EP2550072B1 - Procédé de prévention et de détection de la manipulation frauduleuse de couches grattables sur substrats, et substrats associés - Google Patents

Procédé de prévention et de détection de la manipulation frauduleuse de couches grattables sur substrats, et substrats associés Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2550072B1
EP2550072B1 EP10801275.8A EP10801275A EP2550072B1 EP 2550072 B1 EP2550072 B1 EP 2550072B1 EP 10801275 A EP10801275 A EP 10801275A EP 2550072 B1 EP2550072 B1 EP 2550072B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
scratch
release layer
coating
area
substrate
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP10801275.8A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP2550072A1 (fr
Inventor
Jr. Kenneth Earl Irwin
Gary Streeter
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Scientific Games Holdings Ltd
Original Assignee
Scientific Games Holdings Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Scientific Games Holdings Ltd filed Critical Scientific Games Holdings Ltd
Publication of EP2550072A1 publication Critical patent/EP2550072A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2550072B1 publication Critical patent/EP2550072B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A63—SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
    • A63F—CARD, BOARD, OR ROULETTE GAMES; INDOOR GAMES USING SMALL MOVING PLAYING BODIES; VIDEO GAMES; GAMES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • A63F3/00—Board games; Raffle games
    • A63F3/06—Lottos or bingo games; Systems, apparatus or devices for checking such games
    • A63F3/065—Tickets or accessories for use therewith
    • A63F3/0665—Tickets or accessories for use therewith having a message becoming legible after rubbing-off a coating or removing an adhesive layer
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A63—SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
    • A63F—CARD, BOARD, OR ROULETTE GAMES; INDOOR GAMES USING SMALL MOVING PLAYING BODIES; VIDEO GAMES; GAMES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • A63F2250/00—Miscellaneous game characteristics
    • A63F2250/58—Antifraud or preventing misuse

