EP2476311A1 - Procédé de lutte contre des insectes nuisibles par vibration - Google Patents
Procédé de lutte contre des insectes nuisibles par vibration Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2476311A1 EP2476311A1 EP10815378A EP10815378A EP2476311A1 EP 2476311 A1 EP2476311 A1 EP 2476311A1 EP 10815378 A EP10815378 A EP 10815378A EP 10815378 A EP10815378 A EP 10815378A EP 2476311 A1 EP2476311 A1 EP 2476311A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- vibrations
- insect pest
- related species
- beetle
- vibration
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01M—CATCHING, TRAPPING OR SCARING OF ANIMALS; APPARATUS FOR THE DESTRUCTION OF NOXIOUS ANIMALS OR NOXIOUS PLANTS
- A01M29/00—Scaring or repelling devices, e.g. bird-scaring apparatus
- A01M29/22—Scaring or repelling devices, e.g. bird-scaring apparatus using vibrations
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a method for controlling insect pests with vibrations.
- Vibrations are known to be an important and common signal for insects that cause behaviors such as repellence, attraction, mating, feeding, oviposition and the like. Therefore, it may be possible to control the behavior of various insect pests by artificially controlling a vibration signal. Examples of such control include positive behavior control against beneficial insects and negative behavior control against insect pests. Examples of positive behavior control include the attraction to a target insect pest of natural enemies and predators used as an insect pest control resource, the attraction of pet insect beetles, and the settlement of honey bees, which are domesticated insects. Further, examples of negative behavior control include controlling an insect pest through repellence or by inhibiting its mating, feeding, oviposition and the like.
- an insect pest control method that uses vibrations that propagate through wood is an example of insect pest control that utilizes such behavior control. Since this method can be thought of as a physical control, it has the advantage of not suffering from the problem of chemical resistance, which is a universal problem for chemically synthesized pesticides, or the problem of having an adverse impact on the human body, the environment, or a non-target organism. Therefore, this method will contribute to the development of environmentally-friendly insect pest control technologies as a substitute for chemical agents that for a long time have been demanded by society due to the appearance of insect pests that have resistance to chemical agents and increased awareness about environmental and food safety.
- Non-Patent Documents 1 and 2 disclose attempts to control the mulberry borer by inhibiting a feeding behavior and an oviposition behavior with fig branch vibrations. Further, Patent Documents 1 and 2 disclose a control device for house insect pests that uses ultrasounds.
- the present invention relates to a method for controlling an insect behavior with vibrations, comprising:
- the present invention relates to the method according to claim 1, wherein the frequency range is 5 Hz to 5 kHz In addition, the present invention relates to the above-described method, wherein the frequency range is 25 Hz to 1 kHz.
- the present invention relates to the above-described method, wherein the amplitude range is 0.001 m/s 2 or more. Still further, the present invention relates to the above-described method, wherein the amplitude range is 0.05 m/s 2 to 100 m/s 2 . Further, the present invention relates to the above-described method, wherein vibrations of a duration of 5 s or less are applied at least once. In addition, the present invention relates to the above-described method, wherein vibrations are applied two or more times, and an interval between applying vibrations is 100 ms or more to 100 s or less. Further, the present invention relates to the above-described method, wherein vibrations are directly applied on the habitat medium.
- the present invention relates to the above-described method, wherein the habitat medium is a plant or a structure, and vibrations are applied to the plant or structure by applying vibrations to a contact area supporting the plant or structure.
- the present invention relates to the above-described method, wherein the vibrations are produced in the habitat medium of an insect pest using a super-magnetostrictive element.
- the present invention relates to the above-described method, wherein the insect pest behavior that is controlled is one type or two or more types selected from search, orientation, arrest, aggregation, feeding, mating, oviposition, escape, freezing, and warning.
- the present invention relates to the above-described method, further comprising a step of determining a frequency range of vibrations that are generated in a habitat medium of an insect pest.
- the present invention relates to the above-described method for controlling an insect pest, wherein the insect pest is a forest, wood, or fruit tree insect pest, a house, sanitary, or stored grain insect pest, or an agricultural insect pest. Still further, the present invention relates to the above-described method for controlling an insect pest, wherein the insect pest is the long-horned beetle, bark beetle, powder-post beetle, deathwatch beetle, Japanese rhinoceros beetle, or psylla.
- the present invention relates to the above-described method for controlling an insect pest, wherein the insect pest is one or two or more species of insect pest selected from the Japanese pine sawyer and related species ( Monochamus ), the Asian long-horned beetle and related species ( Anoplophora ), the yellow-spotted longicorn beetle ( Psacothea hilaris) , the mulberry borer ( Apriona japonica ), the cryptomeria bark borer ( Semanotus japonicus ), the oak platypodid beetle and related species ( Platypus ), the spruce bark beetle and related species ( Ips, Dendroctonus) , the powder-post beetle and related species ( Lyctus ), Nicobium hirtum and related species (Nicobium, Ernobius) , the coconut rhinoceros beetle and related species (Oryctes ), and the Asian citrus psylla and related species (Diaphor
- the present invention relates to the above-described method for controlling an insect pest, wherein the insect pest is one or two or more species selected from among termites or cockroaches.
