EP1145142A3 - Systeme informatique et procede pour afficher des donnees dans un graphique sectoriel interactif partage - Google Patents

Systeme informatique et procede pour afficher des donnees dans un graphique sectoriel interactif partage

Info

Publication number
EP1145142A3
EP1145142A3 EP99955950A EP99955950A EP1145142A3 EP 1145142 A3 EP1145142 A3 EP 1145142A3 EP 99955950 A EP99955950 A EP 99955950A EP 99955950 A EP99955950 A EP 99955950A EP 1145142 A3 EP1145142 A3 EP 1145142A3
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
majority
data
sizes
pie chart
record
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP99955950A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP1145142A2 (fr
Inventor
Michael Good
John Wilson, Iii
Hasso Plattner
Keith Elliott
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
SAP SE
Original Assignee
SAP SE
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by SAP SE filed Critical SAP SE
Publication of EP1145142A2 publication Critical patent/EP1145142A2/fr
Publication of EP1145142A3 publication Critical patent/EP1145142A3/fr
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q99/00—Subject matter not provided for in other groups of this subclass
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/90—Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
    • G06F16/903—Querying
    • G06F16/9038—Presentation of query results

Definitions

  • the first factor concerns the amount of data to be displayed.
  • the authors of these diagrams weigh the communicative advantages of a tabular or graphic representation against the cognitive demands of the reader. In this case, a tabular representation is generally preferred.
  • the continued use of the data by the reader becomes important, particularly the level of accuracy that the reader demands. If relationships are more important than precise values, the best way to present the data is on a chart.
  • readers with a general but no specific interest in a topic can view a diagram to get the essential message. In contrast, readers who have worked hard on a topic can view the data in detail.
  • the object of the present invention is to display as much information as possible to the user in an organized manner so that the user can Can view and understand information as easily as possible, whereby the type and amount of information to be displayed is not restricted.
  • the object is achieved by a computer system and a method for the visual display of data in an interactive divided pie chart.
  • the pie chart can display multiple sets of dependent variables in relation to at least two other variables such as time and location.
  • the split pie chart is divided into two sections, each corresponding to a different time period, but depending on the what is graphically possible, any number of sections can be used.
  • Each section is divided into wedges according to different variables and their values in the two different periods.
  • the sizes of the sections are chosen to show the relative sizes of the total of the two data sets.
  • the diagram itself is arranged geographically on a graphic image of a map.
  • the computer system of the present invention is connected via an interface to a data store in which the values for the various variables are stored. The user shapes the variables of the pie chart
  • the user interface can then in turn query the data store to retrieve data.
  • the data memory outputs those values that are input for the
  • Figure 1 a computer system in which the present invention can be implemented
  • Figure 2 is a block diagram illustrating a software subsystem for controlling the operation of the computer system of Figure 1
  • Figure 3 is a block diagram of the present invention
  • Figure 4 is a flow chart of the operations of the present invention
  • Figure 5 the components of the divided circular object with its variables and methods
  • Figure 6 an exemplary data table to which the present invention can be applied
  • Figure 7 is a flow chart illustrating the creation of the split pie chart
  • Figure 8 is an illustration of a split pie chart of the present invention.
  • Figure 9 an exemplary table with three sets of sales figures
  • Figure 10 is a flowchart showing the additional calculation that occurs when constructing a split pie chart with more than two sets of data points;
  • Figure 11 an example of a pie chart that is divided into three;
  • Figure 12 is a pie chart of the present invention including the geographically variable feature;
  • Figure 13 is a flow diagram of the process of creating a pie chart containing the geographic variable;
  • Figure 14 is a flow diagram illustrating the additional calculation performed to produce a split pie chart with the third dimension of width;
  • Figure 15 the divided pie chart with a third dimension;
  • Figure 16 is a split pie chart in which each wedge has its own width;
  • Figure 17 is a flow chart showing the creation of a split pie chart taking Stevens' law into account;
  • FIG. 18 the present invention, with line markings arranged around the circumference of the divided pie chart;
