EP1119853A1 - Verfahren und vorrichtung zur bestimmung der herkunft einer datenträgerplatte - Google Patents
Verfahren und vorrichtung zur bestimmung der herkunft einer datenträgerplatteInfo
- Publication number
- EP1119853A1 EP1119853A1 EP99947698A EP99947698A EP1119853A1 EP 1119853 A1 EP1119853 A1 EP 1119853A1 EP 99947698 A EP99947698 A EP 99947698A EP 99947698 A EP99947698 A EP 99947698A EP 1119853 A1 EP1119853 A1 EP 1119853A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- disc
- error information
- data
- characteristic
- data carrying
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 59
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 24
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims description 22
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims description 21
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000000605 extraction Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 206010009944 Colon cancer Diseases 0.000 description 9
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 description 7
- 239000011521 glass Substances 0.000 description 6
- 238000013500 data storage Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000007619 statistical method Methods 0.000 description 3
- PXHVJJICTQNCMI-UHFFFAOYSA-N Nickel Chemical compound [Ni] PXHVJJICTQNCMI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000002310 reflectometry Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011248 coating agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000576 coating method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000010485 coping Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002596 correlated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006731 degradation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000284 extract Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910052759 nickel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229920002120 photoresistant polymer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G11—INFORMATION STORAGE
- G11B—INFORMATION STORAGE BASED ON RELATIVE MOVEMENT BETWEEN RECORD CARRIER AND TRANSDUCER
- G11B23/00—Record carriers not specific to the method of recording or reproducing; Accessories, e.g. containers, specially adapted for co-operation with the recording or reproducing apparatus ; Intermediate mediums; Apparatus or processes specially adapted for their manufacture
- G11B23/28—Indicating or preventing prior or unauthorised use, e.g. cassettes with sealing or locking means, write-protect devices for discs
- G11B23/281—Indicating or preventing prior or unauthorised use, e.g. cassettes with sealing or locking means, write-protect devices for discs by changing the physical properties of the record carrier
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G11—INFORMATION STORAGE
- G11B—INFORMATION STORAGE BASED ON RELATIVE MOVEMENT BETWEEN RECORD CARRIER AND TRANSDUCER
- G11B20/00—Signal processing not specific to the method of recording or reproducing; Circuits therefor
- G11B20/00086—Circuits for prevention of unauthorised reproduction or copying, e.g. piracy
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G11—INFORMATION STORAGE
- G11B—INFORMATION STORAGE BASED ON RELATIVE MOVEMENT BETWEEN RECORD CARRIER AND TRANSDUCER
- G11B20/00—Signal processing not specific to the method of recording or reproducing; Circuits therefor
- G11B20/00086—Circuits for prevention of unauthorised reproduction or copying, e.g. piracy
- G11B20/00094—Circuits for prevention of unauthorised reproduction or copying, e.g. piracy involving measures which result in a restriction to authorised record carriers
- G11B20/00123—Circuits for prevention of unauthorised reproduction or copying, e.g. piracy involving measures which result in a restriction to authorised record carriers the record carrier being identified by recognising some of its unique characteristics, e.g. a unique defect pattern serving as a physical signature of the record carrier
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G11—INFORMATION STORAGE
- G11B—INFORMATION STORAGE BASED ON RELATIVE MOVEMENT BETWEEN RECORD CARRIER AND TRANSDUCER
- G11B20/00—Signal processing not specific to the method of recording or reproducing; Circuits therefor
- G11B20/00086—Circuits for prevention of unauthorised reproduction or copying, e.g. piracy
- G11B20/0092—Circuits for prevention of unauthorised reproduction or copying, e.g. piracy involving measures which are linked to media defects or read/write errors
- G11B20/00963—Circuits for prevention of unauthorised reproduction or copying, e.g. piracy involving measures which are linked to media defects or read/write errors wherein said defects or errors are not generated on purpose, e.g. random defect patterns occurring during the normal manufacture
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G11—INFORMATION STORAGE
- G11B—INFORMATION STORAGE BASED ON RELATIVE MOVEMENT BETWEEN RECORD CARRIER AND TRANSDUCER
- G11B7/00—Recording or reproducing by optical means, e.g. recording using a thermal beam of optical radiation by modifying optical properties or the physical structure, reproducing using an optical beam at lower power by sensing optical properties; Record carriers therefor
- G11B7/002—Recording, reproducing or erasing systems characterised by the shape or form of the carrier
- G11B7/0037—Recording, reproducing or erasing systems characterised by the shape or form of the carrier with discs
- G11B7/00375—Recording, reproducing or erasing systems characterised by the shape or form of the carrier with discs arrangements for detection of physical defects, e.g. of recording layer
Definitions
- the present invention relates to methods and apparatus for determining the provenance of data carrying discs, such as compact discs (CD), and digital versatile discs (DVD).
