentrated brown liquor may be burned in a recovery boiler to generate steam and to recover the inorganic chemicals for reuse in the pulping process. Additionally or alternatively, the concentrated brown liquor may be neutralized to recover the useful byproducts of pulping.
  • washed pulp 31 also referred to as brown stock when formed by the kraft process, may comprise from 30 to 90 wt.% solids, e.g., about 50 wt.% solids, based on the weight of the dry starting material.
  • Washed pulp 31 is sent to pulp screening system 35, which may be used to remove shives, knots, dirt and other debris from the washed pulp.
  • Pulp screening system 35 may comprise a series of different sieves and/or centrifugal cleaning devices. The sieves may be arranged, for example, in a cascading series. The pulp is removed from pulp screening system 35 as screened pulp 36, which may then be fed to bleaching system 40.
  • Screened pulp 36 typically comprises from 1 to 10 wt.% lignin, e.g., less than 5 wt.% lignin, and is preferably suitable for bleaching.
  • the bleaching process may reduce the lignin concentration to less than 3 wt.%, e.g., less than 2 wt.%, or less than 1 wt.%.
  • the bleaching process may be merged into the extraction process. If the pulp comprises a greater amount of lignin, additional bleaching steps or stronger bleaching agents may be used.
  • the purpose of the optional bleaching step is to remove residual lignin.
  • Bleaching system 40 may comprise, for example, a plurality of bleaching steps, e.g., three, four or more than four bleaching steps with a variety of bleaching agents including chlorine, sodium hypochlorite, chlorine dioxide, oxygen, alkaline hydrogen peroxide, sodium hydroxide, ozone, sodium hydrosulfite, enzymes such as xylanase, and combinations thereof. Additional optional bleaching agents include peroxyacetic acid, peroxyformic acid, dimethyldioxirane, and peroxymonophosphoric acid. Preferably, different bleaching agents are used in each bleaching step. One or more bleaching steps may also use chelation to remove metals. Bleaching system 40 may also include washing steps in between one or more or all of the bleaching steps.
  • the bleaching process is chlorine free.
  • the pH used in each step of bleaching system 40 depends largely on the bleaching agent employed. For example, a bleaching step conducted with chlorine or hypochlorite may be conducted at a pH of less than 1.5, while a bleaching step employing chlorine dioxide may be conducted at a pH from 3.5 to 6. A bleaching step using oxygen may be conducted at a pH of greater than 12. The number of bleaching steps and type of bleaching agent employed determines the brightness of the pulp.
  • the pulp is bleached to a brightness suitable for the intended use of the pulp.
  • bleached pulp 42 may be directed to washer 45 for removal of the bleaching agent(s).
  • washer 45 may comprise multiple washers using the same or different washing agents.
  • the washing agent 43 e.g. water
  • Wet pulp 46 may be removed from washer 45 and sent to dryer section 50, which may comprise screening, refining, wiring, pressing, and thermal drying, in order to dry the pulp to the desired water content.
  • dryer section 50 may include a Fourdrinier machine.
  • wet pulp 46 When entering dryer 50, wet pulp 46 may comprise from 85 to 99.9 wt. % water, e.g., from 95 to 99 wt.% water. Conventionally, wet pulp is dried to form a dried pulp 51, comprising less than 5 wt.% water, which may be rolled or baled and shipped for further processing and/or purification.
  • inventive processes advantageously reduce or omit some of the steps of chemical pulping processes by integrating the chemical pulping process with a pulp purification (extraction) process.
  • one or more of washed pulp 31, screened pulp stream 36, bleached pulp stream 42, wet pulp 46 or pulp 51 e.g., reduced in water content but nevertheless comprising greater than 1 wt.% water, e.g., greater than 5 wt.% water or greater than 10 wt.% water
  • a dryer section 50 is employed to reduce water content as shown in FIG. 1 , but the wet pulp is not dried to an extent that it forms dry pulp, as is typically formed for transporting the pulp, i.e., pulp having a water content of less than 5 wt.%. In this manner, the water content of the wet pulp may be reduced to an acceptable level, while
  • a reduced water content wet pulp which is subject to a deliquoring operation, may be directed to an extraction unit for further processing to remove hemicellulose.
  • This embodiment may or may not involve a baling step depending primarily on whether it is necessary to transport the wet pulp from the pulping facility to a remotely located extraction facility.
  • the integrated pulping and purification process omits the drying and baling steps used in the kraft and sulfite pulping processes.
  • the pulping process shown in FIG. 2 is substantially similar to the process shown in FIG. 1, until the washed pulp 103 exits washer 45.
  • extractant 104 and washed pulp 103 which may be optionally subject to a deliquoring operation, may be fed, separately or as a mixture, to an extractor 105 forming an extraction mixture therein.
  • the extraction mixture may then be removed from extractor 105 as extraction mixture 106 and may then be further purified as shown in FIGS. 4 and 5, described herein.
  • FIGS. 4 and 5 described herein.
  • drying step and baling steps in the typical pulping process may no longer needed for either the wet pulp or for the cellulosic product. Therefore, by omitting the drying step and baling steps from the pulping process, there are significant capital cost and energy savings due to the reduction in equipment and elimination of shipment of the pulp required when the pulping process is physically separate from the downstream processes.
  • the purified cellulosic product may be fed through drying unit 50 and optionally formed into sheets and/or bales.
  • the integrated process may comprise removing a wet pulp from the pulping process prior to drying unit 50, purifying the wet pulp to form a purified cellulosic product, and introducing the purified cellulosic product into drying unit 50 of the pulping process to dry the purified cellulosic product and to optionally form the dried cellulosic product into sheets and/or bales.
  • the integrated pulping and purification process omits all or a portion of the bleaching, washing, drying and baling steps used in the kraft process or the sulfite pulping process.
  • the bleaching step may be omitted entirely, if the extractant can separate both hemicellulose and lignin from the pulp, or optionally moved downstream, e.g., after the pulp has been further purified to remove hemicellulose and other contaminants.
  • the pulping process is similar to FIG. 1, except that screened pulp 103 exits pulp screening system 35 and is directed to extraction unit 105.
  • the screened pulp 36 which may be optionally subjected to a washing operation, comprises greater than 1 wt.% water, e.g., greater than 5 wt.% water or greater than 10 wt.% water, thereby constituting wet pulp according to the present invention.
  • Extractant 104 and unbleached wet pulp 103 may then be fed, separately or as a mixture, to extractor 105 to form an extraction mixture 106.
  • the extraction mixture may be further purified as shown in FIGS.
  • screened pulp 103 comprises at least 5 wt.% water, e.g., at least 7 wt.%, or at least 10 wt.% water, in which case the process may comprise removing water from the wet pulp to no less than 1 wt.%, e.g., no less than 5 wt.% water using filtering, deliquoring, thermal drying, and/or other conventional technologies, before feeding the resulting wet pulp to an extractor for hemicellulose removal.
  • the wet pulp is partially dried, the integrated process still reduces capitals cost and is energy efficient because the pulp is not fully dried. Further, the pulp does not need to be baled or shipped if it can be used directly for a downstream treatment process.
  • the wet pulp (from whichever stream it may be derived) may be washed with one or more pre-extraction washes to (i) reduce the water content in the pulp that will be fed to the extraction process; and (ii) wash away the residual chemicals that are generated in the pulping process in order to maximize the extraction capability.
  • the washing agent in the pre- extraction wash may be, but is not limited to, the co-solvent in the extractant.
  • the pre-extraction wash agent may be used to remove at least 50% of the water, e.g., at least 75% of the water, from the wet pulp.
  • the resulting mixed stream comprising pre-extraction wash and water may be separated using existing separation equipment already present in the extraction process so that no additional capital cost is required.
  • the pre-extraction wash agent may be selected from the group consisting of alcohols, esters, ethers, ketones, carboxylic acids, nitriles, amines, amides, halides, hydrocarbon compounds, heterocyclic compounds, and combinations thereof.
  • the pre-extraction wash agent may be selected from the group consisting of dimethyl sulfoxide, tetramethylene sulfone, tetramethylene sulfoxide, ⁇ , ⁇ -dimethylacetamide, N- methyl pyrrolidone, dimethyl formamide, piperylene sulfone, acetic acid, water, acetonitrile and mixtures thereof.
  • the pre-extraction wash agent may be selected from the group consisting of methanol, ethanol, iso-propanol, methyl acetate, ethyl acetate, propyl acetate, isopropyl acetate, vinyl acetate, tetrahydrofuran, acetone, acetic acid, formic acid, acetonitrile, propionitrile, butyronitrile, chloroacetonitrile, dichloromethane, chloroform, triethylamine, N,N-dimethylformamide, toluene, pyridine, water, and combinations thereof.
  • the resulting wet pulp comprises at least 1 wt.% water, e.g., at least 5 wt.% water or at least 10 wt.% water.
  • the wet pulp that is sent to extractor 105 comprises at least 20 wt.% water or at least 30 wt.% water.
  • the wet pulp comprises, excluding water, at least 70 wt.%) ct-cellulose, e.g., at least 80 wt.% a-cellulose or at least 85 wt.%) a-cellulose.
  • the wet pulp also typically comprises, excluding water, at least 5 wt.%> hemicellulose, at least 10 wt.%> hemicellulose or at least 15 wt.% hemicellulose, which is removed along with degraded cellulose and other contaminants in the subsequent extraction step.
  • heat from the pulping process may be recovered and integrated with the extraction process.
  • steam from recovery furnace 25 may be used, for example, in the evaporation and distillation steps of the extraction process. Additional steam and heat integration opportunities may be explored depending on the steam and heat produced in the pulping process and the steam and heat used in the extraction process. These integration opportunities may be evaluated using established methodologies, e.g., pinch analysis.
  • the operations can be continuous, batch, and/or semi-batch.
  • hemicellulose and optionally degraded cellulose is extracted from the wet pulp using an extractant with or without pre-treatment, e.g. pre-hydrolysis, of the pulp.
  • the extractant comprises a cellulose solvent and a co-solvent.
  • the cellulose solvent is preferably selected from the group consisting of an ionic liquid, an amine oxide and mixtures thereof, examples of which are described below.
  • the cellulose solvent may or (more preferably) may not fully dissolve a- cellulose, but preferably dissolves at least hemicellulose and preferably degraded cellulose and lignin.
  • ⁇ -cellulose preferably is less soluble in the co-solvent than in the cellulose solvent,
  • Ionic liquids are organic salts with low melting points, preferably less than 200°C, less than 150°C, or less than 100°C, many of which are consequently liquid at room temperature. Specific features that make ionic liquids suitable for use in the present invention are their general lack of vapor pressure, their ability to dissolve a wide range of organic compounds and the versatility of their chemical and physical properties. In addition, ionic liquids are non-flammable making them particularly suitable for use in industrial applications.
  • the cellulose solvent comprises one or more ionic liquids.
  • ionic liquids when contacted with cellulosic materials, including plant matter and plant matter derivatives, ionic liquids are capable of acting as a cellulose solvent, dissolving the hemicellulose, degraded cellulose and cellulose contained therein.
  • ionic liquids penetrate the structure of the cellulose-containing material to break down the material and extract organic species therein.
  • a-cellulosic components remaining in the wet pulp are preserved and the fiber morphology is advantageously retained.
  • Ionic liquids in pure form, generally are comprised of ions and do not necessitate a separate solvent for ion formation. Ionic liquids existing in a liquid phase at room temperature are called room temperature ionic liquids. Generally, ionic liquids are formed of large-sized cations and smaller-sized anions. Cations of ionic liquids may comprise nitrogen, phosphorous, sulfur, or carbon. Because of the disparity in size between the cations and anions, the lattice energy of the compound is decreased resulting in a less crystalline structure with a low melting point.
  • Exemplary ionic liquids include compounds expressed by the following Formula (1):
  • the ionic liquid is selected from the group consisting of substituted or unsubstitued imidazolium salts, pyridinium salts, ammonium salts, triazolium salts, pyrazolium salt, pyrrolidinium salt, piperidium salt, and phosphonium salts.
  • [A] + is selected from the group consisting of:
  • Rj, R 2> R 3 , R ⁇ , R 5 , R 6 and R 7 are each independently selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, C 1 -C15 alkyls, C 2 -Ci 5 aryls, and C 2 -C 0 alkenes, and the alkyl, aryl or alkene may be substituted by a substituent selected from the group consisting of sulfone, sulfoxide, thioester, ether, amide, hydroxyl and amine.
  • ionic liquids examples include tetrabutylammonium hydroxide 30 hydrate
  • BnTEAAc benzyltriethylammonium acetate
  • TEAAc-4H 2 0 tetraethylammonium acetate tetrahydrate
  • BnTMAOH benzyltrimethylammonium hydroxide