  • FIG. 19 the present invention, with the line markings arranged in a circle around the circumference of the larger part.
  • the invention may be embodied in a computer system such as the system of Figure 1, which comprises: a central processor 102, a main memory 104, an input / output controller 106, a keyboard 108, a display device 110, a visual display 112 and a data memory 114.
  • Data store 114 can be any of a number of known database systems, such as Microsoft Access, dbase, Oracle, Sybase, etc. This can be a spreadsheet, a relational database, or a multidimensional database.
  • a computer software system is provided to direct the operation of the computer system.
  • the software system which is stored in a system memory 202 and on a mass storage device or a disk storage device, contains a kernel or an operating system 204, which in this special embodiment is Windows 95.
  • One or more application programs 206 can be loaded for execution by the system (transferred from disk to main memory).
  • a database management system client 208 runs in the system memory 202.
  • the system also contains a user interface 210 for receiving user commands and data as input and for displaying result data, eg. B. on a data monitor or a visual display, as output.
  • the present invention discloses a visual display means for a computer system that allows the user to view graphical data in an interactive split pie chart. The display of information on the visual display can be changed by the user by selecting the corresponding symbols in the user interface 210. Although the user can select the display style by keyboard input, the use of a mouse as the display device 110 is preferred in the practice of the present invention.
  • Control and display of a display device 110 controlled by a mouse and one of several push buttons which can be selected by a user are known as graphic displays.
  • the user can use the interactive pie chart Change the displayed data by clicking and dragging the mouse display device 110 over the corresponding field generated and displayed in the user interface 210.
  • the interactive split pie chart is changed to reflect the new data.
  • the system of the present invention is shown in Figure 3. It comprises a user interface 302, a subsystem 304 for formulating data queries, a first communication means 306 for transferring the data queries to a database management system (DBMS) 308, a database memory 310 and a second communication means 312 for transferring data from the database memory 310 to one Visual display system 314 and display 316.
  • DBMS database management system
  • Figure 4 is a flow diagram illustrating the process steps of the present invention.
  • the selection 402 of the type of data to be compared takes place, for example sales figures for a specific product series.
  • the choice 404 of the periods for which the data are compared takes place. In the present example, only two periods are used as examples.
  • the user can also make a choice 406 for a particular geographic area for which the comparison is needed.
  • the computer system formulates queries 408 based on the decisions made by the user.
  • the system generates SQL (Sequential Query Langage) statements to query a data storage mechanism in which the data is stored.
  • SQL Simple Query Langage
  • These queries are transmitted 410 to the database management system to retrieve the data from the database memory 310.
  • the data is sent back 412 to the visual display system to create the split pie chart. testify 414.
  • the database memory is preferably either a spreadsheet, a relational database, or a multidimensional database.
  • Figure 5 illustrates the components of the
  • the LineColor variable 504 sets the color of chart lines.
  • the LineWidth variable 506 defines the width of diagram lines in pixels.
  • the MaxRadius variable 508 defines the maximum radius of the diagram in pixels. A value of zero indicates that the radius of the diagram has no restrictions.
  • the MinRadius variable 510 defines the smallest radius of the diagram in pixels.
  • the Origin OffsetAngle variable 512 specifies the angle in degrees from which to start drawing the graph.
  • the RadialOffset variable 514 sets the angle in radians from which to start drawing the graph.
  • the ValuePerUnitArea variable 516 defines the numerical value represented by a single pixel.
  • the StevensFactor variable 518 specifies the factor by which the values must be scaled in order to take into account the perception effect known as Stevens' law.
  • the CrustColor variable 504 sets the color of chart lines.
  • the LineWidth variable 506 defines the width of diagram lines in pixels.
  • the 520 specifies the color to use when drawing to outline the entire part.
  • the CrustWidth variable 522 defines in pixels the width of the lines with which the outline of the entire part is drawn.
  • the tick interval variable 524 specifies the number of tick marks that should be drawn for each part, and can be in a preselected arbitrary range e.g. B. from 0 to 12.
