EP0690284B1 - Dispositif de déploiement d'une ailette de projectile - Google Patents
Dispositif de déploiement d'une ailette de projectile Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP0690284B1 EP0690284B1 EP95401557A EP95401557A EP0690284B1 EP 0690284 B1 EP0690284 B1 EP 0690284B1 EP 95401557 A EP95401557 A EP 95401557A EP 95401557 A EP95401557 A EP 95401557A EP 0690284 B1 EP0690284 B1 EP 0690284B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- projectile
- fin
- lateral
- deployment
- fins
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F42—AMMUNITION; BLASTING
- F42B—EXPLOSIVE CHARGES, e.g. FOR BLASTING, FIREWORKS, AMMUNITION
- F42B10/00—Means for influencing, e.g. improving, the aerodynamic properties of projectiles or missiles; Arrangements on projectiles or missiles for stabilising, steering, range-reducing, range-increasing or fall-retarding
- F42B10/02—Stabilising arrangements
- F42B10/14—Stabilising arrangements using fins spread or deployed after launch, e.g. after leaving the barrel
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a device for deployment of a projectile stabilization wing, including a projectile fired by a recoilless weapon.
- Certain projectiles notably those fired by a tube smooth like that of a recoilless weapon, have stabilization fins at their rear. These fins are folded back when the projectile is in the tube launch and they deploy at the exit of this one.
- the known deployment devices put the most often using springs which are kept in good condition tension when the fins are folded along the body of the projectile and which relax by deploying the fin at the exit from the launch tube.
- Patent FR7803397 describes such a device for deployment.
- the patent GB2136930 which represents the preambles of claims 1 and 4, describes a sub-calibrated projectile in which the deployment of the fin is ensured by the aerodynamic flow exerted on the front end fin. The efficiency of such a system is reduced and the deployment symmetry is not guaranteed.
- a fin deployment device stabilization for a projectile comprising at least one pallet, made integral with a fin by means drive, and oriented to receive a flow aerodynamics when firing the projectile and transmitting thus an effort resulting in the fin in order to deploy it, device characterized in that it comprises at least two pallets separated by a groove in which is positioned the fin, the groove having a bottom on which the fin comes into support when it is in the folded position on along the projectile body, bottom which constitutes the means which is unlockable so as to separate the deployment device and the fin from a certain opening angle of the latter.
- the device will advantageously include a wall front closing the groove at a front part of the device and constituting an axial stop for the end fin.
- It may include at least two lateral support feet which are in contact with an external surface of the projectile and which are held by stop profiles carried by the projectile and arranged to prevent displacement of the device in a direction perpendicular to a lateral surface of the fin.
- the stabilizer fin deployment device is characterized in that it comprises at least one pallet secured to at least two lateral drive surfaces, each of these drive surfaces being intended for receive support from a different wing of the projectile when the latter are in the folded position along of the projectile body, lateral drive surfaces which constitute the means of training which is unlockable so as to separate the deployment device and the fin from a certain opening angle of the latter.
- This device may include a tab intended to come into abutment against a flange secured to the projectile and which constitutes an axial stop for the device.
- It may include at least one substantially wall perpendicular to each drive surface and constituting an axial stop for the end of the fin considered.
- Each lateral drive surface may include a zone for holding a first lateral surface of the fin.
- the device according to the invention may include a external guide surface with circular profile and the diameter is equal to that of a launch tube of the projectile.
- An advantage of the invention is that it makes it possible to avoid, to open a fin, the use of potential energy elastic stored in springs.
- Another advantage of the invention is that it allows exert maximum force at the start of the opening, when the resistant efforts are also the greatest.
- the invention also makes it possible to avoid any drag residual aerodynamics caused by the device. In releasing the fin early enough we also limit rebounds of the latter.
- Figure 1 shows schematically the rear part a projectile 1 intended to be fired by a launcher without known type of recoil (not shown).
- This rear part includes a flange 2 on which are arranged screeds 3 regularly distributed angularly. Each yoke receives a fin 4, mounted pivoting around an axis 5.
- the projectile thus represented therefore carries six fins 4 regularly distributed (see figure 2).
- the fins 4 are represented here in their position folded along the body of projectile 1, position which is theirs inside the launch tube.
- Each fin 4 carries at a front end 4a a deployment device 6 according to the invention (here a only device is shown for clarity of the figure).