  • TMAOH tetramethylammonium hydroxide
  • ammonium acetate hydroxyethylammonium acetate, hydroxyethylammonium formate, tetramethylammonium acetate, tetraethylammonium acetate, tetrabutylammonium acetate, tetrabutylammonium hydroxide, l-butyl-3 -methyl imidazolium tetrachloroaluminate, l-ethyl-3 -methyl imidazolium tetrachloroaluminate, l-ethyl-3 -methyl imidalzolium hydrogensulfate, l-butyl-3 -methyl imidazolium hydrogensulfate, methylimidazolium chloride, l-ethyl-3 -methyl imidazolium acetate, l-butyl-3 -methyl imidazolium acetate, 1,3 -die
  • the ionic liquid is selected from the group consisting of ammonium-based ionic substances, imidazolium-based ionic substances, phosphonium-based ionic substances, and mixtures thereof.
  • the ammonium-based ionic liquid may be selected from the group consisting of ammonium acetate, hydroxyethylammonium acetate, hydroxyethylammonium formate, tetramethylammonium acetate, tetrabutylammonium acetate, tetraethylammonium acetate, benzyltriethylammonium acetate, benzyltributyl ammonium acetate and combinations thereof.
  • the imidazolium-based ionic liquid may be selected from the group consisting of l-butyl-3 -methyl imidazolium tetrachloroaluminate, l-ethyl-3 -methyl imidazolium tetrachloroaluminate, l-ethyl-3- methyl imidalzolium hydrogensulfate, l-butyl-3 -methyl imidazolium hydrogensulfate,
  • the ionic liquid may also be selected from the group consisting of ⁇ , ⁇ -dimethylpyrrolidinium acetate, ⁇ , ⁇ -dimethylpiperidinium acetate, ⁇ , ⁇ -dimethylpyrrolidinium dimethyl phosphate, N,N- dimethylpiperidinium dimethyl phosphate, ⁇ , ⁇ -dimethylpyrrolidinium chloride, N,N- dimethylpiperidinium chloride, and combinations thereof.
  • the ionic liquid may be selected from the group consisting of l-butyl-3 -methylimidazolium tetrachloroaluminate, l-ethyl-3 -methyl imidazolium
  • the ionic liquid may be selected from the group consisting of ethyltributylphosphonium diethylphosphate, methyltributylphosphonium dimethylphosphate, tetrabutylphosphonium bromide, tetrabutylphosphonium chloride, tributylmethylphosphonium methylsulfate, trihexyltetradecylphosphonium decanoate, trihexyltetradecylphosphonium
  • benzyltriethylphosphonium acetate benzyltributylphosphonium acetate, tetrabutylphosphonium acetate, tetraethylphosphonium acetate, tetramethylphosphonium acetate, and combinations thereof.
  • the ionic liquid may be commercially available, and may include BasionicTM AC 01, BasionicTM AC 09, BasionicTM AC 25, BasionicTM AC 28, BasionicTM AC 75, BasionicTM BC 01, BasionicTM BC 02, BasionicTM FS 01, BasionicTM LQ 01, BasionicTM ST 35, BasionicTM ST 62, BasionicTM ST 70, BasionicTM ST 80, BasionicTM VS 01, and BasionicTM VS 02, but the invention is not limited to use of these species.
  • the ionic liquid compound may be l-ethyl-3- methyl imidazolium acetate (EMIMAc) of the structural formula (2), l-butyl-3 -methyl imidazolium acetate (BMIMAc) of the structural formula (3), l-ethyl-3 -methyl imidazolium dimethylphosphate of structural formula (4), l-ethyl-3 -methyl imidazolium formate of the structural formula (5), tetrabutylammonium acetate (TBAAc) of the structural formula (6), l-allyl-3 -methyl imidazolium
  • EMIMAc l-ethyl-3- methyl imidazolium acetate
  • BMIMAc l-butyl-3 -methyl imidazolium acetate
  • TBAAc tetrabutylammonium acetate
  • Amine oxides are chemical compounds that contain the functional group R 3 N + -0 " , which represents an N-0 bond with three additional hydrogen and/or hydrocarbon side chains.
  • amine oxides that are stable in water may be used.
  • the amine oxide may be selected from the group consisting of compounds with chemical structure of acyclic R 3 N + -CT, compounds with chemical structure of N- heterocyclic compound N-oxide, and combinations thereof.
  • the amine oxide may be an acyclic amine oxide compound with structure of RiR 2 R 3 N + -0 " , wherein R
  • methyldiethylamine N-oxide dimethylethylamine N-oxide, methyldipropylamine N-oxide, tribenzylamine N-Oxide, benzyldimethylamine N-oxide, benzyldiethylamine N-oxide,
  • the amine oxide may be a cyclic amine oxide compound including the structures such as pyridine, pyrrole, piperidine, pyrrolidine and other N-heterocyclic compounds, e.g. N-methylmorpholine N-oxide (NMMO), pyridine N-oxide, 2-, 3-, or 4-picoline N-oxide, N- methylpiperidine N-oxide, N-ethylpiperidine N-oxide N-propylpiperidine N-oxide, N- isopropylpiperidine N-oxide. N-butylpiperidine N-oxide, N-hexylpiperidine N-oxide.
  • NMMO N-methylmorpholine N-oxide
  • 2-, 3- or 4-picoline N-oxide
  • N-methylpiperidine N-oxide N-ethylpiperidine N-oxide N-propylpiperidine N-oxide
  • N- isopropylpiperidine N-oxide N-but
  • the amine oxide may be the combination of the above mentioned acyclic and/or cyclic amine oxides.
  • the amine oxide may be selected from the group consisting of trimethylamine N-oxide, triethylamine N-oxide, tripropylamine N-oxide, tributylamine N-oxide, methyldiethylamine N-oxide, dimethylethylamine N-oxide, methyldipropylamine N-oxide, tribenzylamine N-Oxide, benzyldimethylamine N-oxide, benzyldiethylamine N-oxide,
  • dibenzylmethylamine N-oxide N-methylmorpholine N-oxide ( ⁇ ), pyridine N-oxide, 2-, 3-, or 4-picoline N-oxide, N-methylpiperidine N-oxide, N-ethylpiperidine N-oxide N-propylpiperidine N- oxide, N-isopropylpiperidine N-oxide. N-butylpiperidine N-oxide, N-hexylpiperidine N-oxide. N- methylpyrrolidine N-oxide, N-ethylpyrrolidine N-oxide N-propylpyrrolidine N-oxide, N- isopropylpyrrolidine N-oxide.
  • N-butylpyrrolidine N-oxide N-hexylpyrrolidine N-oxide, and combinations thereof.
  • Cellulose is insoluble in most solvents because of its strong and highly structured intermolecular hydrogen bonding network.
  • NMMO is able to break the hydrogen bonding network that keeps cellulose insoluble in most solvents. Therefore, the use of NMMO alone would destroy the fiber morphology of cellulose. It has now been discovered that by using the proper ratio of an amine oxide, such as NMMO, with a co-solvent, a-cellulosic
  • components in the wet pulp may be beneficially preserved and the fiber morphology retained.
  • NMMO is typically stored in 50 to 70 vol.%, e.g., 60 vol. %, aqueous solution as pure NMMO tends toward oxygen separation. See, e.g., US Patent 4,748,241, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference. Further contaminants in commercial NMMO product, e.g., N- methylmorpholine, peroxides, and acid components, tend to degrade the storage stability. In other words, further application of NMMO needs to address all stability concerns. For example, developed stabilizers like propyl gallate may be added,
  • the extractant also comprises a co-solvent.
  • Co-solvents in the context of this invention include solvents that do not have the ability to readily dissolve a-cellulose.
  • Co- solvents in the context of this invention include solvents that have the ability to readily dissolve hemicellulose, lignin, and/or other impurities.
  • the co-solvent may be selected to be miscible with the cellulose solvent and to reduce the solubility of the resulting extractant for a-cellulose.
  • the co-solvent is selected from the group consisting of alcohols, esters, ketones, carboxylic acids, nitriles, amines, halides, hydrocarbon compounds, heterocyclic compounds, and combinations thereof.
  • the co-solvent is selected from the group consisting of methanol, ethanol, iso-propanol, methyl acetate, ethyl acetate, propyl acetate, isopropyl acetate, vinyl acetate, tetrahydrofuran, acetone, acetic acid, formic acid, acetonitrile, propionitrile, butyronitrile, chloroacetonitrile, dichloromethane, chloroform, triethylamine, ⁇ , ⁇ -dimethylformamide, toluene, pyridine, water, and combinations thereof.
  • the extractant comprise greater than 15 wt.% co-solvent, e.g., greater than 25 wt.% or greater than 40 wt.%.
  • the co-solvent may comprise a combination of acetonitrile and water.
  • the acetonitrile and water may be present in a weight ratio from 6:1 to 500: 1, e.g., from 10:1 to 200: 1 or from 30: 1 to 100: 1.
  • the co-solvent has a boiling point of less than 120°C, or of less than 100°C.
  • Additional co-solvents having a boiling point of less than 120°C include acetic acid, alcohols such as methanol, ethanol, n-propanol, isopropanol, n-butanol, tert-butanol, halogenated solvents, e.g., carbon tetrachloride, dichloroethane or chlorobenzene, ethers, e.g., tetrahydrofuran, diethyl ether, methyl tert-butyl ether, esters, e.g. dimethyl carbonate, and mixtures thereof.
  • the co-solvent may be selected from the group consisting of water, acetic acid, alcohols such as methanol, ethanol, n-propanol, isopropanol, n-butanol, tert- butanol, diols and polyols such as ethanediol and propanediol, amino alcohols such as ethanolamine, diethanolamine and triethanolamine, aromatic solvents, e.g., benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene or xylenes, halogenated solvents, e.g., dichloromethane, chloroform, carbon tetrachloride,
  • dichloroethane or chlorobenzene aliphatic solvents, e.g., pentane, hexane, heptane, octane, ligroin, petroleum ether, cyclohexane and decalin, ethers, e.g., tetrahydrofuran, diethyl ether, methyl tert- butyl ether and diethylene glycol monomethyl ether, ketones such as acetone and methyl ethyl ketone, esters, e.g., ethyl acetate, dimethyl carbonate, dipropyl carbonate, propylene carbonate, amides, e.g., formamide, dimethylformamide (DMF), N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMAC), DMSO, acetonitrile and mixtures thereof. Since the boiling points of co-solvents may vary, the efficient purification processes associated with each co-solvent may not be exactly the same
  • the co-solvent may be chosen in view of its boiling point, to allow for maximized separation of the cellulose solvent from the co-solvent in a flashing step described herein with reference to FIG. 5.
  • the decrease of pressure in the flashing step may vaporize at least 3% of the co-solvent, e.g., at least 10%, or at least 30% of the co-solvent.
  • the extractant wash and/or the precipitant wash optionally used in the cellulose and hemicellulose purification process, described below may be chosen based on the boiling point of the co-solvent chosen.
  • the difference in boiling point between the extractant wash or precipitant wash and the co-solvent may be greater than 10°C, greater than 20°C or greater than 30°C.
  • a second co-solvent may be used in conjunction with the first co- solvent and the cellulose solvent, e.g., amine oxide or ionic liquid, as described above.
  • the second co-solvent decreases the viscosity of the extractant.
  • the second co-solvent may have a viscosity, for example, of less than 10.0 mPa*s, e.g., less than 5 mPa-s or less than 3 mPa » s at 25°C. In terms of ranges, the viscosity may range from 0.1 to 10 mPa » s, e.g., from 0.15 to 5 mPa » s or from 0.2 to 3 mPa » s.
  • the second co-solvent is selected from the group consisting of formamide, DMF, dimethylacetamide, DMSO, N-methylpyrrolidone, propylene carbonate, acetonitrile and mixtures thereof.
  • the extraction rate may be enhanced and a smaller amount of ionic liquid may be needed to extract the hemicellulose and degraded cellulose from the wet pulp.
  • the insolubility of the a-cellulose in the co-solvent and the resulting extractant desirably maintains the cellulose fiber morphology, e.g., leaving the fiber morphology unchanged, while the extractant penetrates the wet pulp, dissolves and extracts the hemicellulose, lignin, and preferably degraded cellulose from the wet pulp.
  • the weight percentage of the cellulose solvent and the co- solvent in the extractant may vary widely.
  • the specific formulation of the extractant employed may vary widely, depending, for example, on the hemicellulose and degraded cellulose content of the wet pulp, and the processing scheme employed.
  • the extractant optionally comprises at least 0.1 wt.% amine oxide, e.g., at least 2 wt.% or at least 4 wt.%. In terms of upper limits, the extractant optionally comprises at most 85 wt.% amine oxide, e.g., at most 75 wt.%, or at most 70 wt.% amine oxide.
  • the extractant optionally comprises from 0.1 wt.% to 85 wt.% amine oxide, e.g., from 2 wt.%) to 75 wt.%, or from 4 wt.% to 70 wt.%.
  • the extractant optionally comprises at least 0.1 wt.%) co-solvent, e.g., at least 1 wt.%o, or at least 3 wt.% co-solvent.
  • the extractant optionally comprises at most 99.9 wt.%, at most 98 wt.%, or at most 97 wt.% co-solvent.
  • the extractant optionally comprises from 0.1 wt.%) to 99.9 wt.% co-solvent, e.g., from 1 wt.% to 98 wt.%, or from 3 wt.%) to 97 wt.%> co-solvent.
  • the extractant comprises an aqueous co-solvent, e.g., water, and an amine oxide.
  • the extractant optionally comprises at least 40 wt.% amine oxide, e.g., at least 50 wt.%> or at least 60 wt.%.
  • the extractant optionally comprises at most 90 wt.% amine oxide, e.g., at most 85 wt.%, or at most 80 wt.% amine oxide.
  • the extractant optionally comprises from 40 wt.% to 90 wt.% amine oxide, e.g., from 50 wt.%) to 85 wt.%), or from 60 wt.% to 80 wt.% amine oxide.
  • the extractant optionally comprises at least 1 wt.%) aqueous co-solvent, e.g., at least 5 wt.%), or at least 10 wt.%> aqueous co-solvent.
  • the extractant optionally comprises at most 50 wt.%> aqueous co-solvent, at most 40 wt.%), or at most 30wt.%.
  • the extractant optionally comprises from 1 wt.%) to 50 wt.%) aqueous co-solvent, e.g., from 5 wt.%o to 40 wt.%>, or from 10 wt.%> to 30 wt.%>.
  • the extractant comprises an organic co-solvent and an amine oxide.
  • the extractant optionally comprises at least 0.1 wt.% amine oxide, e.g., at least 1 wt.% or at least 2 wt.% amine oxide.
  • the extractant optionally comprises at most 85 wt.% amine oxide, e.g., at most 80 wt.%, or at most 70 wt.%. In terms of ranges, the extractant optionally comprises from 0.1 wt.% to 85 wt.% amine oxide, e.g., from 1 wt.% to 80 wt.%, or from 2 wt.%) to 70 wt.%). In this aspect, the extractant optionally comprises at least 15 wt.% organic co- solvent, e.g., at least 20 wt.%, or at least 30 wt.%.
  • the extractant optionally comprises at most 99.9 wt.% organic co-solvent, at most 98 wt.%), or at most 97 wt.%. In terms of ranges, the extractant optionally comprises from 15 wt.% to 99.9 wt.% organic co-solvent, e.g., from 20 wt.%) to 98 wt.%), or from 30 wt.%) to 97 wt.%).
