Classifications

• • G—PHYSICS
  • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
  • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
  • G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
  • G01N33/48—Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
  • G01N33/50—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
  • G01N33/53—Immunoassay; Biospecific binding assay; Materials therefor
  • G01N33/574—Immunoassay; Biospecific binding assay; Materials therefor for cancer
  • G01N33/57484—Immunoassay; Biospecific binding assay; Materials therefor for cancer involving compounds serving as markers for tumor, cancer, neoplasia, e.g. cellular determinants, receptors, heat shock/stress proteins, A-protein, oligosaccharides, metabolites
  • G01N33/57496—Immunoassay; Biospecific binding assay; Materials therefor for cancer involving compounds serving as markers for tumor, cancer, neoplasia, e.g. cellular determinants, receptors, heat shock/stress proteins, A-protein, oligosaccharides, metabolites involving intracellular compounds
• • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
  • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
  • A61P—SPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
  • A61P35/00—Antineoplastic agents
• • G—PHYSICS
  • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
  • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
  • G01N2800/00—Detection or diagnosis of diseases
  • G01N2800/52—Predicting or monitoring the response to treatment, e.g. for selection of therapy based on assay results in personalised medicine; Prognosis

Definitions

• This invention relates to the use of global histone modifications to predict the prognosis of cancers and to predict the likelihood that a patient would respond to therapy with a thymidylate synthase inhibitor.
• Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is a highly aggressive and lethal cancer for which there are limited therapeutic options.
• tumor-associated epigenetic alterations are important determinants in the initiation and progression of pancreatic cancer (Maitra, A., Hruban, R.H., Annu Rev Pathol 3:157-88 (2008); Hezel et al, Genes Dev 20:1218-49 (2006)) and represent promising biomarkers and therapeutic targets.
• Epigenetic alterations in cancer include genome-wide and locus-specific changes in DNA methylation and post-translational histone modifications, which influence chromatin accessibility and gene activity (Bernstein et al, Cell 128:669-81 (2007); Ting et al, Genes Dev 20:3215-3231 (2006); Esteller, M., Nat Rev Genet 8:286-98 (2007)).
• Cancer-associated genome-wide alterations in histone modifications include changes in their levels and distribution across the genome, such as at gene promoters, repetitive DNA sequences and other heterochromatin regions (Esteller, M., Nat Rev Genet 8:286-98 (2007)).
• heterogeneity in cellular levels of histone modifications across a given tumor as demonstrated by cell-to-cell differences in immunohistochemical staining of tumor cell nuclei (Kurdistani, S.K., Br J Cancer 97:1-5 (2007)) adds a further layer of complexity to the spectrum of changes that typify the cancer epigenome.
• Histone modifications such as acetylation and methylation of lysines (K) and arginines (R), which also occur over large regions of chromatin including non-promoter sequences, are referred to as global histone modifications (Vogelauer, et al, Nature 408:495- 8 (2000)).
• enzymes that modify histones exhibit altered activity in cancer. For instance, missense mutations of p300 histone acetyltransferases and loss of heterozygosity at the p300 locus are associated with colorectal and breast cancers, and glioblastomas (Giles, et al, Trends. Genet.
• these enzymes also affect most nucleosomes throughout the genome independently of apparent sequence-specific DNA binding proteins (Vogelauer, et al, Nature 408:495-8 (2000); Reid, et al, MoI Cell 6, 1297- 307 (2000); Krebs, et al, Cell 102, 587-98 (2000)).
• the histone modifying enzymes possess a high degree of substrate specificity which differentiate between the histone sub-types as well as individual side-chains within each histone (Peterson, et al, Curr. Biol. 14, R546-51 (2004); Suka, et al, MoI Cell 8:473-9 (2001)).
• individual residues will be modified globally to varying extent, reflecting the selective but widespread activity of the histone-modifying enzymes.
• the present invention meets these needs and relates to our surprising discovery that specific histone modifications are useful prognostic and predictive biomarkers in pancreatic and other cancers. These cellular levels of histone modifications define previously unrecognized subsets of pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients with distinct epigenetic phenotypes and clinical outcomes and represent prognostic and predictive biomarkers that also inform clinical decisions including the use of 5-FU and similar chemotherapies. BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
• the present invention provides methods of providing a prognosis for a human subject with cancer including, but not limited to, pancreatic cancer.
• the methods generally comprise contacting a test tissue sample from an individual having the cancer; and detecting one, two or more histone protein modifications selected from H3K4me2, H3K9me2, or H3K18ac in the test tissue sample and comparing them to values representative of patients classified according to their survival history.
• the tissue sample is a tissue biopsy.
• H3K4me2, H3K9me2, or H3K18ac are significantly associated with reduced survival in cancer patients
• the presence of a similar low level of a modification in the for an individual leads to a prognosis of reduced survival time or life expectancy.
• the presence of a higher level of a modification leads to a prognosis of an increased survival time or life expectancy.
• the individual has less advanced disease (i.e. low grade or stage), the category in which prognostic markers are acutely needed.
• the invention provides methods of treating an individual having a low grade cancer including, but not limited to, a pancreatic cancer, said method comprising the step of determining the global histone modification level in the test tissue sample in comparison to a comparison tissue sample (persons with a known survival, therapeutic or disease outcome) and administering a more aggressive cancer therapy than usual for the grade to the patient when the histone modification level indicates that the cancer is likely to progress in severity or metastasize based upon the comparison.
• a comparison tissue sample personnel with a known survival, therapeutic or disease outcome
• the steps include obtaining a test or biopsy sample from the individual and contacting the test or biopsy tissue sample from the individual with an antibody or aptamer that specifically binds to a modified histone protein selected from H3K4me2, H3K9me2, and H3K18ac; and
• the invention provides methods of assessing the response of a cancer patient including, but not limited to, pancreatic cancer patients, to a medical treatment, comprising the step of determining the histone modification level in the test tissue sample in comparison to a tissue sample taken from the patient before the treatment , or earlier or later in the course of a treatment, or before and after a treatment has been modified.
• the therapy is immunotherapy, targeted molecular therapy, epigenetic therapy, chemotherapy or radiation or a pro-apoptosis therapy.
• a test or biopsy sample is obtained from the patient and the sample is contacted with an antibody that specifically binds to a modified histone protein selected from H3K4me2, H3K9me2, and H3K18ac.
• the invention provides a kit comprising at least two antibodies which each bind a different histone protein modification.
• the antibodies are selected from the group consisting of H3K4me2, H3K9me2, or H3K18ac.
• the antibodies are labeled with a detectable moiety.
• the kits provide reagents for detecting these antibodies when used as markers.
• the kits provide additional reagents and/or instructions for immunohistochemical staining of tissues using the antibodies.
• the kits further comprise instructions on how to assess the resulting immunohistochemical staining with respect to cancer risk or prognosis.
• the invention provides a method for giving a prognosis to, or for, a subject having cancer including, but not limited to, pancreatic cancer, said method comprising determining the histone modification level for H3K4me2, H3K9me2, or H3K18ac in a tissue sample from the cancer, wherein the presence of a low level of the histone modification indicates a poorer prognosis for survival and the presence of a high histone modification level for H3K4me2, H3K9me2, or H3K18ac indicates a better prognosis for survival.
• the subject has node-negative cancer or is receiving 5- fluorouracil.
• a positive tumor cell staining of the histone modifications H3K4me2, H3K9me2, or H3K18ac is used to classify the patient as low or high staining, wherein a low staining classification supports a prognosis of a poorer overall survival.
• the prognosis is based upon low histone modification levels of both H3K4me2 and H3K18ac (the worst prognosis grouping is defined as low levels of either one or both of the modifications).
• a low histone modification level for both H3K4me2 and H3K18ac predicts a lower likelihood of survival.
• the histone modification levels are determined by immunocytochemistry.
• the subjects may be classified into high or low risk groups by the percent rank staining of a histone modification selected from H3K4me2, H3K9me2, and H3K18ac. For instance, a H3K9dime > 10%, >60% for H3K4me2 or >35 percentile staining K18ac.
• the invention provides a means for predicting the response of a subject having pancreatic cancer, or another cancer for which 5 -FU or another thymidylate synthase inhibitor is a treatment with or without Leucovorin, to 5-FU or the thymidylate synthesase inhibitor therapy (e.g. raltitrexed, pemetrexed, nolatrexed, ZD9331, and GS7904L) wherein the prediction is based upon the presence or absence of lower level of H3K4me2 or H3K18ac as compared to values determined for comparison populations for whom the response is known.
• a lower level of the modification predicts a worse-disease free survival.
• the comparison groups can be dichotomous, continuous, or discretely graded with respect to modification levels and their associated survival outcomes.
• Cancers for which 5-FU is a treatment include, but are not limited to, colon, rectal, head and neck, breast, ovarian cancer, and basal cell cancer of the skin. In most cases 5-FU is used in combination with Leucovorin.
• the invention provides a method of identifying a patient having pancreatic cancer patient or a patient having a cancer for which 5-fluorouracil or another thymidylate synthase inhibitor is utilized as a standard chemotherapy for whom the addition of a histone deacetylase inhibitor to 5-FU would be beneficial.
• the level of the H3K18ac histone modification is determined in a tissue sample from the cancer of the patient.
• a low level of the modification (based upon a similarity to values determined for comparison populations for whom the modifications and response profile to 5-FU without the inhibitor were known) being indicative that a histone deacetylase inhibitor would be beneficial as a therapy or additionally be beneficial.
• the invention also provides methods of treatment wherein a patient who is so identified is then treated with the inhibitor and, optionally, with 5-FU or another treatment described herein..
• the invention provides a method of identifying a patient having a cancer for which 5-fluorouracil is utilized as a standard chemotherapy (e.g., colorectal cancer, breast cancer) for whom the addition of a histone deacetylase inhibitor to 5-FU therapy would be beneficial, hi the method, the level of the H3K18ac histone modification is determined in a tissue sample from the cancer of the patient. A low level of the modification (based upon a similarity to values determined for comparison populations for whom the modifications and response profile to 5-FU without the inhibitor were known) being indicative that a histone deacetylase inhibitor would additionally be beneficial. Accordingly, the invention also provides methods of treatment wherein a patient who is so identified is then treated with 5-FU and the inhibitor.
• a standard chemotherapy e.g., colorectal cancer, breast cancer
• a positive tumor cell staining of the histone modifications H3K4me2, H3K9me2, or H3K18ac is used to classify the patient as low or high staining, wherein a low staining classification supports a prognosis of a poorer overall survival and/or thymidylate inhibitor non-responsiveness, hi still other embodiments, the prognosis is based upon low histone modification levels of both H3K4me2 and H3K18ac (the worse prognosis grouping being defined as low levels of either one or both of these modifications).
• a low histone modification level for both H3K4me2 and H3K18ac predicts a lower likelihood of survival.
