Classifications

• • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
  • D06—TREATMENT OF TEXTILES OR THE LIKE; LAUNDERING; FLEXIBLE MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
  • D06M—TREATMENT, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE IN CLASS D06, OF FIBRES, THREADS, YARNS, FABRICS, FEATHERS OR FIBROUS GOODS MADE FROM SUCH MATERIALS
  • D06M23/00—Treatment of fibres, threads, yarns, fabrics or fibrous goods made from such materials, characterised by the process
  • D06M23/08—Processes in which the treating agent is applied in powder or granular form
• • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
  • D06—TREATMENT OF TEXTILES OR THE LIKE; LAUNDERING; FLEXIBLE MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
  • D06M—TREATMENT, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE IN CLASS D06, OF FIBRES, THREADS, YARNS, FABRICS, FEATHERS OR FIBROUS GOODS MADE FROM SUCH MATERIALS
  • D06M11/00—Treating fibres, threads, yarns, fabrics or fibrous goods made from such materials, with inorganic substances or complexes thereof; Such treatment combined with mechanical treatment, e.g. mercerising
  • D06M11/77—Treating fibres, threads, yarns, fabrics or fibrous goods made from such materials, with inorganic substances or complexes thereof; Such treatment combined with mechanical treatment, e.g. mercerising with silicon or compounds thereof
  • D06M11/79—Treating fibres, threads, yarns, fabrics or fibrous goods made from such materials, with inorganic substances or complexes thereof; Such treatment combined with mechanical treatment, e.g. mercerising with silicon or compounds thereof with silicon dioxide, silicic acids or their salts
• • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
  • D06—TREATMENT OF TEXTILES OR THE LIKE; LAUNDERING; FLEXIBLE MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
  • D06M—TREATMENT, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE IN CLASS D06, OF FIBRES, THREADS, YARNS, FABRICS, FEATHERS OR FIBROUS GOODS MADE FROM SUCH MATERIALS
  • D06M13/00—Treating fibres, threads, yarns, fabrics or fibrous goods made from such materials, with non-macromolecular organic compounds; Such treatment combined with mechanical treatment
  • D06M13/005—Compositions containing perfumes; Compositions containing deodorants
• • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
  • D06—TREATMENT OF TEXTILES OR THE LIKE; LAUNDERING; FLEXIBLE MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
  • D06M—TREATMENT, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE IN CLASS D06, OF FIBRES, THREADS, YARNS, FABRICS, FEATHERS OR FIBROUS GOODS MADE FROM SUCH MATERIALS
  • D06M13/00—Treating fibres, threads, yarns, fabrics or fibrous goods made from such materials, with non-macromolecular organic compounds; Such treatment combined with mechanical treatment
  • D06M13/10—Treating fibres, threads, yarns, fabrics or fibrous goods made from such materials, with non-macromolecular organic compounds; Such treatment combined with mechanical treatment with compounds containing oxygen
  • D06M13/144—Alcohols; Metal alcoholates
• • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
  • D06—TREATMENT OF TEXTILES OR THE LIKE; LAUNDERING; FLEXIBLE MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
  • D06M—TREATMENT, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE IN CLASS D06, OF FIBRES, THREADS, YARNS, FABRICS, FEATHERS OR FIBROUS GOODS MADE FROM SUCH MATERIALS
  • D06M23/00—Treatment of fibres, threads, yarns, fabrics or fibrous goods made from such materials, characterised by the process
  • D06M23/12—Processes in which the treating agent is incorporated in microcapsules
• • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
  • D06—TREATMENT OF TEXTILES OR THE LIKE; LAUNDERING; FLEXIBLE MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
  • D06M—TREATMENT, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE IN CLASS D06, OF FIBRES, THREADS, YARNS, FABRICS, FEATHERS OR FIBROUS GOODS MADE FROM SUCH MATERIALS
  • D06M2200/00—Functionality of the treatment composition and/or properties imparted to the textile material
  • D06M2200/20—Treatment influencing the crease behaviour, the wrinkle resistance, the crease recovery or the ironing ease

