EP2007657A2 - Sammelbehälter mit explosions- und splitterschutz - Google Patents
Sammelbehälter mit explosions- und splitterschutzInfo
- Publication number
- EP2007657A2 EP2007657A2 EP07735405A EP07735405A EP2007657A2 EP 2007657 A2 EP2007657 A2 EP 2007657A2 EP 07735405 A EP07735405 A EP 07735405A EP 07735405 A EP07735405 A EP 07735405A EP 2007657 A2 EP2007657 A2 EP 2007657A2
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- collecting container
- container according
- window
- interior
- door
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Withdrawn
Links
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
- B65F—GATHERING OR REMOVAL OF DOMESTIC OR LIKE REFUSE
- B65F1/00—Refuse receptacles; Accessories therefor
- B65F1/14—Other constructional features; Accessories
- B65F1/1426—Housings, cabinets or enclosures for refuse receptacles
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
- B65F—GATHERING OR REMOVAL OF DOMESTIC OR LIKE REFUSE
- B65F2210/00—Equipment of refuse receptacles
- B65F2210/148—Locking means
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
- B65F—GATHERING OR REMOVAL OF DOMESTIC OR LIKE REFUSE
- B65F2220/00—Properties of refuse receptacles
- B65F2220/104—Bomb resistant
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
- B65F—GATHERING OR REMOVAL OF DOMESTIC OR LIKE REFUSE
- B65F2220/00—Properties of refuse receptacles
- B65F2220/128—Properties of refuse receptacles transparent
Definitions
- the invention relates to a collection container, in particular a waste collection container, with explosion-insulating and anti-fragment properties, and the advantageous production of such collection containers, according to the preamble of the independent claims.
- Garbage bins in public places have been used repeatedly by terrorist groups in attacks as a deterrent for explosives in the past. Because of the still latent terrorist threat, no waste bins are nowadays being set up in many cities in certain zones classified as high-risk. Particularly at risk are zones with very high or dense public traffic, which are a natural target of terrorist groups. The lack of waste containers means that the population simply throws away their waste.
- Refuse containers have been repeatedly disclosed which are intended to provide protection against the splintering effect and / or the force of the explosion of an explosive device hidden therein.
- WO 02/065050 shows a waste container in which a cylindrical, explosion-proof inner waste container is disposed in an outer container. housing is arranged.
- the inner waste container is made of fiber-reinforced composite material.
- GB 2278045 A discloses a waste container in the hollow-cylindrical, fiber-reinforced wall of composite material reinforcing rings or plates are arranged.
- GB 2279231 A again shows an explosion-proof waste container consisting of two tubes made of fiber-reinforced composite material, between which compressible material is arranged.
- EP 0299902 A2 and GB 2289399 show cupped waste containers which are open at the top and have an inner and an outer shell of sheet steel. The resulting between the shells cavity is filled with a vermiculite mixture or sand.
- EP 0882659 A1 shows a waste container, for example a plastic bag, which is arranged in the center of two hollow cylinders arranged in an aligned manner.
- the two cylinders are mounted on a pedestal by means of spacers.
- the inner cylinder is made of steel or titanium, the outer of light metal or composite material.
- FR 2765198 shows an explosion-proof waste container consisting of three aligned steel pipes, the innermost being made of a steel armor.
- the waste container disclosed in WO 96/07073 consists of an inner wall of high-density foam material, which is intended to absorb energy in an explosion, and an outer wall of steel.
- GB 2378382 A shows a waste container which is arranged in a spherically shaped and liquid-filled tank.
- the liquid especially water, should be thrown upwards in an explosion to reduce the effect of the explosion.
- the size of the overall device is very large.
- the weight of the containers is often very large due to the stable construction, which makes emptying difficult, and / or the usable volume is comparatively small.
- the object of the invention is to provide a collecting container, in particular a waste container, with explosion-damping and anti-fragment properties of the type mentioned above, which does not have the above-mentioned and other disadvantages.
- a waste container according to the invention is preferably visible without opening the waste container, and can be easily emptied by the maintenance personnel.