- CD compact discs
- DVD digital versatile discs
- the traditional CD is a read only storage medium.
- CDs were used for the storage of music and other audio data.
- formats such as the CD-ROM format, have been developed facilitating the reliable storage of data for use by computers and other digital devices.
- the CD-ROM format has become very popular and has become the mass data storage medium for computer programs and other files.
- CDs can store about 74 minutes of high quality stereo sound or about 650 megabytes of data or some combination of both.
- the value of a CD to the end user, because of the value of the data it stores, is typically much more than its physical cost. This has made it an attractive target for counterfeiters who can produce replicas of an original CD at a nominal cost and sell the replicas, at the market price for the data, to make large profits.
- the present invention seeks to identify counterfeit CDs and other data carrying discs.
- a method of determining the provenance of a data carrying disc comprising the steps of reading uncorrected data from the disc and extracting information about errors from the data read, and comparing the error information with characteristic error information which characterises data carrying discs produced from a known source to determine whether the data carrying disc has been produced from the known source.
- the manufacturing process for a data carrying disc begins with the production of a master, and in the physical manufacturing process of the master, variations are introduced which give the master distinctive physical characteristics and cause errors in the data.
- the master is used to form generations of discs, and the physical characteristics of the master are passed on, down the generations.
- a group of discs manufactured from the same source therefore, consistently exhibit the physical characteristics of the master, and those physical characteristics can be used as a "fingerprint" for, or identification of, that source.
- This invention has relevance to all data carrying discs, such as CDs and DVDs (digital versatile discs) and other optical discs, where errors in the data, which arise out of the physical manufacturing process, are consistently reproduced in ail discs originating from the same source.
- the error information extracted is representative of errors arising from the physical manufacturing process and acts as a fingerprint for a particular known source in the manufacturing process.
- An embodiment of a method of the invention may be used to identify that a data carrying disc is genuine when the error information extracted from the disc correlates with the characteristic error information from a known and genuine source. Similarly, the absence of correlation between the error information and the characteristic error information may be used to identify a counterfeit disc.
- CDs carrying popular music or computer programs may originate from a number of masters from manufacturing plants in different countries. What is more, the or each master will not be used to directly form the CDs. Each master is used in the production of a number of stampers which are used to produce the discs sold in the marketplace. It will, therefore, be appreciated that although the fingerprint of one master will be apparent in its progeny, each stage of the process will also introduce fingerprints from the sources used in those stages. It is therefore possible that if error information extracted in an embodiment of a method of the invention is compared only with characteristic error information from one genuine source there will no correlation.
- the characteristic error information arises from one master, but genuine CDs can have been manufactured from one of a number of masters, there may be no correlation and yet this will not necessarily mean that the disc under test is counterfeit. Accordingly, unless the characteristic error information to be used in the comparison is known to be characteristic of the single and only master, it will generally be necessary to store characteristic error information from a number of masters or other sources.
- the characteristic error information with which the error information is compared may be representative of errors which have arisen during the manufacture of the known sources. Additionally, and/or alternatively, the sources from which discs are produced may be impressed with characteristic error information to provide copy protect signals to signify that a disc is from a genuine source.
- the characteristic error information with which the extracted error information is compared, may be read from a disc whose provenance is known, for example, in real time as the error information is extracted. A correlation may then be made between the extracted error information and the characteristic error information from the known and genuine disc in order to determine the likelihood that the disc under test is a counterfeit.
- characteristic error information is obtained from a group of discs from a common source, for example, which are all known to have been produced from a common and genuine master, or a common and genuine stamper. Error information common to each of the discs in the group is then extracted and stored to provide the characteristic error information with which the error information from a disc under test is compared. Methods of the invention may be used, as described, to determine whether a disc is genuine or counterfeit. Alternatively, the method may be used to establish the degree of similarity between a disc under test and discs from a known source.
- the error correcting process is undertaken in various stages.
- a bit stream is formed which is then, for example, divided into blocks, which blocks are translated into bytes and then into frames, the frames being subjected to error correction and then being assembled into sectors and encoded.
- the encoded data is then divided into sub-channels.
- the uncorrected information read from the data carrying disc may be taken from any of the stages or levels of data which are produced.
- the method requires that the data which is read reveals errors which have arisen from the physical manufacturing process. Thus, the data which is read has not generally undergone significant error correction.
