EP0902963B1 - Multipolmassenspektrometer mit axialem ausstoss - Google Patents

Multipolmassenspektrometer mit axialem ausstoss Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0902963B1
EP0902963B1 EP97923686A EP97923686A EP0902963B1 EP 0902963 B1 EP0902963 B1 EP 0902963B1 EP 97923686 A EP97923686 A EP 97923686A EP 97923686 A EP97923686 A EP 97923686A EP 0902963 B1 EP0902963 B1 EP 0902963B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
ions
rod set
field
rods
voltage
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP97923686A
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0902963A1 (de
Inventor
James W. Hager
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nordion Inc
Original Assignee
MDS Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by MDS Inc filed Critical MDS Inc
Publication of EP0902963A1 publication Critical patent/EP0902963A1/de
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0902963B1 publication Critical patent/EP0902963B1/de
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01J—ELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
    • H01J49/00—Particle spectrometers or separator tubes
    • H01J49/26—Mass spectrometers or separator tubes
    • H01J49/34—Dynamic spectrometers
    • H01J49/42—Stability-of-path spectrometers, e.g. monopole, quadrupole, multipole, farvitrons
    • H01J49/426—Methods for controlling ions
    • H01J49/427—Ejection and selection methods
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01J—ELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
    • H01J49/00—Particle spectrometers or separator tubes
    • H01J49/004—Combinations of spectrometers, tandem spectrometers, e.g. MS/MS, MSn
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01J—ELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
    • H01J49/00—Particle spectrometers or separator tubes
    • H01J49/26—Mass spectrometers or separator tubes
    • H01J49/34—Dynamic spectrometers
    • H01J49/42—Stability-of-path spectrometers, e.g. monopole, quadrupole, multipole, farvitrons
    • H01J49/4205—Device types
    • H01J49/422—Two-dimensional RF ion traps
    • H01J49/4225—Multipole linear ion traps, e.g. quadrupoles, hexapoles