  • the TickColor variable 526 specifies the color to be used to draw line marks. In the TicksFollowSplits variable 528 is a true / false value that determines how line marks are drawn.
  • the AddSlice method 530 adds a data point to the diagram.
  • the AutoScale method 532 calculates a value for the ValuePerUnitArea property.
  • Render method 534 draws the diagram.
  • Figure 6 shows an exemplary data table that is sent back to the visual display system to which the present invention could be applied.
  • Column 602 contains a list of product series: mobile telephones 604, entertainment - audio / video 606, computer hardware 608, computer software 610, other 612 and the total 614.
  • the second column 616 lists the two financial years for which the current one Example applies: 1997 and 1998.
  • the value in cell 620 row 1 denotes the value of the mobile phone sales in 1997 and in cell 620 row 2 the value of the mobile phone sales in 1998.
  • FIG. 7 is a flow chart illustrating the generation of the pie chart. First, the data is entered 702 in the visual display system.
  • the visual display system separates 704 the different data records, in this case the data records corresponding to the two years. Then the ratio of each value to the total is calculated 706. These ratios are converted 708 to proportions for each part and the segments are graphed 710. The display system then calculates 712 the relative value of the two totals from the two different time periods as a fraction of each other . Finally, the sizes of the two parts are set 714 to represent this fraction.
  • the present invention calculates the percentage of total sales attributable to mobile phone sales in 1997 and computes 8, a proportionally sized segment 802. The present invention performs this calculation for each of the product series for 1997 to create the entire left portion 804 of the divided pie chart 806.
  • the present invention calculates the percentage of total sales made by mobile phone sales for 1998 and creates a proportionally sized segment 808 in the right half 810 of split pie chart 806. The present invention performs this calculation equally for each of the 1998 product lines create the full right part 810 of the split pie chart 806. Finally, the present invention calculates the relative size of total sales from 1998 compared to 1997 and increases or decreases the corresponding half to reflect this ratio in order to achieve the object of the invention, which is to provide a split pie chart. to provide the same purpose.
  • the present invention is not limited to comparisons of only two sets of data points. It is also possible to compare sales from several different time periods with one another, whereby the number of time periods is not limited.
  • Figure 9 is an example table giving an example with three sets of sales figures. The same process described above is applied to scenarios where the user wants to compare multiple sets of data points.
  • Figure 10 is a flow chart illustrating the additional process steps for this.
  • the data is entered 1002 in the visual display system.
  • the system calculates 1004 the total number of data records.
  • the pie chart is then in the same Number of parts of the same size divided into radians 1006.
  • Figure 11 is an example of a pie chart divided into three parts.
  • the radial size of the parts can also represent a comparison.
  • the system determines the relative size of the total size from each year 1008 and the sizes of the parts 1010.
  • the pie chart is then divided 1012 into a number of parts that reflect the number of records.
  • the radial size of the parts can also reflect the relative values of the data set totals.
  • the radial fractions are calculated 1014 from the relative sizes of the totals from the different data sets.
  • the size of the part is determined 1016 and the pie chart is proportionally divided 1012.
  • the present invention can place pie chart 1202 on a computer generated map 1204 so that the data of the previous example corresponds to the location of the pie chart on the map.
  • the user can request multiple comparisons 1206, 1208, 1210 simultaneously for different geographic areas.
  • FIG. 13 shows a flowchart of the process sequence for creating a pie chart, which includes the geographical variable. If the data in that
  • Visual display system can be entered 1302, an additional geographic location variable is also entered.
  • the system then converts 1304 the physical location (location) into corresponding coordinates on the map using a lookup table 1306, calls the
  • the present invention then simultaneously generates a plurality of divided pie charts which are arranged on the map generated by a computer.
  • the invention can also Draw your split pie charts to show a relation between the pie charts themselves.
  • the relationship between the two sides of the pie chart can be compared based on their sizes. If there are several divided pie charts in different geographic areas, the total value of the pie charts can be compared by comparing the relative sizes of the whole charts e.g. B. can be compared by looking.
