Classifications

• • H—ELECTRICITY
  • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
  • H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
  • H04N19/00—Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals
  • H04N19/10—Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals using adaptive coding
  • H04N19/169—Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals using adaptive coding characterised by the coding unit, i.e. the structural portion or semantic portion of the video signal being the object or the subject of the adaptive coding
  • H04N19/17—Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals using adaptive coding characterised by the coding unit, i.e. the structural portion or semantic portion of the video signal being the object or the subject of the adaptive coding the unit being an image region, e.g. an object
  • H04N19/176—Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals using adaptive coding characterised by the coding unit, i.e. the structural portion or semantic portion of the video signal being the object or the subject of the adaptive coding the unit being an image region, e.g. an object the region being a block, e.g. a macroblock
• • H—ELECTRICITY
  • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
  • H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
  • H04N19/00—Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals
  • H04N19/50—Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals using predictive coding
  • H04N19/503—Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals using predictive coding involving temporal prediction
  • H04N19/51—Motion estimation or motion compensation
  • H04N19/513—Processing of motion vectors
  • H04N19/517—Processing of motion vectors by encoding
  • H04N19/52—Processing of motion vectors by encoding by predictive encoding
• • H—ELECTRICITY
  • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
  • H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
  • H04N19/00—Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals
  • H04N19/10—Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals using adaptive coding
  • H04N19/102—Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals using adaptive coding characterised by the element, parameter or selection affected or controlled by the adaptive coding
  • H04N19/103—Selection of coding mode or of prediction mode
  • H04N19/105—Selection of the reference unit for prediction within a chosen coding or prediction mode, e.g. adaptive choice of position and number of pixels used for prediction
• • H—ELECTRICITY
  • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
  • H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
  • H04N19/00—Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals
  • H04N19/50—Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals using predictive coding
  • H04N19/503—Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals using predictive coding involving temporal prediction
  • H04N19/51—Motion estimation or motion compensation
  • H04N19/513—Processing of motion vectors
• • H—ELECTRICITY
  • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
  • H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
  • H04N19/00—Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals
  • H04N19/60—Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals using transform coding
  • H04N19/61—Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals using transform coding in combination with predictive coding
• • H—ELECTRICITY
  • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
  • H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
  • H04N19/00—Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals
  • H04N19/70—Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals characterised by syntax aspects related to video coding, e.g. related to compression standards
• • H—ELECTRICITY
  • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
  • H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
  • H04N19/00—Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals
  • H04N19/90—Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals using coding techniques not provided for in groups H04N19/10-H04N19/85, e.g. fractals
  • H04N19/96—Tree coding, e.g. quad-tree coding

