WO2015098407A1 - Composant de machine utilisant un comprimé de poudre et son procédé de production - Google Patents

Composant de machine utilisant un comprimé de poudre et son procédé de production Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2015098407A1
WO2015098407A1 PCT/JP2014/081250 JP2014081250W WO2015098407A1 WO 2015098407 A1 WO2015098407 A1 WO 2015098407A1 JP 2014081250 W JP2014081250 W JP 2014081250W WO 2015098407 A1 WO2015098407 A1 WO 2015098407A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
green compact
powder
treatment
oxide film
machine part
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/JP2014/081250
Other languages
English (en)
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
尚樹 八代
哲隆 加古
大平　晃也
Original Assignee
Ntn株式会社
尚樹 八代
哲隆 加古
大平　晃也
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from JP2014229131A external-priority patent/JP2016053210A/ja
Application filed by Ntn株式会社, 尚樹 八代, 哲隆 加古, 大平　晃也 filed Critical Ntn株式会社
Priority to CN201480068394.2A priority Critical patent/CN105828988A/zh
Priority to US15/101,958 priority patent/US20160311026A1/en
Priority to EP14873470.0A priority patent/EP3088106A4/fr
Publication of WO2015098407A1 publication Critical patent/WO2015098407A1/fr

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22—CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22F—WORKING METALLIC POWDER; MANUFACTURE OF ARTICLES FROM METALLIC POWDER; MAKING METALLIC POWDER; APPARATUS OR DEVICES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR METALLIC POWDER
    • B22F3/00—Manufacture of workpieces or articles from metallic powder characterised by the manner of compacting or sintering; Apparatus specially adapted therefor ; Presses and furnaces
    • B22F3/24—After-treatment of workpieces or articles
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22—CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22F—WORKING METALLIC POWDER; MANUFACTURE OF ARTICLES FROM METALLIC POWDER; MAKING METALLIC POWDER; APPARATUS OR DEVICES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR METALLIC POWDER
    • B22F2201/00—Treatment under specific atmosphere
    • B22F2201/05—Water or water vapour