Definitions

• the present invention relates to an ironing aid composition suitable for pouring directly into the water reservoir chamber of a high-throughput steam iron wherein the composition is vaporised and released through the steam vents of the iron.
• the invention is also directed to a method for preparing an ironing aid composition and a concentrate ironing aid composition, which, preferably after appropriate dilution provides, the ironing aid composition ready for use.
• solubilise a perfume in water is to include a surfactant/emulsifier typified by anionic, cationic, amphoteric, zwitterionic or particularly nonionic surfactants, most particularly alcohol ethoxylates.
• a surfactant/emulsifier typified by anionic, cationic, amphoteric, zwitterionic or particularly nonionic surfactants, most particularly alcohol ethoxylates.
• GB 2 333 302 describes an ironing aid composition with a nonionic surfactant to disperse the hydrophobic fragrance.
• WO0210503A1 (Unilever), discloses ironing waters with soluble perfume components to avoid the undesirable effects of using surfactants in irons as the high temperatures ranging from 150-270°C encountered by the ironing water during evaporation in a domestic steam iron. Such products have become very successful in the European market under the trademark 'Vaporesse'.
• fragranced ironing waters cannot be used in some 'high-throughput' steam irons. If used in high throughput steam irons ironing waters eject water droplets with steam (this effect is hereafter referred to as 'carryover').
• the hot plate design in such irons enables rapid heat exchange and conversion of water into steam - this employs metallic hot plates with a hydrophilic ceramic coating which has special topological features (see F. M. White, “Heat Transfer”, Addison-Wesley, Reading, USA, 1984, and US 3696861).
• the present invention seeks to provide an improved ironing aid composition. We have determined that by reducing the foaming potential of ironing waters or by effective breaking of the foam film when formed this problem can be solved.
• the foam breakers must be compatible with the ironing waters and inert to the irons.
• hydrophobic nanoparticles act as an effective de-foamer and drastically reduces the carry-over level.
• an ironing aid composition for use in a steam iron, said composition comprising hydrophobic nanoparticles.
• Suitable nanoparticles have a mean size around 10-20 nm.
• the nanoparticles are hydrophobic oxides, more preferably metal oxides or a silica, more preferably a fumed silica.
• Acrosil TM available in the marketplace from Degussa-Huls is a preferred hydrophobic silica nanoparticle (17 nm in size).
• Other hydrophobic nanoparticles with an inorganic core, zeolites or clays, and a hydrophobic shell can also be used
• Typical levels of nanoparticles are 1-100 ppm, with levels of 5-20 ppm being preferred.
• Preferred nanoparticles have the capacity to adsorb perfume and so modify the expression of perfume during and after product use. They are also believed to provide lubrication and hence iron glide (ease of ironing) when delivered at sufficient levels. Additionally, as disclosed in US 2004/0067247, hydrophobic silicon containing nanoparticles bestow anti-microbial and hygiene benefits.
• composition may comprise any optional ingredients, the balance being water as described below.
• Water solubility is determined by mixing the water-soluble perfume in 1 litre of demineralised water at 20 Celsius, and stirring together for 60 minutes at 300 rpm using a standard mixing blade. The resulting mixture is stored for 7 days at 20 Celsius, and after that period if the resulting mixture is in two phases, then the perfume is not water-soluble. At least 0.01 wt.% of perfume should be able to dissolve according to this test. It is preferred that at least 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 3 or even 5 wt.% of the perfume is able to dissolve under these conditions.
• the water-soluble perfumes according to the invention will comprise water-soluble solvent and perfume ingredients, and these may be the sole components of such a perfume. It is preferred that the water-soluble perfume is soluble according to the above test at least at the amount it is included in the composition, if not at a higher concentration.
• the advantage of the presence of solvent is that it may increase the formulation space by enabling the use of more different compounds to create improved ironing aid compositions with more complex fragrances which are more consumer preferred.
• less solvent may be used to stabilise the perfume ingredients in the ironing aid composition.
• the weight ratio of solvent to perfume ingredients in the water-soluble perfume is preferably no more than 20:1, more preferably 10:1, 6:1, 3:1 or 1:1. In some water-soluble perfumes the ratio may be as low as 1:2 or even 1:3 or 1:4.
