EP1216542B1 - Procedes et appareils relatifs a un protocole multiple de telecommunications incluant des considerations de qualite de services - Google Patents

Procedes et appareils relatifs a un protocole multiple de telecommunications incluant des considerations de qualite de services Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1216542B1
EP1216542B1 EP00965519A EP00965519A EP1216542B1 EP 1216542 B1 EP1216542 B1 EP 1216542B1 EP 00965519 A EP00965519 A EP 00965519A EP 00965519 A EP00965519 A EP 00965519A EP 1216542 B1 EP1216542 B1 EP 1216542B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
message
transmitted
voice stream
accordance
protocol
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP00965519A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP1216542A1 (fr
Inventor
Ron Nevo
Xudong Zhao
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Mobilian Corp
Original Assignee
Mobilian Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US09/408,725 external-priority patent/US6894988B1/en
Priority claimed from US09/436,458 external-priority patent/US6990082B1/en
Priority claimed from US09/439,946 external-priority patent/US6600726B1/en
Application filed by Mobilian Corp filed Critical Mobilian Corp
Publication of EP1216542A1 publication Critical patent/EP1216542A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1216542B1 publication Critical patent/EP1216542B1/fr
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W48/00—Access restriction; Network selection; Access point selection
    • H04W48/18—Selecting a network or a communication service
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L12/00—Data switching networks
    • H04L12/66—Arrangements for connecting between networks having differing types of switching systems, e.g. gateways
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L65/00—Network arrangements, protocols or services for supporting real-time applications in data packet communication
    • H04L65/80—Responding to QoS
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L9/00—Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communications; Network security protocols
    • H04L9/40—Network security protocols
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W28/00—Network traffic management; Network resource management
    • H04W28/16—Central resource management; Negotiation of resources or communication parameters, e.g. negotiating bandwidth or QoS [Quality of Service]
    • H04W28/24—Negotiating SLA [Service Level Agreement]; Negotiating QoS [Quality of Service]
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L65/00—Network arrangements, protocols or services for supporting real-time applications in data packet communication
    • H04L65/1066—Session management
    • H04L65/1101—Session protocols
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L69/00—Network arrangements, protocols or services independent of the application payload and not provided for in the other groups of this subclass
    • H04L69/08—Protocols for interworking; Protocol conversion
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L69/00—Network arrangements, protocols or services independent of the application payload and not provided for in the other groups of this subclass
    • H04L69/18—Multiprotocol handlers, e.g. single devices capable of handling multiple protocols
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W76/00—Connection management
    • H04W76/20—Manipulation of established connections
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W80/00—Wireless network protocols or protocol adaptations to wireless operation
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W88/00—Devices specially adapted for wireless communication networks, e.g. terminals, base stations or access point devices
    • H04W88/02—Terminal devices
    • H04W88/06—Terminal devices adapted for operation in multiple networks or having at least two operational modes, e.g. multi-mode terminals

