WO2022225549A1 - Systems and methods for improved metrology for semiconductor device wafers - Google Patents

Systems and methods for improved metrology for semiconductor device wafers Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2022225549A1
WO2022225549A1 PCT/US2021/053051 US2021053051W WO2022225549A1 WO 2022225549 A1 WO2022225549 A1 WO 2022225549A1 US 2021053051 W US2021053051 W US 2021053051W WO 2022225549 A1 WO2022225549 A1 WO 2022225549A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
measurement
orientation
sdw
msss
fms
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/US2021/053051
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Inventor
Liran YERUSHALMI
Daria Negri
Ohad Bachar
Yossi Simon
Amnon Manassen
Nir BEN DAVID
Yoram Uziel
Etay LAVERT
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
KLA Corp
Original Assignee
KLA Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by KLA Corp filed Critical KLA Corp
Priority to CN202180094001.5A priority Critical patent/CN116868069B/zh
Priority to JP2023555675A priority patent/JP7580627B2/ja
Priority to KR1020237032686A priority patent/KR102901219B1/ko
Publication of WO2022225549A1 publication Critical patent/WO2022225549A1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H10SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; ELECTRIC SOLID-STATE DEVICES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • H10PGENERIC PROCESSES OR APPARATUS FOR THE MANUFACTURE OR TREATMENT OF DEVICES COVERED BY CLASS H10
    • H10P74/00Testing or measuring during manufacture or treatment of wafers, substrates or devices
    • H10P74/20Testing or measuring during manufacture or treatment of wafers, substrates or devices characterised by the properties tested or measured, e.g. structural or electrical properties
    • H10P74/203Structural properties, e.g. testing or measuring thicknesses, line widths, warpage, bond strengths or physical defects
    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05BCONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B19/00Program-control systems
    • G05B19/02Program-control systems electric
    • G05B19/418Total factory control, i.e. centrally controlling a plurality of machines, e.g. direct or distributed numerical control [DNC], flexible manufacturing systems [FMS], integrated manufacturing systems [IMS] or computer integrated manufacturing [CIM]
    • G05B19/41875Total factory control, i.e. centrally controlling a plurality of machines, e.g. direct or distributed numerical control [DNC], flexible manufacturing systems [FMS], integrated manufacturing systems [IMS] or computer integrated manufacturing [CIM] characterised by quality surveillance of production
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H10SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; ELECTRIC SOLID-STATE DEVICES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • H10PGENERIC PROCESSES OR APPARATUS FOR THE MANUFACTURE OR TREATMENT OF DEVICES COVERED BY CLASS H10
    • H10P74/00Testing or measuring during manufacture or treatment of wafers, substrates or devices
    • H10P74/27Structural arrangements therefor
    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05BCONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B2219/00Program-control systems
    • G05B2219/30Nc systems
    • G05B2219/45Nc applications
    • G05B2219/45031Manufacturing semiconductor wafers