- a collection container according to the invention is also designed so that it is broken down by an explosion in as few parts as possible, which are also advantageous to be thrown as slowly as possible, so that the damage caused by flying debris damage is also minimized. Because the probability of using a collecting container according to the invention for a terrorist attack is very small for a particular individual collecting container, but the total number of required waste containers in a city is generally very high, the total cost of a collecting container according to the invention is advantageously as small as possible and the size of a standard waste container. Furthermore, the maintenance and care of a collecting container according to the invention should be as cost-effective and simple as possible.
- a collecting container in which at least part of the wall is made transparent, for example by attaching at least one window.
- a transparent area of the wall is designed so that a very large part of the splinters can not penetrate it.
- a suitable material for example, transparent polycarbonate can be used.
- other materials are also suitable, in particular polymers which are transparent, hard, and nevertheless impact-resistant and break-resistant.
- a hinged door allows easy replacement of the bag.
- the use of a window also makes it easier to access the interior space with a water jet cutter, as is sometimes used in bomb blasting operations.
- FIG 1 shows schematically the prior art (a), (b) in comparison to a collecting container according to the invention (c).
- FIGS. 2 to 5 show various advantageous embodiments of a collecting container according to the invention.
- FIG. 6 shows an embodiment of a collecting container according to the invention
- Test Model 1 As tested in Test Run 1 below, with the door open.
- FIG. 7 shows an interior view of test model 1, with regard to the hinges and
- FIG. 8 shows the door of the test model 1 with a view of the lock device.
- FIG. 9 shows a steel cable safety device of a modified collecting container according to the invention ("test model 3").
- FIG. 10 shows an anchor plate for use with a collecting container according to the invention.
- Fig. 11 shows schematically in isometric view an inventive
- FIG. 12 shows (a) the same inventive collecting container with view through the lid towards the bottom; (b) the holder of the polycarbonate discs;
- (c) is a schematic view of the hinge with splitter aperture when closed
- FIG. 13 schematically shows a lock device according to the invention for use in a collecting container according to the invention.
- Figure 14 shows schematically the experimental setup for the test series.
- FIG. 15 shows the arrangement of the test fields for registering splinters.
- FIG. 16 shows the test model 1 prepared for testing.
- FIG. 17 shows the sequence of the reference experiment.
- FIG. 18 shows the sequence of test test no. 1.
- Figures 19 to 21 show the door or the housing of the test model 1 after the
- FIG. 22 shows fragments of the window of the test model 1 after the test.
- FIG. 23 shows the sequence of test test no. 2.
- FIG. 24 shows the debris distribution after test no.
- FIG. 25 shows the housing and a large fragment of the rear window of the
- FIG. 26 shows the inner layer and the outer layer of the door-side window of FIG.
- Test model 2 after test no. 2.
- Figure 27 shows the debris of the test model 2 in an overall view.
- Groupage goods should be understood in this description to mean any form of goods that can be collected in public spaces. In particular, these are of course waste of any kind, which are then disposed of, but also recyclables that are to be recycled, eg PET bottles.
- FIG. 1 shows schematically a collecting container 1 consisting of a conventional bag holder ring 7 and a transparent bag 8. The interior of the bag 8 with the groupage 8a from the outside for an observer 30, such as a security patrol, easily visible. An explosive device 20 hidden in the collecting container can thus easily be detected by the observer 30 and appropriate measures can be taken.
- FIG. 1 (b) shows a collecting container 1 in which an immediate wall 6 of solid metal at least partially shields the environment from the effects of a possible explosion.
- the interior 5 with the bag 8 is not visible to an observer, and thus not controllable.
- FIG. 1 (c) shows schematically a possible design of a collecting container 1 according to the invention.
- a continuous wall 6 shields the environment from the effect of an explosion in the interior 5 of the collecting container 1.
- a part of this wall 6 is designed so that an observer 30 can see the interior 5 and check for suspicious objects without having to open the collecting container 1 thereto.
- This is advantageously done by a transparent embodiment of a part of the wall 5, for example by attaching a viewing window 9.
- the viewing window 9 is designed so that it also offers protection from the effects of an explosion, especially from splinters.
- FIG. 2 shows a possible advantageous variant of a collecting container 1 according to the invention, in the form of a refuse container 1 with a cylindrical wall 6 mounted on a base 12.