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to the field of wireless communication. More specifically, the present invention relates to the problem of concurrent wireless communication with multiple communication partners of different wireless communication protocols.
  • wireless communication Once confined to the privileged, wireless voice communication have become affordable and available to the masses.
  • Bluetooth technology A leading candidate to accomplish the former is commonly known to those skilled in the art as the Bluetooth technology or Bluetooth protocol.
  • Examples of technology to accomplish the later include the different variants of the IEEE 802.11 Standard published by the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, 802.11 (Frequency Hoping, Direct Sequence), 802.11a, 802.1b, as well as Home RF, also known as Shared Wireless Access Protocol (SWAP) to those skilled in the art.
  • SWAP Shared Wireless Access Protocol
  • WO99/16266 discloses a mobile communications network in which the bearer (circuit-switched network or packet-switched network) for application date flow is selectable based on a requested quality of service associated with the application data flow.
  • One such applications is having a notebook computer being able to communicate with peripheral devices such as a phone, a printer, a scanner and the like, in accordance with the Bluetooth, protocol; and with other computing devices, such as other peer computers or servers, communication devices, such as modems or adapters, and networking devices, such as gateways, routers, switches and the like, in accordance with one of the 802.11 protocols or Home RF.
  • the need cannot be met by simply providing the device with multiple transmitters, one for each protocol. The reason is because if multiple ones of these transmitters were to transmit at the same time. The transmitters are going to interfere with each other, resulting in corruption and/or loss of data, as well as degradation in performance.
  • WO99/29126 discloses an integrated mobile radio communications network having a terminal that can operate simultaneously in two different networks by aligning the timing of the different networks.
  • the present invention substantially address this need in a very efficient and low cost manner. This and other advantages of the present invention will be readily apparent from the description to follow.
  • an apparatus comprising:
  • the at least one controller manager is equipped with logic to determine message types of first messages to be transmitted to a selected one or selected ones of the first network devices in accordance with the first protocol, and to give priority to the first messages over second messages to be transmitted to a selected one or selected ones of the second network devices in accordance with the second protocol, if message types of the first messages are determined of a multi-media type.
  • wireless device 100 is provided with wireless transceivers 102a and 102b to transmit and receive signals wirelessly in accordance with a first and a second wireless communication protocol, to enable device 100 to be communicatively coupled to devices 104a and devices 104b of wireless networks 108a and 108b respectively.
  • Wireless device 100 further includes controller managers 106a and 106b to control the operation of wireless transceivers 102a and 102b respectively.
  • controller managers 106a and 106b control transmits and receives by wireless transceivers 102a and 102b , in a coordinated manner, in accordance with the present invention, to allow wireless device 100 to operate with devices 104a and devices 104b of wireless network 108a and 108b in accordance with the respective wireless communication protocols at the same time.
  • controller managers 106a and 106b control transmits and receives by wireless transceivers 102a and 102b (hereinafter, simply transceivers), in a coordinated manner. More specifically, in this embodiment, controller managers 106a and 106b control transceivers 102a and 102b to alternate between transmits by one of the two transceivers and receives by both of the two transceivers.
  • Figure 2 illustrates a period of operation in accordance with this embodiment.
  • control manager 106a controls transceiver 102a to perform transmit of signals to devices 104a of wireless network 108a (hereinafter, simply network) in accordance with the first wireless communication protocol (hereinafter, simply protocol), while control manager 106b controls transceiver 102b to neither perform transmit nor receive of signals to and from devices 104b of network 108b .
  • simply protocol the first wireless communication protocol
  • control manager 106b controls transceiver 102b to neither perform transmit nor receive of signals to and from devices 104b of network 108b .
  • time period T3 for duration t3, the reverse is performed.
  • Control manager 106b controls transceiver 102b to perform transmit of signals to devices 104b of network 108b in accordance with the second protocol
  • control manager 106a controls transceiver 102a to neither perform transmit nor receive of signals to and from devices 104a of network 108a .
  • control managers 106a and 106b control both transceivers 102a and 102b to perform receive of signals from devices 104a and 104b of network 108a and 108b in accordance with the respective protocols respectively.
  • devices 104a are able to receive in time period T1, and transmit when there are packets to transmit, but otherwise receive, in time periods T2-T4.
  • devices 104b are able to receive in time period T3, and transmit when there are packets to transmit, but otherwise receive, in time periods T1-T2 and T4.
  • wireless device 100 is able to operate with devices 104a and 104b of networks 108a and 108b in two wireless protocols at the same time.
  • time periods T1-T4 may or may not be equal in duration. That is, numerically t1-t4 may or may not be equal.
  • duration t1-t4 of time periods T1-T4 are dynamically and adaptively set.
  • duration t1-t4 of time periods T1-T4 are adaptively set based at least in part of transmit and receive workloads of networks 108a and 108b .
  • transceivers 102a and 102b as well as controller managers 106a and 106b are otherwise intended to represent a broad range of these elements known in the art. Accordingly, except for the teachings of the present invention, which will be further described below, transceivers 102a and 102b and controller managers 106a and 106b will not be otherwise further described.
  • Wireless device 100 is intended to represent a wide range of devices that can benefit from having the ability to wirelessly operate with other wireless devices in two or more wireless communication protocols at the same time.
  • Examples of device 100 include but not limited to computers of various form factors, such as desktop, notebook, palm size and so forth, controller devices (i.e. master devices) to manage and control the operation of networks 108a and 108b , and gateway devices to facilitate communication between devices 104a and devices 104b .
  • devices 104a and 104b are intended to represent a broad range of devices that can benefit from being able to communicate wirelessly.
  • devices 104a include but not limited to phones, video cameras, speakers, modems, printers and scanners equipped to wireless communicate in accordance with the Bluetooth protocol.
  • devices 104b include clients and servers, as well as gateways, modems, hubs, routers, and switches equipped to wireless communicate in accordance with a selected variant of the IEEE 802.11 protocols or Home RF.
  • Fig. 1 For ease of understanding, only two groups of devices 104a and 104b , communicating in accordance with the first and second wireless communication protocols are shown in Fig. 1 . However, from the description to follow, it will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, the present invention may be practiced with more than two transceivers (as long as the transceivers are likewise coordinated).
  • each controller manager 106a/106b of wireless device 100 is endowed with a state machine 300a/300b to complementarily assist the controller manager 106a/106b to control its transceiver 102a/102b in the above described coordinated manner.
  • each state machine 300a/300b in addition to idle state 410, has four operating states 412-418 (TX, RX1, NOP, and RX2) to output a signal 304a/304b denoting a selected one of a transmit (TX) operation, a receive (RX) operation and no-op (NOP) for its controller manager 106a/106b.
  • TX transmit
  • RX receive
  • NOP no-op
  • each state machine 300a/300b Upon power-on or reset, each state machine 300a/300b either transitions from idle state 410 to TX state 412 or NOP state 416 , depending on the state of configuration (config) signal 302a/302b.
  • One state machine, e.g. 300a is configured to transition from idle state 410 to TX state 412
  • the other state machine e.g. 300b
  • Config signal 302a/302b may be set e.g. via a jumper or other equivalent means, as well as through software.
  • state machine 300a/300b While in TX state 412 , state machine 300a/300b remains in the state for duration ts1, outputting signal 304a/304b denoting TX operation for its controller manager 1026a/106b .
  • t1 and t3 may take on different values
  • one state machine, e.g. 300a is configured with ts1 set to t1
  • the other state machine, e.g. 300b is configured with ts1 set to t3.
  • Ts1 may be selectively set in any one of a number of techniques known in the art, e.g. through separate registers or multiplexing circuitry.
  • state machine 300a/300b transitions from TX state 412 to RX1 state 414 .
  • state machine 300a/300b While in RX1 state 414 , state machine 300a/300b remains in the state for duration ts2, outputting signal 304a/304b denoting RX operation for its controller manager 106a/106b .
  • t2 and t4 may take on different values
  • one state machine, e.g. 300a is configured with ts2 set to t2
  • the other state machine, e.g. 300b is configured with ts2 set to t4.
  • Ts2 may likewise be selectively set in any one of a number of techniques known in the art.
  • state machine 300a/300b transitions from RX1 state 414 to NOP state 416 .
  • state machine 300a/300b While in NOP state 416 , state machine 300a/300b remains in the state for duration ts3, outputting signal 304a/304b denoting NOP for its controller manager 106a/106b .
  • t1 and t3 may take on different values
