EP1454111A1 - Method for guaranteeing safety during firing with live ammunition - Google Patents
Method for guaranteeing safety during firing with live ammunitionInfo
- Publication number
- EP1454111A1 EP1454111A1 EP02787503A EP02787503A EP1454111A1 EP 1454111 A1 EP1454111 A1 EP 1454111A1 EP 02787503 A EP02787503 A EP 02787503A EP 02787503 A EP02787503 A EP 02787503A EP 1454111 A1 EP1454111 A1 EP 1454111A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- firing
- combat
- shot
- sectors
- participants
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F41—WEAPONS
- F41A—FUNCTIONAL FEATURES OR DETAILS COMMON TO BOTH SMALLARMS AND ORDNANCE, e.g. CANNONS; MOUNTINGS FOR SMALLARMS OR ORDNANCE
- F41A17/00—Safety arrangements, e.g. safeties
- F41A17/08—Safety arrangements, e.g. safeties for inhibiting firing in a specified direction, e.g. at a friendly person or at a protected area
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F41—WEAPONS
- F41G—WEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING
- F41G3/00—Aiming or laying means
- F41G3/26—Teaching or practice apparatus for gun-aiming or gun-laying
Definitions
- the invention relates to a method for ensuring safety when shooting with a sharp shot in a limited and. from a surveillance center from monitored training areas of mobile combat participants practicing under combat conditions.
- the invention has for its object to develop a method for ensuring security in shooting operations that meets the high security requirements for military training areas with a significant reduction in security personnel and the freedom of movement of all combat participants within the training area with a simultaneous sharp shot of the firing combat line he permits.
- the method according to the invention for ensuring the shooting safety during shooting operation has the advantage that a complete and reliable protection of all combatants against shots by shooting combat participants is produced when shooting exercises are carried out in open terrain with moving weapon systems. This protection is guaranteed in every combat situation, regardless of the position, the direction of travel and the speed of the combat participants. In addition, it is also ensured that no shooting participant can shoot beyond the limits of the training area and that stationary objects located within the training area are also protected against damage caused by inadmissible firing.
- Such a spatial extension in the training area is defined as a permitted shooting sector in which a single, shooting combat participant can shoot safely for other combat participants and for any stationary objects that may be present in the training area and that must be protected against fire.
- a danger zone is taken into account either in the calculation of the current permitted shot sectors for the firing combat participants in the monitoring center or when comparing the weapon position with the transmitted, current shot sectors for each firing combat participant.
- This danger zone is specified as the spatial extent in the training area for each weapon of a shooting combat participant and takes into account the • weapon type and the type of ammunition to be fired with the weapon.
- the boundaries of the permitted firing sector are reduced by this danger area, in the second case firing is only permitted if the current danger position also means that the danger zone is within the firing sector.
- so-called system tolerances are also taken into account in the calculation of the danger zone, that is, among other things, fault tolerances that can occur during position determination and weapon position detection.
- the positions of existing stationary objects to be protected within the training area are also included in the calculation of the permitted shot sectors, so that these are also protected against shelling.
- the positions of the combat participants are assigned the times of their determination and the predetermined sectors of the shot the times of their determination and a period of validity.
- their current weapon position is only compared with the assigned shot sectors if the time of determining the weapon position is within the period of validity.
- the positions of the combat participants, the calculation of the firing sectors and the checking of the weapon positions of the combat participants are carried out on the basis of a common time base and in a defined time cycle, so that the current validity of the firing sectors and weapon positions can be determined, which also includes the movements of the Battle participants considered.
- Fig. 1 is a schematic plan view of a
- FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a security device equipped for each shooting participant as part of the shooting security device
- Fig. 4 is a schematic plan view of a shooting sector assigned to a shooting combat participant with danger area.
- FIG. 1 shows a detail of a training area 10 defined by a boundary line 18, in which mobile combat participants 11 practice under combat conditions and thereby combat participants 11 perform a shooting operation with a sharp shot.
- the firing combat participants 11 are combat in a combat association, who fire 12 real shots with their weapons 17, here tank cannons, at targets 10 set up in the training area 10.