• the histone modification levels are determined by immunocytochemistry.
• the subjects may be classified into high or low risk groups by the percent rank staining of a histone modification selected from H3K4me2, H3K9me2, and H3K18ac.
• the invention provides for the selection of a more aggressive therapy for a patient identified as being resistant to therapy or likely to have a worser outcome or prognosis (e.g., poorer overall survival) based upon the histone modification pattern.
• the histone modifications levels for one, two or three of the histone modifications selected from H3K4me2, H3K9me2, and H3K18ac are used to provide the prognosis, identification, assessment, treatment, prediction or determination.
• the histone modifications may be selected from the group consisting of H3K4me2 and H3K9me2, H3K4me2 and H3K18ac, or H3K9me2, and H3K18ac.
• the classification as to whether a modification is low or high is based upon the histone rule.
• the comparison groups can be dichotomous, continuous, or discretely graded with respect to modification levels and their associated survival outcomes.
• the patient can be human and the cancer an adenocarcinoma, a pancreatic cancer, a breast cancer, a prostate cancer, a lung cancer, a breast cancer, a colon cancer, a rectum cancer, an esophageal cancer, a gallbladder or kidney cancer.
• the methods provide additional non-redundant prognostic information useful in providing a prognosis or selecting a therapy for a cancer.
• each tumor is assigned into a low or high level staining group based on its percent rank based upon the median percent of cells staining positive to its , including H3K4me2 ( ⁇ 60 vs. >60 percent rank), H3K9me2 ( ⁇ 30 vs. >30 percent rank for the RTOG TMA or ⁇ 25 vs. ⁇ 25 percent rank for the UCLA Stage I/II TMA) and H3K18ac ( ⁇ 35 vs. >35 percent rank).
• H3K4me2 ⁇ 60 vs. >60 percent rank
• H3K9me2 ⁇ 30 vs. >30 percent rank for the RTOG TMA or ⁇ 25 vs. ⁇ 25 percent rank for the UCLA Stage I/II TMA
• H3K18ac ⁇ 35 vs. >35 percent rank.
• Figure 1 Cellular heterogeneity of histone modifications in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
• A Representative irnmunohistochemistry for histone modifications at 10x or 4Ox (inset) objective from tumors of either low (patient 1) or high (patient 2) grade histology. The distribution of tumors showing indicated percentage of tumor cells with positive nuclear staining is shown for each histone modification in the (B) RTOG 9704 or (C) UCLA Stage I/II TMA.
• FIG. 1 Overall patient survival in the UCLA Stage I/II pancreatic cancer TMA based on indicated histone modification group.
• Kaplan-Meier plots visualize survival probabilities for the high (solid line) versus low (dashed line) level histone group for (A) H3K4me2, (B) H3K18ac, (C) H3K9me2 and (D) low H3K4me2 and/or H3K18ac versus high H3K4me2 and H3K18ac. /rvalues for Log rank tests.
• FIG. 3 Overall survival in RTOG 9704 TMA for indicated histone modification after first stratifying on treatment arms. Patients were stratified based on adjuvant chemotherapy (A-B, 5-fluorouracil or C-D, gemcitabine). Kaplan-Meier plots were then used to visualize survival probabilities for patients with either high (solid line) versus low (dashed line) levels of (A, C) H3K4me2 or (B, D) H3K9me2. p-values for Log rank tests.
• adjuvant chemotherapy A-B, 5-fluorouracil or C-D, gemcitabine
• FIG. 4 Cellular heterogeneity in levels of histone modifications in primary cancer tissues, hnmunohistochemical staining of cancer tissues from (A) lung adenocarcinoma (grade 2) and (B) kidney clear cell carcinoma (grade 1) with an anti-H3K18ac antibody. Percentage of cancer cells with brown nuclei determines the global levels of each histone modification for a given individual. Magnification: 10X, left panel; 40X, right panel. Distribution of patients for the levels of H3K4me2 (black bars) and H3K18ac (grey bars) in cancer tissues from (C) lung and (D) kidney are shown. The graphs represent the fraction of patients (y-axis) with indicated levels of histone modifications as percent cell staining (x- axis).
• FIG. 7 Cellular heterogeneity in levels of histone modifications in cancer cell lines.
• A Immunohistochemical examination of H3K9me2 in LNCaP and PC3 prostate cancer cell lines. Note the increased percentage of PC3 cells with lower levels of H3K9me2 (blue nuclei) compared to LNCaP cells.
• B Western blot of acid-extracted histones from LNCaP and PC3 cells for H3K9me2 levels and histone H3 (irrespective of modifications) as a loading control. The triangles indicate increased loading from left to right.
• FIG. 8 Global levels of H3K9me2 correlates with its levels at repetitive DNA elements.
• A ChIP-chip analysis of H3K9me2 in LNCaP and PC3 cells. Each row represents the region from -5.5 to +2.5 of annotated transcription start site (TSS) for a given gene which is divided into 16 fragments of 500-bp each. Genes are grouped based on similarity of e la- binding pattern across the 8 kb promoter region. The colors indicate relative enrichment or depletion of ChIPed DNA (yellow) vs. input (blue) from each cell.
• B Correlations of H3K9me2 levels at each of the 16 fragments across all promoters between LNCaP and PC3 cells.
• FIG. 9 Cellular patterns of histone modifications in kidney cancer.
• FIG. 10 Cellular patterns of H3K9me2 predict prognosis kidney cancer. Tumors were first stratified based on tumor localization (localized vs. metastatic disease). Patients in each stratum were assigned to two groups based on the levels of H3K9me2 — ⁇ IO% staining, Group 2, red and blue lines; >10% staining, Group 1, black and green lines — and their clinical outcomes were compared. A Kaplan-Meir plot is used to visualize survival probabilities of the two H3K9me2 groups in each stratum. In both localized (black and red lines) and metastatic disease (green and blue lines), lower levels of H3K9me2 predicted poorer survival probabilities.
• FIG. 11 Cellular heterogeneity in levels of histone modifications in cancer cell lines.
• A Immunohistochemical examination of H3K4me2 and H3K18ac in LNCaP and PC3 prostate cancer cell lines. Note the increased percentage of PC3 cells with lower levels of histone modifications (blue nuclei indicated by orange arrows) compared to LNCaP cells. The intensity of staining is also
• B Western blot of acid-extracted histones from LNCaP and PC3 cells for H3K4me2 and H3K18ac levels. The triangles indicate increased loading from left to right.
• H3K4me2 and H3K9me2 predicted worse survival outcome specifically for patients receiving adjuvant 5-FU chemotherapy.
• Our data indicate that cellular levels of histone modifications represent novel prognostic markers for pancreatic cancer and are helpful in predicting response to 5-FU.
• cellular histone modification levels can prove to be useful predictive biomarkers for response to 5-FU or other thymidylate synthase inhibitors in other malignancies (i.e., colorectal or breast cancer) where 5-fluorouracil is utilized as a standard chemotherapy.
• the invention provides methods of treating an individual having a low grade or stage of cancer, by determining whether the individual has a low grade cancer and by contacting a test tissue sample from the individual with an antibody that specifically binds to a modified histone protein selected from H3K4me2, H3K9me2, and H3K18ac; and determining the global histone modification pattern in the test tissue sample in comparison to a control tissue sample and administering a more aggressive cancer therapy to the patient when the global histone modification pattern indicates that the cancer is likely to progress or metastasize.
• the determining the grade or stage of the cancer can be before or after the histone protein modification pattern is determined.
• the invention provides a method of targeting patients for more aggressive or alternative cancer therapy or increased surveillance for a cancer recurrence based upon an altered global histone modification pattern in a tissue sample from the patient taken before, during, or after surgical removal of the cancerous tissue before, during, or after another cancer treatment.
• the altered global histone modification pattern can be determined as described herein.
• Patients identified as having altered an global histone modification pattern(s) selected from H3K4me2, H3K9me2, and H3K18ac with an increased risk of metastasis, recurrence or a therapy resistant cancer can be further selected on that basis for treatment with immunotherapy, chemotherapy and/or radiation.
• the invention provides methods of assessing the response of a cancer patient to a medical treatment, comprising the steps of contacting a test tissue sample from the individual receiving the treatment with an antibody that specifically binds to a modified histone protein selected from H3K4me2, H3K9me2, and H3K18ac; and determining the global histone modification pattern of selected from H3K4me2, H3K9me2, and H3K18ac; in the test tissue sample in comparison to a tissue sample taken from the patient before the treatment, or earlier or later in the course of a treatment, or before and after a treatment has been modified.
• the therapy is hormonal ablation therapy or chemotherapy or radiation or a pro-apoptosis therapy.
• the invention provides a method of providing a prognosis for a cancer by contacting a test tissue sample from an individual at risk for or known to have a cancer with an antibody that specifically binds to a modified histone protein; and determining the global histone modification pattern in the test tissue sample in comparison to a control tissue sample; thereby providing a prognosis for said cancer by identification of an altered global histone modification pattern,
• the tissue sample is a tumor biopsy sample, hi some embodiments, the cancer or tumor is prostate, bladder, kidney, colon or breast cancer.
• the individual has less advanced disease (i.e. low grade or stage), the category in which prognostic markers are acutely needed.
• kits comprising at least two antibodies which each bind a different histone protein modification
• the antibodies are selected from the group consisting of H3 K9 acetylation, H3 Kl 8 acetylation, H4 Kl 2 acetylation, H3 K4 dimethylation, H3 K9diMe, and H4 R3 dimethylation.
• the antibodies are labeled with a detectable moiety
• the kits provide reagents for detecting the antibody when bound to a histone protein having the histone protein modification recognized by the antibody.
• the kits have instructions relating altered histone modification patterns to an increased or decreased risk of cancer metastasis or progression.
• the kits further comprise reagents for use in immunohistochemical methods using the antibodies.
• the global histone protein modification is selected from one or more of the group consisting of H3 K9 acetylation, H3 Kl 8 acetylation, H4 Kl 2 acetylation, H3 K4 dimethylation, H3 K9dimethylation, and H4 R3 dimethylation.
• the cancer or tumor is prostate, bladder, kidney, colon or breast cancer.
• the cancer can be a metastatic cancer.
• the global histone modification pattern of one, two, three, four, or at least two or three different histone protein modifications is detected.
• the at least two different histone protein modifications are selected from the group consisting of H3 K9 acetylation, H3 Kl 8 acetylation, H4 Kl 2 acetylation, H3 K4 dimethylation, a H3 K9dimethylation, and H4 R3 dimethylation.
• the histone protein modifications are H3 K4 dimethylation and H3K18 acetylation.
• the histone proteins are selected from methylations and acetylations of either or both H3 and H4 histone proteins.
• the histone proteins are selected from methylations and acetylations of either or both H2A and H2B histone proteins.
• the histone proteins and individual are preferably human.
• the altered global histone modification pattern in the individual who has cancer or is suspected of having a cancer is determined by (a) obtaining a tissue sample from a portion the subject wherein the portion has or is suspected of having cancer cells therein; and (b) detecting one, two, three, four or more global histone modifications in the sample to provide a global histone modification pattern and (c) comparing the histone modification pattern to a control or normal global histone modification pattern for a subject to identify an altered global histone modification pattern.
• the global histone modifications are detected using antibodies which specifically bind the histone protein modification of interest.
• the antibody may be a monoclonal antibody or a polyclonal antibody directed toward the histone modification pattern of interest.
• the method further comprises the step of fixing the cells and detecting the global histone modifications in the fixed cells.
• the immunohistochemical staining uses antibodies to specifically bind the histone protein modification of interest.
• the antibody may be a monoclonal antibody or a polyclonal antibody directed toward the histone modification pattern of interest.
