EP2857529A1 - Procédé de chargement de matière première dans un haut-fourneau sans entonnoir de coulée - Google Patents

Procédé de chargement de matière première dans un haut-fourneau sans entonnoir de coulée Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2857529A1
EP2857529A1 EP13797875.5A EP13797875A EP2857529A1 EP 2857529 A1 EP2857529 A1 EP 2857529A1 EP 13797875 A EP13797875 A EP 13797875A EP 2857529 A1 EP2857529 A1 EP 2857529A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
furnace
charging
coke
batch
ore
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP13797875.5A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP2857529A4 (fr
Inventor
Takuya NATSUI
Kaoru Nakano
Takanobu INADA
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nippon Steel Corp
Original Assignee
Nippon Steel and Sumitomo Metal Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nippon Steel and Sumitomo Metal Corp filed Critical Nippon Steel and Sumitomo Metal Corp
Publication of EP2857529A1 publication Critical patent/EP2857529A1/fr
Publication of EP2857529A4 publication Critical patent/EP2857529A4/fr
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21—METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21B—MANUFACTURE OF IRON OR STEEL
    • C21B7/00—Blast furnaces
    • C21B7/18—Bell-and-hopper arrangements
    • C21B7/20—Bell-and-hopper arrangements with appliances for distributing the burden
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21—METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21B—MANUFACTURE OF IRON OR STEEL
    • C21B5/00—Making pig-iron in the blast furnace
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21—METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21B—MANUFACTURE OF IRON OR STEEL
    • C21B5/00—Making pig-iron in the blast furnace
    • C21B5/008—Composition or distribution of the charge