Definitions

  • the present disclosure relates in general to methodologies for securing scratch-off lottery tickets and commercial tickets/coupons against assisted and unassisted mechanical lifts and reapplication, as well as a method for protecting against the fraud of recycling losing tickets by the reprinting of a Scratch-Off-Coating (SOC).
  • SOC Scratch-Off-Coating
  • the term 'mechanical lift' refers to a process that uses a flat blade (e.g., X-Acto chisel blade #17) or other device to peel back a portion of a Scratch-Off-Coating (SOC) to reveal previously hidden indicia. The SOC is then glued back into place such that it is not obvious that the integrity of the coating has been breached.
  • a flat blade e.g., X-Acto chisel blade #17
  • SOC Scratch-Off-Coating
  • Another form of fraud involves completely removing the SOC, viewing the indicia, and then reprinting a new SOC on the non-winning products (via silk screen or other printing methodology) that is similar in appearance to the original SOC such that an unsuspecting customer would purchase the modified product assuming it is pristine.
  • WO 00/09344 A1 discloses a ticket with a substrate, on optional primer overlying the substrate, a release layer overlying the substrate or the primer, and a scratch-off coating overlying the release layer.
  • a laser is used to create voids in the release layer, e.g., the letters "W", "I”, "N”. Scratch-off material in said voids permanently adheres to the substrate or the primer and is not removed when a coin is scratched over the ticket.
  • the scratch-off coating material in these voids forms the word "WIN”.
  • CA 2 537 196 A1 discloses a foil layer, which is placed on a basic cardstock.
  • the foil layer has an embossed area that provides a pattern having a visual attractiveness.
  • Foil layers applied to lottery ticket substrates are well known in the art for providing a visually distinct appearance.
  • An integrity layer is applied over the foil layer, and game data is printed on top of the integrity layer.
  • a seal coat is applied over the game data, and a scratch-off layer is applied over the seal coat.
  • a method for deterring and detecting fraudulent removal of a scratch-off coating (SOC) from a substrate having at least one scratch-off area.
  • a release layer is applied over the scratch-off area, and a scratch-off coating is applied over the release layer.
  • the release layer is modified to have non-uniform release properties over the scratch-off area such that the scratch-off coating cannot be lifted or removed as a single continuous layer, but underlying indicia or images in the scratch-off area are still visually discernable upon removal of the scratch-off coating in a normal intended removal process, for example by scraping the SOC with a coin, fingernail, and so forth. In this manner, attempts at assisted lifting or removal and reapplication of the scratch-off coating results in visually apparent evidence of such attempts.
  • the release layer is applied as a discontinuous layer over the scratch-off area, resulting in the scratch-off coating being removed from the substrate in areas where the release layer is present but remaining on the substrate in areas where the release layer is absent.
  • the release layer may be applied with a pattern of holes.
  • the surface of the release layer is modified to be irregular or non-smooth, wherein the scratch-off coating flows into the irregular surface features upon application thereof and prevents removal of the scratch-off coating as a single continuous layer.
  • the thickness of the release layer may be varied such that raised and lowered thickness areas are defined in the release layer.
  • the release layer is formed in multiple levels creating a series of raised planes to which the scratch-off coating is applied.
  • the surface of the release layer is formed or modified to be rough or irregular such that cavities are created into which the scratch-off coating flows and cures.
  • a substrate is provided with a scratch-off area, a release layer over the scratch-off area, and a scratch-off coating applied over the release layer.
  • the release layer has a modified non-smooth surface creating non-uniform release properties such that the scratch-off coating cannot be lifted or removed from the release layer as a single continuous layer, while underlying indicia or images in the scratch-off area remain visually discernable upon removal of the scratch-off coating in a normal intended removal process. In this manner, attempts at assisted lifting or removal and reapplication of the scratch-off coating results in visually apparent evidence of such attempts.
  • the release layer may be formed with the properties from any of the methods discussed above.
  • FIG. 2 to 4 illustrate embodiments which are not subject of the claimed invention.
  • Each example is provided by way of explanation of the invention, not limitation of the invention.
  • various modifications and variations can be made in the present invention without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention.
  • features illustrated or described as part of one embodiment can be used with another embodiment to yield a still further embodiment.
  • the present invention covers such modifications and variations as come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a lottery ticket 100 where the scratch-off area 101 SOC has been mechanically lifted in six places 102, but not reapplied into proper registration with the other graphics on the ticket.
  • a skilled technician can perform SOC lifts and replacements with little impact in registration on most tickets such that the ticket would pass as pristine under normal inspection.
  • the ability for the skilled technician to perform these SOC lifts and replacements without detection varies with ticket design, with more complex graphics in the scratch-off area(s) greatly increasing the difficulty.