  • one state machine, e.g. 300a is configured with ts3 set to t3
  • the other state machine, e.g. 300b is configured with ts3 set to t1.
  • Ts3 may likewise be selectively set in any one of a number of techniques known in the art.
  • state machine 300a/300b transitions from NOP state 416 to RX2 state 418 .
  • state machine 300a/300b While in RX2 state 418 , state machine 300a/300b remains in the state for duration ts4, outputting signal 304a/304b denoting RX operation for its controller manager 106a/106b .
  • t2 and t4 may take on different values
  • one state machine, e.g. 300a is configured with ts4 set to t4
  • the other state machine, e.g. 300b is configured with ts4 set to t2.
  • Ts4 may likewise be selectively set in any one of a number of techniques known in the art.
  • state machine 300a/300b transitions from RX2 state 418 to TX state 412 .
  • state machine 300a/300b continues operation as described earlier.
  • FIG. 5 and 6 wherein a block diagram and a state diagram illustrating wireless device 100 of Fig. 1 in further detail, in accordance with another embodiment, are shown.
  • each controller manager 106a/106b of wireless device 100 instead of having each controller manager 106a/106b of wireless device 100 be endowed with a state machine to complementarily assist the controller manager 106a/106b to control its transceiver 102a/102b in the above described coordinated manner, wireless device 100 is endowed with a single state machine 500 to assist both controller managers 106a and 106b .
  • state machine 500 in addition to idle state 610 , has four operating states 612-618 (S1 - S4) to output a pair of signals 504a-504b denoting a selected combination of operations, TX with NOP, both RX, and NOP with TX for controller managers 106a and 106b .
  • state machine 500 Upon power-on or reset, state machine 500 transitions from idle state 610 to S1 state 612 . While in S1 state 612 , state machine 500 remains in the state for duration ts1, outputting signal 504a-504b denoting TX and NOP for controller managers 106a and 106b . Ts1 is set to t1. Upon expiration of ts1, state machine 500 transitions from S1 state 612 to S2 state 614 . While in S2 state 614 , state machine 500 remains in the state for duration ts2, outputting signal 504a-504b denoting RX for both controller managers 106a and 106b . Ts2 is set to t2. Upon expiration of ts2, state machine 500 transitions from S2 state 614 to S3 state 616 .
  • state machine 500 While in S3 state 616 , state machine 500 remains in the state for duration ts3, outputting signal 504a-504b denoting NOP and TX for controller managers 106a and 106b . Ts3 is set to t3. Upon expiration of ts3, state machine 500 transitions from S3 state 616 to S4 state 618 . While in S4 state 618 , state machine 500 remains in the state for duration ts4, outputting signal 504a-504b denoting RX for both controller managers 106a and 106b . Ts4 is set to t4. Upon expiration of ts4, state machine 500 transitions from S4 state 618 to S1 state 612 .
  • state machine 500 continues operation as described earlier.
  • FIG. 7 a block diagram illustrating wireless device 100 of Fig. 1 in further detail, in accordance with yet another embodiment, is shown.
  • wireless device 100 in addition to having wireless device 100 be endowed with a single state machine 700 to assist both controller managers 106a and 106b as described earlier (with signals 708a-708a denoting TX-NOP, RX-RX or NOP-TX), wireless device 100 is further endowed with register 702, time sharing manager 704 , and workload monitor 706 operatively coupled to each other and state machine 700 as shown.
  • Register 702 stores t1-t4 for state machine 700 .
  • Time sharing manager 704 dynamically adjusts t1-t4 to enable state machine 700 be able to adaptively assist controller managers 106a and 106b in controlling transceivers 102a and 102b .
  • time sharing manager 704 dynamically adjusts t1-t4 based at least in part on transmit and receive workloads of networks 108a and 108b . Transmit and receive workloads are monitored by workload monitor 706 and provided to time sharing manager 704 .
  • Register 702 may be constituted with any storage circuitry known in the art.
  • Time sharing manager 704 and workload monitor 706 may be implemented with any combinatorial logic or in software.
  • first protocol of wireless devices 104a of network 108a is assumed to be a frequency hopping protocol as shown, i.e. wireless devices 104a hop from frequency to frequency in accordance with a pseudo random pattern to transmit signals.
  • second protocol of wireless devices 104b of network 108b is assumed to be a constant frequency protocol (although in alternate embodiments, it may also be a frequency hopping protocol).
  • at least one of the frequencies of the first protocol is the same frequency of the second protocol.
  • frequency interference is shown to occur at the 7 th and 14 th hop (f 7 and f 14 ). That is, in accordance with the pseudo random pattern, in each of these two hops, devices 104a transmit in the same frequency employed by devices 104b .
  • An example of a frequency hopping protocol is the Bluetooth protocol, and an example of a protocol having an interfering frequency with Bluetooth is the 802.11 protocol.
  • the interference pattern is dictated by the intersection of the pseudo random pattern followed by the frequency hopping devices 104a and the frequency employed by devices 104b .
  • wireless device 100 coordinates the operation of devices 104a and 104b to proactively reduce actual occurrence of interference. More specifically, for the illustrated embodiments, either devices 104a or devices 104b are selected to be the "dominant" devices. The non-selected devices are considered to be the dominated devices. The dominated devices are notified, from time to time, to suspend operation to pro-actively avoid interference with the dominant devices, allowing the dominant devices to continue to operate without interference. As result, the time consuming collision detection, back off and retries are substantially reduced, and experience has shown that the overall operating efficiencies of both networks improve, the dominated network as well as the dominant network.
  • Fig. 8a illustrates a period of operation when devices 104a , the frequency hopping devices, are selected to be the dominant devices
  • Fig. 8b illustrates a period of operation when devices 104b are selected to be the dominant devices. That is, under Fig. 8a , devices 104b , upon informed, will temporarily suspend operation to proactively avoid interference, whereas under Fig. 8b , devices 104a , upon informed, will temporarily suspend operation to proactively avoid interference.
  • wireless device 100 basically operates as earlier described. Except wireless device 100 assumes the additional responsibilities of determining the pseudo random frequency hopping pattern of devices 104a (in one embodiment, including the interfering frequency), selecting either devices 104a or 104b to be the dominated devices, predicting the occurrence of interference, and preemptively notifying the dominated devices to suspend operation to avoid interference (in one embodiment, conditionally suspending operation).
  • wireless device 100 is basically the embodiment earlier described referencing Fig. 7 , except wireless device 100 is further provided with network management application (or network manager) 904 to proactively managing network devices 104a and 104b to reduce actual occurrence of interference.
  • Network manager 904 also subsumes the earlier described responsibilities of time sharing manager 704 , i.e. monitoring the workloads of the two protocols, and adaptively setting the values of t1-t4 for time period T1-T4.
  • network manager 904 monitors the operation of devices 104a and 104b for an observation period, and determines the pseudo random frequency hopping pattern followed by devices 104a (and in one embodiment, the interfering frequency with devices 104b ), 912 . This may be accomplished using any one of a number of techniques known in the art.
  • network manager 904 selects either devices 104a or devices 104b to be the dominant devices, 914 . In one embodiment, network manager 904 makes the selection in accordance with configuration information programmed in configuration register 902 . In alternate embodiments, other configuration registers, or other techniques known in the art, such as jumpers, may also be employed to assist network manager 904 in making the selection.
  • network manager 904 predicts when interference will occur, using the determined pseudo random pattern and interference frequency, 916 . Whenever, an interference is to occur, network manager 904 preemptively notifies the dominated devices to suspend operation accordingly, thereby allowing the dominant devices to operate without interference, 918 .
  • the notification includes the interfering frequency, and the suspension is conditional, only if the predicted frequency is indeed the interfering frequency.
  • network manager 904 repeats the calibration periodically. In yet another embodiment, network manager 904 monitors actual interference between devices 104a and 104b , and tracks the mean time between interference. Network manager 904 repeats the calibration, whenever the tracked mean time between interference drops below certain given performance level.
  • network manager 904 may make the selection of the dominated devices in a dynamic and individualized manner, when an interference is predicted to occur. That is, different device or devices 104a and 104b are dynamically and individually selected for different predictions of interference. Such dynamic, individualized manner of selection may also be made in view of the workloads of the two protocols.
  • the above described improved manner of operation may be practiced with minimal or no change to devices 104,a and 104a , as virtually all network devices are capable of temporarily suspending operation responsive to a request.
  • the conditional performance may be effectuated through addition of simple frequency testing combinatorial logic.
  • wireless device 100 upon selecting the dominated devices at 914 , notifies devices 104a and 104b of their respective roles, i.e. whether they are the dominating devices or dominated devices. Further, at least the dominated devices are also provided with a collision map, for the dominated devices to self determine whether interference is to occur. In other words, operation 916 is distributed to the dominated devices, and operation 918 is eliminated.