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a machine part using a green compact and a manufacturing method thereof. More specifically, the present invention relates to a mechanical part in which a green compact obtained by forming metal powder with a uniaxial working press or the like is made strong without sintering, and a method for manufacturing the same.
  • a metal powder that has been molded is referred to as a green compact, and is further distinguished from a sintered body that has undergone a sintering process (see JIS Z 2500: 2000).
  • powder metallurgy is a metallurgy technology department that manufactures metal powder or products from metal powder by forming and sintering processes, and is a technology different from casting and forging.
  • a product is manufactured by the following process. (1) Mixing of raw material metal, lubricant, graphite powder, etc. (2) Compacting with pressure press etc. (3) Sintering below melting point (4) Correction (sizing) (5) Post-processing such as heat treatment and oil impregnation (if necessary)
  • the sintering process (3) is generally performed in a high temperature range of 800 ° C. or more in the case of an iron-based material, and its cost accounts for 1/4 to 1/2 of the entire manufacturing cost. . Furthermore, since the green compact expands and contracts through a high temperature sintering process, the correction process (4) is indispensable in order to achieve the target dimensions or accuracy.
  • Patent Document 1 describes a method for strengthening a green compact in powder metallurgy. That is, after compression molding a metal powder with metal soap added as a molding lubricant, the green compact is heated to a temperature not lower than the melting point of the metal soap and not higher than the dewaxing temperature. It will increase significantly. The mechanism is presumed that the metal soap in the pores contained in the green compact melts by heat treatment, forms a continuous layer and solidifies, and the density of this layer increases the strength of the green compact. (See Claims of Patent Document 1, column 2, lines 10 to 12, column 3, lines 22 to 25).
  • Patent Document 2 describes that an iron-based “sintered” part is manufactured by bonding by a steam blackening process without sintering a green compact.
  • the mechanism is that the whole surface of the green compact is covered with an oxide film by steam blackening treatment, and the surface particles are bonded and solidified to form an object having a predetermined strength as a whole ( (Second page, lower left column, lines 8 to 11 of Patent Document 2).
  • Patent Document 1 The purpose of the technique described in Patent Document 1 is to prevent chipping and cracking during conveyance of a green compact from a molding press or the like to a sintering furnace, and as such, it does not have strength as a product. . Therefore, of course, it does not suggest omission of the sintering process. After all, if you do not go through the sintering process at a high temperature after that, not only can you ensure enough strength to use as a product, but it is a pre-sintering process, so it will increase by 1 process compared to ordinary sintered products. On the other hand, it becomes a factor of cost increase.
  • Patent Document 2 The technique described in Patent Document 2 is that the green compact is subjected to steam blackening, particles are bonded to each other by an oxide film, and corrosion resistance is imparted.
  • it has “a certain level of strength and durability” (7th to 8th lines in the upper right column of the second page), it is not completely known how much strength can actually be obtained.
  • “there are some parts that are not required to be strong enough for the use of magnetic material parts, and it is intended to provide such parts that are easy to manufacture and inexpensive” (second page, upper left column, lines 10 to 12). Is. It is limited to applications where high strength is not required, such as soft magnetic material parts listed as specific examples.
  • the material and density of the green compact that are considered to be important for increasing the strength of the green compact
  • details such as steam treatment conditions are not disclosed.
  • the present invention provides a mechanical part having the same strength as a sintered product manufactured by the conventional technology at a lower cost by adopting another lower temperature treatment instead of this sintering process. It is something to be done.
  • the crushing strength according to JIS Z 2507 “Sintered bearing-crushing strength test method” is 100 MPa or more, it shall have the strength to withstand the use as a machine part.
  • dimensional change is defined as an increase or decrease in green compact size caused by sintering. It shall mean the increase or decrease of the resulting green compact size.
  • the present inventors paid attention to steam treatment.
  • the steam treatment is also called homo-treatment, and the iron-based sintered material (after sintering) is reacted with steam while being heated to about 500 to 560 ° C in an oxidizing atmosphere, and the surface is mainly tetraoxidized.
  • a film of triiron (Fe 3 O 4 ) is generated.
  • the film thickness is said to be about 3-7 ⁇ m.
  • steam treatment has been widely used for a long time as an inexpensive surface treatment for sintered metals.