  • the pie charts 1206, 1208, 1210 have different total areas. These areas reflect the total value of sales in each of these regions and the relative value of sales within each region from year to year.
  • the divided pie chart can have a width whose value corresponds to a further variable. For example, if a user wants to compare profitability between different years, the width variable can be assigned to represent this value. Since profitability is not a function of total revenue, the width variable gives the user a more accurate picture of the company's financial performance, the sales of which are shown in the table of Figure 6.
  • Figure 14 is a flow chart illustrating the additional computation performed to create this split pie chart embodiment. The data is first entered into the visual display system 1402. According to the example given, the system calculates the absolute profitability of each year based on the income and general costs for this year 1404. The system then compares 1406 the absolute profitability values from the two periods and calculates them as Shares from each other.
  • each part is then set 1408 to reflect the share sizes according to their calculated values. Therefore, each half of the pie chart can be given its own width to provide another element of the comparison.
  • the profitability of each segment can be calculated 1410 itself. In the previous example, the profitability of each wedge can be calculated as a percentage.
  • the multiple profitability values can then be calculated 1412 as portions of one another to create segments of different widths. Each segment is drawn with a width that reflects its relative profitability compared to other product lines and compared to other years.
  • FIG. 15 shows the split pie chart described above with the added width.
  • FIG. 16 shows the split pie chart described above in which each segment has its own width.
  • Figure 17 is a flow chart illustrating the
  • the data is entered into the visual display system 1704.
  • the programmer determines 1702 which particular correction factor is to be used. This factor is then in the display system 1706 entered.
  • the steps to create the pie chart are the same as listed above, with the exception of one step.
  • the segment sizes are calculated 1708, and then the sizes are entered 1710 into Stevens' power law to obtain the corrected values of the segment sizes.
  • the sizes of the parts are set 1712 according to the Stevens law formula depending on the correction factor b entered by the programmer.
  • the relative sizes of the segments can also be increased or decreased, including this factor to precisely display the perceived amount to the user.
  • the total area of the pie charts itself can be adjusted with regard to Stevens' law.
  • line markings can be arranged around the circumference of the divided pie chart as a visual aid for determining precise sizes.
  • the variables for generating the line markings are described in FIG. 5 and shown in FIG. 18, the line markings being arranged directly on the circumference of the divided pie chart.
  • Figure 19 illustrates the present invention with the line marks arranged around the circumference of the larger segment of a true circle.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computational Linguistics (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Processing Or Creating Images (AREA)
  • Digital Computer Display Output (AREA)
  • Image Generation (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne un système informatique comprenant un affichage visuel indiquant des données dans un graphique sectoriel partagé interactif, qui permet à un utilisateur de modifier les paramètres d'entrée du graphique sectoriel, en vue d'une modification dynamique de la configuration du graphique. Le graphique sectoriel partagé peut être divisé en deux sections ou davantage, qui correspondent chacune à une autre période. Chaque section est répartie en clavettes qui correspondent chacune à différentes variables et à leurs valeurs correspondantes, par ex. en deux différentes périodes. Le graphique en soi est ensuite disposé de manière géographique sur l'image graphique d'une carte. Il est prévu entre le système informatique et un système de mémorisation des données, une interface pour transmettre des données devant être converties en représentation graphique du graphique sectoriel. L'utilisateur modifie les paramètres d'entrée du graphique sectoriel par une interface utilisateur qui traduit les modifications en questions adressées au système de mémorisation de la bande de données afin d'extraire les données correspondantes.
EP99955950A 1998-11-04 1999-11-02 Systeme informatique et procede pour afficher des donnees dans un graphique sectoriel interactif partage Withdrawn EP1145142A3 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/186,672 US6320586B1 (en) 1998-11-04 1998-11-04 System an method for the visual display of data in an interactive split pie chart
US186672 1998-11-04
PCT/EP1999/008396 WO2000026812A2 (fr) 1998-11-04 1999-11-02 Systeme informatique et procede pour afficher des donnees dans un graphique sectoriel interactif partage