  • a photographic reproduction of people or familiar objects in the scratch-off area(s) of a ticket makes it practically impossible to perform a mechanical lift/reapplication without leaving a telltale mark.
  • the problem with this approach is that it is difficult to maintain an environment conducive to low cost photographic reproduction.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates an example of this embodiment not subject of the claimed invention.
  • the six scratch-off areas 101 of the ticket 100 all include Benday overprints 111 that cover both the scratch-off areas 101 as well as a portion of the background ticket substrate 103.
  • Benday overprints 111 that cover both the scratch-off areas 101 as well as a portion of the background ticket substrate 103.
  • FIG. 3 provides an illustration of how the Benday patterns 111 provide a ready visual indication 115 that a mechanical lift/reapplication has been attempted in the six scratch-off areas, even to someone that is not necessarily aware of the technique.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates how the same Benday patterns 111 would also protect against reprinting of the entire SOC in the six scratch-off areas, by readily showing a registration failure 260 between the replacement SOC and the ticket substrate 103 that is not apparent in non-tampered tickets.
  • protection of the integrity of the SOC is provided by alterations to the release material associated with the SOC rather than by an elaborate overprint.
  • Scratch-off tickets typically employ a release coating layer beneath the SOC opaque and decorative layers.
  • the release layer causes any coatings placed over it to easily scratch-off.
  • the physical nature of the scratch-off coating varies from manufacturer to manufacturer (e.g., wax base, UV coating, etc.) and has been documented in numerous other patents as well as many public domain documents and is not essential to the present description.
  • the release layer is specified as a continuous film providing a foundation from which all subsequent layers of ink film will scratch-off, allowing for the one-time reveal that is typical of scratch-off tickets.
  • the problem with this homogeneous continuous release film is that it provides an excellent base for SOC mechanical lifts and/or replacement of the SOC by devious means.
  • a release film with partial coverage causes the SOC to release easily from some areas and not at all from others, thereby making it difficult if not impossible to lift or reprint the SOC even with mechanical assists.
  • the release film 200 is applied as illustrated in FIG. 5 with a pattern of dots (holes) 201 in which no release film is present.
  • the dots 201 are small enough they will not hinder the normal scratching process or obscure the imaged indicia.
  • the presence of a non-continuous release film with holes large enough to prohibit lifting of the SOC will greatly hinder or render impossible mechanical lifting of the SOC due to the dotted areas with no release that would effectively block a sharp X-Acto or razor blade from raising a smooth film.
  • the pattern of dots (holes) 201 would also make it extremely difficult to reapply a new SOC to the scratched off area(s) due to registration problems with the SOC overprint and the multiplicity of dots.
  • the dot pattern is described in for this particular embodiment.
  • FIG. 6 illustrates an irregular or rough SOC film 202, printed on a ticket substrate 103, above the win or lose indicia 252, with opaque and decorative overprints 253 printed on top of the irregular release film 202.
  • the irregular release film surface 202 when initially applied and not completely cured allows for subsequent SOC ink film layers to flow into the irregular surfaces forming a homogeneous and opaque covering 253.
  • the irregularities in the release film may be generated by planned deformities in the Flexographic printing plate (or other type of printing) that applies the release film to the ticket substrate 103.
  • the rough/irregular surface of the release film 202 is not so irregular that it significantly impacts removal of the SOC by normal consumer scratching with a relatively blunt coin or other object.
  • the rough/irregular surface of the release film 202 functions as a series of 'speed bumps' that repeatedly catch the sharp edge of the X-Acto or razor blade typically used in mechanical lifts causing the blades to jerk and not lift a continuous patch.
  • the irregular release film surface 202 does allow removal of the majority of the SOC 253 with blunt coins and other objects (e.g., fingernail), it does allow for microscopic parts of the SOC 253 to remain. While these microscopic SOC remnants are not sufficient to significantly impact viewing of the revealed play indicia 252, the remnants do intermingle with any fresh SOC ink coating(s) reapplied to a played ticket, such that the resulting ink films appear tampered with and would be unlikely to be accepted by a consumer as pristine.
  • the release film coating thickness can be varied, producing a series of plateaus, which halt or disrupt any mechanical lifting attempts.
  • the release film 203 is applied in multiple levels, resulting in a series of planes to which the SOC ink film(s) 253 are applied.
  • the multiple levels of release coating could be achieved by altering the line screen on a single Flexographic printing plate or by the application of multiple printing plates.
  • Krylon clear spray contains keytones, petroleum distillates, toluene, naphthalene, acetone, and ethyl 3-ethoxypropionate. Dyes exist that responds to one of these ingredients. These dyes could be applied as an overcoat to the ticket's scratch area and serve as an obvious indication of attempted "assisted lift" tampering.
  • FIG. 8 provides an exemplary illustration of this embodiment.
  • the lottery ticket 100 has special dyes 255 that are sensitive to one of the key ingredients in the assisted lift medium (e.g., Krylon).