- other types of combat combat participants 11, e.g. B. guns, rocket launchers, anti-tank helicopters and the like. to be available.
- FIG. 1 shows a vehicle, for example the association logistics of the practicing combat association.
- Other mobile, non-shooting combat participants 11 can also be reconnaissance and / or observation vehicles.
- Also located in Training area 10 isolated stationary objects 13, which may not be fired upon by the shooting combat participants 11.
- the combat exercise is monitored from a stationary monitoring center 14 by appropriate monitoring personnel and can also be conducted from there.
- the surveillance center 14 and the combat participants 11 are in radio communication with one another.
- a main radio station 15 is set up at the monitoring center 14 and relay stations 16 are arranged in the training area 10 in such a way that a seamless radio connection is ensured in the entire training area 10.
- a safety device for the shooting operation is installed in the training area 10, which includes one monitoring device 20 and several arranged in the monitoring center 14
- Security devices 21 includes, one of which is equipped for each firing combat participant 11.
- the monitoring device 20 and the safety devices 21 on the firing combat participants 11 are connected to one another via the radio data transmission and exchange relevant data via the radio data transmission to ensure safety during the shooting operation.
- the non-firing combat participants 11 are equipped with at least one position sensor and a radio data transmission transmitter, so that the non-firing combat participant 11 can transmit its position and possibly further data recorded on site to the monitoring device 20.
- the monitoring device 20 comprises a radio receiver 22 and a radio transmitter 23, a central computer 24 and a database 25, in which the cartographically recorded training area 10 with the boundary line 18 and with the placement of the stationary objects 13 to be protected is stored.
- the data received via the radio receiver 22 by the combat participants 11, that is to say both by the shooting and the non-shooting combat participants 11, are processed in the correct position and are sent as default data to the radio transmitter 23, which codes them in the training area 10 for the individual shooting Battle participant 11 radiates.
- the safety device 21 has a radio transmitter 26, a radio receiver 27, a position sensor 28 for determining the current position P (t) of the firing combat participant 11, a weapon position sensor 29 for detecting the
- Swivel angle position ⁇ (t) of the weapon 17 in azimuth optionally a weapon position sensor 30 for detecting the weapon position ⁇ (t) in elevation, an ammunition selector switch 31 with which the type of ammunition to be fired with the weapon 17 is selected, and an optical and a Acoustic display element 34, 35, which signal the firing combat participant 11 that a shot is released.
- a shot lock 36 can be provided in the safety device 21, which blocks the manual triggering of a shot by a weapon trigger 37.
- the processor 32 which switches on the optical and acoustic display element 34, 35 to detect the release of the shot, deactivates the shot lock 36 when the shot is released, so that the weapon 17 can be fired with the weapon trigger 37.
- Each non-firing combat participant 11 is equipped with a safety device 21 '(FIG. 1) which is greatly reduced in terms of components and which, as is not shown further here, only comprises the radio transmitter 26 and the position sensor 28 for determining the current position P (t).
- the positions of the non-firing combat participant 11 determined by the position sensor 28, like the position of the firing combat participants 11, are transmitted at intervals from the radio transmitter 26 to the monitoring center 14.
- the position determination by the position sensor 28 is based on the global position system (GPS), as is the case with the firing combat participant 11.
- GPS global position system
- the radio transmitter 26 and position sensor 28 becomes shooting safety is guaranteed according to the following procedure: For each firing combat participant 11 and non-firing combat participant 11, its current position P (t) is continuously determined by means of the position sensor 28 and reported to the monitoring center 14 via the radio transmitter 26. The position P (t) is determined in time intervals, each position P being assigned the time t of its determination. The size of the time interval between the position outputs of the combat participants 11 depends on their speed and shortens as the speed increases and the distance from the other combat participants 11 increases.
- the monitoring center 14 all positions of the combat participants 11 determined in this way are shown in the site plan provided by the database 25 of the practice area 10.
- the central computer 24 for each shooting combat participant 11, taking into account the position of the respective shooting combat participant 11, the positions of all other combat participants 11, the positions of the stationary objects 13, the possible movement areas of all combat participants 11 and the boundary line 18 of the training area 10, permitted shot sectors 38 (Fig. 1) calculated in which can be fired by the respective shooting combat participant 11, to which these shot sectors 38 are assigned, within the training area 10 outlined by the boundary line 18.
