WO2018027069A1 - Roll-to-roll programmable film imprint lithography - Google Patents

Roll-to-roll programmable film imprint lithography Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2018027069A1
WO2018027069A1 PCT/US2017/045368 US2017045368W WO2018027069A1 WO 2018027069 A1 WO2018027069 A1 WO 2018027069A1 US 2017045368 W US2017045368 W US 2017045368W WO 2018027069 A1 WO2018027069 A1 WO 2018027069A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
recited
substrate
film
liquid resist
resist formulation
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/US2017/045368
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Inventor
Sidlgata V. Sreenivasan
Shrawan Singhal
Ovadia ABED
Lawrence Dunn
Paras Ajay
Ofodike EZEKOYE
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
University of Texas System
University of Texas at Austin
Original Assignee
University of Texas System
University of Texas at Austin
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by University of Texas System, University of Texas at Austin filed Critical University of Texas System
Priority to US16/322,842 priority Critical patent/US11669009B2/en
Priority to EP17837715.6A priority patent/EP3493921A4/en
Publication of WO2018027069A1 publication Critical patent/WO2018027069A1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G03PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
    • G03FPHOTOMECHANICAL PRODUCTION OF TEXTURED OR PATTERNED SURFACES, e.g. FOR PRINTING, FOR PROCESSING OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; MATERIALS THEREFOR; ORIGINALS THEREFOR; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED THEREFOR
    • G03F7/00Photomechanical, e.g. photolithographic, production of textured or patterned surfaces, e.g. printing surfaces; Materials therefor, e.g. comprising photoresists; Apparatus specially adapted therefor
    • G03F7/0002Lithographic processes using patterning methods other than those involving the exposure to radiation, e.g. by stamping
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B82NANOTECHNOLOGY
    • B82YSPECIFIC USES OR APPLICATIONS OF NANOSTRUCTURES; MEASUREMENT OR ANALYSIS OF NANOSTRUCTURES; MANUFACTURE OR TREATMENT OF NANOSTRUCTURES
    • B82Y40/00Manufacture or treatment of nanostructures
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01QSCANNING-PROBE TECHNIQUES OR APPARATUS; APPLICATIONS OF SCANNING-PROBE TECHNIQUES, e.g. SCANNING PROBE MICROSCOPY [SPM]
    • G01Q60/00Particular types of SPM [Scanning Probe Microscopy] or microscopes; Essential components thereof
    • G01Q60/24AFM [Atomic Force Microscopy] or apparatus therefor, e.g. AFM probes