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Educational Technology (AREA)
  • Multimedia (AREA)
  • Credit Cards Or The Like (AREA)
  • Measurement Of The Respiration, Hearing Ability, Form, And Blood Characteristics Of Living Organisms (AREA)
  • Image Input (AREA)

Claims (14)

  1. Procédé pour dissuader et détecter une suppression frauduleuse d'un revêtement à gratter (SOC) depuis un substrat (103), comprenant les étapes suivantes :
    former un substrat (103) comportant au moins une zone à gratter (101) ;
    fournir des indices ou des images (252) dans la zone à gratter (101) ;
    appliquer une couche détachable (200 ; 202 ; 203) sur la zone à gratter (101) et les indices ou les images (252), ladite couche détachable (200 ; 202 ; 203) comportant une surface non-lisse formée ou modifiée au-dessus de la zone à gratter (101), y inclue la zone dans laquelle les indices ou les images (252) sont réalisés ;
    appliquer un revêtement à gratter (253) sur la couche détachable (200 ; 202 ; 203), les indices ou les images (252) étant sous-jacents au revêtement à gratter (253) ;
    ladite couche détachable (200 ; 202 ; 203) étant formée ou modifiée pour avoir des propriétés de décollage non-uniformes sur la zone à gratter (101), y inclue la zone dans laquelle les indices ou les images (252) sont réalisés, de sorte que des parties du revêtement à gratter (253) demeurent et les indices ou les images (252) dans la zone à gratter (101) sous-jacente au revêtement à gratter (253) avec lesdites propriétés de décollage non-uniformes soient visuellement discernables après la suppression du revêtement à gratter (253) dans un processus de suppression normal intentionnel, mais que le revêtement à gratter (253) ne puisse pas être décollé ou supprimé en tant que couche unique continue et réappliqué sans aboutir à une preuve visuellement apparente d'une telle tentative.
  2. Méthode selon la revendication 1, dans laquelle la couche détachable (200 ; 202 ; 203) est appliquée en tant que couche discontinue sur la zone à gratter (101), donnant lieu au revêtement à gratter (253) qui est enlevé du substrat dans des zones dans lesquelles la couche détachable (200 ; 202 ; 203) est présente, mais qui demeure sur le substrat (103) dans les zones où la couche détachable (200 ; 202 ; 203) est absente.
  3. Méthode selon la revendication 1, dans laquelle la couche détachable (200) est appliquée avec un motif de trous (201).
  4. Méthode selon la revendication 1, dans laquelle la surface de la couche détachable (202 ; 203) est modifiée pour être irrégulière ou non lisse, dans laquelle le revêtement à gratter (253) coule dans les caractéristiques de la surface irrégulière à l'application sur cette dernière et empêche l'enlèvement du revêtement à gratter (253) en tant que couche continue unique.
  5. Méthode selon la revendication 4, dans laquelle l'épaisseur de la couche détachable (202 ; 203) est variée de sorte que des zones d'épaisseur surélevée et surbaissée soient définies dans la couche détachable (202 ; 203).
  6. Méthode selon la revendication 4, dans laquelle la couche détachable (203) est formée à des niveaux multiples, créant une série de plans surélevés auxquels est appliqué le revêtement à gratter (253).
  7. Méthode selon la revendication 4, dans laquelle la surface de la couche détachable (202) est irrégulière et crée des cavités dans lesquelles le revêtement à gratter (253) coule et durcit.
  8. Substrat, comportant :
    une zone à gratter (101) ;
    des indices ou des images (252) dans la zone à gratter (101) ;
    une couche détachable (200 ; 202 ; 203) sur la zone à gratter (101) et les indices ou images (252) ;
    ladite couche détachable (200 ; 202 ; 203) comportant une surface non-lisse formée ou modifiée au-dessus de la zone à gratter (101), y inclue la zone dans laquelle les indices ou les images (252) sont réalisés ;
    un revêtement à gratter (253) est appliqué sur la couche détachable, les indices ou les images (252) étant sous-jacents au revêtement à gratter (253) ;
    ladite couche détachable (200 ; 202 ; 203) créant des propriétés de décollage de sorte que des parties du revêtement à gratter (253) demeurent et les indices ou les images (252) dans la zone à gratter (101) sous-jacente à ladite surface non-lisse de ladite couche détachable (200 ; 202 ; 203) soient visuellement discernables après l'enlèvement du revêtement à gratter (253) dans un processus d'enlèvement normal intentionnel, mais que le revêtement à gratter (253) ne puisse pas être levé ou enlevé de la couche détachable (200 ; 202 ; 203) en tant que couche unique continue et ne puisse être réappliqué sans aboutir à une preuve visuellement apparente d'une telle tentatives.
  9. Substrat selon la revendication 8, dans laquelle la couche détachable (200 ; 202 ; 203) est une couche discontinue sur la zone à gratter (101), donnant lieu au revêtement à gratter (253) qui est enlevé du substrat (103) dans les zones dans lesquelles la couche détachable (200 ; 202 ; 203) est présente, mais qui demeure sur le substrat (103) dans les zones où la couche détachable (200 ; 202 ; 203) est absente.
  10. Substrat selon la revendication 9, dans lequel la couche détachable (200) comprend un motif de trous (201).
  11. Substrat selon la revendication 8, dans lequel la couche détachable (202 ; 203) comporte une surface irrégulière ou non lisse, dans lequel le revêtement à gratter (253) coule dans les caractéristiques irrégulières de la surface à l'application sur cette dernière et empêche l'enlèvement du revêtement à gratter (253) en tant que couche continue unique.
  12. Substrat selon la revendication 11, dans lequel la couche détachable (202 ; 203) comporte une épaisseur non-uniforme avec des zones d'épaisseur surélevée et surbaissée.
  13. Substrat selon la revendication 11, dans lequel la couche détachable (203) comporte des niveaux multiples, créant une série de plans surélevés auxquels est appliqué le revêtement à gratter (253).
  14. Substrat selon la revendication 11, dans lequel la couche détachable (202) comporte une surface irrégulière rugueuse avec des cavités, dans lesquelles le revêtement à gratter (253) coule et durcit.
EP10801275.8A 2010-03-23 2010-11-30 Procédé de prévention et de détection de la manipulation frauduleuse de couches grattables sur substrats, et substrats associés Active EP2550072B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US34080610P 2010-03-23 2010-03-23
PCT/IB2010/055513 WO2011117688A1 (fr) 2010-03-23 2010-11-30 Procédé de prévention et de détection d'une manipulation frauduleuse de films à gratter appliqués sur des substrats, et substrats associés