- the device 6 comprises two pallets 7a and 7b for receiving the aerodynamic flow that appears when firing along of the body of the projectile between the front part (AV mark) and the rear part (AR mark).
- These pallets have substantially the shape of two planes inclined to the axis 8 of the projectile and perpendicular to the lateral surfaces 4b and 4c of the fin 4.
- the inclination of the pallets relative to axis 8 of the projectile is chosen such that aerodynamic flow has the effect of removing the device 6 from the body 1a of the projectile.
- the device according to the invention can only be used to deploy fins which in the rest position are folded along the body of the projectile, the free ends of the fins being oriented towards the front part of the projectile and the screeds being arranged at the rear thereof.
- FIGS 3a, 3b and 3c show in detail the deployment device 6.
- This device is made for example in material molded plastic (such as high density polyethylene or polyamide). The material thickness is substantially constant for the whole device.
- Pallets 7a and 7b are connected to side walls 8a and 8b which are end with lateral support feet 9a and 9b.
- the side walls 8a, 8b are flat and substantially parallel to the lateral surfaces 4b, 4c of the fin 4.
- the device after being placed on the projectile, is shaped so as to present opposite aerodynamic flow two channels 6a, 6b whose inlet openings (arranged towards the front part of the projectile) have a surface greater than the openings of outlet (oriented towards the rear part AR), this due the tilt of the pallet.
- the support feet 9a, 9b are intended to come into contact with the external surface of the projectile body 1a, they have therefore a cylindrical profile with a diameter equal to that of the body 1a of the projectile.
- the two pallets 7a and 7b are separated by a groove 10 in which the fin 4 is positioned.
- the groove 10 has a bottom 10a on which the fin comes into support when it is in the folded position on along the projectile body 1a.
- the groove 10 is closed by a front wall 11 at the level of a front part of the device 6.
- the end 4a of the fin is in axial abutment on the wall 11.
- the fin balances the inertia forces to which subject the pallet when firing.
- the width of the groove 10 will be chosen such that it there is no play when installing the device 6 on the fin.
- the feet 9a and 9b of the device are maintained laterally by stop profiles 12 carried by the projectile. These profiles 12 are arranged so as to prevent any movement of the device in a perpendicular direction to the lateral surfaces 4b, 4c of the fin 4.
- stop profiles 12 could also play the role of axial stop for the device, it would then suffice to provide a setback on each foot preventing any retreat of the device.
- Figure 2 shows in section along the plane AA of the figure 1 the projectile 1 placed in a tube of launch 13.
- the device 6 has an external guide surface 14 whose diameter is equal to that of the launch tube 13. The device thus improves the guidance of the projectile in the tube launch.
- the operation of the device is as follows.
- the fins are firmly held by the device throughout the course inside the launch tube.
- All fins are symmetrically open this mainly because, thanks to the device according to the invention, the force applied to the fin is of origin aerodynamic and it is maximum at the start of the opening.
- the symmetry is also favored by the absence of vibrations of the fin obtained thanks to the transverse setting provided by the stop profiles 12.
- the device according to the invention therefore makes it possible to avoid problems with known deployment springs whose mechanical characteristics are likely to deteriorate during storage of the projectile.
- the resulting aerodynamic forces as well as the centrifugal force which are exercised on the device 6 manage to overcome the friction between the fin and the groove 10 and entrain the separation of the device and the fin.
- the devices are automatically ejected and do not interfere with the flight of the projectile by causing aerodynamic braking.
- FIG. 4 thus shows by way of example a device in which the bottom 11 is set back relative to the inlet openings of channels 6a, 6b.
- Figure 5 shows schematically the rear part a projectile 1 equipped with a deployment device 15 according to a second embodiment of the invention which is for projectiles equipped with an even number of fins.
- This device includes a pallet 7 intended to receive the aerodynamic flow that appears when firing along of the body of the projectile between the front part (AV mark) and the rear part (AR mark).
- the inclination of the pallet relative to axis 8 of the projectile is still chosen such that the flow aerodynamics has the effect of removing the device 15 from the body of the projectile.
- FIGS 7a, 7b and 7c show in detail what deployment device.
- Pallet 7 is connected to side walls 8a and 8b which end with lateral support feet 9a and 9b.
- the walls side 8a, 8b are planar and substantially parallel to lateral surfaces 4b, 4c of the fin 4.