  • the main treatment purposes are rust prevention, improvement of wear resistance, and sealing, and in addition, it is also effective for improvement of surface hardness and machinability (for example, see Patent Document 3). .
  • the present invention clarifies a method for obtaining a high-strength green compact by optimizing the material and density of the green compact, the steam treatment conditions, and the like.
  • high strength is a level that can withstand use as mechanical element parts such as sintered oil-impregnated bearings, rather than improving the chipping resistance of green compacts and the strength of soft magnetic material parts.
  • the crushing strength is 100 MPa or more.
  • the raw material powder is compacted by uniaxial pressing or the like, and then heated to a high temperature below the melting point (800 to 1,300 ° C. in the case of iron-based materials), thereby fusing particles ( Necking) is formed to increase the strength.
  • an oxide film is formed on the surface of iron powder by reacting a green compact having a specific density with high-temperature water vapor at 400 to 550 ° C. in an oxidizing atmosphere.
  • the oxide is mainly triiron tetroxide (Fe 3 O 4 ) when iron-based powder is used as the raw material powder.
  • the oxide film formed between the particles of the raw material powder substitutes for the role of necking between the powder particles, and as a result, the green compact is strengthened.
  • the treatment temperature is lower than that in the normal sintering process, the dimensional change is small ( ⁇ 0.1% or less before and after treatment). Therefore, it is possible to omit the sizing process that has been necessary for correcting the dimensions after sintering.
  • the product and the mold for compacting can be easily designed.
  • the processing temperature is low, energy (electrical or thermal) required during processing can be reduced, processing steps can be reduced, and the manufacturing process and cost of the product can be shortened.
  • the steam treatment is an atmosphere treatment, it can be applied regardless of the shape and size of the product to be molded.
  • the present invention is applicable as long as it is a material capable of forming an oxide film. Therefore, it is considered that the present invention is applicable not only to iron-based materials but also to metal materials having a large ionization tendency such as aluminum, magnesium, and chromium.
  • the atomizing method, the reduction method, the stamp method, the carbonyl method, etc. are known regarding the manufacturing method of raw material powder, this invention is applicable irrespective of the manufacturing method of raw material powder.
  • uniaxial pressure molding was mentioned as a representative example of the green compacting method, it is applicable if a metal base material capable of forming an oxide film is exposed.
  • a metal base material capable of forming an oxide film is exposed.
  • multi-axis CNC press molding, injection molding (MIM), and additional cold isostatic pressing (CIP) molding, etc. are possible.
  • the molding method is not limited.
  • a lubricant powder such as metal soap or amide wax is mixed in the green compact to ensure lubrication between the powder to be molded, the mold and the powder, and the lubricant powder remains in the green compact.
  • the lubricant component may remain depending on the density, processing temperature, and holding time of the green compact. Therefore, it is desirable to take a technique in which a degreasing process for decomposing and removing the lubricant component is provided in advance prior to the steaming process, and the steaming process is continuously performed after the degreasing process.
  • a degreasing process for decomposing and removing the lubricant component is provided in advance prior to the steaming process, and the steaming process is continuously performed after the degreasing process.
  • the higher the density the higher the strength.
  • the density of the green compact is too high, water vapor cannot penetrate into the green compact, and the formation of the oxide film is limited to the very surface layer of the green compact.
  • the powder density is too low, chipping and cracking may occur during handling (large rattra value), and there is a concern that the interparticle distance is too long to form an oxide film between the particles.
  • the green density is 5.0 to 7.6 g / cm 3 , preferably 5.3 to 7.2 g / cm 3 , more preferably 6.0 g / cm 3 or more and less than 7.0 g / cm 3. It is better to be in the range.
  • the green density is based on the dimension measurement method.
  • the surface of the above-described mechanical component (a green compact according to Example 8 to be described later) has an empty space on the order of several tens of ⁇ m remaining between the iron powders 11.
  • micropores 14 on the order of several tens of nm are formed inside the iron oxide film 13 having a thickness of about several ⁇ m. Therefore, the oil impregnated in the micropores 14 is initially This may have contributed to the familiar characteristics.
  • the high strength mentioned here specifically means a crushing strength of 100 MPa or more. If the crushing strength is 100 MPa or more, the strength is sufficiently high as compared with the prior art (Patent Documents 1 and 2), and the strength is practical enough for mechanical parts. For example, it is possible to provide a machine element part that can replace the conventional sintered oil-impregnated bearing.
