Classifications

• • G—PHYSICS
  • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
  • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
  • G05B13/00—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion
  • G05B13/02—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric
  • G05B13/04—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators
  • G05B13/042—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators in which a parameter or coefficient is automatically adjusted to optimise the performance
• • G—PHYSICS
  • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
  • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
  • G05B17/00—Systems involving the use of models or simulators of said systems
  • G05B17/02—Systems involving the use of models or simulators of said systems electric
• • G—PHYSICS
  • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
  • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
  • G05B19/00—Programme-control systems
  • G05B19/02—Programme-control systems electric
  • G05B19/418—Total factory control, i.e. centrally controlling a plurality of machines, e.g. direct or distributed numerical control [DNC], flexible manufacturing systems [FMS], integrated manufacturing systems [IMS] or computer integrated manufacturing [CIM]
  • G05B19/41885—Total factory control, i.e. centrally controlling a plurality of machines, e.g. direct or distributed numerical control [DNC], flexible manufacturing systems [FMS], integrated manufacturing systems [IMS] or computer integrated manufacturing [CIM] characterised by modeling, simulation of the manufacturing system
• • G—PHYSICS
  • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
  • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
  • G05B2219/00—Program-control systems
  • G05B2219/30—Nc systems
  • G05B2219/32—Operator till task planning
  • G05B2219/32017—Adapt real process as function of changing simulation model, changing for better results
• • G—PHYSICS
  • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
  • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
  • G05B2219/00—Program-control systems
  • G05B2219/30—Nc systems
  • G05B2219/42—Servomotor, servo controller kind till VSS
  • G05B2219/42136—Fuzzy feedback adapts parameters model
• • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
  • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
  • Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
  • Y02P90/00—Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
  • Y02P90/02—Total factory control, e.g. smart factories, flexible manufacturing systems [FMS] or integrated manufacturing systems [IMS]

Definitions

• the invention relates to a method and a device for calculating process variables.
• Predicting process variables with which the system is preset are optimized using measured process variables.
• Adaptive models which are used in the process automation of industrial processes, often consist of a physical core model.
• This core model describes the relationships that can be described mathematically and physically with the current level of knowledge with sufficient accuracy (DE 43 38 608 AI).
• Process variables for which a sufficiently precise mathematical-physical theory does not yet exist are nowadays determined using empirical models. These empirical models are either manually, e.g. B. during the commissioning of an industrial process plant, adjusted or adjusted from the direct comparison between measured and calculated process variables.
• the object of the invention is to provide a method or device which enables the empirical models to be adapted quickly and efficiently.
• the process according to the invention according to claim 1 u comprises a core model and one or more empirical models, the empirical models being adapted using what is known as a “partially inverse core model X ⁇ .
• Process variables for which no sufficiently precise mathematical-physical theory is known are calculated in the empirical model.
• only process variables are calculated in the physical core model for which, based on current knowledge, the mathematical-physical dependencies are known with sufficient accuracy.
• the input variables of the empirical models, the output variables of which are to be referred to as empirical variables are known process parameters.
• the empirical variables as well as known process parameters are used as input variables in the core model. In the output variables of the core model, a distinction is made between measurable process variables and other process variables. That for
• Core model of partially inversely constructed model (briefly referred to as "partially inverse core model” 1 ) has a suitable selection of measurable process variables as well as all known parameters that come into play in the core model.
• the output variables of the partially inverse core model are the empirical ones already mentioned above sizes.
• the core model and the inverse core model are compatible with one another except for numerical rounding errors and both models are online-compatible in terms of computing time.
• the Partially inverse core model exactly (except for the measurement accuracy of the selected measurable process variables) determine which values the empirical variables should have had at the time of measurement so that the model predictions of the core model match the selected measurement values as closely as possible. With this knowledge of the empirical quantities at the time of measurement, the empirical models can be adapted.
• Another advantageous embodiment of the invention is that by means of adaptation or training algorithms, such as. B. with a gradient descent method, an adaptation of the process variables in the sense of a reduction in the determined deviation.
• the inventive device comprises a computing system of an industrial process for calculating unknown process parameters, also referred to as empirical variables, depending on known process parameters in at least one empirical model, and for calculating process variables depending on the known process parameters and the empirical variables in a core model, the empirical model being adapted by means of a core model that is partially inverse to the core model.
• unknown process parameters also referred to as empirical variables
• empirical model being adapted by means of a core model that is partially inverse to the core model.
• the single figure shows an example of the execution of an empirical model, a core model and a partially inverse core model according to the invention.
• the exemplary embodiment shows the method according to the invention for calculating process variables 12 of an industrial process.
• the process model shown is e.g. B. used for the calculation of the rolling forces, the rolling moments, the rolling power and the advance for all rolling stands of a five-stand cold rolling mill (tandem mill).
• a five-stand cold rolling mill tilt mill
• the core model 9 and the partially inverse core model 14 are compatible with one another except for numerical rounding errors and that both models are online-compatible in terms of computing time.
• the partially inverse core model 14 can be used to determine exactly which values the empirical variables 15 should have at the time of measurement so that the measurable process variables 10 calculated (selected) by the core model match the actually measured process variables 13 as closely as possible .
• the empirical models 3, 5 can be adapted or optimized using the calculated empirical variables 15.
• the adaptation or optimization of the empirical models 3, 5 takes place via adaptation or training algorithms 2, 4.
• the adaptation or training algorithms 2, 4 have the calculated empirical variables 16, 17 and the known process parameters 1 as input variables.
• the adaptation or training algorithms 2, 4 associated with the empirical models 3, 5 implemented in the form of neural networks are based on a gradient descent method, i. H. that, depending on the deviation, there is an adaptive change in the model parameters contained in the neuronets in the sense of a reduction in the determined deviation.
• the model parameters adapted in this way are available for the calculation of the empirical variables 6, 7 at the beginning of the next process sequence.

Landscapes

• Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
• Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
• Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
• General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
• Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
• Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
• Software Systems (AREA)
• Medical Informatics (AREA)
• Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
• Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
• Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
• General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
• Quality & Reliability (AREA)
• Feedback Control In General (AREA)
• General Factory Administration (AREA)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Publications (1)

Family

ID=7665306

Family Applications (1)

Country Status (5)

Families Citing this family (3)

Family Cites Families (12)

• 2000
  • 2000-11-30 DE DE10059567A patent/DE10059567A1/de not_active Ceased
• 2001
  • 2001-11-28 EP EP01995542A patent/EP1342138A1/de not_active Withdrawn
  • 2001-11-28 JP JP2002546924A patent/JP2004514998A/ja active Pending
  • 2001-11-28 WO PCT/DE2001/004467 patent/WO2002044822A1/de active Application Filing
• 2003
  • 2003-05-30 US US10/449,625 patent/US20030208287A1/en not_active Abandoned

Non-Patent Citations (1)

Also Published As

Similar Documents

Legal Events