• the antibody may be labeled with a detectable label (e.g., a radioactive label, and enzymatic label, a fluorescent label, or chemiluminescent label, or a molecular tag).
• the label bound to the histone modification of interest may be detected by autoradiography, fluorimetry, luminometry, or phosphoimge analysis.
• the global histone modifications are detected for a plurality of individual fixed cells in the sample and the intensity and/or frequency of immunohistochemical staining is determined for each of the plurality such that a frequency distribution of cells according to staining intensities are obtained over an area of interest.
• the area of interest focuses on cells having an altered phenotype suggestive of a cancer.
• the area may be defined empirically according to the region of the sample having the most intense staining (if a modification positively correlates with the risk , grade, or progression of cancer) or the least intense staining if the modification negatively correlates with the risk , grade, or progression of cancer.
• the area may be of a predetermined size sufficient to provide a valid measure of staining patterns in the area of interest. Multiple areas may be sampled and compared from each of the tissue samples.
• the histone protein modification is selected from one or more of the group consisting of H3 K9 acetylation, H3 Kl 8 acetylation, H4 Kl 2 acetylation, H3 K4 dimethylation, H3 K9dimethylation, and H4 R3 dimethylation.
• the cancer or tumor is prostate, bladder, kidney, colon or breast cancer.
• the cancer can be a metastatic cancer.
• the cut-off for a high or level of the modification claim for the histone modification is about > 10% for H3K9dime, about >60% for H3K4me2 or about >35 percentile staining H3K18ac.
• the global histone modification pattern of at least two or three different histone protein modifications is detected, hi further embodiments, the at least two different histone protein modifications are selected from the group consisting of H3 K9 acetylation, H3 K18 acetylation, H4 K12 acetylation, H3 K4 dimethylation, H3 K9dimethylation, and H4 R3 dimethylation.
• the histone protein modifications are H3 K4 dimethylation and H3K18 acetylation.
• the histone proteins are selected from methylations and acetylations of either or both H3 and H4 histone proteins.
• the histone proteins are preferably human, hi some embodiments, the selected modifications are modifications of H3 or H4. In some further embodiments, the selected modifications are methylations and/or acetylations of H3 or H4. hi other embodiments, the selected modifications comprise a phosphorylation or ubiquinylation of H3 or H4. In further embodiments, the at least two different histone protein modifications are selected from the group consisting of H3 K9 acetylation, H3 Kl 8 acetylation, H4 Kl 2 acetylation, H3 K4 methylation(s), H3 K9 methylation (s), and H4 R3 methylation(s).
• the methods use antibodies which specifically bind to the histone protein modification of interest to detect the modifications.
• the antibody may be a monoclonal antibody or a polyclonal antibody directed toward the histone modification pattern of interest.
• a plurality of global histone modification patterns are determined for the sample. The histones to be analyzed for particular modifications may be first isolated from the sample and detected using immunochemical methods in a fluid medium.
• the ratio of a modified histone protein to the total levels of the histone protein provide a predictive measure based upon altered global histone modification patterns. For instance, a sample may be analyzed using an antibody which detects modified and unmodified forms of a histone protein and an antibody which selectively detects histones have the modification of interest. The ratio of the two in a population of cells or in a sample is determined and is compared to the ratio for a normal cell to establish a predictive ratio of altered global histone protein modification which can be used in the methods according to the invention.
• the altered global histone modification patterns are predictive of whether a cancer or tumor will be refractory to treatment or therapy resistant, or provide a better prognosis (e.g., increased likelihood of survival (e.g., survival at 6 months, 1 year, 2, years, 3, years, 4 years, 5 years or longer), or decreased likelihood of the recurrence of the cancer, or a decreased likelihood of the metastasis of the cancer; or the likelihood of a positive response to therapy with a thymidylate synthase inhibiton including, but not limited to 5-FU).
• a better prognosis e.g., increased likelihood of survival (e.g., survival at 6 months, 1 year, 2, years, 3, years, 4 years, 5 years or longer), or decreased likelihood of the recurrence of the cancer, or a decreased likelihood of the metastasis of the cancer; or the likelihood of a positive response to therapy with a thymidylate synthase inhibiton including, but not limited to 5-FU).
• the tissue is disaggregated by enzymatic, grinding, or other means and the global histone modification patterns of individual cells are characterized by immunofluorescence staining using the antibodies described herein followed by FACS sorting and/or scoring and counting of the cells which can provide a frequency distribution of the global histone modification frequencies for the sample.
• FACS sorting and/or scoring and counting of the cells which can provide a frequency distribution of the global histone modification frequencies for the sample.
• This present invention relates to our discovery that changes in global levels of individual histone modifications are associated with the presence of cancer and, importantly, are predictive of clinical outcome (see, WO 2006/119264 and U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US20080248039, corresponding to U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 11/912,429 filed May 29, 2008, which are assigned to the same assignee as the present invention and which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties).
• WO 2006/119264 and U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US20080248039 corresponding to U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 11/912,429 filed May 29, 2008, which are assigned to the same assignee as the present invention and which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
• the invention provides a method of diagnosing a cancer by contacting a test tissue sample from an individual at risk of having a cancer or suspected of having cancer with an antibody that specifically binds to a modified histone protein; and determining the global histone modification pattern in the test tissue sample in comparison to a control tissue sample; thereby diagnosing said cancer by identification of an altered global histone modification pattern.
• the tissue sample is a tumor biopsy sample.
• the cancer or tumor is prostate, bladder, kidney, colon or breast cancer.
• the individual has less advanced disease (i.e. low grade or stage), the category in which diagnostic markers are acutely needed.
• the global histone modification pattern can be scored according to standard immunohistochemical methodologies.
• the invention provides methods of treating an individual having a low grade or stage of cancer, by determining whether the individual has a low grade cancer and by contacting a test tissue sample from the individual with an antibody that specifically binds to a modified histone protein; and determining the global histone modification pattern in the test tissue sample in comparison to a control tissue sample and administering a more aggressive cancer therapy to the patient when the global histone modification pattern indicates that the cancer is likely to progress or metastasize.
• the determining the grade or stage of the cancer can before or after the histone protein modification pattern is determined.
• the invention provides a method of targeting patients for more aggressive or alternative cancer therapy or increased surveillance for a cancer recurrence based upon an altered global histone modification pattern in a tissue sample from the patient taken before, during, or after surgical removal of the cancerous tissue (e.g., prostectomy) or before, during, or after another cancer treatment.
• the altered global histone modification pattern can be determined as described herein.
• the cancer can be, for instance, a prostate cancer, ovarian cancer, renal cancer, lung cancer, breast cancer, colon cancer, leukemia, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, multiple myeloma or hepatocarcinoma.
• the cancer is a prostate or bladder cancer.
• Patients identified as having altered global histone modification pattern(s) associated with an increased risk of metastasis, recurrence or a therapy resistant cancer can be further selected on that basis for treatment with exogenous or endogenous hormone ablation, optionally supplemented with chemotherapy and/or radiation.
• the hormone ablation is androgen ablation (e.g., treatment with finasteride and other anti-tesosterone or anti-DHT agents).
• the invention provides methods of assessing the response of a cancer patient to a medical treatment, comprising the steps of contacting a test tissue sample from the individual receiving the treatment with an antibody that specifically binds to a modified histone protein; and determining the global histone modification pattern in the test tissue sample in comparison to a tissue sample taken from the patient before the treatment, or earlier or later in the course of a treatment, or before and after a treatment has been modified, hi some embodiments, the therapy is hormonal ablation therapy or chemotherapy or radiation or a pro-apoptosis therapy.
• the invention provides a method of providing a prognosis for a cancer by contacting a test tissue sample from an individual at risk for or known to have a cancer with an antibody that specifically binds to a modified histone protein; and determining the global histone modification pattern in the test tissue sample in comparison to a control tissue sample; thereby providing a prognosis for said cancer by identification of an altered global histone modification pattern.
• the tissue sample is a tumor biopsy sample.
• the cancer or tumor is prostate, bladder, kidney, colon or breast cancer.
• the individual has less advanced disease (i.e. low grade or stage), the category in which prognostic markers are acutely needed.
• kits comprising at least two antibodies which each bind a different histone protein modification.
• the antibodies are selected from the group consisting of H3 K9 acetylation, H3 Kl 8 acetylation, H4 Kl 2 acetylation, H3 K4 dimethylation, H3 K9diMe, and H4 R3 dimethylation.
• the antibodies are labeled with a detectable moiety.
• the kits provide reagents for detecting the antibody when bound to a histone protein having the histone protein modification recognized by the antibody.
• the kits have instructions relating altered histone modification patterns to an increased or decreased risk of cancer metastasis or progression.
• the kits further comprise reagents for use in immunohistochemical methods using the antibodies.
• the global histone protein modification is selected from one or more of the group consisting of H3 K9 acetylation, H3 Kl 8 acetylation, H4 Kl 2 acetylation, H3 K4 dimethylation, H3 K9dimethylation, and H4 R3 dimethylation.
• the cancer or tumor is prostate, bladder, kidney, colon or breast cancer.
• the cancer can be a metastatic cancer.
• the global histone modification pattern of one, two, three, four, or at least two or three different histone protein modifications is detected.
• the at least two different histone protein modifications are selected from the group consisting of H3 K9 acetylation, H3 K18 acetylation, H4 K12 acetylation, H3 K4 dimethylation, a H3 K9dimethylation, and H4 R3 dimethylation.
• the histone protein modifications are H3 K4 dimethylation and H3K18 acetylation.
• the histone proteins are selected from methylations and acetylations of either or both H3 and H4 histone proteins.
• the histone proteins are selected from methylations and acetylations of either or both H2A and H2B histone proteins.
• the histone proteins and individual are preferably human.
• the altered global histone modification pattern in the individual who has cancer or is suspected of having a cancer is determined by (a) obtaining a tissue sample from a portion the subject wherein the portion has or is suspected of having cancer cells therein; and (b) detecting one, two, three, four or more global histone modifications in the sample to provide a global histone modification pattern and (c) comparing the histone modification pattern to a control or normal global histone modification pattern for a subject to identify an altered global histone modification pattern.
• the global histone modifications are detected using antibodies which specifically bind the histone protein modification of interest.