  • the processing temperature is low, the dimensional change is small compared to sintering at high temperature. Therefore, the subsequent correction (sizing) step can be omitted. For the same reason, the manufacturing process is shortened and the cost can be reduced. For example, the dimensional change before and after the steam treatment is suppressed to less than ⁇ 0.1% with respect to the green compact. Therefore, it becomes easy to design a product and a mold for compacting.
  • an additive that denatures and decomposes at a temperature exceeding 500 ° C. for example, a material having slidability and lubricity, can be added to enhance the functionality of the product.
  • FIG. 1A It is a photograph (SEM image) of a section of an example of the present invention. It is the figure which showed FIG. 1A typically.
  • It is a front view of a friction and abrasion tester. It is a side view of a friction abrasion tester. It is a graph which shows the convergence value of the friction coefficient in a friction abrasion test (with external oil supply). It is a graph which shows transition of the friction coefficient in a friction wear test (with external oil supply). It is a graph which shows the specific wear amount in a friction wear test (with external oil supply). It is a graph which shows the convergence value of the friction coefficient in a friction abrasion test (without external oil supply). It is a graph which shows transition of the friction coefficient in a friction wear test (without external oil supply). It is a graph which shows the specific wear amount in a friction wear test (without external oil supply).
  • Tests of Examples 1 to 13 and Comparative Examples 1 to 10 using reduced iron powder as the base metal powder, electrolytic copper powder as the second metal component, and amide wax powder lubricant as the compacting lubricant Pieces were made and various tests were performed.
  • the test piece is ring-shaped and the dimensions are as follows. Inner diameter: ⁇ 12mm Outer diameter: ⁇ 20mm Length: 7mm
  • Electrolytic copper powder is 2 wt. %
  • Lubricant is 0.7 wt.
  • the green density (g / cm 3 ) of Examples 1 to 5 was as follows.
  • Examples 6-9 In order to confirm the influence of the difference in the treatment temperature of the steam treatment, a green compact corresponding to Example 3 and having a green compact density of 6.5 g / cm 3 was degreased at 350 ° C. for 90 minutes in the same manner as in Examples 1 to 5. Then, Examples 6 to 9 were obtained by steaming for 40 minutes at the following four treatment temperatures.
  • Example 6 350 ° C.
  • Example 7 400 ° C
  • Example 8 450 ° C
  • Example 9 550 ° C
  • Example 10 In order to confirm the effect of the difference in the treatment time of the steam treatment, two samples with different treatment times were prepared. That is, Example 3 equivalent, the green compact green density 6.5 g / cm 3, after having degreased for 90 minutes in a likewise 350 ° C. Examples 1 to 5, in 500 ° C., only the next time steam Examples 10 and 11 were obtained by processing. Example 10: 20 minutes Example 11: 80 minutes
  • Example 12 In order to confirm the effect of material differences, two samples with different materials were prepared. That is, as in Example 3, each powder was uniaxially pressed to a compact density of 6.5 g / cm 3 , degreased at 350 ° C. for 90 minutes as in Examples 1 to 5, and then 500 Steam treatment was carried out at 40 ° C. for 40 minutes.
  • the composition of the powder used in each example is as follows.
  • Example 13 Electrolytic copper powder was 20 wt. %, Lubricant is 0.7 wt. % Added powder
  • Comparative Examples 1-5 Comparative examples 1 to 5 were obtained by omitting the degreasing step at 350 ° C. for 90 minutes and the subsequent steam treatment step in Examples 1 to 5, that is, in a state where the powder was compacted.
  • Comparative Examples 6 and 7 Comparative examples 6 and 7 were obtained by omitting the degreasing process at 350 ° C. for 90 minutes and the subsequent water vapor treatment process in Examples 12 and 13, that is, in a state where the powder was compacted.
  • Comparative Examples 8-10 Comparative Examples 8-10 Comparative Examples 8 to 10 were obtained by sintering three types of green compacts of Fe only, Fe + 2% Cu and Fe + 20% Cu described in Comparative Examples 6, 3, and 7 at 1100 ° C. for 30 minutes. Comparative Example 8: Fe only (sintered Comparative Example 6) Comparative Example 9: Fe + 2% Cu (Sintered Comparative Example 3) Comparative Example 10: Fe + 20% Cu (sintered Comparative Example 7)
  • the mechanical properties of the obtained test piece were evaluated based on the results of the measurement of the crushing strength performed in accordance with JIS Z 2507.
  • the test apparatus used is Autograph AG-5000A manufactured by Shimadzu Corporation.
  • the crushing strength refers to the strength of a cylindrical sintered body or green compact determined by a certain method from the crushing load
  • the crushing load refers to a cylindrical sintered body or green compact that is parallel to the axis. This is the load when cracks begin to occur due to compression on the surface.
  • Table 1 shows the criteria for determining the crushing strength. That is, as shown in the left column of the same table, the crushing strength (unit: MPa) is divided into four stages of less than 50, 50 or more, less than 100, 100 or more, less than 150, or 150 or more. , ⁇ .
  • the inner diameter and outer diameter of the test piece were measured before and after the steam treatment, and before and after the treatment with respect to the dimensions before the treatment.
  • the percentage of change was calculated and used as the dimensional change rate.
  • the larger numerical value of the inner diameter and the outer diameter was adopted.
  • Table 2 shows the criteria for the rate of dimensional change. That is, as shown in the left column of the table, the dimensional change rate (unit:%) is divided into three stages of ⁇ 0.1 or more, less than ⁇ 0.1, and less than ⁇ 0.05, and the symbols ⁇ and ⁇ , ⁇ .
  • Example 1 the crushing strength is improved by the steam treatment. Specifically, except that Example 1 having a green density of 5.3 g / cm 3 is less than 100 MPa, the crushing strength is 100 MPa in Examples 2 to 5 having a green density of 6.0 g / cm 3 or more. That's it. However, Example 4 of the green density 7.0 g / cm 3, also 7.2 g / cm 3 in Example 5, the dimensional change ratio was slightly worse. Moreover, the crushing strength of Example 5 is inferior to that of Example 4 having a green density of 7.0 g / cm 3 . From this, it can be seen that the higher the green density is not necessarily better.
  • the green density is 5.0 to 7.6 g / cm 3 , preferably 5.3 to 7.2 g / cm 3 , more preferably 6.0 g / cm 3 or more and less than 7.0 g / cm 3. It is better to be in the range.
  • Examples 2 and green density is in the range of less than 6.0 g / cm 3 or more 7.0 g / cm 3 3 is, with regard radial crushing strength, with respect to dimensional change, suffice as machine parts is there.
  • Comparative Examples 1 to 5 In each of Comparative Examples 1 to 5 in which the steam treatment was not performed, the crushing strength was less than 50 MPa. In Comparative Examples 1 to 5, neither steam treatment nor sintering was performed, so the dimensional change rate was not measured. Since Comparative Example 9 having a green compact density of 6.5 g / cm 3 was sintered at 1100 ° C. ⁇ 30 min, the crushing strength was 150 MPa or more, but the dimensional change rate was ⁇ 0.1% or more. Met.
  • the processing temperature was 350 MPa in Example 6, 400 ° C in Example 7, 550 ° C in Example 9 and 550 ° C in Example 9 at 100 MPa or more, and the processing temperature at 450 ° C in Example 8 and the processing temperature at 500 ° C. In Example 3, it was 150 MPa or more.
  • the maximum dimensional change rate was less than ⁇ 0.1% in all Examples, and was less than ⁇ 0.05% in Examples 3, 8, 7, and 6 in which the processing temperature was 500 ° C. or less.
  • Example 6 at a treatment temperature of 350 ° C. some red rust (Fe 2 O 3 ) was generated, and it was not possible to form only the originally intended Fe 3 O 4 film.
  • no red rust was observed.
  • the treatment temperature of the water vapor treatment is 400 ° C. or higher, preferably 400 ° C. or higher and 550 ° C. or lower, more preferably 450 ° C. or higher and 500 ° C. or lower.
  • the processing temperature if the test results of Example 3 at 500 ° C. and Example 9 at 550 ° C. are compared, it can be seen that the higher the processing temperature, the better. In particular, it has been found that the crushing strength and the dimensional change rate are suitable at a processing temperature lower than 500 to 560 ° C., which is a general processing temperature of conventional steam processing.
  • each of Examples 10, 3, and 11 had a crushing strength of 150 MPa or more and a dimensional change rate of less than ⁇ 0.1%. In light of this result, it is considered that a sufficient effect can be obtained if the water vapor treatment time is 20 minutes or longer.
  • Comparative Example 3 the crushing strength was less than 50 MPa, but the dimensional change rate was not measured because neither steam treatment nor sintering was performed. In Comparative Example 9, the crushing strength was 150 MPa or more, but the dimensional change rate was ⁇ 0.1% or more.
  • the ratio of electrolytic copper powder to reduced iron powder was 0 wt. %, Example 3 was 2 wt. %, Example 13 was 20 wt.
  • the crushing strength was 100 MPa or more in all cases. In these investigated compositions, the iron ratio was 80 wt. It can be seen that the crushing strength of 100 MPa or more is achieved even when the amount is reduced to%, and the dimensional change rate is less than ⁇ 0.1% in any composition.
  • the dimensional change rate is ⁇ 0.1% or more, so that it is understood that the dimensional change is smaller when only the steam treatment is performed.
  • the crushing strength was less than 50 MPa, but the dimensional change rate was not measured because neither steam treatment nor sintering was performed.
  • test pieces Two types of test pieces, the above-mentioned Example 2 in which the green compact was subjected to the steam treatment and the Comparative Example 11 in which the green compact of the comparative example 2 not subjected to the steam treatment was subjected to sintering treatment at 1100 ° C. ⁇ 30 min. was made.
  • the number of test pieces was three each. These test pieces were immersed in a lubricating oil (hydraulic hydraulic oil, Shell Terrace S2M68, ISO viscosity VG68 equivalent) and vacuum impregnated at 70 ° C. for 1 hour or more.
  • a lubricating oil hydroaulic hydraulic oil, Shell Terrace S2M68, ISO viscosity VG68 equivalent
  • the friction and wear test was performed using a testing machine shown in FIG.
  • This testing machine includes an arm 22 that can swing around a rotating shaft 21, a mating member 24 that is provided below the arm 22, and that is fixed to the rotating shaft 23, and a felt that slides on the outer peripheral surface of the mating member 24. And a pad 25.
  • the test piece W is attached to the lower surface of the arm 22.
  • the mating member 24 has an outer diameter of 40 mm, an outer diameter surface sub-curvature R of 60 mm, a surface roughness of 0.01 ⁇ m Ra or less, and a Vickers hardness of 780 HV or more, and is made of, for example, SUJ2 hardened steel.
  • the felt pad 25 is impregnated with the same lubricating oil as the lubricating oil impregnated in the test piece W.
  • a predetermined weight 26 is attached to the arm 22, and the test piece W is pressed against the mating member 24 from above with a predetermined load. Under a maximum contact surface pressure of Hertz of 0.5 GPa and room temperature (25 ° C.), 0 The mating member 24 was rotated for 30 minutes at a rotational speed of .05 m / s. At this time, the frictional force generated between the test piece W and the mating member 24 was detected by the load cell 27 provided on the arm 22. Further, after the rotation, the specific wear amount was calculated from the size of the indentation formed on the test piece W.
  • Example 2 steam-treated product
  • Comparative Example 11 sintered product
  • Fig. 4 shows the results of changes in the friction coefficient.
  • the transition of the friction coefficient was different between Example 2 and Comparative Example 11.
  • Comparative Example 11 showed a high coefficient of friction exceeding 0.2 at the beginning of the test and then decreased to about 0.15 in about 1 minute, but 5 to 5 until the final level was reached. It took about 10 minutes.
  • Example 2 showed a low coefficient of friction from the beginning of the test, and the coefficient of friction decreased to a level equivalent to that at the end of the test within 0 or several seconds. From this, it can be said that Example 2 which is a steam-treated product has an initial familiarity characteristic superior to Comparative Example 11 which is a sintered product.
  • Example 2 which is a steam-treated product has better wear resistance than Comparative Example 11 which is a sintered product.
  • Example 2 which is a steam-treated product has a convergence value of the friction coefficient equivalent to that of Comparative Example 11 which is a sintered product, and is more excellent in initial familiarity characteristics than Comparative Example 11 which is a sintered product. In addition, it was confirmed to have wear resistance.
  • Fig. 6 shows the result of the convergence of the friction coefficient in the friction and wear test without external lubrication. As shown in the figure, the convergence value of the friction coefficient of Example 2 is substantially equal to the convergence value of the friction coefficient of Comparative Example 11.
  • Fig. 7 shows the results of changes in the friction coefficient in the friction and wear test without external lubrication.
  • Comparative Example 11 showed a high friction coefficient exceeding 0.15 at the beginning of the test, and decreased to a level equivalent to the convergence value over about 1 minute.
  • Example 2 shows a low coefficient of friction that is substantially equivalent from the beginning to the end of the test. From this, it can be said that Example 2 which is a steam-treated product has an initial familiarity characteristic superior to Comparative Example 11 which is a sintered product.
  • Example 2 was a steam-treated product has better wear resistance than Comparative Example 11 which is a sintered product.
  • Example 2 which is a steam-treated product has a convergent value of the friction coefficient equivalent to that of Comparative Example 11 which is a sintered product.
  • the material had better initial conformability and wear resistance than Comparative Example 11 which was a sintered product.
  • the mechanical component of the present invention Since the mechanical component of the present invention has a crushing strength exceeding 100 MPa, it can be used as a substitute for a conventional sintered metal component.
  • Specific examples of sintered metal parts include sliding parts and magnetic iron cores.
  • the sliding parts include those that slide with a mating member via lubricating oil, such as bearings, gears, cams, and the like that are used in an oil-lubricated environment.
  • the bearing include a sliding bearing that slides and supports a mating member (shaft) through oil, specifically, a sintered oil-impregnated bearing and a fluid dynamic pressure bearing.
  • the mechanical component of the present invention is not limited to the replacement of a sintered machine component for high-load use, but can of course be replaced with a sintered metal component for a lighter load application.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Powder Metallurgy (AREA)

Abstract

Selon la présente invention, il est possible de produire un composant de machine ayant une résistance à l'écrasement radial de plus de 100 MPa par obtention d'un comprimé de poudre par moulage par compression d'une poudre de matière de départ qui est principalement composée d'une poudre métallique pouvant former un film d'oxyde; et par formation d'un film d'oxyde entre des particules de la poudre métallique qui constitue le comprimé de poudre à l'aide d'un traitement à la vapeur d'eau.
PCT/JP2014/081250 2013-12-26 2014-11-26 Composant de machine utilisant un comprimé de poudre et son procédé de production WO2015098407A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201480068394.2A CN105828988A (zh) 2013-12-26 2014-11-26 粉末压坯制机械部件及其制造方法
US15/101,958 US20160311026A1 (en) 2013-12-26 2014-11-26 Machine component using powder compact and method for producing same
EP14873470.0A EP3088106A4 (fr) 2013-12-26 2014-11-26 Composant de machine utilisant un comprimé de poudre et son procédé de production

Applications Claiming Priority (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2013-269343 2013-12-26
JP2013269343 2013-12-26
JP2014-180181 2014-09-04
JP2014180181 2014-09-04
JP2014229131A JP2016053210A (ja) 2013-12-26 2014-11-11 圧粉体を用いた機械部品およびその製造方法
JP2014-229131 2014-11-11

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2015098407A1 true WO2015098407A1 (fr) 2015-07-02

Family

ID=53478277

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/JP2014/081250 WO2015098407A1 (fr) 2013-12-26 2014-11-26 Composant de machine utilisant un comprimé de poudre et son procédé de production

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2015098407A1 (fr)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2017150604A1 (fr) * 2016-03-03 2017-09-08 Ntn株式会社 Procédé de production de composant de machine