Definitions

  • This invention relates to a multipole elongated rod ion trap mass spectrometer with axial ejection.
  • Conventional ion traps are generally composed of three electrodes, namely a ring electrode, and a pair of end caps, with appropriate RF and DC voltages applied to these electrodes to establish a three-dimensional field which traps ions within a mass range of interest in the relatively small volume between the ring electrode and the end caps.
  • the electrodes may be hyperbolic, producing a theoretically perfect three-dimensional quadrupole field, or they may deviate from hyperbolic geometry, giving rise to additional multipole fields superimposed on the quadrupole field and which can produce improved results.
  • ion trap mass spectrometers are filled in an essentially mass-independent manner and are emptied mass-dependently by manipulating the RF and DC voltages applied to one or more of the electrodes.
  • the ion storage and fast scanning capabilities of the ion trap are advantageous in analytical mass spectrometry.
  • High analysis efficiency, compared to typical beam-type mass spectrometers, can be achieved if the time to eject and detect ions from the trap is smaller than the time required to fill a trap. If this condition is met, then very few ions are wasted.
  • ion traps are usually of very low efficiency, e.g. one to ten percent, primarily due to the relatively small volume of the trap and the very demanding ion energetic constraints for trap acceptance of externally generated ions.
  • the relatively small volume of the ion trap means that the number of ions that can be accepted before space charge effects become serious is also relatively small.
  • Increasing the radial dimension of the volume of the trapping chamber of a conventional ion trap partially overcomes this limitation, but with the additional disadvantages of reduced analytical utility and/or increased costs (e.g. reduced mass range, larger power supplies).
  • the small volume of the ion trapping chamber will also tend to limit the linear response range (i.e. dynamic range), again because of the effects of space charge at high ion densities.
  • ions can be trapped and stored very efficiently in a two-dimensional RF quadrupole.
  • ions have been admitted into and then trapped in a two-dimensional quadrupole for purposes of releasing them into a conventional ion trap, as shown in U.S. patent 5,179,278.
  • More generally ions have been admitted into a pressurized linear cell or a two-dimensional RF quadrupole for the purpose of studying ion molecule reactions.
  • the ions enter the device from a mass selective source such as a resolving quadrupole, are trapped for a specified period of time, and then are ejected mass-independently for subsequent mass analysis.
  • U.S. patent 5,420,425 teaches that ions can be trapped and stored in a two-dimensional RF quadrupole and scanned out mass-dependently, using the technique of mass selective instability.
  • the device disclosed therein was conceived in order to improve ion sensitivities, detection limits, and dynamic range, by increasing the volume of the trapping chamber in the axial dimension.
  • the mass selective instability mode of ion ejection (and all other mass analysis scanning modes described in U.S. patent 5,420,425) involve ejecting ions out of the trapping chamber in a direction orthogonal to the center axis of the device, i.e. radially.
  • radial ejection of ions from a two-dimensional RF quadrupole there are several disadvantages of radial ejection of ions from a two-dimensional RF quadrupole.
  • One disadvantage is that radial ejection expels ions through or between the quadrupole (or higher order multipole) rods. This forces the ions through regions of space for which there are significant RF field imperfections. The effect of these imperfections is to eject ions at points not predicted by the normal stability diagram.
  • Radial ejection from a two-dimensional RF quadrupole has the further disadvantage of providing a poor match between the dimensions of the plug of ejected ions and conventional ion detectors.
  • radially ejected ions will exit throughout the length of the device, i.e. with a rectangular cross-section of length corresponding to the rods themselves.
  • Most conventional ion detectors have relatively small circular acceptance apertures (e.g. less than 2 cm 2 ) that are not well-suited for elongated ion sources.
  • Mass selective instability for radial ion ejection of ions from a two-dimensional RF quadrupole has additional problems. Ions ejected radially from such a device will exit with a diverging spatial profile with a characteristic solid angle. Some of the ejected ions will hit the rods and be lost. In addition, radially ejected ions will leave the trapping structure in opposite directions. Multiple ion detectors would be required to collect all of the ions made unstable by this and similar techniques. Ions ejected away from the detector(s) or which encounter one of the electrodes are lost and therefore do not contribute to the measured ion signal. Therefore only a small fraction of trapped ions would normally be collected, despite the very high storage ability of this device.
  • an object of the present invention in one of its aspects to provide an elongated multipole mass spectrometer which has a high injection efficiency and an enlarged trapping volume, and in which ions are ejected along the major axis of the device, thus allowing a good geometric match with commonly used ion detectors.
