EP1832540B1 - Dispositif de mesure pour une mesure de capacité de propulsion - Google Patents

Dispositif de mesure pour une mesure de capacité de propulsion Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1832540B1
EP1832540B1 EP07004760A EP07004760A EP1832540B1 EP 1832540 B1 EP1832540 B1 EP 1832540B1 EP 07004760 A EP07004760 A EP 07004760A EP 07004760 A EP07004760 A EP 07004760A EP 1832540 B1 EP1832540 B1 EP 1832540B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
measuring device
force
cables
tested
cable
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP07004760A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP1832540A1 (fr
Inventor
Eberhard Frejno
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
TUEV Rheinland Industrie Service GmbH
Original Assignee
TUEV Rheinland Industrie Service GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by TUEV Rheinland Industrie Service GmbH filed Critical TUEV Rheinland Industrie Service GmbH
Publication of EP1832540A1 publication Critical patent/EP1832540A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1832540B1 publication Critical patent/EP1832540B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
    • B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
    • B66B5/00—Applications of checking, fault-correcting, or safety devices in elevators
    • B66B5/0006—Monitoring devices or performance analysers
    • B66B5/0037—Performance analysers

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a measuring device for a traction sheave elevator installation as well as a method for checking a traction of at least one traction cable of a traction sheave elevator installation.
  • Object of the present invention is to be able to realize amaschinends phenomenon a traction sheave elevator regardless of the available space without much effort.
  • a development of the fixing device has a mechanical clamping of at least one supporting cable.
  • the test cable to be tested can preferably be fixed relative to the measuring device.
  • one or more supporting cables adjacent to the supporting rope to be tested can be firmly fixed by means of the fixing device to the measuring device, in particular to the force transmission device.
  • the power transmission device has at least one mechanical clamping connection. By means of this at least one, in particular at least two or more carrying cables can be fixed.
  • An embodiment provides that the fixing device is part of the power transmission device.
  • a further embodiment which may preferably also be provided as an independent solution, has a measuring device which can be attached to supporting cables of the traction sheave elevator installation, with the following features: the force transmission device comprises a force generator which between the test cable to be tested and a supporting cables adjacent thereto Generates force that causes a relief of the test rope to be tested and a load on the adjacent suspension cables.
  • the suspension cables are mechanically non-positively and frictionally coupled with each other.
  • test device is connected to the measuring device in a repeatably detachable manner, the test device initiating an introduction of force for checking the carrying capacity in the measuring device.
  • the tester may be a portable computer running a measurement program.
  • the test apparatus may also be a test facility located far away, which can be connected to the measuring device. Such a connection is also possible in a wireless manner, for example as a bidirectional connection.
  • the measuring device is coupled to a test device which records one or more data characterizing at least one result of a traction test.
  • the test apparatus can also provide an evaluation of the recorded data, preferably also with a logging.
  • a method for measuring a traction of a traction cable of a traction sheave elevator, whereby a proportional cable force of a total load prevailing on the traction cables is transmitted by at least one of the traction cables to be examined to one or more adjacent carrier cables. This allows to observe the behavior of the test rope to be tested. From the reaction at the discharge can be concluded that the driving ability of at least the test cable to be tested.
  • a further embodiment provides that a transfer of a proportionate load takes place until a drive limit is reached. This is detected, for example, by the fact that there is no frictional connection and thus no frictional connection between the test cable to be tested and the support disk.
  • a force is mechanically impressed between the test cable to be tested and at least one adjacent carrying cable, wherein the test cable to be tested is relieved.
  • a force can be generated via a rotating spindle, via a hydraulic pressure transducer or via a spring tension.
  • a lever can be used.
  • two power sources can be arranged opposite to each other and cause a symmetrical force into the measuring device.
  • a development of the method provides that an automated introduction of force takes place after triggering of a measurement process. This makes it easier to understand how a force was impressed. In particular, this makes a measurement accurately repeatable, so that the data obtained from the system actually become comparable.
