EP1923657B1 - A compact, fully stabilised, four axes, remote weapon station with independent line of sight - Google Patents

A compact, fully stabilised, four axes, remote weapon station with independent line of sight Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1923657B1
EP1923657B1 EP06124200.4A EP06124200A EP1923657B1 EP 1923657 B1 EP1923657 B1 EP 1923657B1 EP 06124200 A EP06124200 A EP 06124200A EP 1923657 B1 EP1923657 B1 EP 1923657B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
weapon
sight
remote
axis
sight unit
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Revoked
Application number
EP06124200.4A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1923657A1 (en
Inventor
Robert Svensson
Martin Stalfors
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Saab AB
Original Assignee
Saab AB
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=37897300&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP1923657(B1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Saab AB filed Critical Saab AB
Priority to EP06124200.4A priority Critical patent/EP1923657B1/en
Priority to US11/984,397 priority patent/US20080148931A1/en
Publication of EP1923657A1 publication Critical patent/EP1923657A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1923657B1 publication Critical patent/EP1923657B1/en
Revoked legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41WEAPONS
    • F41GWEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING
    • F41G3/00Aiming or laying means
    • F41G3/14Indirect aiming means
    • F41G3/16Sighting devices adapted for indirect laying of fire
    • F41G3/165Sighting devices adapted for indirect laying of fire using a TV-monitor
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41WEAPONS
    • F41GWEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING
    • F41G3/00Aiming or laying means
    • F41G3/22Aiming or laying means for vehicle-borne armament, e.g. on aircraft
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41WEAPONS
    • F41GWEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING
    • F41G5/00Elevating or traversing control systems for guns
    • F41G5/14Elevating or traversing control systems for guns for vehicle-borne guns

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a remote weapon station according to the precharacterising part of claim 1.
  • the present invention relates, but not limited, to industries making remotely controlled weapon stations, machine-guns, automatic grenade launchers, missile firing equipment etc.
  • a three axes remote weapon station comprises a gun being turnable about a first transverse axis and a second elevation axis and a sight unit rotatable about a third elevation axis, wherein the third axis is primary used when firing grenade launcher type weapons.
  • the four axes weapon stations is provided for that the line of sight can be controlled independently of the bore axis of the weapon, wherein the bore axis weapon is stabilised in two axes.
  • Prior art systems having four axes arrangement wherein solely the weapon's bore axis is two axes stabilized involve that the field of vision must be selected such that the target remain within the field of vision when the vehicle is moving (roll/pitch/heading). Also this means that it is difficult to measure the distance to the target when the vehicle moves, especially when angles for super elevation and lead angles are added to compensate for relative motion between the target and the weapon station. Furthermore, prior art systems wherein solely the sight unit's line of sight is two axes stabilized involve that it is difficult to hit the target with fired ammunition.
  • US 5273236 discloses an apparatus provided for designating a plurality of objects within a field of view and thereafter simultaneously tracking each of the objects.
  • a further document, US 4576346 describes a seeker head for a target seeking missile, which comprises a seeker adapted to be directed to a target.
  • EP 111 192 discloses a weapon control system including target search and tracking means wherein the target search means are mounted on a column connected with the gun turret, and wherein the target tracking means are mounted on the gun and are able to slew about two mutually perpendicular axes.
  • the object of the present invention is to overcome the drawbacks of known techniques.
  • the remote weapon station is characterised by the features of claim's 1 characterising part.
  • a not bulky remote weapon station is achieved at the same time as the operator of the remote weapon station is able to perform targeting and surveillance without changing the remote weapon station's silhouette and thus reducing the risk of being detected by visual means.
  • the concentration of masses will also be symmetrically arranged which will make the remote weapon station possible to stabilise without adding extra weight in the form of undesired counter weights or larger drives. Thereby increase the usage of the weapon station when the platform on which the weapon station is mounted is moving. Thereby is also achieved a possibility to utilise the sensor without pointing a gun directly at the object of interest.
  • a positive effect is that a weapon station can be provided with a high precision stabilised system having a sighting function with an unitary installation of a sight unit matching the performance of the weapon and at the same time providing a sufficient performance for e.g. missile guidance.
  • the sight unit in an effective manner can follow a target by controlling the weapon via a control unit for aiming-off, at the same time as compensation means provides for compensation of eventual uneven motion of the remote weapon station, for example being mounted at a gun boat.
  • the control unit can control the sight unit independently of the gun aiming by means of the arrangement of the remote weapon station according to the present invention.
  • a compact remote weapon station is thus achieved having a sight unit with a totally independent line of sight relatively the pointing of the gun having the sight unit correctly balanced relatively the weapon and providing an exact line of sight.
  • a remote weapon station having a sight unit, which weapon station can be used utilizing the sight unit without the need of other kinds of compensation for lead angles and/or super elevation.
  • the objects of the invention is to provide a compact remote weapon station, wherein the assembly permits that the angle between the bore axis of the weapon and the line of sight of the sight in a controllable manner can be made independently of each other.
  • the weapon's bore axis being stabilized in two axes and the sight unit's line of sight being stabilized in two axes.
  • the target can be placed in the centre of a image generating display and the distance to the target continuously can be measured by a laser range finder etc, wherein the weapon's bore axis can be directed in such a way that the fired ammunition hits the target with precision. Also is achieved that the bore axis of the weapon and the line of sight of the sight unit can be oriented relative each other in such a way that the sight unit can be used without the need of directing the weapon towards the target.
  • the sight unit's line of sight can be stabilized and directed with a higher accuracy than being provided by systems only stabilising the weapon's bore axis.
  • the weapon support is rotatable about the first transverse axis independently of the rotatable motion of the sight unit about the third transverse axis such that the weapon can be directed essentially in another direction relatively the search direction of the sight unit.
  • the weapon can be rotated to the opposite direction relatively to the sight unit's target tracking(or search) direction.
  • This is also a beneficial feature for shortening the time when for example a supporting leg of the weapon carriage covers the line of sight, by controlling the weapon support's and sight unit's relative rotation.
  • the weapon support also is arranged to be controlled to rotate about the first transverse axis dependent upon the rotatable motion of the sight unit about the third transverse axis.
  • the first axis coincides with the third axis.
  • a remote weapon station being capable to utilize a compact motor driving system using the same axis for the transverse rotations.
  • the sight unit comprises a first essentially spherical, hollow body which interacts with a second essentially rotationally symmetrical body, both bodies being rotatable in relation to one another about the transverse axis, the spherical body accommodating at least one electro-optical sensor, being rotatable about the fourth elevation axis.
  • the sight unit can be independently stabilised, thereby making the remote weapon station optimized for high precision sensor systems, e.g. laser illumination at long ranges.
  • the use of a sensor sight system with a spherical form arranged in the remote weapon station provides independent 360° traverse operation with an optimal configuration of the remote weapon station with regard to overall volume, interior sensor volume utilisation, ballistic protection, signature management, and weapon dumping/elevation angles.
  • the weapon support comprises a tiltable leg arrangement supporting the weapon attachment device, the leg arrangement being tiltable over the first essentially spherical, hollow body.
  • the remote weapon station can be made lower for transportation purposes by tilting the weapon attachment device over the sight unit.
  • the tilting action performing an imaginary circular arc essentially with the same radius as the radius of the first essentially spherical, hollow body.
  • the sight unit comprises a first essentially cylindrical, hollow body accommodating at least one electro-optical sensor.
  • the hollow body encloses all interior movable parts, such as electro-optical sensors, of the sight unit for hiding said parts.
  • the body is preferably armour cased and transparent and/or partly transparent.
  • the weapon support being comprised in a motorized gun control system.
  • the remote weapon station is applicable to an available platform, such as a truck, an armoured car, gun boat, tank, helicopter etc.
  • the sight unit is arranged for controlling at least one weapon disposed at a distance from the remote weapon station.
  • a remote weapon station 1 is schematically illustrated.
  • the remote weapon station 1 is mountable onto a gun boat (not shown) or the like.
  • the remote weapon station 1 comprises a weapon support 3 adapted for rotatable motion about a frst transverse axis X1.
  • the weapon support 3 supports a weapon attachment device 5 being rotatable about a second elevation axis X2.
  • the second elevation axis X2 comprises an U-shaped part 7 for accommodation of a gun 9.
  • the gun 9 is mounted onto the weapon attachment device 5, such as a bayonet fitting (not shown) connected to the second elevation axis X2, wherein the gun 9 easily can be disconnected from the weapon attachment device 5.
  • the weapon support 3 supports two legs 11 extending from a platform 13 of the weapon support 3, which platform 13 being rotatable about the axis X1. Between the legs 11 and at their upper ends 15 is the U-shaped part 7 mounted. One of the legs 11 accommodates an ammunition belt guide (not shown).
  • the remote weapon station 1 comprises a sight unit 17 for observation of the surroundings and for measuring in a detected target, tracking, classifying the type of target, identifying the target etc.
  • the sight unit 17 is rotatable about a third transverse axis X3 and about a fourth elevation axis X4.
  • the sight unit 17 has at least one electro-optical sensor 19 with associated apertures 21 arranged in the sight unit's 17 spherical hollow body 23.
  • the sight unit 17 is mounted between the weapon support 3 (platform or fundament) and the weapon (gun) attachment device 5, whereby is achieved a compact remote weapon station 1 having a sight unit 17 with a totally independent line of sight relatively the bore axis of the gun 9.
  • a control unit 25 is arranged remote from the weapon station 1 and is adapted to control a weapon driving means 27 for rotating the gun 9 about the first transverse axis X1 and the second elevation axis X2 and also to control a sight unit driving means 29 for rotation about the third transverse axis X3 and the fourth elevation axis X4.
  • FIGS. 2a, 2b, 2c are shown in a plane view the remote weapon station 1 performing a sight unit rotation towards a target/object 31 while pointing the gun 9 in a somewhat opposite direction.
  • both the gun 9 and the sight unit 17 are directed in the same direction.
  • the sight unit 17 has started it's rotation r for localising the target 31 without pointing the gun 9 at the target 31. In some cases this performance can be beneficial since pointing a gun at an object may result in a non-desirable reaction.
  • FIG. 2b is shown how the sight line L will be covered by one of the legs 11 of the weapon support 3.
  • This problem is partly solved by using e.g. two sensors or two in pair arranged sensors 19, such as one TV- and one IR-sensor or two in pair arranged TV- and IR-sensors.
  • the first sensor or pair of sensors observes the surroundings, the second sensor or pair of sensors instantaneously will lose contact with the target 31 since the sight line L is covered by the leg 11.
  • the second sensor or pair of sensors pick up the line of sight to the target L.
  • the control unit 25 controls the weapon support 3 to rotate in an opposite direction marked with arrow r2, see FIG. 2c (an overlapping function).
  • the legs 11 can be arranged as a system of framework.
  • the apertures and sensors can be parked occasionally behind one of the legs 11.
  • the sight unit 17 is rotatable about the third transverse axis X3 and about, perpendicular to the third axis X3, the fourth elevation axis X4, independently of the position or rotation of the weapon support 3 about the first transverse axis X1 and the second elevation axis X2.
  • a spherical hollow body 23 embodying the sight sensors 19 an independent 360° traverse operation of the sight unit 17 is possible without moving the gun 9, wherein the silhouette of the remote weapon station 1 not being changed, thus minimizing the risk of being detected by the object/target 31 by visual means.
  • FIGS. 1 and 2 show a sight unit 17 comprising an spherical hollow body 23 embodying the sensors 19, as an alternative the sight unit 17 may comprise a first essentially cylindrical or cubical, hollow body 23 accommodating at least one electro-optical sensor 19.
  • FIGS. 3a, 3b, 3c Such an embodiment is shown in FIGS. 3a, 3b, 3c .
  • FIG. 3c shows the sight unit 17 directed to the opposite direction relatively the gun 9 in a horizontal action.
  • FIGS. 3a, 3b, 3c The embodiment of FIGS. 3a, 3b, 3c is arranged such that the first transverse axis X1 coincides with the third transverse axis X3 of the sight unit 17, whereby is provided a remote weapon station 1 being capable to utilize a compact motor driving system using the same axis for the transverse rotations as being described below with reference to FIG. 6 .
  • a cylindrical hollow body 33 encloses all interior movable parts, such as electro-optical sensors, of the sight unit for protecting said parts.
  • the body is transparent and armour cased. In such a way, on one hand the interior equipment is protected from splinters, small arms fire or ricochets etc., and on the other hand hidden from being detected by the object/target.
  • the sight unit 17 comprises an essentially spherical body 23 adjacent to one end of a rotationally symmetrical body 35, preferably of circular cylindrical shape.
  • the spherical body 23 comprises a circular central section 37 surrounded by two peripheral half sections 39 on each side (only one section 39 is illustrated with broken line).
  • Each peripheral half section is provided with two apertures 21.
  • the sections each only have one aperture.
  • the spherical hollow body 23 is rotatable in relation to the rotationally symmetrical body 35 about the third transverse axis X3.
  • the two peripheral half sections 39 are rigidly mechanically interconnected and arranged rotatable so as to be capable of being rotated about the fourth elevation axis X4.
  • the elevation can be limited to a range wherein the apertures 21 are in one end position oriented at an angle downwards relative to the horizontal plane and, in the other end position, oriented at an angle upwards relative to the horizontal plane.
  • the electro-optical sensors 19 can be selected from a variety of sensors, e.g. TV, IRV, laser rangefinder and laser illuminator.
  • the use of the sight unit 17 with a spherical form arranged in the remote weapon station 1 provides independent 360° traverse operation with an optimal configuration of the remote weapon station 1 with regard to overall volume, interior sensor volume utilisation, ballistic protection, signature management, and weapon dumping/elevation angles.
  • FIG. 5a and 5b are shown an embodiment of the remote weapon station 1, wherein the weapon support 3 comprises a tiltable leg arrangement 41 supporting the weapon attachment device 5.
  • the leg arrangement 41 comprises two legs 11 being tiltable about a tilting point p over the essentially spherical, hollow body 23 being also shown in FIG. 4 .
  • the tilting action of the weapon attachment device 5 over the sight unit 17 performs an imaginary circular arc c essentially with the same radius as the radius of the circumference of the essentially spherical, hollow body 23.
  • the remote weapon station 1 can be made lower in a transportation mode without the need of making the volume of the sight equipment smaller.
  • FIG. 6 is schematically illustrated a compact motor driving system 43 using the same axis X1, X3 for the transverse rotations of both the sensor unit 17 and the weapon support 3.
  • the first axis X1 coincides with the third axis X3.
  • a first rotor 45 is arranged rotatable about the common transverse axis X1 and X3 and is connected to the legs 11 of the weapon support 3 and via a first bearing 47 connected to the weapon carrier 49, such as a gun boat.
  • a first stator 51 actuates the first rotor 45 for transverse rotation of the gun 9.
  • a further second bearing 53 is arranged between the first rotor 45 and a second rotor 55 carrying the circular central section 37, within which the electro-optical sensors 19 are rotatable arranged for elevation rotation about the fourth elevation axis X4.
  • a second stator 57 actuates the second rotor 55 for the transverse rotation of the circular central section 37 and the peripheral sections (not shown) of the sight unit 17.
  • FIG. 7 is shown schematically the aiming of the remote weapon station 1 at a moving target 31.
  • the gun's 9 pointing direction and the sight line L of the sight unit 17 is broken for sake of clarity and the target 31 is drawn smaller than the remote weapon station 1 for the sake of illustration.
  • An aiming-off angle ⁇ is required as the target 31 is moving.
  • the compact remote weapon station's 1 sight unit 17 detecting the target 31 is rotated independently of the gun's 9 motion.
  • the control unit 25 is estimated the required aiming-off angle ⁇ , dependent upon the velocity of the target 31 and eventually the velocity of the carrier carrying the remote weapon station 1. Also parameters as wind direction and speed etc. are considered.
  • An uniaxial rate gyro is stabilizing the gun 9 via an elevation drive unit 27 and a transverse drive unit arranged at the second elevation axis X2 and the transverse axis, and the electro-optical sensors 19 are stabilized via a sensor unit elevation drive system (not shown) of an elevation drive system and transverse drive system arranged within the circular central section 37 of the sight unit 17.
  • the remote weapon station 1 is according to one embodiment of the invention provided with a weapon support 3 being comprised in a motorized gun control system. Thereby is achieved that the remote weapon station 1 is applicable to an available carrier, such as a truck, car, gun boat, tank, helicopter etc.
  • the sight unit 17 of the remote weapon station 1 can control at least one separate weapon 60 placed at a distance from the remote weapon station 1.Control is achieved by means of being directly connected to the weapon, illuminating the target for the weapon or providing in-the-air guidance to the weapon or a combination of any of these means.
  • the invention is not limited to a specific embodiment herein, but may also consist of several combinations of the presented embodiments.
  • only one peripheral half section can provide an aperture and none in the other section.
  • the elevation drive system and transverse drive system may be arranged in one of the supports of the sight unit.
  • the sight unit's hollow body can have a central section being rotatable and two outer section acting as supports (fork-shaped assembly) or the section being supported by only one peripheral support.
  • the sight unit may be placed between the weapon support and the weapon attachment device by mounting the sight unit "hanging" under the weapon attachment device or adjacent the same.

Description

    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention relates to a remote weapon station according to the precharacterising part of claim 1. The present invention relates, but not limited, to industries making remotely controlled weapon stations, machine-guns, automatic grenade launchers, missile firing equipment etc.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • Remote weapon stations of the type indicated in the introduction are available on the market today. A three axes remote weapon station comprises a gun being turnable about a first transverse axis and a second elevation axis and a sight unit rotatable about a third elevation axis, wherein the third axis is primary used when firing grenade launcher type weapons. The four axes weapon stations is provided for that the line of sight can be controlled independently of the bore axis of the weapon, wherein the bore axis weapon is stabilised in two axes. However, in such a station according to prior art the freedom of movement of the sight unit is limited, since the sight unit must be moved together with the gun, limiting the usage of the sight and weapon station when the relative speed between the target and the weapon station is high since a high relative speed requires large offset angles between the line of sight and the bore axis of the gun in order to hit the target. Also the use of such prior art systems is limited when the platform on which the weapon station is mounted is performing a roll motion relative to the bore axis of the gun when the gun is directed to hit the target. Furthermore prior art weapon stations with three or four axes all make a change of silhouette when the sight unit and thus the weapon support rotates.
  • Known systems having four axes stabilizing arrangements are bulky in width or height. This since the sight unit is placed above or attached onto the side of the weapon support. Prior art systems with the sight unit attached onto the side of the weapon, wherein the concentration of masses asymmetrically will cause the station to be unbalanced, are also difficult to stabilise without the use of undesired counter weights or larger and thus heavier drives. Also prior art systems being three axes stabilizing arrangements, wherein the bore axis of the weapon is stabilised in two axes and the line of sight line of the sight unit is stabilised in one axis, suffer from the disadvantages that an image generating sensor (such as TV, IR etc.) field of vision must be adapted for holding the target within said field of vision, which is extremely difficult when a vehicle comprising the station is moving since the system must be directed towards the target for facilitating the determination of the distance to the target, requiring a long time.
  • Prior art systems having four axes arrangement wherein solely the weapon's bore axis is two axes stabilized, involve that the field of vision must be selected such that the target remain within the field of vision when the vehicle is moving (roll/pitch/heading). Also this means that it is difficult to measure the distance to the target when the vehicle moves, especially when angles for super elevation and lead angles are added to compensate for relative motion between the target and the weapon station. Furthermore, prior art systems wherein solely the sight unit's line of sight is two axes stabilized involve that it is difficult to hit the target with fired ammunition.
  • US 5273236 discloses an apparatus provided for designating a plurality of objects within a field of view and thereafter simultaneously tracking each of the objects. A further document, US 4576346 , describes a seeker head for a target seeking missile, which comprises a seeker adapted to be directed to a target.
  • EP 111 192 discloses a weapon control system including target search and tracking means wherein the target search means are mounted on a column connected with the gun turret, and wherein the target tracking means are mounted on the gun and are able to slew about two mutually perpendicular axes.
  • The object of the present invention is to overcome the drawbacks of known techniques.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • This has been solved by a remote weapon station being defined in the introduction, the remote weapon station is characterised by the features of claim's 1 characterising part. In such a way a not bulky remote weapon station is achieved at the same time as the operator of the remote weapon station is able to perform targeting and surveillance without changing the remote weapon station's silhouette and thus reducing the risk of being detected by visual means. The concentration of masses will also be symmetrically arranged which will make the remote weapon station possible to stabilise without adding extra weight in the form of undesired counter weights or larger drives. Thereby increase the usage of the weapon station when the platform on which the weapon station is mounted is moving. Thereby is also achieved a possibility to utilise the sensor without pointing a gun directly at the object of interest. Also there is a possibility to start searching for a new target while firing the gun at the first acquired target. A positive effect is that a weapon station can be provided with a high precision stabilised system having a sighting function with an unitary installation of a sight unit matching the performance of the weapon and at the same time providing a sufficient performance for e.g. missile guidance. Thereby is also achieved that the sight unit in an effective manner can follow a target by controlling the weapon via a control unit for aiming-off, at the same time as compensation means provides for compensation of eventual uneven motion of the remote weapon station, for example being mounted at a gun boat. This is achieved by that the control unit can control the sight unit independently of the gun aiming by means of the arrangement of the remote weapon station according to the present invention. A compact remote weapon station is thus achieved having a sight unit with a totally independent line of sight relatively the pointing of the gun having the sight unit correctly balanced relatively the weapon and providing an exact line of sight. Thus is also achieved a remote weapon station having a sight unit, which weapon station can be used utilizing the sight unit without the need of other kinds of compensation for lead angles and/or super elevation.
  • Thus, the objects of the invention is to provide a compact remote weapon station, wherein the assembly permits that the angle between the bore axis of the weapon and the line of sight of the sight in a controllable manner can be made independently of each other. The weapon's bore axis being stabilized in two axes and the sight unit's line of sight being stabilized in two axes.
  • The effects being provided by such an arrangement is for example that the target can be placed in the centre of a image generating display and the distance to the target continuously can be measured by a laser range finder etc, wherein the weapon's bore axis can be directed in such a way that the fired ammunition hits the target with precision. Also is achieved that the bore axis of the weapon and the line of sight of the sight unit can be oriented relative each other in such a way that the sight unit can be used without the need of directing the weapon towards the target.
  • Also is achieved the advantage that the sight unit's line of sight can be stabilized and directed with a higher accuracy than being provided by systems only stabilising the weapon's bore axis.
  • Preferably, the weapon support is rotatable about the first transverse axis independently of the rotatable motion of the sight unit about the third transverse axis such that the weapon can be directed essentially in another direction relatively the search direction of the sight unit.
  • In such a way is achieved that the weapon can be rotated to the opposite direction relatively to the sight unit's target tracking(or search) direction. This is also a beneficial feature for shortening the time when for example a supporting leg of the weapon carriage covers the line of sight, by controlling the weapon support's and sight unit's relative rotation.
  • Suitably, the weapon support also is arranged to be controlled to rotate about the first transverse axis dependent upon the rotatable motion of the sight unit about the third transverse axis.
  • Thereby is provided an alternative mode for controlling the weapon support to follow the sight unit's rotational movement, at the same time as the weapon support can be disconnected from following the target.
  • Suitably, the first axis coincides with the third axis.
  • Thereby is provided a remote weapon station being capable to utilize a compact motor driving system using the same axis for the transverse rotations.
  • Preferably, the sight unit comprises a first essentially spherical, hollow body which interacts with a second essentially rotationally symmetrical body, both bodies being rotatable in relation to one another about the transverse axis, the spherical body accommodating at least one electro-optical sensor, being rotatable about the fourth elevation axis.
  • Thus is also achieved that the sight unit can be independently stabilised, thereby making the remote weapon station optimized for high precision sensor systems, e.g. laser illumination at long ranges. The use of a sensor sight system with a spherical form arranged in the remote weapon station provides independent 360° traverse operation with an optimal configuration of the remote weapon station with regard to overall volume, interior sensor volume utilisation, ballistic protection, signature management, and weapon dumping/elevation angles.
  • Alternatively, the weapon support comprises a tiltable leg arrangement supporting the weapon attachment device, the leg arrangement being tiltable over the first essentially spherical, hollow body.
  • In such a way the remote weapon station can be made lower for transportation purposes by tilting the weapon attachment device over the sight unit. The tilting action performing an imaginary circular arc essentially with the same radius as the radius of the first essentially spherical, hollow body.
  • Preferably, the sight unit comprises a first essentially cylindrical, hollow body accommodating at least one electro-optical sensor.
  • Thereby is achieved a large volume for sight equipment even still performing an optimal signature management, that is having essentially the same silhouette independently the sensor transverse motion about the third axis.
  • Alternatively, the hollow body encloses all interior movable parts, such as electro-optical sensors, of the sight unit for hiding said parts. The body is preferably armour cased and transparent and/or partly transparent.
  • In such a way, on one hand the interior equipment is protected from splinters, small arms fire or ricochets etc., and on the other hand hidden from being detected by the object/target.
  • Alternatively, the weapon support being comprised in a motorized gun control system.
  • Thereby is achieved that the remote weapon station is applicable to an available platform, such as a truck, an armoured car, gun boat, tank, helicopter etc.
  • Suitably, the sight unit is arranged for controlling at least one weapon disposed at a distance from the remote weapon station.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • The present invention will now be described by way of example with reference to the accompanying schematic drawings of which:
    • FIG. 1a schematically illustrates a remote weapon station in a front view,
    • FIG. 1b schematically illustrates the station in FIG. 1a in a side view,
    • FIG. 1c schematically illustrates the station in FIG. 1a in a plane view,
    • FIGS 2a-2c schematically illustrate the station in FIG. 1c in motion,
    • FIGS. 3a-3c schematically illustrate a remote weapon station according to a second embodiment,
    • FIGS 3d-3f schematically illustrate a remote weapon station according to a further embodiment,
    • FIG. 4 schematically illustrates parts of a sight unit shown in FIGs 1a-2c,
    • FIGS. 5a-5b schematically illustrate a leg arrangement of a remote weapon station,
    • FIG. 6 schematically illustrates a motor driving system of the remote weapon station in FIG. 4, and
    • FIG. 7 schematically illustrates the aiming of the remote weapon station at a moving target.
    DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings related to the embodiments, wherein for the sake of clarity and understanding of the invention some details of no importance are deleted from the drawings.
  • Referring to FIGS. 1a, 1b, 1c, a remote weapon station 1 is schematically illustrated. The remote weapon station 1 is mountable onto a gun boat (not shown) or the like. The remote weapon station 1 comprises a weapon support 3 adapted for rotatable motion about a frst transverse axis X1.
  • The weapon support 3 supports a weapon attachment device 5 being rotatable about a second elevation axis X2. The second elevation axis X2 comprises an U-shaped part 7 for accommodation of a gun 9. The gun 9 is mounted onto the weapon attachment device 5, such as a bayonet fitting (not shown) connected to the second elevation axis X2, wherein the gun 9 easily can be disconnected from the weapon attachment device 5.
  • The weapon support 3 supports two legs 11 extending from a platform 13 of the weapon support 3, which platform 13 being rotatable about the axis X1. Between the legs 11 and at their upper ends 15 is the U-shaped part 7 mounted. One of the legs 11 accommodates an ammunition belt guide (not shown).
  • The remote weapon station 1 comprises a sight unit 17 for observation of the surroundings and for measuring in a detected target, tracking, classifying the type of target, identifying the target etc. The sight unit 17 is rotatable about a third transverse axis X3 and about a fourth elevation axis X4. The sight unit 17 has at least one electro-optical sensor 19 with associated apertures 21 arranged in the sight unit's 17 spherical hollow body 23. The sight unit 17 is mounted between the weapon support 3 (platform or fundament) and the weapon (gun) attachment device 5, whereby is achieved a compact remote weapon station 1 having a sight unit 17 with a totally independent line of sight relatively the bore axis of the gun 9. It also means that the sight unit 17 can be correctly stabilized/directed relatively the gun 9 and providing an exact line of sight. Since the gun 9 is dispensed in a vertical plane comprising the first transverse axis X1 and essentially the third transverse axis X3, an optimal aiming can be achieved. A control unit 25 is arranged remote from the weapon station 1 and is adapted to control a weapon driving means 27 for rotating the gun 9 about the first transverse axis X1 and the second elevation axis X2 and also to control a sight unit driving means 29 for rotation about the third transverse axis X3 and the fourth elevation axis X4. By arranging the sight unit 17 between the weapon support 3 (fundament or platform) and the weapon (gun 9) cables and wires can be hidden and protected and easy to mount during the manufactory of the station.
  • In FIGS. 2a, 2b, 2c are shown in a plane view the remote weapon station 1 performing a sight unit rotation towards a target/object 31 while pointing the gun 9 in a somewhat opposite direction. In FIG. 2a both the gun 9 and the sight unit 17 are directed in the same direction. In FIG. 2b the sight unit 17 has started it's rotation r for localising the target 31 without pointing the gun 9 at the target 31. In some cases this performance can be beneficial since pointing a gun at an object may result in a non-desirable reaction.
  • Meanwhile the sight unit 17 rotates, the sight unit's 17 sensors 19 perform a scanning of the surroundings. In FIG. 2b is shown how the sight line L will be covered by one of the legs 11 of the weapon support 3. This problem is partly solved by using e.g. two sensors or two in pair arranged sensors 19, such as one TV- and one IR-sensor or two in pair arranged TV- and IR-sensors. Meanwhile the first sensor or pair of sensors observes the surroundings, the second sensor or pair of sensors instantaneously will lose contact with the target 31 since the sight line L is covered by the leg 11. When the first sensor or pair of sensors has lost contact with the target 31, the second sensor or pair of sensors pick up the line of sight to the target L. For even more shortening the time, when the leg 11 covers the sensors 19, the control unit 25 (see FIG. 1a) controls the weapon support 3 to rotate in an opposite direction marked with arrow r2, see FIG. 2c (an overlapping function). For even better visibility of the sensors 19, the legs 11 can be arranged as a system of framework. For protection of the sensors the apertures and sensors can be parked occasionally behind one of the legs 11.
  • The sight unit 17 is rotatable about the third transverse axis X3 and about, perpendicular to the third axis X3, the fourth elevation axis X4, independently of the position or rotation of the weapon support 3 about the first transverse axis X1 and the second elevation axis X2. By using a spherical hollow body 23 embodying the sight sensors 19, an independent 360° traverse operation of the sight unit 17 is possible without moving the gun 9, wherein the silhouette of the remote weapon station 1 not being changed, thus minimizing the risk of being detected by the object/target 31 by visual means.
  • Whereas the FIGS. 1 and 2 show a sight unit 17 comprising an spherical hollow body 23 embodying the sensors 19, as an alternative the sight unit 17 may comprise a first essentially cylindrical or cubical, hollow body 23 accommodating at least one electro-optical sensor 19. Such an embodiment is shown in FIGS. 3a, 3b, 3c. Thereby is achieved a large volume for sight equipment even still performing an optimal signature management, that is having essentially the same silhouette independently of the sensor transverse motion about the third axis X3. The FIG. 3c shows the sight unit 17 directed to the opposite direction relatively the gun 9 in a horizontal action.
  • The embodiment of FIGS. 3a, 3b, 3c is arranged such that the first transverse axis X1 coincides with the third transverse axis X3 of the sight unit 17, whereby is provided a remote weapon station 1 being capable to utilize a compact motor driving system using the same axis for the transverse rotations as being described below with reference to FIG. 6.
  • A cylindrical hollow body 33 encloses all interior movable parts, such as electro-optical sensors, of the sight unit for protecting said parts. The body is transparent and armour cased. In such a way, on one hand the interior equipment is protected from splinters, small arms fire or ricochets etc., and on the other hand hidden from being detected by the object/target.
  • In FIG. 4 is shown the sight unit 17 in FIGS. 1a, 1b, 1c more in detail. The sight unit 17 comprises an essentially spherical body 23 adjacent to one end of a rotationally symmetrical body 35, preferably of circular cylindrical shape. The spherical body 23 comprises a circular central section 37 surrounded by two peripheral half sections 39 on each side (only one section 39 is illustrated with broken line). Each peripheral half section is provided with two apertures 21. Of course can according to other embodiments the sections each only have one aperture.
  • The spherical hollow body 23 is rotatable in relation to the rotationally symmetrical body 35 about the third transverse axis X3. By the rotation about the third transverse axis X3 it is possible to bring about 360° rotation. The two peripheral half sections 39 are rigidly mechanically interconnected and arranged rotatable so as to be capable of being rotated about the fourth elevation axis X4. The elevation can be limited to a range wherein the apertures 21 are in one end position oriented at an angle downwards relative to the horizontal plane and, in the other end position, oriented at an angle upwards relative to the horizontal plane.
  • The electro-optical sensors 19 can be selected from a variety of sensors, e.g. TV, IRV, laser rangefinder and laser illuminator.
  • The use of the sight unit 17 with a spherical form arranged in the remote weapon station 1 provides independent 360° traverse operation with an optimal configuration of the remote weapon station 1 with regard to overall volume, interior sensor volume utilisation, ballistic protection, signature management, and weapon dumping/elevation angles.
  • In FIG. 5a and 5b are shown an embodiment of the remote weapon station 1, wherein the weapon support 3 comprises a tiltable leg arrangement 41 supporting the weapon attachment device 5. The leg arrangement 41 comprises two legs 11 being tiltable about a tilting point p over the essentially spherical, hollow body 23 being also shown in FIG. 4. In such a way the remote weapon station 1 can be made lower for transportation purposes by tilting the weapon attachment device 5 over the sight unit 17. The tilting action of the weapon attachment device 5 over the sight unit 17 performs an imaginary circular arc c essentially with the same radius as the radius of the circumference of the essentially spherical, hollow body 23. Thereby is achieved that the remote weapon station 1 can be made lower in a transportation mode without the need of making the volume of the sight equipment smaller.
  • In FIG. 6 is schematically illustrated a compact motor driving system 43 using the same axis X1, X3 for the transverse rotations of both the sensor unit 17 and the weapon support 3. The first axis X1 coincides with the third axis X3. A first rotor 45 is arranged rotatable about the common transverse axis X1 and X3 and is connected to the legs 11 of the weapon support 3 and via a first bearing 47 connected to the weapon carrier 49, such as a gun boat.
  • A first stator 51 actuates the first rotor 45 for transverse rotation of the gun 9. A further second bearing 53 is arranged between the first rotor 45 and a second rotor 55 carrying the circular central section 37, within which the electro-optical sensors 19 are rotatable arranged for elevation rotation about the fourth elevation axis X4. A second stator 57 actuates the second rotor 55 for the transverse rotation of the circular central section 37 and the peripheral sections (not shown) of the sight unit 17.
  • In FIG. 7 is shown schematically the aiming of the remote weapon station 1 at a moving target 31. The gun's 9 pointing direction and the sight line L of the sight unit 17 is broken for sake of clarity and the target 31 is drawn smaller than the remote weapon station 1 for the sake of illustration. An aiming-off angle α is required as the target 31 is moving. The compact remote weapon station's 1 sight unit 17 detecting the target 31 is rotated independently of the gun's 9 motion. By means of the control unit 25 is estimated the required aiming-off angle α, dependent upon the velocity of the target 31 and eventually the velocity of the carrier carrying the remote weapon station 1. Also parameters as wind direction and speed etc. are considered. An uniaxial rate gyro is stabilizing the gun 9 via an elevation drive unit 27 and a transverse drive unit arranged at the second elevation axis X2 and the transverse axis, and the electro-optical sensors 19 are stabilized via a sensor unit elevation drive system (not shown) of an elevation drive system and transverse drive system arranged within the circular central section 37 of the sight unit 17.
  • The remote weapon station 1 is according to one embodiment of the invention provided with a weapon support 3 being comprised in a motorized gun control system. Thereby is achieved that the remote weapon station 1 is applicable to an available carrier, such as a truck, car, gun boat, tank, helicopter etc.
  • The sight unit 17 of the remote weapon station 1 can control at least one separate weapon 60 placed at a distance from the remote weapon station 1.Control is achieved by means of being directly connected to the weapon, illuminating the target for the weapon or providing in-the-air guidance to the weapon or a combination of any of these means.
  • The invention is not limited to a specific embodiment herein, but may also consist of several combinations of the presented embodiments. For example, only one peripheral half section can provide an aperture and none in the other section. Alternatively, the elevation drive system and transverse drive system may be arranged in one of the supports of the sight unit. For example, the sight unit's hollow body can have a central section being rotatable and two outer section acting as supports (fork-shaped assembly) or the section being supported by only one peripheral support. Of course, the sight unit may be placed between the weapon support and the weapon attachment device by mounting the sight unit "hanging" under the weapon attachment device or adjacent the same.

Claims (10)

  1. A remote weapon station comprising a weapon support (3) adapted for rotatable motion about a first transverse axis (X1), the weapon support (3) including a platform (13) supporting a weapon attachment device (5) supporting a weapon (9), said weapon attachment device being rotatable about a second elevation axis (X2) perpendicular to the first transverse axis (X1), the remote weapon station (1) further comprising a sight unit (17) rotatable about a third transverse axis (X3) and about a fourth elevation axis (X4), perpendicular to the third transverse axis,
    characterized in that
    said sight unit (17) is rotatable about said third transverse axis (X3) and said fourth elevation axis (X4) independently of the position or rotation of the weapon support (3) about the first transverse axis (X1) and of the weapon attachment device (5) about the second elevation axis (X2),
    and in that the sight unit (17) is mounted to the platform and arranged between the platform (13) of the weapon support (3) and the weapon (9) attached to the weapon attachment device (5) and in that the weapon's bore axis is stabilized in two axes and the sight unit's line of sight is stabilized in two axes.
  2. The remote weapon station according to claim 1, wherein the weapon support (3) is rotatable about the first transverse axis (X1) independently of the rotatable motion of the sight unit (17) about the third transverse axis (X3) such that the weapon (9) can be directed in essentially another direction relatively the line of sight of the sight unit (17).
  3. The remote weapon station according to any of claims 1 or 2, wherein the weapon support (3) also is arranged to be controlled to rotate about the first transverse axis (X1) dependent upon the rotatable motion of the sight unit (17) about the third transverse axis (X3).
  4. The remote weapon station according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the first axis (X1) coincides with the third axis (X3).
  5. The remote weapon station according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the sight unit (17) comprises a first essentially spherical, hollow body (23) which interacts with a second essentially rotationally symmetrical body (35), both bodies being rotatable in relation to one another relative to the third transverse axis (X3), the spherical body (23) accommodating at least one electro-optical sensor (19), the sensor (19) being rotatable about the fourth elevation axis (X4).
  6. The remote weapon station according to claim 5, wherein the weapon support (3) comprises a tiltable leg arrangement (41) supporting the weapon attachment device (5), the leg arrangement (41) being tiltable over the first essentially spherical, hollow body (23).
  7. The remote weapon station according to any of claims 1-4, wherein the sight unit (17) comprises a first essentially cylindrical, hollow body (33) accommodating at least one electro-optical sensor (19).
  8. The remote weapon station according to any of the preceding claims, wherein an essentially transparent hollow body (23, 33) encloses all interior movable parts, such as electro-optical sensors, of the sight unit (17) for protecting and hiding said parts.
  9. The remote weapon station according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the weapon support (3) being comprised in a gun control system.
  10. The remote weapon station according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the sight unit (17) is adapted for controlling or guiding at least one weapon (60) disposed at a distance from the remote weapon station (1).
EP06124200.4A 2006-11-16 2006-11-16 A compact, fully stabilised, four axes, remote weapon station with independent line of sight Revoked EP1923657B1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP06124200.4A EP1923657B1 (en) 2006-11-16 2006-11-16 A compact, fully stabilised, four axes, remote weapon station with independent line of sight
US11/984,397 US20080148931A1 (en) 2006-11-16 2007-11-16 Compact, fully stablised, four axes, remote weapon station with independent line of sight

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP06124200.4A EP1923657B1 (en) 2006-11-16 2006-11-16 A compact, fully stabilised, four axes, remote weapon station with independent line of sight

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1923657A1 EP1923657A1 (en) 2008-05-21
EP1923657B1 true EP1923657B1 (en) 2017-05-03

Family

ID=37897300

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP06124200.4A Revoked EP1923657B1 (en) 2006-11-16 2006-11-16 A compact, fully stabilised, four axes, remote weapon station with independent line of sight

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (1) US20080148931A1 (en)
EP (1) EP1923657B1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2024003808A1 (en) * 2022-07-01 2024-01-04 Leonardo S.P.A. Turret, in particular for naval applications, provided with a device for moving an ammunition guidance system

Families Citing this family (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7966763B1 (en) 2008-05-22 2011-06-28 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Targeting system for a projectile launcher
US8336442B2 (en) * 2008-11-21 2012-12-25 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army Automatically-reloadable, remotely-operated weapon system having an externally-powered firearm
US8646374B2 (en) * 2010-07-27 2014-02-11 Raytheon Company Weapon station and associated method
US8620023B1 (en) * 2010-09-13 2013-12-31 The Boeing Company Object detection and location system
US8787114B1 (en) 2010-09-13 2014-07-22 The Boeing Company Audio surveillance system
US9243869B1 (en) 2011-08-09 2016-01-26 Raytheon Company Weapon posturing system and methods of use
DE102012102235C5 (en) 2012-03-16 2017-10-26 Krauss-Maffei Wegmann Gmbh & Co. Kg Military vehicle and method of aligning a piece of equipment
DE102013101635A1 (en) 2013-02-19 2014-08-21 Krauss-Maffei Wegmann Gmbh & Co. Kg weapon station
FR3019279B1 (en) * 2014-03-28 2018-06-22 Safran Electronics & Defense OPTRONIC ARMY TURTLE
US9464856B2 (en) 2014-07-22 2016-10-11 Moog Inc. Configurable remote weapon station having under armor reload
US9568267B2 (en) 2014-07-22 2017-02-14 Moog Inc. Configurable weapon station having under armor reload
RU167543U1 (en) * 2015-08-25 2017-01-10 Открытое Акционерное Общество "Пеленг" Implement tracking device
DE102015119847A1 (en) 2015-09-18 2017-03-23 Rheinmetall Defence Electronics Gmbh Remote weapon station and method of operating a remote weapon station
WO2021080684A1 (en) 2019-10-25 2021-04-29 Aimlock Inc. Remotely operable weapon mount
US11499791B2 (en) 2019-10-25 2022-11-15 Aimlock Inc. Trigger and safety actuating device and method therefor
US11835312B1 (en) 2021-01-22 2023-12-05 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army Combat optimized ballistic remote armament
FR3128523B1 (en) * 2021-10-26 2023-10-27 Arquus Aiming and defense system comprising a cupola and a laser system and motor vehicle comprising such an aiming and defense system
FR3132140B1 (en) * 2022-01-21 2024-04-05 Compagnie Ind Des Lasers Cilas Laser weapon carried by a pod

Family Cites Families (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2484626A1 (en) * 1980-06-11 1981-12-18 Applic Mach Motrices Anti-aircraft target tracking system for tank - employs TV cameras and servo loops with weapon firing correction for weapon turret positioning
NL8204706A (en) 1982-12-06 1984-07-02 Hollandse Signaalapparaten Bv INTEGRATED WEAPON FIRE CONTROL SYSTEM.
DE3317232A1 (en) 1983-05-11 1984-11-15 Bodenseewerk Gerätetechnik GmbH, 7770 Überlingen SEARCH HEAD FOR TARGET-SEARCHING AIRBODIES
US5197691A (en) * 1983-09-16 1993-03-30 Martin Marietta Corporation Boresight module
DE3912672A1 (en) * 1989-04-18 1990-10-25 Rheinmetall Gmbh DISTANCE MINE WITH OPTICAL SEEKER
US5273236A (en) 1992-12-02 1993-12-28 Electronics & Space Corp. Multiple designation missile system
DE19752464A1 (en) * 1997-11-27 1999-07-15 Dynamit Nobel Ag Automatic adaptive weapon to combat vehicles
CA2245406C (en) * 1998-08-24 2006-12-05 James Hugh Lougheed Aiming system for weapon capable of superelevation
AUPR080400A0 (en) * 2000-10-17 2001-01-11 Electro Optic Systems Pty Limited Autonomous weapon system
SE519151E5 (en) * 2001-11-19 2013-07-30 Bae Systems Bofors Ab Weapon sight with sight sensors intended for vehicles, vessels or equivalent
US6896423B2 (en) * 2002-09-20 2005-05-24 Pelco Camera mounting enclosure and method of installation
US20080034954A1 (en) * 2005-01-31 2008-02-14 David Ehrlich Grober Stabilizing mount for hands-on and remote operation of cameras, sensors, computer intelligent devices and weapons

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
"PERI-R12", TDV 1240/050-40 (F), GERATEBESCHREIBUNG, pages C1 - C15

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2024003808A1 (en) * 2022-07-01 2024-01-04 Leonardo S.P.A. Turret, in particular for naval applications, provided with a device for moving an ammunition guidance system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP1923657A1 (en) 2008-05-21
US20080148931A1 (en) 2008-06-26

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1923657B1 (en) A compact, fully stabilised, four axes, remote weapon station with independent line of sight
US9523548B2 (en) Operational control logic for harmonized turret with gimbaled sub-systems
CA2569940C (en) Improved device for the remote control of a fire arm
EP2478323B1 (en) Multi-weapons system
KR101081214B1 (en) Multi Purpose Remote Weapon System
US9121667B1 (en) Mortar
US4885977A (en) Stabilized line-of-sight aiming system for use with fire control systems
KR101408340B1 (en) Remote shooting system
US20080053300A1 (en) Gun Mount
RU180932U1 (en) Fighting compartment of an armored personnel carrier with external cannon-machine gun weapons
RU142907U1 (en) ARMOR TRANSPORT DIVISION
RU2531421C1 (en) Universal combat module
KR20100096518A (en) Remote shooting system
CN110108161B (en) Missile launching device
JPH0755395A (en) Silencer of gun barrel arms
ES2703898T3 (en) Look for use with super-lift weapon
RU2612750C1 (en) Antitank missle complex
RU2816418C1 (en) Tank weapon system
RU2003107942A (en) BATTLE DIVISION OF THE ARMORED MACHINE
RU2231737C1 (en) Tank with antiaircraft armament
RU2256582C1 (en) Shipboard launcher
RU2222759C2 (en) Rocket launcher
TR2021018482A2 (en) AUTOMATIC FIRING SYSTEM WITH GIMBALL
RU2183810C1 (en) Enclosure of fire structure
TR201906011A1 (en) AUTOMATIC SHOOTING STABILIZATION SYSTEM

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA HR MK RS

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20081008

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20081113

AKX Designation fees paid

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

TPAC Observations filed by third parties

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNTIPA

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20161026

GRAJ Information related to disapproval of communication of intention to grant by the applicant or resumption of examination proceedings by the epo deleted

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20161207

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 890453

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20170515

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602006052416

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20170503

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 890453

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20170503

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170804

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170503

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170503

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170503

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170503

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R026

Ref document number: 602006052416

Country of ref document: DE

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170503

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170503

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170903

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170503

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170503

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170803

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: BAAINBW

Effective date: 20171109

PLAZ Examination of admissibility of opposition: despatch of communication + time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOPE2

PLBA Examination of admissibility of opposition: reply received

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOPE4

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170503

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170503

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170503

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170503

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170503

PLAN Information deleted related to communication of a notice of opposition and request to file observations + time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDOBS2

PLAX Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2

PLAR Examination of admissibility of opposition: information related to receipt of reply deleted

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDOPE4

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170503

PLBA Examination of admissibility of opposition: reply received

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOPE4

PLAX Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170503

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602006052416

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170503

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20171116

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171130

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171116

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20180731

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20171130

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171116

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171130

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180602

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171130

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171116

PLAY Examination report in opposition despatched + time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNORE2

PLBC Reply to examination report in opposition received

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNORE3

RDAF Communication despatched that patent is revoked

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREV1

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R064

Ref document number: 602006052416

Country of ref document: DE

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R103

Ref document number: 602006052416

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20061116

RDAG Patent revoked

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009271

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: PATENT REVOKED

27W Patent revoked

Effective date: 20190613

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170503

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170503

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170503