- the device after its installation on the projectile, is shaped so as to present, in view of the aerodynamic flow, a channel 15a whose the entry opening (arranged towards the front part of the projectile) has a surface larger than that of the opening outlet (oriented towards the rear rear part).
- the support feet 9a, 9b come into contact with the external surface of the projectile body 1a, they have a profile cylindrical with a diameter equal to that of this body.
- Each surface 16a, 16b therefore receives a different fin when the latter are in the folded position on along the body 1a of the projectile.
- the feet 9a, 9b also carry holding zones 17a, 17b which are each in contact with a surface lateral of the fin considered.
- Each fin is held laterally on one side by a holding zone 17 carried by one of the devices 15 and on the other by a stop profile 18 secured to a flange 19 also made of plastic and made secured to the projectile body, for example by bonding.
- the flanges are axially offset from the device, so that the flanges do not prevent the opening of the fin.
- the dimensions of the devices 15 and the flanges 19 will be chosen so that there is no play during the placement on the fin.
- Each device 15 finally comprises a rear tab 20 which is intended to come into abutment against a flange 21 of the projectile and which constitutes an axial stop for the device.
- the tab also makes it possible to locate, at the level of the rear flange and at equal distance from each fin, the pivot point of the device. Such a provision ensures symmetrical opening of the two fins by the device.
- the device 15 has an external guide surface 14 whose diameter is equal to that of the launch tube 13. The device thus improves the guidance of the projectile in the tube launch.
- the deployment device is still ejected at from a certain opening angle of the fins.
- An advantage of this embodiment is that it allows to eject the device very quickly which reduces its action to a simple initial impulse on the fins which end then their opening by inertia and by the effect of their clean trail.
- the rapid ejection of the device also presents the advantage of limiting the angular speed of the fin in limit switch which limits the rebounds of the fin and improves the stabilization of the projectile.
- the distance between the ends of two neighboring fins increases during opening.
- the fins are therefore quickly released from surfaces 16a, 16b and it is possible to determine precisely the instant of ejection of the device by playing on the dimensions of the drive surfaces 16a, 16b and especially on the length L (see Figures 6 and 7a).
- Another advantage of this embodiment is that it reduces the number of devices used for a projectile, therefore the cost of production.
- Such a device would include for example one or more fixed pallets to the side walls of each fin.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Toys (AREA)
- Pallets (AREA)
- Aiming, Guidance, Guns With A Light Source, Armor, Camouflage, And Targets (AREA)
- Iron Core Of Rotating Electric Machines (AREA)
Description
- la figure 1 représente partiellement la partie arrière d'un projectile équipé d'un dispositif de déploiement d'ailettes selon un premier mode de réalisation de l'invention,
- la figure 2 est une vue en coupe transversale de la partie arrière de ce projectile au niveau des dispositifs de déploiement d'ailettes, suivant le plan repéré AA sur la figure 1,
- les figures 3a, 3b et 3c représentent ce premier dispositif de déploiement d'ailettes suivant trois vues orthogonales,
- la figure 4 représente une variante de ce dispositif,
- la figure 5 représente partiellement la partie arrière d'un projectile équipé d'un dispositif de déploiement d'ailettes selon un deuxième mode de réalisation de l'invention,
- la figure 6 est une vue en coupe transversale de la partie arrière de ce projectile au niveau des dispositifs de déploiement d'ailettes, suivant le plan repéré BB sur la figure 5,
- les figures 7a, 7b et 7c représentent ce deuxième dispositif de déploiement d'ailettes suivant trois vues orthogonales.
Claims (8)
- Dispositif de déploiement d'ailette de stabilisation (4) pour un projectile (1) comportant au moins une palette, rendue solidaire d'une ailette (4) par des moyens d'entraínement, et orientée de façon à recevoir un écoulement aérodynamique lors du tir du projectile et à transmettre ainsi un effort résultant à l'ailette (4) afin de la déployer, dispositif caractérisé en ce qu'il comprend au moins deux palettes (7a,7b) séparées par une rainure (10) dans laquelle se positionne l'ailette (4), la rainure (10) comportant un fond (10a) sur lequel l'ailette (4) vient en appui lorsqu'elle se trouve en position repliée le long du corps de projectile (1), fond qui constitue le moyen d'entraínement qui est déverrouillable de façon à séparer le dispositif de déploiement et l'ailette à partir d'un certain angle d'ouverture de cette dernière.