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1145142A2 EP1145142A2 (fr) 2001-10-17
EP1145142A3 true EP1145142A3 (fr) 2002-08-07

Family

ID=22685850

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP99955950A Withdrawn EP1145142A3 (fr) 1998-11-04 1999-11-02 Systeme informatique et procede pour afficher des donnees dans un graphique sectoriel interactif partage

Country Status (7)

Country Link
US (1) US6320586B1 (fr)
EP (1) EP1145142A3 (fr)
JP (1) JP3735684B2 (fr)
AU (1) AU775248B2 (fr)
CA (1) CA2334865C (fr)
IL (1) IL140747A (fr)
WO (1) WO2000026812A2 (fr)

Families Citing this family (62)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6359635B1 (en) * 1999-02-03 2002-03-19 Cary D. Perttunen Methods, articles and apparatus for visibly representing information and for providing an input interface
CA2320615A1 (fr) * 2000-09-20 2002-03-20 David J. P. Baar Systeme et methode d'analyse de portefeuille
US6664964B1 (en) * 2000-11-10 2003-12-16 Emc Corporation Correlation criteria for logical volumes
US7692653B1 (en) * 2001-10-01 2010-04-06 Versata Development Group, Inc. System and method for presenting statistics
US7046248B1 (en) 2002-03-18 2006-05-16 Perttunen Cary D Graphical representation of financial information
US6900808B2 (en) 2002-03-29 2005-05-31 Sas Institute Inc. Graphical data display system and method
US7308421B2 (en) * 2002-04-12 2007-12-11 Vendavo, Inc. System and method for grouping products in a catalog
US7233928B2 (en) * 2002-04-12 2007-06-19 Vendavo, Inc. Rule-based system for determining price adjustments in a product catalog
US7281218B1 (en) 2002-04-18 2007-10-09 Sap Ag Manipulating a data source using a graphical user interface
US20030225734A1 (en) * 2002-06-04 2003-12-04 Evan Witt Interactive diagram in markup language page
US7912792B2 (en) * 2002-07-12 2011-03-22 Vendavo, Inc. Systems and methods for making margin-sensitive price adjustments in an integrated price management system
US7089261B2 (en) 2002-07-25 2006-08-08 International Business Machines Corporation Programmable use of data extracted from common presentation files
WO2004036357A2 (fr) * 2002-10-15 2004-04-29 Informance International Systeme et procede de mesure graphique de l'efficacite globale d'un equipement
US20040088208A1 (en) * 2002-10-30 2004-05-06 H. Runge Bernhard M. Creating and monitoring automated interaction sequences using a graphical user interface
US7015912B2 (en) * 2003-01-13 2006-03-21 Vendavo, Inc. System and method for the visual display of data in an interactive zebra chart
US20040267644A1 (en) * 2003-06-27 2004-12-30 Richard Feco Computer-implemented method and system for accessing, processing, and outputting data
EP1492018A1 (fr) * 2003-06-27 2004-12-29 Sap Ag Un procédé et système implémenté par ordinateur pour accéder, traiter et visualiser des données
US20050216525A1 (en) * 2004-03-26 2005-09-29 Andre Wachholz-Prill Defining target group for marketing campaign
US20060004861A1 (en) * 2004-05-28 2006-01-05 Albanese Michael J System and method for displaying price modeling data
US20050278227A1 (en) * 2004-05-28 2005-12-15 Niel Esary Systems and methods of managing price modeling data through closed-loop analytics
US8458060B2 (en) * 2004-05-28 2013-06-04 Vendavo, Inc. System and method for organizing price modeling data using hierarchically organized portfolios
US7640198B1 (en) 2004-05-28 2009-12-29 Vendavo, Inc. System and method for generating and displaying indexed price modeling data
US7454412B2 (en) * 2004-06-16 2008-11-18 Sap Aktiengesellschaft Compiling values that relate to aggregate data
US7176923B2 (en) * 2004-06-18 2007-02-13 Sap Rechnungsprufung Method and system to generate chart models
US7275211B2 (en) * 2004-07-02 2007-09-25 Cognos Incorporated Rendering page sets
US20070016435A1 (en) * 2004-08-05 2007-01-18 William Bevington Visualization tool
US7613626B1 (en) 2004-08-09 2009-11-03 Vendavo, Inc. Integrated price management systems with future-pricing and methods therefor
US20060031179A1 (en) * 2004-08-09 2006-02-09 Vendavo, Inc. Systems and methods for making margin-sensitive price adjustments in an integrated price management system