  • first protocol of wireless devices 104a of network 108a is assumed to be a frequency hopping protocol
  • second protocol of wireless devices 104b of network 108b is assumed to be a constant frequency protocol (although it may also be a frequency hopping protocol).
  • wireless device 100 coordinates the operation of devices 104a and 104b to proactively reduce actual occurrence of interference. More specifically, under this embodiment, devices 104a and 104b are correspondingly notified of the filtering to be employed to correspondingly cancel the respective interfering signals, and when to apply the filtering.
  • the filtering to be employed is a notch filter inversely formed in accordance with the other devices' signal.
  • both devices 104a and 104b apply the corresponding required filtering to correspondingly cancel the respective interfering signals.
  • the basic operations of wireless device 100 remain substantially unchanged, except, wireless device 100 assumes the additional responsibilities of determining the pseudo random frequency hopping pattern of devices 104a , the interfering frequency, the corresponding filtering to be employed to cancel the respective interfering signals, and preemptively notifying devices 104a and 104b of the determined filtering as well as when to apply them.
  • wireless device 100 is basically the embodiment earlier described referencing Fig. 9a . That is, wireless device 100 is also additionally provided with network manager 1104 , except the additional responsibilities assumed by network manager 1104 to proactively reduce interference are slightly different.
  • network manager 1104 monitors the operation of devices 104a and 104b for an observation period, and determines the pseudo random frequency hopping pattern followed by devices 104a , and the interfering frequency with devices 104b, 1112 . This again may be accomplished using any one of a number of techniques known in the art.
  • network manager 1104 determines the corresponding filtering to be employed by devices 104a and 104b to correspondingly cancel their respective interfering signals of "the other devices", and provides the determined information to devices 104a and 104b , 1114 .
  • the corresponding filtering to be employed are notched filters inversely constructed in accordance with the other devices' signals (see Fig.
  • devices 104a are to apply a notch filter, inversely formed in accordance with transmit signals of devices 104b
  • devices 104b are to apply a notch filter, inversely formed in accordance with transmit signals of devices 104a .
  • Notech filters in general are known in the art, and will not be further described.
  • network manager 1104 predicts when interference will occur, using the determined pseudo random pattern and interference frequency, 1116 . Whenever, an interference is to occur, network manager 1104 preemptively notifies devices 104a and 104b to correspondingly apply their corresponding filtering, thereby allowing both devices 104a and 104b to operate without interference, 1118 . The process continues, as long as there are wireless devices of both types 104a and 104b operating. [Likewise, the application of filtering by devices 104a may also be conditionally performed, only if the frequency is indeed the same as the interfering frequency.]
  • network manager 1104 repeats the calibration periodically.
  • network manager 1104 monitors actual interference between devices 104a and 104b , and tracks the mean time between interference.
  • Network manager 1104 repeats the calibration, whenever the tracked mean time between interference drops below certain given performance level.
  • devices 104a and 104a may also be practiced with minimal change to devices 104a and 104a , by equipping both types of network devices with the ability to responsively apply notch filtering.
  • devices 104a may be additionally provided with simple combinatorial logic to effectuate the conditional application of notch filtering.
  • wireless device 100 in addition to notifying the devices of the required filtering at 1114 , wireless device 100 provides the devices with a collision map, such that the devices can self determine whether interference is to occur, and the appropriate filtering to be applied. In other words, operation 1116 is distributed to the devices, and operation 1118 is eliminated.
  • controller managers 106 in operating wireless device 100 additionally take into consideration quality of service criteria to be achieved for the respective protocol.
  • the at least one controller manager is equipped with logic to determine message types of first messages to be transmitted to a selected one or selected ones of the first network devices in accordance with the first protocol, and to give priority to the first messages over second messages to be transmitted to a selected one or selected ones of the second network devices in accordance with the second protocol, if message types of the first messages are determined of a multi-media type.
  • the at least one controller manager is equipped with logic to maintain a quality metric reflective of frequency of error for each voice stream, and to make its priority determination for messages competing to be transmitted to the first and second network devices in accordance with the first and second protocols in view of the quality metric maintained for each voice stream.
  • Fig. 14 illustrates the essential operations of the operation flow of controller managers 106 for such embodiment, for taking into consideration quality of service criteria through quality metrics reflective of the frequency of error for each voice stream.
  • the controller managers establish and initialize a message transmitted counter for thevoice stream being instantiated. Thereafter, for each message to be transmitted, the controller managers determine if the message is for a voice stream, 1404. If not, the message is handled in any one of a number of application dependent manner 1405. The exact manner is not relevant to the practice of the present invention. If it is message for a voice stream, the controller managers further determines if the message is in competition for priority with another message to be transmitted in accordance with the other protocol, 1406. If not, the message is transmitted, 1408.
  • the controller managers further determine if at least m messages have been successfully transmitted consecutively for the voice stream, 1410. M is greater than 1/e, where e is an error percentage rate not to be exceeded. If not more than m messages have been successfully transmitted consecutively for the voice stream, priority is given to the message for the voice stream, and the message is transmitted, 1408. Upon transmission of a message for a voice stream, the controller managers increment the message transmitted counter corresponding to the voice stream, 1412. On the other hand, if at least m messages have been successfully transmitted consecutively for the voice stream, priority is given to the other message, allowing the message for the voice stream to be dropped, 1414. Upon dropping a message for a voice stream, the controller managers reset the message transmitted counter for the voice stream, 1416.
  • operation 1410 is not merely performed with respect to a single successful consecutive transmission threshold. Instead, a more sophisticated approach involving the message type of the priority competing message and multiple successful consecutive transmission thresholds is employed. More specifically, the controller managers would determine if the priority competing message is of a first message type or a second message type. If it is of the first message type, than priority is given to the message of the voice stream unless at least m1 messages for the voice stream have been successfully transmitted consecutively for the voice stream. If at least m 1 messages for the voice stream have been successfully transmitted consecutively for the voice stream, priority is given for the other message of the first message type. M1 is a first multiplier of 1/e 1, where e1 is as earlier defined.
  • M2 is a second multiplier of 1/e2, and greater than m1.
  • the first message type is "acknowledgement" message type
  • the second message type is a data message type.
  • the present invention may also be practiced withmore than two message categorizations and corresponding quality thresholds.
  • wireless device 100 is communicatively coupled to devices 104a and devices 104b of wireless networks 108a and 108b respectively.
  • Wireless device 100 performs transmits and receives of the two protocols, in a coordinated manner, to allow wireless device 100 to operate with devices 104a and devices 104b of wireless network 108a and 108b in accordance with the respective protocols at the same time.
  • wireless device 100 is provided with a single wireless transceiver 1302 , which includes joint signal transmit/receive section 1303 , and a number of transmit and receive signals up/down conversion sections 1205 sharing joint signal transmit/receive section 1303 .
  • Wireless device 100 further includes controller/signal processing (C/SP) section 1306 to process data for transmission by wireless transceiver 1302 , to process signals received by wireless transceiver 1302 , and to control the data/signal processing operations as well as the operation of wireless transceiver 1302 .
  • C/SP controller/signal processing
  • wireless device 100 is endowed with a network manager equipped with the capabilities earlier described referencing Figs. 8a-8b and 9a-9b. In other embodiments, wireless device 100 is endowed with a network manager equipped with the capabilities earlier described referencing Figs. 10 and 11a -11b. In yet other embodiments, wireless device 100 is endowed with the capabilities earlier described referencing Figs. 15 . In one words, the capabilities and methods of operations described referencing Figs 8a-8b and 9a-9b , Figs . 10 and 11a -11b , and Fig. 15 , may be practiced with the multiple protocol wireless apparatus of the first parent application, number 09/408,725 , or the multiple protocol wireless apparatus of the second parent application.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Multimedia (AREA)
  • Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)
  • Small-Scale Networks (AREA)
  • Communication Control (AREA)
  • Transmitters (AREA)

