EP0335961A1 - Biodegradable herbicidal composition - Google Patents
Biodegradable herbicidal compositionInfo
- Publication number
- EP0335961A1 EP0335961A1 EP19880909664 EP88909664A EP0335961A1 EP 0335961 A1 EP0335961 A1 EP 0335961A1 EP 19880909664 EP19880909664 EP 19880909664 EP 88909664 A EP88909664 A EP 88909664A EP 0335961 A1 EP0335961 A1 EP 0335961A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- composition
- ammonium
- acid
- plants
- plant
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Withdrawn
Links
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01N—PRESERVATION OF BODIES OF HUMANS OR ANIMALS OR PLANTS OR PARTS THEREOF; BIOCIDES, e.g. AS DISINFECTANTS, AS PESTICIDES OR AS HERBICIDES; PEST REPELLANTS OR ATTRACTANTS; PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS
- A01N37/00—Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators containing organic compounds containing a carbon atom having three bonds to hetero atoms with at the most two bonds to halogen, e.g. carboxylic acids
- A01N37/02—Saturated carboxylic acids or thio analogues thereof; Derivatives thereof
Definitions
- This invention relates to compounds and methods for non-selectively retarding and controlling the growth rate of unwanted vegetation using a family of environmentally safe herbicidal compositions. More particularly, it relates to the use of certain fatty acids or their salts in admixture with an ammonium compound to induce an immediate topical burn followed by a tap root kill preventing regrowth of unwanted vegetation. As used herein, the words "retarding and controlling" refer to partial or complete killing of vegetation.
- Herbicides control the growth rate and/or cause mortality to flora through physiochemical interactions with plant systems. Many chemical classes of herbicides are presently available with varying modes of action, toxicities, chemical structures, and use patterns. Billions of dollars are spent annually to control vegetation pests which, due to importation or other causes, lack the natural enemies to keep their population in check, or which simply grow from seed in areas where they interfere with land use. Previously, inorganic compounds were used to control vegetation, but these have been superceded by effective petro-chemical products. Mass production of petro-chemical herbicides reduced the overall cost of vegetation control and facilitated widespread use.
- Ammonium compounds have been used as fertilizers. Generally, they are used in a form, such as the salt form, which releases the ammonium ion upon decomposition. When used in sufficiently high concentrations, these ammonimum compounds are injurious to plants.
- Ammonium sulfamate has been used as a translocatable herbicide, and is registered in the United States as a herbicide by E.I. Du Pont de Nemours under the tradename Ammate. Ammonium sulfamate has little immediate effect on foliage, but eventually is absorbed into the plant causing cell damage and finally death. However, it must be used in very high concentrations to be effective.
- compositions which are environmentally safe, biogradable, effective, and cost efficient
- the invention comprises a family of compositions which may be applied to retard and control the growth of unwanted vegetation, and a method of using such compositions.
- the compositions comprise one or more substances taken from the family of organic fatty acids, preferably straight-chained alpha monocarboxylic acids comprising 6 to 18 carbon atoms inclusive, and/or salts of the aforementioned acids, in combination with one or more ammonium compounds, preferably ammonium nitrate, ammonium sulfate or ammonium sulfamate. It has been discovered that mixtures of these two groups of compounds can cause a synergistically. enhanced plant mortality. That is, the components when mixed cooperate to give a significantly higher kill rate than the sum of the kill rates of the individual components in a broad range of ratios and on a broad range of plant species.
- the fatty acids and inorganic ammonium compounds employed in these compositions are essentially non-toxic to vertebrates and are biodegradable. Of the hundreds of fatty acids found in nature, only a few possess herbicidal properties. These are found on human skin, in seeds, and as part of the total lipid composition of many organisms. Mammals metabolize and/or excrete these fatty acids, and many micro-organisms can utilize them as a source of carbon.