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2550072A1 EP2550072A1 (fr) 2013-01-30
EP2550072B1 true EP2550072B1 (fr) 2015-09-30

Family

ID=43735849

Family Applications (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP10805505A Ceased EP2550073A1 (fr) 2010-03-23 2010-11-30 Procédé de prévention et de détection d'une manipulation frauduleuse de films à gratter appliqués sur des substrats, et substrats associés
EP10801274.1A Active EP2550071B1 (fr) 2010-03-23 2010-11-30 Procédé de prévention et de détection de la manipulation frauduleuse de couches grattables sur substrats, et substrats associés
EP10801275.8A Active EP2550072B1 (fr) 2010-03-23 2010-11-30 Procédé de prévention et de détection de la manipulation frauduleuse de couches grattables sur substrats, et substrats associés

Family Applications Before (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP10805505A Ceased EP2550073A1 (fr) 2010-03-23 2010-11-30 Procédé de prévention et de détection d'une manipulation frauduleuse de films à gratter appliqués sur des substrats, et substrats associés
EP10801274.1A Active EP2550071B1 (fr) 2010-03-23 2010-11-30 Procédé de prévention et de détection de la manipulation frauduleuse de couches grattables sur substrats, et substrats associés

Country Status (4)

Country Link
EP (3) EP2550073A1 (fr)
CA (3) CA2793804C (fr)
ES (2) ES2551385T3 (fr)
WO (3) WO2011117687A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10456661B2 (en) * 2016-07-19 2019-10-29 Hydragraphix Llc Enhanced security and printability of instant ticket scratch-off-coatings via stochastic overprints
US11807028B1 (en) 2022-12-13 2023-11-07 Igt Global Solutions Corporation Scratch-off document altering and copying countermeasures