• the antibody may be a monoclonal antibody or a polyclonal antibody directed toward the histone modification pattern of interest, hi some embodiments, the method further comprises the step of fixing the cells and detecting the global histone modifications in the fixed cells.
• the imniunohistochemical staining uses antibodies to specifically bind the histone protein modification of interest.
• the antibody may be a monoclonal antibody or a polyclonal antibody directed toward the histone modification pattern of interest.
• the antibody may be labeled with a detectable label (e.g., a radioactive label, and enzymatic label, a fluorescent label, or chemiluminescent label, or a molecular tag).
• the label bound to the histone modification of interest may be detected by autoradiography, fiuorimetry, luminometry, or phosphoimge analysis.
• the global histone modifications are detected for a plurality of individual fixed cells in the sample and the intensity and/or frequency of immunohistochemical staining is determined for each of the plurality such that a frequency distribution of cells according to staining intensities are obtained over an area of interest.
• the area of interest focuses on cells having an altered phenotype suggestive of a cancer.
• the area may be defined empirically according to the region of the sample having the most intense staining (if a modification positively correlates with the risk , grade, or progression of cancer) or the least intense staining if the modification negatively correlates with the risk , grade, or progression of cancer.
• the area may be of a predetermined size sufficient to provide a valid measure of staining patterns in the area of interest. Multiple areas may be sampled and compared from each of the tissue samples.
• the histone protein modification is selected from one or more of the group consisting of H3 K9 acetylation, H3 Kl 8 acetylation, H4 Kl 2 acetylation, H3 K4 dimethylation, H3 K9dimethylation, and H4 R3 dimethylation.
• the cancer or tumor is prostate, bladder, kidney, colon or breast cancer.
• the cancer can be a metastatic cancer.
• the global histone modification pattern of at least two or three different histone protein modifications is detected.
• the at least two different histone protein modifications are selected from the group consisting of H3 K9 acetylation, H3 Kl 8 acetylation, H4 Kl 2 acetylation, H3 K4 dimethylation, H3 K9dimethylation, and H4 R3 dimethylation.
• the histone protein modifications are H3 K4 dimethylation and H3K18 acetylation.
• the histone proteins are selected from methylations and acetylations of either or both H3 and H4 histone proteins.
• the histone proteins are preferably human.
• the selected modifications are modifications of H3 or H4. In some further embodiments, the selected modifications are methylations and/or acetylations of H3 or H4. In other embodiments, the selected modifications comprise a phosphorylation or ubiquinylation of H3 or H4. In further embodiments, the at least two different histone protein modifications are selected from the group consisting of H3 K9 acetylation, H3 Kl 8 acetylation, H4 K12 acetylation, H3 K4 methylation(s), H3 K9 methylation (s), and H4 R3 methylation(s). Characterization of the global histone modification pattern allows the altered global histone modifications which are of diagnostic and prognostic value to be determined.
• the histone modifications used for the analyses are selected according to the predictive power of their altered histone modification patterns with respect to the severity, grade, or likelihood of progression of a cancer.
• the histone modification to be analyzed is one whose altered histone modification patterns by themselves, or in combination with a second, third or fourth histone modification pattern, provide a relative risk for an increased likelihood of a more severe outcome or grade of cancer or of metastasis or non-responsiveness to thymidylate synthase treatment on the order of at least 1.5, 2, 3, 4, or 5-fold or more or on the order of from 1.5 to 3-fold, or 1.5 to 4-fold, or 2 to 5-fold.
• the methods use antibodies which specifically bind to the histone protein modification of interest to detect the modifications.
• the antibody may be a monoclonal antibody or a polyclonal antibody directed toward the histone modification pattern of interest.
• a plurality of global histone modification patterns are determined for the sample.
• the histones to be analyzed for particular modifications may be first isolated from the sample and detected using immunochemical methods in a fluid medium.
• the ratio of a modified histone protein to the total levels of the histone protein provide a predictive measure based upon altered global histone modification patterns. For instance, a sample may be analyzed using an antibody which detects modified and unmodified forms of a histone protein and an antibody which selectively detects histones have the modification of interest. The ratio of the two in a population of cells or in a sample is determined and is compared to the ratio for a normal cell to establish a predictive ratio of altered global histone protein modification which can be used in the methods according to the invention.
• the altered global histone modification patterns are predictive of whether a cancer or tumor will be refractory to treatment or therapy resistant.
• a histone rule is applied wherein cancer patients having a K4 diMe staining value at or above about the 60 percentile and patients have a better prognosis than patients who are below these levels.
• cancer patients having a Kl 8 Ac and K4 diMe staining value which are each at or above about the 35 percentile have a better prognosis than patients who are below these levels.
• the tissue is blood and the altered global histone modification pattern for blood cells is determined.
• the samples are from patients who have a leukemia or lymphoma and the altered global histone modification pattern includes patterns from leukemic or lymphoma cells.
• the detection of the global histone modification patterns can be conducted using immunofuorescence staining of the cells followed by FACS sorting and/or scoring and counting of the cells. These methods can provide a frequency distribution of the global histone modification frequencies for the cells of interest in the sample. In such methods it can also be useful to employ other fluorescent markers identifying the particular cell or its phenotype to facilitate in the sorting and counting of the leukemic or lymphoma cells.
• the tissue is disaggregated by enzymatic, grinding, or other means and the global histone modification patterns of individual cells are characterized by immunofluorescence staining using the antibodies described herein followed by FACS sorting and/or scoring and counting of the cells which can provide a frequency distribution of the global histone modification frequencies for the sample.
• FACS sorting and/or scoring and counting of the cells which can provide a frequency distribution of the global histone modification frequencies for the sample.
• Each tumor can then be assigned into a low or high level staining group based on its percent rank, including H3K4me2 ( ⁇ 60 vs. >60 percent rank), H3K9me2 ( ⁇ 30 vs. >30 percent rank for the RTOG TMA or ⁇ 25 vs. >25 percent rank for the UCLA Stage LTI TMA) and H3K18ac ( ⁇ 35 vs.
• cell staining percentages can be influenced the staining methodologies used. Accordingly, in some embodiments of the invention, the percentages would be equivalent to those obtained herein if obtained by the same methods.
• a method of predicting the response of, or selecting a cancer therapy for, of a patient to a thymidylate synthase inhibitor comprising the steps of (a)contacting a test tissue sample from an individual at risk for or known to have a cancer with an antibody or immunologically active fragment thereof or aptamer that specifically binds to a modified histone protein; and (b) determining the global H3K4 dimethylation, H3K9dimethylation and/or H3K18 acetylation histone modification pattern.
• the tissue sample is a tumor biopsy sample of a pancreatic is prostate, bladder, kidney, ovarian, colon or breast cancer.
• Each tumor can then be assigned into a low or high level staining group based on its percent rank, including H3K4me2 (about ⁇ 60 vs. >60 percent rank), H3K9me2 (about ⁇ 30 or 25 vs. >30 or >25 percent rank) and about H3K18ac ( ⁇ 35 vs. >35 percent rank) or within a range of from 0.8 to 1.2, 0.9 to 1.1, or 0.95 to 1.05 times those values.
• H3K4me2 about ⁇ 60 vs. >60 percent rank
• H3K9me2 about ⁇ 30 or 25 vs. >30 or >25 percent rank
• H3K18ac ⁇ 35 vs. >35 percent rank
• the cell staining percentages can be influenced the staining methodologies used. Accordingly, in some embodiments of the invention, the percentages would be equivalent to those obtained herein if obtained by the same methods.
• Global histone modification refers to patterns of histone protein modification that are not confined to promoter regions but that encompass large areas of chromatin, including non-promoter regions. Global histone modification patterns may be determined by any means known in the art, including immunological methods and the like employing antibodies, apatamers, and immunologically active fragments of the antibodies which can bind to the histone modification of interest. Immunohistochemical and immunocytological methods may be used in detecting the modified histones or staining the cells to establish a global histone modification pattern and the percent of cells staining for the modification. Mass spectroscopic and electrochemical means may also be used.
• a cut-off which provides a difference in the relative likelihood of survival, or survival in response to a therapy of at least 20%, 30%, 40, 50%, 60% can be selected for survival periods of 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 10 years or longer.
• Histone refers to DNA binding structural proteins of chromosomes. Histones have a high proportion of positively charged amino acids such as lysine and arginine, which aids in DNA binding. The five main types of histones fall into two groups: nucleosomal histones H2A, H2B, H3, H4; and Hl histones.
• Modified histone protein refers to a histone protein with one or more of the following chemical modifications which include, but are not limited to, lysine acetylation, lysine methylation (mono-, di-, and trimethylation), lysine ubiquitylation, arginine methylation (mono-, di-, symmetric and asymmetric methylation), serine/threonine/tyrosine phosphorylation.
• histone H3 includes the proteins of SEQ ID NO:1 and SEQ ID NO:2 (see, Swiss Prot Ace No: Q93081 (which is incorporated by reference in its entirety with respect to the sequence itself) and the naturally occurring variants including, but not limited to, the modified histone proteins thereof, as well as proteins which are substantially identical thereto, and in particular, also lack the N-terminal methionine residue at position 1 of the above sequences (e.g., a post-translational loss of the N-terminal methionine residue).
• Modified histone proteins are well known in the art.
• the suitable histone protein modifications may include, but are not limited to, any one or more listed below. Exemplary protein modifications for possible use according to the invention are set forth below.
• Me refers to methyl modifications
• Ac to acetyl modifications
• P or “phos” refer to phosphorylation modifications
• Ub to ubiquinylations.
• Me may be a mono-, di, or trimethylation.
• two modifications are listed for a particular protein residue, they can be alternative modifications.
• the residue position of the tables is with respect to the positions of SEQ ID Nos: 1 to 6, renumbered without the N-terminal methionine (i.e, the residue position of SEQ ID NOs: 1 to 6 minus one).
• the histone proteins of SEQ ID Nos: 1 to 6 to be detected lack an N-terminal methionine residue.
• Histone deacetylase inhibitors for use according to the invention include, but are not limited to, vorinostat, FK228, PXDlOl, PCI-24781, ITF2357, MGCD0103, MS-275, valproic acid and LBH589 (see, Tan et al, Journal of Hematology & Oncology 2010, 3:5).
• the inhibitor can be an (a) organic hydroxamic acids (e.g., Trichostatin A (TSA) and suberoylanilide bishydroxamine (SAHA)) (b) short-chain fatty acids (e.g., butyrates and valproic acid (VPA)), (c) benzamides (e.g., MS-275), (d) cyclic tetrapeptides (e.g., trapoxin), and (e) sulfonamide anilides.
• organic hydroxamic acids e.g., Trichostatin A (TSA) and suberoylanilide bishydroxamine (SAHA)
• SAHA suberoylanilide bishydroxamine
• VPA valproic acid
• benzamides e.g., MS-275
• cyclic tetrapeptides e.g., trapoxin
• sulfonamide anilides e.g., sulfonamide anil
• Agents include LBH589 (panobinostat), PCI24781 (CRA- 024781), LAQ824 I, II, PXDlOl (belinostat), ITF2357, SB939, JNJ-16241199 (R306465), m-carboxycinnamic acid bishydroxamide (CBHA), Scriptaid, Oxamflatin, Pyroxamide, Cyclic hydroxamic acid containing peptides (CHAPs), AN-9, OSU-HD AC42, Benzamides MS-275 (entinostat), MGCDOl 03, Pimelic diphenylamide, M344, N-acetyldinaline (CI-994), Cyclic tetrapeptides Apicidine, Trapoxins, HC-toxin, Chlamydocin, Depsipeptide (FR901228 or FK228) (romidepsin), sulfonamide anilides, N-2-aminophenyl-3-