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method for charging raw material into a Bell-less blast furnace, which is capable of controlling gas flow in the vicinity of a furnace wall without significantly increasing a reducing material ratio of the blast furnace.
  • a bell-less blast furnace is a blast furnace which is provided with a bell-less type charging apparatus having a swivel chute as a raw material charging apparatus in a furnace top portion.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram schematically illustrating the apparatus configuration of a furnace top portion of a bell-less blast furnace, and a piled-up state of raw material in the blast furnace.
  • iron sources such as sintered ore, lump ore, pellets, scrap, and reduced iron (hereinafter these are generically referred to as "ore") and coke, which is a reducing material (ore and coke are generically referred to as "raw material") are piled up alternately in layers in a furnace of a blast furnace 2 by means of a swivel chute 1, and auxiliary fuel such as pulverized coal is blown into the furnace along with hot air from a tuyere in a furnace bottom portion.
  • a charging raw material (charging material) which is the raw material charged into the blast furnace is heated and reduced by rising hot gas and the coke in the charging material while gradually descending in the furnace from the furnace top so that the ore is melted to become pig iron and is discharged from a tap hole in a side wall of a furnace bottom portion.
  • Operation to distribute charging material in the bell-less blast furnace is performed by turning the swivel chute 1 while being in tilting motion, thereby charging coke and ore into the furnace, and controlling a fall position of coke and ore in the direction of a furnace opening radius 4 at a raw material stock level 3.
  • tilting motion means that an angle formed between a central axis 1a of the swivel chute and a central axis 2a in the vertical direction of the blast furnace is changed during turning.
  • the swivel chute is disposed in a furnace wall side at the start of charging, and is then actuated to gradually tilt toward a furnace center side.
  • a series of charging operations to form a coke layer and an ore layer (which consists mainly of ore, but may include a small or medium lump coke) are referred to as "charge”.
  • charge a series of charging operations to form a coke layer and an ore layer (which consists mainly of ore, but may include a small or medium lump coke) are referred to as "charge”.
  • charge a series of charging operations to form a coke layer and an ore layer (which consists mainly of ore, but may include a small or medium lump coke) are referred to as "charge”.
  • charge Conventionally, one charge of raw material is charged by continuously charging one batch of coke and one batch of ore respectively from the furnace wall side toward the center side while the swivel chute is in tilting motion.
  • the average particle size of the coke to be charged into the furnace is larger than that of the ore, it is possible to control the distribution of gas flow from a furnace lower portion toward a furnace upper portion by controlling the O/C distribution and particle size distribution of the ore and coke in the furnace radial direction (that is, by adjusting the distribution of the charging material).
  • the O/C of the central portion is kept at a low level (that is, to increase the proportion of coke). Further, to improve the reaction efficiency of the entire furnace, it is preferable to keep the O/C in a range from a furnace intermediate portion (a portion between the region near the central portion and the region near the furnace wall in the furnace), which occupies a large proportion of the furnace opening sectional area, to the furnace wall side at a high level.
  • FIG. 1 shows a piled-up state 5 of one charge of raw material, in which coke and ore are divided into 2 batches respectively, and a total of 4 batches are charged.
  • a first batch of coke (hereafter, referred to as a "first charging batch”) 5a is charged in a range from the furnace wall portion to the intermediate portion, and a second batch of coke (hereafter, referred to as a "second charging batch”) 5b is charged in the vicinity of the center of the furnace so as to have a larger thickness than that of the first charging batch 5a.
  • a first batch of ore (hereafter, referred to as a "third charging batch”) 5c is charged over the first and second charging batches 5a and 5b in a range from the furnace wall to the furnace intermediate portion, and a second batch of ore (hereafter, referred to as a "fourth charging batch”) 5d is charged in the furnace wall side.
  • the O/C of the central portion of the furnace is kept at a low level, thereby ensuring a stable gas flow, and the O/C in a range from the furnace intermediate portion to the furnace wall side is kept at a high level, thereby improving the reaction efficiency of the entire furnace.
  • so-called small-and-middle lump coke which has a particle size smaller than that of the coke to be charged in the coke batch, is mixed in the ore batch. This is because it can be expected that the reaction between ore and coke is facilitated by disposing them in proximity, and the air permeability is improved as a result of coke serving as an aggregate (spacer) when the ore is softened and fused together.
  • the particle size of the small-and-middle lump coke has a lower limit of about 5 mm, and an upper limit of about 35 to 40 mm, although it varies depending on the particle size of coke to be charged in the coke batch.
  • zinc-containing compounds may solidify and form deposits on the inner wall of a furnace upper portion, and metallic iron and slag on the inner wall in a range from a furnace belly portion to a furnace lower portion. If such furnace wall deposits grow excessively, the descent of charging material and the gas flow may become unstable, thereby hindering stable operation of the blast furnace. Further, if furnace wall deposits fall off irregularly and descend to the furnace lower portion, the furnace may lose heat due to the fallen-off deposits, thereby even causing serious operation troubles such as cool down of furnace etc. For this reason, to maintain stable operation of the blast furnace, it is important to suppress the formation of furnace wall deposits.
  • Patent Literatures 1 to 3 disclose methods therefor.
  • Patent Literature 1 makes it possible to control the O/C in the vicinity of the furnace wall without requiring a new ancillary facility, by charging small lump coke, preferably as a mixture with fine particle sintered ore having a particle size of 1 to 5 mm, on the ore layer in a range of 500 mm from the furnace wall.