Definitions

• This patent document relates to video coding and decoding techniques, devices and systems.
• This document discloses methods, systems, and devices for encoding and decoding digital video using a merge list of motion vectors.
• a method of video processing is provided to include:
• each table includes motion candidates and each motion candidate is associated with corresponding motion information; updating a candidate list based on motion candidates in one or more tables using a pruning operation on the motion candidates; and performing a conversion between a first video block and a bitstream representation of a video including the first video block using the constructed candidate list.
• a method for video processing comprises: receiving a bitstream representation of a video including a first video block; and applying a pruning operation to motion candidates in one or more tables to update a candidate list, wherein each table includes motion candidates and each motion candidate is associated with corresponding motion information; performing a conversion between the bitstream representation and the first video block using the constructed candidate list.
• the various techniques described herein may be embodied as a computer program product stored on a non-transitory computer readable media.
• the computer program product includes program code for carrying out the methods described herein.
• a video encoding or decoding apparatus may implement a method as described herein.
• FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing an example of a video encoder implementation
• FIG. 2 illustrates macroblock partitioning in the H.264 video coding standard.
• FIG. 3 illustrates an example of splitting coding blocks (CB) into prediction blocks
• FIG. 4 illustrates an example implementation for subdivision of a CTB into CBs and transform block (TBs).
• Solid lines indicate CB boundaries and dotted lines indicate TB boundaries, including an example CTB with its partitioning, and a corresponding quadtree.
• FIG. 5 shows an example of a Quad Tree Binary Tree (QTBT) structure for partitioning video data.
• QTBT Quad Tree Binary Tree
• FIG. 6 shows an example of video block partitioning.
• FIG. 7 shows an example of quad-tree partitioning.
• FIG. 8 shows an example of tree-type signaling.
• FIG. 9 shows an example of a derivation process for merge candidate list
• FIG. 10 shows example positions of spatial merge candidates.
• FIG. 11 shows examples of candidate pairs considered for redundancy check of spatial merge candidates.
• FIG. 12 shows examples of positions for the second PU of Nx2N and 2NxN partitions.
• FIG. 13 illustrates motion vector scaling for temporal merge candidates.
• FIG. 14 shows candidate positions for temporal merge candidates, and their co located picture.
• FIG. 15 shows an example of a combined bi-predictive merge candidate.
• FIG. 16 shows an example of a derivation process for motion vector prediction candidates.
• FIG. 17 shows an example of motion vector scaling for spatial motion vector candidates.
• FIG. 18 shows an example Alternative Temporal Motion Vector Prediction
• ATMVP ATMVP
• FIG. 19 pictorially depicts an example of identification of a source block and a source picture.
• FIG. 20 shows an example of one CU with four sub-blocks and neighboring blocks.
• FIG. 21 illustrates an example of bilateral matching.
• FIG. 22 illustrates an example of template matching.
• FIG. 23 depicts an example of unilateral Motion Estimation (ME) in Frame Rate Lip Conversion (FRETC).
• ME Motion Estimation
• FRETC Frame Rate Lip Conversion
• FIG. 24 shows an example of DMVR based on bilateral template matching.
• FIG. 25 shows an example of spatially neighboring blocks used to derive spatial merge candidates.
• FIG. 26 depicts an example how selection of a representative position for look-up table updates.
• FIG. 27A and 27B illustrate examples of updating look up table with new set of motion information.
• FIG. 28 is a block diagram of an example of a hardware platform for implementing a visual media decoding or a visual media encoding technique described in the present document.
• FIG. 29 is a flowchart for an example method of video processing.
• FIG. 30 is a flowchart for another example method of video processing.
• FIG. 31 shows an example of a decoding flow chart with the proposed HMVP method.
• FIG. 32 shows examples of updating tables using the proposed HMVP method.
• FIGS. 33A and 33B show examples of a redundancy-removal based LUT updating method (with one redundancy motion candidate removed).
• FIGS. 34A and 34B show examples of a redundancy-removal based LUT updating method (with multiple redundancy motion candidates removed).
• the present document is related to video coding technologies. Specifically, it is related to motion information coding (such as merge mode, AMVP mode) in video coding. It may be applied to the existing video coding standard like HEVC, or the standard (Versatile Video Coding) to be finalized. It may be also applicable to future video coding standards or video codec.
• motion information coding such as merge mode, AMVP mode
• Video coding standards have evolved primarily through the development of the well- known ITU-T and ISO/IEC standards.
• the ITU-T produced H.261 and H.263, ISO/IEC produced MPEG-l and MPEG-4 Visual, and the two organizations jointly produced the
• H.262/MPEG- 2 Video and H.264/MPEG-4 Advanced Video Coding (AVC) and H.265/HEVC standards Since H.262, the video coding standards are based on the hybrid video coding structure wherein temporal prediction plus transform coding are utilized.
• An example of a typical HEVC encoder framework is depicted in FIG. 1.
• the core of the coding layer in previous standards was the macroblock, containing a 16x 16 block of luma samples and, in the usual case of 4:2:0 color sampling, two corresponding 8x8 blocks of chroma samples.
• An intra-coded block uses spatial prediction to exploit spatial correlation among pixels. Two partitions are defined: 16x16 and 4x4.
• An inter-coded block uses temporal prediction, instead of spatial prediction, by estimating motion among pictures.
• Motion can be estimated independently for either 16x16 macroblock or any of its sub-macroblock partitions: 16x8, 8x16, 8x8, 8x4, 4x8, 4x4 (see FIG. 2). Only one motion vector (MV) per sub-macroblock partition is allowed.
• a CTU is split into CUs by using a quadtree structure denoted as coding tree to adapt to various local characteristics.
• the decision whether to code a picture area using inter-picture (temporal) or intra-picture (spatial) prediction is made at the CU level.
• Each CU can be further split into one, two or four PUs according to the PU splitting type. Inside one PU, the same prediction process is applied and the relevant information is transmitted to the decoder on a PU basis.
• a CU can be partitioned into transform units (TUs) according to another quadtree structure similar to the coding tree for the CU.
• TUs transform units
• Coding tree units and coding tree block (CTB) structure The analogous structure in HEVC is the coding tree unit (CTU), which has a size selected by the encoder and can be larger than a traditional macroblock.
• the CTU consists of a luma CTB and the corresponding chroma CTBs and syntax elements.
• HEVC then supports a partitioning of the CTBs into smaller blocks using a tree structure and quadtree-like signaling.
• Coding units and coding blocks (CBs):
• the quadtree syntax of the CTU specifies the size and positions of its luma and chroma CBs. The root of the quadtree is associated with the CTU. Hence, the size of the luma CTB is the largest supported size for a luma CB.
• the splitting of a CTU into luma and chroma CBs is signaled jointly.
• a CTB may contain only one CU or may be split to form multiple CUs, and each CU has an associated partitioning into prediction units (PUs) and a tree of transform units (TUs).
• PUs prediction units
• TUs tree of transform units
• Prediction units and prediction blocks The decision whether to code a picture area using inter picture or intra picture prediction is made at the CU level.
• a PU partitioning structure has its root at the CU level.
• the luma and chroma CBs can then be further split in size and predicted from luma and chroma prediction blocks (PBs).
• HEVC supports variable PB sizes from 64x64 down to 4x4 samples.
• FIG. 3 shows examples of allowed PBs for a MxM CU.
• the prediction residual is coded using block transforms.
• a TU tree structure has its root at the CU level.
• the luma CB residual may be identical to the luma transform block (TB) or may be further split into smaller luma TBs. The same applies to the chroma TBs.
• Integer basis functions similar to those of a discrete cosine transform (DCT) are defined for the square TB sizes 4x4, 8x8, 16x16, and 32x32.
• DCT discrete cosine transform
• an integer transform derived from a form of discrete sine transform (DST) is alternatively specified.
• FIG. 4 shows an example of a subdivision of a CTB into CBs [and transform block (TBs)].
• Solid lines indicate CB borders and dotted lines indicate TB borders (a) CTB with its partitioning (b) corresponding quadtree.
• a CB can be recursively partitioned into transform blocks (TBs).
• the partitioning is signaled by a residual quadtree. Only square CB and TB partitioning is specified, where a block can be recursively split into quadrants, as illustrated in FIG. 4.
• a flag signals whether it is split into four blocks of size M/2xM/2. If further splitting is possible, as signaled by a maximum depth of the residual quadtree indicated in the SPS, each quadrant is assigned a flag that indicates whether it is split into four quadrants.