- These permissible shot sectors 28 are transmitted individually by the monitoring center 14 to the firing combat participants 11 by radio data transmission.
- the calculated, permitted shot sectors 38 can additionally be subjected to a plausibility check and excluded from transmission to the shooting combat participants 11.
- Such reasons for exclusion can include, for example, the absence of targets in the respective shooting sector or be didactic or tactical reasons.
- the shot sectors 38 approved for transmission to the shooting combat participants are assigned the time of their calculation and a period of validity, so that each data telegram emitted via the radio transmitter 23 to the shooting combat participants 11 contains the coordinates of the shot sectors 38, the time of their calculation and the validity period.
- each shot sector 38 is defined, for example, by an azimuth angle ⁇ , which is in each case related to the individual position of the respective shooting combat participant 11.
- Azimuth angle ⁇ is defined, for example, by a north-related, lower angular limit ⁇ Gi and a north-related, upper angular limit & G 2, as shown in FIG. 1 for the shooting sector 38 of the upper, firing combat participant 11.
- the processor 32 checks whether the current weapon position 39 of the weapon 17 of the firing combat participant 11, which in the exemplary embodiment is supplied to the processor 32 by the azimuthal pivoting angle ⁇ (t) of the weapon 17, coincides in time with the assigned shot sectors 38, that is, whether the The time of the weapon position determination lies within the period of validity of the assigned shot sectors 38.
- the processor 32 checks whether the current weapon position 39 of the firing combat participant 11 lies within one of the shot sectors 38 assigned to it. Otherwise, ie if the period of validity of one or more shot sectors 38 does not include, detect, cover or span the time of determining the position of the weapon, this shot sector 38 or these shot sectors 38 are eliminated and are no longer taken into account. If the current weapon position 39 lies within a firing sector 38, firing by the firing combat participant 11 is permitted for this firing sector 38, and the processor 32 generates a firing release signal which switches on the optical display element 34 and / or the acoustic display element 35 for signaling the firing release and possibly the shot lock 36 for the weapon trigger 37 deactivated. The firing combat participant 11 is now able to fire a shot at the targeted target 12 with the current weapon position 39.
- the north-related angle limits ⁇ G ⁇ and ⁇ G2 des are exemplified in FIG Azimuth angle ⁇ of a shooting sector 38 approved for the upper, firing combat participant 11 is shown and is, for example, 40 ° or 295 °.
- the north-related, azimuthal swivel angle ⁇ of the weapon 17 is, for example, 333 °.
- the swivel angle ⁇ is substantially larger than the upper angle limit & G2 and smaller than the upper angle limit ⁇ G ⁇ .
- the current weapon position 39 is therefore within the firing sector 38. If the firing combat participant 11 does not change his position, he can combat all three targets 12 within this approved firing sector 38.
- the weapon type of the firing combat participant 11 and the type of ammunition to be fired with this type of weapon defines a danger zone 33 as a spatial extension in the training area 10.
- a danger zone 33 is shown as an example in FIG. 4.
- the geometric shape of such a danger zone can look very different depending on the type of weapon and ammunition.
- the defined danger zone 33 is compared with the current weapon position 39 allowable shot sectors 38 is taken into account by checking whether the danger zone 33 at the current weapon position 39 is within one of the allowable shot sectors 38. Only if this is the case is a shot released for this shot sector 38.
- the danger zone 33 can also be taken into account in the central computer 24 of the monitoring device 20, for which purpose it is necessary that the firing combat participants 11 contact the
- Monitoring device 20 also transmit the type of ammunition to be fired by them by radio data transmission.
- the danger zone 33 in the calculation of the permissible shot sectors 38, the sector boundaries ⁇ G1 and ⁇ G2 of the shot sectors 38 are reduced, so that the permissible shot sectors 38 are more restricted in their angular width.
- system tolerances can also be included, which arise from the fact that e.g. Error tolerances occur when determining the position of combat participants 11 and when determining the current weapon position 39.