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS5763602A (en) * 1980-07-25 1982-04-17 Ariajiyu Furitsute Sa Iron-base sintered member and manufacture
JPS6111282B2 (fr) 1981-05-18 1986-04-02 Hitachi Funmatsu Yakin Kk
JPS6372803A (ja) 1986-09-12 1988-04-02 Fujitsu Ltd 鉄系焼結部品の製造方法
JPH04198403A (ja) 1990-11-29 1992-07-17 Nkk Corp 粉末焼結品のスチーム処理方法
JPH1073132A (ja) * 1996-08-30 1998-03-17 Nippon Piston Ring Co Ltd シンクロナイザーリング
JP2003213308A (ja) * 2002-01-16 2003-07-30 Oiles Ind Co Ltd 鋳鉄系焼結摺動部材及びその製造方法

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS5763602A (en) * 1980-07-25 1982-04-17 Ariajiyu Furitsute Sa Iron-base sintered member and manufacture
JPS6111282B2 (fr) 1981-05-18 1986-04-02 Hitachi Funmatsu Yakin Kk
JPS6372803A (ja) 1986-09-12 1988-04-02 Fujitsu Ltd 鉄系焼結部品の製造方法
JPH04198403A (ja) 1990-11-29 1992-07-17 Nkk Corp 粉末焼結品のスチーム処理方法
JPH1073132A (ja) * 1996-08-30 1998-03-17 Nippon Piston Ring Co Ltd シンクロナイザーリング
JP2003213308A (ja) * 2002-01-16 2003-07-30 Oiles Ind Co Ltd 鋳鉄系焼結摺動部材及びその製造方法

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See also references of EP3088106A4 *

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2017150604A1 (fr) * 2016-03-03 2017-09-08 Ntn株式会社 Procédé de production de composant de machine
CN108472733A (zh) * 2016-03-03 2018-08-31 Ntn株式会社 机械部件的制造方法
EP3424622A4 (fr) * 2016-03-03 2019-11-20 NTN Corporation Procédé de production de composant de machine
US11344948B2 (en) 2016-03-03 2022-05-31 Ntn Corporation Method for producing machine component

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP5247329B2 (ja) 鉄系焼結軸受およびその製造方法
KR100187616B1 (ko) 소결 마찰재와 이에 사용되는 복합 동합금 분말 및 이들의 제조방법
JP2009168247A (ja) 焼結歯車
JP2009120918A (ja) 焼結部品の製造方法
JP2009035757A (ja) 複層焼結摺動部材
JP2016053210A (ja) 圧粉体を用いた機械部品およびその製造方法
JP6395217B2 (ja) 焼結部品の製造方法
WO2016098525A1 (fr) Comprimé cru et son procédé de production
WO2022137810A1 (fr) Élément à glissement, palier, procédé de fabrication d'un élément à glissement et procédé de fabrication d'un palier
WO2016147796A1 (fr) Composant de machine et son procédé de production
JP5765490B2 (ja) 摺動部材及び摺動部材の製造方法
WO2015098407A1 (fr) Composant de machine utilisant un comprimé de poudre et son procédé de production
US11105369B2 (en) Method of producing composite component having brass or bronze using sinter fit
JP2016141815A (ja) 摺動部材およびその製造方法
JP2009270141A (ja) Ｔｉ−Ａｌ系合金ターゲット材の製造法
WO2017150604A1 (fr) Procédé de production de composant de machine
WO2016148137A1 (fr) Composant de machine et son procédé de fabrication
WO2018181107A1 (fr) Matériau d'alliage d'aluminium fritté et son procédé de production
JP2018040458A (ja) 動圧軸受およびその製造方法
JP2018009222A (ja) 粉末冶金部材およびその製造方法
JP6765177B2 (ja) 多孔質金属部品の製造方法
WO2019181976A1 (fr) Composant mécanique et son procédé de production
JP2017128764A (ja) 鉄基焼結摺動材料及びその製造方法
JP2000283060A (ja) ギアロータ、ギアロータセットおよびその製造方法
Petroni et al. Evaluation of press-and-sinter processing parameters in titanium hydride powder metallurgy

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 14873470

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 15101958

Country of ref document: US

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

REEP Request for entry into the european phase

Ref document number: 2014873470

Country of ref document: EP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2014873470

Country of ref document: EP