  • the sequence of the test procedure can preferably be preset, for example, via a setting of a time of the test, a force increase over a period of time, via an initiation of a steadily increasing test force or else via an introduction of different test force groups of different characteristics.
  • the measuring device can be attached to an existing elevator installation without having to remove or modify these or parts thereof.
  • the measuring device is dimensioned such that the operating principle can be used universally.
  • supporting cable shots of the measuring device can be variably arranged so as to take account of different distances between carrying cables of different elevator systems.
  • elements of the measuring device are variable, in particular differently positionable in the measuring device in order to be adapted to different elevator systems. It can be provided that individual Modules of the measuring device are exchanged, so that the measuring device is attachable.
  • the purpose of the measurement by means of the measuring device is to provide sufficient traction capability of the traction sheave connection as part of a traction measurement of a traction sheave elevator.
  • An existing frictional connection realizes a defined power transmission via the suspension cable - traction sheave - connection.
  • the capability testing can be carried out not only for a suspension cable but also for several suspension cables or for a complete system. For this purpose, for example, a single support cable tested and concluded on the overall system.
  • the cable force determination is made on one or more of the support cables by the proportionate cable force is transmitted in the examined rope in the total load on the other participating in the recording of the total load ropes, it can be concluded that the overall behavior. From the measured cable force, which, for example, the drive limit for the rope force ratio of this support rope when examined indicates only this support cable, or which indicates the driving limit of several ropes with simultaneous load transfer of rope loads of several suspension cables to the respective associated mittragenden suspension cables, can be immediately close to the traction of the overall connection.
  • a power transmission of the supporting cables takes place by means of mechanical clamping connections.
  • a measurement of the rope forces is preferably carried out on mechanical transmission elements.
  • Fig. 1 shows a first schematic embodiment of a measuring device 1 in a plan view, wherein a first support cable 2 is checked, while adjacent support cables 3 are mitumlant of the measuring device 1, to a load of the test cable 2 to be tested to take over.
  • the measuring device has a fastening device 4, which can preferably be opened and closed by pivoting via a hinge 5.
  • the fastening device 4 preferably has at least a first part 6 and a second part 7, which are separable from each other and can be joined together. Instead of the joint 5 more joints or other possibilities may be provided. Also, the first 6 and the second 7 part of the fastening device 4 can be completely separated from each other.
  • a hinge pin can be removed and replaced, for example for storage of the measuring device in a system case.
  • the fastening device 4 is such that a clamping force can be impressed on the supporting cables. For example, this can be effected by a corresponding closure of the first and the second part.
  • a clamping spindle 8 is provided as a closure. If this is rotated, the two parts 6, 7 can approach each other ever further. Due to the construction as a clamping spindle 8 can be applied either by motor or by hand, preferably using a lever, a required force or torque for closing and clamping.
  • Connected to the fastening device 4 is a power transmission device 9.
  • This has a load spindle axis 10 and a load spindle 11.
  • the load spindle 11 is arranged displaceably along the load spindle axis 10. As shown, the load spindle 11 is aligned with the test cable 2 to be tested. This makes it possible for the force which can be applied via the load spindle 11 to act on the carrying cable 2 to be tested.
  • Fig. 2 shows a sectional view through the measuring device Fig. 1 whereby the measuring device 1 and its structure in the area around the supporting rope 2 to be tested is shown in more detail. Shown are the first part 6 and the second part 7 of the fastening device 4. These two parts 6, 7 each have a clamping jaw 12. These serve as a fixing device 13 for the test cable 2 to be tested. Preferably, the other supporting cables are held in a stationary manner in the measuring device 1 via the fixing device 13. If all supporting cables are fixed in this way, a pair of clamping jaws is preferably provided for each carrying cable. Furthermore, a support rail 14 is provided.
  • a clamping jaw 12 in a specific region of the fixing device 13 relative to a part of the fastening device 4 can be provided.
  • the support traverse limits movement of the jaw 12.
  • Fig. 2 shown is the pair of jaws 12 that is associated with the test cable 2, in a rest position. It is held by a jaw lock 15 in the rest position. If the jaw lock would be opened, at least one of the two, preferably both jaws 12 would be movable and according to gravity move down.
  • the support cross 14 then serves as a support for at least one of the two jaws 12. As shown, however, a support cross 14 provided on both sides. A displaced from the rest position in a test position jaw 14 is indicated by dashed lines.