- the normal reading process may be modified to extract uncorrected information from the data carrying disc.
- processing means may be used to enable data at any stage or level to be read and error information to be extracted.
- a reader for a CD or DVD there are drive means to position the laser relative to sectors on the disc and the positioning data used by such drive means is not error free. Furthermore, readers already incorporate means to read this positioning data. In a preferred embodiment of a method of the invention, it is proposed to extract the error information from positioning data read from the data carrying disc.
- a method of the invention reads the Q-subchannel blocks of data in order to enable the extraction of the error information.
- the method further comprises the steps of reading the Q-subchannel blocks of a CD and determining which Q-subchannel blocks have been corrupted or are missing, and comparing the list of corrupted or missing blocks with a characteristic list of corrupted or missing blocks.
- the characteristic list of corrupted or missing blocks may have been produced by reading a group of CDs from a common source, determining for each disc a list of corrupted or missing blocks, and then forming a characteristic list of corrupted or missing blocks common to all of the CDs of said group.
- a number of characteristic lists obtained from groups of genuine CDs are stored and the error information extracted from a disc under test is compared with all of the characteristic lists whereby it is determined if the CD is genuine.
- the present invention also extends to apparatus for enabling the provenance of a data carrying disc to be determined, said apparatus comprising a disc reader for reading uncorrected data from a data carrying disc, and processing means for extracting information about errors from the data read, and for comparing the error information with characteristic error information which characterises data carrying discs produced from a known source to determine whether the read data carrying disc has been produced from the known source.
- said apparatus comprises means for identifying that a data carrying disc is genuine when the error information extracted from the disc correlates with the characteristic error information from a known and genuine source.
- said apparatus comprises means for storing characteristic error information from a number of known sources.
- said apparatus may comprise means for storing characteristic error information which has been impressed on known sources.
- the processing means may be arranged to compare the extracted error information with characteristic error information read from a disc whose provenance is known as the error information is extracted.
- apparatus for enabling the provenance of a data carrying disc to be determined, said apparatus comprising a disc reader for reading blocks of data from a data carrying disc, processing means for identifying and listing blocks of the data which have been corrupted or are missing, storage means for storing a characteristic list of corrupted or missing data blocks which characterises discs produced from a known source, and means for comparing the identified list with the characteristic list to determine if said disc has been produced from said known source.
- the disc reader is arranged to read blocks of positioning data such that blocks of positioning data which have been corrupted or are missing can be listed and compared with a characteristic list of corrupted or missing positioning data blocks.
- said disc reader is preferably arranged to read the Q-subchannel blocks in order to extract the error information.
- the processing means is arranged to determine which Q-subchannel blocks have been corrupted or are missing, and to compare the list of corrupted or missing blocks with said characteristic list of corrupted or missing blocks.
- the characteristic list of corrupted or missing blocks may have been produced by reading a group of CDs from a common source, determining for each disc a list of corrupted or missing blocks, and then forming a characteristic list of corrupted or missing blocks common to all of the CDs of said group.
- said apparatus has storage means for storing a number of characteristic lists obtained from groups of genuine discs, and said processing means is arranged to compare the identified list with all of the characteristic lists whereby it is determined if a disc under test is genuine.
- the methods and apparatus defined above enable genuine and counterfeit discs to be distinguished where, for example, all genuine discs come from a common source such that they all carry the unique fingerprint of that common source.
- all genuine discs come from a common source such that they all carry the unique fingerprint of that common source.
- characteristic error information, or fingerprints from all genuine sources
- a method of incorporating identifying error information into a data carrying disc where the data carrying disc is physically manufactured either directly or indirectly from a master, and wherein the master is produced by a manufacturing process which is controlled by processing means, the method comprising the step of providing identifying error data to said processing means such that said identifying error information is incorporated in the master during its formation.
- Methods and apparatus of the invention can be used not only to identify genuine or counterfeit discs, but also to deny access to the data on counterfeit discs.
- Figure 1 shows schematically a data carrying disc with a spiral track
- Figure 2 shows a frame format of data read from a CD
- Figure 3 illustrates the format of a subcode block of data read from a CD
- FIG. 4 illustrates the general data format of the Q-subchannel
- Figure 5 illustrates the formation of a list of the locations of data errors
- Figure 6 shows a block diagram of apparatus of an embodiment of the invention for determining the provenance of a CD
- Figure 7 shows a diagram of apparatus for incorporating identifying error information into a CD.
- the present invention can be used for any data carrying discs where errors in the data on the discs arising out of the physical manufacturing process will be consistent for all discs originating from the same source.
- the invention can be used for CDs and DVDs.