Definitions

  • the present disclosure relates to measurement of quality metrics in the manufacture of semiconductor devices generally.
  • the present disclosure seeks to provide improved methods and systems for measurement of quality metrics in the manufacture of semiconductor devices.
  • FMQPD measurement-orientation quality parameter dataset
  • SMQPD tool-induced-shift
  • the first measurement orientation and the second measurement orientation each include a rotational orientation within a plane generally parallel to an upper surface of the SDW.
  • the first measurement orientation can be embodied as a rotational orientation of 0° within a plane generally parallel to an upper surface of the SDW
  • the second measurement orientation is embodied as a rotational orientation of 180° within the plane generally parallel to the upper surface of the SDW.
  • the quality parameter is a misregistration between at least a first layer formed on the SDW and a second layer formed on the SDW. Additionally or alternatively, the quality parameter is a dimension of at least one of the features. Additionally or alternatively, the quality parameter is a dimension of at least one space between the features.
  • each of the at least one TAQPV is associated with one of the FMSs or SMSs.
  • each of the at least one TAQPV is associated with one of the MSSs.
  • each of the at least one TAQPV is associated with a group of the MSS s.
  • the TAQPV is used to adjust at least one parameter of the fabrication of the SDW.
  • the features can be formed within each the FMS of the at least one of the
  • MSSs are intended to be identical to the features formed within each the SMS of the at least one of the MSSs.
  • the features formed within the FMS include a misregistration target and the features formed within the SMS include a misregistration target. Additionally or alternatively, in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure, the features formed within the FMS include functional semiconductor devices and the features formed within the SMS include functional semiconductor devices.
  • the generating of the at least one TAQPV can include fitting the FMQPD and the SMQPD to a model.
  • a system for generating a quality parameter value of a semiconductor device wafer including a measurement site set designator (MSSD), operative to designate a plurality of measurement site sets (MSSs) on the SDW, each of the MSSs including a first measurement-orientation site (FMS), and a second-orientation measurement site (SMS), the FMS and the SMS being different measurement sites on the SDW, a metrology tool, operative to measure features formed within each the FMSs of each of the MSSs in a first measurement orientation, thereby generating a first measurement-orientation quality parameter dataset (FMQPD), and measure features formed within each the SMSs of each of the MSSs in a second measurement orientation, thereby generating a second measurement- orientation quality parameter dataset (SMQPD), and a quality parameter analyzer, operative to generate at least one tool-induced-shift (TlS)-ameliorated quality parameter value (TAQPV
  • Fig. 1 is a simplified schematic diagram of an embodiment of a metrology system of the present disclosure
  • Fig. 2 is a simplified schematic diagram showing an exemplary use case of the metrology system of Fig. 1;
  • FIGS. 3 A & 3B are together a simplified flowchart illustrating an embodiment of a method for use with the system of Figs. 1 & 2;
  • Fig. 4A is a simplified plot illustrating a prior art method of generating a TIS- adjusted quality parameter value
  • Fig. 4B is simplified plot illustrating a portion of the method of Figs. 3 A &
  • the system and method described hereinbelow with reference to Figs. 1 - 3B can be used to measure semiconductor devices and generate quality metrics therefor, such as indications of misregistration between different layers of semiconductor devices, and are part of a manufacturing process for semiconductor devices.
  • the quality metrics generated by the system and method described hereinbelow with reference to Figs. 1 - 3B can be used to adjust fabrication processes, such as lithography, during the manufacturing of semiconductor devices, to ameliorate the semiconductor devices being fabricated, for example, to ameliorate misregistration between various layers of semiconductor devices.
  • misregistration between structures formed on the semiconductor device wafer are typically measured multiple times throughout a fabrication process of the semiconductor devices.
  • Signals used to calculate misregistration values typically include both desired data, which accurately represents misregistration, and noise, such as tool-induced-shift (TIS) error, particularly TIS error that is due to poor tel ecentri city associated with the measurement or to irregularities, such as asymmetry, of features being measured.
  • TIS tool-induced-shift
  • TIS error In order to improve the quality and utility of the metrology measurements, a portion of the misregistration signal which is due to TIS error can be identified and removed.
  • Conventional systems typically identify TIS error at a multiplicity of measurement sites by measuring each site twice, with a first measurement being taken while the measurement site is at a first rotational orientation within an x-y plane, the x-y plane being generally parallel to an upper surface of the semiconductor device wafer, and the second measurement being taken while the measurement site is at a second rotational orientation within the x-y plane.