  • This jaw 12 is associated with a support rail 14, which is pivotally connected to a pressure lever 16.
  • the pressure lever 15 is in turn coupled to a pull lever 11. Preferably, these together form a rigid component.
  • a pressure on the pressure lever 15 can now be exercised.
  • the load spindle axis 10 serves as a pivot point about which the pressure lever 15 and the load lever 16 rotate.
  • the load spindle 11 is connected to a measuring device 17, by means of which the force to be applied, a path or another characterizing parameter which is meaningful for the drivability test, can be detected.
  • the measuring device 1 is now used as follows: An inspection and work routine begins with a selection of any supporting rope, which is determined as a measuring cable.
  • the load spindle 11 with measuring device 17 is moved for this purpose on the load spindle axis 10 to the measuring cable.
  • the jaw lock 15 of the jaw 12 associated with the measuring cable is unlocked.
  • the associated jaw 12 moves down until it comes to rest on the support rail 14.
  • the attachment of the fastening device 4 takes place on the support cables.
  • the opened mounting device 4 is pushed laterally over the support cables and closed by means of the clamping spindle 8.
  • the respective, not individually illustrated jaws put on the suspension cables.
  • the load transfer takes place successively from the measuring cable into the other carrying cables, preferably until the carrier cable drive pulley connection fails as a static friction connection.
  • the force then measured on the load spindle 11 is a measure of the driving ability of the overall connection.
  • one or more jaw bearings 18 are provided. Preferably, these are designed as sliding or roller bearings.
  • Fig. 3 shows a schematic view of an arrangement of a measuring device with four support cables 3 and one of them to be tested support cable 2.
  • the measuring device is able to cover all supporting cables of the traction sheave elevator. By selectively clamping as described above, each individual suspension rope can be checked one after the other.
  • the advantage here is a simultaneous examination of several supporting pages and thus a shortening of the examination time.
  • Fig. 4 shows a schematic view of a further embodiment and arrangement of a measuring device 1.
  • the measuring device 1 has a fastening device 4 for three of the five test cables to be tested. Basically, any number of three selected suspension cables can be taken into account, regardless of a total number of suspension cables. This allows a very lightweight design and facilitates handling of the measuring device 1 when mounting. If, for example, there are five carrying ropes and the measuring device comprises three carrying ropes, then three carrying ropes are tested in each case.
  • the measuring device is arranged so that there is an unchecked suspension rope between two tested suspension cables. By knowing the tested ropes can then be closed with knowledge of the overall behavior of the suspension ropes on the individual previously untreated suspension cable.
  • Fig. 5 a schematic diagram of a way to access a measuring device 1.
  • the arrows illustrate that the measuring device is not only in front before the suspension ropes attachable. This illustrates a first arrow. Due to the very narrow system, there is the possibility of attaching the measuring device 1 even with only lateral access to the support cables. This indicates a second arrow.
  • the measuring device 1 can therefore be used independently of the other constructional conditions in an elevator shaft or in the region of a drive plane, if access to the suspension cables is available.
  • Fig. 6 a further schematic view of another embodiment of a measuring device 1.
  • a clamping force generated for at least one supporting cable in particular also can be impressed.
  • Schematically represented via respective arrows A a force and direction of movement of the jaws 12 is shown.
  • Arrows B illustrate a directional vector of an example load registration mechanism.
  • a clamping force can be generated mechanically, for example by using a spindle 19.
  • the spindle 19 may also be a rack, in particular also another toothing present.
  • a transmission may be provided, the translation enables a fine transmission of the movement.
  • a clamping force can be carried out by an independent application of the jaws to one or more support cables due to a relative movement of the jaws to the support cable.
  • a power transmission can take place.
  • a further embodiment provides for a hydraulic and / or pneumatic actuation, indicated by an expansion cylinder 20.
  • one or more levers for force generation can be used, for example a lever, as described above in the prior art and on in the Reference is made to the scope of the disclosure.
  • Fig. 7 shows a further embodiment of a measuring device 1 in a schematic view.
  • two arbitrary support cables are selected and used for a measurement of a previously determined support cable. This is indicated by the arrows.
  • a test device 21 is also specified which, on the one hand, can initiate a measuring process, but on the other hand is able to record and further process measured data.
  • the test device 21 can be wired to the measuring device 1 or else coupled to the measuring device 1 via other transmission possibilities for exchanging data.