Claims (32)

  1. Dispositif (100) comprenant :
    au moins un émetteur-récepteur sans fil (102) agencé pour émettre et recevoir des signaux selon un premier et un deuxième protocoles vers et de premier et deuxième dispositifs en réseau (104) d'un premier et d'un deuxième réseaux sans fil (108) couplés de manière communicante au dispositif (100) ; et
    au moins un gestionnaire de contrôleur (106) couplé audit au moins un émetteur-récepteur sans fil (102) pour mettre en oeuvre ledit au moins un émetteur-récepteur sans fil pour effectuer lesdites émissions et réceptions selon lesdits premier et deuxième protocoles, en prenant en considération des critères de qualité de service à atteindre pour les protocoles respectifs ;
    caractérisé en ce que ledit au moins un gestionnaire de contrôleur (106) est équipé d'une logique pour déterminer le fonctionnement dudit au moins un émetteur-récepteur sans fil (102) pour coordonner lesdites émissions et réceptions selon les premier et deuxième protocoles pour éviter une interférence entre des signaux émis selon lesdits premier et deuxième protocoles, ledit fonctionnement étant déterminé sur la base d'une métrique de qualité maintenue pour chaque signal, la métrique de qualité reflétant une fréquence d'erreur associée à ce signal.
  2. Dispositif selon la revendication 1, dans lequel ledit au moins un gestionnaire de contrôleur (106) est équipé d'une logique pour déterminer des types de messages de premiers messages à émettre dans un premier signal vers l'un sélectionné ou les uns sélectionnés desdits premiers dispositifs en réseau (104) selon ledit premier protocole, et pour donner la priorité auxdits premiers messages par rapport à des deuxièmes messages à émettre dans un deuxième signal vers l'un sélectionné ou les uns sélectionnés desdits deuxièmes dispositifs en réseau selon ledit deuxième protocole, si les types de messages desdits premiers messages sont déterminés comme étant un type multimédia.
  3. Dispositif selon la revendication 2, dans lequel ledit au moins un gestionnaire de contrôleur (106) est configuré pour effectuer sa détermination de priorité pour des messages en concurrence à émettre vers lesdits premier et deuxième dispositifs en réseau (104) selon lesdits premier et deuxième protocoles compte tenu de ladite métrique de qualité maintenue pour chacun des premier et deuxième signaux.
  4. Dispositif selon la revendication 3, dans lequel les premier et deuxième signaux sont des flots vocaux, et ledit au moins un gestionnaire de contrôleur (106) est équipé d'une logique pour incrémenter un compteur de messages émis correspondant à un flot vocal à chaque fois qu'un message est émis pour le flot vocal, et pour ne pas abandonner un message du flot vocal tant qu'au moins m messages n'ont pas été émis avec succès consécutivement pour le flot vocal, où m est supérieur à 1/e, et e est un pourcentage d'erreurs à ne pas dépasser.
  5. Dispositif selon la revendication 4, dans lequel ledit au moins un gestionnaire de contrôleur (106) est en outre équipé d'une logique pour réinitialiser un compteur de messages émis correspondant à un flot vocal lorsqu'un message du flot vocal est abandonné après qu'au moins m messages ont été émis avec succès consécutivement pour le flot vocal.
  6. Dispositif selon la revendication 3, dans lequel le premier signal est un flot vocal, et ledit au moins un gestionnaire de contrôleur (106) est équipé d'une logique pour incrémenter un compteur de messages émis correspondant au flot vocal à chaque fois qu'un message est émis pour le flot vocal selon ledit premier protocole, et pour ne pas abandonner un message du flot vocal à la faveur d'un message d'un premier type de message à émettre selon ledit deuxième protocole tant qu'au moins m1 messages n'ont pas été émis avec succès consécutivement pour le flot vocal, où m1 est supérieur à un premier multiple de 1/e, et e est un pourcentage d'erreurs à ne pas dépasser.
  7. Dispositif selon la revendication 6, dans lequel ledit message du premier type de message à émettre selon ledit deuxième protocole est un message d'acquittement.
  8. Dispositif selon la revendication 6, dans lequel ledit au moins un gestionnaire de contrôleur (106) est en outre équipé d'une logique pour ne pas abandonner un message du flot vocal à la faveur d'un message d'un deuxième type de message à émettre selon ledit deuxième protocole tant qu'au moins m2 messages n'ont pas été émis avec succès consécutivement pour le flot vocal, où m2 est supérieur à un deuxième multiple de 1/e, qui est supérieur à m1.
  9. Dispositif selon la revendication 8, dans lequel ledit message du deuxième type de message à émettre selon ledit deuxième protocole est un message de données.
  10. Dispositif selon la revendication 8, dans lequel ledit au moins un gestionnaire de contrôleur (106) est en outre équipé d'une logique pour réinitialiser un compteur de messages émis correspondant à un flot vocal lorsqu'un message du flot vocal est abandonné après qu'au moins m1 ou m2 messages ont été émis avec succès consécutivement pour le flot vocal.
  11. Dispositif selon la revendication 1, dans lequel le premier et le deuxième protocoles sont deux protocoles sélectionnés dans un groupe consistant en Bluetooth, 802.11 à saut de fréquence, 802.11 à séquence directe, 802.11a, 802.11b, et Home RF.
  12. Dispositif selon la revendication 1, dans lequel le dispositif est un ordinateur ayant un facteur de forme sélectionné dans un groupe consistant en un type de bureau, un type d'ordinateur portable et un type de la dimension d'un palm.
  13. Procédé de fonctionnement d'un dispositif (100) comportant au moins un émetteur-récepteur sans fil (102) et au moins un gestionnaire de contrôleur (106), le procédé comprenant les étapes consistant à :
    commander ledit au moins un émetteur-récepteur sans fil (102) pour émettre et recevoir des signaux selon un premier protocole vers et de premiers dispositifs en réseau (104a) d'un premier réseau sans fil (108a) ; et
    commander ledit au moins un émetteur-récepteur sans fil (102) pour émettre et recevoir des signaux selon un deuxième protocole vers et de deuxièmes dispositifs en réseau (104b) d'un deuxième réseau sans fil (108b) ;
    dans lequel lesdites commandes sont toutes deux effectuées d'une manière coordonnée, comprenant la prise en considération de critères de qualité de service à atteindre pour les protocoles respectifs, et
    caractérisé par la détermination du fonctionnement dudit au moins un émetteur-récepteur sans fil (102) pour coordonner lesdites émissions et réceptions selon les premier et deuxième protocoles pour éviter une interférence entre des signaux émis selon lesdits premier et deuxième protocoles, ledit fonctionnement étant déterminé sur la base d'une métrique de qualité maintenue pour chaque signal, la métrique de qualité reflétant une fréquence d'erreur associée à ce signal.
  14. Procédé selon la revendication 13, dans lequel ladite prise en considération de critères de qualité de service à atteindre pour les protocoles respectifs comprend la détermination de types de messages de premiers messages à émettre dans un premier signal vers l'un sélectionné ou les uns sélectionnés desdits premiers dispositifs en réseau (104a) selon ledit premier protocole, et l'attribution de la priorité auxdits premiers messages par rapport à des deuxièmes messages à émettre dans un deuxième signal vers l'un sélectionné ou les uns sélectionnés desdits deuxièmes dispositifs en réseau (104b) selon ledit deuxième protocole, si les types de messages desdits premiers messages sont déterminés comme étant un type multimédia.
  15. Procédé selon la revendication 14, dans lequel ladite prise en considération de critères de qualité de service à atteindre pour les protocoles respectifs comprend l'exécution d'une détermination de priorité pour des messages en concurrence à émettre vers lesdits premier et deuxième dispositifs en réseau (104) selon lesdits premier et deuxième protocoles compte tenu de ladite métrique de qualité maintenue pour chacun des premier et deuxième signaux.
  16. Procédé selon la revendication 15, dans lequel lesdits premier et deuxième signaux sont des flots vocaux et ladite prise en considération de critères de qualité de service à atteindre pour les protocoles respectifs comprend l'incrémentation d'un compteur de messages émis correspondant à un flot vocal à chaque fois qu'un message est émis pour le flot vocal, et le fait de ne pas abandonner un message du flot vocal tant qu'au moins m messages n'ont pas été émis avec succès consécutivement pour le flot vocal, où m est supérieur à 1/e, et e est un pourcentage d'erreurs à ne pas dépasser.