  • each site may be measured a first time while the site has a rotational orientation in an x-y plane of 0°, and then each site may be measured a second time while the site has a rotational orientation in an x-y plane of 180°.
  • a difference between the two measurements at two different rotational orientations is taken to be the TIS error, and is removed from the misregistration value reported for that site.
  • Fig. 1 is a simplified schematic diagram of an embodiment of a metrology system 100 of the present disclosure
  • Fig. 2 is a simplified schematic diagram showing an exemplary use case of metrology system 100. It is appreciated that, for ease of understanding, Figs. 1 & 2 are not drawn to scale.
  • system 100 can include a measurement site set designator (MSSD) 110, a metrology tool 120 and a quality parameter analyzer
  • MSSD 110 and QPA 130 typically include a programmable processor, which is programmed in software and/or firmware to carry out the functions that are described herein, along with suitable digital and/or analog interfaces for connection to the other elements of system 100.
  • MSSD 110 or QPA 130 typically include a programmable processor, which is programmed in software and/or firmware to carry out the functions that are described herein, along with suitable digital and/or analog interfaces for connection to the other elements of system 100.
  • MSSD 110 or QPA 130 typically include a programmable processor, which is programmed in software and/or firmware to carry out the functions that are described herein, along with suitable digital and/or analog interfaces for connection to the other elements of system 100.
  • MSSD 110 or QPA 130 typically include a programmable processor, which is programmed in software and/or firmware to carry out the functions that are described herein, along with suitable digital and/or analog interfaces for connection to the other elements of system 100.
  • MSSD 110 or QPA 130 typically include a programmable processor, which is
  • MSSD 110 and QPA 130 can include hard-wired and/or programmable hardware logic circuits, which carry out at least some of the functions of the MSSD 110 or QPA 130.
  • MSSD 110 and QPA 130 are shown in Fig. 1, for the sake of simplicity, as monolithic functional blocks, in practice these may comprise a single unit or additional interconnected control units, with suitable interfaces for receiving and outputting the signals that are illustrated in the figures and described in the text.
  • Program code or instructions for the MSSD 110 and QPA 130 to implement various methods and functions disclosed herein may be stored in readable storage media, such as a memory.
  • Metrology tool 120 may be any suitable metrology tool, including, inter alia, an imaging-based misregistration metrology tool, a scatterometry-based misregistration metrology tool, a critical dimension metrology tool, a shape metrology tool, a film metrology tool, an electron-beam metrology tool and an X-ray imaging tool, such as a layer-to-layer x-ray metrology tool.
  • Exemplary metrology tools suitable for use as metrology tool 120 include, inter alia, an ArcherTM 750, an ATLTM 100, a SpectraShapeTM Ilk, a SpectraFilmTM FI and an eDR7380TM all of which are commercially available from KLA Corporation of Milpitas, CA, USA.
  • An additional exemplary metrology tool suitable for use as metrology tool 120 is an x- ray tool similar to the x-ray tool described in U.S. Patent No. 9,778,213.
  • Metrology tool 120 can be operative to measure a quality metric of a sample, which can be embodied as a semiconductor device wafer (SDW) 150, such as a misregistration between at least two layers formed on SDW, a dimension of one or more features 152 formed on SDW 150 or a dimension of one or more spaces 154 between features 152 formed on SDW 150.
  • SDW semiconductor device wafer
  • SDW 150 is typically generally disc-like in shape, and can include a positioning feature 156, such as a notch or a flattened portion. Positioning feature 156 is useful in identifying a rotational orientation of SDW 150 within a plane generally parallel to an upper surface 158 of SDW 150.
  • MSSD 110 can designate a plurality of measurement site sets (MSSs) 160 on SDW 150, each MSS 160 including a first measurement-orientation site (FMS) 162, and a second measurement-orientation site (SMS) 164. It is appreciated that FMS 162 and SMS 164 are different measurement sites on SDW 150, and thus measurements of each of FMS 162 and SMS 164 measure different ones of features 152. In some embodiments of the present disclosure (not shown), each MSS 160 includes at least one additional measurement-orientation site. It is appreciated that FMS 162 and SMS 164 of a single MSS 160 can be adjacent to one another, but need not be.
  • each FMS 162 and SMS 164 on SDW 150 may have any suitable shape and dimension.
  • SDW 150 may have any suitable number of MSSs 160 having any suitable distribution thereupon.
  • at least some of features 152 within FMS 162 and SMS 164 of each MSS 160 are intended to be identical or nearly identical to features within FMS 162 and SMS 164 of other MSSs 160.
  • at least some of features 152 within FMS 162 and SMS 164 of each MSS 160 intentionally differ from features 152 within FMS 162 and SMS 164 of other MSSs 160.
  • features 152 within FMS 162 of a particular MSS 160 may be intended to be identical or nearly identical to features 152 within SMS 164 of that particular MSS 160.
  • features 152 within FMS 162 of a particular MSS 160 may be intended to be identical or nearly identical to features 152 within each additional measurement-orientation site of that particular MSS 160.
  • features 152 in FMS 162 and SMS 164 may be formed with a single layer formed on SDW 150 or with multiple layers formed on SDW 150.
  • each FMS 162 and SMS 164 includes both features 152 formed together with a first layer 166 formed on SDW 150 and features 152 formed together with a second layer 168 formed on SDW 150.
  • Features on semiconductor device wafers are typically characterized by a smallest dimension thereof in an x-y plane, as indicated by x- and y-axes, such as dimensions Di and D2 of features 152 indicated in Fig. 2.
  • spaces between features on semiconductor device wafers are typically characterized by a smallest dimension thereof in the x-y plane, such as dimensions D3, D4 and D5 of spaces 154 indicated in Fig. 2.
  • FMS 162 and SMS 164 are shown in Fig. 2 as each including an advanced imaging metrology (AIM) target.
  • AIM advanced imaging metrology
  • features 152 within each of FMS 162 and SMS 164 may form any suitable misregistration target, such as, inter alia, a box-in-box target, such as a target similar to targets described in U.S. Patent No. 7,804,994; an AIM in-die (AIMid) target, such as a target similar to targets described in U.S. Patent No. 10,527,951; a blossom or micro-blossom target, such as a target similar to targets described in C. P. Austage, J. Momingstar, W. Muth, J.
  • features 152 formed within FMS 162 and SMS 164 may include complete or partial semiconductor devices intended to be functional semiconductor devices, such as, inter alia, those described in PCT Application No. PCT/US2019/051209. [0030] As seen particularly in Fig.
  • metrology tool 120 is operative to measure features 152 formed within each FMS 162 of each MMS 160 in a first measurement orientation, and to measure features 152 formed within each SMS 164 of each MMS 160 in a second measurement orientation.
  • orientation refers to a rotational orientation of SDW 150 within a plane generally parallel to upper surface 158 of SDW 150.
  • the first and second measurement orientations may have any suitable values which are different from one another, most typically 0° and 180°, respectively.
  • metrology tool 120 is operative to measure measurement sites on SDW 150 while SDW 150 is in at least one additional rotational orientation other than the first measurement orientation and the second measurement orientation.
  • Metrology tool 120 can include a chuck 170 which is rotatable in an x-y plane being generally parallel to upper surface 158 of SDW 150. Chuck 170 is operative to support and position a sample, such as SDW 150, being measured by metrology tool
  • Chuck 170 may be any suitable chuck, including, inter alia, a chuck such as is described in PCT Application No. PCT/US2019/023918.
  • the measurement orientation of DWS 150 is determined by a position of chuck 170.
  • SDW 150 can be fixedly mounted on chuck 170 during measurement, typically by a vacuum attachment, and a rotational orientation of SDW 150 in a plane generally parallel to upper surface 158 of SDW 150 is determined by a corresponding rotational orientation of chuck 170.
  • FMSs 162 and SMSs 164 may be measured in both the first measurement orientation and the second measurement orientation, most of FMSs 162 are measured only in the first orientation and most of SMSs 164 are measured only in the second measurement orientation.
  • approximately 10% of FMSs 162 on SDW 150 are measured both while SDW 150 is in the first measurement orientation and while SDW 150 is in the second measurement orientation, and the remaining approximately 90% of FMSs 162 on SDW 150 are measured only while SDW 150 is in the first measurement orientation.
  • approximately 10% of SMSs 164 on SDW 150 are also measured both while SDW 150 is in the first measurement orientation and while SDW 150 is in the second measurement orientation, and the remaining approximately 90% of SMSs 164 on SDW 150 are measured only while SDW 150 is in the second measurement orientation.
  • Metrology tool 120 can further include at least one optical module 180, which generates incident radiation 182 for use in measuring features 152 formed within each of FMS 162 and SMS 164. It is appreciated that metrology tool 120 can generate a first measurement-orientation quality parameter dataset (FMQPD) from measurement of each FMS 162 in the first measurement orientation. Similarly, metrology tool 120 can generate a second measurement-orientation quality parameter dataset (SMQPD) from measurement of each SMS 164 in the second measurement orientation.
  • FMQPD measurement-orientation quality parameter dataset
  • SMQPD second measurement-orientation quality parameter dataset
  • QPA 130 can receive the FMQPD and the SMQPD and, generates at least one TIS-ameliorated quality parameter value (TAQPV), at least partially based thereon.
  • TIS-ameliorated quality parameter value TIS-ameliorated quality parameter value
  • the TAQPV may be related to any suitable parameter, such as, inter alia, a misregistration between at least first layer 166 and second layer 168; a dimension, such as Di or D2, of at least one of features 152 in FMS 162 and SMS 164; a dimension, such as D3, D4 or D5, of at least one of spaces 154 between features 152 in FMS 162 and 164; a shape of at least one of features 152 in FMS 162 and SMS 164; and a shape of one of spaces 154 between features 152 in FMS 162 and SMS 164.
  • a suitable parameter such as, inter alia, a misregistration between at least first layer 166 and second layer 168; a dimension, such as Di or D2, of at least one of features 152 in FMS 162 and SMS 164; a dimension, such as D3, D4 or D5, of at least one of spaces 154 between features 152 in FMS 162 and 164; a shape of at least one of features 152 in FMS 162