  • the organic co-solvent is DMSO. In another embodiment, the organic co-solvent is acetonitrile.
  • the extractant includes an amine oxide, a first co-solvent and a second co-solvent.
  • the extractant includes an amine oxide, an aqueous co- solvent, e.g., water, and an organic co-solvent.
  • the amine oxide concentration may range, for example, from 1 wt.%> to 85 wt.%
  • the water concentration may range from 1 wt.% to 35 wt.%)
  • the organic co-solvent, concentration may range from 1 wt.% to 98 wt.%.
  • the cellulose solvent used in the extractant comprises one or more ionic liquids.
  • the extractant optionally comprises at least 0.1 wt.% ionic liquid, e.g., at least 1 wt.%) or at least 2 wt.%. In terms of upper limits, the extractant optionally comprises at most 95 wt.%) ionic liquid, e.g., at most 90 wt.%>, or at most 85 wt.%).
  • the extractant optionally comprises from 0.1 wt.%> to 95 wt.%> ionic liquid, e.g., from 1 wt.%> to 90 wt.%), or from 2 wt.%) to 85 wt.%).
  • the extractant optionally comprises at least 5 wt.% co-solvent, e.g., at least 10 wt.%), at least 15 wt.%, at least 20 wt.%o or at least 50 wt.%).
  • the extractant optionally comprises at most 99.9 wt.%) co-solvent, at most 99 wt.%>, or at most 98 wt.%).
  • the extractant optionally comprises from 5 wt.% to 99.9 wt.% co-solvent, e.g., from 10 wt.% to 99 wt.%, or from 20 wt.% to 98 wt.%.
  • the cellulose solvent comprises one or more ionic liquids and the co- solvent comprises an aqueous co-solvent, e.g., water.
  • the extractant preferably comprises at least 50 wt.% ionic liquid, e.g., at least 65 wt.%> or at least 80 wt.%. In terms of upper limits, the extractant optionally comprises at most 95 wt.% ionic liquid, e.g., at most 90 wt.%>, or at most 85 wt.%).
  • the extractant optionally comprises from 50 wt.%) to 95 wt.% ionic liquid, e.g., from 65 wt.%> to 90 wt.%>, or from 70 wt.%o to 85 wt.%>.
  • the extractant optionally comprises at least 5 wt.% aqueous co-solvent, e.g., at least 10 wt.%, at least 15 wt.%, at least 20 wt.%) or at least 50 wt.%.
  • the extractant optionally comprises at most 50 wt.% aqueous co-solvent, e.g., at most 35 wt.%, or at most 20 wt.% aqueous co-solvent.
  • the extractant may comprise from 5 wt.% to 50 wt.% aqueous co-solvent, e.g., from 10 wt.% to 35 wt.%), or from 15 wt.% to 20 wt.%.
  • the extractant when the extractant comprises one or more ionic liquids as cellulose solvent and an organic co-solvent, the extractant preferably comprises at least 0.1 wt.% ionic liquid, e.g., at least 1 wt.% or at least 2 wt.%. In terms of upper limits, the extractant optionally comprises at most 50 wt.% ionic liquid, e.g., at most 40 wt.%, or at most 30 wt.%.
  • the extractant may comprise from 0.1 wt.% to 50 wt.% ionic liquid, e.g., from 1 wt.% to 40 wt.%, from 2 wt.% to 30 wt.%) or from 10 to 30 wt.%.
  • the extractant optionally comprises at least 50 wt.% organic co-solvent, e.g., at least 60 wt.%, or at least 70 wt.%.
  • the extractant may comprise at most 99.9 wt.% organic co-solvent, e.g., at most 98 wt.%, or at most 97 wt.%.
  • the extractant optionally comprises from 50 wt.% to 99.9 wt.% organic co-solvent, e.g., from 60 wt.% to 98 wt.%, or from 70 wt.% to 97 wt.%.
  • organic co- solvent is DMSO.
  • the organic co-solvent is acetonitrile.
  • the extractant includes a cellulose solvent, e.g., amine oxide or ionic liquid, a first co-solvent and a second co-solvent.
  • the weight ratio of first co-solvent to second co-solvent is preferably from 10:1 to 500:1, e.g. from 10:1 to 1 :15 or from 10:1 to 100:1. Since current production costs of ionic liquids are generally greater than those of co-solvents, the use of a large amount of the second co-solvent beneficially reduces the cost of purifying the wet pulp.
  • the extractant includes an ionic liquid, a first co-solvent and a second co-solvent.
  • the extractant includes an ionic liquid, an aqueous co-solvent, e.g., water, and an organic co-solvent.
  • the extractant may include at most 85 wt.% ionic liquid, e.g., at most 75 wt.%, or at most 50 wt.%. In terms of lower limit, the extractant may include at least 0.1 wt.% ionic liquid, e.g., at least 5 wt.% or at least 10 wt.%.
  • the extractant may include from 0.1 wt.% to 85 wt.% ionic liquid, e.g., from 5 wt.% to 75 wt.%, from 10 wt.% to 50 wt.% or from 20 to 35 wt.%. In some embodiments, the extractant may include at most 20 wt.% the first co-solvent, i.e., at most 16 wt.%, or 10 wt.%.
  • the extractant may include from 0.1 wt.% to 20 wt.% the first co-solvent, e.g., from 0.5 wt.% to 16 wt.% or from 1 wt.% to 10 wt.%.
  • water is the first co-solvent.
  • DMSO is the second co-solvent.
  • acetonitrile is the second co- solvent.
  • the extractant comprises an aqueous co-solvent, an ionic liquid and an amine oxide.
  • the co-solvent concentration may range, for example, from 5 wt.% to 50 wt.%
  • the ionic liquid concentration may range from 0.1 wt.% to 50 wt.%
  • the amine oxide concentration may range from 0.1 wt.% to 80 wt.%.
  • the extractant comprises an organic co-solvent, an ionic liquid and an amine oxide.
  • the co-solvent concentration may, for example, range from 5 wt.% to 99 wt.%
  • the ionic liquid concentration may range from 0.1 wt.% to 50 wt.%
  • the amine oxide concentration may range from 0.1 wt.% to 80 wt.%.
  • the wet pulp from pulping process 10 may be purified through an inventive extraction process that removes hemicellulose, lignin, and preferably degraded cellulose.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates one non-limiting exemplary system for purifying wet pulp, and recovering a hemicellulose byproduct.
  • the wet pulp may be purified in purification process 100, which comprises a wet pulp purification zone 101 and a hemicellulose recovery zone 102. As shown, the wet pulp is fed via line 103 to extractor 105.
  • Line 103 may represent, for example, a slurry pump. However, for pulp with reduced water content, other transport apparatus, such as a screw feeder, a belt feeder, a rotary valve feeder, or another type of solid transport equipment, may be applicable.
  • the wet pulp may also be subject to a deliquoring operation and/or a pre-extraction wash in order to optimize the water content in the extraction process.
  • Fresh or recycled extractant comprising a cellulose solvent and co- solvent, as described above, is fed to extractor 105 via line 104.
  • wet pulp 103 and extractant 104 are shown as fed separately to extractor 105, it is contemplated that they may be completely or partially mixed prior to being fed to extractor 105. As shown in FIG.
  • wet pulp 103 and extractant 104 may be combined in extractor 105 to form an extraction mixture.
  • the mass flow ratio of extractant 104 to wet pulp 103 may range from 5: 1 to 20: 1.
  • the extraction mixture within extractor 105 may comprise, for example, from 0.1 to 20 wt.% solids, e.g., from 0.5 to 15 wt.% or from 1.25 to 10 wt.% solids. Accordingly, the water content may be up to 99.9 wt%.
  • Extractant 104 for extracting hemicellulose and degraded cellulose from wet pulp 103 may be any extractant capable of dissolving preferably at least 50% of the hemicellulose, more preferably at least 75% or at least 90% of the hemicellulose, in wet pulp 103, as determined by UV absorbance analysis of hemicellulose concentration and mass measurements of the feed, cellulosic product, and hemicellulose product. Extractant 104 comprises a cellulose solvent and co-solvent in relative amounts that do not overly degrade the cellulose.
  • the extractant dissolves less than 15% of the a-cellulose in wet pulp 103, e.g., less than 10%, or less than 5%, as determined similarly by UV absorbance analysis and mass measurements.
  • the extractant may also dissolve at least 5% lignin, e.g., at least 10%, at least 15%, or at least 20%.
  • amine oxides and ionic liquids may tend to dissolve a-cellulose.
  • the extractant preferably comprises sufficient co-solvent to reduce ⁇ -cellulose solubility in the overall extractant to a point that the ⁇ -cellulose does not readily dissolve therein.
  • the a- cellulose is substantially insoluble in the co-solvent. Extractant 104 in accordance with the present invention, therefore, has the property of selectively dissolving the hemicellulose, lignin, and preferably degraded cellulose that is in wet pulp 103.
  • Cellulose in this row refers to cellulose of all forms including degraded cellulose
  • the treatment of wet pulp 103 with extractant 104 may be conducted at an elevated temperature, and preferably occurs at atmospheric pressure or slightly above atmospheric pressure.
  • the contacting is conducted at a temperature from 20°C to 300°C, e.g., from 20°C to 150°C , from 40°C to 140°C, or from 50°C to 130°C.
  • the treatment of wet pulp 103 may be conducted at a temperature of less than 300°C, e.g., less than 200°C, less than 150°C , less than 140°C or less than 130°C.
  • the treatment of wet pulp 103 may be conducted at a temperature of greater than 20°C, e.g., greater than 40°C, or greater than 80°C.
  • the pressure (absolute, unless otherwise indicated) is in the range from 20 kPa to 20 MPa, preferably from 40 kPa to 10 MPa, more preferably from 100 kPa to 5000 kPa.
  • the pressure may be optimized, e.g., reduced below 20 kPa in order to maintain a liquid phase for the extraction process.
  • Wet pulp 103 may contact extractant 104 (or have a residence time in extractor 105 for continuous processes) between 5 minutes to 1000 minutes, e.g., between 20 minutes to 500 minutes, or from 40 minutes to 200 minutes. In terms of lower limits, the treatment of wet pulp 103 may be for at least 5 minutes, e.g., at least 20 minutes or at least 40 minutes. In terms of upper limits, the treatment of wet pulp 103 may be for at most 1000 minutes, e.g., at most 500 minutes, or at most 200 minutes. [0097] The extraction process may be conducted in a batch, a semi-batch or a continuous process with material flowing either co-current or counter-current in relation to one another.
  • wet pulp 103 contacts extractant 104 in one or more extraction vessels.
  • extractant 104 may be heated to the desired temperature before contacting wet pulp 103.
  • the extraction vessel(s) may be heated by any suitable means to the desired
  • an inert gas (not shown), e.g., nitrogen or C0 2 , may be supplied to the extractor to improve turbulence in the extractor and improve heat and mass transfer.
  • the flow rate of inert gas will be controlled not to cause hydrodynamic problem, e.g., flooding.
  • the addition of an inert gas may cause the solids in extractor 105 to float on the surface of the extraction mixture allowing for the solids to be skimmed off the surface of the liquid phase contained in extractor 105.
  • the mass ratio of extractant to wet pulp may range from 5: 1 to 500:1, e.g., from 7: 1 to 300:1, or from 10:1 to 100:1.
  • the solid:liquid mass ratio may range from 0.005:1 to 0.17:1, e.g., from 0.01 :1 to 0.15:1 or from 0.02: 1 to 0.1 : 1 , depending on the extraction apparatus and set-up.
  • a soliddiquid ratio of from 0.01 :1 to 0.02:1 or about 0.0125: 1 may be used to facilitate the filtration operation in a batch process.
  • a soliddiquid ratio of from 0.01 :1 to 0.02:1 or about 0.0125: 1 may be used to facilitate the filtration operation in a batch process.
  • a solid:liquid ratio of 0.1 : 1 to 0.17: 1 can be used, in particular for extractors employing countercurrent extraction.
  • the amount of extractant employed has a significant impact on process economics.
  • Counter-current extraction may achieve greater extraction efficiency while maintaining reasonable extractant usage.
  • Counter-current extraction of solubles from pulp can be accomplished in a variety of commercial equipment such as, but not limited to, a series of agitated tanks or columns with or without baffles, hydrapulpers, continuous belt extractors, and screw extractors.
  • Twin-screw extractors are generally more efficient than single-screw extractors. After extraction, the separation of solid and liquid phases can be completed in suitable commercial equipment, which includes filters, centrifuges, and the like.
  • the wet pulp is subjected to repeated extraction steps.
  • the wet pulp may be treated with the extractant in an initial extraction step followed by one or more additional extraction steps, in the same or multiple extractors, to further extract residual
  • the cellulosic product may be subjected to an initial extraction step, followed by an extractant wash step (discussed below), followed by a second extraction step.
  • the cellulosic product may be subjected to a third or fourth extraction step.
  • the extractant in each extraction step may be the same or varied to account for the different concentrations of hemicellulose and degraded cellulose in intermediate cellulosic materials between extraction steps.
  • a first extraction step may use an extractant comprising an ionic liquid and a co-solvent and a second extraction step may use an extractant comprising an amine oxide and a co-solvent, or vice versa, optionally with one or more extractant wash steps between and/or after the second extraction step.
  • Similar configurations can be designed and optimized based upon the general chemical engineering principles and process design theory.
  • the process may further include enzymatic digestion of hemicellulose, extraction and/or isolation of digested hemicellulose and recovery of a cellulosic product with reduced hemicellulose content.
  • enzymes may be better able to penetrate the resulting cellulosic material to hydrolyze residual hemicellulose and/or degraded cellulose contained therein.
  • experimental data has shown that less hemicellulose may be removed from the wet pulp if it is first treated with an enzyme cocktail under optimum enzyme hydrolysis conditions, followed by an extraction step.
  • the water in the wet pulp may improve the pretreatment (e.g., prehydrolysis) of the pulp, which may be utilized to improve the efficiency of the enzymatic hydrolysis of the pulp.
  • the pretreatment step preferably comprises treating the wet pulp with high pressure steam, optionally at low or high acid