- a holding device (not shown) for a bag 8 is arranged in the interior 5 of the refuse container 1.
- a viewing window 9 is arranged, consisting of a suitable transparent material, which allows insight into the interior 5, and in particular the interior of the transparent bag 8.
- the viewing window 9 is to be regarded as a part of the wall 6.
- steel may be used, in particular chromium steel or special armor steel, but also other materials such as aramid or fiber-reinforced composite materials.
- a window 9 of a collecting container 1 according to the invention is intended, on the one hand, to arrest the splitter flying away at extremely high speed (several 1000 m / s) during a detonation and, on the other hand by the subsequent blast wave of the explosion will not be broken down into smaller debris, which in turn can cause injury. The same applies to the non-transparent part of the wall 6.
- FIG. 3 shows a further advantageous embodiment of a collecting container 1 according to the invention.
- the collecting container 1 has a cover 10 which closes off the inner space 5 towards the top.
- the groupage 8a shown here waste, is thrown through an arranged in the wall 6 insertion slot 2.
- two insertion locks 2 a are arranged at the insertion slot.
- FIG. 4 shows another advantageous embodiment of a collecting container 1 according to the invention, as was used analogously in the test experiments.
- the collection container 1 according to the invention in turn, has an insertion slot 2.
- a baffle 11 is mounted below the insertion slot 2, which baffle 11 is advantageous downwards against the interior 5 is inclined.
- the collecting container 1 has a door 3, which is pivotally connected via hinge devices (not visible) with the housing 6a. On the side opposite the hinge devices, the door 3 can be reversibly connected in a form-fitting manner to the housing 6a by means of a lock device.
- FIG. 5 shows yet another advantageous embodiment of a collecting container 1 according to the invention.
- the wall 6 is designed as a hollow cylinder and has two opposite viewing windows 9, 9 '. It is also possible to install three or more viewing windows.
- the collecting container 1 Towards the top, the collecting container 1 has a lid 10, with a central insertion opening 2, which limits the size of the objects that can be thrown in.
- test model 1, 2 and 3 test models
- the test models are based in their basic concept on a waste container of the type "Waste Shark®” marketed by Brüco Swiss AG 150I ".
- FIG. 6 shows a receptacle of test model 1, with door 3 open.
- Sack holder ring 7 is mounted pivotably on an axis 15.
- the two mounted in the door 3 and the rear wall of the housing 6a windows 9, 9 'each consist of a curved polycarbonate disc 9a, 9a' of 8 mm thickness.
- the polycarbonate used is sold, for example, by Bayer under the trade name MACRO-LON®, and is advantageously UV-stabilized.
- the disks 9a, 9a ' are arranged on the outer wall 6 from the inside. From the dimension they correspond essentially to the dimensions of the door 3 and the rear wall 6a, which improves the stability of the discs 9a, 9a '.
- all parts of the collecting container 1 according to the invention are made of stainless steel of the type WN 1.4301 (V2A).
- the flat steel parts have a thickness of 3 mm.
- additional splitter apertures were additionally provided, in particular in the region of the hinges, the lock and the areas of the housing wall 6a and the door 3 not covered by the polycarbonate panes.
- test model 1 all parts of the outer wall 6 of the inventive collecting container 1 consist of at least 5 mm chromium nickel steel (in the area of the outer wall) or 3 mm chromium nickel steel and 8 mm polycarbonate (in the region of the overlap of outer wall and window)) or 8 mm polycarbonate (in the region of the viewing windows 9, 9 ').
- all parts were connected by one or more welding points.
- the collection container 1 is fixed with 4 M8 steel screws on a base 12, which in turn is connected to the ground with four brass dowels.
- FIG. 7 shows the band / hinge-side region of the test model 1.
- splitter apertures 16, 16 ', 16 ", 17, 17" of 3 mm thickness were welded onto the outer wall 6 of 3 mm thickness.
- Figure 8 shows the lock-side region of the door 3 of test model 1 17 ", 17 '" reinforce the outer wall 6.
- the counterpart 61' of the lock device has a thickness of 8 mm, and is in addition to four screws fully welded to the door 3.