- Dispositif selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce qu'il comporte une paroi frontale (11) fermant la rainure (10) au niveau d'une partie avant du dispositif et constituant une butée axiale pour l'extrémité de l'ailette (4).
- Dispositif selon une des revendications 1 ou 2, caractérisé en ce qu'il comporte au moins deux pieds d'appui latéraux (9a,9b) qui sont en contact avec une surface externe du projectile (1) et qui sont maintenus par des profils de butée (12) portés par le projectile et disposés de façon à empêcher tout déplacement du dispositif suivant une direction perpendiculaire à une surface latérale (4b,4c) de l'ailette (4).
- Dispositif de déploiement d'ailette de stabilisation (4) pour un projectile (1) comportant au moins une palette, rendue solidaire d'une ailette (4) par des moyens d'entraínement, et orientée de façon à recevoir un écoulement aérodynamique lors du tir du projectile et à transmettre ainsi un effort résultant à l'ailette (4) afin de la déployer, dispositif caractérisé en ce qu 'il comporte au moins une palette (7) solidaire d'au moins deux surfaces d'entraínement latérales (16a,16b), chacune de ces surfaces d'entraínement étant destinée à recevoir l'appui d'une ailette (4) différente du projectile (1) lorsque ces dernières se trouvent en position repliée le long du corps de projectile, surfaces d'entraínement latérales qui constituent le moyen d'entraínement qui est déverrouillable de façon à séparer le dispositif de déploiement et l'ailette à partir d'un certain angle d'ouverture de cette dernière.
- Dispositif selon la revendication 4, caractérisé en ce qu'il comporte une languette (20) destinée à venir en appui contre une collerette (21) solidaire du projectile (1) et qui constitue une butée axiale pour le dispositif.
- Dispositif selon la revendication 4, caractérisé en ce qu'il comporte au moins une paroi sensiblement perpendiculaire à chaque surface d'entraínement (16a,16b) et constituant une butée axiale pour l'extrémité de l'ailette (4) considérée.
- Dispositif selon une des revendications 4 à 6, caractérisé en ce que chaque surface d'entraínement latérale (16a,16b) comporte une zone de maintien (17a,17b) d'une première surface latérale de l'ailette (4).
- Dispositif selon une des revendications 1 à 7, caractérisé en ce qu'il comporte une surface de guidage externe (14) à profil circulaire et dont le diamètre est égal à celui d'un tube de lancement du projectile (1).
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
FR9407953 | 1994-06-28 | ||
FR9407953A FR2721702B1 (fr) | 1994-06-28 | 1994-06-28 | Dispositif de déploiement d'une ailette de projectile. |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP0690284A1 EP0690284A1 (fr) | 1996-01-03 |
EP0690284B1 true EP0690284B1 (fr) | 1999-09-15 |
Family
ID=9464743
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP95401557A Expired - Lifetime EP0690284B1 (fr) | 1994-06-28 | 1995-06-28 | Dispositif de déploiement d'une ailette de projectile |
Country Status (7)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US5685503A (fr) |
EP (1) | EP0690284B1 (fr) |
DE (1) | DE69512146T2 (fr) |
ES (1) | ES2138165T3 (fr) |
FR (1) | FR2721702B1 (fr) |
IL (1) | IL114383A (fr) |
ZA (1) | ZA955302B (fr) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP1947415A1 (fr) * | 2007-01-19 | 2008-07-23 | Diehl BGT Defence GmbH & Co.KG | Dispositif destiné au développement de surfaces de support |
Families Citing this family (17)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE19827278A1 (de) * | 1998-06-19 | 1999-12-23 | Diehl Stiftung & Co | Lenkbarer Flugkörper |
DE10118216A1 (de) * | 2001-04-12 | 2002-10-17 | Diehl Munitionssysteme Gmbh | Ruderblatt-Lagereinrichtung für ein Geschoß |
US6691948B1 (en) | 2003-04-10 | 2004-02-17 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | High torque rocket nozzle |
FR2864612B1 (fr) | 2003-12-24 | 2007-11-23 | Giat Ind Sa | Dispositif de deploiement des ailettes d'un projectile |
US7262394B2 (en) * | 2004-03-05 | 2007-08-28 | The Boeing Company | Mortar shell ring tail and associated method |
US7856929B2 (en) | 2007-06-29 | 2010-12-28 | Taser International, Inc. | Systems and methods for deploying an electrode using torsion |
US7984676B1 (en) | 2007-06-29 | 2011-07-26 | Taser International, Inc. | Systems and methods for a rear anchored projectile |