Definitions

  • the present invention relates generally to nanoimprint lithography, and more particularly to a roll-to-roll programmable film imprint lithography process using an optimization program to achieve the desired features on the substrate.
  • Nanoimprint lithography is a method of fabricating nanometer scale patterns that is low cost, high throughput and high resolution.
  • the imprint resist is typically a monomer or polymer formulation that is cured by heat or UV light during the imprinting. Adhesion between the resist and the template is controlled to allow proper release.
  • J-FIL Jet and Flash Imprint Lithography
  • J-FIL offers distinct advantages in the replication of non-uniform patterns. This is because J-FIL uses drop-on-demand inkjetting as the preferred mode of material deposition, which allows pattern density based adaptive material placement.
  • J-FIL has also been configured for roll-to-roll (R2R) imprinting which combines the benefits of inexpensive R2R processing with the precise nanoscale patterning afforded by J-FIL.
  • R2R imprint lithography use gravure or slot-die coating as the mechanism for material deposition and hence print substantially uniform patterns.
  • a method for fabricating patterns on a flexible substrate in a roll-to-roll configuration comprises implementing an inverse optimization scheme to determine process parameters used to obtain a desired film thickness of a liquid resist formulation.
  • the method further comprises covering the flexible substrate in the roll-to-roll configuration with a substantially continuous film of the liquid resist formulation, using one or more of the following techniques: dispensing discrete drops of a monomer on a substrate using an inkjet and allowing the dispensed drops to spontaneously spread and merge to form the substantially continuous film of the liquid resist formulation, slot-die coating, dip coating, gravure coating and knife-edge coating, where the liquid resist formulation is diluted in a solvent on the substrate.
  • the method additionally comprises evaporating the solvent substantially from the liquid resist formulation forming a film. Furthermore, the method comprises closing a gap between a template and the substrate to fill features of the template with the film. Additionally, the method comprises curing the film to polymerize the film. In addition, the method comprises separating the substrate from the template leaving the polymerized film on the substrate.
  • a method for depositing a film on a flexible substrate held in a roll-to-roll configuration comprises implementing an inverse optimization scheme with a desired film thickness profile as an input which is used to determine process parameters of a liquid resist formulation, where the liquid resist formulation comprises a solvent and one or more non-solvent components.
  • the method further comprises covering the flexible substrate in a roll-to-roll configuration with a substantially continuous film of the liquid resist formulation using one or more of the following techniques: dispensing discrete drops of a monomer on the substrate using an inkjet and allowing the dispensed drops to spontaneously spread and merge, and slot die coating, where the liquid resist formulation is diluted in the solvent.
  • the method additionally comprises evaporating the solvent substantially from the liquid resist formulation forming a film.
  • the method comprises curing the film to polymerize the film.
  • a method for performing in-situ metrology on an area of a flexible substrate comprises having an array of Atomic Force Microscope (AFM) tips with individually addressable locations.
  • the method further comprises determining an optimum positioning of the array of AFM tips on the area of the flexible substrate with a pattern, a topography variation or a variation in a film thickness, where each AFM tip in the array of AFM tips provides data that is aggregated to infer the pattern, the topography variation or the film thickness variation.
  • the method additionally comprises scanning the patterned area to measure the pattern, the topography variation or the film thickness variation.
  • the method comprises aggregating and analyzing the measured pattern, the measured topography variation or the measured film thickness variation to infer the pattern, the topography variation or the film thickness variation.
  • Figure 1 is a flowchart of a method of the inkjet-based P-FIL (IJ-PFIL) process for fabricating a pattern in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention
  • Figures 2A-2F depict the cross-sectional views of fabricating a pattern using the steps described in Figure 1 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention
  • Figure 3 is a flowchart of method for fabricating replica templates and final substrates using roll-to-plate lithography in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention
  • Figures 4A-4J depict the cross-sectional views of fabricating replica templates and final substrates using the steps described in Figure 3 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 5 illustrates the roll-to-roll (R2R) configuration in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention
  • Figure 6 is a diagram of the framework for the inverse optimization scheme for D-PFIL in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • Figure 7 is a diagram of the framework for the inverse optimization scheme for Slot-die (SD)-PFIL in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • Figure 8 illustrates a stable bead formation in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention
  • Figure 9 is a flowchart of a method for fabricating nanoscale patterns made of high-index dielectric materials, such as Ti0 2 , on a flat surface in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • Figures 10A-10D depict the cross-sectional views of fabricating nanoscale patterns on a flat surface using the steps described in Figure 9 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • P-FIL Programmable Film Imprint Lithography
  • This non-uniformity may be (i) substantially correlated with an initial non-uniform material distribution or, (ii) can be enhanced from an initial uniform distribution of material through controlled external inputs, such as distributed thermal actuation or controlled gas flow to evaporate the resist film with spatial selectivity or, (iii) a combination of approaches (i) and (ii) discussed herein.
  • distributed inkjetting of material can be used to add more material selectively on top of films that are deposited using slot-die coating, gravure coating, etc. This may be necessitated in cases where simultaneous patterning of micro- and nano-scale structures is desired.
  • the thickness of the deposited film may be made compatible with the nano-scale structures, while inkjetting of larger drops may be used to cater to the micro-scale structures.
  • the achievement of a programmed non-uniform and substantially continuous film is driven by an optimization program that informs the initial material distribution and the nature of external inputs, such as evaporation or gas flow.
  • the gap between the resist-coated substrate and a patterned template is closed to fill the template pattern.
  • the resist film is then cross-linked using UV light and the template is then separated from the substrate to leave the polymerized resist film on the substrate.
  • an intentionally non-uniform film is formed on a pre-patterned substrate or an un-patterned substrate using the methods described above. This is done to compensate for substrate topography variations to achieve a desired final substrate topography.
  • a goal of the process of the present invention is to deposit an intentionally non-uniform film on a substrate where the resulting top surface has no patterns.
  • the liquid resist material may be cross-linked in the free surface state or contact may be made against a superstrate that is substantially free from nanoscale and microscale patterns.
  • the superstrate influences the evolution dynamics of the thin film. Its geometry can thus be optimized, by locally changing its thickness, to match the desired film thickness profile and process specifications.
  • a superstrate thickness profile of the superstrate and geometry are optimized to obtain desired evolution dynamics for a given substrate topography.
  • the superstrate is flexible or held in a roll-to-roll configuration.
  • Figure 1 is a flowchart of a method 100 of the inkjet-based P-FIL (IJ-PFIL) process for fabricating a pattern in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • Figures 2A-2F depict the cross-sectional views of fabricating a pattern using the steps described in Figure 1 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • drops of a monomer 201 are dispensed on a flexible substrate 202 in a roll-to-roll configuration (discussion of roll-to-roll configuration discussed further below) using an inkjet as shown in Figure 2 A, where drops 201 spontaneously spread and merge with one another as shown in Figure 2B to form a liquid resist formulation 203 (containing the solvent and one or more non-solvent components) as shown in Figure 2C.
  • substrate 202 is handled in a roll-to-roll format.
  • substrate 202 has a pattern.
  • the inkjet is used to dispense discrete drops of diluted monomer which does not form a substantially continuous film to locally modify film thickness profiles prior to closing the gap between template 205 and substrate 202 (discussed below).