- the lock device is designed relatively solid, with the aim of To achieve a relatively similar mechanical resistance of the lock device and the hinges in order to achieve a predictable, straight trajectory in the event of an explosion Also visible are the welding points for connecting the individual parts, for example, at the guide plate 11th
- a modified test model 2 based on the test model 1, the splitter apertures were attached at three times the number of welding points. Other parts have been provided with longer welds, for example in the area of the baffle. The hinge parts 18 were also welded to the wall. In addition, in this test model 2, several short steel cable fuses were attached, which should prevent the door or the cover from flying away. These short steel wire locks, however, proved useless because they were torn at once.
- steel cable retainers are therefore designed with longer rope and with spring effect to allow a slowing down of the parts and to avoid tearing of the cables, as will be explained below.
- polycarbonate disks of twice the thickness were used, in other words 16 mm in total.
- test model 3 which is essentially based on test model 2
- the base is even more strongly connected to the substrate.
- the use of a base cast in the concrete foundation is possible of the collecting container according to the invention after an explosion.
- FIG. 10 shows an anchor plate 40 with an annular base plate 41 and four threaded sleeves 42 welded thereto, for use with the collecting container according to the invention.
- the anchor plate is cast in a concrete foundation base.
- An additional reinforcement grid can also be arranged around the anchor plate.
- the bottom of the collecting container with four bolts 43 is screwed through the base 12 of the collecting container with the four threaded sleeves 42 of the anchor plate 40.
- Further tests showed again that base 12 and ground were not torn away from the ground by the explosion.
- Also present in test model 3 is an advantageous variant of a cable safety device for the individual parts of the collecting container according to the invention. For this purpose, the door of the collecting container is connected via a steel cable to the bottom and the base.
- the safety rope has a supply of rope of about 2 to 5 m, preferably 3 to 4m, which is stored wound up for the most part.
- a longer steel cable safety device has the advantage that the parts accelerated by the explosion pressure to a certain initial speed first lose some of their speed again due to the air resistance, before they are stopped by the cable safety device. The resulting force peak thus remains below the breaking load.
- FIG. 9 shows such a cable safety device 50 installed in a collecting container according to the invention.
- the steel cable 51 is stored wound in large part in a bag 52, which prevents premature release of the cable stock.
- the rope is connected at the bag 52 to the bottom 14, and thus also to the anchored anchor plate, and from there leads along the outer wall to the upper part of the collecting container where it is connected to the door (not shown).
- the steel cable to the left of the bag 52 is a short steel cable safety device without cable stock, as it is also present in the test models 1 and 2.
- the steel cable used (construction: 6 strands of 19 wires, with steel core, material stainless steel V4A 1.4401) has one Diameter of 4 mm.
- the theoretical minimum breaking load is 11.4 kN, which is more than one ton of breaking load.
- FIG. 11 schematically shows, in an isometric view, a collecting container according to the invention analogous to test model 3, disassembled into (a) housing 6a with an oblique view from below, and (b) door 3 with oblique view from above.
- FIG. 12 (a) shows the same collecting container according to the invention, viewed through the lid in the direction of the bottom 14.
- the collecting container has two steel cable fuses 50 with coils 53, which are connected at one end to the concrete foundation via bolts 54.
- the bags in which the coils 53 are arranged are not shown.
- the discs 9, 9 ' may be made in one piece, or combined at lower cost from standard thicknesses.
- the individual part discs can be glued surface or otherwise connected.
- the thickness of the discs can be increased depending on the desired degree of protection in order to further increase the anti-fragmentation effect. For example, a polycarbonate disk of 32 mm thickness can be made of four disks of 8 mm thickness.
- the windows 9, 9 'each consist of two superimposed bent polycarbonate disks of 8 mm thickness, which are connected by clamping rails 9b extending in the longitudinal direction to both sides of the window with the door or the housing 6a, as in detail view shown in Figure 12 (b).
- This solution allows easy attachment of the discs, or, if necessary, rapid replacement of the discs, e.g. to remove graffiti.
- a composite of several layers disc also has the advantage that it can be easily separated with a water jet cutter as a single-layer, thicker disc.
- FIG. 12 (c) schematically shows the splitter apertures in the hinge / hinge area with the door closed (see also FIG. 7).