- An approved firing sector 38 for a firing combat participant 11 calculated by the central computer 24 always has a depth or length which is greater than the range of the projectile to be fired by the weapon 17 of the firing combat participant 11.
- it is possible to shorten the shot for the shooting combat participant 11 by for a maximum elevation angle ⁇ is given to the firing combat participant 11 for each authorized shot sector 38, which is fed to the processor 32 via the radio receiver 27.
- the current attachment or elevation angle ⁇ (t) of the weapon 17 is fed to the processor 32, and the processor 32 compares the predetermined maximum elevation angle ⁇ (t) with the current attachment ⁇ (t) of the weapon 17 of the firing combat participant 11 If the latter is smaller than the predetermined maximum elevation angle ⁇ (t), the shot release is released, if this is not the case, a shot release is blocked.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
- Aiming, Guidance, Guns With A Light Source, Armor, Camouflage, And Targets (AREA)
- Emergency Lowering Means (AREA)
- Beans For Foods Or Fodder (AREA)
- Water Treatment By Sorption (AREA)
- Lighting Device Outwards From Vehicle And Optical Signal (AREA)
- Camera Bodies And Camera Details Or Accessories (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE10160946A DE10160946A1 (en) | 2001-12-12 | 2001-12-12 | Procedure for ensuring safety when shooting with a sharp shot |
DE10160946 | 2001-12-12 | ||
PCT/EP2002/011894 WO2003054472A1 (en) | 2001-12-12 | 2002-10-24 | Method for guaranteeing safety during firing with live ammunition |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1454111A1 true EP1454111A1 (en) | 2004-09-08 |
EP1454111B1 EP1454111B1 (en) | 2005-07-27 |
EP1454111B8 EP1454111B8 (en) | 2005-10-05 |
Family
ID=7708883
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP02787503A Expired - Lifetime EP1454111B8 (en) | 2001-12-12 | 2002-10-24 | Method for guaranteeing safety during firing with live ammunition |
Country Status (10)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US6977593B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1454111B8 (en) |
AT (1) | ATE300721T1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU2002351780A1 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2470119C (en) |
DE (2) | DE10160946A1 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2247402T3 (en) |
NO (1) | NO20042545L (en) |
PL (1) | PL203880B1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2003054472A1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7616935B2 (en) | 2001-11-09 | 2009-11-10 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus for matching receiver carrier frequency |
Families Citing this family (16)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
IL143603A0 (en) * | 2001-06-06 | 2003-06-24 | C T S Combat Training Simulati | Combat simulation system and method |
US7124531B1 (en) | 2004-12-23 | 2006-10-24 | Raytheon Company | Method and apparatus for safe operation of an electronic firearm sight |
DE102005001558B4 (en) * | 2005-01-13 | 2018-12-27 | Krauss-Maffei Wegmann Gmbh & Co. Kg | Method for monitoring and controlling firing events of a combat vehicle |
US20080220397A1 (en) * | 2006-12-07 | 2008-09-11 | Livesight Target Systems Inc. | Method of Firearms and/or Use of Force Training, Target, and Training Simulator |
US7962243B2 (en) * | 2007-12-19 | 2011-06-14 | Foster-Miller, Inc. | Weapon robot with situational awareness |
ATE499581T1 (en) * | 2008-06-30 | 2011-03-15 | Saab Ab | ASSESSMENT SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR SHOOTING TRAINING |
US20100031808A1 (en) * | 2008-08-05 | 2010-02-11 | Honeywell International Inc. | Method, apparatus, and system of providing sensor-based tactile feedback |
SE1050239A1 (en) * | 2010-03-17 | 2011-09-18 | Bae Systems Haegglunds Ab | Device and method for assessing a potential target |
FI122890B (en) * | 2011-06-16 | 2012-08-31 | Sako Ltd | FIRE GUN SAFETY AND METHOD OF USING THE SAFETY DEVICE |
US8739672B1 (en) * | 2012-05-16 | 2014-06-03 | Rockwell Collins, Inc. | Field of view system and method |
US20140173961A1 (en) | 2012-12-21 | 2014-06-26 | David Goren | Methods and system for controlling the use of firearms |
US20140259847A1 (en) * | 2013-03-14 | 2014-09-18 | Alexander Medovnikov | Integrated firearm safety system |
DE102013111644A1 (en) * | 2013-10-22 | 2015-04-23 | Krauss-Maffei Wegmann Gmbh & Co. Kg | Method for controlling a directable weapon of a vehicle during firing exercises |
IL229078A (en) * | 2013-10-24 | 2015-06-30 | Alfa Yuta Prompting Dev And Advanced Technology Ltd | System, device and method for the prevention of friendly fire incidents |
RU2660723C1 (en) * | 2014-09-05 | 2018-07-09 | Данфосс А/С | Method for controlling ejector unit of variable capacity |
CA3089237A1 (en) * | 2018-01-22 | 2019-07-25 | Rade Tecnologias, S.L. | Weapon safety system |