  • small lump coke preferably as a mixture with fine particle sintered ore having a particle size of 1 to 5 mm
  • Patent Literature 2 makes it possible to independently control the O/C in the vicinity of the furnace wall by charging raw material in a state that a cylindrical member is placed along a furnace opening outer periphery. However, since control range is fixed by the placement position of the cylindrical member, the degree of freedom in operation is small.
  • Patent Literature 3 makes it possible to independently control the O/C in the vicinity of the furnace wall by providing a raw material charging system different from a normal route and a supplemental bunker, and discharging coke from the supplemental bunker in conjunction with ore discharge from the normal bunker.
  • a raw material charging system different from a normal route and a supplemental bunker
  • discharging coke from the supplemental bunker in conjunction with ore discharge from the normal bunker.
  • it is necessary in this method to control the coke discharge from the supplemental bunker in accordance with the ore discharge from the normal bunker and the tilting position of the swivel chute its control becomes complicated.
  • Non Patent Literature 1 Kaoru Nakano, Kohei Sunahara, and Takanobu Inada, "Advanced Supporting System for Burden Distribution Control at Blast Furnace Top,” ISIJ International, 45(2005), p. 538 to 543 .
  • a range of 500 mm from the furnace wall is specified as a charging range of small lump coke
  • the relative position in radial direction in the furnace of small lump coke will vary depending on the furnace opening radius of the blast furnace.
  • the width of raw material flow to be charged via a swivel chute often becomes 500 mm or more at a stock level, and therefore it is difficult to make the raw material to be stably piled up on the terrace in a range of 500 mm from the furnace wall.
  • the raw material is made up of small lump coke and fine particle sintered ore, if part of the raw material overflows from the terrace and flows into the center side, there is risk that it hinders the gas flow in the central portion, or causes fluctuation of the gas flow.
  • the present invention has been made in view of the above described circumstances, and has its object to provide a method for charging raw material into a bell-less blast furnace, which can independently control O/C only in the vicinity of the furnace wall without requiring a new ancillary facility.
  • the present inventors have conducted various studies on the method of charging raw material for a bell-less blast furnace, which can independently control and decrease the O/C in the vicinity of the furnace wall. As a result of that, they have found a method for charging raw material, which can independently control only the O/C in the vicinity of the furnace wall without requiring a new ancillary facility by charging raw material from a chute, thereby forming a piled-up layer of the raw material having a peak in the furnace intermediate portion, and taking advantage of a segregation effect by a raw material slope in a range from that peak (hereafter, referred to as a "piled-up peak”) to the furnace wall.
  • a method for charging raw material which can independently control only the O/C in the vicinity of the furnace wall without requiring a new ancillary facility by charging raw material from a chute, thereby forming a piled-up layer of the raw material having a peak in the furnace intermediate portion, and taking advantage of a segregation effect by a raw material slope in
  • the present invention has been made based on such a study result, and its gist is the following method for charging raw material into a bell-less blast furnace.
  • a method for charging raw material into a bell-less blast furnace such that a coke layer and an ore layer are alternately piled up characterized in that a coke batch, a mixture batch of ore and coke, and an ore batch are charged in this order with respect to raw material charging from a furnace intermediate portion to a furnace wall;
  • the coke batch is piled up such that a coke surface has a piled-up peak in a range of dimensionless furnace-opening radius of 0.6 to 0.8, and forms a raw material piled-up slope which is inclined from the piled-up peak to a furnace center and to the furnace wall;
  • the mixture batch of ore and coke is charged such that a fall point of charging is on the furnace wall side from the piled-up peak of coke; and the ore batch is charged such that the fall point of charging is in a range of dimensionless furnace-opening radius of 0.5 to 0.9.
  • the above described "dimensionless furnace-opening radius” is an index to represent a position with respect to the furnace center in a raw material charging plane (raw material stock level), and also an index normalized by dividing a distance from the furnace center to the relevant position by the furnace opening radius.
  • the furnace center is represented by 0 and the furnace wall by 1.
  • furnace intermediate portion here refers to a range of dimensionless furnace-opening radius of 0.5 to 0.8.
  • the method of the present invention for charging raw material into a bell-less blast furnace it is possible to independently control and decrease O/C only in the vicinity of the furnace wall without requiring a new ancillary facility. This makes it possible to enhance the gas flow of the furnace wall side, thereby suppressing formation of furnace wall deposits, or removing deposits. Since this method for charging raw material does not significantly increase the reducing material ratio of the blast furnace, it can suppress decrease in productivity, increase in pig iron production cost, and increase in the amount of CO 2 emission.
  • the method for charging raw material according to the present invention is premised on a method for charging raw material in which coke layers and ore layers are charged to be alternately piled up, which are commonly practiced in a bell-less blast furnace as described above.
  • a coke batch, a mixture batch of ore and coke, and an ore batch are charged in this order with respect to raw material charging from the furnace intermediate portion to the furnace wall.
  • the statement "with respect to raw material charging from the furnace intermediate portion to the furnace wall” intends to focus on raw material charging in an in-furnace region excluding the center of the furnace and the furnace intermediate portion.