WO2009005540A1 (fr) * | 2007-06-29 | 2009-01-08 | Taser International, Inc. | Systèmes et procédés de projectile à stabilisateur à stabilisation gyroscopique |
FI120709B (fi) * | 2008-01-31 | 2010-01-29 | Patria Weapon Systems Oy | Tukielin kranaatin tukemiseksi ja menetelmä |
RU2462685C1 (ru) * | 2011-02-15 | 2012-09-27 | Николай Евгеньевич Староверов | Многоэлементный патрон староверова (варианты) |
US9212877B2 (en) * | 2012-07-05 | 2015-12-15 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army | Retention system for a deployable projectile fin |
RU2512041C1 (ru) * | 2012-11-13 | 2014-04-10 | Открытое акционерное общество "Конструкторское бюро приборостроения" | Стабилизатор снаряда |
RU2551299C1 (ru) * | 2014-06-26 | 2015-05-20 | Открытое акционерное общество "Конструкторское бюро приборостроения им. академика А.Г. Шипунова" | Способ испытаний артиллерийского снаряда |
FR3041744B1 (fr) * | 2015-09-29 | 2018-08-17 | Nexter Munitions | Projectile d'artillerie ayant une phase pilotee. |
RU2651671C1 (ru) * | 2017-01-17 | 2018-04-23 | Акционерное общество "Конструкторское бюро приборостроения им. академика А.Г. Шипунова" | Выстреливаемая из пусковой трубы ракета |
FR3071917B1 (fr) * | 2017-10-04 | 2021-11-19 | Nexter Munitions | Dispositif de blocage d'ailette et projectile comportant un tel dispositif |
US20230072799A1 (en) * | 2021-09-03 | 2023-03-09 | Raytheon Company | Control surface restraining system for tactical flight vehicles |
Family Cites Families (18)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2427217A (en) * | 1943-09-23 | 1947-09-09 | Harry J Lebherz | Rocket fin assembly |
US2666387A (en) * | 1949-12-07 | 1954-01-19 | United Aircraft Corp | Stabilizing fins for missiles |
NL106348C (fr) * | 1959-03-09 | |||
US3188957A (en) * | 1962-04-03 | 1965-06-15 | Aerojet General Co | Ring stabilizer |
FR2070389A5 (fr) * | 1969-12-03 | 1971-09-10 | Serat | |
CH552189A (de) * | 1972-05-10 | 1974-07-31 | Oerlikon Buehrle Ag | Treibspiegelgeschoss. |
DE2264338A1 (de) * | 1972-12-30 | 1974-07-04 | Dynamit Nobel Ag | Ausklappbares leitwerk, insbesondere fuer raketen |
FR2221707B1 (fr) * | 1973-03-14 | 1976-04-30 | France Etat | |
DE2721536A1 (de) * | 1977-05-13 | 1978-11-16 | Brunsch Kurt | Projektil mit leitflaechen |
US4143838A (en) * | 1977-08-22 | 1979-03-13 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Folding fin assembly detent |
US4158447A (en) * | 1977-11-29 | 1979-06-19 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Expanding stabilizing fin cup |
US4332360A (en) * | 1980-07-21 | 1982-06-01 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army | Automatically deployed shell fins |
IL66624A (en) * | 1982-02-10 | 1986-04-29 | Gen Dynamics Corp | Wing housing and cover release assembly for self-erecting wing of a structure such as missile |
DE3309533A1 (de) * | 1983-03-17 | 1984-09-20 | Diehl GmbH & Co, 8500 Nürnberg | Fluegelstabilisiertes geschoss mit treibkaefig |
IL72000A (en) * | 1984-06-04 | 1989-09-10 | Israel State | Projectile stabilization system |
US4667899A (en) * | 1984-11-28 | 1987-05-26 | General Dynamics, Pomona Division | Double swing wing self-erecting missile wing structure |
SE444612B (sv) * | 1984-12-13 | 1986-04-21 | Ffv Affersverket | Styrverk for utfellning av fenor hos projektil |
GB8815060D0 (en) * | 1988-06-24 | 1988-11-16 | British Aerospace | Fin assembly for projectile |
-
1994
- 1994-06-28 FR FR9407953A patent/FR2721702B1/fr not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
1995
- 1995-06-23 US US08/481,038 patent/US5685503A/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1995-06-27 ZA ZA955302A patent/ZA955302B/xx unknown
- 1995-06-28 EP EP95401557A patent/EP0690284B1/fr not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1995-06-28 ES ES95401557T patent/ES2138165T3/es not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1995-06-28 IL IL11438395A patent/IL114383A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1995-06-28 DE DE69512146T patent/DE69512146T2/de not_active Expired - Fee Related
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP1947415A1 (fr) * | 2007-01-19 | 2008-07-23 | Diehl BGT Defence GmbH & Co.KG | Dispositif destiné au développement de surfaces de support |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
ZA955302B (en) | 1996-12-23 |
FR2721702B1 (fr) | 1996-08-14 |
FR2721702A1 (fr) | 1995-12-29 |
EP0690284A1 (fr) | 1996-01-03 |