• Immunohistochemistry refers to the use of antibodies or aptamers to detect proteins in biological samples such as cells and tissue sections.
• the detection methods of the present invention can be carried out, for example, using standard immunohistochemical techniques known in the art (reviewed in Gosling, Immunoassays: A Practical Approach, 2000, Oxford University Press). Detection is accomplished by labeling a primary antibody or a secondary antibody with, for example, a radioactive isotope, a fluorescent label, an enzyme or any other detectable label known in the art. Visual grading of tissue sections by intensity of staining is well known in the art. Standard controls from tumor and healthy tissue samples are routinely used by those of skill in the art to control for variation among samples and reagents.
• the frequencies of tissue samples in which an indicated percent or degree of cell staining occurs are ascertained for each modification.
• Those of ordinary skill in the art appreciate the use of standard controls from tumor and healthy tissue samples to control for variation among samples and reagents.
• negative controls that do not include primary antibodies specific for the desired target can be used routinely to control for background at the time the application was filed.
• Methods of immunohistochemical scoring are also well known in the art. In some embodiments, immunohistochemical scoring is on a scale from 0 to 4 or 1 to 4. For example, Van Diest et al, Anal. Quant. Cytol. Histol.
• a “label” or a “detectable moiety” is a composition detectable by spectroscopic, photochemical, biochemical, immunochemical, chemical, or other physical means.
• useful labels include 32 P, fluorescent dyes, electron-dense reagents, enzymes (e.g., as commonly used in an ELISA), biotin, digoxigenin, or haptens and proteins which can be made detectable, e.g., by incorporating a radiolabel into the peptide or used to detect antibodies specifically reactive with the peptide.
• Labels may be conjugated directly to the biorecognition molecules, or to probes that bind these molecules, using conventional methods that are well known in the arts.
• Labeling schemes are known in the art and permit a plurality of binding assays to be performed simultaneously.
• Different labels may be radioactive, enzymatic, chemiluminescent, fluorescent, quantum dot, or others.
• Methods of covalently or noncovalently conjugating labels to antibodies are well known to one of ordinary skill in the art.
• Methods of detecting proteins and modified proteins by use of labeled antibodies are also well known to persons of ordinary skill in the art.
• Cancer refers to human cancers and carcinomas, sarcomas, adenocarcinomas, lymphomas, leukemias, etc., including but not limited to solid tumors and lymphoid cancers, kidney, breast, lung, kidney, bladder, colon, ovarian, prostate, pancreas, stomach, brain, head and neck, skin, uterine, testicular, esophagus, and liver cancer, lymphoma, including but not limited to non-Hodgkins and Hodgkins lymphoma, leukemia, and multiple myeloma.
• the cancer is an adenocarcinoma, a pancreatic cancer, a breast cancer, a prostate cancer, a lung cancer, or a kidney cancer.
• Specific types of cancers including malignant tumors, either primary or secondary, for which prognosis and 5 -FU responsiveness can be assessed according to the invention include, but are not limited to, bone cancer, cancer of the larynx, gall bladder, rectum, head and neck, bronchi, basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma of both ulcerating and papillary type, metastatic skin carcinoma, osteosarcoma, Ewin's sarcoma, reticulum cell sarcoma, myeloma, giant cell tumor, small-cell lung tumor, islet cell tumor, primary brain tumor, acute and chronic lymphocytic and granulocytic tumors, hair-cell tumor, adenoma, hyperplasia, medullary carcinoma, pheochromocytoma, mucosal neuromas, cervical cancer
• 5-FU therapy includes, but is not limited to, treatment with 5-FU and prodrugs of 5- FU and combination therapies with 5-FU and its prodrugs (e.g., with Leucovorin).
• Biological sample includes sections of tissues such as biopsy and autopsy samples, and frozen sections taken for histologic purposes. Tissue, cultured cells, e.g., primary cultures, explants, and transformed cells. Pn one embodiment, the biological sample is a tissue sample prepared for immunohistochemistry. In another embodiment, the biological sample is a tissue sample prepared as a tissue microarray (TMA) for high throughput screening.
• TMA tissue microarray
• a biological sample is typically obtained from a eukaryotic organism, most preferably a human or a mammal such as a primate e.g., chimpanzee; cow; dog; cat; a rodent, e.g., guinea pig, rat, Mouse; rabbit; or a bird; reptile; or fish.
• a “biopsy” refers to the process of removing a tissue sample for diagnostic or prognostic evaluation, and to the tissue specimen itself. Any biopsy technique known in the art can be applied to the diagnostic and prognostic methods of the present invention. The biopsy technique applied will depend on the tissue type to be evaluated, the size and type of the tumor, among other factors. Representative biopsy techniques include excisional biopsy, incisional biopsy, needle biopsy, surgical biopsy, and bone marrow biopsy. An “excisional biopsy” refers to the removal of an entire tumor mass with a small margin of normal tissue surrounding it. An “incisional biopsy” refers to the removal of a wedge of tissue that includes a cross-sectional diameter of the tumor.
• a diagnosis or prognosis made by endoscopy or fluoroscopy can require a "core-needle biopsy" of the tumor mass, or a "fine- needle aspiration biopsy” which generally obtains a suspension of cells from within the tumor mass.
• Biopsy techniques are discussed, for example, in Harrison 's Principles of Internal Medicine, Kasper, et al., eds., 16th ed., 2005, Chapter 70, and throughout Part V.
• Antibody refers to a polypeptide comprising a framework region from an immunoglobulin gene or fragments thereof that specifically binds and recognizes an antigen.
• the recognized immunoglobulin genes include the kappa, lambda, alpha, gamma, delta, epsilon, and mu constant region genes, as well as the myriad immunoglobulin variable region genes.
• Light chains are classified as either kappa or lambda.
• Heavy chains are classified as gamma, mu, alpha, delta, or epsilon, which in turn define the immunoglobulin classes, IgG, IgM, IgA, IgD and IgE, respectively.
• the antigen-binding region of an antibody will be most critical in specificity and affinity of binding.
• An exemplary immunoglobulin (antibody) structural unit comprises a tetramer.
• Each tetramer is composed of two identical pairs of polypeptide chains, each pair having one "light” (about 25 kD) and one "heavy” chain (about 50-70 kD).
• the N-terminus of each chain defines a variable region of about 100 to 110 or more amino acids primarily responsible for antigen recognition.
• the terms variable light chain (V L ) and variable heavy chain (V H ) refer to these light and heavy chains respectively.
• Antibodies exist, e.g., as intact immunoglobulins or as a number of well- characterized fragments produced by digestion with various peptidases.
• pepsin digests an antibody below the disulfide linkages in the hinge region to produce F(ab)' 2j a dimer of Fab which itself is a light chain joined to VH-C H I by a disulfide bond.
• the F(ab)' 2 may be reduced under mild conditions to break the disulfide linkage in the hinge region, thereby converting the F(ab)' 2 dimer into an Fab' monomer.
• the Fab' monomer is essentially Fab with part of the hinge region ⁇ see Fundamental Immunology (Paul ed., 3d ed. 1993). While various antibody fragments are defined in terms of the digestion of an intact antibody, one of skill will appreciate that such fragments may be synthesized de novo either chemically or by using recombinant DNA methodology. Thus, the term antibody, as used herein, also includes antibody fragments either produced by the modification of whole antibodies, or those synthesized de novo using recombinant DNA methodologies (e.g., single chain Fv) or those identified using phage display libraries ⁇ see, e.g. , McCafferty et al. , Nature 348:552-554 (1990))
• antibodies e.g., recombinant, monoclonal, or polyclonal antibodies
• many techniques known in the art can be used ⁇ see, e.g. , Kohler & Milstein, Nature 256:495-497 (1975); Kozbor et al., Immunology Today 4: 72 (1983); Cole et al., pp. 77-96 in Monoclonal Antibodies and Cancer Therapy, Alan R. Liss, Inc. (1985); Coligan, Current Protocols in Immunology (1991); Harlow & Lane, Antibodies, A Laboratory Manual (1988); and Goding, Monoclonal Antibodies: Principles and Practice (2d ed. 1986)).
• the genes encoding the heavy and light chains of an antibody of interest can be cloned from a cell, e.g., the genes encoding a monoclonal antibody can be cloned from a hybridoma and used to produce a recombinant monoclonal antibody.
• Gene libraries encoding heavy and light chains of monoclonal antibodies can also be made from hybridoma or plasma cells. Random combinations of the heavy and light chain gene products generate a large pool of antibodies with different antigenic specificity ⁇ see, e.g., Kuby, Immunology (3 rd ed. 1997)).
• Techniques for the production of single chain antibodies or recombinant antibodies (U.S. Patent 4,946,778, U.S. Patent No.
• mice can be adapted to produce antibodies to polypeptides of this invention.
• transgenic mice or other organisms such as other mammals, may be used to express humanized or human antibodies ⁇ see, e.g., U.S. Patent Nos.
• phage display technology can be used to identify antibodies and heteromeric Fab fragments that specifically bind to selected antigens ⁇ see, e.g.
• Antibodies can also be made bispecific, i.e., able to recognize two different antigens ⁇ see, e.g., WO 93/08829, Traunecker et al, EMBO J. 10:3655-3659 (1991); and Suresh et al, Methods in Enzymology 121:210 (1986)). Antibodies can also be heteroconjugates, e.g., two co valently joined antibodies, or immunotoxins ⁇ see, e.g., U.S. Patent No. 4,676,980 , WO 91/00360; WO 92/200373; and EP 03089).
• a humanized antibody has one or more amino acid residues introduced into it from a source which is non-human. These non-human amino acid residues are often referred to as import residues, which are typically taken from an import variable domain. Humanization can be essentially performed following the method of Winter and co-workers ⁇ see, e.g., Jones et al, Nature 321:522-525 (1986); Riechmann et al, Nature 332:323-327 (1988); Verhoeyen et al, Science 239:1534-1536 (1988) and Presta, Curr. Op. Struct. Biol.
• humanized antibodies are chimeric antibodies (U.S. Patent No. 4,816,567), wherein substantially less than an intact human variable domain has been substituted by the corresponding sequence from a non-human species.
• humanized antibodies are typically human antibodies in which some CDR residues and possibly some FR residues are substituted by residues from analogous sites in rodent antibodies.
• a "chimeric antibody” is an antibody molecule in which (a) the constant region, or a portion thereof, is altered, replaced or exchanged so that the antigen binding site (variable region) is linked to a constant region of a different or altered class, effector function and/or species, or an entirely different molecule which confers new properties to the chimeric antibody, e.g., an enzyme, toxin, hormone, growth factor, drug, etc.; or (b) the variable region, or a portion thereof, is altered, replaced or exchanged with a variable region having a different or altered antigen specificity.
• Treatments to be used in the case where the patient is resistant to 5-FU or a thymidylate synthase inhibitor or has a poorer expected survival based upon their global histone modification pattern include drugs impacting dhfr pathway, hormone therapy, immunotherapy, RNAi therapeutics, radiation therapy, nutraceutical therapies, "meditation” Therapy, any therapy in general where cellular energy metabolism is impacted and/ or drugs contributing to shifting global patterns of histone modifications from low levels of modification to higher level of modifications and I think this could be an all encompassing way of describing response predictions to any drug impacting the shift from low-to-high levels of cellular histone modifications.
• Subjects whose histone modification patterns indicates they are unlikely to be responsive to 5-FU or another thymidylate synthase inhibitor can be treated with an additional or alternative therapy to 5-FU or the thymidylate synthase inhibitor which would include, but not be limited to, treatment with another chemotherapeutic agent, an immunotherapy, a radiation therapy, an antisense therapy, RNAi therapy, a hormone therapy, drugs impacting the dhfr pathway, and an anti-metabolate therapy (e.g., folate inhibitor, methotrexate), a taxane (e.g., paclitaxel, a taxol), Abraxanes, kinase inhibitors, particularly inhibitors of c-met, MEK, Apo2L/TRAIL, EGFR (inhibitors of both internal and external domains of EGFR), anti-VEGF therapies, and anti - IGFlR & IGF2R therapies, hi addition, Nutraceutical therapies or any therapy in general where cellular energy metabolism is