  • the resulting cellulosic material may be treated with an enzyme, preferably a hemicellulase, to break down residual hemicellulose contained in the cellulosic material.
  • the hemicellulase includes one or more enzymes that hydrolyze hemicellulose to form simpler sugars, ultimately yielding monosaccharides, such as glucose, hexoses and pentoses.
  • Suitable hemicellulase include one or more of xyloglucanase, ⁇ -xylosidase, endoxylanase, a-L-arabinofuranosidase, a-glucuronidase, mannanase, and acetyl xylan esterase.
  • the enzymes include a combination of both endo-enzymes (i.e., enzymes hydrolyzing internal polysaccharide bonds to form smaller poly- and oligosaccharides) and exo-enzymes (i.e., enzymes hydrolyzing terminal and/or near-terminal polysaccharide bonds) to facilitate the rapid hydrolysis of large polysaccharide molecules.
  • Suitable commercial hemicellulase include SHEARZYME (available from Novozymes A/S, Bagsvaerd, Denmark), PULPZYME (available from Novozymes A/S, Bagsvaerd, Denmark), FRIMASE B210 (available from Puratos, Groot- Bijgaarden, Belgium), FRIMASE B218 (available from Puratos, Groot-Bijgaarden, Belgium), GRIND AMYL (available from Danisco, Copenhagen, Denmark), ECOPULP TX200A (available from AB Enzymes, Darmstadt, Germany), MULTIFECT Xylanase (available from SHEARZYME (available from Novozymes A/S, Bagsvaerd, Denmark), PULPZYME (available from Novozymes A/S, Bagsvaerd, Denmark), FRIMASE B210 (available from Puratos, Groot- Bijgaarden, Belgium), FRIMASE B218 (available
  • the enzymes generally can be used in amounts that are not particularly limited.
  • hemicellulase can be used in amounts ranging from about 0.001 mg/g to about 500 mg/g (e.g., about 0.05 mg/g to about 200 mg/g, about 0.1 mg/g to about 100 mg/g, about 0.2 mg/g to about 50 mg/g, or about 0.3 mg/g to about 40 mg/g).
  • the concentration units are milligrams of enzyme per gram of cellulosic material (e.g., wet pulp) to be treated.
  • an extraction mixture is removed from extractor 105 via line 106.
  • the extraction mixture 106 comprises extractant, dissolved hemicellulose, dissolved degraded cellulose, side products, e.g., mono-, di-, and oligo-saccharide, and an intermediate cellulosic material having reduced hemicellulose content and preferably reduced degraded cellulose content relative to the wet pulp composition.
  • extraction mixture 106 is fed to filter/washer 110 to remove extractant, dissolved hemicellulose, and dissolved degraded cellulose. Removal of the extractant in the filtering step reduces the amount of residual hemicellulose that must be further processed with the intermediate cellulosic material.
  • Filter/washer 110 may comprise solid-liquid separation equipment, including but not limited to, for example, rotary vacuum drums, belt filters and screw presses. Filter/washer 110 forms a filtered intermediate cellulosic material and an extraction filtrate 1 1 1.
  • the intermediate cellulosic material Prior to exiting filter/washer 1 10, optionally while on a vacuum belt filter, the intermediate cellulosic material may be washed with extractant wash 107 to further reduce the amount of extractant remaining in the filtered extraction mixture.
  • the washing may be conducted in a batch, a semi-batch or a continuous process with material flowing either co-current or counter-current in relation to one another.
  • the intermediate cellulosic material may be washed more than once in separate washing units from filter/washer 1 10. When more than one washing step is used, the composition of the extractant wash may vary in the different washing steps.
  • a first washing step may use DMSO as an extractant wash to remove residual hemicellulose and a second washing step may use water as an extractant wash to remove residual DMSO.
  • DMSO dimethyl methacrylate
  • a second washing step may use water as an extractant wash to remove residual DMSO.
  • Extractant wash 107 preferably comprises a co-solvent, which dissolves residual hemicellulose and/or degraded cellulose from the cellulosic material, but may also include some low level of extractant resulting from the sequence of washing steps.
  • the extractant wash is selected from the group consisting of water, acetonitrile, DMF, DMAC, ketones (e.g.
  • acetone aldehydes, esters (e.g. methyl acetate, ethyl acetate), ethers (e.g., MTBE), lactones, carboxylic acids (e.g., acetic acid), alcohols, polyols, amino alcohols, DMSO, formamide, propylene carbonate, aromatic solvents, halogenated solvents, aliphatic solvents, vinyl acetate, nitriles (propionitrile, chloroacetonitrile, butyonitrile), chloroform, dichloromethane, and mixtures thereof.
  • carboxylic acids e.g., acetic acid
  • alcohols polyols, amino alcohols, DMSO, formamide, propylene carbonate
  • aromatic solvents halogenated solvents
  • aliphatic solvents vinyl acetate
  • nitriles propionitrile, chloroacetonitrile, butyonitrile
  • chloroform dichloromethane, and mixtures
  • extractant wash 107 is selected from the group consisting of DMSO, DMF, N-methyl pyrrolidone, methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, dimethyl carbonate, propylene carbonate, acetone, water, and mixtures thereof.
  • at least two extractant washes are used in series, such as DMSO and water. It should be understood that depending on the amount of residual hemicellulose contained in the intermediate cellulosic material, the amount of extractant wash may be minimized to reduce capital cost and energy requirements for subsequent separation and recycle, described below. Additionally, it should be understood that the one or more extractant washes may also be used to remove side products, e.g., mono-, di-, and oligo-saccharides from the extraction mixture.
  • the extractant wash may further comprise one or more washing aids that improve the removal of extractant from the cellulosic material, improve operability, or otherwise improve the physical properties of the intermediate cellulose material.
  • the washing aids may include, for example, defoamers, surfactants, and mixtures therefore.
  • the amount of washing agent can vary widely based upon the amount of residual extractant, quality requirement for cellulosic product, and process operability.
  • the extractant wash may then be removed via line 112, e.g., as used extractant wash filtrate.
  • the washed intermediate cellulosic material exits filter/washer 1 10 as an intermediate cellulosic material 113 having reduced hemicellulose content and preferably reduced degraded cellulose content.
  • Intermediate cellulosic material 113 may comprise less than 6 wt.% extractant, e.g., less than 5 wt.% or less than 4 wt.% extractant.
  • the intermediate cellulosic material 1 13 may comprise less than 0.5 wt.% cellulose solvent (ionic liquid and/or amine oxide), e.g., less than 0.05 wt.%, less than 0.005 wt.%, or less than 0.001 wt%.
  • Intermediate cellulosic material 1 13 may comprise from 9.9 to 99% solids, e.g., from 19 to 90% or from 28 to 85%.
  • compositions using DMSO as the co-solvent and water as the extractant wash for the intermediate cellulosic material are provided in Table 2.
  • DMSO is used as the co- solvent and water is used as the extractant wash, at least 90% of the cellulose in wet pulp 103 is maintained in cellulose product 123, as described herein.
  • Solvent e.g., Ionic Liquid 0.09 to 99.4 1.7 to 90 2.6 to 80 or Amine Oxide
  • Co-solvent e.g., DMSO 0.09 to 99.4 8.5 to 98 17 to 97
  • Solvent e.g., Ionic Liquid 0.09 to 99.9 1.7 to 90 2.6 to 80 or Amine Oxide
  • Co-solvent e.g., DMSO 0.09 to 99.9 8.5 to 99.6 17.0 to 99.3
  • Solvent e.g., Ionic Liquid 0.004 to 2.7 0.004 to 2.0 0.004 to 1.5 or Amine Oxide
  • Co-solvent e.g., DMSO 0.01 to 2.7 0.02 to 2.2 0.03 o l .9
  • Intermediate cellulosic material 113 may then be further de-liquored, e.g., mechanically concentrated in a concentrator 1 15 to form a concentrated cellulosic material 1 17 having an increased solids content and a residual extractant wash 1 16, which may be recycled to and combined with either extractant wash 107 or stream 1 12.
  • the solids content in concentrated cellulosic material 1 17 may range from 10 to 99 wt%, e.g., from 20 to 90 wt% or from 30 to 85 wt%.
  • the concentrator may include squeeze rolls, rotating rolls, and/or ringer rolls as well as optional heat exchangers to vaporize the liquids. Additional water removal methods may be used to concentrate the cellulosic material, depending on the desired solids content and available energy supply.
  • the concentrated cellulosic material may comprise from 2 to 99 wt.% cellulose (e.g., from 3 to 95 wt.% cellulose), from 1 to 60 wt.% water (e.g., from 1 to 50 wt.% water), and from 0.01 to 20 wt.% hemicellulose (e.g., from 0.5 to 10 wt.% hemicellulose).
  • a concentrator may be utilized between washing steps or after all washing steps in order to maximize the washing separation of hemicellulose, as well as improve washing efficiency for the solvent and co-solvent thereby reducing total washing agent quantity required and associated energy and disposal costs.
  • Concentrated cellulosic material 1 17 or 113 may then be further dried in dryer 120.
  • Hot gas may be fed to dryer 120 via line 121 and may exit dryer 120 via line 122.
  • a finished cellulose product may then exit dryer 120 via line 123.
  • the dryer may function to remove residual extractant wash.
  • the finished cellulose product may comprise from 80 to 99.9 wt.% cellulose (e.g., from 90 to 95 wt.%) cellulose), from 0.01 to 25 wt.% hemicellulose (e.g., from 0.1 to 15 wt.% hemicellulose) and from 0.1 to 20 wt.% water (e.g., from 3 to 15 wt.% water).
  • Exemplary dryers include disintegrator dryers, flash dryers, apron dryers, rotary dryers, heated rolls, infrared dryers, ovens and vacuums.
  • the disintegrator dryer may be used to further open the cellulosic material, which may be advantageous for subsequent processing, e.g., in the formation of cellulose acetate, and derivatives thereof.
  • dryer 120 comprises heated rolls which may be used to form baled sheets or product rolls of cellulosic material.
  • the drying unit 50 from the pulping process may be used instead of dryer 120, thus allowing for integration of pulping process and purification process equipment.
  • Finished cellulose product 123 may comprise less than 20 wt.% water, e.g., less than 15 wt.%, less than 10 wt.% or less than 5 wt.%) water.
  • high purity a-cellulose product may be produced.
  • the finished cellulose product comprises high purity ⁇ -cellulose products such as high purity dissolving grade pulps with less than 5 wt.% hemicellulose, e.g., less than 2 wt.% hemicellulose or less than 1 wt.% hemicellulose.
  • the cellulosic product has a UV absorbance of less than 2.0 at 277 nm, e.g., less than 1.6 at 277 nm, or less than 1.2 at 277 nm.
  • Paper grade pulp typically has a UV absorbance of greater than 4.7 at 277 nm, as determined by standard UV absorbance measurements. Conveniently and accurately, purity of the ⁇ -cellulose product may be indicated by a lower absorbance at a certain wavelength.
  • the high purity a- cellulose pulp product also may advantageously retain other beneficial characteristics such as intrinsic viscosity and brightness.
  • the high purity ⁇ -cellulose pulp product may be further processed to make cellulose derivatives, such as cellulose ether, cellulose esters, cellulose nitrate, other derivatives of cellulose, or regenerated cellulose fiber, such as viscose, lyocell, rayon, etc.
  • the high purity ⁇ -cellulose pulp may be used to make cellulose acetate, e.g., cellulose acetate flake or tow.
  • the stream may be sent to a hemicellulose concentrator 130 to form a (first) recovered extractant 131 and hemicellulose concentrate 132.
  • the recovered extractant 131 will likely be enriched in co-solvent and lean in ionic liquid or amine oxide relative to extractant 104.
  • the hemicellulose concentrator 130 may comprise a filtration unit or an evaporator.
  • the filtration unit may be an ultrafiltration unit or a nanofiltration unit, or membrane separation unit, and may comprise a membrane.
  • the filtration unit may be operated at a pressure from 1 kPa to 5,000 kPa and a temperature from 0°C to 200°C and appropriate flow rates. If an evaporator is used, the conditions employed preferably include a pressure from 1 kPa to 1,000 kPa and temperature from 30°C to 200°C.
  • compositions for the recovered extractant and the hemicellulose concentrate are provided in Table 3. TABLE 3
  • Solvent e.g., Ionic Liquid or 0 to 5 0 to 3 O to 1
  • Co-solvent e.g., DMSO 95 to 100 97 to 100 99 to 100
  • Solvent e.g., Ionic Liquid or 0.09 to 99.9 1.8 to 99 2.7 to 98
  • Co-solvent e.g., DMSO
  • DMSO dimethyl methacrylate
  • recovered extractant 131 may be recycled to the extractor. In some embodiments, recovered extractant 131 may be combined with extractant 104, as shown. In other embodiments, when recovered extractant 131 consists essentially of co-solvent, recovered extractant 131 may be directly fed to filter/washer 1 10, or optionally used as a first stage washing agent or combined with extractant wash 107 in washing the intermediate cellulose material.
  • Hemicellulose concentrate 132 may then be fed to precipitator 135 to precipitate hemicellulose therefrom.
  • Precipitation agent may be fed to precipitator 135 via line 133 and combined with hemicellulose concentrate 132 to form a precipitation slurry 136.
  • Precipitator 135 may comprise one or more stirred tanks or other agitation equipment, and may be either batch or continuous. It may utilize electrostatic charge to facilitate precipitation.
  • Precipitation agent 133 may be selected from the group consisting of an alcohol, e.g., methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, and butanol; ketone, e.g., acetone, 2-butanone; ninitrile, e.g., acetonitrile, propionitrile, butyronitrile, chloroacetonitrile; ether, e.g., tetrahydrofuran, diethyl ether, dibutyl ether; ester, e.g., methyl acetate, ethyl acetate, propyl acetate, isopropyl acetate, vinyl acetate, propylene carbonate; carboxylic acid, e.g., acetic acid, formic acid; amide, e.g., formamide; halide, e.g., dichloromethane, chloroform, 1- chlorobutane, 1,2-dichlorethane; hydrogen