  • the solvent is evaporated (e.g., blanket evaporation) from liquid resist formulation 203 followed by selective multi -component resist film evaporation resulting in a non-uniform and substantially continuous film 204 on substrate 202 as shown in Figures 2C and 2D.
  • the liquid resist formulation consists of solvent with a substantially higher volatility than the rest of the components of the liquid resist formulation.
  • the non-solvent component(s) of the liquid resist formulation have substantially similar volatility.
  • the non-solvent component(s) of the liquid resist formulation except for a photoinitiator have a boiling point that differ by less than 30° C, 10° C or 5° C.
  • the non-solvent component(s) of the liquid resist formulation except for a photoinitiator have a boiling point in a temperature range of less than 30° C.
  • the non-solvent component(s) include a thermoset polymer with a high glass transition temperature.
  • the non-solvent component(s) include silicon or carbon.
  • liquid resist formulation 203 is selectively evaporated, such as via infra-red (IR) lamps, forming a non-uniform and substantially continuous film 204 on substrate 202 as shown in Figure 2D.
  • the selective evaporation is carried out by one or more of the following: a temperature controlled substrate chuck, an array of individually controllable infrared lamps, an array of individually controllable fans to control air flow, individually controllable micro heaters or coolers on substrate 202, and a spatial light modulator (may include one or more Digital Micromirror Device (DMD) arrays) to control one or more sources of electromagnetic radiation.
  • DMD Digital Micromirror Device
  • the selective evaporation and patterning are carried out in separate stations to avoid recondensation of evaporated materials onto substrate 202 prior to patterning.
  • the selective evaporation is carried out in an environment with controlled vapor pressures.
  • the liquid resist formulation, whose solvent has already been evaporated is selectively evaporated to form film 204 with an intentional thickness profile that leads to a desired thickness profile, where the desired thickness profile is uniform and the intentional thickness profile is non-uniform to compensate for the process parasitics.
  • an inverse optimization scheme may be used to determine process parameters used to obtain a desired film thickness of the liquid resist formulation.
  • the inverse optimization scheme includes one or more of the following: genetic algorithms, simulated annealing, and full pattern search to achieve an objective function of minimizing an error between a function of the desired film thickness and the obtained film thickness.
  • the liquid resist formulation whose solvent has already been evaporated, is selectively evaporated to form film 204 with an intentional thickness profile that leads to a desired thickness profile, where the desired thickness profile is uniform and the intentional thickness profile is non-uniform to compensate for process parasitics.
  • the selective evaporation is carried out by one or more of the following: a temperature controlled substrate chuck, an array of individually controllable infrared lamps, an array of individually controllable fans to control air flow, individually controllable micro heaters or coolers on substrate 202, and a spatial light modulator (may include one or more Digital Micromirror Device (DMD) arrays) to control one or more sources of electromagnetic radiation.
  • a spatial light modulator may include one or more Digital Micromirror Device (DMD) arrays
  • DMD Digital Micromirror Device
  • the solvent evaporation, selective resist evaporation and imprinting are carried out in stations that may be separated by barriers that prevent vapor transport between the stations.
  • the selective evaporation is carried out in an environment with controlled vapor pressures.
  • the control of resist film evaporation can be done in a separate station, which is physically separated with barriers, through judicious control of temperature through a distributed set of thermal actuators, infrared (IR) lamps, or combinations thereof, in which each element in the set can be individually controlled.
  • This individual control in infra-red (IR) lamps can be achieved through devices, such as Digital Micromirror Device (DMD) Arrays from Texas Instruments.
  • DMD Digital Micromirror Device
  • a state-of-the-art array has 4M pixels at a pitch of 7.6 micrometers at a diagonal width of 0.9 inches. This can enable spatial modulation of IR intensity to control the evaporation over at least an area of - 0.4 sq. inch.
  • a resist formulation containing methyl methacrylate (MMA) as the liquid monomer and primary component would need a local heat source of ⁇ 1 W to absorb sufficient heat at normal temperature and pressure to evaporate -100 nm of liquid film from a local 50 x 50 ⁇ 2 area, assuming the starting film thickness is 500 nm.
  • Such powers can be delivered using DMD arrays. These devices also have frame rates approaching 10 kHz, and thereby provide high frequency temporal control of the incident radiation and subsequent evaporation.
  • multiple DMD arrays can be used across a larger area, if resolution cannot be compromised further.
  • the individual pixels may have significant cross-talk, which can also be modeled and incorporated in the forward model for thin film evaporation.
  • an underlying substrate with MEMS-based micro-heaters may also be used for enhanced temperature distribution, if a higher resolution is required than what can be afforded by the DMD arrays. This principle of selective heating can be generally applied to all embodiments of the present invention and is not specific to only IJ-PFIL.
  • template 205 e.g., unpatterned template
  • substrate 202 is then closed (bringing corresponding template 205 in contact with film 204) in step 103 as shown in Figures 2D and 2E such that film 204 fills the features of template 205.
  • template 205 is patterned with a lateral feature dimension of less than 500 nm.
  • template 205 is patterned with a lateral feature dimension of less than 100 nm.
  • the template consists of a three-dimensional shape or a multi-tiered pattern as discussed in P.
  • contact between the substrate and the template is initiated substantially along a line or substantially at a point. This is done to prevent substantial area contact, as it can potentially lead to trapping of bubbles and voids because of the flexible nature of the substrate.
  • precise motion control and/or force control is employed while closing the gap to prevent impact between the template and the substrate.
  • the chuck is an air cavity chuck as discussed in U.S. Patent Nos. 6,982,783; 7,019,819 and 6,980,282, which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
  • resist film 204 is cured by cross-linking using UV light 206 so as to polymerize resist film 204 as shown in Figure 2E.
  • step 105 template 205 is separated from substrate 202 to leave the polymerized resist film 207 on substrate 202 as shown in Figure 2F.
  • the tension in substrate 202 is controlled to substantially mitigate distortions because of thermal expansion.
  • template 205 has a multi-tiered pattern and/or a three-dimensional shape.
  • template 205 is flexible or held in a roll-to-roll configuration. This template configuration can be realized after substrate 202 is patterned using a rigid template 205, and can be used to pattern large-area substrates, such as glass panels, as discussed in U.S. Patent No. 9,616,614, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
  • a roll-to-roll PFIL approach can support both roll-to-roll and roll-to-plate (R2P) lithography.
  • the former involves having both the template and the substrate held in roll-to-roll configurations, while the latter has one of the two held in a roll-to-roll configuration with the other being a rigid substrate, such as a wafer or a glass panel.
  • the substrate is assumed to be held in a roll-to-roll configuration while the template is rigid.
  • the substrate is flexible.
  • An example of roll-to-plate lithography to make replica templates, and final substrates is provided in Figures 3 and 4A-4J.
  • Figure 3 is a flowchart of method 300 for fabricating replica templates and final substrates using roll-to-plate lithography in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • Figures 4A-4J depict the cross-sectional views of fabricating replica templates and final substrates using the steps described in Figure 3 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • a master template 401 is fabricated, such as using e-beam, photolithography, etc., as shown in Figure 4A.
  • master template 401 is slot-die coated with resist 402 as shown in Figure 4B.
  • step 303 imprint on resist 402 using roll-to-plate (R2P) lithography (imprint rollers 403, plate 404) and cure forming replica 405 as shown in Figures 4C and 4D.
  • R2P roll-to-plate
  • step 304 replica 405 is separated from master template 401 as shown in Figure 4D and the process is repeated (steps 302-304) to fabricate further replicas 405.
  • step 305 oxide 406 is deposited on master template 401 as shown in Figure 4E.
  • replica 405 is imprinted (R2P) on master template 401 with oxide 406 forming replica template 407 as shown in Figures 4E and 4F.
  • Step 306 is repeated to fabricate a roll of replica templates 407 with a protective interleaf as shown in Figure 4F.
  • a substrate 408 is slot-die coated with resist 409 as shown in Figure 4G.
  • substrate 408 is flexible and/or held in a roll-to-roll configuration thereby enabling R2R lithography.
  • resist 409 is imprinted (R2P) using replica template 407 and cured as shown in Figure 4H.