- One important embodiment of the present invention comprises a herbicidally active composition consisting essentially of a 50:50 mixture of ammonium nonanoate and ammonium decanoate at a concentration of between 0.01% and 0.50%, admixed with a water soluble inorganic ammonium compound, preferably ammonium sulfamate, at a concentration between 0.50% and 5.00%.
- a water soluble inorganic ammonium compound preferably ammonium sulfamate
- Species of this combination results in a synergistically enhanced kill against vegetation including relatively hardy species such as Phaseolus vul ⁇ aris (green bush plant) , Hvpocheris radicata (false dandelion), Tropaelum maius (nasturtiums) and Zea mays (corn) .
- the herbicidal mixtures are applied to the leaves or soil to retard plant growth, preferably in amounts sufficient to kill the plant.
- Other objects are to provide a method for nonselectively controlling unwanted vegetation by applying compounds composed of medium chain fatty acids and/or their salts and inorganic ammoniated compounds to provide a class of herbicides which are environmentally safe, and to provide a class of non-selective herbicides utilizing commercially available, relatively inexpensive constituents.
- Fatty acids and their salts containing eight to twelve carbon atoms cause easily observed topical burn to plants when applied at concentrations of about 0.5% by weight or higher. However, these compounds do not translocate within the plant and can fail to kill the root, particularly when applied to tap root plants such as dandelions. Ammonium compounds, on the other hand, can translocate and kill tap roots, but have little immediate effect on foliage. It has been discovered that mixtures of the active fatty acids or salts with the ammoniated compounds provide a unique coaction, yielding higher kill rates and a surer kill, on a wide variety of plant types, particularly annuals and small perennials. The combination in ingredients provides a rapid topical kill as well as a delayed tap root kill, providing a far superior herbicide as compared with either compound alone. Mixtures of these two types of compounds when applied to roots or foliage can provide greater mortality effects than the sum of the effects of the individual components.
- acids posessing nine or ten carbon atoms have been observed to perform best. They are particularly advantageous because they are relatively inexpensive and readily available. Acids having eight, eleven, and twelve carbon atoms are almost as effective as the acids having nine or ten carbon atoms. Fatty acids having a carbon number smaller than eight, e.g., six or seven, and larger than 12, e.g., 13 to 18, are usable although less effective. Mixtures of the acids in this group also perform well as components in the composition of the invention. These fatty acids may be in the pre-acid form or in herbicidally acceptable salt forms. These salts can include, for example, ammonium, alkali metal, or alkali earth metal salts. Alkali metal salts such as the sodium or potassium salt and ammonium salts are preferred. The acids are available commercially.- They may be neutralized with bases of various types. The acids used in the experiments below were obtained from Emery Company.
- the preferred ammonium compounds are inorganic ammonium compound which, when applied at appropriate concentrations, causes damage to plants.
- Preferred among ammonium compounds are herbicidally active inorganic, water-soluble ammonium salts.
- Ammonium sulfamate is currently most preferred because it is the strongest herbicide among the ammonium compounds.
- Ammonium sulfate and ammonium nitrate are also preferred.
- Other ammonium compounds which may be used include ammonium chloride, ammonium carbonate and ammonium acetate. Others will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art.
- the ratio of the fatty acid or its salt to the ammonium compound may vary widely, depending upon a variety of factors, such as the identity of the fatty acid or its salt, the identity of the ammonium compound, the composition formed, the target weed, and whether the composition is intended as a concentrate or is to be applied as is.
- the ratio of acid compound to ammonium compound is between 0.001 and 10, preferably between 0.01 and 1.0, more preferably between 0.02 and 1.0.
- the amount of the essential components in the composition may also vary. Normally the total amount is at least 0.1% by weight.
- the total amount of the ammonium compound and the fatty acid or its salt is at least 0.5% by weight, more preferably at least about 1% by weight.
- the essential active ingredients have very strong herbicidal activity, and accordingly, the total amount of active ingredients used is relatively high compared with petrochemical herbicides. However, both components are environmentally safe and inexpensive.