  17. Procédé selon la revendication 16, dans lequel ladite prise en considération de critères de qualité de service à atteindre pour les protocoles respectifs comprend la réinitialisation d'un compteur de messages émis correspondant à un flot vocal lorsqu'un message du flot vocal est abandonné après qu'au moins m messages ont été émis avec succès consécutivement pour le flot vocal.
  18. Procédé selon la revendication 15, dans lequel le premier signal est un flot vocal, ladite prise en considération de critères de qualité de service à atteindre pour les protocoles respectifs comprend l'incrémentation d'un compteur de messages émis correspondant au flot vocal à chaque fois qu'un message est émis pour le flot vocal selon ledit premier protocole, et le fait de ne pas abandonner un message du flot vocal à la faveur d'un message d'un premier type de message à émettre selon ledit deuxième protocole tant qu'au moins m1 messages n'ont pas été émis avec succès consécutivement pour le flot vocal, où m1 est supérieur à un premier multiple de 1/e, et e est un pourcentage d'erreurs à ne pas dépasser.
  19. Procédé selon la revendication 18, dans lequel ledit message du premier type de message à émettre selon ledit deuxième protocole est un message d'acquittement.
  20. Procédé selon la revendication 18, dans lequel ladite prise en considération de critères de qualité de service à atteindre pour les protocoles respectifs comprend en outre le fait de ne pas abandonner un message du flot vocal à la faveur d'un message d'un deuxième type de message à émettre selon ledit deuxième protocole tant qu'au moins m2 messages n'ont pas été émis avec succès consécutivement pour le flot vocal, où m2 est supérieur à un deuxième multiple de 1/e, qui est supérieur à m1.
  21. Procédé selon la revendication 20, dans lequel ledit message du deuxième type de message à émettre selon ledit deuxième protocole est un message de données.
  22. Procédé selon la revendication 20, dans lequel ladite prise en considération de critères de qualité de service à atteindre pour les protocoles respectifs comprend en outre la réinitialisation d'un compteur de messages émis correspondant à un flot vocal lorsqu'un message du flot vocal est abandonné après qu'au moins m1 ou m2 messages ont été émis avec succès consécutivement pour le flot vocal.
  23. Ensemble de dispositifs en réseau comprenant :
    une première pluralité de dispositifs (104a) mis ensemble en un réseau sans fil, chaque dispositif étant équipé pour communiquer sans fil selon un premier protocole ;
    une deuxième pluralité de dispositifs (104b) mis ensemble en un réseau sans fil, chaque dispositif étant équipé pour communiquer sans fil selon un deuxième protocole ; et
    un dispositif multiprotocole (100) équipé pour échanger des signaux sans fil avec lesdites première et deuxième pluralités de dispositifs (104) selon lesdits premier et deuxième protocoles respectivement, d'une manière coordonnée, dans lequel le dispositif multiprotocole (100) est équipé pour prendre en considération des critères de qualité de service à atteindre pour les protocoles respectifs,
    caractérisé en ce que le dispositif multiprotocole (100) est équipé d'une logique pour coordonner la communication selon les premier et deuxième protocoles avec lesdites première et deuxième pluralités de dispositifs (104) respectivement pour éviter une interférence entre des signaux émis selon les premier et deuxième protocoles, ladite coordination étant basée sur une métrique de qualité maintenue pour chaque signal communiqué, la métrique de qualité reflétant une fréquence d'erreur associée à ce signal.
  24. Dispositifs selon la revendication 23, dans lesquels ledit dispositif multiprotocole (100) est équipé d'une logique pour déterminer des types de messages de premiers messages à émettre dans un premier signal vers l'un sélectionné ou les uns sélectionnés desdits premiers dispositifs en réseau selon ledit premier protocole, et pour donner la priorité auxdits premiers messages par rapport à des deuxièmes messages à émettre dans un deuxième signal vers l'un sélectionné ou les uns sélectionnés desdits deuxièmes dispositifs en réseau selon ledit deuxième protocole, si les types de messages desdits premiers messages sont déterminés comme étant un type multimédia.
  25. Dispositifs selon la revendication 24, dans lesquels ledit dispositif multiprotocole (100) est équipé d'une logique pour effectuer sa détermination de priorité pour des messages en concurrence à émettre vers lesdits premier et deuxième dispositifs en réseau selon lesdits premier et deuxième protocoles compte tenu de ladite métrique de qualité maintenue pour chacun des premier et deuxième signaux.
  26. Dispositifs selon la revendication 25, dans lesquels les premier et deuxième signaux sont des flots vocaux et ledit dispositif multiprotocole (100) est équipé d'une logique pour incrémenter un compteur de messages émis correspondant à un flot vocal à chaque fois qu'un message est émis pour le flot vocal, et pour ne pas abandonner un message du flot vocal tant qu'au moins m messages n'ont pas été émis avec succès consécutivement pour le flot vocal, où m est supérieur à 1/e, et e est un pourcentage d'erreurs à ne pas dépasser.
  27. Dispositifs selon la revendication 26, dans lesquels ledit dispositif multiprotocole (100) est en outre équipé d'une logique pour réinitialiser un compteur de messages émis correspondant à un flot vocal lorsqu'un message du flot vocal est abandonné après qu'au moins m messages ont été émis avec succès consécutivement pour le flot vocal.
  28. Dispositifs selon la revendication 25, dans lesquels le premier signal est un flot vocal et ledit dispositif multiprotocole (100) est équipé d'une logique pour incrémenter un compteur de messages émis correspondant au flot vocal à chaque fois qu'un message est émis pour le flot vocal selon ledit premier protocole, et pour ne pas abandonner un message du flot vocal à la faveur d'un message d'un premier type de message à émettre selon ledit deuxième protocole tant qu'au moins m1 messages n'ont pas été émis avec succès consécutivement pour le flot vocal, où m1 est supérieur à un premier multiple de 1/e, et e est un pourcentage d'erreurs à ne pas dépasser.
  29. Dispositifs selon la revendication 28, dans lesquels ledit message du premier type de message à émettre selon ledit deuxième protocole est un message d'acquittement.
  30. Dispositifs selon la revendication 28, dans lesquels ledit dispositif multiprotocole (100) est en outre équipé d'une logique pour ne pas abandonner un message du flot vocal à la faveur d'un message d'un deuxième type de message à émettre selon ledit deuxième protocole tant qu'au moins m2 messages n'ont pas été émis avec succès consécutivement pour le flot vocal, où m2 est supérieur à un deuxième multiple de 1/e, qui est supérieur à m1.
  31. Dispositifs selon la revendication 30, dans lesquels ledit message du deuxième type de message à émettre selon ledit deuxième protocole est un message de données.
  32. Dispositifs selon la revendication 30, dans lesquels ledit dispositif multiprotocole (100) est en outre équipé d'une logique pour réinitialiser un compteur de messages émis correspondant à un flot vocal lorsqu'un message du flot vocal est abandonné après qu'au moins m1 ou m2 messages ont été émis avec succès consécutivement pour le flot vocal.
EP00965519A 1999-09-29 2000-09-29 Procedes et appareils relatifs a un protocole multiple de telecommunications incluant des considerations de qualite de services Expired - Lifetime EP1216542B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (9)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/408,725 US6894988B1 (en) 1999-09-29 1999-09-29 Wireless apparatus having multiple coordinated transceivers for multiple wireless communication protocols
US408725 1999-09-29
US436458 1999-11-08
US09/436,458 US6990082B1 (en) 1999-11-08 1999-11-08 Wireless apparatus having a transceiver equipped to support multiple wireless communication protocols
US439946 1999-11-12
US09/439,946 US6600726B1 (en) 1999-09-29 1999-11-12 Multiple wireless communication protocol methods and apparatuses
US55704800A 2000-04-21 2000-04-21
US557048 2000-04-21
PCT/US2000/026806 WO2001024456A1 (fr) 1999-09-29 2000-09-29 Procedes et appareils relatifs a un protocole multiple de telecommunications incluant des considerations de qualite de services