- Test model 3 has a particularly advantageous lock device 60 for use in a collecting container according to the invention, as shown schematically in FIG. 13 in (a) view perpendicular to the housing wall and (b) side view.
- This lock device according to the invention is able to provide more resistance to the forces resulting from the explosion pressure in the interior of a collecting container in the tangential direction to the outer wall.
- the illustrated inventive lock device 60 consists of a first part 61, which has two barbs, and a second part 61 a with two brackets 62 which engage around the first part in a form-fitting manner.
- the two brackets 62 are pivotally mounted on parallel shafts 63, and coupled by suitable means, such as by interlocking serrations 64, as shown, such that the pivotal movements are in opposite directions.
- a spring element 65 is arranged between the two brackets 62 such that a spring force is overcome for opening the brackets got to.
- the lock device 60 according to the invention is opened by rotating a pivoting element 66 about an axis, thereby exerting a force on a clamp 62.
- the pivoting element 66 may be connected, for example, with a key or a door handle.
- the two parts 61, 61 a of the inventive lock device 60 are designed such that when closing the first part 61, the clamp 62 of the second part 61 a apart, and after passing through the part 61, the clamps 62 snap around the first part 61 ,
- An inventive lock device 60 with such a construction can absorb very large tensile forces in the closing direction.
- the lock device according to the invention has a support plate, which is arranged on the side facing away from the interior of the collecting container flush with the parts 61, 61 a. This support plate prevents slippage of the parts due to the deformation by the pressure wave in the radial direction, ie parallel to the axes 63 and perpendicular to the closing direction.
- the cover may additionally be provided with predetermined breaking points, which are separated on impact of the pressure wave, thus allowing the escape of the pressure wave, and avoid throwing off the cover. Also possible is the arrangement of insulating layers of water or compressible materials or sand, in the lid, in the base or in the wall.
- the approximately 1,800 fragmented fragments spread out after the detonation in a substantially spherical shape in the room, and have an average density of 4-5 splinters per square meter and an average kinetic energy of about 8OJ at a distance of 5 m from the detonation point.
- the original deceleration fuse was removed for the experiments, and the resulting cavity filled with Piastits explosive.
- the ignition took place via a plastic shock capsule 66 HU of the level 0/30.
- the explosions occurred at a constant height of 0.5 m, which corresponds to the probable average location of a bomb in a waste container.
- the grenade was positioned on a thin styrofoam column.
- Figure 14 shows the experimental setup in (a) side view and (b) floor plan.
- witness plates 70 made of steel 70a and aluminum 70b were added on three sides at an angle of 90 °. otherwise attached to the inventive container 1 to be tested.
- the used sheets of 2 mm thickness were 1 m wide and 2.5 m high, and were arranged in pairs. One pair was placed at a distance of 2.5 m to the front of the waste container under test, one pair at a distance of 7.5 m from the rear, and one pair at a distance of 5 m from the side.
- the detonation tests were recorded on a 4000-frame-per-second "Videal HG 100" high-speed camera 71.
- the individual witness panels were subdivided into eight equally sized sectors S1 to S8 and A1 to A8 of 50 x 62.5 cm 15 schematically shows the arrangement of the sectors on a pair of witness plates as seen from the location of the waste container, the letter S stands for sheet steel, the letter A for aluminum sheet, and the number of punctures of fragments in the sectors was counted after the test From the comparison of the values for steel and aluminum, it is possible to draw conclusions about the kinetic energy of the impacting splinters, whereas the values in the individual sectors provide information about the spatial distribution.
- FIG. 17 shows the course of the explosion of the explosive device up to 100 ms after the ignition.
- the first fragments (marked by arrows) hit the ground after about 1 ms, whereas the hot gases of the explosion, which cause the pressure wave, to expand a little slower.
- Table 1 shows the results of the count of the breakdowns in the individual sectors of the witness plates. As expected, the number of copies decreases with increasing distance due to the spatial distribution. The values for steel and aluminum are each substantially the same, indicating only a small decrease in kinetic energy.
- FIG. 16 shows the test model 1 with the explosive device 20 arranged in the interior.
- the explosive device is again arranged at a height of 0.5 m above the ground on a styrofoam pedestal.