US8396814B1 (en) 2004-08-09 2013-03-12 Vendavo, Inc. Systems and methods for index-based pricing in a price management system
US20060047574A1 (en) * 2004-08-27 2006-03-02 Shankar Sundaram Methods and systems for managing hierarchically organized objects in a pricing adjustment system
US7437352B2 (en) * 2004-09-24 2008-10-14 International Business Machines Corporation Data plotting extension for structured query language
US7360697B1 (en) 2004-11-18 2008-04-22 Vendavo, Inc. Methods and systems for making pricing decisions in a price management system
US7961188B2 (en) 2005-12-05 2011-06-14 Microsoft Corporation Persistent formatting for interactive charts
US8819083B2 (en) * 2005-12-29 2014-08-26 Sap Ag Creating new database objects from existing objects
US8560946B2 (en) * 2006-03-22 2013-10-15 Vistracks, Inc. Timeline visualizations linked with other visualizations of data in a thin client
US8301487B2 (en) * 2006-05-02 2012-10-30 Vendavo, Inc. System and methods for calibrating pricing power and risk scores
US20090259522A1 (en) * 2006-05-02 2009-10-15 Jamie Rapperport System and methods for generating quantitative pricing power and risk scores
US7680686B2 (en) * 2006-08-29 2010-03-16 Vendavo, Inc. System and methods for business to business price modeling using price change optimization
US8321781B2 (en) * 2007-02-08 2012-11-27 Microsoft Corporation User interface pane for an interactive chart
US7737979B2 (en) * 2007-02-12 2010-06-15 Microsoft Corporation Animated transitions for data visualization
US7904355B1 (en) 2007-02-20 2011-03-08 Vendavo, Inc. Systems and methods for a revenue causality analyzer
US20090183101A1 (en) * 2008-01-10 2009-07-16 International Business Machines Corporation Method, Apparatus and Program Storage Device for Providing a Gauge for Displaying Data that Includes Historical-Based Data
US8412598B2 (en) 2008-02-06 2013-04-02 John Early Systems and methods for a causality analyzer
US7460122B1 (en) * 2008-02-22 2008-12-02 International Business Machines Corporation Method for graphical display of CPU utilization
US20090315891A1 (en) * 2008-06-18 2009-12-24 Fyi Corporation Method and system for automatic range determination of data for display
US20100083184A1 (en) * 2008-09-30 2010-04-01 Apple Inc. Selective grouping and manipulation of chart components
US8176096B2 (en) * 2008-12-18 2012-05-08 Microsoft Corporation Data visualization interactivity architecture
US20130110853A1 (en) * 2011-10-31 2013-05-02 Microsoft Corporation Sql constructs ported to non-sql domains
CN103186700B (zh) 2011-12-28 2016-01-27 国际商业机器公司 基于环形角度的数据展示方法和系统
CN104994747B (zh) * 2012-02-24 2018-11-20 麦克考米克有限公司 用于提供风味建议和增强的系统和方法
US9015591B2 (en) 2012-06-13 2015-04-21 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Dynamic visualization generation and implementation
US9163492B2 (en) * 2012-10-23 2015-10-20 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods and systems using a fluid treatment polar graph
CN104487961B (zh) * 2012-10-30 2018-05-18 企业服务发展公司有限责任合伙企业 用计算机视觉来分析数据
US10380799B2 (en) 2013-07-31 2019-08-13 Splunk Inc. Dockable billboards for labeling objects in a display having a three-dimensional perspective of a virtual or real environment
US20150035823A1 (en) 2013-07-31 2015-02-05 Splunk Inc. Systems and Methods for Using a Three-Dimensional, First Person Display to Convey Data to a User
US10139989B2 (en) 2013-12-13 2018-11-27 Sap Se Mapping visualization contexts
US9684983B2 (en) 2014-04-30 2017-06-20 International Business Machines Corporation Three dimensional visualization of big data
US20170091967A1 (en) * 2015-09-25 2017-03-30 Sap Se Animating transitions to circular data visualizations
JP7217103B2 (ja) * 2018-07-31 2023-02-02 シスメックス株式会社 生活習慣の改善に関するアドバイス情報を生成する方法及び情報処理装置
USD1006820S1 (en) 2020-07-10 2023-12-05 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Electronic device with display screen and graphical user interface
USD1009070S1 (en) 2020-07-10 2023-12-26 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Electronic device with display screen and graphical user interface
USD983810S1 (en) 2020-07-10 2023-04-18 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Electronic device with display screen and graphical user interface