• the leaf node blocks resulting from the residual quadtree are the transform blocks that are further processed by transform coding.
• the encoder indicates the maximum and minimum luma TB sizes that it will use. Splitting is implicit when the CB size is larger than the maximum TB size. Not splitting is implicit when splitting would result in a luma TB size smaller than the indicated minimum.
• the chroma TB size is half the luma TB size in each dimension, except when the luma TB size is 4x4, in which case a single 4x4 chroma TB is used for the region covered by four 4x4 luma TBs.
• intra-picture-predicted CUs the decoded samples of the nearest-neighboring TBs (within or outside the CB) are used as reference data for intra picture prediction.
• the HEVC design allows a TB to span across multiple PBs for inter-picture predicted CUs to maximize the potential coding efficiency benefits of the quadtree-structured TB partitioning.
• a CTB is divided according to a quad-tree structure, the nodes of which are coding units.
• the plurality of nodes in a quad-tree structure includes leaf nodes and non-leaf nodes.
• the leaf nodes have no child nodes in the tree structure (i.e., the leaf nodes are not further split).
• The, non-leaf nodes include a root node of the tree structure.
• the root node corresponds to an initial video block of the video data (e.g., a CTB).
• the respective non-root node corresponds to a video block that is a sub-block of a video block corresponding to a parent node in the tree structure of the respective non-root node.
• Each respective non-leaf node of the plurality of non-leaf nodes has one or more child nodes in the tree structure.
• JVET Joint Exploration Model
• the QTBT structure removes the concepts of multiple partition types, i.e. it removes the separation of the CU, PU and TU concepts, and supports more flexibility for CU partition shapes.
• a CU can have either a square or rectangular shape.
• a coding tree unit (CTU) is first partitioned by a quadtree structure.
• the quadtree leaf nodes are further partitioned by a binary tree structure.
• the binary tree leaf nodes are called coding units (CUs), and that segmentation is used for prediction and transform processing without any further partitioning.
• a CU sometimes consists of coding blocks (CBs) of different colour components, e.g. one CU contains one luma CB and two chroma CBs in the case of P and B slices of the 4:2:0 chroma format and sometimes consists of a CB of a single component, e.g., one CU contains only one luma CB or just two chroma CBs in the case of I slices.
• CBs coding blocks
• - CTU size the root node size of a quadtree, the same concept as in HEVC
• the CTU size is set as 128x 128 luma samples with two corresponding 64x64 blocks of chroma samples
• theMinQTSize is set as 16x
• t e MaxBTSize is set as 64x64
• the MinBTSize (for both width and height) is set as 4x4
• the MaxBTDepth is set as 4.
• the quadtree partitioning is applied to the CTU first to generate quadtree leaf nodes.
• the quadtree leaf nodes may have a size from 16x 16 (i.e., the MinQTSize) to 128x128 (i.e., the CTU size).
• the quadtree leaf node is also the root node for the binary tree and it has the binary tree depth as 0.
• MaxBTDepth i.e., 4
• no further splitting is considered.
• MinBTSize i.e. 4
• no further horizontal splitting is considered.
• the binary tree node has height equal to MinBTSize
• no further vertical splitting is considered.
• the leaf nodes of the binary tree are further processed by prediction and transform processing without any further partitioning. In the JEM, the maximum CTU size is 256x256 luma samples.
• FIG. 5 illustrates an example of block partitioning by using QTBT
• FIG. 5 illustrates the corresponding tree representation.
• the solid lines indicate quadtree splitting and dotted lines indicate binary tree splitting.
• each splitting (i.e., non-leaf) node of the binary tree one flag is signalled to indicate which splitting type (i.e., horizontal or vertical) is used, where 0 indicates horizontal splitting and 1 indicates vertical splitting.
• the quadtree splitting there is no need to indicate the splitting type since quadtree splitting always splits a block both horizontally and vertically to produce 4 sub-blocks with an equal size.
• the QTBT scheme supports the ability for the luma and chroma to have a separate QTBT structure.
• the luma and chroma CTBs in one CTU share the same QTBT structure.
• the luma CTB is partitioned into CUs by a QTBT structure
• the chroma CTBs are partitioned into chroma CUs by another QTBT structure. This means that a CU in an I slice consists of a coding block of the luma component or coding blocks of two chroma components, and a CU in a P or B slice consists of coding blocks of all three colour components.
• inter prediction for small blocks is restricted to reduce the memory access of motion compensation, such that bi-prediction is not supported for 4x8 and 8x4 blocks, and inter prediction is not supported for 4x4 blocks. In the QTBT of the JEM, these restrictions are removed.
• TT ternary tree partitions
• FIG. 6 shows: (a) quad-tree partitioning (b) vertical binary-tree partitioning (c) horizontal binary-tree partitioning (d) vertical center-side ternary-tree partitioning (e) horizontal center-side ternary-tree partitioning.
• region tree region tree
• prediction tree binary-tree or ternary-tree
• a CTU is firstly partitioned by region tree (RT).
• a RT leaf may be further split with prediction tree (PT).
• PT leaf may also be further split with PT until max PT depth is reached.
• a PT leaf is the basic coding unit. It is still called CU for convenience.
• a CU cannot be further split.
• Prediction and transform are both applied on CU in the same way as JEM.
• the whole partition structure is named‘multiple-type-tree’.
• the tree structure used in this response is a generalization of the QTBT.
• MTT Multi-Tree Type
• a Coding Tree Unit CTU
• the quad-tree leaf nodes are further partitioned by a binary- tree structure.
• the fundamental structure of MTT constitutes of two types of tree nodes: Region Tree (RT) and Prediction Tree (PT), supporting nine types of partitions, as shown in FIG. 7.
• RT Region Tree
• PT Prediction Tree
• FIG. 7 shows: (a) quad-tree partitioning (b) vertical binary-tree partitioning (c) horizontal binary-tree partitioning (d) vertical ternary-tree partitioning (e) horizontal ternary-tree partitioning (f) horizontal-up asymmetric binary-tree partitioning (g) horizontal-down asymmetric binary-tree partitioning (h) vertical-left asymmetric binary-tree partitioning (i) vertical-right asymmetric binary-tree partitioning.
• a region tree can recursively split a CTU into square blocks down to a 4x4 size region tree leaf node.
• a prediction tree can be formed from one of three tree types: Binary Tree (BT), Ternary Tree (TT), and Asymmetric Binary Tree (ABT).
• BT Binary Tree
• TT Ternary Tree
• ABT Asymmetric Binary Tree
• JEM JEM
• the luma tree and the chroma tree are separated in I slices.
• the signaling methods for RT and PT are illustrated in FIG. 8.
• Each inter-predicted PU has motion parameters for one or two reference picture lists.
• Motion parameters include a motion vector and a reference picture index. Usage of one of the two reference picture lists may also be signalled using inter _predjdc.
• Motion vectors may be explicitly coded as deltas relative to predictors, such a coding mode is called AMVP mode.
• a merge mode is specified whereby the motion parameters for the current PU are obtained from neighbouring PUs, including spatial and temporal candidates.
• the merge mode can be applied to any inter-predicted PU, not only for skip mode.
• the alternative to merge mode is the explicit transmission of motion parameters, where motion vector, corresponding reference picture index for each reference picture list and reference picture list usage are signalled explicitly per each PU.
• the PU is produced from one block of samples. This is referred to as‘uni-prediction’. Uni-prediction is available both for P-slices and B-slices.
• the PU is produced from two blocks of samples. This is referred to as‘bi-prediction’. Bi-prediction is available for B-slices only.
• Step 1.2 Redundancy check for spatial candidates
• FIG. 12 depicts the second PU for the case of Nx2N and 2NxN, respectively.
• candidate at position Ai is not considered for list construction.
• position Bi is not considered when the current PU is partitioned as 2NxN.
• a scaled motion vector is derived based on co-located PU belonging to the picture which has the smallest POC difference with current picture within the given reference picture list.
• the reference picture list to be used for derivation of the co-located PU is explicitly signalled in the slice header.
• the scaled motion vector for temporal merge candidate is obtained as illustrated by the dashed line in FIG.
• tb is defined to be the POC difference between the reference picture of the current picture and the current picture
• td is defined to be the POC difference between the reference picture of the co-located picture and the co-located picture.
• the reference picture index of temporal merge candidate is set equal to zero.
• the position for the temporal candidate is selected between candidates Co and Ci, as depicted in FIG. 14. If PU at position Co is not available, is intra coded, or is outside of the current CTU, position Ci is used. Otherwise, position Co is used in the derivation of the temporal merge candidate.