  • step 309 substrate 408 is separated from replica template 407 forming a patterned resist 410 on substrate 408 as shown in Figures 41 and 4J.
  • the evaporation and patterning are carried out in separate stations.
  • different tool locations may be used in method 100 (IJ-PFIL), such as in the roll-to-roll (R2R) configuration as illustrated in Figure 5 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • IJ-PFIL roll-to-roll
  • FIG 5 in the R2R configuration, there is an uptake roll 501, an imprint station 502, a resist topography control station 503 that compensates for total travel time, a resist dispense station 504 and a source roll 505.
  • method 100 can potentially overcome problems with bubble trapping, it can be further enhanced by the use of an inverse model to also address varying template pattern geometry to determine optimum drop locations and volumes, along with DMD array parameters, such as the spatial and temporal distribution of mirrors to open and close.
  • the inverse model should be wrapped around a forward model that takes into account thin film flow in the presence of evaporation and surface tension driven gradients for the drop spreading, merging and evaporation stages prior to imprinting.
  • the inverse optimization scheme is used to determine process parameters, such as inkjet drop volume, location and evaporation temperature profile.
  • the inverse optimization scheme uses genetic algorithms, simulated annealing and/or a full pattern search to achieve an objective function of minimizing an error between a function of the desired film thickness and the obtained film thickness.
  • automatic machine in a loop control is achieved using genetic algorithms, simulated annealing and/or a full pattern search.
  • the inverse model may also include parameters of the Digital Micromirror Device (DMD) array, for example, the spatial distribution and frequency of switching of individual mirrors, to control the spatial evaporation profile.
  • DMD Digital Micromirror Device
  • the inverse optimization scheme may be augmented to determine one of the following: a spatial evaporation profile, a spatial temperature profile, a spatial material removal profile, a spatial evaporation rate profile, and a spatial material removal rate profile.
  • a framework for this optimization scheme is shown in Figure 6.
  • Figure 6 is a diagram of the framework for the inverse optimization scheme for D-PFIL in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • optimization solver 601 receives as inputs, the process parameters 602, topography 603, a desired pre-imprint residual layer thickness (RLT) profile 604, which uses the template pattern 605 as an input, and a predicted pre-imprint RLT profile 606.
  • RLT residual layer thickness
  • Optimization solver 601 outputs the inkjet material distribution 607, temperature distribution 608 and merging and spreading times 609.
  • the initial volumes and locations 610 which receives as input, the inkjet material distribution 607, as well as temperature distribution 608 and merging and spreading times 609 are inputs to the thin film and evaporation model 611 which is inputted to predicted pre-imprint RLT profile 606.
  • template pattern 605 is inputted to heuristics 612 which is inputted to initial volumes and locations 610.
  • such an inverse optimization scheme is implemented by a computing system.
  • any deviations in drop volume in the drop dispense stage can be overcome through image-processing based drop volume and velocity control.
  • the inverse model for determining optimum drop volumes and locations can also leverage prior work from Sreenivasan et al. (U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0048050), which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
  • the boiling point of the solvent should be much lower than the rest of the resist components, such that there is minimal evaporation of the resist when evaporating the solvent.
  • the boiling point of the XNTL-26SF resist from MicroResist Technologies is close to 180° C
  • the boiling point of a common solvent, such as PGMEA is close to 140° C.
  • This selective evaporation of the resist material can enable a desired film thickness profile, based on the need to obtain a uniform residual layer in the presence of non-uniform patterns, or address substantially systematic process parasitics, such as non-uniform shrinkage upon cross-linking and non-uniform etch rates in etch tools.
  • the film thickness profile can also be used to obtain a desired functional performance, such as desired optical performance, mechanical stability, etc.
  • the film thickness profile can also be used to obtain an intentional non-uniform residual layer, which would effectively result in controlled non-uniform feature dimensions for a uniform template pattern, as an example. This variation in feature dimensions across the field can result in interesting nanophotonic properties.
  • slot die coating based P-FIL is the material deposition technique.
  • Slot-die coating is an inexpensive process that has been used traditionally for R2R processing of flexible substrates. The challenge with slot-die coating is that it is extremely difficult to obtain nanoscale wet films of the thickness desired for nanoscale imprint lithography process residual layer films that have a mean thickness of less than 50 nm.
  • the material can be substantially diluted using solvents. Details of material design are discussed further below. Thus, the resist material concentration can be minimized to reduce the waste of expensive material. During execution of the slot die coating process and baking step, almost all of the solvent evaporates leading to a thin film of monomer resist with little or no concentration of solvent. This evaporation during the slot-die coating process can also be affected by the air flow in the vicinity. Unlike IJ-PFIL, where the initial material distribution can be controlled to get an initially non-uniform film, in SD-PFIL, the coated film immediately after slot-die coating is substantially uniform in at least one dimension.
  • control parameters include speed of the substrate relative to the die and coating gap.
  • the inverse model can be used to obtain optimum values for these parameters to obtain an initial uniform thick film that can then be driven to non-uniformity using controlled evaporation of the remaining resist in a separate station.
  • the inverse model can also be used for determining DMD parameters, such as the spatial and temporal distribution of "on” and "off mirrors.
  • the relation between these parameters and the film thickness can be quite complex to model. This is because the relation depends on the "region of operation" of the slot-die coater.
  • the coater typically operate in the so-called "region III," where the wet film thickness decreases with increasing speed, leading to favorable throughput.
  • region III where the wet film thickness decreases with increasing speed, leading to favorable throughput.
  • the material rheology may constrain the operation to only outside this region.
  • the inverse model may be augmented with heuristics to determine an optimum set of values.
  • the inverse optimization scheme is used to determine process parameters, such as inkjet drop volume, location and evaporation temperature profile, with an input being substrate topography.
  • the inverse optimization scheme uses genetic algorithms, simulated annealing and/or a full pattern search to achieve an objective function of minimizing an error between a function of a desired film thickness and said obtained film thickness.
  • FIG. 7 is a diagram of the framework for the inverse optimization scheme for SD-PFIL in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • optimization solver 701 receives as inputs, the input parameters 702, topography 703, a desired pre-imprint residual layer thickness (RLT) profile 704, which uses the template pattern 705 as an input, and a predicted pre-imprint RLT profile 706.
  • RLT residual layer thickness
  • Optimization solver 701 outputs the region of operation 707, temperature distribution 708 and slot-die process parameters 709.
  • the film thickness after slot-die coating 710, which receives as input, the region of operation 707, as well as temperature distribution 708 and slot- die process parameters 709 are inputs to the thin film and evaporation model 711 which is inputted to predicted pre-imprint RLT profile 706.
  • template pattern 705 is inputted to heuristics 712 which is inputted to film thickness after slot-die coating 710.
  • such an inverse optimization scheme is implemented by a computing system.
  • the control of resist evaporation can be done through judicious control of temperature through a distributed set of thermal actuators, IR lamps, or combinations thereof, in which each element in the set can be individually controlled.
  • This individual control in IR lamps can be achieved through devices, such as Digital Micromirror Device (DMD) Arrays from Texas Instruments.
  • DMD Digital Micromirror Device
  • a state-of-the-art array has 4M pixels at a pitch of 7.6 micrometers at a diagonal width of 0.9 inches. This can enable spatial modulation of IR intensity to control the evaporation over at least an area of - 0.4 sq. inch. With the appropriate reduction optics, a larger area can be projected upon, but by compromising resolution.
  • a resist formulation containing methyl methacrylate (MMA) as the liquid monomer and primary component would need a local heat source of ⁇ 1 W to absorb sufficient heat at normal temperature and pressure to evaporate -100 nm of liquid film from a local 50 x 50 ⁇ 2 area, assuming the starting film thickness is 500 nm.