- the present invention relates to the above-described method for controlling an insect pest, wherein the insect pest is one or two or more species of insect pest selected from the Formosan subterranean termite and related species ( Coptotermes ), the Japanese subterranean termite and related species ( Reticulitermes ), the western drywood termite and related species ( Incisitermes ), the Daikoku drywood termite and related species ( Cryptotermes ), the Nevada damp-wood termite ( Zootermopsis nevadensis), the smoky-brown cockroach, the American cockroach and related species ( Periplaneta ), and the German cockroach and related species ( Blattella ).
- the present invention relates to the above-described method for controlling an insect pest, comprising using a super-magnetostrictive element to produce vibrations in a habitat medium of the insect pest.
- the present invention relates to the above-described method for controlling an insect pest, wherein a frequency range of the vibrations is 5 Hz to 5 kHz and an amplitude range of the vibrations is 0.001 m/s 2 or more.
- the present invention relates to the above-described method for controlling an insect pest, wherein the insect pest is the Japanese pine sawyer.
- Non-Patent Document 3 As described above, it is known that insect behavior is controlled when an insect detects vibrations, especially vibrations of a specific frequency and amplitude (Non-Patent Document 3). Further, as described above, examples of attempts to control an insect pest using vibrations are also known (Non-Patent Documents 1 and 2). However, it was not known until now that for such control it is essential to specify the vibration frequency and amplitude that are required to control insect pest behavior, and to precisely control that frequency and amplitude. Moreover, no adequate control effect has ever been proven based on such a control attempt. Therefore, enabling an insect pest to be controlled with vibrations, which is an advantageous effect of the present invention, is a remarkable effect that could not have been expected based on the conventional art.
- the term "habitat medium” means any substrate in which insects live or occur. This term encompasses any substrate, including living organisms such as plants and animals, as well as structures such as buildings and soil. Further, in laboratory experiments, the term “habitat medium” includes artificial media other than substrates in which a target insect lives or is settled in a natural environment. Further, in the present invention, the term “vibration” means something that is propagated through a substrate other than air as a medium. Therefore, although “vibration” in the present invention does not include the sound per se that is a stimulus on hearing, for which air is the medium, this term does include the vibrations in the medium that produce the sound. In the present invention, the expression “control an insect pest” includes, in addition to reducing the habitat density of an insect pest in a habitat medium, reducing the damage to the habitat medium by the insect pest (feeding damage, transmission of other harmful organisms etc.).
- the method according to the present invention is a method for controlling an insect pest with vibrations, which includes the following steps (a) and (b):
- Step (a) is, as stated above, a step of determining a frequency range and an amplitude range of vibrations in a habitat medium of a control target insect pest that induce or suppress a specific behavior of the insect pest.
- the frequency range and amplitude range can be determined by specifying, for example, a target insect pest species and a behavior that is targeted for control, applying vibrations consisting of a combination of various frequencies and amplitudes on the insect pest using a signal generator and a vibration exciter, observing and recording the behavior, and specifying the combination of frequency and amplitude thresholds that control this behavior.
- the insect pest behavior that is targeted for control is not especially limited. Examples thereof may include search, orientation, arrest, aggregation, feeding, mating, oviposition, escape, freezing, and warning.
- the site where the vibrations are produced may be the actual habitat medium where the target insect pest is settled, or may be some other medium, such as a contact area that propagates the vibrations to the habitat medium.
- the vibration frequency range is not especially limited. This frequency range may be, for example, 5 Hz to 5 kHz, and 20 Hz to 1 kHz is preferred. Further, a vibration frequency range that includes all or a part of the frequency band defined as a "sweep" or “noise” is also effective, and is in fact preferred. Further, it is preferred to combine two or more frequencies, as this is effective in avoiding adaptation. Examples of combined frequencies include a frequency of 5 Hz to 1 kHz and a frequency of 1 kHz to 5 kHz, a frequency of 20 Hz to 500 kHz and a frequency of 500 kHz to 1 kHz or the like.
- the vibration amplitude range is also not especially limited, and may be set based on the target insect pest species and the behavior that is targeted for control, for example.
- a preferred example of this amplitude range is 0.001 m/s 2 or more, more preferred is a range of 0.01 m/s 2 to 100 m/s 2 , still more preferred is a range of 0.05 m/s 2 to 100 m/s 2 , and especially preferred is a range of 0.05 m/s 2 to 10 m/s 2 . Therefore, a combination of a frequency range and an amplitude range that combines the above frequency ranges and amplitude ranges is preferred.
- a combination of a frequency range of 5 Hz to 5 kHz and an amplitude range of 0.001 m/s 2 or more, 0.01 m/s 2 to 100 m/s 2 , 0.05 m/s 2 to 100 m/s 2 , or 0.05 m/s 2 to 10 m/s 2 is preferred.
- the duration of the applied vibrations is not especially limited, and may be set as appropriate.
- the method according to the present invention preferably includes applying vibrations of a duration of 1 ms or more to 5 s or less at least once. More preferably, the method according to the present invention includes applying vibrations of a duration of 5 ms to 500 ms at least once.
- the number of times of applying vibrations is also not especially limited, and may be set as appropriate.
- the number of times of applying vibrations is preferably two times or more.
- the duration of the respective vibrations and the interval between applying vibrations is not especially limited, and may be set as appropriate. Further, this duration and interval may be the same or set differently for the respective vibrations. It is preferred that the method according to the present invention includes applying vibrations of a duration of 5 s or less at least once, applying vibrations of a duration of 1 ms or more to 5 s or less at least once, or applying vibrations of a duration of 5 ms to 500 ms or less at least once.
- a method in which the interval between applying vibrations is 100 ms or more to 100 s or less is preferred, a method in which this interval is 200 ms to 60 s is more preferred, a method in which this interval is 500 ms to 10 s is still more preferred, and a method in which this interval is 1 s to 3 s is especially preferred.
- the waveform of the applied vibrations is not especially limited, and may be either a sine wave or a non-sinusoidal wave, such as a square wave, a triangle wave, or a sawtooth wave.
- Step (b) is a step of producing vibrations in the above frequency range and amplitude range once or two or more times in the insect pest habitat medium.
- the habitat medium is typically an ordinary tree, a fruit tree, an ornamental tree, a garden tree, a bonsai tree, a seedling, a roadside tree, a natural forest, an artificial tree, or a crop, which may each be outdoors or indoors, as well as the structure per se or a contact area of a house and the like.
- the vibrations are directly applied to the habitat medium.
- the insect pest behavior that is targeted for control is not especially limited. Examples thereof may include search, orientation, arrest, aggregation, feeding, mating, oviposition, escape, freezing, and warning.
- the site where the vibrations are produced may be the actual habitat medium where the target insect is settled, or may be some other medium that propagates the vibrations to the habitat medium.
- the frequency range is not especially limited, and may be set based on the target insect pest species and the behavior that is targeted for control, for example. However, a low frequency range is preferred. Such a frequency is especially preferred against Japanese pine sawyer. More preferred is 10 Hz to 5 kHz, and still more preferred 25 Hz to 1 kHz. Further, to prevent the insect pest species targeted for control from adaptation to the vibrations, it is effective, and in fact preferred, to apply vibrations which combine two or more values of frequencies, rather than use one single value of frequency.
- the vibration amplitude range is not especially limited, and may be set based on the target insect species and the behavior that is targeted for control, for example.
- a preferred example of this amplitude range is 0.001 m/s 2 or more, more preferred is a range of 0.01 m/s 2 to 100 m/s 2 , and still more preferred is a range of 0.05 m/s 2 to 10 m/s 2 . Therefore, a combination of a frequency range and an amplitude range that combines the above frequency ranges and amplitude ranges is preferred. For example, a combination of a frequency range of 10 Hz to 5 kHz and an amplitude range of 0.01 m/s 2 to 100 m/s 2 is preferred.
- the method for producing the vibrations is not limited.
- a vibration exciter or an actuator capable of precisely controlling the vibrations in the vibration frequency range and amplitude range in the insect habitat medium determined in step (a) can be used ( Figure. 3 ).
- the number of habitat media of the target insect is one (a single habitat medium)
- a single vibration exciter may be used.
- multiple vibration exciters can also be used.
- vibrations may be applied to each habitat medium using multiple vibration exciters, or a smaller number or just one vibration exciter capable of applying a sufficient vibrational force may be used.
- multiple vibration exciters may be used based on the size or the breadth of the habitat medium of the target insect. Alternatively, a smaller number or just one vibration exciter capable of applying a sufficient vibrational force may be used.
- the habitat region of the target insect is a forest or agricultural land
- one or two or more vibration exciters can be placed per given area.
- the habitat region of the target insect is a structure such as a single house
- one or two or more vibration exciters can be placed at a site where the insect is thought to enter or live, or nearby at a contact area with the structure, for example.
- the site for vibrations to be applied may be the habitat medium itself where the target insect is settled, or may be some other medium that propagates the vibrations to the habitat medium.
- the habitat medium is a plant or a structure
- the duration of the applied vibrations is not especially limited, and may be set as appropriate.
- the method according to the present invention preferably includes applying vibrations of a duration of 5 s or less at least once, applying vibrations of 1 ms or more to 5 s or less at least once, or applying vibrations of 5 ms to 500 ms at least once. Further, the number of times of applying vibrations is not especially limited, and may be set as appropriate. The number of times of applying vibrations is preferably two times or more. When applying vibrations two times or more, the interval between applying vibrations is also not especially limited, and may be set as appropriate.
- a method in which the interval between applying vibrations is 100 ms or more to 100 s or less is preferred, more preferred is an interval of 200 ms to 60 s, still more preferred is an interval of 500 ms to 10 s, and especially preferred is an interval of 1 s to 3 s.
- a super-magnetostrictive element To perform the precise control of the vibrations, it is preferred to use a super-magnetostrictive element. This is because using a super-magnetostrictive element is superior than the electromagnetic shakers that are currently widely used, in terms of allowing a sufficient vibrational force to be applied even on targets spread over a wide area, such as trees and crops, and structures such as houses, as well as enabling more precise frequency control as a result of the broader frequency control range. Further, although there are compact vibration shakers that employ a piezoelectric element, piezoelectric elements require a high voltage in order to run, whereas a super-magnetostrictive element can run on batteries.
- a method that uses a super-magnetostrictive element is superior to an insect pest control method that uses chemically synthesized pesticides, for example.
- a vibration generator that employs a super-magnetostrictive element can also be run by wireless remote operation or by a low-power solar cell. Using a vibration generator that employs a super-magnetostrictive element also allows vibration of a vibration-propagating metals, woods, trees, soil and the like, as well as vibration of a habitat medium via a vibration-propagating object thereof.
- a vibration generator that employs a super-magnetostrictive element it is possible to attach a hard object made from a long flexible stainless steel wire or a ceramic, for example, and generate vibrations that do not produce much attenuation at the tip of the hard object.
- the generation of such vibrations is advantageous for remote and local targets. Consequently, by using a vibration generator that employs a super-magnetostrictive element, the method according to the present invention that can be applied from localized habitat media to wide-area objects, for example from houses, greenhouses, and warehouses to agricultural land, orchards, and forests. Accordingly, there are no limitations on the habitat media that can be targeted.
- the present invention is also highly significant in terms of enabling super-magnetostrictive elements to be preferably used in such applications.
- Super-magnetostrictive elements are elements that expand and contract due to changes in magnetic field, and are formed from a lanthanoid element and an iron-group element. Super-magnetostrictive elements are practically used as an actuator or a sensor in mechanical, architecture, medical, and environmental fields. Magnetostriction is a phenomenon in which magnetic permeability (how easily magnetism passes through an object) changes when the shape of an object is caused to expand and contract due to magnetism. Therefore, a super-magnetostrictive element is an element in which this magnetostriction is strong, with amount of the change reaching 1,500 to 2,000 ppm, and also a high rate of the change in the order of nanoseconds to milliseconds.
- the insect behavior to be controlled is not especially limited, in the present invention, the behavior is preferably one type or two or more types selected from search, orientation, arrest, aggregation, feeding, mating, oviposition, escape, freezing, and warning.
- the behavior to be controlled may be, considering behavior induction and suppression, any of search, orientation, arrest, aggregation, feeding, mating, oviposition, escape, freezing, and warning.
- step (b) it is preferred to further include a step of determining a frequency range of the vibrations that occur in the insect habitat medium. Determining such a frequency range enables the frequency range to be applied in step (b) to be determined more precisely. For example, if spontaneous vibrations are observed in a given type of tree, but such spontaneous vibrations are not at a frequency that has an effect on the behavior on the desired control target, the desired behavior can be more reliably controlled by avoiding or including the frequency of those spontaneous vibrations.
- the insect pest that is a control target by the method according to the present invention is not especially limited. Examples may include forest, wood, and fruit tree insect pests, house, sanitary, and stored grain insect pests, or agricultural insect pests.
- the chemically synthesized pesticides that are currently commonly used not only have the drawback that they also have an insecticidal effect on other species that are not the target, such as natural enemies, but also lead to problems such as adverse effects on the residents in the surrounding areas and environmental pollution.
- the method according to the present invention can efficiently control just a specific target in a pinpoint manner by propagating vibrations to a habitat medium based on the characteristics of the target insect pest. More specifically, the method according to the present invention provides an environmentally-friendly control technology that does not have the above-described problems of chemically synthesized pesticides.
- the method according to the present invention employs vibrations that are propagated through the habitat medium, it is also environmentally friendly in terms of not producing air-borne noise.
- the method according to the present invention is also environmentally friendly in that for short-duration vibrations (e.g., 10 ms or less), it is difficult for people to detect those vibrations.
- the method according to the present invention can control insect pests by controlling an insect pest species vibration signal and 1) insect pest guidance and intrusion prevention based on repellence and attraction, 2) inhibiting mating by disturbing, 3) reducing feeding and oviposition, 4) monitoring with attractant traps, and 5) a combination of the inventive method and a known control technology (e.g., a light-based control technology).
- a known control technology e.g., a light-based control technology
- the above-mentioned forest and orchard insect pests are not especially limited. Examples may include long-horned beetles, bark beetles, powder-post beetles, and deathwatch beetles. These insect pests are boring pests, which are difficult to control directly with chemically synthesized pesticides. However, the method according to the present invention has an excellent control effect even against such hard-to-control insect pests.
- the inventive method is preferred against one or two or more species of insect pest selected from the Japanese pine sawyer and related species ( Monochamus ), the Asian long-horned beetle and related species ( Anoplophora ), the yellow-spotted longicorn beetle ( Psacothea hilaris) , the mulberry borer ( Apriona japonica ), the cryptomeria bark borer (Semanotus japonicus ), the oak platypodid beetle and related species (Platypus ), the spruce bark beetle and related species ( Ips , Dendroctonus), the powder-post beetle and related species (Lyctus ), Nicobium hirtum and related species ( Nicobium, Ernobius ), the coconut rhinoceros beetle and related species ( Oryctes ), and the Asian citrus psylla and related species ( Diaphorina ).
- Monochamus Monochamus
- Forest and orchard insect pests can be controlled by, for example, repelling, inhibiting oviposition, and inhibiting feeding of the insect pest, by placing one or two or more vibration exciters per given area of the forest or orchard where the insect pest lives or is thought to live.
- vibrations can be directly applied from the vibration exciter on a damaged tree or fruit tree, or tree or fruit tree that is at risk of being damaged.
- a preferred method is to apply vibrations to the tree or fruit tree by propagating suitable vibrations on some other medium, such as the soil that is supporting the tree or fruit tree.
- the house and sanitary insect pests are also not especially limited. Examples may include termites and cockroaches.
- the inventive method is preferred against one or two or more species of insect pest selected from among these, and is more preferred against one or two or more species of insect pest selected from the Formosan subterranean termite and related species ( Coptotermes ), the Japanese subterranean termite and related species ( Reticulitermes ), the western drywood termite and related species ( Incisitermes ), the Daikoku drywood termite and related species ( Cryptotermes ), the Nevada damp-wood termite ( Zootermopsis nevadensis), the smoky-brown cockroach, the American cockroach and related species ( Periplaneta ), and the German cockroach and related species ( Blattella ).
- House and sanitary insect pests can be controlled by, for example, inhibiting the intrusion of termites or inducing the repellence of termites by placing a vibration exciter at each corner portion near the roof of a house where the insect lives or is thought to live. Further, control can also be carried out by inhibiting the intrusion of cockroaches and indoor dust mites or inducing the repellence of cockroaches and indoor dust mites by placing a vibration exciter at each corner portion near the base structure of a house where the insect is thought to live.
- Agricultural insect pests are not especially limited. Examples thereof include various insect pests, such as grasshoppers, stick insects, crickets, katydids, chafers, weevils, ants, stink bugs, aphids, mites, planthoppers, whiteflies, flies, leaf beetles, moths, and butterflies.
- the inventive method is preferred against the above vibration-sensitive insect pests.
- Agricultural insect pests can be controlled by, for example, repelling, inhibiting oviposition, and inhibiting feeding of the insect pest, by placing one or two or more vibration exciters per given area of agricultural land where the insect pest lives or is thought to live.
- an even greater advantageous effect can be obtained by attracting, for example, insects that are beneficial to humans by using the method according to the present invention, which controls insect pest behavior with vibrations, for positive behavior control of an insect.
- vibrations that attract natural enemies and predators to the habitat region of the insect that is an insect pest, or that stimulates the oviposition or mating of such natural enemies and predators, the control efficiency by these natural enemies and predators can be increased.
- natural enemies and predators include cylindrical bark beetles, lacewings, ladybugs, bees, flies, spiders and the like.
- the production efficiency of honey for example, by honey bees, which are a domesticated insect, can be increased by controlling their behavior.
- the present invention also relates to a method for controlling insect pests, which includes using a super-magnetostrictive element to produce vibrations in the habitat medium of the insect pest.
- a method for controlling insect pests which includes using a super-magnetostrictive element to produce vibrations in the habitat medium of the insect pest.
- insect pests and habitat media extending over a wide spectrum (ordinary trees, fruit trees, ornamental trees, garden trees, bonsai trees, seedlings, roadside trees, natural forests, artificial forests, and crops, which may each be outdoors or indoors, as well as a structure such as a house) can be controlled.
- the frequency range of the vibrations is 5 Hz to 5 kHz and the amplitude range is 0.001 m/s 2 or more, as this enables a specific insect pest to be controlled more efficiently. Further, more preferred is a vibration frequency of 25 Hz to 1 kHz. Further, in this aspect of the method for controlling an insect pest according to the present invention, it is preferred that the insect pest is the Japanese pine sawyer, because this allows the Japanese pine sawyer to be controlled efficiently and safely.
- the method according to the present invention enables the spread of the Japanese pine sawyers infesting pines due to the feeding of the Japanese pine sawyer to be suppressed very efficiently and more safely than chemically synthesized pesticides, thereby allowing damage to pines by the Japanese pine sawyer to be prevented. Consequently, the inventive method can be considered to be a very effective method for pine conservation, which can replace chemical-based control methods.
- the method for controlling the various insect pests is the same as the above-described control method, except for using at least one super-magnetostrictive element as a vibration exciter.
- the duration of the applied vibrations is not especially limited, and may be set as appropriate.
- the method according to the present invention preferably includes applying vibrations of a duration of 5 s or less at least once, applying vibrations of 1 ms or more to 5 s or less at least once, or applying vibrations of 5 ms to 500 ms at least once.
- the number of times of applying vibrations is not especially limited, and may be set as appropriate. The number of times of applying vibrations is preferably two times or more.
- the interval between applying vibrations is also not especially limited, and may be set as appropriate.
- a method in which the interval between applying vibrations is 100 ms or more to 100 s or less is preferred, more preferred is an interval of 200 ms to 60 s, still more preferred is an interval of 500 ms to 10 s, and especially preferred is an interval of 1 s to 3 s.
- the site to which the vibrations are applied and the waveforms of the vibrations are not especially limited, and may be appropriately set in consideration of control efficiency and the like.
- a preferred frequency and number of frequency combination concerning a specific insect pest for the Japanese pine sawyer, the combination of a frequency range of 5 Hz to 5 kHz and an amplitude range of 0.001 m/s 2 or more is preferred, the combination of 25 Hz to 1 kHz and 0.05 to 100 m/s 2 is more preferred, and the combination of 100 Hz to 1 kHz and 0.05 to 100 m/s 2 is still more preferred. Further, the frequency and number of frequency combinations are also preferred for the Formosan subterranean termite, and most preferred is the combination of 1 kHz and 0.5 m/s 2 . However, for any insect pest species, a preferred frequency and amplitude range combination can be set based on any combination of the frequency and number of frequency ranges described in this specification.
- Vibration response and associated sensory receptor were explored using adults of the Japanese pine sawyers
- a vibration stimulus with a varying amplitude (25 Hz to 10 kHz) generated from an electromagnetic vibration exciter was applied to resting adult of the Japanese pine sawyers, and the presence of warning behavior (leg or antennae movement), freezing, or sound generation behavior was observed
- the duration of the vibration stimulus was 100 ms, with an interval of 900 ms.
- the Japanese pine sawyers exhibited a highly sensitive response to the low frequency component (25 Hz to 1 kHz) ( Figure 1 )
- the behavior threshold for the low frequency component was 3 6 to 23.5 m/s 2 .