• Suitable water-soluble solvents include dipropylene glycol, propylene glycol, isopropyl alcohol (IPA), ethanol and mixtures thereof. The most preferred of these is dipropylene glycol.
• Perfume ingredients are well known to those skilled in the art, and are described in Perfume and Flavor Chemicals, Steffan Arctander (ISDN 75-91398).
• the solubility of individual perfume ingredients in water can be represented by the calculated partition coefficient (ClogP) of the ingredient between distilled water and octanol at 20 Celsius.
• ClogP partition coefficient
• raspberry ketone has a ClogP of 1.072 and is very soluble in water
• rose acetate has a ClogP of 4.048 and is not easily soluble in water.
• the ClogP values are most conveniently calculated by the "CLOGP" program, available from Daylight CIS.
• the water-soluble perfumes of the present invention preferably comprise at least 5 different perfume ingredients, more preferably at least 7, and possibly 10, 12 or even 15 or more different perfume ingredients. This number of different fragrance components is usually required to provide a 'complex' fragrance suitable for use in modern laundry products.
• perfume ingredients of the water-soluble perfume used will have a range of ClogP values.
• a perfume with a higher proportion of components with a high ClogP value will require a higher ratio of solvent to perfume ingredients than a perfume with a lower level of ingredients with a high ClogP value.
• a perfume with less than 5 wt.% of perfume ingredients with a ClogP value of greater than 3 may have a ratio of solvent to perfume ingredients of 1:1 or 1:2.
• a perfume where at least 20 wt.% of the perfume ingredients have ClogP values of greater than 3 may have a solvent to perfume ingredients ratio of 5:1 or 7:1.
• the water of the composition according to the invention should have a French Hardness of 20 or below, preferably 12 or below.
• Water with a French Hardness of 12 to 20 is usually termed Medium water, whilst that with a French Hardness of 5 to 12, soft water.
• the water of the composition has a French Hardness of less than 5 (sometimes called very soft water), and demineralised water is most preferred.
• 'Demineralised water' means water where a large proportion, if not substantially all, of the dissolved salts have been removed. Water where the hardness ions (Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ ) have simply been replaced by other ions (such as Na + ) is not as preferred.
• the term 'Demineralised water' also includes distilled water.
• composition comprises at least 70 wt.%, more preferably 80, 90, 95 or 99 wt.% of water.
• the ironing aid composition of the present invention may further comprise between 0.1 ppm and 3 wt.% of a preferably water-soluble preservative.
• the preservative preferably should not release or decompose to chemicals which are potentially harmful to the user at the temperatures encountered in a steam iron, i.e. preferably at 150, 200 or even 250 Celsius.
• a guide to safe limits of numerous chemicals is provided by Occupational Exposure Limits which are available from OHSE and are listed in EH40, available from HMSO.
• Many known preservatives e.g. Bronopol TM (Myacide), DowicilTM 75 or 200, GermabenTM II, GermallTM I 15, GermallTM II, GlycacilTM, GlydantTM, GlydantTM plus, OxabanTM A and SuttocideTM can release or breakdown to harmful or irritating chemicals (e.g. formaldehyde) at the temperatures encountered in steam irons or leave unacceptable residues in the steam irons, or have odours that mask that of the water-soluble perfumes at concentrations required to provide effective preservation against bacterial and mould growth.
• harmful or irritating chemicals e.g
• a preservative other than those defined as preferable, is to be included in the composition, then it should not be present at an amount of greater than 0.5 wt.%, more preferably 0.1, 0.001, 0.0001 wt.%, most preferably 1 ppm.
• the ironing aid composition comprises at least one preservative selected from aromatic, linear or branched C1-C20 alcohols and mixtures thereof, and may be present in an amount of between 0.1 ppm and 3 wt.% or preferably 0.5 and 1 wt. %.
• at least one preservative is selected from benzyl alcohol (phenoxy methanol) and phenoxy ethanol and mixtures thereof. Of these preservatives, benzyl alcohol is more preferred.
• benzyl alcohol preferably a high purity grade is employed, to minimise the presence of the known impurity, benzaldehyde, which is preferably essentially absent from the composition according to the invention, i.e., so low that ironing aid composition can still be safely used.
• one preferred preservative comprises at least one isothiazolone-based compound, e.g., KathonTM CG ICP II (available from Rohm and Haas), a 3:1 mixture of 5-chloro-2-methyl-3(2H)-isothiazolone and 2-methyl-3(2H)-isothiazolone with a low salt content, which may be present at an amount of between 1 and 15 ppm, more preferably 4 to 7.5 ppm.