- the upper limit of the amount of activity in the composition may be determined by taking various factors into account, including whether the composition is intended as a concentrate or a ready-to-use product, what carrier or diluent is to be used, solubility considerations, and the composition's intended mode of application.
- compositions embodying the invention may be applied in various ways, including topically as a spray to foliage as a post-emergence herbicide, and also as a pre-ernergence herbicide if formulated appropriately, for example, sorbed in powder or granules.
- a post-emergence herbicide When applied as a post-emergence herbicide, an aqueous solution or emulsion form is best for a ready-to-use formulation. Seedling weeds are the easiest to control, as is typical of most herbicidal compositions. Many annuals may be controlled with a single application. Established weeds with large tap roots may require additional treatments.
- Compositions of the invention typically are water based, and may include ingredients in addition to the two or more active components noted above such as stabilizers and solubility enhancing materials.
- False dandelion (Hypochoeris radicate) , crab grass (Aqropyron repens) and yellow foxtail (Setaria ⁇ lauca) were tested in the following experiments as model target weeds.
- EXAMPLE 1 80 green bush plants, Phaseolus vul ⁇ aris. were randomly selected and labelled into 16 treatments with 5 replicates per treatment. The beans were grown in 5.5 cm pots with standard greenhouse soil mix. Plants were healthy and averaged 20.0 cm in height.
- Treatment solutions were prepared from original chemicals.
- the compositions consisted of ammonium nitrate (AN) at 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0% alone and in combination with a 50:50 mixture of ammonium nonanoate and ammonium decanoate (HS) applied at 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0%.
- AN ammonium nitrate
- HS ammonium decanoate
- the procedure for the preparation of 100 grams of the test herbicides is: a. Weigh appropriate quantity of fatty acid or mixture into beaker. b. Into another beaker weigh 90.00 gram deionized H_0. c. Add appropriate amount of ammonium salt to water. d. Stir water and ammonium salt and slowly add fatty acid or acid mixture. e. While stirring, add ammonium hydroxide (or other base) dropwise until solution clears. f. Add deionized H-0 until weight equals 100 grams.
- the pH of the resulting solution typically is slightly alkaline.
- the pH of the C9/C10-ammonium nitrate mixtures used in this example was about 8.0.
- Treatment involved application of a thin coating of the test solutions by paintbrush to the large true leaves of the beans. Assessment was performed 8 days later by visually rating damage of foliar area using a pretransformed angular scale (0-10) where integers represent 0, 2.5, 10, 21, 35, 50, 65, 79, 90, 97.5, and 100% foliar damage.
- the Table below summarizes the compositions of the test solutions. Table 1:
- Ammonium nitrate (AN) at 1.0% in combination with the fatty acid salts (HS) at 1.0% (44.0% damage) produced an observed treatment effect of 100.0% damage, significantly greater than the expected additive treatment effect of 46.0%.
- ammonium nitrate at 2.0% (37.0% damage) in combination with HS at 1.0% (44.0% damage) produced the observed treatment effect of 100.0%, significantly greater than the expected additive treatment effect of 81.0%.
- the compounds act synergistically in efficacy in their kill of bush beans (Phaseolus vul ⁇ aris) .
- plants 160 false dandelion, Hypocheris radicata. plants were watered, selected and arranged into 20 treatments (8 replicates per treatment). Plants were of the same age and as uniform in growth development as possible (8-14 true leaves). Seedlings were grown in 3.5 centimeter diameter plastic vials with standard greenhouse soil mix. Plants were healthy, actively growing, and randomly placed into treatments.
- Treatment solutions were prepared from original components in this and all subsequent examples disclosed herein using the procedure disclosed in Example 1, and 500 ml of each were bottled and labelled.
- the compositions consisted of ammonium sulfamate (AMS) applied at 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0%, alone, and in combination with a 50:50 mixture of ammonium nonanoate and ammonium decanoate (HS) at 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, and 0.25%.