  • Precipitation slurry 136 may comprise, for example, from 0.001 to 7 wt.% cellulose, from 0.003 to 34 wt.% hemicellulose, from 0.0003 to 7 wt.% water, from 0.05 to 50 wt.% solvent, and from 50 to 99 wt.% precipitation agent.
  • a gas optionally an inert gas, e.g., nitrogen
  • the inert gas is carbon dioxide, optionally supercritical carbon dioxide.
  • the supercritical carbon dioxide may lead to the formation of a carbon dioxide phase, a solvent phase and a hemicellulose phase.
  • hemicellulose is automatically separated out as a solids rich stream.
  • the carbon dioxide may be flashed under low pressure, recovered using a compressor, and returned to precipitator 135.
  • Some or all of the co- solvent may be flashed at reduced pressure and recycled (not shown). This type of concentrating process for hemicellulose may advantageously reduce the downstream washing requirements and associated energy costs (described below).
  • precipitation slurry 136 may then be sent to filter/washer 137 which separates a precipitation agent filtrate 139 from recovered solid hemicellulose.
  • Filter/washer 137 may comprise solid-liquid separation equipment, including but not limited to rotary vacuum drums, belt filters and screw presses.
  • the recovered solid hemicellulose Prior to exiting filter/washer 137, the recovered solid hemicellulose may be washed with precipitant wash 134 to form washed recovered solid hemicellulose 138.
  • the washing step may serve to further reduce the amount of extractant and/or precipitation agent remaining in the recovered solid hemicellulose.
  • the washing may be conducted in a batch, a semi-batch or a continuous process with material flowing either co-current or counter-current in relation to one another.
  • the precipitator may comprise a crystallizer as long as the hemicellulose solubility is sensitive to solvent temperature.
  • the reduced temperature may cause the hemicellulose to precipitate as solids from the solution.
  • Precipitant wash 134 preferably comprises a co-solvent, which dissolves the impurities inside the hemicellulose, but may also include some low level of cellulose solvent, e.g., ionic liquid or amine oxide, resulting from the sequence of washing steps.
  • the precipitant wash is selected from the group consisting of the group of alcohol, e.g., methanol, ethanol, iso- propanol, and butanol; ketone, e.g.
  • acetone, 2-butanone ninitrile, e.g., acetonitrile, propionitrile, butyronitrile, chloroacetonitrile
  • ether e.g., tetrahydrofuran, diethyl ether, dibutyl ether
  • ester e.g., methyl acetate, ethyl acetate, propyl acetate, isopropyl acetate, vinyl acetate, propylene carbonate
  • carboxylic acid e.g., acetic acid, formic acid
  • amide e.g., formamide
  • halide e.g., dichloromethane, chloroform, 1-chlorobutane, 1 ,2-dichlorethane
  • hydrogencarbon compound e.g., hexane, 2,2,4- trimethylpentane, benzene, toluene
  • amine e.g.
  • precipitant wash 134 is selected from the group consisting of DMSO, DMF, N- methyl pyrrolidone, methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, dimethyl carbonate, propylene carbonate, acetone, water, and mixtures thereof.
  • the precipitant wash may then be removed either via line 139 with the precipitation agent filtrate or via line 112 with the extractant wash.
  • Precipitation agent filtrate 139 may be fed to separation equipment, e.g., a membrane or a distillation column 150, to form recovered precipitant wash 151, recovered precipitation agent 152 and second recovered extractant 153.
  • Recovered precipitant wash 151 preferably comprises high concentration, e.g., at least 95 wt.% precipitant wash, e.g., water, and may be recycled and become a first stage precipitant wash stream or part of stream 134.
  • Recovered precipitation agent 152 preferably comprises high concentration, e.g., at least 80 wt.% precipitation agent, optionally greater than 85 wt.% precipitation agent, e.g., an alcohol such as ethanol, and optionally at most 20 wt.% precipitant wash, optionally at most 10 wt.% precipitant wash, e.g., water, and may be recycled and combined with precipitation agent in line 133.
  • high concentration e.g., at least 80 wt.% precipitation agent, optionally greater than 85 wt.% precipitation agent, e.g., an alcohol such as ethanol, and optionally at most 20 wt.% precipitant wash, optionally at most 10 wt.% precipitant wash, e.g., water, and may be recycled and combined with precipitation agent in line 133.
  • Second recovered extractant 153 preferably comprises a high concentration, e.g., at least 80 wt.% co-solvent optionally at least 85 wt.% co- solvent, and at most 20 wt.% cellulose solvent, optionally at most 15wt.% cellulose solvent (e.g., ionic liquid or amine oxide).
  • the second recovered extractant may be recycled and combined with extractant 104.
  • column 150 may be operated at a temperature from 0°C to 300°C, e.g., from 10°C to 200°C or from 25°C to 150°C and at a pressure (absolute) from 1 to 2,000 kPa, e.g., from 2 to 1,000 kPa, from 5 to 800 kPa or from 10 to 600 kPa. At least a portion of the overhead stream 152 may be returned as reflux to improve separation (not shown). In some embodiments, a second distillation column (not shown) may be used to separate residual cellulose solvent and/or co-solvent from the recovered precipitant wash 151.
  • this stream may be treated in separation equipment, e.g., a membrane or a distillation column 140, to form recovered extractant wash 142 and a third recovered extractant 141.
  • Distillation column 140 may be operated at a temperature from 0°C to 300°C, e.g., from 10°C to 200°C or from 25°C to 150°C and at a pressure (absolute) from 1 to 2,000 kPa, e.g., from 2 to 1,000 kPa, from 5 to 800 kPa or from 10 to 600 kPa.
  • At least a portion of the recovered extractant wash may be refluxed to distillation column 140, as shown.
  • the remainder of the stream may be recycled and combined with extractant wash 107.
  • one or more of the third recovered extractant 141 , second recovered extractant 153 and (first) recovered extractant 131 may be combined and recycled to extractant 104.
  • the used extractant wash removed via line 1 12 may be directed to the separation equipment 150 when the extractant wash and precipitation wash are the same material.
  • the function of distillation column 140 has been addressed by separation equipment 150 and distillation column 140 can be advantageously eliminated from the process.
  • the stream may then be mechanically de-liquored, e.g., concentrated in a concentrator 144 to form concentrated hemicellulose material 143 and a second residual precipitant wash 145 that may be combined with precipitant wash 134.
  • the solids content in concentrated hemicellulose material 143 may be from 10 to 99 wt.%, e.g., from 20 to 90 wt.% or from 30 to 85 wt.%.
  • Concentrated hemicellulose material 143 may comprise from 0.1 to 20 wt.% cellulose (e.g., from 1 to 15 wt.% cellulose), from 20 to 99 wt.% hemicellulose (e.g., from 30 to 90 wt.% hemicellulose), and from 1 to 75 wt.% water (e.g., from 10 to 70 wt.% water).
  • the concentrator may include squeeze rolls, rotating rolls, and/or wringer rolls. It should be understood that additional water removal methods may be used to concentrate the hemicellulose, depending on the desired solids content and available energy supply.
  • Concentrated hemicellulose material 143 or 138 may then be further dried in dryer 146. Hot gas may be fed to dryer 146 via line 148 and may exit dryer 146 via line 149. A finished
  • hemicellulose product may then exit dryer 146 via line 147.
  • the dryer may function to remove residual precipitant wash, e.g., water.
  • Exemplary dryers may include disintegrator dryers, flash dryers, apron dryers, rotary dryers, heated rolls, infrared dryers, ovens and vacuums.
  • the drying unit 50 from the pulping process may be used instead of dryer 146, thus allowing for integration of pulping process and purification process equipment.
  • the finished hemicellulose product 147 may comprise from 1 to 25 wt.% cellulose (e.g., from 5 to 20 wt.% cellulose), from 60 to 99 wt.% hemicellulose (e.g., from 70 to 95 wt.% hemicellulose), and from 1 to 30 wt.% water (e.g., from 3 to 20 wt.% water).
  • the finished hemicellulose product has a broad application to generate high value chemicals. Some, but not all, examples are described briefly here. Firstly, it may be advantageously used as an intermediate in furfural, methyl furfural, or valerolactone production. Secondly, the finished hemicellulose product may also be used as a feedstock to produce ethanol and/or as a fuel to a recovery boiler. Thirdly, hemicellulose can be used as a starting material to produce functional chemicals, such as adhesives and sweeteners. Fourthly, it can be recycled back to paper mill to make papers with special features.
  • the process may comprise a first washing step with an alcohol, followed by a washing step with a co-solvent.
  • the alcohol may dissolve cellulose solvent but has limited solubility to mono-, di-, and oligo-saccharides.
  • the co- solvent wash may dissolve mono-, di-, and oligo-saccharides from hemicellulose.
  • evaporation, membranes, ion exchange resins, activated carbon beds, simulated moving bed chromatographic separation, flocculants, e.g., polydiallyldimethylammonium chloride (polyDADMAC), and/or their combinations may be employed to separate mono-, di-, and oligosaccharide from the liquid stream.
  • polyDADMAC polydiallyldimethylammonium chloride
  • polymer-bound boronic acid has been demonstrated to be able to complex with sugars so that the sugars are separated from the liquid stream.
  • the small sugars may be converted by either enzymatic treatment or acid-catalytic process into furfural, ethanol, acetic acid, and/or other products which can be further separated out from the system.
  • mono-, di-, and oligo-saccharide and other side products can be removed in one or more operations, which are located before the separation of the extraction filtrate, after the precipitation step, in the hemicellulose wash steps, and/or in other steps.
  • the operating conditions are also determined by the stability of the extractant. Without being bound by theory, it is believed that this allows for the minimization of degradation products of the extractant.
  • degradation products may be removed by directly purging a degradation products stream. Additionally, distillation may be used to purge degradation products from a column as a distillate or a residue, depending on the boiling point(s) of the degradation product(s). In some embodiments, combinations of these degradation product removal strategies may be employed.
  • FIG. 5 Another pulp purification process, which is particularly well suited for extractants comprising solvents and co-solvents having disparate boiling points, is shown in FIG. 5.
  • the extraction mixture is formed as described above for the process of FIG. 4.
  • an extraction mixture is removed from extractor 105 via line 106.
  • extraction mixture 106 is fed to filter 1 10 to remove extractant, dissolved hemicellulose, and dissolved degraded cellulose as well as dissolved side products. Removal of the extractant in the filtering step reduces the amount of residual hemicellulose that must be further processed with the intermediate cellulosic material. It also reduces the amount of extractant that must be separated from the intermediate cellulose in subsequent steps.
  • Filter 110 may comprise solid-liquid separation equipment, including but not limited to, for example, rotary vacuum drums, belt filters and screw presses. Filter 110 may be operated at a pressure from 20 kPa to 20,000 kPa, from 40 kPa to 10,000 kPa, or from 100 kPa to 5,000 kPa and a temperature from 10°C to 150°C, from 15°C to 100°C, or from 20°C to 80°C. In some embodiments, the pressure on the filtrate side may be reduced to below 100 kPa, e.g., from 1 to 99 kPa for enhanced filtering process rate. Filter 110 forms an intermediate cellulosic material 1 12 and an extraction filtrate 1 1 1.
  • intermediate cellulosic material 1 12 may be directed to washer 115 where it is washed with extractant wash 118 to further reduce the amount of extractant remaining in the intermediate cellulosic product.
  • the washing may be conducted in a batch, a semi-batch or a continuous process with material flowing either co-current or counter-current in relation to one another. In some embodiments, only one washing step is used. In other embodiments, as shown, the intermediate cellulosic material may be washed more than once in separate washers 115 and 120. When more than one washing step is used, the composition of the extractant wash may vary in the different washing steps.
  • a first washing step may use co-solvent, e.g., acetonitrile as extractant wash 118 to remove residual cellulose solvent and residual hemicellulose and a second washing step may use water as extractant wash 124 to remove residual acetonitrile.
  • co-solvent e.g., acetonitrile
  • water extractant wash 124 to remove residual acetonitrile.
  • the washing step may be conducted at a higher temperature in order to enhance mass transfer and to increase solubility.
  • the temperature may be from 10°C to 100°C, e.g., from 15°C to 90°C, or from 20°C to 80°C.
  • Extractant wash 118 preferably comprises a co-solvent, which dissolves residual cellulose solvent and residual hemicellulose and/or degraded cellulose from the cellulosic material, but may preferably be substantially free of cellulose solvent. Extractant wash 124 preferably also comprises a co-solvent, which can be used to wash away the residual of the first co-solvent in the cellulose material and can be further separated conventionally from the cellulose material. In one
  • the extractant wash is selected from the group consisting of acetonitrile, acetone, methanol, ethanol, iso-propanol, methyl acetate, ethyl acetate, vinyl acetate, propionitrile, dichloromethane, chloroform, butyronitrile, chloroacetonitrile, water, and combinations thereof.
  • the extractant wash is selected from the group consisting of water, ethylene glycol, glycerin, formamide, ⁇ , ⁇ -dimethylformamide, N-methylpyrrolidinone, N,N- dimethylacetamide, DMSO, a mixture of water and alcohol, and combinations thereof.