• the antibody is conjugated to an "effector" moiety.
• the effector moiety can be any number of molecules, including, but not limited to, labeling moieties such as radioactive labels or fluorescent labels, or can be a therapeutic moiety.
• the antibody modulates the activity of the protein.
• the specified antibodies bind to a particular protein at least two times the background and more typically more than 10 to 100 times background.
• Specific binding to an antibody under such conditions requires an antibody that is selected for its specificity for a particular protein.
• polyclonal antibodies can be selected to obtain only those polyclonal antibodies that are specifically immunoreactive with the selected antigen and not with other proteins.
• This selection may be achieved by subtracting out antibodies that cross-react with other molecules.
• a variety of immunoassay formats may be used to select antibodies specifically immunoreactive with a particular protein.
• solid-phase ELISA immunoassays are routinely used to select antibodies specifically immunoreactive with a protein (see, e.g., Harlow & Lane, Using Antibodies, A Laboratory Manual (1998) for a description of immunoassay formats and conditions that can be used to determine specific immunoreacti vity) .
• nucleic acids or polypeptide sequences refer to two or more sequences or subsequences that are the same or have a specified percentage of amino acid residues or nucleotides that are the same (i.e., about 60% identity, preferably 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99%, or higher identity over a specified region, when compared and aligned for maximum correspondence over a comparison window or designated region) as measured using a BLAST or BLAST 2.0 sequence comparison algorithms with default parameters described below, or by manual alignment and visual inspection ⁇ see, e.g., NCBI web site http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/ or the like).
• sequences are then said to be “substantially identical.”
• This definition also refers to, or may be applied to, the compliment of a test sequence.
• the definition also includes sequences that have deletions and/or additions, as well as those that have substitutions.
• the preferred algorithms can account for gaps and the like.
• identity exists over a region that is at least about 25 amino acids or nucleotides in length, or more preferably over a region that is 50-100 amino acids or nucleotides in length.
• sequence comparison typically one sequence acts as a reference sequence, to which test sequences are compared.
• test and reference sequences are entered into a computer, subsequence coordinates are designated, if necessary, and sequence algorithm program parameters are designated.
• sequence algorithm program parameters Preferably, default program parameters can be used, or alternative parameters can be designated.
• sequence comparison algorithm then calculates the percent sequence identities for the test sequences relative to the reference sequence, based on the program parameters.
• a “comparison window”, as used herein, includes reference to a segment of any one of the number of contiguous positions selected from the group consisting of from 20 to 600, usually about 50 to about 200, more usually about 100 to about 150 in which a sequence may be compared to a reference sequence of the same number of contiguous positions after the two sequences are optimally aligned.
• Methods of alignment of sequences for comparison are well-known in the art.
• Optimal alignment of sequences for comparison can be conducted, e.g., by the local homology algorithm of Smith & Waterman, Adv. Appl. Math. 2:482 (1981), by the homology alignment algorithm of Needleman & Wunsch, J. MoI. Biol.
• a preferred example of algorithm that is suitable for determining percent sequence identity and sequence similarity are the BLAST and BLAST 2.0 algorithms, which are described in Altschul et al., Nuc. Acids Res. 25:3389-3402 (1977) and Altschul et al, J. MoI. Biol. 215:403-410 (1990), respectively.
• BLAST and BLAST 2.0 are used, with the parameters described herein, to determine percent sequence identity for the nucleic acids and proteins of the invention.
• Software for performing BLAST analyses is publicly available through the National Center for Biotechnology Information (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/).
• This algorithm involves first identifying high scoring sequence pairs (HSPs) by identifying short words of length W in the query sequence, which either match or satisfy some positive- valued threshold score T when aligned with a word of the same length in a database sequence.
• T is referred to as the neighborhood word score threshold (Altschul et al, supra).
• a scoring matrix is used to calculate the cumulative score. Extension of the word hits in each direction are halted when: the cumulative alignment score falls off by the quantity X from its maximum achieved value; the cumulative score goes to zero or below, due to the accumulation of one or more negative- scoring residue alignments; or the end of either sequence is reached.
• the BLAST algorithm parameters W, T, and X determine the sensitivity and speed of the alignment.
• polypeptide peptide
• protein protein
• amino acid polymers in which one or more amino acid residue is an artificial chemical mimetic of a corresponding naturally occurring amino acid, as well as to naturally occurring amino acid polymers and non- naturally occurring amino acid polymer.
• amino acid refers to naturally occurring and synthetic amino acids, as well as amino acid analogs and amino acid mimetics that function in a manner similar to the naturally occurring amino acids.
• Naturally occurring amino acids are those encoded by the genetic code, as well as those amino acids that are later modified, e.g., hydroxyproline, ⁇ - carboxyglutamate, and O-phosphoserine.
• Amino acid analogs refers to compounds that have the same basic chemical structure as a naturally occurring amino acid, i.e., an a carbon that is bound to a hydrogen, a carboxyl group, an amino group, and an R group, e.g., homoserine, norleucine, methionine sulfoxide, methionine methyl sulfonium. Such analogs have modified R groups (e.g., norleucine) or modified peptide backbones, but retain the same basic chemical structure as a naturally occurring amino acid.
• Amino acid mimetics refers to chemical compounds that have a structure that is different from the general chemical structure of an amino acid, but that functions in a manner similar to a naturally occurring amino acid.
• Example 1 The prognostic and predictive value of three histone modifications in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
• Tissue microarrays from two large pancreatic adenocarcinoma cohorts were examined, including a 195 patient cohort from RTOG 9704, a multi-center phase III randomized treatment trial comparing adjuvant gemcitabine versus 5- fluorouracil (5-FU), and a 140 patient cohort of Stage I or II cancer from UCLA Medical Center. Immunohistochemistry for three histone modifications (H3K4me2, H3K9me2 and H3K18ac) was performed. Positive tumor cell staining of the histone modifications was used to classify patients into low and high staining groups, which were related to clinicopathologic parameters and clinical outcome measures.
• RESULTS Low cellular levels of H3K4me2, H3K9me2 or H3K18ac were each significant and independent predictors of poor survival in univariate and multivariate models, with combined low levels of H3K4me2 and/or H3K18ac predicting the worst overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 2.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.53-4.22; P- 0.0003) in the UCLA Stage I/II TMA. In subgroup analyses, histone levels were predictive of survival for only those patients with node-negative cancer or for those patients receiving adjuvant 5-FU, but not gemcitabine, in RTOG 9704.
• pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients and tissue microarrays The RTOG 9704 pancreatic cancer tissue microarray (TMA) consisted of 229 cases of pancreatic adenocarcinoma obtained from patients enrolled in RTOG 9704, a phase III randomized postoperative adjuvant treatment trial comparing 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) to gemcitabine before and after chemoradiation (Regine et al., Jama 299:1019-26 (2008)).
• RTOG 9704 all patients received adjuvant chemotherapy (5-FU or gemcitabine) for durations of one month before and three months following chemoradiation therapy, which included 5-FU infusion as a radiation sensitizer.
• Each tumor was then assigned into a low or high level staining group based on its percent rank, including H3K4me2 ( ⁇ 60 vs. >60 percent rank), H3K9me2 ( ⁇ 30 vs. >30 percent rank for the RTOG TMA or ⁇ 25 vs. >25 percent rank for the UCLA Stage I/II TMA) and H3K18ac ( ⁇ 35 vs. >35 percent rank).
• Survival estimates were generated and visualized using the Kaplan-Meier method and survival curves were compared using the log- rank test. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to test statistical independence and significance of multiple predictors.
• 195 had diagnostic tumor present for immunohistochemical evaluation, including 103 patients in the fluorouracil treatment arm and 91 (or 92 for H3K9me2) in the gemcitabine treatment arm.
• the second TMA consisted of 140 patients with AJCC Stage I or II pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent complete gross surgical resection at UCLA Medical Center. Representative staining for each of the three histone modifications is shown in Figure 1. Absence of nuclear staining indicates a bulk decrease in a given cell, and thus assesses the cellular heterogeneity of that histone modification.
• Tumors ranged from 0 to 100% percent cell staining for each of the three histone modifications, with H3K4me2 and H3K18ac skewed towards overall higher percent cell staining and H3K9me2 skewed towards overall lower percent cell staining ( Figure 1).
• histone rule a classifier that divides patients into high and low risk groups based on the percent rank staining of each histone modification (Seligson et al, Am J Pathol 174:1619-1628 (2009); Seligson et al, Nature 435:1262-6 (2005)) (which herein are specifically incorporated by reference with respect to their disclosure of such rule).
• TMA pancreatic cancer
• Histone modification levels predict survival in pancreatic cancer.
• low H3K4me2 ⁇ 60 percent rank
• low H3K9me2 ⁇ 30 percent rank
• low H3K18ac ⁇ 35 percent rank
• Kaplan-Meier survival curves visualized significant associations between low levels of H3K4me2 or H3K9me2 and worse overall survival (data not shown).
• Histone modifications predict prognosis in node-negative pancreatic cancer. Tumor stage, lymph node involvement or histologic grade are important predictors of clinical outcome in pancreatic cancer (Garcea et al, Jop 9:99-132 (2008)). However, even within these useful clinicopathologic groups there remains a wide range of survival outcomes. To determine whether histone groups might further classify patients into distinct prognostic groups, we performed subgroup analysis of histone levels after first stratifying patients based on T-stage, N-stage or histologic grade.
• Histone modification levels predict response to adjuvant 5-FU chemotherapy.
• cellular histone modification levels represent a novel category of biomarkers able to predict response to adjuvant 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy in resected pancreatic cancer, and with potential applicability to the neoadjuvant setting or advanced pancreatic cancer. More generally, cellular histone modification levels may also prove to be useful predictive biomarkers in other malignancies (i.e., colorectal or breast cancer) where 5-fluorouracil is utilized as a standard chemotherapy.
• Example 2 Global Levels of Histone Modifications Predict Prognosis in Different Cancers.
• Cancer cells exhibit alterations in histone modification patterns at individual genes and globally at the level of single nuclei in individual cells.
• H3K4me2 histone H3 lysine 4 dimethylation
• ac H3K18 acetylation
• the cellular levels of H3K4me2 and H3K18ac also predict clinical outcome in lung and kidney cancer patients, with lower levels predicting significantly poorer survival probabilities in both cancers.
• H3K9me2 a modification associated with both gene activity and repression, is also prognostic of poorer outcome in prostate and kidney cancers.
• Cancer is a disease of genetic and epigenetic alterations.
• Epigenetics include the interrelated processes of DNA methylation and histone modifications, aberrations of which occur commonly in human cancer (Baylin, S.B., Ohm, J. E., Nat Rev Cancer 6:107-116 (2006); Feinberg, A.P., Tycko, B., Nat Rev Cancer, 4:143-153 (2004); Jones, P.A., Baylin, S.B., Cell 128:683-692 (2007)).