- a CD or a DVD originates from a glass master which is cut by a laser whilst the disc is rotated on a mandrel.
- the laser beam intensity is modulated by the data to be recorded.
- Each master is used to make nickel copies which are used to make stampers.
- Commercial CDs and DVDs are manufactured using these stampers. Every master is physically unique, and will have errors resulting from imperfections in the glass substrate or photoresist coating, and arising out of variations, for example, in the speed of rotation of the mandrel and from the movement of the laser. These errors produce a fingerprint which is inherent to the master.
- a group of discs from a common source for example all formed by the same stamper, are analysed and errors common to all of the discs in the group are identified. These common errors are thus representative of the fingerprint of the stamper and can be compared with the errors in a disc under test to determine whether or not that test disc belongs to the same group.
- Data is recorded on CDs according to the International Standard ISO/1EC 10149.
- the data is present on the CD as a sequence of pits of varying length in the reflective material of a CD. As is indicated in Figure 1 , these pits lie on a tight spiral 4 which runs continuously from near the centre of the reflective portion to near the outside of the reflective portion of a CD 6.
- a CD reader uses a laser to scan along the spiral and it detects the edges of the pits by measuring the reflectivity of the disc as it scans. The presence of a pit causes less of the light to be reflected back.
- the laser produces a beam of light which is reflected from the disc 6 for its intensity to be measured with a photodetector.
- the photodetector produces an analogue signal which can be identified with the reflectivity of the disc along the spiral.
- the signal is amplified and converted to produce a stream of zero bits with a set bit for every edge detected. This is called the EFM (eight to fourteen modulation) stream and is the first digital signal from the disc.
- the EFM stream is divided into blocks separated by a 24 bit synchronisation pattern.
- the synchronisation pattern is followed by three "merging” bits and then 33 lots of 14 bit words each followed by three “merging” bits.
- the 14 bit words are passed through a EFM demodulator (for example, a look-up table) which translates the words into 8 bit bytes.
- Each EFM block separated by the 24 bit synchronisation pattern therefore translates into a "frame" of 33 bytes as illustrated in Figure 2.
- One byte of every frame is used for the "subcode” and the remaining 32 bytes are passed to C1 and C2 decoders which apply error correction.
- Error corrected data comes out of the decoders in 24 byte blocks. These blocks are assembled sequentially, 98 at a time, into 2352 byte sectors. These 2352 bytes encode audio data but computer data has another layer of error correction on top, leaving 2048 bytes of user data.
- the subcode bytes are assembled vertically 98 at a time into subcode blocks as is shown in Figure 3.
- the first two subcode bytes are synchronisation bytes and the rest of the bytes are divided into the P, Q, R, S, T, U, V and W subchannels.
- the P-subchannel consists of the high order bit of the 96 non-synchronisation subcode bytes.
- the Q-subchannel block is made from the second highest order bit of the same bytes and so on.
- Figure 4 shows the general data format of the Q-subchannel block. As shown, the first four bytes of the Q-subchannel block are the "control" field 8, the second four make up the "ADR" field 10. 72 DATA-Q bits, 12, then follow, the interpretation of which depends on the value of the ADR field. There then follows a 16 bit CRC 14 on the three previous fields. The CRC detects errors but does not correct them.
- Q-subchannel blocks There are very nearly the same number of Q-subchannel blocks as there are sectors on a CD. It may appear from the description that Q-subchannel blocks correspond to sectors on a one to one basis; but this is not quite true as the C1 and C2 decoders delay some bytes for the purposes of coping with burst errors.
- Q-subchannel blocks do not enjoy the same level of error correction as 5 the data in the sectors. This means that quite a few subchannel blocks on the disc do not have valid CRCs and are hence corrupted due to natural errors introduced during mastering and general wear and tear.
- the Q-subchannel blocks are used by the drive of a CD reader 0 to navigate around the CD.
- the "ADR" field contains "0001" the DATA-Q bits encode the position of the block in the track from the start of the disc.
- Each Q-subchannel block therefore has a unique address which increases monotonically.
- the Q-subchannel block can be used to record other information such as the UPC/EAN which is effectively a bar code or an ISRC as defined in DIN-31- 621.
- These Q-subchannel blocks do not contain much position data and hence are not so useful for navigating around the drive. They are placed at regular but fairly large intervals in the Q-subchannel so as not to interfere with the CD 0 drive's navigation requirements.
- the laser pick up is moved to a certain position on a CD.