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5491779A (en) * 1992-04-03 1996-02-13 Bezjian; Richard D. Three dimensional presentation of multiple data sets in unitary format with pie charts
US5608899A (en) * 1993-06-04 1997-03-04 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for searching a database by interactively modifying a database query
US5513271A (en) * 1993-11-24 1996-04-30 Xerox Corporation Analyzing an image showing a proportioned parts graph
US5619631A (en) * 1995-06-07 1997-04-08 Binaryblitz Method and apparatus for data alteration by manipulation of representational graphs

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2000026812A2 (fr) 2000-05-11
EP1145142A2 (fr) 2001-10-17
JP3735684B2 (ja) 2006-01-18
CA2334865C (fr) 2007-03-20
AU775248B2 (en) 2004-07-22
IL140747A0 (en) 2002-02-10
US6320586B1 (en) 2001-11-20
WO2000026812A8 (fr) 2000-09-21
CA2334865A1 (fr) 2000-05-11
IL140747A (en) 2005-09-25
JP2003530608A (ja) 2003-10-14
AU1269200A (en) 2000-05-22

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1145142A3 (fr) Systeme informatique et procede pour afficher des donnees dans un graphique sectoriel interactif partage
DE69031851T2 (de) Graphische Anordnung zur Anzeige von räumlich verteilten, zeitvarianten Daten
DE60205750T2 (de) Lenkung der aufmerksamkeit des benutzers auf bestimmte icons, denen sich ein zeiger nähert, in interaktiven benutzerschnittstellen
DE69534331T2 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Hervorhebung der Einzelheit einer Baumstruktur
EP0910829B1 (fr) Systeme de banque de donnees
DE69017118T2 (de) Verfahren zur Steuerung der Konstruktion von veränderlichen Fenstern auf einem Anzeigebildschirm.
DE3852384T2 (de) Adaptives Hilfs-/Dialogsystem.
DE69631947T2 (de) Positionierung eines Eingabezeigers
DE3781892T2 (de) Datenverarbeitungsanlage zur automatischen veraenderung von datenformaten.
EP2050023B1 (fr) Procédé pour l'analyse et/ou le test d'au moins une surface utilisateur, dispositif de traitement de données et produit de programme informatique
DE3910338A1 (de) Vorrichtung und verfahren zur umsetzung eines attributs von anzeigedaten in einen code
DE10120869A1 (de) Verwendung eines Index für den Zugriff auf eine mehrdimensionale Subjektdatenbank
DE10251440A1 (de) Reproduzierbare Auswahl von Elementen in einer Hierarchie
DE112012006038T5 (de) Blutdruckbezogene Information-Anzeigeeinrichtung
DE102011108079A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Anordnung komplex verknüpfter Informationen sowie deren Durchwegung
DE60300984T2 (de) Methode und Computersystem für die Optimierung eines Boolschen Ausdrucks für Anfragebearbeitung
DE4040348A1 (de) Vorrichtung zur designauswertung
DE10121791A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung für dynamische Web-Seitenanordnung
DE10017551C2 (de) Verfahren zur zyklischen, interaktiven Bildanalyse sowie Computersystem und Computerprogramm zur Ausführung des Verfahrens
DE102012219284A1 (de) Interaktive vergleichende Analyse von Datenvisualisierungen mehrerer Objekte
WO2000054167A2 (fr) Dispositif de detection et de navigation pour documents hypertexte
DE19751103A1 (de) Verfahren zum Bemaßen von auf einer Anzeigeeinrichtung dargestellten graphischen Objekten
EP1750209A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif pour la présentation automatique de données ordonnées dans des champs de données
CN112347183B (zh) 一种数据显示装置、方法、设备及介质
DE10239077A1 (de) Visualisierung von aktiven Codes, ihrer Streufaktoren und Leistungspegel in einer Codedomänen-Leistungsanzeige

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

XX Miscellaneous (additional remarks)

Free format text: DERZEIT SIND DIE WIPO-PUBLIKATIONSDATEN A3 NICHT VERFUEGBAR.

PUAK Availability of information related to the publication of the international search report

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009015

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

R17D Deferred search report published (corrected)

Effective date: 20000921

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20010605

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: SAP AG

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20071116

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20080327