Landscapes

  • Force Measurement Appropriate To Specific Purposes (AREA)
  • Lift-Guide Devices, And Elevator Ropes And Cables (AREA)
  • Maintenance And Inspection Apparatuses For Elevators (AREA)
  • Control Of Stepping Motors (AREA)

Claims (12)

  1. Dispositif de mesure (1) pour mesurer la capacité motrice d'un ascenseur équipé de plusieurs câbles de traction (3), qui relient un contrepoids à une cage d'ascenseur, à une cabine ou à une plate-forme, lesdits câbles de traction passant autour d'une poulie motrice et établissant une liaison par adhérence due à l'entraînement par friction avec la poulie motrice, le dispositif de mesure (1)
    - comportant un dispositif de fixation (4) pour le positionnement sur au moins plusieurs câbles de traction (3), et
    - possédant un dispositif d'immobilisation (13) pour au moins un des câbles de traction (2),
    - caractérisé en ce qu'il comporte un dispositif de transmission de force (9), par lequel au moins une charge proportionnelle d'une charge totale sur au moins un câble de traction (2) à contrôler peut étre transmise à un ou plusieurs câbles de traction (3) adjacents, et
    - un appareillage de mesure (17) pour déterminer une capacité motrice à l'appui de la charge proportionnelle.
  2. Dispositif de mesure (1) selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que le dispositif d'immobilisation (3) permet un blocage mécanique d'au moins un câble de traction (2).
  3. Dispositif de mesure (1) selon la revendication 1 ou 2, caractérisé en ce que le dispositif de transmission de force (9) comporte au moins une liaison de blocage mécanique.
  4. Dispositif de mesure (1) selon la revendication 3, caractérisé en ce que le dispositif d'immobilisation (13) est une partie intégrante du dispositif de transmission de force (9).
  5. Dispositif de mesure (1) selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que le dispositif de transmission de force (9) comporte un générateur de force, qui génère, entre le câble de traction (2) à contrôler et les câbles de traction (3) adjacents à celui-ci, une force qui induit un délestage du câble de traction (2) à contrôler et une charge des câbles de traction (3) adjacents.
  6. Dispositif de mesure (1) selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que l'appareillage de mesure (17) comporte un récepteur de charge, qui mesure une charge ou un délestage du câble de traction (2) à contrôler.
  7. Dispositif de mesure (1) selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce qu'un dispositif de contrôle est raccordé, de manière amovible à plusieurs reprises, au dispositif de mesure, ledit dispositif de contrôle induisant une initialisation d'une introduction de force dans le dispositif de mesure (1) en vue de contrôler la limite de charge.
  8. Dispositif de mesure (1) selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce qu'au dispositif de mesure est couplé un dispositif de contrôle, qui enregistre une ou plusieurs données, qui caractérisent au moins un résultat d'un contrôle de la capacité motrice.
  9. Procédé pour mesurer une capacité motrice d'un câble de traction d'un ascenseur à poulie motrice, au moyen d'un dispositif de mesure selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 8, dans lequel procédé une force de câble proportionnelle d'une charge totale régnant sur les câbles de traction est transmise depuis au moins un des câbles de traction (2) à contrôler sur un ou plusieurs câbles de traction (3) adjacents.
  10. Procédé selon la revendication 9, caractérisé en ce qu'une transmission d'une charge proportionnelle est effectuée jusqu'à ce qu'une limite de capacité motrice soit atteinte.
  11. Procédé selon la revendication 9 ou 10, caractérisé en ce qu'une force est imprimée mécaniquement entre le câble de traction (2) à contrôler et au moins un des câbles de traction (3) adjacents, le câble de traction (2) à contrôler étant délesté.
  12. Procédé selon la revendication 9, 10 ou 11, caractérisé en ce qu'une introduction de force automatisée est effectuée après le déclenchement d'un processus de mesure.
EP07004760A 2006-03-09 2007-03-08 Dispositif de mesure pour une mesure de capacité de propulsion Active EP1832540B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102006011395.0A DE102006011395B4 (de) 2006-03-09 2006-03-09 Messvorrichtung für eine Treibfähigkeitsmessung