- the Q- subchannel block that most recently passed under the laser pick up is read. This process is repeated sequentially until all of the Q-subchannel blocks on a
- any missing Q-subchannel blocks can be identified and listed. These are Q-subchannel blocks which include corrupted data. They can be detected by comparing the CRC recorded at the end of the block with a CRC computed by the drive. If the CRCs are not the same, the Q-subchannel block is listed as corrupted and hence missing.
- Figure 5 shows schematically a CD 6 which has a number of errors E which are corrupted Q-subchannel blocks. The location of the errors E are listed, as described below, to form an error list L.
- FIG. 6 shows an embodiment of an apparatus for determining the provenance of a CD.
- This apparatus comprises a CD reader 21 connected to processing means 22.
- the processing means 22 communicates with a data store 23 and also has a display 24 which may be used to visually indicate information about the provenance determining process.
- a disc 6 to be tested is inserted into the CD reader 21 and, under the control of the microprocessor 22, the CD is sequentially read.
- the CRC of each Q-subchannel block is checked against the contents of the block and the microprocessor 22 then stores or displays a list L of the Q- subchannel blocks which do not have a valid CRC.
- the list of corrupted or missing blocks could be used alone to determine the provenance of the CD.
- the Q-subchannel blocks which contain UPC/EANs or ISRCs are detected and written to storage or displayed by the microprocessor 22.
- the microprocessor 22 may also, if required, calculate a check sum of the data on the CD and store or display the value computed.
- the C1 and C2 decoders, as well as detecting errors, can correct them and this fact, together with information as to which decoder detected the error and which decoder corrected the error, if indeed it was corrected, can also be extracted.
- the microprocessor 22 extracts error information from the CD to be used in determining its provenance. This error information is then compared with characteristic error information.
- discs from the same batch are read using apparatus as shown in Figure 6 to extract the same error information as has been described.
- the group of discs which have been read will all have been produced from the same master or stamper on the assumption that all the discs in that group will have errors caused by the fingerprint of that master or stamper.
- the data from all of the discs in the group is compared to identify error information that is common to every disc.
- the characteristic list of error information can then be formed and stored or displayed by the microprocessor 22. Then, the error information extracted from the disc on test may be compared with the characteristic list and it is possible to determine, by that comparison, if the disc comes from the same group as the discs used to make the characteristic list.
- the data from the test disc and the characteristic error data are correlated to calculate their degree of similarity. This may be done by cross referencing the two sets of data, identifying common features, and then making a calculation using statistical methods of the probability of the common features occurring purely by chance. A calculation of the probability that the discs are from different manufacturings can be made. A certain probability is taken as the threshold above which the hypothesis will be accepted.
- the statistical method used can be chosen as required. Currently Bayesian statistical methods are preferred.
- Figure 7 shows an apparatus for recording a master with known identifying error information such as, for example, a known characteristic list of missing Q-subchannel blocks.
- the apparatus shown in Figure 7 is very similar to conventional apparatus for manufacturing a master.
- the apparatus has processing means 34, with memory, to control the system, in particular the processor 34 controls a laser 32 to write on a disc 20.
- a data storage medium 37 which will contain the data to be encoded on the disc 20, is coupled to the microprocessor 34, and the data is passed thereby to signal encoding circuitry 33 where the data is then coded on to a laser intensity modulation signal.
- This signal is passed to the laser 32 which produces laser light with the required modulation.
- the light is passed through laser focusing optics 31 which focuses the laser light onto the correct portions of the disc 20.
- the processing means 34 controls the positioning of the focusing optics 31 by way of a write head servo 35.
- the processing means 34 also controls the rotational speed of the disc 20 by way of a spindle controller 36 which controls the speed of rotation of a mandrel on which the disc 20 is mounted.
- the identifying error data causes the stream of user data encoded onto the laser intensity modulation signal to be altered so as to introduce the features identified in the identifying error data.
- the disc is a glass master, all stampers and discs physically made from it will have the same identifying error data. If such a CD is then subjected to the method of the invention to identify its provenance it will produce error information which strongly correlates with the identifying error data supplied to the master in its manufacture.
- identifying error data added to the master is, as described above, an intentional corrupting of Q-subchannel blocks
- a group of legitimate discs can be used to produce a list of the common missing Q-subchannel blocks for the group. Then, it is necessary only to test each test disc to see if it has Q- subchannel block in portions thereof where legitimate discs have missing Q- subchannel blocks. Identification of a block where it is supposed to be missing shows that the CD is counterfeit.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Signal Processing For Digital Recording And Reproducing (AREA)
- Optical Recording Or Reproduction (AREA)
- Manufacturing Optical Record Carriers (AREA)
- Memory System Of A Hierarchy Structure (AREA)
- Optical Record Carriers And Manufacture Thereof (AREA)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP04001409.4A EP1411515B1 (de) | 1998-10-06 | 1999-09-29 | Verfahren zur Bestimmung der Herkunft einer Datenträgerplatte |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
GBGB9821808.4A GB9821808D0 (en) | 1998-10-06 | 1998-10-06 | Method and apparatus for determining the provenance of a data carrying disc |
GB9821808 | 1998-10-06 | ||
PCT/GB1999/003232 WO2000021086A1 (en) | 1998-10-06 | 1999-09-29 | Method and apparatus for determining the provenance of a data carrying disc |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP04001409.4A Division EP1411515B1 (de) | 1998-10-06 | 1999-09-29 | Verfahren zur Bestimmung der Herkunft einer Datenträgerplatte |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1119853A1 true EP1119853A1 (de) | 2001-08-01 |
EP1119853B1 EP1119853B1 (de) | 2007-01-10 |
Family
ID=10840118
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP04001409.4A Expired - Lifetime EP1411515B1 (de) | 1998-10-06 | 1999-09-29 | Verfahren zur Bestimmung der Herkunft einer Datenträgerplatte |
EP99947698A Expired - Lifetime EP1119853B1 (de) | 1998-10-06 | 1999-09-29 | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur bestimmung der herkunft einer datenträgerplatte |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP04001409.4A Expired - Lifetime EP1411515B1 (de) | 1998-10-06 | 1999-09-29 | Verfahren zur Bestimmung der Herkunft einer Datenträgerplatte |
Country Status (14)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US6535469B1 (de) |
EP (2) | EP1411515B1 (de) |
JP (2) | JP4672146B2 (de) |
KR (1) | KR20010080001A (de) |
CN (1) | CN100350487C (de) |
AU (1) | AU756130C (de) |
BR (1) | BR9916797A (de) |
CA (1) | CA2345725C (de) |
DE (1) | DE69934812T2 (de) |
GB (2) | GB9821808D0 (de) |
NZ (1) | NZ510626A (de) |
PL (1) | PL347157A1 (de) |
RU (1) | RU2251162C2 (de) |
WO (1) | WO2000021086A1 (de) |
Families Citing this family (23)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7039188B2 (en) * | 2001-08-31 | 2006-05-02 | Oleg Saliahov | Optical disc authentication method and apparatus |
GB0100528D0 (en) * | 2001-01-09 | 2001-02-21 | Taylor Robert W | Optical disks, a monitoring system for monitoring production of optical disks, manufacturing methods for optical disks and an authentication method for |
US7343330B1 (en) * | 2001-06-26 | 2008-03-11 | Boesjes Eimar M | Systems and methods for acquisition, evaluation, inventory, distribution, and/or re-sale of pre-owned recorded data products |
US20070101157A1 (en) * | 2002-03-14 | 2007-05-03 | Cerberus Central Limited | Security in digital data distribution |
JP2003308651A (ja) * | 2002-04-12 | 2003-10-31 | Hudson Soft Co Ltd | データ細工装置、細工データ作成方法、細工データ作成方法をコンピュータにより実行可能なプログラム、オリジナルデータ記録方法、オリジナルデータ記録方法をコンピュータにより実行可能なプログラム、記録媒体、不正読取実行防止装置、不正読取実行防止方法、及び、不正読取実行防止方法をコンピュータにより実行可能なプログラム |
IL149759A (en) * | 2002-05-20 | 2009-07-20 | Eyal Cohen | Method and system for protecting digital media from illegal copying |
US7175086B2 (en) | 2004-04-21 | 2007-02-13 | General Electric Company | Authentication system, data device, and methods for using the same |
US7496938B2 (en) | 2003-11-24 | 2009-02-24 | Sabic Innovative Plastics Ip B.V. | Media drive with a luminescence detector and methods of detecting an authentic article |
US7218589B2 (en) | 2003-11-24 | 2007-05-15 | General Electric Company | Authenticable optical disc, system for authenticating an optical disc and method thereof |
US20050172071A1 (en) * | 2004-02-03 | 2005-08-04 | Edmonds Robert A. | Method and apparatus for identifying a digital recording source |
US11734393B2 (en) | 2004-09-20 | 2023-08-22 | Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. | Content distribution with renewable content protection |
US20060064386A1 (en) | 2004-09-20 | 2006-03-23 | Aaron Marking | Media on demand via peering |
US20060277609A1 (en) * | 2005-06-07 | 2006-12-07 | Marc Brandon | Method and apparatus for tracking pirated media |
JP2009504026A (ja) * | 2005-07-27 | 2009-01-29 | ダグ カーソン アンド アソシエーツ,インク. | デジタルコンテンツに関連付けられた検証用来歴データ |
JP4574587B2 (ja) * | 2006-03-15 | 2010-11-04 | 太陽誘電株式会社 | 光記録媒体の識別方法及びその装置 |
EP1850260A1 (de) * | 2006-04-26 | 2007-10-31 | Macrovision Corporation | Verfahren und System zum Binden von einem ausführbaren Code zur Verwaltung von Digitalen Rechten an eine Softwareanwendung |
US8458673B2 (en) * | 2006-04-26 | 2013-06-04 | Flexera Software Llc | Computer-implemented method and system for binding digital rights management executable code to a software application |
US8620145B2 (en) | 2006-09-06 | 2013-12-31 | Corel Corporation, Inc. | Methods, system and mediums for use in protecting content |
US8369562B2 (en) | 2007-03-30 | 2013-02-05 | Hitachi Global Storage Technologies Netherlands B.V. | Encryption methods for patterned media watermarking |
US7852717B2 (en) * | 2007-08-17 | 2010-12-14 | Hitachi Global Storage Technologies Netherlands B.V. | System, method, and apparatus for characterizing, tracking, and segregating known defective disk regions on patterned disks |
WO2010134015A1 (en) * | 2009-05-20 | 2010-11-25 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Fragile stamper structures for tracing of unauthorized descendants |
US10068282B2 (en) * | 2009-06-24 | 2018-09-04 | Uniloc 2017 Llc | System and method for preventing multiple online purchases |
KR20120050449A (ko) * | 2009-07-17 | 2012-05-18 | 세큐어 콘텐트 스토리지 어소시에이션, 엘엘씨 | 단순 비자동 피어링 미디어 복제 감지 |
Family Cites Families (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5418852A (en) * | 1992-03-18 | 1995-05-23 | Fujitsu Limited | Unauthorized use prevention method for optical disks, optical disk having unauthorized use prevention function, and optical disk apparatus |
CA2133960A1 (en) * | 1992-04-20 | 1993-10-28 | Mark Lieberman | System for protection of software |
US5615061A (en) * | 1994-09-29 | 1997-03-25 | Singh; Jitendra K. | Method of preventng software piracy by uniquely identifying the specific magnetic storage device the software is stored on |
CA2165532C (en) * | 1995-01-23 | 2005-10-04 | Michael L. Mitchell | System for encoding a glass master to enable detection of a counterfeit optical cd-rom |
JP3284296B2 (ja) * | 1995-06-27 | 2002-05-20 | 富士通株式会社 | 光記録媒体及びその記録再生方法 |
SE514352C2 (sv) * | 1996-07-05 | 2001-02-12 | Ifunga Test Equipment Bv | Sätt att förse en optisk databärare med identitetsinformation |
JPH10326463A (ja) * | 1997-05-26 | 1998-12-08 | Victor Co Of Japan Ltd | ディスク,その識別方法,その識別装置,その再生装置 |
DE69704352T2 (de) * | 1997-08-28 | 2001-07-12 | Sony Dadc Austria Ag Anif | System zur Kopierverwaltung einer optischen Platte |
DE69836100T2 (de) * | 1997-12-30 | 2007-02-15 | Macrovision Europe Ltd., Maidenhead | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur bestimmung der herkunft einer datenträgerplatte |
-
1998
- 1998-10-06 GB GBGB9821808.4A patent/GB9821808D0/en not_active Ceased
-
1999
- 1999-09-29 RU RU2001112101/28A patent/RU2251162C2/ru not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1999-09-29 AU AU61075/99A patent/AU756130C/en not_active Ceased
- 1999-09-29 KR KR1020017004306A patent/KR20010080001A/ko not_active Application Discontinuation
- 1999-09-29 BR BR9916797-2A patent/BR9916797A/pt not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1999-09-29 CA CA002345725A patent/CA2345725C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1999-09-29 NZ NZ510626A patent/NZ510626A/xx not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1999-09-29 EP EP04001409.4A patent/EP1411515B1/de not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1999-09-29 JP JP2000575128A patent/JP4672146B2/ja not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1999-09-29 WO PCT/GB1999/003232 patent/WO2000021086A1/en active IP Right Grant
- 1999-09-29 GB GB9923081A patent/GB2342488B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1999-09-29 PL PL99347157A patent/PL347157A1/xx unknown
- 1999-09-29 CN CNB998118311A patent/CN100350487C/zh not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1999-09-29 DE DE69934812T patent/DE69934812T2/de not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1999-09-29 EP EP99947698A patent/EP1119853B1/de not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1999-10-05 US US09/413,718 patent/US6535469B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2006
- 2006-10-03 JP JP2006272012A patent/JP2007035273A/ja active Pending
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See references of WO0021086A1 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JP4672146B2 (ja) | 2011-04-20 |
KR20010080001A (ko) | 2001-08-22 |
EP1411515A2 (de) | 2004-04-21 |
JP2002527848A (ja) | 2002-08-27 |
PL347157A1 (en) | 2002-03-25 |
EP1119853B1 (de) | 2007-01-10 |
GB2342488B (en) | 2003-01-15 |
DE69934812T2 (de) | 2007-10-11 |
AU6107599A (en) | 2000-04-26 |
EP1411515A3 (de) | 2008-08-06 |
NZ510626A (en) | 2003-01-31 |
JP2007035273A (ja) | 2007-02-08 |
CN1322354A (zh) | 2001-11-14 |
AU756130B2 (en) | 2003-01-02 |
WO2000021086A1 (en) | 2000-04-13 |
US6535469B1 (en) | 2003-03-18 |
AU756130C (en) | 2003-10-02 |
CA2345725C (en) | 2009-03-17 |
GB9821808D0 (en) | 1998-12-02 |
DE69934812D1 (de) | 2007-02-22 |
BR9916797A (pt) | 2001-10-09 |
RU2251162C2 (ru) | 2005-04-27 |
GB2342488A (en) | 2000-04-12 |
CA2345725A1 (en) | 2000-04-13 |
EP1411515B1 (de) | 2014-07-02 |