  • coke can be charged into the vicinity of the center of the furnace as a second charging batch 5b after being charged into a range from the furnace wall portion to the intermediate portion as a first charging batch 5a as in the past (see FIG. 1 ).
  • the coke batch is charged to pile up a coke layer such that the coke layer surface has a piled-up peak in a range of dimensionless furnace-opening radius of 0.6 to 0.8 at the end of coke charging, and forms a raw material piled-up (coke layer) slope which is inclined from the piled-up peak to a furnace center and to the furnace wall.
  • a mixture batch of ore and coke is charged such that the fall point of charging of the mixture batch is on the furnace wall side from the piled-up peak of the coke layer.
  • the reason why the coke layer is piled up such that the coke layer surface has a piled-up peak in the predetermined range of dimensionless furnace-opening radius at the end of coke charging, and forms a raw material piled-up slope which is inclined from the piled-up peak to the furnace center is because it is intended to enhance central gas flow by facilitating particle size segregation on the slope and causing raw material having larger particle sizes to be piled up in the furnace center side.
  • the reason why a slope which is inclined from the piled-up peak to the furnace wall is formed is to cause particles of larger sizes to be piled up in the vicinity of the furnace wall by taking advantage of a phenomenon of particle size segregation on the slope.
  • the piled-up peak on the coke layer surface is formed to be excessively close to the center. Further, it is preferable to prevent the raw material of the mixture batch of ore and coke to be charged after the formation of the coke layer from flowing into the center side, and to effectively take advantage of the particle segregation on the slope from the piled-up peak to the furnace wall. From these viewpoints, the piled-up peak of the coke layer is formed to be in a range of dimensionless furnace-opening radius of 0.6 to 0.8. Generally, small-and-middle lump coke is mixed in the mixture batch of ore and coke.
  • the charging position of the mixture batch of ore and coke onto the coke slope is important.
  • This charging position is made to be on the furnace wall side from the piled-up peak of the coke layer.
  • the charging position is desirably in a range of dimensionless furnace-opening radius of not more than 0.9 as described below.
  • an ore batch is charged.
  • This ore batch is charged as usual while a swivel chute is in tilting motion from the furnace wall side to the center side such that the fall point of charging is in a range of dimensionless furnace-opening radius of 0.5 to 0.9. Since charging raw material of the mixture batch of ore and coke which is piled up in the furnace wall side acts as a barrier against the ore batch piling up in the furnace wall side, the O/C in the vicinity of the furnace wall will not excessively increase, and will be kept at a low level.
  • a charging amount of the above described mixture batch of ore and coke is less than that of the ore batch, and the fall point of charging of the mixture batch of ore and coke is on the furnace wall side from the piled-up peak after completion of charging of coke, and in a range of dimensionless furnace-opening radius of not more than 0.9.
  • the reason why the charging amount of the mixture batch of ore and coke is set to be less than that of the ore batch is to prevent the raw material to be charged in the mixture batch of ore and coke from flowing over to the furnace center side from the piled-up peak of the coke layer.
  • the reason why the mixture batch of ore and coke is charged is for the purpose of bringing ore and coke into contact not as layers but as grains (that is, by disposing ore and coke in proximity), thereby facilitating reaction, and also making the coke function as an aggregate (spacer), thereby enhancing the gas flow in the furnace wall side and more effectively suppressing the formation of furnace wall deposits.
  • the above described effect can be equally obtained in both cases where the coke to be mixed with ore in the mixture of ore and coke is small-and-middle lump coke and large lump coke (coke having a particle size which is charged in an ordinary coke batch).
  • the method for charging raw material of the present invention it is possible to independently control and decrease the O/C in the vicinity of the furnace wall without requiring installment of new facility and maintenance cost associated therewith.
  • Decrease of the O/C in the vicinity of the furnace wall makes it possible to enhance the gas flow in the furnace wall side, thereby suppressing the formation of furnace wall deposits or removing the deposits.
  • it becomes possible to decrease the OC only in the vicinity of the furnace wall there is no need to significantly increase the reducing material ratio of the blast furnace, and therefore it is possible to suppress decrease in productivity, increase in pig iron production cost, and increase in the amount of CO 2 emission.
  • the subject blast furnace was a bell-less blast furnace having a furnace volume of 5,370 m 3 , and one charge was made up of a total of 4 batches including 2 batches of coke and 2 batches of ore based on charging record of a real furnace.
  • the charging amount per one charge was assumed to be 25.7 ton in total of coke batch, and 140.7 ton in total of ore batch including 4.1 ton of coke (of a particle size of 6 to 50 mm).
  • One batch out of the two batches of coke corresponds to a coke batch ("first charging batch 5a" of FIG. 2 to be described below, hereafter referred to by this term) to be charged in a range from the furnace intermediate portion to the furnace wall.
  • FIG. 2 is a diagram showing calculation results of a simulation model of raw material piled-up profile.
  • (a) is Comparative Example in which raw material charging was conducted by an ordinary operation
  • (b) is Inventive Example of the present invention in which raw material charging was conducted by the above described method of the present invention.
  • FIG. 2 shows one charge of raw material piled-up profile (that is, first and second charging batches 5a, 5b of coke, and third and fourth charging batches 5c, 5d of ore, where the third charging batch 5c includes coke).
  • the O/C in a range from the furnace intermediate portion to the furnace wall side was kept at a high level while keeping the O/C in the center portion at a low level to aim at stabilizing the central gas flow and improving reaction efficiency in a range from the furnace intermediate portion to the furnace wall side.
  • the coke layer was piled up such that the coke layer (first charging batch 5a), which was formed before the charging of ore, had a piled-up peak 6 at a dimensionless furnace-opening radius of 0.7, and formed a raw material slope which was inclined from the piled-up peak to the furnace center and to the furnace wall.
  • the raw material of the third charging batch 5c to be charged after the formation of the coke layer was assumed to be a mixture of ore and coke, and from the viewpoint of preventing the raw material of the aforementioned batch from flowing to the center portion, the tilting angle of the swivel chute was adjusted such that the raw material supplied from the swivel chute was charged at a position of a dimensionless furnace-opening radius of 0.9 which was on the furnace wall side from the piled-up peak of the coke layer.
  • Adopting such a charging method would result in that ore and coke were separated due to particle segregation on the slope of the coke layer in a range from the piled-up peak in the furnace intermediate portion to the furnace wall, and coke was piled up in the vicinity of the furnace wall.
  • the fourth charging batch 5d to be charged next was charged with the fall point of charging being in a range of dimensionless furnace-opening radius of about 0.6 to 0.8, while the swivel chute is in tilting motion from the furnace wall side to the furnace intermediate portion. Since the raw material of the third charging batch 5c which was piled up in the furnace wall side would act as a barrier against the raw material of the fourth charging batch 5d being piled up in the furnace wall side, the O/C in the vicinity of the furnace wall was kept a low level.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram showing calculation results by the simulation model of the O/C distribution in the furnace radial direction, in which the radial distribution of O/C of a furnace top portion of the blast furnace by the method for charging raw material in an ordinary operation (Comparative Example) as shown in FIG. 2(a) is compared with the radial distribution of O/C by the method for charging raw material according to the present invention shown in FIG. 2(b).
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram showing calculation results by the simulation model of the O/C distribution in the furnace radial direction, in which the radial distribution of O/C of a furnace top portion of the blast furnace by the method for charging raw material in an ordinary operation (Comparative Example) as shown in FIG. 2(a) is compared with the radial distribution of O/C by the method for charging raw material according to the present invention shown in FIG. 2(b).
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram showing calculation results by the simulation model of the O/C distribution in the furnace radial direction, in which the radial
  • FIG. 4 is a diagram showing calculation results by a simulation model of in-furnace distribution of ore and coke in an ore batch in the method for charging raw material according to the present invention, in which the piled-up peak position of the coke layer was at a dimensionless furnace-opening radius of 0.7, and the in-furnace charging position of the third charging batch was at a dimensionless furnace-opening radius of 0.9.
  • This figure reveals that a large amount of coke was piled up in the vicinity of the furnace wall as a result of particle size segregation on the coke slope.
  • the particle size of the raw material used in the experiment was about 1/5.6 of the real furnace particle size, and the charging amount per one charge was determined according to the similarity rule as: 146 kg in total of coke batches (the first and second charging batches) and 801 kg in total of ore batches (the third and fourth charging batches) including 23 kg of coke (of a particle size of 1 to 10 mm).
  • the mass ratio between the third charging batch and the fourth charging batch in Example of the present invention was set to be 10:90.
  • the piled-up peak position of the coke layer was at a dimensionless furnace-opening radius of 0.7
  • the raw material charging position of the third charging batch was at a dimensionless furnace-opening radius of 0.9 as in Example 1.
  • FIG. 5 is a diagram showing raw material piled-up profiles in the model experiment.
  • (a) shows Comparative Example in which raw material charging was conducted by an ordinary operation
  • (b) shows Inventive Example of the present invention in which raw material charging was conducted by the above described method of the present invention.
  • the raw material piled-up profile in the furnace was continuously measured by using a laser range meter. It is noted that FIG. 5 shows a raw material piled-up profile of one charge.
  • FIG. 5 reveals that in both of the case (Comparative Example) in which raw material charging was conducted by an ordinary operation, and the case in which raw material charging was conducted by the method of the present invention, the raw material piled-up profiles were substantially the same as those of the calculation results by the above described simulation model for charging material distribution.
  • FIG. 6 is a diagram showing the O/C distribution in the furnace radial direction in the model experiment, in which the radial distribution of O/C of a furnace top portion of the blast furnace by the method for charging raw material in an ordinary operation (Comparative Example) as shown in (a) of FIG. 5 is compared with the radial distribution of O/C by the method for charging raw material according to the present invention as shown in (b).
  • FIG. 6 reveals that when raw material charging was conducted by the method for charging raw material according to the present invention, the O/C from the furnace center to the furnace intermediate portion did not change significantly compared with the case of the method for charging raw material by an ordinary operation, and the O/C in the vicinity of the furnace wall decreased as in the calculation results by the simulation model (see FIG. 3 ).
  • the present invention can be effectively used at the time of raw material charging into a bell-less blast furnace.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Manufacture Of Iron (AREA)
EP13797875.5A 2012-05-28 2013-03-19 Procédé de chargement de matière première dans un haut-fourneau sans entonnoir de coulée Withdrawn EP2857529A4 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2012120631 2012-05-28
PCT/JP2013/001857 WO2013179541A1 (fr) 2012-05-28 2013-03-19 Procédé de chargement de matière première dans un haut-fourneau sans entonnoir de coulée

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2857529A1 true EP2857529A1 (fr) 2015-04-08
EP2857529A4 EP2857529A4 (fr) 2016-02-24

Family

ID=49672776

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP13797875.5A Withdrawn EP2857529A4 (fr) 2012-05-28 2013-03-19 Procédé de chargement de matière première dans un haut-fourneau sans entonnoir de coulée

Country Status (6)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2857529A4 (fr)
JP (1) JP5696814B2 (fr)
KR (1) KR101579031B1 (fr)
CN (1) CN104364397B (fr)
IN (1) IN2014DN10251A (fr)
WO (1) WO2013179541A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP6303685B2 (ja) * 2014-03-25 2018-04-04 新日鐵住金株式会社 ベルレス高炉の装入物装入方法
BR112018008267B1 (pt) * 2015-10-28 2021-09-08 Jfe Steel Corporation Método de carregar matéria-prima para dentro de alto-forno
JP6447470B2 (ja) * 2015-11-24 2019-01-09 Ｊｆｅスチール株式会社 高炉における装入物分布制御方法
JP6627718B2 (ja) * 2016-10-29 2020-01-08 Ｊｆｅスチール株式会社 高炉への原料装入方法
JP6627717B2 (ja) * 2016-10-29 2020-01-08 Ｊｆｅスチール株式会社 高炉への原料装入方法
JP2019143182A (ja) * 2018-02-19 2019-08-29 日本製鉄株式会社 高炉への原料装入方法
JP7003725B2 (ja) * 2018-02-23 2022-01-21 日本製鉄株式会社 高炉原料の装入方法
CN115023508B (zh) * 2020-01-29 2023-07-18 杰富意钢铁株式会社 向高炉中装入原料的方法
CN115418422A (zh) * 2022-09-15 2022-12-02 包头钢铁（集团）有限责任公司 一种降低高炉布料偏析的优化方法