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1832540A1 EP1832540A1 (fr) 2007-09-12
EP1832540B1 true EP1832540B1 (fr) 2010-05-19

Family

ID=38091669

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP07004760A Active EP1832540B1 (fr) 2006-03-09 2007-03-08 Dispositif de mesure pour une mesure de capacité de propulsion

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1832540B1 (fr)
AT (1) ATE468295T1 (fr)
DE (2) DE102006011395B4 (fr)

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102009001055A1 (de) 2009-02-20 2010-09-02 Dekra Testing & Inspection Gmbh Verfahren zur Prüfung der ordnungsgemäßen Funktionsfähigkeit eines Aufzugs
EP2221268B1 (fr) 2009-02-20 2014-04-16 DEKRA e.V. Procédé et agencement destinés à contrôler la capacité de fonctionnement réglementaire d'un ascenseur
DE102009026992A1 (de) 2009-06-17 2010-12-30 Dekra Testing & Inspection Gmbh Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Prüfung der ordnungsgemäßen Funktionsfähigkeit eines Aufzugs
DE102009028596A1 (de) 2009-08-17 2011-03-03 Dekra Testing & Inspection Gmbh Verfahren und Anordnung zur Prüfung der ordnungsgemäßen Funktionsfähigkeit eines Aufzugs
WO2013087115A1 (fr) 2011-12-15 2013-06-20 Dekra Industrial Gmbh Procédé et agencement permettant de tester la fonctionnalité adéquate d'un ascenseur

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE3911391C5 (de) * 1989-04-07 2010-04-29 TÜV SÜD Industrie Service GmbH Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Überprüfen der Treibfähigkeit
DE8904375U1 (fr) * 1989-04-07 1989-07-27 Tuev Bayern E.V., 8000 Muenchen, De
DE9015495U1 (fr) * 1990-11-12 1992-01-02 Technischer Ueberwachungs-Verein Bayern E.V., 8000 Muenchen, De
DE10323175A1 (de) * 2003-05-22 2004-12-23 TÜV Industrie Service GmbH - TÜV Rheinland Group Prüfhebel
DE102004029133A1 (de) * 2004-06-17 2006-01-05 TÜV Industrie Service GmbH - TÜV Rheinland Group Kraftreduziertes Messverfahren für Traktionsantriebe, insbesondere Treibscheibenantriebe von Aufzügen

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE502007003815D1 (de) 2010-07-01
DE102006011395A1 (de) 2007-09-13
EP1832540A1 (fr) 2007-09-12
ATE468295T1 (de) 2010-06-15
DE102006011395B4 (de) 2014-12-31