- FIG. 18 shows the explosion of the explosive device until 125 ms after ignition. The door is on the left. At 1.25 ms the flash of the detonation is visible. At this time, the splinters have already reached the wall. At 2.75 ms, the pressure wave of the explosion hits the discs and passes through the insertion slot. The discs burst, and are thrown away by the pressure wave. The individual fragments were then within a radius of about 10 m.
- Figure 18 (e) shows the lid 10 which is thrown away by the pressure wave.
- Figure 18 (f) again shows the housing 6a flying to the right at an estimated speed of 4 to 6 m / s. The base remained at the installation site.
- FIGS. 19 to 22 show the individual parts of the test model 1 after the experiment.
- FIG. 19 shows the door 3 with the baffle 11, and
- FIG. 20 shows the housing 6a.
- the splitter apertures 16, 17 were partly torn off the wall 6 due to the forces during the tearing of the lock device 60 or of the hinges 18.
- the splinters were able to penetrate the polycarbonate disk of 8 mm thickness (see fragments in FIG.
- Table 2 shows the results of the count of carbon copies in the individual sectors of the witness panels after test experiment 1.
- the steel witness sheet also shows only three punctures at 2.5 m distance, less than 9% of the result of the reference test.
- the number dropped to 2.5 m only to 69% of the reference value. From this it can be concluded that, although most of the chips have penetrated the polycarbonate disks, but a large part Your speed, and thus your impulse and your kinetic energy have lost.
- FIG. 23 shows the course of the explosion of the explosive device until 100 ms after the ignition.
- the door is on the left again.
- the flash of the detonation is visible again.
- the pressure wave penetrates through the insertion slot and the connection points between the door and the housing, but not through the windows, which are not broken.
- Fig. 23 (e) shows the flying door 3 and the lid 10.
- Fig. 23 (f) shows the case 6a connected to the base 12 torn from the concrete floor.
- the distribution of the individual parts after the experiment is shown in FIG.
- the housing 6a remained in one piece except for the lid (see Fig. 25 (a)).
- the rear disk 9a 'consisting of two spaced disks was broken (see Fig. 25 (b)).
- FIG. 26 shows the inner 8 mm disc of the disc
- Fig. 26 (b) shows the outer 8 mm disc.
- Table 3 shows the results of the count of the punches in the individual sectors of the witness plates after test experiment 2.
- the steel witness plate shows no more punctures.
- 13 punches are still to be reported only at a distance of 2.5 m.
- a closer inspection of the disks revealed that most of the chips got stuck in the second 8mm disk.
- Test Trial 3 In a third experiment, a hand grenade of the Russian type M52 and M75 were simultaneously detonated in a collecting tank (test model 3). Again, it showed that practically all splinters were intercepted.
- suitable reinforcements By means of suitable reinforcements, the disassembly of the collecting container according to the invention into small individual parts can be prevented.
- suitable steel cable guards prevent the individual parts from being thrown far and wide by the pressure wave, and thus possible secondary damage.
- a collecting container In a further advantageous embodiment of a collecting container according to the invention, certain regions of the housing are annealed in order to predetermine the deformation by the pressure wave to a certain extent. Also, predetermined breaking points can be provided for this purpose.