• KathonTM CG ICP II available from Rohm and Haas
• a 3:1 mixture of 5-chloro-2-methyl-3(2H)-isothiazolone and 2-methyl-3(2H)-isothiazolone with a low salt content which may be present at an amount of between 1 and 15 ppm, more preferably 4 to 7.5 ppm.
• the water solubility of the preservative can be measured as for the water soluble perfume, and according to the test defined above, at least 0.01 wt.%, more preferably 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.25, 0.5, 1 or 3 wt.% of the water-soluble preservative should dissolve. In the alternative, it is preferred that the water-soluble preservative is soluble according to this test at least at the amount it is included in the composition, if not at a higher concentration.
• composition according to the invention may not be necessary to include a preservative in the composition according to the invention, if the composition can be manufactured using good manufacturing practices and contamination of the product by bacteria and fungi is thus avoided.
• compositions for dosing in the water reservoir chamber of steam irons are neutral or slightly alkaline, as is most tap water. Therefore buffers may be included in the composition of the present invention in order to adjust the pH of the solution such that it is greater than or equal to 6, preferably 7 to 9 more preferably 7 to 8. Such buffers may be included in amounts of between 0.0001, preferably 0.001 to 0.1 or 1 wt. %.
• Buffers which are suitable for use in the present invention should preferably be non-corrosive, low in odour and leave little deposits in the steam chamber.
• Suitable buffers may include carbonate/bicarbonate, borate and phosphate salts.
• compositions of the present invention may also include sequestrants and scale poisoning agents in an amount of between 0.0001, preferably 0.001 to 0.1 or 1, or even 3 wt. %, in order to prevent the deposition of limescale and other unwanted salts in the steam chamber of the iron.
• Sequestrants are compounds that act to sequester (chelate) metal ions, and, for example, include phosphonic or carboxylic acid functionalities, whereas scale-poisoning agents interfere with the scale formation process. Sequestrants and scale poisoning agents which are suitable for use in the present invention should preferably be non-corrosive, low in odour and leave little deposits in the steam chamber.
• Suitable sequestrants include organo diphosphonic acids, such as DequestTM 2016 (HEDP; 1-hydroxyethylene-1,1-diphosphonic acid), organo aminophosphonates, such as DequestTM 2047 (EDTMP), and polyaminocarboxylic acids, such as EDTA.
• organo diphosphonic acids such as DequestTM 2016 (HEDP; 1-hydroxyethylene-1,1-diphosphonic acid
• organo aminophosphonates such as DequestTM 2047 (EDTMP)
• EDTA polyaminocarboxylic acids
• Scale poisoning agents include acrylic acid containing organic polymers, such as polyacrylic acid maleic anhydride copolymers (e.g. SokolanTM CP5 from BASF and NarlexTM LD20 from National Starch), salts of polyacrylic acids, and polyacrylic acid homopolymers.
• polyacrylic acid maleic anhydride copolymers e.g. SokolanTM CP5 from BASF and NarlexTM LD20 from National Starch
• salts of polyacrylic acids e.g. SokolanTM CP5 from BASF and NarlexTM LD20 from National Starch
• polyacrylic acid homopolymers such as acrylic acid containing organic polymers, such as polyacrylic acid maleic anhydride copolymers (e.g. SokolanTM CP5 from BASF and NarlexTM LD20 from National Starch), salts of polyacrylic acids, and polyacrylic acid homopolymers.
• the ironing aid composition according to one aspect of the invention will be prepared by mixing a water-soluble perfume with water having a French hardness of 20 or below.
• the water-soluble perfume will comprise water-soluble perfume ingredients and a solvent.
• an auxiliary solvent may be included in the invention in an amount of 0.01 to 5 or possibly 20 wt.%, more preferably 0.1 to 5 or 10 wt.%, most preferably 0.2 to 1 or 2 wt. %.
• Suitable auxiliary solvents include dipropylene glycol, glycerine, propylene glycol, ethanol and isopropyl alcohol (IPA) and mixtures thereof.
• the most preferred of these is dipropylene glycol.
• dipropylene glycol may be especially useful in ironing applications as a humidifier to facilitate ironing. Therefore, another aspect of the invention provides the use of an effective amount of dipropylene glycol for an ironing aid application.
• the ironing aid composition comprising the effective amount of dipropylene glycol can be used either directly on laundry items before ironing or can be used via the steam chamber of a steam iron. According this aspect of the invention, the ironing aid composition comprises:
• the amount of ethanol and/or isopropyl alcohol (IPA) in the composition preferably does not exceed 5% by weight.
• the total level of solvent in the composition can therefore be up to and including about 25 wt.%, more preferably 15, 10, 5, or even 2 or 3 wt.%.