  • Such powers can be delivered using DMD arrays. These DMD arrays can also support switching frequencies approaching 10 kHZ thereby providing high frequency pulses of radiation. [0071] Additionally, multiple DMD arrays can be used across a larger area, if resolution cannot be compromised further. Compensation of any process parasitics resulting from sequential processing under different DMD arrays can be incorporated in the inverse optimization framework.
  • the inverse optimization framework compensates for sequentially selective evaporation from one or more DMD arrays, or temperature profiles resulting from heat capacity of the substrate or material, or deterministic changes in film thickness profile due to known changes in ambient conditions or when handling or transporting the substrate.
  • the individual pixels may also have significant cross-talk, which can also be modeled and incorporated in the forward model for thin film evaporation.
  • an underlying substrate with MEMS-based micro-heaters may also be used for enhanced temperature distribution, if a higher resolution is required than what can be afforded by the DMD arrays.
  • the starting material can be substantially free from the solvent and may only consist of the resist (e.g., XNIL26-SF resist from MicroResist Technologies).
  • the approach presented herein uses controlled resist evaporation thereby removing a portion of the resist that is to be cross-linked.
  • This selective evaporation of the resist material can enable a desired film thickness profile, based on the need to obtain a uniform residual layer in the presence of non-uniform patterns, or address substantially systematic process parasitics, such as non-uniform shrinkage upon cross-linking, and non-uniform etch rates in etch tools.
  • the film thickness profile can also be used to obtain a desired functional performance, such as desired optical performance, mechanical stability, etc.
  • the film thickness profile can also be used to obtain an intentional non-uniform residual layer, which would effectively result in controlled non-uniform feature dimensions for a uniform template pattern, as an example. This variation in feature dimensions across the field can result in interesting nanophotonic properties.
  • the diffusion-limited case would likely offer stable control of the film thickness variations in initially non-uniform films, such as in LT-PFIL.
  • the transfer-limited case can be used to generate non-uniformities that can enable filling of directional patterns, or in SD-PFIL, where the initial film is substantially uniform.
  • the exact time scales are important, which can be found through a thorough analysis of typical process parameters.
  • a stability criterion has been established to determine when such lines are stable and when they lead to defects, as shown in Figure 8.
  • Such heuristics can be used to tweak drop pitch to enable stable film formation, assuming there is no evaporation in the spreading and merging stages.
  • the process can be repeated after solvent evaporation, to get defined stable lines over the continuous film that are parallel to the directionality of the pattern.
  • Figure 8 illustrates a stable bead formation in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • the x-axis of Figure 8 is a function of drop spacing and contact angle, while the y-axis is a function of printhead velocity and fluid material properties.
  • the second is a journal article (Romero et al., "Response of Slot Coating Flows to Periodic Disturbances," Chemical Engineering Science, Volume 63, Issue 8, April 2008, Pages 2161-2173, ISSN 0009- 2509, http://dx.doi.Org/10.1016/j .ces.2008.01.012) where the authors have conducted a perturbation analysis for the final wet film thickness on coating gap and upstream pressure variations. They report that the wet film thickness variation has a phase shift from the coating gap variation.
  • the film thickness variation amplitudes are usually damped, but at high perturbation frequencies ( ⁇ 1 KHz), there can be high-amplitude oscillations in the wet film thickness.
  • the slot-die coating process too, can benefit from a prior experimental determination of the process window that can be used to augment the model in the form of heuristics, which can also drive tweaking of the film thickness profile to accommodate directional patterns on the template.
  • the present invention uses an in-line metrology to provide feedback (e.g., visual, optical, electro-magnetic, thermal) for automatic machine in a loop control.
  • the in-line metrology is performed using an array of microelectromechanical systems (MEMS)-based Atomic Force Microscopes (AFMs) with individual control of a location of each AFM tip.
  • MEMS microelectromechanical systems
  • AFMs Atomic Force Microscopes
  • the array of AFM tips has individually addressable locations.
  • an optimum positioning of the array of AFM tips on an area of a flexible substrate with a pattern, a topography variation or a variation in a thickness of a film(s) is determined.
  • Each AFM tip in the array of AFM tips provides data that is aggregated to infer a pattern, a topography variation or a film thickness variation.
  • the area may be scanned to measure the pattern, topography variation or film thickness variation.
  • the measured pattern, topography variation or film thickness variation is aggregated and analyzed to infer the pattern, topography variation or film thickness variation.
  • each AFM tip of the array of AFM tips is on a different device on the same area. In one embodiment, each of these different devices is the same.
  • real-time sensing is used as feedback for the process in order to obtain optimum parameters.
  • This feedback mechanism can work with a validated model of the process or with the actual machine in the loop should the forward or inverse model become intractable. In such situations, real-time process feedback may be used on its own to run "model-free" optimization, or may be used to enhance the existing model.
  • in-line metrology is used to provide feedback for optimization using a machine in a loop control.
  • the process metrics that ensure reliable coating include mean and standard deviation of coating thickness over large areas, and avoidance of defect mechanisms.
  • Current off-line metrology approaches are too slow to be incorporated in real-time process control as nanoscale measurements have to be made over centimeter scales resulting in a high-dimensional multi-scale metrology problem.
  • New sensing architectures that are designed in conjunction with process models can be used to significantly enhance the speed of sensing and detection of process parasitics and defects.
  • Optical techniques such as film thickness reflectometry, ellipsometry, spectrometry, etc.
  • Optical techniques are typically used in manufacturing processes as they can be fast (relative to tip-based mechanical techniques, electron microscopy, etc.) and are often non-destructive.
  • the precision and speed trade-offs can be properly understood with careful modeling.
  • lower spatial and spectral resolution of optical techniques can increase sensing speed and models can help us understand the corresponding loss of sensed information and its potential impact on process yield.
  • the sensing can happen very close to the nozzle and before the drop sits on the substrate.
  • a camera can be collocated with the die to capture the coating bead formation.
  • the coating gap is much smaller ( ⁇ 10X) than the distance between the nozzle and the substrate in a typical inkjetting environment.
  • Planarization of feature transitions presents a challenge. This is because, such sharp transitions entail a change in fluid and solid mechanical behavior, which is difficult to characterize in robust models, and which require in-situ validation. Moreover, the use of high throughput optical film thickness metrology, which works well for bulk films without sharp thickness changes within the optical spot size, is not compatible with measuring film thickness changes in the immediate vicinity of such steps. This entails the use of relatively slow tip-based surface profiling techniques, such as atomic force microscopy (AFM).
  • AFM atomic force microscopy
  • the present invention extends the idea of the AFM array for planarization with the ability to reconfigure the location of each AFM tip in the array based on the pattern layout across a full field (typically 26 mm x 33 mm), typically obtained from a GDS file. More specifically, knowing the GDS file of the prior pattern(s), the prior pattern's etch depth and any subsequent film deposition on that pattern, a knowledge of the specific regions where planarization would be a challenge, could be inferred a priori through empirical or computational models, or a combination of the two. The AFM array could then be reconfigured to specifically measure in those challenging regions. This way, the AFM array can rapidly measure the film thickness profile in the vicinity of critical step transitions.
  • the AFM array can be devised such that it is reconfigurable across an entire area of the flexible substrate, rather than a single field. This is because most fields in a patterned area undergoing routine lithography processing, are substantially similar.
  • the AFM array can then be arranged such that a single AFM tip has the range to address a single field. Different AFM tips can then measure different features on the substantially similar field, with each feature being on a different field. Aggregating these measurements can then provide a picture of the surface of a field. If a different field layout is then processed, the same AFM array can be reconfigured to enable metrology of the new layout. This embodiment is applicable to U.S. Patent No. 9,415,418, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