- the individual steel cable fuses are arranged so that they form a net-like, and thus elastic, structure in the space in an unrolled state. This elasticity improves the maximum breaking load compared to wire rope guards, which are abruptly loaded only in the longitudinal direction.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Refuse Receptacles (AREA)
- Air Bags (AREA)
- Tents Or Canopies (AREA)
- Aiming, Guidance, Guns With A Light Source, Armor, Camouflage, And Targets (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CH6452006 | 2006-04-19 | ||
PCT/IB2007/051236 WO2007119194A2 (de) | 2006-04-19 | 2007-04-05 | Sammelbehälter mit explosions- und splitterschutz |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2007657A2 true EP2007657A2 (de) | 2008-12-31 |
Family
ID=38523359
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP07735405A Withdrawn EP2007657A2 (de) | 2006-04-19 | 2007-04-05 | Sammelbehälter mit explosions- und splitterschutz |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP2007657A2 (de) |
WO (1) | WO2007119194A2 (de) |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FR3103181B1 (fr) * | 2019-11-18 | 2021-11-05 | S N Rossignol | Système de corbeille à déchets anti-nuisible |
Family Cites Families (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4955497A (en) * | 1989-02-14 | 1990-09-11 | Joseph D. Winden | Litter container |
GB2279231B (en) * | 1993-06-26 | 1997-07-02 | Glasdon Ltd | Bomb-resistant container |
GB2288528A (en) * | 1994-04-12 | 1995-10-25 | Derek Thomas Charles H Lampard | Bomb-resistant litter bins |
DE19619357A1 (de) * | 1996-05-14 | 1997-11-20 | Degussa | Durchschußhemmende Verglasung sowie deren Verwendung |
DE19629361C1 (de) * | 1996-07-20 | 1997-11-20 | Heraeus Instr Gmbh | Schloß |
GB0103300D0 (en) | 2001-02-09 | 2001-03-28 | Holland Steven | Blast attention litter bin |
FR2862293B1 (fr) * | 2003-11-17 | 2005-12-23 | Michel Hervieu | Dispositif de container anti-attentat |
-
2007
- 2007-04-05 WO PCT/IB2007/051236 patent/WO2007119194A2/de active Application Filing
- 2007-04-05 EP EP07735405A patent/EP2007657A2/de not_active Withdrawn
Non-Patent Citations (2)
Title |
---|
None * |
See also references of WO2007119194A2 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2007119194A3 (de) | 2008-02-21 |
WO2007119194A2 (de) | 2007-10-25 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
DE60007005T2 (de) | Explosionsbarriere | |
DE69916101T2 (de) | Stossdämpfende barriere | |
DE202008000808U1 (de) | Absorberelement für einen Behälter zur Aufbewahrung von Gegenständen | |
EP0897097A2 (de) | Sandwichplatte zum Schutz gegen explosive Minen | |
DE102009036956A1 (de) | Schutzsystem für Fahrzeuge und andere Objekte | |
EP2007657A2 (de) | Sammelbehälter mit explosions- und splitterschutz | |
DE102009051436B4 (de) | Schutzsystem für Fahrzeuge und andere Objekte | |
DE202019001557U1 (de) | Geschossfang | |
DE60305706T2 (de) | Schutzwand mit einer panzerung gegen eindringen für einen behälter und behälter mit einer solchen wand | |
DE3320675A1 (de) | Fahrzeug zum beseitigen von explosiven gegenstaenden, insbesondere bomben | |
DE19635549C2 (de) | Wertstoffsammelbehälter aus Stahlblech mit inneren Einrichtungen, insbesondere für Altglas | |
DE102012006040A1 (de) | Verpackung für Hohlladungen | |
WO2011057628A1 (de) | Schutzelement zum schutz gegen hohlladungsgeschosse, schutzabdeckung für ein schutzelement, geschütztes objekt sowie verfahren zum schutz eines objektes | |
EP1990599A1 (de) | Vorrichtung zum Auffangen von ballistischen Geschossen, sowie Verfahren und System zu deren Zurückgewinnung | |
DE682180C (de) | ||
DE19628105A1 (de) | Mehrschichtiges Leichtpanzerelement | |
EP2807444A1 (de) | Schutzelement zum schutz gegen ballistische geschosse und militärisches fahrzeug | |
DE4441075C1 (de) | Minen-Räumfahrzeug | |
DE102009031443A1 (de) | Verfahren zur Vorbereitung von Hohlladungen zum Transport,, welches eine sichere Versendung ermöglicht | |
DE7733465U1 (de) | Sammelbehaelter fuer alt-hohlglaskoerper, wie flaschen u.dgl. | |
DE102005020657A1 (de) | Schutzvorrichtung gegen Hohlladungsgeschosse | |
EP1227293B1 (de) | Reaktives Schutzelement an militärischen Fahrzeugen | |
AT384856B (de) | Einrichtung zur erhoehung der beschussfestigkeit von waenden | |
AT393561B (de) | Sicherungsvorrichtung fuer landminen | |
DE19629310A1 (de) | Panzerelement |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20080811 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL BA HR MK RS |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: E01C 23/22 20060101AFI20090416BHEP |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20130307 |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: ANTA SWISS AG |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN |
|
18D | Application deemed to be withdrawn |
Effective date: 20191101 |