  • the TAQPV characterizes and is associated with a single FMS 162 or SMS 164. In an additional embodiment of the present disclosure, the TAQPV characterizes and is associated with a single MMS 160. In yet an additional embodiment of the present disclosure, the TAQPV characterizes and is associated with a group of MMSs 160, such as, inter alia, a group of MSSs 160 in a single column, row, field, or quadrant of SDW 150, a group of MSSs on a single SDW 150, and a group of MSSs on multiple SDWs 150.
  • a group of MMSs 160 such as, inter alia, a group of MSSs 160 in a single column, row, field, or quadrant of SDW 150, a group of MSSs on a single SDW 150, and a group of MSSs on multiple SDWs 150.
  • Figs. 3A & 3B are a simplified flowchart illustrating an embodiment of a method 300 for use with system 100 of Figs. 1 & 2, to Fig. 4A, which is a simplified plot illustrating a prior art method of generating a TIS-adjusted quality parameter value, and to Fig. 4B, which is simplified plot illustrating a portion of method 300 of Figs. 3 A & 3B.
  • method 300 can be performed as part of a larger fabrication process, after formation of at least one, and more typically of at least two, layers on SDW 150.
  • data generated as part of method 300 can be used to adjust fabrication parameters of the fabrication process of which method 300 forms a part.
  • a plurality of MSSs 160 on a sample, such as SDW 150 are designated, such as by MSSD 110.
  • each of MSSs 160 can include at least a single FMS 162 and a single SMS 164.
  • each MSS 160 includes at least one additional measurement-orientation site.
  • FMS 162 and SMS 164 are different measurement sites on SDW 150, and thus measurements of each of FMS 162 and SMS 164 measure different ones of features 152.
  • method 300 is particularly suitable for use with MSSs 160 wherein a difference between a TIS associated with a FMQPD from a measurement of FMS 162 and a TIS associated with an SMQPD from a measurement of SMS 164 is within a predetermined tolerance. Therefore, at an optional next step
  • the TIS associated with measurements of FMSs 162 and SMSs 164 of each MSS 160 on SDW 150 is evaluated, for example, by performing a TIS-on-Link protocol similar to the one described in Boaz Ophir, Udi Shusterman, Anna Golotsvan, Cindy Kato, Masanobu Hayashi, Richika Kato, Tomohiro Goto, Taketo Kuriyama, Manabu Miyake, Yasuki Takeuchi, Hiroyuki Mizuochi, "Machine learning for Tool Induced
  • Shift (TIS) reduction an HVM case study
  • Proc. SPIE 11611 Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Semiconductor Manufacturing XXXV, 116110E (22 February 2021).
  • Step 304 If results of the evaluation of step 304 indicate that a difference between a TIS associated with a FMQPD from a measurement of FMS 162 and a TIS associated with an SMQPD from a measurement of SMS 164 is not within the predetermined tolerance, the difference can be brought to within the predetermined tolerance at a next step 306.
  • Step 306 may be performed by adjusting fabrication parameters of SDW 150 or by adjusting measurement parameters used in method 300.
  • step 306 proceeds to a next step 308.
  • step 308 at least one FMQPD is generated by measuring features 152 formed within each FMS 162 of at least one of the MSSs 160 in a first measurement orientation.
  • orientation refers to the rotational orientation of SDW 150 within a plane generally parallel to upper surface 158 of SDW 150.
  • the measurement or measurements taken at step 308 can be measured using metrology tool 120.
  • At a next step 310 at least one SMQPD is generated by measuring, for each MSS 160 measured at step 308, features 152 formed within each SMS 164 in a second measurement orientation.
  • the first and second measurement orientations of respective steps 308 and 310 may have any suitable values which are different from one another, most typically 0° and 180°, respectively.
  • a next step 312 a determination is made whether or not to measure measurement sites at additional measurement orientations. If additional measurements at additional measurement orientations are to be taken, method 300 proceeds to a next step 314.
  • each additional measurement-orientation site is measured at a corresponding measurement orientation thereof, thereby generating an additional measurement-orientation quality parameter dataset (AMQPD) for each additional measurement taken at step 314.
  • AMQPD additional measurement-orientation quality parameter dataset
  • FMS 162 may be measured at a rotational orientation of 0°
  • SMS 164 may be measured at a rotational orientation of 180°
  • the two additional measurement-orientation sites may be measured at rotational orientations of 90° and 270°, respectively.
  • At step 314 at least one of FMS 162 and SMS 164 may be measured at an orientation different than the orientation at which the FMS 162 or SMS 164 was measured at respective step 308 or 310.
  • approximately 10% of FMSs 162 and SMSs 164 on SDW 150 are measured both while SDW 150 is in the first measurement orientation and while SDW 150 is in the second measurement orientation, and the remaining approximately 90% of FMSs 162 on SDW 150 are measured only while SDW 150 is in the first measurement orientation and the remaining approximately 90% of SMSs 164 on SDW 150 are measured only while SDW 150 is in the second measurement orientation.
  • step 308 all FMSs 162 are measured in the first measurement orientation
  • step 310 all SMSs 164 are measured in the second measurement orientation
  • step 314 approximately 10% of FMSs 162 are measured in the second measurement orientation and approximately 10% of SMSs 164 are measured in the first measurement orientation.
  • steps 312 and 314 are shown as being performed after both of steps 308 and 310, in an embodiment wherein some FMSs 162 are measured at the second measurement orientation and/or some SMSs 164 are measured at the first measurement orientation, step 314 can be performed together with steps 308 and 310.
  • chuck 170 can move SDW 150 to that measurement orientation only once, and all measurements to be taken at that measurement orientation are taken while SDW is at that measurement orientation. Only after all measurement sites which are to be measured at that measurement orientation have been measured at that measurement orientation, does chuck 170 moves SDW 150 to a different measurement orientation.
  • step 314 proceeds to a next step 316.
  • FMQPDs generated at step 308 and SMQPDs generated at step 310, as well as AMQPDs generated at step 314, if any, are provided to QPA 130.
  • QPA 130 can analyze the FMQPDs, SMQPDs and AMQPDs provided at step 316, and generates at least one tool -induced-shift (TIS)- ameliorated quality parameter value (TAQPV), at least partially based thereon.
  • TIS tool -induced-shift
  • TAQPV ameliorated quality parameter value
  • the TAQPV generated at step 318 may be any suitable TAQPV, such as, inter alia, a misregistration between at least first layer 166 and second layer 168; a dimension, such as Di or D2, of at least one of features 152 in FMS 162 and SMS 164; a dimension, such as D3, D4 or D5, of at least one of spaces 154 between features 152 in FMS 162 and 164; a shape of at least one of features 152 in FMS 162 and SMS 164; and a shape of one of spaces 154 between features 152 in FMS 162 and SMS 164.
  • TAQPV such as, inter alia, a misregistration between at least first layer 166 and second layer 168; a dimension, such as Di or D2, of at least one of features 152 in FMS 162 and SMS 164; a dimension, such as D3, D4 or D5, of at least one of spaces 154 between features 152 in FMS 162 and 164; a shape of at least one of features
  • the TAQPV characterizes and is associated with a single FMS 162 or SMS 164.
  • the TAQPV characterizes and is associated with a single MMS 160.
  • the TAQPV characterizes and is associated with a group of MMSs 160, such as, inter alia, a group of MSSs 160 in a single column, row, field, or quadrant of SDW 150, a group of MSSs on a single SDW 150, and a group of MSSs on multiple SDWs 150.
  • the analysis performed at step 318 can include fitting the FMQPDs, SMQPDs and AMQPDs provided at step 316 to a model.
  • a model may be any suitable model, such as, inter alia, an arithmetic mean, a linear regression, or a higher-order model, such as a model similar to a model described in Dana Klein, Daria Negri, "Error modeling and accuracy breakdown in optical overlay metrology for advanced nodes," Proc. SPIE 11613, Optical Microlithography XXXIV, 116130X (22 February 2021).
  • the analysis by QPA 130 of the FMQPDs, SMQPDs and AMQPDs can automatically remove at least some components of a quality parameter which are due mostly or only due to TIS, thereby allowing QPA 130 to provide a TAQPV.
  • a prior art method measures each of a multiplicity of measurement sites at both a first measurement orientation, as indicated by each of triangular markers 402, and a second measurement orientation, as indicated by each of rectangular markers 404.
  • the prior art method fits data generated by the measurements to a straight-line model using a linear regression, generating a quality parameter value for each measurement site, as indicated by a dashed trend line 410. Since each measurement site is measured at two different measurement orientations, the TIS error for each site cancels when the data is fit to a suitable model.
  • method 300 measures most or all FMSs 162 at only a first measurement orientation at step 308, as indicated by each of triangular markers 422, and measures most or all SMSs 164 at only a second measurement orientation at step 310, as indicated by each of rectangular markers 424.
  • Method 300 fits data generated by the measurements of steps 308 and 310 to a model, shown in Fig. 4B as a straight-line model fit with a linear regression, thereby generating the TAQPV for each measurement site, as indicated by a dashed trend line 430.
  • method 300 As indicated by the number of markers 422 and 424 in Fig. 4B as compared to the number of markers 402 and 404 in Fig. 4 A, method 300 generates approximately half as many measurements as are required by the prior art method illustrated in Fig. 4A. Additionally, as indicated by the relative positions of trend lines 410 and 430, method 300 generates TAQPVs within a predetermined tolerance of quality parameter values generated by the prior art method illustrated in Fig. 4A.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Testing Or Measuring Of Semiconductors Or The Like (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
PCT/US2021/053051 2021-04-22 2021-10-01 Systems and methods for improved metrology for semiconductor device wafers Ceased WO2022225549A1 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202180094001.5A CN116868069B (zh) 2021-04-22 2021-10-01 用于半导体装置晶片的改进计量的系统及方法
JP2023555675A JP7580627B2 (ja) 2021-04-22 2021-10-01 半導体デバイスウエハのための改良されたメトロロジーについてのシステムおよび方法
KR1020237032686A KR102901219B1 (ko) 2021-04-22 2021-10-01 반도체 디바이스 웨이퍼에 대한 향상된 계측을 위한 시스템 및 방법

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US202163177966P 2021-04-22 2021-04-22
US63/177,966 2021-04-22
US17/469,280 2021-09-08
US17/469,280 US12131959B2 (en) 2021-04-22 2021-09-08 Systems and methods for improved metrology for semiconductor device wafers

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2022225549A1 true WO2022225549A1 (en) 2022-10-27

Family

ID=83694528

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2021/053051 Ceased WO2022225549A1 (en) 2021-04-22 2021-10-01 Systems and methods for improved metrology for semiconductor device wafers

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US12131959B2 (cg-RX-API-DMAC7.html)
JP (1) JP7580627B2 (cg-RX-API-DMAC7.html)
KR (1) KR102901219B1 (cg-RX-API-DMAC7.html)
CN (1) CN116868069B (cg-RX-API-DMAC7.html)
TW (1) TWI865831B (cg-RX-API-DMAC7.html)
WO (1) WO2022225549A1 (cg-RX-API-DMAC7.html)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US12165930B2 (en) 2021-06-03 2024-12-10 Kla Corporation Adaptive modeling misregistration measurement system and method

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20030025895A1 (en) * 2001-08-03 2003-02-06 Michael Binnard Apparatus and methods for detecting tool-induced shift in microlithography apparatus
JP4314082B2 (ja) * 2003-08-19 2009-08-12 キヤノン株式会社 アライメント方法
US20110292365A1 (en) * 2008-12-16 2011-12-01 Asml Netherlands B.V. Calibration Method, Inspection Method and Apparatus, Lithographic Apparatus, and Lithographic Processing Cell
JP4971225B2 (ja) * 2007-03-30 2012-07-11 エーエスエムエル ネザーランズ ビー.ブイ. スキャトロメータの非対称性を測定する方法、基板のオーバレイエラーを測定する方法、および計測装置
US20190122357A1 (en) * 2017-10-22 2019-04-25 Kla-Tencor Corporation Utilizing overlay misregistration error estimations in imaging overlay metrology

Family Cites Families (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP3609896B2 (ja) * 1996-04-16 2005-01-12 株式会社ルネサステクノロジ 重ね合わせ測定誤差補正方法
US7804994B2 (en) 2002-02-15 2010-09-28 Kla-Tencor Technologies Corporation Overlay metrology and control method
WO2004053426A1 (en) 2002-12-05 2004-06-24 Kla-Tencor Technologies Corporation Apparatus and methods for detecting overlay errors using scatterometry
US7608468B1 (en) 2003-07-02 2009-10-27 Kla-Tencor Technologies, Corp. Apparatus and methods for determining overlay and uses of same
DE102007033345B4 (de) * 2007-07-16 2009-07-16 Vistec Semiconductor Systems Gmbh Verfahren zur Korrektur von Abbildungsfehlern einer Messoptik einer Koordinaten-Messmaschine
US9927718B2 (en) 2010-08-03 2018-03-27 Kla-Tencor Corporation Multi-layer overlay metrology target and complimentary overlay metrology measurement systems
US8860941B2 (en) * 2012-04-27 2014-10-14 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Tool induced shift reduction determination for overlay metrology
US8843875B2 (en) * 2012-05-08 2014-09-23 Kla-Tencor Corporation Measurement model optimization based on parameter variations across a wafer
US9778213B2 (en) 2013-08-19 2017-10-03 Kla-Tencor Corporation Metrology tool with combined XRF and SAXS capabilities
WO2015196168A1 (en) 2014-06-21 2015-12-23 Kla-Tencor Corporation Compound imaging metrology targets
IL282726B2 (en) * 2018-11-21 2025-01-01 Kla Corp Process optimization through experimental design and response surface models
JP7254217B2 (ja) * 2019-02-14 2023-04-07 ケーエルエー コーポレイション 誘導されたトポグラフィを利用した半導体デバイスウェハの位置ずれを測定するためのシステムと方法
WO2020167331A1 (en) 2019-02-15 2020-08-20 Kla-Tencor Corporation Misregistration measurements using combined optical and electron beam technology
KR102666266B1 (ko) 2019-03-25 2024-05-14 케이엘에이 코포레이션 휘어진 반도체 웨이퍼를 평탄화하는 진공 홀드-다운 장치
US11302544B2 (en) * 2019-03-28 2022-04-12 Kla-Tencor Corporation Method for measuring and correcting misregistration between layers in a semiconductor device, and misregistration targets useful therein
US11862521B2 (en) 2019-06-20 2024-01-02 Kla Corporation Multiple-tool parameter set calibration and misregistration measurement system and method
US11640117B2 (en) * 2019-06-25 2023-05-02 Kla Corporation Selection of regions of interest for measurement of misregistration and amelioration thereof
CN114342053B (zh) 2019-09-16 2025-05-16 科磊股份有限公司 周期性半导体装置偏移计量学系统及方法

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20030025895A1 (en) * 2001-08-03 2003-02-06 Michael Binnard Apparatus and methods for detecting tool-induced shift in microlithography apparatus
JP4314082B2 (ja) * 2003-08-19 2009-08-12 キヤノン株式会社 アライメント方法
JP4971225B2 (ja) * 2007-03-30 2012-07-11 エーエスエムエル ネザーランズ ビー.ブイ. スキャトロメータの非対称性を測定する方法、基板のオーバレイエラーを測定する方法、および計測装置
US20110292365A1 (en) * 2008-12-16 2011-12-01 Asml Netherlands B.V. Calibration Method, Inspection Method and Apparatus, Lithographic Apparatus, and Lithographic Processing Cell
US20190122357A1 (en) * 2017-10-22 2019-04-25 Kla-Tencor Corporation Utilizing overlay misregistration error estimations in imaging overlay metrology

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2024517055A (ja) 2024-04-19
CN116868069B (zh) 2024-09-06
TWI865831B (zh) 2024-12-11
KR20230174215A (ko) 2023-12-27
KR102901219B1 (ko) 2025-12-16
US20220344218A1 (en) 2022-10-27
US12131959B2 (en) 2024-10-29
JP7580627B2 (ja) 2024-11-11
TW202245090A (zh) 2022-11-16
CN116868069A (zh) 2023-10-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11048174B2 (en) Method of controlling a patterning process, lithographic apparatus, metrology apparatus lithographic cell and associated computer program
US7858404B2 (en) Measurement of overlay offset in semiconductor processing
US11669017B2 (en) Method for controlling a manufacturing apparatus and associated apparatuses
US20110051150A1 (en) Unique mark and method to determine critical dimension uniformity and registration of reticles combined with wafer overlay capability
KR101869573B1 (ko) 서브 샘플링 방식을 이용하여 툴-유도 시프트를 제공하는 방법 및 시스템
EP3312672A1 (en) Methods of determining corrections for a patterning process, device manufacturing method, control system for a lithographic apparatus and lithographic apparatus
US11862524B2 (en) Overlay mark design for electron beam overlay
JP2004228327A (ja) アライメント方法及び装置並びに露光装置
US12131959B2 (en) Systems and methods for improved metrology for semiconductor device wafers
US11720031B2 (en) Overlay design for electron beam and scatterometry overlay measurements
US10928737B2 (en) Method for characterizing distortions in a lithographic process, lithographic apparatus, lithographic cell and computer program
WO2019115431A1 (en) Method for controlling a manufacturing apparatus and associated apparatuses
WO2023036526A1 (en) A method of monitoring a lithographic process and associated apparatuses
JP2003512738A (ja) レチクル、ウェーハ、測定ステッパおよび予防保守方法
US12055859B2 (en) Overlay mark design for electron beam overlay
JP3571874B2 (ja) 位置合わせ方法および装置
US20250284205A1 (en) Robust and accurate overlay target design for cmp
US20230068016A1 (en) Systems and methods for rotational calibration of metrology tools
TW202509457A (zh) 與疊對相關之度量衡方法
KR20010068536A (ko) 반도체 장치의 제조를 위한 웨이퍼 노광 방법

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 21938114

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 202180094001.5

Country of ref document: CN

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2023555675

Country of ref document: JP

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 21938114

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1