• histone modifications these aberrations may occur locally at gene promoters by inappropriate targeting of histone modifying enzymes, leading to improper expression or repression of individual genes that play important roles in tumorigenesis.
• the E2F transcription factor recruits the tumor suppressor retinoblastoma protein (Rb) to its target genes.
• Rb in turn recruits HDACl which leads to transcriptional silencing of genes with important roles in tumor biology such as cyclin E (Brehm et al, Nature 391 :597-601 (1998); Hake et al, Br J Cancer 90:761-769 (2004)).
• HDACl retinoblastoma protein
• Aberrant modification of histones associated with DNA repetitive sequences has also been reported which include lower levels of H4K16ac and H4K20me3 in hematological malignancies and colorectal adenocarcinomas (Fraga et al, Nat Genet 37:391-400 (2005)).
• tumor cells when examined at a global level by immunostaining of primary tumor tissues, individual tumor nuclei show variable levels of histone modifications, generating an additional layer of epigenetic heterogeneity at the cellular level (Seligson et al. , Nature 435:1262-1266 (2005)). Thus, tumor cells may harbor aberrant patterns of histone modifications at individual promoters, repetitive elements and globally at the level of single nuclei.
• MGMT O 6 -methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase
• H3K4me2 and H3K18ac proved to be the most informative of prognosis.
• the cellular patterns of these two modifications were sufficient to distinguish two groups of patients with distinct clinical outcomes, whom otherwise were not distinguishable by standard clinico- pathological variables (Seligson et al, Nature 435:1262-1266 (2005)).
• patients with low cellular levels of H3K4me2 and H3K18ac i.e., decreased percent cell staining
• histones and their modifications are present ubiquitously, our results in prostate cancer raised the possibility that histone modification patterns may serve as markers of prognosis in other cancer types. Furthermore, the prognostic utility of histone modifications may not be limited to the modifications examined so far. Other histone modifications may provide improved or complimentary prognostic capability.
• expression of one or more genes can be predictive of clinical outcome, but in most cases the identity of prognosticator genes is different in different cancers. Extending this logic to epigenetics, one would expect that different histone modifications predict prognosis in different cancers.
• TMA Tissue Microarrays
• T stage was determined from surgical pathology, N and M stages were determined by postoperative pathologic, clinical and/or radiographic data.
• the study endpoint examined for lung and kidney cancers was disease specific death.
• the survival time, in months, was the period from disease diagnosis, or from surgery, to death (lung and kidney, respectively). Patients alive at last follow-up or those with deaths not due to disease were censored at last follow-up. Death of unknown cause was censored for lung cancers; all causes were known for kidney cancer patients.
• the endpoint for prostate cancers was disease recurrence, defined as a postoperative serum PSA of 0.2 ng/ml or greater. Patients without recurrence were censored at last follow-up.
• the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) was determined at initial presentation for kidney and lung cancers.
• Lung cancer patients The World Health Organization (WHO) histological classifications of carcinomas of the lung were used.
• the lung cancer TMA contained 285 patient samples of which 262 (92%) were clinically informative. 257 of 262 cases (98%) were also informative for H3K18ac and H3K4me2.
• Adenocarcinomas included tumors with bronchioloalveolar components.
• the lung tumors were graded according to AJCC Cancer Staging Manual.
• the median age of lung cancer patients in this cohort was 67 years (range 41-87) and the male to female ratio was 1:1.4.
• the median tumor size was 2.5 cm.
• the median follow-up in this cohort was 59.0 months (range 1.0-229 months).
• Kidney cancer patients Pathological tumor subtyping of kidney cancers was performed according to the 1997 UICC/ AJCC classification of malignant tumors. Kidney tumors were taken from radical or partial nephrectomies of patients with renal cell carcinoma. Of the 379 cases on the TMA, 373 (98%) were clinically informative with a further 359 (96%) being informative for H3K18ac, H3K4me2 and H3K9me2.
• the median age of kidney cancer patients in the localized cohort was 63.5 (range 27-88) and the male to female ratio was 1.9:1.
• the median tumor size was 4.5 cm.
• the median follow-up in this cohort was 43.1 months (range 0.0-142 months).
• Prostate cancer patients Prostate cancers were all of the histological type "adenocarcinoma, conventional, not otherwise specified". From 226 prostate cancer patients on the TMA who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy, 212 were clinically informative, of which 185 (87%) were also informative for H3K9me2. Prostate grading was performed using the Gleason Score system (equivalent to Gleason Sum); "low grade" in our cohort included those cases of Gleason Score 2-6. The median age of prostate cancer patients in this cohort was 64 years (range 46-75). The median follow-up in this cohort was 60.0 months (range 2.0-120 months).
• the polyclonal rabbit anti-H3 (Abeam) was used at 5 ⁇ g/ml.
• Monoclonal anti-Ki-67 MEB-I (7.5 ⁇ g/ml) and anti-human p53 DO-7 (15 ⁇ g/ml) (Dako) were used for Ki67 and p53 detection, respectively.
• TMA Triclonal anti-Ki-67 MEB-I
• anti-human p53 DO-7 15 ⁇ g/ml
• Negative controls were identical array sections stained minus the primary antibody.
• histones were acid-extracted from PC3 (bone metastasis of prostate cancer; ATCC) and LNCaP (lymph node metastasis of prostate cancer; ATCC) cell lines and subjected to standard western blotting.
• Normal epithelium in cancer specimens, mesenchymal or infiltrating inflammatory cells and metastases were excluded from scoring.
• the frequency of positive nuclear expression (range 0-100%) was scored for each TMA spot using the 'labeling index' method.
• the percent cell positivity from each tumor spot within each case was pooled and used to determine the percentile rank of patients in each dataset.
• ChIP Chromatin immunoprecipitation
• microarray hybridization Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) and microarray hybridization.
• ChBP was performed essentially as described (Wang et al., Mol Cell 17:683-694 (2005)). Briefly, formaldehyde was added for 10 min at 37°C to growing cultures of cells. After PBS washing, cross-linked cells were scraped from the plates and washed with 1 ml of PBS containing protease inhibitors (Roche). Cells were lysed, incubated for 10 min on ice and immediately sonicated. 100 ⁇ l of the lysate were used for immunoprecipitation with anti-H3K9me2 or H3K18ac antibody; 10 ⁇ l of the lysate was used as input.
• the labeling reaction was completed with 6OU Klenow, dNTPs (0.12 mM dATP, dGTP and dTTP and 0.06 mM dCTP), 1.28 mM Cy3 and Cy5 for input and ChIPed DNA, respectively, and incubated for 3h at 37°C.
• the labeled DNA was purified using Qiagen Qiaquick PCR purification Kit and the incorporation was measured with Nanodrop.
• Hybridization onto the Human Promoter array (Agilent-G4489A), washing, and scanning were carried out according to the manufacturer's instructions. The arrays were scanned using an Agilent DNA Microarray scanner. Data extraction and analyses were carried out using the Agilent Feature Extraction software (version 9.1.3.1) and Chip Analytics software (version 1.2). Probe signals were normalized with Lowess normalization.
• TMA Tissue Microarrays
• H3K4me2, H3K9me2 and H3K18ac were analyzed the levels of H3K4me2, H3K9me2 and H3K18ac, using antibodies that recognize these specifically modified residues (Seligson et al, Nature 435:1262-1266 (2005); Suka et al., MoI Cell 8:473-479 (2001)), on TMAs of lung, kidney and prostate cancers.
• the choice of these cancers and the number of patients in each array were based on specimen availability with complete follow-up clinical data.
• the global level of histone modifications refers to the percentage of cancer cells within each tissue sample that stained positively for a given antibody. This scoring system is used routinely and extensively for a wide range of biomarkers that are currently in clinical use in pathology laboratories.
• Fig 4A-B Shown in Fig 4A-B is representative cancer tissues from lung (Fig 4A) and kidney (Fig 4B) stained with anti-H3K18ac antibody (Objective: 1OX left panel; 4OX right panel).
• the cells with brown nuclei are considered positively stained, and their percentage within the tumor tissue is determined.
• the lack of staining by the histone modification antibodies is unlikely due to inaccessibility of their respective antigen as an anti-H3 antibody, which recognizes unmodified histone H3, stains positively in essentially all cells (data not shown).
• the unstained cells may still contain the modifications at certain genomic loci but their levels are below the detection limits of 1HC, signifying that bulk histone modifications are considerably decreased in these cells.
• grade is a histological measure of tumor differentiation. Stage is a measure of tumor size and spread beyond its original site. In general, higher grade and stage are associated with poorer outcome.
• Histone modifications predict survival probability in lung cancer.
• histone modification patterns are clinically informative in lung cancer, we first partitioned the patients into stages 1 through 4 (data not shown). The patients were then assigned to two groups according to the predictive histone modification pattern that we identified from prostate cancer.
• H3K4me2 and H3K18ac were assigned to Group 1 (i.e., H3K4me2>60 or H3K4me2 and H3K18ac>35 percentile staining); the remaining tumors with lower levels of the modifications were assigned to Group 2.
• the patients in Group 2 with lower cellular levels of histone modifications red line, Fig 5A
• the histone pattern is an independent prognosticator in lung cancer.
• the histone pattern is an independent prognosticator in kidney cancer.
• Ki67 a marker of proliferation
• p53 Increased expression of Ki67 or p53 was shown previously to be associated significantly with poor patient outcome in kidney adenocarcinoma (Shvarts et al., J Urol 173:725-728 (2005); Visapaa et al, Urology 61:845-850 (2003)).
• the histone grouping remained a significant predictor of outcome (Table 2) but not when ECOG performance status was also included. Thus, the histone modification patterns are predictors of outcome in localized kidney cancer independently of grade, proliferation rate and p53 expression.
• H3K9me2 a modification associated with both gene repression and activity as well as heterochromatin — also predicts poorer prognosis in cancer.
• the prognostication by H3K9me2 was independent of tumor grade (Fig 6B inset), stage, preoperative PSA, and capsule invasion within the low Gleason score group (Table 2).
• PC3 cells contained reduced H3K9me2 levels compared to LNCaP cells.
• Western blotting of acid-extracted histones confirmed the 1HC results (Fig 7B).
• PC3 cells also showed lower levels of H3K18ac and H3K4me2 compared to LNCaP cells (see Figure 11).
• PC3 cells showed lower levels of H3K9me2 at subtelomeric repeat elements (D4Z4), a tandem 1.4-kb element found in acrocentric chromosomes (NB L2) and juxtacentromeric satellite 2 (Sat2) DNA sequences.
• D4Z4 subtelomeric repeat elements
• NB L2 acrocentric chromosomes
• Sat2 juxtacentromeric satellite 2
• the prognostic power of the histone modifications is independent of clinico-pathological variables including proliferation rate as well as certain biomarkers such as p53 expression in lung and p53 and Ki67 expression in kidney cancers. Therefore, the cellular patterns of histone modifications add further non- redundant information to the current prognostic markers for prediction of clinical behaviour in cancer patients.
• HDACs histone modifiers
• Some of these histone modifiers may preferentially affect DNA repetitive elements. Although this has not been demonstrated for mammalian proteins, the Hos3 HDAC in yeast preferentially deacetylates the ribosomal DNA repeats (Robyr et al. , Cell 109:437-446 (2002)).
• mitotic index is one of three parameters that is incorporated into the breast cancer grading system
• the histone groupings are also independent of mitotic index and thus proliferation rate.
• prostate, lung and kidney cancers global levels of histone modifications serve as markers of prognosis in breast adenocarcinoma.
• Histone pattern in stage 1 lung cancer H3K4me2 and H3K18ac
• Histone pattern in localized kidney cancer H3K4me2 and H3K18ac
• Ki67 levels 1.01 0.97-1.06 6.2E-1 p53 levels 1.02 1.00-1.04 3.9E-1 Table 3. Cellular levels of histone modifications are generally correlated with each other