- AMS ammonium sulfamate
- HS ammonium nonanoate
- HS ammonium decanoate
- Assessment was performed three days from treatment.
- the pretransformed angular scale (0-10) as disclosed in Example 1 was used for visual damage assessment. The various mixtures used are set forth below.
- Example 3 120 Tropaeolum maius plants (nasturtiums) were watered, selected, and arranged into 20 treatments (6 replicates per treatment), and tested as set forth in Example 2. The compositions of the test mixtures are set forth in Table 5.
- plants were watered, selected and arranged into 20 treatments (8 replicates per treatment) . Plants were of the same age and as uniform in growth development as possible. Seedlings were grown in 3.5 centimeter diameter vials with standard greenhouse soil mix. Plants were healthy, actively growing, averaging 18.0 centimeters in height, and were randomly placed into treatments.
- compositions consisted of ammonium sulfamate (AMS) applied at 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0%, alone and in combination with HS at 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, and 0.25%.
- AMS ammonium sulfamate
- the compositions were applied by hand-held trigger sprayer to run off, and the treated plants remained under artificial light fox assessment. Assessment was performed fi-ve days after treatment using the pretransformed angular -scale. The test mixtures are set forth -below.
- Phaseolus vul ⁇ aris bean plants were watered, selected and arranged into 12 treatments (8 replicates per treatment) . Plants were of the same age and as uniform in growth development as possible. Seedlings were grown in 5.5 centimeter square pots with standard greenhouse soil mix. Plants were healthy, actively growing, averaging 24.0 centimeters in height, and randomly placed into treatment.
- compositions consisted of AMS applied at 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0%, alone and in combination with HS at 0.25%.
- the compositions were applied by hand-held trigger sprayer to run off, and the plants remained under artificial light for assessment. Assessment was performed four days from treatment using the pretransformed angular scale.
- 112 crab grass, Di ⁇ itaria san ⁇ uinalis plants were watered, selected and arranged into 16 treatments (7 replicates per treatment) . Plants were of the same age and as uniform in growth development as possible. Seedlings were grown in 3.5 centimeter diameter vials with standard greenhouse soil mix. Plants were healthy, actively growing averaging 15.0 centimeters in height, and were randomly placed into treatment.
- compositions consisted of AMS applied at 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0%, alone and in combination with HS at 0.01, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.25%.
- the compositions were applied by hand-held trigger sprayer to run off, and the plants were left under artificial lights for assessment. Assessment was performed five days from treatment using the pretransformed angular scale. Test compositions are noted below.
- compositions consisted of ammonium sulphate (AS) at 1.0, 3.0 and 5.0%, alone and in combination with HS applied at 0.10 and 0.20% active ingredient.
- AS ammonium sulphate
- compositions consisted of AS at 1.0, 3.0 and 5.0%, alone and in combination with HS applied at 0.10 and 0.20% active ingredient.
- the compositions were applied by hand-held trigger sprayer to run off. Assessment was performed two days later using the pretransformed angular scale.
- Example 9 120 yellow foxtail Setaria ⁇ lauca. plants were randomly selected and labelled into twelve treatments with 10 replicates per treatment. Foxtails were grown in 3.5 cm diameter vials with standard greenhouse soil mix. Plants were healthy, actively growing and averaged 14.0 cm in height. The compositions consisted of AS at 1.0, 3.0, and 5.0% alone and in combination with HS applied at 0.10% and 0.20%, active ingredient The compositions were applied by hand-held trigger sprayer to run off. Assessment was performed seven days later using the pretransformed angular scale.