• the lower limit on the total solvent content may be as low as 0.001 wt.%, or may be 0.01, 0.1 or 1 wt.%. Since it will be obvious to the skilled person in the art that it does not matter whether the solvent is added as part of the perfume or separate from the perfume, the term water-soluble perfume is preferably to be interpreted as water-soluble perfume ingredients.
• the ironing aid composition comprises 0.001 to 5 wt.% of water-soluble perfume ingredients and water having a French Hardness of 20 or below and a total amount of solvent of from 0.001 to 25 wt.% of the total composition.
• water-soluble perfume preferably refers to the mixture of perfume ingredients and the total amount of solvent present in the perfume and any additional solvent.
• Surfactants are compounds having a hydrophilic head and a hydrophobic tail which contains at least 8 carbon atoms, and can be anionic, cationic, nonionic, or amphoteric (which includes zwitterionic).
• Anionic surfactants contain as their hydrophilic head a carboxylate, sulphate, sulphonate or phosphate group, whilst their hydrophobic chain contains an alkyl group of at least 8 carbon atoms, possibly in combination with an aryl group.
• Cationic surfactants contain as their hydrophilic head a quaternary nitrogen group, whilst their hydrophobic chain contains one or more alkyl groups of at least 8 carbon atoms.
• Nonionic surfactants are the reaction product of a hydrophobic group with a reactive hydrogen and an alkylene oxide, usually ethylene oxide.
• the hydrophobic group will contain at least 8 carbon atoms, and is usually a primary or secondary alcohol.
• Amphoteric surfactants will either have a carboxylate, or sulphate head group, or will be an amine oxide, and will contain alkyl chains having at least 8 carbon atoms.
• compositions of the present invention comprise less than 0.2 wt.% of these surfactants, more preferably less than 0.1, 0.05, 0.01, 0.001 wt.% and most preferably less than 1 ppm of these surfactant. It should be understood that the phrase "less than” in this case also encompasses 0 wt.% surfactant. In fact in some cases it may be preferred to have no surfactant present.
• compositions according to the invention may consist of a water-soluble perfume and water with a French Hardness of 20 or below, and also of any of the optional components described above.
• the overall composition is storage stable at 20 °C, i.e. it does not separate into two phases on extended storage (preferably at least 1 month). It is further preferred that the overall composition is storage stable at between 5°C and 37 Celsius.
• An ironing aid composition comprising perfume can be prepared in many ways known to the person skilled in the art. However, we have now found an improved process for preparing an ironing aid composition. One advantage is that relatively high concentrations of perfume can be incorporated in the aqueous carrier with minimal bacterial contamination.
• An improved process for preparing an ironing aid composition comprising the step of mixing perfume with water having a French hardness of 20 or less at a temperature between 10 and 95°C, preferably 60 and 90°C, most preferably between 70 and 85°C.
• the perfume is water-soluble as described above.
• the water-soluble perfume comprises water-soluble solvent and perfume ingredients, the weight ratio of water-soluble solvent to perfume ingredients being no more than 20:1.
• the nanoparticles can be admixed with the perfume components and/or the solvent prior to addition of the water.
• the hydrophobic particles because of their nano scale size are extremely agglomerated.
• the resulting solutions are crystal clear and hence compatible with ironing waters.
• a further aspect of the present invention provides a method for the preparation of an ironing water which comprises the steps of forming a pre-mix comprising:
• the mixing may be performed under low shear for relatively long periods e.g. 30 minutes at about 100 to 4000 s -1 with for example a Sulzer static mixer (SMV type).
• SMV Sulzer static mixer
• the ironing aid composition of the present invention can be packaged by any conventional means, for instance in bottles or pouches, these being made from conventional materials. It is however preferred that if the composition is packaged in a bottle, the material from which the bottle is made comprises PET (polyethylene tetraphalate). This is preferred as it prevents perfume loss from the product on storage, and is transparent. Glass is also a preferred packaging material.
• PET polyethylene tetraphalate
• the bottle comprises a pour spout to aid pouring of the product from the bottle.
• the pour spout comprises a through spout for the liquid composition to pass through from the bottle, an annular drip tray which surround the through spout, and a drain hole in said drip tray to allow fluid to pass into the bottle.