  • first extractant wash 1 18 may comprise greater than 85 wt.% acetonitrile, e.g., greater than 90 wt.% or greater than 95 wt.%; and second extractant wash 124 may comprise greater than 90 wt.% washing solvent, preferably water, e.g., greater than 95 wt.% water, greater than 99 wt.% water or greater than 99.5 wt.% water. It should be understood that, depending on the amount of residual hemicellulose contained in the cellulosic material, the amount of extractant wash may be minimized to reduce capital cost and energy requirements for subsequent separation and recycle, described below.
  • the extractant wash may further comprise one or more washing aids described herein.
  • the first extractant wash may then be removed via line 1 17 and the second extractant wash may be removed via line 121, e.g., as used extractant wash filtrates.
  • used extractant wash filtrate 1 17 may be returned to extractor 105, either directly to extractor 105 or combined with solvent 104.
  • Used extractant wash filtrate 121 may be used in hemicellulose recovery zone 102.
  • the intermediate cellulosic material exits filter 110 and washer 115 and washer 120 via line 122. Washed intermediate cellulosic material 122 has reduced hemicellulose content and preferably reduced degraded cellulose content.
  • Washed intermediate cellulosic material 122 may comprise less than 6 wt.% extractant, e.g., less than 5 wt.% or less than 4 wt.% extractant. In some embodiments, washed intermediate cellulosic material 122 may comprise less than 0.5 wt.% cellulose solvent (ionic liquid and/or amine oxide), e.g., less than 0.05 wt.%, less than 0.005 wt.%, or less than 0.001 wt%. Washed intermediate cellulosic material 122 may comprise from 9.9 to 99% solids, e.g., from 19 to 90% or from 28 to 85%.
  • compositions using acetonitrile as the co-solvent, acetonitrile as the first extractant wash and water as the second extractant wash for the intermediate cellulosic material are provided in Table 4.
  • acetonitrile is used as the co-solvent and first extractant wash 1 18, and water is used as second extractant wash 124, .at least 90% or at least 95% of the cellulose in wet pulp 103 is maintained in washed intermediate cellulosic material 122, as described herein. If no further processing is required, washed intermediate cellulosic material 122 may be referred to as finished cellulosic material.
  • FILTER 110 WASHER 115 and WASHER 120
  • Solvent e.g., Ionic Liquid or Amine 0.02 to 70 0.34 to 63 0.51 to 56
  • Solvent Ionic Liquid or Amine Oxide 0.08 to 99.3 1.7 to 90 2 to 80
  • Solvent Ionic Liquid or Amine Oxide 0 to 7.7 0 to 7.0 0 to 6.5
  • used extractant wash 121 may be directed to distillation column 135 to form a distillate 136 comprising the first and second extractant washes and a residue 137 comprising the second extractant wash 124. It is understood that at least a portion of first extractant wash 1 18 is present in washed intermediate cellulosic material 116, and is then separated from the cellulosic material and removed with used extractant wash 121. At least a portion of residue 137 may be directed to washer 120 and at least a portion of residue 137 may be directed to washer 160, discussed herein.
  • Distillate 136 may be further separated in distillation column 140 to form distillate 142, also comprising the first and second extractant washes and a residue 141, comprising all or part of the recovered first extractant wash 1 18, e.g., acetonitrile.
  • residue 141 may be sent directly to extractor 105 or combined with fresh extractant via line 104. Additionally, at least a portion of residue 141 may be directed to washer 155, discussed herein, via line 143.
  • Distillate 142 may be combined with used extractant wash 121 and directed to distillation column 135.
  • Columns 135 and 140 may each be operated at a temperature from 20°C to 300°C, e.g., from 30°C to 250°C or from 40°C to 200°C and at a pressure (absolute) from 1 to 2,000 kPa, e.g., from 2 to 1,500 kPa, from 5 to 1,000 kPa or from 10 to 800 kPa.
  • the operating pressure of column 140 may be greater than the operating pressure in column 135.
  • the greater pressure in column 140 may be used to change the concentrations in the acetonitrile/water azeotrope.
  • a single distillation column is sufficient for separation of the co-solvent from the washing agent(s).
  • washed intermediate cellulosic material 122 or 1 16 may then be further de-liquored, e.g., mechanically concentrated in a concentrator to form a concentrated cellulosic material having an increased solids content, e.g., from 10 to 99 wt%, from 20 to 90 wt% or from 30 to 85 wt%. In some embodiments, the solids content is at least 90 wt.%.
  • the concentrator and concentrated cellulosic material are described herein.
  • the concentrated cellulosic material may then be further dried in a dryer (not shown).
  • the dryer may function to remove residual extractant wash.
  • Exemplary dryers include disintegrator dryers, flash dryers, apron dryers, rotary dryers, heated rolls, infrared dryers, ovens and vacuums.
  • the disintegrator dryer may be used to further open the cellulosic material, which may be advantageous for subsequent processing, e.g., in the formation of cellulose acetate, and derivatives thereof.
  • a dryer may be designed to comprise heated rolls which may be used to form baled sheets or product rolls of cellulosic material.
  • a concentrator may be utilized between washing steps or after all washing steps in order to improve washing efficiency for the cellulose solvent and co-solvent, as well as to maximize separation of any remaining hemicellulose, thereby reducing total washing agent quantity required and associated energy and disposal costs.
  • extractant filtrate 1 1 1 is sent to a flasher 130 to form a vapor stream enriched in co-solvent 132 and a liquid stream enriched in cellulose solvent 131.
  • the flashing step desirably forms a vapor stream enriched in co-solvent 132 and a liquid stream enriched in cellulose solvent 131 due to the low to negligible vapor pressure of cellulose solvent and the significantly greater vapor pressure of the co-solvent.
  • Vapor stream 132 may be condensed in condenser 133.
  • At least a portion of the condensed vapor stream may be employed as the first extractant wash 118 via line 138 and at least a portion of the condensed vapor stream may be employed as the hemicellulose precipitant wash 158, discussed herein, via line 134.
  • Either a pressure drop from filter 110 to flasher 130 or additional energy supply can drive the separation of the cellulose solvent from the co-solvent in the flasher.
  • Flasher 130 may be operated at a pressure from 1 to 10,000 kPa, e.g., from 10 to 5,000 kPa, or from 100 to 1,000 kPa and at a temperature from 0°C to 300°C, e.g., from 20°C to 200°C, or from 80°C to 160°C.
  • the extracting step is conducted at a greater pressure than the flashing step, e.g., a pressure at least 3% greater, e.g., at least 10% greater, at least 20% greater, or at least 30% greater.
  • the flashing step is conducted at a pressure lower than the extracting step, e.g., a pressure at most 97% of the pressure of the extracting step, e.g., at most 90% or at most 80%.
  • Exemplary compositions for liquid stream 131 and vapor stream 132 are provided in Table 5.
  • Solvent e.g., Ionic Liquid or 0.09 to 99.5 1 to 90 2 to 81
  • Solvent e.g., Ionic Liquid or O.001 O.0001 —
  • Co-solvent e.g., Acetonitrile 60 to 100 64 to 100 68 to 100
  • Liquid stream 131 may then be fed to precipitator 145 to precipitate hemicellulose therefrom at a temperature from 0°C to 100°C.
  • Precipitation agent may be fed to precipitator 145 via line 129 and combined with liquid stream 131 to form a precipitation slurry 146.
  • Precipitator 145 may comprise one or more stirred tanks or other agitation equipment, and may be either batch or continuous optionally utilizing electrostatic charge to facilitate precipitation.
  • Precipitation agent 129 may the same as described in FIG. 4.
  • Precipitation agent 129 may also comprise a mixture of an alcohol and water, optionally at an alcohol: water mass ratio from 1 :1 to 20:1 or from 2:1 to 15:1.
  • precipitation agent 129 is the same as the co-solvent, e.g., acetonitrile. When acetonitrile and/or water are used as both the co-solvent and the precipitation agent, the
  • Precipitation slurry 146 may comprise, for example, from 0.001 to 3 wt.% cellulose, from 0.001 to 15 wt.% hemicellulose, from 1 to 10 wt.% water, from 0.05 to 50 wt.% solvent, from 0.05 to 50 wt.% co-solvent, and from 10 to 60 wt.% precipitation agent.
  • the precipitator may comprise a crystallizer and/or precipitation agent 129 may be fed at a lower temperature, e.g., froml0°C to 60°C as long as the hemicellulose solubility is sensitive to solvent temperature.
  • the reduced temperature may cause the hemicellulose to precipitate as solids from the solution.
  • a gas optionally an inert gas, e.g. nitrogen, may be fed to precipitator 145 as described in FIG. 4.
  • an inert gas e.g. nitrogen
  • precipitation slurry 146 may then be sent to filter 150 which separates a precipitation agent filtrate 151 from filtered intermediate hemicellulose 152.
  • Filter 150 may comprise solid-liquid separation equipment, including but not limited to rotary vacuum drums, belt filters and screw presses. Without being bound by theory, it is believed that the pressure difference between precipitation slurry 146 and filtrate stream 151 may serve as the driving force for filtration. The pressure difference may vary from 1 to 10,000 kPa, e.g., from 10 to 5,000 kPa, or from 100 to 1 ,000 kPa.
  • Precipitation agent filtrate 151 may be directed to a distillation column 165 to form a distillate 166 comprising precipitation agent and a residue 167 comprising cellulose solvent and co- solvent.
  • distillate 166 may comprise from 0.1 to 25 wt.% water, from 5 to 40 wt.% co-solvent, from 45 to 90 wt.% precipitation agent and less than 0.0001 cellulose solvent (e.g., substantially free of cellulose solvent).
  • Distillate 166 may be directed to precipitator 145.
  • Residue 167 may comprise from 20 to 70 wt.% cellulose solvent and from 20 to 80 wt.% co-solvent.
  • Residue 167 may be returned directly to extractor 105 via line 104 or may be combined with fresh extractant and then be directed to extractor 105 via line 104.
  • Column 165 may be operated at a temperature from 0°C to 300°C, e.g., from 10°C to 200°C or from 25°C to 150°C and at a pressure (absolute) from 1 to 10,000 kPa, e.g., from 5 to 4,000 kPa, or from 3 to 1,000 kPa.
  • filtered intermediate hemicellulose 152 may be directed to washer 155 where it is washed with precipitant wash 158 to further reduce the amount of precipitation agent remaining in the intermediate cellulosic product as well as cellulose solvent.
  • the washing may be conducted in a batch, a semi-batch or a continuous process with material flowing either co-current or counter-current in relation to one another. At least a portion of precipitant wash 158 may be from condensed vapor stream 134. In some embodiments, only one washing step is used. In other embodiments, as shown, filtered intermediate hemicellulose 152 may be washed more than once in separate washers 155 and 160.
  • the composition of the precipitant wash may vary in the different washing steps.
  • a first washing step may use acetonitrile, e.g., comprising at least 90 wt.% acetonitrile, as precipitant wash 158 to remove residual precipitation agent and cellulose solvent and a second washing step may use water as precipitant wash 168, e.g., comprising at least 90 wt.% water, to remove residual acetonitrile.
  • the washing temperature may vary broadly, e.g., from 0°C to 100°C. Typically, a greater temperature can help dissolve more residuals and enhance the mass transfer.
  • a similar configuration can be designed and optimized based upon the general chemical engineering principles and process design theory and it is understood that multiple washing steps, optionally with drying steps in between, may be used.
  • Precipitant washes 158 and 168 may preferably be substantially free of the cellulose solvent. Further, precipitant wash 158 preferably has high solubility to cellulose solvent but low solubility to mono-, di-, and oligo-saccharide and other side products. In one embodiment, precipitant wash 158 is the same as is described in FIG. 4. The precipitant wash may be enriched in co-solvent and may comprise a condensed portion of the vapor stream of the co-solvent from the flashing step. In another embodiment, the precipitant wash may comprise a stream enriched in precipitation agent. Further, precipitant wash 158 preferably has high solubility to cellulose solvent but low solubility to mono-, di-, and oligo-saccharides and other side products.
  • a precipitant wash 168 preferably having a high solubility to side products may be employed.
  • Precipitant wash 168 optionally may be selected from the group consisting of water, ethylene glycol, glycerin, formamide, ⁇ , ⁇ -dimethylformamide, N-methylpyrrolidinone, ⁇ , ⁇ -dimethylacetamide, DMSO, mixture of water and alcohol, and their combinations.
  • the side products e.g., mono-, di-, and oligo-saccharide
  • precipitant wash 158 is the same as extractant wash 118
  • precipitant wash 168 is the same as extractant wash 124.
  • Precipitant wash 158 may then be removed via line 156 and returned to precipitator 145.
  • Precipitant wash 168 may then be removed via line 164 and sent to distillation column 135, discussed herein, to separate co-solvent and/or precipitation agent using distillation and/or evaporation.
  • fresh precipitant wash e.g., water, may be added to washer 160 via line 169.
  • compositions using ethanol as precipitating agent 129, acetonitrile as precipitant wash 158 and water as precipitant wash 168 are provided in Table 6.
  • acetonitrile is used as the co-solvent and first extractant wash 118, and water is used as second extractant wash 124, at least 90% of the cellulose in wet pulp 103 is maintained in washed intermediate cellulosic material 122, as described herein. If no further processing is required, washed hemicellulose 162 may be referred to as a finished hemicellulose product in which the ratio of hemicellulose concentration to cellulose concentration is at least 5 times greater than in wet pulp 103.