- vibrations 100 Hz, 2 m/s 2 or more, duration 100 ms, interval 900 ms
- An oviposition selection test between applied blocks was carried out by releasing 6 females in a container into two habitat media (small logs of the Japanese black pine with 3 to 4 cm in diameter and 35 cm in length), and leaving overnight. Vibrations (100 Hz, 2 m/s 2 or more, sine wave, duration 100 ms, interval 900 ms) were applied to one of the habitat media (vibration-applied block), and not applied to the other habitat medium (non-applied block).
- the Japanese pine sawyer can be controlled by applying vibrations to the habitat medium where this insect pest species lives to suppress behaviors such as oviposition, feeding, and mating, and/or induce behaviors such as escape, freezing, and warning.
- the oak platypodid beetle which is a serious insect pest of broadleaf trees, such as oaks, also generates sound by rubbing the tip of its abdomen with its elytron
- Non-Patent Document 4 the fact that the oak platypodid beetle communicates using this sound is already known (Non-Patent Document 4).
- the frequency of this sound covers a broad band (Table 5), and the amplitude (sound pressure) is also large, it is considered that the oak platypodid beetle also communicates using vibrations on the habitat medium produced by sound.
- Non-Patent Document 5 Images of these vibration behaviors captured with a high-speed camera were analyzed.
- the spontaneous vibrations emitted by the Japanese black pine seedlings (4 years old) that were weakened due to pine wood nematode were measured by an accelerometer and an acoustic emission method.
- the low-frequency component of less than 5 kHz (amplitude 0.002 m/s 2 or more) and the high-frequency component, which is in the ultrasonic range, acoustic emission (frequency of 20 kHz or more) (Table 7) increase and decrease in conjunction with changes in the moisture content over time, which is a cause of pine weakening.
- Vibrations (100 Hz, 5 m/s 2 , sine wave, stimulus time 1 s or more) were applied by a vibration exciter using a signal generator, an amplifier, and a super-magnetostrictive element ( Figure. 3 ) via a steel wire to the femur of a leg having a chordotonal organ ( Figure. 2 )
- Figure. 3 A large number of individuals at resting posture was significantly observed that exhibited an escape behavior or a sound-generating behavior, and of individuals that moved their legs and antennae Individuals showing no response to the vibrations were not observed (Table 10)
- a control group when touched with a steel wire without applying vibrations, most of the individuals showed no response, and they continued moving their legs or antennae, or continued resting. Hardly any individuals were observed that exhibited an escape behavior or a sound-generating behavior (Table 10). Based on the above results, this species is considered to exhibit an escape or a warning response by sensing vibrations with the femur having a chordotonal organ
- vibrations 100 Hz, 2 m/s 2 , sine wave, duration 100 ms, interval 900 ms
- the method of the present invention can repel the Japanese pine sawyer, so that the number of feeding individuals of the Japanese pine sawyer can be reduced more than the chemical-based method.
- the method according to the present invention enables the spread of the Japanese pine sawyers infesting pines due to the feeding of the Japanese pine sawyer to be suppressed very efficiently and safely, thereby allowing damage to pines by the Japanese pine sawyer to be prevented Consequently, the present method is considered to be very effective method for pine conservation, which can replace chemical-based control methods.
- vibrations were applied to a habitat medium (small balsa sheet), and the behavioral response (escape, warning) of the Formosan subterranean termites was observed.
- the minimum amplitude threshold for inducing a response was measured (two replicates) by applying vibrations (sine wave, duration 100 ms, interval 900 ms) with three different frequencies (50 Hz, 1 kHz, 5 kHz) on 50 individuals (mixture of workers and soldiers), while varying the amplitude between 0.05 and 24 m/s 2 .
- the present invention enables insect behavior to be controlled. More specifically, the present invention can be applied not only to control insect pests, but also to attract natural enemy insects, for example. In addition, the present invention can also be applied in the conservation and management of rare species. It is considered that the present invention can make a great contribution to the development of environmentally-friendly control technologies as a substitute for chemical agents. Therefore, the present invention will greatly contribute to the development of the insect pest control industry as well as environmental conservation and related industries.
Landscapes
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Birds (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Insects & Arthropods (AREA)
- Pest Control & Pesticides (AREA)
- Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
- Zoology (AREA)
- Environmental Sciences (AREA)
- Catching Or Destruction (AREA)
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2009208413 | 2009-09-09 | ||
PCT/JP2010/065398 WO2011030783A1 (fr) | 2009-09-09 | 2010-09-08 | Procédé de lutte contre des insectes nuisibles par vibration |
Publications (4)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2476311A1 true EP2476311A1 (fr) | 2012-07-18 |
EP2476311A4 EP2476311A4 (fr) | 2017-05-10 |
EP2476311B1 EP2476311B1 (fr) | 2020-03-25 |
EP2476311B8 EP2476311B8 (fr) | 2020-04-29 |
Family
ID=43732452
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP10815378.4A Active EP2476311B8 (fr) | 2009-09-09 | 2010-09-08 | Procédé de lutte contre des insectes nuisibles par vibration |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US9107399B2 (fr) |
EP (1) | EP2476311B8 (fr) |
JP (1) | JP5867813B2 (fr) |
AU (1) | AU2010293497B2 (fr) |
WO (1) | WO2011030783A1 (fr) |
Families Citing this family (13)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2014508509A (ja) * | 2010-12-07 | 2014-04-10 | アリゾナ・ボード・オブ・リージェンツ,アクティング・フォー・アンド・オン・ビハーフ・オブ,ノーザン・アリゾナ・ユニバーシティ | 木にはびこる昆虫および他の無脊椎動物を、木および木材製品から、またその内部で、混乱させて阻止するための音響効果の利用 |
US9013961B1 (en) | 2012-03-06 | 2015-04-21 | William D. Nicholson | Apparatus and method of repelling unwanted pests |
CN103120105B (zh) * | 2013-02-07 | 2014-12-10 | 广东省昆虫研究所 | 一种柑橘园控制柑橘木虱和黄龙病的方法 |
RU2018113075A (ru) * | 2015-09-11 | 2019-10-14 | Стивен ЭЛИВАЙ | Уничтожение морских вшей на искусственно выращиваемой рыбе с помощью ультразвука |
JP6849186B2 (ja) * | 2016-12-16 | 2021-03-24 | 国立研究開発法人森林研究・整備機構 | 振動を用いた害虫の行動制御により植物を保護する方法 |
JP2018093830A (ja) * | 2016-12-16 | 2018-06-21 | 国立大学法人 筑波大学 | 微小生物侵入抑制装置および方法 |
US11559006B2 (en) | 2019-12-10 | 2023-01-24 | John Richard Lachenmayer | Disrupting the behavior and development cycle of wood-boring insects with vibration |
JP7055959B2 (ja) * | 2020-02-21 | 2022-04-19 | 国立研究開発法人森林研究・整備機構 | 振動を用いた樹木害虫の防除法 |
WO2021260683A1 (fr) * | 2020-06-21 | 2021-12-30 | Biosound Ltd. | Système, dispositif et procédé servant à améliorer la croissance d'une plante |
CN112715531A (zh) * | 2020-12-21 | 2021-04-30 | 中国农业科学院茶叶研究所 | 一种利用地埋振源驱赶或干扰害虫的方法 |
JP7233060B2 (ja) * | 2021-07-15 | 2023-03-06 | 国立研究開発法人森林研究・整備機構 | 振動を用いた害虫の行動及び成長の制御によりキノコ類を保護する方法 |
CN113767889A (zh) * | 2021-09-30 | 2021-12-10 | 舞阳县林业技术推广总站 | 一种林业高效率自动化诱虫杀虫装置 |
CN117852778B (zh) * | 2024-03-08 | 2024-05-14 | 沂南县林业发展中心 | 一种森林病虫害防治信息管理系统 |
Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2003022315A2 (fr) * | 2001-08-15 | 2003-03-20 | Paul Snyman Greyvensteyn | Sterilisation de sol |
US20070137096A1 (en) * | 2005-09-27 | 2007-06-21 | Ragon Kevin W | Termite control system, method and apparatus |
Family Cites Families (17)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4097838A (en) * | 1977-05-27 | 1978-06-27 | Engelbert Fiala | Seismic rodent control device |
CA1097790A (fr) * | 1978-03-31 | 1981-03-17 | George R. Mounce | Traduction non-disponible |
US4215429A (en) * | 1978-12-29 | 1980-07-29 | George Riach | Rodent-repelling device |
US4219884A (en) * | 1979-01-29 | 1980-08-26 | Desantis Albert | Apparatus for controlling insects |
US5473836A (en) * | 1993-11-05 | 1995-12-12 | Liu; Michael | Pest and insect expeller of an electromagnetic type |
US5896696A (en) * | 1995-11-01 | 1999-04-27 | Pat Fox | Selective radio frequency pest control apparatus |
US5598379A (en) * | 1996-02-23 | 1997-01-28 | Malleolo; Patrick F. | Satellite ultrasonic pest repeller |
US6250255B1 (en) * | 1998-08-06 | 2001-06-26 | Virginia Commonwealth University | Methods and apparatus for alerting and/or repelling birds and other animals |
JP2000204684A (ja) | 1999-01-11 | 2000-07-25 | Ide Keiki:Kk | 木製構造体の防虫システム並びに木材の防虫方法 |
US6166996A (en) * | 1999-02-26 | 2000-12-26 | The No Mas Group, Inc. | Ultrasonic broadband frequency transducer pest repulsion system |
US6301194B1 (en) * | 1999-04-26 | 2001-10-09 | Charles J. Cauchy | Self-powered insect and rodent repellent device |
JP2001252002A (ja) | 2000-03-15 | 2001-09-18 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | 害虫忌避装置 |
JP2001294505A (ja) | 2000-04-14 | 2001-10-23 | Jukankyo Kojo Jumoku Seibun Riyo Gijutsu Kenkyu Kumiai | 有害生物駆除及び忌避剤並びに徐放材 |
JP4758133B2 (ja) | 2005-04-28 | 2011-08-24 | フォスター電機株式会社 | 超磁歪スピーカ |
US20090303053A1 (en) | 2006-02-24 | 2009-12-10 | Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organization | Method and System for Controlling Termites |
AU2006200814A1 (en) * | 2006-02-24 | 2007-09-13 | Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation | Method and system for controlling termites |
US20120263021A1 (en) * | 2009-10-16 | 2012-10-18 | Plug In Pest Free Australia Pty Ltd | Pest Repellent System and Device |
-
2010
- 2010-09-08 AU AU2010293497A patent/AU2010293497B2/en not_active Ceased
- 2010-09-08 US US13/394,892 patent/US9107399B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2010-09-08 EP EP10815378.4A patent/EP2476311B8/fr active Active
- 2010-09-08 WO PCT/JP2010/065398 patent/WO2011030783A1/fr active Application Filing
- 2010-09-08 JP JP2011530850A patent/JP5867813B2/ja active Active
Patent Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2003022315A2 (fr) * | 2001-08-15 | 2003-03-20 | Paul Snyman Greyvensteyn | Sterilisation de sol |
US20070137096A1 (en) * | 2005-09-27 | 2007-06-21 | Ragon Kevin W | Termite control system, method and apparatus |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See also references of WO2011030783A1 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2011030783A1 (fr) | 2011-03-17 |
US9107399B2 (en) | 2015-08-18 |
US20120167826A1 (en) | 2012-07-05 |
AU2010293497B2 (en) | 2015-07-09 |
EP2476311B1 (fr) | 2020-03-25 |
EP2476311A4 (fr) | 2017-05-10 |
JP5867813B2 (ja) | 2016-02-24 |
AU2010293497A1 (en) | 2012-03-22 |
JPWO2011030783A1 (ja) | 2013-02-07 |
EP2476311B8 (fr) | 2020-04-29 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP2476311B1 (fr) | Procédé de lutte contre des insectes nuisibles par vibration | |
Polajnar et al. | Manipulating behaviour with substrate‐borne vibrations–potential for insect pest control | |
Bomford et al. | Sonic deterrents in animal damage control: a review of device tests and effectiveness | |
JP6849186B2 (ja) | 振動を用いた害虫の行動制御により植物を保護する方法 | |
JP7055959B2 (ja) | 振動を用いた樹木害虫の防除法 | |
JP6991488B2 (ja) | 振動による害虫防除及び作物受粉の方法 | |
JP2009527229A (ja) | シロアリを制御する方法およびシステム | |
Čokl et al. | Manipulation of insect signaling for monitoring and control of pest insects | |
Aflitto et al. | Sonic pest repellents | |
Fredregill et al. | Efficacy of Two Larvasonic™ Units Against Culex Larvae and Effects on Common Aquatic Nontarget Organisms in Harris County, Texas1 | |
Tiwari et al. | Electronic pest repellent: a review | |
Laumann et al. | Use of vibratory signals for stink bug monitoring and control | |
Steele et al. | Male and female mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) attraction to sound and its relevance to potential applications in vector surveillance | |
Al-Deeb | Date palm insect and mite pests and their management | |
JP7233060B2 (ja) | 振動を用いた害虫の行動及び成長の制御によりキノコ類を保護する方法 | |
Walker | Acoustic methods of monitoring and manipulating insect pests and their natural enemies | |
Polajnar et al. | Developing a bioacoustic method for mating disruption of a leafhopper pest in grapevine | |
Tishechkin | Vibrational communication in insects | |
Hamed et al. | Utilization Sonic Waves for Birds Controlling in Crops Field | |
JP6644299B2 (ja) | 果菜類栽培施設へのチョウ目害虫の飛翔行動を合成超音波により阻害する方法 | |
Polajnar et al. | Advances in understanding and exploiting insect vibrational communication | |
Tito | Utilization of ultrasonic waves (Acheta domesticus) as a biocontrol of mosquito in Malang Agricultural Institute | |
Nakamura | Attraction trap for monitoring Monochamus alternatus adults–its usefulness and limitations | |
Arul | FABRICATION OF MOBILE ULTRASONIC BIRD REPELLER | |
Stancă-Moise et al. | Integrated control of damages and diseases within the forest ecosystem" miercurea sibiului"(Sibiu, Romania) in the conditions of the year 2019. |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20120307 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
RA4 | Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched (corrected) |
Effective date: 20170410 |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: A01M 29/00 20110101ALI20170404BHEP Ipc: A01M 1/00 20060101AFI20170404BHEP Ipc: A01M 1/02 20060101ALI20170404BHEP |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20180125 |
|
RIN1 | Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected) |
Inventor name: MORI, TERUO Inventor name: KUBOJIMA, YOSHITAKA Inventor name: KOIKE, TAKUJI Inventor name: OHMURA, WAKAKO Inventor name: TAKANASHI, TAKUMA Inventor name: OHYA, EIJI Inventor name: NISHINO, HIROSHI |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20190916 |
|
RIN1 | Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected) |
Inventor name: TAKANASHI, TAKUMA Inventor name: NISHINO, HIROSHI Inventor name: MORI, TERUO Inventor name: OHMURA, WAKAKO Inventor name: KUBOJIMA, YOSHITAKA Inventor name: KOIKE, TAKUJI Inventor name: OHYA, EIJI |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: FORESTRY AND FOREST PRODUCTS RESEARCH INSTITUTE Owner name: THE UNIVERSITY OF ELECTRO-COMMUNICATIONS Owner name: NATIONAL UNIVERSITY CORPORATION HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: NATIONAL UNIVERSITY CORPORATION HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY Owner name: FOREST RESEARCH AND MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION Owner name: THE UNIVERSITY OF ELECTRO-COMMUNICATIONS |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602010063659 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PK Free format text: BERICHTIGUNG B8 Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 1247460 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20200415 Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
RAP2 | Party data changed (patent owner data changed or rights of a patent transferred) |
Owner name: FOREST RESEARCH AND MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200625 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200325 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200626 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200325 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200325 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200325 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200625 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20200325 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200325 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200725 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200325 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200325 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200325 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200818 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200325 Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200325 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200325 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 1247460 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20200325 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602010063659 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200325 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200325 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200325 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200325 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20210112 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 602010063659 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200325 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20200908 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200325 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20200930 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20200908 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210401 Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20200930 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20200908 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20200930 Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20200908 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20200930 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20200930 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20200908 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200325 Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200325 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200325 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200325 Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200325 |