Family Cites Families (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS58164710A (ja) * 1982-03-24 1983-09-29 Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd 高炉原料の装入方法
JPS60258402A (ja) * 1984-06-06 1985-12-20 Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd 高炉操業方法
JPS62290809A (ja) * 1986-06-10 1987-12-17 Kobe Steel Ltd 高炉の原料装入方法
JPS6447803A (en) * 1987-08-18 1989-02-22 Nippon Steel Corp Blast furnace operating method
JP3573780B2 (ja) * 1994-03-30 2004-10-06 Ｊｆｅスチール株式会社 ベルレス高炉への原料装入方法
JPH08239705A (ja) 1995-01-06 1996-09-17 Nippon Steel Corp 高炉付着物生成の抑制方法
JP3787237B2 (ja) * 1998-01-23 2006-06-21 新日本製鐵株式会社 高炉へのペレット高配合鉄鉱石の装入方法
JP3995380B2 (ja) * 1999-09-02 2007-10-24 Ｊｆｅスチール株式会社 高炉への原料装入方法
CN1596315B (zh) * 2002-08-29 2011-03-23 杰富意钢铁株式会社 无料钟高炉的原料装入方法
JP2005314771A (ja) 2004-04-30 2005-11-10 Jfe Steel Kk 高炉設備および原料装入方法
JP5135959B2 (ja) 2007-09-06 2013-02-06 Ｊｆｅスチール株式会社 高炉への原料装入方法及び原料装入装置
CN102010920A (zh) * 2010-12-24 2011-04-13 宝钢集团新疆八一钢铁有限公司 一种无钟炉顶高炉高比例球团矿炉料结构冶炼方法

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
KR20150009575A (ko) 2015-01-26
IN2014DN10251A (fr) 2015-08-07
EP2857529A4 (fr) 2016-02-24
JP5696814B2 (ja) 2015-04-08
KR101579031B1 (ko) 2015-12-18
CN104364397A (zh) 2015-02-18
JPWO2013179541A1 (ja) 2016-01-18
WO2013179541A1 (fr) 2013-12-05
CN104364397B (zh) 2016-08-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2857529A1 (fr) Procédé de chargement de matière première dans un haut-fourneau sans entonnoir de coulée
JP4971812B2 (ja) 高炉操業方法
JP5515288B2 (ja) 高炉への原料装入方法
JP5338309B2 (ja) 高炉への原料装入方法
JP4765723B2 (ja) 高炉への鉱石装入方法
JP6198649B2 (ja) 高炉の原料装入方法
JP5029085B2 (ja) 高炉炉底部耐火物の保護方法
JP5338308B2 (ja) 高炉への原料装入方法
JP5338310B2 (ja) 高炉への原料装入方法
JP3975692B2 (ja) 高炉用ベルレス式炉頂装入装置の分配シュート構造
JP4759985B2 (ja) 高炉操業方法
JP4604788B2 (ja) 高炉操業方法
JP3700457B2 (ja) 高炉の操業方法
JP6950718B2 (ja) ベルレス高炉の原料装入方法
JP6558518B1 (ja) 高炉の原料装入方法
JP2018070954A (ja) 高炉への原料装入方法
JP3779815B2 (ja) 高炉操業方法
JP5338311B2 (ja) 高炉への原料装入方法
JP3700458B2 (ja) 低Ｓｉ溶銑の製造方法
JP2000199005A (ja) 高炉中心ガス流の制御方法
JPH0978110A (ja) 高炉の操業方法
JP4941122B2 (ja) 高炉操業方法
JP5292845B2 (ja) 焼結機への原料装入方法
JP2005264292A (ja) ベルレス原料装入装置を備えた高炉での原料装入方法
JPH07228904A (ja) 高炉の操業方法

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20141223

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
RA4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched (corrected)

Effective date: 20160125

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: C21B 5/00 20060101AFI20160119BHEP

Ipc: C21B 7/20 20060101ALI20160119BHEP

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20160617

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: NAKANO, KAORU

Inventor name: NATSUI, TAKUYA

Inventor name: INADA, TAKANOBU

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20161028