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5667250A (en) * 1992-05-07 1997-09-16 Behm; William F. Game ticket confusion patterns
US5601887A (en) * 1994-02-14 1997-02-11 Dittler Brothers Incorporated Embossed card
US5681065A (en) * 1994-12-09 1997-10-28 Webcraft Technologies, Inc. Recyclable instant scratch-off lottery ticket with improved security to prevent unauthorized detection of lottery indicia
CA2176175C (fr) * 1995-06-07 1999-08-24 Jean-Pierre Desbiens Surimpression multi-couleur de billets de loterie que l'on gratte
US6106932A (en) * 1997-06-24 2000-08-22 Dittler Brothers, Inc. Laser image sublimation in scratch-off coating applications
GB2352422A (en) * 1999-07-26 2001-01-31 Oberthur Gaming Tech Inc A tamper indicating scratch off lottery ticket or other printed document
DE102005005615A1 (de) * 2005-02-08 2006-10-05 Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh Sichern von Information
CA2537196C (fr) * 2006-03-01 2007-10-23 Brett Taylor Billet de loterie imprime sur une feuille gaufree

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA2793804A1 (fr) 2011-09-29
CA2793803C (fr) 2016-01-05
CA2793802A1 (fr) 2011-09-29
WO2011117689A1 (fr) 2011-09-29
CA2793803A1 (fr) 2011-09-29
CA2793804C (fr) 2018-01-02
CA2793802C (fr) 2017-02-28
WO2011117687A1 (fr) 2011-09-29
ES2551385T3 (es) 2015-11-18
EP2550071A1 (fr) 2013-01-30
EP2550073A1 (fr) 2013-01-30
WO2011117688A1 (fr) 2011-09-29
ES2555392T3 (es) 2015-12-30
EP2550071B1 (fr) 2015-11-11
EP2550072A1 (fr) 2013-01-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4591190A (en) Voucher with self-contained verification means
US20120025516A1 (en) Secure Lottery Ticket Using Hybrid Construction
US10456661B2 (en) Enhanced security and printability of instant ticket scratch-off-coatings via stochastic overprints
US20070224398A1 (en) Brand Protection Label With A Tamper Evident Abrasion-Removable Magnetic Ink
JP2009255574A (ja) スクラッチオフ書類およびその印刷方法
US20060006639A1 (en) Lottery ticket with metailized scratchoff layer
EP2550072B1 (fr) Procédé de prévention et de détection de la manipulation frauduleuse de couches grattables sur substrats, et substrats associés
US20120018994A1 (en) Lottery ticket with holographic appearance
CA2709564C (fr) Billet de loterie a aspect holographique
KR20070065426A (ko) 스크래치식 인쇄물
CA2091723C (fr) Configuration de confusion pour billet de jeu
JP4003632B2 (ja) 可変情報印刷物
KR101164549B1 (ko) 게임데이터 위변조 방지를 위한 즉석식 복권의 인쇄구조 및 그 인쇄방법
JP2004255687A (ja) 可変情報を施した籤類
JP2004025698A (ja) 情報カード
EP3389802B1 (fr) Billet de loterie instantanée à gratter à marqueur de sécurité luminescent
CN209879995U (zh) 定位揭镂多重防伪标识
US20040157046A1 (en) Gaming ticket
JP6060594B2 (ja) スクラッチカード
CA1212395A (fr) Piece comptable a autoverification
JPH11299959A (ja) スクラッチシート
JP2003195766A (ja) 遮蔽シール
JP2000309183A (ja) スクラッチ印刷物

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20120919

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20140317

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20150416

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 752046

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20151015

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 6

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602010027939

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2551385

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

Effective date: 20151118

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151230

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150930

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150930

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150930

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151231

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20150930

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 752046

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20150930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150930

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150930

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150930

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150930

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160130

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150930

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150930

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160201

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150930

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150930

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602010027939

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151130

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150930

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20151130

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20151130

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150930

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20160701

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160601

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20151130

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 7

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20101130

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150930

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150930

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 8

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150930

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150930

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: 732E

Free format text: REGISTERED BETWEEN 20230615 AND 20230621

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20231013

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20231208

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20231113

Year of fee payment: 14

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20231010

Year of fee payment: 14