Family Cites Families (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE2555020C3 (en) * | 1975-12-06 | 1984-09-27 | Krauss-Maffei AG, 8000 München | Device for blocking the firing of a weapon |
DE3023517A1 (en) * | 1980-06-24 | 1982-01-14 | Wegmann & Co, 3500 Kassel | DEVICE FOR LIMITING THE SHOT SECTOR AT A COMBAT VEHICLE MONITORED FROM A CONTROL CENTER, IN PARTICULAR A COMBAT ARMOR |
DE4026207A1 (en) * | 1990-08-18 | 1992-02-20 | Telefunken Systemtechnik | Exchange of battlefield data between armoured fighting vehicles - involves central processing computer linked by duplex radio to each vehicle carrying GPS and combat simulator |
US5822713A (en) * | 1993-04-05 | 1998-10-13 | Contraves Usa | Guided fire control system |
FR2712675B1 (en) * | 1993-11-18 | 1996-02-02 | Giat Ind Sa | Method and system for prohibiting the firing of a small, medium or large caliber weapon, in particular with a straight trajectory, outside at least one ground or aerial surveillance zone. |
JP3538870B2 (en) * | 1993-11-24 | 2004-06-14 | 富士通株式会社 | Simulation training system |
DE19915222A1 (en) * | 1999-04-03 | 2000-10-05 | Stn Atlas Elektronik Gmbh | Battlefield simulation method involves exchanging all data relevant to shell simulation via central station to which targets and participants are exclusively connected by radio |
-
2001
- 2001-12-12 DE DE10160946A patent/DE10160946A1/en not_active Ceased
-
2002
- 2002-10-24 ES ES02787503T patent/ES2247402T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-10-24 DE DE50203787T patent/DE50203787D1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-10-24 CA CA002470119A patent/CA2470119C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2002-10-24 WO PCT/EP2002/011894 patent/WO2003054472A1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2002-10-24 AU AU2002351780A patent/AU2002351780A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2002-10-24 AT AT02787503T patent/ATE300721T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2002-10-24 PL PL369586A patent/PL203880B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2002-10-24 EP EP02787503A patent/EP1454111B8/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-12-12 US US10/317,142 patent/US6977593B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2004
- 2004-06-17 NO NO20042545A patent/NO20042545L/en not_active Application Discontinuation
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See references of WO03054472A1 * |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7616935B2 (en) | 2001-11-09 | 2009-11-10 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus for matching receiver carrier frequency |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
NO20042545L (en) | 2004-06-17 |
ES2247402T3 (en) | 2006-03-01 |
US20040005532A1 (en) | 2004-01-08 |
EP1454111B1 (en) | 2005-07-27 |
US6977593B2 (en) | 2005-12-20 |
DE50203787D1 (en) | 2005-09-01 |
PL369586A1 (en) | 2005-05-02 |
DE10160946A1 (en) | 2003-07-03 |
CA2470119C (en) | 2008-01-29 |
CA2470119A1 (en) | 2003-07-03 |
AU2002351780A1 (en) | 2003-07-09 |
PL203880B1 (en) | 2009-11-30 |
WO2003054472A1 (en) | 2003-07-03 |
EP1454111B8 (en) | 2005-10-05 |
ATE300721T1 (en) | 2005-08-15 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP1454111B1 (en) | Method for guaranteeing safety during firing with live ammunition | |
DE3108562C2 (en) | ||
DE19523399C2 (en) | Handgun | |
DE2454453C3 (en) | Device for performing and evaluating target exercises with anti-aircraft guns with simulated fire | |
DE2907590A1 (en) | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR EVALUATING SIMULATED SHOOTING EXERCISES WITH A WEAPON AT A TARGET | |
DE602004010880T2 (en) | System and method for weapon effect simulation | |
DE102005001558B4 (en) | Method for monitoring and controlling firing events of a combat vehicle | |
EP1166029B2 (en) | Method for simulating a battlefield | |
DE19617061A1 (en) | Free terrain combat simulation in spatially limited training ground | |
EP0913661B1 (en) | Device for protecting moving objects, in particular armoured vehicles, against projectiles | |
EP3060872B1 (en) | Method for controlling a directable weapon of a vehicle during shooting exercises | |
DE8400652U1 (en) | Device for detecting a target on firearms | |
EP1159578B1 (en) | Shooting simulation method | |
WO2022083822A1 (en) | Determination of a fire guidance solution of an artillery weapon | |
EP3034983B2 (en) | Automatic gun | |
EP0154809A1 (en) | Method for simulating combat | |
DE3405017A1 (en) | Device for firing simulation in combat vehicles, especially in armoured combat vehicles, in practice operation | |
DE2932428C2 (en) | Method of combating ground targets by end-phase guided missiles | |
DE3531602A1 (en) | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR REDUCING THE MAGNETIC IDENTITY FOR SHIP PARTS, WHICH ARE MOVABLE WITH REGARD TO THEIR POSITION AND HEIGHT | |