Landscapes

• Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
• Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
• Immunology (AREA)
• Cell Biology (AREA)
• Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
• Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
• Hematology (AREA)
• Urology & Nephrology (AREA)
• Molecular Biology (AREA)
• Biomedical Technology (AREA)
• Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
• General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
• Biochemistry (AREA)
• Food Science & Technology (AREA)
• Hospice & Palliative Care (AREA)
• Oncology (AREA)
• Pathology (AREA)
• General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
• Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
• Biotechnology (AREA)
• Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
• Microbiology (AREA)
• General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
• Organic Chemistry (AREA)
• Pharmacology & Pharmacy (AREA)
• Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
• Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
• Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
• Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
• Public Health (AREA)
• Investigating Or Analysing Biological Materials (AREA)
• Medicines That Contain Protein Lipid Enzymes And Other Medicines (AREA)
• Medicines Containing Antibodies Or Antigens For Use As Internal Diagnostic Agents (AREA)
• Acyclic And Carbocyclic Compounds In Medicinal Compositions (AREA)
• Measuring Or Testing Involving Enzymes Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)

Priority Applications (7)

Applications Claiming Priority (6)

Publications (2)

Family

ID=42983132

Family Applications (1)

Country Status (8)

Cited By (6)

Families Citing this family (11)

Citations (1)

Family Cites Families (2)

• 2010
  • 2010-04-14 WO PCT/US2010/031112 patent/WO2010120942A2/en not_active Ceased
  • 2010-04-14 JP JP2012506186A patent/JP2012524278A/ja active Pending
  • 2010-04-14 CN CN2010800251368A patent/CN102460173A/zh active Pending
  • 2010-04-14 EP EP10765132A patent/EP2419737A4/en not_active Withdrawn
  • 2010-04-14 BR BRPI1013546-4A patent/BRPI1013546A2/pt not_active IP Right Cessation
  • 2010-04-14 CA CA2758933A patent/CA2758933A1/en not_active Abandoned
  • 2010-04-14 AU AU2010236415A patent/AU2010236415A1/en not_active Abandoned
  • 2010-04-14 US US13/262,219 patent/US20120094949A1/en not_active Abandoned

Patent Citations (1)

Non-Patent Citations (2)

Also Published As

Similar Documents

Legal Events