• merge candidates there are two additional types of merge candidates: combined bi-predictive merge candidate and zero merge candidate.
• Combined bi- predictive merge candidates are generated by utilizing spatio-temporal merge candidates.
• Combined bi-predictive merge candidate is used for B-Slice only.
• the combined bi-predictive candidates are generated by combining the first reference picture list motion parameters of an initial candidate with the second reference picture list motion parameters of another. If these two tuples provide different motion hypotheses, they will form a new bi-predictive candidate.
• FIG. 15 depicts the case when two candidates in the original list (on the left), which have mvLO and refldxLO or mvLl and refldxLl, are used to create a combined bi-predictive merge candidate added to the final list (on the right). There are numerous rules regarding the combinations which are considered to generate these additional merge candidates.
• Zero motion candidates are inserted to fill the remaining entries in the merge candidates list and therefore hit the MaxNumMergeCand capacity. These candidates have zero spatial displacement and a reference picture index which starts from zero and increases every time a new zero motion candidate is added to the list. The number of reference frames used by these candidates is one and two for uni and bi-directional prediction, respectively. Finally, no redundancy check is performed on these candidates.
• motion estimation can be performed in parallel whereby the motion vectors for all prediction units inside a given region are derived
• HEVC defines the motion estimation region (MER) whose size is signalled in the picture parameter set using the
• I°g2_parallel_merge_level_minus2 plus 2 specifies the value of the variable Log2ParMrgLevel, which is used in the derivation process for luma motion vectors for merge mode as specified in clause 8.5.3.2.2 and the derivation process for spatial merging candidates as specified in clause 8.5.3.2.3.
• the value of log2_parallel_merge_level_minus2 shall be in the range of 0 to CtbLog2SizeY - 2, inclusive.
• Log2ParMrgLevel is derived as follows:
• Log2ParMrgLevel log2_parallel_merge_level_minus2 + 2 (7-37)
• Log2ParMrgLevel indicates the built-in capability of parallel derivation of the merging candidate lists. For example, when Log2ParMrgLevel is equal to 6, the merging candidate lists for all the prediction units (PUs) and coding units (CUs) contained in a 64x64 block can be derived in parallel.
• PUs prediction units
• CUs coding units
• Motion vector prediction exploits spatio-temporal correlation of motion vector with neighbouring PUs, which is used for explicit transmission of motion parameters. It constructs a motion vector candidate list by firstly checking availability of left, above temporally neighbouring PU positions, removing redundant candidates and adding zero vector to make the candidate list to be constant length. Then, the encoder can select the best predictor from the candidate list and transmit the corresponding index indicating the chosen candidate. Similarly with merge index signalling, the index of the best motion vector candidate is encoded using truncated unary. The maximum value to be encoded in this case is 2 (e.g., FIGs. 2 to 8). In the following sections, details about derivation process of motion vector prediction candidate are provided.
• FIG. 16 summarizes derivation process for motion vector prediction candidate.
• motion vector candidate two types are considered: spatial motion vector candidate and temporal motion vector candidate.
• spatial motion vector candidate derivation two motion vector candidates are eventually derived based on motion vectors of each PU located in five different positions as depicted in FIG. 11.
• one motion vector candidate is selected from two candidates, which are derived based on two different co-located positions. After the first list of spatio-temporal candidates is made, duplicated motion vector candidates in the list are removed. If the number of potential candidates is larger than two, motion vector candidates whose reference picture index within the associated reference picture list is larger than 1 are removed from the list. If the number of spatio-temporal motion vector candidates is smaller than two, additional zero motion vector candidates is added to the list.
• the motion vector of the neighbouring PU is scaled in a similar manner as for temporal scaling, as depicted as FIG. 17.
• the main difference is that the reference picture list and index of current PU is given as input; the actual scaling process is the same as that of temporal scaling.
• bitstream For the AMVP mode, four parts may be signalled in the bitstream, i.e., prediction direction, reference index, MVD and mv predictor candidate index.
• each CU can have at most one set of motion parameters for each prediction direction.
• Two sub-CU level motion vector prediction methods are considered in the encoder by splitting a large CU into sub-CUs and deriving motion information for all the sub- CUs of the large CU.
• Alternative temporal motion vector prediction (ATMVP) method allows each CU to fetch multiple sets of motion information from multiple blocks smaller than the current CU in the collocated reference picture.
• STMVP spatial-temporal motion vector prediction
• the motion vectors temporal motion vector prediction is modified by fetching multiple sets of motion information (including motion vectors and reference indices) from blocks smaller than the current CU.
• the sub-CUs are square NxN blocks (N is set to 4 by default).
• ATMVP predicts the motion vectors of the sub-CUs within a CU in two steps.
• the first step is to identify the corresponding block in a reference picture with a so-called temporal vector.
• the reference picture is called the motion source picture.
• the second step is to split the current CU into sub-CUs and obtain the motion vectors as well as the reference indices of each sub-CU from the block corresponding to each sub-CU, as shown in FIG. 18.
• a reference picture and the corresponding block is determined by the motion information of the spatial neighbouring blocks of the current CU.
• the first merge candidate in the merge candidate list of the current CU is used.
• the first available motion vector as well as its associated reference index are set to be the temporal vector and the index to the motion source picture.
• the corresponding block may be more accurately identified, compared with TMVP, wherein the corresponding block (sometimes called collocated block) is always in a bottom-right or center position relative to the current CU.
• the associated MV and reference picture are utilized to identify the source block and source picture.
• FIG. 19 shows an example of the identification of source block and source picture
• a corresponding block of the sub-CU is identified by the temporal vector in the motion source picture, by adding to the coordinate of the current CU the temporal vector.
• the motion information of its corresponding block (the smallest motion grid that covers the center sample) is used to derive the motion information for the sub-CU.
• the motion information of a corresponding NxN block is identified, it is converted to the motion vectors and reference indices of the current sub-CU, in the same way as TMVP of HEVC, wherein motion scaling and other procedures apply.
• the decoder checks whether the low-delay condition (i.e.
• FIG. 20 illustrates this concept. Let us consider an 8x8 CU which contains four 4x4 sub-CUs A, B, C, and D. The neighbouring 4x4 blocks in the current frame are labelled as a, b, c, and d.
• the motion derivation for sub-CU A starts by identifying its two spatial neighbours.
• the first neighbour is the NxN block above sub-CU A (block c). If this block c is not available or is intra coded the other NxN blocks above sub-CU A are checked (from left to right, starting at block c).
• the second neighbour is a block to the left of the sub-CU A (block b). If block b is not available or is intra coded other blocks to the left of sub-CU A are checked (from top to bottom, staring at block b).
• the motion information obtained from the neighbouring blocks for each list is scaled to the first reference frame for a given list.
• temporal motion vector predictor (TMVP) of sub-block A is derived by following the same procedure of TMVP derivation as specified in HEVC.
• the motion information of the collocated block at location D is fetched and scaled accordingly.
• all available motion vectors (up to 3) are averaged separately for each reference list. The averaged motion vector is assigned as the motion vector of the current sub-CU.
• FIG. 20 shows an example of one CU with four sub-blocks (A-D) and its
• the sub-CU modes are enabled as additional merge candidates and there is no additional syntax element required to signal the modes.
• Two additional merge candidates are added to merge candidates list of each CU to represent the ATMVP mode and STMVP mode.
• MVDs motion vector differences
• LAMVR locally adaptive motion vector resolution
• MVD can be coded in units of quarter luma samples, integer luma samples or four luma samples.
• the MVD resolution is controlled at the coding unit (CU) level, and MVD resolution flags are conditionally signalled for each CU that has at least one non-zero MVD components.
• a first flag is signalled to indicate whether quarter luma sample MV precision is used in the CU.
• the first flag (equal to 1) indicates that quarter luma sample MV precision is not used, another flag is signalled to indicate whether integer luma sample MV precision or four luma sample MV precision is used.
• the quarter luma sample MV resolution is used for the CU.
• the MVPs in the AMVP candidate list for the CU are rounded to the corresponding precision.
• CU-level RD checks are used to determine which MVD resolution is to be used for a CU. That is, the CU-level RD check is performed three times for each MVD resolution.
• the following encoding schemes are applied in the JEM.
• the motion information of the current CU (integer luma sample accuracy) is stored.
• the stored motion information (after rounding) is used as the starting point for further small range motion vector refinement during the RD check for the same CU with integer luma sample and 4 luma sample MVD resolution so that the time-consuming motion estimation process is not duplicated three times.
• RD check of a CU with 4 luma sample MVD resolution is conditionally invoked.
• RD cost integer luma sample MVD resolution is much larger than that of quarter luma sample MVD resolution
• the RD check of 4 luma sample MVD resolution for the CU is skipped.
• Pattern matched motion vector derivation (PMMVD) mode is a special merge mode based on Frame-Rate Up Conversion (FRUC) techniques. With this mode, motion information of a block is not signalled but derived at decoder side.
• a FRUC flag is signalled for a CU when its merge flag is true. When the FRUC flag is false, a merge index is signalled and the regular merge mode is used. When the FRUC flag is true, an additional FRUC mode flag is signalled to indicate which method (bilateral matching or template matching) is to be used to derive motion information for the block.
• the decision on whether using FRUC merge mode for a CU is based on RD cost selection as done for normal merge candidate. That is the two matching modes (bilateral matching and template matching) are both checked for a CU by using RD cost selection. The one leading to the minimal cost is further compared to other CU modes. If a FRUC matching mode is the most efficient one, FRUC flag is set to true for the CU and the related matching mode is used.
• Motion derivation process in FRUC merge mode has two steps.
• a CU-level motion search is first performed, then followed by a Sub-CU level motion refinement.
• an initial motion vector is derived for the whole CU based on bilateral matching or template matching.
• a list of MV candidates is generated and the candidate which leads to the minimum matching cost is selected as the starting point for further CU level refinement.
• a local search based on bilateral matching or template matching around the starting point is performed and the MV results in the minimum matching cost is taken as the MV for the whole CU.
• the motion information is further refined at sub-CU level with the derived CU motion vectors as the starting points.
• the following derivation process is performed for a W X H CU motion information derivation.
• MV for the whole W x H CU is derived.
• the CU is further split into M x M sub-CUs.
• the value of M is calculated as in (16)
• D is a predefined splitting depth which is set to 3 by default in the JEM. Then the MV for each sub-CU is derived.
• the bilateral matching is used to derive motion information of the current CU by finding the closest match between two blocks along the motion trajectory of the current CU in two different reference pictures.
• the motion vectors MV0 and MV1 pointing to the two reference blocks shall be proportional to the temporal distances, i.e., TD0 and TD1, between the current picture and the two reference pictures.
• the bilateral matching becomes mirror based bi-directional MV.
• template matching is used to derive motion information of the current CU by finding the closest match between a template (top and/or left neighbouring blocks of the current CU) in the current picture and a block (same size to the template) in a reference picture. Except the aforementioned FRUC merge mode, the template matching is also applied to AMVP mode.
• AMVP has two candidates. With template matching method, a new candidate is derived. If the newly derived candidate by template matching is different to the first existing AMVP candidate, it is inserted at the very beginning of the AMVP candidate list and then the list size is set to two (meaning remove the second existing AMVP candidate).
• AMVP mode only CU level search is applied.
• the MV candidate set at CU level consists of:
• each valid MV of a merge candidate is used as an input to generate a MV pair with the assumption of bilateral matching.
• one valid MV of a merge candidate is (MVa, refa) at reference list A.
• the reference picture refb of its paired bilateral MV is found in the other reference list B so that refa and refb are temporally at different sides of the current picture. If such a refb is not available in reference list B, refb is determined as a reference which is different from refa and its temporal distance to the current picture is the minimal one in list B.
• MVb is derived by scaling MVa based on the temporal distance between the current picture and refa, refb.
• MVs from the interpolated MV field are also added to the CU level candidate list. More specifically, the interpolated MVs at the position (0, 0), (W/2, 0), (0, FI/2) and (W/2, FI/2) of the current CU are added.
• the original AMVP candidates are also added to CU level MV candidate set.
• the original AMVP candidates are also added to CU level MV candidate set.
• up to 15 MVs for AMVP CUs and up to 13 MVs for merge CUs are added to the candidate list.
• the MV candidate set at sub-CU level consists of:
• the scaled MVs from reference pictures are derived as follows. All the reference pictures in both lists are traversed. The MVs at a collocated position of the sub-CU in a reference picture are scaled to the reference of the starting CU-level MV.
• ATMVP and STMVP candidates are limited to the four first ones.
• interpolated motion field is generated for the whole picture based on unilateral ME. Then the motion field may be used later as CU level or sub-CU level MV candidates.
• the motion field of each reference pictures in both reference lists is traversed at 4x4 block level.
• the motion of the reference block is scaled to the current picture according to the temporal distance TD0 and TD1 (the same way as that of MV scaling of TMVP in HEVC) and the scaled motion is assigned to the block in the current frame. If no scaled MV is assigned to a 4x4 block, the block’s motion is marked as unavailable in the interpolated motion field.
• the matching cost is a bit different at different steps.
• the matching cost is the absolute sum difference (SAD) of bilateral matching or template matching.
• SAD absolute sum difference
• the matching cost C of bilateral matching at sub-CU level search is calculated as follows:
• w is a weighting factor which is empirically set to 4
• MV and MV S indicate the current MV and the starting MV, respectively.
• S D is still used as the matching cost of template matching at sub-CU level search.
• MV is derived by using luma samples only. The derived motion will be used for both luma and chroma for MC inter prediction. After MV is decided, final MC is performed using 8-taps interpolation filter for luma and 4-taps interpolation filter for chroma.
• MV refinement is a pattern based MV search with the criterion of bilateral matching cost or template matching cost.
• two search patterns are supported - an unrestricted center-biased diamond search (UCBDS) and an adaptive cross search for MV refinement at the CU level and sub-CU level, respectively.
• UMBDS center-biased diamond search
• the MV is directly searched at quarter luma sample MV accuracy, and this is followed by one-eighth luma sample MV refinement.
• the search range of MV refinement for the CU and sub-CU step are set equal to 8 luma samples.
• the encoder can choose among uni-prediction from listO, uni-prediction from listl or bi-prediction for a CU. The selection is based on a template matching cost as follows:
• costBi ⁇ factor * min (costO, costl )
• costO is the SAD of listO template matching
• costl is the SAD of listl template matching
• costBi is the SAD of bi-prediction template matching.
• the value of factor is equal to 1.25, which means that the selection process is biased toward bi-prediction.
• the inter prediction direction selection is only applied to the CU-level template matching process.
• bi-prediction operation for the prediction of one block region, two prediction blocks, formed using a motion vector (MV) of listO and a MV of listl, respectively, are combined to form a single prediction signal.
• MV motion vector
• DMVR decoder-side motion vector refinement
• the two motion vectors of the bi-prediction are further refined by a bilateral template matching process.
• the bilateral template matching applied in the decoder to perform a distortion-based search between a bilateral template and the reconstruction samples in the reference pictures in order to obtain a refined MV without transmission of additional motion information.
• a bilateral template is generated as the weighted combination (i.e.
• the template matching operation consists of calculating cost measures between the generated template and the sample region (around the initial prediction block) in the reference picture. For each of the two reference pictures, the MV that yields the minimum template cost is considered as the updated MV of that list to replace the original one.
• the nine MV candidates are searched for each list.
• the nine MV candidates include the original MV and 8 surrounding MVs with one luma sample offset to the original MV in either the horizontal or vertical direction, or both.
• the two new MVs i.e., MV0' and MVT as shown in FIG. 24, are used for generating the final bi-prediction results.
• a sum of absolute differences (SAD) is used as the cost measure.
• DMVR is applied for the merge mode of bi-prediction with one MV from a reference picture in the past and another from a reference picture in the future, without the transmission of additional syntax elements.
• JEM when LIC, affine motion, FRUC, or sub-CU merge candidate is enabled for a CU, DMVR is not applied.
• a merge candidate list is first constructed by inserting the motion vectors and reference indices of the spatial neighboring and temporal neighboring blocks into the candidate list with redundancy checking until the number of the available candidates reaches the maximum candidate size of 19.
• the merge candidate list for the merge/skip mode is constructed by inserting spatial candidates (FIG. 11), temporal candidates, affine candidates, advanced temporal MVP (ATMVP) candidate, spatial temporal MVP (STMVP) candidate and the additional candidates as used in HEVC (Combined candidates and Zero candidates) according to a pre defined insertion order:
• IC flags are also inherited from merge candidates except for STMVP and affine. Moreover, for the first four spatial candidates, the bi-prediction ones are inserted before the ones with uni-prediction.
• blocks which are not connected with the current block may be accessed. If a non-adjacent block is coded with non-intra mode, the associated motion information may be added as an additional merge candidate.
• the current HEVC design could take the correlation of current block its neighbouring blocks (next to the current block) to better code the motion information. However, it is possible that that the neighbouring blocks correspond to different objects with different motion trajectories. In this case, prediction from its neighbouring blocks is not efficient.
• Prediction from motion information of non-adjacent blocks could bring additional coding gain with the cost of storing all the motion information (typically on 4x4 level) into cache which significantly increase the complexity for hardware implementation.
• an LUT may be a table, a list, an array or another arrangement of indexed entries.
• LUT-based motion vector prediction techniques using one or more tables with at least one motion candidate stored to predict motion information of a block can be implemented in various embodiments to provide video coding with higher coding efficiencies.
• a look up table is an example of a table which can be used to include motion candidates to predict motion information of a block and other implementations are also possible.
• Each LETT can include one or more motion candidates, each associated with corresponding motion information.
• Motion information of a motion candidate can include partial or all of the prediction direction, reference
• Motion information may further include the block position information to indicate from which the motion information is coming.
• the LUT-based motion vector prediction can also be referred to as History- based Motion Vector Prediction (HMVP) method.
• HMVP History- based Motion Vector Prediction
• the LUT-based motion vector prediction method one or multiple tables with motion information from previously coded blocks are maintained during the encoding/decoding process. These motion candidates stored in the LUTs are named HMVP candidates.
• the associated motion information in LUTs may be added to the motion candidate lists (e.g., merge/AMVP candidate lists), and after encoding/decoding one block, LUTs may be updated. The updated LUTs are then used to code the subsequent blocks.
• the updating of motion candidates in the LUTs are based on the encoding/decoding order of blocks.
• Some embodiments may use one or more look up tables with at least one motion candidate stored to predict motion information of a block.
• Embodiments may use motion candidate to indicate a set of motion information stored in a look up table.
• embodiments may use AMVP or merge candidates for storing the motion information.
• Each look up table may contain one or more motion candidates wherein each candidate is associated with its motion information.
• Example Bl For coding a block, partial or all of motion candidates from one look up table may be checked in order. When one motion candidate is checked during coding a block, it may be added to the motion candidate list (e.g., AMVP, merge candidate lists).
• the motion candidate list e.g., AMVP, merge candidate lists
• the total number of motion candidates in a look up table to be checked may be pre defined.
• the total number of motion candidates to be checked may be signalled in Video Parameter Set (VPS), Sequence Parameter Set (SPS), Picture Parameter Set (PPS), Slice header, tile header, Coding Tree Unit (CTU), Coding Tree Block (CTB), Coding Unit (CU) or Prediction Unit (PU), region covering multiple CTU/CTB/CU/PUs.
• VPS Video Parameter Set
• SPS Sequence Parameter Set
• PPS Picture Parameter Set
• CTU Coding Tree Unit
• CTB Coding Tree Block
• CU Coding Unit
• PU Prediction Unit
• a may be used for the merge mode coding, i.e., motion candidates may be checked in the merge candidate list derivation process.
• They may be used for the affine merge mode coding.
• a motion candidate in a look up table can be added as an affine merge candidate if its affine flag is one.
• the merge candidate list is not full after inserting the TMVP candidate; ii. the merge candidate list is not full after checking a certain spatial neighboring block for spatial merge candidate derivation;
• the merge candidate list is not full after all spatial merge candidates; iv. the merge candidate list is not full after combined bi-predictive merge candidates;
• the threshold is set to 1 or 0.
• the threshold may be signaled or pre-defined in SPS/PPS/sequence, picture, slice header/tile.
• the threshold may be adaptively changed from block to block. For example, it may be dependent on coded block information, like block size/block shape/slice type, and/or dependent on the number of available spatial or temporal merge candidates.
• the pruning may include a) comparing the motion information with existing entries for uniqueness, or b) if unique, then adding the motion information to the list, or c) if not unique, then either cl) not adding or c2) adding the motion information and deleting existing entry that matched.
• the pruning operation is not invoked when adding a motion candidate from a table to a candidate list.
• a motion candidate may be pruned to all or partial of the available spatial or temporal (e.g., including adjacent spatial and non-adjacent spatial, TMVP, STMVP, ATMVP, etc. al) merge candidates from other coding methods in the merge candidate list.
• the available spatial or temporal e.g., including adjacent spatial and non-adjacent spatial, TMVP, STMVP, ATMVP, etc. al
• a motion candidate may be NOT pruned to sub-block based motion candidates, e.g., ATMVP, STMVP.
• a current motion candidate may be pruned to all or partial of the available motion candidates (inserted before the current motion candidate) in the merge candidate list.
• how to select candidates previously added in the list to be compared with a new motion candidate from a table may depend on where the previously added candidates derived from. a.
• a motion candidate in a look-up table may be compared to candidates derived from a given temporal and/or spatial neighboring block.
• different entries of motion candidates in a look-up table may be compared to different previously added candidates (i.e., derived from different locations).
• Example C2 The motion candidate(s) included in a look up table may be used as a predictor for coding motion information of a block.
• AMVP mode coding i.e., motion candidates may be checked in the AMVP candidate list derivation process.
• the AMVP candidate list is not full after inserting the TMVP candidate; ii. the AMVP candidate list is not full after selecting from spatial neighbors and pruning, right before inserting the TMVP candidate;
• Pruning may be applied before adding a motion candidate to the AMVP candidate list.
• motion candidates with different reference pictures from the current reference picture are also checked (with MV scaled).
• motion candidates are checked following the same in merge.
• Example C3 Motion candidates of a look up table in previously coded
• frames/slices/tiles may be used to predict motion information of a block in a different frame/slice/tile.
• Example Dl After coding a block with motion information (i.e., IntraBC mode, inter coded mode), one or multiple look up tables may be updated.
• a block with motion information i.e., IntraBC mode, inter coded mode
• Example D2 If one block is located at a picture/slice/tile border, updating of look up tables may be always disallowed.
• Example D3 Motion information of above LCU rows may be disabled to code the current LCU row.
• Example D4 At the beginning of coding a slice/tile with a new temporal layer index, the number of available motion candidates may be reset to 0.
• Example D5 The look up table may be continuously updated with one slice/tile/LCU row/slices with same temporal layer index.
• Example D6 Look up table updating process may be invoked within different procedures.
• HMVP history-based MVP
• a First-In-First- Out (FIFO) rule is applied so that the table always contains the latest previously coded L motion candidates.
• FIG. 32 depicts an example wherein the FIFO rule is applied to remove a HMVP candidate and add a new one to the table used in the proposed method.
• FIG. 33A shows an example when the LUT is full before adding a new motion candidate.
• FIG. 33B shows an example when the LUT is not full before adding a new motion candidate.
• FIG. 33A and 33B together show an example of redundancy-removal based LUT updating method (with one redundancy motion candidate removed).
• FIG. 34A and 34B show example implementation for two cases of the redundancy- removal based LUT updating method (with multiple redundancy motion candidates removed, 2 candidates in the figures)
• FIG. 34A shows an example case of when the LUT is full before adding a new motion candidate.
• FIG. 34B shows an example case of When the LUT is not full before adding a new motion candidate
• HMVP candidates could be used in the merge candidate list construction process. All HMVP candidates from the last entry to the first entry (or the last K0 HMVP, e.g., K0 equal to 16 or 6) in the table are inserted after the TMVP candidate. Pruning is applied on the HMVP candidates. Once the total number of available merge candidates reaches the signaled maximally allowed merge candidates, the merge candidate list construction process is terminated.
• HMVP candidates could also be used in the AMVP candidate list construction process.
• the motion vectors of the last K1 HMVP candidates in the table are inserted after the TMVP candidate. Only HMVP candidates with the same reference picture as the AMVP target reference picture are used to construct the AMVP candidate list. Pruning is applied on the HMVP candidates. In one example, K1 is set to 4.
• FIG. 28 is a block diagram of a video processing apparatus 2800.
• the apparatus 2800 may be used to implement one or more of the methods described herein.
• the apparatus 2800 may be embodied in a smartphone, tablet, computer, Internet of Things (IoT) receiver, and so on.
• the apparatus 2800 may include one or more processors 2802, one or more memories 2804 and video processing hardware 2806.
• the processor(s) 2802 may be configured to implement one or more methods described in the present document.
• the memory (memories) 2804 may be used for storing data and code used for implementing the methods and techniques described herein.
• the video processing hardware 2806 may be used to implement, in hardware circuitry, some techniques described in the present document.
• FIG. 29 is a flowchart for an example of a video processing method 2900.
• the method 2900 includes, at step 2902, maintaining a set of tables, wherein each table includes motion candidates and each motion candidate is associated with corresponding motion information.
• the method 2900 further includes, at step 2904, updating a motion candidate list based on motion candidates in one or more tables using a pruning operation on the motion candidates.
• the method 2900 further includes, at step 2906, performing a conversion between a first video block and a bitstream representation of a video including the first video block using the constructed motion candidate list.
• FIG. 30 is a flowchart for an example of video processing method 3000.
• the method 3000 includes, at step 3002, receiving a bitstream representation of a video including a first video block.
• the method 3000 further includes, at step 3004, applying a pruning operation to motion candidates in one or more tables to update a candidate list, wherein each table includes motion candidates and each motion candidate is associated with corresponding motion information.
• the method 3000 further includes at step 3006, performing a conversion between the bitstream representation and the first video block using the constructed candidate list.
• a video processing method comprising: maintaining a set of tables, wherein each table includes motion candidates and each motion candidate is associated with corresponding motion information; updating a candidate list based on motion candidates in one or more tables using a pruning operation on the motion candidates; and performing a conversion between a first video block and a bitstream representation of a video including the first video block using the constructed candidate list.
• a method for video processing comprising: receiving a bitstream representation of a video including a first video block; and applying a pruning operation to motion candidates in one or more tables to construct a candidate list, wherein each table includes motion candidates and each motion candidate is associated with corresponding motion information; and performing a conversion between the bitstream representation and the first video block using the constructed candidate list.
• a motion candidate is associated with motion information including at least one of: a prediction direction, a reference picture index, motion vector values, an intensity compensation flag, an affine flag, a motion vector difference precision, or motion vector difference value.
• the disclosed and other embodiments, modules and the functional operations described in this document can be implemented in digital electronic circuitry, or in computer software, firmware, or hardware, including the structures disclosed in this document and their structural equivalents, or in combinations of one or more of them.
• the disclosed and other embodiments can be implemented as one or more computer program products, i.e., one or more modules of computer program instructions encoded on a computer readable medium for execution by, or to control the operation of, data processing apparatus.
• the computer readable medium can be a machine-readable storage device, a machine-readable storage substrate, a memory device, a composition of matter effecting a machine-readable propagated signal, or a combination of one or more them.
• data processing apparatus encompasses all apparatus, devices, and machines for processing data, including by way of example a programmable processor, a computer, or multiple processors or computers.
• the apparatus can include, in addition to hardware, code that creates an execution environment for the computer program in question, e.g., code that constitutes processor firmware, a protocol stack, a database management system, an operating system, or a combination of one or more of them.
• a propagated signal is an artificially generated signal, e.g., a machine-generated electrical, optical, or electromagnetic signal, that is generated to encode information for transmission to suitable receiver apparatus.
• a computer program (also known as a program, software, software application, script, or code) can be written in any form of programming language, including compiled or interpreted languages, and it can be deployed in any form, including as a stand-alone program or as a module, component, subroutine, or other unit suitable for use in a computing environment.
• a computer program does not necessarily correspond to a file in a file system.
• a program can be stored in a portion of a file that holds other programs or data (e.g., one or more scripts stored in a markup language document), in a single file dedicated to the program in question, or in multiple coordinated files (e.g., files that store one or more modules, sub programs, or portions of code).
• a computer program can be deployed to be executed on one computer or on multiple computers that are located at one site or distributed across multiple sites and interconnected by a communication network.
• the processes and logic flows described in this document can be performed by one or more programmable processors executing one or more computer programs to perform functions by operating on input data and generating output.
• the processes and logic flows can also be performed by, and apparatus can also be implemented as, special purpose logic circuitry, e.g., an FPGA (field programmable gate array) or an ASIC (application specific integrated circuit).
• special purpose logic circuitry e.g., an FPGA (field programmable gate array) or an ASIC (application specific integrated circuit).
• processors suitable for the execution of a computer program include, by way of example, both general and special purpose microprocessors, and any one or more processors of any kind of digital computer.
• a processor will receive instructions and data from a read only memory or a random-access memory or both.
• the essential elements of a computer are a processor for performing instructions and one or more memory devices for storing instructions and data.
• a computer will also include, or be operatively coupled to receive data from or transfer data to, or both, one or more mass storage devices for storing data, e.g., magnetic, magneto optical disks, or optical disks.
• mass storage devices for storing data, e.g., magnetic, magneto optical disks, or optical disks.
• a computer need not have such devices.
• Computer readable media suitable for storing computer program instructions and data include all forms of non-volatile memory, media and memory devices, including by way of example semiconductor memory devices, e.g., EPROM, EEPROM, and flash memory devices; magnetic disks, e.g., internal hard disks or removable disks; magneto optical disks; and CD ROM and DVD-ROM disks.
• semiconductor memory devices e.g., EPROM, EEPROM, and flash memory devices
• magnetic disks e.g., internal hard disks or removable disks
• magneto optical disks e.g., CD ROM and DVD-ROM disks.
• the processor and the memory can be supplemented by, or incorporated in, special purpose logic circuitry.

Landscapes

• Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
• Multimedia (AREA)
• Signal Processing (AREA)
• Compression Or Coding Systems Of Tv Signals (AREA)
• Image Analysis (AREA)

Priority Applications (12)

Applications Claiming Priority (8)

Related Child Applications (1)

Publications (1)

Family

ID=67253945

Family Applications (1)

Country Status (10)

Cited By (18)

Families Citing this family (24)

Citations (4)

Family Cites Families (297)

• 2019
  • 2019-07-01 TW TW108123185A patent/TWI752331B/zh active
  • 2019-07-01 KR KR1020227042182A patent/KR102680903B1/ko active Active
  • 2019-07-01 CA CA3101730A patent/CA3101730C/en active Active
  • 2019-07-01 MX MX2020013829A patent/MX392418B/es unknown
  • 2019-07-01 EP EP19739405.9A patent/EP3791585A1/en not_active Ceased
  • 2019-07-01 KR KR1020207038007A patent/KR20210024502A/ko not_active Ceased
  • 2019-07-01 WO PCT/IB2019/055582 patent/WO2020003275A1/en not_active Ceased
  • 2019-07-01 CN CN201910586581.4A patent/CN110662054B/zh active Active
  • 2019-07-01 JP JP2021523110A patent/JP7100200B2/ja active Active
  • 2019-07-01 EP EP24199552.1A patent/EP4475530A3/en active Pending
  • 2019-07-01 CN CN202211707625.2A patent/CN115988203A/zh active Pending
  • 2019-07-01 SG SG11202011714RA patent/SG11202011714RA/en unknown
• 2020
  • 2020-08-14 US US16/993,598 patent/US11528500B2/en active Active
  • 2020-12-16 MX MX2022006015A patent/MX2022006015A/es unknown
• 2021
  • 2021-07-20 US US17/380,225 patent/US20210352312A1/en active Pending
• 2022
  • 2022-06-24 JP JP2022102073A patent/JP2022126817A/ja active Pending

Patent Citations (4)

Non-Patent Citations (6)

Also Published As

Similar Documents

Legal Events