CN100350487C (zh) | 2007-11-21 |
GB9923081D0 (en) | 1999-12-01 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
AU756130C (en) | Method and apparatus for determining the provenance of a data carrying disc | |
CA2163177C (en) | Digital compact disc player security system reproducing method and apparatus | |
US5703858A (en) | System for encoding a glass master to enable detection of a counterfeit optical CD-ROM | |
AU751134B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for determining the provenance of a data carrying disc | |
EP0907952B1 (de) | Verfahren zum versehen eines optischen datenträgers mit identitätsinformationen | |
US6928040B2 (en) | Identifying copy protected optical compact discs | |
US6487155B1 (en) | Optical disc authentication using alternate data modulation encoding schemes | |
US7414930B2 (en) | Method of accessing data on a copy protected data carrying disc | |
CA2604169C (en) | Method for incorporating identifying error information into a data carrying disc | |
CA2318310A1 (en) | Cd-disk identification through a pattern analysis | |
JP4073438B2 (ja) | 情報記録媒体、情報記録媒体のセクタ読取り方法、情報記録媒体の真贋判定方法、情報記録媒体の真贋判定プログラム | |
MXPA01003582A (en) | Method and apparatus for determining the provenance of a data carrying disc | |
US20050007911A1 (en) | Method for recording data on a data storage medium enabling data identification | |
JPH09145634A (ja) | 欠陥検出方法及び装置、並びに光学的情報記録媒体 | |
WO2004044912A1 (en) | Optical disc authentication using alternate data modulation encoding schemes |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20010403 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20030718 |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: MACROVISION EUROPE LIMITED |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070110 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070110 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070110 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070110 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070110 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 69934812 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20070222 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070410 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070421 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070611 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20071011 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070110 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20070930 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070110 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070411 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: HK Ref legal event code: WD Ref document number: 1037422 Country of ref document: HK |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: 732E |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20071001 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: GC |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070110 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20070929 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: RG Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: CD |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: 732E Free format text: REGISTERED BETWEEN 20110217 AND 20110223 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: TD Effective date: 20110304 Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: SD Effective date: 20110304 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: TP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 69934812 Country of ref document: DE Representative=s name: UEXKUELL & STOLBERG PARTNERSCHAFT VON PATENT- , DE Effective date: 20110805 Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 69934812 Country of ref document: DE Representative=s name: UEXKUELL & STOLBERG, DE Effective date: 20110805 Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R081 Ref document number: 69934812 Country of ref document: DE Owner name: ROVI EUROPE LTD., MAIDENHEAD, GB Free format text: FORMER OWNER: MACROVISION EUROPE LTD., MAIDENHEAD, BERKSHIRE, GB Effective date: 20110805 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 17 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20150922 Year of fee payment: 17 Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20150923 Year of fee payment: 17 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20150811 Year of fee payment: 17 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20150909 Year of fee payment: 17 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 69934812 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20161001 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20160929 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20161001 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20170531 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170401 Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160930 Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160929 |