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1216542A1 EP1216542A1 (fr) 2002-06-26
EP1216542B1 true EP1216542B1 (fr) 2008-12-17

Family

ID=27503558

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP00965519A Expired - Lifetime EP1216542B1 (fr) 1999-09-29 2000-09-29 Procedes et appareils relatifs a un protocole multiple de telecommunications incluant des considerations de qualite de services

Country Status (7)

Country Link
US (1) US7420936B2 (fr)
EP (1) EP1216542B1 (fr)
JP (1) JP2003515965A (fr)
AT (1) ATE418204T1 (fr)
AU (1) AU7622200A (fr)
DE (1) DE60041141D1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2001024456A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (27)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2002030022A2 (fr) 2000-10-06 2002-04-11 Aryya Communications, Inc. Systemes et procedes pour limiter les interferences entre des protocoles multiples de reseaux locaux sans fil
WO2002037706A1 (fr) 2000-11-03 2002-05-10 Aryya Communications, Inc. Systeme emetteur-recepteur radio sans fil a bande large multi-protocole
US7167484B2 (en) * 2001-03-22 2007-01-23 Oxford Semiconductor, Inc. Centralized coordination point for wireless communication devices using multiple protocols
US7233602B2 (en) * 2001-03-22 2007-06-19 Oxford Semiconductor, Inc. Coordination architecture for wireless communication devices using multiple protocols
US7177294B2 (en) * 2001-03-22 2007-02-13 Oxford Semiconductor, Inc. Collision rectification in wireless communication devices
US7277451B1 (en) 2001-10-11 2007-10-02 Oxford Semiconductor, Inc. Recognition scheme for moderating wireless protocols
US7215659B1 (en) 2001-10-18 2007-05-08 Oxford Semiconductor, Inc. Remotely-cooperative scheduling solution for moderating wireless protocols
US6842439B2 (en) * 2002-06-17 2005-01-11 Harris Corporation Free space optical terminal with ad hoc network back-up and associated methods
JP2005151259A (ja) * 2003-11-17 2005-06-09 Toshiba Corp データ転送装置およびプログラム
US7680059B2 (en) * 2004-02-13 2010-03-16 Broadcom Corporation Multiple protocol wireless communications in a WLAN
US20060015621A1 (en) * 2004-07-13 2006-01-19 Quinn Liam B System and method for information handling system task selective wireless networking
EP1774815B1 (fr) * 2004-07-30 2018-09-12 Koninklijke Philips N.V. Procédé et dispositif de répartition équitable du spectre dans des systèmes sans fil à vitesse de transmission physique multiple
US8249106B2 (en) * 2004-08-23 2012-08-21 Alcatel Lucent Extended cellular telephony protocol
US7539175B2 (en) * 2004-11-19 2009-05-26 The Trustees Of Stevens Institute Of Technology Multi-access terminal with capability for simultaneous connectivity to multiple communication channels
US7486932B2 (en) 2005-02-25 2009-02-03 Nokia Corporation Method and system for VoIP over WLAN to bluetooth headset using advanced eSCO scheduling
US7454171B2 (en) 2005-02-25 2008-11-18 Nokia Corporation Method and system for VoIP over WLAN to Bluetooth headset using ACL link and sniff for aligned eSCO transmission
RU2418391C2 (ru) 2006-01-13 2011-05-10 Квэлкомм Инкорпорейтед Мультиплексирование и управление локализованным и распределенным выделением
US20080008116A1 (en) * 2006-05-25 2008-01-10 Proximetry, Inc. Systems and methods for wireless resource management with multi-protocol management
US8325661B2 (en) 2008-08-28 2012-12-04 Qualcomm Incorporated Supporting multiple access technologies in a wireless environment
KR101345220B1 (ko) * 2009-02-23 2013-12-26 시에라 와이어리스 인코퍼레이티드 원하는 파워 버짓내에서 복수의 무선 트랜시버를 제공하는 장치 및 관련 방법
EP2522194B1 (fr) 2010-01-06 2014-05-21 InterDigital Patent Holdings, Inc. Procédé et appareil permettant des communications assistées/coordonnées au sein du foyer
US20120044371A1 (en) * 2010-08-18 2012-02-23 King Kevin J Wireless camera system bridging methods and apparatus
US9287944B2 (en) * 2010-12-20 2016-03-15 Celeno Communications Ltd. System and method for allowing multiple stations in a network to use MU-MIMO transmit beamforming
EP2706554B1 (fr) 2012-09-10 2016-05-25 Fei Company Procédé d'utilisation de lentille combinée à particules chargées
US10264462B2 (en) * 2013-06-17 2019-04-16 Marvell World Trade Ltd. Method and apparatus for mitigating the effect of certain types of interference on a signal received in a wireless network
US10064112B2 (en) * 2015-05-29 2018-08-28 Apple Inc. Apparatus, systems and methods for switching between radio access technologies
US10672252B2 (en) 2015-12-31 2020-06-02 Delta Faucet Company Water sensor

Family Cites Families (20)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH09504659A (ja) 1993-06-16 1997-05-06 コム ２１， インコーポレイテッド． マルチプロトコルパーソナル通信システム
AU7210894A (en) 1993-06-25 1995-01-17 Xircom, Inc. Virtual carrier detection for wireless local area network with distributed control
JP3248348B2 (ja) 1994-03-15 2002-01-21 松下電器産業株式会社 通信方法及び通信装置
JP3349861B2 (ja) 1995-03-17 2002-11-25 富士通株式会社 ワイヤレスｌａｎシステム
US5983098A (en) 1996-05-31 1999-11-09 Lucent Technologies Inc. Dual-mode network access point
JPH09326713A (ja) 1996-06-05 1997-12-16 Sharp Corp デュアルモードセルラー電話システム
US6128490A (en) 1997-05-08 2000-10-03 Nortel Networks Limited Wireless communication system that supports selection of operation from multiple frequency bands and multiple protocols and method of operation therefor
US6201960B1 (en) 1997-06-24 2001-03-13 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Speech quality measurement based on radio link parameters and objective measurement of received speech signals
US6411825B1 (en) 1997-09-09 2002-06-25 Samsung Electronics, Co., Ltd. Distributed architecture for a base station transceiver subsystem
US6608832B2 (en) * 1997-09-25 2003-08-19 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson Common access between a mobile communications network and an external network with selectable packet-switched and circuit-switched and circuit-switched services
US6058106A (en) 1997-10-20 2000-05-02 Motorola, Inc. Network protocol method, access point device and peripheral devices for providing for an efficient centrally coordinated peer-to-peer wireless communications network
GB9725659D0 (en) * 1997-12-03 1998-02-04 Nokia Mobile Phones Ltd The LPRF system with frequency hopping extensions
US7289478B1 (en) * 1999-07-30 2007-10-30 At&T Corp. Method and apparatus for a fixed wireless broadband access and wireless LAN integration
US6477373B1 (en) 1999-08-10 2002-11-05 Research Foundation Of State University Of New York Method and apparatus to maintain connectivity for mobile terminals in wireless and cellular communications systems
US6891857B1 (en) * 1999-09-29 2005-05-10 Intel Corporation Multiple wireless communication protocol methods and apparatuses including proactive reduction of interference
US6600726B1 (en) * 1999-09-29 2003-07-29 Mobilian Corporation Multiple wireless communication protocol methods and apparatuses
US6928266B1 (en) * 1999-11-12 2005-08-09 Intel Corporation Wireless apparatus interference avoidance/resolution method and apparatuses
US6990082B1 (en) * 1999-11-08 2006-01-24 Intel Corporation Wireless apparatus having a transceiver equipped to support multiple wireless communication protocols
US6894988B1 (en) * 1999-09-29 2005-05-17 Intel Corporation Wireless apparatus having multiple coordinated transceivers for multiple wireless communication protocols
US7193965B1 (en) * 2000-05-04 2007-03-20 Intel Corporation Multi-wireless network configurable behavior

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US7420936B2 (en) 2008-09-02
EP1216542A1 (fr) 2002-06-26
AU7622200A (en) 2001-04-30
ATE418204T1 (de) 2009-01-15
DE60041141D1 (de) 2009-01-29
JP2003515965A (ja) 2003-05-07
US20050078616A1 (en) 2005-04-14
WO2001024456A1 (fr) 2001-04-05

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1216542B1 (fr) Procedes et appareils relatifs a un protocole multiple de telecommunications incluant des considerations de qualite de services
EP1222777B1 (fr) Procedes et appareils de protocole de communications sans fil multiples
US6600726B1 (en) Multiple wireless communication protocol methods and apparatuses
EP1216544B1 (fr) Appareil sans fil equipe de multiples emetteurs-recepteurs coordonnes destines a de multiples protocoles de communication sans fil
US6990082B1 (en) Wireless apparatus having a transceiver equipped to support multiple wireless communication protocols
EP1243099B1 (fr) Procedes et appareils pour eviter ou resoudre l'interference des appareils sans fil
EP1216545B1 (fr) Procede et appareil relatifs a un protocole multiple de telecommunications sans fil incluant une reduction proactive des interferences
CN103354993A (zh) 促进设备对设备通信
WO2011056738A1 (fr) Système de gestion de la fourniture de contenu en ligne pour système de communication sans fil
CN101388846A (zh) 用于传输数据的方法和装置
EP1465370B1 (fr) Communication de données prévisible en temps réel sur un bus en serie
EP1216546B1 (fr) Communication hertzienne simultanee vocale et de donnees utilisant des protocoles chevauchants
JP2008524959A (ja) 多層ｗｌａｎにおける無線バックホールの方法
RX ‘06L’, CONTROLLER conmouenh M106!
US20240008066A1 (en) Systems, methods, and devices for coexistence enhancement using acknowledgment signals in wireless devices
JPH09172434A (ja) 通信制御装置
JPH05268224A (ja) ローカルエリアネットワークシステム
JPS61293043A (ja) ネツトワ−クシステムにおける制御用メツセ−ジ交換方式

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20020418

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: NEVO, RON

Inventor name: ZHAO, XUDONG

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20060518

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

RTI1 Title (correction)

Free format text: MULTI-PROTOCOL WIRELESS COMMUNICATION METHODS AND APPARATUSES INCLUDING QUALITY OF SERVICE CONSIDERATIONS

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 60041141

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20090129

Kind code of ref document: P

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081217

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081217

NLV1 Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090328

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081217

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090518

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081217

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090317

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081217

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20090918

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090930

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20100531

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090930

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090929

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090930

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090318

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081217

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090929

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081217

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20160920

Year of fee payment: 17

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20160928

Year of fee payment: 17

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 60041141

Country of ref document: DE

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20170929

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170929

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180404