  • machine-in-the-loop forward models, validated numerical simulations and stochastic optimal control techniques based on genetic algorithms can be used to develop sophisticated control algorithms for the P-FIL process.
  • a hierarchical approach can be used to gradually increase the number of control variables to be included in the optimized control algorithm.
  • a sensing and actuator framework of low complexity can be first used to develop GA based process control schemes.
  • the complexity of sensing (e.g., the spatial and spectral resolution of optical sensing) and actuator framework e.g., number and resolution of control variables
  • the GA based process control schemes can be established.
  • an embodiment of the present invention involves a tension control scheme which monitors the web tension along the width of the web at the solvent evaporation and selective resist evaporation stations.
  • the web tension may be monitored through load cells or optical sensors that detect out-of-plane distortions from which web tension may be inferred.
  • the effect of spatial evaporation on web tension can also be included in the GA scheme with appropriate bounds on the web tension to prevent process defects.
  • the formulation design consists of imprint resist comprising of considerable amount of components having similar volatility, dissolved in a solvent that is considerably more volatile than the rest of the components.
  • the solvent role is to dilute the required quantity of imprint resist to higher volume thus allowing for better way of spreading small amounts of imprint resist over the substrate in IJ-PFIL, and managing the final dry film thickness starting from a much thicker initial wet film in SD-PFIL.
  • the remaining, solvent- depleted liquid is then selectively evaporated leaving a substrate containing areas with controlled imprint resist distribution.
  • the final ratio of the remaining components may not be the same as the initial ratio of the same components in the resist formulation.
  • the components ratios may not be the same on various spots across the substrate after selective evaporation.
  • appropriately formulated systems may perform satisfactorily under a range of compositions. Formulation design may take into account the expected amount of material that needs to be evaporated, such that the optimum range of component ratios is not disrupted. Further, certain components, such as the photoinitiator or crosslinkers, will almost always be less volatile, as seen in the table below.
  • an imprint resist formulation may contain a mixture of some, or all the following components: an initiator; polymerizable monomers with one active group; polymerizable monomers with more than one active group referred to in the art as crosslinkers; and surfactants. This list is not exhaustive as other components may be present according to desired performance and applications.
  • Downstream process considerations may preclude the use of UV-crosslinkable polymers, particularly in the application of planarization, which does not require a patterning resist material.
  • most methacrylate polymers have a Tg of ⁇ 150 °C. Any downstream thermal processing beyond 150 °C may damage the material.
  • thermoset polymers such as polyimide, that have a much higher Tg of -350 °C.
  • the practice of planarization using this polymer can alleviate concerns with thermal processing. But these materials are also highly viscous, which makes them difficult to coat or inkjet with substantially lower volumes.
  • the polyimide material can be diluted in a solvent, which can reduce their viscosity and make the material amenable to coating and/or inkjetting.
  • the solvent will need to be completely evaporated to minimize condensation on the substrate.
  • a solvent with substantially higher volatility e.g., MIBK, ethyl acetate
  • the polymer can then be baked or cured on the substrate.
  • the liquid formulation (or "liquid resist formulation") used for this purpose is also called a "resist," having a solvent component and one or more non-solvent components.
  • one embodiment of the invention can involve the use of partially evacuated chambers to reduce the boiling points of the resist components.
  • Another embodiment can involve the use of a chuck or mount for the substrate which is substantially maintained at a constant temperature which is below the boiling points of the resist components.
  • This chuck or mount can be metallic to enable rapid dissipation of any heat that is transferred to it from the substrate and thereby allow the substrate to substantially maintain its temperature, even in the presence of dynamic heat loads during the selective evaporation process.
  • Another embodiment of the invention involves the use of one or more material films between the substrate and the resist material.
  • films could be chosen such that their combination would lead to near zero transmission of electro-magnetic radiation in the infrared spectrum to the substrate, thereby reducing the overall heating of the substrate, but can themselves absorb the heat without suffering any damage.
  • An exemplar film material is CVD Carbon or Spin-on-Carbon (deposited using slot-die coating for example). These materials may additionally also be used as sacrificial films when transferring the resist pattern onto the substrate or an additional functional film on the substrate.
  • planarization includes the use of silicon or carbon containing materials that facilitate good mechanical properties, such as elastic modulus, elongation to fail and failure strength.
  • the embodiment of free-surface planarization can use a low- viscosity silicon-containing resist material as discussed in Lin, M.W., "Simulation and design of planarizing materials and interfacial adhesion studies for step and flash imprint lithography", Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin, 2008. This material can enable a high initial degree of planarization which can be further improved through selective evaporation of the resist material.
  • nanophotonic devices include wire-grid polarizers and metamaterials, such as flat lenses. These devices typically involve fabrication of nanostructures made of metals (Al, Au, etc.) or dielectrics (Si0 2 , S13N4, Ti0 2 , etc.).
  • wire-grid polarizers for display applications require nanoscale patterns made of aluminum.
  • Such polarizers can be fabricated using one of two approaches. In the first approach, a polymer resist line/space pattern can be obtained using the PFIL process. This can be followed by Glancing Angle Deposition of Al on the line/space pattern such that the metal remains discontinuous.
  • the second approach involves deposition of an Al film using vacuum-based processes, such as e-beam evaporation, followed by the imprinting of a polymer resist line/space pattern using PFIL. This is then followed by a descum etch of the residual layer using 0 2 plasma and etching of the underlying Al film using Cl-based plasma chemistry.
  • Metamaterials such as flat lenses, have been discussed in the context of enabling interaction of visible light with nanoscale patterns to achieve phenomena that are otherwise impossible in the absence of nanoscale patterns.
  • Flat lenses for example, enable the 'refraction' of light from flat surfaces, that would otherwise have required some curvature. These lenses are enabled by fabricating specific nanoscale patterns on the flat surface that interact with incoming light to result in refraction. These nanoscale patterns are made of high-index dielectric materials, most notable, Ti0 2 .
  • Such flat lenses can be made using PFIL in combination with other nanoscale fabrication techniques.
  • One approach for the fabrication of flat lenses involves imprinting the negative of the desired Ti0 2 pattern with a polymerized resist using PFIL.
  • This continuous film of the Ti0 2 precursor can be etched using reactive ion etching in a 0 2 /Ar/F based plasma.
  • the features on this resist pattern can be modified at the top to make them tapered.
  • Such structures can be fabricated using multi- tiered templates fabricated for imprint lithography. This would allow the sol-gel Ti0 2 precursor to substantially fill the resist mold without forming a substantially continuous film at the top, provided the volume of the precursor is tightly controlled in the slot-die coating process.
  • Another approach can involve conformal Chemical Vapor Deposition or Atomic Layer Deposition of Ti0 2 to fill the resist mold, followed by an etch-back of the continuous Ti0 2 film at the top of the mold.
  • the resist pattern can be removed using 0 2 plasma.
  • Figure 9 is a flowchart of a method 900 for fabricating nanoscale patterns made of high- index dielectric materials, such as Ti0 2 , on a flat surface in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • Figures 10A-10D depict the cross-sectional views of fabricating nanoscale patterns on a flat surface using the steps described in Figure 9 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • resist 1001 is patterned on a substrate 1002 as shown in Figure 10A.
  • step 902 a short descum ash is performed to expose substrate 1002 as shown in Figure 10B.
  • step 903 substrate 1002 is slot-die coated with Ti0 2 1003 or, alternatively, Ti0 2 1003 is deposited on substrate 1002 via chemical vapor deposition as shown in Figure IOC.
  • step 904 a blanket etch of Ti0 2 1003 is performed as shown in Figure 10D.