  • the invention provides a method of operating a mass spectrometer having an elongated rod set, said rod set having an entrance end and an exit end and a longitudinal axis, said method comprising:
  • Fig. 1 shows a mass analyzer system 10 with which the invention may be used.
  • the system 10 includes a sample source 12 (normally a liquid sample source such as a liquid chromatograph) from which sample is supplied to a conventional ion source 14.
  • Ion source 14 may be an electrospray, an ion spray, or a corona discharge device, or any other known ion source.
  • An ion spray device of the kind shown in U.S. patent 4,861,988 issued August 29, 1989 to Cornell Research Foundation Inc. is suitable.
  • Ions from ion source 14 are directed through an aperture 16 in an aperture plate 18.
  • Plate 18 forms one wall of a gas curtain chamber 19 which is supplied with curtain gas from a curtain gas source 20.
  • the curtain gas can be argon, nitrogen or other inert gas and is described in the above-mentioned U.S. patent 4,861,988.
  • the ions then pass through an orifice 22 in an orifice plate 24 into a first stage vacuum chamber 26 evacuated by a pump 28 to a pressure of about 1 Torr.
  • the ions then pass through a skimmer orifice 30 in a skimmer plate 32 and into a main vacuum chamber 34 evacuated to a pressure of about 2 milli-Torr by a pump 36.
  • the main vacuum chamber 34 contains a set of four linear conventional quadrupole rods 38.
  • an exit lens 42 Located about 2mm past the exit ends 40 of the rods 38 is an exit lens 42.
  • the lens 42 is simply a plate with an aperture 44 therein, allowing passage of ions through aperture 44 to a conventional detector 46 (which may for example be a channel electron multiplier of the kind conventionally used in mass spectrometers).
  • the rods 38 are connected to the main power supply 50 which applies a DC rod offset to all the rods 38 and also applies RF in conventional manner between the rods.
  • the power supply 50 is also connected (by connections not shown) to the ion source 14, the aperture and orifice plates 18 and 24, the skimmer plate 32, and to the exit lens 42.
  • the ion source 14 may typically be at +5,000 volts, the aperture plate 18 may be at +1,000 volts, the orifice plate 24 may be at +250 volts, and the skimmer plate 32 may be at ground (zero volts).
  • the DC offset applied to rods 38 may be -5 volts.
  • the axis of the device, which is the path of ion travel, is indicated at 52.
  • ions of interest which are admitted into the device from ion source 14 move down a potential well and are allowed to enter the rods 38.
  • Ions that are stable in the applied main RF field applied to the rods 38 travel the length of the device undergoing numerous momentum dissipating collisions with the background gas.
  • a trapping DC voltage typically -2 volts DC
  • the exit lens 42 Normally the ion transmission efficiency between the skimmer 32 and the exit lens 42 is very high and may approach 100%.
  • Ions that enter the main vacuum chamber 34 and travel to the exit lens 42 are thermalized due to the numerous collisions with the background gas and have little net velocity in the direction of axis 52.
  • the ions also experience forces from the main RF field which confines them radially.
  • the RF voltage applied is in the order of about 450 volts (unless it is scanned with mass) and is of a frequency of the order of about 816 kHz. No resolving DC field is applied to rods 38.
  • ions in region 54 in the vicinity of the exit lens 42 will experience fields that are not entirely quadrupolar, due to the nature of the termination of the main RF and DC fields near the exit lens. Such fields, commonly referred to as fringing fields, will tend to couple the radial and axial degrees of freedom of the trapped ions. This means that there will be axial and radial components of ion motion that are not mutually orthogonal: This is in contrast to the situation at the center of rod structure 38 further removed from the exit lens and fringing fields, where the axial and radial components of ion motion are not coupled or are minimally coupled.
  • ions may be scanned out of the ion trap constituted by rods 38, by the application to the exit lens 42 of a low voltage auxiliary AC field of appropriate frequency.
  • the auxiliary AC field may be provided by an auxiliary AC supply 56, which for illustrative purposes is shown as forming part of the main power supply 50.
  • the auxiliary AC field is an addition to the trapping DC voltage supplied to exit lens 42 and couples to both the radial and axial secular ion motions.
  • the auxiliary AC field is found to excite the ions sufficiently that they surmount the axial DC potential barrier at the exit lens 42, so that they can leave axially in the direction of arrow 58.
  • the deviations in the field in the vicinity of the exit lens 42 lead to the above described coupling of axial and radial ion motions enabling the axial ejection at radial secular frequencies. This is in contrast to the situation existing in a conventional ion trap, where excitation of radial secular motion will generally lead to radial ejection and excitation of axial secular motion will generally lead to axial ejection, unlike the situation described above.
  • ion ejection in a sequential mass dependent manner can be accomplished by scanning the frequency of the low voltage auxiliary AC field.
  • the frequency of the auxiliary AC field matches a radial secular frequency of an ion in the vicinity of the exit lens 42, the ion will absorb energy and will now be capable of traversing the potential barrier present on the exit lens due to the radial/axial motion coupling.
  • the ion exits axially, it will be detected by detector 46.
  • other ions upstream of the region 54 in the vicinity of the exit lens are energetically permitted to enter the region 54 and be excited by subsequent AC frequency scans.
  • Ion ejection by scanning the frequency of the auxiliary AC voltage applied to the exit lens is desirable because it does not empty the trapping volume of the entire elongated rod structure 38.
  • the RF voltage on the rods would be ramped and ions would be ejected from low to high masses along the entire length of the rods when the q value for each ion reaches a value of 0.907. After each mass selective instability scan, time is required to refill the trapping volume before another analysis can be performed.
  • ion ejection will normally only happen in the vicinity of the exit lens because this is where the coupling of the axial and radial ion motions occurs and where the auxiliary AC voltage is applied.
  • the upstream portion 60 of the rods serves to store other ions for subsequent analysis.
  • the time required to refill the volume 54 in the vicinity of the exit lens with ions will always be shorter than the time required to refill the entire trapping volume. Therefore fewer ions will be wasted.
  • the auxiliary AC voltage on end lens 42 can be fixed and the main RF voltage applied to rods 38 can be scanned in amplitude, as will be described. While this does change the trapping conditions, a q of only about 0.2 to 0.3 is needed for axial ejection, while a q of about 0.8 to 0.907 is needed for radial ejection. Therefore, as will be explained, few if any ions are lost to radial ejection if the RF voltage is scanned through an appropriate amplitude range, except possibly for very low mass ions.
  • a further supplementary or auxiliary AC dipole voltage may be applied to rods 38 (as indicated by dotted connection 57 in Fig. 1) and scanned, to produce varying fringing fields which will eject ions axially in the manner described.
  • the dipole voltage is usually applied between an opposed pair of the rods 38, as indicated in Fig. 1a.
  • a combination of some or all of the above three approaches can be used to eject ions axially and mass dependently past the DC potential barrier present at the end lens 42.
  • the device illustrated may be operated in a continuous fashion, in which ions entering the main RF containment field applied to rods 38 are transported by their own residual momentum toward the exit lens 42 and ultimate axial ejection.
  • the ions which have reached the extraction volume in the vicinity of the exit lens have been preconditioned by their numerous collisions with background gas, eliminating the need for an explicit cooling time (and the attendant delay) as is required in most conventional ion traps.
  • ions are being ejected axially from region 54 in the mass dependent manner described.
  • the extraction volume 54 in the vicinity of the exit lens is quite small.
  • the exit lens 42 is normally placed very close to the ends of the rods 38, e.g. 2mm from the rod ends (as mentioned).
  • the penetration of the fringing fields from the exit lens 42 into the space between the rods 38 is believed to be very small, typically of the order of between 0.5mm and 1.0mm, so the extent of volume or region 54 is exaggerated in Fig. 1, for clarity of illustration.
  • the DC offset applied to all four rods 38 can be modulated at the same frequency as the AC which would have been applied to exit lens 42.
  • no AC is needed on exit lens 42 since modulating the DC offset is equivalent to applying an AC voltage to the exit lens, in that it creates an AC field in the fringing region.
  • the DC potential barrier is still applied to the exit lens 42.
  • the amplitude of the modulation of the DC offset will be the same as the amplitude of the AC voltage which otherwise would have been applied to the exit lens 42, i.e. it is set to optimize the axially ejected ion signal.
  • the RF amplitude is scanned to bring ions sequentially into resonance with the AC field created by the DC modulation, or else the frequency of the modulation is scanned so that again, when such frequency matches a radial secular frequency of an ion in the fringing fields in the vicinity of the exit lens, the ion will absorb energy and be ejected axially for detection.
  • the rod offset would not be modulated until after ions have been injected and trapped within the rods, since the modulation would otherwise interfere with ion injection, so this process would be a batch process. This is in contrast to the continuous process possible when AC is placed on the exit lens, in which case ions can be ejected from the extraction region 54 at the same time as ions are entering region 60 (because the AC field on exit lens 42 does not affect ion injection).
  • the highest efficiency in a continuous mode operation is achieved when the ion ejection rate is faster than the rate at which ions of the desired mass/charge ratio are injected into the rods and travel along them to the exit lens 42.
  • Ion ejection processes can require some tens of milliseconds.
  • the time required for ions to travel from one end to the other of the rods 38 depends on the lengths of the rods themselves, the initial energy of the ions, and the pressure in the vacuum chamber 34. In some cases the end-to-end transit time will dominate, but more often the time required to extract the ions from the region in the vicinity of the exit lens 42 will be more important.
  • One method of matching the time required for ions to travel from one end to the other of the rods 38 to the time required to eject the ions is to apply an axial field along the rods 38.
  • Methods for imposing axial fields of this kind are described in copending application serial no. 08/514,372 filed August 5, 1995 and entitled "Spectrometer with Axial Field" assigned to the assignee of this application.
  • An applied axial field in the direction of the exit lens 42 will tend to concentrate ions in the region of rods 38 in the vicinity of lens 42, i.e. in the volume 54 of the device from which the ions are extracted.
  • An applied axial field in the opposite direction will tend to deplete ions from the extraction volume 54, and may also be desirable in some cases.
  • Fig. 2 One typical electrode geometry which may be used is that depicted in Fig. 2, where primed reference numerals indicate parts corresponding to those of Fig. 1.
  • the rods 38' are divided into segments 38-1' to 38-5', with DC offsets V1 to V6 which increase in negative value applied to successive segments from 38-1' to 38-6'.
  • This arrangement will provide an axial field as described in said application.
  • Such an arrangement will strongly concentrate ions in the volume near the exit lens 42' and will increase the coupling of axial and radial ion motion.
  • the axial field can be oscillated as described in the above mentioned copending application. Such oscillation may enhance axial ejection of ions trapped in the volume near the exit lens 42. It can also be used for ion dissociation as described in said application, by oscillating the ion population trapped in the rod structure about their equilibrium positions.
  • the system described can be considered as being an open-ended three dimensional ion trap, where the open end is an integrated high efficiency ion injection device (supplied by ion source 14).
  • the ions in the vicinity of the exit lens 42 experience a three-dimensional trapping field comprised of radial and axial components. Radially the ions are contained by the main RF field applied to the linear rods 38. Axially the ions are contained at the exit end of the device by the DC potential on the exit lens 42, and are contained at the entrance end of the device by the potential gradient from the applied axial field (or from the skimmer 32).
  • the ions are also to some extent contained in the trapping region or volume 54 by the field created by the build-up of charge density upstream of that region. It will therefore be appreciated that the actual trapping volume 54 is variable along the axial or Z direction.
  • the RF on the rods 38 can be scanned to eject ions mass dependently, while keeping a DC potential barrier on end lens 42 but with no AC field on end lens 42, no modulation of the DC offset on rods 38, and no dipole AC field on rods 38.
  • ions in the fringing fields at the downstream ends of rods 38 will leave axially and be detected, but most of the ions between rods 38 (those in region 60) will leave radially and will be wasted.
  • the wastage can be reduced by segmenting rods 38 as shown in Fig. 2, making the last set of segments 38-5' very short (e.g. less than 1cm), and scanning the RF for ejection only on segments 38-5'. In this way, a higher proportion of the ions between rods 38-5' will be ejected axially mass dependently, for detection.
  • ions from conventional ion sources are of little or no analytical utility.
  • examples of such ions are low mass solvent and cluster ions. These ions simply serve to increase the overall charge density within the ion trap at the expense of optimum performance.
  • Various techniques may be used to eliminate such unwanted ions from the linear ion trap described.
  • One such method is to operate the main RF voltage from power supply 50 at a level where the analytes of interest are stable within the rod structure 38, but the unwanted ions are unstable. For example if the unwanted ions are in the mass to charge range 10 to 100, and the ions of interest are in the mass to charge range 200 to 1,000, then the main RF voltage can be operated at 214 volts peak to peak.
  • Another method of eliminating unwanted ions from the ion trap is to apply an additional auxiliary AC voltage between opposite pairs of the rods 38, to resonantly eject the unwanted ions radially out of the rod set.
  • This technique is well known, as mentioned.
  • an auxiliary AC voltage of magnitude equal to about 10% of the level of the main RF voltage and of much lower frequency, is typically applied between opposite pairs of rods.
  • the auxiliary AC voltage of appropriate amplitude and frequency, may be scanned to resonantly eject unwanted ions radially.
  • Another technique for removing unwanted ions is to apply low voltage DC to opposite pairs of rods to make the rods 38 act as a low resolution mass spectrometer.
  • the magnitude of the DC applied will be such that the combination of AC and DC ejects ions only in the low mass range which is not of interest.
  • rods 38 In the Fig. 3 device, in which double primed reference numerals indicate parts corresponding to those of Fig. 1, the rods 38" have been divided into three sets of rods 38a, 38b and 38c.
  • Rods 38a are used to pre-trap ions from the continuous ion source 14".
  • the rods 38b are used as an RF rod mirror that can reflect or transmit ions, by changing the DC offset of rods 38b.
  • the rods 38c and lens 42" serve as the open-ended ion trap previously described, for analysis of ions which are injected into rods 38c through the rods 38b.
  • the RF and DC voltages on rod set 38a are set to accept ions within a mass range of interest, while the AC and DC voltages on rod set 38b are set to reflect ions, so that a population of ions accumulates in rod set 38a.
  • the operation is exactly as described for rod set 44 in U.S. patent 5,179,278.
  • the voltages on rod set 38b are changed to allow passage of the accumulated ions in rod set 38a through rod set 38b to rod set 38c.
  • the RF voltage and DC offset voltage applied to rod set 38c, and the AC and DC voltages applied to lens 42 are set such that rod set 38c operates as an ion trap with axial ejection as described in connection with Fig. 1.
  • ions are axially ejected in a mass dependent manner from rod set 38c, as previously described, for detection in detector 46".
  • An advantage of this configuration is that while ions are being analyzed in rod set 38c, ions from the continuous source are accumulated for subsequent analysis in the pre-trapping region, i.e. rod set 38a, and are not lost.
  • U.S. patent 5,179,278 teaches, proper optimization of the time to collect sufficient ions to fill the analysis region of the device, the time to empty the pre-trap region, and the time to perform analysis can result in very high duty cycles, and thus high overall sensitivity. Of course even in the Fig.
  • ions are collected in region 60 of rods 38 while ions from the extraction region 54 are being ejected, so that some ions can be collected while the ion trap constituted by rods 38 and lens 42 is scanning out ions.
  • the Fig. 3 version allows storage of more ions since a larger volume can be used.
  • some DC can conveniently be applied between the pairs of rods of rod set 38a to eliminate unwanted ions, thus reducing space charge effects in rod set 38c.
  • 0.1 ⁇ M (micro moles) of reserpine (having mass to charge ratio 609) was introduced using the well known ion spray source (not shown) into a conventional mass spectrometer model API 300 produced by Sciex Division of MDS Health Group Limited of Concord, Ontario, Canada.
  • a simplified diagrammatic view of the model API 300 ion optical path is shown in Fig. 4, where the gas curtain entrance plate is indicated at 70, the gas curtain exit plate is indicated at 72, the skimmer plate is shown at 74, and four sets of rods are indicated as Q0, Q1, Q2 and Q3, with orifice plates IQ1 between rod sets Q0 and Q1, IQ2 between Q2 and Q3, and IQ3 between Q2 and Q3.
  • the exit lens is indicated at 76 and the detector (a channel electron multiplier) is indicated at 78.
  • the pressures were 2.2 Torr in chamber 80, 8 milli-Torr in chamber 82 and 2 x 10 -5 Torr in the remainder of the vacuum chamber 84.
  • the applied DC voltages were: ground at skimmer plate 80; -5 volts DC at Q0, -7 volts DC at IQ1, -10 volts at Q1, -20 volts at IQ2, -7 volts DC at Q2, -3 volts DC at IQ3 (which served as the equivalent of the exit lens 42); -15 volts DC on Q3, and 0 volts on the final exit plate 76. All resolving DC voltages were removed from the quadrupoles.
  • auxiliary AC voltage was applied to the exit lens IQ3.
  • the auxiliary AC power supply could produce 100 volts peak to peak, at frequency one-ninth that of the main RF frequency, and was phase locked to the main RF frequency. (The main RF frequency was 816 kHz so that of the auxiliary AC voltage was 91.67 kHz.)
  • the auxiliary AC voltage was held at 47 volts peak to peak, its frequency was held constant at 91.67 kHz for the experiment, and the RF voltage applied to the Q2 rods was scanned to obtain a mass spectrum. Although scanning the amplitude of RF voltage changes the trapping conditions and could eject very low mass ions, the q of the device is so low under the conditions described that ions of interest trapped in the rod set Q2 are not normally ejected (unless the experimenter is interested in extremely low mass ions).
  • FIG. 5 A typical spectrum produced using this technique is shown in Fig. 5, which shows a peak 100 at mass 529.929. Since the spectrum was not mass calibrated, the reported peak of 529.929 was incorrect; the true mass was 609.
  • the peak width at half height corrected manually for the mass calibration offset, is 0.42 AMU.
  • good resolution was best obtained by scanning slowly, at a scan speed in this example of 78 AMU per second. However with optimization, higher scan rates are expected to be achieved.
  • Peak 108 is the parent ion at m/z 587 (triply charged), while the fragment ions m/z 697 and m/z 720 are shown at 106, 108 (they have higher m/z ratios because they are only doubly charged).
  • collisional fragmentation can readily be performed in the linear trap described, and the fragment ions can be scanned axially in a mass dependent manner for detection and analysis.
  • exit lens 42 has been described as a plate with an aperture, other configurations of exit lenses may be used, for example a short RF-only rod array such as that indicated at 102 in Fig. 7 and having A and B poles 102a, 102b.
  • the rod offsets of the A and B poles 102a, 102b may then be resonated at the resonance frequency of the ion to be ejected, producing axial ejection as was achieved by the auxiliary AC field applied to exit lens 42.
  • the end lens 110 may be a segmented plate having wedge-shaped segments 110-1, 110-2, 110-3, 110-4 and an aperture 112. This allows different fields to be applied to each segment, to optimize the results, while still limiting the quantity of gas which can leave the part of the vacuum chamber upstream of lens 110.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Other Investigation Or Analysis Of Materials By Electrical Means (AREA)
  • Electron Tubes For Measurement (AREA)

Claims (17)

  1. Verfahren zum Betreiben eines Massenspektrometers mit einem länglichen Stäbesatz, wobei der Stäbesatz ein Eingangsende und ein Ausgangsende sowie eine Längsachse aufweist, wobei das Verfahren umfasst:
    (a) das Zuführen von Ionen in das Eingangsende des Stäbesatzes,
    (b) das Einfangen zumindest einiger der Ionen im Stäbesatz durch Erzeugung eines Schwellenfelds an einer Ausgangslinse, die an das Ausgangsende des Stäbesatzes angrenzt, und durch Erzeugung eines HF-Feldes zwischen den Stäben des Stäbesatzes angrenzend zumindest an das Ausgangsende des Stäbesatzes,
    (c) wobei das HF- und das Schwellenfeld in einem Entnahmebereich, der an das Ausgangsende des Stäbesatzes angrenzt, in Wechselwirkung stehen, um ein Streufeld zu erzeugen,
    (d) das Beaufschlagen von Ionen mit Energie im Entnahmebereich, um massenselektiv zumindest einige Ionen mit einem ausgewählten Masse-zu-Ladung-Verhältnis axial aus dem Stäbesatz am Schwellenfeld vorbei auszustoßen,
    (e) und das Detektieren zumindest einiger der axial ausgestoßenen Ionen.
  2. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, worin das Schwellenfeld ein Gleichspannungsfeld ist.
  3. Verfahren nach Anspruch 2, worin an die Ausgangslinse eine Hilfs-Wechselspannung angelegt wird.
  4. Verfahren nach Anspruch 3, worin in Schritt (d) die Hilfs-Wechselspannung abgetastet wird.
  5. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1 oder 2, worin eine Offset-Wechselspannung an die Stäbe angelegt wird und in Schritt (d) die Offset-Wechselspannung mit einer solchen Frequenz moduliert wird, dass ausgewählte Ionen angeregt werden, wobei ausgewählte Ionen massenabhängig axial am Schwellenfeld vorbei ausgestoßen werden.
  6. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, 2 oder 3, worin in Schritt (d) das HF-Feld abgetastet wird.
  7. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, 2 oder 3, worin in Schritt (d) die Amplitude des HF-Feldes abgetastet wird.
  8. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, 2 oder 3, worin in Schritt (d) eine Zusatz-Wechselspannung zwischen den Stäben des Stäbesatzes angelegt wird.
  9. Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 1, 2 oder 3, worin in Schritt (d) eine Zusatz-Wechselspannung zwischen den Stäben des Stäbesatzes angelegt wird und die Zusatz-Wechselspannung abgetastet wird.
  10. Verfahren nach Anspruch 3 oder 4, worin die Hilfs-Wechselspannung eine Frequenz aufweist, die mit der Frequenz und Phase des HF-Feldes synchronisiert und phasenstarr ist.
  11. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, 2 oder 3, das den Schritt des Anlegens eines Axialfeldes entlang der Achse des Stäbesatzes umfasst.
  12. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, 2 oder 3, das den Schritt des Bereitstellens eines Niedrigdruck-Gases zwischen den Stäben des Stäbesatzes zur Kollisionsfokussierung und Abkühlung von Ionen darin umfasst.
  13. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, 2 oder 3, das den Schritt des Bereitstellens der Ionen von einer lonenquelle, das Bereitstellen eines zweiten Stäbesatzes zwischen dem erstgenannten Stäbesatz und der lonenquelle, des Voreinfangens von Ionen im zweiten Stäbesatz und des selektiven Zuführens von Ionen aus dem zweiten Stäbesatz in den erstgenannten Stäbesatz zum axialen Ausstoßen aus dem erstgenannten Stäbesatz und nachfolgende Detektion umfasst.
  14. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, 2 oder 3, das vor dem Schritt des axialen Ausstoßens von Ionen weiters den Schritt des radialen Ausstoßens zumindest einiger Ionen außerhalb eines ausgewählten Massenbereichs von Interesse aus dem Stäbesatz umfasst.
  15. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, das vor dem axialen Ausstoßen der Ionen weiters den Schritt des Anregens der Ionen umfasst, um zumindest einige der Ionen zu dissoziieren.
  16. Verfahren nach Anspruch 15, worin die Ionen angeregt werden, indem an die Ionen ein axiales Feld angelegt wird und das axiale Feld zum Schwingen gebracht wird.
  17. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, 2 oder 3, worin gleichzeitig damit, dass Ionen in das Eingangsende des Stäbesatzes zugeführt werden, Ionen massenselektiv axial aus dem Ausgangsende des Stäbesatzes am Schwellenfeld vorbei ausgestoßen werden.
EP97923686A 1996-06-06 1997-06-02 Multipolmassenspektrometer mit axialem ausstoss Expired - Lifetime EP0902963B1 (de)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US65695496A 1996-06-06 1996-06-06
US656954 1996-06-06
PCT/CA1997/000381 WO1997047025A1 (en) 1996-06-06 1997-06-02 Axial ejection in a multipole mass spectrometer

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0902963A1 EP0902963A1 (de) 1999-03-24
EP0902963B1 true EP0902963B1 (de) 2002-09-04

Family

ID=24635275

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP97923686A Expired - Lifetime EP0902963B1 (de) 1996-06-06 1997-06-02 Multipolmassenspektrometer mit axialem ausstoss

Country Status (6)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0902963B1 (de)
JP (1) JP3818671B2 (de)
AU (1) AU718774B2 (de)
CA (1) CA2256028C (de)
DE (1) DE69715190T2 (de)
WO (1) WO1997047025A1 (de)

Families Citing this family (29)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6177668B1 (en) * 1996-06-06 2001-01-23 Mds Inc. Axial ejection in a multipole mass spectrometer
CA2287499C (en) * 1997-05-12 2006-11-07 Mds Inc. Rf-only mass spectrometer with auxiliary excitation
US5998787A (en) * 1997-10-31 1999-12-07 Mds Inc. Method of operating a mass spectrometer including a low level resolving DC input to improve signal to noise ratio
WO1999038193A1 (en) * 1998-01-23 1999-07-29 Analytica Of Branford, Inc. Mass spectrometry with multipole ion guide
CA2626383C (en) * 1998-05-29 2011-07-19 Craig M. Whitehouse Mass spectrometry with multipole ion guides
GB9820210D0 (en) 1998-09-16 1998-11-11 Vg Elemental Limited Means for removing unwanted ions from an ion transport system and mass spectrometer
US6504148B1 (en) * 1999-05-27 2003-01-07 Mds Inc. Quadrupole mass spectrometer with ION traps to enhance sensitivity
JP2003507874A (ja) * 1999-08-26 2003-02-25 ユニバーシティ オブ ニュー ハンプシャー 多段型の質量分析計
JP4578613B2 (ja) * 2000-04-03 2010-11-10 キヤノンアネルバ株式会社 Ｑポール型質量分析計
US7060972B2 (en) 2000-07-21 2006-06-13 Mds Inc. Triple quadrupole mass spectrometer with capability to perform multiple mass analysis steps
US6720554B2 (en) 2000-07-21 2004-04-13 Mds Inc. Triple quadrupole mass spectrometer with capability to perform multiple mass analysis steps
GB0210930D0 (en) 2002-05-13 2002-06-19 Thermo Electron Corp Improved mass spectrometer and mass filters therefor
US6703607B2 (en) * 2002-05-30 2004-03-09 Mds Inc. Axial ejection resolution in multipole mass spectrometers
US6770871B1 (en) 2002-05-31 2004-08-03 Michrom Bioresources, Inc. Two-dimensional tandem mass spectrometry
GB2391694B (en) 2002-08-01 2006-03-01 Microsaic Systems Ltd Monolithic micro-engineered mass spectrometer
US7045797B2 (en) * 2002-08-05 2006-05-16 The University Of British Columbia Axial ejection with improved geometry for generating a two-dimensional substantially quadrupole field
JP4659395B2 (ja) * 2004-06-08 2011-03-30 株式会社日立ハイテクノロジーズ 質量分析装置及び質量分析方法
EP1854125B1 (de) * 2005-01-17 2014-03-12 Micromass UK Limited Massenspektrometer
US7312442B2 (en) * 2005-09-13 2007-12-25 Agilent Technologies, Inc Enhanced gradient multipole collision cell for higher duty cycle
JP5424085B2 (ja) * 2005-11-30 2014-02-26 エムディーエス インコーポレイテッド パルス軸方向場を使用した質量選択的軸方向輸送のための方法および装置
DE102006016896B4 (de) 2006-04-11 2009-06-10 Bruker Daltonik Gmbh Orthogonal-Flugzeitmassenspektrometer geringer Massendiskriminierung
TWI484529B (zh) * 2006-11-13 2015-05-11 Mks Instr Inc 離子阱質譜儀、利用其得到質譜之方法、離子阱、捕捉離子阱內之離子之方法和設備
GB0717146D0 (en) * 2007-09-04 2007-10-17 Micromass Ltd Mass spectrometer
EP2112683A1 (de) * 2008-04-22 2009-10-28 IEE INTERNATIONAL ELECTRONICS & ENGINEERING S.A. Differentialmobilitätsspektrometer und Betriebsverfahren dafür
WO2010044370A1 (ja) * 2008-10-14 2010-04-22 株式会社日立製作所 質量分析装置および質量分析方法
WO2010119568A1 (ja) 2009-04-17 2010-10-21 株式会社日立製作所 イオン検出装置
JP5767843B2 (ja) 2011-04-01 2015-08-19 株式会社日立製作所 イオン検出装置
EP3005405B1 (de) * 2013-06-02 2019-02-27 PerkinElmer Health Sciences, Inc. Kollisionszelle
GB2549645B (en) * 2015-01-15 2020-09-16 Hitachi High-Tech Corp Mass spectrometry device

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5206506A (en) * 1991-02-12 1993-04-27 Kirchner Nicholas J Ion processing: control and analysis
US5179278A (en) * 1991-08-23 1993-01-12 Mds Health Group Limited Multipole inlet system for ion traps
US5420425A (en) * 1994-05-27 1995-05-30 Finnigan Corporation Ion trap mass spectrometer system and method
DE59507820D1 (de) * 1995-03-18 2000-03-23 Bruker Daltonik Gmbh Zwischenspeicherung von Ionen für massenspektrometrische Untersuchungen

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU2946197A (en) 1998-01-05
JP3818671B2 (ja) 2006-09-06
CA2256028A1 (en) 1997-12-11
DE69715190D1 (de) 2002-10-10
AU718774B2 (en) 2000-04-20
EP0902963A1 (de) 1999-03-24
WO1997047025A1 (en) 1997-12-11
CA2256028C (en) 2007-01-16
JP2000510638A (ja) 2000-08-15
DE69715190T2 (de) 2003-04-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0902963B1 (de) Multipolmassenspektrometer mit axialem ausstoss
CA2239399C (en) Axial ejection in a multipole mass spectrometer
US5576540A (en) Mass spectrometer with radial ejection
US6995364B2 (en) Mass spectrometry method and apparatus
US7323683B2 (en) Linear ion trap for mass spectrometry
US7425699B2 (en) Mass spectrometry method and apparatus
EP0529885B1 (de) Multipol-Einlassvorrichtung für Ionenfalle
EP1051731B1 (de) Verfahren zur untersuchung von ionen in einem apparat mit einem flugzeit-spektrometer und einer linearen quadrupol-ionenfalle
WO2003103009A1 (en) Improved axial ejection resolution in multipole mass spectrometers
US7196327B2 (en) Quadrupole mass spectrometer with spatial dispersion
CA2689094C (en) Mass spectrometry method and apparatus
EP3357080A1 (de) Masse-selektive lineare ionenfalle mit axialem auswurf

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19981224

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): DE GB

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20010719

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): DE GB

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): DE GB

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69715190

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20021010

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20030605

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20160627

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20160628

Year of fee payment: 20

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R071

Ref document number: 69715190

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: PE20

Expiry date: 20170601

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20170601