DE69512146T2 (de) | 2000-01-27 |
US5685503A (en) | 1997-11-11 |
IL114383A0 (en) | 1995-10-31 |
DE69512146D1 (de) | 1999-10-21 |
IL114383A (en) | 1998-12-06 |
ES2138165T3 (es) | 2000-01-01 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP0690284B1 (fr) | Dispositif de déploiement d'une ailette de projectile | |
EP0906556B1 (fr) | Projectile non letal | |
EP0723131B1 (fr) | Frein de bouche pour canons de moyen ou de gros calibre | |
FR2873802A1 (fr) | Systeme d'ejection de missile et boitier de lancement | |
EP0434505B1 (fr) | Enveloppe périphérique pour une munition guidée tirée par effet canon | |
FR2790079A1 (fr) | Projectile stabilise par un empennage et pouvant etre lance a partir d'un tube d'arme | |
FR2685468A1 (fr) | Tube douille pour grenade a fusil pouvant retenir les fragments de la balle. | |
EP0640204B1 (fr) | Munition de type telescopee | |
FR2860577A1 (fr) | Dispositif de deploiement d'une ailette d'un projectile | |
FR2758953A1 (fr) | Cupule porte raisin et etui de produit a levres la comportant | |
EP1376045B1 (fr) | Dispositif adaptateur pour projectile tiré à partir d'un tube de lancement | |
EP0594482B1 (fr) | Boîtier pour charge propulsive | |
FR2629908A1 (fr) | Dispositif de freinage aerodynamique d'un corps | |
EP0279715A1 (fr) | Arme à feu pour tirer des munitions sans douilles et munitions pour une telle arme | |
FR2874251A1 (fr) | Systeme de deploiement de plan aerodynamique | |
EP0653604B1 (fr) | Dispositif de déploiement pour une ailette de stabilisation de projectile de type roquette | |
EP0767356B1 (fr) | Perfectionnement apporté à un système de freinage aérodynamique d'une sous-munition éjectée d'un obus cargo en étant animée d'un mouvement de rotation | |
FR2884600A1 (fr) | Dispositif d'alimentation en munitions | |
BE530432A (fr) | ||
EP1693645A1 (fr) | Projectile d'artillerie comportant une ceinture | |
FR2780156A1 (fr) | Missile guide comportant des ailettes deployables montees dans des fentes de guidage | |
FR2695378A1 (fr) | Dispositif à sangle pour le maintien temporaire d'objets ensemble. | |
EP4105591A1 (fr) | Dispositif de mise à poste d'un projectile | |
FR2672673A1 (fr) | Dispositif d'amorcage pour un sous-projectile. | |
CH506770A (fr) | Projectile comprenant un empennage déployant |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): CH DE ES GB GR IT LI SE |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 19960219 |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 19971216 |
|
RIN1 | Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected) |
Inventor name: VERSTRAETE ALAIN Inventor name: TROUILLOT CHRISTIAN |
|
GRAG | Despatch of communication of intention to grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA |
|
GRAG | Despatch of communication of intention to grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA |
|
GRAH | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA |
|
GRAH | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): CH DE ES GB GR IT LI SE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRE;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.SCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 19990915 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 19990915 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 69512146 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 19991021 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2138165 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20000630 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20000630 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed | ||
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: IF02 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20030624 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20040629 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FD2A Effective date: 20040629 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Payment date: 20070528 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20070530 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20070530 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
EUG | Se: european patent has lapsed | ||
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20080628 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20090101 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20080628 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20080629 |