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3436390B1 (fr) Dispositif et procede de montage destine a executer une procedure d'installation dans une cabine d'ascenseur
EP3102523B1 (fr) Système et procédé de mesure pour vérifier le dispositif d'arrêt d'un ascenseur
EP1832540B1 (fr) Dispositif de mesure pour une mesure de capacité de propulsion
EP3265773B1 (fr) Dispositif de retenue pour une balance aérodynamique et procédé d'essai
EP1755998B1 (fr) Procede de mesure a force reduite pour entrainements de traction, en particulier entrainements a poulie motrice d'ascenseurs
EP1847501B1 (fr) Installation d'élévation dotée d'un dispositif de surveillance du moyen d'entraînement destiné à la surveillance de l'état d'un moyen d'entraînement et procédé de vérification du moyen d'entraînement
DE102011053325B4 (de) Prüfstand für die dynamische Überprüfung einer einzelnen Fahrwerkskomponente oder eines vollständigen Achssystems eines Kraftfahrzeugs, sowie Verfahren zum Überprüfen auf Selbigem
DE102007018192A1 (de) Rad, Prüfstand und Verfahren zur Ermittlung von aerodynamischen Kennwerten eines Testfahrzeugs
DE102015204020A1 (de) Mehrfachkonfigurationswindkanalwaage und Verfahren zum Umrüsten der Windkanalwaage
WO2010124686A2 (fr) Procédé de contrôle de bogies et banc d'essai/de montage
EP3137872A1 (fr) Banc d'essai à rouleaux et procédé permettant de faire fonctionner un banc d'essai à rouleaux
AT512260B1 (de) Prüfvorrichtung für einen Rollen-Prüfstand
DE102016223900A1 (de) Messvorrichtung zum Vermessen des Biegeverhaltens einer Probe
DE10144913B4 (de) Aufzugbremslast-Wägesystem
DE102015203332B3 (de) Verfahren und Anordnung zum Erfassen von Noise-Vibration-Harshness-Emissionen einer Radbremse
DE102014206412A1 (de) Vorrichtung zur Aufnahme eines Prüflings, Anordnung und Verfahren zur Prüfung eines Prüflings
DE102010029186A1 (de) Messvorrichtung und Roboter
DE102012009139A1 (de) Prüfstand und Verfahren zum Prüfen einer Lamellenkupplung
DE102017209918B3 (de) Prüfstand sowie Verfahren zum Prüfen eines Türschließers oder Türantriebs
EP2650245A2 (fr) Procédé et agencement destinés à contrôler la capacité de fonctionnement réglementaire d'un ascenseur
DE19939549A1 (de) Prufstand zum Messen der Beulsteifigkeit von Bauteilen
DE102009023428B4 (de) Überprüfungssystem und Überprüfungsverfahren
DE102007009602A1 (de) Treibfähigkeitsmessung an Treibscheibenaufzugsanlagen
DE102016101838A1 (de) Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Kraftmessung für einen Bremskraftprüfstand
DE102015115719A1 (de) Prüfstand und Prüfverfahren mit verstellbarem Achsabstand zwischen Übertragungsprüfkörpern

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20070308

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA HR MK YU

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20071107

AKX Designation fees paid

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AXX Extension fees paid

Extension state: MK

Payment date: 20070308

Extension state: RS

Payment date: 20070308

Extension state: BA

Payment date: 20070308

Extension state: HR

Payment date: 20070308

Extension state: AL

Payment date: 20070308

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA HR MK RS

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 502007003815

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20100701

Kind code of ref document: P

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: VDEP

Effective date: 20100519

LTIE Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extension

Effective date: 20100519

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100519

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100830

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100519

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100519

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100519

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100519

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100919

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100519

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100519

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FD4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100519

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100519

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100519

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100820

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100519

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100920

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100519

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100519

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100519

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100519

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20110222

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 502007003815

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20110221

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: TUV RHEINLAND INDUSTRIE SERVICE G.M.B.H.

Effective date: 20110331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110331

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20110308

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20111130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100519

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110331

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110331

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110308

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 468295

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20120308

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110308

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120308

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100819

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100519

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100519

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 502007003815

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: VON KREISLER SELTING WERNER - PARTNERSCHAFT VO, DE

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 502007003815

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: DOMPATENT VON KREISLER SELTING WERNER - PARTNE, DE

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20240315

Year of fee payment: 18