Landscapes

  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Nanotechnology (AREA)
  • Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
  • Radiology & Medical Imaging (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Condensed Matter Physics & Semiconductors (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Crystallography & Structural Chemistry (AREA)
  • Shaping Of Tube Ends By Bending Or Straightening (AREA)
  • Application Of Or Painting With Fluid Materials (AREA)
  • Exposure Of Semiconductors, Excluding Electron Or Ion Beam Exposure (AREA)
PCT/US2017/045368 2016-08-03 2017-08-03 Roll-to-roll programmable film imprint lithography Ceased WO2018027069A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US16/322,842 US11669009B2 (en) 2016-08-03 2017-08-03 Roll-to-roll programmable film imprint lithography
EP17837715.6A EP3493921A4 (en) 2016-08-03 2017-08-03 Roll-to-roll programmable film imprint lithography

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201662370259P 2016-08-03 2016-08-03
US62/370,259 2016-08-03

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2018027069A1 true WO2018027069A1 (en) 2018-02-08

Family

ID=61073232

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2017/045368 Ceased WO2018027069A1 (en) 2016-08-03 2017-08-03 Roll-to-roll programmable film imprint lithography
PCT/US2017/045373 Ceased WO2018027073A1 (en) 2016-08-03 2017-08-03 Wafer-scale programmable films for semiconductor planarization and for imprint lithography

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2017/045373 Ceased WO2018027073A1 (en) 2016-08-03 2017-08-03 Wafer-scale programmable films for semiconductor planarization and for imprint lithography

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (2) US11669009B2 (https=)
EP (1) EP3493921A4 (https=)
JP (1) JP7041121B2 (https=)
WO (2) WO2018027069A1 (https=)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2020123929A1 (en) 2018-12-13 2020-06-18 Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System System and method for modification of substrates
WO2020232150A3 (en) * 2019-05-13 2020-12-24 Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System Roll-to-roll nanoimprint lithography tools processes
US11762284B2 (en) 2016-08-03 2023-09-19 Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System Wafer-scale programmable films for semiconductor planarization and for imprint lithography
WO2025089959A1 (en) * 2023-10-27 2025-05-01 Morphotonics Holding B.V. Method and system for in situ layer thickness control during imprinting

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2020246405A1 (ja) * 2019-06-07 2020-12-10 富士フイルム株式会社 パターン形成用組成物、硬化膜、積層体、パターンの製造方法および半導体素子の製造方法
US11562924B2 (en) * 2020-01-31 2023-01-24 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Planarization apparatus, planarization process, and method of manufacturing an article
US11455436B2 (en) * 2020-03-25 2022-09-27 Tokyo Electron Limited Predicting across wafer spin-on planarization over a patterned topography
EP4153363A4 (en) * 2020-05-18 2024-10-30 SDS Nano, Inc. HIGH-PRECISION NANOSCALE THIN FILM MANUFACTURING PROCESS
FI131751B1 (en) * 2020-10-21 2025-11-07 Teknologian Tutkimuskeskus Vtt Oy Roll-to-roll imprinting
US12152162B2 (en) 2021-11-30 2024-11-26 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Method of forming a photo-cured layer

Citations (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050276919A1 (en) * 2004-06-01 2005-12-15 Molecular Imprints, Inc. Method for dispensing a fluid on a substrate
US20060062867A1 (en) * 2002-07-11 2006-03-23 Molecular Imprints, Inc. Formation of discontinuous films during an imprint lithography process
US20080308971A1 (en) * 2007-06-18 2008-12-18 Molecular Imprints, Inc. Solvent-Assisted Layer Formation for Imprint Lithography
US20090214689A1 (en) * 2001-07-16 2009-08-27 Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System Imprint Lithography Templates Having Alignment Marks
US20100098940A1 (en) * 2008-10-20 2010-04-22 Molecular Imprints, Inc. Nano-Imprint Lithography Stack with Enhanced Adhesion Between Silicon-Containing and Non-Silicon Containing Layers
US20100102487A1 (en) * 2008-10-28 2010-04-29 Molecular Imprints, Inc. Optical System for Use in Stage Control
US20100109205A1 (en) * 2008-11-04 2010-05-06 Molecular Imprints, Inc. Photocatalytic reactions in nano-imprint lithography processes
US20110183521A1 (en) * 2010-01-27 2011-07-28 Molecular Imprints, Inc. Methods and systems of material removal and pattern transfer
US20130214452A1 (en) * 2012-02-22 2013-08-22 Molecular Imprints, Inc. Large area imprint lithography
US20140160714A1 (en) * 2012-12-08 2014-06-12 Nichia Corporation Component mounting substrate and method of managing component mounting substrate
US20150048050A1 (en) * 2013-08-19 2015-02-19 Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System Programmable deposition of thin films of a user-defined profile with nanometer scale accuracy

Family Cites Families (28)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6565656B2 (en) 1999-12-20 2003-05-20 Toyko Electron Limited Coating processing apparatus
US20050037143A1 (en) 2000-07-18 2005-02-17 Chou Stephen Y. Imprint lithography with improved monitoring and control and apparatus therefor
US7019819B2 (en) 2002-11-13 2006-03-28 Molecular Imprints, Inc. Chucking system for modulating shapes of substrates
US6980282B2 (en) 2002-12-11 2005-12-27 Molecular Imprints, Inc. Method for modulating shapes of substrates
US8211214B2 (en) 2003-10-02 2012-07-03 Molecular Imprints, Inc. Single phase fluid imprint lithography method
US20050253307A1 (en) * 2004-05-11 2005-11-17 Molecualr Imprints, Inc. Method of patterning a conductive layer on a substrate
JP2006069120A (ja) 2004-09-03 2006-03-16 Asahi Kasei Chemicals Corp 電子回路あるいは光学部材の製造方法
US7244386B2 (en) * 2004-09-27 2007-07-17 Molecular Imprints, Inc. Method of compensating for a volumetric shrinkage of a material disposed upon a substrate to form a substantially planar structure therefrom
WO2006060757A2 (en) * 2004-12-01 2006-06-08 Molecular Imprints, Inc. Eliminating printability of sub-resolution defects in imprint lithography
JP2007324504A (ja) 2006-06-05 2007-12-13 Ibaraki Univ 転写印刷方法、転写印刷装置およびそれを用いて製造した転写印刷製品
JP4739121B2 (ja) 2006-06-05 2011-08-03 エスアイアイ・ナノテクノロジー株式会社 走査型プローブ顕微鏡
US8707890B2 (en) 2006-07-18 2014-04-29 Asml Netherlands B.V. Imprint lithography
WO2009151560A2 (en) 2008-06-09 2009-12-17 Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System Adaptive nanotopography sculpting
KR20090128006A (ko) 2008-06-10 2009-12-15 삼성전자주식회사 마이크로 히터, 마이크로 히터 어레이, 그 제조 방법 및이를 이용한 패턴 형성 방법
JP2010036444A (ja) 2008-08-05 2010-02-18 Fuji Electric Device Technology Co Ltd 微細凹凸構造体の製造方法
KR20100037717A (ko) 2008-10-02 2010-04-12 연세대학교 산학협력단 플라즈마 촉진 폴리머 트랜스퍼 프린팅을 이용한 폴리(3-헥실 티오펜)(p3ht) 박막의 마이크로패터닝 방법 및 상기 p3ht 마이크로패턴화된 박막을 활성층으로 포함하는 유기 박막 트랜지스터의 제조방법
US8470188B2 (en) 2008-10-02 2013-06-25 Molecular Imprints, Inc. Nano-imprint lithography templates
WO2011143341A2 (en) * 2010-05-11 2011-11-17 Molecular Imprints, Inc. Backside contact solar cell
US8541053B2 (en) 2010-07-08 2013-09-24 Molecular Imprints, Inc. Enhanced densification of silicon oxide layers
US8980418B2 (en) * 2011-03-24 2015-03-17 Uchicago Argonne, Llc Sequential infiltration synthesis for advanced lithography
JP5712778B2 (ja) 2011-05-10 2015-05-07 信越半導体株式会社 Soiウェーハのsoi層の膜厚測定方法
JP5554290B2 (ja) * 2011-06-17 2014-07-23 富士フイルム株式会社 インクセット及び画像形成方法
JP5611912B2 (ja) * 2011-09-01 2014-10-22 株式会社東芝 インプリント用レジスト材料、パターン形成方法、及びインプリント装置
JP6045363B2 (ja) 2012-01-27 2016-12-14 キヤノン株式会社 インプリント装置、それを用いた物品の製造方法
JP5935453B2 (ja) 2012-03-30 2016-06-15 大日本印刷株式会社 基板の製造方法、および、ナノインプリントリソグラフィ用テンプレートの製造方法
JP2015088667A (ja) 2013-10-31 2015-05-07 株式会社東芝 微細加工システム、微細加工装置、および微細加工方法
ES2733809T3 (es) * 2015-02-13 2019-12-03 Morphotonics Holding Bv Método para texturizar substratos discretos y sello flexible
US11669009B2 (en) 2016-08-03 2023-06-06 Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System Roll-to-roll programmable film imprint lithography