Landscapes
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Agronomy & Crop Science (AREA)
- Pest Control & Pesticides (AREA)
- Plant Pathology (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Dentistry (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
- Zoology (AREA)
- Environmental Sciences (AREA)
- Agricultural Chemicals And Associated Chemicals (AREA)
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10947387A | 1987-10-16 | 1987-10-16 | |
US109473 | 1987-10-16 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP0335961A1 true EP0335961A1 (en) | 1989-10-11 |
Family
ID=22327833
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP19880909664 Withdrawn EP0335961A1 (en) | 1987-10-16 | 1988-10-14 | Biodegradable herbicidal composition |
Country Status (7)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP0335961A1 (ja) |
JP (1) | JPH03505722A (ja) |
AR (1) | AR244499A1 (ja) |
AU (1) | AU605651B2 (ja) |
BR (1) | BR8807258A (ja) |
NZ (1) | NZ226600A (ja) |
WO (1) | WO1989003178A1 (ja) |
Families Citing this family (20)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4975110A (en) * | 1989-10-13 | 1990-12-04 | Safer, Inc. | Fatty acid based herbicidal compositions |
US5035741A (en) * | 1989-10-13 | 1991-07-30 | Safer, Inc. | Fatty acid based emulsifiable concentrate having herbicidal activity |
JP2588350B2 (ja) * | 1990-11-02 | 1997-03-05 | セイファ インコーポレイテッド | 改良型脂肪酸系除草剤組成物 |
US6930075B1 (en) * | 1990-11-02 | 2005-08-16 | Monsanto Technology, Llc | Fatty acid-based herbicidal composition |
US5196044A (en) * | 1991-01-08 | 1993-03-23 | Mycogen Corporation | Process and composition for controlling weeds |
US5703011A (en) * | 1991-01-08 | 1997-12-30 | Mycogen Corporation | Process and composition for controlling weeds |
WO1992011764A1 (en) | 1991-01-08 | 1992-07-23 | Monsanto Company | Improved herbicidal formulation |
CA2124090C (en) * | 1991-11-22 | 1999-04-20 | Steven L. Evans | Novel herbicidally-active fatty acid salts |
CA2105763A1 (en) * | 1992-01-10 | 1993-07-11 | Frederick S. Sedun | Tree wound coating composition |
NZ242249A (en) * | 1992-04-06 | 1995-02-24 | Robert Vincent Thompson | Herbicidal method and composition; fat or wax dispersed in oil blocks transport of liquid in plant stem when applied thereto |
EP0577914A1 (en) * | 1992-07-08 | 1994-01-12 | Monsanto Europe S.A./N.V. | Improved glyphosate compositions and their use |
US5700759A (en) * | 1995-06-07 | 1997-12-23 | Mycogen Corporation | Process and composition for controlling weeds comprising a C7 -C20 |
US5919733A (en) * | 1997-04-04 | 1999-07-06 | W. Neudorff Gmbh Kg | Non-staining herbicidal soap |
US6383985B1 (en) * | 2000-01-10 | 2002-05-07 | Eco-Care Technologies, Inc. | Herbicidal fatty acid and maleic hydrazide salt compositions |
US6503869B1 (en) * | 2000-08-21 | 2003-01-07 | Falcon Lab Llc | Enhanced post-emergent herbicidal compositions containing ammonium salts and methods of using the same |
NZ553629A (en) * | 2004-09-17 | 2010-12-24 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Glyphosate formulations with early burndown symptoms |
CA2768802C (en) * | 2009-07-21 | 2018-05-15 | Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc. | Use of sarmentine and its analogs for controlling plant pests |
BR112016000141B1 (pt) * | 2013-07-12 | 2020-12-08 | Bayer Cropscience Aktiengesellschaft | combinações de herbicida compreendendo ácido pelargônico e inibidores als específicos, método para controlar ervas daninhas compreendendo aplicar as combinações de herbicida e uso das referidas combinações |
FR3093402B1 (fr) * | 2019-03-05 | 2021-05-07 | Filab | Utilisation comme régulateur de croissance végétale et/ou herbicide |
CN111406748A (zh) * | 2020-04-29 | 2020-07-14 | 上海万力华生物科技有限公司 | 一种含植物源壬酸的除草剂及其制备方法和应用 |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2277744A (en) * | 1940-08-15 | 1942-03-31 | Du Pont | Pest control |
US3619168A (en) * | 1967-07-24 | 1971-11-09 | Emery Industries Inc | Method for killing undesirable plant growth |
GB1243987A (en) * | 1967-12-01 | 1971-08-25 | Exxon Research Engineering Co | Carboxylic acids and derivatives thereof as broad base, post emergence herbicides |
US4225621A (en) * | 1977-11-09 | 1980-09-30 | Ralston Purina Company | Feed intake limiting composition for cattle containing a saturated fatty acid |
-
1988
- 1988-10-14 EP EP19880909664 patent/EP0335961A1/en not_active Withdrawn
- 1988-10-14 AU AU26252/88A patent/AU605651B2/en not_active Ceased
- 1988-10-14 JP JP50894888A patent/JPH03505722A/ja active Pending
- 1988-10-14 WO PCT/US1988/003582 patent/WO1989003178A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 1988-10-14 BR BR888807258A patent/BR8807258A/pt unknown
- 1988-10-17 AR AR31221988A patent/AR244499A1/es active
- 1988-10-17 NZ NZ22660088A patent/NZ226600A/xx unknown
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See references of WO8903178A1 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO1989003178A1 (en) | 1989-04-20 |
BR8807258A (pt) | 1989-10-31 |
NZ226600A (en) | 1989-12-21 |
JPH03505722A (ja) | 1991-12-12 |
AR244499A1 (es) | 1993-11-30 |
AU2625288A (en) | 1989-05-02 |
AU605651B2 (en) | 1991-01-17 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP0335961A1 (en) | Biodegradable herbicidal composition | |
AU656744B2 (en) | Novel process and compositions for controlling weeds | |
Turner et al. | Effect of ammonium sulphate and other additives upon the phytotoxicity of glyphosate to Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv | |
DE69908313T2 (de) | Mischungen zur unkrautbekampfung in glyphosat-tolerante sojabohnen | |
US5703011A (en) | Process and composition for controlling weeds | |
JPS5839127B2 (ja) | 除草剤組成物 | |
KR20100119897A (ko) | 제초 방법 | |
WO2024066031A1 (zh) | 一种2甲4氯钠盐和杀虫双的除草杀虫组合物 | |
US5597778A (en) | Herbicidal compositions containing DMSO | |
GB2259912A (en) | Plant growth stimulator | |
JPS59484B2 (ja) | 除草剤組成物 | |
GB2024016A (en) | Degradation of pesticide residues | |
US6387850B1 (en) | Pesticide composition and method | |
US4020182A (en) | Pesticidal formaldehyde concentrate | |
WO1999063827A1 (fr) | Agents permettant de lutter contre les dommages causes par des maladies bacteriennes dans les domaines de l'agriculture et de l'horticulture | |
NO151026B (no) | Insekticid og akaricid blanding inneholdende gelatin, og anvendelse av blandingen til aa bekjempe insekter og midd | |
Albrigo | Methods for evaluation of spray chemical phytotoxicity to citrus | |
WO2000053018A1 (en) | Herbicidal composition | |
US20040121026A1 (en) | Non-toxic composition for the control of epiphytic weeds | |
JP2024532323A (ja) | 農業用の除草活性を有する組み合わせ | |
JPS58109403A (ja) | 微小害虫の防除方法 | |
US3515535A (en) | Herbicidal composition | |
JP2549142B2 (ja) | 除草剤組成物 | |
JP2024532324A (ja) | バイオベースの除草剤増強剤およびその使用方法 | |
CA2296940C (en) | Process and composition for controlling weeds |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE FR GB IT LI LU NL SE |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 19890929 |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 19910506 |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: SAFER, INC. |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN |
|
18D | Application deemed to be withdrawn |
Effective date: 19921112 |