  • Solvent e.g., Ionic Liquid or 0.004 to 54 0.09 to 49 0.1 to 44
  • Co-solvent (Acetonitrile) 0.001 to 54 0.1 to 53 0.2 to 52
  • Solvent e.g., Ionic Liquid or 0 to 6.7 0 to 5.8 0 to 4.9
  • the stream may then be mechanically de- liquored (not shown), e.g., concentrated in a concentrator to form concentrated hemicellulose material.
  • the solids content in concentrated hemicellulose material may be from 10 to 99 wt.%, e.g., from 20 to 90 wt.% or from 30 to 85 wt.%. In some embodiments, the solids content is greater than 90 wt.%.
  • the concentrator may include squeeze rolls, rotating rolls, and/or wringer rolls. It should be understood that additional water removal methods may be used to concentrate the hemicellulose, depending on the desired solids content and available energy supply.
  • the concentrated hemicellulose material may then be further dried in a dryer and used in further processes, as described herein.
  • An extraction mixture comprising 3.6 wt.% cellulose, 0.89 wt.% hemicellulose, 0.31 wt.% water, 3.3 wt.% ionic liquid and 91.9 wt.% DMSO was removed from the extractor and sent through a vacuum filter and washed with an extractant wash to remove an extraction filtrate comprising extractant and hemicellulose.
  • the extractant wash was water and was fed at a 10: 1 mass ratio of water to pulp.
  • the washed cellulosic material e.g., the intermediate cellulosic material, comprised 24.5 wt.% cellulose, 0.5 wt.% hemicellulose and 75 wt.% water.
  • the intermediate cellulosic product was then de-liquored to concentrate the intermediate cellulosic product.
  • the resulting concentrated cellulosic product comprised 49 wt.% cellulose, 1 wt.% hemicellulose, and 50 wt.% water.
  • the concentrated cellulosic product was then further dried in a disintegrator drier to produce a finished cellulosic product comprising 92 wt.% cellulose, 1.9 wt.% hemicellulose and 6.5 wt.% water.
  • the extractant wash filtrate comprising 72 wt.% water, 1 wt.% ionic liquid and 27 wt.% DMSO was also removed from the vacuum filter. Then ionic liquid and DMSO was separated from water using evaporator at 10 kPa and 1 15°C. The water was recycled to be used as extractant wash and the ionic liquid and DMSO were recycled to the extractor
  • the extraction filtrate comprised 0.4 wt.% cellulose, 1 wt.% hemicellulose, 0.1 wt.% water, 3.5 wt.% ionic liquid and 95 wt.% DMSO.
  • This stream was sent through an evaporator to separate the ionic liquid and DMSO from the hemicellulose.
  • This recovered extractant was recycled to the extractor.
  • the recovered hemicellulose e.g., hemicellulose concentrate, comprised 2.7 wt.% cellulose, 6.1 wt.% hemicellulose, 0.6 wt.% water, 22 wt.% ionic liquid, and 68 wt.% DMSO, and was sent to a precipitator.
  • a precipitation agent comprising ethanol was also sent to the precipitator to form a precipitation slurry which comprised 1.3 wt.% cellulose, 3.1 wt.% hemicellulose, 0.3 wt.% water, 1 1 wt.% ionic liquid, 34 wt.% DMSO and 50 wt.% ethanol.
  • the volume ratio of ethanol to liquid filtrate is at least 0.95, e.g. at least 1.5, e.g. at least 2.0.
  • the precipitation slurry was then vacuum filtered, washed with a precipitant wash comprising water, de-liquored, and further dried with hot air to produce a finished hemicellulose product comprising 28 wt.% cellulose, 65 wt.% hemicellulose and degraded cellulose and 7 wt.% water.
  • the finished cellulosic product and the finished hemicellulose product were prepared as in Example 1 , except that the extraction process was completed in a 2-stage counter-current operation.
  • the extraction time was dropped to 60 minutes at a temperature of 90°C for dissolving the same amount of hemicellulose, which was indicated by the UV absorbance value of 1.2 at 277 nm wavelength, or equivalently 2.8 wt.% hemicellulose.
  • Example 4 The finished cellulosic product and the finished hemicellulose product were prepared as in Example 1, except that the extractant wash comprised 90 wt.% acetic acid and 10 wt.% water. The value of UV absorbance at 277 nm for the final pulp is 0.98, or equivalently 1.9 wt% hemicellulose.
  • Example 4 The value of UV absorbance at 277 nm for the final pulp is 0.98, or equivalently 1.9 wt% hemicellulose.
  • the finished cellulosic product and the finished hemicellulose product were prepared as in Example 1, except that the extractant wash comprised acetic acid.
  • the value of UV absorbance at 277 nm for the final pulp is 1.03, or equivalently 2.1 wt% hemicellulose.
  • the finished cellulosic product and the finished hemicellulose product were prepared as in Example 1, except that the extractant comprised 75 wt.% ionic liquid and 25 wt.% water.
  • the value of UV absorbance at 277 nm for the final pulp was 1.01, or equivalently 2.0 wt% hemicellulose.
  • the cost of this process was greater than the costs of the process of Examples 1-4 due to the greater amount of ionic liquid used and not recovered.
  • the finished cellulosic product and the finished hemicellulose product were prepared as in Example 5, except that the extractant wash comprised acetic acid.
  • the value of UV absorbance at 277 nm for the final pulp was 1.1, or equivalently 2.4 wt% hemicellulose
  • EMIM Ac and DMSO were include as one component EMIM Ac/DMSO since their boiling points, i.e., greater than 185°C at normal pressure, are significantly greater than those of water and ethanol.
  • the extractant comprised a combination of EMIM Ac/DMSO and water.
  • the feed to column 140 comprised 44.6 wt.% water and 55.4 wt.% EMIM Ac/DMSO.
  • the distillation column was operated at a temperature of 87.8°C and a pressure of 4.4 kPa.
  • Example B the extractant comprised a combination of water, EMIM Ac/DMSO, and ethanol at 35.9 wt.%, 29.8 wt.%, and 34.3 wt.%, respectively.
  • the distillation column further comprised a side stream (not shown). The distillation column was operated at a temperature of 65°C and a pressure of 2.13 kPa.
  • Example C the extractant comprised a combination of water, EMIM Ac/DMSO, and ethanol at 17.7 wt.%, 38.3 wt.%, and 44 wt.%, respectively.
  • the distillation column further comprised a side stream (not shown). The distillation column was operated at a temperature of 65°C and a pressure of 2.13 kPa.
  • Table 7 The results of the separation in distillation column 140 are shown below in Table 7. As shown, the separation of EMIM Ac/DMSO from water and ethanol was substantially complete.
  • Pulp (approximately 0.1 1 g) was dried on a moisture balance twice. The moisture and final weight of pulp were recorded. The dry pulp was placed in a glass tube and hydrolyzed with 72% sulfuric acid (1ml) at 30°C for lh, then diluted with 5 ml of water. This procedure converted hemicellulose, e.g., xylan, to furfural while cellulose was not affected due to the difference in sugar dehydration rates. UV absorbance from 600 to 210 nm was measured and the peak value at 277nm was recorded. Qualitatively, for the lower hemicellulose concentration in the solid, the lower UV intensity was at 277 nm.
  • a high-grade acetylation grade (AG) pulp used as a comparative sample with a lower hemicellulose concentration of 1.5-2.0 wt% was measured for UV absorbance to be from 0.6 to 0.9 at 277 nm.
  • the following table shows the UV absorbance of a paper grade hardwood (PGHW) pulp extracted by an EMIM Ac and acetonitrile system (e.g., purified pulp) with different concentration of EMIM Ac in acetonitrile. The greatest extraction of hemicellulose was achieved when EMIM Ac concentration in acetonitrile was from approximately 23 wt.% to approximately 25 wt.%.
  • Example 8 The same procedures as described in Example 8 were followed, except that a paper grade softwood (PGSW) pulp was extracted by an EMIM Ac and acetonitrile extractant system with different concentrations of EMIM Ac in acetonitrile at 95°C for 1 hr.
  • PGSW paper grade softwood
  • hemicellulose was changed significantly when EMIM Ac was varied from 0 wt.% to 15 wt.%), as shown in the table below.
  • Example 8 The same procedures as described in Example 8 were followed, except that the PGSW pulp and the PGHW pulp were extracted using different ionic liquid under different experimental conditions.
  • the EMIM Ac/acetonitrile system achieved the greatest hemicellulose extraction yield, as shown in Table 11 , along with the UV measurement for standard high-grade AG pulp sample for comparison.
  • *PGSW refers to paper grade softwood
  • **PGHW refers to paper grade hardwood
  • the pulp sheet from the filter pads was dispersed in 40 to 100 ml of water, and then filtered again. This water wash generally was conducted 4 times. 20 ml of acetone was added to the pulp sheet on the filter pads followed by application of vacuum to dryness. The pulp sheet was left dry in a chemical hood overnight.
  • the extracted pulp samples were subjected to another extraction processes indicated in Table 13) to further improve the pulp purity.
  • the extractant composition ionic liquid/DMSO
  • the extractant composition was used to extract the sample for one or more times. Water was used to wash away the extractant composition.
  • Table 13 The results for the amount of hemicelhilose in the paper pulp product using the above- described ionic liquid/DMSO binary extractant treatment are shown in Table 13.
  • the absorbance of a commercially available hardwood acetate grade pulp was used as a bench mark.
  • the absorbance of a hardwood paper grade pulp and a softwood paper grade pulp starting material were also measured and used as a comparison.
  • HWPP HEAAc 10% 95°C, lh, 5% 4.22
  • HWPP EMIMAc 3.5% 95°C, Hi, 5% (two 0.80
  • HWPP BMIMAc 4.1% 95°C, lh, 5% 1.08
  • HWPP EMIMOtf 5.5% 95°C, lh, 5% 4.35
  • a dry pulp was mixed with water in the amounts shown in Table 14, to form a pulp/water slurry, simulating wet pulp fed from a pulping process.
  • An ionic liquid was added to the slurry to form a pulp/ionic liquid/water mixture.
  • EMIM Ac was added into the pulp slurry to form a mixture with a solid to liquid mass ratio of 5:100.
  • the UV results of the extracted pulp are shown in Table 14.
  • a dry pulp was mixed with water in the amounts shown in Table 15, to form a pulp/water slurry, simulating wet pulp fed from a pulping process.
  • Amine oxide was added to the slurry to form a pulp/ionic liquid/water mixture.
  • NMMO was added into a pulp slurry to form a mixture with a solid to liquid ratio of 5: 100.
  • the UV results of the extracted pulp are shown in Table 15.
  • a pulp was dispersed in water to form a pulp/water slurry, simulating wet pulp fed from a pulping process.
  • the obtained pulp slurry was filtered to remove the water, then washed with DMSO with DMSO/slurry weight ratios as shown in Table 16.
  • the obtained wet cake (pulp/liquids ratio from 1 :4 to 1 :5) was extracted with 3.5% EMIM Ac/DMSO as extractant at 95°C for lh with a dry pulp/extractant (S/L) mass ratio of 1/20.
  • S/L dry pulp/extractant
  • a stock solution of 3.5% EMIM in DMSO was prepared by diluting 3.41 mL of EMIM Ac to 100 mL with DMSO.
  • Four samples of lignin [Aldrich, CAS 8072-93-3] (5 mg, 10 mg, 15 mg, and 20 mg) were weighed for initial solubility testing. The samples were transferred to separate vials each containing approximately 10 mL of the 3.5% EMIM/DMSO stock solution. After addition of the lignin, the samples were stirred on a hot plate at approximately 100°C for 30 minutes. During the 30 minute interval, any solid that remained on the wall of the vial was washed into solution by manual vigorous shaking to ensure that all of the lignin was introduced into the solution.
  • EMIMAc/DMSO at 100°C was in the range of 2.5 to 3.1 g/L.
  • the extraction was conducted at a temperature of approximately 120°C and a pressure of approximately 1010 kPa, which was greater than the saturated acetonitrile vapor pressure in order to minimize the vaporization of acetonitrile.
  • An extraction mixture comprising 8.0 wt.% cellulose, 2.0 wt.% hemicellulose, 5.7 wt.% water, 19.7 wt.% EMIM Ac and 64.4 wt.% acetonitrile was removed from the extractor and sent through a filter at a temperature of approximately 120°C and a pressure of approximately 1010 kPa to form an intermediate cellulosic material comprising 62.6 wt.% cellulose, 1.6 wt.% hemicellulose, 25.6 wt.% acetonitrile, 7.8 wt.% EMIM Ac and 2.3 wt.% water, and an extraction filtrate comprising less than 0.2 wt.% cellulose, 2.1 wt.%
  • the intermediate cellulosic material was washed with acetonitrile and then with water to form a washed cellulosic material comprising 60.5 wt.% cellulose, 1.5 wt.% hemicellulose and 38.0 wt.% water.
  • the extraction filtrate was then flashed in a flasher to form a vapor stream comprising 91.2 wt.% acetonitrile, due to the low water concentration in the extraction filtrate.
  • the vapor was condensed and used as the washing agent for the intermediate cellulose material and for the filtered hemicellulose.
  • the liquid stream from the flasher comprised 41.4 wt.% acetonitrile, 50.2 wt.% EMIM Ac and 4.8 wt.% hemicellulose.
  • the liquid stream was sent to a precipitator where it was combined with ethanol to form a precipitation slurry comprising 37.5 wt.% acetonitrile, 18.9 wt.% EMIM Ac, 34.2 wt.% ethanol, 1.7 wt.% hemicellulose and 0.2 wt.% cellulose.
  • the precipitation slurry was filtered to form a filtered intermediate hemicellulose comprising 5.5 wt.% water, 25.6 wt.% hemicellulose, 27.6 wt.% acetonitrile, 25.2 wt.% ethanol and 13.9 wt.% EMIM Ac, and a precipitation filtrate comprising 38.2 wt.%, acetonitrile, 34.9 wt.% ethanol and 19.3 wt.% EMIM Ac.
  • the filtered hemicellulose was washed with acetonitrile and then with water to form a washed hemicellulose comprising 44.5 wt.% hemicellulose, 4.0 wt.% cellulose and 51.6 wt.% water.
  • the precipitation filtrate was separated in a distillation column to return a distillate comprising precipitation agent to the precipitator and a residue comprising solvent and co-solvent to the extractor.
  • Table 18 shows the information of each stream in Figure 5, where stream 103 has been subject to a pre-extraction wash with acetonitrile and acetonitrile was excluded from the