• a further aspect of the present invention relates to a concentrate that when diluted with water, preferably having a French hardness of 20 or below, results in an ironing composition according to the present invention.
• the dilution is such that one part of concentrate is diluted with between 0.5 to 100, more preferably, between 1 and 10, most preferably between 2 and 5 parts of water (wt/wt).
• the exact composition of the concentrate can be easily calculated given the desired end concentration in the ironing aid composition and the dilution factor. For example when the end concentration of perfume in the ironing aid composition has to be between 3.0 and 5.0 wt % than the dilution factor will be limited to at most 20.
• the diluted ironing aid composition will necessarily comprise lower maximal perfume levels i.e., theoretically at most 1 wt.% of perfume. In most cases in will be preferred to have perfume levels in the ironing aid composition of at most 0.5 wt.%
• the concentrate could also be diluted by water having a French hardness of greater than 20 to result in a composition according to the first aspect of the invention, except containing hard water.
• the concentrate preferably contains sequestrants and/or scale-poisoning agents.
• the present invention provides a concentrate ironing aid composition for use in a steam chamber of a steam iron when diluted by water comprising a water-soluble perfume, as defined above.
• the concentrate contains no water or preservative. If a weaker concentrate is required, then auxiliary solvent may be required to ensure the water-soluble perfume remains solubilised in the concentrate. Auxiliary solvent may also be required if any of the additional components defined above are to be included in the concentrate.
• a method for using a concentrate ironing aid composition comprising the step of diluting the concentrate to form an ironing aid composition comprising 0.001 to 5 wt.% water-soluble perfume and water having a French Hardness of 20 or below.
• Table 1 compares the results for some known foam breakers and hydrophobic silica particles for a simple test where 3 ml of sample is boiled on a model ceramic coated aluminium disc. Note that although the other additives can be easily incorporated into an ironing water the silica had to be incorporated according to the preferred method of dispersing it in the neat perfume first.
• the 'boiling score' denotes how frothing a 2 ml sample of a perfumed water becomes during boiled on a hot plate and scales between 0 to 100 - zero for demineralised water and 100 for the neat base (in this case 'Sol and Fresh' variant of 'Vaporesse'TM).
• the boiling characteristics of additives added to a perfumed water denotes how frothing a 2 ml sample of a perfumed water becomes during boiled on a hot plate and scales between 0 to 100 - zero for demineralised water and 100 for the neat base (in this case 'Sol and Fresh' variant of 'Vaporesse'TM).
• Table 1 shows that the silica is more effective in reducing the foaming potential (and boiling time) of the perfumed water than the other antifoam materials.
• other nanoparticles which are not hydrophobic i.e. the clay and the Zeolite did not work.
• Table 2 shows the results of noise measurements, during ironing experiments, Noise is generally reduced in the presence of silica showing that inside iron there is less foaming.
• the 'control' sample is 'Sol and Fresh' variant of 'Vaporesse'TM which contains 0.2%wt DPG. Further DPG is added in other experiments.
• 'Base' is the 'control' sample prepared without DPG. Comparison of measured noise level while ironing with a Philips Azur iron Ironing Time/s Steam Boost Demin water Control Control + 0.001% silica Base + 0.001 silica + glycerol Base + 0.001 silica (no solvent) 15 58 60 49 56 54 30 54 65 52 55 55 45 54 57 54 53 55 60 On 85 80 87 78 80 75 53 61 53 54 53 90 52 56 57 51 54 105 54 58 55 52 52 120 On 73 84 84 73 72 135 56 66 58 52 56 150 57 54 54 52 56 165 56 69 49 50 57 180 On 72 80 80 69 78 195 52 67 53 54 52 210 56 57 51 51 55 225 53 54 50 51 53 240 On 81 87 88 76
• the noise level measured in dBA (dB(A) - decibels with an A-weighting for the human ear) on a hand held noise detector by placing it in front of the iron when ironing.
• the steam boost 'on' means that this is when the button was pressed to release a burst of steam to the cloth.

Landscapes

• Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
• Textile Engineering (AREA)
• Cosmetics (AREA)
• Colloid Chemistry (AREA)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Publications (2)

Family

ID=32482667

Family Applications (1)

Country Status (2)

Cited By (4)

Citations (3)

• 2004
  • 2004-05-05 GB GB0409963A patent/GB0409963D0/en not_active Ceased
• 2005
  • 2005-04-14 EP EP05075866A patent/EP1593774A3/de not_active Withdrawn

Patent Citations (3)

Also Published As

Similar Documents

Legal Events