DE102011084572A1 (en) | Electromechanical security system for production of hand-held weapon utilized in sports, has calibration apparatus transferring reference position of weapon to controller, where signals of apparatus are received at entrance of safety area | |
DE102011107950A1 (en) | System of e.g. firearms, to prevent e.g. civilian aircraft collision with e.g. civilian building, has communication apparatus from which output signal generated by applying logic function to transmission information is sent to weapons | |
DE102020007996A1 (en) | Guidance system for aligning a barrel weapon | |
DE3041076C1 (en) | Guidance method for torpedoes | |
DE102015120036A1 (en) | Remote weapon station and method of operating a remote weapon station | |
DE1163708B (en) | Mechanical coupling of the height adjustment lever of the weapon barrel with the height adjustment lever of the sight optics on a weapon |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20040514 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE SK TR |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE SK TR |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20050727 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20050727 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20050727 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20050727 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20050727 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20050727 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 50203787 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20050901 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
RAP2 | Party data changed (patent owner data changed or rights of a patent transferred) |
Owner name: RHEINMETALL DEFENCE ELECTRONICS GMBH |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20051024 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20051024 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20051027 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20051027 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20051031 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20051031 Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20051031 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: TRGR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GR Ref legal event code: EP Ref document number: 20050402970 Country of ref document: GR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: NV Representative=s name: TROESCH SCHEIDEGGER WERNER AG |
|
NLT2 | Nl: modifications (of names), taken from the european patent patent bulletin |
Owner name: RHEINMETALL DEFENCE ELECTRONICS GMBH Effective date: 20050921 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20051227 |
|
GBT | Gb: translation of ep patent filed (gb section 77(6)(a)/1977) |
Effective date: 20051222 |
|
NLV1 | Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act | ||
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FD4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2247402 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 |
|
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20060428 |
|
BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: STN ATLAS ELEKTRONIK G.M.B.H. Effective date: 20051031 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Payment date: 20071012 Year of fee payment: 6 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20071016 Year of fee payment: 6 Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20071023 Year of fee payment: 6 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Payment date: 20071030 Year of fee payment: 6 |
|
EUG | Se: european patent has lapsed | ||
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20081024 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20090630 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20081031 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20090505 Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20081024 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20081025 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20131025 Year of fee payment: 12 Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20131029 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20141024 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FD2A Effective date: 20151126 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20151021 Year of fee payment: 14 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20141025 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20161031 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20161031 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Payment date: 20151024 Year of fee payment: 14 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20211020 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20050727 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R071 Ref document number: 50203787 Country of ref document: DE |