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Polysaccharides And Polysaccharide Derivatives (AREA)

Abstract

La présente invention concerne un procédé permettant de convertir une matière de départ en pâte purifiée, ledit procédé consistant à éliminer la lignine d'une matière de départ afin de former une pâte humide comprenant au moins 5 % en poids d'eau, à extraire l'hémicellulose de la pâte humide avec un agent d'extraction, et à séparer l'hémicellulose extraite du mélange d'extraction afin de former un produit cellulosique comprenant moins d'hémicellulose que la pâte humide. L'agent d'extraction comprend un solvant de cellulose et un cosolvant. Le produit cellulosique garde de manière avantageuse sa morphologie de fibre cellulosique. Le procédé consiste à séparer et à récupérer l'hémicellulose et à séparer et à recycler divers flux de procédés utilisés dans le procédé.
EP14728768.4A 2013-05-03 2014-05-02 Procédés intégrés de purification d'une matière cellulosique Withdrawn EP2992135A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201361819150P 2013-05-03 2013-05-03
US201361862914P 2013-08-06 2013-08-06
US201361862917P 2013-08-06 2013-08-06
US201361873764P 2013-09-04 2013-09-04
US201461933203P 2014-01-29 2014-01-29
PCT/US2014/036597 WO2014179702A1 (fr) 2013-05-03 2014-05-02 Procédés intégrés de purification d'une matière cellulosique

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2992135A1 true EP2992135A1 (fr) 2016-03-09

Family

ID=50896557

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP14728768.4A Withdrawn EP2992135A1 (fr) 2013-05-03 2014-05-02 Procédés intégrés de purification d'une matière cellulosique

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (1) US20140326422A1 (fr)
EP (1) EP2992135A1 (fr)
BR (1) BR112015027772A2 (fr)
WO (1) WO2014179702A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8317975B2 (en) * 2004-04-20 2012-11-27 The Research Foundation Of The State University Of New York Product and processes from an integrated forest biorefinery
CA2836895C (fr) * 2011-05-23 2020-03-31 Arthur J. Nonni Fibre kraft de bois de coniferes ayant une blancheur et un eclat ameliores et procedes de fabrication et utilisation de celle-ci
US9365525B2 (en) 2013-02-11 2016-06-14 American Science And Technology Corporation System and method for extraction of chemicals from lignocellulosic materials
WO2015126468A1 (fr) * 2014-02-19 2015-08-27 Celanese Acetate Llc Compositions d'hémicellulose
US9382283B2 (en) * 2014-08-01 2016-07-05 American Science And Technology Corporation Oxygen assisted organosolv process, system and method for delignification of lignocellulosic materials and lignin recovery
WO2016022459A1 (fr) * 2014-08-05 2016-02-11 Celanese Acetate Llc Procédés de prétraitement et de purification d'une matière cellulosique
JP6799259B2 (ja) * 2014-10-27 2020-12-16 国立大学法人金沢大学 多糖類誘導体及びリグニン誘導体の製造方法
US9950858B2 (en) 2015-01-16 2018-04-24 R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company Tobacco-derived cellulose material and products formed thereof
CA2996423A1 (fr) * 2015-08-27 2017-03-02 Kimberly Nelson Production de nanocellulose colocalisee dans une usine de pates et papiers
WO2017091781A1 (fr) * 2015-11-24 2017-06-01 Sandia Corporation Liquides ioniques à base d'ammonium utiles pour un traitement de matières lignocellulosiques
US11154087B2 (en) 2016-02-02 2021-10-26 R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company Method for preparing flavorful compounds isolated from black liquor and products incorporating the flavorful compounds
RU2637015C1 (ru) * 2016-11-08 2017-11-29 Евгений Александрович Луканин Способ производства очищенной целлюлозы из льноволокна
CN106750360B (zh) * 2016-11-22 2020-02-07 重庆中烟工业有限责任公司 一种利用碱性离子液体-反向溶液体系分离木质素的方法
US10196778B2 (en) 2017-03-20 2019-02-05 R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company Tobacco-derived nanocellulose material
EP3421662A1 (fr) * 2017-06-30 2019-01-02 Fundación Tecnalia Research & Innovation Procédé de séparation de lignine à partir de matériaux lignocellulosiques
CN109776697A (zh) * 2017-11-13 2019-05-21 中国科学院大连化学物理研究所 一种分离木屑和秸秆中纤维素、半纤维素和木质素的方法
WO2019143802A1 (fr) * 2018-01-17 2019-07-25 Texas Tech University System Dissolution de cellulose dans des liquides ioniques

Family Cites Families (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE19856582C1 (de) * 1998-12-08 2001-03-15 Rhodia Acetow Ag Verfahren zur Gewinnung von Chemiezellstoff aus Hackschnitzeln
AU2003904323A0 (en) * 2003-08-13 2003-08-28 Viridian Chemical Pty Ltd Solvents based on salts of aryl acids
AR065257A1 (es) * 2007-02-07 2009-05-27 Univ Queensland Fraccionamiento de un material lignocelulosico
US20090084509A1 (en) * 2007-09-28 2009-04-02 Weyerhaeuser Company Dissolution of Cellulose in Mixed Solvent Systems
US8440869B2 (en) * 2008-07-01 2013-05-14 Merck Patent Gmbh Use of ionic liquids containing tricyanomethide anions as solvents for the extraction of alcohols from aqueous solutions
US8241873B2 (en) * 2008-12-19 2012-08-14 E I Du Pont De Nemours And Company Organic solvent pretreatment of biomass to enhance enzymatic saccharification
KR20110123184A (ko) * 2010-05-06 2011-11-14 바히아 스페셜티 셀룰로스 에스에이 높은 알파 용해 펄프 제조를 위한 방법 및 시스템
CA2821403C (fr) * 2010-12-15 2020-08-04 Imperial Innovations Limited Traitement d'une biomasse lignocellulosique avec un liquide ionique
CN102174754A (zh) * 2011-01-07 2011-09-07 华南理工大学 一种分离生物质的溶剂及其在生物质选择性分离中的应用
US8986501B2 (en) * 2012-08-20 2015-03-24 Celanese International Corporation Methods for removing hemicellulose

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2014179702A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2014179702A1 (fr) 2014-11-06
US20140326422A1 (en) 2014-11-06
BR112015027772A2 (pt) 2017-07-25

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20140326422A1 (en) Integrated Processes for Purifying a Cellulosic Material
US20160040360A1 (en) Processes for pretreating and purifying a cellulosic material
US8986501B2 (en) Methods for removing hemicellulose
US20140326421A1 (en) Processes for Purifying a Cellulosic Material
SU1194282A3 (ru) Способ разложени лигноцеллюлозного материала
US6057438A (en) Process for the co-production of dissolving-grade pulp and xylan
US8980050B2 (en) Methods for removing hemicellulose
JP3348387B2 (ja) ギ酸を添加した酢酸によるパルプの製法
US20160369455A9 (en) Methods for removing hemicellulose
US6512110B1 (en) Process for the production of xylose from a paper-grade hardwood pulp
US20150232582A1 (en) Hemicellulose Compositions
US20150041084A1 (en) Processes for Purifying a Cellulosic Material
CN101967771B (zh) 一种改善纸浆漂白性能的方法
US20150233055A1 (en) Dissolving-Grade Pulp Compositions
JP7340528B2 (ja) 微結晶性セルロースの製造方法
JP2015200056A (ja) 溶解クラフトパルプを連続製造する方法
JPS5836289A (ja) リグニン含有量が低いセルロ−スの製造方法
US20150191873A1 (en) Processes for producing high-yield pulp and paper products
CN117344563A (zh) 一种溶解浆的生产方法

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20151203

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: ARORA, DINESH

Inventor name: SHER, JAIMES

Inventor name: LI, RONGFU

Inventor name: COMBS, MICHAEL

Inventor name: FALLON, DENIS

Inventor name: MEHTA, JAY

Inventor name: BOATWRIGHT, MONICA

Inventor name: ALLEN, LESLIE

Inventor name: LI, BIN

Inventor name: BUNDREN, CHRISTOPHER M.

Inventor name: PAN, TIANSHU

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20161201