Patent Citations (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20090214689A1 (en) * 2001-07-16 2009-08-27 Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System Imprint Lithography Templates Having Alignment Marks
US20060062867A1 (en) * 2002-07-11 2006-03-23 Molecular Imprints, Inc. Formation of discontinuous films during an imprint lithography process
US20050276919A1 (en) * 2004-06-01 2005-12-15 Molecular Imprints, Inc. Method for dispensing a fluid on a substrate
US20080308971A1 (en) * 2007-06-18 2008-12-18 Molecular Imprints, Inc. Solvent-Assisted Layer Formation for Imprint Lithography
US20100098940A1 (en) * 2008-10-20 2010-04-22 Molecular Imprints, Inc. Nano-Imprint Lithography Stack with Enhanced Adhesion Between Silicon-Containing and Non-Silicon Containing Layers
US20100102487A1 (en) * 2008-10-28 2010-04-29 Molecular Imprints, Inc. Optical System for Use in Stage Control
US20100109205A1 (en) * 2008-11-04 2010-05-06 Molecular Imprints, Inc. Photocatalytic reactions in nano-imprint lithography processes
US20110183521A1 (en) * 2010-01-27 2011-07-28 Molecular Imprints, Inc. Methods and systems of material removal and pattern transfer
US20130214452A1 (en) * 2012-02-22 2013-08-22 Molecular Imprints, Inc. Large area imprint lithography
US20140160714A1 (en) * 2012-12-08 2014-06-12 Nichia Corporation Component mounting substrate and method of managing component mounting substrate
US20150048050A1 (en) * 2013-08-19 2015-02-19 Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System Programmable deposition of thin films of a user-defined profile with nanometer scale accuracy

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11762284B2 (en) 2016-08-03 2023-09-19 Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System Wafer-scale programmable films for semiconductor planarization and for imprint lithography
WO2020123929A1 (en) 2018-12-13 2020-06-18 Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System System and method for modification of substrates
EP3894097A4 (en) * 2018-12-13 2022-12-21 Board of Regents, The University of Texas System System and method for modification of substrates
US12424498B2 (en) 2018-12-13 2025-09-23 Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System System and method for modification of substrates
WO2020232150A3 (en) * 2019-05-13 2020-12-24 Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System Roll-to-roll nanoimprint lithography tools processes
EP3969244A4 (en) * 2019-05-13 2023-09-13 Board of Regents, The University of Texas System ROLL-TO-ROLL PROCESS FOR NANOIMPRINT LITHOGRAPHY TOOLS
US12578637B2 (en) 2019-05-13 2026-03-17 Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System Roll-to-roll nanoimprint lithography tools and processes
WO2025089959A1 (en) * 2023-10-27 2025-05-01 Morphotonics Holding B.V. Method and system for in situ layer thickness control during imprinting
NL2036140B1 (en) * 2023-10-27 2025-05-12 Morphotonics Holding Bv Method and system for in situ layer thickness control during imprinting

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2018027073A1 (en) 2018-02-08
JP2019526174A (ja) 2019-09-12
EP3493921A1 (en) 2019-06-12
JP7041121B2 (ja) 2022-03-23
US11762284B2 (en) 2023-09-19
US11669009B2 (en) 2023-06-06
US20210389666A1 (en) 2021-12-16
EP3493921A4 (en) 2020-06-03
US20210341833A1 (en) 2021-11-04

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11669009B2 (en) Roll-to-roll programmable film imprint lithography
JP6495283B2 (ja) ナノメータスケール精度を有するユーザ定義プロファイルのプログラム可能な薄膜蒸着
US8187515B2 (en) Large area roll-to-roll imprint lithography
KR102353875B1 (ko) 잉크제트 좌표계에 대한 기판 좌표계의 정밀 정렬
TWI380895B (zh) 控制殘餘層厚度之技術
US8545709B2 (en) Critical dimension control during template formation
US12424498B2 (en) System and method for modification of substrates
JP2019526174A5 (https=)
US20210402677A1 (en) Systems and Methods for Reducing Pressure While Shaping a Film
Handte et al. Manufacturing of nanostructures with high aspect ratios using soft UV-nanoimprint lithography with bi-and trilayer resist systems
KR20180067416A (ko) 임프린트 리소그래피를 위한 유체 액적 방법 및 장치
US20100096470A1 (en) Drop volume reduction
Si et al. A study of imprint and etching behavior on fused silica of a new tailored resist mr-NIL213FC for soft UV-NIL
Kim et al. Minimization of residual layer thickness by using the optimized dispensing method in S-FILTM process
Usuki et al. Design considerations for ultraviolet-nanoimprint lithography resists
US20250180985A1 (en) Method of Using and Fabricating a Nanoimprint Template with a Mesa Sidewall Coating
Usuki Resist Materials for UV Nanoimprint Lithography: Approaches to Rapid Resist Spreading on Dispensing Based UV-NIL
Mekaru et al. Immersion effect of fluoride liquid into cavities of negative mold in thermal imprint
Greenwald et al. Roll-to-Roll nanoimprinting metamaterials
Lu et al. Micro-and nano-patterning using imprinting technique
Usuki et al. Design considerations for UV-NIL resists

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 17837715

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2017837715

Country of ref document: EP

Effective date: 20190304

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP